20.01.2015 Views

A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library

A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library

A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Occupants can also be introduced into the simulation at a certain time and place, after the<br />

evacuation has begun. When family groups are specified in STEPS, the family moves<br />

throughout the simulation to meet at a certain position in the building before evacuating.<br />

Output: STEPS output includes the total evacuation time, numbers <strong>of</strong> occupants in certain<br />

areas, planes, paths, and the entire simulation and the number <strong>of</strong> people that have left these<br />

different fields vs. time.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> fire data: None.<br />

Import CAD drawings: Yes, CAD drawings are input in DXF file format.<br />

Visualization capabilities: 3-D visualization.<br />

Validation studies: STEPS<br />

simulations have been compared to<br />

the method <strong>of</strong> evacuation<br />

calculations outlined by NFPA<br />

130 21 . This report outlines two<br />

examples that demonstrate STEPS’<br />

applicability to station geometries.<br />

The first case, shown in Figure A.6,<br />

involves a center-platform station in<br />

which the platform is raised above<br />

the concourse (at grade level) as<br />

shown in the figure. By using the<br />

NFPA calculations for Case 1, the<br />

total time to clear the platform is<br />

190.7 s and the total time to<br />

evacuate the station is 239.9 s.<br />

21, p. 130-30<br />

Figure A.6: Case Study 1<br />

When the identical model <strong>of</strong> this station is simulated with STEPS, the mean time to clear the<br />

platform is 212.4 s and the mean evacuation time is 257.4 s. This case shows a difference <strong>of</strong> 7.3<br />

% to 11.4 % between NFPA 130 and STEPS. Also, STEPS is able to model the natural<br />

imbalance <strong>of</strong> exit use, while NFPA 130 calculations assume that all exits are used optimally.<br />

Case 2 involves a more complex station with a side-platform. As shown in Figure A.7, the<br />

concourse is below grade level and the platform is below the level <strong>of</strong> the concourse. Using<br />

NFPA 130, the total time to clear the platform is 179.8 s and the total evacuation <strong>of</strong> the station is<br />

369.8 s. Also, when recalculating NFPA evacuation times using a different, more realistic split,<br />

the result is found to be 306.3 s. When modeled in STEPS, a mean platform clearing time <strong>of</strong><br />

181.4 s is achieved and a mean total evacuation time was 313.2 s. This shows a 0.9 % to 2.3 %<br />

difference between STEPS and NFPA 130 calculation methods.<br />

A-14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!