Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

satsonline.org
from satsonline.org More from this publisher
20.01.2015 Views

why do they continue to write books and talk about it. They are obviously making some claims -- and if not, then they literally have nothing to say and no objection to [the rational] employment of the classical canons of logic (Craig, 1995:82). In the postmodern cultural climate, the strong differentiation between moral thesis and antithesis are unacceptable. Take for example the controversy surrounding homosexuality, the ordination of [practicing] homosexuals, and same-sex marriage. The disestablishment of Christianity, coupled with postmodern relativism and pluralism, has made for a society in which personal choices are more important than truth -- following Rorty’s contentions. So-called Christian truths are no longer widely accepted in ‘free’ Western societies. Even in many churches, biblical imperatives and dogmas are less important and acceptable than personal choice and tolerance. The biblical concept of ‘love’ has been elevated far above the biblical concept of ‘truth.’ Even Muslims cannot understand what is happening in Western societies. Again, M. A. Muqtedar Khan: Suddenly perversion is an alternate lifestyle. God-consciousness for long understood as enlightenment is now bigotry and an indicator of social under-development. There is no absolute truth only contingent truths. Morality are conventions that work and justice is an option that enjoys political support. The self is no more the mystical domain where the spiritual and mundane merge. Life is no more the discovery and the perfection of that self. Today self is something you buy off a shelf (Khan, 2000). Another epistemological and cultural trait of postmodernity is that there is little or no difference between the natural and artificial experience, between substantiated knowledge and unsubstantiated perceptions of reality and truth. This notion of ‘de-realization’ can be traced back to Kierkegaard, Marx, and Nietzsche. The abstract phantom, what Kierkegaard called ‘the public,’ is the creation of the press, which is the medium by and through which reality is created for the masses. Nietzsche later talks about the dissolution of the distinction between the ‘real’ and the ‘apparent’ world (Nietzsche, 1954:485), arguing that the real world has been done away with, leaving only something in between, 70 University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

71 something akin to the virtual reality of contemporary [high-tech] life. It is interesting that Nietzsche describes this modernist trait well before the computer age. Lyotard also acknowledges the impact of computer technologies, which have also affected, as he calls it, the language game. He insists, “there is a strict inter-linkage between the kind of language called science and the kind called ethics and politics” (Lyotard 1984:8). Science, as such, is closely interwoven with government and information, and therefore participates in this ‘apparent’ world. As if Western societies were not materialistic enough already, postmodernism engenders and encourages an even deeper level of superficiality. “Image is everything,” and facades are encouraged. Life becomes a collage of inner fragmented experiences that mean little. Postmodern eclecticism embraces whatever the individual deems valuable. Fragmentation is perfectly acceptable, even if it means embracing only portions of concepts, making truth and morality artificial, or unreal. Magical realism, for example, is widely popular in the arts, where movies such as The Chronicles of Narnia, the Harry Potter series, and Lord of the Rings have been hugely popular in the West. In this postmodern, relativistic, eclectic, fragmented and nearly meaningless world, there is little need for a religion, like Christianity that deals with sin, because good and evil no longer exist. Sin is based upon [so-called] Christian truth, but is not the truth all people accept. Therefore, in ‘politically correct’ postmodern culture, there is only worse and better, and the relativists are not even sure of these. This truth relativism has deeply impacted the church, especially historic, mainline Protestantism, which still today is ensnared in synthesis, compromise, and accommodation, having lost its grip on the need for antithesis, truth and dogma, which are critical to the very existence of the church. As Francis Schaeffer argued so passionately: “Christianity demands antithesis, not as some abstract concept of truth, but in the fact that God exists, and in personal justification” (Schaeffer, 1990:47). As with all relativism, postmodern claims are self-defeating, self-contradictory and logically inconsistent. D.A. Carson said if “there is no objective truth that binds all cultures together and evaluates them, then epistemologically, there is only truth for the individual, or for the individual culture, or for the diverse interpreting communities found University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

71<br />

something akin to the virtual reality of contemporary [high-tech] life. It is interesting that<br />

Nietzsche describes this modernist trait well before the computer age. Lyotard also<br />

acknowledges the impact of computer technologies, which have also affected, as he calls<br />

it, the language game. He insists, “there is a strict inter-linkage between the kind of<br />

language called science and the kind called ethics and politics” (Lyotard 1984:8).<br />

Science, as such, is closely interwoven with government and information, and therefore<br />

participates in this ‘apparent’ world.<br />

As if Western societies were not materialistic enough already, postmodernism<br />

engenders and encourages an even deeper level of superficiality. “Image is everything,”<br />

and facades are encouraged. Life becomes a collage of inner fragmented experiences that<br />

mean little. Postmodern eclecticism embraces whatever the individual deems valuable.<br />

Fragmentation is perfectly acceptable, even if it means embracing only portions of<br />

concepts, making truth and morality artificial, or unreal. Magical realism, for example, is<br />

widely popular in the arts, where movies such as The Chronicles of Narnia, the Harry<br />

Potter series, and Lord of the Rings have been hugely popular in the West.<br />

In this postmodern, relativistic, eclectic, fragmented and nearly meaningless world,<br />

there is little need for a religion, like Christianity that deals with sin, because good and<br />

evil no longer exist. Sin is based upon [so-called] Christian truth, but is not the truth all<br />

people accept. Therefore, in ‘politically correct’ postmodern culture, there is only worse<br />

and better, and the relativists are not even sure of these. This truth relativism has deeply<br />

impacted the church, especially historic, mainline Protestantism, which still today is<br />

ensnared in synthesis, compromise, and accommodation, having lost its grip on the need<br />

for antithesis, truth and dogma, which are critical to the very existence of the church. As<br />

Francis Schaeffer argued so passionately: “Christianity demands antithesis, not as some<br />

abstract concept of truth, but in the fact that God exists, and in personal justification”<br />

(Schaeffer, 1990:47).<br />

As with all relativism, postmodern claims are self-defeating, self-contradictory and<br />

logically inconsistent. D.A. Carson said if “there is no objective truth that binds all<br />

cultures together and evaluates them, then epistemologically, there is only truth for the<br />

individual, or for the individual culture, or for the diverse interpreting communities found<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!