20.01.2015 Views

publication

publication

publication

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Interview: Perry Kaufman – Mastering Systematic Trading P. 72<br />

The Pro’s<br />

Process<br />

Bruce Bower P. 68<br />

Your Personal Trading Coach<br />

Nr. 04, April 2014 | www.tradersonline-mag.com<br />

Multi-Dimensional<br />

Trading<br />

The Ability to Take<br />

the Broader View P. 40<br />

Buying Above and Selling<br />

Below the Snake Line<br />

A Strategy that Trades<br />

on the Cable P. 50<br />

How Small Traders Can<br />

Benefit from the Big Players<br />

David vs<br />

Goliath P. 6


LIGHT UP YOUR<br />

FOREX BUSINESS<br />

www.swissquote.co.uk<br />

CFDs and Forex are leveraged products; trading on margin carries a high degree of risk and losses can exceed<br />

your deposits. Swissquote Ltd is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority: 562170


www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

EDiTOriAL<br />

ioannis kantartzis<br />

Editor-in-chief<br />

if it Feels Good, Don’t Do it<br />

» in the last issue, i described a few ideas on how to gain a psychological advantage.<br />

The key point there was to keep doing those things that you find difficult to do. This<br />

means that you will be one step ahead of others who are either just incapable of<br />

accomplishing those things or fall short of that. Not just in trading, but in many other<br />

competitive areas of life, such as competitive sport, this can help you gradually gain<br />

a psychological advantage and achieve significantly better results over time.<br />

But there is even more to this connection, which is why i would like to pick up on<br />

that topic again. Do you know the situation where you come home in the evening after<br />

a hard day at work and then need to decide whether to watch Tv on the couch or go<br />

for a jog in the park Compounding the problem, that run in the park had already been<br />

scheduled whereas, as is so often the case, there is nothing but (often) rubbish offered<br />

on television. To all intents and purposes, that means that the decision has already been<br />

made for you. And yet, for a short period of time the thought of the cosy couch will cross<br />

your mind. it would feel much better to relax there than to brave the cold and go jogging.<br />

And that’s exactly where the problem is: More often than not, what we wish to do in the<br />

long term doesn’t feel good in the short term. As a result, many people give up what they<br />

really want (in this case, physical fitness) in exchange for what they would like to do at<br />

this very moment (relax). But at the same time that is the very thing that runs counter to<br />

your long-term objective! The upshot is that there are many people who for years have<br />

wanted to get fit, but never make it or even get less fit.<br />

Things may be similar in trading. you have resolved to trade only the best setups,<br />

i.e. just a few swing trades a week. in the short term, you will be feeling bored since<br />

the market is stagnating and you haven’t made any trades for three days (rightly so).<br />

however, since it is much more exciting “to be in on the action“ and “not to miss<br />

anything“, you will place a few short-term intraday trades, sooner or later risking losing<br />

what you really want (swing trading) for what you happen to be wanting at that point in<br />

time (“action“). This is also the reason why it is not enough to have a trading plan – most<br />

importantly, you need to be able to stick to it. Make sure you work on implementing it.<br />

When it gets really boring, go to the gym. And turn off the Tv, for goodness sake!<br />

Enjoy the new issue of TrADErS’ magazine. For those who know that<br />

sometimes you don’t have to go to great lengths to have your eyes opened. «<br />

Good Trading,<br />

3


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

6<br />

72<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

April 2014<br />

COVER STORY<br />

6 David vs Goliath<br />

In our cover story Gernot Daum discusses how individual traders<br />

(David) may stand a chance against the big players (Goliath) in the<br />

game of trading. In addition, he explores concepts that will help<br />

traders to even gain an edge off the large, inflexible positions of<br />

large institutions. Even more, the author provides some specific<br />

real-trading examples of how to apply these concepts.<br />

INSIGHTS<br />

12 TRADERS´ Talk: Guy Simpkin<br />

We discuss the latest developments in European clearing with<br />

Guy Simpkin from BATS Chi-X Europe.<br />

14 Hedge Fund Series – Part 2<br />

In the second part Bruce Bower reveals what he learned by<br />

working at a Hedge Fund.<br />

18 Be(a)ware of Diversification – Part 2<br />

This time Dirk VanDycke shows how to put the knowledge about<br />

diversification in practise to your advantage.<br />

22 Trading Seasonalities – Part 9<br />

Thomas Bopp introduces a trade with Whole Foods Market and<br />

currency-future AUD/USD.<br />

40<br />

24<br />

News<br />

Find the latest notes and<br />

announcements from around the world<br />

of trading in our “News“ section.<br />

TOOLS<br />

28 New Products<br />

The Latest Trading Technology<br />

30 Softwarereview<br />

iView Charts<br />

34 Book Review<br />

“Inside the House of Money”<br />

by Steven Drobny and<br />

Niall Ferguson<br />

36 Appreview<br />

Trade Tuner<br />

4


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

PEOPLE<br />

68 The Pro’s Process<br />

Part 18: Bruce Bower<br />

72 Perry Kaufman: Mastering Systematic Trading<br />

Perry Kaufman is one of the early systematic traders who<br />

started out researching systems back in the 1970s. Due<br />

to his vast trading knowledge and writing many popular<br />

trading books he is today a highly respected expert.<br />

MASTHEAD<br />

Publisher<br />

Lothar Albert<br />

Subscription Service<br />

www.traders-mag.com;<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com;<br />

abo@traders-mag.com; Tel: +49 (0) 931 45226-15<br />

Address of Editorial<br />

and Advertising Department<br />

TRADERS´ Magazine Limited<br />

The Black Church, St. Mary´s Place<br />

Dublin 7<br />

Ireland<br />

Contact:<br />

E-mail: ioannis.kantartzis@traders-mag.com<br />

Phone: +44 (0) 7798631716<br />

Mobile: +30 (0) 6932 315450<br />

Fax: +49 (0) 9 31/4 52 26-13<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

40 A Multi-Dimensional Approach to Day-Trading DAX<br />

Futures<br />

Stanley Dash demonstrates a ‘multi-dimensional’ approach by<br />

using two measures of the relationship between two markets.<br />

46 The RSI Return Strategy<br />

The RSI is an established indicator for trading. David Pieper<br />

shows how to use it in a simple trading system.<br />

50 Buying Above and Selling Below the Snake Line<br />

Azeez Mustapha explains a Cable trade setup.<br />

BASICS<br />

54 Darvas Boxes Analysis<br />

Nicolas Darvas developed his famous boxes theory in the late<br />

50s. In this article Oscar Cuevas shows you how it works.<br />

58 Trading Journal<br />

U.S. trader and blogger Steve Burns explains one of his SPY<br />

Trades from last year.<br />

60 Risk and Money Management – Part 4<br />

In the fourth part Jens Klatt deals with the fact that trading is<br />

not about how often you win or lose.<br />

64 The Trader’s Technical Arsenal – Part 6<br />

Azeez Mustapha discusses the MACD, Momentum and other<br />

indicators.<br />

Editor-in-Chief<br />

Ioannis Kantartzis, Anastasios Papakostas<br />

Editors<br />

Katharina Boetsch, Prof. Dr. Guenther Dahlmann-<br />

Resing, Corinne Endrich, Marko Graenitz, Lena<br />

Hirnickel, Sandra Kahle, Rodman Moore, Stefan<br />

Rauch, Katja Reinhardt, Karin Seidl, Tina Wagemann,<br />

Christine Weissenberger, Nadine Wiget<br />

Articles<br />

Thomas Bopp, Bruce Bower, Steve Burns,<br />

Richard Chignell, Oscar Cuevas, Stanley Dash,<br />

Gernot Daum, Jens Klatt, Azeez Mustapha,<br />

David Pieper, Dirk Vandycke<br />

Pictures<br />

© Andrei, B.Stefanov, basketman23, bluedesign, Brian<br />

Jackson, chairman, chones, DavidArts, ferkelraggae,<br />

Frog 974, gavran333, Georg Preissl, Givaga, Horticulture,<br />

IMaster, Nneirda, opicobello, Sashkin, sergey_p,<br />

wmedien / www.fotolia.com<br />

Price data<br />

www.captimizer.de; www.esignal.com;<br />

www.metaquotes.net; www.tradesignalonline.<br />

com; www.tradestation.com<br />

ISSN<br />

1612-9415<br />

Disclosure<br />

The information in TRADERS´ is intended for<br />

educational purposes only. It is not meant to<br />

recommend, promote or in any way imply the<br />

effectiveness of any trading system, strategy or<br />

approach. Traders are advised to do their own<br />

research and testing to determine the validity<br />

of a trading idea. Trading and investing carry<br />

a high level of risk. Past performance does not<br />

guarantee future results.<br />

© 2014 TRADERS´ Magazine Limited, The Black<br />

Church, St. Mary´s Place, Dublin 7, Ireland<br />

5


COvErSTOry<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

David vs Goliath<br />

how Small Traders Can Benefit<br />

from the Big Players<br />

What does a trader need to complete his trades in a<br />

disciplined way Confidence! And how can he get that By<br />

knowing what he is doing and by completely understanding<br />

the situation in which he happens to be trading and by<br />

executing the very trades that match this understanding.<br />

Read here how a retail investor can mentally adjust to the<br />

“trading game”, in which he is pitted as a David against<br />

the major investor Goliaths. What are the strengths and<br />

weaknesses of the Goliaths and what are those of trader<br />

David What is his slingshot and how can he use it best<br />

» Amateurs and Professionals<br />

The situation in the trading arena is as follows (and some<br />

traders – especially neophytes – are not quite aware of<br />

it): Alongside a small number of major investors (equity<br />

funds, pension funds, and so on) that can safely be called<br />

professionals, there is a large number of so-called retail<br />

investors. Of these, most have not progressed beyond<br />

the “amateur” status yet. And unlike in sports where<br />

Gernot Daum<br />

Gernot Daum, who is a trained computer scientist,<br />

has been a swing trader for 14 years, also<br />

focusing in recent years on the intraday trading of<br />

futures and stocks. He uses his very own Statistikfuchs<br />

software (www.statistikfuchs.de), which<br />

he also offers as a Freemium fi nancial service.<br />

email@GernotDaum.de<br />

professionals and amateurs compete against each other<br />

in separate leagues, amateur traders are, of necessity,<br />

pitted against the professionals from the very beginning.<br />

Major investors have a number of advantages:<br />

• Well-trained staff: Portfolio managers can be<br />

expected to have received the best possible training<br />

and to have plenty of work experience.<br />

• Technology: The latest software, good analysts to<br />

use it properly, fast computers, high-speed lines.<br />

• Sufficient capacity to conduct fundamental analyses.<br />

While good fundamental analyses comes at high<br />

cost, large investors can afford to meet them.<br />

• Good contacts: The large investors’ money managers<br />

have contacts in all directions of the financial sector,<br />

which gives them sources of information that retail<br />

investors can only dream of.<br />

• Size: They can move the market.<br />

6


ADvErTOriAL<br />

Unlock your trading potential<br />

by joining us at this FrEE seminar<br />

TradeStation Europe Limited is offering an exclusive seminar in association with TRADERS’ magazine. The seminar is<br />

FREE for TRADERS’ readers.<br />

Join us from 6pm-10pm on Thursday, 1st May 2014, at the Lansdowne club, Mayfair, for an in-depth look at FX and<br />

options trading setups using the award-winning TradeStation platform.<br />

Professional trader, Ioannis Kantartzis, will guide you through the common pitfalls and nuances of the FX markets,<br />

focusing on 4 simple, but often overlooked, steps for trade setups. He will also focus on the appropriate use of leverage<br />

and application of risk management.<br />

In addition, Ioannis will explain how to exploit specific market outlooks through basic options strategies and their<br />

payoffs. A special promotion will be available to anyone opening a TradeStation account at the seminar.<br />

This seminar is strictly limited to 30 attendees. Please e-mail international@tradestation.com to reserve your place.<br />

TRADERS’ Magazine and TradeStation Europe Limited are separate companies and are not affiliated in<br />

any way. The topics covered during these seminars are for educational purposes only and do not offer<br />

any investment advice. TradeStation Europe Limited, an introducing broker to TradeStation Group’s<br />

affiliates, is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) in the UK and has<br />

passport rights in EEA. For more information visit www.TradeStation-International.com<br />

BEST PLATFORM<br />

FOR ACTIVE TRADERS<br />

u Write your own strategies, back-test and<br />

optimize with up to 50 years of market data<br />

u Professional-grade tools for advanced<br />

charting and analysis<br />

u Competitive commissions, as low as 0.6¢ per<br />

share for stocks or 25¢ per side, per contract<br />

for futures<br />

No trading advice is offered by TradeStation Europe or any of its affiliates.<br />

Trading futures, options and off-exchange foreign currencies carries a high<br />

level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. The loss may exceed<br />

your initial investment.<br />

Like to learn more<br />

international@tradestation.com<br />

00800.242.78190 | 001.954.652.7677<br />

Rating based on Barron’s magazine (2006, 2008, 2011, 2012, 2013). TradeStation Europe Limited, an introducing broker to TradeStation Group’s affiliates,<br />

is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) in the UK and has passport rights in EEA. © 2014 TradeStation. All rights reserved.<br />

TradeStation-International.com


coverstory<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

Opportunities for Retail Investors<br />

On the face of it, things look hopeless for retail investors,<br />

don’t they To be sure, it’s important to be aware of the<br />

situation. But this awareness allows ways to be found<br />

even for small investors to graduate from amateurs<br />

to professionals in order to finally make money on the<br />

markets.<br />

Let’s start with the last of the five items listed<br />

above: Is it really advantageous for investors to be<br />

capable of moving the market Doesn’t this also entail<br />

disadvantages for large investors It certainly does.<br />

Here is a list of them:<br />

• Inflow and outflow of capital. Customers of the<br />

funds are the ones responsible for timing. And these<br />

are often amateurs who purposely delegate their<br />

personal investment decisions. So the inflow and<br />

outflow of capital is likely to occur at more or less the<br />

wrong time for funds.<br />

• Equity funds need to engage in marketing. This may<br />

lead to constraints on the selection of investments<br />

caused by the need to show for marketing purposes<br />

“that you are doing everything right.”<br />

• Successful equity funds continue to grow. But one<br />

particular fund may have been successful mainly<br />

because of good technical analysis. Starting from a<br />

certain size, however, this does not work anymore,<br />

making it necessary to switch to more fundamental<br />

approaches. But in this case that is no longer part of<br />

the special skills set of the fund managers.<br />

• Is having many contacts always a good thing The<br />

financial crisis of 2009 was primarily caused by the<br />

F1) Software AG Stock on 29th Jan 2013<br />

Outline of a day trade after a down gap. Entry was made shortly before 10 am upon the breakout of prices<br />

below the 32 euro level. Shortly before the close, the position was smoothed below 29 euros near the daily<br />

lows.<br />

fact that everybody owning certain stocks (now<br />

often referred to as “toxic assets”) was doing the<br />

same thing simply “because they all were” – and<br />

along the way everybody seems to have lost sight of<br />

the overall risk.<br />

• And now to the item of size: Moving the market is not<br />

advantageous since that causes your own activities<br />

to be visible making it possible for other participants<br />

in the trading game to adjust to that. At bottom, the<br />

entire trend-following approach is based on this idea.<br />

So, there is hope then. I will elaborate on the latter<br />

aspect of “visibility” in this article, resulting in trade<br />

setups for the retail investor. This is the basic idea of<br />

charting: Looking at what the big players are doing,<br />

following suit and “taking advantage” of their problems.<br />

First off, an example: It’s about a stock that in 2013<br />

quite clearly resulted in constraints on large investors<br />

that retail investors were able to benefit from – by trend<br />

following, of course.<br />

Day Trader David<br />

In Figure 1 you can see a Software AG intraday chart<br />

of 29th Jan 2013 on a 5-minute basis. On this day, the<br />

company released figures showing that while its own<br />

targets had been achieved or even slightly exceeded,<br />

market expectations must have been much higher since<br />

the stock opened with a large downward gap .<br />

The stock had gone up by more than 60 per cent from<br />

July 2012 to January 2013, doing significantly better than<br />

the overall market. There were certainly fundamental<br />

reasons for this. Large investors with good fundamental<br />

analyses recognised this in time and<br />

benefited from it. But what was the<br />

situation now Apparently, there<br />

were quite a few large positions<br />

with a short time horizon in the<br />

market, otherwise there would not<br />

immediately have been the large<br />

gap, considering the numbers. How<br />

does a day trader behave in such a<br />

situation He is going to wait and<br />

see how the situation will develop in<br />

the first one or two hours. After all,<br />

it will become apparent soon how<br />

serious the imbalances of the major<br />

investors really are. There will then<br />

be high pressure on them to reduce<br />

those positions, which may very<br />

soon lead to further sell-offs.<br />

Source: Author‘s own Statistikfuchs software<br />

8


Coverstory<br />

That’s exactly what happened here. There was<br />

important support at 32 euros and the price was able to<br />

hold above it for an hour. A stop sell below 32 or below<br />

the daily low was now a reasonable trading plan. The<br />

trade was triggered shortly before 10 am. There was no<br />

reason to close the trade before the end of the trading<br />

session. This is the time for those who only do day trading<br />

to close their trades. Since it was possible for the stop to<br />

2012), and finally there was a clear trend counter-signal<br />

at point 5.<br />

So there were many shorting opportunities for<br />

retail investors. And all that at the expense of large<br />

investors who had lost sight of the fundamental<br />

perspective and had used technical analysis (which<br />

was inappropriate for their position sizes) to push<br />

each other ever higher.<br />

be placed on the daily high just above 32.50, the trade had<br />

a fantastic risk/reward ratio.<br />

David and Two Goliaths<br />

The following example is a more complicated chart<br />

Swing Trader David<br />

pattern that shows several things:<br />

Change of time level: We are leaving the day trader and<br />

move on to a swing trader who holds his trades for days<br />

or even weeks. The Software AG stock will also have<br />

• What particular signs are there for major investors in<br />

a market<br />

surfaced on his radar. He will be looking closely at the<br />

intraday chart and will figure out his chances. After such<br />

• What are the large investors’ lines of thought and<br />

what traces do these leave in the chart<br />

a day with virtually no resistance to the gap, this trader<br />

knows that many more sales can probably be expected<br />

from large investors. In actual fact, things were going<br />

slightly downhill for a few more days before the multiweek<br />

• What are the consequences for the trading done by<br />

David, our retail investor<br />

While the chart pattern is for the “advanced” among<br />

technical correction occurred which had been due.<br />

After that, though, there were swing trading opportunities<br />

on the short side. The chart in Figure 2 shows the<br />

development in the months after the downward gap<br />

shown in Figure 1.<br />

A detailed discussion of trend-following tactics is<br />

traders, it shows well in which direction you can develop<br />

your thinking about the stock market if you’re looking to<br />

understand the causes behind the patterns. This is all<br />

about the “megaphone” continuation of a rectangular<br />

pattern. The Bayer stock provided a fitting example of<br />

this in early 2013 – see Figure 3.<br />

not part of this article, which is why<br />

the potential trading plans will only<br />

be briefly outlined here: At point F2) Daily Chart of the Software AG Stock<br />

1, a counter-cyclical entry into a<br />

short trade was possible since a 50<br />

per cent Fibonacci correction mark<br />

was hit here. The following procyclical<br />

entry opportunities for the<br />

security-oriented trend trader have<br />

been marked with point 2. At point<br />

3a it was possible for the trade to be<br />

strengthened. However, this partial<br />

position would have been stopped<br />

out at point 3b in any normal trade<br />

management because of a false<br />

signal. Point 4 shows another (this<br />

time successful) opportunity to<br />

strengthen the trade pro-cyclically.<br />

From the end of June it was<br />

possible to reduce the position<br />

significantly since a reversal pattern<br />

The chart shows several swing trading plans. At point 1, the 50 per cent Fibonacci retracement was twice hit<br />

almost perfectly. Points 2, 3, and 4 show suitable spots to increase the short position. At point 3b, there would<br />

have been a false trade of the short position that was opened at point 3a. At point 5, there was finally a clear<br />

had formed above the “great”<br />

counter-signal for the downward trend.<br />

Source: www.tradesignalonline.com<br />

support at 22 euros (low of July<br />

9


coverstory<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

In December 2012 and January 2013, a rather narrow<br />

rectangle had formed within the limits of 71 to 73.50<br />

euros. In such a case, the probability of the following<br />

scenario occurring is quite high: A strong buyer (Goliath 1)<br />

bought at 71, a strong seller (Goliath 2) sold at 73.50<br />

and the rest of the market participants provided the<br />

fluctuation between these two price levels. “Strong” here<br />

means: There is an interest on the part of a single market<br />

participant (a major investor) in building up or reducing a<br />

large position in the stock.<br />

Then, on 25th January, there was a large upward bar<br />

with a closing price above 76 euros (first marking). This<br />

was a strong buy signal since the seller who had sold at<br />

73.50 euros had apparently sold his holdings while the<br />

strong buyer was still in the market. This is a suitable<br />

signal for our trader David to open a long position. But<br />

there are also false signals, and this was one of them.<br />

Within just a few days the price dropped again below<br />

73.50 euros.<br />

Just on the strength of the many new buyers being<br />

attracted by such a signal, this should actually not have<br />

happened. So the seller was still there after all and<br />

managed to get rid of some of his stocks at much higher<br />

prices. So far, so bad for the breakout trader. False signals<br />

are part and parcel of any trading system. That’s why you<br />

need a stop management system that in case of loss stops<br />

out a position again after a short period of time (second<br />

marking). At this point, all you can do is just regret the<br />

F3) Megaphone Pattern at Bayer in Early 2013<br />

This pattern shows a “duel” between two major investors each of whom “pulled out” their sell orders upwards<br />

(point 1) and their buy orders downwards (point 3) respectively, as described in the text.<br />

loss. Or else try out an “advanced” way of looking at the<br />

situation. And this is exactly where it gets exciting!<br />

Pulling out as a Tactic to Increase the Average Selling Price<br />

The seller had pulled out. He had suspended his sales<br />

for a short time. Presumably, he had also been inspired<br />

by some good news on the stock that came out on 25th<br />

January. The buy signal caused many new buyers to<br />

enter the market and on the following days the seller<br />

started selling again, no doubt getting rid of some stocks<br />

at higher prices than before. This is precisely the task of<br />

a fund manager who needs to reduce a large position:<br />

driving the average selling price upwards. The pulling-out<br />

tactic helps him do that. Upon “coming back in”, however,<br />

he promptly needs to put his cards on the table.<br />

But what is going through David’s mind now that he<br />

has just lost money If he is an experienced trader, he is<br />

thinking one step further. And says to himself, ”The buyer<br />

will now be pulling out too, which is only logical.” And<br />

so it is now possible to turn the long position lost into<br />

a short-term short position and have a good risk/reward<br />

ratio.<br />

Pulling out as a Tactic to Lower the Average Buying Price<br />

Why is it logical for the buyer to also “pull out” Because<br />

the latter knows, of course, that the apparent breakout<br />

– which proved to be a false signal – has caused many<br />

traders to be now in new long positions and that those<br />

traders do not all operate with a tight<br />

stop. And because, given the strength<br />

of selling pressure shown by the<br />

seller “coming back in”, even many<br />

traders who have had their positions<br />

for some time will now be giving up.<br />

So the buyer will remove his bid at<br />

71 euros, waiting for lower prices.<br />

The big red bar on 6th Feb 2013 (third<br />

marking in Figure 3) is an impressive<br />

showing of this mechanism. That was<br />

also the right day to close the shortterm<br />

short position at 70 euros or<br />

just below. Gambling further on this<br />

position would have been risky since<br />

pulling out is a short term tactic.<br />

The buyer needs to come back in<br />

very soon to collect his shares amid<br />

all the panic and triggering of stops.<br />

However, this time the price even<br />

fell quite a bit lower in the following<br />

days, eventually resulting in the chart<br />

Source: www.tradesignalonline.com<br />

10


Coverstory<br />

revealing the line-plotted “megaphone” pattern caused However, the chart situation was the consequence of<br />

by the expansion of the previously existing rectangle. a publicly known takeover bid by Fresenius for Rhoen-<br />

But back to our experienced trader David who Klinikum in April. In Figure 4, the timing of this is<br />

made the breakout trade, accepted his loss and then highlighted by the massive upward gap. This then is not a<br />

implemented the short trade. That trade has probably “duel” between two large investors. In such a case the risks<br />

not only compensated for his loss, but on balance has outweigh the opportunities. It is possible, for example, for<br />

even made him a small profit. This is what flexibility in the takeover not to go according to plan, which was the<br />

trading is. You can develop it by trying to understand the case here causing massive price losses.<br />

situation and motives of those involved in the market – Such situations should be ignored by David and<br />

and by taking advantage of your own “invisibility” as limited to cases where the duel between two Goliaths is<br />

opposed to the visibility of large investors.<br />

visible on the chart but is not accompanied by any news<br />

or at least none that is of any significance.<br />

David’s Trading Work<br />

What will be the consequences now for the daily trading Conclusion<br />

done by our retail investor David Using the example Competing against the large investor “Goliath”, the retail<br />

of the Software AG stock, trades were shown in two investor “David” has a fighting chance if he chooses to<br />

time levels suggesting an important aspect in the base his trading style on Goliath’s weaknesses. The latter’s<br />

organisation of trading: Since a retail investor’s time principal weakness is his visibility which is due to the size<br />

is limited, a strict selection of stocks is necessary. And of his positions. This is where David’s slingshot has an<br />

this means shares where something “extraordinary” opportunity to strike. The Software AG stock was used as<br />

is happening as was the case here with the Software an example to explain how David may benefit from any<br />

AG stock. It’s these shares that you will be looking at false positioning on the part the Goliaths in two different<br />

more closely, and you will then be working out different time levels. The example of the Bayer stock shows how<br />

trading plans accordingly.<br />

flexible trading evolves from an understanding of the way<br />

The formation of a very narrow rectangle is also major market participants operate. The counter-example<br />

something extraordinary. David can set up a scanner for provided by the Rhoen-Klinikum stock demonstrates<br />

such patterns and use these as the starting points of his that it is absolutely necessary to research all the relevant<br />

trading plans. Breakout setups are his first choice in such news that is happening. «<br />

a case. It’s also important for him to<br />

be open to new ideas if things don’t<br />

develop as planned. In the case of F4) A Word of Caution Concerning Rectangular Patterns after Takeover Bids<br />

narrow rectangles, David should<br />

also check and see whether there is<br />

a takeover bid at that price. Prices<br />

especially of minor stocks may then<br />

not move at all and the stock may not<br />

be worth bothering with. However,<br />

major DAX stocks are rather unlikely<br />

to experience this and are easy to<br />

research in any case. In the Bayer<br />

stock, there was no such takeover<br />

bid at that point in time.<br />

A Word of Caution<br />

Concerning Special Situations<br />

Finally, here is a counter-example. In<br />

the Rhoen-Klinikum stock (Figure 4),<br />

a narrow rectangle had formed in<br />

May 2012 and there was a potential<br />

breakout trade (see marking).<br />

The trading risk is too high for takeover scenarios, as is illustrated by the example of Rhoen-Klinikum. News<br />

that the deal is unlikely to be reached caused the stock to plummet at the end of June.<br />

Source: www.tradesignalonline.com<br />

11


insights – TRADERS´ Talk<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

Guy Simpkin<br />

Head of Business Develop. BATS Chi-X Europe<br />

TRADERS´ Talk<br />

How MiFID Will Affect the Way Clearing Operates in the Future<br />

With barely a month since the ink dried on the new MiFID II text, European market<br />

participants are now working through the details as they seek to derive further<br />

understanding of how European markets could look by the end of the decade. We sit<br />

down with Guy Simpkin, Head of Business Development for BATS Chi-X Europe, to<br />

discuss the latest developments in European clearing.<br />

» TRADERS´: What can we expect from the final,<br />

agreed draft of MiFID II<br />

Simpkin: Many of the measures – like dark pool caps,<br />

or commercially reasonable data costs – that are<br />

contained in the final text made headlines in the many<br />

months beforehand and have remained largely unaltered<br />

since. But in a final twist, the dialogue – comprising the<br />

European Commission, Council and Parliament – agreed<br />

to open up access to derivatives clearing in a last minute<br />

compromise. If implemented in a manner that allows<br />

venues and CCPs to compete with each other it would<br />

deliver long-term benefits to Europe’s capital markets.<br />

12


insights – TRADERS´ Talk<br />

Listed derivatives contracts are more<br />

complicated structures than equities.<br />

TRADERS´: What does this mean in practice How will it<br />

affect key market players<br />

Simpkin: This will foster greater competition between<br />

exchange and clearing venues and should serve to<br />

drive costs down whilst increasing innovation. It will<br />

challenge the ‘vertical silos’ operated by exchanges<br />

like Deutsche Boerse, LSEG, ICE and the CME in which<br />

listed derivatives are traded and cleared at the same<br />

venue. Instead, contracts will be fungible across<br />

exchanges with a clearing structure that’s more akin to<br />

the equities model in which customers choose where<br />

they clear.<br />

TRADERS´: Is this unprecedented<br />

Simpkin: MiFID II is not unique among its peers in<br />

seeking to push clearing houses to act for numerous<br />

venues: In the US, the Dodd-Frank Act has mandated<br />

much the same process for over-the-counter derivatives<br />

whilst the Options Clearing Corporation in the US has<br />

very successfully provided fungible clearing of US equity<br />

options to over 20 competing venues for many years.<br />

TRADERS´: Can you really compare listed equities and<br />

listed derivatives Surely different products require<br />

different regulation<br />

Simpkin: Listed derivatives contracts are more<br />

complicated structures than equities. In linking<br />

clearing houses under an interoperable model the<br />

new risk, which lies between the CCPs, needs to be<br />

effectively measured and managed. The CCPs will<br />

need to understand and in some cases accept for<br />

example: each-others margin methodology, acceptable<br />

collateral and rules; legal differences in the event of<br />

a member default need to be understood and the<br />

commercial terms have to be fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory.<br />

Whilst presenting more complexity<br />

that interoperating in cash equity clearing, this model<br />

was implemented safely and successfully between<br />

Stockholms borsen’s (now Nasdaq OMX) CCP and LCH.<br />

Clearnet Ltd.<br />

With MiFID also introducing the clearing of OTC<br />

derivatives, the need to offer customers the choice<br />

of where they clear becomes ever more important.<br />

Given the size of the OTC markets the CCPs are being<br />

asked to take on considerable new and additional<br />

counterparty, liquidity, operational and market risk. If<br />

these risks are properly measured and managed then<br />

the move to liberalise clearing could not only increase<br />

price transparency and competition but could also help<br />

provide the capacity and diversification of risk that the<br />

market will need.<br />

TRADERS´: What’s the time frame on these measures<br />

coming into force<br />

Simpkin: This is where the picture becomes more<br />

unclear. There will be a delay of at least 2.5 years on<br />

opening access to clearing – with a further, negotiable<br />

2.5 years per member state – and this could render the<br />

measure toothless for the time being. This is frustrating,<br />

but until the ‘Level 2’ text of MiFID II has been agreed –<br />

i.e. the technical detail – we shouldn’t consider it a ‘done<br />

deal’. We’re still hopeful that regulators choose more<br />

competition over protectionism, as it benefits all market<br />

participants.<br />

TRADERS´: Is BATS Chi-X interested<br />

in the listed derivatives space<br />

Simpkin: It remains to be seen how this regulation looks<br />

in its final, detailed form. We regularly review asset<br />

classes beyond equities to determine which market could<br />

prove to be an interesting addition to our business. Right<br />

now, we’re very focused on growing our market share<br />

of the European equities market, and fostering a better<br />

environment for ETFs trading. «<br />

13


insights<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

Hedge Fund Series<br />

What I Learned Working at a Hedge Fund – Part 2<br />

In the world of investing, hedge funds have an interesting reputation. They are well-known for<br />

producing vast riches and famous fund managers, but their actual operations are still cloaked in<br />

secrecy. This mismatch gives rise to some obvious questions. How do they function How do<br />

they make money How did their founders become so wealthy And, most importantly for traders<br />

everywhere: Could you or me become one of those fabulously successful individuals, like George<br />

Soros or Ray Dalio In this series of articles, hedge fund trader Bruce Bower will shed some light<br />

on these issues and explain what individual traders can learn from all that.<br />

» It’s About Making Money, Not Being Right<br />

Often, you’ll hear people on CNBC or in the press talking<br />

about their positions and their reasons for investing<br />

or holding on to it. They can offer a million different<br />

rationales, such as thinking that “the stock is cheap” or<br />

that “it’s a great long-term story” or that it “a fabulous<br />

growth stock”. Often times, they repeat those rationales<br />

without paying attention to the performance of the stock<br />

or how the markets are moving. It’s fine to have reasons<br />

for investing – actually, you should! But there’s more to it<br />

than that. You have to make money.<br />

The problem comes when they wrap bad trading<br />

practices around it. For instance, if a stock is cheap and<br />

then falls, the same person will come on TV and say “well,<br />

14


insights<br />

it’s even cheaper now and we’re averaging down”. Let<br />

me translate: The position is losing money but we’re so<br />

stubborn that we’re going to keep throwing money at.<br />

While the sound bite does a good job of ignoring the loss<br />

and preventing him from looking bad, the reality is at odds.<br />

He lost money. His investment thesis or his timing, or both,<br />

were wrong. The position is a dog and it should be cut.<br />

At a hedge fund, people only care about one thing:<br />

performance. Make money, cut losers and you’ll be OK.<br />

This is how it goes:<br />

• If you “had the right idea but were too early”, it means<br />

one thing: you lost money.<br />

• If you “had a good stock pick but the overall market<br />

doesn’t care about fundamentals”, you lost money.<br />

• If you “took a ton of ‘heat’ on your short but the<br />

market finally caught on”, it means you should have<br />

been stopped out.<br />

• If you “picked a good long-term growth story that the<br />

market finally woke up to”, it means you made money.<br />

Profits and losses (P&L) are what matters, not<br />

the story that you attach to your actions. And if you’re<br />

relying on crutches like “I was early” or “the market just<br />

doesn’t recognise my thesis” to excuse your losses,<br />

then you’re too busy defending your ego and not busy<br />

enough generating performance and practicing proper<br />

risk management.<br />

Focus on what matters most. Have an investment<br />

process and stick to it. Proper solid risk management.<br />

And above all, don’t worry about being right or looking<br />

smart in front of TV audiences. Focus on making money.<br />

You Absolutely Need a Process<br />

If you talk to a trader who is starting out, they are often<br />

grasping for something, anything that works reliably.<br />

They are probably looking to find a style that fits their<br />

personality and is profitable. While that is expected when<br />

people are just starting out, this is absolutely unacceptable<br />

when you work in an institutional environment.<br />

If you are starting a hedge fund, then you should<br />

already know what your “edge” is. After a few years of<br />

working in the market, then you know what you need to<br />

do to make money consistently. Instead of searching for<br />

something that works, you possess all the confidence of<br />

knowing that you have an advantage. If anything, like most<br />

15


iNSiGhTS<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

If you don’t have or can’t define a process,<br />

then you have an uncertain edge.<br />

famous investors, you can simplify your process into a few<br />

simple points on a checklist. You have documented it.<br />

If you can’t document the process, then it means one<br />

thing – you are not sure what your edge is. Maybe you<br />

haven’t thought hard enough about it to define it properly.<br />

Maybe you haven’t tested adequately or looked enough<br />

at your records to make a real judgment. Or maybe it’s<br />

become intuitive and you’re not really sure. Nonetheless,<br />

if you don’t have or can’t define a process, then you<br />

have an uncertain edge. When market conditions are<br />

favourable, then you may do okay; when they are against<br />

you, then you don’t have anything clearly defined to fall<br />

back on.<br />

Now think about if you had a lot of money to manage.<br />

More capital, from more people. These people have to<br />

know what the game plan is and where they fit into it.<br />

This is where having a process is absolutely key. Having<br />

one guy sit in front of the Bloomberg and punting can<br />

be a lot of fun. It can even be profitable. But it’s not a<br />

business. Besides, what would those other people do<br />

What are their responsibilities How do they support<br />

the senior investment professional And what happens<br />

if, God forbid, he goes on vacation – let alone gets hit<br />

by a bus! What game plan is everyone else to going<br />

follow then Having one guy doing everything by the seat<br />

of his pants can potentially be profitable, but it is most<br />

assuredly not a business. And people are only going to<br />

invest in a real business.<br />

Another way of looking at it is to compare with a real<br />

business. Imagine something basic like a dry cleaner.<br />

Bruce Bower<br />

Bruce Bower manages a portfolio of emerging<br />

market equities at a hedge fund. He has<br />

a keen interest in markets, psychology<br />

and self-development, having trained as a<br />

hypnotherapist.<br />

www.howoftrading.com<br />

If you go to drop off clothes, things get taken care of<br />

with responsibilities clearly defined and divided up. One<br />

person receives your clothes, discusses any potential<br />

problems and issues you a pick-up slip. A second<br />

person in the back takes all of the clothes in the space<br />

and cleans them. A third takes them out of the cleaning<br />

machine, shrink wraps them and gets them ready for<br />

pickup. A fourth person mans the desk when you pick<br />

it up. At every stage, it’s pretty clear who is doing<br />

what and the overall plan is for rendering service and<br />

generating profits. Why should a fund be any different<br />

It’s a business after all.<br />

As an investor or trader, you also need to get your<br />

process in order. You need to figure out what your edge is<br />

and try to write it down. If you’re not sure how to verbalise<br />

it, then just the act of writing it down a few times will<br />

help you to get closer to the mark. Even if a checklist<br />

sounds simplistic, you will nevertheless want to reduce it<br />

a simple list of bullets points to understand what matters<br />

most and what you need to be doing.<br />

Just understanding this has helped me in evaluating<br />

investments and preparing my own strategies. If I am<br />

thinking about a new strategy or approach and can’t<br />

reduce it to a few bullet points or define a process,<br />

then it’s a no go. This has also helped me to work with<br />

analysts. I can tell them how to come up with ideas, what<br />

the criteria are, how they should think about investments<br />

– and then what I do on top of their work to figure out if<br />

it’s a portfolio position or not.<br />

Conclusion<br />

While the inner working of hedge funds can seem<br />

shrouded in mystery, they turn out to be mundane.<br />

Surprisingly for outsiders, there is a real emphasis on<br />

the business aspects. While there is so much more<br />

than just this, hopefully this list gives the best of what I<br />

learned at a hedge fund that can help you to be a better<br />

trader.<br />

Next month, it’s all about career advice from a Hedge<br />

Fund Pro. Stay tuned! «<br />

16


insights<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

Be(a)ware of Diversification<br />

A Good Hard Look at Spreading the Eggs – Part 2<br />

Spreading and its more sophisticated synonym ‘diversification’ is classically being heralded by the established financial<br />

industry as being the right, and for that matter the only, way to cope with risk. Nevertheless this is done with little or no<br />

nuance. All too often the disadvantages are underestimated, if mentioned at all. In this article series we’ll put on our analytical<br />

glasses to study the concept in depth to see if it’s such a great idea altogether. Of course, if it’s not, we have to start<br />

wondering what the better alternatives are.<br />

» In the first article we decided to drag profits and total<br />

return into the picture of diversification, next to its<br />

common risk lowering incentive. This gave us a more<br />

realistic view on diversification. While the advantages<br />

on the risk side are clear to practically everyone,<br />

from the expert to the layman, we shifted focus to the<br />

disadvantages, mostly on the profit side. Diversification<br />

will spread risk, but at the cost of averaging returns. Let’s<br />

see if we can put this knowledge to our advantage while<br />

putting it in practice as well.<br />

Diversification or Concentration<br />

Expectancy, as depicted in Figure 1, first of all, tells us that we<br />

have far more control over the average size of our winners<br />

and losers, than we have over their frequency, which is what<br />

all forms of analysis are all about. So instead of focusing<br />

on increasing the number of winners, whilst decreasing the<br />

number of losers, we should actually just try to minimise<br />

the size of losers and maximise the size of winners. So<br />

expectancy is the mathematical embodiment of the old<br />

trader’s adage of cutting losses and riding winners.<br />

Secondly, and of specific interest to us here, is<br />

the fact that this also implies that resources will have<br />

to flow from losers to ever fewer winners, eventually<br />

concentrating a portfolio rather than spreading it! For<br />

though it’s quite clear to most how to cut losses, i.e.<br />

by selling them early on, before the proverbial mistake<br />

becomes a problem, the answer to the question on how<br />

to maximise profits more often than not doesn’t get<br />

taken beyond holding on to winners. But winners can<br />

be added to as well, even accelerating the speed with<br />

winners get us more profits and as a consequence take<br />

a bigger piece of the portfolio pie.<br />

Thirdly, the mathematics of geometrical growth tell<br />

us that diversification decreases the average return for<br />

sure. Take the example of having nine winners of one per<br />

18


iNSiGhTS<br />

cent and one winner of 25 per cent. Average return in that<br />

case would be a mere ((1 + 0.01 x 9 + 1.25) - 1) / 10 or 3.4 per<br />

Dirk vandycke<br />

cent. If that were not so or the effect was negligible that<br />

Dirk Vandycke has been actively and independently<br />

studying the markets since 1995 with a focus on<br />

could only mean that the original returns must be very<br />

technical analysis, market dynamics and behavioural<br />

finance. He writes articles on a regular basis and<br />

close to each other in which case diversification didn’t<br />

develops software partly available at his co-owned<br />

change a thing other than perhaps increasing transaction<br />

website www.chartmill.com. He teaches software<br />

development and statistics at a Belgian University.<br />

costs and again lowering return.<br />

dirk@monest.net<br />

To look at this another way if diversification is<br />

contradictory to expectancy, then concentration seems<br />

to be the only valid option.<br />

Of course all this raises the question if this doesn’t return of both portfolios was captured. So the interval<br />

increase risk to unacceptable levels Let’s leave that the reference portfolio got monitored depended on<br />

question for later and first turn to experimental, well the moment the last stock of the pruning portfolio was<br />

practical if you want, proof of all this. To address this we stopped out. Hence a period ‘specific to the test’. From<br />

made use of a Monte Carlo simulation.<br />

the thousands of tests that were run, some portfolio’s<br />

only lasted a few weeks while others took more than a<br />

A Huge Simulation<br />

year to get stopped out of their last holdings. So of course<br />

The experiment I ran gave diversification the benefit by now you must be wondering what the results of this<br />

of the doubt. We used a database of several tens of experiment were. Here’s what we got.<br />

thousands of stocks (excluding low volume stocks, very<br />

low priced stock, non-regulated markets, overly volatile Results<br />

stocks and the like). Stocks were monitored over several Take a look at the average return in Figure 2. There you<br />

decades, including a wide range of market conditions. have 13 grey lines depicting the equity curves of all<br />

The Monte Carlo simulator ran (and in the end averaged) 13 holdings in the pruning portfolio. As you will notice,<br />

several thousands of tests, each one going like this. some got drawn over a longer time interval than others,<br />

First a portfolio was made of 13 randomly chosen depending on how long they stayed in the portfolio. The<br />

stocks over a period specific to that test (I’ll explain this un-interrupted black line is the equity curve of the pruning<br />

in a moment). Initial capital was equally divided between portfolio becoming more and more concentrated, while<br />

all 13 stocks. The computer then ran each portfolio in the dashed black line shows the equity curve of the<br />

two copies. One copy was kept as a reference which was homogenously diversified reference portfolio. Keep in<br />

called the homogenous diversified portfolio. One might mind that these are averaged equity curves of the actual<br />

refer to this as an non-weighted index. The other copy did<br />

something very simple to get rid of<br />

the diversification and move over to<br />

the side of a concentrated portfolio F1) Expectancy Depicted as Scales<br />

gradually.<br />

This pruning-portfolio, as we<br />

named it, put a 3 Average True<br />

Range (ATR) trailing stop underneath<br />

all positions. The trailing stop was<br />

of course only allowed to increase,<br />

as the general good practice ideas<br />

of using stops dictate. As soon as a<br />

position got stopped out, the cash<br />

was distributed evenly over the<br />

remaining holdings in the portfolio.<br />

Eventually only one stock would<br />

Being profi table in the long run with trading, and all investing for that matter, is about cutting losses and<br />

survive making up 100 per cent of letting profi ts run. Although it’s a hearsay thing of ages, statistical expectancy actually prooves the saying<br />

mathematically. It’s not about being right or wrong but handling both profi ts and losses well.<br />

the portfolio’s resources. As soon<br />

Source: www.chartmill.com<br />

as this last one got stopped out, net<br />

19


insights<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

equity curves of thousands of tests run on samples of Well the truth is, that never before in history have we<br />

portfolios starting out with 13 randomly chosen stocks. been more able or have we had more tools at our disposal<br />

Systematically concentrating funds in the winners/ to fine-tune and isolate risk than at present. Going in<br />

survivors, seems to be the better way. Which makes a depth through all the tools and techniques available<br />

great case for us warning against mindless diversification, would take at least another article and probably a whole<br />

i.e. without thinking things through first. Apart from book. So let me just give an example in the above case<br />

providing a better end result on average, the return of of having, on margin, 180 per cent of one’s portfolio into<br />

the pruning portfolio stays on top of the diversified one stock. First of all, no one in his right mind would start<br />

portfolio all along the way with a difference up to 2.36 per out any position with 180 per cent of his/her total capital.<br />

cent, including transaction costs. And that’s even after Such a position would only make its appearance after<br />

realising that in this setup the pruning portfolio has to scaling in a stock that is appreciating. The scaling indeed<br />

make a lot of artificial costs just to un-spread itself. In accelerates the profits from the appreciation.<br />

reality a concentrated portfolio doesn’t have to start from So to begin with the position would already have to<br />

a diversified one. Instead of having 13 round-trip costs show quite a nice profit as the current stock price will<br />

as in the experiment, in reality, a concentrated portfolio probably hold quite a distance from the average entry price.<br />

could be built up nicely in three to four entries and only This would provide a first margin of safety. Of course if we<br />

one exit. That leaves room for up to four dips in the water don’t want to indulge in ‘mental accounting’, paper profits<br />

(eight round-trips) and cutting the loss short, before need to be cherished as much as initial capital or margined<br />

starting to generate higher round-trip transaction costs capital. A stop can take us already a long way but only so<br />

than the homogenous diversified portfolio would leave far. A simple technique for coping with this is to extract<br />

you with.<br />

cash from the position by actually selling part or whole<br />

of the position, freeing up most of the cash and securing<br />

But, But …<br />

most of the profits, while exchanging a very small part of it<br />

Isn’t that carelessly dangerous After all, spreading did for call options (in the case of a former long position).<br />

lower the average risk, right Can you even imagine So instead of holding, say, 1000 shares worth $32.37 a<br />

holding 180 per cent of your portfolio (that also implies piece, one could sell the shares, cashing them in for $32,370<br />

the use of margin already) in one position No stop will while buying ten long to medium-term call contracts for<br />

protect you if it opens 40 per cent lower on after-close lets say $3000 or only 9.27 per cent of the original position,<br />

news from the previous day.<br />

cutting the downside to a fraction of what it was. No more<br />

than the option premium can be lost<br />

form there on. It’s like having a stop at<br />

F2) Homogenous Diversified Portfolio vs Concentrated Pruning<br />

9.27 per cent without having to worry<br />

about the whole thing gapping down.<br />

Next to cash extraction you can also<br />

use, what we call, volume extraction,<br />

trying to buy shares for the same<br />

amount at a lower price after selling<br />

on a new base breakout. By buying<br />

for an equal amount at a lower price,<br />

one can buy more shares without<br />

investing more capital in the position.<br />

Of course this will take more time to<br />

manage the portfolio.<br />

So to take this home, instead of<br />

using diversification, pretty much<br />

the only thing available in earlier<br />

An average portfolio of 13 randomly chosen stocks is compared to its concentrated counterpart where the<br />

cash freed up by positions getting stopped out are divided amongst the survivors. The grey lines show the days to minimise risk, we should<br />

average returns from each individual (averaged stock) up until the point where they got stopped out. The black start using new ways of achieving<br />

lines give the total return of both alternative portfolios.<br />

this, without keeping on paying the<br />

Source: www.chartmill.com<br />

negative consequences it brings. «<br />

20


D o y o u s u f f e r f r o m Fo r e x<br />

i n f o r m a t i o n i n d i g e s t i o n <br />

We present the first fully customizable<br />

website built for FX traders where<br />

what information to see.<br />

you decide<br />

The Forex website by Web Financial Group<br />

Save your time for<br />

trading and read only<br />

what you really need!<br />

Real-Time Forex Alerts<br />

Streaming Forex Quotes<br />

Flash Charts<br />

Video Technical Analysis<br />

Economic Calendar


insights<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

Trading Seasonalities<br />

Part 9: Whole Foods Market and AUD/USD-Future Should Increase<br />

The first trading idea for this month is organic foods retailer Whole Foods Market that has recently<br />

defended its support. In addition we take a closer look at the currency-future AUD/USD for a second<br />

time. Readers of TRADERS´ already earned 300 to 500 ticks profit with this trading idea in September<br />

2013. This currency pair can also be traded on the spot-market or with leveraged certificates.<br />

B1) Trading Idea Whole Foods Market (WFM)<br />

A holding period from 1st April to 7th May mostly paid off in the past with a price increase. The ideal<br />

situation would be price exceeding the downward trendline at entry (green line).<br />

Source: www.lp-software.de<br />

» Trading Idea Whole Foods Market<br />

Organic products are becoming more<br />

and more popular. Therefore our<br />

first trading idea for this month is<br />

Whole Foods Market (WFM) which is<br />

included in the NASDAQ100. In 1980<br />

four businessmen established the<br />

first US-supermarket for organic food<br />

and over the years it has become the<br />

world’s biggest organic supermarket<br />

chain. With its headquarters in Austin,<br />

Texas the company has about 76,000<br />

employees in North America. This<br />

year Whole Foods Market expects an<br />

increase in sales of eleven per cent.<br />

That also could boost the corporation<br />

earnings, which were about ten per<br />

cent higher in the first quarter than<br />

22


insights<br />

last year. Strategic new openings of stores should increase Signal Update<br />

growth – the company plans to raise the current number of<br />

You will find an article regarding these two trading ideas on<br />

373 stores to 1000 in the next few years.<br />

1st and 3rd April on www.tradersonline-mag.com. We will<br />

After the <strong>publication</strong> of the previously mentioned<br />

work on the entry points and the profit targets.<br />

quarterly earnings at the beginning of this year, the<br />

stock opened with a down-gap which had already<br />

closed by the beginning of February. The stock is a buy<br />

at this level. You can expect that the support, which The years 2011 and 2012 were characterised by<br />

is shown by the blue line in Figure 1 will be defended a consolidation in the Australian dollar and by a<br />

successfully.<br />

correction in the year 2013. The new government of<br />

The stock can be bought immediately on the first Australia may be the reason why the year 2014 could be<br />

trading day of April. You could have achieved an average the year of strength for the Australian dollar. The prime<br />

profit of eight per cent in the past 15 years if you would minister of Australia has stopped all initiatives for the<br />

have held the stock until the 7th of May. The hit rate was introduction of renewable energies and the limitation of<br />

93 per cent. Only in one year, 2011, there was a loss of two CO 2 -emissions. This might be not very environmentally<br />

dollars, which is seven per cent. The stop-loss should be correct, but it will make the Australian economy more<br />

placed six per cent below the entry or below the support competitive in the short term. The reasons are lower<br />

line, currently at 51 USD.<br />

production and energy costs.<br />

Often the break in a trend attracts new buyers. The all Also the current strength of gold could lead to an<br />

time high of about 66 USD would be the possible target. increase. The Australian dollar shows a correlation with<br />

You would achieve a profit of nearly 25 per cent if the gold of 0.93. The value one would mean that there was a<br />

stock reaches this target if you enter at 52 USD.<br />

100-per-cent synchronism in the past year.<br />

Both introduced ideas can be traded with options as<br />

Trading Idea AUD/USD Future<br />

well. The duration of bought calls should be about two<br />

The AUD/USD-future June 2013 should be traded long again weeks longer than the recommended seasonal duration.<br />

– as we already did in September 2013. The ideal entry date If you are the writer, the duration may be shorter if the<br />

is the 3rd April with a holding period until the end of April. premium is OK. The basis of the written option should be<br />

The future increased 80 per cent of the time in the past clearly below the stop-loss. «<br />

15 years. The result was an average<br />

profit of 159 ticks or 1590 USD based<br />

on a value of 1000 USD per contract B2) Trading Idea AUD/USD Future<br />

– sometimes even more. The margin<br />

for one futures-contract is 2013 USD.<br />

A stop-loss could be placed 110 ticks<br />

below entry.<br />

The green line in Figure 2<br />

shows the time of the entry with a<br />

holding period to the red bar. The<br />

downtrend started in April 2013 at<br />

1.04 is still valid; the resistance at<br />

0.904 was tested two times since<br />

the beginning of the year and it is<br />

still intact. It would be ideal if the<br />

price of the future would be above<br />

the blue downtrend line at the time<br />

of the entry. The potential based As early as September 2013 the AUD/USD Future could have been traded on the long side with an average<br />

profit of more than 150 Ticks.<br />

on technical analysis would be up<br />

Source: www.lp-software.de<br />

to 0.96.<br />

23


iNSiGhTS – NEWS<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

carl icahn MaKes $600M in one DaY<br />

Carl Icahn, the billionaire investor, made more than<br />

$600m on Tuesday 18 February, after Dublin-based<br />

pharmaceuticals giant Actavis agreed to buy rival Forest<br />

Laboratories for $25bn. Mr Icahn, who is Forest’s second<br />

largest shareholder with an 11.3 per cent stake in the<br />

company, has spent years agitating the business to make a<br />

deal, and appears finally to have got his way after securing<br />

a seat on its board last summer.<br />

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk<br />

another Big win For lMax exchange<br />

LMAX Exchange has been named “Best FX Trading Venue – ECN/MTF” and “Best<br />

Infrastructure/Technology Initiative by Exchange/ATS” at this year’s Wall Street Letter (WSL)<br />

Institutional Trading Awards. LMAX Exchange has been recognised alongside leading global<br />

exchanges and financial services firms, including NASDAQ OMV, ICE NYSE Euronext, BNP<br />

Paribas Securities. The award was presented at a gathering of FX industry leaders at 583 Park<br />

Avenue in New York City on 25 February, and received by LMAX Exchange’s Chief Executive Officer<br />

David Mercer.<br />

The WSL Institutional Trading Awards honour excellence among providers to the institutional trading<br />

industry, awarding exchanges, brokerages and financial technology companies for achievements<br />

and innovation throughout the previous year.<br />

Source: www.lmax.com<br />

Fxstreet to teaM uP with M-Finance<br />

to sell its Forex news<br />

FXStreet has signed an agreement of partnership with m-finance,<br />

the most experienced and dominant entrepreneur in Hong Kong<br />

and Greater China for forex/bullion trading platforms and financial<br />

information services. They will team up to sell FXStreet’s News in Simplified and Traditional Chinese and English to<br />

m-finance’s network of brokers through their platform, applications and clients websites. This collaboration will open new<br />

markets for FXStreet through m-finance’s extended network in Asia, in particular in China, while m-finance will enrich<br />

its offer by adding this Forex news feed, a product already well implemented in the Western world but not in the East.<br />

The Forex News feed of FXStreet is made of around 160 pieces of news per day in English and around 100 in Chinese. It<br />

gives a technical radiography of the most traded currency pairs and the market’s latest movements, together with experts’<br />

analysis and bank’s forecasts for making trading decisions. The product also includes stocks and commodities news as<br />

well as some of the most important economic indicators, as Central Banks interest rate decisions or Non-Farm Payrolls for<br />

example. FXStreet’s news are provided with technical studies and charts that can be integrated in any information website<br />

or broker’s currencies platform and enterprise wide.<br />

Source: www.fxstreet.com<br />

24


Insights – news<br />

Forex Person of the Year 2013<br />

Laith Marmarchi and Nicole Elliott have been<br />

named “Forex Person of the Year 2013” by<br />

FXStreet, the independent Forex information<br />

website, for their service “ForexTrading.TV”.<br />

ForexTradingTV offers a real-time, technical and<br />

educational service: both new and experienced<br />

traders can go to get a clutter free view on the<br />

markets without the over analysis and noise of<br />

today’s trading environment.<br />

FXStreet decided to give Laith Marmarchi and<br />

Nicole Elliott<br />

Laith Marmarchi<br />

Nicole Elliott the title because they were able to convert their small startup business into a trusted service and collaborative<br />

platform of very high value and quality and managed to gain the trust of both traders and brokers, in only one year.<br />

Source: www.fxstreet.com<br />

$316 Million in Bitcoin Presumably Stolen<br />

$316 million in bitcoins, or six per cent of the outstanding<br />

amount of the digital currency, seem to have been stolen.<br />

The Tokyo based Mt.Gox, the once largest trading place<br />

for the currency is insolvent as announced by Managing<br />

Director Mark Karpeles in a recent press conference. In<br />

seeking bankruptcy protection he blamed ‘weaknesses in<br />

the computer system’ for allowing hackers to plunder the<br />

company. Some 127,000 Bitcoin devotees are reported to<br />

have lost their investment according to Coindesk, a bitcoin<br />

website that aggregates bitcoin news and rates, as quoted<br />

from an internal document. As a result, Mt.Gox has incurred<br />

744,408 in bitcoin debt compared to $350 million before the<br />

crisis broke out. As recently as January, bitcoin had climbed<br />

from $575 to $939. Whether Mt.Gox was a victim of hackers<br />

or unrecognized money was somehow stolen from the<br />

company’s computers or if the company simply swiped its<br />

customer’s money is yet to be determined.<br />

Source: www.sueddeutsche.de<br />

Just A Single Day of<br />

Trading Losses in 1238 Days<br />

Daily Adjusted Net Trading Income Distribution (in Millions)<br />

In its IPO prospectus, High Frequency Trading<br />

firm Virtu reveals it had just one losing trading<br />

day in 1238 days of trading. HFT has become<br />

increasingly controversial in recent years and this<br />

new IPO shines light on an otherwise secretive<br />

(and computerised) industry. Virtu is what’s called<br />

a market maker. It doesn’t hold onto securities for<br />

very long, but instead derives profit from bid/ask<br />

spreads.<br />

Virtu is a New-York based firm famous for trying<br />

(and failing) to buy Knight Capital Group in 2012.<br />

But things are definitely going well for the HFT<br />

firm. Its founder and chief executive officer recently<br />

purchased the Florida Panthers hockey team.<br />

Source: www.businessinsider.com<br />

The chart below illustrates the daily Adjusted Net Trading Income from January 1, 2009<br />

through December 31, 2013. As a result of Virtu’s real-time risk management strategy and<br />

technology, they had only one losing trading day during the period depicted, a total of 1238<br />

trading days.<br />

Source: www.businessinsider.com<br />

25


insights – news<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

The Trading Show Chicago<br />

The Trading Show Chicago 2014 is the only place you will<br />

hear from leading CTOs, CEOs and experts in proprietary<br />

trading, quant investing and exchange technology. Whether<br />

you’re focused on new quantitative models, adopting<br />

low latency systems or managing risk, The Trading Show<br />

Chicago provides unparalleled opportunities to network<br />

and ultimately do business with top trading firms, quant<br />

funds, international exchanges, end investors, banks,<br />

brokers and technology providers.<br />

North America’s leading traders, funds and exchanges will<br />

be there to:<br />

• Discover what machine learning can predict about<br />

future market behaviour<br />

• Learn how to quantify unstructured news sources and<br />

social media<br />

• Understand how to integrate exchange technology<br />

• Decipher the Dodd Frank and SEF regulatory landscape<br />

• Compare the pros and cons for building or buying<br />

your infrastructure<br />

• Master quantitative portfolio construction and<br />

forecasting<br />

• Realise how volatility can become your strongest asset<br />

• Discuss why it is time for a new non-profit wiki<br />

exchange<br />

• Identify the long-term future of the derivatives market<br />

There are two different options for attending The Trading<br />

Show Chicago – as a visitor, or as a VIP conference<br />

attendee.<br />

• Visitors get access to the on-floor seminars and<br />

international exhibition free of charge.<br />

Register as a visitor here: http://bit.ly/1iEu2p5<br />

• VIP conference attendees get access to on-floor<br />

seminars, the international exhibition, the VIP<br />

conference sessions, networking, an Old Wall Street<br />

themed cocktail party, and lunch and refreshments.<br />

Register as a VIP attendee here: http://bit.ly/1iEu2p5<br />

Additional discounts are available for groups of three or<br />

more – for more information please contact Felipe Lima at<br />

Felipe.Lima@Terrapinn.com or +1 212 379 6320<br />

Download the brochure at http://bit.ly/1oPvoe3<br />

Light beams mounted on the tops of buildings<br />

could soon carry messages about rising and falling prices<br />

A form of rapid-fire communication previously only available to the military is now<br />

coming to the financial world. Lasers perched atop high-rise buildings will next month<br />

allow the New York Stock Exchange’s data centre in Mahwah, NJ to communicate with<br />

NASDAQ‘s data center in Carteret, NJ. Though these two data centers are only 35 miles<br />

apart, the light will allow them to communicate with unprecedented speed. It is the<br />

culmination of a quest for instantaneous trading that first utilised custom-built fiber-optic<br />

cables, then microwave and later millimetre-wave transmissions, and the speed at which<br />

traders’ orders are transmitted is rapidly approaching the speed of light. The technology<br />

is expected to spread to the Stock Exchange’s trading clients as well, which are currently<br />

offered a system that uses microwaves.<br />

Source: www.psfk.com<br />

26


iNSiGhTS – NEWS<br />

news FroM Bats<br />

BATS Global Markets (BATS) and Equinix,Inc., the global<br />

interconnection and data centre company, announced<br />

that BATS has selected Equinix as its primary data center<br />

provider for all of the BATS exchange platforms, including<br />

the Direct Edge Exchanges – EDGA and EDGX. The Direct<br />

Edge Exchanges will remain at their current location at<br />

Equinix’s NY4 data center in Secaucus, NJ until January<br />

2015 when they will migrate to BATS’ technology in<br />

Equinix’s NY5 data center. In the second quarter of 2015,<br />

the BATS BZX and BYX Exchanges, and BATS Options,<br />

will move to NY5 from their current location of NJ2 in<br />

Weehawken, NJ.<br />

In other news, BATS Chi-X Europe appointed Jill Griebenow<br />

as chief financial officer. Ms. Griebenow joined from parent<br />

company BATS Global Markets and is responsible for all<br />

financial control and human resource functions at BATS<br />

Chi-X Europe, including financial planning and reporting.<br />

Jill is based in London, reporting directly to CEO Mark<br />

Hemsley.<br />

Source: www.bats.com<br />

FxcM increases<br />

FXCM reported revenues of $113.3 million for the final<br />

quarter of 2013 (October through December). Compared<br />

to the same period the previous year, this represents a five<br />

per cent increase. For the full year, revenues rose 17 per<br />

cent at $489.6 million compared to $417.3 million in 2012.<br />

Source: www.fxcm.com<br />

soros toPs historical heDge FunD PerForMers<br />

The annual study from fund-of-funds firm LCH Investments found that the<br />

manager, who closed his firm to outside investment a few years ago,<br />

bests most of his peers over the long term. George Soros’ Quantum<br />

Endowment Fund made $5.5 billion in profits last year, net of fees. This<br />

suggests that Quantum Endowment gained between 22 and 23 per cent<br />

in 2013. As a result, Quantum, managed by New York-based Soros Fund<br />

Management, has now generated a total of $39.6 billion in net profits since<br />

its 1973 inception, more than any other hedge fund, according to an annual<br />

study performed by LCH Investments NV, a London-based fund-of-funds<br />

firm. Soros’ strong performance in 2013 enabled his fund to move back into<br />

first place as the most successful hedge fund of all time, by LCH Investments’<br />

calculation. That’s slightly ahead of Raymond Dalio’s Bridgewater Pure Alpha,<br />

which has made a total of $39.2 billion since its inception in 1975. Last year<br />

it generated “just” $2.2 billion in net gains, according to LCH Investments.<br />

The absolute dollar figures cited in the study are astounding and underscore<br />

how much money has been created by the most successful hedge fund managers.<br />

Altogether, hedge fund managers made $192 billion after fees for all investors in 2013, LCH<br />

Investments calculated. The top 20 managers alone generated $55.4 billion in net gains. Since their inception, all hedge<br />

funds have generated $847 billion in net gains, the firm found. Over the past five years, hedge funds have made an<br />

estimated $709 billion, net of fees, for investors.<br />

The current top 20 managers alone made $199 billion over the same time period. These gains more than made up for the<br />

$28 billion loss suffered by the 20 managers during the 2008 financial crisis, according to LCH.<br />

Source: www.institutionalinvestorsalpha.com, by Stephen Taub<br />

27


TOOLS www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

NEW PRODUCTS WEBREVIEW SOFTWAREREVIEW BOOKREVIEW APPREVIEW<br />

New Products<br />

News from the World of Technology<br />

» U.S. News & World Report, a publisher of consumer<br />

advice and rankings, has released its U.S. News Advisor<br />

Finder, a directory of 320,000 active investment advisors<br />

and 10,000 advisory firms. The directory will offer<br />

information about financial professionals and advisory<br />

firms to consumers seeking advisors. The directory<br />

features online tools that enable consumers to search<br />

based on location, investment and planning needs,<br />

advisor experience and other criteria. Information in the<br />

Advisor Finder is provided by Financial Media Group and<br />

is drawn from state and federal regulatory filings, which<br />

are submitted to state regulators, the Financial Industry<br />

Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Securities and<br />

Exchange Commission (SEC). According to the publisher,<br />

information from these filings will be updated quarterly<br />

in the Advisor Finder. You can find more information on<br />

http://money.usnews.com/financial-advisors.<br />

U.S. News Advisor Finder<br />

» Trading Technologies International (TT) announced<br />

its X_TRADER software is now installed at more than 50<br />

universities worldwide. Through its university program,<br />

TT works with undergraduate and graduate educators<br />

in business, financial engineering, math and computer<br />

science programs to help prepare students for careers<br />

in finance and the futures markets. Universities can<br />

incorporate TT’s X_TRADER software and APIs, which<br />

are donated to schools by TT, into coursework and oncampus<br />

trading labs, allowing students to learn about and<br />

experience trading and risk management in a simulated<br />

environment using tools and market data similar to what<br />

professionals use. Some of the schools in the program<br />

include The Johns Hopkins University, Northwestern<br />

University, Purdue University, Tulane University,<br />

University of Chicago, University of Colorado Denver,<br />

University of Illinois, and University of Virginia. Please visit<br />

www.tradingtechnologies.com for more information.<br />

» VectorVest announced the release of VectorVest<br />

AutoTimer and Portfolio Genius, proprietary tools<br />

designed to help the investor minimise time spent<br />

on portfolio management and help eliminate trading<br />

decisions that may be driven by emotion and deviate<br />

from an investor’s trading plan. VectorVest AutoTimer<br />

incorporates market timing signals into both historical<br />

and real-time trading plans for investors to determine<br />

separate portfolio-management rules based on market<br />

direction, and then automatically implements these rules<br />

without manual intervention. It can be used in historical<br />

mode to create, test and refine automated trading<br />

systems that include market timing, stock selection, stop<br />

criteria and other portfolio-management options. It also<br />

can be used in real time to implement an automated<br />

trading plan through VectorVest Portfolio Genius, a<br />

paper-trading tool that, when used with AutoTimer, allows<br />

investors to set up their trading plans with long, short, or<br />

neutral trading templates. For more details, please visit<br />

www.vectorvest.com/AutoTimerRT.<br />

» The CBOE Futures Exchange (CFE) announced the<br />

launch of trading of futures with weekly expirations on<br />

28


TOOLS<br />

the new CBOE Short Term Volatility Index (VXSTSM). Like<br />

CBOE’s CBOE Volatility Index (VIX Index), the Short Term<br />

VIX Index (VXST Index) uses S&P 500 Index options in<br />

its calculations. The VIX Index uses SPX monthly options<br />

to measure expectations of 30-day volatility, while the<br />

VXST Index uses SPX options that expire every week<br />

(including SPX Weeklys) to gauge expectations of nineday<br />

volatility. The VXST Index’s shorter time horizon<br />

makes it responsive to short-term volatility triggered by<br />

market events such as corporate earnings, government<br />

reports, and Fed announcements. The 30-day VIX Index<br />

and the nine-day VXST Index are highly correlated, but<br />

the VXST Index is generally more volatile than the VIX<br />

Index, according to the company. It stated it expects<br />

professional traders could develop strategies to take<br />

advantage of price differences between VIX and VXST<br />

products. Find out more on www.cboe.com.<br />

» Worden Brothers has released version 12.4 of its TC2000<br />

online market analysis program, which features charting,<br />

streaming data and analysis tools. This latest version offers<br />

increased speeds, more flexible layouts, quicker access<br />

to the daily notes and reports, Morningstar rankings,<br />

WatchList additional features, real-time streaming<br />

indicators, more data to plot simultaneously, trendline<br />

alerts, new drawing boards and drawing tools and more.<br />

Additional details can be found at www.worden.com.<br />

» Thomson Reuters announced the roll out of a number<br />

of new features for the buy-side on its flagship financial<br />

markets desktop, Thomson Reuters Eikon. As part of<br />

the ongoing evolution of Eikon, these enhancements<br />

will provide portfolio managers, analysts, strategists<br />

and economists with access to powerful analytics and<br />

workflow. The new Microsoft Office add-in feature for<br />

Eikon enables portfolio managers and analysts to leverage<br />

the breadth and depth of Thomson Reuters content in<br />

applications such as Excel and PowerPoint to produce<br />

insightful models and superior presentations. This feature<br />

includes Excel tools to facilitate deep analysis of premium<br />

content sets including Datastream, fundamentals,<br />

StarMine analytics, smart estimates and key performance<br />

indicators. The addition of StarMine models to Eikon<br />

leverages new visualisation technology to provide buyside<br />

customers with greater insight to uncover actionable<br />

opportunities and better understand credit risk.<br />

Eikon portfolio analytics provides investment<br />

professionals with an intuitive monitor of intra-day<br />

performance across any number of portfolios and<br />

benchmarks, allowing them to identify primary drivers of<br />

absolute and relative performance at the sector/security<br />

level. Eikon briefcase is another powerful workflow<br />

capability that allows users to collect, manage and access<br />

key content and documents via their mobile solution and<br />

synchronise this with the desktop, allowing them to work<br />

remotely from anywhere at any time.<br />

Instead of a fixed home screen, Eikon now manifests<br />

itself as a floating command bar at the top of a customer’s<br />

screen, staying visible whatever application the customer<br />

is currently using and enabling quick access to Eikon’s data<br />

and tools. The floating command bar works seamlessly<br />

with the Eikon plug-in for Google Chrome which installs<br />

into the toolbar of Google Chrome’s browser interface and<br />

on-demand allows Eikon to analyse information that is<br />

being viewed on the internet and provide key related data<br />

for any entities listed on the page. For more information,<br />

please visit www.thomsonreuters.com.<br />

Worden Brothers<br />

29


TOOLS www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

NEW PRODUCTS WEBREVIEW SOFTWAREREVIEW BOOKREVIEW APPREVIEW<br />

iview Charts<br />

See the Markets through the Eyes of a Pro Trader<br />

For the everyday trader there are 1000’s of trading systems, signal services and educational content out there to choose from.<br />

Trading is a complex art form and there are many things to consider when making your market calls. MT4 (Meta Trader 4) is a<br />

powerful charting tool that a lot traders choose to use for their charting and technical analysis. There are many systems you<br />

can overlay in order to give you better trade signals and iView charts is one of them.<br />

F1) Trade view » iView Charts is currently available<br />

in two versions, the ‘starter’ and<br />

‘professional’ package. This is a<br />

brand new product in the market<br />

and V1.0 is the first release openly<br />

available to the public for purchase.<br />

Developed by Steve Ruffley who<br />

is the Chief Market Strategist<br />

at Intertrader.com and CEO of<br />

Tradermaker.com he has been<br />

using iView for over 18 months to<br />

make market calls via Twitter and<br />

use for his market commentary<br />

which has been featured on many<br />

major sites like Reuters, Bloomberg<br />

and the FT.<br />

The ‘trade view’ window allows the user to see all the products MT4 has to offer. Set up with all the indicators<br />

key to making trade calls. Pay particular attention to the iView bias and ‘hover’ over the arrow to see the trade<br />

call idea and supporting video.<br />

Source: iView Charts<br />

The Packages<br />

In the starter package you will<br />

have full access to the ‘trade view’<br />

window and all the MT4 indicators<br />

and templates that will work on every<br />

time frame on MT4. What makes the<br />

30


tools<br />

’trade view’ stand out is that it uses the technical analysis<br />

self-fulfilling prophecy theory. This theory states that<br />

if the majority of market participants are looking at an<br />

indicator for a signal, the signal will then generally work<br />

with the majority. iView is set to tell the user what other<br />

market participants are basing their trade calls on. All the<br />

key indicators are displayed such as Delta volume, DeM,<br />

RSI and Delta ATR are all set so that the user can clearly<br />

see if the markets are over bough or oversold. These are<br />

all widely available and indicators that are typically used<br />

by traders to identify both market trends and possible<br />

reversals.<br />

The ‘trade view’ window is run from the indicator<br />

list in the MT4 menu. This will run on any time frame of<br />

chart you attach it to, but hourly is recommended. This<br />

means you can use iView on the higher monthly, weekly<br />

and daily time frames for longer term trading decisions,<br />

right down to the 1- and 5-minute chart for intraday<br />

scalps. Once you have grasped this you can then use<br />

the ‘iView bias’ see what Steve, the creator, thinks the<br />

trade scenario for that product may be. There are seven<br />

main trades that Steve has identified from how the bias<br />

is calculated.<br />

0-10 Imminent Bull reversal<br />

10-30 Increasing Bear sentiment – leading to reversal<br />

30-45 Low edge directional bias<br />

45-55 Strong range breakout chance<br />

55-70 Low edge directional bias<br />

70-90 Increasing Bull sentiment – leading to reversal<br />

90-100 Imminent Bear reversal<br />

Once you have decided on the product and iView bias<br />

you think fits in with your view, you<br />

simply double click on that product to<br />

bring up the chart with all the attached<br />

indicators ready to use. This means<br />

that you can set iView running on any<br />

time frame to give you information<br />

and trade calls on every product that<br />

your MT4 broker version supports.<br />

For the ‘professional’ package<br />

you will also get access to real<br />

time trade calls via the Expert tab<br />

in the Trade view window, button<br />

‘analysis’, in which Steve and other<br />

noted professional traders and<br />

analysts are actually trading.<br />

F3) Expert<br />

F2) Sample Chart<br />

This is a sample of the chart you will see when you double click on a product<br />

in the ‘Trade view’ window. The template will show all the indicators, support<br />

and resistance, Fibonacci retracement lines you need to make your trading<br />

judgements.<br />

Source: iView Charts<br />

Pricing<br />

What’s included:<br />

• Three custom MT4 indicators<br />

• Ten custom time frame templates<br />

• Free access to Steve’s webinars<br />

The ‘Expert’ window is where you will see all the trades made by experts traders like Steve Ruffley and other<br />

well-known traders and analysts.<br />

Source: iView Charts<br />

31


tools<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

iView charts is designed to be both a mentor<br />

and a system that compliments your own trading style.<br />

• 100’s of archived trade examples and educational<br />

webinars<br />

Starter package: $79 per month / $699 per year<br />

Professional package: £129 per month / $999 per year<br />

Complete package: – Professional package & one to one’s<br />

with Steve $199 per month / $1999 per year<br />

The Technical Analysis behind the Indicators<br />

All Time Frame Trading<br />

Once of the most popular questions Steve was asked<br />

on his webinars is what time frame does he use to<br />

trade His answer as always was that ‘I use all of<br />

them’. He states, “when trading the markets you have<br />

to understand that the participants, will be made up<br />

of all type of traders and investors. You will have day<br />

traders, hedge funds, banks, central banks, the list<br />

goes on. All of these will have a different view and<br />

also different tolerances to volatility and directional<br />

moves.” The system takes calculations on monthly,<br />

weekly and daily points of attraction. These are then<br />

disabled throughout all the charts and templates<br />

giving the user a support and resistance frame work<br />

to use.<br />

Fibonacci<br />

What goes up must come down. In keeping to the selffulfilling<br />

prophecy of technical analysis one of most<br />

commonly used technical analysis tools is Fibonacci. It is<br />

often misused and the key to working with Fibonacci is<br />

using it with the correct market conditions.<br />

iView uses the principle of overextended markets<br />

and break out candles with other oscillators to make sure<br />

when the Fibonacci levels are drawn onto the chart they<br />

are of maximum value. The system clearly indicates the<br />

50 per cent retracement level which is a key level when<br />

trading with over extended moves.<br />

Pivots<br />

There are certain aspects of technical analysis that just<br />

work in trading and pivot points are one. Most traders<br />

will use pivots in some way, just as most traders will use<br />

moving averages.<br />

iView is set to give R1 R2 & S1 S2 (support and<br />

resistance) based upon when a certain criteria of volume<br />

and volatility are met. This indicator will work on any time<br />

frame and I again recommend that you use a combination<br />

of time frames to get your own view of the product you<br />

trade and the entry levels you pick.<br />

F4) Trade View in Action<br />

Open as many products as you like to correlate your trading calls, and see how different products perform<br />

against each other with the pre-set iView template.<br />

Source: iView Charts<br />

Conclusion<br />

iView charts is designed to be both a<br />

mentor and a system that compliments<br />

your own trading style. Indicators<br />

and templates are clean and easy to<br />

interpret. With the ‘trade view’ window<br />

your potential to analyse countless<br />

markets may bring an unexpected<br />

addition to the instruments you have<br />

considered trading in the past.<br />

The draw back may be that<br />

you might not want to know how a<br />

professional trader interprets what<br />

he sees and also how he perceives<br />

other trader’s view of the markets. The<br />

fact of the matter is that trading in a<br />

percentage game, so anything that<br />

can give you that confidence to both<br />

enter and remain in trades has to be<br />

worth the investment. «<br />

32


TOOLS www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

NEW PRODUCTS WEBREVIEW SOFTWAREREVIEW BOOKREVIEW APPREVIEW<br />

inside the house of Money<br />

Top hedge Fund Traders on Profiting in the Global Markets, revised and Updated<br />

by Steven Drobny and Niall Ferguson<br />

» This updated paperback edition of “Inside the House<br />

of Money” lifts the veil on the typically opaque world<br />

of hedge funds offering a rare glimpse at how today’s<br />

highest paid money managers approach their craft. Now<br />

with new commentary, author, Steve Drobny takes the<br />

reader even further into the hedge fund industry. He<br />

demystifies how these star traders make billions for their<br />

well-heeled investors, revealing their theories, strategies<br />

and approaches to markets.<br />

About the Author<br />

Steven Drobny is the founder and CEO of Drobny Global<br />

Asset Management, an independent investment advisory,<br />

asset management and consulting firm focused on global<br />

macro and commodity hedge fund strategies. He is also<br />

the author of “The Invisible Hands: Top Hedge Fund Traders<br />

on Bubbles, Crashes, and Real Money” (Wiley). Mr Drobny<br />

holds an MSc in finance and accounting from the London<br />

School of Economics and Political Science and a BS/BA from<br />

Bucknell University. Please visit www.drobnycapital.com for<br />

more information on Drobny and this book.<br />

Whereas some still maintain that rationality<br />

permeates financial markets, Drobny captures a different<br />

dimension, showing how the unquantifiable human<br />

forces of emotion and intuition are also at play. Along<br />

the way, readers get an inside look at firsthand trading<br />

experiences through some of the major world financial<br />

crises of the last few decades.<br />

Written by respected industry expert Steven Drobny,<br />

the book discusses how no market or instrument is out of<br />

bounds for elite global macro hedge fund managers. In<br />

addition, the book offers unique and illuminating insight<br />

into the inaccessible and sometimes downright secretive<br />

world of hedge fund investing. Highly accessible and filled<br />

with in-depth expert opinion, this updated paperback<br />

edition of “Inside the House of Money” is a must-read<br />

for financial professionals and anyone else interested in<br />

understanding how greed, fear, and the human forces of<br />

emotion drive world markets.<br />

Content<br />

The foreword is written by famous Niall Ferguson. Then,<br />

after the prefaces of former editions, there are 15 chapters<br />

altogether.<br />

34


TOOLS<br />

In the first chapter there is an introduction to Global<br />

Macro Hedge Funds written by Joseph G. Nicholas of HFR<br />

Group. The next chapter describes the history of Global<br />

Macro Hedge Funds, followed by some prospects about<br />

the future of Global Macro Hedge Funds. Then the book<br />

describes several prominent trading styles in detail.<br />

Chapter 4 discusses Family Offices and was written<br />

by Jim Leitner of Falcon Management. Next are the<br />

Prop Trader (Christian Siva-Jothy of SemperMacro),<br />

the Treasurer (Dr. John Porter by Barclays Capital), the<br />

Central Banker (Dr. Sushil Wadhwani by Wadhwani<br />

Asset Management), the Dot-Commer (Peter Thiel by<br />

Clarium Capital) and the Floor Trader (Yra Harris by<br />

Praxis Trading).<br />

Chapter 10 is about the Pioneer (Jim Rogers), chapter 11<br />

describes the Commodity Specialist (Dwight Anderson by<br />

Ospraie Management) and chapter 12 is about the Stock<br />

Operator (Scott Bessent of Bessent Capital).<br />

The final three chapters are about the Emerging<br />

Market Specialist (Marko Dimitrijevic´ of Everest Capital),<br />

the Fixed Income Specialists (David Gorton and Rob<br />

Standing of London Diversified Fund Management) and<br />

the Currency Specialist (anonymous author).<br />

Bibliography<br />

Title: Inside the House of Money<br />

Subtitle: Top Hedge Fund Traders on Profiting in the<br />

Global Markets, Revised and Updated<br />

Author: Steven Drobny, Niall Ferguson<br />

Pages: 368<br />

Price: $12.99, Paperback; $8.99, E-Book<br />

ISBN: 978-1-118-84328-4<br />

Release: April 2014<br />

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Altogether, the book provides great insights in the thinking<br />

of these great minds and their strategies (in parts). The<br />

book is absolutely worth the read as Steve Drobny once<br />

again shows his ability to find the best managers in the<br />

industry, relate to them and conduct great interviews<br />

readers can learn a lot from. «<br />

35


TOOLS www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

NEW PRODUCTS WEBREVIEW SOFTWAREREVIEW BOOKREVIEW APPREVIEW<br />

Trade Tuner<br />

Trading Journal App<br />

A company without decent book keeping will not be successful in the long run. The<br />

same goes for traders: If you do not have an overview of your current and closed<br />

trades and – even more important – if you do not learn from past mistakes, you will not<br />

grow as a trader and miss out on an essential tool for your trading success. All traders<br />

who are looking for a simple, easy-to-use trading-journal-app should take a look at<br />

Trade Tuner.<br />

» Step 1: Trade Parameters<br />

You can keep a trading journal in different ways:<br />

handwritten or with simple software like Excel or an app.<br />

We already introduced a professional solution for all<br />

iPad-users in TRADERS’ 08/2013. In the following we test<br />

a ‘liter’, but also less expensive solution. Let’s start.<br />

After the download from the App store the starting<br />

screen opens and explains all important functions. On the<br />

left side you see the menu options and from there the<br />

entry of the first trades is very easy. Figure 1 shows the<br />

entry mask. Here you enter the following information for<br />

your entries and exits:<br />

• Name of the security<br />

• Trading direction<br />

• Number of stocks<br />

36


tools<br />

• Commission<br />

• Entry and exit price<br />

• Entry and exit date and time<br />

• Market situation<br />

• Mood of the trader<br />

(15 pre-defined characteristics)<br />

• Stop<br />

B1) Entry Mask<br />

Furthermore you can enter<br />

individual notes in a separate box.<br />

Therefore every trader can remember<br />

the trades even after a longer period<br />

of time and he can analyse them and<br />

make improvements. Finally the user<br />

can enter whether or not he followed<br />

his trading plan. The entry of the<br />

parameters is very quick on the iPad.<br />

The entry of the trades is easy and can be adapted individually. You can comment every trade in the notes box.<br />

Source: Trade Tuner<br />

Step 2: Filtering and<br />

Display of the Trades<br />

After the trader entered the activities<br />

he now uses the “Trader Viewer”. This screen fulfils same goes for the display of the trades. Therefore we’ll<br />

two essential tasks. First, the trader can display a list test the visualisation of Trade Tuner in the next step. The<br />

of all of his trades. You can see this list in Figure 2. It is area “account graphs” is placed on the left menu bar. The<br />

clearly structured and includes all essential information, trader sees his trading results as a bar chart.<br />

profitable and losing trades are highlighted. If you want to The most important thing is the display of<br />

have more details on a certain trade you only need to click the performance, which you can see in Figure 3.<br />

on the trade and the total overview of all parameters is Unfortunately you can only see the result on a monthly<br />

displayed on the right side of the screen. The risk/reward basis, which is ok for medium- and long-term analysis.<br />

ratio is calculated automatically. You<br />

can adjust the sorting of the trade<br />

list individually and therefore every B2) Trade List in Detail<br />

trader gets an overview of his own<br />

preferences.<br />

Especially if you have a high<br />

number of trades it is very annoying<br />

to search for a specific trade. The<br />

developers recognised this problem<br />

and have included an extensive<br />

filter-option. If the user wants to<br />

filter only winning trades or losing<br />

trades or only trades that executed<br />

in a certain mood it can be done with<br />

a few clicks. Furthermore filtering<br />

by certain periods of time or certain<br />

markets is also possible.<br />

Step 3: Visualisation<br />

There is a saying that goes: A picture<br />

is worth a thousand words. The<br />

The overview of all entered trades is a good tool. You see a short overview or you can click on a specific trade<br />

to see all parameters in detail.<br />

Source: Trade Tuner<br />

37


tools www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

You can display the results of the trades<br />

based on different criteria.<br />

B3) Visualisation of the Trading Results<br />

You can display the results of the trades based on different criteria; with that you have a good basis to<br />

recognise mistakes and ways to improve your trading.<br />

Source: Trade Tuner<br />

A display of all single trades would<br />

be helpful to identify anomalies.<br />

However, the ability to “zoom” into a<br />

month is lacking – which is too bad,<br />

because a detailed inspection of a<br />

certain month can be interesting if<br />

one result differs heavily from the<br />

average. You can also display the<br />

trading direction (long/short), the<br />

number of trades, the markets and<br />

the risk and the number of stocks.<br />

These graphs are also displayed on<br />

a monthly basis.<br />

The “position graphs” are also<br />

interesting. These are charts that<br />

display trading in different facets<br />

which can then be analysed. You can<br />

choose the following display options<br />

for different time periods (twelve<br />

months at maximum):<br />

Solid Trading Journal with Room for Improvement<br />

Account summaries will be available soon!<br />

All in all there is room for improvement at Trade Tuner. It<br />

would be very important to include the usual key figures<br />

like hit rate, profit factor, maximum drawdown and so<br />

on – they are not offered yet, but should be available<br />

soon according to the developer. Trade Tuner fulfils the<br />

requirement of a clearly structured documentation and<br />

sorting for traders who do not want to use Excel or Access.<br />

The Trade Tuner app costs 26.99 EUR and can be extended<br />

by an unlimited number of trading journals for a small fee<br />

– for example to separate a daytrading journal from a long<br />

term trading journal.<br />

• Position by time: monthly performance of one or<br />

more underlyings<br />

• Position by symbol: total result per stock<br />

• Position by trade type: display of the number of<br />

trades long and short<br />

• Position by quantity: traded number of units per<br />

underlying<br />

• Position by price: average entry price per underlying<br />

• Position by risk: average risk per underlying<br />

• Position by market condition: display of the trading<br />

performance per market type and underlying<br />

• Position by mood: trading performance depending<br />

on the trader’s mood<br />

• Position by trading rules: following of the trading plan<br />

per underlying<br />

Based on these charts the trader can examine his trading<br />

behaviour and change it if necessary. It is very useful that<br />

you can always filter the trades by a specific underlying<br />

and therefore you can see quickly which markets or which<br />

stocks are traded successfully or unsuccessfully. «<br />

38


Enjoy free money £100,000 of it<br />

Take advantage of a free registration at BullBearings.co.uk<br />

today, and claim your free £100,000 of virtual cash. Join the<br />

UK’s foremost trading simulator and discover the real benefits<br />

of virtual trading. Over 100,000 other savvy investors have<br />

already joined and realise that trading virtually helps them<br />

succeed in the real world.<br />

Remember, practice makes perfect.<br />

Start your path to success today. What have you got to lose<br />

Stock Trading Fixed Odds Betting Spread Betting<br />

CFD Trading FX Trading<br />

Bespoke corporate solutions<br />

We are world leaders in financial market and other simulation technology, with high profile clients ranging<br />

from stock exchanges, global investment banks, national newspapers, online media groups, recruitment firms,<br />

educational institutions and international financial services companies. If would like to discover the benefits of<br />

running a trading game for your company please contact us at corporate@bullbearings.co.uk<br />

www.bullbearings.co.uk


STrATEGiES<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

Multi-Dimensional Trading<br />

The Ability to Take the Broader view<br />

Strategy traders often struggle with ways to see beyond the two-dimensional analysis of time and price.<br />

Although volume is often used to add a third dimension, there are other methods that employ analysis of<br />

additional markets related to the one being traded. Even with such multi-market methods, there can be a<br />

tendency to fall back on side-by-side time-price-volume analysis on the multiple data sets.<br />

Stanley Dash<br />

Stanley Dash holds the position of Vicepresident,<br />

Applied Technical Analysis, at<br />

TradeStation. His Wall Street career began in<br />

1975 and includes time as an active fl oor trader<br />

at one of the leading U.S. futures and options<br />

exchanges.<br />

SDash@TradeStation.com<br />

» The strategy presented here is designed to<br />

demonstrate a ‘multi-dimensional’ approach by<br />

using two measures of the relationship between two<br />

markets, DAX futures and the Euro (EUR/USD), to<br />

generate trading signals in the DAX futures. That is,<br />

the strategy becomes ‘multi-dimensional’ by analysing<br />

two measurements of the relationship between two<br />

40


strategies<br />

markets, Relative Strength (RS) and correlation, to<br />

find and filter trading signals.<br />

Simplicity is considered a desirable trait in a trading<br />

strategy and this style of analysis does carry the risk of<br />

having rules that are overly complex. A guiding principle<br />

in developing this idea was to fall on the side of simple<br />

and straightforward in the calculations and signals by<br />

restricting them to these two relationships.<br />

F1) FDAX and EUR/USD 6-Minute Bars with Relative Strength<br />

Relative Strength<br />

A Relative Strength (RS) line, also known as a Relative<br />

Strength ratio, is a simple technical tool used to compare<br />

the price action in two markets. It is calculated by dividing<br />

the price of one market by the price of the other. Although<br />

this is often done with, say, a stock price divided by an<br />

index, the RS line for this strategy is the result of dividing<br />

the DAX by the EUR/USD. The numeric value of an RS<br />

calculation is not important; rather, the direction and<br />

momentum of the RS line let us know if the first market<br />

is relatively stronger or weaker than the second, DAX and<br />

EUR/USD respectively in this case.<br />

It is not unusual to smooth an RS Line and that was<br />

done here as well. Again in pursuit of simplicity, the RS<br />

line was smoothed with a simple average. The length for<br />

this average was set to ten bars. None of the parameters<br />

in this strategy, including the length of this average, have<br />

been optimised. Ten is not only a common default for a<br />

calculation like this but, more importantly, it represents<br />

one hour of trading on 6-minute bars. There is a discussion<br />

of the bar interval later in this article.<br />

The direction of the average of the RS line is<br />

determined using a common momentum analysis of the<br />

average. Specifically, the strategy determines if the 5-bar<br />

momentum of the average is positive (for long entries) or<br />

negative (for short entries).<br />

During the test period, described more fully below,<br />

this approach was marginally profitable. The results<br />

were not strong enough to be convincing, yet some of the<br />

metrics were of interest and called for more refinement.<br />

It was encouraging that 39 per cent of the trades were<br />

profitable, with about the same percentage of long- and<br />

short-side trades being profitable. Of greatest concern,<br />

however, was the very large number of trades that the<br />

strategy generated, approximately 1690 or about seven<br />

trades per day during a 1-year test.<br />

Might it be possible to add another dimension to<br />

the analysis by examining another relationship between<br />

these two markets and use that to filter the trades The<br />

goal would be to improve profitability, of course, while<br />

reducing the number of trades.<br />

This chart contains both DAX futures and EUR/USD. The darker bars indicate<br />

the hours that correspond to cash DAX trading. The indicator is the 5-bar<br />

momentum of the 10-bar average of the relative strength line.<br />

Source: TradeStation<br />

F2) FDAX with Relative Strength, Correlation<br />

and Strategy Signals<br />

EUR/USD data has been hidden. The correlation study is red when the<br />

coefficient is less than -0.1 (not zero) to match the strategy rules. Any open<br />

trades are closed at the end of the cash session. See the text for details on<br />

the rules.<br />

Source: TradeStation<br />

Correlation<br />

Technical analysts use correlation studies to gauge<br />

how closely two markets track each other. Such studies<br />

generate a correlation coefficient, a value between +1 and<br />

-1. A correlation of +1 is a ‘perfect positive’ correlation<br />

– the two markets are in lockstep. A correlation of -1 is<br />

a ‘perfect negative’ correlation. Values near these, say,<br />

41


strategies<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

above +.7 and below -.7 are usually considered to be<br />

strong correlations and may be useful when interpreting<br />

market dynamics.<br />

F3) Performance Summary for this Backtest<br />

The backtest period was calendar 2013. Commissions were taken out at € 2.80<br />

round-turn.<br />

Source: TradeStation<br />

It is important to note that a correlation coefficient is<br />

non-directional; it tells us something about the directional<br />

movement of the two markets relative to each other but<br />

not about the past or potential future direction of absolute<br />

prices.<br />

For this strategy, a negative correlation is taken as a<br />

confirmation that the RS line signal has greater validity.<br />

That is, a buy (sell) signal is taken based on positive<br />

(negative) momentum in the DAX / EUR/USD RS line only<br />

when the DAX / EUR/USD correlation is negative. After<br />

all, if the RS line is used to point out relative movement<br />

then it is likely to be more reliable if the correlation study<br />

also shows the potential for divergent movement on an<br />

absolute basis.<br />

Note that negative correlation is the additional<br />

condition for both long and short entry signals.<br />

The addition of this rule had a dramatic effect on<br />

profitability while reducing the number of trades by 55<br />

per cent to 752, or about three per day during the one-year<br />

test period. The per cent of trades profitable improved<br />

slightly to 43 per cent and maintained the characteristic<br />

of having about the same per cent profitable for long and<br />

short side trades.<br />

Source: www.stockcharts.com<br />

John Murphy explains<br />

Relative Strength Ratio<br />

„The relative strength ratio or line<br />

is created by dividing the price<br />

of one market by the price of another... Any two markets<br />

can be compared with ratios… Absolute performance<br />

measures the actual trend of a market. Relative performance<br />

measures its performance against other markets…. Relative<br />

performance usually changes direction before absolute<br />

performance.“<br />

Correlation Coefficient<br />

“The correlation coefficient measures the strength of a<br />

relationship between two markets… The most important<br />

signals are given when the correlation line moves above or<br />

below the zero line… The correlation coefficient indicator is<br />

especially helpful in intermarket analysis…”<br />

John Murphy, „Trading with Intermarket Analysis“<br />

Other Considerations<br />

In practice, several basic conditions had to be selected<br />

before detailing the trading signals. First, when to trade<br />

Given that the intention was to create a day-trading strategy,<br />

trading was restricted to only the hours when the cash DAX<br />

index is trading despite the fact that the futures (and EUR/<br />

USD) trade for additional hours outside those times.<br />

The first possible entry each day is at 9 am CET,<br />

the open of the first bar that corresponds with the cash<br />

index trading hours. The last entry signal may be taken<br />

no later than the open of the 5 pm bar, allowing time for<br />

price action to develop before the end-of-session exit.<br />

In accord with a day-trading strategy the end-of-session<br />

exit rule closes any open positions at the open of the 5.30<br />

pm bar, corresponding to the last bar of the cash index<br />

trading hours.<br />

Second, the bar interval to be used had to be<br />

determined. The hours noted above mean that, for our<br />

purposes, the length of the trading day is 510 minutes.<br />

Six-minute bars were used, which means the session<br />

is divided into 85 bars. This allows for adequate data<br />

sampling and an ample number of trading opportunities<br />

each day. In addition, short-duration bars offer a<br />

manageable risk/range per bar, particularly in light of the<br />

size of the DAX contract.<br />

42


strategies<br />

It should also be noted that an unadjusted continuous<br />

contract data series was used for the DAX futures to<br />

minimise data anomalies caused by the back adjustments<br />

that are typical for a continuous contract series.<br />

Trading Rules<br />

The strategy is built on just a few core calculations:<br />

• Relative Strength line<br />

• 10-bar average of the Relative Strength line<br />

• 5-bar momentum of the 10-bar average of the Relative<br />

Strength line<br />

• 21-bar correlation coefficient<br />

Long entry signals are based on conditions in both<br />

Relative Strength and correlation.<br />

• Momentum of average RS line greater than zero<br />

(positive momentum)<br />

• Correlation coefficient less than -0.1 (negative<br />

correlation)<br />

Selecting a Bar Interval<br />

There is no ‘best’ intraday interval, and any selection<br />

of an interval for research purposes is subject to change<br />

as feedback is received from backtests. Consider these<br />

selection criteria.<br />

• Start with an interval that divides the day into enough<br />

data samples (bars) to generate useful analysis and an<br />

appropriate number of signals per day.<br />

• Experiment with intervals that tend to reflect a useful<br />

amount of price action for the strategy. Bars that contain<br />

too much or too little range may either hide information<br />

from the strategy or overwhelm it. A small amount of<br />

historical research will reveal the range tendencies of<br />

different bar intervals.<br />

• When using time-based bars, consider how the interval<br />

divides the day and that each bar be of the same length.<br />

That is, try an interval that is a whole-number factor of<br />

the length of the session.<br />

Short entry signals are based on conditions in both<br />

Relative Strength and correlation.<br />

margin requirement and maximum drawdown seen<br />

in the tests.<br />

• Momentum of average RS line less than zero (negative<br />

momentum)<br />

• Correlation coefficient less than -0.1 (negative<br />

correlation)<br />

Entry signals are restricted to 9 am until 5 pm CET,<br />

and any open positions are closed at 5.30 pm.<br />

No protective stops, profit targets or exits other than<br />

the end-of-session exit rule were used in the tests. Open<br />

positions are closed and reversed when new signals are<br />

generated during the day.<br />

Additional test parameters:<br />

• The period tested was the calendar year 2013. The<br />

first trades were on 2 Jan 2013 and the last trades<br />

were on 30 Dec 2013.<br />

• Position size was one contract only, with no<br />

pyramiding, add-ons or scaling.<br />

• Commissions were deducted at the rate of € 2.80<br />

round turn per contract, with no deduction for<br />

slippage.<br />

• Initial capital for backtest purposes was set to<br />

€40,000. This was chosen to cover the approximate<br />

Test Results and Observations<br />

The Total Net Profit for this test was almost € 46,000.<br />

While this is certainly an attractive number, the Profit<br />

Factor was only 1.28 so the margin-of-error was narrow.<br />

With 43 per cent of the trades profitable, 46 per cent<br />

of the long trades and 41 per cent of the short trades,<br />

there appears to be healthy bi-directional symmetry. It is<br />

interesting to note that the ratio of average winning trade<br />

to average losing trade is almost 1.7, a metric that goes<br />

well with a 43 per cent win rate.<br />

Nine of the twelve months were profitable, with the<br />

lowest percentage of profitable trades in any month<br />

coming in July (a losing month) at 35 per cent.<br />

Profitable trades were held 1.6 times longer than<br />

losing trades, despite the fact that no stop-loss orders<br />

were used and end-of-session exits were mandatory.<br />

This is an encouraging trait in itself but it may be<br />

most important when considering the conservation<br />

of psychological capital. It is rewarding to see holding<br />

periods skewed toward the better trades.<br />

Drawdowns and losing streaks experienced during<br />

this test would generally be considered unacceptable.<br />

The period from mid-June through late July 2013 was<br />

the period of notable drawdown, approximately €<br />

43


strategies<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

F4) Equity Curve for This Backtest<br />

18,000. Remember that there are<br />

no trade management techniques<br />

incorporated into this test. An<br />

examination of the individual<br />

signals and the trading history may<br />

yield ways to smooth the equity<br />

curve.<br />

In addition to favourable net results, the slope is positive overall. The drawdown period mentioned in the<br />

article, from mid-June through late July 2013, is clearly visible in the middle of the curve.<br />

Strategy Snapshot<br />

Strategy Name:<br />

Strategy Type:<br />

Time Horizon:<br />

Entry:<br />

Exit:<br />

Average Number of<br />

Signals:<br />

Average Hit Rate/<br />

Profit to Loss/Return<br />

per Month etc.:<br />

DAX/Euro Relative Strength<br />

Trend-following for DAX futures, using Relative<br />

Strength and correlation analysis between the DAX<br />

futures and EUR/USD<br />

Day-trading during cash DAX session, using<br />

6-minute bars<br />

Long entry: Momentum of average RS line greater<br />

than 0 (positive momentum) and correlation<br />

coefficient less than -0.1 (negative correlation)<br />

Short entry: Momentum of average RS line less<br />

than 0 (negative momentum) and correlation<br />

coefficient less than -0.1 (negative correlation)<br />

Positions reversed on new signals; all positions<br />

closed at end of cash DAX session, open of 5.30<br />

pm CET bar<br />

3 per day during the test period<br />

Percent Profitable 43%<br />

Ratio Avg Win: Avg Loss 1.67<br />

Profit Factor 1.28<br />

Average monthly return 7.21%<br />

(All results are from a backtest on calendar 2013 data.<br />

More information on test conditions is in the article)<br />

Conclusions<br />

The DAX/Euro Relative Strength<br />

strategy employs two measures<br />

of the price relationship between<br />

DAX futures and EUR/USD. Those<br />

measures are common technical<br />

analysis methods: Relative Strength<br />

and correlation. This is an approach<br />

that is not only multi-market, but<br />

also multi-dimensional in that it<br />

involves two distinct intermarket<br />

calculations.<br />

There are several aspects of<br />

Source: TradeStation<br />

this strategy that can and should be<br />

researched further, and even some<br />

missing elements that could be<br />

incorporated into the strategy. However, one should be<br />

careful not to be fall into the trap of overcomplicating the<br />

machinery.<br />

The most obvious missing element is a protective<br />

stop. Even a simple fixed stop-loss protocol may be<br />

helpful in preventing outsize losses on individual<br />

trades.<br />

As demonstrated here, the strategy has no exit rules.<br />

Can any of the calculations used to determine entries, or<br />

other technical analysis methods, be part of exit signals<br />

Can entries be filtered any further For example,<br />

entries require that correlation be less than -0.1 but<br />

there is no consideration given to the direction in which<br />

correlation is trending.<br />

Finally, the strategy’s time-in-market approaches<br />

100 per cent when considered against the trading hours<br />

as defined above. It is possible that performance and<br />

particularly the risk-adjusted performance measures<br />

would improve by identifying periods when there should<br />

be no positions. «<br />

44


STrATEGiES<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

The rSi return Strategy<br />

Simple Trading with an Established indicator<br />

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is one of the oldest indicators and many traders use it. The<br />

following article shows how to use this classic indicator in a simple trading system. We’ll use the<br />

hourly DAX-chart as the basis.<br />

David Pieper<br />

David Pieper is a CIIA and has been interested<br />

in stock markets since the end of the Nineties.<br />

He concentrates on trading with CFDs and is a<br />

freelance author.<br />

david.pieper@traders-mag.com<br />

» The RSI was developed by Welles Wilder and is a<br />

momentum-oscillator. Because of its construction<br />

it moves in the area between zero and 100 and<br />

delivers anti-cyclical signals if it reaches its extremes.<br />

According to the classic interpretation, values above<br />

70 are overbought and below 30 they are oversold<br />

and therefore bullish. An analyst or a trader often<br />

46


strategies<br />

With a little observation and<br />

a bit of experimentation you can<br />

create a simple trading strategy.<br />

assumes that the “blind“ following of the standard<br />

parameters is not successful. The same goes with the<br />

RSI – ultimately the market can stay in extremes for a<br />

long time if it is a strong trend – and that can lead to<br />

losses in trading.<br />

Modification of the Standard Parameters<br />

With a little observation and a bit of experimentation you<br />

can easily create a simple trading strategy even with old<br />

indicators. In our case the RSI is calculated based on 21<br />

candles instead of 14. Therefore the oscillator becomes<br />

slower and less volatile. Below 40 is oversold and the<br />

overbought-level is reached at the RSI-value of 80. We<br />

trade this system only long in the hourly chart. We hold a<br />

position overnight if necessary.<br />

Entry, Stop and Re-Entry<br />

Signal-generating is very easy with<br />

the RSI return strategy: If the RSI<br />

is below 40 at the close of a 1-hour<br />

candle a long-signal is generated.<br />

But it is only activated if the RSI then<br />

closes above this line on the 1-hour<br />

basis. The results of past years<br />

confirm that the return of the RSI –<br />

hence the name “RSI Return“ – is a<br />

wise approach compared to direct<br />

entry upon reaching the extremes.<br />

Therefore you avoid to “catching a<br />

falling knife”.<br />

There is no profit target with this<br />

strategy. You close the long-position,<br />

if the RSI climbs above 80 and then<br />

drops below.<br />

A trading strategy is only<br />

complete if the stop-loss is defined<br />

to limit the losses and to secure<br />

the book profits. In this strategy<br />

we use a 21-period ATR stop. At<br />

the entry we place the stop at the<br />

F1) DAX with RSI(21) in April 2013<br />

double ATR (Average True Range). As soon as the<br />

trade has earned the “initial risk“ the stop is place at<br />

break-even and afterwards it is trailed at a distance of<br />

the simple ATR.<br />

Example 22nd April 2013<br />

Figure 1 shows a good demonstration of the strategy. We<br />

see the hourly chart of the DAX with the RSI(21). There<br />

was a small losing trade on 19th April 2013 (point 1)<br />

and on 22nd April 2013 there was a long-signal at 7484<br />

points as the RSI dipped below 40 and then returned<br />

above (point 2). The initial stop was placed at 7406 points<br />

(green) therefore there was an initial risk of 78 points.<br />

We can see that there was a slight drop at first. On the<br />

following day a strong increase began and at 2 pm we<br />

could place the stop at break-even. The next trading days<br />

showed a strong upwards movement. The RSI finally<br />

The RSI-Return strategy generated long-signals as soon as the RSI drops below 40 and returns above it again.<br />

Every trade has a volatility stop (green) that is calculated based on the ATR and that is trailed as soon as the<br />

trade runs into profit.<br />

Source: www.tradesignalonline.com<br />

47


strategies<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

Strategy Snapshot<br />

Strategy Name:<br />

Strategy Type:<br />

Time Frame:<br />

Setup:<br />

Entry:<br />

Stop-Loss:<br />

Trailing Stop:<br />

Target:<br />

Risk- and Money<br />

Management:<br />

Average Number of<br />

Signals:<br />

Average Hit Rate &<br />

Profit to Loss:<br />

RSI Return Strategy<br />

Swing trading<br />

Hourly chart<br />

Entry after a downtrend or correction, RSI(21) is<br />

the signal generator<br />

Entry long as soon as the RSI(21) drops below<br />

40 and afterwards closes above this level on the<br />

1-hour close<br />

Double ATR(21) as initial stop<br />

As soon as the trade has earned its risk<br />

the ATR(21) stop is placed<br />

RSI reaches the upper extreme (80)<br />

on the 1-hour close<br />

0.5% to 1% per trade<br />

2-6 per month<br />

Hit rate about 45%, profit/loss about 2<br />

trades (compared to the reaching of the upper extreme of<br />

the RSI). There was a false signal at first on 9th October<br />

2013 (point 1). After the position was stopped out, the<br />

RSI reached the level of 40 again on 10th October (close<br />

of the 1-hour-candle) and therefore a new long signal<br />

was triggered (point 2). The entry was at 8588 points.<br />

The initial stop was placed at 8532 points according to<br />

the ATR. Therefore the risk was 56 points. The trade<br />

developed nicely and we stayed in the position over the<br />

weekend until it was stopped out on 17th October at<br />

8775 points (point 3).<br />

Re-Entry Rule<br />

Considering the strong uptrend of the DAX the exit was<br />

again too early – there is potential for optimisation.<br />

Therefore we use a simple re-entry-rule: If a long trade<br />

is stopped out according to the ATR-systematics, we<br />

recommend re-entering with a stop-buy order as soon as<br />

the last swing-high in the hourly chart is broken.<br />

reached 80 on 6th May (point 2) and generated the exit<br />

signal at 8128 points with its return below this level.<br />

Example of 10th October 2013<br />

Another example is the trade of October 2013 shown in<br />

Figure 2 where you can see that the trailing stop causes<br />

the exit of the long position – and this is the case in most<br />

F2) DAX with RSI(21) in October 2013<br />

Other Markets, Other Parameters<br />

The RSI Return strategy has generated profitable results in<br />

the DAX in the past. But there are only two to four signals<br />

per month on average and therefore the signal-frequency<br />

is relatively low. It should be analysed if other markets that<br />

are not correlated with the DAX are suitable for this trading<br />

strategy. If you backtest the EUR/USD or the bund-future<br />

the results of the past few years are<br />

fairly decent. But an adaption of the<br />

RSI and the ATR-stop is necessary to<br />

take the particular characteristics of<br />

the market into account.<br />

In October 2013, there was a false signal; the trade was stopped out. Soon afterwards there was a long signal<br />

(point 2) which generated a nice profit in the following trading days.<br />

Source: www.tradesignalonline.com<br />

Conclusion<br />

The RSI Return approach introduced<br />

here is simple and successful and<br />

can be traded in different markets.<br />

With this strategy we try to use the<br />

countertrend after a strong drop<br />

in price that can last a few days. Of<br />

course you can adapt this system<br />

further to fit the individual beliefs<br />

of the particular trader. For example<br />

you can use a trend filter, another<br />

entry rule for short positions or<br />

you can determine the position size<br />

dynamically. But it is important to<br />

test every approach extensively<br />

before trading with real money. «<br />

48


Proprietary Trader<br />

Career Mentoring Program<br />

(PT – ca. M. P.)<br />

Trader Training and Development Ltd.<br />

Trader Training and Development Ltd.<br />

Traders are made, not born ©<br />

Trader Training and Development Ltd. is launching its 12-week flagship<br />

“Proprietary Trader Career Mentoring Program“ (P. T. – Ca. M. P.)<br />

Program Aim:<br />

The Program has been designed to train traders in quantified,<br />

rule-based trading technologies to manage one‘s portfolio across<br />

all time frames and all liquid global markets (Equity indices, Bonds,<br />

Commodities, Forex). The techniques can be applied across all<br />

instruments (futures, spot, CFD‘s, spread betting).<br />

Programme Duration:<br />

The Program consists of 12 weeks of intensive supervised training.<br />

Trader Training and Development Ltd.<br />

will be forming a pre-launch “Protégé Group“ of trainee traders,<br />

whereby we will train 12 people, for 12 weeks, without any cost.<br />

Trader Training and Development Ltd.<br />

after the completion of the Program will<br />

put the trainee traders of the Protégé Group<br />

on the “Top Trading Talent“ Challenge.<br />

Each trainee will have the opportunity to win £12,000 in cash.<br />

In order to apply for a position in the “Protégé Group“,<br />

email Alex Spiroglou: alex@traderTD.com<br />

Trader Training and Development Ltd.<br />

145-157 St John Street<br />

London, EC1v 4PW<br />

United kingdom


STrATEGiES<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

Buying Above and<br />

Selling Below the “Snake Line”<br />

A Strategy That Trades on the Cable<br />

This article has nothing to do with natural history, let alone the world of snakes. The term<br />

‘Snake Line,’ as coined by the author, is a line formed by two closely related Moving<br />

Averages, which could be used to generate simple but proficient trading signals. This is<br />

especially useful when used on the Cable (GBP/USD), since it tends to trend significantly<br />

more than most majors. Here is one way of trading profitably with the Snake Line.<br />

Azeez Mustapha<br />

Azeez Mustapha is a trading professional,<br />

an InstaForex offi cial analyst, a blogger at<br />

ADVFN.com, and a freelance author for trading<br />

magazines. He is working as a trading signals<br />

provider at some websites. His numerous<br />

articles are being posted on other websites like<br />

www.ituglobalforex.blogspot.com.<br />

azeez.mustapha@analytics.instaforex.com<br />

» The Snake Line Strategy – a Trading Epiphany<br />

According to one widely read magazine, researchers have<br />

determined that the average adult makes 35,000 decisions<br />

a day. With 86,400 seconds in a 24-hour day, that equates<br />

to a decision being made almost every other second.<br />

The determination to buy or sell is one of the numerous<br />

decisions an intraday trader would make repeatedly in a<br />

50


strategies<br />

trading day. These trading decisions F1) The Cable Gains Stamina<br />

can have impact on our financial<br />

welfare: Therefore we want to be<br />

sure that we are making rational<br />

decisions as intraday traders.<br />

We have always been fascinated<br />

by the lines of the least resistance<br />

and ways of pinpointing them early.<br />

You probably know that there are no<br />

guarantees in the markets, but there<br />

are stages of breakthroughs in the<br />

trading career of serious traders.<br />

On January 17, 2014, the Cable experienced a new lease of energy and crossed the Snake Line to the upside.<br />

Experience has shown that hard A long order was immediately initiated at 1.6348. The stop was put around the EMA 60 which was 1.6337<br />

trading methods do not necessarily (eleven pips from the entry price). The take profit was set at 1.6370 (22 pips from the entry price). The target<br />

was hit immediately and within 15 minutes the price shot upwards by over 90 pips.<br />

assist traders to achieve their goals.<br />

Source: www.metaquotes.com<br />

Easy cum effective strategies are<br />

what can help traders. Therefore,<br />

there is always a need to stay with<br />

a short-term market propensity with deftness. You see, pullbacks in the market, but it would affirm the ‘going<br />

going with the lines of the least resistance is not only the up’ with further northwards push. The northward push<br />

best trading method; it is also the most helpful. There is has some factors behind it. Some speculators are<br />

no need to go back to methods that do not bring lasting afraid of missing the northward push, while some who<br />

success, although going with the current biases would are already in the market would long for continuous<br />

not be profitable if it is not done the right ways. The northward push. The northward push would stop only<br />

Snake Line helps us trade the current biases more in an when too many speculators feel like the price has gone<br />

easy way.<br />

too far and could reverse. That is when a southward<br />

push may begin.<br />

Principles behind the Snake Line<br />

The Cable (GBP/USD) is the favourable currency<br />

The Snake Line consists of the EMAs 60 and 100. It acts trading instrument for this strategy since it tends to trend<br />

as a support zone in an uptrend and a resistance zone in a significantly more than most popular majors (except the<br />

downtrend. The Cable is above it in an uptrend and below EUR/JPY and the GBP/JPY). Its spread is comparatively<br />

it in a downtrend. Likewise, in an uptrend, the EMA 60 low – a good bargain for intraday traders. The Cable<br />

would be above the EMA 100. In a downtrend, the EMA 60 moves by over 90 pips during the American session. It<br />

would be below the EMA 100. The<br />

premise is that when a support zone<br />

or a resistance zone is challenged F2) The Cable Loses Stamina<br />

and violated by the price, the price<br />

would move significantly after it has<br />

crossed it to the other side. When the<br />

price is within or around the Snake<br />

Line, it shows an equilibrium phase<br />

in the market, and no trades would<br />

be taken.<br />

When the price goes up after<br />

some equilibrium zone, there would<br />

be bullish engulfing pattern candles<br />

or consistent bullish candles (at<br />

times, gap-ups). The price normally There was a bullish bias on the Cable on January 24, 2014. But suddenly, the price dropped like a stone,<br />

crossing the Snake Line to the downside and closing below it. A short order was immediately initiated.<br />

breaks the Snake Line upwards,<br />

Source: www.metaquotes.com<br />

although there may be negligible<br />

51


strategies<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

moves by over 120 pips during the European session, and<br />

it also moves by over 90 pips during the Asian session.<br />

According to Babypips.com, here is the average<br />

movement of the Cable in each trading day:<br />

• Sunday 73 pips<br />

• Monday 149 pips<br />

• Tuesday 172 pips<br />

• Wednesday 152 pips<br />

• Thursday 169 pips<br />

• Friday 179 pips<br />

These figures are mean calculation, but it shows<br />

that the Cable moves considerably during all important<br />

trading sessions. Can you now see why the Cable is the<br />

favourite instrument for this strategy<br />

You can see Strategy Snapshot for more details of the<br />

trading method. Always make sure that you stand to gain<br />

at least, twice your stake, i.e. if the difference between<br />

your stop and your entry price is 21 pips, then you would<br />

need to set a target of 42 pips. This attractive risk control<br />

method ensures that you are happy with only 50 per cent<br />

accuracy. It also makes sure that you can recover your<br />

losses (break-even) with only 33 per cent accuracy.<br />

Two Winners and a Flop<br />

We would like to point out that the space between the two<br />

EMAs could be coated/painted with some translucent<br />

colour to make the Snake Line looks more interesting.<br />

Nevertheless, the space has been left untouched in the<br />

figures below. All the trades in the examples below were<br />

taken on the Cable. The consideration for spreads was<br />

F3) A Flopped Order on the Cable<br />

not reflected. The red vertical line shows where a trade<br />

was initiated. Do not forget to close a trade that is more<br />

than twelve hours old, no matter whether it is positive<br />

or negative.<br />

A winner : On January 17, 2014, the Cable, which<br />

had been moving below the Snake Line, experienced a<br />

new lease of energy and crossed the Snake Line to the<br />

upside. The price closed above the Line and a long order<br />

was immediately initiated at 1.6348. The stop was put<br />

around the EMA 60 which was 1.6337 (eleven pips from<br />

the entry price). The take profit was set at 1.6370 (22 pips<br />

from the entry price). The target was hit immediately<br />

and within 15 minutes the price shot upwards by over<br />

90 pips!<br />

Order: Buy<br />

Entry date: January 17, 2014<br />

Entry price: 1.6348<br />

Stop-loss: 1.6337<br />

Take profit: 1.6370<br />

Exit date: January 17, 2014<br />

Profit/loss: 22 pips<br />

Another winner: There was a bullish bias on the Cable<br />

on January 24, 2014. But suddenly, the price dropped like<br />

a stone, crossing the Snake Line to the downside and<br />

closing below it. A short order was immediately initiated.<br />

The order panned out thus:<br />

Order: Sell<br />

Entry date: January 24, 2014<br />

Entry price: 1.6611<br />

Stop-loss: 1.6627<br />

Take profit: .6579<br />

Exit date: January 24, 2014<br />

Profit/loss: 32 pips<br />

Profitable trading is essentially dealing with momentary losses triumphantly. A sell signal occurred according<br />

to our entry requirement and an order was made. However, the trade was a flop, because the price regained<br />

stamina and skyrocketed.<br />

Source: www.metaquotes.com<br />

Note: Since the stop was placed<br />

around the EMA 60, it was 1.6627<br />

(16 pips from the entry price). This<br />

made us double the target to achieve<br />

the RRR of 1:2; and it was 1.6579 (the<br />

difference between our stop and our<br />

entry price multiplied by two). This<br />

gave us 32 pips in profits.<br />

A flop: We do not want to make<br />

everything look too rosy, since<br />

profitable trading is essentially<br />

dealing with momentary losses<br />

triumphantly. Here is an example of<br />

52


strategies<br />

one trade that did not work. The most important thing<br />

here is that the price did not go beyond the initial stop<br />

and the loss was insignificant. A sell signal occurred<br />

according to our entry requirement and an order was<br />

made. However, the trade was a flop, because the price<br />

regained stamina and skyrocketed.<br />

Order: Sell<br />

Entry date: January 22, 2014<br />

Entry price: 1.6460<br />

Stop-loss: 1.6471<br />

Take profit: 1.6438<br />

Exit date: January 22, 2014<br />

Profit/loss: -11 pips<br />

Conclusion<br />

The Snake Line strategy ensures that you go short on<br />

the Cable when it is weak enough and go long on it<br />

when it gains stamina, while you manage your risk<br />

effectively. This is real trading, not gambling. Just as<br />

water and oil do not mix, trading and gambling are<br />

polar opposites. «<br />

Strategy Snapshot<br />

Strategy Name: The Snake Line Strategy<br />

Strategy Type: Day trading<br />

Suitability:<br />

Intraday traders<br />

Instrument:<br />

The Cable (GBP/USD)<br />

Time Horizon: 15-minute chart<br />

Indicators:<br />

EMAs 60 (red line) and 100 (blue line)<br />

Long Order:<br />

Buy when the Cable crosses the Snake Line to<br />

the upside and closes above it<br />

Short Order:<br />

Sell when the Cable crosses the Snake Line to<br />

the downside and closes below it<br />

For a buy order, the EMA 60 would be the stoploss<br />

Stop-Loss:<br />

area. This is also true of a sell order, and it<br />

makes sure that the stop is sensibly tight enough<br />

The difference between your stop and your entry<br />

Target:<br />

price multiplied by two<br />

Position sizing: 0.01 lots for each $1000<br />

Risk/Reward Ratio: 1:2<br />

Break-Even:<br />

You may move your stop to break-even once you<br />

have recovered your initial risk<br />

Maximum Trades: 10 trades per week<br />

Maximum Trade<br />

Duration:<br />

12 hours<br />

Preview of the next issue<br />

COVERSTORY<br />

PEOPLE<br />

New Concepts for Timing the Market<br />

In our coverstory trader Faik Giese will discuss new<br />

concepts for analysing special situations for charts as<br />

well as for analyst ratings. Often there will be conflicts<br />

of interest when it comes to analysts deciding about<br />

their ratings which in turn enables traders to profit from<br />

these imbalances. In the article, we will discuss sell<br />

recommendations as well as downgrades in detail.<br />

interview Adam Jowett<br />

Many traders went through rough times in their<br />

careers. However, Adam Jowett even more so after<br />

he was disgnosed with cancer at age 30, when he<br />

had to fight a hard battle for his life. Today, he is<br />

trader, entrepreneur and triathlete. Stay tuned for<br />

an interview that’s more than just talking trading; an<br />

interview that’s also about the value of being alive.<br />

The May issue of TrADErS´ will be published on 24th April 2014.<br />

53


BASiCS<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

Darvas Boxes Analysis<br />

A Simple and Useful Tool Based on Support and resistance Theory<br />

Oscar Cuevas<br />

Oscar Cuevas is a computer engineer and<br />

provides online webinars on Expert Advisor<br />

programming. He has also been a content<br />

developer and trading strategies programmer in<br />

Visual Chart for more than fi ve years.<br />

sistemas@visualchart.com<br />

In the late 50s, Nicolas Darvas developed his famous boxes<br />

theory. According to this theory, prices move inside support<br />

and resistance channels that the author of the theory called<br />

Darvas Boxes. When price moves outside these boxes, the<br />

author claims that new support and resistance levels are<br />

going to be generated depending on the extreme price exit<br />

the boxes form.<br />

54


BASICS<br />

The strategy consists of waiting<br />

for the breakout of one of the box<br />

extremes and trade in this direction.<br />

» Darvas Boxes<br />

The Darvas Boxes study follows the basics of any<br />

other price channel patterns based study: While price<br />

remains inside the range, we assume that the price<br />

movement is going to follow its normal course for a<br />

while. However, if some of the extremes are broken by<br />

price action, the expected reaction will be a change in<br />

the price behaviour and probably the beginning of a<br />

new trend. In the following article we will explain the<br />

functioning of this tool and also the trading rules to be<br />

used with it.<br />

Calculating the Limits<br />

Before going into detail on the information provided by<br />

the Darvas boxes, we are going to explain their calculation<br />

procedures.<br />

The high and low levels formed by each of the boxes<br />

are obtained by following these<br />

steps:<br />

1. We establish the top price of the<br />

box at the high of the current<br />

session.<br />

2. Once this top has been obtained,<br />

we monitor price to see if this<br />

level is broken by the price<br />

action during the following two<br />

sessions. If this level is broken,<br />

we start again.<br />

3. If we find a top that has not<br />

been violated over the latest two<br />

sessions, we save it and store the<br />

low price of the current session<br />

as a base for the box.<br />

4. Now we note this base and<br />

monitor it over the following two<br />

sessions, in order to see if the<br />

base is violated or not. If the base<br />

is violated, we move back to step<br />

3, in other words, we update the<br />

base again. Likewise, if the top<br />

value of the box is violated by the price action, then<br />

we move back again to the beginning, this being step<br />

1.<br />

5. If step 5 is reached, a Darvas Box will be consolidated<br />

and will be formed by the duo TOP/BASE that has not<br />

been violated, at least, over the latest two sessions.<br />

After step 5 the process is repeated by keeping the<br />

last box until a new one appears.<br />

Figure 1 shows a calculation example with a daily<br />

chart of Google. The value top has been updating over<br />

the first three bars so we remain under step 2. On January<br />

24th top ($1167) remains active, and consequently<br />

we move to step three and start looking for the BASE,<br />

starting up in the low of the same day, this being $1123.<br />

However, the next day price breaks to lower lows so start<br />

over again with a new base at 1082. Two days later on<br />

F1) Darvas Boxes Calculation – Google Daily Chart<br />

The top keeps updating until the two sessions’ rule is fulfilled. This happens on January 24th (2 sessions<br />

after TOP). The box is completed on January 29, once the two sessions’ rule has been fulfilled for the BASE.<br />

Source: Visual Chart<br />

55


ASICS<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

Not all breakouts are going to be<br />

considered as signals by Darvas.<br />

January 29th price action did not violate the new base for<br />

2 sessions, so we keep it as our reference and the Darvas<br />

Box is confirmed.<br />

This process can be automated with the use of technical<br />

indicators to be found in technical analysis software. At<br />

our website we provide you the code of the tool in Visual<br />

Chart. Please follow the link: www.tradersonline-mag.<br />

com/download/Code_DarvasBoxesAnalysis.txt<br />

In Figure 2, we can see an example of how the boxes<br />

look with a Visual Chart indicator: We notice that the<br />

indicator draws the boxes in the chart but only once<br />

they are confirmed, while it calculates internally the<br />

subsequent box.<br />

Signals Interpretation<br />

Basically, the Darvas Boxes strategy consists of waiting<br />

for the breakout of one of the box extremes and trade in<br />

F2) Signals Based on Darvas Boxes – Amazon Daily Chart<br />

this direction. However the author included an element<br />

to be taken into account for the strategy, this being the<br />

volume of the asset during the breakout. In fact, not<br />

all breakouts are going to be considered as signals by<br />

Darvas. Instead, the breakout has to come together with<br />

a volume peak (well above volume average).<br />

Each new trade comes with a stop-loss to cover the<br />

losses caused by false signals. If price moves in the proper<br />

direction and new box breakouts occur, the position<br />

is to be increased. Each new breakout comes with the<br />

corresponding position increasing. Concurrently, the<br />

stop-loss accompanies the change of boxes, at the level<br />

of the opposite side of the box.<br />

In Figure 2 we will monitor the signals provided by<br />

the method applied to Amazon. The functioning of the<br />

volume filter is evident in point B as the system does not<br />

give a signal because the breakout is not accompanied<br />

by a volume peak. However, the<br />

breakouts produced in the rest<br />

of the points match the volume<br />

conditions and consequently the<br />

long signal is given. Also in point<br />

D we observe the increasing of the<br />

position size with the new breakout<br />

in the direction of our positions. The<br />

strategy sets as an exit point the<br />

base of the box, allowing cutting of<br />

losses in the case of false signals (as<br />

happened at point A) or take your<br />

profits if the creation of new boxes<br />

accompanies the bullish movement<br />

(cases C and D).<br />

At point A, we notice a box breakout accompanied by volume increase. The stop is placed at the base of the<br />

box. Price changes its direction and the position is closed with losses. A new signal is given in point C. In this<br />

case, price moves in the direction of our position. At point D a new valid breakout occurs, so the size of our<br />

positions is increased. On December 29th price breaks the base and the system.<br />

Source: Visual Chart<br />

Conclusions<br />

Nicolas Darvas’ method is known<br />

for being very simple, as it is based<br />

in one of the main principles of<br />

technical analysis, price action and<br />

volume. Often best results come<br />

with the simplest strategies. «<br />

56


WHY LEARN TO TRADE WITH US<br />

Free<br />

Courses<br />

Private<br />

Mentorship<br />

Trading Videos<br />

DVDs<br />

Indicators<br />

Live<br />

Trading Room<br />

“This is the best decision I ever made in my life"<br />

Pratik Thakar, Customer<br />

FOREX, SPREADBETTING, COMMODITIES, STOCKS AND EQUITIES<br />

FOR BEGINNERS TO ADVANCED<br />

Customer<br />

Survey<br />

81% rated<br />

"Excellent"<br />

- Company Registration: 7080671<br />

- VAT number: GB982448189<br />

Winner of London<br />

Investor Show<br />

Award 2012<br />

TRADING COLLEGE LTD<br />

Sandford House, Claremont Rd,<br />

Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 8DH<br />

Tel: 020 3 005 4905<br />

Email: tilly@tradingcollege.co.uk<br />

www.tradingcollege.co.uk


BASiCS<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

Trading Journal:<br />

Steve Burns<br />

My SPy Trade Step by Step<br />

In the trading journal, traders – from beginners to professionals – present one of their<br />

trades that taught them a special lesson. This time it is Steve Burns, professional<br />

trader, author and blogger.<br />

» First Entry<br />

For the sake of simplicity all dollar amounts are rounded<br />

in this article. I was trading SPY which is the SPDR ETF<br />

on the S&P 500 Index (see Figure 1). SPDR funds belong<br />

to the ETF family of State Street Global Advisors (SSgA).<br />

My first entry spot was with a break above the 10 day<br />

on September 4th with $130,000 position size (50 per cent<br />

of the account). This was the first day out of 18 that price<br />

broke over the 10 day moving average line. In essence<br />

this was a breakout trade out of a range after the 100 day<br />

moving average held as support at $163. With 50 per cent<br />

of my account at risk then a big two per cent fall in the<br />

index would still have only been a one per cent total loss<br />

of trading capital keeping risk managed.<br />

58


BASICS<br />

Two days later I was able to hold<br />

through the volatility because I was using<br />

end of day stop losses.<br />

Scaling-In<br />

Two days later I was able to hold through the volatility<br />

because I was using end of day stop losses. My original<br />

stop was SPY closing below the 10 day moving average<br />

thus invalidating the break out. It sliced through but<br />

quickly recovered to close higher. Three days later SPY<br />

was able to close above the 50 day moving average with<br />

power. So I added the other half of my account ($130,000)<br />

to bring my position size to $260,000 total. I moved my<br />

end of day stop at this point to under the 50 day.<br />

I held as SPY gapped up and was in a price base for<br />

a few days. I then moved my end of day stop to the 5<br />

day exponential moving average. After a few days it<br />

then gapped up again to $170 and finished at the low of<br />

the day with a nasty black candle.<br />

I stayed in and kept my stop at the<br />

5 day exponential line. In my trading F1) SPY Trade<br />

I have not found one black candle to<br />

mean much, it usually even resumes<br />

the trend after a day like that. It did<br />

recover the next day after the black<br />

candle, I was still in.<br />

may go parabolic at that point I thought. No such luck,<br />

buyers were not coming in over $173 at all on Thursday<br />

and SPY was very extended over the 5 day exponential<br />

moving average. With most of my reward already having<br />

happened and more risk of a retracement back to the<br />

5 day line than possible gain to the upside I decided to<br />

take my profits and I would probably have a chance to get<br />

back in with a better entry as the 5 day line caught back<br />

up to price.<br />

Conclusion<br />

It was a great trading campaign and I ended with an<br />

almost $11,000 profit in two weeks of holding a very<br />

stable position in a low risk index. I’ll take it. «<br />

Exit<br />

Then came the FOMC day (Federal<br />

Open Market Committee). I had to<br />

follow the chart and stay long with<br />

it sitting right at all time highs with<br />

a catalyst on tap. Everyone that<br />

wanted risk off was likely out and<br />

waiting to get back in when the coast<br />

was clear. Everyone waited for the<br />

word “taper”, when it was steady<br />

as she goes the SPY exploded up<br />

to over $173 then came back to<br />

close at $173 on the day. I held, we<br />

The first mark shows the entry. The second mark shows where Steve Burns added to his position. Finally, the<br />

third mark shows where he exited the whole trade with a good profit.<br />

Source: www.tradesignalonline.com<br />

59


BASiCS<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

risk- and Money-Management<br />

Part 4: “Trading is Not About how Often you Win or Lose“<br />

In this series of articles we present a multi-level process to create a good,<br />

sophisticated risk- and money-management plan. The fourth part deals with the<br />

fact that trading is not about how often you win or lose.<br />

Jens klatt<br />

Jens Klatt is a market analyst at DailyFX.de and<br />

moderates the German DailyFX-forum. He has been<br />

in the financial sector for over seven years. Besides<br />

technical and fundamental observation of the<br />

markets, he focuses on sentiment analysis in the<br />

forex markets and develops his trading decisions<br />

based on this analysis.<br />

www.dailyfx.de<br />

» We assume you know two traders. Trader 1 is right 40<br />

per cent of the time and achieves profit. Trader 2 is right<br />

about 80 per cent of the time and is successful with his<br />

trades. What do you think – who is more profitable<br />

Actually you cannot tell which trader is more successful<br />

or if any of these two traders is profitable at all. For example,<br />

if we assume that trader 1 achieves 200 pips with every<br />

successful trade and limits his losses to 100 pips – then he<br />

60


BASICS<br />

would have earned about 200 pips<br />

after a series of ten trades:<br />

4 * 200 pips - 6 * 100 pips =<br />

800 pips - 600 pips = 200 pips<br />

If the second trader earns 25 pips<br />

with every successful trade but loses<br />

100 pips on every losing trade, then<br />

he would have reached break-even<br />

after ten trades:<br />

F1) Payoff Ratio Shows Reason for Falling Equity Curve<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

127<br />

122<br />

112 110<br />

105<br />

Average Profit Average Loss<br />

102<br />

98 96<br />

90 90 89<br />

84<br />

65<br />

60<br />

61<br />

52<br />

53 54<br />

50 49 47<br />

48<br />

44<br />

43<br />

78<br />

63<br />

60 60<br />

30<br />

51<br />

52<br />

94<br />

0<br />

8 * 25 pips - 2 * 100 pips =<br />

200 pips - 200 pips = 0 pips<br />

You can see why the majority of traders lose money trading, although they are right most of the time: The<br />

average profits (blue) are much smaller than the average losses (red).<br />

New traders are often impressed<br />

Source: DailyFX Research Department<br />

by the hit rate and are therefore<br />

often misled. Of course, it is exciting<br />

and it satisfies one’s ego if you earn<br />

money on most of your trades. But at the end of the day rates of 90 per cent or more. This seems appealing at first, but<br />

you should achieve a positive result, shouldn’t you there is no information about the profitability of the strategy.<br />

You should always keep this in mind – especially if you In other words: It is very simple to generate a high hit<br />

are confronted with trading strategies that claim to have hit rate. You trade without a stop-loss and close the position as<br />

Average<br />

61


ASICS<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

F2) One Year Hit Rates – Q4 2009 to Q3 2010<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

% Profit % Loss<br />

49% 54% 57% 58% 59% 60% 60% 61% 61% 62% 64% 64% 66% 71%<br />

position is stopped out or not. It is<br />

a fact that you cannot predict future<br />

market movements – therefore the<br />

risk of having a losing trade remains<br />

in place. However, it is possible<br />

to achieve long-term profits with<br />

trading. If this is your goal you should<br />

always remember that the hit rate is<br />

not that important. The relation of<br />

the average profit to average loss<br />

– the pay-off-ratio – should be your<br />

focus. The formula is:<br />

0%<br />

Payoff Ratio =<br />

The graphic shows the hit rate of FXCM retail traders during the fourth quarter 2009 to the third quarter 2010.<br />

Average Profit / Average Loss<br />

It illustrates that the hit rate in the currency pair AUD/JPY was the lowest with 49 per cent and it was the<br />

highest in the currency pair AUD/NZD with 71 per cent.<br />

Based on the facts mentioned<br />

Source: DailyFX Research Department<br />

above and the Figures 2 and 3 it is<br />

obvious that you should focus on the<br />

improvement of the average size of<br />

soon as it is one point in profit. The problem: The position<br />

that is not achieving a profit results in a horrendous loss<br />

– and the margin call and the wipe-out of the account<br />

is only a question of time. The logical protection is the<br />

placing of a stop-loss. But with the limitation of the size<br />

of the loss the trader loses his influence on the hit rate.<br />

Truth is, that wider stops reduce the probability of<br />

being stopped out and “tighter“ stops are hit more often.<br />

But at a higher level the market is now determining if a<br />

winners and losers – and not on the maximisation of the<br />

hit rate.<br />

The displayed graphics are especially interesting if<br />

you consider that the worst hit rate was 49 per cent, the<br />

best was 71 per cent – during the same period of time.<br />

However the profitability was negative – although the hit<br />

rate was very good – and the traders lost money.<br />

Therefore the author recommends targeting a payoff-ratio<br />

of 2:1. That means that the average profit<br />

should be twice as high as the<br />

average loss.<br />

F3) Average Profitability Q4 2009 to Q3 2010<br />

It is necessary to approach the<br />

subject of trading with a professional<br />

70%<br />

Q4 2009 Q1 2010 Q2 2010 Q3 2010<br />

perspective and therefore deal<br />

60%<br />

accordingly with loss-trades.<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

The graphic shows the percentage of profitable retail traders of FXCM during the fourth quarter 2009 to the<br />

third quarter 2010. It illustrates that less than 50 per cent of the FXCM retail traders were profitable in the<br />

mentioned period (dotted red line) – despite the good hit rate (Figure 2).<br />

Source: DailyFX Research Department<br />

Conclusion and Outlook<br />

The hit rate plays only a minor part<br />

in professional trading. Whether a<br />

trader is profitable or not depends<br />

on the management and the relation<br />

of average profits and losses. The<br />

trader especially has control over<br />

the average size of a losing trade<br />

because he can use a stop-loss.<br />

The next part of this series of<br />

articles will deal with the reaction<br />

of trading newbies and trading<br />

professionals to loosing trades and<br />

what you can learn from it. «<br />

62


InTheMoneyStocks .com<br />

The Leader In Market Guidance


BASiCS<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

The Trader’s Technical Arsenal<br />

Common indicators in Meta Trader – Part 6<br />

Azeez Mustapha<br />

Azeez Mustapha is an offi cial analyst at Instaforex<br />

Companies Group, a blogger at Advfn.com, and<br />

a freelance author for trading magazines. He is<br />

working as a trading signals provider at some<br />

websites. He is a senior analyst at Paxforex.com.<br />

His articles are also available on other websites like<br />

www.ituglobalforex.blogspot.com.<br />

azeez.mustafa@analytics.instaforex.com<br />

In his last article (TRADERS´ 02/2014) Azeez Mustapha<br />

explained Fractals, the Gator Oscillator and the Ichimoku Kinko<br />

Hyo. This time he discusses the Moving Average Convergence<br />

Divergence (MACD), the Market Facilitation Index (MFI) and<br />

the Momentum indicator; as they work in MetaTrader, which<br />

continues to increase in popularity (especially version 4.0).<br />

In most cases, the indicators’ default parameters are used.<br />

64


BASICS<br />

» The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)<br />

The MACD was created by Gerald Appel in the 1970s. This<br />

indicator is highly favoured by professionals and it is very<br />

easy to use. It shows the dominant bias as well as the<br />

momentum at a particular period of the market. Because<br />

of this, it is very good for trend identification/momentum<br />

identification. Trending markets are bifurcated into<br />

bullish and bearish ones. The MACD default parameters<br />

on MT4 go as follow:<br />

Fast EMA: 12<br />

Slow EMA: 26<br />

MACD SMA: 9<br />

All applied to close<br />

Note: EMA stands for Exponential Moving Average and<br />

SMA stands for Simple Moving Average.<br />

Computation:<br />

MACD Line: (12-day EMA - 26-day EMA)<br />

Signal Line: 9-day EMA of MACD Line<br />

MACD Histogram: MACD Line - Signal Line<br />

In Figure 1, you see how the MACD appears on the<br />

GBP/CAD 4-hour chart. In order to make things as easily<br />

understood as possible, the red line of the MACD is the<br />

signal line and the vertical grey lines are the histogram.<br />

The zero line is marked as 0.00. As you can see, either the<br />

signal line and the histogram are above the zero line or<br />

they are below it. The zero line plays the role of supply<br />

and demand zones of the MACD.<br />

Uses for the MACD<br />

1. MACD Crossovers:<br />

When both the MACD signal line<br />

and the histogram fall below<br />

the zero line, you consider short<br />

orders, for it means the market<br />

is falling. When both the MACD<br />

signal line and histogram go<br />

above the zero line, you can<br />

consider long orders only, for it<br />

means the market is rising. This is<br />

very noteworthy in that it makes<br />

you enter a trending market when<br />

it has been confirmed by the<br />

MACD. This is one advantage the<br />

MACD has over certain oscillators<br />

which make speculators dive<br />

into the ocean of the markets on<br />

bogus signals.<br />

F1) The MACD on the GBP/CAD<br />

2. MACD Convergence and Divergence:<br />

MACD Convergence occurs when the price is in a<br />

downtrend and the MACD signal line and histogram<br />

are rising towards the zero line or above it, it could<br />

signal the end of the downtrend and the beginning<br />

of a bullish trend. MACD Divergence occurs when<br />

the price is in an uptrend and the MACD signal line<br />

and histogram are falling towards the zero line or<br />

below it, it could signal the end of the uptrend and<br />

the beginning of a bearish trend. At that point, things<br />

may go sour for the bulls, but the conditions in the<br />

market may become propitious for the bears.<br />

3. Overextended Market Conditions:<br />

In an overextended bearish market, the MACD signal<br />

line and histogram will fall extremely significantly.<br />

This is an indication that there will soon be a rally<br />

in the market. The overextension of the market will<br />

be more significant on higher time frames than<br />

lower time frames; therefore the speculator should<br />

be careful. The quail does not claim to be wise,<br />

but it claims to be highly suspicious. This logic can<br />

be reversed for a bull market. In an overextended<br />

bullish market, the MACD signal line and histogram<br />

will rise extremely significantly. This is an indication<br />

that there will soon be a pullback in the market. It is<br />

like a kind of overbought and oversold conditions for<br />

oscillators.<br />

Market Facilitation Index (BW MFI)<br />

Introduced into the trading world by Bill Williams, the<br />

Market Facilitation Index (BW MFI) reveals the change of<br />

price per candle (or per bar). The indicator itself needs to<br />

When both the MACD signal line and histogram fall below the zero line, you consider short orders. When both<br />

the MACD signal line and histogram go above the zero line, you can consider long orders only, for it means<br />

the market is rising.<br />

Source: www.metaquotes.net<br />

65


ASICS<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

F2) BW MFI Being Applied on the EUR/CAD Daily Chart<br />

A pink bar means that the BW MFI<br />

is falling, but the volume is rising.<br />

This means that the bears and the<br />

bulls are in cut-throat competition<br />

and there is no clear winning side.<br />

At last, either the bulls or the bears<br />

will dominate, which would lead to a<br />

continuation of the extant bias or its<br />

termination. The next histogram bar<br />

that comes up would determine the<br />

ultimate outcome.<br />

A brown bar means that both the<br />

The candles are deliberately enlarged so that you can easily understand how the colours of the histogram bars BW MFI and the volume are falling.<br />

work in conjunction with the formations of the candles, as explained.<br />

The market players have become<br />

Source: www.metaquotes.net<br />

apathetic and the price has entered<br />

an equilibrium phase, awaiting a<br />

future breakout which could be the<br />

work with volume before any meaningful interpretation beginning of another serious bias in the market. Biases<br />

could be deduced. In order to understand how this tend to begin in a significant manner. At times, the mania<br />

indicator works, we need to explain the meaning of each in the markets is revealed as gap-ups or gap-downs.<br />

of the four colours of the histogram bars in it.<br />

Sometimes, a bias may start when there is a bullish or a<br />

A green bar means that both the BW MFI and the bearish engulfing pattern candlestick.<br />

volume are rising. There are more bulls in the market and<br />

the market is very active. This shows that the bulls are Computation:<br />

passionate about driving the market further upwards, and BW MFI = Range * (high - low) / Volume<br />

therefore we can benefit when we follow the direction of<br />

the bulls.<br />

Whereas: Range is the factor for multiplication, which<br />

A blue bar means that the BW MFI is rising, but the brings the difference in points down to whole numbers.<br />

volume is falling. The price continues to go upwards, In Figure 2, you can see the BW MFI being applied<br />

albeit not supported by the volume. This shows that the on the EUR/CAD daily chart. The candles are deliberately<br />

bias may change, and therefore we can benefit when we enlarged so that you can easily understand how the<br />

tighten our stops, trail our stops, take partial profits or colours of the histogram bars work in conjunction with<br />

weigh the possibility of smoothing open orders.<br />

the formations of the candles, as explained above.<br />

F3) Momentum on the CAD/JPY 4-Hour Chart<br />

Momentum appears as a single line on the chart, and it is located at the bottom of the chart. You can see how<br />

the indicator moves in conjunction with price action.<br />

Source: www.metaquotes.net<br />

Momentum<br />

Momentum is a very simple indicator.<br />

It is used to gauge the swiftness<br />

and stamina of a given price. It also<br />

measures the weakness of a bias and<br />

probable mean reversion zones.<br />

Momentum appears as a single<br />

line on the chart, and it is located<br />

at the bottom of the chart. Please<br />

see Figure 3. You can see how the<br />

indicator moves in conjunction with<br />

price action. The default parameters:<br />

period 14 applied to the close.<br />

The indicator is used to pinpoint<br />

a bullish bias or a bearish bias,<br />

plus how much the market is going<br />

66


BASICS<br />

Taking signals against the dominant<br />

trend does not fit good trend followers.<br />

north or south. It can also gauge overextended market<br />

conditions as well as equilibrium phases.<br />

Computation:<br />

Calculations for the Momentum indicator may vary<br />

slightly depending on the preferences of the trader who<br />

sets it. But in general, a current closing price is viewed in<br />

relation to a particular duration of the previous closing<br />

price.<br />

Current closing price: CP<br />

Previous closing price: CPn<br />

Therefore: M = CP - CPn Or M = (CP / CPn) * 100<br />

Basically, the momentum value is the latest closing<br />

price as a percentage of the previous closing price.<br />

does not fit good trend followers. What fits us is what<br />

fits us. A rope is not fit for a chicken’s neck. After taking<br />

a trade with this indicator, you may want to exit the trade<br />

when the indicator is going contrary to it. This can really<br />

save you from coming surprises when the market starts<br />

going against you.<br />

Though, the Momentum indicator can stand as a<br />

strategy on its own, it appears to work more powerfully<br />

when combined with another trend identifying<br />

indicator, for we want to take signals only in the<br />

direction of the overall bias. Figure 4 shows how the<br />

Momentum is combined with the MACD, which allows<br />

more convincing trend confirmation as well as taking<br />

signals in favour of the dominant trend only, even if the<br />

market is jumpy (volatile). This is what trend followers<br />

want.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Taking Signals from the Momentum Indicator<br />

In part 7 of this series we’ll discuss these indicators:<br />

This indicator is good for generating signals on Money Flow Index and Moving Average of Oscillator. «<br />

instruments that trend significantly<br />

and on instruments that move<br />

sideways. In a sideways phase F4) A Combination of the MACD with Momentum<br />

of a market, you may want to go<br />

long and set a short term target<br />

when there is a recent upturn of<br />

a particular trading instrument.<br />

This is OK when the indicator rises<br />

upwards after it seemed oversold.<br />

Similarly in a sideways phase of a<br />

market, you may want to go short<br />

and set a short-term target when the<br />

current price action is bearish. This<br />

is OK when the indicator falls after it<br />

seemed overbought. It just sounds This figure shows how Momentum is combined with the MACD. This allows trend confirmation as well as<br />

rational that signals are taken in taking signals in favour of the dominant trend only, even if the market is jumpy. The MACD is used for trend<br />

confirmation when Momentum is used for entries and exits.<br />

favour of the overall bias. Taking<br />

Source: www.metaquotes.net<br />

signals against the dominant trend<br />

67


People<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

» Hometown: Baltimore, Maryland USA. (“The Wire”’s hometown)<br />

» Interests: Photography, Cooking, Psychology, History, Travel<br />

» Trading Style: Equities, driven by fundamentals with input from both<br />

macro and technicals<br />

» Websites: www.howoftrading.com<br />

The Pro’s Process<br />

Part 18: Bruce Bower<br />

In this series we are asking Pro Traders about their psychological processes. Delving<br />

a little into how it feels to them when trading. The good and the bad. How this has<br />

changed over time and what preparation they do mentally for performing as a trader.<br />

One of the key features for us was that we wanted traders with experience who have<br />

been through the mill over the years and of course, we appreciate those who were<br />

kind enough to talk to us so candidly. We hope this gives developing traders more to<br />

learn from. Each interview in this series was conducted by Richard Chignell who is<br />

himself a trader. Please visit his blog at http://embracethetrend.com.<br />

» Richard Chignell: How long have you been trading<br />

Bower: I’ve been fascinated by the markets since I was<br />

a teenager. After working a couple summers, I saved up<br />

enough money to start trading when I was 18 – the year<br />

was 1999! At first, I tried to be a day trader like everyone<br />

else and to play short-term moves in the markets,<br />

principally bluechips. Instead of being rich overnight,<br />

I lost 50 per cent. After that, I took a step back and started<br />

to learn a lot more about markets and trading, which led<br />

me to develop a new approach with equities and also to<br />

start trading other instruments, like bonds and FX.<br />

After graduating from college, I worked as a prop<br />

trader at a big bank. Since 2005 I have been a portfolio<br />

manager at two Moscow-based hedge funds, managing<br />

more than one hundred million dollars in emerging<br />

market equities, primarily in Russia.<br />

Richard Chignell: What style of trading/investing<br />

do you practice<br />

Bower: As an equities investor, I am driven primarily<br />

by company fundamentals. This means meeting with<br />

the management, reading their financial statements,<br />

68


People<br />

The best-performing investments are ones<br />

where you catch a potentially big re-rating story<br />

at the right time, just as it starts its big move.<br />

constructing financial models and trying to get a read on<br />

whether or not it’s a good investment. In general, I find<br />

that the best-performing investments are ones where<br />

you catch a potentially big re-rating story at the right<br />

time, just as it starts its big move. There are three criteria:<br />

1) An attractive fundamental story with improvement in<br />

the underlying business, 2) A decent or better valuation,<br />

compared to peers and versus the Discounted Cashflow<br />

valuation, 3) A catalyst which cause the position to<br />

perform. I then follow the investment thesis and the<br />

performance; if I’m wrong about the thesis or if I hit a preset<br />

stop-loss, I get out.<br />

I do pay attention to charts when I am getting in and<br />

out of positions, as sometimes key levels can signal a<br />

good entry or exit point. If I’m bullish on a stock and long,<br />

if it breaks out of a six-month base, then I would use that<br />

chance to add to the position.<br />

My style is inspired by William J O’Neill’s work<br />

which has documented the ingredients that lead to big<br />

winners. However, I have had to adapt it heavily to the<br />

particular conditions of emerging markets. For instance,<br />

you have to do a lot of intense research to make financial<br />

projections for most companies. O’Neill would reject<br />

turnaround and deep value stories, but those can be<br />

incredibly profitable in emerging markets. Nonetheless,<br />

he was right on the money about the most important<br />

thing: Focus on winning stocks if you want to generate<br />

outsized performance.<br />

Richard Chignell: How do you feel when<br />

a trade goes against you<br />

Bower: Usually, I’m pretty calm about positions going<br />

against me. I will review my work as to why I got it and<br />

see if I did anything wrong or stupid; if so, I will get upset<br />

with myself. If not, then I am pretty dispassionate about<br />

following my plan.<br />

Richard Chignell: How do you feel when<br />

a trade goes for you<br />

Bower: I might feel a bit of validation and like patting<br />

myself on the back if I had a very strong view and it<br />

played out correctly. Overall, I don’t really feel much.<br />

If anything, I expect my trades to go my way so it’s my<br />

“default setting”.<br />

Richard Chignell: How have these feelings changed<br />

over your trading career<br />

Bower: When I first started trading, I was super excitable.<br />

I used to get all wrapped up in every tick and take loses<br />

personally, to the point of depression. As I developed as a<br />

trader through practice, reading a lot of books and talking<br />

with experienced traders, I realised several things. The<br />

first was that you had to be detached at some level from<br />

your trades. The second was that the best way to get to<br />

that point was to have a methodology that you followed<br />

rigorously and that you trusted fully. That way, you could<br />

think of trading more as a decision-making exercise,<br />

which allowed you to reframe the whole process away<br />

from “making money”, which is emotionally charged,<br />

towards “making good decisions”, which is much more<br />

detached. The third was that by adding in some additional<br />

tools, like visualisation, you could learn to really manage<br />

your emotional state and to put yourself into what “Flow”,<br />

as Mihaly Csikszentmihaly labelledit.<br />

Richard Chignell: Do you have any practices that you do<br />

away from the trading screen to help you mentally and<br />

emotionally handle trading<br />

Bower: I have a few. I am quite religious and go to church<br />

every day, in addition to doing mental prayer for up to an<br />

hour. While it’s a spiritual exercise, it does have a very<br />

Bruce Bower<br />

Bruce Bower manages a portfolio of emerging market<br />

equities at a hedge fund. He has a keen interest in markets,<br />

psychology and self-development.<br />

69


People<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

Focus on winning stocks<br />

if you want to generate outsized performance.<br />

calming effect on me. I also like to read and write, both<br />

for my blog and also in my own journal, which helps me<br />

to process and expand any thoughts or feelings that I may<br />

be having. Lastly, I listen to guided visualisations that I<br />

created for myself, which help to manage my emotional<br />

state and also for goal-setting. Usually, I put them on<br />

before I go to sleep and drift off to the sound of the<br />

visualisation.<br />

Richard Chignell: Have you always done this<br />

Bower: Not all of those things. I have always been<br />

quite active in keeping a trading journal, which has<br />

been a critical resource for me from the beginning. The<br />

other stuff, like praying, have just grown over time as<br />

I found that they improved my overall life. The guided<br />

visualisation I’ve learned as a result of some unique<br />

training I’ve had.<br />

Richard Chignell: If not, how have you learnt to deal with<br />

the feelings that come up when trading<br />

Bower: The first is just experience. As you go through<br />

the ups and downs of the markets, you become gradually<br />

de-sensitized. The second way was through conscious<br />

training. I’ve actually studied two related psychology<br />

fields, NLP and Hypnotherapy. What piqued my interest<br />

was that if you read Market Wizards or New Market Wizards,<br />

it’s worth noting that all of the trading psychologists that<br />

they profiled had trained in those fields! And indeed<br />

those tools are used widely in other demanding fields like<br />

professional athletics. The third step was just learning to<br />

trust my methodology. It’s like jumping out of a plane –<br />

if you don’t believe in the parachute, you’re going to be<br />

very anxious, but if you trust that the parachute will work<br />

and focus on opening it properly, then you will be fine and<br />

even enjoy the ride.<br />

Richard Chignell: Can you describe a time in your trading<br />

life which really rammed home the point that so much of<br />

trading comes down to psychological factors<br />

Bower: As I once documented in a popular blog post<br />

called “What I Learned From the Best Trader at Citibank”,<br />

I started out my working career in a great seat – as a<br />

prop trader at a big bank. I sat next to a brilliant trader<br />

and learned as much as I could. Unfortunately, I was<br />

making lots of mistakes and lost money. By the end of<br />

that experience, I was actually quite depressed, because<br />

I knew that it was a golden opportunity and that I had<br />

screwed it up. I swore to learn everything I could to<br />

achieve complete mastery in this field, so as never to feel<br />

that way again.<br />

Richard Chignell: If you could give aspiring traders one<br />

piece of advice about emotionally handling the market<br />

what would it be<br />

Bower: As Dr. Steenbarger likes to point out, most<br />

trading psychology issues are actually trading issues.<br />

For instance, if you take too much risk, then your P&L<br />

will have big swings, leaving you more susceptible to<br />

greed and fear. Similarly, if you don’t have a consistent<br />

methodology, then you will end frustrated with trading.<br />

As glib as it sounds, the solution is to trade better. Focus<br />

on defining a methodology that works for you and to<br />

keep your risk limited, so that you know you can execute<br />

your methodology and you can’t blow yourself up. In<br />

the process, you will learn to trust your system and your<br />

emotions will naturally calm down.<br />

We’d like to thank Bruce Bower for sharing about the<br />

way he tackles the market from an emotional/mental side of<br />

things and for his willingness to allow me to post this as a free<br />

resource in the hope that traders who have been in the market<br />

for less time or are thinking of entering can perhaps pick up<br />

some A-HA’s.<br />

If you are interested in finding more out about Bruce<br />

Bower you can find him:<br />

» On twitter: @HowofTrading<br />

» At his website: www.howoftrading.com «<br />

70


Chicago’s leading quant,<br />

automated trading, exchange<br />

technology and big data event<br />

June 4-5, 2014, Navy Pier, Chicago, IL<br />

Join us to hear from leading CTOs, CEOs, and experts in proprietary<br />

trading, quant investing, and exchange technology.<br />

Confirmed speakers include:<br />

Neil Joshi<br />

Co-Chief Investment<br />

Officer<br />

PEAK6<br />

Raj Mahajan<br />

CEO<br />

Allston Trading<br />

Blair Hull<br />

Founder<br />

Ketchum Trading<br />

Friends of TRADERS Magazine can save 10%<br />

on registration with code KJBT.<br />

Register now and get the best price<br />

- on your phone<br />

Scan this QR pattern with the camera on<br />

your smartphone to register now. Don't have<br />

a smartphone You can also register on our<br />

website: www.terrapinn.com/tradingchicago.<br />

www.terrapinn.com/tradingchicago<br />

2014<br />

sponsors<br />

tel<br />

the interconnection &<br />

data center company


People<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

Perry Kaufman<br />

Mastering Systematic Trading<br />

Perry J Kaufman began his career as a “rocket scientist,” before becoming involved in the futures markets in 1971. His earliest<br />

systematic programs used exponential smoothing and moving averages. In the late 1970s he moved to New York where he<br />

developed the most successful in-house commodity investment program for Prudential-Bache. From 1980 through 1991 he<br />

headed the systematic trading for Transworld Oil, which traded the largest proprietary account in futures markets in the world.<br />

From 1992 to 1999, Mr Kaufman was a principal and Head of Research for Drapeau Advisors, a Commodity Trading Advisor<br />

focused on short-term trading. From 2000, Mr Kaufman’s consulting business served clients such as Cinergy’s proprietary<br />

trading group, Graham Capital Management, and Mizuho’s Alternative Investments. Mr Kaufman writes extensively on<br />

markets and strategies. He has published 13 books, of which “Trading Systems and Methods, 5th Edition” (2013) is the most<br />

recent. He is President of KaufmanSignals.com, a new business that serves retail investors (www.KaufmanSignals.com). He<br />

continues to lecture to economic forums, investor groups, and graduate students.<br />

72


People<br />

» TRADERS´: Financials markets are not exactly where your<br />

career started. When did you first hear about the markets<br />

and trading<br />

Kaufman: After leaving aerospace in 1970, I started<br />

my own computer company. We were automating<br />

government medical reimbursements (had I known, I<br />

should have stayed in that field!). Someone came to us<br />

and asked if we could research a way to hedge options.<br />

At that time there was really nothing done on a computer<br />

and the only options were London. IBM wasn’t interested,<br />

so they found someone with mathematical background.<br />

We did that and one thing led to another.<br />

TRADERS´: What was the reason to change your career and<br />

stay with financial markets<br />

Kaufman: After the options project we had a client who<br />

challenged us to beat him trading the market using<br />

mathematics. We were to get a large percentage of<br />

anything we could earn better than him. That was 1972.<br />

We did really well, hitting the Russian wheat deal in<br />

1973 that drove grains up 300 per cent. Unfortunately,<br />

we didn’t beat him because everyone does well in a bull<br />

market. But I was hooked on the markets by then and<br />

never looked anywhere else.<br />

TRADERS´: Over the years and with your growing expertise,<br />

what did you learn and how did you change in the way you<br />

approach the markets<br />

Kaufman: A big question. I’ve learned a lot about the markets<br />

but overall have come full circle. I’ve developed every type<br />

of system, fast and slow, done well<br />

with most, badly with a few, but in<br />

the end, I prefer trading the trend. I F1) Levels of Noise<br />

have learned that markets are more<br />

complex now. Well, actually they’re<br />

noisier. When I started in the 70’s<br />

you could make money with a 10-day<br />

moving average. Over the years the<br />

noise has increased and you need to<br />

trade slower and slower trends. And<br />

you capture less of the move. Still, the<br />

trend finds the big economic moves<br />

which always exist. It’s not the only<br />

method that works, but it’s the safest.<br />

the same technical systems that I offer to clients. I liked<br />

discretionary trading but, for me, it goes in streaks. I can<br />

make money for weeks at a time, then go off and can’t<br />

seem to get anything right. And it’s tiring. Since I’m lucky<br />

enough to be good at both math and computers, I’ve found<br />

that I’m happy to be the turtle and not the hare. Technical<br />

systems aren’t perfect but they are good over time, and<br />

have greater predictability. That’s enough for me.<br />

TRADERS´: From a systematic trading point of view, how do<br />

huge market participants play their game to keep an edge<br />

over their competition<br />

Kaufman: A good question. My experience is that the<br />

biggest players can be either discretionary or algorithmic,<br />

but the bulk of them are algorithmic. And, they are mostly<br />

trend followers. They can get the liquidity they need<br />

because long-term trends don’t change positions very<br />

often. And, they can average in over a week or more so<br />

they don’t push the market. They can also have a large<br />

number of faster strategies, because you can’t trade a lot<br />

on a faster strategy, but you can gain diversification.<br />

Keeping an edge is more difficult. You can see from<br />

the published performance that the big companies often<br />

have similar profits and losses each month. Some of them<br />

will put greater weight in one sector, say interest rates,<br />

but that also increases their risk. My own preference is<br />

equal weighting wherever possible, because I don’t know<br />

anyone who has successfully predicted which sector will<br />

be the best performer next time. So you need to take<br />

greater risk to separate yourself from the competition. Or,<br />

TRADERS´: Did you ever get into<br />

discretionary trading, as well<br />

Kaufman: Yes, I did discretionary<br />

trading early on and traded for<br />

myself. I still trade for myself but I use<br />

Figure 1 shows several paths for the exact same result (price rising from $440 to $475). The difference,<br />

however, is the volatility, or noise on the way.<br />

Source: www.kaufmansignals.com<br />

73


People<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

F2) Noise Ranking of Asian Markets 2005-2010<br />

Kaufman: That would seem easy to<br />

answer: “Because it’s not making<br />

money!” but actually, that’s a<br />

difficult question. Theoretically, we<br />

design a trading program to have a<br />

specific level of risk, measured by<br />

the annualized volatility of returns.<br />

For the futures industry, that’s about<br />

14 per cent, equal to one standard<br />

deviation. So there is a 16 per cent<br />

chance (the left tail) that we’ll see a<br />

loss of more than 14 per cent during<br />

one year. It’s also possible that we<br />

could see a loss twice as large. The<br />

real problem is deciding if that’s<br />

a “normal” loss or whether the<br />

program is no longer working. To<br />

This figure shows several Asian markets sorted for their noise levels. The more mature markets (Japan and find that out, you need to dig deeper<br />

Hong Kong), are the noisiest while the less traded ones (Sri Lanka and Vietnam), are the trendiest.<br />

into the frequency of losses, the<br />

Source: www.kaufmansignals.com<br />

duration, and other statistics. I lean<br />

towards frequency of losses to tell<br />

me that something is wrong. In the<br />

if you’re really smart, you will be the first to find another end you could say “It still could be normal,” but I favour<br />

new way of trading, like high-frequency trading, but that deleveraging when I’m uncertain about the program,<br />

doesn’t happen often.<br />

or when we reach a 1.5 standard deviation loss. In that<br />

sense we manage the “business risk,” that is, both the<br />

TRADERS´: How do you recognise a system you’re using is investor and I want to stay in business. I will give up some<br />

not working profitably anymore<br />

potential profits until I either decide that the program is<br />

fine, or it continues to deteriorate. By<br />

the way, the solution to that problem<br />

F3) Information Ratio, Sorted Highest to Lowest, All Futures from 1990<br />

is still the most elusive.<br />

TRADERS´: In the way markets function,<br />

do you see any consistent edges for<br />

retail traders over the big guys<br />

Kaufman: Yes, retail traders are<br />

more flexible because they can get<br />

in and out of the market without<br />

anyone noticing. They can trade<br />

equal risk in stocks because their<br />

positions are small. The big traders<br />

can’t even trade some opportunities<br />

because they would move the<br />

market too much with the position<br />

size they need.<br />

The U.S. and European index markets are the noisiest. So you want to favour mean reversion systems for<br />

those markets on the right of the chart, and trend systems for those on the left.<br />

Source: www.kaufmansignals.com<br />

TRADERS´: You were already using<br />

moving averages in the 1970s. Many<br />

traders use these concepts today. Do<br />

you still see value in such methods<br />

74


People<br />

If the Efficiency Ratio is low,<br />

then a mean-reverting strategy is<br />

better than a trend method.<br />

Kaufman: Absolutely. Trends in general are what I call a<br />

“sound premise.” But they need to be long-term trends to<br />

pick up the direction of the economy, or the US dollar or<br />

euro, or major changes in supply and demand. I wouldn’t<br />

try faster trends because I don’t think they’re reliable.<br />

Prices can jump quite a bit on news, but it’s hard to<br />

capture that with a moving average, and most often you<br />

get false signals. Trend systems need to capture the fat<br />

tail to be successful. If you’ve studied the profile of trend<br />

performance, there are many more losses than profits, so<br />

the profits need to be bigger. I’m convinced that you need<br />

the rare, very large profit to win on balance.<br />

TRADERS´: What do you think about genetic programming<br />

Do you have experience in this field, and if so, which<br />

results did you attain<br />

Kaufman: I’ve created a portfolio program using a genetic<br />

algorithm, and I think I can beat the standard meanvariance<br />

approach that is used in the industry. On the<br />

other hand, I wouldn’t use either one because they are<br />

simply an exercise in over-fitting. These powerful tools<br />

are tempting, but I don’t think they work in the markets.<br />

And I haven’t read anywhere that they have predictive<br />

power. I still think the best solutions are simpler ones.<br />

TRADERS´: Young markets and old markets … this topic<br />

was originally addressed in your “Smarter Trading” book.<br />

Nowadays, which are the younger easier markets and<br />

which one the older<br />

Kaufman: That’s a good question and it goes back to why<br />

the smaller investor has an advantage. Newer markets,<br />

usually index markets, are much trendier and can be<br />

traded with faster moving averages, or whatever trending<br />

method you want. It’s the same as the way we traded<br />

in the 1970s before volume jumped up. New markets<br />

don’t have as much noise because there are far fewer<br />

participants. As they mature they get noisier, so the US<br />

index markets, followed by European, are the noisiest<br />

and need slower trends to be successful. So there is a<br />

window of opportunity for the retail trader to use a trend<br />

for new index markets.<br />

TRADERS´: What is the most reliable technical indicator in<br />

order to detect noise in a price series<br />

Kaufman: The only one I know that measures noise is<br />

my own “Efficiency Ratio,” which has also been named<br />

“fractal efficiency.” It’s simply the difference in price over<br />

n days divided by the sum of the path, which is the sum<br />

of absolute values of the daily changes over the same<br />

n days. The idea was that if you went in a straight line<br />

from point A to point B, then the efficiency was 1.0 (no<br />

noise). If you wander around then the efficiency goes<br />

down, and if you go nowhere then the efficiency is zero<br />

(all noise). Even though I did that in the early 1980s, the<br />

only useful application that I’ve found is for it is deciding<br />

which system to apply to each market. For example, if the<br />

ratio is high then there is a lot of trend and we can use a<br />

trend method. If the ratio is low, then a mean-reverting<br />

strategy is better. I was hoping for more but haven’t yet<br />

figured it out.<br />

I have two charts that I created for the Asian Financial<br />

Forum in 2012. One chart ranks the Asian markets by<br />

noise (Figure 2) and the other ranks a large number of<br />

futures markets the same way (Figure 3). You’ll see that<br />

the more mature Asian markets, the ones in Japan and<br />

Hong Kong, are the noisiest while the less traded ones,<br />

Sri Lanka and Vietnam, are the trendiest. And for futures,<br />

the U.S. and European index markets are the noisiest if<br />

you look past the agricultural products (seasonality fights<br />

with the long term trend). So you want to favour mean<br />

reversion systems for those markets on the right of the<br />

chart, and trend systems for those on the left.<br />

TRADERS´: From your experience, what seems to be the<br />

best filter ever for detecting a trend<br />

Kaufman: I would use a long-term trend as a filter for<br />

short-term trading. And it doesn’t really matter which<br />

method you use. I think that most trend calculations<br />

give you the same result over time. It’s really the market<br />

and not the method. If the market is trending then all<br />

the methods are profitable, and if it’s not trending then<br />

none of them are. There are some internal differences.<br />

For example, a moving average has a lot of small losses<br />

75


People<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

I lean towards frequency of losses<br />

to tell me that something is wrong.<br />

and fewer larger profits. A breakout system is nearly the<br />

opposite, with more profits but larger losses. But in the<br />

long run, the returns are much the same. There are two<br />

charts that show this, one is the S&P and the other 5-year<br />

notes (both futures, see Figure 4 and 5). They show the<br />

profits using a 100-day calculation period for each of the<br />

three most popular methods, the moving average (MA),<br />

breakout (BO), and linear regression slope (LRS). We know<br />

that notes are trendier from the noise study, and you can<br />

see in the chart on the right that the returns over 24 years<br />

track very closely. For the S&P the pattern is similar but<br />

not as uniform. However, if I were to average the results<br />

of a large number of markets, you would have a difficult<br />

time deciding which trend was best.<br />

For those traders looking for more detail, Figure 6<br />

and 7 show the optimisation results for these three trends<br />

in terms of the profit factor (gross profits divided by<br />

gross losses). Both show a tendency to do better as the<br />

calculation period gets larger (shown along the bottom<br />

from ten to 150 days). For the 5-year Note, the breakout<br />

seems to be best and for the S&P it is mostly the slope.<br />

It’s important to view this as a big data problem when<br />

choosing which method to use.<br />

TRADERS´: In your huge last book about trading systems<br />

you developed hundreds of codes for TradeStation. Can you<br />

tell us which ones you’d recommend for 1) intraday trading<br />

and 2) overnight trading/swing trading<br />

Kaufman: Well, that’s asking a lot! If I wanted to do that<br />

I would have just published the one that I thought was<br />

the best system and be done with it. Actually, there are<br />

a lot of systems that make money and a lot of trading<br />

personalities that prefer faster trading, lots of small<br />

profits, big positions, arbitrage, and whatever else. More<br />

important, the book is intended to show technique. When<br />

you become familiar with different ways to view the price<br />

moves then you can create your own, or find the ones that<br />

match your personality.<br />

But to answer the question a little better, I would be<br />

looking for mean-reversion systems for intraday trading<br />

and possibly short-term breakout for trades that last a few<br />

days. Of course, there is pairs trading and divergence,<br />

which are also good methods.<br />

TRADERS´: Everybody complains about High Frequency<br />

Trading. But, does it really affect the big trends<br />

Kaufman: I don’t think so. If it’s profitable (and that’s not<br />

always the case), then it’s extracting profits from the<br />

market, which affects everyone. But it also adds liquidity<br />

and a bit of noise. The most effect may be that it takes<br />

a somewhat bigger move in one direction for a trend<br />

system to get a signal, and another bigger move to exit,<br />

but I see the effects as minimal for anyone holding trades<br />

for a few days or more.<br />

TRADERS´: Many traders start out trading via trial & error.<br />

What would you suggest these traders to do, assuming they<br />

do not really understand that having a process as well as<br />

risk management and proper position sizing is the name of<br />

76


People<br />

the game Is it necessary to hit the<br />

wall first<br />

Kaufman: New traders should expect<br />

to lose money. It’s part of the initiation<br />

process. They should understand<br />

that they can make money if they do<br />

it the right way, but the excitement of<br />

getting started often causes them to<br />

rush into trading. My first rules would<br />

be to have a system. It doesn’t have<br />

to be computerised, but you need<br />

clear rules. The best discretionary<br />

traders are systematic, even though<br />

the systems are in their heads. And,<br />

when you have rules, follow them!<br />

You need to start small, really<br />

small. You can’t be worried about<br />

taking a loss. In fact, you need to be<br />

able to embrace a loss. It’s just part<br />

of the process. If you can’t cut a trade<br />

and take a small loss then you’ll<br />

never be a trader. And each trading<br />

system has its own profile, which I<br />

mentioned before. So you need to be<br />

comfortable with your rules.<br />

It’s also important that you don’t<br />

have too many rules. I’ve always<br />

gone by the philosophy that “loose<br />

pants fit everyone.” If I can apply the<br />

same rules to all stocks or all futures,<br />

then the results won’t look beautiful,<br />

but I’ll have robustness, which is<br />

the key to success for me. I want the<br />

trading system to work on all markets<br />

(well, most markets) even if it’s great<br />

on some and barely profitable on<br />

others. I don’t want a system that<br />

works on only one market.<br />

Always trade each position with<br />

equal risk. That is, for stocks, use the<br />

same investment for each position.<br />

Just divide the investment amount<br />

(say $10,000) by the share price to<br />

get the position size. It’s not perfect,<br />

F4) Popular Systems – S&P, 100-Day Trend<br />

The chart shows the profits using a 100-day calculation period for three popular systems: moving average<br />

(MA), breakout (BO), and linear regression slope (LRS). In the long-run, the returns are much the same.<br />

Source: www.kaufmansignals.com<br />

F5) Popular Systems – 5-Year Note, 100-Day Trend<br />

The chart shows the profits using a 100-day calculation period for three popular systems: moving average<br />

(MA), breakout (BO), and linear regression slope (LRS). In the long-run, the returns are much the same.<br />

Source: www.kaufmansignals.com<br />

77


People<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

F6) Popular Systems – S&P Optimisation from 1990: Profit Factor<br />

The chart shows the profit factors for a variety of calculation periods for the systems: moving average (MA),<br />

breakout (BO), and linear regression slope (LRS). For most settings, the returns are much the same again.<br />

Source: www.kaufmansignals.com<br />

F7) Popular Systems – 5-Year Note Optimisation from 1990: Profit Factor<br />

The chart shows the profit factors for a variety of calculation periods for the systems: moving average (MA),<br />

breakout (BO), and linear regression slope (LRS). For most settings, the returns are much the same again.<br />

Source: www.kaufmansignals.com<br />

but you don’t want to trade 100<br />

shares of Apple and 100 shares of<br />

Bank of America. The Apple profits<br />

and losses will be so big that Bank<br />

of America will be unimportant.<br />

For futures you take an investment<br />

amount, say $25,000 per market<br />

and divide by the 20-day volatility<br />

to get the number of contracts.<br />

You can do that because of the<br />

leverage in futures. Once you find<br />

the position size for all futures, you<br />

can scale them equally to your actual<br />

investment size.<br />

Equal risk gives you maximum<br />

diversification, which means the<br />

best risk control. Of course, there are<br />

other important risk controls, but it’s<br />

the best place to start.<br />

TRADERS´: In one of your books, you<br />

describe how to put the process<br />

of research and development into<br />

a “cohesive framework.” Can you<br />

just briefly explain how this works,<br />

please<br />

Kaufman: The basic idea is to start<br />

with a sound premise, such as an<br />

economic trend or arbitrage. You<br />

can’t let the computer find a method<br />

for you. It just doesn’t work. Then you<br />

need to test it properly using lots of<br />

data, some in-sample and some outof-sample.<br />

You need to understand<br />

how to interpret the results. I favour<br />

looking at the results of all tests so<br />

that “success” means that 70 per cent<br />

of all tests were profitable. Then my<br />

expectation is the average result of<br />

all tests. I don’t believe you can pick<br />

one set of parameters and expect<br />

that to be the best next month, so I<br />

use multiple parameters in order to<br />

get an average result. That may be<br />

78


PEOPLE<br />

too conservative for some investors, but it’s another case<br />

of the turtle and the hare.<br />

TRADERS´: Many Hedge Funds tend to hire more and more<br />

PhDs of physics, statistics, biology, cybernetics. In my own<br />

trading, however, I still find the easy methods do work best.<br />

What do you think about that<br />

Kaufman: That’s a sensitive issue in the Hedge Fund<br />

business. Firms that allocate money to hedge funds seem<br />

to hold value in the number of PhDs in the company,<br />

assuming they are going to keep the strategies on the<br />

“cutting edge.” My personal experience is that’s not<br />

true. You need someone with solid math skills but also<br />

market experience. You can’t create a good strategy by<br />

discovering it on a computer. It must be a sound premise,<br />

and that will only come from observing the market and<br />

understanding the fundamentals. So a new PhD is not likely<br />

to be productive until she gets real market knowledge.<br />

On the other hand, an experienced floor trader can tell a<br />

quant an idea about the way the market reacts to, say an<br />

earnings shock, and the quant can then implement that.<br />

But then so could a regular smart programmer. So it’s the<br />

concept, not the math, that’s most important.<br />

TRADERS´: If you were handling $100 million in trading<br />

capital, how would you manage it in order to produce<br />

absolute returns Which markets, strategies, time frames<br />

Kaufman: You must know that’s proprietary information!<br />

If I tell you how I would manage that now, I would no longer<br />

have a competitive edge. I will say that large amounts of<br />

capital require either many fast trading systems or a few<br />

slow trading ones. That’s why probably more than 60 per<br />

cent of all systems traded are long term trend following.<br />

It works over time and you can trade large amounts on it.<br />

The faster the system, the less liquidity, so if you’re a firm<br />

with $20 billion under management, you’ll favour slow<br />

and concentrate on risk management.<br />

TRADERS´: Is there any other piece of advice you’d like to<br />

share<br />

Kaufman: Yes, I want everyone to remember that the<br />

market keeps changing and that there are patterns that<br />

will occur in the future that we’ve not seen in the past. I<br />

highly recommend a book by Dietrich Doerner, “The Logic<br />

Book Info<br />

Trading Systems and Methods, Fifth Edition<br />

Author: Perry Kaufman Pages: 1232<br />

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons ISBN-10: 1118043561<br />

Language: English ISBN-13: 978-1118043561<br />

of Failure”, originally published in German (“Logik des<br />

Misslingens”). I’ll let the readers figure out the solution<br />

themselves, but the lesson learned will be important for<br />

trading.<br />

TRADERS´: Besides markets, what do you enjoy in your free<br />

time Also, any future projects you’re looking forward to<br />

Kaufman: Free time You think I have free time I used to<br />

play more tennis, go skiing, and diving but these days I<br />

seem to be in front of my computer more than I should.<br />

But then, I really enjoy developing systems and trading.<br />

I tried retiring twice and ended up starting a new company<br />

and writing another book. I guess I’m just lucky to do<br />

what I like. «<br />

The interview was conducted by Marko Graenitz.<br />

79


COLUMN<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

The Four Agreements<br />

for Traders<br />

» Don Miguel Ruiz, a Mexican author in the tradition of<br />

Carlos Castaneda, wrote a best-selling book called “The<br />

Four Agreements” in 1997. It sold millions of copies and<br />

has acted as a life-clarifying guide for many. How might<br />

these “four agreements” specifically apply to trading<br />

1. Be Impeccable with Your Word<br />

As down and dirty as Wall Street can be, there is a code<br />

of honour among traders. Floor traders and trading desks<br />

are known for confirming deals worth millions, or even<br />

tens of millions in profit or loss, on the strength of a verbal<br />

telephone commitment, a handshake, or even eye contact<br />

and a nod of the head. The whole system works because<br />

all true traders, while fierce competitors down to the last<br />

tick, are also honour-bound to their word. Those who break<br />

the code are rightly banished. Being impeccable means<br />

making damn sure you can deliver, and moving heaven<br />

and earth to come through. Developing a reputation<br />

like this has benefits internal as well as external, as you<br />

become the type of person who “gets it done” in the eyes<br />

of your subconscious as well as the eyes of others.<br />

2. Don’t Take Anything Personally<br />

When going through a rough patch the classic temptation<br />

is to think the market is out to “get you,” that the market<br />

is always opposing you. However, the market is far more<br />

like a force of nature than a personal entity. Does Mount<br />

Everest care who you are Does the ocean care who you<br />

are No. If a freak storm comes up while you are climbing<br />

or sailing, it has nothing to do with “you” – except to the<br />

extent you voluntarily exposed yourself to such risks. Many<br />

traders are smart enough to consciously reject the “market<br />

out to get you” point of view, yet subconsciously indulge in<br />

“woe is me” personalisation on a subtle level. Taking things<br />

personally is all too often a form of whining. As a general<br />

rule of thumb, whiners are losers. The winners are too busy<br />

getting it done – and this means addressing undesirable<br />

results in a detached, objective, wholly non-personal way.<br />

3. Don’t Make Assumptions<br />

Foolish assumptions have swallowed up entire oceans of<br />

profit. The habit of assumption is born of laziness – lack of<br />

due diligence, lack of proper investigation and verification.<br />

Justice ‘Jack Sparrow’ Litle has seventeen-plus years of experience in markets. He cut his teeth as<br />

an international commodity broker with clients on fi ve continents, including a large Russian hedge<br />

fund, and has traded virtually every asset class except real estate. His specialty is global macro.<br />

Contact: www.mercenarytrader.com; E-Mail: jack@mercenarytrader.com<br />

It also stems from a lack of creativity, e.g. the inability to<br />

see an alternative range of scenarios – and sometimes<br />

emotional bias, meaning irrational predisposition to an<br />

expected or demanded outcome.<br />

The number of questionable assumptions traders<br />

can make – and do make, on a routine basis – is veritably<br />

endless. From unexamined notions of how a market works,<br />

to blinding ideological zeal, to unjustified confidence in<br />

a methodology with substantial gaps in process, theory<br />

and execution, to casually misguided assignment of<br />

blame for a bad result (see agreement #2). This is why, in<br />

fact, more traders lose than win.<br />

4. Always Do Your Best<br />

A lot of people half-ass their way through life – and when<br />

they get into the trading arena, it only becomes natural and<br />

habitual and instinctive to do the same thing. Committing<br />

to risk management but not really... committing to a welldeveloped<br />

methodological process but not really... giving<br />

lip service to various aspects of trading excellence but<br />

not following through... As a point of motivation, stop<br />

and ask yourself what might be possible if you really and<br />

truly “always did your best,” every single day. What if you<br />

stopped futzing around completely and totally, committing<br />

to a higher level of focus and dedication than ever before<br />

What if you really and truly found the absolute best within<br />

yourself, and cultivated an iron-clad commitment to<br />

maximum trading excellence What would that look like<br />

What would it feel like How much pain would it require...<br />

and would the pain be worth it Furthermore, what if you<br />

could figure out how to sustain this level of excellence, day<br />

in and day out, not just as a touchy-feely resolution, but true<br />

transcendence to a higher path, as the framework for an<br />

enlightened and evolved way of life How would that impact<br />

your P&L, your success as a trader and your sense of life<br />

fulfilment on the whole How awesome would it be «<br />

80


Get Your Copy by Emailing us at<br />

registration@stap.com.pk<br />

Joint <strong>publication</strong> of : Karachi Stock Exchange<br />

Society of Technical Analysts Pakistan


#1 Free Bull Flag Screen<br />

Hunt for stocks going sideways after a run up<br />

with a minimum price of 5$ and volume of 500k<br />

Run This Scan on Chartmill.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!