20.01.2015 Views

A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library

A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library

A Review of Building Evacuation Models - NIST Virtual Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lastly, Fahy simulated a fire drill conducted in a major department store by the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Ulster in the UK. 495 occupants were involved, many <strong>of</strong> whom were video taped and<br />

interviewed about their evacuation. Travel speed that would provide the longest and most<br />

conservative evacuation times (normal evacuation speed) were used, due to the lack <strong>of</strong> cues<br />

indicated an emergency. Also, the shortest route option was selected for the occupants because<br />

<strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> staff during the evacuation. The model simulation incorporated delay times<br />

for occupants recorded on videotape, as well as mean delays times for each department and<br />

additional random delays for each occupant. Table A.15 below shows the results for the<br />

observed and simulated evacuations from the department store:<br />

Table A.15: EXIT89 validation study results from the department store<br />

Observed<br />

Predicted<br />

Exit # People First (s) Last (s) # People First (s) Last (s)<br />

1 33 23 83 45 28 64<br />

2 52 31 165 85 43 71<br />

3 32 36 100 16 22 49<br />

4 49 1 104 80 33 83<br />

5 77 17 95 36 39 52<br />

6 41 21 153 26 37 49<br />

7 2 - - - - -<br />

8 23 33 78 23 47 85<br />

9 23 26 119 27 42 111<br />

10 7 50 78 27 37 106<br />

11 6 46 60 5 45 54<br />

12 58 32 119 13 49 83<br />

13 45 14 85 49 31 104<br />

14 29 34 102 63 37 74<br />

Total 495 495<br />

As shown, the observed evacuation ended in 2 min, 45 s and the simulation ended in 1 min 51 s.<br />

Fahy states that there was good agreement between the observed and EXIT89 results, and also<br />

noted large discrepancies for Exits 2 and 6. Fahy explained these discrepancies as delays<br />

prompted by the staff involving the deactivation <strong>of</strong> the door alarm, checking shopping baskets <strong>of</strong><br />

evacuees, and performing final sweeps <strong>of</strong> the area for stray occupants.<br />

Special features:<br />

Counterflow – Yes, the user specifies what percentage <strong>of</strong> the stairwell is blocked and at what<br />

time within the simulation that this occurs. If the obstruction or counterflow disappears after<br />

some time, the user can set the node back to its original area.<br />

Manual exit block/obstacles – Yes, the user enters the name <strong>of</strong> the blocked node and the time<br />

from the start <strong>of</strong> the evacuation that the blockage occurs (in s). Multiple nodes can be blocked at<br />

one time.<br />

Fire conditions affect behavior Yes, the user can enter the output from CFAST. EXIT89 uses<br />

the smoke densities and depth <strong>of</strong> the smoke layer from CFAST to calculate the “psychological<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> smoke, S.” This is done with the following equation: S = 2*OD*(D/H) where OD is<br />

the optical density <strong>of</strong> the smoke layer, D is the depth <strong>of</strong> the upper layer, and H is the height <strong>of</strong><br />

A-81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!