20.01.2015 Views

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

37<br />

expression. This “first response (propagated or practiced by Schleiermacher, Pietism, and<br />

the evangelical awakenings) was to divorce religion from reason, locate it in human<br />

feeling and experience, and thus protect it from any possible attacks by the<br />

enlightenment’s tendency toward ‘objectifying consciousness’” (Bosch, 2000:269).<br />

Schleiermacher was raised in a strong Christian family. He attended the Moravian<br />

seminary at Barby, and later studied at Halle -- at the time, the centre of radical thought in<br />

Germany -- then at Berlin, and read Kant and other modernists. He eventually became a<br />

member of “a brilliant circle of romantic writers and poets” (Brown, 1968:109). It was<br />

during this time that he published his celebrated, On Religion: Speeches to its Cultured<br />

Despisers (1799). Following the Napoleonic wars, he became one of the leading<br />

intellectuals in Germany and helped found the University of Berlin in 1810, the school at<br />

which he dominated the faculty of theology. He wrote much, and published works like<br />

the Life of Jesus. Many consider his systematic theology, The Christian Faith (1821,<br />

1830), his most important work. Others consider him the most important theologian<br />

between John Calvin and Karl Barth (cf., Livingston, 1997:93) -- a man who has<br />

influenced a great many, including Kierkegaard.<br />

Schleiermacher explored and expanded traditionalist thinking. He sought to liberate<br />

theology from archaic forms, and worked to better understand the faith within the<br />

modernist climate. The rationalist challenges to theology at the time, and still even in our<br />

day, subjected all thought and history to critical scrutiny, a standard many from the faith<br />

community tried to attain. Yet, Schleiermacher questioned the overall value of this overrationalistic<br />

approach to faith, emphasizing the practical over the theoretical, without<br />

necessarily sacrificing reason for faith (cf., fideism). Where theology before modernity<br />

had been ‘from above,’ or of transcendent focus, after the arrival of modernity, and in<br />

Schleiermacher’s work as well, theology came ‘from below,’ having a God-imminent<br />

emphasis.<br />

From Thomas Aquinas onwards were those who tried to merge the revealed, biblical<br />

faith, with natural theology -- the construct that focuses on God revealing himself through<br />

nature, in contrast to God-revealed through the prophets and their inspired writings. Kant<br />

held “that the two cancelled each other out, because natural theology was rotten at the<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!