20.01.2015 Views

Contents - Greenmount Press

Contents - Greenmount Press

Contents - Greenmount Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sicot 74BRF – What have we<br />

learnt<br />

■■CSD Extension and Development Team with Mike Bange, CSIRO<br />

Sicot 74BRF from its release has moved to dominate the<br />

variety choice of Australian cotton growers. At present<br />

it represents up to 64 per cent of all seed planted within<br />

Australia. It has become popular for its 0.2 to 0.3 bale per<br />

hectare improvement in yield over Sicot 71BRF as well as have a<br />

good fibre quality, disease resistance and being partially regionally<br />

adaptive.<br />

Previously the Australian cotton industry was predominated by<br />

varieties from the Sicot 71 family. A variety suite with high yield<br />

potential, wide regional adaptability and excellent responsiveness<br />

to the inputs of management.<br />

But although there are similarities between Sicot 71BRF and<br />

Sicot 74BRF, it is in the subtle differences between the two<br />

varieties where growers and consultants can fine tune their<br />

management to achieve the most from this excellent variety.<br />

How does Sicot 74BRF differ from Sicot 71BRF<br />

There has been a lot of speculation and comment about the<br />

establishment of Sicot 74BRF in past seasons, due to its lower<br />

seed density. This has resulted in below par establishment in<br />

marginal conditions, but this is widely known and can and should<br />

be compensated for quite easily.<br />

The CSD variety trial program allows an excellent opportunity<br />

to examine the relative establishment between Sicot 71BRF<br />

and Sicot 74BRF. This data compares like with like, the varieties<br />

are planted into the same field, on the same day, at the same<br />

seeding rate and depth. No adjustments are made to the planter<br />

between the varieties. Therefore difference in plant stand is a<br />

direct indication of how a particular seed type has coped with<br />

field conditions. From over 70 comparisons we have witnessed an<br />

average reduction of plants established of 11 per cent between<br />

Sicot 74BRF and Sicot 71BRF.<br />

FIGURe 1: Relative yield of Sicot 74BRF and<br />

Sicot 71BRF and the relationship to difference<br />

in plant stand<br />

In brief…<br />

■■<br />

Aim for and create conditions to get Sicot 74BRF off to a<br />

good start. Have the plant growing strongly into first flower.<br />

■■<br />

Concentrate on minimisation of plant stress during the<br />

flowering period to extend this for as long as possible,<br />

stress minimisation during this period will also improve boll<br />

weight.<br />

■■<br />

Allow the plant to grow out for as long as the season allows.<br />

There are some benefits in aiming to get the plant stand of<br />

Sicot 74BRF equal to what would normally be accepted as a<br />

good stand for Sicot 71BRF on your farm. On average, the yield<br />

differential between Sicot 74BRF and Sicot 71BRF is 0.21 bales<br />

per hectare (in 95 CSD trials). When the plant stands are similar,<br />

Sicot 74BRF outyields Sicot 71BRF by 0.5 bales per hectare.<br />

Over the past three seasons, the CSD extension and<br />

development team has been examining the growth habit and<br />

yield components of Sicot 74BRF to gain further insight into how<br />

to extract the maximum from this variety.<br />

The CSD Extension and Development team has stressed that<br />

it is crucial to get Sicot 74BRF off to a good start. If we can<br />

generate a healthy actively growing seedling into squaring and<br />

first flower than we have set the crop up to achieve its full yield<br />

potential.<br />

Squaring nodes<br />

There is no difference between the two varieties in the<br />

production of squaring nodes. This is not a startling revelation<br />

as squaring node production is temperature respondent. But it<br />

FIGURe 2: No difference between the varieties<br />

in production of squaring nodes<br />

48 — The Australian Cottongrower October–November 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!