20.01.2015 Views

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

meaning and language. The postmodern project is not a constructive; it is a deconstructive<br />

criticism of, and challenge to, the presuppositions upon which the<br />

Enlightenment has long rested.<br />

Postmodernism is at once violently opposed to the absolutes of institutionalized<br />

religion and welcoming of an individual [non-traditional] spirituality long disallowed by<br />

traditional Western religion. Orthodox, traditional religious adherents are highly<br />

distrusted by postmoderns. To be Evangelical, for example, is wrong-headed, because<br />

postmoderns believe that to be orthodox and zealous means adherence to absolutes that<br />

might offend someone else, or infringe upon their personal freedoms. Irrational<br />

postmodernism goes beyond the rationally oriented attacks of modernity. “Modernism is<br />

a revolt against revealed religion. It is a revolt against the truth. Postmodernism is a<br />

further revolt, fundamentally against modernism and secondarily against Christianity and<br />

the truth as well” (Mark Dever, in Carson, 2000:142).<br />

Where religion is concerned, postmoderns often follow Friedrich Nietzsche who said:<br />

“Where has God gone I shall tell you. We have killed him -- you and I. We are all his<br />

murderers... God is dead. That which was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has<br />

yet possessed has bled to death under our knives. There has never been a greater deed”<br />

(Nietzsche, 1882:125). To Nietzsche Christianity was nothing more than an ethos that<br />

glorified weakness. He believed mankind was in the transitional stage from animality to<br />

the superman (ubermensch, German) of the future. He believed man must propel himself<br />

into the future by abolishing the archaic notions of God, or divine rule, to create a new<br />

value foundation upon which to build a new world.<br />

The source of the concept ‘good’ has been<br />

sought and established in the wrong place: the<br />

judgment ‘good’ did not originate with those<br />

to whom ‘goodness’ was shown! Rather it<br />

was ‘the good’ themselves, that is to say, the<br />

noble, powerful, high-stationed and highminded,<br />

who felt and established themselves<br />

and their actions as good... It was out of this<br />

pathos of distance that they first seized the<br />

right to create values and to coin names for<br />

values... the protracted and domineering<br />

fundamental total feeling on the part of a<br />

55<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!