20.01.2015 Views

Contents - Greenmount Press

Contents - Greenmount Press

Contents - Greenmount Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Irrigation is worth $9–$11 billion a year at the farm gate and<br />

maybe five times that in the shops; along the food chain it helps<br />

keep half a million Australians in work. It manages two million<br />

hectares and roughly two thirds of our available freshwater. It is<br />

highly efficient in what it does – turning water into good food<br />

and fibre. In the last drought it cut its water use by 43 per cent,<br />

while cities cut theirs by just one per cent. But because it consists<br />

of a gaggle of regional industries and jurisdictions prone to<br />

argue among themselves, it lacks political influence, a national<br />

vision, and has no effective voice. This makes it easy meat for<br />

government razor gangs, populist politicians and self-seeking<br />

bureaucracies.<br />

Northern Victorian Federal Member for Murray Dr Sharman<br />

Stone is one who is deeply concerned as spur lines off the main<br />

irrigation channels are shut down and channels ploughed in,<br />

while local dairy and fruit manufacturers downsize. “This socalled<br />

‘Foodbowl Modernisation Project’ was set up to justify<br />

piping farm water to Melbourne during the drought.” Sharman<br />

explains. “The project was so ill-conceived that a damning State<br />

Ombudsman’s report saw the agency dismantled and the CEO<br />

resign. But the project lives on now managed by the similarly<br />

inept State-owned Goulburn Murray Water Authority, which is<br />

on track to ‘reduce the infrastructure footprint... by 50 per cent’.<br />

This will halve the local irrigation system by 2015,” she warns.<br />

At federal level, Sharman adds, the Commonwealth<br />

Environmental Water Holder is also targeting food producers’<br />

water in the Murray Darling Basin, in what she describes as ‘a<br />

non-scientific raid aimed at pleasing urban green voters’.<br />

Similarly, in Queensland and NSW, farmers in key foodbowl<br />

regions like the Liverpool Plains and Darling Downs are up in<br />

arms over state governments apparently determined to hand<br />

their water resources to coal seam gas, coal and other resource<br />

companies in search of a quick profit – potentially trading off<br />

centuries of reliable food production for a few years of cheap<br />

energy.<br />

Australians need to understand that the real victims of this<br />

process are not so much farmers, who can sell their water and<br />

land and walk away – though most do not want to. The real<br />

victims are 22+ million Australian consumers who will face<br />

increasingly erratic and high food prices, sudden shortages and a<br />

growing assault on their health due to the offshoring of our food<br />

supply. And, of course, the taxpayers who will inevitably be asked<br />

to pay billions to rebuild and restore food production when the<br />

penny finally drops, the public gets angry and governments are<br />

forced to backtrack.<br />

The Bruntland definition of sustainability is handing the<br />

country to your kids in the same, or better, condition than you<br />

received it. In the case of food production, and especially irrigated<br />

food production, this will not happen in Australia under current<br />

policies. We will pass on, at best, a brow-beaten, downsized, deskilled<br />

and demoralised system at a time when global food crises<br />

are multiplying and prices soaring.<br />

Australia has enough water for all its food and export needs,<br />

to protect and sustain its native landscapes and to embark<br />

on new industries in aquaculture, algae culture and irrigation<br />

potentially worth $30 to $40 billion – but to do that we need,<br />

above all, good science, technology and education to redouble<br />

water use efficiency and second, policies which foster sustainable<br />

water development and investment.<br />

We should be building low-loss distribution systems (that<br />

do not require half the present network to be shut down). We<br />

should be recycling up to 100 per cent of our urban water. No<br />

Australian city or frivolous user should be allowed to touch<br />

food’s supply of water. We should bank water by recharging our<br />

aquifers nationwide, plan mosaic irrigation in the north and seek<br />

to double productivity in the southern irrigation industry – instead<br />

of crushing it. We should share best practice and innovative<br />

water management the length and breadth of the land. We<br />

should build a billion dollar export sector in sustainable water<br />

knowhow and technology, like the Israelis.<br />

The Australians of the 19th and 20th centuries built our<br />

modern irrigation sector to sustain the nation in its growth. In<br />

a world where food supplies will become increasingly scarce,<br />

expensive and unreliable as it surges toward 10 billion ravenous<br />

global consumers, the impact of our own neglect of this vital area<br />

will be borne by our children and grandchildren.<br />

What sort of parents, indeed what sort of Australians, does<br />

that make us<br />

1<br />

Julian Cribb is a Canberra-based science and agriculture writer, and<br />

author of ‘The Coming Famine’ (CSIRO Publishing 2010).<br />

This article was originally published in The Canberra Times on October 5.<br />

TwinN – nitrogen fixing microbes<br />

Increase yields<br />

Decrease input costs<br />

TwinN microbes fix N from the<br />

atmosphere into your crop<br />

TwinN microbes improve root<br />

growth and function<br />

TwinN@mabiotec.com 07 5445 7151 Techs 0458 989 282 www.mabiotec.com<br />

20 — The Australian Cottongrower October–November 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!