Fraser River Sockeye Salmon - Cohen Commission
Fraser River Sockeye Salmon - Cohen Commission
Fraser River Sockeye Salmon - Cohen Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Part Two • Previous reports and government responses<br />
Pearse and Larkin (1992). In September 1992, the minister of fisheries and oceans<br />
appointed Dr. Pearse as an independent adviser to conduct an investigation into<br />
the apparent disappearance of 482,000 sockeye salmon on their way to spawning<br />
grounds in the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> system. He was directed to identify the reasons for this<br />
shortfall and to recommend any corrective measures needed for the future. The<br />
minister also appointed Dr. Peter Larkin as scientific and technical adviser. Dr.<br />
Larkin produced a separate technical appendix, entitled Analysis of Possible Causes<br />
of the Shortfall in <strong>Sockeye</strong> Spawners.<br />
Response: “Statement by John C. Crosbie, Minister of Fisheries and Oceans:<br />
Action Plan in Response to the Report of the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Salmon</strong> Investigation,<br />
December 7, 1992.”<br />
________________________<br />
<strong>Fraser</strong> (1995). In the fall of 1994, a discrepancy of an estimated 1.3 million <strong>Fraser</strong><br />
<strong>River</strong> sockeye salmon was discovered, followed shortly thereafter by a further<br />
shortfall in the Late run, which includes the famous Adams <strong>River</strong> run. The minister<br />
of fisheries and oceans appointed the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Sockeye</strong> Public Review Board,<br />
under the chairmanship of the Hon. John <strong>Fraser</strong>, PC, QC, a former minister of<br />
fisheries and oceans and former speaker of the House of Commons. The board had<br />
three main objectives:<br />
• to identify the reason(s) for the discrepancies in the expected and actual<br />
number of sockeye salmon arriving on the spawning grounds;<br />
• to evaluate the accuracy of the Pacific <strong>Salmon</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>’s methodology for<br />
estimating run sizes and sockeye escapement in the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong>; and<br />
• to make recommendations on how any deficiencies could be corrected,<br />
beginning in 1995.<br />
The terms of reference called for a review that would include consideration of<br />
the following areas:<br />
• the accuracy of estimates of the number of sockeye salmon moving past the<br />
Pacific <strong>Salmon</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>’s hydroacoustic facility at Mission in 1994, for<br />
each of the four major run components – Early Stuart, Early Summer, Summer,<br />
and Late Summer;<br />
• the accuracy of estimates of the catch of sockeye salmon in the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />
in 1994, including an examination of the reliability of the in-river catchmonitoring<br />
program, techniques used to estimate catches, and procedures for<br />
estimating the confidence range around the catch estimates;<br />
• the level of mortality experienced by sockeye salmon in the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> and on<br />
the spawning grounds in 1994, including the causes and effect of elevated water<br />
temperatures in the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong>;<br />
37