Contents - Greenmount Press
Contents - Greenmount Press
Contents - Greenmount Press
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Sicot 74BRF – What have we<br />
learnt<br />
■■CSD Extension and Development Team with Mike Bange, CSIRO<br />
Sicot 74BRF from its release has moved to dominate the<br />
variety choice of Australian cotton growers. At present<br />
it represents up to 64 per cent of all seed planted within<br />
Australia. It has become popular for its 0.2 to 0.3 bale per<br />
hectare improvement in yield over Sicot 71BRF as well as have a<br />
good fibre quality, disease resistance and being partially regionally<br />
adaptive.<br />
Previously the Australian cotton industry was predominated by<br />
varieties from the Sicot 71 family. A variety suite with high yield<br />
potential, wide regional adaptability and excellent responsiveness<br />
to the inputs of management.<br />
But although there are similarities between Sicot 71BRF and<br />
Sicot 74BRF, it is in the subtle differences between the two<br />
varieties where growers and consultants can fine tune their<br />
management to achieve the most from this excellent variety.<br />
How does Sicot 74BRF differ from Sicot 71BRF<br />
There has been a lot of speculation and comment about the<br />
establishment of Sicot 74BRF in past seasons, due to its lower<br />
seed density. This has resulted in below par establishment in<br />
marginal conditions, but this is widely known and can and should<br />
be compensated for quite easily.<br />
The CSD variety trial program allows an excellent opportunity<br />
to examine the relative establishment between Sicot 71BRF<br />
and Sicot 74BRF. This data compares like with like, the varieties<br />
are planted into the same field, on the same day, at the same<br />
seeding rate and depth. No adjustments are made to the planter<br />
between the varieties. Therefore difference in plant stand is a<br />
direct indication of how a particular seed type has coped with<br />
field conditions. From over 70 comparisons we have witnessed an<br />
average reduction of plants established of 11 per cent between<br />
Sicot 74BRF and Sicot 71BRF.<br />
FIGURe 1: Relative yield of Sicot 74BRF and<br />
Sicot 71BRF and the relationship to difference<br />
in plant stand<br />
In brief…<br />
■■<br />
Aim for and create conditions to get Sicot 74BRF off to a<br />
good start. Have the plant growing strongly into first flower.<br />
■■<br />
Concentrate on minimisation of plant stress during the<br />
flowering period to extend this for as long as possible,<br />
stress minimisation during this period will also improve boll<br />
weight.<br />
■■<br />
Allow the plant to grow out for as long as the season allows.<br />
There are some benefits in aiming to get the plant stand of<br />
Sicot 74BRF equal to what would normally be accepted as a<br />
good stand for Sicot 71BRF on your farm. On average, the yield<br />
differential between Sicot 74BRF and Sicot 71BRF is 0.21 bales<br />
per hectare (in 95 CSD trials). When the plant stands are similar,<br />
Sicot 74BRF outyields Sicot 71BRF by 0.5 bales per hectare.<br />
Over the past three seasons, the CSD extension and<br />
development team has been examining the growth habit and<br />
yield components of Sicot 74BRF to gain further insight into how<br />
to extract the maximum from this variety.<br />
The CSD Extension and Development team has stressed that<br />
it is crucial to get Sicot 74BRF off to a good start. If we can<br />
generate a healthy actively growing seedling into squaring and<br />
first flower than we have set the crop up to achieve its full yield<br />
potential.<br />
Squaring nodes<br />
There is no difference between the two varieties in the<br />
production of squaring nodes. This is not a startling revelation<br />
as squaring node production is temperature respondent. But it<br />
FIGURe 2: No difference between the varieties<br />
in production of squaring nodes<br />
48 — The Australian Cottongrower October–November 2012