13.11.2012 Views

Ecorestoration of Banni Grassland - Global Restoration Network

Ecorestoration of Banni Grassland - Global Restoration Network

Ecorestoration of Banni Grassland - Global Restoration Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Species<br />

Table 10: Frequency Occurrence / Distribution Pattern <strong>of</strong> Plant Species in<br />

Unprotected and Prosopis juli flora Infested Areas <strong>of</strong> Dhordo<br />

A>B>C=D>E in the unploughed area while (class<br />

A-8, B-3, C-0, D-1 and E-1) it was A>B>CCE in the unprotected area (site B) while<br />

(class A-6, B-3, C-0, D-0 and E-0) it was<br />

A>B>C=D=E in Prosopis juliflora infested areas.<br />

5.3.2. Species Distribution Pattern at<br />

Bhirandiyara<br />

The percentage frequency <strong>of</strong> various plant species<br />

indicated that Cyperus haspan (81.5 per cent) and<br />

Cressa cretica fall under class E and thus showed<br />

a more uniform distribution while Aeluropus<br />

logopoides and Scirpus sp. exercised a random<br />

distribution (class B). The rest <strong>of</strong> the species fall<br />

under class A and thereby showed aggregation in<br />

nature. Looking at the variation in the distribution<br />

Unprotected Area Prosopis juli flora Infested Area<br />

N Frequency Distribution<br />

Class<br />

<strong>Ecorestoration</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Banni</strong> <strong>Grassland</strong><br />

N Frequency Distribution<br />

Class<br />

Cyperus rotundus 34 70.8 D 15 38.5 B<br />

Chloris barbata 20 41.7 C 14 35.9 B<br />

Sporobolus sp. 10 20.8 B 3 7.7 A<br />

Setaria sp. 0 0.0 4 10.3 A<br />

Cressa cretica 36 75.0 D 14 35.9 B<br />

Aeluropus logopoides 19 39.6 B 5 12.8 A<br />

Eragrostis sp. 6 12.5 A 7 17.9 A<br />

Gandhiro 0 0.0 - 4 10.3 A<br />

Echinocloa sp. 0 0.0 - 1 2.6 A<br />

Cenchrus sp. 0 0.0 - 0 0.0 -<br />

Dactyloctenium aegyptium 0 0.0 - 0 0.0 -<br />

Tetrapogan tenellus 0 0.0 - 0 0.0 -<br />

Dichanthium annulatum 1 2.1 A 0 0.0 -<br />

pattern between October and December, species<br />

like Cyperus haspan and Scirpus sp. showed a<br />

reverse trend. The former had shifted from E to D<br />

and the latter from C to A. Thus the distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

the latter was very much narrowed during the course<br />

<strong>of</strong> the post monsoon while Cressa cretica is the<br />

only species which showed a positive trend from<br />

high random (class C) to high uniform (class E)<br />

distribution.<br />

The species such as Cenchrus sp., Eragrostis sp.<br />

and Dichanthium annulatum were totally absent<br />

during the initiation <strong>of</strong> the study (October).<br />

However, they appeared in the restoration site<br />

during the course <strong>of</strong> post monsoon while<br />

Sporobolus sp. and Echinocloa sp., showed no<br />

changes in their distribution pattern during the<br />

study period (Table 11). The frequency relationship<br />

showed that, (class A-3, B-0, C-1.D-0 and E-1)<br />

A>BDB>C

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!