19.01.2015 Views

April Journal-2009.p65 - Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy

April Journal-2009.p65 - Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy

April Journal-2009.p65 - Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Current Trends in <strong>Biotechnology</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pharmacy</strong><br />

Vol. 3 (2) 188-196, <strong>April</strong> 2009. ISSN 0973-8916<br />

receptor compartment by dialysis membrane with<br />

molecular weight cut <strong>of</strong>f between 12000 to 14000<br />

(Himedia, Mumbai, India). The dialysis membrane<br />

was previously soaked for 24 hours in PBS pH<br />

7.4. The donor <strong>and</strong> receptor compartment hold<br />

together using clamp. The receptor compartment<br />

with 15 ml <strong>of</strong> PBS pH 7.4 was maintained at 37<br />

± 0.5 o C <strong>and</strong> stirred with magnetic capsule<br />

operated by magnetic stirrer, to prevent the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> concentrated drug solution layer<br />

below the dialysis membrane. Samples <strong>of</strong> 3 ml,<br />

were collected at predetermined time intervals<br />

<strong>and</strong> replaced with fresh buffer. The concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> drug was determined by UV.<br />

spectrophotometrically at 269 nm. Cumulative<br />

percentage drug released were calculated (Table<br />

3) <strong>and</strong> plotted against time (Fig. 1 <strong>and</strong> 2). The<br />

data was fitted to different kinetic models to explain<br />

the release mechanism <strong>and</strong> pattern using the<br />

following equations.<br />

Zero order equation Q = Q o<br />

= Kt<br />

First order equation Q = Q o<br />

= e -Kt<br />

Higuchi equation Q = Kt 1/2<br />

Where, Q is the cumulative amount <strong>of</strong><br />

drug released, Q 0<br />

is the initial amount <strong>of</strong> drug, k<br />

is release constant <strong>and</strong> t is time.<br />

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram <strong>of</strong> Franz diffusion cell<br />

191<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> Skin<br />

Prior approval by Institutional Animal<br />

Ethics Committee was obtained for conduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> experiment (Ref: IAEC/SUCP/03/2007). The<br />

albino rats were obtained from Sainath Animal<br />

Agency, Hyderabad, India. Albino rats weighing<br />

170-190 gm were sacrificed using anesthetic<br />

ether. The hair <strong>of</strong> test animals was carefully<br />

removed with the help <strong>of</strong> depilatory <strong>and</strong> the full<br />

thickness skin was removed from the abdominal<br />

region. The epidermis was prepared surgically<br />

by heat separation technique (22), which involved<br />

soaking the entire abdominal skin in water at 60<br />

°C for 45 sec, followed by careful removal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

epidermis. The epidermis was washed with water<br />

<strong>and</strong> used for ex vivo permeability studies.<br />

Ex vivo Skin Permeation Studies<br />

The ex vivo skin permeation studies were<br />

carried out using Franz diffusion cell (Fig. 1) with<br />

a diffusional area <strong>of</strong> 3.73 cm 2 . Rat abdominal skin<br />

was mounted between the compartments <strong>of</strong> the<br />

diffusion cell with stratum corneum facing the<br />

donor compartment. The receiver phase is 15 ml<br />

<strong>of</strong> PBS pH 7.4, stirred at 300 rpm on a magnetic<br />

stirrer. The stratum corneum side <strong>of</strong> the skin was<br />

kept in intimate contact with the film <strong>and</strong> over<br />

that placed a backing membrane. The whole<br />

assembly was kept in a water bath at 37 ± 0.5<br />

o<br />

C. Samples (3 ml) were collected at<br />

predetermined time intervals <strong>and</strong> replaced with<br />

fresh buffer. The concentration <strong>of</strong> drug was<br />

determined by U.V. spectrophotometrically at 269<br />

nm. Cumulative percentage drug permeated was<br />

calculated <strong>and</strong> plotted against time (Fig. 3 <strong>and</strong> 4).<br />

Flux was determined directly as the slope <strong>of</strong> the<br />

curve between the steady state values <strong>of</strong> the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> drug permeated (mg cm -2 ) v/s time<br />

(hours) (23) <strong>and</strong> permeability coefficients were<br />

deduced by dividing the flux by the initial drug<br />

load (mg cm -2 ) as shown in Table 3.<br />

Mamatha et al

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!