Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Haase_UZ_x007E_DTh (2).pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
salvation. Here again we see how God’s own have conceded to the broader culture.<br />
Views about salvation are varied. Fundamentally, there is universalism and<br />
particularism. With universalism, all people are ‘saved;’ while with particularism, only<br />
those are saved who [somehow] partake of God’s salvation. There are also the generally<br />
accepted divisions of exclusivism, inclusivism and pluralism. The exclusivist believes<br />
that God’s salvation is only appropriated via Christ’s work and faith in Him alone (soli<br />
fide). The inclusivist believes in salvation via Christ, but that God has provided<br />
exceptions; and the pluralist believes God’s salvation can be through Christ, or via any<br />
number of other spiritual paths.<br />
Another contemporary debate among Christians involves the difference between<br />
accessibilism and restrictivism. In accessibilism, people can respond to God through<br />
general revelation (cf., Rom. 1), and can be saved without special revelation (cf., Rom.<br />
10). In restrictivism, salvation is available only via special revelation (Rom. 10) and a<br />
faith response to Christ is required. The pluralist and the postmodern both argue that<br />
such matters must be left to the individual, that others cannot impose such judgments on<br />
others. Are individuals subject to what the larger group (e.g., institutional church)<br />
decides, or are these matters entirely between the individual and God There seems no<br />
end to these arguments.<br />
Of course, religious pluralists believe there are many ways to be saved, or get to<br />
heaven, or please god -- depending upon one’s personal views and goals. According to<br />
Lesslie Newbigin, religious pluralism is the “belief that differences between religions are<br />
not a matter of truth and falsehood, but of different perceptions of the one truth; that to<br />
speak of religious beliefs as true or false is inadmissible” (Newbigin, 1989:14). People<br />
like John Hick and Bishop Spong have argued for years that the exclusivity of Christ is<br />
utter foolishness and the teachings of Scripture are mere metaphor. They want to<br />
universalize religion and the particular claims each make. Love and peace are the<br />
ultimate goals, but in the process, truth claims are relegated to the garbage heap.<br />
It doesn’t make too much difference whether<br />
you are Protestant, Catholic, or Jewish, or for<br />
that matter, Hindu or Mohammedan. They are<br />
all different ways to the same goal. Basically<br />
they follow the same moral code and the<br />
101<br />
University of Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, <strong>South</strong> Africa