Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
50<br />
If one assumes the inherent goodness of man, moral relativism is theoretical possible.<br />
If man’s inherent goodness were true, humanity could and perhaps would rise to the<br />
challenge -- freely doing what was good, and respecting the sovereignty of others.<br />
However, if humans are born inherently good, or without ‘nature,’ as Sartre puts it, where<br />
does all the evil in the world come from Why is man so incessantly evil If all are free<br />
to do as they want, will not the expression of these freedoms at some point impinge upon<br />
the freedoms of others Therefore true and absolute freedom -- the moral subjectivity<br />
Sartre espouses -- is irrational, and a fiction that produces anarchy (or lawlessness).<br />
Sartre, Joseph Fletcher, A.J. Ayer and others, are of the opinion that moral boundaries<br />
are of little, or no ultimate value. Yet, Sartre calls man self and even neighbour<br />
responsible. Absolute ethical relativity is impossible according to these criteria.<br />
Worldviews need to be rational and consistent, meaning they must be based upon<br />
absolutes. For Nietzsche the absolute was the “will-to-power,” or “eternal recurrence.”<br />
John Dewey made ‘progress’ his absolute. As Paul Tillich observed, “everyone has an<br />
ultimate commitment, an unconditional centre of his life. Without this centre he would<br />
not be a person” (Feinberg, 1980:408). Sartre’s absolute was freedom, but his construct<br />
is not consistent, and what he builds is an inconsistent ‘house of cards’ that cannot stand.<br />
If truth is a social construct, and if all moral boundaries are relative, why should<br />
people be ‘good’ Even further, what is ‘good’ If there are no absolutes, no<br />
metaphysical realities, no God, no ‘hereafter,’ and no final judgment, then we might just<br />
as well live for the moment and get all we can out our brief, miserable lives, as so many<br />
people do anyway. Is life worth living Is there no more Does Sartre provide answers,<br />
or just add to the uncertainties mankind already feels<br />
University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa