Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

satsonline.org
from satsonline.org More from this publisher
20.01.2015 Views

28 Modernity's Cultural Impact Returning to the UK from decades of missionary work in India, Bishop Lesslie Newbigin was uniquely able to identify the changed character of Western culture that had developed during his absence. He noted in particular the sharp ideological division between ‘values’ and ‘facts.’ That Christianity in the West has historically responded to modernist challenges in several ways. The first has been to divorce religion from science; sometimes expressed in Pietism, or in various forms of Christian mysticism, where feelings and experience are given primacy over rationalism. The second has been the privatization of religion, where Christians have legally and socially withdrawn from the public sphere. The third response has been the faith community’s accommodationist embrace of secular society, which has led to de-sacralisation movements in various forms (cf., Bosch, 2000:269f), and is considered by many one of the main reasons for the decline of the traditional ‘main-line’ denominations in our postmodern era. Newbigin noted that Hindus, for example, do not have the ideological conflict between science and religion that Westerners do. Eastern religions “do not understand the world in terms of purpose” (Newbigin, 1986:39). Modern notions of purpose and [linear] time come from the Bible. However, they were later attributed to secular humanist notions rooted in inevitable progress, and various utopianisms. Newbigin said Eastern religions are quite content to maintain a dualistic world, maintaining a practical separation between the secular and religious. Eastern religions do not fight the modernist, or scientific, worldview, as Western Christianity so often does. Because Eastern religionists do not fight science, but seek instead to co-exist in a non-conflictual manner, Eastern religions are generally more accepted by modernists than are religions that compete with, and/or criticise the modernist agenda (e.g., Christianity, Islam). The concepts of ‘progress’ and ‘production’ are two major driving forces of modernity. “Production became the highest goal of being human, resulting in humans having to worship at the altar of the autonomy of technology” (Bosch, 2000:355). The Enlightenment promised that rationalistic man could eventually dominate his world, University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

29 eliminating poverty, hunger and suffering. Instead, modern progress has produced a world where technological advancements have in some ways benefited mankind, but have also threatened our very existence (pollution, etc.). Mankind benefits from mechanization, but has also become its slave, as in humanity’s growing need for energy sources (e.g., coal, oil). Production and progress simply have not delivered as promised, yet in many parts of the world the “gospel of modernity” continues to be preached and practiced. The church has been deeply influenced by the Enlightenment project. “Even where it resisted the Enlightenment mentality it [the church] was profoundly influenced by it” (Bosch, 2000:269). Reason became profoundly important in theology, even as it still is in our day. Theology eventually became a science, and the queen of the sciences. The accommodation to rationalism has thoroughly shaped and re-shaped the church and theological studies ever since. The preoccupation with proper interpretation, precision hermeneutics, and ‘pure doctrine’ continues to dominate Christian thinking in the West and now beyond. Not a few, especially in our postmodern day, argue that the absolutes sought by modernist theologians go beyond the scope and purposes of God, who demands that His own live by faith, not by sight (2Co. 5:7). Why is modernity so broadly embraced, even among [committed] Christians Because modernity is rooted in a man-exalting, man-pleasing ideology that accords with humanity’s sin-corrupted [base] nature, about which the Bible clearly informs us (cf., Gen. 6:4-7; Jer. 16:12; Mat. 15:19; Rom. 8:19f). In this fallen condition (cf., Gen. 3), man’s inclination is always toward corruption and rebellion against God (cf., Luther, Martin. The Bondage of the Will). Passages such as Genesis 11:1-9 and Isaiah 14, esp. vs.13-14, among so many others -- reveal man’s penchant for exalting himself and rebelling against God. Thus, an innate and direct product of man’s inherent sincorruption is the desire to deny and rebel against God and to exalt self. “Yet they did not obey or incline their ear, but followed the counsels and the dictates of their evil hearts, and went backward and not forward” (Jer. 7:24). Modernity has produced a cultural climate in which, “the Christian faith is severely questioned, contemptuously repudiated, or studiously ignored. Revelation, which used to be the matrix and fountainhead of University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

29<br />

eliminating poverty, hunger and suffering. Instead, modern progress has produced a<br />

world where technological advancements have in some ways benefited mankind, but have<br />

also threatened our very existence (pollution, etc.). Mankind benefits from<br />

mechanization, but has also become its slave, as in humanity’s growing need for energy<br />

sources (e.g., coal, oil). Production and progress simply have not delivered as promised,<br />

yet in many parts of the world the “gospel of modernity” continues to be preached and<br />

practiced.<br />

The church has been deeply influenced by the Enlightenment project. “Even where it<br />

resisted the Enlightenment mentality it [the church] was profoundly influenced by it”<br />

(Bosch, 2000:269). Reason became profoundly important in theology, even as it still is in<br />

our day. Theology eventually became a science, and the queen of the sciences. The<br />

accommodation to rationalism has thoroughly shaped and re-shaped the church and<br />

theological studies ever since. The preoccupation with proper interpretation, precision<br />

hermeneutics, and ‘pure doctrine’ continues to dominate Christian thinking in the West<br />

and now beyond. Not a few, especially in our postmodern day, argue that the absolutes<br />

sought by modernist theologians go beyond the scope and purposes of God, who demands<br />

that His own live by faith, not by sight (2Co. 5:7).<br />

Why is modernity so broadly embraced, even among [committed] Christians<br />

Because modernity is rooted in a man-exalting, man-pleasing ideology that accords with<br />

humanity’s sin-corrupted [base] nature, about which the Bible clearly informs us (cf.,<br />

Gen. 6:4-7; Jer. 16:12; Mat. 15:19; Rom. 8:19f). In this fallen condition (cf., Gen. 3),<br />

man’s inclination is always toward corruption and rebellion against God (cf., Luther,<br />

Martin. The Bondage of the Will). Passages such as Genesis 11:1-9 and Isaiah 14, esp.<br />

vs.13-14, among so many others -- reveal man’s penchant for exalting himself and<br />

rebelling against God. Thus, an innate and direct product of man’s inherent sincorruption<br />

is the desire to deny and rebel against God and to exalt self. “Yet they did not<br />

obey or incline their ear, but followed the counsels and the dictates of their evil hearts,<br />

and went backward and not forward” (Jer. 7:24). Modernity has produced a cultural<br />

climate in which, “the Christian faith is severely questioned, contemptuously repudiated,<br />

or studiously ignored. Revelation, which used to be the matrix and fountainhead of<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!