Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
maximum voluntary community agreement, rather than some tolerated disagreement<br />
(Rorty, 1991:38-39). Rorty’s concept of truth has become nearly pervasive throughout<br />
Western societies, where solidarity without truth, is more important than truth attained<br />
through argument and objections.<br />
The Judeo-Christian, or biblical worldview, by contrast, is built upon the<br />
presupposition that there is right and wrong, true and false. Francis Schaeffer discussed<br />
often how postmodern [relativist] epistemology was undermining both the Christian faith<br />
and epistemology in general. Absolutes require antithesis, the existence of the contrast of<br />
opposites. Antithetical thought ultimately argues that God exists in contrast to His not<br />
existing. It relies further on the reality of God’s creation of what exists, in contrast to<br />
what does not exist -- and then to His creating people to live, observe and think in the<br />
reality (Schaeffer, 1990:228).<br />
Contrary to this, Georg Hegel’s dialectic model advocates compromise, rather than<br />
absolutes and antithesis. Beginning with the traditional dichotomy between thesis and<br />
antithesis, Hegel works toward a synthesis, or compromise of the two extremes. Rather<br />
than the polar opposites of right and wrong, true and false, holy and unholy, there are now<br />
just relativistic compromises: the synthesis of thesis and antithesis. For about a century<br />
this has been practiced in the West, though limited to the moral, not scientific realm.<br />
“Getting along” without controversy, especially in the moral realm has become more<br />
important that truths and absolutes. Philosopher William Lane Craig says:<br />
To assert that ‘the truth is that there is no truth’<br />
is both self-refuting and arbitrary. For if this<br />
statement is true, it is not true, since there is no<br />
truth. So-called deconstructionism thus cannot<br />
be halted from deconstructing itself.<br />
Moreover, there is also no reason for adopting<br />
the postmodern perspective rather than, say,<br />
the outlooks of Western capitalism, male<br />
chauvinism, white racism, and so forth, since<br />
post-modernism has no more truth to it then<br />
these perspectives. Caught in this selfdefeating<br />
trap, some postmodernists have been<br />
forced to the same recourse as Buddhist<br />
mystics: denying that postmodernism is really<br />
a view or position at all. But then, once again,<br />
69<br />
University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa