A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library
A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library
A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
adjusts the FED susceptibility <strong>of</strong> each occupant or occupant group, which affects whether the<br />
person become incapacitated or can escape the building space without problem.<br />
Import CAD drawings: Yes, CAD drawings can be imported into the model via another BRE<br />
program, Josephine. Or, the floor plan can be drawn using a graphical user interface (GUI)<br />
within GridFlow. The user specifies links on the floor plan that lead to the outside or another<br />
space in the building. The user is prompted to input the link width and maximum flow<br />
(persons/second) through the link.<br />
Visualization capabilities: 2-D and 3-D capabilities (with Josephine).<br />
Validation studies: The model developer states that GridFlow has undergone many runs <strong>of</strong><br />
simple buildings and multi-enclosure spaces for the purpose <strong>of</strong> four aspects <strong>of</strong> validation:<br />
Component testing (routine checking <strong>of</strong> major s<strong>of</strong>tware), functional validation (checking model<br />
capabilities and that these are compatible with intentions), qualitative testing (comparing<br />
predicted human behavior with expectations), and quantitative verification (comparison <strong>of</strong> model<br />
predictions with experimental data). The developers have performed component testing and<br />
quantitative verification, which involved simulations from simple and complex building<br />
compared against empirical data from the SFPE Handbook 8 and other sources. Functional<br />
validation has also been performed and limitations <strong>of</strong> the model have been identified (but not<br />
included in the Purser report). Also, human behavior has been validated by using actual premovement<br />
data to simulate a scenario and by comparing the model’s evacuation behavior and<br />
time to the observed evacuation and Handbook data.<br />
Purser discusses simulations used to examine the effects <strong>of</strong> delay time, travel time, and exit flow<br />
capacity for various occupancies and layouts. He outlines the results <strong>of</strong> a hypothetical building<br />
with 3 different numbers <strong>of</strong> occupants. In this work, Purser could understand graphically<br />
whether the evacuation was driven by pre-movement time, travel distributions, or exit flow<br />
capacity, depending upon the number <strong>of</strong> occupants in the building.<br />
Lastly, a GridFlow simulation was described that was similar to an actual evacuation incident,<br />
the “Sprucefield” evacuation. This included 190 occupants evacuating from a food hall.<br />
GridFlow modeled that 99 % <strong>of</strong> the occupants would evacuate in 130 s with their similar case,<br />
when the actual time was 140 s. Purser notes that GridFlow provided reasonable results and they<br />
plan to perform direct simulations on the Sprucefield case, among others.<br />
Special features:<br />
Counterflow – Yes.<br />
Manual exit block/obstacles – Yes, because the user can specify the destination or exit choices<br />
for each individual or occupant group, certain exits can be “hidden” (or not given as a choice)<br />
from an occupant group as if it does not exist.<br />
Fire conditions affect behavior Fire conditions are implicitly incorporated. The user imports a<br />
spreadsheet (created by the user) with speed factors and FED doses with time for each building<br />
space.<br />
A-32