20.01.2015 Views

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Religious pluralism challenges us to hold<br />

firmly to the uniqueness of Jesus Christ as<br />

Savior even as we work for increased<br />

tolerance and understanding among religious<br />

communities. We cannot seek harmony by<br />

relativizing the truth claims of religions...<br />

We commit ourselves to reconciliation. We<br />

also commit ourselves to proclaim the gospel<br />

of Jesus Christ in faithfulness and loving<br />

humility (Iguassu Affirmation, in Taylor,<br />

2000:19).<br />

Christians must further understand that pluralism is syncretism. Real syncretism is,<br />

as A. Oepke asserts, “always based on the presupposition that all positive religions are<br />

only reflections of a universal original religion and show therefore only gradual<br />

differences” (Oepke, in Anderson, 1984:17). Hooft defines syncretism as “the view<br />

which holds that there is no unique revelation in history, that there are many different<br />

ways to reach the divine reality, that all formulations of religious truth or experience are<br />

by their very nature inadequate expressions of that truth and that is necessary to<br />

harmonise as much as possible all religious ideas and experiences so as to create one<br />

universal religion for mankind” (Hooft, in Anderson, 1984:17). Like John Hick, the<br />

Hindu mystic Ramakrishna, and others, pluralists claim that all paths lead to the same<br />

‘god,’ or ultimate reality. Ghandhi, for example, declared, “the soul of religions is one,<br />

but it is encased in a multitude of forms” (ibid. 18).<br />

The Christian response to postmodernity cannot be a “myopic conservative<br />

retrenchment” (Middleton, 1995:173), for the faith has much to offer this rootless<br />

postmodern, pluralistic generation. D.A. Carson adds that we must acknowledge “certain<br />

truths in postmodernity, without getting snookered by the entire package” (Carson,<br />

1996:136). A person’s hope should not rest in the promises of modernity, or any other<br />

human construct. Contrary to the anti-foundationalism and hopelessness that<br />

postmodernism endorses, people do need a raison d'être, or reason for being. People do<br />

want stability in their lives: they want something stable and sure to believe in: and who<br />

better to lead foundation-less people to, than the Rock (cf., Psa. 18:2, 31, 46).<br />

The modernists would not endorse the future hope provided via biblical eschatology,<br />

instead replacing what Scripture offered with various secular Utopianisms. Hope for the<br />

112<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!