CalCOFI Reports, Vol. 30, 1989 - California Cooperative Oceanic ...
CalCOFI Reports, Vol. 30, 1989 - California Cooperative Oceanic ...
CalCOFI Reports, Vol. 30, 1989 - California Cooperative Oceanic ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SMITH ET AL.: ZOOPLANKTON PATERN ANALYSIS<br />
CalCOFl Rep., <strong>Vol</strong>. <strong>30</strong>,<strong>1989</strong><br />
33O<strong>30</strong>'<br />
3<strong>30</strong>00'<br />
\<br />
. ':<br />
..<br />
., 2:<br />
. ... ..<br />
,<br />
..' .:<br />
. ....<br />
San Clemente Is.<br />
32O<strong>30</strong>'<br />
'1 17OOO'<br />
Figure 1, Track of R/V New Horizon during ZB1 cruise. Data were collected during the entire cruise. See figure 8.<br />
this report we analyze the information content of<br />
the echo amplitudes, rather than their frequencies.<br />
The speed of sound in water is approximately<br />
1500 meters per second. Therefore a sound oscillation<br />
of <strong>30</strong>0,000 cycles per second (Hz) has a wavelength<br />
of 5 mm; in general, insonified objects much<br />
larger than 5 mm scatter sound more efficiently<br />
than objects equal to or smaller than 5 mm (Holliday<br />
1980). The proportion of the sound transmitted<br />
through, reflected from, and scattered around the<br />
object is influenced by small contrasts between the<br />
compressibility and density of water and these features<br />
of the object. For example, an organism with<br />
a bony skeleton, scaly integument, and air bladder<br />
returns much more sound than an organism which<br />
is primarily protoplasm. Similarly, organisms that<br />
are aggregated into patches or layers return more<br />
scattered sound per unit of local volume than the<br />
same organisms would if distributed evenly<br />
throughout a larger volume.<br />
The probability that the acoustic pulse will encounter<br />
a target increases with depth because the<br />
widths of each acoustic beam increase with depth<br />
(figure 2). The probability of detection of a given<br />
target decreases with depth because the sensitivity<br />
of the receiver is fixed but the sound available for<br />
reflecting or scattering is decreasing as the inverse<br />
square of the range. In addition, there is a frequency-specific<br />
attenuation of sound in water, with<br />
more sound Iost as a function of range in the higher<br />
frequencies. To use the ADCP as an acoustic sampling<br />
system, we must be able to define the conditions<br />
of encounter and the probability of detection.<br />
Targets smaller than 240 m cannot be resolved at<br />
the deepest depths because of the transducer beam<br />
geometry.<br />
The ADCP used in the April cruise operated at<br />
<strong>30</strong>7.2 kHz. The transducer installation on the R/V<br />
New Horizon was 4 m deep (the draft of the ship),<br />
and the outgoing pulse was set at 4-m length (2.7<br />
90