View - ResearchGate
View - ResearchGate View - ResearchGate
184 Pattenden and Thomas binding efficiency is reduced using 10% glycerol but appears to be tolerated, the binding efficiency is significantly reduced below 5% in the presence of 0.25% Triton X-100 or Tween 20, and is completely precluded in the presence of 0.1% SDS. It is advised not to use a detergent as an additive to assist lysis as varied results occur, however if used, the binding efficiency is often suitably restored by dilution prior to binding to the amylose matrix (2) (∼0.05% Tween 20 and ∼1:10 dilution for B-Per retains ∼80% binding efficiency). The authors have found there can be batch-to-batch inconsistencies using B-Per extraction reagent that could be related to detergent effects dependent on MBP-passenger protein and total protein concentrations. We have specifically noted proteolysis inefficiencies following detergent extractions. 6. Under normal conditions defined as 15 mL of amylose agarose matrix processing, 1 L of Lauria Bertani media supplemented with 0.2% glucose (producing ∼40 mg MBP fusion protein); the deterioration of the matrix is reported to be approximately 1–3% of the initial binding capacity each time it is used. It is stated that such a column may be used up to 5 times before a decrease in yield is detectable (5–15% lost binding capacity), and up to 10 times before the loss is significantly noticeable (10–30% lost binding capacity). However with different media producing heavier cell densities but a lower MBP fusion protein yield, the loss of amylose binding capacity will be more dramatic. 7. The inhibitor cocktail is a solution containing protease inhibitors to reduce the degradation of the recombinant protein due to the activity of proteases released from the bacterial cell upon lysis. They generally consist of broad specificity inhibitors of serine, cysteine, aspartic and aminopeptidases, with the activity of EDTA and EGTA influencing metalloenzymes and proteases (see Note 8). Inhibitor cocktails can be purchased from most chemical supply companies or made in-house using a combination of nonspecific and/or specific protease inhibitors. The Expasy peptide cutter tool (http://au.expasy.org/tools/peptidecutter/) (35) can be used to predict potential proteolysis issues or specific protease classes which may be an issue to a given MBP-passenger protein amino acid sequence. Using the peptide cutter tool, a particular set of potential proteolysis issues can be identified and addressed using protease inhibitors. In general, inhibitor cocktail comprise phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 mM), aprotinin (1 μg/mL), leupeptin (1 μg/mL) and pepstatin A (1 μg/mL) in the buffer. Specific care should be taken with washing steps following protease solutions if proteolysis is to follow purification. 8. EDTA and EGTA chelate metal ions that are important to metalloproteases and metalloenzymes. EDTA specifically chelates divalent and trivalent metal ions such as Mn(II), Cu(II), Fe(III) and Co(III). EGTA has a higher affinity for Ca(II) compared to EDTA, and calcium ions may be particularly relevant to MBP purification as a co-factor for some formulations of Factor Xa used to separate MBP from the passenger protein, but also as a known cofactor for potential contaminants of the maltose regulon (18).
- Page 322: 158 Godat et al. 3. Sonicate sample
- Page 326: 160 Godat et al. the above protocol
- Page 330: 162 Godat et al. 3.7.1. Purificatio
- Page 334: 164 Godat et al. 3. Adding 200 mM N
- Page 338: 166 Godat et al. 4. The MagneHis Ni
- Page 342: 168 Godat et al. 22. Lin, D., Tabb,
- Page 346: 170 Pattenden and Thomas 1. Introdu
- Page 350: 172 Pattenden and Thomas functions
- Page 354: 174 Pattenden and Thomas of the mal
- Page 358: 176 Pattenden and Thomas necessary.
- Page 362: 178 Pattenden and Thomas 2.4. Amylo
- Page 366: 180 Pattenden and Thomas 9. Thoroug
- Page 370: 182 Pattenden and Thomas 8. Collect
- Page 376: Amylose Affinity Chromatography of
- Page 380: Amylose Affinity Chromatography of
- Page 384: Amylose Affinity Chromatography of
- Page 388: 192 Urh et al. and affinity purific
- Page 392: 194 Urh et al. beads with HaloTag l
- Page 396: 196 Urh et al. 2.3. Detection of Pr
- Page 400: 198 Urh et al. 2. Carefully remove
- Page 404: 200 Urh et al. 3.2.1.2. Phase 2 Imm
- Page 408: 202 Urh et al. 3.2.2. Detection of
- Page 412: 204 Urh et al. The following protoc
- Page 416: 206 Urh et al. 3. Incubate for 10 m
- Page 420: 208 Urh et al. by 0.5% Triton X-100
184 Pattenden and Thomas<br />
binding efficiency is reduced using 10% glycerol but appears to be tolerated, the<br />
binding efficiency is significantly reduced below 5% in the presence of 0.25%<br />
Triton X-100 or Tween 20, and is completely precluded in the presence of 0.1%<br />
SDS. It is advised not to use a detergent as an additive to assist lysis as varied<br />
results occur, however if used, the binding efficiency is often suitably restored by<br />
dilution prior to binding to the amylose matrix (2) (∼0.05% Tween 20 and ∼1:10<br />
dilution for B-Per retains ∼80% binding efficiency). The authors have found<br />
there can be batch-to-batch inconsistencies using B-Per extraction reagent that<br />
could be related to detergent effects dependent on MBP-passenger protein and<br />
total protein concentrations. We have specifically noted proteolysis inefficiencies<br />
following detergent extractions.<br />
6. Under normal conditions defined as 15 mL of amylose agarose matrix processing,<br />
1 L of Lauria Bertani media supplemented with 0.2% glucose (producing ∼40<br />
mg MBP fusion protein); the deterioration of the matrix is reported to be approximately<br />
1–3% of the initial binding capacity each time it is used. It is stated<br />
that such a column may be used up to 5 times before a decrease in yield is<br />
detectable (5–15% lost binding capacity), and up to 10 times before the loss is<br />
significantly noticeable (10–30% lost binding capacity). However with different<br />
media producing heavier cell densities but a lower MBP fusion protein yield, the<br />
loss of amylose binding capacity will be more dramatic.<br />
7. The inhibitor cocktail is a solution containing protease inhibitors to reduce<br />
the degradation of the recombinant protein due to the activity of proteases<br />
released from the bacterial cell upon lysis. They generally consist of<br />
broad specificity inhibitors of serine, cysteine, aspartic and aminopeptidases,<br />
with the activity of EDTA and EGTA influencing metalloenzymes<br />
and proteases (see Note 8). Inhibitor cocktails can be purchased from most<br />
chemical supply companies or made in-house using a combination of nonspecific<br />
and/or specific protease inhibitors. The Expasy peptide cutter tool<br />
(http://au.expasy.org/tools/peptidecutter/) (35) can be used to predict potential<br />
proteolysis issues or specific protease classes which may be an issue to a given<br />
MBP-passenger protein amino acid sequence. Using the peptide cutter tool, a<br />
particular set of potential proteolysis issues can be identified and addressed using<br />
protease inhibitors. In general, inhibitor cocktail comprise phenylmethylsulfonyl<br />
fluoride (1 mM), aprotinin (1 μg/mL), leupeptin (1 μg/mL) and pepstatin A<br />
(1 μg/mL) in the buffer. Specific care should be taken with washing steps<br />
following protease solutions if proteolysis is to follow purification.<br />
8. EDTA and EGTA chelate metal ions that are important to metalloproteases and<br />
metalloenzymes. EDTA specifically chelates divalent and trivalent metal ions<br />
such as Mn(II), Cu(II), Fe(III) and Co(III). EGTA has a higher affinity for Ca(II)<br />
compared to EDTA, and calcium ions may be particularly relevant to MBP<br />
purification as a co-factor for some formulations of Factor Xa used to separate<br />
MBP from the passenger protein, but also as a known cofactor for potential<br />
contaminants of the maltose regulon (18).