20.01.2015 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Site-Specific Cleavage of Fusion Proteins 215<br />

based around a charged amino acid, as is the case with many of the other<br />

proteases, Genenase I offers a quite different cleavage mechanism. It is tolerant<br />

of somewhat harsher conditions than its mammalian counterparts.<br />

Owing to the requirement for substrate-assisted catalysis, the overall activity<br />

of this enzyme is considerably lower than other, fully self-functional proteases.<br />

This often translates to a requirement for higher enzyme : substrate ratios. As a<br />

licensed product, Genenase I is only available from one manufacturer and may<br />

impose a cost limitation to future scale-up of a cleavage system.<br />

1.6. Viral Cysteine Proteases<br />

To obtain novel site-specific proteases, attention has turned to the enzymes<br />

of RNA viruses. Upon infection, the genomes of these viruses are translated<br />

as one large polyprotein (13). The proteases act to specifically cleave the<br />

polyprotein into its individual structural and functional components. A major<br />

feature that distinguishes this group of proteases is that they employ a cysteine<br />

residue at the core of their catalytic mechanism, as opposed to the serine of<br />

the mammalian and bacterial proteases. The overall fold of these viral enzymes<br />

is very similar to that of the serine proteases; in some cases, the active site<br />

cysteine can be substituted with serine to achieve an active enzyme, albeit with<br />

significantly diminished activity (14).<br />

Many viral proteases are highly specific for very long recognition sequences,<br />

but the two that have made the greatest impact in fusion protein cleavage are<br />

the proteases of Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV) and Human Rhinovirus (HRV).<br />

The recognition sequence for these enzymes spans at least seven and eight<br />

residues, respectively, with little divergence from the wild-type sequence of<br />

the natural polyprotein junctions possible. The minimum cleavage site for TEV<br />

protease is of the form E-X-X-Y-X-Q↓(G/S), with a consensus sequence of<br />

E-N-L-Y-F-Q↓(G/S) (15,16). The site for HRV follows a similar general theme,<br />

with a consensus sequence of L-E-V-L-F-Q↓G-P (17). As can be seen from<br />

these sequences, the viral proteases cleave within their recognition sequences<br />

and will hence leave a non-natural monopeptide or dipeptide extension on the<br />

N terminus of the target protein. TEV protease is somewhat more flexible in its<br />

P1´ requirements, with peptide studies suggesting that it may tolerate Glycine,<br />

Serine, Alanine or Methionine at P1´ (18). Although for initial proof of concept<br />

cleavage trials, it would be advisable to maintain the wild-type Glycine or<br />

Serine.<br />

High purity recombinant preparations of TEV and HRV proteases are<br />

available for fusion protein cleavage. Many manufacturers’ implementations of<br />

these enzymes also bear an affinity tag to facilitate later removal of the protease<br />

from the protein preparation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!