20.01.2015 Views

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

maximum voluntary community agreement, rather than some tolerated disagreement<br />

(Rorty, 1991:38-39). Rorty’s concept of truth has become nearly pervasive throughout<br />

Western societies, where solidarity without truth, is more important than truth attained<br />

through argument and objections.<br />

The Judeo-Christian, or biblical worldview, by contrast, is built upon the<br />

presupposition that there is right and wrong, true and false. Francis Schaeffer discussed<br />

often how postmodern [relativist] epistemology was undermining both the Christian faith<br />

and epistemology in general. Absolutes require antithesis, the existence of the contrast of<br />

opposites. Antithetical thought ultimately argues that God exists in contrast to His not<br />

existing. It relies further on the reality of God’s creation of what exists, in contrast to<br />

what does not exist -- and then to His creating people to live, observe and think in the<br />

reality (Schaeffer, 1990:228).<br />

Contrary to this, Georg Hegel’s dialectic model advocates compromise, rather than<br />

absolutes and antithesis. Beginning with the traditional dichotomy between thesis and<br />

antithesis, Hegel works toward a synthesis, or compromise of the two extremes. Rather<br />

than the polar opposites of right and wrong, true and false, holy and unholy, there are now<br />

just relativistic compromises: the synthesis of thesis and antithesis. For about a century<br />

this has been practiced in the West, though limited to the moral, not scientific realm.<br />

“Getting along” without controversy, especially in the moral realm has become more<br />

important that truths and absolutes. Philosopher William Lane Craig says:<br />

To assert that ‘the truth is that there is no truth’<br />

is both self-refuting and arbitrary. For if this<br />

statement is true, it is not true, since there is no<br />

truth. So-called deconstructionism thus cannot<br />

be halted from deconstructing itself.<br />

Moreover, there is also no reason for adopting<br />

the postmodern perspective rather than, say,<br />

the outlooks of Western capitalism, male<br />

chauvinism, white racism, and so forth, since<br />

post-modernism has no more truth to it then<br />

these perspectives. Caught in this selfdefeating<br />

trap, some postmodernists have been<br />

forced to the same recourse as Buddhist<br />

mystics: denying that postmodernism is really<br />

a view or position at all. But then, once again,<br />

69<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!