Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
198<br />
enough, as such fashions do” (Gellner, 1992:71). To Gellner, postmodernity was the<br />
currently fashionable form of [philosophical] relativism, and while it has affected many,<br />
is already passing. Indeed, postmodernism has been passé in France for some years now,<br />
replaced by a generation of ‘neo-conservatives,’ a counter-trend some say is developing<br />
across the West.<br />
Yet, postmodernity will leave its mark, mostly expressed in greater moral relativism<br />
and religious pluralism in Western societies. Many would argue these are necessary<br />
components of free societies, yet upon what moral foundation will these societies be<br />
founded, since science readily admits its inherent inability to supply morality As Ernst<br />
Gellner said, monotheistic religions endorse unique truths, and still need to be a factor in<br />
Western cultural foundations. In the end, I believe postmodernity, post-colonialism, and<br />
post-Christendom have challenged Christianity to be influencers, not controllers.<br />
How should Christianity respond to postmodernity and its remnant cultural features<br />
As philosopher William Lane Craig has said, Christianity should not realign its witness to<br />
the world in accordance with the present postmodern fad. “Such a realignment would be<br />
not only unnecessary, but counterproductive, for the abandonment of objective standards<br />
of truth and rationality could only undermine the Christian faith in the long run by<br />
making its call to repentance and faith in Christ but one more voice in the cacophony of<br />
subjectively satisfying but subjectively vacuous religious interpretations of the world”<br />
(Craig in Cowan, 2000:183). Arguing the case for Christianity using postmodern<br />
standards will only make the faith weaker in the process. Postmodernity does require an<br />
apologetic response, but not one that abandons reason in the process.<br />
Where the grand scheme of things is concerned, postmodernity is hardly the ‘shaking’<br />
God yet promises to do (cf., Psa. 96:13; Heb. 12:25-29), and I am not suggesting that<br />
postmodernity is some divine wind. Yet, postmodernity, post-Christendom and postcolonialism<br />
have all worked to make significant changes in Western Christianity. The<br />
faith has largely been disestablished from its Christendom position. Further, the exposure<br />
of this Western religious facade has produced some positive results. Postmodernists “are<br />
right to warn us of the dangers of using language to gain power over others, to<br />
recommend the importance of story and narrative, and to warn against the historical<br />
University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa