20.01.2015 Views

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

salvation. Here again we see how God’s own have conceded to the broader culture.<br />

Views about salvation are varied. Fundamentally, there is universalism and<br />

particularism. With universalism, all people are ‘saved;’ while with particularism, only<br />

those are saved who [somehow] partake of God’s salvation. There are also the generally<br />

accepted divisions of exclusivism, inclusivism and pluralism. The exclusivist believes<br />

that God’s salvation is only appropriated via Christ’s work and faith in Him alone (soli<br />

fide). The inclusivist believes in salvation via Christ, but that God has provided<br />

exceptions; and the pluralist believes God’s salvation can be through Christ, or via any<br />

number of other spiritual paths.<br />

Another contemporary debate among Christians involves the difference between<br />

accessibilism and restrictivism. In accessibilism, people can respond to God through<br />

general revelation (cf., Rom. 1), and can be saved without special revelation (cf., Rom.<br />

10). In restrictivism, salvation is available only via special revelation (Rom. 10) and a<br />

faith response to Christ is required. The pluralist and the postmodern both argue that<br />

such matters must be left to the individual, that others cannot impose such judgments on<br />

others. Are individuals subject to what the larger group (e.g., institutional church)<br />

decides, or are these matters entirely between the individual and God There seems no<br />

end to these arguments.<br />

Of course, religious pluralists believe there are many ways to be saved, or get to<br />

heaven, or please god -- depending upon one’s personal views and goals. According to<br />

Lesslie Newbigin, religious pluralism is the “belief that differences between religions are<br />

not a matter of truth and falsehood, but of different perceptions of the one truth; that to<br />

speak of religious beliefs as true or false is inadmissible” (Newbigin, 1989:14). People<br />

like John Hick and Bishop Spong have argued for years that the exclusivity of Christ is<br />

utter foolishness and the teachings of Scripture are mere metaphor. They want to<br />

universalize religion and the particular claims each make. Love and peace are the<br />

ultimate goals, but in the process, truth claims are relegated to the garbage heap.<br />

It doesn’t make too much difference whether<br />

you are Protestant, Catholic, or Jewish, or for<br />

that matter, Hindu or Mohammedan. They are<br />

all different ways to the same goal. Basically<br />

they follow the same moral code and the<br />

101<br />

University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!