20.01.2015 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

172 Pattenden and Thomas<br />

functions as a molecular bivalve; the protein adopts two conformations: an<br />

unliganded ‘open’ conformation and a ligand-bound ‘closed’ conformation that<br />

involves a twisting rotation of approximately 8° and bending movement of up<br />

to 35° by the N-terminal lobe (26). The residues forming the binding cleft are<br />

placed at the surface of the two domains, so upon binding, the ligand induces<br />

the conformational changes that allow the two globular domains to enclose<br />

the ligand-binding cleft, excluding solvent and forming a stable, bound state.<br />

Positioned behind the ligand-binding cleft is a hinge region, which facilitates<br />

the opening and closing structural movements that occur with ligand-induced<br />

conformational change.<br />

Fusion constructs of MBP are not normally engineered with the passenger<br />

protein at the N terminus, as such constructs are not frequently soluble and<br />

do not readily purify. The N-terminal region is located external to the ligandbinding<br />

cleft but undergoes radical changes upon ligand binding. Therefore,<br />

steric or thermodynamic effects may occur with N-terminal constructs to<br />

influence the conformational changes in this region of MBP depending on the<br />

size and nature of the construct, impinging on the ability of MBP to open<br />

and close – precluding binding to the amylose affinity resin (27). Therefore<br />

the C terminus is the preferred site of cloning and appears to undergo far less<br />

structural changes in response to ligand binding (26).<br />

1.1. Aspects of MBP and Amylose Biology and Chemistry<br />

that Impact on Purification<br />

For E. coli expression of MBP, the history (including codon usage) and high<br />

intrinsic concentration of MBP are features of the biology, making MBP very<br />

favourable as a carrier protein for heterologous expression – depending on the<br />

nature of the cloning and physico-chemical properties of the passenger moiety.<br />

There are two different construct types available from New England BioLabs.<br />

The first type allows for typical recombinant E. coli expression localized in<br />

the cytoplasm at large levels. The second construct-type exploits MBP biology<br />

to direct expressed proteins to the periplasmic space at modest levels, but<br />

provides a simplified bioprocess (see Note 3) from a unique environment where<br />

native disulphide bonds may be formed and a proteolytic profile exists which<br />

is distinct from the cytoplasm.<br />

New England BioLabs claim purification ranges, as high as 200 mg/L culture<br />

have been obtained for MBP fusion proteins with typical yields in the range<br />

of 10–40 mg/L culture for cytoplasmic expression (being 20–40% of the total<br />

cellular protein), while typical yields from periplasmic expression being ≤4<br />

mg/L culture (1–5% of the total cellular protein) (2). It is not uncommon to<br />

obtain yields of 100 mg/L from shake-flask cultures (28). With favourable

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!