View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate View - ResearchGate

20.01.2015 Views

192 Urh et al. and affinity purification tags. Autofluorescent proteins revolutionized the way protein function is studied in living cells (1–3). They are useful not only for protein localization studies but also for study of dynamic processes, conformational changes and protein–protein interactions. Similarly, affinity fusion tags transformed in vitro analysis of proteins. Affinity tags provide a selective, easy and efficient tool for protein isolation and immobilization (4–7). The number of new affinity tags and applications for their use continues to grow (8). However, there are limitations to both technologies. With autofluorescent proteins, we are limited with respect to fluorophores, and in addition, these proteins do not provide us with an easy option to isolate and immobilize proteins for in vitro studies. The use of an additional tag, for example, His tag, is required for protein immobilization when using fluorescent proteins. On the other hand, affinity tags provide a very efficient method for in vitro protein studies, but they do not enable specific labeling and imaging of proteins in live cells. Our goal was to develop a new technology that will combine advantages of both of these technologies and overcome some of the limitations. Based on these criteria, we have developed the HaloTag technology that enables specific labeling, imaging and immobilization of proteins in vivo and in vitro. The technology is a based on a new protein fusion tag, called HaloTag, and a series of synthetic HaloTag ligands which specifically and covalently bind the HaloTag protein. HaloTag is a monomeric protein of 33 kDa and can be genetically fused to the protein of interest either at the C or N terminus using a HaloTag expression vector. The HaloTag protein was derived from a hydrolase found in Rhodococcus rhodochrous, and therefore, it is not present in mammalian systems, insect cells, yeast and even Escherichia coli. Thus, HaloTag technology does not suffer from the interference of an endogenous protein or ligand, which enhances the specificity of this system. The first and most important modification of the wild-type enzyme was introduction of a mutation that leads to preservation of the covalent bond and a permanent association of the protein with the substrate. We used the natural substrate to develop a series of chemically modified HaloTag ligands (see Fig. 1). In addition to the critical modification in the active site which leads to covalent binding of the ligand, other mutations were introduced into the binding pocket. These mutations dramatically increase the rate of binding between HaloTag protein and the HaloTag ligands. Fluorescence polarization analysis using fluorescent HaloTag ligand and purified GST-HaloTag fusion protein shows that the binding kinetics of the ligand to HaloTag protein is very rapid with an on-rate similar to that measured for the biotin–streptavidin interactions.

192 Urh et al.<br />

and affinity purification tags. Autofluorescent proteins revolutionized the way<br />

protein function is studied in living cells (1–3). They are useful not only for<br />

protein localization studies but also for study of dynamic processes, conformational<br />

changes and protein–protein interactions. Similarly, affinity fusion tags<br />

transformed in vitro analysis of proteins. Affinity tags provide a selective, easy<br />

and efficient tool for protein isolation and immobilization (4–7). The number of<br />

new affinity tags and applications for their use continues to grow (8). However,<br />

there are limitations to both technologies. With autofluorescent proteins, we<br />

are limited with respect to fluorophores, and in addition, these proteins do<br />

not provide us with an easy option to isolate and immobilize proteins for in<br />

vitro studies. The use of an additional tag, for example, His tag, is required<br />

for protein immobilization when using fluorescent proteins. On the other hand,<br />

affinity tags provide a very efficient method for in vitro protein studies, but<br />

they do not enable specific labeling and imaging of proteins in live cells.<br />

Our goal was to develop a new technology that will combine advantages<br />

of both of these technologies and overcome some of the limitations. Based<br />

on these criteria, we have developed the HaloTag technology that enables<br />

specific labeling, imaging and immobilization of proteins in vivo and in vitro.<br />

The technology is a based on a new protein fusion tag, called HaloTag, and<br />

a series of synthetic HaloTag ligands which specifically and covalently bind<br />

the HaloTag protein.<br />

HaloTag is a monomeric protein of 33 kDa and can be genetically fused<br />

to the protein of interest either at the C or N terminus using a HaloTag<br />

expression vector. The HaloTag protein was derived from a hydrolase found<br />

in Rhodococcus rhodochrous, and therefore, it is not present in mammalian<br />

systems, insect cells, yeast and even Escherichia coli. Thus, HaloTag<br />

technology does not suffer from the interference of an endogenous protein<br />

or ligand, which enhances the specificity of this system. The first and most<br />

important modification of the wild-type enzyme was introduction of a mutation<br />

that leads to preservation of the covalent bond and a permanent association of<br />

the protein with the substrate. We used the natural substrate to develop a series<br />

of chemically modified HaloTag ligands (see Fig. 1).<br />

In addition to the critical modification in the active site which leads to<br />

covalent binding of the ligand, other mutations were introduced into the binding<br />

pocket. These mutations dramatically increase the rate of binding between<br />

HaloTag protein and the HaloTag ligands. Fluorescence polarization<br />

analysis using fluorescent HaloTag ligand and purified GST-HaloTag<br />

fusion protein shows that the binding kinetics of the ligand to HaloTag protein<br />

is very rapid with an on-rate similar to that measured for the biotin–streptavidin<br />

interactions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!