20.01.2015 Views

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

104<br />

constructs and doctrines are allegoricalized, making all things ‘nothingness,’ or<br />

meaningless. So-called ‘higher powers’ become ‘gods’ that mankind can shape as suits<br />

his/her whims. In this milieu of nothingness, James W. Sire asks: “Why should anyone<br />

believe anything at all” (Sire, in Carson, 2000:94).<br />

All this ‘meaninglessness’ is similar to the higher stages of Hinduistic selfrealization,<br />

where the lines between good and evil are completely blurred. At all levels of<br />

Hinduism, there is a works-righteousness emphasis. If you do well, you may be able to<br />

escape the endless cycle of samsara. For the higher castes, however, self-realization and<br />

the Brahmin oneness of all things means that good is evil and evil, good. There is no<br />

motivation to be moral, which is reflected in the highly immoral behaviour of the higher<br />

caste priests (Koukl, 1993). Where reality is only Maya, or illusion, where there is no<br />

motivation to do good, or even to attempt to differentiate one from the other, where<br />

nothing really matters -- man inevitably reverts back to pursuing his own self interests.<br />

From this sprout the carnal creeds: “do unto others, before they do unto you,” and “grab<br />

all you can in this life, because that’s all there is.” This is why postmoderns generally<br />

‘get along’ so well with Eastern philosophies, which routinely blur lines and leave man<br />

the creator of moral constructs and his own world.<br />

The Slippery Slope<br />

Francis Schaeffer warned for decades of the growing postmodern pluralistic climate<br />

in the West. He argued, among other things, that without antithesis, truth would fall<br />

apart, as indeed it has -- especially regarding morality. Schaeffer noted how the embrace<br />

of the Hegelian dialectic of thesis, antithesis and synthesis, had done so much to<br />

undermine truth and absolutes. Schaeffer said “Christianity demands antithesis, not as<br />

some abstract concept of truth, but in the fact that God exists and in personal<br />

justification” (Schaeffer, 1990:47). If we embrace synthesis, not antithesis, we are left<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!