20.01.2015 Views

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

transcendental and empirical, etc...<br />

It is therefore as if what we call language<br />

could have been in its origin and in its end<br />

only a moment, an essential but determined<br />

mode, a phenomenon, an aspect, a species of<br />

writing, and as if it had succeeded in making<br />

us forget this, and in willfully misleading us,<br />

only in the course of an adventure: as that<br />

adventure itself (Derrida, 1967:8).<br />

Deconstructionists further argue that all texts are mediated by language and cultural<br />

systems, which are manifested as ideologies and symbols, expressed in genres, ideas and<br />

practices, and are limited in their ability to truly express the author’s thoughts. They<br />

argue that texts which ‘confess’ the highly mediated, or biased, nature of our human<br />

experience move closer to deconstructing themselves. This ‘confession’ moves the text<br />

closer to reality than other texts, which remain conditioned by culture and tradition. The<br />

process is, especially in a formal literary sense, an attempt to literarily express oneself,<br />

freed from the traditions and biases that culturally condition all people. Those who<br />

subsequently read these offerings must in turn attempt to be hermeneutically unbiased,<br />

exegeting fairly and without bias; but deconstruction does not stop here, routinely doing<br />

violence to the text (Lye, 1996). Postcolonial studies sometimes employ this same<br />

deconstructive technique, especially relative to the abuse of power and exploitation of<br />

others by the Colonials.<br />

In our day, deconstruction has come to mean ‘tearing down,’ often in a disrespectful<br />

and nihilistic manner. Some would argue that it misses Derrida’s original intention,<br />

which is to [humbly] consider afresh the claims of traditional texts, especially those held<br />

by society to be properly understood. Others would argue that Derrida’s own conceit laid<br />

the foundation for today’s radical hermeneutics. Yet, it is this, “take a fresh look at the<br />

old texts” aspect of Derrida's work that is worthy of consideration. In a similar manner,<br />

the Renaissance scholars ‘re-considered’ the ancient Greek texts, even as the Reformers<br />

did with the biblical texts in the original languages. From an interview, Derrida said of<br />

his work:<br />

Deconstruction questions the thesis, theme,<br />

the positionality of everything. . . . We have<br />

to study the models and the history of the<br />

62<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!