O Timothy April 2011 - Way of Life Literature
O Timothy April 2011 - Way of Life Literature
O Timothy April 2011 - Way of Life Literature
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
credit, the man is willing to state clearly<br />
what he believes or doesn’t believe<br />
(though he seems to fudge about being a<br />
universalist). Zondervan has probably<br />
done as much to muddy the waters <strong>of</strong><br />
biblical truth in the minds <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essing<br />
believers as any institution on earth today.<br />
Why back <strong>of</strong>f now<br />
It’s great that evangelicals like Al Mohler have<br />
made strong statements about Rob Bell’s<br />
heretical new book, but Billy Graham has said<br />
many <strong>of</strong> the same things. It’s extremely<br />
hypocritical to pick and choose which heretics<br />
you are going to denounce.<br />
“CONSERVATIVE EVANGELICAL”<br />
HYPOCRISY (Friday Church News<br />
N o t e s , M a r c h 2 5 , 2 0 1 1 ,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org,<br />
866-295-4143) - Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
“conservative” evangelicals are criticizing<br />
Rob Bell in a pretty strong way. John<br />
Piper tweeted, “Good bye, Rob Bell.”<br />
Albert Mohler, Jr. <strong>of</strong> Southern Baptist<br />
Seminary described Bell’s view as<br />
“Velvet Hell.” I’m glad to see a bit <strong>of</strong><br />
backbone among some evangelicals and a<br />
level <strong>of</strong> doctrinal conviction that would<br />
drive them to actually name the name <strong>of</strong> a<br />
false teacher, but it appears very<br />
hypocritical at the same time. The view<br />
that atheists and pagan religionists might<br />
be saved without submitting to Jesus<br />
Christ is not new. Billy Graham has been<br />
saying it for decades, but I don’t recall<br />
any outcry from the evangelical world,<br />
i n c l u d i n g f r o m G r a h a m ’s o w n<br />
denomination, the Southern Baptist<br />
Convention. In an interview with<br />
McCall’s magazine, January 1978,<br />
entitled “I Can’t Play God Any More,”<br />
Graham said: “I used to believe that<br />
pagans in far-<strong>of</strong>f countries were lost—<br />
were going to hell—if they did not have<br />
the Gospel <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ preached to<br />
them. I no longer believe that. … I believe<br />
that there are other ways <strong>of</strong> recognizing<br />
the existence <strong>of</strong> God—through nature, for<br />
i n s t a n c e — a n d p l e n t y o f o t h e r<br />
opportunities, therefore, <strong>of</strong> saying ‘yes’ to<br />
God.” In 1985, Graham affirmed his<br />
belief that those outside <strong>of</strong> Christ might<br />
be saved. Los Angeles reporter David<br />
Colker asked Graham: “What about<br />
people <strong>of</strong> other faiths who live good lives<br />
but don’t pr<strong>of</strong>ess a belief in Christ”<br />
Graham replied, “I’m going to leave that<br />
to the Lord. He’ll decide that” (Los<br />
Angeles Herald Examiner, July 22, 1985).<br />
In 1993, Graham repeated this doctrine in<br />
an interview with David Frost. “And I<br />
think there is that hunger for God and<br />
people are living as best they know how<br />
according to the light that they have. Well,<br />
I think they’re in a separate category than<br />
people like Hitler and people who have<br />
just defied God, and shaken their fists at<br />
God. … I would say that God, being a<br />
God <strong>of</strong> mercy, we have to rest it right<br />
there, and say that God is a God <strong>of</strong> mercy<br />
and love, and how it happens, we don’t<br />
know” (The Charlotte Observer, Feb. 16,<br />
1993). In an interview with Robert<br />
Schuller in May 1997, Graham again said<br />
that he believes people in other religions<br />
can be saved without consciously<br />
believing in Jesus Christ. “[God’s] calling<br />
people out <strong>of</strong> the world for His name,<br />
whether WHETHER THEY COME<br />
FROM THE MUSLIM WORLD, OR<br />
THE BUDDHIST WORLD, OR THE<br />
CHRISTIAN WORLD OR THE NON-<br />
BELIEVING WORLD, THEY ARE<br />
MEMBERS OF THE BODY OF<br />
CHRIST BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN<br />
CALLED BY GOD. THEY MAY NOT<br />
EVEN KNOW THE NAME OF JESUS<br />
but they know in their hearts that they<br />
need something that they don't have, and<br />
they turn to the only light that they have,<br />
and I think that they are saved, and that<br />
they're going to be with us in<br />
heaven” (television interview <strong>of</strong> Billy<br />
Graham by Robert Schuller, broadcast in<br />
southern California, Saturday, May 31,<br />
1997). What is Rob Bell saying today that<br />
Billy Graham hasn’t been saying for more<br />
than 30 years<br />
FULLER SEMINARY PRESIDENT<br />
PRAISES ROB BELL’S BOOK (Friday<br />
Church News Notes, March 25, <strong>2011</strong>,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org,<br />
866-295-4143) - Richard Mouw,<br />
President <strong>of</strong> Fuller Theological Seminary,<br />
told USA Today that “Rob Bell’s newlyreleased<br />
Love Wins is a fine book and that<br />
I basically agree with his theology” (“The<br />
Orthodoxy <strong>of</strong> Rob Bell,” Christian Post,<br />
Mar. 20, <strong>2011</strong>). This tells us just how<br />
terribly far Fuller Seminary has fallen<br />
from its roots in Charles Fuller’s “only<br />
through the blood” evangelistic ministry.<br />
Mouw agrees with Bell that it is wrong to<br />
say, “Accept Jesus right now, because if<br />
ten minutes from now you die without<br />
accepting this <strong>of</strong>fer God will punish you<br />
forever in the fires <strong>of</strong> hell.” Mouw<br />
comments, “What kind <strong>of</strong> God are we<br />
presenting to the person” The answer is<br />
the God <strong>of</strong> the Bible and the God that was<br />
preached by the founders <strong>of</strong> Fuller<br />
Theological Seminary. It is Bell and<br />
Mouw who have the new god. Mouw says<br />
that after a rabbi friend <strong>of</strong> his died, he<br />
“held out the hope that when he saw Jesus<br />
he would acknowledge that it was Him all<br />
along, and that Jesus would welcome him<br />
into the heavenly realm.” I’ve never read<br />
anything like that in the Bible, but C.S.<br />
Lewis taught this very thing. Mouw says<br />
that those who question Mother Teresa’s<br />
salvation just because she believed a false<br />
gospel should be ashamed <strong>of</strong> themselves.<br />
Mouw implies that Bell’s critics just want<br />
to keep people out <strong>of</strong> heaven, which is<br />
patently ridiculous and slanderous. Mouw<br />
would have us believe that he is more<br />
compassionate than Jesus, who stated<br />
very bluntly, “Except ye repent, ye shall<br />
all likewise perish” (Luke 13:3, 5). Both<br />
Bell and Mouw complain about their<br />
“critics,” but they don’t draw back from<br />
lashing out pretty fiercely at the<br />
“fundamentalists.” Bell calls hellfire<br />
preaching “lethal,” “toxic,” “unloving,”<br />
“creepy,” a “cheap view <strong>of</strong> God.” No<br />
judgmental criticism there! Nothing but<br />
compassionate, tolerant dialogue!<br />
C.S. LEWIS’S INFLUENCE ON THE<br />
EVANGELICAL DOWNGRADE OF<br />
HELL (Friday Church News Notes,<br />
March 25, <strong>2011</strong>, www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org<br />
fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org, 866-295-4143) -<br />
C.S. Lewis (1898-1963) has been called a<br />
“Superstar” by Christianity Today. A 1998<br />
CT poll rated Lewis the most influential<br />
evangelical writer, and In light <strong>of</strong> the<br />
wretched spiritual-doctrinal-moral<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> “evangelicalism” today, that<br />
is a very telling statistic and certainly no<br />
praise for C.S. Lewis. One <strong>of</strong> the ways<br />
22 1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21