19.01.2015 Views

DOCUMENTS FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

DOCUMENTS FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

DOCUMENTS FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MOL Plc. Annual General Meeting 2013 Documents<br />

The average realized price increased, mainly in line with higher gas<br />

prices in international operations.<br />

Hydrocarbon Production (mboepd) FY 2011 FY 2012 Ch. %<br />

Crude oil production 46.4 42.8 (8)<br />

Hungary 12.4 12.2 (1)<br />

Croatia 9.1 8.8 (3)<br />

Russia 18.7 17.5 (6)<br />

Syria 2.8 0.1 (96)<br />

Other International 3.4 4.2 23<br />

Natural gas production 85.6 66.7 (22)<br />

Hungary 31.6 29.0 (8)<br />

Croatia 35.7 30.7 (14)<br />

ow. Croatia offshore 21.8 15.8 (28)<br />

Syria 13.5 2.3 (83)<br />

Other International 4.8 4.7 (3)<br />

Condensate 15.4 9.0 (42)<br />

Hungary 4.8 5.1 5<br />

Croatia 6.0 2.5 (57)<br />

Syria 4.0 0.7 (82)<br />

Other International 0.7 0.7 0<br />

Average daily hydrocarbon production 147.4 118.5 (20)<br />

Main reasons behind production changes:<br />

Hungarian hydrocarbon production decreased as a<br />

consequence of natural depletion. In 2012, the company fully<br />

completed an oil production optimisation project in Algyő to<br />

further increase oil recovery. Intensive field development was<br />

carried out in the southern part of Békés county, putting new gas<br />

wells into production which partly compensated for decreasing<br />

production.<br />

In 2012, total Croatian production decreased by 8.8 mboepd or<br />

17% versus prior year. The major part came from offshore gas (-<br />

6.0 mboepd or 28 %) as a result of natural decline, water cut and<br />

decreased INA share due to the start of recording<br />

decommissioning costs, maintenance work on the Aiza Laura<br />

Contract Area (INAgip) and the postponed start-up of the Izabela<br />

field (EdINA) which therefore could not compensate for the<br />

natural decline. Onshore condensate production also decreased<br />

due to natural decline and changed presentation methodology<br />

i.e. exclusion of C2+ from condensate starting from 2012 related<br />

to a modified production process due to discontinued ethane<br />

production and showing NGL within onshore gas production. A<br />

slight decrease was also experienced in onshore oil, due to<br />

natural decline.<br />

Russia:<br />

i.) In the Zapadno-Malobalik (ZMB) field, MOL Group’s share of<br />

production amounted to 7.9 mboepd in 2012. The Central<br />

Processing Station was upgraded, while water injection pipelines<br />

were built or re-constructed. In accordance with government<br />

regulations, associated gas utilisation exceeded 95% at the end<br />

of the year.<br />

ii.) In the Matjushkinsky Block production increased to 4.2<br />

mboepd, a 26% rise compared to 2011. This was mainly a<br />

11/94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!