13.11.2012 Views

Ecorestoration of Banni Grassland - Global Restoration Network

Ecorestoration of Banni Grassland - Global Restoration Network

Ecorestoration of Banni Grassland - Global Restoration Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. RESTORATION APPROACH<br />

As a pilot measure, the restoration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Banni</strong><br />

grassland was initially (for the year 1996) aimed to<br />

cover a total area <strong>of</strong> 500 ha at 5 different sites <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Banni</strong>. During the successive years it was planned<br />

to gradually extend it into several other areas <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Banni</strong>. However, due to administrative and local<br />

issues in acquiring the land, the restoration<br />

programme could be successfully launched only at<br />

two sites; one located at 11 km before Bhirandiyara<br />

and the other at Dhordo village covering an area <strong>of</strong><br />

15 and 200 ha respectively. The requirements and<br />

implementation activities carried out to improve the<br />

status <strong>of</strong> the restoration sites and to develop the<br />

grass and indigenous tree cover in the area are<br />

explained in the successive paragraphs (Figure 2).<br />

However, it is important to state here that the natural<br />

recovery following degradation is a slow process;<br />

it depends on time and space, and is influenced<br />

by geographical and climatic factors and<br />

ecological conditions <strong>of</strong> the site. Therefore, a successful<br />

restoration programme attempts to accelerate<br />

the natural recovery process artificially in order<br />

to achieve the goal in a short time. In order to rebegin<br />

performing the productive and protective<br />

functions, a degraded land needs human assistance,<br />

i.e. protection, pre-treatment for habitat rectification<br />

such as; slope modification, nutrient and organic<br />

matter amendments, etc. (Singh and Jha,<br />

1992).<br />

3.1 Protection<br />

The <strong>Banni</strong> grassland could be improved only in the<br />

good rainfall years. Since good years are generally<br />

followed by droughts in a cycle <strong>of</strong> every 3 years or<br />

sometimes alternative years, the best method to<br />

improve grasslands are based on the fact that an<br />

overgrazed land is protected from frequent grazing,<br />

the productive perennials, quality grasses replace<br />

the undesirable annual grasses. Protection from<br />

grazing allows the perennials to produce large<br />

quantities <strong>of</strong> seeds. Thus depending on the<br />

condition <strong>of</strong> a site, a continuous protection from<br />

grazing develops the ground layer principally made<br />

<strong>Ecorestoration</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Banni</strong> <strong>Grassland</strong><br />

up <strong>of</strong> perennial grasses (Kanodia and Patil, 1983).<br />

The same improvement can be achieved but at a<br />

slower rate, with either deferred or rotational grazing<br />

system where the grasses are protected up to seed<br />

dispersal or as under pasture management systems.<br />

Therefore, the first step in any restoration strategy,<br />

<strong>of</strong> course, is to protect the disturbed habitats and<br />

communities from being further wasted, and from<br />

losing the extant genes (Singh and Jha, 1993).<br />

As a measure to protect the Bhirandiyara restoration<br />

site from livestock grazing, a trench fence consisting<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1.2 m width and 1 m deep was laid along<br />

the periphery <strong>of</strong> the site. There are views that trench<br />

fencing is not a foolpro<strong>of</strong> method to protect the<br />

grass plot from cattle. However, its effectiveness in<br />

the protection, depends upon the width and depth<br />

<strong>of</strong> the trench. Therefore, a barbed wire fence around<br />

the site was also raised to ensure double protection<br />

from any kind <strong>of</strong> grazing. It has been reported<br />

that the protection <strong>of</strong> grasslands with the help <strong>of</strong><br />

barbed wire fencing increased forage production<br />

<strong>of</strong> better grasses (Bhimaya et. al. 1967, Ahuja 1977,<br />

Kanodia et. al. 1978). At Dhordo restoration site,<br />

due to the coverage <strong>of</strong> vast area <strong>of</strong> 200 ha, it was<br />

decided to have only trench fencing. But, to ensure<br />

full protection from cattle, a 2 m wide and 1.5 m<br />

deep trench was dug along the periphery <strong>of</strong> the<br />

plot, which covers a length <strong>of</strong> 6000 m. The mud<br />

removed from the trench was also used to raise a<br />

1.5 m high mud wall on the inner fringe <strong>of</strong> the trench.<br />

This ensured a complete protection from cattle. This<br />

method <strong>of</strong> fencing though less expensive as compared<br />

to barbed wire fencing, requires maintenance<br />

every year. This trench, apart from its cattle pro<strong>of</strong><br />

function, also helps in harvesting the rainwater due<br />

to its vast length, depth and width.<br />

3.2 Removal <strong>of</strong> Prosopis juliflora and Other Weeds<br />

Prosopis juliflora infestation is believed to be the<br />

major cause in reducing the productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

pastureland and hinder the growth <strong>of</strong> grasses.<br />

Unwanted thorny bushes need to be removed out<br />

mechanically or manually to eliminate the<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!