20.01.2015 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Amylose Affinity Chromatography of MBP 185<br />

9. When preparing all buffers add ingredients making the buffer to 90% of final<br />

volume and titrate the pH using HCl to the desired concentration, making up<br />

to the final volume. With urea-containing buffers, dilute dry ingredients to 50%<br />

of final volume and fully dissolve the solids. Urea dissolves in an endothermic<br />

reaction (turning the solution cold), therefore, allow the buffer solution to return<br />

to room temperature once fully dissolved before making to 90% of the final<br />

volume and adjusting the pH with HCl.<br />

10. The different amylose matrices are supplied by New England BioLabs in a<br />

20% ethanol solution that can negatively influence purification and requires<br />

removal. The amylose magnetic beads are supplied with 0.05% Tween-20 that<br />

can be significant at very small protein concentrations. In related applications,<br />

the authors have found that low levels of residual detergents (especially from<br />

regeneration solutions) can still remain and have found SDS and detergent mixed<br />

micelles particularly difficult to remove. The authors have analyzed removal<br />

of detergent and mixed micelles using surface plasmon resonance (BIAcore<br />

T100, BIAcore) and dual polarization interferometry (AnaLight 200, Farfield<br />

Instruments), finding dilute methanol-containing solutions are most efficient for<br />

removal of these agents.<br />

11. The manner of lysis is dependent on available equipment, scale, bacterial<br />

strain (which may encode a lysozyme in the case of pLysS strains (45)) and<br />

whether periplasmic (see Note 3) or cytoplasmic expression is undertaken.<br />

For cytoplasmic expression, mechanical lysis is more effective for successful<br />

MBP purification than chemical lysis as chemical lysis employs agents that<br />

are frequently incompatible with MBP chemistry (see Note 5). Large scales<br />

may require a cell disruptor such as a French press to successfully achieve<br />

lysis and suitable viscosity, whereas moderate and small scales may employ<br />

sonication. Small-scale lysis can also be achieved using standard freeze-thaw<br />

cycling techniques but may have elevated viscosities due to intact nucleic acid<br />

being present. The standard method of the authors employs sonication on ice<br />

using a Branson B30 Sonifier at 70% duty cycle to 20 kHz (∼5.5 output but<br />

varies with turbidity), for 3 min with 3 × 30-s bursts with rests between cycles.<br />

Typically, the authors form a cleared lysate by centrifugation at 45,700 × g for<br />

45 min at 4ºC.<br />

12. It is important to avoid vigorous mixing during all liquid handling steps as this<br />

causes loss of product by denaturation (foaming) of protein solutions. For this<br />

reason, liquid handling and mixing is conducted gently.<br />

13. If suitable mixers or cold rooms are unavailable, place the suspension on ice<br />

and invert gently every 5 min. The binding reaction is enhanced by collisions<br />

between amylose and MBP species as opposed to passive diffusion and therefore<br />

gentle agitation of the suspension maximizes the capture to the amylose matrix.<br />

14. Higher concentrations of maltose (50–100 mM) can influence storage of eluted<br />

protein samples as a cryoprotectant, and so, eluted samples sometimes require<br />

dilution below 20 mM for proper freezing.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!