20.01.2015 Views

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Foucault claimed he was not presenting a coherent and timeless block of knowledge.<br />

He makes statements that seem to contradict one another. “Part of the reason for this is<br />

that he is not attempting to present a theory of anything, a complete explanation of the<br />

structure of things. To attempt to do so, he says on one occasion, would be to concede<br />

the very position he is rejecting, since ‘theory still relates to the dynamic of bourgeois<br />

knowledge’” (Erickson, 2001:135). Foucault said of his own works:<br />

I would like my books to be a kind of tool-box<br />

which others can rummage through to find a<br />

tool which they can use however they wish in<br />

their own area... I would like the little volume<br />

that I want to write on disciplinary systems to<br />

be useful to an educator, a warden, a magistrate,<br />

a conscientious objector. I don’t write for an<br />

audience, I write for users, not readers<br />

(Foucault, 1974:523).<br />

Foucault did not really focus on the deep, traditional questions that other philosophers<br />

and historians have often grappled with. Foucault was well schooled in history, but more<br />

focused on the contemporary. McHoul and Grace said of Foucault:<br />

We do not believe that Foucault provides a<br />

definitive theory of anything in the sense of a<br />

set of unambiguous answers to time-worn<br />

questions. In this respect, there is little benefit<br />

to be gained from asking what, for example, is<br />

Foucault’s theory of power Nevertheless, his<br />

work clearly involves various types of<br />

theorisation. This is because we regard<br />

Foucault as first and foremost a philosopher<br />

who does philosophy as an interrogative<br />

practice rather than as a search for essentials<br />

(Grace, 1995:vii).<br />

Foucault was once asked during an interview what people had especially influenced<br />

his thinking, to which he responded: Heidegger, Husserl, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty and<br />

especially Nietzsche. He added:<br />

Nietzsche was a revelation to me. I felt that<br />

this was someone quite different from what I<br />

had been taught. I read him with a great<br />

passion and broke with my life, left my job in<br />

the asylum, left France: I had the feeling I<br />

76<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!