20.01.2015 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

224 Charlton<br />

may dictate. However, deviation outside the upper and lower limits specified<br />

is unlikely to meet with a successful cleavage reaction outcome. The tertiary<br />

structure of the protein can either inhibit protease action at the intended site<br />

by sterically hindering accessibility, or promote incorrect internal cleavage by<br />

exposing labile surface motifs. The non-exhaustive list in Table 2 or Table 4<br />

suggests conditions that will mildly alter the protein structure without denaturing<br />

the protease or protein product. Modification of multiple factors in concert may<br />

be required for optimal outcomes. If the degree of correct cleavage is increased<br />

by a factor, but not sufficiently so at any concentration/level, further cleavage<br />

improvements may be made by holding this first factor constant at the level<br />

that gave the best result and introduce a second variant factor and repeating the<br />

optimization experiments.<br />

a. Whilst not significantly altering the structure of the protein, the pH at<br />

which the reaction is performed may be particularly useful for reducing<br />

non-specific cleavage within the protein. As can be seen in Table 1, many<br />

of the proteases recognize charge amino acid groupings; therefore, altering<br />

the pH of the buffer can move toward or away from the pKa of the side<br />

chains of ionizable amino acids. This can alter local charge environments<br />

and can be sufficient to mask the secondary sites and prevent cleavage.<br />

Similarly, varying the pH can cause localized charge modifications in the<br />

protease active site that can shift the specificity of the enzyme enough to<br />

discourage secondary cleavage.<br />

b. Table 5 lists some common buffers that will be effective at the stated pH<br />

points. Fifty millimolar solutions of each will provide sufficient buffering.<br />

c. Inclusion of chaotropes or detergents will relax the structure of the protein.<br />

These agents allow the normally buried hydrophobic residues of the<br />

protein to become more solvent exposed by disrupting hydrogen bonding<br />

and hydrophobic interactions. This can perturb the original structure of the<br />

protein, providing greater exposure of the expected target cleavage site,<br />

Table 5<br />

Suitable Buffers at Given pH Ranges<br />

6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5<br />

citrate<br />

MES<br />

MOPS<br />

MOPS<br />

Tris-HCl Tris-HCl Tris-HCl<br />

HEPES HEPES<br />

Tricine Tricine Tricine<br />

borate borate borate<br />

CHES CHES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!