20.01.2015 Views

CalCOFI Reports, Vol. 30, 1989 - California Cooperative Oceanic ...

CalCOFI Reports, Vol. 30, 1989 - California Cooperative Oceanic ...

CalCOFI Reports, Vol. 30, 1989 - California Cooperative Oceanic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SMITH ET AL.: ZOOPLANKTON PATERN ANALYSIS<br />

CalCOFl Rep., <strong>Vol</strong>. <strong>30</strong>,<strong>1989</strong><br />

33O<strong>30</strong>'<br />

3<strong>30</strong>00'<br />

\<br />

. ':<br />

..<br />

., 2:<br />

. ... ..<br />

,<br />

..' .:<br />

. ....<br />

San Clemente Is.<br />

32O<strong>30</strong>'<br />

'1 17OOO'<br />

Figure 1, Track of R/V New Horizon during ZB1 cruise. Data were collected during the entire cruise. See figure 8.<br />

this report we analyze the information content of<br />

the echo amplitudes, rather than their frequencies.<br />

The speed of sound in water is approximately<br />

1500 meters per second. Therefore a sound oscillation<br />

of <strong>30</strong>0,000 cycles per second (Hz) has a wavelength<br />

of 5 mm; in general, insonified objects much<br />

larger than 5 mm scatter sound more efficiently<br />

than objects equal to or smaller than 5 mm (Holliday<br />

1980). The proportion of the sound transmitted<br />

through, reflected from, and scattered around the<br />

object is influenced by small contrasts between the<br />

compressibility and density of water and these features<br />

of the object. For example, an organism with<br />

a bony skeleton, scaly integument, and air bladder<br />

returns much more sound than an organism which<br />

is primarily protoplasm. Similarly, organisms that<br />

are aggregated into patches or layers return more<br />

scattered sound per unit of local volume than the<br />

same organisms would if distributed evenly<br />

throughout a larger volume.<br />

The probability that the acoustic pulse will encounter<br />

a target increases with depth because the<br />

widths of each acoustic beam increase with depth<br />

(figure 2). The probability of detection of a given<br />

target decreases with depth because the sensitivity<br />

of the receiver is fixed but the sound available for<br />

reflecting or scattering is decreasing as the inverse<br />

square of the range. In addition, there is a frequency-specific<br />

attenuation of sound in water, with<br />

more sound Iost as a function of range in the higher<br />

frequencies. To use the ADCP as an acoustic sampling<br />

system, we must be able to define the conditions<br />

of encounter and the probability of detection.<br />

Targets smaller than 240 m cannot be resolved at<br />

the deepest depths because of the transducer beam<br />

geometry.<br />

The ADCP used in the April cruise operated at<br />

<strong>30</strong>7.2 kHz. The transducer installation on the R/V<br />

New Horizon was 4 m deep (the draft of the ship),<br />

and the outgoing pulse was set at 4-m length (2.7<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!