20.01.2015 Views

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

had been trapped. Through Nietzsche, I had<br />

become a stranger to all that. I’m still not<br />

quite integrated within French social and<br />

intellectual life. If I were younger, I would<br />

have immigrated to the United States<br />

(Foucault, in Martin, 1988:9).<br />

Foucault’s rejection of modernism begins with his rejection of this Cartesian-Kantian<br />

beginning, preferring ‘otherness’ to ‘sameness.’ “The modern thinker assumes that the<br />

perceptions of the inquiring self provide accurate representations of an external world and<br />

hence a valid basis for knowledge of that world” (Grenz, 1996:127). According to<br />

Foucault, Western society has made a number of fundamental errors. He argues that<br />

scholars have wrongly believed, “(1) that an objective body of knowledge exists and is<br />

waiting to be discovered, (2) that they actually possess such knowledge and that it is<br />

neutral or value-free, and (3) that the pursuit of knowledge benefits all humankind rather<br />

than just a specific class” (ibid. 131). Foucault rejected the notion of a disinterested<br />

knower, or unbiased observer (a basic notion of science), thus rejecting the traditional<br />

construction of knowledge. Knowledge is, for him, a power struggle: not objectively<br />

discovered, but collectively constructed. Those with the greatest power establish<br />

knowledge and truth, therefore truth is a product of the process, and it establishes our<br />

reality. Of truth, Foucault said:<br />

The important thing here, I believe, is that truth<br />

isn’t outside power, or lacking in power:<br />

contrary to a myth whose history and functions<br />

would repay further study, truth isn’t the<br />

reward of free spirits, the child of protracted<br />

solitude, nor the privilege of those who have<br />

succeeded in liberating themselves. Truth is a<br />

thing of this world: it is produced only by<br />

virtue of multiple forms of constraint. And it<br />

induces regular effects of power. Each society<br />

has its regime of truth, its ‘general politics’ of<br />

truth: that is, the types of discourse which it<br />

accepts and makes function as true; the<br />

mechanisms and instances which enable one to<br />

distinguish true and false statements, the<br />

means by which each is sanctioned; the<br />

techniques and procedures accorded value in<br />

the acquisition of truth; the status of those who<br />

77<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!