20.01.2015 Views

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

172<br />

Benedikter believes the postmoderns -- Jacques Derrida, Jean-Francois Lyotard,<br />

Michel Foucault, Helene Cixous, Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari, etc. -- were products of<br />

the European revolutionary impulse, quintessentially begun with the French Revolution<br />

(c.1789). He believes this spirit remains alive today, especially among the French, who<br />

still deeply embrace the notions of freedom and brotherhood, but even more, the notion of<br />

‘equality.’ Benedikter believes postmoderns are a rekindling of the French Revolutionary<br />

spirit. Both groups call into question social inequalities and injustices, and change where<br />

possible. Benedikter believes the postmoderns see themselves in this role, toppling<br />

strong, unjust hierarchies.<br />

The postmodernist effort to topple unjust governments and institutions, like<br />

institutional Christianity, began in earnest at Berkley and San Francisco in the 1960’s.<br />

The immediate question for them at the time, was how do mere students topple powerful<br />

governments and institutions, and change society The postmoderns believed their goals<br />

could be accomplished through socially deconstructing “the pillars of hierarchical<br />

organisational patterns in the European-Western societies” (Benedikter, 2005). Because<br />

the students were largely unable to produce change through violent means -- the way the<br />

peasants toppled the French government -- these new [postmodern] revolutionaries<br />

infused the notion of self-deconstruction into philosophical discourse, especially among<br />

the academics, which are still the largest progenitors of social disestablishment in the<br />

West today. Benedikter further notes that Europeans, in particular, are wary that<br />

postmodern individuality may turn into something collective, even when driven by high<br />

goals. He believes Europeans are especially sceptical about such groups gaining<br />

collective consciousness, because of Europe’s history with groups like the Nazi’s.<br />

The first postmodern wave was rooted in deconstruction, or what some called, social<br />

‘re-fragmentation.’ Thus, the first generation of true postmoderns was the ‘wrecking<br />

crew,’ the destroyers, or the disestablishmentarians. They were certainly not builders of<br />

something new and better. According to Benedikter, the postmodernists thought: “Maybe<br />

the next generation will build something new, or maybe not; but we, in any case, have to<br />

deconstruct the wrong concepts and open up the field radically, by going to destroy,<br />

disseminate and pluralize the roots... That is the necessary first step” (Benedikter, 2005).<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!