19.01.2015 Views

English - CEDAW Southeast Asia

English - CEDAW Southeast Asia

English - CEDAW Southeast Asia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Gendered and Rights-Based Review of Vietnamese Legal Documents through the Lens of <strong>CEDAW</strong><br />

has negative impacts on working women. In particular, employers may be reluctant to hire<br />

women who have a shorter working life, and the early retirement can limit chances for<br />

promotion. 506 This is another example of protective legislation in Vietnamese law that requires<br />

review and revision.<br />

This is one of the more controversial issues relating to gender equality. During the<br />

drafting of the Law on Gender Equality, there was much discussion on whether a revision of<br />

differential age of retirement is needed. However, no resolution was reached in the<br />

discussions on this issue during the drafting of the Law on Gender Equality. Hence, it was<br />

decided that the Law on Gender Equality would contain no provision relating to retirement age,<br />

and that any revisions should be made directly in the Labour Code and Law on Social<br />

Insurance.<br />

Recommendation: The Labour Code and Law on Social Insurance must be<br />

revised to ensure equal retirement age for men and women. This refers in particular to<br />

Article 145 of the Labour Code and Articles 50-51, 70 and 73 of the Law on Social<br />

Insurance. No distinction on account of sex must be made relating to retirement age.<br />

Provisions relying on differential retirement ages of men and women - in particular<br />

those in Chapter III, Section 4 and Chapter IV, Section 1 of the Law on Social Insurance,<br />

as well as those relating to the survivorship regime (that is, Articles 64(2)(b), 64(2)(c)<br />

and 123 of the Labour Code) - must also be revised accordingly. It is also suggested<br />

that wider coverage of voluntary insurance scheme be in place to include a maternity<br />

regime.<br />

It should be pointed out, though, that, although social insurance is available to both<br />

public and private employees - by 2002, about 4.4 million people had bought social insurance,<br />

of which 3.8 million were from the public sector and accounted for 86.4 percent of the total<br />

buyers 507 - only 22 percent of private domestic enterprises contributed to social insurance,<br />

health insurance, and trade union funds in 2003. 508 The Enterprise Survey 2003 revealed that<br />

private foreign-invested enterprises have better participation at 87 percent. 509 The number of<br />

female workers buying social insurance is very high at 50.5 percent, 52.2 percent of which<br />

belong to the public sector. 510 The main reasons cited for the low participation of private<br />

domestic enterprises is that employers do not strictly abide by the law, and the authorities<br />

concerned do not conduct frequent inspections and promptly deal with violations. 511<br />

Recommendation: Stricter enforcement and better monitoring is needed to<br />

ensure that more workers are covered by the social insurance regime, which includes<br />

the retirement and maternity regimes.<br />

Indicator 78<br />

Does legislation provide protection from dismissal on account of<br />

marriage, pregnancy or maternity leave<br />

233<br />

506<br />

Wells, op. cit., p. 20<br />

507<br />

Combined Fifth and Sixth Periodic Report, p. 34<br />

508<br />

Wells, op.cit., p. 19<br />

509<br />

Ibid.<br />

510<br />

Combined Fifth and Sixth Periodic Report, p. 34<br />

511<br />

Ibid.<br />

Employment (Article 11 of <strong>CEDAW</strong>)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!