20.01.2015 Views

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

198<br />

enough, as such fashions do” (Gellner, 1992:71). To Gellner, postmodernity was the<br />

currently fashionable form of [philosophical] relativism, and while it has affected many,<br />

is already passing. Indeed, postmodernism has been passé in France for some years now,<br />

replaced by a generation of ‘neo-conservatives,’ a counter-trend some say is developing<br />

across the West.<br />

Yet, postmodernity will leave its mark, mostly expressed in greater moral relativism<br />

and religious pluralism in Western societies. Many would argue these are necessary<br />

components of free societies, yet upon what moral foundation will these societies be<br />

founded, since science readily admits its inherent inability to supply morality As Ernst<br />

Gellner said, monotheistic religions endorse unique truths, and still need to be a factor in<br />

Western cultural foundations. In the end, I believe postmodernity, post-colonialism, and<br />

post-Christendom have challenged Christianity to be influencers, not controllers.<br />

How should Christianity respond to postmodernity and its remnant cultural features<br />

As philosopher William Lane Craig has said, Christianity should not realign its witness to<br />

the world in accordance with the present postmodern fad. “Such a realignment would be<br />

not only unnecessary, but counterproductive, for the abandonment of objective standards<br />

of truth and rationality could only undermine the Christian faith in the long run by<br />

making its call to repentance and faith in Christ but one more voice in the cacophony of<br />

subjectively satisfying but subjectively vacuous religious interpretations of the world”<br />

(Craig in Cowan, 2000:183). Arguing the case for Christianity using postmodern<br />

standards will only make the faith weaker in the process. Postmodernity does require an<br />

apologetic response, but not one that abandons reason in the process.<br />

Where the grand scheme of things is concerned, postmodernity is hardly the ‘shaking’<br />

God yet promises to do (cf., Psa. 96:13; Heb. 12:25-29), and I am not suggesting that<br />

postmodernity is some divine wind. Yet, postmodernity, post-Christendom and postcolonialism<br />

have all worked to make significant changes in Western Christianity. The<br />

faith has largely been disestablished from its Christendom position. Further, the exposure<br />

of this Western religious facade has produced some positive results. Postmodernists “are<br />

right to warn us of the dangers of using language to gain power over others, to<br />

recommend the importance of story and narrative, and to warn against the historical<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!