20.01.2015 Views

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

with reality. “Don’t words refer to<br />

something” I asked her. “If you are seeking<br />

an intelligible answer from me, mustn’t there<br />

be correspondence between my words and<br />

reality How then can this basic requirement<br />

be met in our culture” Of course, this student<br />

is only reflecting the spirit of postmodern<br />

thought -- No truth, no meaning, no certainty.<br />

We now hear that language is detached from<br />

reality and truth detached from meaning. So<br />

what we are left with is a way of thinking<br />

basically shaped by our bodies and by our<br />

proclivities. That is how defining our<br />

untamed passions have become and hence<br />

incoherence is now normal (Zacharias,<br />

2006).<br />

Postmoderns doubt that any objective, or singular, truth exists. For them truth is a<br />

social construct, and is community-relative. Since there are myriads of communities,<br />

there are myriads of truths. The postmodern claims there are no absolutes, no one truth,<br />

or standard of truth, to judge one against another -- leaving only relativism.<br />

Postmodernity refers to a shift away from<br />

attempts to ground epistemology and<br />

faith in a humanly engineered process. The<br />

condition of post-modernity is distinguished<br />

by an evaporating of the ‘grand narrative’ --<br />

the overarching ‘story line’ by means of which<br />

we are placed in history as beings having a<br />

definite past and a predictable future. The<br />

post-modern outlook sees a plurality of<br />

heterogeneous claims to knowledge, in<br />

which science does not have a privileged<br />

place (Giddens, in Gelder, 1996:153).<br />

Richard Rorty does not argue for total nihilism, as is sometimes attributed to him, but<br />

does emphasize the social influence of nihilism upon the individual and his beliefs. For<br />

Rorty truth is an inter-subjective agreement among members of a community that enables<br />

them to speak a common language and establish a commonly accepted reality (Rorty,<br />

1991:21). The end-all for Rorty is not the discovery or even the approximation of<br />

absolute truth, but rather the formulation of beliefs that further solidify the community,<br />

which is “to reduce objectivity to solidarity” (Rorty, 1991:22). Rorty’s ideal seems to be<br />

68<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!