The Extortion SYSTEM Of The Ruling Elite - The New Ensign

and why it was important in society, as well as some basic protocols about what to do during the
selection process. The accused stood on a pulpit type thing watching all this transpire while the
Judge and lawyers sat watching a lottery taking place. They first took attendance then the lottery
began. The lawyers refused people who appeared to not have the maturity or mental capacity to
make decisions (yes mentally handicapped people were drawn into the court). Anyone involved
in Security or law enforcement in any way were also refused automatically. Interestingly, lawyers
can be on a Jury. My PERSONS name was never called, but they went through about 3/4 of the
room, about 130 people total, before twelve people were selected. The excuses that people came
up with to tell the judge that they couldn’t do jury duty was amazing. It occurred to me much
later in life that the Jury is actually made up of people who were not smart enough to come up
with an excuse not to do Jury duty! During the selections, every step of the way they are seeking
consent from the accused, having him stand there and not say anything about the process, or the
simple fact that it isn’t him that is being accused but rather his fictional sidekick the PERSON,
and his silence makes the contract.
Everyone is equal under the law, but they are actors in a play and we have all been invited to
join along.
Another time I had to go to court as a witness to some assaults and threats. No matter how bad
the assaults were, as long as weapons were not used, the crown would seek a peace bond, which
would remove the criminal aspect and just keep it CIVIL. The outcome from this is that the
accused would have to agree that he should stay away from the victim for 6 months. One victim
did not know English very well and because his interpreter showed up late he did not understand
what was happening and was made to agree with this. The guy who pounded this poor guy nearly
to death walked out the court with a promise that he would stay away from him for 6 months.
Try doing that to a cop and see what happens. I saw three or four of these situations and could
only shake my head at how shameful it was.
Now what really turned the worm on my thought process of the justice system was when I had
to go to court to testify against a young man who had aided his friends in robbing me. He had a
300-pound friend of his stand beside him while he threatened my life and then proceeded to
punch me after I had thrown him to the ground for being in my face and previously punching
me. I was well reserved trying to get my money back and trying to talk sense to this young man.
Of course things would have been much different if he didn’t have his friends backing him up.
This dragged on for about two years before it got into a trial.
The first Crown prosecutor, who was absolutely snaky with me, only spent 15 minutes reading
up on the case, totally unprepared to prosecute and only wanted to seek a Peace BOND. I was
outraged. He also said that the robbery part was removed from the trial because they got the guy
who actually did it, but his cohorts were not responsible in some way! It got put over because
my witness never showed. The Crown prosecutor stated that it was his decision alone if they
were going to prosecute. That blew my mind right there. What’s the point of going through all
of this if there isn’t going to be a prosecution
When we finally got to trial about again a year later my witness did not show yet again, but they
proceeded any ways. There was a different CROWN prosecutor this time and he seemed very
kind. The Lawyer of the DEFENSE made reference to the CROWN prosecutor as being his
friend to me. It was court talk, but I wondered just how friendly are these guys, later to find that
he was saying he was a friend of the court, which tends to deal decisions his way, what a fraud!
What transpired from there was the one of the lamest prosecutions I have ever seen. It was a
complete dog and pony show. The judge actually had to intervene a bit and ask the young fellow
questions pointing out his perjury and lies trying to obscure the obvious. In the end the Judge
said he couldn’t decide who had hit whom first, even though they I had been robbed and they
had just put one fellow into alternative measures for the robbery. They do that for first offenders
to avoid giving them a criminal record.
( Page 75 )