Ecorestoration of Banni Grassland - Global Restoration Network
Ecorestoration of Banni Grassland - Global Restoration Network
Ecorestoration of Banni Grassland - Global Restoration Network
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Species<br />
Table 10: Frequency Occurrence / Distribution Pattern <strong>of</strong> Plant Species in<br />
Unprotected and Prosopis juli flora Infested Areas <strong>of</strong> Dhordo<br />
A>B>C=D>E in the unploughed area while (class<br />
A-8, B-3, C-0, D-1 and E-1) it was A>B>CCE in the unprotected area (site B) while<br />
(class A-6, B-3, C-0, D-0 and E-0) it was<br />
A>B>C=D=E in Prosopis juliflora infested areas.<br />
5.3.2. Species Distribution Pattern at<br />
Bhirandiyara<br />
The percentage frequency <strong>of</strong> various plant species<br />
indicated that Cyperus haspan (81.5 per cent) and<br />
Cressa cretica fall under class E and thus showed<br />
a more uniform distribution while Aeluropus<br />
logopoides and Scirpus sp. exercised a random<br />
distribution (class B). The rest <strong>of</strong> the species fall<br />
under class A and thereby showed aggregation in<br />
nature. Looking at the variation in the distribution<br />
Unprotected Area Prosopis juli flora Infested Area<br />
N Frequency Distribution<br />
Class<br />
<strong>Ecorestoration</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Banni</strong> <strong>Grassland</strong><br />
N Frequency Distribution<br />
Class<br />
Cyperus rotundus 34 70.8 D 15 38.5 B<br />
Chloris barbata 20 41.7 C 14 35.9 B<br />
Sporobolus sp. 10 20.8 B 3 7.7 A<br />
Setaria sp. 0 0.0 4 10.3 A<br />
Cressa cretica 36 75.0 D 14 35.9 B<br />
Aeluropus logopoides 19 39.6 B 5 12.8 A<br />
Eragrostis sp. 6 12.5 A 7 17.9 A<br />
Gandhiro 0 0.0 - 4 10.3 A<br />
Echinocloa sp. 0 0.0 - 1 2.6 A<br />
Cenchrus sp. 0 0.0 - 0 0.0 -<br />
Dactyloctenium aegyptium 0 0.0 - 0 0.0 -<br />
Tetrapogan tenellus 0 0.0 - 0 0.0 -<br />
Dichanthium annulatum 1 2.1 A 0 0.0 -<br />
pattern between October and December, species<br />
like Cyperus haspan and Scirpus sp. showed a<br />
reverse trend. The former had shifted from E to D<br />
and the latter from C to A. Thus the distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
the latter was very much narrowed during the course<br />
<strong>of</strong> the post monsoon while Cressa cretica is the<br />
only species which showed a positive trend from<br />
high random (class C) to high uniform (class E)<br />
distribution.<br />
The species such as Cenchrus sp., Eragrostis sp.<br />
and Dichanthium annulatum were totally absent<br />
during the initiation <strong>of</strong> the study (October).<br />
However, they appeared in the restoration site<br />
during the course <strong>of</strong> post monsoon while<br />
Sporobolus sp. and Echinocloa sp., showed no<br />
changes in their distribution pattern during the<br />
study period (Table 11). The frequency relationship<br />
showed that, (class A-3, B-0, C-1.D-0 and E-1)<br />
A>BDB>C