20.01.2015 Views

A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library

A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library

A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

adjusts the FED susceptibility <strong>of</strong> each occupant or occupant group, which affects whether the<br />

person become incapacitated or can escape the building space without problem.<br />

Import CAD drawings: Yes, CAD drawings can be imported into the model via another BRE<br />

program, Josephine. Or, the floor plan can be drawn using a graphical user interface (GUI)<br />

within GridFlow. The user specifies links on the floor plan that lead to the outside or another<br />

space in the building. The user is prompted to input the link width and maximum flow<br />

(persons/second) through the link.<br />

Visualization capabilities: 2-D and 3-D capabilities (with Josephine).<br />

Validation studies: The model developer states that GridFlow has undergone many runs <strong>of</strong><br />

simple buildings and multi-enclosure spaces for the purpose <strong>of</strong> four aspects <strong>of</strong> validation:<br />

Component testing (routine checking <strong>of</strong> major s<strong>of</strong>tware), functional validation (checking model<br />

capabilities and that these are compatible with intentions), qualitative testing (comparing<br />

predicted human behavior with expectations), and quantitative verification (comparison <strong>of</strong> model<br />

predictions with experimental data). The developers have performed component testing and<br />

quantitative verification, which involved simulations from simple and complex building<br />

compared against empirical data from the SFPE Handbook 8 and other sources. Functional<br />

validation has also been performed and limitations <strong>of</strong> the model have been identified (but not<br />

included in the Purser report). Also, human behavior has been validated by using actual premovement<br />

data to simulate a scenario and by comparing the model’s evacuation behavior and<br />

time to the observed evacuation and Handbook data.<br />

Purser discusses simulations used to examine the effects <strong>of</strong> delay time, travel time, and exit flow<br />

capacity for various occupancies and layouts. He outlines the results <strong>of</strong> a hypothetical building<br />

with 3 different numbers <strong>of</strong> occupants. In this work, Purser could understand graphically<br />

whether the evacuation was driven by pre-movement time, travel distributions, or exit flow<br />

capacity, depending upon the number <strong>of</strong> occupants in the building.<br />

Lastly, a GridFlow simulation was described that was similar to an actual evacuation incident,<br />

the “Sprucefield” evacuation. This included 190 occupants evacuating from a food hall.<br />

GridFlow modeled that 99 % <strong>of</strong> the occupants would evacuate in 130 s with their similar case,<br />

when the actual time was 140 s. Purser notes that GridFlow provided reasonable results and they<br />

plan to perform direct simulations on the Sprucefield case, among others.<br />

Special features:<br />

Counterflow – Yes.<br />

Manual exit block/obstacles – Yes, because the user can specify the destination or exit choices<br />

for each individual or occupant group, certain exits can be “hidden” (or not given as a choice)<br />

from an occupant group as if it does not exist.<br />

Fire conditions affect behavior Fire conditions are implicitly incorporated. The user imports a<br />

spreadsheet (created by the user) with speed factors and FED doses with time for each building<br />

space.<br />

A-32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!