Total Environment Assessment Model for Early Child Development

Total Environment Assessment Model for Early Child Development Total Environment Assessment Model for Early Child Development

earlylearning.ubc.ca
from earlylearning.ubc.ca More from this publisher
19.01.2015 Views

the value of local knowledge: a cautionary note on universalizing approaches to early child development It is essential to encourage and support services that invest and give “a good start in life involving nurturing, care and a safe environment” to children during their early years [184]. That is the ultimate goal of working globally to establish a unified framework of understanding and unified standard for ecd measurement. However, a long history of experiences provides evidence that, whether intentionally, inadvertently, or due to systematic lack of inclusion, many efforts aimed at universalizing knowledge and practices (with respect to ecd but also many other aspects of life) have been based on dominant Anglo-American values, goals, norms, and ideals. When this is the case, the suggestion is that there is an implicit denial of global equity [185]. The following examples illustrate this point. In many areas of the world, breastfeeding has been a timeless tradition. Yet, for many years, European and American organizations and corporate entities pulled mothers away from this practice through advocacy for formula feeding. With the scientifically accumulated knowledge regarding the merits of breastfeeding garnered today in western nations, Euro-Americans have now introduced a global call for mothers to return to breastfeeding. In this case, the value of breastfeeding in nations of Africa and Asia was already known through years of tradition and experience, but was initially subverted and trumped by ‘wisdom’ [sic] imported from Europe and America [186]. Even within Anglo-American nations, minority groups face similar issues. Indigenous populations are a case in point. In many Indigenous communities around the world, the concept of citizenship is premised on the notion that “…every entity and being is part of a whole in which they are interdependent…” The concept is one that privileges the group over the individual, fostering a sense of collectiveness, or social responsibility. By contrast, most Euro-American nations have an approach to citizenship that is entrenched in the self, private property and other liberal notions. Early childhood programs based on Aboriginal cultures therefore, might depart from those rooted in Anglo-Canadian traditions in the fundamental values which are imparted [187]. For instance, the value of individual self-expression (in terms of language/cognitive/communication skills) may be subordinated to group expression. Further, an irony similar to the aforementioned example exists, in that the understanding among scholars from European and American nations has turned to the importance of social capital, collective efficacy and similar manifestations of connectedness, for the establishment of healthy and successful societies [188]. Thus, in spite of acknowledging the global diversity of ecd services, it seems difficult, if not impossible, to transcend touting Western ecd as instinctively superior and as the gold standard by which to measure all other forms of ecd. teamecd’s explicit approach is to create an analysis of the individual-environment-interactional determinants of ecd that, from inception to final report, is based on information and expert opinions gathered from a range of nations around the globe. Throughout the work of the who Commission on Social Determinants of Health Knowledge Hub on Early Child Development, a process was created through which to achieve this crucial aspect of the work at hand. Nonetheless, history compels an authoritative caution. There are always shortcomings and lacunae that arise, but the Knowledge Hub for ecd has done its utmost to address this on an ongoing basis. For instance, many of the discourses, conventions and documents regarding ecd are often exported from the Anglo-American nations to other parts of the world. As such, the knowledge that they draw upon relies heavily on scientific literature, rather than other types of knowledge, such as ‘gray’ literature. team-ecd, by contrast, has incorporated scientific knowledge, gray literature from around the world, and the individually held knowledge of ecd experts from many different nations of the world. Despite the many merits of a universal approach to ecd, the value the duality (or plurality) of most ecd environments is equally as critical to bear in mind. In so doing, it is crucial not to compromise useful local precepts and practices for “received knowledge and techniques.” It is also critical to create a platform through which the experience and knowledge of societies in Africa, Asia, and South America, may be represented to the fullest extent in dialogues about healthy practices and shared knowledge with respect to ecd. 16

Total Environment Assessment Model for Early Child Development social, cultural, and economic—that maximize nurturance, and equity of nurturant experiences (though physical factors are less emphasized). Where relevant, chapters consider the role played by civil society. In this regard, the underlying notion of the framework is that civil society groups are organized and act upon every level of society (i.e. every sphere of influence). Civil society is thus depicted as traversing all environments. Temporality is also incorporated in two respects. Historical time, referring to the gradual building-up and/or tearing down of nurturant conditions (which is particularly applicable to institutions, policies, and other structural aspects of environments), is conceptualized as connecting to all environments - this represents the change in structural features of environments and contingent changes in other (intersecting) environments. Further, changes in the child over her/his life course are represented by the growing person in the central (individual) sphere of influence. The purpose of team-ecd is to frame aspects of environments that are universally critical to providing nurturant experiences for ecd. However, it is not the intent of teamecd to suggest singularity in what might characterize nurturance. Not withstanding deference to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the framework is based on the notion that nurturance may be manifest in many different ways, in different cultures and different societies. Thus within its universal approach, team-ecd provides support for application of general principles of nurturance for ecd to local contexts and realities. Having made that commitment explicit, it is still the position of the authors that the value of local knowledge should be entrenched from the outset of this work. Introduction and Overview 17

<strong>Total</strong> <strong>Environment</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Model</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>Early</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

social, cultural, and economic—that maximize<br />

nurturance, and equity of nurturant<br />

experiences (though physical factors are less<br />

emphasized).<br />

Where relevant, chapters consider the<br />

role played by civil society. In this regard, the<br />

underlying notion of the framework is that<br />

civil society groups are organized and act<br />

upon every level of society (i.e. every sphere<br />

of influence). Civil society is thus depicted as<br />

traversing all environments.<br />

Temporality is also incorporated in two<br />

respects. Historical time, referring to the<br />

gradual building-up and/or tearing down of<br />

nurturant conditions (which is particularly<br />

applicable to institutions, policies, and other<br />

structural aspects of environments), is conceptualized<br />

as connecting to all environments<br />

- this represents the change in structural<br />

features of environments and contingent<br />

changes in other (intersecting) environments.<br />

Further, changes in the child over her/his life<br />

course are represented by the growing person<br />

in the central (individual) sphere of influence.<br />

The purpose of team-ecd is to frame<br />

aspects of environments that are universally<br />

critical to providing nurturant experiences <strong>for</strong><br />

ecd. However, it is not the intent of teamecd<br />

to suggest singularity in what might<br />

characterize nurturance. Not withstanding<br />

deference to the Convention on the Rights<br />

of the <strong>Child</strong>, the framework is based on the<br />

notion that nurturance may be manifest in<br />

many different ways, in different cultures and<br />

different societies.<br />

Thus within its universal approach,<br />

team-ecd provides support <strong>for</strong> application<br />

of general principles of nurturance <strong>for</strong> ecd to<br />

local contexts and realities. Having made that<br />

commitment explicit, it is still the position of<br />

the authors that the value of local knowledge<br />

should be entrenched from the outset of this<br />

work.<br />

Introduction<br />

and Overview<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!