A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library
A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library
A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Lastly, Fahy simulated a fire drill conducted in a major department store by the University <strong>of</strong><br />
Ulster in the UK. 495 occupants were involved, many <strong>of</strong> whom were video taped and<br />
interviewed about their evacuation. Travel speed that would provide the longest and most<br />
conservative evacuation times (normal evacuation speed) were used, due to the lack <strong>of</strong> cues<br />
indicated an emergency. Also, the shortest route option was selected for the occupants because<br />
<strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> staff during the evacuation. The model simulation incorporated delay times<br />
for occupants recorded on videotape, as well as mean delays times for each department and<br />
additional random delays for each occupant. Table A.15 below shows the results for the<br />
observed and simulated evacuations from the department store:<br />
Table A.15: EXIT89 validation study results from the department store<br />
Observed<br />
Predicted<br />
Exit # People First (s) Last (s) # People First (s) Last (s)<br />
1 33 23 83 45 28 64<br />
2 52 31 165 85 43 71<br />
3 32 36 100 16 22 49<br />
4 49 1 104 80 33 83<br />
5 77 17 95 36 39 52<br />
6 41 21 153 26 37 49<br />
7 2 - - - - -<br />
8 23 33 78 23 47 85<br />
9 23 26 119 27 42 111<br />
10 7 50 78 27 37 106<br />
11 6 46 60 5 45 54<br />
12 58 32 119 13 49 83<br />
13 45 14 85 49 31 104<br />
14 29 34 102 63 37 74<br />
Total 495 495<br />
As shown, the observed evacuation ended in 2 min, 45 s and the simulation ended in 1 min 51 s.<br />
Fahy states that there was good agreement between the observed and EXIT89 results, and also<br />
noted large discrepancies for Exits 2 and 6. Fahy explained these discrepancies as delays<br />
prompted by the staff involving the deactivation <strong>of</strong> the door alarm, checking shopping baskets <strong>of</strong><br />
evacuees, and performing final sweeps <strong>of</strong> the area for stray occupants.<br />
Special features:<br />
Counterflow – Yes, the user specifies what percentage <strong>of</strong> the stairwell is blocked and at what<br />
time within the simulation that this occurs. If the obstruction or counterflow disappears after<br />
some time, the user can set the node back to its original area.<br />
Manual exit block/obstacles – Yes, the user enters the name <strong>of</strong> the blocked node and the time<br />
from the start <strong>of</strong> the evacuation that the blockage occurs (in s). Multiple nodes can be blocked at<br />
one time.<br />
Fire conditions affect behavior Yes, the user can enter the output from CFAST. EXIT89 uses<br />
the smoke densities and depth <strong>of</strong> the smoke layer from CFAST to calculate the “psychological<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> smoke, S.” This is done with the following equation: S = 2*OD*(D/H) where OD is<br />
the optical density <strong>of</strong> the smoke layer, D is the depth <strong>of</strong> the upper layer, and H is the height <strong>of</strong><br />
A-81