O Timothy April 2011 - Way of Life Literature
O Timothy April 2011 - Way of Life Literature
O Timothy April 2011 - Way of Life Literature
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
O <strong>Timothy</strong><br />
“Keep that which is committed to thy trust...”<br />
A Monthly Newsletter <strong>of</strong> Warning and Edification Volume 28 - Issue 4 - <strong>April</strong>, <strong>2011</strong><br />
Brian McLaren on the nature <strong>of</strong> God and redemption<br />
“God...is incapable <strong>of</strong> forgiving, unless he<br />
kicks somebody else.” “(He) gets his way<br />
through coercion and violence and<br />
intimidation and domination.” The “power<br />
<strong>of</strong> the blood” gospel “raises some questions<br />
about the goodness <strong>of</strong> God.” (More on<br />
McLaren throughout this issue.)<br />
Digging in the Walls<br />
A month’s worth <strong>of</strong> news<br />
items, republished from Friday<br />
Church News Notes. Page 15<br />
MUSICAL ASSOCIATIONS AND CCM ADAPTATION<br />
by David Cloud<br />
When it comes to music, the philosophy coming into ascendance among IB<br />
churches is this: as long as the words are right we should relax and be edified and<br />
not be critical.<br />
Recent West Coast graduate: “The music was a lot more <strong>of</strong> a concern to me when<br />
I first started to hear it and think <strong>of</strong> the fact that it was CCM artists that perform<br />
it. But seriously, are the words evil Can a Christian not be edified by these<br />
songs Is it not more important for a person to be edified than it is to be approved<br />
by men”<br />
Recent Hyles Anderson graduate: “I am not against new songs that are theocentric<br />
and doctrinally correct. Who the writer is is not my concern. Any music<br />
that promotes God for who He is or what He has done without emphasizing the<br />
flesh, I am for.”<br />
This philosophy allows the churches to “adapt” CCM by<br />
selecting songs that have Scriptural lyrics and toning down<br />
the rhythm. It is an attempt to take the “rock” out <strong>of</strong><br />
Christian rock and to turn charismatic praise music into<br />
fundamentalist praise music.<br />
1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20, 21 1
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
Following are some <strong>of</strong> the reasons why this philosophy is<br />
unscriptural and dangerous:<br />
1. THIS PHILOSOPHY DISREGARDS THE BIBLE’S<br />
CLEAR COMMANDS TO SEPARATE FROM<br />
HERESY AND END-TIMES APOSTASY.<br />
Romans 16:17 Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them<br />
which cause divisions and <strong>of</strong>fences contrary to the<br />
doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.<br />
1 Corinthians 15:33 Be not deceived: evil<br />
communications corrupt good manners.<br />
Ephesians 5:11 And have no fellowship with the<br />
unfruitful works <strong>of</strong> darkness, but rather reprove them.<br />
1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:3-5 If any man teach otherwise, and<br />
consent not to wholesome words, even the words <strong>of</strong> our<br />
Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according<br />
to godliness; he is proud, knowing nothing, but doting<br />
about questions and strifes <strong>of</strong> words, where<strong>of</strong> cometh<br />
envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, perverse disputings<br />
<strong>of</strong> men <strong>of</strong> corrupt minds, and destitute <strong>of</strong> the truth,<br />
supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw<br />
thyself.<br />
2 <strong>Timothy</strong> 3:5 Having a form <strong>of</strong> godliness, but denying<br />
the power there<strong>of</strong>: from such turn away.<br />
O TIMOTHY Magazine<br />
Volume 28 Issue 4<br />
David W. Cloud, Editor<br />
Subscription information on<br />
back page <strong>of</strong> the magazine<br />
Copyright <strong>2011</strong> by D.W.Cloud<br />
<strong>Way</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Literature</strong><br />
PO Box 610368, Port Huron, MI<br />
48061<br />
866-295-4143 (toll free)<br />
fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org<br />
http://www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org<br />
Bethel Baptist Church<br />
4212 Campbell St. N.<br />
London, Ontario, N6P 1A6 Canada<br />
519-652-2619<br />
Revelation 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven,<br />
saying, Come out <strong>of</strong> her, my people, that ye be not<br />
partakers <strong>of</strong> her sins, and that ye receive not <strong>of</strong> her<br />
plagues.<br />
All <strong>of</strong> these commandments pertain to associations.<br />
The Contemporary Christian Music movement is<br />
permeated with heresy and is committed wholesale to a<br />
philosophy <strong>of</strong> ecumenism that is plainly building the<br />
end-times Harlot Church. Rome has a very prominent<br />
role in the CCM movement, and there is not one out <strong>of</strong><br />
1000 <strong>of</strong> the CCM artists that issue any sort <strong>of</strong> warning<br />
about that whatsoever. They talk about Christ and sing<br />
His praises, but they are spiritually blind at a truly<br />
fundamental level.<br />
If they were indeed filled with the Holy Spirit, which<br />
they so frequently and earnestly sing about, they would<br />
do as Paul did when he encountered a false teacher trying<br />
to lead people away from the truth:<br />
“Then Saul, (who also is called Paul,) filled with the<br />
Holy Ghost, set his eyes on him, and said, O full <strong>of</strong> all<br />
subtilty and all mischief, thou child <strong>of</strong> the devil, thou<br />
enemy <strong>of</strong> all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert<br />
the right ways <strong>of</strong> the Lord” (Acts 13:9-10).<br />
I have been to some large, influential charismatic<br />
ecumenical conferences with press credentials and I have<br />
thus witnessed with my own eyes and ears those places<br />
where CCM is birthed and where it is most at home.<br />
Never have I seen repro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> error after the fashion <strong>of</strong><br />
what the Spirit-filled Paul did in Acts 13. All <strong>of</strong> those<br />
conferences (New Orleans 1987, Indianapolis 1990, St.<br />
Louis 2000, etc.) featured an ecumenical mixed<br />
multitude that included large numbers <strong>of</strong> Roman<br />
Catholics. And not one <strong>of</strong> the charismatic leaders or<br />
popular CCM “artists” (including Bill Gaither and his<br />
outfit who performed at one <strong>of</strong> these) lifted even a finger<br />
<strong>of</strong> protest and warning. They are practically all in bed<br />
with the vile, wretched end-times apostasy. You might be<br />
able to find some exception somewhere, but it is only<br />
that -- an exception. (For reports on these conferences<br />
see “Strange Things in New Orleans,” “Charismatic<br />
Confusion in Evangelism,” and “End Times Confusion in<br />
St. Louis,” at the <strong>Way</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> web site. Use the search<br />
engine or consult the Charismatic section <strong>of</strong> the Topical<br />
Listing from the tab at the top <strong>of</strong> the web site’s home<br />
page.)<br />
I attended with press credentials the New Baptist<br />
Covenant Celebration in 2008, with speakers like Jimmy<br />
Carter, Al Gore, Tony Campolo, and that great Baptist<br />
giant Bill Clinton. The very liberal Cooperative Baptist<br />
2 1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
Rob Bell at the National Pastor’s Convention in 2009. Bell’s heresies are too numerous to mention, and his recent book “Love Wins” has come<br />
under fire for presenting a false God. If you accept Bell’s music, it won’t be long before you accept him. Visit a convention like this to find out<br />
whether or not that is true.<br />
Fellowship and Baptist World Alliance and American<br />
Baptist Churches USA were participants. The music was<br />
CCM and the theme was ecumenism. In his opening<br />
message Jimmy Carter said that it is impossible to agree<br />
on doctrines and issues so we should unite rather on the<br />
“gospel,” but the gospel was never defined, and the<br />
“gospel” that was actually preached was a social gospel.<br />
Carter mentioned the “fundamentals” but no one said<br />
what they were, because doctrinal purity was not on the<br />
table. There were “ministries” represented at the<br />
Celebration such as Affirming and Welcoming Baptists<br />
who are trying to get churches to receive unrepentant<br />
homosexuals as members and workers. We interviewed<br />
the representative <strong>of</strong> this organization and she told us that<br />
she believes the early chapters <strong>of</strong> Genesis are not literal<br />
history, marriage is a man-made institution, and there is<br />
no such thing as sexual sin. (For a report on this<br />
conference see “The New Baptist Covenant: A<br />
Celebration <strong>of</strong> Liberalism,” FBIS, Feb. 25, 2008, at the<br />
<strong>Way</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Literature</strong> web site. Use the search engine or<br />
consult the Ecumenism section <strong>of</strong> the Topical Listing<br />
from the tab at the top <strong>of</strong> the web site’s home page.)<br />
I attended the National Pastor’s Fellowship in 2009<br />
sponsored by Zondervan and InterVarsity Press (with<br />
speakers such as Brian McLaren, Rob Bell, Bill Hybels,<br />
Paul Young, author <strong>of</strong> The Shack, Shane Claiborne, John<br />
Ortberg, Christopher Wright, Scot McKnight, Alex<br />
McManus, J.P. Moreland, Andy Crouch <strong>of</strong> Christianity<br />
Today, and Billy Graham’s brother-in-law Leighton Ford,<br />
to name a few). (For a report on this see “The Emerging<br />
Church Is Coming,” FBIS, March 3, 2009, at the <strong>Way</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Life</strong> <strong>Literature</strong> web site. Use the search engine or consult<br />
the Emerging Church section <strong>of</strong> the Topical Listing from<br />
the tab at the top <strong>of</strong> the web site’s home page.)<br />
All <strong>of</strong> these large influential conferences are committed<br />
to the ecumenical philosophy. None <strong>of</strong> them would dream<br />
<strong>of</strong> reproving Roman Catholicism. They are far too busy<br />
with other agendas to do anything like that. These<br />
conferences throw men together <strong>of</strong> all doctrinal<br />
persuasions, from Leighton Ford’s “evangelical<br />
conservatism” to Brian McLaren’s universalism and<br />
rejection <strong>of</strong> hell to Paul Young’s non-judgmental female<br />
God as taught in his book The Shack.<br />
1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21 3
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
These are the types <strong>of</strong> forums in which CCM is birthed<br />
and where it is most at home. The music at these forums<br />
was “real” Christian rock. They pulled out all the stops.<br />
No messing around with this silly business <strong>of</strong> trying to<br />
remove the rock” from Christian rock. There was even<br />
colored lights and smoke. No holds barred CCM. The real<br />
stuff.<br />
It is really pathetic to see once old-fashioned Baptist<br />
churches like Thomas Road Baptist Church in Lynchburg,<br />
Virginia, or Highland Park Baptist Church in<br />
Chattanooga, Tennessee, trying to use CCM, like they<br />
have been doing for a couple <strong>of</strong> decades. They have the<br />
“worship leader” and the band but the people just stand<br />
there stiffly, mouthing the words on the big screen<br />
without the foggiest idea <strong>of</strong> what to do with such music.<br />
Hey, that music is created to “connect” you to God, to<br />
enable you to “experience” God. It’s all about “feeling”<br />
something. You’re supposed to yield to it, move to it,<br />
dance, man! Independent Baptist churches that want to<br />
use CCM need to bring in some charismatic ecumenists<br />
to teach them how to do it or they need to go to some <strong>of</strong><br />
the charismatic churches and conferences and observe<br />
how it is done so they can do right by it. If you want to<br />
use charismatic stuff, you ought to at least make an effort<br />
to know what it is and how it should be used.<br />
For nearly four decades I have researched the<br />
Pentecostal-Charismatic movement, beginning from<br />
when I was led to Christ by an old-line Pentecostal and<br />
visited Pentecostal churches as a new Christian seeking<br />
God’s will about “who” to join. The 317-page book The<br />
Pentecostal-Charismatic Movements: The History and the<br />
Error is packed with documentation <strong>of</strong> the apostasy and<br />
spiritual danger represented by this movement, which<br />
also represents the very heart and soul <strong>of</strong> Contemporary<br />
Christian Music. We also have a photo-packed DVD<br />
series on that subject.<br />
I have visited for research purposes influential churches<br />
that represent the heart and soul <strong>of</strong> CCM and its<br />
philosophy, such as Mars Hill Church in Seattle (Mark<br />
Driscoll), Calvary Chapel <strong>of</strong> Costa Mesa, California,<br />
Vineyard Fellowship in Anaheim, Carpenter’s Home<br />
Church <strong>of</strong> Lakeland, Florida, Christ Church in Nashville,<br />
City Harvest Church in Singapore, Without Walls in<br />
Florida, Yoido Full Gospel Church in Seoul (supposedly<br />
the world’s biggest church), Bill Hybel’s Willowcreek<br />
Community Church west <strong>of</strong> Chicago, Rick Warren’s<br />
Saddleback Church in California, First Baptist in Atlanta,<br />
Hills Christian <strong>Life</strong> Centre in Sydney, and schools such as<br />
Oral Roberts University, Regent College in Vancouver,<br />
B.C., Wheaton College, and Southern Baptist Seminary<br />
in Louisville.<br />
Charles Billingsly is the Worship Leader at Thomas Road Baptist<br />
Church in Lynchburg, TN.<br />
I do have some unique personal experiences and have<br />
done some serious research into the Pentecostal-<br />
Charismatic movement and ecumenism and CCM. In<br />
1998, when I published the first edition <strong>of</strong> Contemporary<br />
Christian Music Under the Spotlight, the use and<br />
“adaptation” <strong>of</strong> CCM was still rare among IB churches,<br />
but that is no longer the case.<br />
Paul warned that evil communications corrupt good<br />
manners. If anything is evil today, it is the charismatic<br />
ecumenical movement which is producing the vast bulk<br />
<strong>of</strong> contemporary worship music. It has a name that it<br />
lives, but when judged biblically, it is found to be dead. It<br />
has zeal without knowledge. It has a form <strong>of</strong> godliness<br />
but it denies the power there<strong>of</strong>, which is absolute truth.<br />
There is widespread confusion about the gospel itself<br />
within this movement. At the North American Congress<br />
on the Holy Spirit and World Evangelization in 1987,<br />
which I attended with press credentials, a large<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> the participants and many <strong>of</strong> the speakers<br />
were Roman Catholic. The two leaders were a<br />
Pentecostal and a Roman Catholic who bragged about<br />
4 1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
how wonderful it was that they could be so united and<br />
what a great thing God is doing today. Each evening<br />
featured about an hour <strong>of</strong> contemporary worship music,<br />
which united that mixed multitude in fervent “praise.”<br />
But then one evening a large percentage <strong>of</strong> the 35,000 or<br />
so participants raised their hands to indicate that they<br />
weren’t sure <strong>of</strong> their salvation. At a press conference the<br />
next day, Dennis Costella <strong>of</strong> Foundation magazine asked<br />
why the conference didn’t address the matter <strong>of</strong> salvation<br />
plainly and publicly in order to clear up the obvious<br />
confusion. A Pentecostal leader replied, “We don’t have<br />
time for that.” The more honest answer would have been<br />
as follows:<br />
“We are a mixed multitude. This conference represents 40<br />
different denominations, and we have different ideas<br />
about that. Our Catholic brethren have one idea and our<br />
Lutheran brethren another and there are differences <strong>of</strong><br />
opinion even among us Pentecostals. In the context <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ecumenical movement, some believe baptism is necessary<br />
for salvation; some believe you can’t be saved without<br />
tongues; some believe baptism regenerates; some believe<br />
cooing infants can be saved; some believe salvation must<br />
be nurtured through sacraments; some believe you can<br />
lose your salvation; some believe salvation is a mere<br />
sinner’s prayer; some believe in ‘Four Spiritual Laws,’<br />
etc. So it is impossible to be doctrinally precise on that or<br />
practically any other issue and still keep our unity. As you<br />
know, doctrine divides; love unites, and love is what<br />
really matters. We can’t judge someone else, you know.”<br />
That would have been the honest answer.<br />
And the fact that the vast majority <strong>of</strong> CCM “artists” have<br />
bought into this wretchedly unscriptural ecumenical<br />
doctrine is why their music should be rejected<br />
wholesale--lock, stock, and barrel--by Bible-believing<br />
churches.<br />
Thus, the first reason why the associations <strong>of</strong> CCM and<br />
not just the words must be considered is that the Bible<br />
commands us to separate from heresy and even more<br />
particularly from end-times apostasy.<br />
John Styll, the publisher <strong>of</strong> Worship Leader magazine,<br />
made the following telling observation:<br />
“You can have a pretty straight-laced but theologically<br />
liberal Presbyterian church using the same songs that are<br />
being sung at a wild and crazy charismatic church, but<br />
they use different arrangements and adapt the songs to<br />
their unique settings” (Styll, quoted by Steve Rabey, “The<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> Praise,” Christianity Today, July 12, 1999).<br />
Observe that he said that churches “use different<br />
arrangements and adapt their songs to their unique<br />
settings.”<br />
My friends, that is EXACTLY what Lancaster Baptist<br />
Church in California and a rapidly growing number <strong>of</strong><br />
other IB churches are doing. Styll, who is totally<br />
committed to ecumenism and who delights in the fact that<br />
CCM is bringing all churches together, understands this<br />
matter much better than the average IB pastor who is<br />
allowing his people to mess around with CCM. Styll<br />
understands the power <strong>of</strong> music. He knows that if<br />
churches dabble around with CCM they will be hooked<br />
and they will be drawn gradually closer to the ecumenical<br />
thinking and orb and its multitude <strong>of</strong> heresies and fables.<br />
In an interview with Christianity Today, Don Moen <strong>of</strong><br />
Integrity Music said: “I’ve discovered that worship<br />
[music] is transdenominational, transcultural. IT<br />
BRIDGES ANY DENOMINATION. Twenty years ago<br />
there were many huge divisions between denominations.<br />
Today I think the walls are coming down. In any concert<br />
that I do, I will have 30-50 different churches<br />
represented.”<br />
Styll and Moen know that they are talking about. They<br />
know the power <strong>of</strong> music and the deception <strong>of</strong><br />
ecumenism. Forty years ago, who would have thought<br />
that fundamental Baptist churches would be using CCM<br />
on a wide basis in the early 21st century But they are,<br />
and if they don’t set their houses in order they will be<br />
swept along by the flood <strong>of</strong> compromise and apostasy.<br />
The typical pragmatic IB thinking and the refusal to listen<br />
to “criticism” on the part <strong>of</strong> the average IB pastor, won’t<br />
get the job done.<br />
2. THE CCM CROWD IS ACTIVELY TARGETING<br />
“OLD FASHIONED” CHURCHES TO MOVE THEM<br />
FROM SACRED TO CONTEMPORARY<br />
These people are real proselytizers. There are<br />
TRANSITION SONGS and BRIDGE SONGS designed<br />
to move traditional churches along the contemporary path<br />
toward Christian rock. From the perspective <strong>of</strong> the CCM<br />
artists involved in this, they aren’t doing anything sinister.<br />
They are simply and sincerely trying to “feed” the<br />
“broader church.” But from a fundamentalist Biblebelieving<br />
position, the effect is to draw “old-fashioned”<br />
Bible churches into the contemporary orb, and that is<br />
most sinister.<br />
Bridge songs include “How Deep the Father's Love for<br />
Us” by Stuart Townend and “In Christ Alone” by<br />
Townend and Keith Getty.<br />
1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21 5
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
Stuart Townend is an extremely popular writer <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Christian Music who’s tunes are sometimes adapted for use in<br />
independent Baptist churches and colleges. One <strong>of</strong> his most popular songs, “How Deep the Father’s Love for Us” has a very<br />
penetrating melody which is s<strong>of</strong>t and sensual, but the tune is sentimental in nature and speaks <strong>of</strong> a God who is never wrathful,<br />
vengeful or angry. It is completely unlike sound Christian music which can be s<strong>of</strong>t but not betray the truth about God’s nature.<br />
These songs are doctrinally sound and hymn-like as<br />
opposed to out-and-out rock & roll in style, so they are<br />
considered “safe” by traditional churches. But by using<br />
this music a church is brought into association with the<br />
contemporary world that Townsend represents.<br />
Townend is a Christian rocker. He is charismatic in<br />
theology and radically ecumenical in philosophy,<br />
supporting the Alpha program which bridges charismatic,<br />
Protestant, and Roman Catholic churches. He is a<br />
member <strong>of</strong> the charismatic Church <strong>of</strong> Christ the King in<br />
Brighton, U.K. and supports the “extraordinary<br />
manifestations <strong>of</strong> the Spirit (S4W.com). This refers, <strong>of</strong><br />
course, to the demonic/fleshly charismatic mysticism<br />
such as spirit slaying, holy laughter, and shaking.<br />
Townend is holding hands with the “broader church” in<br />
all <strong>of</strong> its facets and heresies and end-time apostasies, and<br />
Townend’s objective in writing the “hymn-like”<br />
contemporary songs is ecumenism. Consider the<br />
following statement:<br />
“‘How Deep the Father’s Love’ was the first hymn-like<br />
song I had written; before that point I had only written<br />
modern worship songs in a more contemporary style. ...<br />
This melody just kinda popped out <strong>of</strong> my head one day. ...<br />
It had a kind <strong>of</strong> classic hymn-like element to it. I thought<br />
I should just tell the story <strong>of</strong> Christ on the cross, but tell it<br />
perhaps from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> what it cost the Father<br />
to give the Son. ... There is lot <strong>of</strong> talk about the wrath <strong>of</strong><br />
God and is that right to think that the Father’s wrath was<br />
poured out on Christ, and I think that is right to say that.<br />
But that is not to say that God is a vengeful God; actually<br />
it cost him to give up His son. ... It’s been interesting to<br />
see the response. It’s quite useful not only in the more<br />
modern contemporary churches, but in traditional<br />
churches as well because <strong>of</strong> the style. And I’m kind <strong>of</strong><br />
exited about that; I am excited about the fact that you can<br />
write something that actually feeds the broader church<br />
6 1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
rather than just particular musical pockets <strong>of</strong> the church.<br />
That’s something that motivates me and probably why<br />
I’ve thought more and more about writing hymns, is I<br />
would like to try and feed the whole church and not just<br />
part <strong>of</strong> it” (Stuart Townend, “Mission: Worship, The<br />
Story Behind the Song”).<br />
The first comment we would make is that Townend<br />
openly states that his objective is to bridge “traditional”<br />
churches with contemporary ones. After “How Deep the<br />
Father’s Love” popped into his mind and he turned the<br />
“hymn-like” tune into a s<strong>of</strong>t “modern hymn,” he realized<br />
that this type <strong>of</strong> music could be a powerful bridge. In his<br />
own blog he says “I don’t go home at the end <strong>of</strong> a busy<br />
day and put on a hymns album! So I don’t think <strong>of</strong> hymns<br />
as where I’m at musically at all!” (http://<br />
blog.stuarttownend.co.uk/2010/05/how-deep-fatherslove.html).<br />
He is a rock & roller, pure and simple. He<br />
wants to use the s<strong>of</strong>t CCM to bring together the “broader<br />
church.”<br />
What he does not say is that the contemporary churches<br />
aren’t very interested in s<strong>of</strong>t CCM hymns. It is only the<br />
“traditional” churches that are interested in “s<strong>of</strong>t” CCM,<br />
and by using it they are the ones that are in danger <strong>of</strong><br />
being influenced and changed. When “traditional”<br />
churches borrow Townend’s “s<strong>of</strong>t” CCM, the<br />
contemporary churches are in no danger <strong>of</strong> being<br />
“traditionalized,” but the traditional churches are most<br />
definitely in danger <strong>of</strong> being contemporarized.<br />
The second observation is that Townend is committed to<br />
serious heresy. He states that God is not vengeful,<br />
whereas the Bible plainly, repeatedly, and forcefully<br />
states that God is vengeful. The Psalmist says that God<br />
will “execute vengeance upon the heathen” (Psa. 149:7).<br />
The prophets warn <strong>of</strong> the coming <strong>of</strong> the “day <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Lord’s vengeance” (Isa. 34:8; Jer. 46:10; Mic. 5:15;<br />
Nahum 1:2). It was God’s holy vengeance that fell upon<br />
Christ, and it is His vengeance that will fall upon every<br />
sinner outside <strong>of</strong> Christ. The apostle Paul said that Christ<br />
will exercise God’s vengeance on all who obey not the<br />
gospel (2 Thess. 1:8).<br />
One concerned pastor wrote:<br />
“Keith and Kristyn Getty advertise themselves as<br />
‘Modern Hymn Writers’ and are deceiving many into the<br />
Rock Genre by this very innocent title and the more<br />
conservative Praise S<strong>of</strong>t Rock music. But the fact is, that<br />
they are not modern hymn writers because they are<br />
putting out Rock Music which is not spiritual at all but<br />
carnal and thereby, fulfilling the desires <strong>of</strong> the flesh and<br />
not the spirit (spiritual part <strong>of</strong> us yielding to the Holy<br />
Spirit).”<br />
The frightful thing is that the average Independent Baptist<br />
pastor and music people don’t have the foggiest idea that<br />
they are being manipulated and that they are walking on a<br />
BRIDGE that leads to a place they say they are against,<br />
which is full blown CCM and its enticing philosophy <strong>of</strong><br />
“don’t be so strict and uptight; relax; enjoy life; live the<br />
grace.”<br />
3. THIS PHILOSOPHY WILL EFFECTIVELY STOP<br />
CLEAR WARNINGS.<br />
How are the pastors and teachers going to give clear<br />
warnings about CCM and that crowd if they are using<br />
their music (It is one thing to warn in generalities, which<br />
doesn’t <strong>of</strong>fend people but also doesn’t get the job done,<br />
and it is quite another to warn in a plain manner so that<br />
the people who visit the music section <strong>of</strong> a typical<br />
Christian bookstore will know what music to avoid --<br />
which is almost all <strong>of</strong> it!)<br />
I can’t figure out how this would work at any practical<br />
level.<br />
Consider a church that is using music <strong>of</strong> the likes <strong>of</strong> Jack<br />
Hayford, Darlene Zschech, Michael W. Smith, Twila<br />
Paris, Michael English, Brian Doerksen, Graham<br />
Kendrick, Rick Founds, Marty Nystrom, Michael Ledner,<br />
Marty Sampson, Steve Green, Jonathan Stockstill, Chris<br />
Tomlin, Stuart Townend, Casting Crowns, and other<br />
mainstream CCM musicians.<br />
How can the pastor <strong>of</strong> such a church or visiting preachers<br />
effectively lift a word <strong>of</strong> clear warning against this<br />
crowd<br />
Knowing human nature as I do and knowing the<br />
preaching ministry as I do, I don’t believe this would ever<br />
work, and the longer the situation is allowed to continue<br />
the quieter the pulpit will be about CCM in an effective<br />
sense.<br />
The pastor <strong>of</strong> the church that allows his people to dabble<br />
around in CCM in search <strong>of</strong> “good” stuff has effectively<br />
been stopped from giving the clear warnings that he<br />
should be giving about music.<br />
Oh, he might be able to say, “Beware <strong>of</strong> Contemporary<br />
Christian Music, folks,” in a general, vague fashion, but<br />
he won’t be able to be precise in the way that is required<br />
today to make people understand the real danger. He will<br />
hesitate and probably decide against bringing in a<br />
preacher who might deal with these matters plainly,<br />
knowing that his people would be confused and probably<br />
<strong>of</strong>fended.<br />
1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21 7
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
More likely these days they will go home and do a<br />
Google search for the titles <strong>of</strong> the adapted CCM songs<br />
they hear at church, perhaps some Hillsong numbers, and<br />
the top returns will be the “real” Christian rock and they<br />
will be drawn farther and farther into the CCM world.<br />
One lady left the following comment at a YouTube clip<br />
featuring an “adapted” CCM song. The title is “We Will<br />
Remember” by Tommy Walker.<br />
“I fell in love with this song when it was sang in our<br />
church today. I then got home to find the lyrics on the<br />
Internet. It’s a wonderful song.”<br />
You can be sure that she found more than the mere<br />
“lyrics.”<br />
In this way the appetite for the “real” CCM will spread<br />
throughout the church, and this type <strong>of</strong> thing doesn’t<br />
happen slowly.<br />
Highland Park Baptist Church did not start out as a full blown CCM<br />
venue, but started with s<strong>of</strong>ter sounds first. Is your church adapting<br />
CCM for use in services<br />
If such a pastor becomes convicted that he has allowed<br />
the church to go down a wrong path and tries to turn it<br />
around by issuing clear warnings himself, he will quickly<br />
learn that addicted people (in this case, addicted to<br />
sensual music) fervently defend their addictions.<br />
4. THIS PHILOSOPHY MEANS THE CHURCH IS<br />
ACTUALLY PROMOTING CCM ARTISTS, AND THE<br />
CHURCH MEMBERS WILL DOUBTLESS BE<br />
LULLED INTO LISTENING TO THE “REAL STUFF.”<br />
When church members see that CCM is “adapted” in<br />
their services, at least some <strong>of</strong> them will doubtless obtain<br />
the full-blown stuff to listen to in private.<br />
When they visit Christian bookstores and browse the<br />
music section they will see the same songs that they hear<br />
on Sunday and they will buy the stuff and before long<br />
they will see that real Christian rock is more fun, more<br />
powerful, more enticing than “adapted” Christian rock.<br />
When Lancaster Baptist Church, home <strong>of</strong> West Coast<br />
Baptist College, performed “Shout to the Lord” in a<br />
Sunday service, Cary Schmidt, one <strong>of</strong> the leaders, said,<br />
“Most <strong>of</strong> you have heard this song or know the words to<br />
this song.” He knew that many <strong>of</strong> the church members<br />
were familiar with Hillsong and their music, and I do not<br />
believe that they listen only to the toned down s<strong>of</strong>t rock<br />
versions played in church.<br />
A pastor described to me a scene at a fundamental Baptist<br />
preachers meeting in which Hillsong numbers were sung<br />
as specials by a pastor’s wife. He said, “One session<br />
when she was performing, I was looking across the<br />
auditorium and just happened to see a young pastor<br />
coming out <strong>of</strong> the toilet with a big smile, and he was<br />
miming the words <strong>of</strong> the Hillsong junk she was singing.<br />
So I said to myself, ‘You are not only familiar with this<br />
song, but you have memorized it, and that means it is the<br />
music you listen to with enjoyment.’” Exactly, and he is<br />
probably not listening to the toned down “adapted”<br />
editions!<br />
5. IF A CHURCH IS “ADAPTING” CCM, SOMEONE<br />
IS LISTENING TO “FULL-BLOWN” CCM IN ORDER<br />
TO FIND AND ADAPT “ACCEPTABLE” PIECES.<br />
Typically, if musicians are “adapting” CCM for use in a<br />
conservative church that doesn’t yet allow full-blown<br />
rock & roll, those musicians are listening to “the real<br />
stuff” in order to find something to adapt.<br />
Since rock & roll, even “s<strong>of</strong>t rock,” is highly addictive<br />
and sensual, we know that these musicians rapidly lose<br />
8 1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
their spiritual sensitivity and appetite for truly sacred<br />
music and become lulled into accepting an increasingly<br />
wider range <strong>of</strong> CCM.<br />
Sun Records founder Sam Phillips, who recorded some <strong>of</strong><br />
the first rock & roll hits, including Elvis’ first recording<br />
in 1954, knew the power <strong>of</strong> rock. Reminiscing many<br />
years later about why rock became such a social<br />
phenomenon, he said, “It all came out <strong>of</strong> THAT<br />
INFECTIOUS BEAT and those young people wanting to<br />
FEEL GOOD by listening to some records” (“Rock ‘n’<br />
Roll Pioneer Sam Phillips Dies,” USA Today, July 30,<br />
2003).<br />
Janis Joplin, who died young from the rock & roll<br />
lifestyle, describes her first big concert in these words: “I<br />
couldn’t believe it, all that rhythm and power. I got stoned<br />
just feeling it, like IT WAS THE BEST DOPE IN THE<br />
WORLD. It was SO SENSUAL, so vibrant, loud,<br />
crazy” (Joel Dreyfuss, “Janis Joplin Followed the Script,”<br />
Wichita Eagle, Oct. 6, 1970, p. 7A).<br />
I can concur with that. Rock & roll reached into the<br />
Christian home and church in which I grew up and<br />
absolutely captivated my heart and soul with I was a kid,<br />
and it taught me the path <strong>of</strong> rebellion and godlessness.<br />
Thousands upon thousands have the same testimony.<br />
Are you pastors who are letting your churches dabble<br />
with “adapted” CCM and its s<strong>of</strong>t rock willing to take the<br />
chance that your carelessness in the matter <strong>of</strong> music will<br />
cause some young people to <strong>of</strong>fend and go the way <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world, the flesh, and the devil Is it not better and wiser<br />
to err on the side <strong>of</strong> safety<br />
Rock can be hard or s<strong>of</strong>t, fast or slow, loud or quiet, and it<br />
is still rock because it still has a sensual, heavily<br />
syncopated swing rhythm that moves the body, and it is<br />
still “infectious” and it still makes people “feel good.”<br />
With the musicians being influenced by “real” CCM,<br />
their influence spreads throughout the church body.<br />
A typical private conversation will be, “Hey, listen to this<br />
new cut by Darlene Zschech! Hey, you won’t believe this<br />
new Vineyard CD! Cool stuff!”<br />
6. THE ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE “ROCK” FROM<br />
CHRISTIAN ROCK TYPICALLY RESULTS IN<br />
MERELY TONING DOWN THE MUSIC FROM HARD<br />
ROCK TO SOFT ROCK.<br />
Those who adapt CCM do so because that particular<br />
church still says it is opposed to CCM so they can’t use it<br />
full blown. They have to tone down the rhythm. They<br />
have to try to take the rock out <strong>of</strong> Christian rock. The<br />
pastor won’t allow a rock band on stage and is afraid <strong>of</strong><br />
thumping bass guitars and drums, so the music people<br />
“adapt” it to whatever model is acceptable.<br />
Typically, though, this is done merely by replacing hard<br />
rock with s<strong>of</strong>t rock, and since it isn’t loud and boisterous<br />
and doesn’t have a heavy thump and the singers aren’t<br />
shaking around and there is no light show or smoke,<br />
everyone is satisfied that they are avoiding CCM.<br />
The problem is that the back beat and other elements <strong>of</strong><br />
s<strong>of</strong>t rock are still there but it is much more subtle and the<br />
s<strong>of</strong>t rock rhythm is created by the pianists and perhaps<br />
other musicians rather than guitarists and a drummer with<br />
a trap set.<br />
It’s s<strong>of</strong>t rock or Southern Gospel honky tonk, and it is just<br />
as sensual and addictive to the flesh as hard rock. And it<br />
creates an appetite for such music that is never satisfied.<br />
7. THIS PHILOSOPHY RESULTS IN THE SAME OLD<br />
SLIPPERY SLOPE.<br />
For the previous reasons, the “adaptation” <strong>of</strong> CCM<br />
launches a church down the slippery contemporary slope<br />
as surely as if they had brought in a pure rock band.<br />
It results in the gradual acceptance <strong>of</strong> and increasing use<br />
<strong>of</strong> CCM, a gradual allowance for sensual rhythms, the<br />
continual pushing <strong>of</strong> the boundaries.<br />
We repeat the warning that many discerning men have<br />
issued about this slippery slope and its outcome:<br />
“When the standard <strong>of</strong> music is LOWERED, then the<br />
standard <strong>of</strong> dress is also lowered. When the standard <strong>of</strong><br />
dress is lowered, then the standard <strong>of</strong> conduct is also<br />
lowered. When the standard <strong>of</strong> conduct is lowered, then<br />
the sense <strong>of</strong> value in God’s truth is lowered” (Evangelist<br />
Gordon Sears, Songfest newsletter, <strong>April</strong> 2001).<br />
The late Gordon Sears, who I had the privilege <strong>of</strong><br />
meeting the day before he died, loved the Lord and loved<br />
the Lord’s churches, and he was deeply concerned about<br />
what is happening among fundamental Baptists. In the<br />
1990s the number <strong>of</strong> his meetings dropped significantly<br />
because so many churches had changed their music<br />
standards, and they didn’t want an evangelist to come in<br />
and shake the boat. Notice that Sears said that the<br />
standard <strong>of</strong> music doesn’t have to be radically changed. It<br />
just has to be lowered, and that leads to a downward<br />
progression that will ultimately result in a lowering <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sense <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> truth itself. A church can hold to<br />
truth, to doctrinal soundness, without truly valuing it or<br />
1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21 9
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
deeply caring for it, and this happens when it buys into<br />
the CCM philosophy that “love” and “unity” are more<br />
important than doctrinal purity.<br />
“If a church starts using CCM, it will eventually lose all<br />
other standards” (Dr. Frank Garlock, Bob Jones<br />
University, chapel, March 12, 2001).<br />
Dr. Garlock is dogmatic here and doesn’t allow for any<br />
exceptions. I hope he has warned West Coast about this,<br />
because to “adapt” CCM is doubtless the same as “using<br />
CCM.”<br />
“Perhaps nothing precipitates a slide toward New<br />
Evangelicalism more than the introduction <strong>of</strong><br />
Contemporary Christian Music. This inevitably leads<br />
toward a gradual slide in other areas as well until the<br />
entire church is infiltrated by ideas and programs alien to<br />
the original position <strong>of</strong> the church” (Dr. Ernest Pickering,<br />
The Tragedy <strong>of</strong> Compromise: The Origin and Impact <strong>of</strong><br />
the New Evangelicalism, Bob Jones University Press,<br />
1994).<br />
The late Dr. Pickering warned that the introduction <strong>of</strong><br />
CCM precipitates a slide toward New Evangelicalism<br />
more than anything else. That is a powerful statement.<br />
And observe that he said this slide is initiated by the mere<br />
“INTRODUCTION” <strong>of</strong> CCM. It doesn’t have to be a full<br />
blown reception. CCM just has to be introduced, and the<br />
church is on its way to New Evangelicalism. This is<br />
because the “introduction” <strong>of</strong> CCM at any level and in<br />
any way brings the church into intimate association with<br />
the world <strong>of</strong> CCM which is totally, passionately<br />
committed to the New Evangelical philosophy at best,<br />
and to “ideas and programs alien” to the position <strong>of</strong> an<br />
old-fashioned Baptist church.<br />
“Good fundamental Baptists and others that refuse the<br />
teachings <strong>of</strong> the charismatic crowd concerning tongues,<br />
signs, miracles, and so forth are NOW SINGING THEIR<br />
MUSIC in our churches and preparing our people for the<br />
world, the flesh and the Devil. It is the new Trojan Horse<br />
move ... to deaden our churches to spiritual truth” (Victor<br />
Sears, Baptist Bible Tribune, 1981).<br />
This amazing warning was given 30 years ago! That was<br />
before CCM began to sweep into IB churches. But Victor<br />
Sears saw it as “the new Trojan Horse move ... to deaden<br />
our churches to spiritual truth.” He knew that that the<br />
contemporary music brings a contemporary philosophy,<br />
and he was deeply concerned. Sears was a leader in the<br />
Baptist Bible Fellowship International, and this was the<br />
first group <strong>of</strong> Independent Baptists that “introduced”<br />
CCM. It started with the use <strong>of</strong> contemporary background<br />
tapes for singing specials. I recall attending a BBFI<br />
preacher’s conference in the 1980s. The music was CCM<br />
even then. In light <strong>of</strong> these warnings, it is not surprising<br />
that the BBFI today has capitulated entirely to the New<br />
Evangelical philosophy. Victor Sears predicted it, and the<br />
men <strong>of</strong> real conviction and moral courage left long ago.<br />
10 1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21
Martin Luther stood up to the most powerful forces on the earth in his day, and he did it to defend the God <strong>of</strong> scripture from the wicked heresies <strong>of</strong><br />
the Roman Catholic Church. While we certainly could not condone all his doctrine, it’s hard not to appreciate the boldness <strong>of</strong> a man who is willing<br />
to die for Bible truth. You have only to read the lyrics <strong>of</strong> his hymns to understand that he did not believe in “The Shack” god. “Did we in our own<br />
strength confide, our striving would be losing; Were not the right Man on our side, the Man <strong>of</strong> God’s own choosing: Dost ask who that may be<br />
Christ Jesus, it is He; Lord Sabaoth, His Name, from age to age the same, And He must win the battle.”<br />
CCM Permeated With False Christs and False Gods<br />
A pastor who wrote to criticize me for the warning about<br />
West Coast’s adaptation <strong>of</strong> CCM, said that if my position<br />
is right and that if we should stop using CCM because <strong>of</strong><br />
the heresies <strong>of</strong> the writers, we should also stop using the<br />
old Protestant hymns, such as those by Martin Luther,<br />
Charles Wesley, and Fanny Crosby, and we should also<br />
stop using the King James Bible, because it was written<br />
by Anglicans.<br />
Whatever doctrinal differences a Baptist would have with<br />
Martin Luther or John Wesley or Fanny Crosby or KJV<br />
translator John Rainolds, we share the same God, but that<br />
is <strong>of</strong>ten not true for Contemporary Christian Worship.<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> the influential CCW artists worship A NON-<br />
TRINITARIAN GOD. Geron Davis, Joel Hemphill, Mark<br />
Carouthers, Phillips, Craig and Dean, Lanny Wolfe, and<br />
others are “Jesus Only” Pentecostals who deny the<br />
Trinity. To deny the Trinity is to worship a false God.<br />
Other CCW artists worship A NON-VENGEFUL GOD.<br />
Stuart Townend, for example, who writes “modern<br />
hymns” popular in IB churches, denies that God is<br />
vengeful, which is a brazen rejection <strong>of</strong> the very God <strong>of</strong><br />
the Bible (Stuart Townend, “Mission: Worship, The Story<br />
Behind the Song”, http://www.youtube.com/watch<br />
v=BdVQNyQmdM4).<br />
A great many <strong>of</strong> the CCM artists worship A NON-<br />
JUDGMENTAL GOD. Consider the popularity <strong>of</strong> The<br />
Shack among CCM artists. It has been directly endorsed<br />
by Michael W. Smith and others CCM artists has been<br />
well received in prominent CCM circles such as Calvary<br />
Chapels, Vineyard churches, and Hillsong. It was<br />
promoted at the 2009 National Pastor’s Convention in<br />
San Diego, which was sponsored by Zondervan and<br />
InterVarsity Fellowship. Young was one <strong>of</strong> the speakers<br />
and a survey found that 57% had read the novel. Young<br />
was enthusiastically received, and in an interview with<br />
Andy Crouch, a senior editor <strong>of</strong> Christianity Today, there<br />
was not a hint <strong>of</strong> condemnation for his false god. Crouch<br />
is a CCM musician in his own right and led one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
praise and worship sessions in San Diego.<br />
The Shack is all about redefining God. It is about a man<br />
who becomes bitter at God after his daughter is murdered
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
l-r: William P. Young, Rob Bell, G. Bromley Oxnam. Modernism changes faces and tacks, but is still a lie <strong>of</strong> the Devil.<br />
and has a life-changing experience in the very shack<br />
where the murder occurred; but the God he encounters is<br />
most definitely not the God <strong>of</strong> the Bible.<br />
Young says the book is for those with “a longing that God<br />
is as kind and loving as we wish he was” (interview with<br />
Sherman Hu, Dec. 4, 2007). What he is referring to is the<br />
desire on the part <strong>of</strong> the natural man for a God who loves<br />
“unconditionally” and does not require obedience, does<br />
not require repentance, does not judge sin, and does not<br />
make men feel guilty for what they do.<br />
In that same interview, Young said that a woman wrote to<br />
him and said that her 22-year-old daughter came to her<br />
after reading the book and asked, “IS IT ALRIGHT IF I<br />
DIVORCE THE OLD GOD AND MARRY THE NEW<br />
ONE”<br />
This is precisely what a very large portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Contemporary Christian Music crowd is doing.<br />
Young admits that the God <strong>of</strong> “The Shack” is different<br />
from the traditional God <strong>of</strong> Bible-believing Christianity<br />
and blasphemously says that the God who “watches from<br />
a distance and judges sin” is “a Christianized version <strong>of</strong><br />
Zeus.”<br />
This reminds me <strong>of</strong> the modernist G. Bromley Oxnam,<br />
who called the God <strong>of</strong> the Old Testament “a dirty bully”<br />
in his 1944 book Preaching in a Revolutionary Age.<br />
Young depicts the triune God as a young Asian woman<br />
named “Sarayu” * (supposedly the Holy Spirit), an<br />
oriental carpenter who loves to have a good time<br />
(supposedly Jesus), and an older black woman named<br />
“Elousia” (supposedly God the Father). God the Father is<br />
also depicted as a guy with a ponytail and a goatee. (*<br />
The name “Sarayu” is from the Hindu scriptures and<br />
represents a mythical river in India on the shores <strong>of</strong> which<br />
the Hindu god Rama was born.)<br />
Young’s god is the god <strong>of</strong> the emerging church. He is<br />
cool, loves rock & roll, is non-judgmental, does not<br />
exercise wrath toward sin, does not send unbelievers to an<br />
eternal fiery hell, does not require repentance and the new<br />
birth, puts no obligations on people. (See “The Shack’s<br />
Cool God” at the <strong>Way</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> web site,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org.)<br />
The false CCM non-judgmental, universalistic god is<br />
represented by emerging church leaders Brian McLaren<br />
and Rob Bell, both <strong>of</strong> whom are very popular with CCM<br />
artists. One Christian rocker told us that these writings<br />
“resonate” with him.<br />
McLaren calls the God who punished Jesus on the cross<br />
for man’s sin “a God who is incapable <strong>of</strong> forgiving,<br />
unless he kicks somebody else” (McLaren, http://<br />
www.understandthetimes.org/mclarentrans.shtml and<br />
http://str.typepad.com/weblog/2006/01/<br />
brian_mclaren_p.html). He presents the traditional God <strong>of</strong><br />
the Bible as a tyrant who “gets his way through coercion<br />
and violence and intimidation and domination. McLaren<br />
says that the “power <strong>of</strong> the blood” gospel “raises some<br />
questions about the goodness <strong>of</strong> God.”<br />
Rob Bell, author <strong>of</strong> the influential book Velvet Elvis,<br />
claims that the God who would allow multitudes to go to<br />
12 1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
Brian McLaren believes nothing you believe about the God <strong>of</strong> the Bible. He denies, questions, twists and perverts every doctrine <strong>of</strong> scripture and<br />
does it with a sly grin and a pleasing tone <strong>of</strong> voice. These men are eternally dangerous to our children and grandchildren and they have their<br />
sights set on them.<br />
eternal hell is not great or mighty (Love Wins, location<br />
1189-1229). He says that such God is not loving and calls<br />
the preaching <strong>of</strong> eternal hell “misguided and toxic.” says<br />
there is something wrong with this God and calls Him<br />
“terrifying and traumatizing and unbearable” (Love Wins,<br />
location 47-60, 1273-1287, 2098-2113). He even says<br />
that if an earthly father acted like the God who sends<br />
people to hell “we could contact child protection services<br />
immediately” (Love Wins, location 2085-2098).<br />
It is obvious that Bell worships a different God than the<br />
One we worship in “traditional” Baptist churches.<br />
Bell’s God is more akin to New Age panentheism than<br />
the God <strong>of</strong> the Bible. He describes God as “a force, an<br />
energy, a being calling out to us in many languages, using<br />
a variety <strong>of</strong> methods and events” (Love Wins, location<br />
1710-1724).<br />
“There is an energy in the world, a spark, an electricity<br />
that everything is plugged into. The Greeks called it zoe,<br />
the mystics call it ‘Spirit,’ and Obi-Wan called it ‘the<br />
Force’” (Love Wins, location 1749-1762).<br />
Bell worships a false christ. His Jesus is “supracultural ...<br />
present within all cultures ... refuses to be co-opted or<br />
owned by any one culture ... He doesn’t even state that<br />
those coming to the Father through him will even now<br />
that they are coming exclusively through him ... there is<br />
only mountain, but many paths. ... People come to Jesus<br />
in all sorts <strong>of</strong> ways ... Sometimes people use his name;<br />
other times they don’t” (Love Wins, location 1827-1840,<br />
1865-1878, 1918-1933).<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> the CCM artists worship A REBEL CHRIST,<br />
which is certainly a false christ. Mark Stuart <strong>of</strong> Audio<br />
Adrenaline says, “Jesus Christ is the biggest rebel to ever<br />
walk the face <strong>of</strong> the earth” (Pensacola News Journal,<br />
1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21 13
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
Pensacola, Fla., March 1, 1998, pp. 1, 6E). Sonny <strong>of</strong><br />
P.O.D. says, “We believe that Jesus was the first rebel; the<br />
first punk rocker” (http://www.shoutweb.com/interviews/<br />
pod0700.phtml). This is absolute blasphemy. The Bible<br />
says rebellion is as the sin <strong>of</strong> witchcraft (1 Sam. 15:23).<br />
A rebel is a lawbreaker, but Christ was the lawgiver who<br />
He came to earth to fulfill the requirements <strong>of</strong> His own<br />
law (Matt. 5:17-19). Christ was not crucified for<br />
rebellion; He was crucified for testifying that He is God<br />
(John 10:33).<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> the CCM artists worship A ROCK & ROLL<br />
PARTY CHRIST. In his Live ... Radically Saved video<br />
Carman says, “Jesus is always cool; He’s got his thing<br />
together.” In Resurrection Rap Carman portrays Jesus as<br />
a street hippie; in The Standard he calls Jesus “J.C.”; and<br />
in Addicted to Jesus he speaks <strong>of</strong> “Jammin’ with the<br />
Lamb.” Petra claims that “God gave rock and roll to you/<br />
Put it in the soul <strong>of</strong> every one.” In “Party in Heaven” the<br />
Daniel Band sang, “The Lamb and I are drinkin’ new<br />
wine.” Phil Driscoll says, “God is the King <strong>of</strong> Soul; He’s<br />
the King <strong>of</strong> all rhythm” (quoted by Tim Fisher, Battle for<br />
Christian Music, p. 82). Messiah Prophet Band says,<br />
“Jesus is the Master <strong>of</strong> Metal,” and Barren Cross says,<br />
“Better than pot, Jesus rocks.” John Fischer described<br />
God as puffing on a cigar and swaying to rock music<br />
(CCM Magazine, July 1984, p. 20), while J. Lee Grady<br />
says Jesus enjoys dancing with the angels and “grooving<br />
to the sound <strong>of</strong> Christian R&B pumped out <strong>of</strong> a boom<br />
box” (Charisma, July 2000).<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
The fact that the CCM crowd typically worships a<br />
different kind <strong>of</strong> God than the “old-fashioned” Biblicist,<br />
is why they are perfectly comfortable using music that<br />
has been identified as sexy by the secular world.<br />
“... that is what rock is all about--sex with a 100-megaton<br />
bomb, the beat” (Gene Simmons <strong>of</strong> KISS, Entertainment<br />
Tonight, ABC, Dec. 10, 1987).<br />
Note that Simmons was not referring to the words <strong>of</strong> rock<br />
music; he was referring only to its backbeat rhythm.<br />
Music researchers Daniel and Bernadette Skubik, in their<br />
study on the neurophysiology <strong>of</strong> rock music, warned:<br />
“Whether the words are evil, innocuous, or based in Holy<br />
Scripture, the overall neurophysiological effects<br />
generated by rock music remain the same. There is<br />
simply no such thing as Christian rock that is<br />
substantively different in its impact” (“The<br />
Neurophysiology <strong>of</strong> Rock,” an Appendix to Ken<br />
Blanchard’s Pop Goes the Gospel, pp. 187ff).<br />
The reason that statement doesn’t bother a CCM defender<br />
is because he sees Jesus as a rock & roll party Dude who<br />
loves a good time.<br />
“Those who envision God as a special friend, a kind <strong>of</strong><br />
lover, with whom they can have fun, see no problem in<br />
worshipping him by means <strong>of</strong> physically stimulating<br />
music. On the other hand, those who perceive God as a<br />
majestic, holy, and almighty Being to be approached with<br />
awe and reverence will only use the music that elevates<br />
them spiritually” (Samuele Bacchiocchi, The Christian<br />
and Rock Music).<br />
14 1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
D IGGING IN THE W ALLS<br />
God commanded the prophet Ezekiel to dig in<br />
the walls <strong>of</strong> Israel's temple and observe the evils<br />
being done in secret by apostate religious<br />
leaders <strong>of</strong> that day. "Then said he unto me, Son<br />
<strong>of</strong> man, dig now in the wall ... And he said unto<br />
me, Go in, and behold the wicked abominations<br />
that they do here. So I went in and<br />
saw. ..." (Ezek. 8:7-10).<br />
Ezekiel was then instructed to preach against<br />
the errors <strong>of</strong> the leaders and to tell the people<br />
the things he had witnessed.<br />
"Therefore prophesy against them, prophesy, O<br />
son <strong>of</strong> man. ... Then I spake unto them <strong>of</strong> the<br />
captivity all the things that the Lord had<br />
shewed me" (Ezek. 11:4,25).<br />
The hour in which we live is very similar to<br />
that <strong>of</strong> Ezekiel's day. Many <strong>of</strong> those who pr<strong>of</strong>ess<br />
to be the people <strong>of</strong> God are apostate. It was<br />
prophesied in the New Testament Scriptures<br />
that such would be the case in the closing hours<br />
<strong>of</strong> our age. This will culminate in the brief<br />
worldwide rule <strong>of</strong> an utterly apostate Harlot<br />
"church" (2 Tim. 3-4; 1 Tim. 4; 2 Pet. 2-3; Jude;<br />
Rev. 17).<br />
As in Ezekiel's day much <strong>of</strong> the apostasy <strong>of</strong> our<br />
hour is hidden from the view <strong>of</strong> the average<br />
Christian. We intend by God's grace to "dig in<br />
the walls" <strong>of</strong> modern ecumenism and to expose<br />
and cry out against the things we find. In this<br />
section we also report on secular events which<br />
are relevant to Christians. May God give us ears<br />
to hear, minds to understand, and hearts to obey.<br />
Is the truth <strong>of</strong> God not worthy <strong>of</strong> defense<br />
DESPERATE TIMES FOR<br />
I N D E P E N D E N T B A P T I S T<br />
CHURCHES (Friday Church News<br />
N o t e s , M a r c h 4 , 2 0 1 1 ,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org,<br />
866-295-4143) - Over the past 15 years<br />
we have seen dramatic changes within<br />
Independent Baptist churches. Large<br />
numbers <strong>of</strong> them have moved from “old<br />
fashioned” conservative to contemporary.<br />
Everywhere I travel these days for Bible<br />
conferences the pastors tell me about<br />
churches in their areas that have<br />
capitulated to the contemporary<br />
philosophy and are now enemies <strong>of</strong> what<br />
they used to stand for. For example,<br />
Akron Baptist Temple in Akron, Ohio,<br />
was taken in the contemporary direction<br />
by the founder’s grandson, Dallas R.<br />
Billington, (shown above) who became<br />
the pastor in 1996. Today, the Akron<br />
Baptist Temple is an emerging church<br />
with a “traditional service” called The<br />
Temple and a raunchy contemporary<br />
service called The Bridge. The church<br />
<strong>of</strong>fers a smorgasbord <strong>of</strong> worship<br />
“experiences.” It’s all me and my tastes<br />
and my choices. How 21st century! How<br />
2 <strong>Timothy</strong> 3:3-4! In The Bridge a loud<br />
rock & roll band plays 7/11 (seven words<br />
sung 11 times) contemporary worship<br />
music in a darkened auditorium. The<br />
service is advertised as “creating an<br />
environment where people who are<br />
seeking God, can do so in a nonthreatening,<br />
comfortable way.” It is all<br />
about “experiencing God.” (For more<br />
examples, see “Contemporary Music<br />
Brings Great Changes to Churches,”<br />
FBIS, September 28, 2010). If something<br />
isn’t done, something drastic and<br />
dramatic and truly direction changing, the<br />
VAST majority <strong>of</strong> IB churches will be<br />
well down the emerging path within 10<br />
years,. It’s not time to beat around the<br />
bush. It’s not time to play footsie with the<br />
good old boy IB network. It’s not time to<br />
be afraid <strong>of</strong> being blacklisted, slandered,<br />
and mocked by the “majority.” It’s not<br />
time to sit on the sidelines and enjoy the<br />
fight. It’s not time to worry about some<br />
leader’s feelings. This is real spiritual<br />
warfare, friends. “When thou sawest a<br />
thief, then thou consentedst with him, and<br />
h a s t b e e n p a r t a k e r w i t h<br />
adulterers” (Psalm 50:18). “The best <strong>of</strong><br />
them is as a brier: the most upright is<br />
sharper than a thorn hedge: the day <strong>of</strong> thy<br />
watchmen and thy visitation cometh; now<br />
shall be their perplexity” (Micah 7:4).<br />
THE INDEPENDENT BAPTIST<br />
HYPOCRISY ABOUT WARNINGS<br />
(Friday Church News Notes, March 4,<br />
<strong>2011</strong>, www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org<br />
fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org, 866-295-4143) -<br />
This brouhaha about my warning about<br />
West Coast’s music has reminded me that<br />
there is a lot <strong>of</strong> hypocrisy on this issue.<br />
The vast majority <strong>of</strong> IB preachers give<br />
themselves the liberty to warn about men<br />
and ministries outside <strong>of</strong> the IB<br />
movement (without first contacting<br />
them), but they draw the line at issuing<br />
the same type <strong>of</strong> warning about the errors<br />
<strong>of</strong> IB leaders and ministries, regardless <strong>of</strong><br />
the fact that these ministries have a large<br />
PUBLIC influence, an influence that<br />
reaches into multitudes <strong>of</strong> IB churches<br />
beyond their own borders. We’re allowed<br />
to warn about Rick Warren and his music<br />
but not about Paul Chappell’s; about Bill<br />
Bright and Campus Crusade’s<br />
unscriptural soul-winning but not Bob<br />
Gray’s <strong>of</strong> Texas; about John Piper and his<br />
Christian hedonism but not Matt Olson <strong>of</strong><br />
Northland who teaches a similar<br />
philosophy; about Mark Driscoll and his<br />
cultural liberalism but not Tom Messer <strong>of</strong><br />
Trinity Baptist in Jacksonville; about the<br />
SBC’s unity in diversity philosophy but<br />
not Clarence Sexton’s similar error in<br />
Independent Baptist Friends<br />
International; about the SDA and their<br />
cultic traits but not some IB preacher and<br />
his cultic “unquestioning loyalty.” It<br />
seems to me that any preacher who has<br />
ever warned about men and ministries<br />
without first contacting them and who has<br />
turned around and condemned me for not<br />
first contacting Pastor Chappell is simply<br />
a hypocrite. A pastor friend who read a<br />
1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21 15
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
pre-publication edition <strong>of</strong> this little piece<br />
commented, “I would mention 1 Peter<br />
4:17 about judgment beginning at the<br />
house <strong>of</strong> God. From this we learn that we<br />
are to deal with sin in our backyard even<br />
before we deal with it in the SBC, etc. So<br />
we need to be MORE concerned about<br />
error in IB churches and colleges and<br />
conferences than we are about Robert<br />
Schuller’s show.” Also, among the many<br />
interesting e-mails I have received on this<br />
issue recently is the following:<br />
“When preachers say you should have<br />
talked to Pastor Chappell privately first, I<br />
was reminded about Galatians 2:14: ‘But<br />
when I saw that they walked not uprightly<br />
according to the truth <strong>of</strong> the gospel, I said<br />
u n t o P e t e r b e f o r e t h e m a l l . . . ’<br />
Paul rebuked Peter before them all<br />
b e c a u s e t h e y w e r e n ’ t w a l k i n g<br />
uprightly. This seems to apply here. They<br />
(West Coast Baptist College and other IB<br />
churches) are not walking uprightly,<br />
so scripturally Pastor Chappell is rebuked<br />
before all. Without this rebuke before all,<br />
even a Barnabas might be ‘carried away<br />
with their dissimulation’ (Gal 3:13).” “For<br />
the time is come that judgment must<br />
begin at the house <strong>of</strong> God: and if it first<br />
begin at us, what shall the end be <strong>of</strong> them<br />
that obey not the gospel <strong>of</strong> God” (1 Peter<br />
4:17).<br />
SPEAKER AT RICK WARREN<br />
CONFERENCE URGES CHURCHES<br />
TO DROP BRANDS AND NETWORK<br />
WITH BARBARIANS (Friday Church<br />
N e w s N o t e s , M a r c h 4 , 2 0 1 1 ,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org,<br />
866-295-4143) - Speaking at Rick<br />
Warren’s Radicalls conference on<br />
February 25, emerging church pastor<br />
Dave Gibbons called on Christians to<br />
forgo their names and to network with<br />
barbarians. Gibbons, pastor <strong>of</strong> Newsong<br />
Community Church <strong>of</strong> Irvine, California,<br />
said the world believes churches are a<br />
“sham” because we aren’t united enough.<br />
He suggested that churches forego their<br />
individual names and simply call<br />
themselves “the church,” adding, “You<br />
can do a lot for the Kingdom <strong>of</strong> God if<br />
you forget about your brand” (“Dave<br />
Gibbons,” Christian Post, Feb. 26, <strong>2011</strong>).<br />
But “brands” are marks <strong>of</strong> identification.<br />
I’m glad that canned food has labels, and<br />
in light <strong>of</strong> the Bible’s emphasis on the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> sound doctrine and its<br />
frequent warnings that apostasy and<br />
heresy will be widespread, particularly in<br />
the last days, it would be foolish in the<br />
extreme not to want to know what a<br />
church believes. Actually, it is difficult to<br />
understand what Gibbons is getting at,<br />
because the churches with which he is<br />
associated gave up their “brands” long<br />
ago. Now they are just “Newsong” or<br />
“Saddleback” or “Vineyard” or whatever.<br />
Gibbons also advised that churches work<br />
with “barbarians--or people other than the<br />
ones they don’t always network with.” On<br />
his church’s web site, Gibbons calls<br />
himself “Social Entrepreneur and Lead<br />
Pastor” and agrees with unbelievers that<br />
non-emerging churches are “irrelevant,<br />
boring, hypocritical.” Newsong is heavily<br />
involved with “social justice” issues and<br />
artsy projects. It is culturally cutting-edge,<br />
technologically savvy, very cool. The<br />
church’s statement <strong>of</strong> faith has nine<br />
simple doctrines including support for<br />
infant baptism. At the Radicalls<br />
conference Rick Warren echoed Gibbons’<br />
call for unity, saying that “we’re all on the<br />
same team.” To the contrary, the Bible<br />
warns that “evil men and seducers shall<br />
wax worse and worse, deceiving, and<br />
being deceived” (2 <strong>Timothy</strong> 3:13), and,<br />
“Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them<br />
which cause divisions and <strong>of</strong>fences<br />
contrary to the doctrine which ye have<br />
learned; and avoid them” (Romans<br />
16:17), and, “Be ye not unequally yoked<br />
together with unbelievers: for what<br />
fellowship hath righteousness with<br />
unrighteousness and what communion<br />
hath light with darkness” (2 Corinthians<br />
6:14). It would be interesting to know if<br />
Rick Warren ever warns about false<br />
teachers in any plain sense. What he does<br />
do, though, is to liken biblical<br />
fundamentalists to Islamic<br />
fundamentalists. The man has a frightful<br />
lot to account for, but he refuses the<br />
“criticism” that could help him repent.<br />
EMERGING PREACHERS TO<br />
SPEAK AT SOUTHERN BAPTIST<br />
PASTOR’S CONFERENCE (Friday<br />
Church News Notes, March 18, <strong>2011</strong>,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org,<br />
866-295-4143) - The annual Southern<br />
Baptist Pastors’ Conference this year<br />
features at least four emerging preachers:<br />
Rick Warren <strong>of</strong> Saddleback Church,<br />
Louie Giglio (shown above) <strong>of</strong> Passion<br />
City Church in Atlanta, Paul Gotthardt <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Life</strong> Baptist Church in Las Vegas, and<br />
Darrin Patrick <strong>of</strong> The Journey Church in<br />
St. Louis (home <strong>of</strong> “Theology at the<br />
Bottleworks” where participants “grab a<br />
beer and discuss spiritual topics”).<br />
Actually, all <strong>of</strong> the speakers at the SBC<br />
conference are emerging in philosophy<br />
after the fashion <strong>of</strong> Seattle’s Mark<br />
Driscoll (“theologically conservative and<br />
culturally liberal”), and right in the<br />
middle <strong>of</strong> the pack is John Piper, who is<br />
influencing many fundamental Baptists.<br />
The June SBC conference will be Piper’s<br />
second joint meeting with Rick Warren. In<br />
<strong>April</strong>, Piper is scheduled to conduct a<br />
Desiring God conference at Saddleback<br />
Church. The “fundamentalists” who are<br />
moving in the direction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
“conservative evangelical” John Piper<br />
(such as Kevin Bauder <strong>of</strong> Central Baptist<br />
Seminary who praises Piper in his blog)<br />
need to explain how such a conservative<br />
man is so spiritually blind that he would<br />
yoke together with an apostate like Rick<br />
Warren, who says God won’t ask about<br />
your doctrinal views; who continually and<br />
approvingly and non-critically quotes<br />
from heretics such as Roman Catholic<br />
universalists Mother Teresa, Henri<br />
Nouwen, and Thomas Merton; who likens<br />
Christian fundamentalists to Islamic<br />
fundamentalists; who calls for unity<br />
between Baptists, Roman Catholics,<br />
Anglicans, etc.; who promotes the<br />
exceedingly liberal Baptist World<br />
Alliance; who yokes together with New<br />
Age practitioners such as Mehmet Oz,<br />
who promotes occultic Reiki, and Daniel<br />
Amen who promotes the filthy Hindu<br />
Tantra Yoga; and who presents Roman<br />
Catholic inter-spiritualist globalist Tony<br />
Blair with a peace prize at Saddleback<br />
Church (March <strong>2011</strong>). Hasn’t Warren read<br />
the Bible, which states that there is no<br />
peace to the wicked (Isaiah 48:22; 57:21)<br />
“Conservative evangelical,” indeed! The<br />
16 1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
Southern Baptist Convention is an<br />
unscriptural, frightfully worldly, mixed<br />
multitude <strong>of</strong> “evangelicals,” charismatics,<br />
modernists, Masons, modern textual<br />
critics, theistic evolutionists, New Agers,<br />
female preachers, pastor-ruling deacons,<br />
and women-run churches, all dancing to<br />
the beat <strong>of</strong> rock & roll, and the fact that<br />
many Independent Baptist preachers are<br />
moving in the direction <strong>of</strong> the SBC in<br />
sympathy and philosophy and most<br />
IBaptist preachers <strong>of</strong> influence are saying<br />
nothing publicly is truly frightful to a man<br />
who grew up in that denomination and<br />
knows it all too well from inside-out. And<br />
please don’t say that it has gotten better,<br />
because I can prove that such is not the<br />
case. A few things have improved at a<br />
certain level, but in most ways the<br />
corruption has continued to progress<br />
steadily.<br />
The Hindu goddess Kali. No one is writing<br />
books railing against her; atheists seem to save<br />
all their venom for the God <strong>of</strong> the Bible.<br />
There’s a message in that.<br />
ATHEISTS ANGRY AT GOD (Friday<br />
Church News Notes, March 18, <strong>2011</strong>,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org,<br />
866-295-4143) - The amazing title <strong>of</strong> a<br />
recent CCN report was “Anger at God<br />
Common, Even Among Atheists” (Jan. 1,<br />
<strong>2011</strong>). A series <strong>of</strong> studies in the Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Personality and Social Psychology has<br />
found that people get angry at God all the<br />
time and “atheists and agnostics reported<br />
more anger at God during their lifetimes<br />
than believers.” On the other hand, “more<br />
religious people are more likely to see<br />
God’s intentions as well-meaning.” What<br />
was not addressed is the strange issue <strong>of</strong><br />
why an atheist would be angry at a myth.<br />
My educated guess would be that the<br />
“God” the atheist and agnostic are angry<br />
at is the very God described in the Bible,<br />
the Almighty Creator God, and not Zeus<br />
or Kali or Mother Earth or a vague New<br />
Age Higher Power. This again proves the<br />
truth and reality <strong>of</strong> the Bible, which says<br />
that it is the fool who says there is no God<br />
and men have a knowledge <strong>of</strong> God in<br />
their hearts and conscience but they have<br />
rebelled against Him and are at enmity<br />
with Him (e.g., Psalm 14:1; Romans<br />
3:18-21; 8:7). We are thankful that the<br />
Good News is that salvation is available<br />
through Jesus Christ for sinners who will<br />
repent, acknowledging their rebellion and<br />
surrendering to God’s authority, and put<br />
their faith in Christ’s Atonement which<br />
He purchased on the Cross. “Whom God<br />
hath set forth to be a propitiation through<br />
faith in his blood, to declare his<br />
righteousness for the remission <strong>of</strong> sins<br />
that are past, through the forbearance <strong>of</strong><br />
God” (Romans 3:25).<br />
DESTRUCTION OF THE AFRICAN<br />
AMERICAN POPULATION<br />
THROUGH BIRTH CONTROL AND<br />
ABORTION (Friday Church News<br />
N o t e s , M a r c h 1 8 , 2 0 1 1 ,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org,<br />
866-295-4143) - According to a new<br />
report by the New York City Department<br />
<strong>of</strong> Health, 59.8 percent <strong>of</strong> African-<br />
American pregnancies in 2009 ended in<br />
abortion. A whopping 60% <strong>of</strong> black<br />
babies in “Christian” America are brutally<br />
murdered in the womb! What has brought<br />
this terrible situation about For one, it is<br />
the fruit <strong>of</strong> apostate churches. A majority<br />
<strong>of</strong> black Americans are pr<strong>of</strong>essing<br />
Christians, but obviously this Christianity<br />
has no biblical substance, because even<br />
while pr<strong>of</strong>essing to “love Jesus” it is<br />
typical to shamelessly indulge in every<br />
wicked thing, and The same is true for<br />
white Christians and every color <strong>of</strong><br />
Christians in these evil days. And no<br />
surprise when we are plagued with<br />
adulterous “reverends” like Jesse Jackson.<br />
How many blacks have stood up to<br />
condemn the gross hypocrisy <strong>of</strong> these<br />
“men <strong>of</strong> the cloth” Multitudes <strong>of</strong><br />
churches today are moral cesspools.<br />
Another thing that has destroyed morality<br />
among American blacks is the modern<br />
Welfare State, which has turned millions<br />
<strong>of</strong> people into perpetual slaves living on<br />
the dole and which has helped destroy the<br />
family. Of those who are not killed in the<br />
womb, a large majority are raised by<br />
single-parent mothers. Many other things<br />
could be mentioned, but another major<br />
cause <strong>of</strong> the massacre <strong>of</strong> African-<br />
American blacks through abortion is the<br />
Darwinian eugenics movement. This<br />
movement and philosophy, which<br />
flourished prior to World War II, is based<br />
on Darwinian natural selection. Founded<br />
by Charles Darwin’s cousin, Francis<br />
Galton, eugenics was built upon the idea<br />
that the white race is superior and should<br />
be kept pure from intermixture with other<br />
“races.” In Germany the eugenics<br />
movement was called “race hygiene.”<br />
Founder Alfred Ploetz said that his ideas<br />
about eugenics were drawn from<br />
Darwinism, and he praised Darwin’s<br />
disciple Ernst Haeckel as a key influence<br />
(Richard Wiekart, From Darwin to Hitler,<br />
p. 15). Henry Fairfield Osborn, head <strong>of</strong><br />
the American Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History<br />
and president <strong>of</strong> the Second International<br />
Congress <strong>of</strong> Eugenics in 1921, praised the<br />
work <strong>of</strong> German racists Jon Mioen and<br />
Hermann Lundborg for giving men “a<br />
new appreciation <strong>of</strong> the spiritual, moral<br />
and physical value <strong>of</strong> the Nordic [white]<br />
race” (Edwin Black, War Against the<br />
Weak, p. 244). Eugenics sought to purify<br />
the human race by culling it <strong>of</strong> the<br />
“inferior” through birth control, abortion,<br />
infanticide, and euthanasia. Planned<br />
Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger<br />
referred to “inferior” humans as “weeds,”<br />
complaining that “nature eliminates the<br />
weeds, but we turn them into parasites<br />
and allow them to reproduce” (Black, War<br />
Against the Weak, p. 133). Sanger called<br />
large families “immoral.” She was on the<br />
cutting edge <strong>of</strong> the modern Culture <strong>of</strong><br />
Death. In her book Woman and the New<br />
Race, she said, “The most merciful thing<br />
that the large family does to one <strong>of</strong> its<br />
infant members is to kill it.” Eugenics<br />
went out <strong>of</strong> popularity after Hitler took<br />
the program to its logical conclusion, but<br />
the Darwinian eugenics philosophy is<br />
alive and well and has spread throughout<br />
society. This philosophy has resulted in<br />
the elimination <strong>of</strong> multitudes <strong>of</strong> people,<br />
and black babies have suffered more than<br />
those <strong>of</strong> any other group. If it isn’t racist<br />
to destroy a class <strong>of</strong> people through birth<br />
control and abortion, I don’t know what<br />
racism is.<br />
EARTHQUAKES IN DIVERS<br />
PLACES (Friday Church News Notes,<br />
March 18, <strong>2011</strong>, www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org<br />
fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org, 866-295-4143) -<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the many infallible pro<strong>of</strong>s that the<br />
Bible is what it claims to be, which is the<br />
divinely inspired Word <strong>of</strong> God, is fulfilled<br />
prophecy. Two thousand years ago the<br />
Lord Jesus Christ gave many detailed<br />
1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21 17
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
Cars atop 3 story buildings after the Japanese earthquake and tsunami.<br />
prophecies <strong>of</strong> the future. One was the<br />
prophecy <strong>of</strong> the destruction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Jerusalem Temple, which was fulfilled 40<br />
years later in A.D. 70 at the hands <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Roman Tenth Legion under general Titus.<br />
Jesus prophesied that “there shall not be<br />
left one stone upon another, that shall not<br />
be thrown down” (Mark 13:2). Some <strong>of</strong><br />
the stones that were pulled down were<br />
thrown <strong>of</strong>f the Temple Mount and were<br />
unearthed in recent times along the<br />
Western Wall where they can still be seen<br />
today as mute witness to the fact that<br />
Jesus knows the future. In another<br />
prophecy, Jesus said that one <strong>of</strong> the signs<br />
<strong>of</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> the age will be “earthquakes<br />
in divers places” (Matthew 24:7). The<br />
most recent fulfillment <strong>of</strong> that prophecy<br />
was the earthquake that devastated<br />
northern Japan last weekend and brought<br />
this economic powerhouse nation to its<br />
knees in a matter <strong>of</strong> moments. Many<br />
thousands are dead; a modern port city<br />
was washed out to sea; four nuclear<br />
reactors were damaged, and one has<br />
exploded. The nation has been reduced to<br />
rolling blackouts to conserve power. Its<br />
powerful train system is at a standstill. Its<br />
leaders have stated that they are facing the<br />
worse crisis since World War II. The<br />
Japan earthquake is only the latest in a<br />
series <strong>of</strong> “earthquakes in divers places.”<br />
Some 40,000 died in in South Asia in<br />
October 2005; 220,000 in Indonesia in<br />
2004; 31,000 in Iran in 2003; 13,000 in<br />
India in January 2001; 17,000 in western<br />
Turkey in August 1999; 10,000 in Latur,<br />
India, in September 1993; 50,000 in<br />
northwest Iran in June 1990. According to<br />
Bible prophecy, all <strong>of</strong> these are mere<br />
previews <strong>of</strong> what is coming. A future<br />
earthquake will cause every island to sink<br />
and the mountains to fall (Revelation<br />
13:11-18). The good news is that no<br />
person living today has to go through the<br />
terrible future judgments. We are still<br />
living in the era <strong>of</strong> “good tidings <strong>of</strong> great<br />
joy, which shall be to all people” (Luke<br />
2:10), which is the gospel that Jesus died<br />
for our sins, was buried, and rose the third<br />
day to <strong>of</strong>fer eternal salvation to<br />
whosoever will repent and receive Him as<br />
Lord and Saviour. The Bible says God has<br />
no pleasure in the death <strong>of</strong> the wicked<br />
(Ezek. 33:11). It is His gracious will,<br />
rather, that all men be saved (1 <strong>Timothy</strong><br />
2:3-4; 2 Peter 3:9).<br />
POPE SAYS JEWS NOT GUILTY OF<br />
JESUS’ DEATH (Friday Church News<br />
N o t e s , M a r c h 1 8 , 2 0 1 1 ,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org,<br />
866-295-4143) - In a new book Pope<br />
Benedict has exonerated Jews <strong>of</strong> the<br />
responsibility for Jesus’ death. In the<br />
second volume <strong>of</strong> “Jesus <strong>of</strong> Nazareth,”<br />
the pope blames Jesus’ death on the<br />
“Temple aristocracy” rather than the<br />
Jewish nation as a whole. Jewish leaders<br />
have responded enthusiastically. Elan<br />
Steinberg <strong>of</strong> the American Gathering <strong>of</strong><br />
Holocaust Survivors, said, “This is a<br />
personal repudiation <strong>of</strong> the theological<br />
underpinning <strong>of</strong> centuries <strong>of</strong> anti-<br />
Semitism” (“Pope Book Says Jews Not<br />
Guilty,” Reuters, March 2, <strong>2011</strong>). The<br />
anti-Semitism and hatred <strong>of</strong> the Jews on<br />
the part <strong>of</strong> the Roman Catholic Church,<br />
the Eastern Orthodox, the Lutherans, and<br />
others was a sin and a great reproach upon<br />
the cause <strong>of</strong> Christ. The Catholic<br />
Crusaders slaughtered Jews, and this type<br />
<strong>of</strong> thing has ruined “Christianity” in the<br />
minds <strong>of</strong> vast numbers <strong>of</strong> people. What<br />
they don’t know, <strong>of</strong> course, is that the<br />
Crusaders were not Bible-believing<br />
Christians. They were religious nuts<br />
enflamed with popery! Anti-semitism<br />
aside, the Bible plainly states that it was<br />
not merely the Jewish Temple leaders<br />
who condemned Jesus; multitudes <strong>of</strong> Jews<br />
were in fervent agreement. It’s absolutely<br />
true that “the chief priests moved the<br />
people” (Mark 15:11), but that does not<br />
absolve the Jewish nation <strong>of</strong> rejecting its<br />
own Messiah when He had fulfilled every<br />
sign prophesied in Scripture. When Pilate<br />
tried to calm the Jewish crowd and release<br />
Jesus, they “cried out the more<br />
exceedingly, Crucify him” (Mark 15:14).<br />
They went even further. The Bible says,<br />
“Then answered ALL THE PEOPLE, and<br />
said, His Blood be on us, and on our<br />
children” (Matthew 27:25). Further, the<br />
Jews continued to hound and persecute<br />
Christ’s followers like the Paul wherever<br />
and whenever and however they could.<br />
We need to see this thing through God’s<br />
eyes, not through the eyes <strong>of</strong> the Jews or<br />
the Pope or the news media. Jesus<br />
claimed to be the Son <strong>of</strong> God, the<br />
promised Messiah. He was born in the<br />
right place, at the right time, in the right<br />
way. He spoke the right words, did the<br />
18 1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
right miracles, showed the right fervency<br />
for God’s law and the right compassion<br />
for the souls <strong>of</strong> men, died the right way,<br />
and rose from the dead the right way.<br />
There is more and better evidence that<br />
Jesus rose from the dead than there is for<br />
any event in ancient history, and His<br />
resurrection proved beyond doubt that He<br />
was who He said He was, and that is the<br />
eternal Son <strong>of</strong> God, the Creator, the only<br />
Lord and Saviour. The Jews definitely<br />
crucified Christ, but not only the Jews.<br />
The Roman Empire crucified Christ in the<br />
person <strong>of</strong> Pilate and the Roman soldiers,<br />
but even more than that, the whole world<br />
crucified Christ, because it was for every<br />
man’s sin that He died. It was in<br />
fulfillment <strong>of</strong> the great prophecy <strong>of</strong> Isaiah<br />
53. “Surely he hath borne our griefs, and<br />
carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem<br />
him stricken, smitten <strong>of</strong> God, and<br />
afflicted. But he was wounded for our<br />
transgressions, he was bruised for our<br />
iniquities: the chastisement <strong>of</strong> our peace<br />
was upon him; and with his stripes we are<br />
healed” (Isaiah 53:4-5). The words “we”<br />
and “our” here refer both to the Jews and<br />
also to the sinners <strong>of</strong> the whole world.<br />
THE FASTEST FLOWER IN THE<br />
FOREST (Friday Church News Notes,<br />
March 18, <strong>2011</strong>, www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org<br />
fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org, 866-295-4143) - The<br />
following is from Creation Moments,<br />
February 4, <strong>2011</strong>: “The peace and serenity<br />
<strong>of</strong> North America's spruce forests is<br />
occasionally broken by little other than<br />
the rustle <strong>of</strong> a deer passing by. At least<br />
that's what most people think. In truth,<br />
there are things going on which would<br />
cause us pr<strong>of</strong>ound wonder. The<br />
bunchberry dogwood flower stands only<br />
about one-tenth <strong>of</strong> an inch tall. Scientists<br />
knew that the flowers opened explosively.<br />
The flowers do this to propel their pollen<br />
further. The scientists decided to find out<br />
precisely how fast the flowers really<br />
opened. So they decided to tape a flower<br />
opening with a high speed camera that is<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> taking 1,000 pictures a second.<br />
But the camera proved to be too slow. It<br />
was only with a camera that takes 10,000<br />
pictures a second that they could clearly<br />
see what was going on. They saw that the<br />
petals opened, and in a separate action,<br />
the stamens unfold so fast that they<br />
catapult pollen into the air. All <strong>of</strong> this<br />
happens in four tenths <strong>of</strong> a thousandth <strong>of</strong><br />
a second. That's more than a hundred<br />
times faster than a chameleon's tongue<br />
captures lunch. The stamens unfold so<br />
fast that they subject the pollen to 2,400<br />
times the force <strong>of</strong> gravity. There are no<br />
limits to the wonders God can conceive<br />
and create. His greatest wonder is His<br />
mercy which resulted in forgiveness and<br />
salvation.”<br />
EVANGELICALS AND MORMONS<br />
TOGETHER (Friday Church News<br />
N o t e s , M a r c h 1 8 , 2 0 1 1 ,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org,<br />
866-295-4143) - Prominent “evangelical”<br />
leaders are meeting with Mormons in Salt<br />
Lake City for a “dialogue” in search <strong>of</strong><br />
better understanding. The evangelicals<br />
include Leith Anderson, president <strong>of</strong> the<br />
National Association <strong>of</strong> Evangelicals;<br />
Richard Mouw, president <strong>of</strong> Fuller<br />
Seminary; and David Neff, editor-in-chief<br />
<strong>of</strong> Christianity Today. Anderson said, “We<br />
hope this time <strong>of</strong> dialogue with LDS<br />
leaders will deepen our understanding <strong>of</strong><br />
the Mormon faith and contribute to the<br />
ongoing work <strong>of</strong> evangelicals in<br />
Utah” (“Evangelicals, Mormon,”<br />
Christian Post, March 10, <strong>2011</strong>). This is a<br />
continuation <strong>of</strong> something that began<br />
several years ago. In November 2004, an<br />
“Evening <strong>of</strong> Friendship” at the Salt Lake<br />
Mormon Tabernacle featured some<br />
e v a n g e l i c a l s s e e k i n g a b e t t e r<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> and relationship with<br />
Mormons. Ravi Zacharias, the main<br />
speaker, was joined by Richard Mouw,<br />
Craig Hazen (a pr<strong>of</strong>essor at Biola), Joseph<br />
Tkach, Jr., head <strong>of</strong> the World Wide<br />
Church <strong>of</strong> God, and CCM musician<br />
Michael Card. In the Deseret Morning<br />
News, Card was quoted as saying that “he<br />
doesn’t see Mormonism and evangelical<br />
Christianity as opposed to each other;<br />
they are more like the two ends <strong>of</strong> a long<br />
thread -- part <strong>of</strong> the same thing.”<br />
Mouthing the CCM ecumenical<br />
philosophy he said, “The older I get, I<br />
guess the more I want to integrate<br />
everything. I think it’s more important to<br />
be faithful than right” (Nov. 16, 2004).<br />
The 2004 event and the most recently<br />
dialogue were sponsored by Standing<br />
Together Ministries, which was formed in<br />
2001 by “evangelical” preacher Greg<br />
Johnson, who has conducted “dialogues”<br />
with Mormon pr<strong>of</strong>essor Robert Millet.<br />
Johnson is a radical ecumenist. His web<br />
site says, “We affirm that there is one<br />
Church in Utah that meets in various<br />
locations,” and, “Unprecedented unity<br />
will contribute to healthier local churches<br />
and transformed lives by the thousands.”<br />
The first “ministry focus” listed is<br />
“Uniting the Body.” Johnson was<br />
instrumental in getting Craig Blomberg <strong>of</strong><br />
Denver Seminary and Steve Robinson <strong>of</strong><br />
Brigham Young University together to<br />
“dialogue” and to produce a book entitled<br />
How Wide the Divide, which concludes<br />
that the divide between Mormons and<br />
Bible-believing Christians is not as wide<br />
as formerly thought. We wonder what it is<br />
about Mormonism and its false gospel and<br />
false christ that these evangelicals don’t<br />
understand. We are also puzzled at why<br />
they are dialoguing with heretics when the<br />
Bible states that we are to mark and avoid<br />
them, turn away from them, and reject<br />
them (Romans 16:17-18; 2 <strong>Timothy</strong> 3:5;<br />
Titus 3:10-11). The apostle Paul wasn’t<br />
much <strong>of</strong> a dialoguer. He called false<br />
teachers “dogs” and “evil workers” (Phil.<br />
3:2). Of those who pervert the gospel he<br />
said, “Let them be accursed” (Gal. 1:8, 9).<br />
H e c a l l e d t h e m “ e v i l m e n a n d<br />
seducers” (2 Tim. 3:13), “men <strong>of</strong> corrupt<br />
minds, reprobate concerning the faith” (2<br />
Tim. 3:8), “false apostles, deceitful<br />
workers” (2 Cor. 11:13) Beware <strong>of</strong><br />
modern “evangelicalism.”<br />
BROTHER CLOUD IS THE ONE<br />
WHO HAS BEEN SHOT IN THE<br />
WEST COAST MUSIC AFFAIR<br />
(Friday Church News Notes, March 18,<br />
<strong>2011</strong>, www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org<br />
fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org, 866-295-4143) - Not<br />
only do I have the right Scripturally to<br />
give a warning about the promotion <strong>of</strong><br />
“adapted” CCM music at an IB school<br />
that is influencing people all over the<br />
world, I have a responsibility before God<br />
to do so. The only authority I need is 2<br />
<strong>Timothy</strong> 4:1-2. “I charge thee therefore<br />
before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ,<br />
who shall judge the quick and the dead at<br />
his appearing and his kingdom; preach the<br />
word; be instant in season, out <strong>of</strong> season;<br />
reprove, rebuke, exhort with all<br />
longsuffering and doctrine.” There is no<br />
limit placed on my preaching, except that<br />
it be done in the Spirit <strong>of</strong> God by the<br />
Word <strong>of</strong> God. I can reprove and rebuke<br />
wherever and whoever and whatever and<br />
whenever, in season and out <strong>of</strong> season. So<br />
can Paul Chappell and every other Godcalled<br />
preacher. Take my preaching<br />
ministry, for example. I have a very<br />
public ministry that influences many<br />
people (a half million downloads <strong>of</strong> my<br />
sermons and videos, for example, and<br />
1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21 19
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
many tens <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> unique visits to<br />
our web site every month), and I am<br />
critiqued publicly all <strong>of</strong> the time by<br />
countless men. I can’t recall ever being<br />
contacted first, and I have never written to<br />
any <strong>of</strong> those men and reproved them for<br />
not coming to me, and I have never<br />
wanted my “supporters” to reprove them.<br />
If I publish a book or a sermon series or a<br />
video presentation that influences people,<br />
other preachers have a right and<br />
responsibility to warn about my teaching<br />
if they think it is in error, and they don’t<br />
have to come to me first. I would<br />
certainly prefer that they critique me<br />
honestly and in a gracious, Christhonoring<br />
way, but at the end <strong>of</strong> the day,<br />
that is not my business. Their critiques <strong>of</strong><br />
my public preaching ministry are between<br />
them and God. I can respond to their<br />
warnings by repenting <strong>of</strong> error if I believe<br />
they are right or I can challenge the<br />
accuracy <strong>of</strong> their critique, but I am not<br />
going to say they have no right to do warn<br />
about me publicly if they think they have<br />
a Scriptural basis. Likewise, when a man<br />
builds an institution and draws students<br />
into his school from many other churches<br />
so that he can train and influence them<br />
and when he publishes material that is<br />
distributed around the world and when he<br />
conducts large conferences attended by<br />
people from many other churches and<br />
when he preaches at conferences in many<br />
places, his doctrine and practice is NOT a<br />
private matter. I have every right to issue<br />
godly, scriptural warnings in a gracious<br />
manner in regard to public preaching and<br />
practice, which is what I do, and Pastor<br />
Chappell and their supporters and<br />
students have every right to reply to my<br />
warnings. But they have no scriptural<br />
right to mock and ridicule me, yet this is<br />
exactly what has happened. I’ve been<br />
called every name in the book. I’ve been<br />
treated like a fool. I’ve been bossed<br />
around like some silly puppy. Consider<br />
the following choice words from a West<br />
Coast senior: “I strongly suspect ... that<br />
you are nothing more than a selfproclaimed,<br />
unbiblical, loud-mouthed,<br />
arrogant false prophet that attacks others<br />
to try to gain influence and respect for<br />
yourself. ... You are a vicious, raucous,<br />
poisoned, ignorant complainer. ... Your<br />
hypocrisy and misinterpretation and out<strong>of</strong>-context<br />
use <strong>of</strong> the Bible sickens me.<br />
May God have mercy on your soul you<br />
arrogant, raunchy man. I cannot help but<br />
wonder if those who call you ‘brother’ are<br />
sadly mistaken. ... you’re full <strong>of</strong> holes,<br />
arrogance and grotesque pride.” How is<br />
that for a piece <strong>of</strong> godly communication<br />
from a mere kid to a grandfather preacher<br />
who has been in the battle for Christ in<br />
this dark world for a long, long time But<br />
as he said, he is defending the “man <strong>of</strong><br />
God” and I guess anything is allowed<br />
when you are so highly motivated.<br />
BEWARE OF THE SCOOPING/<br />
SLIDING VOCAL STYLE (Friday<br />
Church News Notes, March 18, <strong>2011</strong>,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org,<br />
866-295-4143) - It is common to hear the<br />
world’s scooping/sliding vocal technique<br />
in specials sung in Bible-believing<br />
churches. The reason is not that the<br />
singers are trying to be worldly, but they<br />
are simply imitating the style <strong>of</strong> music<br />
that is heard everywhere in the pop<br />
culture and which predominates in<br />
Southern Gospel today. In his book How<br />
to Sing for Money, Charles Henderson<br />
defined scooping as “sliding up to a note<br />
from an attack below its true pitch,” and<br />
he identified it as a “common practice as a<br />
swing effect” (1940, p. 36). Note that the<br />
scooping technique was created as a part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the modern dance music scene, which<br />
is all about sexual license. The technique<br />
is a fitting accompaniment to the sensual<br />
backbeat rhythm. In a secular book The<br />
Foundations <strong>of</strong> Rock, Walter Everett says,<br />
“Many rock vocalists reach out to their<br />
audience largely through the<br />
PHYSICALITY <strong>of</strong> their singing.”<br />
Scooping has even been described as<br />
“sexual utterances” (Charles Brown, The<br />
Art <strong>of</strong> Rock & Roll, p. 68). Everett<br />
observes, “Classical singers traditionally<br />
strive for constant beauty <strong>of</strong> tone, but this<br />
is rarely <strong>of</strong> interest to rock vocalists, who<br />
reject the dogma <strong>of</strong> there being one<br />
‘right’ way to do anything.” This is a<br />
telling statement. Note that rock vocalists<br />
don’t care about beauty <strong>of</strong> tone, but God’s<br />
people should strive for beauty in singing<br />
style because we are serving the God <strong>of</strong><br />
beauty and order and are singing about<br />
His lovely truth. Further, rock singers<br />
contort their voices and slip and slide<br />
around the notes because they have<br />
rejected absolute truth. Their singing style<br />
reflects their philosophy <strong>of</strong> moral<br />
relativism. Decades ago Dr. Frank<br />
Garlock issued the following warning.<br />
“The identical methods employed by the<br />
world to make the sound sensual are now<br />
b e i n g u s e d b y m a n y p o p u l a r<br />
contemporary Christian music vocalists.<br />
THE STYLE ITSELF REFLECTS AND<br />
PROJECTS A PHILOSOPHY. These<br />
techniques include swaying and dancing,<br />
scooping (sliding up to a note from an<br />
attack below its true pitch), vocal sliding,<br />
flipping below and above the actual<br />
written melody, whispery, breathy voice,<br />
and delayed vibrato” (Garlock). These are<br />
not things that God’s people should<br />
imitate. We would also observe that the<br />
scooping style <strong>of</strong> singing is not only<br />
sensual and worldly, but it also draws<br />
attention to the singer. In contrast, when<br />
we sing psalms and hymns and spiritual<br />
songs, the attention should be fully upon<br />
the Lord and upon the message <strong>of</strong> the<br />
lyrics.<br />
ROB BELL’S LATEST SWIPE AT<br />
HELL (Friday Church News Notes,<br />
March 25, <strong>2011</strong>, www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org<br />
fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org, 866-295-4143) -<br />
Rob Bell’s new book Love Wins has<br />
stirred up something <strong>of</strong> a hornet’s nest <strong>of</strong><br />
controversy, which we find puzzling. The<br />
man has been denying an eternal fiery hell<br />
and teaching a universalistic faith for a<br />
long time. In a 2005 interview with<br />
Beliefnet, Bell said “the church must stop<br />
thinking about everybody primarily in<br />
categories <strong>of</strong> in or out, saved or not,<br />
believer or nonbeliever.” In his influential<br />
book Velvet Elvis, which is popular with a<br />
great number <strong>of</strong> Southern Baptists, he<br />
described a marriage that he conducted<br />
for two pagan unbelievers who told him<br />
that “they didn’t want any Jesus or God or<br />
Bible or religion to be talked about” but<br />
they did want him to “make it really<br />
spiritual (p. 76). Bell agreed with this<br />
ridiculous request and said that his pagan<br />
friends “are resonating with Jesus,<br />
whether they acknowledge it or not” (p.<br />
92). Bell’s most recent book, Love Wins,<br />
is just more <strong>of</strong> the same. Not only does he<br />
preach near-universalism, he preaches a<br />
false god, a false christ, a false gospel, a<br />
false heaven, a false hell, you name it. He<br />
is a master <strong>of</strong> taking Scripture out <strong>of</strong><br />
context and shoehorning his heresies into<br />
a text. Though Bell has denied that he<br />
20 1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
believes in universalism, he certainly<br />
makes a case for it in this book, though he<br />
might have left room for some folk to<br />
wind up for awhile in some type <strong>of</strong> hell.<br />
Consider two <strong>of</strong> many quotes we could<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer as evidence: “This insistence that<br />
God will be united and reconciled with all<br />
people is a theme the writers and prophets<br />
return to again and again. ... The God that<br />
Jesus teaches us about doesn’t give up<br />
until everything that was lost is found.<br />
This God simply doesn’t give up.<br />
Ever” (Love Wins, Kindle location<br />
1259-1287). “The love <strong>of</strong> God will melt<br />
every hard heart, and even the most<br />
‘depraved sinners’ will eventually give up<br />
their resistance and turn to God. And so,<br />
beginning with the early church, there is a<br />
long tradition <strong>of</strong> Christians who believe<br />
that God will ultimately restore<br />
everything and everybody” (Love Wins,<br />
location 1339-1365). Bell even claims<br />
that Sodom and Gomorrah will be<br />
r e s t o r e d ( l o c a t i o n 1 0 5 7 - 1 0 7 1 ,<br />
1071-1082). Bell has nothing but ridicule<br />
for the gospel that Jesus died for man’s<br />
sins and that those who repent and believe<br />
(and only those who repent and believe)<br />
will be saved. In true heretic fashion, Bell<br />
redefines Biblical terms. He defines both<br />
heaven and hell as present realities on<br />
earth. He says the statements in Bible<br />
about hell being a place <strong>of</strong> fire and<br />
torment are mere poetry.<br />
ROB BELL’S NEW GOD (Friday<br />
Church News Notes, March 25, <strong>2011</strong>,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org,<br />
866-295-4143) - In his new book Love<br />
Wins, Rob Bell isn’t just rejecting the<br />
Bible’s doctrine <strong>of</strong> hell; he is rejecting the<br />
Bible’s God and in so doing is rejecting<br />
the very God that his grandparents<br />
worshiped. Bell’s God is not the thrice<br />
holy Lawgiver who hates sin. In Love<br />
Wins there is a photo <strong>of</strong> a painting that<br />
hung on a wall in Bell’s grandmother’s<br />
house. It depicts heaven as a shining city<br />
on the far side <strong>of</strong> a dark, burning,<br />
fearsome chasm. Bridging the chasm is a<br />
cross upon which people are walking<br />
toward safety. Bell claims that the God<br />
depicted in this painting is not great or<br />
mighty (Love Wins, location 1189-1229).<br />
He calls the preaching <strong>of</strong> eternal hell<br />
“misguided and toxic,” a “cheap view <strong>of</strong><br />
God,” and “lethal” (location 47-60,<br />
2154-2180). He implies that this God is<br />
not a true friend and protector; he says<br />
there is something wrong with this God<br />
a n d c a l l s H i m “ t e r r i f y i n g a n d<br />
traumatizing and unbearable” (location<br />
1273-1287, 2098-2113). He even says<br />
that if an earthly father acted like the God<br />
who sends people to hell “we could<br />
contact child protection services<br />
immediately” (location 2085-2098). It is<br />
obvious that Bell wants nothing<br />
whatsoever to do with the God worshiped<br />
by his grandparents. Bell’s god is more<br />
akin to New Age panentheism than the<br />
God <strong>of</strong> the Bible. He describes God as “a<br />
force, an energy, a being calling out to us<br />
in many languages, using a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
methods and events” (Love Wins, location<br />
1710-1724). Bell also worships a false<br />
christ. His Jesus is “supracultural ...<br />
present within all cultures ... refuses to be<br />
co-opted or owned by any one culture ...<br />
He doesn’t even state that those coming to<br />
the Father through him will even know<br />
that they are coming exclusively through<br />
him ... there is only one mountain, but<br />
many paths. ... People come to Jesus in all<br />
sorts <strong>of</strong> ways ... Sometimes people use his<br />
name; other times they don’t” (Love Wins,<br />
location 1827-1840, 1865-1878,<br />
1918-1933).<br />
WHAT ABOUT THOSE WHO DON’T<br />
PERSONALLY TRUST CHRIST<br />
(Friday Church News Notes, March 25,<br />
<strong>2011</strong>, www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org<br />
fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org, 866-295-4143) -<br />
Whether or not all men without personal<br />
faith in Christ go to Hell, the nature <strong>of</strong><br />
that Hell, and whether or not judgment is<br />
eternal in duration is extremely important<br />
for the preaching <strong>of</strong> the Gospel. Will God<br />
“save some who have not explicitly<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essed faith in Jesus Christ” Well, the<br />
Bible says certainly not! Ephesians<br />
chapter two tells us the condition <strong>of</strong> every<br />
individual outside <strong>of</strong> regenerating faith in<br />
Jesus Christ. He is dead in trespasses and<br />
sins (v. 1), controlled by and living<br />
according to the working <strong>of</strong> the devil (v.<br />
2), a child <strong>of</strong> disobedience (v. 2),<br />
dominated by the flesh (v. 3), by nature<br />
the child <strong>of</strong> wrath (v. 3), without Christ (v.<br />
12), an alien and stranger from the<br />
covenant <strong>of</strong> God (v. 12), WITHOUT<br />
HOPE (v. 12), WITHOUT GOD IN THE<br />
WORLD (v. 12), far <strong>of</strong>f from God (v. 13).<br />
The Bible gives absolutely no hope for<br />
those who die without personal faith in<br />
Christ. The Lord Jesus Christ had already<br />
settled this matter before the penning <strong>of</strong><br />
Ephesians. In His conversation with<br />
Nicodemus, Christ said categorically,<br />
“Except a man be born again, he cannot<br />
see the kingdom <strong>of</strong> God” (John 3:3).<br />
Nicodemus was a very sincere and<br />
religious Jew, and if any category <strong>of</strong><br />
person could have gone to heaven without<br />
being born again, it would have been<br />
people like him. Jesus Christ said that it<br />
will not happen. In that same conversation<br />
Jesus said, “He that believeth on him is<br />
not condemned: but he that believeth not<br />
IS CONDEMNED ALREADY, because<br />
he hath not believed in the name <strong>of</strong> the<br />
only begotten Son <strong>of</strong> God” (John 3:18),<br />
and, “He that believeth on the Son hath<br />
everlasting life: and he that believeth not<br />
the Son shall not see life; but the wrath <strong>of</strong><br />
God abideth on him” (John 3:36). Praise<br />
God for the full salvation that was<br />
purchased by the blood <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ for<br />
all that will call upon him in repentance<br />
and faith. God IS good; He paid the full<br />
price <strong>of</strong> salvation Himself. We sin, but<br />
God suffered in our place. There is no<br />
charge <strong>of</strong> unrighteousness that can<br />
legitimately be brought against God. Let<br />
us who know the Lord not be guilty <strong>of</strong><br />
being lazy in getting the Gospel to the<br />
ends <strong>of</strong> the earth.<br />
ZONDERVAN’S STRANGE CHANGE<br />
OF MIND (Friday Church News Notes,<br />
March 25, <strong>2011</strong>, www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org<br />
fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org, 866-295-4143) -<br />
After publishing the first four <strong>of</strong> Rob<br />
Bell’s books and his Nooma video series,<br />
Zondervan decided not to publish Love<br />
Wins. The president <strong>of</strong> Zondervan said the<br />
b o o k “ d o e s n ’ t f i t i n w i t h o u r<br />
mission” (“Firestorm Grows over<br />
‘Christian heresy’ Book,” CNN Belief<br />
Blog, March 8, <strong>2011</strong>). Perhaps that<br />
means, “This book is too hot to handle.” I<br />
don’t see what else it can mean, because<br />
Zondervan published Bell’s books Velvet<br />
Elvis and Sex God which contained the<br />
same heresies as Love Wins. It appears<br />
that Zondervan simply foresaw the<br />
“firestorm” <strong>of</strong> criticism and decided to<br />
distance itself. In Velvet Elvis (2005), Bell<br />
defined hell as “a way, a place, a realm<br />
absent <strong>of</strong> how God desires things to<br />
be” (p. 147), and in Sex God (2007), Bell<br />
says hell is where “people aren’t treated<br />
as fully human” (p. 21). As we have<br />
already cited in this Friday Church News<br />
Notes, in Velvet Elvis Bell said that<br />
atheists can be saved without personal<br />
faith in Christ. In a 2005 interview he said<br />
that Jesus did not claim one religion is<br />
better than another when he said he was<br />
“the way, the truth and the life.” Rather,<br />
“his way is the way to the depth <strong>of</strong><br />
reality” (“‘Velvet Elvis’ Author<br />
Encourages Exploration <strong>of</strong> Doubts,”<br />
Beliefnet, 2005). This is exactly what Bell<br />
continues to teach in Love Wins. To his<br />
1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21 21
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
credit, the man is willing to state clearly<br />
what he believes or doesn’t believe<br />
(though he seems to fudge about being a<br />
universalist). Zondervan has probably<br />
done as much to muddy the waters <strong>of</strong><br />
biblical truth in the minds <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essing<br />
believers as any institution on earth today.<br />
Why back <strong>of</strong>f now<br />
It’s great that evangelicals like Al Mohler have<br />
made strong statements about Rob Bell’s<br />
heretical new book, but Billy Graham has said<br />
many <strong>of</strong> the same things. It’s extremely<br />
hypocritical to pick and choose which heretics<br />
you are going to denounce.<br />
“CONSERVATIVE EVANGELICAL”<br />
HYPOCRISY (Friday Church News<br />
N o t e s , M a r c h 2 5 , 2 0 1 1 ,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org,<br />
866-295-4143) - Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
“conservative” evangelicals are criticizing<br />
Rob Bell in a pretty strong way. John<br />
Piper tweeted, “Good bye, Rob Bell.”<br />
Albert Mohler, Jr. <strong>of</strong> Southern Baptist<br />
Seminary described Bell’s view as<br />
“Velvet Hell.” I’m glad to see a bit <strong>of</strong><br />
backbone among some evangelicals and a<br />
level <strong>of</strong> doctrinal conviction that would<br />
drive them to actually name the name <strong>of</strong> a<br />
false teacher, but it appears very<br />
hypocritical at the same time. The view<br />
that atheists and pagan religionists might<br />
be saved without submitting to Jesus<br />
Christ is not new. Billy Graham has been<br />
saying it for decades, but I don’t recall<br />
any outcry from the evangelical world,<br />
i n c l u d i n g f r o m G r a h a m ’s o w n<br />
denomination, the Southern Baptist<br />
Convention. In an interview with<br />
McCall’s magazine, January 1978,<br />
entitled “I Can’t Play God Any More,”<br />
Graham said: “I used to believe that<br />
pagans in far-<strong>of</strong>f countries were lost—<br />
were going to hell—if they did not have<br />
the Gospel <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ preached to<br />
them. I no longer believe that. … I believe<br />
that there are other ways <strong>of</strong> recognizing<br />
the existence <strong>of</strong> God—through nature, for<br />
i n s t a n c e — a n d p l e n t y o f o t h e r<br />
opportunities, therefore, <strong>of</strong> saying ‘yes’ to<br />
God.” In 1985, Graham affirmed his<br />
belief that those outside <strong>of</strong> Christ might<br />
be saved. Los Angeles reporter David<br />
Colker asked Graham: “What about<br />
people <strong>of</strong> other faiths who live good lives<br />
but don’t pr<strong>of</strong>ess a belief in Christ”<br />
Graham replied, “I’m going to leave that<br />
to the Lord. He’ll decide that” (Los<br />
Angeles Herald Examiner, July 22, 1985).<br />
In 1993, Graham repeated this doctrine in<br />
an interview with David Frost. “And I<br />
think there is that hunger for God and<br />
people are living as best they know how<br />
according to the light that they have. Well,<br />
I think they’re in a separate category than<br />
people like Hitler and people who have<br />
just defied God, and shaken their fists at<br />
God. … I would say that God, being a<br />
God <strong>of</strong> mercy, we have to rest it right<br />
there, and say that God is a God <strong>of</strong> mercy<br />
and love, and how it happens, we don’t<br />
know” (The Charlotte Observer, Feb. 16,<br />
1993). In an interview with Robert<br />
Schuller in May 1997, Graham again said<br />
that he believes people in other religions<br />
can be saved without consciously<br />
believing in Jesus Christ. “[God’s] calling<br />
people out <strong>of</strong> the world for His name,<br />
whether WHETHER THEY COME<br />
FROM THE MUSLIM WORLD, OR<br />
THE BUDDHIST WORLD, OR THE<br />
CHRISTIAN WORLD OR THE NON-<br />
BELIEVING WORLD, THEY ARE<br />
MEMBERS OF THE BODY OF<br />
CHRIST BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN<br />
CALLED BY GOD. THEY MAY NOT<br />
EVEN KNOW THE NAME OF JESUS<br />
but they know in their hearts that they<br />
need something that they don't have, and<br />
they turn to the only light that they have,<br />
and I think that they are saved, and that<br />
they're going to be with us in<br />
heaven” (television interview <strong>of</strong> Billy<br />
Graham by Robert Schuller, broadcast in<br />
southern California, Saturday, May 31,<br />
1997). What is Rob Bell saying today that<br />
Billy Graham hasn’t been saying for more<br />
than 30 years<br />
FULLER SEMINARY PRESIDENT<br />
PRAISES ROB BELL’S BOOK (Friday<br />
Church News Notes, March 25, <strong>2011</strong>,<br />
www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org,<br />
866-295-4143) - Richard Mouw,<br />
President <strong>of</strong> Fuller Theological Seminary,<br />
told USA Today that “Rob Bell’s newlyreleased<br />
Love Wins is a fine book and that<br />
I basically agree with his theology” (“The<br />
Orthodoxy <strong>of</strong> Rob Bell,” Christian Post,<br />
Mar. 20, <strong>2011</strong>). This tells us just how<br />
terribly far Fuller Seminary has fallen<br />
from its roots in Charles Fuller’s “only<br />
through the blood” evangelistic ministry.<br />
Mouw agrees with Bell that it is wrong to<br />
say, “Accept Jesus right now, because if<br />
ten minutes from now you die without<br />
accepting this <strong>of</strong>fer God will punish you<br />
forever in the fires <strong>of</strong> hell.” Mouw<br />
comments, “What kind <strong>of</strong> God are we<br />
presenting to the person” The answer is<br />
the God <strong>of</strong> the Bible and the God that was<br />
preached by the founders <strong>of</strong> Fuller<br />
Theological Seminary. It is Bell and<br />
Mouw who have the new god. Mouw says<br />
that after a rabbi friend <strong>of</strong> his died, he<br />
“held out the hope that when he saw Jesus<br />
he would acknowledge that it was Him all<br />
along, and that Jesus would welcome him<br />
into the heavenly realm.” I’ve never read<br />
anything like that in the Bible, but C.S.<br />
Lewis taught this very thing. Mouw says<br />
that those who question Mother Teresa’s<br />
salvation just because she believed a false<br />
gospel should be ashamed <strong>of</strong> themselves.<br />
Mouw implies that Bell’s critics just want<br />
to keep people out <strong>of</strong> heaven, which is<br />
patently ridiculous and slanderous. Mouw<br />
would have us believe that he is more<br />
compassionate than Jesus, who stated<br />
very bluntly, “Except ye repent, ye shall<br />
all likewise perish” (Luke 13:3, 5). Both<br />
Bell and Mouw complain about their<br />
“critics,” but they don’t draw back from<br />
lashing out pretty fiercely at the<br />
“fundamentalists.” Bell calls hellfire<br />
preaching “lethal,” “toxic,” “unloving,”<br />
“creepy,” a “cheap view <strong>of</strong> God.” No<br />
judgmental criticism there! Nothing but<br />
compassionate, tolerant dialogue!<br />
C.S. LEWIS’S INFLUENCE ON THE<br />
EVANGELICAL DOWNGRADE OF<br />
HELL (Friday Church News Notes,<br />
March 25, <strong>2011</strong>, www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org<br />
fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org, 866-295-4143) -<br />
C.S. Lewis (1898-1963) has been called a<br />
“Superstar” by Christianity Today. A 1998<br />
CT poll rated Lewis the most influential<br />
evangelical writer, and In light <strong>of</strong> the<br />
wretched spiritual-doctrinal-moral<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> “evangelicalism” today, that<br />
is a very telling statistic and certainly no<br />
praise for C.S. Lewis. One <strong>of</strong> the ways<br />
22 1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
that Lewis has influenced evangelicalism<br />
is in the fundamental issues <strong>of</strong> hell and<br />
the exclusiveness <strong>of</strong> salvation through the<br />
name <strong>of</strong> Christ. Lewis said that it would<br />
not be very wrong to pray to Apollo,<br />
because to do so would be to “address<br />
Christ sub specie Apollonius” (C.S. Lewis<br />
to Chad Walsh, May 23, 1960, cited from<br />
George Sayer, Jack: A <strong>Life</strong> <strong>of</strong> C.S. Lewis,<br />
1994, p. 378). Lewis elsewhere claimed<br />
that followers <strong>of</strong> pagan religions can be<br />
saved without personal faith in Jesus<br />
Christ (C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity,<br />
HarperSanFrancisco edition, 2001, pp. 64,<br />
208, 209). In the popular Narnia series,<br />
which has influenced countless children,<br />
Lewis taught that those who sincerely<br />
serve the devil (called Tash) are actually<br />
serving Christ (Aslan) and will eventually<br />
be accepted by God. “But I said, ‘Alas,<br />
Lord, I am no son <strong>of</strong> thine but the servant<br />
<strong>of</strong> Tash.’ He answered, ‘Child, all the<br />
service thou hast done to Tash, I account<br />
as service done to me.’ ... Therefore, if<br />
any man swear by Tash and keep his oath<br />
for the oath’s sake, it is by me that he has<br />
truly sworn, though he know it not, and it<br />
is I who reward him’” (The Last Battle,<br />
chapter 15, “Further Up and Further In”).<br />
It is not surprising, then, that Lewis has<br />
been cited as a major influence by<br />
evangelicals who are s<strong>of</strong>t on hell. Clark<br />
Pinnock said, “When I was a young<br />
believer in the 1950s, C.S. Lewis helped<br />
me understand the relationship between<br />
Christianity and other religions in an<br />
inclusivist way” (More Than One <strong>Way</strong><br />
Zondervan, 1996, p. 107). Richard Mouw<br />
says, “If I were given the assignment <strong>of</strong><br />
writing a careful theological essay on<br />
‘The Eschatology <strong>of</strong> Rob Bell,’ I would<br />
begin by laying out the basics <strong>of</strong> C.S.<br />
Lewis’s perspective on heaven and<br />
hell” (“The Orthodoxy <strong>of</strong> Rob Bell,”<br />
Christian Post, March 20, <strong>2011</strong>). In the<br />
acknowledgements section <strong>of</strong> Love Wins,<br />
Rob Bell writes, “... to my parents, Rob<br />
and Helen, for suggesting when I was in<br />
high school that I read C.S. Lewis.”<br />
Beware <strong>of</strong> C.S. Lewis. That he is loved<br />
with equal fervor by “conservative<br />
evangelicals,” hell-denying emergents,<br />
Christian rockers, Roman Catholics,<br />
Mormons, and even some atheists is a fact<br />
that speaks volumes to those who have<br />
ears to hear.<br />
Aim <strong>of</strong> O <strong>Timothy</strong> Magazine<br />
• Exalting the Lord Jesus Christ; His eternal perfect, and preserved Word; and the Gospel <strong>of</strong> his Grace. (2<br />
Peter 3:1-2, 18)<br />
• Standing for the whole counsel <strong>of</strong> God. (Acts 20:27; Jude 3)<br />
• Challenging Christian workers to uphold the truth and resist the apostasy <strong>of</strong> our times. (1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20-21)<br />
• Exposing the spirit <strong>of</strong> error and compromise within Christendom (Hosea 4:6a; 2 Tim. 3)<br />
• Upholding the New Testament Church (1 Tim. 6:13-14). O <strong>Timothy</strong> is a ministry <strong>of</strong> Bethel Baptist Church <strong>of</strong> London, Ontario.<br />
• Challenging churches to fulfill the Great Commission <strong>of</strong> world evangelism (Matt. 28:18-20; Acts 13-14)<br />
• Standing for the Received Text <strong>of</strong> the Holy Scriptures, the Authorized Version in the English Language, and sound translations <strong>of</strong> the TR<br />
in the languages <strong>of</strong> the world. (Ps. 12:6-7)<br />
1 <strong>Timothy</strong> 6:20,21 23
W A Y O F L I F E L I T E R A T U R E<br />
O TIMOTHY MAGAZINE<br />
<strong>Way</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Literature</strong><br />
P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061-0368<br />
866-295-4143 (toll free),<br />
fbns@way<strong>of</strong>life.org (e-mail)<br />
http://www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org (web site)<br />
ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED<br />
PRSRT STD<br />
U.S. Postage<br />
PAID<br />
Port Huron, MI<br />
Permit No. 1061<br />
SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION<br />
• NEW ONLINE EDITION - Only $10 per year! - To subscribe, go to www.way<strong>of</strong>life.org, click on the Bookstore tab and<br />
then click on O <strong>Timothy</strong>. Follow the directions from there.<br />
• UNITED STATES: The annual subscription is US $20 for the US. Make checks payable to <strong>Way</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Literature</strong> and designate<br />
the amount for O <strong>Timothy</strong>. Please use the form below for ordering.<br />
• CANADA: The annual subscription for Canada is $26.25 Canadian (GST included). Checks or money orders should be made to O<br />
<strong>Timothy</strong>. Please use the form below for ordering.<br />
• AUSTRALIA: The subscription cost is A$10. This will not cover the costs <strong>of</strong> publishing the magazine and sending it out in Australia,<br />
but we plan to take up an <strong>of</strong>fering at the end <strong>of</strong> each year from those who receive the magazine. Please understand that there will be a<br />
time delay caused by having to ship the magazines in bulk to Australia and then having to mail them to individual addresses. (send<br />
check to Pastor Buddy Smith, P.O. Box 684, Malanda, Queensland 4885 smiletex@bigpond.net.au , (07) 4096 6657)<br />
• PHILIPPINES: O <strong>Timothy</strong> magazine began publication in the Philippines in January 2005. It is distributed on a free will <strong>of</strong>fering basis<br />
in the Philippines at this time, as long as the Lord provides the needs. We take up an annual <strong>of</strong>fering to pay the expenses. If you are<br />
interested in receiving the magazine in the Philippines, contact us c/o: Pastor Medel Barrera, Berean Bible Baptist Church, Blk. 11 Lot<br />
42, Gardenia Valley Molino Bacoor, Cavite, Philippines The phone # is 0916-555-4723<br />
• INTERNATIONAL: The annual subscription for other countries is US $30. Contributions must be sent in US Funds by International<br />
Money Order drawn on a major New York bank. Make the drafts payable to <strong>Way</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Literature</strong> and designate the amount for O<br />
<strong>Timothy</strong> subscription.<br />
SUBSCRIPTIONS (O <strong>Timothy</strong> is a monthly publication)<br />
USA - One Year Subscription............................$20 US<br />
CANADA .........................................................$26.25 Canadian (GST Included)<br />
FOREIGN..........................................................$30 US<br />
AUSTRALIA.....................................................A$10<br />
PHILIPPINES....................................................(see contact information above)<br />
DATE______________________________________________________________________<br />
NAME_____________________________________________________________________<br />
ADDRESS__________________________________________________________________<br />
CITY, STATE, ZIP___________________________________________________________<br />
COUNTRY__________________________________________________________________<br />
PHONE, EMAIL______________________________________________________________<br />
PRINTED IN CANADA<br />
O <strong>Timothy</strong> Volume 28 - Issue 4 - <strong>April</strong> <strong>2011</strong>