Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
172<br />
Benedikter believes the postmoderns -- Jacques Derrida, Jean-Francois Lyotard,<br />
Michel Foucault, Helene Cixous, Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari, etc. -- were products of<br />
the European revolutionary impulse, quintessentially begun with the French Revolution<br />
(c.1789). He believes this spirit remains alive today, especially among the French, who<br />
still deeply embrace the notions of freedom and brotherhood, but even more, the notion of<br />
‘equality.’ Benedikter believes postmoderns are a rekindling of the French Revolutionary<br />
spirit. Both groups call into question social inequalities and injustices, and change where<br />
possible. Benedikter believes the postmoderns see themselves in this role, toppling<br />
strong, unjust hierarchies.<br />
The postmodernist effort to topple unjust governments and institutions, like<br />
institutional Christianity, began in earnest at Berkley and San Francisco in the 1960’s.<br />
The immediate question for them at the time, was how do mere students topple powerful<br />
governments and institutions, and change society The postmoderns believed their goals<br />
could be accomplished through socially deconstructing “the pillars of hierarchical<br />
organisational patterns in the European-Western societies” (Benedikter, 2005). Because<br />
the students were largely unable to produce change through violent means -- the way the<br />
peasants toppled the French government -- these new [postmodern] revolutionaries<br />
infused the notion of self-deconstruction into philosophical discourse, especially among<br />
the academics, which are still the largest progenitors of social disestablishment in the<br />
West today. Benedikter further notes that Europeans, in particular, are wary that<br />
postmodern individuality may turn into something collective, even when driven by high<br />
goals. He believes Europeans are especially sceptical about such groups gaining<br />
collective consciousness, because of Europe’s history with groups like the Nazi’s.<br />
The first postmodern wave was rooted in deconstruction, or what some called, social<br />
‘re-fragmentation.’ Thus, the first generation of true postmoderns was the ‘wrecking<br />
crew,’ the destroyers, or the disestablishmentarians. They were certainly not builders of<br />
something new and better. According to Benedikter, the postmodernists thought: “Maybe<br />
the next generation will build something new, or maybe not; but we, in any case, have to<br />
deconstruct the wrong concepts and open up the field radically, by going to destroy,<br />
disseminate and pluralize the roots... That is the necessary first step” (Benedikter, 2005).<br />
University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa