20.01.2015 Views

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

elieve the conventions of modernity are unassailable, or unalterable. Of power and<br />

knowledge Foucault said:<br />

Finally, there is a fourth characteristic of<br />

power -- a power that, in a sense, traverses<br />

and drives those other powers. I’m thinking<br />

of an epistemological power -- that is, a power<br />

to extract a knowledge from individuals and<br />

to extract a knowledge about those individuals<br />

-- who are subjected to observation and<br />

already controlled by those different powers.<br />

This occurs, then, in two different ways. In an<br />

institution like the factory, for example, the<br />

worker’s labor and the worker’s knowledge<br />

about his own labor, the technical<br />

improvements -- the little inventions and<br />

discoveries, the micro adaptations he’s able to<br />

implement in the course of his labor -- are<br />

immediately recorded, thus extracted from his<br />

practice, accumulated by the power exercised<br />

over him through supervision. In this way, the<br />

worker’s labor is gradually absorbed into a<br />

certain technical knowledge of production<br />

which will enable a strengthening of control.<br />

So we see how there forms a knowledge that’s<br />

extracted from the individuals themselves and<br />

derived from their own behavior (Foucault,<br />

in Faubion, 2000:83).<br />

Gene Veith argues that Foucault’s notions are at times pro-Marxist, though Foucault<br />

never seemed interested in aligning himself with that worldview. In fact, Foucault was<br />

never fond of any tradition, established worldview, or institution. Foucault suggests that<br />

moral responsibility and individual freedom are merely grand illusions, “shaped by our<br />

own Western bourgeois culture” (Foucault, in Veith, 1994:76). Foucault even argues that<br />

liberty is an invention of the ruling classes (Foucault, 1984:78). For Foucault, oppression<br />

comes in many forms and thus, “oppression is intrinsic to all social institutions and to the<br />

language that gives them utterance. Individual identity must therefore be deconstructed”<br />

(Foucault, in Veith, 1994:77).<br />

Foucault, like Rorty, wanted to change the rules of the game, so to speak -- to upset the<br />

traditions of modernity. Foucault is not trying to create his own ‘grand theory,’ only to<br />

81<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!