19.01.2015 Views

PART 1 - National Institute of Urban Affairs

PART 1 - National Institute of Urban Affairs

PART 1 - National Institute of Urban Affairs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />

Vol. XXIX July – Dec 2009<br />

No. 2<br />

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />

Establishing a Title Registration System in India:<br />

Problems and prospects<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income settlements (slums) in urban areas:<br />

A case for on-site upgrading<br />

Fiscal Performance <strong>of</strong> Civic Bodies: The Greater Mumbai Perspective<br />

Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Poor Settlements: Trends and Experiences<br />

Property Tax Reforms<br />

Some facets <strong>of</strong> Migration to the districts <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

Project Notes :<br />

FIRE (D) e-Governance in Municipalities<br />

Case Study:<br />

Bhoj wetlands management and conservation<br />

CEPT Workshop Report on Approaches to lands for the urban Poor, India<br />

Book Review:<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Economic Base <strong>of</strong> <strong>National</strong> Capital Region <strong>of</strong> India by Dr. Barun kumar<br />

Governing India's Metropolises by Joel Ruet et.al.<br />

A Journal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Affairs</strong><br />

India Habitat Centre<br />

New Delhi<br />

COVER


<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Affairs</strong><br />

Editorial Advisory Board<br />

Ashish Bose (Chairman) Chetan Vaidya Sayed S. Shafi Amitabh Kundu<br />

Editor<br />

Anil Rai<br />

Assistant Editor<br />

Basudha Chattopadhyay<br />

Nalini Shangloo<br />

Secretarial Assistance<br />

Nand Lal Jaiswal<br />

Guidelines for Manuscript Submission<br />

Manuscripts should be submitted/sent in duplicate to NIUA. Alternatively, they should be<br />

mailed to the Editorial team at NIUA. The length <strong>of</strong> the text should not exceed 6,000 - 8,000<br />

words including tables and references. An abstract <strong>of</strong> 100–150 words must be given.<br />

Illustrations, Maps and Graphs should be submitted on separate sheets. Material submitted<br />

to the Journal should not be published/under review for publication elsewhere; a declaration<br />

to this effect should accompany the manuscript. On acceptance <strong>of</strong> the manuscript for<br />

publication in the Journal, the author is required to submit the material in s<strong>of</strong>t copy either by<br />

mail or on Compact Disk in MS Word format. Any complex Tables and Graphs must be<br />

submitted separately in Excel.<br />

References should follow the author-date system within the text, e.g. ( Chester 1951). The<br />

style <strong>of</strong> referencing in the bibliography should be as follows:<br />

Dutta, Abhijit and Bappaditya Chakravarty (1981) Organising Metropolitan<br />

Development, New Delhi: Indian <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> Public Administration.<br />

Krishnan, G (1993) The Slowing Down <strong>of</strong> Indian <strong>Urban</strong>isation, Geography,<br />

78(1):80–84.<br />

Please ensure that References are accurate with respect to author’s name, volume, issue<br />

number <strong>of</strong> the Journal, page numbers, date and place <strong>of</strong> publication and the name <strong>of</strong> the<br />

publisher.<br />

Authors should send a brief resume indicating institutional affiliation, title <strong>of</strong> position,<br />

address, phone/fax number and email address.<br />

All editorial correspondence and subscription enquiries should be addressed to the Editor,<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India.<br />

st<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Affairs</strong>, 1 Floor, Core 4B, India Habitat Centre,<br />

Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003<br />

Phone: 24617543, Fax 011-24617513, Email: urbanindia@niua.org<br />

ISSN - 0970-9045<br />

FRONT INSIDE


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />

Vol. XXIX July – December 2009<br />

No. 2<br />

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />

Establishing a Title Registration System in India:<br />

Problems and prospects<br />

Dr Debolina Kundu<br />

1<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income settlements (slums) in urban areas:<br />

A case for on-site upgrading<br />

Dr Renu Khosla<br />

Fiscal Performance <strong>of</strong> Civic Bodies: The Greater Mumbai Perspective<br />

Anita Rath<br />

Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Poor Settlements: Trends and Experiences<br />

Natraj Kranthi and Dr Kavita Daryani Rao<br />

Property Tax Reforms<br />

Dr Gnaneshwar<br />

Some Facets <strong>of</strong> Migration to the districts <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

Dr Dipti Mukherji and Dr V.S. Phadke<br />

FIRE Project Note : e-Governance in Municipalities<br />

Case Study: Bhoj wetlands management and conservation<br />

Aniruddhe Mukherjee<br />

CEPT Workshop Report on Approaches to lands for the urban Poor, India<br />

Dr Darshini Mahadevia Rutul Joshi and Rutool Sharma<br />

22<br />

50<br />

70<br />

85<br />

120<br />

138<br />

150<br />

176<br />

Book Review:<br />

Economic Development <strong>of</strong> NCR by Dr Barun kumar<br />

Dr Rumi Aijaz<br />

Governing India's Metropolises by Joel Ruet et.al<br />

Chetan Vaidya & Poornima Singh<br />

206<br />

208<br />

Contents <strong>of</strong> Previous Volume XXIX, No 1, Jan - June 2009<br />

A Journal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>National</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Affairs</strong><br />

India Habitat Centre<br />

New Delhi<br />

A


Our Contributors<br />

Dr. Debolina Kundu<br />

Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, <strong>National</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Affairs</strong> (NIUA), New Delhi<br />

Dr. Renu Khosla<br />

Director, Centre for <strong>Urban</strong> and Regional Excellence (CURE), New Delhi<br />

Anita Rath<br />

Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Centre for development Studies, Tata <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> Social<br />

Sciences, Mumbai<br />

Natraj Kranthi<br />

Doctoral Research Scholar, Jawaharlal Nehru Architecture & fine Arts<br />

University, Masab Tank, Hyderabad<br />

Kavita Daryani Rao<br />

Director <strong>of</strong> Evaluation i/c, Jawaharlal Nehru Architecture & fine Arts<br />

University, Masab Tank, Hyderabad<br />

Dr. V.Gnaneshwar<br />

Regional Centre for <strong>Urban</strong> and Environmental Studies, Hyderabad<br />

Dr. Dipti Mukherji<br />

Reader, Department <strong>of</strong> Geography, University <strong>of</strong> Mumbai<br />

Dr. V.S. Phadke<br />

Retired Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Department <strong>of</strong> Geography, University <strong>of</strong> Mumbai<br />

Hitesh Vaidya<br />

Sr. Municipal Development Specialist <strong>of</strong> FIRE (D)<br />

Stephen Matzie<br />

Planner and Finance Specialist <strong>of</strong> FIRE (D)<br />

Aniruddhe Mukherjee<br />

Secretary, Transport, Government <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal (M.P.)<br />

Darshini Mahadevia<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Poverty Alleviation (UPA) Cell coordinator, CEPT University<br />

Rutul Joshi<br />

UPA Cell and Faculty member at the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Planning and Public Policy,<br />

CEPT University<br />

B


Rutool Sharma<br />

UPA Cell and Faculty member at the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Planning and Public Policy,<br />

CEPT University<br />

Dr. Rumi Aijaz<br />

Fellow, Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Chetan Vaidya<br />

Director, <strong>National</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Affairs</strong> (NIUA), New Delhi<br />

Poornima Singh<br />

Research Associate, NIUA, New Delhi<br />

B


Editorial<br />

The extraordinary growth <strong>of</strong> cities in India is coming at a steep price. Not only has<br />

overcrowding become endemic in many cities, it has resulted in shortage <strong>of</strong> urban<br />

land, lack <strong>of</strong> access to adequate housing and services, as well as, rise in urban<br />

poverty, closely associated with unemployment. These are becoming an increasing<br />

social problem. The present issue <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> India brings together research papers,<br />

project and case study notes, workshop report, and book reviews, on a gamut <strong>of</strong><br />

significant urban issues, requiring urgent policy attention <strong>of</strong> urban planners and<br />

practitioners alike. We expect readers shall find this issue <strong>of</strong> our bi-annual journal,<br />

useful in generating a wider discussion and debate, on some <strong>of</strong> the most pressing<br />

issues confronting the urban sector today.<br />

Efficient functioning <strong>of</strong> land markets require efficient and updated land registration<br />

systems which clearly indicate legal ownership <strong>of</strong> land. A robust system <strong>of</strong> land<br />

record management and land rights in India is conspicuous by its absence, is argued<br />

by Dr Debolina Kundu in a seminal paper “Establishing A Title Registration<br />

System In India : Problems And Prospects”. The paper seeks to identify the need for<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> this reform, trace its genesis and outlines a roadmap for<br />

implementation, based on best practices, from national and international<br />

experiences. The paper further argues that a sound system <strong>of</strong> land records<br />

management and efficient use <strong>of</strong> Information Technology is the key to successful<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> an appropriate property title certification system in the country.<br />

Slums and low-income settlements in India have expanded greatly, and particularly<br />

in the last two decades. The initiatives taken by the government, in relation to this<br />

issue, have evolved from superficial actions and measures aimed at minimizing<br />

infrastructure deficiencies, to broader initiatives seeking to consolidate newly<br />

upgraded slum areas as part <strong>of</strong> the city. Based on a cost-benefit comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

slum resettlement in Delhi and in-situ slum upgradation in Mumbai, Dr Renu<br />

Khosla's paper “Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading” argues that city policies aimed at<br />

slum resettlement have had adverse long term economic impact; disempowerment<br />

<strong>of</strong> working women; child education and health; tenurial security; and sustainable<br />

urban poverty reduction. The paper advocates that in-situ upgradation should be<br />

the preferred option and a 'win-win solution' for slum development, and goes on to<br />

suggest that relocation must be conditional only in essential cases.<br />

C


th<br />

While the 74 Constitutional Amendment Act has widened the functional domain<br />

<strong>of</strong> civic bodies, the fiscal divide <strong>of</strong> cities, wherein some rely heavily on intergovernmental<br />

transfers while others enjoy comfortable fiscal position, is quite<br />

conspicuous. Reviewing the fiscal performance <strong>of</strong> the Municipal Corporation <strong>of</strong><br />

Greater Mumbai (MCGM) the paper highlights that though MCGM relies on its<br />

own sources <strong>of</strong> revenue, the fiscal surplus in its accounts is illusory as it has access<br />

to forbidden source <strong>of</strong> revenue the octroi - and there is perpetual negligence <strong>of</strong><br />

capital expenditure. The paper underscores key issues related to the finances <strong>of</strong><br />

MCGM<br />

Security <strong>of</strong> tenure for urban poor continues to be a vexed issue. Experts advocate<br />

that tenurial security, together with an enabling role <strong>of</strong> the government with<br />

reference to provision <strong>of</strong> housing finance, would go a long way in mitigating the<br />

housing problem in cities and assist urban poor, over time, to gradually improve<br />

their housing and living conditions. In this context, a scholastic attempt to<br />

understand international and national experiences relating to tenure security <strong>of</strong><br />

urban poor settlements is made in the paper “Security Of Tenure Of <strong>Urban</strong> Poor<br />

Settlements: Trends And Experiences” by Natraj Kranthi and Kavita Daryani Rao.<br />

Presenting a critical review <strong>of</strong> nine international cases the paper identifies the best<br />

practices and summarizes them into four broad categories which include (i) Tenure<br />

security against eviction by force, (ii) Incremental and flexible approaches, (iii)<br />

Collaborative and participatory approaches, and (iv) Regularization <strong>of</strong> tenure.<br />

Property tax constitutes the single largest source <strong>of</strong> revenue to the urban local<br />

bodies in India and it can provide ULBs with access to a broad and expanding tax<br />

base. However V Gnaneshwar in the paper “Property Tax Reforms in India” argues<br />

that the yield from property tax is not encouraging due to reasons like inelastic tax<br />

base, defective assessment and rent control legislation. Unscientific method <strong>of</strong><br />

assessment, lack <strong>of</strong> transparency, non-assessment or underassessment <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

properties, lack <strong>of</strong> proper property recording, <strong>of</strong>ficial discretion and tax payer<strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

collision-all lead to revenue loss to the ULBs. Several reforms are<br />

underway in the property tax assessment in the country. This paper examines<br />

reforms initiated and underway in the property tax assessment and identifies<br />

emerging patterns and their inadequacies in the Indian context.<br />

In their paper “Some Facets <strong>of</strong> Migration to Districts <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra” Dr.Dipti<br />

Mukherji and Dr. V. S. Phadke, while bringing out the spatial patterns related to<br />

D


migration, observe that the process leads to growth <strong>of</strong> destination areas, and<br />

depopulation <strong>of</strong> sending areas. On the basis <strong>of</strong> Census 2001 data on migration at<br />

the district level in Maharashtra, it is observed that the sources <strong>of</strong> migrant<br />

population display a significant spatial variation, with local migrants<br />

predominating in less economically developed areas. It is argued that as the source<br />

<strong>of</strong> migrants becomes more and more distant, the districts under their shadow<br />

significantly increases.<br />

Municipal e-Governance is a significant initiative in India and constitutes a<br />

mandatory reform under the flagship Jawarharlal Nehru <strong>National</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Renewal<br />

Mission (JNNURM) <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> India. Not only does municipal e-<br />

Governance combine good governance reforms with new information and<br />

technologies (ICT), it also benefits citizens and government employees alike, by<br />

enhancing management processes, service delivery, and public interface in order to<br />

provide more efficient, convenient and transparent services. We are glad to publish,<br />

for the benefit <strong>of</strong> our readers, a Project Note : “e-Governance in Municipalities”<br />

dealing with lessons <strong>of</strong> experience for successful implementation <strong>of</strong> these critical<br />

reforms in selected cities. The Project Note has been prepared by Hitesh Vaidya<br />

and Stephen Matzie. .<br />

Improving water quality and increasing storage capacity <strong>of</strong> the Upper and Lower<br />

Lakes <strong>of</strong> Bhopal city, comprised the basic objectives <strong>of</strong> the Bhoj Wetlands project<br />

in Bhopal. In our case studies section, we present a Note “Conservation and<br />

management <strong>of</strong> Bhoj wetlands, India” which has been prepared by Aniruddhe<br />

Mukherjee. This case study Note discusses the administrative, social and legal<br />

issues, faced while implementing the various conservation measures, and draws<br />

appropriate lessons <strong>of</strong> experience.<br />

The need for multiple approaches to increasing land supply for the urban poor in<br />

Indian cities is the main conclusion <strong>of</strong> the Workshop on “Approaches to Lands for<br />

the <strong>Urban</strong> Poor” held by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Housing and <strong>Urban</strong> Poverty Alleviation<br />

(MHUPA) jointly with the <strong>National</strong> Resource Centre (NRC), CEPT University at<br />

Ahmedabad. In the context <strong>of</strong> the Ministry's policy thrust on affordable housing for<br />

the urban poor, embodied in the recently inaugurated Rajiv Awas Yojana, the<br />

Workshop presented a concrete actionable agenda for increasing land supply for<br />

the urban poor. The Report <strong>of</strong> this major Workshop has been prepared by Dr<br />

Darshini Mahadevia, Rutul Joshi and Rutool Sharma.<br />

E


The last section has a selection <strong>of</strong> book reviews. Dr Rumi Aijaz reviews the<br />

publication titled “<strong>Urban</strong> Economic Base <strong>of</strong> <strong>National</strong> Capital Region <strong>of</strong> India” by<br />

Dr Barun Kumar which <strong>of</strong>fers a set <strong>of</strong> recommendations for the balanced regional<br />

development <strong>of</strong> NCR. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Chetan Vaidya and Poornima Singh review the book<br />

“Governing India's Metropolises” edited by Joel Ruet and Stephanie Tawa Rewal<br />

which describes and analyses urban governance through the study <strong>of</strong> decision<br />

making processes pertaining to, supply and demand <strong>of</strong> collective goods and<br />

services, in four Indian metropolises.<br />

Wiith this issue, <strong>Urban</strong> India completes thirty years <strong>of</strong> its publication. We take<br />

pride and a sense <strong>of</strong> achievement in fulfilling this task. In our long journey, we are<br />

glad to have received the unstinted support and cooperation, <strong>of</strong> authors and<br />

contributors, who are among the crème de la - creme <strong>of</strong> the urban pr<strong>of</strong>ession,<br />

including economists, planners, administrators, architects, environmentalists and<br />

other pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in the urban field. At the same time we, particularly the<br />

dedicated editorial team, have had our share <strong>of</strong> trials and tribulations, which<br />

invariably provided maturity, stability, immense strength and wisdom to carry on<br />

this exciting journey. Our grateful thanks and congratulations to all <strong>of</strong> you!<br />

Anil Rai<br />

<br />

F


Establishing A Title Registration System In India:<br />

Problems And Prospects<br />

1<br />

Establishing A Title Registration System In India:<br />

Problems And Prospects<br />

Dr.Debolina Kundu<br />

Abstract<br />

The land registration system in India is conspicuous by the absence <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />

record management. Globalising India needs a robust system <strong>of</strong> land record<br />

management and land rights in the country. The existing system <strong>of</strong> deed<br />

registration is fraught with discrepancies and errors because <strong>of</strong> outdated methods,<br />

which are predominantly manual. Introduction <strong>of</strong> the property title certification<br />

system seeks to create a public record <strong>of</strong> titles through the introduction scientific<br />

management <strong>of</strong> land records in a transparent manner. This paper attempts to<br />

identify the need for introduction <strong>of</strong> this reform, trace its genesis and outline a<br />

roadmap for implementation based on best practices from national and<br />

international experiences. Available case studies indicate that huge funds and a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> enabling legislations are required to bring about this reform in urban<br />

centres. A sound system <strong>of</strong> land records and efficient use <strong>of</strong> Information<br />

Technology would be key to success to ensure introduction <strong>of</strong> property title<br />

certification system in the country.<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction:<br />

Indian cities are fast globalising. This has put demand for creation <strong>of</strong> conducive<br />

business environment to attract both domestic and international capital. As a result,<br />

reforms in urban governance have received considerable attention <strong>of</strong> the<br />

government. Certain ad-hoc policies <strong>of</strong> urban reforms had started in the early<br />

nineties with the initiative <strong>of</strong> the Financial Institutions Reform and Expansion<br />

(Debt-Market component) programme <strong>of</strong> the USAID followed by the passing <strong>of</strong><br />

th<br />

the 74 Constitutional Amendment Act in 1992. However, these measures <strong>of</strong><br />

disciplining the urban local bodies were piecemeal in nature. The central<br />

government, therefore, launched the Jawaharlal Nehru <strong>National</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Renewal


2 <strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Mission (JNNURM) in 2005 to make the reform agenda more holistic in nature and<br />

1<br />

enable cities to become more competitive .<br />

Notwithstanding these efforts, land registration system in India is conspicuous by<br />

the absence <strong>of</strong> scientific record management. Globalising India needs a robust<br />

system <strong>of</strong> land record management and land rights in the country. Unfortunately,<br />

the existing system <strong>of</strong> registration in India is characterised by the absence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

scientific system <strong>of</strong> recording and maintenance <strong>of</strong> land and property rights. In<br />

India, both formal recognition <strong>of</strong> property rights by the state and facilitation <strong>of</strong><br />

efficient trade in rights by the state exist in incomplete form. As a result, title<br />

ownership; possessory rights (e.g. leases), easements, mortgages etc are not readily<br />

verifiable (USAID, 2006). This is more so because under the Indian Registration<br />

Act <strong>of</strong> 1908 or Transfer <strong>of</strong> Property Act, 1882, the registration authority does not<br />

need to verify the past records <strong>of</strong> the land/property or ownership details <strong>of</strong> the seller.<br />

The deed registration, which is in common practice, does not provide certainty <strong>of</strong><br />

title and, therefore, land registration is not registration <strong>of</strong> title, but <strong>of</strong> deed <strong>of</strong><br />

2<br />

transaction. This ultimately affects the property rights <strong>of</strong> the buyer adversely.<br />

The agricultural holdings in rural India are recorded with the respective patwari <strong>of</strong><br />

the tehsil. The system <strong>of</strong> maintenance <strong>of</strong> land records for rural land is, however,<br />

characterised by outdated methods, predominantly manual, susceptible to<br />

discrepancies and errors. Like the rural land records, the urban land records are also<br />

in a deplorable condition since the urban land in the country is not subject to any<br />

central title registration system. In various states, records <strong>of</strong> land owned by<br />

governmental agencies are maintained by individual agency. These records are not<br />

systematically recorded in any cadastral survey. The maintenance <strong>of</strong> land records is<br />

even worse for private ownership, where no central land ownership details are<br />

recorded at the city or state level. The same is true for properties transferred from<br />

leasehold to freehold. However, there is a common perception that payment <strong>of</strong><br />

property tax and associated receipts confer some pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> ownership, which is,<br />

however, not the case. This presumed ownership could be challenged on various<br />

grounds, like ownership history, area boundaries, financial encumbrances etc.<br />

The widespread use <strong>of</strong> informal methods <strong>of</strong> property transaction through Powers <strong>of</strong><br />

Attorney and unregistered 'Agreements to Sell' has led many people to avoid use <strong>of</strong>


Establishing A Title Registration System In India:<br />

Problems And Prospects<br />

3<br />

the formal system <strong>of</strong> deed registration in the country. The perceived high level <strong>of</strong><br />

Stamp Duty and registration charges on property transactions is mostly responsible<br />

for the preponderance <strong>of</strong> the informal methods <strong>of</strong> transactions. The existing system<br />

<strong>of</strong> deed registration is also highly inefficient. As for example, the delay in the deed<br />

registration due to the presence <strong>of</strong> a manual system <strong>of</strong> registration has posed<br />

problems in the development <strong>of</strong> a title registration in most <strong>of</strong> the cities <strong>of</strong> India. This<br />

has been brought out in one <strong>of</strong> the recent studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong><br />

3<br />

<strong>Affairs</strong>. In addition, because the deed records are filed in written form and by date<br />

<strong>of</strong> registration, it is difficult to trace the chain <strong>of</strong> ownership through a manual search<br />

<strong>of</strong> the records. The process <strong>of</strong> registration <strong>of</strong> new deeds is now being computerized<br />

in almost all the states, but the exercise <strong>of</strong> extending computerization to the old<br />

records is a formidable task. Further, barring Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan and<br />

4<br />

Karnataka, no attempts are being made to prepare a systematised computer<br />

database <strong>of</strong> land records in a manner, which would help in ascertaining the previous<br />

chain <strong>of</strong> owners, etc.<br />

The need to establish a title registration in the country has been long felt in the<br />

country. In 2006, the Delhi Government had taken up a concerted action in this<br />

regard by commissioning a study to the <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>, Washington on preparation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a roadmap for establishing a title registration system in the state. Importantly,<br />

this issue has also received considerable emphasis from the central government in<br />

recent years. In fact, under the Jawaharlal Nehru <strong>National</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Renewal Mission<br />

(JNNURM), putting in place an effective Property Title Certification System forms<br />

a mandatory state level reform. Under this system, the cities need to ensure proper<br />

management and record <strong>of</strong> all property holdings within the city limits reflecting<br />

authentic ownership at all points and easily accessible information on land<br />

holdings.<br />

Following the introductory section, the second section attempts to identify the need<br />

for a new title registration system in the country. The third section attempts to trace<br />

the genesis <strong>of</strong> the system. The fourth section suggests methods to move towards<br />

more transparent and efficient land registration systems and also highlights case<br />

studies from national and international best practices. The final section summarises<br />

the conclusions from the previous sections and puts a perspective for future<br />

development.


4 <strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

2. The need for a new title registration system:<br />

In urban India, land records are in a chaotic state with no central/state authority<br />

having centralised database on land titles. This has resulted in the persistence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

risk factor among buyers and mortgagors that the title to a property may be<br />

imperfect or fraudulent; financial risk for banks and housing finance companies<br />

that they may be unable to foreclose a mortgage, or that the property has been used<br />

to secure a prior mortgage (USAID 2007). Further, inability to prove legitimate<br />

ownership results in poor access to mortgage finance constraining the volume <strong>of</strong><br />

secondary transactions. The absence <strong>of</strong> a verifiable property titling and record<br />

system has also led to litigation about property ownership and boundaries. There<br />

are various instances <strong>of</strong> the same property being sold to numerous buyers leading to<br />

endless litigation. Further Stamp and Transfer Duties are probably collected on<br />

only a minority <strong>of</strong> transactions due to the preponderance <strong>of</strong> informal transactions<br />

through power <strong>of</strong> attorney. The reduction <strong>of</strong> stamp duty to 5 per cent under<br />

JNNURM reforms is expected to bring more transactions under the formal system<br />

<strong>of</strong> registration.<br />

City planners, para statal agencies and urban local bodies have no access to a land<br />

information system, which constrain planning and management. Although the<br />

urban local bodies collect property tax, their ability to identify properties that are<br />

not presently included in the property tax registers would be enhanced if they were<br />

to have access to a central register <strong>of</strong> properties. Further, their taxation ability<br />

would be made much more efficient and equitable if they had access to an up-todate<br />

property register. Similar benefits would accrue to the city governments while<br />

planning for basic services for the city.<br />

Further, availability <strong>of</strong> land is artificially constrained by speculative purchases,<br />

litigation, lack <strong>of</strong> information on the land available for social housing etc.<br />

Implementation <strong>of</strong> the master plans is also effected by the absence <strong>of</strong> database on<br />

land that has clear land title. Absence <strong>of</strong> land cadastres also come in the way <strong>of</strong><br />

regularisation drives <strong>of</strong> cities.<br />

The introduction <strong>of</strong> a formal system <strong>of</strong> property registration would bring about an<br />

efficient and new system for property registration (new technology and new laws I


Establishing A Title Registration System In India:<br />

Problems And Prospects<br />

5<br />

regulations) to clarify and authenticate citizens' property rights and improve<br />

security <strong>of</strong> title to allow banks and housing finance companies to function with<br />

confidence. It would bring clear definition <strong>of</strong> title in subdivided properties and<br />

systematic documentation <strong>of</strong> titles. The recent developments in s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

technology have much easier and cheaper options to introduce appropriate<br />

technology than it was earlier. Best practices introduced in other countries have<br />

demonstrated the technologies that could be adopted by India. A modern title<br />

registration system will provide a service to all property owners in the country that<br />

was previously lacking, in a cost-effective and user-friendly manner. The initiation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a title registry will boost business, as it would signal to investors that India is a<br />

globalising country, with a confident economy based on stable land rights.<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> the JNNURM reform is to provide certainty <strong>of</strong> title to land in<br />

towns and cities in order to facilitate property transactions, encourage investment<br />

and improvement, reduce litigations and uncertainty over the ownership <strong>of</strong> land.<br />

The present system <strong>of</strong> deed registration, whether manually operated or<br />

computerised would be replaced with a system <strong>of</strong> title registration such as has been<br />

adopted by many countries by the establishment <strong>of</strong> a central registry <strong>of</strong> property,<br />

rights and charges.<br />

According to the USAID Study (2007), a land registration, mapping and<br />

information system, would help the local economy in various ways as outlined<br />

below:<br />

provide a complete and transparent record <strong>of</strong> title and other interests in land<br />

and immovable property;<br />

establish the legality <strong>of</strong> title or other interests;<br />

provide constructive notice to third parties <strong>of</strong> title and other interests on<br />

property;<br />

help avoid conflicts and property disputes;<br />

be self-proving, providing a presumption <strong>of</strong> accuracy and indemnification for<br />

errors;<br />

protect subsequent owners through a complete and transparent chain <strong>of</strong> title;<br />

collate data about real estate markets;<br />

provide data to help government determine rational land use policies;


6 <strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

facilitate the rational management <strong>of</strong> property assets held by public agencies;<br />

support the property tax system.<br />

All these would result in bringing about a guaranteed title certification system<br />

which would help in more effective urban planning, developing an efficient<br />

mortgage market, planning <strong>of</strong> informal housing etc.<br />

3. The Genesis <strong>of</strong> the Land Title Registration (Torrens) System<br />

The Title Registration (Torrens) System refers to a system by which ownership <strong>of</strong><br />

real property is established through the issuance <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>ficial certificate indicating<br />

the name <strong>of</strong> the individual in whom such ownership is vested. The idea <strong>of</strong> a system<br />

<strong>of</strong> land title registration originated with Sir Robert Torrens <strong>of</strong> Australia, and has<br />

generally become known as the "Torrens System." In 1857 he introduced a bill<br />

5<br />

providing for the registration <strong>of</strong> land titles. The idea spread rapidly to British<br />

Honduras in Central America in the same year and to Queensland, Tasmania and<br />

Victoria in 1861. Most <strong>of</strong> the other British colonies have since then adopted the<br />

system. It has become popular throughout the globe as it addresses two major<br />

problems, that <strong>of</strong> uncertainty surrounding land ownership, and confusion around<br />

land transactions. Under this system, all transfers <strong>of</strong> land are recorded in the land<br />

register. Most importantly, the owner <strong>of</strong> the land is established by virtue <strong>of</strong> his name<br />

6<br />

being recorded in the government's register. This system also records easements<br />

and mortgages.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> registration under the deed registration system is to give the<br />

instrument registered "priority" over all instruments that are unregistered. The<br />

basic difference between the deeds registration and Torrens systems is that the<br />

former involves registration <strong>of</strong> instruments while the latter involves registration <strong>of</strong><br />

title (USAID, 2007).The Torrens title system operates on the principle <strong>of</strong> title by<br />

registration (i.e. the indefeasibility <strong>of</strong> a registered interest) rather than registration<br />

<strong>of</strong> title. The system does away with the need for a chain <strong>of</strong> title (i.e. tracing title<br />

through a series <strong>of</strong> documents). Instead, each parcel <strong>of</strong> land is given a separate folio<br />

in the register and is identified by reference to a registered plan. On the first<br />

registration <strong>of</strong> land under the system, the land is given a unique number called a<br />

folio which identifies the land by reference to a registered plan. The folio records


Establishing A Title Registration System In India:<br />

Problems And Prospects<br />

7<br />

the dimensions <strong>of</strong> the land and its boundaries, the name <strong>of</strong> the registered owner, and<br />

any legal interests that affect title to the land. To change the boundaries <strong>of</strong> a parcel<br />

<strong>of</strong> land, a revised plan must be prepared and registered. Once registered, the land<br />

cannot be withdrawn from the system.<br />

A transfer <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> a parcel <strong>of</strong> land is effected by a change <strong>of</strong> the record on<br />

the register. The registrar has a duty to ensure that only legally valid changes are<br />

made to the register. A change <strong>of</strong> ownership may come about because <strong>of</strong> a sale <strong>of</strong> the<br />

land, or the death <strong>of</strong> the registered owner, or as a result <strong>of</strong> a court order, etc.<br />

Similarly, any interest, which effects or limits the ownership rights <strong>of</strong> the registered<br />

owner, such as a mortgage, can also be noted on the register. There are legal rules,<br />

which regulate the rights and powers <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these interests in relation to each<br />

other and in relation to third parties. The State guarantees the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

register and undertakes to compensate those whose rights are adversely affected by<br />

an administrative error.<br />

The Torrens system works on the following three principles as outlined in the box.<br />

Three principles <strong>of</strong> Torrens system<br />

Mirror principle - the register or the Certificate <strong>of</strong> Title reflects,<br />

i.e.,mirrors accurately and completely the current facts about a person's<br />

title. This means if a person sells an estate, the new title has to be identical<br />

to the old one in terms <strong>of</strong> description <strong>of</strong> lands, except for the owner's name.<br />

Curtain principle - one does not need to go behind the Certificate <strong>of</strong> Title<br />

as it contains all the information about the title. This means that ownership<br />

need not be proved by long complicated documents that are kept by the<br />

owner, as in Private Conveyancing system. All the necessary information<br />

regarding ownership is on the Certificate <strong>of</strong> Title.<br />

Insurance principle - provides for compensation <strong>of</strong> loss if there are errors<br />

made by the Registrar <strong>of</strong> Titles.<br />

Source: T Rouff, 1957


8<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

4.1. The legal basis for a Title Registry:<br />

The USAID (2007) study outlined an alternative approach to improve the<br />

functioning <strong>of</strong> the present system <strong>of</strong> deed registration under the Registration Act<br />

1908 in order to allow users better access to the data base and to bring more<br />

properties into the system. The study (2007) suggested that this could be achieved<br />

by computerizing all the existing records dating back to 1908 and linking them<br />

through a chain <strong>of</strong> title; by enforcement <strong>of</strong> regulations relating to Powers <strong>of</strong><br />

Attorney; and by extension <strong>of</strong> the requirement to register other types <strong>of</strong> transaction<br />

(e.g. mortgages, transactions in the <strong>Urban</strong> Villages, etc). The study indicates that<br />

this exercise would marginally increase the certainty <strong>of</strong> title, and could not form the<br />

basis for any form <strong>of</strong> guarantee. Further, it would be relatively difficult and<br />

expensive in cases especially while interpreting and linking the chains <strong>of</strong> older<br />

documents, and would likely increase the incidence <strong>of</strong> litigation. Alternatively, the<br />

study recommended the introduction <strong>of</strong> a land register.<br />

The land register would contain the following details:<br />

A description <strong>of</strong> the attributes <strong>of</strong> the land parcel: a precise reference to the Land<br />

Cadastre -title number, location, etc<br />

Land ownership and possessory rights -e.g. the name <strong>of</strong> the owner(s) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

land, the capacity in which the owner holds the land, particulars <strong>of</strong> leases, etc.<br />

Non-possessory rights (easements and covenants), mortgages and other<br />

charges. Title registration includes the details <strong>of</strong> all legal transactions affecting<br />

the parcel, including sales and mortgages. Equitable Mortgages (mortgage by<br />

deposit <strong>of</strong> title deeds) are presently exempt from registration by the Registrar<br />

<strong>of</strong> Assurances under the Registration Act 1908. In order to protect lenders -all<br />

such transactions could be included in the title register by an administrative<br />

order.<br />

Interests in apartments. The title registry should reflect the legal interests <strong>of</strong><br />

different ownership interests in a built property (e.g. a condominium built on<br />

leased land).<br />

All these details <strong>of</strong> the land register would make it possible for the respective state<br />

government to build a database on urban land/property and also confer land titles in<br />

an efficient and transparent manner. In India, the respective state


Establishing A Title Registration System In India:<br />

Problems And Prospects<br />

9<br />

governments may undertake the introduction <strong>of</strong> the new registry systematically,<br />

area-wise (district), over a period <strong>of</strong> years. Gradually when the whole <strong>of</strong> a state is<br />

covered by the new Title Registry, the existing Deed Registry operated by the<br />

Registrar <strong>of</strong> Assurances would become redundant and such a system may be<br />

discarded. In the transition period, however deeds pertaining to areas not yet<br />

notified for inclusion in the Title Registry would continue to be registered in the<br />

Deed Registry. The record <strong>of</strong> titles could be created over a period <strong>of</strong> time. Three sets<br />

<strong>of</strong> registers would be maintained ultimately, namely: a) register <strong>of</strong> titles, b) register<br />

<strong>of</strong> disputes and c) register <strong>of</strong> charges and covenants.<br />

Enabling Legislations:<br />

Various enabling legislations are to be put in place to bring about title registration<br />

system in the country. Amendment to the following Acts would be necessary for the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> Title Registration system:<br />

Indian Registration Act 1908, requiring compulsory registration <strong>of</strong> title instead<br />

<strong>of</strong> deed (union Government),<br />

Section 18 <strong>of</strong> Indian Registration Act 1908 requiring compulsory registration<br />

<strong>of</strong> all land related transactions land acquisition, court decrees, land orders,<br />

heirship partitions, mortgages, agreements to sell, power <strong>of</strong> attorney, etc.<br />

(union Government),<br />

Transfer <strong>of</strong> Property Act, 1982 requiring verification <strong>of</strong> ownership, (union<br />

Government),<br />

Indian Evidence Act that require Revenue Records to be conclusive rather than<br />

presumptive and Indian Contract Act <strong>of</strong> 1872, requiring contracts to be<br />

registered (union Government).<br />

In addition to the enabling legislations, various other legal measures need to be<br />

taken by the respective state governments. These would include resolving the<br />

conflicting role <strong>of</strong> the revenue department <strong>of</strong> the state government as the sovereign<br />

authority on government land and also as an adjudicator <strong>of</strong> rights against the<br />

Government. Further, legal provisions must be introduced to safeguard guaranteed<br />

title provisions from contrary provisions <strong>of</strong> other state laws and for providing for<br />

legitimate counter-claims to land ownership. Efforts should be taken to protect the<br />

state and legitimate owners with “ provisional title” that over a certain time


10<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

converts to “conclusive title” protected by state. Further, there should be provisions<br />

for creation <strong>of</strong> an indemnity fund to provide for compensation for genuine counterclaims.<br />

An escrow account may also be created to safeguard the indemnity fund.<br />

The proposed institutional structure<br />

A land registry may be established in each state under the existing land revenue Act.<br />

The State Government could establish a new Department <strong>of</strong> Lands and Survey,<br />

with the responsibility for administration <strong>of</strong> both the land registry and the land<br />

cadastre. It would be desirable if the cadastral agency and the land information<br />

system were tied within the same agency, rather than being decentralised between<br />

different government authorities. Such an administrative set up would avoid<br />

duplication <strong>of</strong> responsibilities and speed up the process <strong>of</strong> title registration.<br />

Adoption <strong>of</strong> Computerised Process <strong>of</strong> Registration <strong>of</strong> Properties<br />

Land registers are computerized in various countries although there are several<br />

national or provincial governments that have chosen to retain a manual system. It is<br />

important to note here that a manual system <strong>of</strong> registration leads to several<br />

inefficiencies in land administration. Given the present state <strong>of</strong> technology<br />

worldwide and India's pre-eminent expertise in information technology, each<br />

state's land registry and land cadastre can be fully computerized from the<br />

beginning. The JNNURM reform has 'adoption <strong>of</strong> computerised process <strong>of</strong><br />

registration <strong>of</strong> properties' as one <strong>of</strong> the mandatory reforms. Adoption <strong>of</strong> this reform<br />

would bring a step closer to the title certification system. In fact, almost all states<br />

have already adopted computerised process <strong>of</strong> registration <strong>of</strong> properties. States like<br />

West Bengal are in the process <strong>of</strong> implementing this system, where manual system<br />

<strong>of</strong> registration is still prevalent in most <strong>of</strong> the districts.<br />

Public Access to information<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the principles <strong>of</strong> title registration is that once title or other interests are<br />

registered, all persons are deemed to have constructive notice <strong>of</strong> the facts in the<br />

record. This information is essential to prevent fraud, to protect the interests <strong>of</strong><br />

holders <strong>of</strong> rights in the property against other parties, ease mortgage procedures and


Establishing A Title Registration System In India:<br />

Problems And Prospects<br />

11<br />

to allow property owners to freely exercise their property rights, both in formal and<br />

7<br />

informal areas <strong>of</strong> cities.<br />

Cadastral Survey<br />

As mentioned earlier, it would be important to undertake a cadastral survey in order<br />

to establish the precise boundaries <strong>of</strong> each parcel <strong>of</strong> land. This will form the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

a cadastre, which would comprise <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> maps showing the size and location<br />

<strong>of</strong> all land parcels, together with a small text describing the attributes <strong>of</strong> the land.<br />

The land cadastre should show the geometric characteristics <strong>of</strong> a property. This<br />

would help to precisely locate each individual parcel <strong>of</strong> land. The cadastre may<br />

include: geometric coordinates, property addresses, land use, property<br />

information, tenure, details <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> buildings and apartments;<br />

population, price or value stated (most recent) as well as details <strong>of</strong> any registered<br />

charges.<br />

In addition to guaranteeing ownership and security <strong>of</strong> tenure, and thereby assuring<br />

better access to credit, information contained in the land registry and cadastre can<br />

be used for purposes <strong>of</strong> estimating and collecting property taxes in the urban areas.<br />

The same data may be used to support land use planning and management including<br />

development control, and planning for redevelopment, planning for and<br />

management <strong>of</strong> public utilities and services; transport planning; emergency<br />

planning and management; and for demographic and other statistical analysis in the<br />

respective cities. It can be used to monitor land markets, an important potential<br />

source <strong>of</strong> revenue as well as for property assessment and valuation. Survey <strong>of</strong> India<br />

(NRSA) could be entrusted with the establishment <strong>of</strong> a geodetic network whereas<br />

licensed private surveyors can undertake lower-level mapping (USAID, 2007).<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> Implementation:<br />

Capital costs for the introduction <strong>of</strong> a new land title registration system vary widely<br />

from country to country, depending on needs and the scope <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

International experience shows that capital costs are equivalent to upwards <strong>of</strong> $10<br />

per property registered. In India, the costs <strong>of</strong> first registration for the Nagarasti<br />

Project in Belgaum was about Rs.300 per property.


12<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

International experience shows that capital costs <strong>of</strong> new registration project have<br />

been allocated between components as follows:<br />

Land registration and titling, including systematic (first)<br />

registration and data conversion 20-45%<br />

Cadastre services contracts (aerial photography,<br />

mapping, surveying) 10-40%<br />

Equipment, vehicles, furniture 5-25%<br />

Technical advisors 3-10%<br />

Policy development and project management 7%<br />

Training and education 5%<br />

Civil works 1-15%<br />

Total 100%<br />

Source: USAID, 2007<br />

In Thailand, the first registration charge was $4 per parcel while the actual cost was<br />

$40 per parcel. The fee was kept minimum with the idea that an affordable fee<br />

would result in higher registration necessary for the success <strong>of</strong> the program. This<br />

approach does not ensure recovery <strong>of</strong> the full costs <strong>of</strong> set-up <strong>of</strong> the new system. It<br />

was based on the assumption that relatively low operational costs can allow land<br />

registries to become self-financing after the start-up period even with modest fees.<br />

Fees that are too high tend to discourage registration and increase the likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />

increase <strong>of</strong> unregistered properties. The central government should assist the states<br />

in financing such capital projects, as funds are a major constraint in the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the reforms.<br />

4.2. Case studies from <strong>National</strong> and International Best Practices:<br />

Various countries have a long history <strong>of</strong> scientific management <strong>of</strong> their urban land<br />

through urban land title certification system. Attempts may be made by the state<br />

governments to introduce these efforts in their respective urban areas. Under the


Establishing A Title Registration System In India:<br />

Problems And Prospects<br />

13<br />

JNNURM, a few states have initiated certain reforms in the above area. The<br />

following section attempts to outline the best practices, both at an international<br />

level as also at the national level, which would act as a roadmap for various state<br />

governments to introduce the reform.<br />

International best practice: State Government <strong>of</strong> Victoria:<br />

The State Government <strong>of</strong> Victoria delivers the Title and Property Certificates<br />

(TPC) Service. TPC is an easy-to-use self-service that combines online orders for<br />

state and local government property certificates and information statements for<br />

Victoria. It also includes online retrieval <strong>of</strong> information such as titles and plans<br />

where available. It charges a fee for service and payment is by credit card.<br />

Properties are typically described by street address or a 'rate assessment number'<br />

allocated by an authority, e.g. local government or utility. A property can consist <strong>of</strong><br />

one parcel (e.g. a suburban house-block); many parcels (e.g. a farm); or part <strong>of</strong> a<br />

parcel (e.g. a shop in a development). The Council's view <strong>of</strong> property is usually seen<br />

as being definitive and is described by a Council Property Number (CPN).<br />

The service is through seven simple steps:<br />

1. Specify property - One has to choose one <strong>of</strong> the listed property and enter in<br />

the requested details.<br />

2. Confirm property - To confirm the property, the service will match the<br />

volume/folio and plan numbers (these are required to order Copy <strong>of</strong> Title and<br />

Plan <strong>of</strong> Subdivision certificates). One has to confirm the property to order<br />

certificates from other authorities. One will also be able to visually confirm<br />

the property on a map. If the property details are not correct, one can select an<br />

alternative property.<br />

3. Select certificates - One will be asked to select from a list <strong>of</strong> certificates<br />

available for the specified property.<br />

4. Delivery details - One will be asked to provide and confirm delivery details<br />

and options for delivery by email or fax.


14<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

5. Payment details - Payment for the whole order is completed by a single credit<br />

card transaction.<br />

6. Confirm Order - One will be asked to check the details <strong>of</strong> order and to select<br />

purchase if all details are correct. One can also save selections and finish<br />

transaction later.<br />

7. Receipt - When the application and payment has been successfully processed<br />

a printable receipt is issued. One can check the status <strong>of</strong> your order, at any time<br />

during processing <strong>of</strong> the order.<br />

England:<br />

In England, the government agency (www.landreg.gov.uk) maintains a database <strong>of</strong><br />

all properties in the United Kingdom (UK) with regard to the address, ownership,<br />

service address, purchase price, mortgages and basic description. Websites like<br />

www.ourproperty.co.uk, www.mouseprice.com, www.hometrack.co.uk,<br />

www.upmystreet.com etc take this information from the Land Registry as well as a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> other sources to provide customers with the relevant information.<br />

The Land Registry records whether each house etc has a mortgage or not and this<br />

information is publicly available via their website. However, they do not have the<br />

ability to export this data as a bulk text output for analysis since this would require<br />

significant and costly changes to their database package. At present one can search<br />

any property in the UK at www.landregisteronline.gov.uk and download a PDF file<br />

with all the information about the property for about £3 per property. One can pay<br />

for this by credit card without any need to register or open an account and be billed<br />

monthly. The PDF file download will be the Official Copy <strong>of</strong> the register for the<br />

property. It will show the address, owner's name, his service address, price bought<br />

for, when bought, what “charges (mortgages) exist and with whom and a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

other current and historic details.<br />

A caution is taken against first registration for protecting an interest in an<br />

unregistered estate affecting land. A caution can protect a wide variety <strong>of</strong> interests,<br />

as for example, rent charges and franchises. For each caution there is a 'caution title'


Establishing A Title Registration System In India:<br />

Problems And Prospects<br />

15<br />

- a record, under a distinguishing number, <strong>of</strong> the details <strong>of</strong> the caution and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

declaration in support and <strong>of</strong> a plan showing the extent <strong>of</strong> the land affected by the<br />

caution. A caution is not an actual registration <strong>of</strong> any estate in land. It is merely a<br />

means to trigger notification to the person who lodged the caution when an<br />

application for first registration is made. There can be more than one caution in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the same property.<br />

In the UK, the title register contains the details relating to the property.<br />

Further, each title register has three parts:<br />

property register - a description <strong>of</strong> the property and any rights that may benefit<br />

the property<br />

proprietorship register - who owns the property and any restrictions upon their<br />

power to deal with the property<br />

charges register - further information such as mortgages or rights that may<br />

adversely affect the property.<br />

<strong>National</strong> Experience: The Rajasthan <strong>Urban</strong> Land (certification <strong>of</strong> title) Reform,<br />

2008:<br />

The State Government <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan issued an ordinance in October 2008 to provide<br />

for survey and maintenance <strong>of</strong> record <strong>of</strong> urban lands and certification <strong>of</strong> titles. This<br />

reform along with computerisation <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> registration <strong>of</strong> land and<br />

property will help to bring about an efficient real estate market where transactions,<br />

i.e., sale and purchase <strong>of</strong> properties, can take place smoothly in a transparent<br />

manner.<br />

Appointment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Land Title Certification Authority:<br />

The ordinance enables the State Government or urban local body to carry out a<br />

survey <strong>of</strong> any urban area within the State. The <strong>of</strong>ficer conducting survey shall<br />

prepare a map, register and field book <strong>of</strong> the urban area or part there<strong>of</strong> under survey.<br />

After completion <strong>of</strong> survey operations in any urban area, the <strong>of</strong>ficer in charge <strong>of</strong><br />

survey shall send all maps, registers and other documents including files on which<br />

decisions were recorded and other papers connected with survey to such urban


16<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

body in whose local area the survey was conducted or to such other authority or<br />

department <strong>of</strong> the State Government as the State Government may specify by<br />

general or special order for safe custody <strong>of</strong> record <strong>of</strong> survey.<br />

If the State Government is satisfied with the survey and approves it, it should be<br />

notified in the Official Gazette. The owner, title holder or occupier <strong>of</strong> the land or<br />

premises which has been surveyed shall be liable to pay to the <strong>of</strong>ficer or authority in<br />

charge <strong>of</strong> the survey, a fee at such rate, in such manner, within such time after the<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> survey and to such extent, as the State Government may prescribe<br />

and any survey fee not so paid shall be recoverable as arrears <strong>of</strong> land revenue. Every<br />

owner, holder <strong>of</strong> title or occupier <strong>of</strong> land or premises who has paid the survey fee<br />

under this section shall be entitled to receive free <strong>of</strong> charge, and every owner, holder<br />

<strong>of</strong> title or occupier who is not liable to pay such survey fee shall be entitled to<br />

receive on payment <strong>of</strong> such charges, as may be prescribed, a certified extract from<br />

the map and a certified extract from the register prepared so far as they relate to such<br />

land or premises.<br />

After the commencement <strong>of</strong> the Act, the State Government shall, by notification in<br />

the Official Gazette, appoint an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> the Indian Administrative Service to be<br />

the <strong>Urban</strong> Land Title Certification Authority for the purpose <strong>of</strong> receiving<br />

applications, scrutinizing the documents, verification from relevant <strong>of</strong>ficial records<br />

including the records kept by the local urban bodies, and issuance <strong>of</strong> certificate <strong>of</strong><br />

title in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed. The State Government<br />

may also appoint such number and category <strong>of</strong> other <strong>of</strong>ficers as it may think<br />

necessary to assist the Certification Authority in discharge <strong>of</strong> his functions under<br />

this Act. A person who holds title <strong>of</strong> any urban land immediately before the<br />

commencement <strong>of</strong> this Ordinance may, and the person who acquires title <strong>of</strong> any<br />

urban land after the commencement <strong>of</strong> this Ordinance shall, apply to the Authority<br />

for the certificate <strong>of</strong> title under the provisions <strong>of</strong> this Act, in a manner and within<br />

such time as may be prescribed by the Act. The Authority, after verification <strong>of</strong> the<br />

documents would issue a provisional certificate <strong>of</strong> title for a period <strong>of</strong> two years<br />

without claiming any guarantee on behalf <strong>of</strong> the State Government. The Authority<br />

may, after expiry <strong>of</strong> the said period, issue a permanent certificate <strong>of</strong> title.<br />

Certification cum guarantee charges: Every person, who seeks a certificate <strong>of</strong>


Establishing A Title Registration System In India:<br />

Problems And Prospects<br />

17<br />

title under the provisions <strong>of</strong> this Act, shall be liable to pay, by way <strong>of</strong> certification<br />

8<br />

cum guarantee charges. 1% <strong>of</strong> the prevailing DLC rates <strong>of</strong> the land to which<br />

certificate relates. The amount <strong>of</strong> certification cum guarantee charge shall be<br />

payable at the time <strong>of</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> the provisional certificate <strong>of</strong> title.<br />

Establishment <strong>of</strong> a sinking Fund: A sinking fund needs to be established where<br />

the money realized on account <strong>of</strong> fees, penalty and certification cum guarantee<br />

charge shall be deposited to the Fund. The Fund shall be utilized to meet out the<br />

expenses on account <strong>of</strong> the payment <strong>of</strong> any compensation in accordance with the<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> the Ordinance and such other administrative expenses incurred by the<br />

Certification Authority. The management, accounts and audit <strong>of</strong> the Fund shall be<br />

regulated by such rules as may be made by the State Government from time to time<br />

in this behalf.<br />

State Guarantee: The State Government shall stand as guarantor for the<br />

genuineness and authenticity <strong>of</strong> the title to the extent specified in permanent<br />

certificate issued by the Authority. Any person, who enters into an agreement for<br />

consideration with the titleholder on the basis <strong>of</strong> a permanent certificate <strong>of</strong> title<br />

issued under this Act and thereby incurs any loss due to any defect <strong>of</strong> title other than<br />

that specified in the certificate, shall be entitled to be compensated by the Authority.<br />

However the compensation payable shall not exceed the amount <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

land to which the certificate relates calculated at the rates for purpose <strong>of</strong> Stamp<br />

Duty prevalent at the time <strong>of</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> the certificate.<br />

Indemnity: Any person, who enters into an agreement for consideration with the<br />

title holder on the basis <strong>of</strong> a permanent certificate <strong>of</strong> title issued under the Act and<br />

thereby incurs any loss due to any defect <strong>of</strong> title other than that specified in the<br />

certificate, shall be entitled to be compensated by the Certification Authority on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> the State Government as guarantor, for such loss to such extent as they are<br />

attributable to such defect, in such manner as may be prescribed. It may be noted<br />

that the amount <strong>of</strong> compensation payable shall not exceed the amount <strong>of</strong> the value<br />

<strong>of</strong> the land to which the certificate relates calculated at the DLC rates prevalent at<br />

the time <strong>of</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> the certificate in the area in which the land is located.<br />

Appeals: Any person aggrieved by an order <strong>of</strong> the Certification Authority may<br />

appeal within sixty days from the date <strong>of</strong> such order to the Tribunal.


18<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Delhi <strong>Urban</strong> Property Registration:<br />

The Delhi urban property registration deeds will be replaced by title deeds and the<br />

latter will be issued once a central authority that will have a database <strong>of</strong> all<br />

properties in the city. The draft plan talks <strong>of</strong> awarding provisional registration in<br />

more complicated cases such as unauthorised colonies and old pre-independence<br />

constructions like those in the Walled City in the first seven years from the time the<br />

Act comes into force as it will take that much time to put a central database in place.<br />

Consequently permanent registrations will be awarded.<br />

After the seven-year window period, registering with the titling authority will<br />

become mandatory. The authority will conduct its own survey to ascertain<br />

ownership. For very old properties like those in the Walled City where documents<br />

may not always be available, registration will continue to be done by the subregistrar.<br />

As <strong>of</strong> now there is no central system <strong>of</strong> maintaining records <strong>of</strong> property<br />

ownership because <strong>of</strong> multiplicity <strong>of</strong> authorities. The proposed Central Authority<br />

under the draft Bill will maintain complete records <strong>of</strong> all properties and scrutinize<br />

the details provided to identify the real owner. These will also be digitised and will<br />

prevent fraudulent claims on ownership <strong>of</strong> a property, as the records will be<br />

available for courts to take decisions. Registration <strong>of</strong> agricultural land, however,<br />

will be out <strong>of</strong> its purview. The Authority will also function as a Tribunal to look at<br />

disputes and an appellate tribunal too. All data collected by the Titling Authority<br />

will be digitised and title status <strong>of</strong> properties registered with it will be put up on a<br />

central website.<br />

The Delhi Government had hired a legal firm to draft the bill. Consultation on it will<br />

soon be taken up along with various stakeholders like the real estate companies.<br />

The move towards introducing a Property Title Certification is the need <strong>of</strong> the hour<br />

to prevent rampant fraud in the real estate sector. In the city <strong>of</strong> Delhi, there are<br />

instances <strong>of</strong> a single property sometimes getting registered under different names<br />

numerous times. The Titling Law, when introduced, will put an end to this problem.<br />

5. Conclusion:<br />

Introduction <strong>of</strong> property title certification system in ULBs is one <strong>of</strong> the key reforms


Establishing A Title Registration System In India:<br />

Problems And Prospects<br />

19<br />

under the Jawaharlal Nehru <strong>National</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Renewal Mission. The objective <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reform is to enable the cities to move towards guaranteed property title systems,<br />

which would help to introduce scientific management <strong>of</strong> land records in a<br />

transparent manner. The existing system <strong>of</strong> deed registration is fraught with<br />

discrepancies and errors because <strong>of</strong> outdated methods, which are predominantly<br />

manual. Introduction <strong>of</strong> the property title certification system seeks to create a<br />

public record <strong>of</strong> titles, which describe the property details, as well as the title and<br />

has a system for reflecting any transaction over time. The present records are at best<br />

presumptive and do not convey any title. As mentioned earlier, a property title<br />

certification system would require various legal changes, which can be brought<br />

about by enacting an overriding law for amendments to existing laws. In this<br />

regard, an overview <strong>of</strong> the best practices may prove useful for implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

the reform. It may be reiterated that a property title certification system is based on a<br />

sound system <strong>of</strong> land records and efficient use <strong>of</strong> Information Technology would be<br />

key to success <strong>of</strong> the reform. Last but not the least, the central government should<br />

assist the states in financing such projects as funds are a major constraint in the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the reforms.<br />

Acknowledgement: The secretarial assistance <strong>of</strong> Ms.Anita Sharma (NIUA) is<br />

acknowledged.


20<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

End Notes<br />

1 Introducing Property Title Certification is a mandatory reform under<br />

JNNURM. States are to implement this reform by the end <strong>of</strong> the mission<br />

period.<br />

2 The deed <strong>of</strong> transaction is a fiscal instrument for the state, allowing it to collect<br />

a 'fee'.<br />

3 Preparation <strong>of</strong> Guidelines For Model System For Procedures Under the<br />

Parameters <strong>of</strong> Registering Property and Dealing with Licenses (Doing<br />

Business in Indian Cities) NIUA, 2008 under Ministry <strong>of</strong> Commerce and<br />

Industry, GOI<br />

4 Karnataka has computerised land records since 2003-04 onwards (NIUA,<br />

2008).<br />

5 This bill became a law in South Australia January 27, 1858, and went into<br />

effect on July 1, 1858.<br />

6 An easement is a non-possessory interest to use real property in possession <strong>of</strong><br />

another person for a stated purpose.<br />

7 Details available in the Report prepared for USAID/India, December 2006:<br />

"New Approaches to Land Titling and Tenure in Delhi". Report prepared for<br />

USAID/India<br />

8 “DLC rates” mean the rates determined from time to time by the District<br />

Level Committee constituted by the State Government under clause (b) <strong>of</strong><br />

sub-rule (1) <strong>of</strong> rule 2 <strong>of</strong> the Rajasthan Stamp Rules, 2004 for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

levying Stamp Duty on instruments.


Establishing A Title Registration System In India:<br />

Problems And Prospects<br />

21<br />

References:<br />

1. T Rouff, 1957, An Englishmen Looks at the Torrens System, Law Book Co,<br />

Sydney.<br />

2. U.S. Agency for International Development /India, 2006, "New Approaches to<br />

Land Titling and Tenure in Delhi".<br />

3. U.S. Agency for International Development / India , 2006, “A New Land Title<br />

Registration System for Delhi: Recommendations,” The <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Institute</strong><br />

Washington D.C, April 2007<br />

4. www.landreg.gov.uk<br />

5. www.landregisteronline.gov.uk<br />

6. en.wikipedia.org/wiki


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

22<br />

Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

1<br />

Dr. Renu Khosla<br />

Executive Summary<br />

The 'Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettlement' study measured costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> slum<br />

upgrading versus resettlement. Cities favour resettlement to pr<strong>of</strong>it from<br />

evacuated land but believe that tenure security and better living conditions under<br />

resettlement have benefits for the poor. Anti resettlement lobbies believe distances<br />

from livelihoods shock people into poverty but no conclusive evidence.<br />

The study made a cost-benefit comparison <strong>of</strong> slum resettlement in Delhi and insitu<br />

upgrading in Mumbai including all financial costs and benefits, particularly<br />

the unacknowledged social costs and benefits. It concluded that far-site<br />

resettlement was significantly more costly for residents. Whilst benefits for<br />

governments are less in upgrading, it has significantly lower costs for both cities<br />

and people. Resettlement costs from job and income losses and expenditure and<br />

debt increases have long term economic impact. Decrease in working women with<br />

disempowerment, and termination <strong>of</strong> education among children has huge<br />

implications for gender development and sustainable poverty reduction. Impacts<br />

are also likely on city environments through added transport requirements.<br />

Relocation also disturbs inner city economy through market erosion. City policy<br />

must acknowledge the critical link between resettlement and development for<br />

tenure security benefits not to be nullified. Upgrading is a win-win solution for<br />

slum development, and relocation must be conditional in essential cases.<br />

________________________________________________________________<br />

1<br />

Director, Centre for <strong>Urban</strong> and Regional Excellence. The study was conducted with<br />

financial support <strong>of</strong> the South Asia Network <strong>of</strong> Economic <strong>Institute</strong>s (SANEI) in May 2006.<br />

The following co-authors and researchers have contributed significantly to the study; Shveta<br />

Mathur, Antonia Smithies The study predates the JNNURM and the policy context is likely to<br />

have changed since the study.


23<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Introduction<br />

This study was designed to measure the costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> slum upgradation<br />

versus resettlement. Most cities favour resettlement, believing that the high value<br />

<strong>of</strong> evacuated land is rationale enough for resettling slum dwellers. They also<br />

believe that it creates a Win-Win situation where poor get alternate land in good<br />

quality environments and government accrues benefits from newly available land<br />

for development. Those against resettlement believe that it distances families from<br />

livelihoods and shocks them into poverty. Yet there is no conclusive evidence<br />

comparing the two approaches.<br />

The current study conducted a cost-benefit analysis <strong>of</strong> slum resettlement and in-situ<br />

upgradation in Delhi and Mumbai respectively. Through a detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

financial costs and benefits, as well as the <strong>of</strong>ten unacknowledged social costs and<br />

benefits, the study is intended to inform slum policy and raise governments'<br />

awareness.<br />

Approaches to Slum Development<br />

Response to slum development in India has been mixed but typical; ignore,<br />

eradicate or relocate. According to Cities Alliance, ignoring existence <strong>of</strong> slums was<br />

common until the early 1970s, on the assumption that slums were unavoidable but a<br />

temporary phenomenon that would be overcome by economic growth. In India, the<br />

reality <strong>of</strong> slums was first acknowledged in the Seventh Five Year Plan (1980-85)<br />

and city master plans just saw them as blank spots <strong>of</strong> undeveloped land. By mid<br />

1980's, when this policy <strong>of</strong> disregard proved ineffective in the face <strong>of</strong> continuing<br />

slum growth, governments pursues evictions, rationalized on the grounds that freed<br />

up space was required for urban renewal and infrastructure development.<br />

Upgrading <strong>of</strong> slums is about rejuvenation <strong>of</strong> the existing community with<br />

minimum disruption and loss <strong>of</strong> physical and social assets (DFID, 2000). Typically,<br />

upgrading provides security from eviction through regularization <strong>of</strong> land tenure<br />

and improvement in existing infrastructure. Successful upgrading strengthens a<br />

community's voice and ability to transform its own conditions and brings in<br />

substantial investment from residents into housing and small business expansion.<br />

India has had several experiences with successful upgrading yet upgrading


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

24<br />

solutions have not been acceptable to the government. Instead relocation is<br />

pursued, prompted by the desire to improve use <strong>of</strong> land and property on which<br />

slums are located (Cities Alliance). However, since relocation is usually to the city's<br />

edge, away from informal income opportunities <strong>of</strong> inner-city areas, such policies<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten perpetuate, rather than mitigate, conditions <strong>of</strong> poverty.<br />

Both Delhi and Mumbai have large numbers <strong>of</strong> slums housing nearly half the city's<br />

population <strong>of</strong> poor and migrants. As slums are encroachments on public land<br />

without legal land ownership rights for residents, housing here is impermanent with<br />

poor access to basic services, intolerable sanitary and health conditions,<br />

overpopulated in insecure neighbourhoods with continual threat <strong>of</strong> eviction,<br />

excluded from decisions and with enormous social and psychological burdens.<br />

Majority <strong>of</strong> slum households live below <strong>of</strong>ficial poverty lines, <strong>of</strong>ten unskilled and<br />

employed in the highly insecure informal sector. Srivastava notes that the informal<br />

sector accounts for 66.7% <strong>of</strong> total employment in Delhi and nearly the same share<br />

(68%) in Mumbai.<br />

2001 Census estimated 40.3 million slum dwellers in India, 1.85 million in Delhi<br />

and 6.2 million in Mumbai. For the same period, the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment<br />

estimated 4.7 million slum dwellers in Delhi living in the 1080 slums listed by the<br />

Municipal Corporation <strong>of</strong> Delhi. Official enumeration <strong>of</strong> slums in Mumbai in 1983<br />

was 1,930 settlements and recent estimates suggest that 54.7% <strong>of</strong> the city's<br />

population lives in 3.5% <strong>of</strong> its area in dense enclaves.<br />

Objectives<br />

The study was designed to:<br />

(i) Contribute to the body <strong>of</strong> research on slum resettlement in India, through<br />

comparing the costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> slum relocation and slum upgrading for all<br />

stakeholders;<br />

(ii) Make recommendations on the resettlement policy by providing concrete<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> successes and failures.


25<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Sample<br />

India's two largest cities, Delhi and Mumbai, with the country's most significant<br />

slum populations were selected for the study. Also, because the two have adopted<br />

very different approaches to slum redevelopment, relocation in Delhi versus<br />

upgrading or near site resettlement in Mumbai.<br />

Delhi<br />

Three resettled and three matched non-resettled sites were selected in Delhi using<br />

the following criteria:<br />

(i)<br />

Timing <strong>of</strong> relocation; within three years <strong>of</strong> the study for clear recall and for<br />

three different time periods since the move (6months, 12-18 months, up to 36<br />

months).<br />

(ii) Distance from old settlement to new site variable (5kms, 15km, 50km) to<br />

measure intensity <strong>of</strong> economic shock; and<br />

(iii) Size <strong>of</strong> settlement medium with approximately 1000 households.<br />

Mumbai<br />

Three upgraded sites and three non-upgraded control sites were selected. Upgraded<br />

sites were randomly selected from those that were part <strong>of</strong> the Slum Redevelopment<br />

Scheme 1995. Distance, time and size criteria were inapplicable here.<br />

Primary data was collected using both quantitative and qualitative tools. Detailed<br />

household questionnaires were used for the household survey. Households in the<br />

study were selected using a stratified random sampling methodology. 15<br />

households each from 4 parts <strong>of</strong> settlement were selected. A total <strong>of</strong> 360 households<br />

in Delhi, and 300 households in Mumbai were sampled to generate our quantitative<br />

database. Qualitative data was also collected through Participatory Learning and<br />

Action (PLA) tools. Secondary Data was collected from government departments<br />

and through interviews with <strong>of</strong>ficials.


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

26<br />

Table.1: Sample


27<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Data was used to assess the socio economic costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> relocation and<br />

upgrading using key variables <strong>of</strong> income, employment, expenditure, savings,<br />

loans, etc. Severity <strong>of</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> resettlement was ranked using seven<br />

development pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. An ANOVA calculation was applied to the scores to<br />

test significance at the rate <strong>of</strong> p>0.001 and an index <strong>of</strong> severity developed. The<br />

index was used to find the ten worst and ten least affected households from each site<br />

to analyse differential impact <strong>of</strong> resettlement and gauge resilience for shocks.<br />

Other statistical analysis included the Gini Coefficient, Head count Index and Sen<br />

Index.<br />

A two-stage analysis was completed with the collected data. Firstly, flow diagrams<br />

were created to illustrate the general trends and outcomes under relocation and<br />

upgrading. These diagrams became the jumping <strong>of</strong>f point for discussing the impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> relocation. Secondly, a ranking exercise <strong>of</strong> the severity <strong>of</strong> different outcomes <strong>of</strong><br />

relocation was conducted using 7 development pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who allocated scores<br />

to different consequences <strong>of</strong> resettlement according to severity. Ten worst affected<br />

and ten least affected households in each site were identified and their data analysed<br />

separately to gauge the impact <strong>of</strong> vulnerability <strong>of</strong> resettlement.<br />

A financial Cost Benefit Analysis was conducted using secondary data from<br />

government budgets and primary research. The present values <strong>of</strong> the costs (PV<br />

(C)) and benefits (PV (B)) were calculated, from which the net present value (NPV<br />

= PV (B) - PV (C) and the benefit-cost ratio PV (B): PV (C) <strong>of</strong> each approach were<br />

deduced. The necessary conditions for the economic validity <strong>of</strong> the project was that<br />

the NPV is positive (NPV>0) and the BCR greater than one.<br />

Data Constraints<br />

Some critical environmental costs <strong>of</strong> relocation such as resettlement on land refill<br />

sites with high toxic elements were beyond the parameters <strong>of</strong> the present study, but<br />

are highlighted here as critical area for further study.<br />

Right to relocation was not built into the plan for investigations, on the assumption<br />

that all would be rehabilitated. However, further research has illustrated that only a<br />

small % <strong>of</strong> evicted were granted the right to relocate. This key variable was not


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

28<br />

assessed during our data collection but is acknowledged within the study for further<br />

research on impact on those denied relocation rights.<br />

Study Findings<br />

1. The People<br />

Delhi: Prior to relocation, slum residents mostly worked as daily-wage labourers or<br />

in ad hoc construction work, were employed privately as sweepers, domestic<br />

workers, rickshaw pullers, vegetable vendors, etc. Post relocation households were<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered 18sqm or 12.5sqm plots <strong>of</strong> land for housing, and a mix <strong>of</strong> permanent and<br />

semi permanent structures were found on the site depending on length <strong>of</strong> stay in the<br />

relocated site. Provision <strong>of</strong> basic amenities was mostly temporary; water supplied<br />

from community hand pumps and tankers, poorly maintained community toilets,<br />

no drainage networks resulting in wastewater flows and unsanitary conditions.<br />

Facilities such as schools and health centres were under various stages <strong>of</strong><br />

construction.<br />

Mumbai: Slums in Mumbai were made up <strong>of</strong> around 350 to 400 families who lived<br />

in largely semi permanent hutments made from tin and plastic. Most residents were<br />

employed as daily wage labourers or engaged in small-scale home based activities,<br />

and women worked as domestic workers in nearby residential areas. For in situ<br />

upgrading, families were organised into a cooperative society. New housing<br />

society was within a 2 km range <strong>of</strong> a government school, hospital and local railway<br />

station, small and large markets for goods etc. Each family was provided a oneroom<br />

flat measuring 225 sq m with attached toilets. Children mostly continued in<br />

the same schools and people pursued the same livelihoods.


29<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Delhi<br />

Eviction<br />

Remain in slum<br />

No right to relocate<br />

Right to Relocate<br />

Move into new slum area......<br />

Keep Job 85.72% Changed Job 4.51% Lose Job 9.77%


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

30<br />

Upgraded Settlements<br />

Mumbai<br />

Non-Upgraded<br />

Settlement


31<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

2. Changes in Income, Employment Patterns and Livelihood Assets<br />

Resettled households in Delhi experienced a decrease in income <strong>of</strong> more than<br />

Rs.1000 per month compared to non resettled houses; the decrease being most<br />

significant for those who changed jobs in the new location (by Rs.1900pm) and<br />

those who lost jobs (Rs.1300pm). Surprisingly, decline in income was also found<br />

in the non-relocated sites, because families left behind were either the poorest<br />

(renters or people who opted out <strong>of</strong> resettlement because <strong>of</strong> low affordability) or<br />

d e p e n d e n t o n t h e<br />

internal economy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

settlement. In Mumbai,<br />

average household<br />

income in upgraded sites<br />

at Rs.5569 per month<br />

was 12.7% higher than<br />

the average household<br />

income <strong>of</strong> non-upgraded<br />

s i t e s . U p g r a d e d<br />

households were not<br />

only able to continue<br />

with their livelihoods,<br />

but also experienced<br />

income rises attributed<br />

to shelter security. Per<br />

capita incomes in Delhi<br />

declined between Rs277<br />

and Rs387 whereas<br />

i n c r e a s e d f o r a l l<br />

u p g r a d e d s i t e s i n<br />

M u m b a i b y<br />

R s . 7 0 0 . C h a n g e i n<br />

Employment<br />

Percentage<br />

Percentage<br />

Changes in Employment pattern after Relocation<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

2<br />

5<br />

20 19<br />

77 75<br />

Seasonal Daily Wage Full time<br />

Job status<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> earning members in relocated household dropped by 1.5% and about<br />

12% lost their jobs. Upgraded households in Mumbai experienced a very marginal<br />

increase in earning members by 0.4%, suggesting that as conditions improve<br />

0<br />

1<br />

Lost job<br />

Changes in Employment after Upgradation<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0 0 3 6<br />

Seasonal<br />

Daily<br />

Wage<br />

90 94<br />

Job Status<br />

Full time<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Lost job<br />

Non-resettled<br />

Resettled<br />

Upgraded<br />

Not Upgraded


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

32<br />

number <strong>of</strong> members required to work to meet household expenses may actually go<br />

down.<br />

Seasonal labour in relocated households doubled to 4.9% but daily wage work<br />

dropped due to rising distances to labour sites and fewer employment opportunities<br />

in vicinity <strong>of</strong> new neigbourhoods. Daily wage labour decreased at upgraded sites<br />

as well but was replaced by full-time employment that went up from 93.6% to<br />

96.2%.<br />

The decrease in jobs was most significant among women who were domestic<br />

workers and could not pursue work in absence <strong>of</strong> similar/suitable employment<br />

opportunities in the vicinity. Distance to old work sites, high transport costs, lack <strong>of</strong><br />

social safety nets due to an erosion <strong>of</strong> social capital in resettlement prevented<br />

women from working. In Mumbai, share <strong>of</strong> female workers however increased<br />

from 10 to over 17% from domestic work, daily wage and private sector<br />

employment.<br />

Ownership <strong>of</strong> household and livelihood assets declined following relocation.<br />

People were forced to sell assets due to payment pressure (for plot, shifting and<br />

house construction). Asset loss was most significant among those who changed<br />

jobs or became unemployed. Those who kept their jobs also held on to assets<br />

needed for the same (autos, carts etc). In Mumbai all upgraded households reported<br />

increase in assets as compared with non-upgraded sites including ownership <strong>of</strong><br />

assets <strong>of</strong> production such as auto rickshaws.<br />

3. Changes in Expenditure Patterns<br />

Changes in expenditure patterns <strong>of</strong> relocated households point to households in<br />

distress.<br />

(i) Their overall expenditures reduced by about Rs.1000 per month.<br />

(ii) Travel and health care costs increased from an average Rs.197 and Rs.123 to<br />

Rs.432 and Rs156 per month respectively. Simultaneously spending on<br />

education and food decreased from Rs.150 and Rs.1699 average per month to<br />

Rs.128 and Rs.1382 respectively.


33<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

(iii) Gap between income and expenditure decreased and households had less to<br />

save or for emergencies as compared to non-relocated households that saved<br />

an average Rs.400 per month.<br />

(iv) Expenditures exceeded incomes by Rs.30 to Rs.170 depending on length <strong>of</strong><br />

stay in the new sites.<br />

(v) Residents who changed their jobs experienced the greatest increase in<br />

expenses at Rs.750.<br />

In Mumbai, household<br />

expenditures in all three<br />

upgraded sites increased<br />

from gentrification,<br />

e d u c a t i o n a n d<br />

e n t e r t a i n m e n t . I n<br />

particular, spending on<br />

food increased by over<br />

Rs200 over past expenses<br />

and was twice that in nonupgraded<br />

areas.<br />

Percentage<br />

80<br />

40<br />

0<br />

-40<br />

-80<br />

-120<br />

-160<br />

Changes in Household Expenditure After Relocation<br />

(%)<br />

Food<br />

Clothing<br />

Education<br />

Travel<br />

Health<br />

Items <strong>of</strong> Expenditure<br />

Electricity<br />

Festivals etc<br />

Total<br />

%<br />

change<br />

Travel costs and modal shifts in transport were the most significant changes in<br />

relocated households. Monthly travel spend increased by an average Rs.424 per<br />

month, varying by distance and 119% over and above the Rs.197 per month pre<br />

relocation. Nearly 62% resettled families reported an increase in distance to work;<br />

the furthest being over four times from 8.1 km to 35.9 km. Those who continued<br />

hawking and vending and depended on the local economy experienced no change.<br />

A modal shift in transport was also noted; from walking to work place (25%) to<br />

using the local bus (75.9%). Use <strong>of</strong> bicycles declined by 16% as work places<br />

became distant and daily wage workers reported reduced earning hours and<br />

incomes.<br />

Relocation to non slummy sites was intended to improve health. Health costs on<br />

the other hand increased among relocated households by 21% and were attributed


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

34<br />

to ineffective water and sanitation services. Although, there was no change in<br />

access to public health services, that to government hospitals and NGO managed<br />

services decreased because <strong>of</strong> distance, increasing poor people's dependence on<br />

private doctors and health costs.<br />

Average monthly household savings <strong>of</strong> relocated households not only decreased<br />

from Rs392 to Rs250 but were nearly Rs200 less when compared with Rs596 in<br />

non-relocated households. Percent saving also dropped by half, from 6.91% to<br />

3.47%. In Mumbai, 6% more households in upgraded sites (28%) saved when<br />

compared with non-upgraded households (22%).<br />

Table. 2: Population seeking credit in Delhi sites<br />

Relocation also loaded families with additional costs for plot, shifting and<br />

rebuilding unlike in Mumbai where housing was free for which families (75%)<br />

reported borrowing from friends, relatives or private informal financial<br />

intermediaries (38%) at exorbitant interest rates. Relocation thus pushed<br />

households into a debt and poverty trap, however, moneylenders were still the<br />

preferred option as they were easy to access, required little or no paper work, had no<br />

loan ceilings and demanded no collateral. Monthly loans interest was estimated at<br />

Rs.470.<br />

As incomes decline, families have two options; first to reduce household<br />

expenditure. As expenditure on vital items such as food is already low, any further<br />

reduction can only lead to malnutrition and disease. Malnourishment in turn<br />

reduces work participation. The second option is to meet the income deficit<br />

through borrowing, typically from moneylenders at high interest rates. With poor<br />

assets and depleted savings, households slip into debt traps as was seen in Delhi<br />

where households compensated first by lowering expenditure on food and<br />

education and later by increasing borrowings.


35<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

4. Future compromised<br />

Relocation has adversely impacted schooling. As schools were still under<br />

construction and non-functional at the time <strong>of</strong> shifting, and children had to choose<br />

between returning to old schools or join a private neighbourhood school. Drop out<br />

rates more than doubled from 17.9% to 51.1% because <strong>of</strong> distance, reluctance<br />

among children to change schools and among parents to send children far away.<br />

Children were also needed at home to supplement incomes. Surprisingly drop out<br />

rates increased for non-resettled families as well as NGO-managed schools shut<br />

down. Non-resettled<br />

f a m i l i e s b e i n g<br />

among the poorest<br />

possibly has children<br />

out <strong>of</strong> school in the<br />

first place. In<br />

Mumbai, drop out<br />

rates declined from<br />

19.7% in upgraded<br />

as against 13.3% in<br />

non-upgraded sites.<br />

Percentage<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Reasons Given for Dropping Out <strong>of</strong> School<br />

School is Too Far Away Children Don't Want to<br />

go to New School<br />

Social capital eroded for relocated families, increasing their sense <strong>of</strong> insecurity<br />

(from 3% to 40%). Women were reluctant to leave children unattended in the new<br />

sites with new neighbours. In Mumbai, social capital not only remained intact but<br />

actually improved as residents got organized into cooperatives to facilitate<br />

upgrading.<br />

4. Little Improvement in Access to Physical Infrastructure<br />

Children Needed to<br />

Supplement Family<br />

Income<br />

Access to housing and basic services continued to be poor post relocation,<br />

neutralizing the development benefits <strong>of</strong> tenurial security and tenability.


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

36<br />

Table 3: Type <strong>of</strong> Housing in Mumbai and Delhi<br />

Housing improvements were measured on the basis <strong>of</strong> construction material using<br />

Census <strong>of</strong> India parameters. Temporary housing increased from 87% in nonresettled<br />

to 96% in resettled sites. All upgraded households in Mumbai experienced<br />

remarkable changes in housing conditions; permanent structures with in the house<br />

basic amenities as compared with just 55% in non upgraded areas. Unlike in<br />

upgrading, resettlement expects households to fend for themselves and those<br />

without resources to rebuild, experience reduction in housing quality. As house<br />

leases were issued just for 10 years, the threat <strong>of</strong> eviction persisted. Upgraded<br />

housing in Mumbai has attracted 1.5% more renters than non-upgraded sites,<br />

raising the spectre <strong>of</strong> gentrification and displacement <strong>of</strong> the poor.<br />

Despite legal ownership, none <strong>of</strong> the relocated households had access to piped<br />

water supply or toilets at home whereas nearly 25% in non-relocated sites had<br />

illegal water supply extensions from network supplies. Covered drainage reached<br />

just a small part <strong>of</strong> the settlement (5%) with slum like conditions starting to develop<br />

here. Non-relocated sites on the other hand had full drainage outreach; covered<br />

(25%) and uncovered (75%). In Mumbai, all upgraded households had in the house<br />

piped water supply and toilets. Resettled households were provided community<br />

t o i l e t s a n d n o<br />

underground sewerage<br />

for personal toilets on the<br />

assumption that plot sizes<br />

were too small for toilets.<br />

Solid waste collection<br />

services were also not<br />

available to resettled<br />

sites, but were reported<br />

by over 50% in old sites.<br />

Percentage<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Water and Sanitation Provisions in Delhi<br />

Piped<br />

Water<br />

Supply<br />

Covered<br />

Drains<br />

Open<br />

Drains<br />

No<br />

drains<br />

Resettled<br />

Not Resettled


37<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

5. Who is most vulnerable<br />

Households worst affected by relocation were those poor to start with and less<br />

equipped to deal with the socio-economic shock. As per the Tenth Five Year Plan,<br />

the urban poor can be classified into three groups: Core poor, Intermediate poor and<br />

Transitional Poor. Based on the Planning Commission's estimated urban poverty<br />

lines for 1999-2000 (Maharashtra: Rs.539.71 per capita per month, Delhi:<br />

Rs.505.45 per capita per month) households were classified by current incomes.<br />

The worst affected households were found to be in the 'intermediate poor' category<br />

(average per capita monthly income, Rs.489.80) and least affected in the<br />

transitional or non-poor group (average per capita monthly income, Rs.599.80).<br />

Table 4: Households below poverty line in selected sites in Delhi and Mumbai<br />

Poverty based on the vulnerability classification was found to have deepened.<br />

Compared to non-relocated sites, the change was 10%. In Mumbai, poverty<br />

reduced significantly following upgrading; the core poor reducing by over half, and<br />

the intermediate poor declining dramatically from 13.85%to 3.89%; an overall<br />

10% decline in incidence <strong>of</strong> poverty. Average monthly income in worst affected<br />

households dropped by 3.3% (at Rs2365) but remained constant for least affected<br />

families at Rs.3475. Primary earner and sometimes the second earner too, in the<br />

former lost his/her job, and reported 42 days <strong>of</strong> unemployment on relocation as<br />

compared to nil in the least affected families. Reasons for this was the low human<br />

capital, fewer years <strong>of</strong> schooling, slim savings because <strong>of</strong> low incomes, low asset


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

38<br />

ownership and inadequate skills to manage in new environments. Coping<br />

strategies included sale <strong>of</strong> assets among the worst affected and withdrawal <strong>of</strong><br />

children from school among least affected (12%) to supplement income, possible<br />

reason for their income status quo. This finding has long term implications on<br />

income from less educated children.<br />

The Sen Index <strong>of</strong> poverty was used to measure the incidence and intensity <strong>of</strong><br />

poverty within the group through the use <strong>of</strong> the Head Count Index and Gini<br />

Coefficient, and supported the above findings.<br />

The Head Count Index calculates the ratio <strong>of</strong> people living below the poverty<br />

line where a value <strong>of</strong> zero indicates non-poor and a value <strong>of</strong> one indicates<br />

poverty. Measures <strong>of</strong> Head Count Index suggest that poverty in upgraded<br />

households <strong>of</strong> Mumbai had declined significantly whereas for Delhi it had<br />

deepened following relocation.<br />

The Gini coefficient highlighted that not only had poverty increased amongst<br />

relocated households, but so had income inequality, which was found to be<br />

higher than in the non-relocated sites. In Mumbai too, increases in incomes <strong>of</strong><br />

upgraded households were commensurate with increases in inequality and<br />

there was the probability <strong>of</strong> some households having actually got poorer<br />

following upgrading as house ownership meant additional expenditure on<br />

services which were previously free, and payments for building maintenance<br />

charges etc.<br />

Table 5: Results <strong>of</strong> Sen Index for Delhi and Mumbai data


39<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Costs and Benefits <strong>of</strong> Resettlement<br />

1. Benefits <strong>of</strong> Relocation<br />

Perceived benefit <strong>of</strong> resettlement for local government is the economic value <strong>of</strong><br />

evacuated land for development purpose, which in turn generates employment and<br />

economic growth. Benefits for resettled families are from legal tenure. In on-site<br />

upgrading, benefits for residents include increased income and employment<br />

opportunities, as well as legal tenure status. In the cost-benefit analysis, three major<br />

benefits were calculated for far-site relocation:<br />

(i) Land value <strong>of</strong> evacuated site for commercial/developmental use;<br />

(ii) Revenue flow in terms <strong>of</strong> net taxes and charges to the city managers;<br />

(iii) Employment generated from the development projects in the evacuated sites.<br />

The main benefits for on-site upgradation were<br />

(i) Increased income to households;<br />

(ii) Self-investment by families reducing investments by government on<br />

relocation projects.<br />

Land value <strong>of</strong> evacuated site: The land values <strong>of</strong> evacuated sites were estimated.<br />

Prior to relocation households were occupying an estimated 21.7sq.m. area but got<br />

18 sq. m or 12.5 sq. m plots <strong>of</strong> the 50 sq.m. per household designed in the<br />

resettlement scheme, the balance being used for roads, parks, common services,<br />

etc. Costs for resettlement have therefore been estimated at 50sq.mts. Average<br />

number <strong>of</strong> households relocated in Delhi in 1999-2000 and 2003-04 was an<br />

estimated 7868 per year. The land value <strong>of</strong> the evacuated areas as per real estate<br />

estimates is very high as these are prime areas in the city and estimated at<br />

Rs.21531.08 per sq. m (Rs.21.53Crore/hectare). For a single relocated household,<br />

the value <strong>of</strong> evacuated land is Rs.467,000 (i.e.Rs.21531.08/sq.m * 21.7 sq. m).<br />

Net taxes and charges: The evacuated land can be successfully commercialised<br />

with revenue to the city in terms <strong>of</strong> taxes and charges for civic amenities. It is<br />

assumed that one percent <strong>of</strong> land value <strong>of</strong> evacuated land can be generated as net<br />

taxes and charges from development projects. This has been estimated as Rs.4670<br />

per hectare.


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

40<br />

Employment Generation: Development projects on evacuated land can provide<br />

employment opportunities. It is assumed that about 200 people can get employment<br />

from one hectare <strong>of</strong> evacuated land from suitable development projects or<br />

commercial activities. The income generated from such activities has been<br />

estimated as Rs.600,000 per hectare per year. From the evacuated land <strong>of</strong> one<br />

relocated household this income is about Rs.10,890 per year.<br />

2. Benefits <strong>of</strong> Upgrading<br />

Household incomes in Mumbai had increased by an average 12.7%. If resettlement<br />

in Delhi had been through onsite upgrading it is assumed that household incomes<br />

would have increased in the same proportion. The average household income <strong>of</strong><br />

non-relocated households in Delhi was estimated as Rs.3674.6 per month and<br />

expected to increase by Rs.466.67 per month per household, or approximately<br />

Rs.5600 per household per year if upgraded.<br />

Table. 6: Estimated benefits <strong>of</strong> relocation for one household in Delhi<br />

3. Costs <strong>of</strong> Resettlement<br />

The cost <strong>of</strong> resettlement is <strong>of</strong>ten underestimated and excludes social costs and those<br />

incurred by each relocated household as also the impact <strong>of</strong> displacement on the city<br />

economy. In this study, costs <strong>of</strong> resettlement were estimated for government and<br />

residents to understand the economic viability <strong>of</strong> relocation given below.


41<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Table 7: Estimated Cost <strong>of</strong> Relocation <strong>of</strong> selected items for one household<br />

in Delhi (at 2004 prices)<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> procurement <strong>of</strong> land for relocation: Land for relocation is usually<br />

purchased at sites far away from the city centres, where it is cheaper. Average land<br />

value was estimated as Rs.8.36 crores per hectare or Rs 418,000 per relocated<br />

family at 50sq.m.<br />

Civic amenities: Delhi's resettlement plan provides Rs.10,000 per plot for civic<br />

amenities, land owing agencies contribute Rs.29,000 per plot for 18 sq.mt and<br />

Rs.20,000 for 12.5 sq.mt; contributions from beneficiaries is fixed at Rs5000 for<br />

both sizes. Total spending on amenities for 18 and 12.5 sq.m plots is Rs.44,000 and<br />

Rs.35,000 respectively. From <strong>of</strong>ficial information, cost for civic amenities was<br />

estimated at Rs.40,000 per household.<br />

Other costs: Other costs in the cost-benefit analysis are summarized in table 8 and<br />

include mainly income and expenditure analysis <strong>of</strong> households. The non-recurring<br />

cost for house and related relocation costs such as shifting costs, etc. has been<br />

calculated as Rs.68445 per household. The cost <strong>of</strong> providing a bus service was<br />

estimated at Rs.2628 per household per year at Rs.30 per km and a minimum 4 trips


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

42<br />

are assumed. Losses per month per household from lower Incomes are estimated as<br />

Rs.1182.5, additional travel as Rs.226.9, additional health care at Rs.33 and loss <strong>of</strong><br />

savings at Rs.142.79. Further, it is likely that relocation costs will be higher than<br />

presented in this analysis as we were unable to acquire data for costs such as<br />

administration, consultation and area surveys, compensation or resettlement cost<br />

(costs that should be paid to residents to resettle).<br />

4. Cost-Benefit Analysis<br />

A cost-benefit analysis was applied to costs and benefits above. Two scenarios were<br />

considered:<br />

Scenario I: Resettlement with relocation and utilizing evacuated land for<br />

development/ commercial purposes.<br />

Scenario II: Resettlement with onsite upgrading on 60% land, utilizing the<br />

remaining 40% for development/commercial purposes.<br />

Benefits and costs were estimated /projected over a period <strong>of</strong> 10 years starting from<br />

2004. The present values <strong>of</strong> costs and benefits were worked out with the real<br />

interest rate <strong>of</strong> 8 per cent, the difference between the social discount rate (12%) and<br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> inflation (4%). The Net Present Value (NPV) and Benefit Cost Ratio<br />

(BCR) were calculated to determine the economic viability <strong>of</strong> the resettlement<br />

project. In order for a particular scenario to be economically viable, the NPV is<br />

required to be positive (i.e. NPV >0) and the BCR greater than one (BCR >1).<br />

For far-site relocation the present value <strong>of</strong> benefits was calculated at Rs.5,80,000<br />

per household, and the cost at Rs.10,16,000 per household, giving a NPV <strong>of</strong> 4.35<br />

and BCR 0.57. This suggests that relocation is not an economically viable option.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> onsite upgrading, the present value <strong>of</strong> benefits was Rs.2,69,000 per<br />

household and costs were Rs.2,57,000 per households, giving a positive NPV <strong>of</strong><br />

0.51 and a BCR <strong>of</strong> 1.24. This suggests this option is a more economically viable<br />

approach.


43<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Table 8: Case I: Benefit-cost Analysis <strong>of</strong> relocation with development project in the evacuated site.


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

44<br />

Table 9: Case II: BCA with the option <strong>of</strong> onsite up-gradation <strong>of</strong> resettlement in Delhi.


45<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Table 10: Cost-Benefit Analysis <strong>of</strong> Resettlement options<br />

Note: Present values are estimated at 8 percent real interest rate for a period <strong>of</strong> 10 years<br />

{Real Interest rate (8%)= Social Discount rate (12%)-Rate <strong>of</strong> Inflation (4%)}


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

46<br />

Conclusions<br />

Far site resettlement is significantly more costly for residents than on-site<br />

upgrading. Whilst benefits for government authorities are less in upgrading<br />

schemes, the significantly lower costs for government and residents in this make<br />

this a preferable option. The cost <strong>of</strong> resettlement was very high for residents and<br />

resulted in loss <strong>of</strong> jobs, decreases in income, increases in expenditures, loss <strong>of</strong><br />

assets and termination <strong>of</strong> education; invisible costs that will impact city economy in<br />

the long term.<br />

Poor employment opportunities in resettlement areas, particularly among women,<br />

are high. Minimal requirements for continuation <strong>of</strong> work among women after<br />

resettlement (travel, safety, child care) had led to a decrease in the proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

women working with possible disempowerment. This has huge long term<br />

implications in a gender-biased society and among the poor.<br />

Reduction in full time employment in resettled areas or loss <strong>of</strong> jobs, substantial<br />

increases in travel expenses from increased distance to work sites, severe mismatch<br />

between skills and employment opportunities mean tremendous hardships for<br />

families which require minimum <strong>of</strong> 5 years to overcome. The significant impact is<br />

on environment through increases in use <strong>of</strong> personal vehicles and extensions <strong>of</strong><br />

transport networks to far away areas.<br />

Relocation also leaves a void in the inner city areas and affects the city economy as<br />

informal services and daily wages get more expensive. Demand draws new<br />

slumdwellers into vacated areas and or resettled families to move back into other<br />

slums. The failure <strong>of</strong> the policy to acknowledge the critical link between slum<br />

dwellers and the informal sector, upon which the city economy relies, is inherent in<br />

the shortcomings <strong>of</strong> resettlement policy. Successful slum development plans must<br />

link housing with employment arrangements. Increased spending on health from<br />

inadequate water and sanitation services, malnutrition and non-availability <strong>of</strong><br />

government health services suggests that benefits <strong>of</strong> tenure security may in fact be<br />

nullified.<br />

Negative impact on education with a 50% increase in drop out rates so that children


47<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

could supplement family incomes when contrasted with better school attendance at<br />

upgraded Mumbai sites has long term implications; <strong>of</strong> low human capital<br />

development among the poorest and their ability to break the poverty cycle. The<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> resettlement are felt more so by those who remain behind. Credit<br />

from private moneylenders pushes households into poverty and debt traps, and the<br />

informal nature <strong>of</strong> private money-lending arrangements can dis-inherit the poor<br />

through unrealistic debt repayment schedules.<br />

Upgrading is a win-win option for the local government and households.<br />

Governments at the national, state and city level need to recognize the benefit <strong>of</strong><br />

upgrading and ensure that this is the primary option for slum development.<br />

Relocation should be conditional and undertaken only if absolutely essential and<br />

city renewal should not be seen as a valid reason for relocation.


Economics <strong>of</strong> Resettling Low-income Settlements (Slums) in<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Areas: A Case for On-site Upgrading<br />

48<br />

Bibliography<br />

1) CURE-DJB-WSP, 2005, Draft Report on Status <strong>of</strong> water and sanitation<br />

services in urban poor communities <strong>of</strong> Delhi.<br />

2) Delhi Development Authority, 1990, Perspective Master Plan for Delhi 2001,<br />

New Delhi.<br />

3) Delhi Development Authority, 2000, Report <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Group on Population<br />

Projections and Demographic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile for Preparation <strong>of</strong> Master Plan for<br />

Delhi - 2021, New Delhi.<br />

4) Government <strong>of</strong> India, 2001, Poverty Estimates for 1999-2000, Press<br />

Information Bureau, 22 February: New Delhi.<br />

5) Government <strong>of</strong> India, 1997, White paper on Pollution in Delhi, Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Environment and Forests.<br />

6) Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>National</strong> Capital Territory <strong>of</strong> Delhi, 1997, Problems and Issues<br />

Relating to Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Slum Dwellers in Delhi, Report <strong>of</strong> the Expert<br />

Group: New Delhi.<br />

7) Jhabvala, R, 1997, Employment and Income in the Unorganised Sector:<br />

Implications for policy. In R. Sudarshan (Ed.). Gender Employment and<br />

Health: Perspectives from India and Sri Lanka. pp. 31-61, <strong>National</strong> Applied<br />

Economic Research: New Delhi.<br />

8) Khosla, R, 2003, Community Women Leaders in the <strong>Urban</strong> Basic Services for<br />

the Poor Programme: an Empirical Study, PhD Dissertation,<br />

9) Khosla, R, 2000, Women and Sanitation: The <strong>Urban</strong> Reality, Experiences <strong>of</strong><br />

Government Programmes, NGOs and CBOs, Social Change: Issues and<br />

Perspectives, Journal <strong>of</strong> the Council for Social Development, Vol.30, No.1&2,<br />

192-207.<br />

10) Kundu, A, and Sharma, A.N. 2001, Informal Sector in India. <strong>Institute</strong> for<br />

Human Development and <strong>Institute</strong> for Applied Manpower research, New<br />

Delhi.<br />

11) Kundu, A, 1994, Employment- Poverty Linkage in <strong>Urban</strong> Areas, Centre for the<br />

Study <strong>of</strong> Regional development, JNU, ARTEP/ILO.<br />

12) Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Development, 2001, Reducing <strong>Urban</strong> Poverty in India,<br />

NIUA , New Delhi.<br />

13) Mitra, A, Growth and Employment Relations, <strong>National</strong> Seminar on Economic<br />

Reforms and Employment in Indian Economy


49<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

14) Municipal Corporation <strong>of</strong> Delhi, Study <strong>of</strong> Socio-Economic Survey <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Slum Dwellers in 19 JJ Clusters covered under the Survey <strong>of</strong> Shalimar Bagh<br />

Constituency, New Delhi<br />

15) Natarajan, K.S. Population Projections for <strong>National</strong> Capital Region 1996-<br />

2021, New Delhi<br />

16) <strong>National</strong> Capital Region Planning Board, 1999, Delhi 1999 - A Fact Sheet,<br />

New Delhi.<br />

17) <strong>National</strong> Sample Survey Organisation, 2000, Non-Agricultural Enterprises in<br />

the Informal Sector in India, 1999-2000, (NSS 55th Round), New Delhi.<br />

18) Roy, D, 2000, Sanjha Manch, Hazard Centre, New Delhi.<br />

19) Sastry, N.S. 2002, Preservation Of Micro Data On Informal Economy At<br />

<strong>National</strong> Level: Case Study Of India , Paper presented during International<br />

Labour Conference, Geneva.<br />

20) Sparc, 1985, We the invisible: A census <strong>of</strong> pavement dwellers, Mumbai.<br />

21) Srivastava, Rahul. “The informal sector and urban poverty” [Online]<br />

Available, January 2005


Fiscal Performance <strong>of</strong> Civic Bodies: The Greater<br />

Mumbai Perspective<br />

50<br />

Fiscal Performance <strong>of</strong> Civic Bodies: The Greater<br />

Mumbai Perspective<br />

Anita Rath<br />

Abstract<br />

th<br />

74 Constitutional Amendment Act has widened the functional domain <strong>of</strong> civic<br />

bodies. However, their fiscal duress has not been eased out and the intergovernmental<br />

fiscal framework continues to gravitate towards higher level <strong>of</strong><br />

governments. Fiscal divide <strong>of</strong> the cities, wherein some rely heavily on intergovernmental<br />

transfers while others enjoy comfortable fiscal position, is quite<br />

conspicuous. In this context, it is pertinent to review the fiscal nuances <strong>of</strong><br />

Municipal Corporation <strong>of</strong> Greater Mumbai (MCGM), which belongs to the latter<br />

cohort. MCGM is the largest civic body in the country whose fiscal magnitude<br />

even exceeds that <strong>of</strong> some states in India. MCGM relies completely on its own<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> revenue and demonstrates fiscal surplus in its accounts. However, there<br />

are issues with its apparent fiscal composure. It has access to a forbidden source <strong>of</strong><br />

revenue, the octroi, and there is perpetual negligence <strong>of</strong> capital expenditure. This<br />

paper underscores key issues related to the finances <strong>of</strong> MCGM.<br />

________________________________________________________________<br />

Civic finance in India remains a matter <strong>of</strong> concern. It assumes significance as on the<br />

one hand, the pace and pattern <strong>of</strong> urbanization is unprecedented while on the other,<br />

there is absence <strong>of</strong> any well defined arrangement for the devolution <strong>of</strong> funds to civic<br />

bodies. The fiscal divide <strong>of</strong> the civic bodies is quite conspicuous in such a scenario.<br />

Not only is there vertical inequity in terms <strong>of</strong> larger and smaller bodies having very<br />

different level <strong>of</strong> fiscal autonomy, but also horizontal inequity remains a<br />

contemporary reality, wherein civic bodies <strong>of</strong> similar size confront different fiscal<br />

situation. There could be a host <strong>of</strong> factors contributing to the relative fiscal<br />

autonomy <strong>of</strong> these civic bodies. Not much is also known about the fiscal behavior<br />

<strong>of</strong> civic bodies. A study <strong>of</strong> civic finance, which can provide useful insights on these<br />

issues, is greatly constrained by the non-availability <strong>of</strong> reliable information. In such<br />

a scenario, case studies <strong>of</strong> certain local bodies which stand out in terms <strong>of</strong> their


51 <strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

fiscal position would be useful. The Municipal Corporation <strong>of</strong> Greater Mumbai<br />

(MCGM) <strong>of</strong>fers an interesting case for study from this perspective.<br />

At the outset, some stylized facts about the fiscal situation <strong>of</strong> MCGM are presented.<br />

MCGM is the largest local body in terms <strong>of</strong> its fiscal score. As per the Budget<br />

Statement <strong>of</strong> the current financial year 2009-10, its total expenditure is Rs. 20,000<br />

crores (budget estimates, excluding that <strong>of</strong> Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and<br />

Transport-BEST, a subsidiary <strong>of</strong> MCGM). Again, MCGM's revenue income<br />

constitutes almost two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the total revenue income <strong>of</strong> all Municipal<br />

1<br />

Corporations in the state. Interestingly, its fiscal magnitude also surpasses that <strong>of</strong><br />

2<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the states in India. Its per capita revenue income exceeds that <strong>of</strong> the state,<br />

i.e. Maharashtra. It is worth reckoning that MCGM maintains this high fiscal<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile through mainly its own sources <strong>of</strong> revenue.<br />

There are issues with the finances <strong>of</strong> MCGM despite this apparent fiscal composure<br />

as indicated by an earlier study (Rath, 2008). The current paper considers these<br />

issues by extending the scope <strong>of</strong> the analysis and by incorporating the latest<br />

information. The scheme <strong>of</strong> presentation <strong>of</strong> the paper is as follows. An orientation<br />

to the structure <strong>of</strong> MCGM's budget and its fiscal pr<strong>of</strong>ile is attempted in the first<br />

section. Subsequently, major fiscal indicators <strong>of</strong> the Corporation are analysed. This<br />

constitutes a discussion on revenue effort, fiscal balance, fiscal marksmanship, and<br />

fiscal autonomy. Final observations are outlined in the last section.<br />

I<br />

Structure <strong>of</strong> the Budget and Basic Fiscal Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

MCGM initiated the processes <strong>of</strong> budgetary reform in 2005 for converting the Cash<br />

Based Double Entry Accounting System into Accrual Based Double Entry<br />

Accounting System in accordance with the principles, procedures and formats<br />

specified in the <strong>National</strong> Municipal Accounts Manual as circulated by the<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> India, and as per the guidelines issued by the Comptroller and<br />

Accountant General. Budget statements for MCGM since 2007-08 have adopted<br />

this new format. MCGM also presents outcome-based budget estimates now,<br />

indicating the physical outcomes expected out <strong>of</strong> various budgetary provisions.<br />

MCGM has also taken some initiatives for gender budgeting in recent years. Due to


Fiscal Performance <strong>of</strong> Civic Bodies: The Greater<br />

Mumbai Perspective<br />

52<br />

all these changes, Outline <strong>of</strong> Civic Finance, one <strong>of</strong> the key financial documents <strong>of</strong><br />

MCGM, has been discontinued since 2006-07 and the Budget Document remains<br />

the sole source <strong>of</strong> information on the finances <strong>of</strong> the Corporation since 2007-08.<br />

An orientation to various sub-budgets <strong>of</strong> MCGM is in order prior to any<br />

deliberation on its fiscal situation. The overall budget <strong>of</strong> MCGM is divided into six<br />

sub-budgets. Though, all individual budgets are not self contained and there are<br />

inter-budget flows, there is segregation <strong>of</strong> important functional domain. These subbudgets<br />

are Budget A (General Administration), B (Improvement Schemes), E<br />

(Education Fund), G (Water and Sewerage), C (Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and<br />

Transport B.E.S.T.) and Tree Authority Budget (T.A.). Table 1 reveals the fiscal<br />

details <strong>of</strong> these sub-budgets. This paper considers all budgets except the budget <strong>of</strong><br />

BEST (C) for the analysis. This selection seems appropriate due to two reasons.<br />

Firstly, BEST is almost a separate entity and its budget is prepared and presented<br />

independently. Secondly, supply <strong>of</strong> electricity and provision <strong>of</strong> transport facility<br />

are not the common functional domain <strong>of</strong> other local bodies and thus, this selection<br />

facilitates a comparison <strong>of</strong> the fiscal performance <strong>of</strong> MCGM with other<br />

Corporations.<br />

Significance <strong>of</strong> various sub-budgets in the total expenditure <strong>of</strong> the Corporation can<br />

be deciphered from Table 2. Figure 1A provides the graphical exposition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

inter-budget comparison <strong>of</strong> the fiscal share. It shows that Budget A and C have<br />

almost equal share (around 40%) in total expenditure and G accounts for around<br />

one-eighth. Education fund (E) has an expenditure <strong>of</strong> 7 per cent in the total. Budget<br />

B and T.A. jointly account for around 2 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total allocation. As regards<br />

the capital expenditure, Budget A and G account for around 40 per cent each in the<br />

total capital expenses incurred by MCGM during this period. Around 12 per cent is<br />

spent by B.E.S.T. towards its capital expenses. Figure 1 shows the comparative<br />

position <strong>of</strong> sub-budgets excluding BEST, which suggests that the share <strong>of</strong> Budget A<br />

is almost two-third <strong>of</strong> the total revenue expenditure <strong>of</strong> the rest. Thus, Budget A, G<br />

and C are important in terms <strong>of</strong> their share in the overall fiscal scenario <strong>of</strong> MCGM.<br />

An analysis <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> revenue income <strong>of</strong> the Corporation for the period 2002-03<br />

to 2006-07, indicates that octroi is the single most important source <strong>of</strong> revenue<br />

income. On an average, around 45 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total income accrues from octroi


53 <strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

(Table 3). Property tax contributes to 13 to 14 per cent (excluding G-Budget taxes<br />

like water and Sewerage taxes which are levied on property tax base for properties<br />

without water meter). Water and sewerage tariff and taxes contribute to around a<br />

quarter <strong>of</strong> the total revenue income.<br />

It is worthwhile to note here that the G-Budget gets around 50 per cent <strong>of</strong> its income<br />

from charges as per meter reading, 30 to 35 per cent from taxes and 10 to 15 per cent<br />

from miscellaneous sources. The tax component is levied on the rateable value, the<br />

base <strong>of</strong> property tax. Thus, the total contribution from property tax (exclusive <strong>of</strong><br />

government taxes) is around 25 per cent. This suggests that the two major sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> revenue, i.e. octroi and property tax, jointly contribute more than two-third <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total revenue income <strong>of</strong> the Corporation. Annual growth rate <strong>of</strong> property tax is the<br />

same as that <strong>of</strong> total revenue income during this period (12.5%) while the growth<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> octroi is higher (13.5%).<br />

A similar analysis for capital accounts (for A, B, E and G budgets and for the same<br />

five year period) reveals that around 80 per cent accrue from transfers from revenue<br />

account and less than 5 per cent are raised through loans. The share contributed<br />

from the revenue account is much higher in case <strong>of</strong> G-budget (90%).<br />

MCGM is involved in a wide array <strong>of</strong> civic functions. An activity-wise break up <strong>of</strong><br />

the revenue expenditure (average for recent three years: 2001-02 to 2003-04)<br />

shows that the major heads <strong>of</strong> expenditure are water and sewerage activities,<br />

management <strong>of</strong> solid waste and storm water drains, and the social sector. Education<br />

and health jointly account for around a quarter <strong>of</strong> the total revenue expenditure.<br />

Expenditure on water and sewerage constitute around 20 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total.<br />

Expenses on solid waste management and storm water drains jointly involve more<br />

than 10 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total expenditure.<br />

It is important to discern the share <strong>of</strong> employee cost and debt charges in the total<br />

expenditure. Expenditure on wages and debt charges (excluding Budget C), on an<br />

average, constitute 50 per cent and 11 per cent <strong>of</strong> total revenue expenditure<br />

respectively during 2002-03 to 2004-05 (see Figure 2). Thus, less than two-fifth <strong>of</strong><br />

the total revenue expenditure is actually spent on operation and maintenance. It is<br />

worthwhile to mention here that the wage bill for Budget E is the highest with


Fiscal Performance <strong>of</strong> Civic Bodies: The Greater<br />

Mumbai Perspective<br />

54<br />

almost three-fourth <strong>of</strong> the total expenditure spent on employees. In case <strong>of</strong> Budgets<br />

A and C it is around 50 per cent and 25 per cent respectively. Around 50 per cent is<br />

allocated for employee cost and debt charges in case <strong>of</strong> Budget G. Table 4, which<br />

presents a different break up <strong>of</strong> revenue expenditure for the period 2002-03 to<br />

2006-07, reveals that total establishment expenditure is around 53 per cent and the<br />

actual maintenance expenditure is about 15 per cent.<br />

II<br />

Fiscal Prudence<br />

This section analyses the overall fiscal performance <strong>of</strong> the Corporation. Various<br />

measures considered here are revenue effort, fiscal balance, fiscal marksmanship<br />

and fiscal autonomy. Revenue effort indicates how successful MCGM has been in<br />

raising revenue proportionate to the economic progress <strong>of</strong> the region. The fiscal<br />

balance measures unravel the fiscal solvency <strong>of</strong> the Corporation as per various<br />

accounting procedures. Fiscal marksmanship, the third indicator, reveals the<br />

transparency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> budget preparation exercise by way <strong>of</strong> showing<br />

the gap between the budgeted and actual figures. Finally, a discussion on fiscal<br />

autonomy <strong>of</strong> MCGM underscores some issues with its major revenue instruments.<br />

2. 1 Revenue Effort<br />

MCGM's revenue income has kept pace with the changing economic scenario <strong>of</strong><br />

the district. A comparison between the revenue proceeds <strong>of</strong> the MCGM and the Net<br />

District Domestic Product (NDDP) <strong>of</strong> Greater Mumbai makes this fact apparent.<br />

The revenue receipt <strong>of</strong> MCGM was 5.6 per cent <strong>of</strong> NDDP <strong>of</strong> Greater Mumbai in<br />

3<br />

1993-94. It has now improved to become 8.5 per cent in 2006-07 (see Figure 3) . In<br />

the first 7 years up until 1999-2000 this share, on an average, has only been 5.8 per<br />

cent, however, in the subsequent 7 year period it has gone up to 8 per cent. During<br />

1993-94 to 2006-07, NDDP <strong>of</strong> Greater Mumbai grew at an annual trend rate <strong>of</strong> 8.7<br />

per cent where as the revenue income <strong>of</strong> the Corporation (exclusive <strong>of</strong> C) grew at<br />

12.4 per cent. Thus, the pace <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> revenue income <strong>of</strong> the Corporation is<br />

faster than that <strong>of</strong> NDDP. This is also reflected in the elasticity <strong>of</strong> the revenue<br />

income <strong>of</strong> MCGM with respect to NDDP during this period, which is 1.36.


55 <strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

A perusal <strong>of</strong> Figure 3, however, reveals that the growing percentage <strong>of</strong> MCGM's<br />

revenue in NDDP has not been quite steady over the reference period. There is an<br />

upward shift in the trend in the year 2000-01, when MCGM's revenue as a<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> NDDP was the highest (8.6%). Almost 60 per cent <strong>of</strong> this increase in<br />

the revenue receipts over the previous year is due to the increase in the proceeds<br />

from the octroi (40%) and property tax (20%). Hike in the rates <strong>of</strong> both property tax<br />

and the octroi during this period has contributed mainly to this increased returns.<br />

2.2 Fiscal Balance<br />

Different deficit indicators are used here to decipher the fiscal health <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Corporation. These are revenue, conventional and fiscal deficit. Revenue Deficit<br />

indicates the hiatus between receipts and expenditures in the revenue accounts.<br />

Conventional deficit is the overall surplus or deficit and equals the difference<br />

between total expenditure and total receipts (both revenue and capital). Fiscal<br />

deficit indicates the gap between total expenditure (revenue and capital) and the<br />

total <strong>of</strong> revenue receipts and other non-debt creating receipts (capital receipts net <strong>of</strong><br />

debt). Table 5 presents detailed information in this regard for the period 1991-92 to<br />

2006-07. It can be observed that MCGM maintains surplus in its revenue account<br />

all through except for one year. It also has conventional surplus in 13 out <strong>of</strong> this 16<br />

year period. However, as per the fiscal deficit measure, one finds deficits in the first<br />

nine years and surplus subsequently (see Figure 4). It reveals that the debt<br />

component constitutes an important part <strong>of</strong> the capital account till 2001-02 (80%),<br />

however, in the next five year period the reliance on debt for capital account is quite<br />

low (14%).<br />

Municipal investment expenditures are crucial in shaping the infrastructure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

city. It is more than 40 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total municipal expenditure in countries like<br />

Portugal, Slovenia and Czech Republic, and more than 30 per cent in case <strong>of</strong><br />

Switzerland, Slovakia and Ireland (Bailey, 1999). For a megalopolis like Greater<br />

Mumbai, the crucial role <strong>of</strong> the Corporation's investment expenditure needs no<br />

emphasis. The state <strong>of</strong> capital expenditure <strong>of</strong> MCGM has been a major concern as<br />

revealed in the earlier work which considered 13 year period from 1991-92 to 2003-<br />

04 (Rath, 2008). It noted that growth rate <strong>of</strong> the per capita capital expenditure (real)<br />

was virtually zero during this period. The share <strong>of</strong> capital expenditure in total


Fiscal Performance <strong>of</strong> Civic Bodies: The Greater<br />

Mumbai Perspective<br />

56<br />

expenditure was consistently falling and on an average, more than two-fifths <strong>of</strong> the<br />

budgeted capital expenditure was never spent. Here, the analysis is extended by<br />

including latest three years and thus it pertains to 16 year period from 1991-1992 to<br />

2006-07. The capital expenditure has got some boost in the last two years. It can be<br />

noticed from Table 5 that the annual change in capital expenditure in 2005-06 and<br />

2006-07 over the previous years has been around 70 and 45 per cent respectively.<br />

The growth <strong>of</strong> per capita expenditure in current prices (1991-92 to 2006-07)<br />

presented in Figure 5 reveals that after a long stagnancy in capital expenditure it has<br />

only now taken an upward movement since 2005-06. This is reflected in the slightly<br />

higher growth rate <strong>of</strong> capital expenditure during this 16 year period. It can be<br />

observed from Table 5 that the annual trend growth rate <strong>of</strong> revenue and capital<br />

expenditure in current prices are 12.2 and 10.2 per cent respectively during this<br />

period. After accounting for the escalation in cost <strong>of</strong> living indices and the growing<br />

population, annual trend growth rate in per capita (real) revenue and capital<br />

expenditure are 4.0 and 1.9 per cent respectively.<br />

The share <strong>of</strong> capital expenditure in total, which has been declining consistently, has<br />

shown some positive improvement in the last two years. This trend is explicit in the<br />

Figure 6. Capital expenditure was 24.3% <strong>of</strong> the total expenditure in 1991-92. Since<br />

then it has been declining continuously and became 12.5 per cent in 2004-05. The<br />

capital expenditure has picked up since 2005-06 and its share in total expenditure is<br />

22 per cent in 2006-07. Despite these positive trends, severe pruning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

budgeted capital expenditure has been happening undeterred as would be revealed<br />

in the subsequent discussion.<br />

2.4 Fiscal Marksmanship<br />

Another indicator <strong>of</strong> fiscal prudence, the fiscal marksmanship, demonstrates how<br />

far the budgeted targets are actually realized. It shows the transparency as well as<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the budget preparation exercise (see Karnik, 2002). The relevant<br />

information in this regard is furnished in the Table 6.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> revenue expenditure, it can be observed that the gaps are very much<br />

within limits except for 2000-01 and 2001-02 (see Fig 7). However, in case <strong>of</strong><br />

capital accounts one observes a huge gap between the actual and the budgeted


57 <strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

figures (see Fig 8). From the Table 3 it can be deciphered that the gap between the<br />

two is not only huge but also it is increasing. It shows that almost half <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

budgeted capital expenditure during this ten year period is never incurred.<br />

It is important to note that there would have been deficits in all the years during the<br />

reference period (1997-98 to 2006-07) had the budgeted capital expenditure were<br />

actually incurred. There is fiscal surplus on the aggregate during this ten year<br />

period. If the budgeted capital expenditure were actually incurred there would have<br />

been a fiscal deficit to the tune <strong>of</strong> 10 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total expenditure as against a<br />

surplus <strong>of</strong> 6 per cent during this period.<br />

2.4 Fiscal Autonomy<br />

Fiscal autonomy <strong>of</strong> the civic bodies are greatly circumscribed by the access to<br />

productive own sources <strong>of</strong> revenue. Bahl and Linn (1992) in their comprehensive<br />

work on urban finance observe, “[C] changes in locally raised resources determine<br />

the ability <strong>of</strong> an urban government to expand its services. Where locally raised<br />

revenues fare badly, urban government expenditure suffers, where they do well,<br />

urban expenditure thrives” (p. 43). MCGM is doing well on this front as almost cent<br />

per cent <strong>of</strong> its revenue are self-generated. As can be found from the Table 3 that<br />

MCGM's reliance on the grants is limited to around 2 to 3 per cent <strong>of</strong> its total<br />

revenue income.<br />

MCGM demonstrates a case <strong>of</strong> high fiscal autonomy. However, there are<br />

contentious issues associated with its major revenue sources. It is raising almost a<br />

half <strong>of</strong> its revenue income from octroi, which is one <strong>of</strong> the most contentious taxes <strong>of</strong><br />

the local bodies. Being the economic capital <strong>of</strong> the country and a mega<br />

consumption centre, octroi remains a perennial source <strong>of</strong> revenue in a city like<br />

Greater Mumbai. The state has abolished it in the municipal councils and have<br />

announced for its abolition in 15 municipal Corporations. MCGM has somehow<br />

successfully managed to maintain the status quo. The fiscal autonomy <strong>of</strong> the city<br />

would seriously suffer in its absence, a danger which always hovers around with the<br />

talk <strong>of</strong> its abolition time and again (see Rath, 2009).<br />

Rental value based property tax system in Greater Mumbai is shrouded in


Fiscal Performance <strong>of</strong> Civic Bodies: The Greater<br />

Mumbai Perspective<br />

58<br />

controversies. The property tax rates for residential and non-residential properties<br />

in Greater Mumbai (without water meter) are as high as 187.5 per cent and 320.5<br />

per cent respectively. The base <strong>of</strong> the property tax remains non-buoyant as most <strong>of</strong><br />

the properties in the main city are under the Rent Control Act and the reassessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> other existing properties is quite infrequent. By imposing high tax rates and<br />

construction activities, the Corporation has successfully managed to utilize<br />

property tax as a residual source <strong>of</strong> revenue despite the frozen base. However,<br />

issues related equity and efficiency <strong>of</strong> the system are paramount (see Karnik et al.,<br />

2004). The inequity <strong>of</strong> the system has actually perpetuated by the Corporation's<br />

effectiveness in extracting revenue by raising tax rates beyond any limits. Inequity<br />

in the property tax system, subjectivity <strong>of</strong> assessment and lack <strong>of</strong> periodic revision<br />

<strong>of</strong> the base are certainly issues that warrant immediate attention.<br />

Greater perspicacity is needed in identifying fiscal instruments for local bodies.<br />

Federalism is known to facilitate experimentation <strong>of</strong> innovative practices and that<br />

is how 'laboratory federalism' has become the part <strong>of</strong> the vocabulary (Osborne,<br />

1988; Oates, 1999). Locating other fiscal avenues like expansion <strong>of</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> user<br />

charges and bringing about fiscal reforms are the options which MCGM need to<br />

explore.<br />

III<br />

Concluding Observations<br />

MCGM has a comfortable fiscal position as demonstrated by its complete reliance<br />

on own sources <strong>of</strong> revenue, fiscal surpluses in its accounts, and the higher pace <strong>of</strong><br />

growth <strong>of</strong> its income vis-à-vis the NDDP <strong>of</strong> Greater Mumbai. However, a matter <strong>of</strong><br />

serious concern is the state <strong>of</strong> its capital expenditure. Barring the last two years in<br />

the reference period, i.e. 2005-06 and 2006-07, the pace <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> per capita<br />

capital expenditure in the last 14 year period has been negligible and there has been<br />

a steep fall in the share <strong>of</strong> capital expenditure in the total expenditure. Moreover,<br />

hardly half <strong>of</strong> the budgeted capital expenditure was actually spent during 1997-98<br />

to 2006-07. The surpluses in MCGM's accounts would have vanished and there<br />

would have been deficits to the tune <strong>of</strong> 10 per cent <strong>of</strong> total expenditure during this<br />

reference period had the budgeted capital expenditure were actually spent.


59 <strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

A perusal <strong>of</strong> major sources <strong>of</strong> revenue <strong>of</strong> MCGM suggests that it continues with the<br />

old, archaic system following the adage 'an old tax is a good tax'. Octroi, the<br />

controversial source <strong>of</strong> revenue which has been abolished across the country,<br />

certainly is the sole reason for its fiscal comfort. Despite several clarion calls for its<br />

abolition, MCGM has no plan for its easy phase out; rather significant investment<br />

has gone into strengthening the octroi system in recent years. Property tax, the other<br />

major source <strong>of</strong> income, provides residual revenue to the Corporation. However,<br />

there are serious issues regarding the equity and efficiency aspects <strong>of</strong> the property<br />

tax system. Thus, MCGM's finances do not demonstrate a case <strong>of</strong> good economic<br />

logic.<br />

A discussion on the finances <strong>of</strong> civic bodies can not ignore their expenditure<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile, especially when, governments are driven by leviathan motive and invest in<br />

many pork barrel projects. Hopefully, budgetary reforms initiated now would<br />

render this largest civic body more fiscally responsive.<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> the finances <strong>of</strong> MCGM provides some important insights into the<br />

issues <strong>of</strong> civic finance, which are not parochial. It underscores the aspect <strong>of</strong><br />

political economy <strong>of</strong> fiscal federalism influencing the relative fiscal status <strong>of</strong> civic<br />

bodies. It also raises concerns about the fiscal responsibility <strong>of</strong> these local bodies.


Fiscal Performance <strong>of</strong> Civic Bodies: The Greater<br />

Mumbai Perspective<br />

60<br />

Endnote:<br />

1 Calculated from the information provided in Handbook <strong>of</strong> Basic Statistics <strong>of</strong><br />

Maharashtra State, 2000, Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics,<br />

Maharashtra<br />

2 The revenue expenditure <strong>of</strong> MCGM was Rs. 7120 crs in 2007-08 (Exclusive <strong>of</strong><br />

the Budget <strong>of</strong> BEST-Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport). It exceeds<br />

the revenue expenditure <strong>of</strong> 9 states for that year.. These states are Arunachal<br />

Pradesh, Goa, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura and<br />

Uttaranchal. Its total expenditure (inclusive <strong>of</strong> capital) exceeds that <strong>of</strong> four<br />

states: Goa, Manipur, Nagaland and Sikkim (Source: MCGM for Expenditure<br />

<strong>of</strong> MCGM; RBI, 2008 for state level expenditure- revised figures).<br />

3 Information on the NDDP was collected from Directorate <strong>of</strong> economics and<br />

Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra. NDDP figures are as per 1999-2000<br />

series; these figures are provisional for the period 1999-00 to 2005-06 and<br />

preliminary for the years 2006-07.


61 <strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

References<br />

Bahl, R. W. and Linn, J.F. (1992), <strong>Urban</strong> Public Finance in Developing Countries,<br />

Oxford University Press, New York.<br />

Bailey, Stephen J. (1999), Local Government Economics: Principles and Practice,<br />

Macmillan Press Ltd, Hampshire and London.<br />

GOM (Government <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra), (Various Years), District Domestic Product <strong>of</strong><br />

Maharashtra, Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics, Mumbai.<br />

GOM (Government <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra), (Various Years), Economic Survey <strong>of</strong><br />

Maharashtra, Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics, Mumbai.<br />

Karnik, Ajit (2002), Ready for Second Generation Reforms An Evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

Progress Made by Maharashtra, in: <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> Applied Manpower Research, ed.,<br />

Reform and Employment, Concept, New Delhi.<br />

Karnik, Ajit; Rath, Anita and Sharma, J.C. (2004), Reforming Property Tax<br />

System: Simulated Results for Mumbai City, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.<br />

XXXIX, No. 34, 3818-26.<br />

MCGM (Municipal Corporation <strong>of</strong> Greater Mumbai), (Various Years), Outline <strong>of</strong><br />

Civic Finance, MCGM, Mumbai.<br />

Oates, W.E. (1999), An Essay on Fiscal Federalism, Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />

Literature, Vol. XXXVII, 1120-1149.<br />

Osborne, David (1988), Laboratories <strong>of</strong> Democracy, Harvard Business School<br />

Press, Boston.<br />

Rath, Anita (2008), City Governments and Fiscal Responsibility: A Study <strong>of</strong><br />

Greater Mumbai, Occasional Paper <strong>of</strong> Bombay Geographical Association, No. 3,<br />

13-24.


Fiscal Performance <strong>of</strong> Civic Bodies: The Greater<br />

Mumbai Perspective<br />

62<br />

………….. (2009), Octroi-A Tax in a Time Warp: What its Removal Implies for<br />

Greater Mumbai, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XLIV, No.25, 86-93.<br />

RBI (2005), State Finances A Study <strong>of</strong> Budgets, Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> India, Mumbai.<br />

Tables<br />

Table 1: Fiscal Details <strong>of</strong> various Sub-Budgets <strong>of</strong> MCGM<br />

Source: Compilation based on Information provided in MCGM,<br />

Outline <strong>of</strong> Civic Finance<br />

Table 2: Comparative Budget-wise Fiscal Position: 2001-02 to 2004-05<br />

(Excluding Inter-budget contributions)<br />

Source: MCGM, Outline <strong>of</strong> Civic Finance, Various Years


63 <strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Table 3: Sources <strong>of</strong> Revenue Income<br />

(Budget A,B,E & G- Excluding Inter-budget Contributions)<br />

(Rs. in Crores)<br />

Source: Budget Section, MCGM<br />

Table 4: Major Heads <strong>of</strong> Revenue Expenditure<br />

(Budget A,B,E & G- Excluding Inter-budget Contributions)<br />

(Rs. in Crores)<br />

Note: *Also includes Administrative Expenditure<br />

Source: Budget Section, MCGM


Fiscal Performance <strong>of</strong> Civic Bodies: The Greater<br />

Mumbai Perspective<br />

64<br />

Table 5: Major Fiscal Indicators <strong>of</strong> MCGM: 1991-92 to 2006-07 (Actual; Exclusive <strong>of</strong> Budget C)<br />

(Rs. in crores)<br />

Notes: $Excludes inter-budget contributions.<br />

* Capital receipts and capital expenditures are for Budgets A, B, E and G; T.A has no capital account. Capital Receipts include receipts from the revenue accounts.<br />

# Growth rates (annual trend) are calculated for the period 1991-92 to 2006-07. Figures in parentheses represent the growth rate <strong>of</strong> the relevant series in real terms. The<br />

Consumer Price Index for <strong>Urban</strong> Non Manual Employees (CPINM) is used for converting these series in constant prices <strong>of</strong> 1991-92. Information on CPINM was<br />

collected from GoM, Economic Survey <strong>of</strong> Maharshtra, Various Years.<br />

1. Revenue Deficit is the difference between revenue expenditure and revenue receipts<br />

2. Conventional Deficit is the overall surplus or deficit and equals the difference between total expenditure (revenue and capital) and total receipts (revenue and capital)<br />

3. Fiscal Deficit is the difference between total expenditure (revenue and capital) and the aggregation <strong>of</strong> revenue receipts and other non-debt creating receipts (capital<br />

receipts net <strong>of</strong> debt); the loan component for Budget A and G are only considered for calculating the fiscal deficit for 1991-92 to 1995-96, hence, deficit could be on the<br />

lower side; for other years it includes the loan component for all 4 budgets.<br />

4. Positive sign indicates surplus; Negative sign indicates deficits<br />

Source: MCGM, Outline <strong>of</strong> Civic Finance, Various Years (up to 2004-05); Budget Documents and Information from Budget Section, MCGM for 2005-06 and 2006-07.


65 <strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Table 6: Fiscal Marksmanship*#<br />

Notes: *Exclusive <strong>of</strong> Budget C and in case <strong>of</strong> capital expenditure it is for A, B, E and G<br />

as T.A. has no capital account; # Difference between actual and budget estimate as a<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> budget estimate; Source: Same as Table 5.<br />

Figures<br />

C<br />

38%


Fiscal Performance <strong>of</strong> Civic Bodies: The Greater<br />

Mumbai Perspective<br />

66


67 <strong>Urban</strong> India


Fiscal Performance <strong>of</strong> Civic Bodies: The Greater<br />

Mumbai Perspective<br />

68


69 <strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Endnotes :<br />

1. Calculated from the information provided in Handbook <strong>of</strong> Basic Statistics <strong>of</strong><br />

Maharashtra State, 2000, Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics,<br />

Maharashtra.<br />

2. The revenue expenditure <strong>of</strong> MCGM was Rs. 7120 crs in 2007-08 (Exclusive <strong>of</strong><br />

the Budget <strong>of</strong> BEST-Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport). It exceeds<br />

the revenue expenditure <strong>of</strong> 9 states for that year.. These states are Arunachal<br />

Pradesh, Goa, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura and<br />

Uttaranchal. Its total expenditure (inclusive <strong>of</strong> capital) exceeds that <strong>of</strong> four<br />

states: Goa, Manipur, Nagaland and Sikkim (Source: MCGM for Expenditure<br />

<strong>of</strong> MCGM; RBI, 2008 for state level expenditure- revised figures).<br />

3. Information on the NDDP was collected from Directorate <strong>of</strong> economics and<br />

Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra. NDDP figures are as per 1999-2000<br />

series; these figures are provisional for the period 1999-00 to 2005-06 and<br />

preliminary for the years 2006-07.


Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Poor Settlements:<br />

Trends and Experiences<br />

70<br />

Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Poor Settlements:<br />

Trends and Experiences<br />

Natraj Kranthi<br />

Doctoral Research Scholar, Jawaharlal Nehru Architecture & Fine Arts<br />

University, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.<br />

Kavita Daryani Rao<br />

Director <strong>of</strong> Evaluation i/c, Jawaharlal Nehru Architecture & Fine Arts<br />

University, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.<br />

Abstract<br />

This paper is a scholastic attempt to comprehend the international and national<br />

trends and experiences <strong>of</strong> tenure security pertaining to urban poor settlements. It<br />

explores and reviews different approaches adopted across different countries<br />

around the world in diverse conditions. Besides, it discusses the strategies and<br />

results <strong>of</strong> these approaches. The paper presents a critical review <strong>of</strong> nine<br />

international cases including Cambodia, Sao Paulo-Brazil, Recife-Brazil,<br />

Thailand, Philippines, Namibia, Indonesia, Peru and Kenya; and five national<br />

cases including Kolkata, Ahmedabad, Mumbai, Delhi and Hyderabad. Further, it<br />

identifies the best practices and summarizes them into four broad categories which<br />

include (1). Tenure security against eviction by force, (2). Incremental and flexible<br />

approaches, (3). Collaborative and participatory approaches, and (4).<br />

Regularization.<br />

________________________________________________________________<br />

1.0 INTRODUCTION<br />

Security <strong>of</strong> tenure, especially in the context <strong>of</strong> the urban poor, has been defined and<br />

interpreted in a number <strong>of</strong> ways the world over by various international<br />

organizations, as it involves a variety <strong>of</strong> related issues attached to it. According to<br />

the UNCHS, tenure security is defined as, (i) protection against eviction; (ii) the<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> selling, and transferring rights through inheritance; (iii) the


71<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

possibility... (<strong>of</strong> having a)... mortgage, and access to credit under certain<br />

conditions (UNCHS, 1997).<br />

During UN-HABITAT Expert Group Meeting on <strong>Urban</strong> Indicators in October<br />

2002, secure tenure was defined as: the right <strong>of</strong> all individuals and groups to<br />

effective protection by the state against forced evictions. UN-HABITAT regards<br />

security <strong>of</strong> tenure as a strategic entry point rather than as a panacea to poverty<br />

reduction. In practical terms for the individual slum dweller, security <strong>of</strong> tenure<br />

translates into a degree <strong>of</strong> certainty that can motivate investment <strong>of</strong> own resources<br />

for the purpose <strong>of</strong> improving shelter and services. In some cases, a certificate <strong>of</strong><br />

right or temporary occupancy can serve as an instrument for making claims on<br />

public resources or negotiating with state authorities for access to basic services.<br />

Secure tenure may also legitimize land or structures on that land as forms <strong>of</strong><br />

collateral for credit, and therefore investment (UN-Habitat, 2002).<br />

2.0 SECURITY OF TENURE: INTERNATIONAL TRENDS<br />

In 1990s, tenure security in urban areas has emerged as one <strong>of</strong> the challenges in<br />

urban land management and has been identified as one <strong>of</strong> the major issues<br />

concerning the urban poor. Land tenure issues and access to land for the urban poor<br />

were first initiated in the Second United Nations Conference on Human<br />

Settlements during 3-14 June 1996 in Istanbul (Durand et al, 2002). Prior to this,<br />

the focus was more on tenure regularization than on tenure security. The decade <strong>of</strong><br />

1990s witnessed a number <strong>of</strong> research initiatives towards issues concerning<br />

security <strong>of</strong> tenure.<br />

The emphasis on security <strong>of</strong> tenure increased after the Habitat II preparatory<br />

conference on 'Access to Land and Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure as a Condition for<br />

Sustainable Shelter and <strong>Urban</strong> Development', held in New Delhi in 1996 (UNCHS,<br />

1996). It was this conference that laid down the founding principles for tenure<br />

security and access to land and also emphasized upon providing security <strong>of</strong> tenure<br />

to inhabitants <strong>of</strong> irregular settlements, slums, shack dwellers and precarious living<br />

environments. Following this UNCHS launched Global Campaign for Secure<br />

Tenure with an overall development objective to improve the conditions <strong>of</strong> people<br />

living and <strong>of</strong>ten working in slum areas and informal settlements in major urban


Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Poor Settlements:<br />

Trends and Experiences<br />

72<br />

centers <strong>of</strong> the world by promoting security <strong>of</strong> their residential tenure and a direct<br />

contribution to the realization <strong>of</strong> the commitments <strong>of</strong> the Millennium Declaration,<br />

specifically, the goal <strong>of</strong> Improving the lives <strong>of</strong> 100 million slum dwellers by the year<br />

2020. UN-Habitat has been launching the Campaign in cities and countries all over<br />

the world since January 2000<br />

3.0 SECURITY OF TENURE: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCES<br />

While tenure is perceived and interpreted differently in different countries, broadly<br />

it <strong>of</strong>ten involves partial or full rights to land. Consequently, approaches vary<br />

depending on the degree <strong>of</strong> access to land. A number <strong>of</strong> formal and informal tenure<br />

structures exist which are <strong>of</strong>ten dependent on the legality or recognition by the<br />

concerned administrative authority or the government.<br />

The UN-Habitat generalizes the most common tenure systems which include<br />

freehold, leases, provisional or conditional tenure and group tenure arrangements<br />

(UN-Habitat, 2003). The following cases illustrate the results <strong>of</strong> various innovative<br />

approaches adopted by different countries to provide security <strong>of</strong> tenure for the<br />

urban poor:<br />

3.1 Phnom Penh, Cambodia<br />

Land Sharing was used as the upgrading and a compromise technique to resolve<br />

land disputes between land occupants and private or public landowners or<br />

developers, who want the land (back) for redevelopment. The results were mixed<br />

and it met with varied degree <strong>of</strong> success (Paul, 2005).<br />

3.2 Sao Paulo, Brazil<br />

The 2004 Housing Rights Protector Award was awarded to the Municipality <strong>of</strong> Sao<br />

Paulo, Brazil for its innovative Bairro Legal (Legal Neighbourhood) Programme,<br />

an initiative providing security <strong>of</strong> tenure and improved living conditions for<br />

hundreds <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> its residents. The programme assisted 45,000 families to<br />

obtain legal title to their land, thereby safeguarding them from the threat <strong>of</strong> forced<br />

evictions, and improved living conditions <strong>of</strong> more than 210,000 people through<br />

infrastructure improvement (COHRE, 2004).


73<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

3.3 Recife, Brazil<br />

The Concession <strong>of</strong> the Real Right to Use (CRRU) land has stimulated the<br />

1<br />

regularisation <strong>of</strong> favelas on public land, or in selected private areas and was based<br />

on the notion that public land should not, and need not, be privatised for the<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> housing rights to take place. Settlements granted with CRRU have<br />

gained physical improvements from private and public investment in housing and<br />

infrastructure, and increasingly take on the appearance <strong>of</strong> working class<br />

neighborhoods physically integrated with the adjacent areas (World Bank, 2003).<br />

3.4 Bangkok, Thailand<br />

Bangkok's land rental system illustrates how poor communities legitimately<br />

occupy land in locations which would otherwise be far too expensive for them, but<br />

which also puts unused land to socially and economically efficient use. Different<br />

tenure arrangements provided different levels <strong>of</strong> security and allowed more than a<br />

million people to find access to land and housing (Mohit, 2001).<br />

3.5 Philippines<br />

The Community Mortgage Program (CMP), a program to facilitate access by lowincome<br />

groups to land and credit, is the fruit <strong>of</strong> collaboration between communitybased<br />

organizations, non-governmental organizations and the government. Social<br />

organizations find land for sale on the private market, they develop their proposal<br />

and gain access to credit. NGOs have significantly contributed to the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

this program benefiting more than 90,000 families. The programme increased in<br />

scale although doubts are being raised about its capacity to reach the poorest<br />

families (Fernandez, 1997).<br />

3.6 Namibia<br />

The Shack Dwellers' Federation <strong>of</strong> Namibia adopted a Progressive Policy that<br />

supports incremental development with legal land tenure. Some success in<br />

Windhoek with policy that <strong>of</strong>fers the urban poor the option to secure tenure through<br />

sales <strong>of</strong> blocks (multiple plots) to communities that are then responsible for


Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Poor Settlements:<br />

Trends and Experiences<br />

74<br />

upgrading the sites, including transforming communal toilets and water points to<br />

individual household connections (Muller, 2000).<br />

3.7 Indonesia<br />

The national Kampung Improvement Programme (KIP) is a government led<br />

flexible approach towards recognition <strong>of</strong> Kampungs. Lack <strong>of</strong> basic services in<br />

2<br />

kampungs created serious social problems and posed threat to public life. KIP was<br />

introduced with the help <strong>of</strong> the World Bank to upgrade kampungs through the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> access roads, basic infrastructure and communal facilities, such as<br />

schools and health clinics. The results <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> KIP generated massive<br />

individual and collective improvements which improved public health and<br />

particularly stimulated local economic activity (Payne 2001). KIP in Jakarta, alone,<br />

has improved more than 500 kampungs and provided basic services to about 3.8<br />

million people (urban.wikia.com).<br />

3.8 Lima, Nazca and Arequipa, Peru<br />

The government <strong>of</strong> Peru modified its longstanding policy under the <strong>Urban</strong> Poverty<br />

Rights Project <strong>of</strong> repressing extralegal settlement on state land and private property<br />

and improper use <strong>of</strong> agricultural land for urban development, accepting these<br />

3<br />

developments as inevitable. COFOPRI is the agency in charge <strong>of</strong> the design and<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> a massive Land Tenure Regularization Program. Land tenure<br />

regularization <strong>of</strong> 450 human settlements, which means 368,887 plots in urban<br />

settlements had been registered at the <strong>Urban</strong> Property Registry. Individual Land<br />

Tenure regularization and delivery <strong>of</strong> 265,433 titles to the qualified house holders<br />

(Yi Yang, 1999).<br />

3.9 Voi Town, Kenya<br />

Community Land Trusts (CLT) concept is that land tenure is not with the individual<br />

but with the community (Jaffer, 1996). This enables protection from land grabbing<br />

<strong>of</strong> open spaces and social facilities. A wide range <strong>of</strong> building types have evolved,<br />

ranging from modest two-room structures built <strong>of</strong> sun dried bricks, to substantial<br />

doublestorey houses built <strong>of</strong> concrete blocks.


75<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

4.0 SECURITY OF TENURE: NATIONAL TRENDS<br />

As per the Census <strong>of</strong> India 2001, 42.6 million population live in slums. This<br />

constitutes 15 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total urban population <strong>of</strong> the country which is quite<br />

alarming. In order to improve the condition <strong>of</strong> slums, the government over the years<br />

has undertaken a number <strong>of</strong> measures, including the legitimization <strong>of</strong> irregular land<br />

occupation and as well as the provision <strong>of</strong> basic services to the informal<br />

settlements. The government <strong>of</strong> India laid emphasis and argued in favour <strong>of</strong><br />

securing tenure for the urban poor. Until 1970s, there was no particular mention and<br />

major focus on secure tenure for the urban poor in any <strong>of</strong> the policy documents.<br />

However, the model Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act <strong>of</strong> 1956<br />

provided secure tenure indirectly by notifying areas as slums although tenure<br />

regularization is not a part <strong>of</strong> the Act. This implied that slum cannot be evicted<br />

without the approval <strong>of</strong> the competent authority. It was in the year 1972,<br />

Environmental Improvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Slums (EIUS) Scheme was launched for<br />

providing basic services in the notified slums under the Slum Act 1956. It was<br />

jointly funded by the central and the state governments. Indirectly, this scheme also<br />

provided security for slums from eviction for a period <strong>of</strong> ten years as one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

criteria for funding was to obtain a certificate from the municipality declaring that<br />

the slum would not be evicted for atleast ten years. During 1980s and 1990s,<br />

security <strong>of</strong> tenure has been the subject <strong>of</strong> attention in India after a report in 1983 by<br />

the task force recommended legal tenure for slums (GOI, 1983). This was evident<br />

in the policies and also was reflected in the five year plans. A number <strong>of</strong> these failed<br />

to compliment each other and were implemented in isolation. All the policies and<br />

programmes were short termed and were not designed for a long term approach.<br />

The <strong>National</strong> Slum Policy, 2001 can be considered as one <strong>of</strong> the most historical<br />

steps towards the provision <strong>of</strong> tenure and provision <strong>of</strong> basic services in slums.<br />

However the policy is still in its draft stage and has not yet come into effect. It<br />

advocates provision <strong>of</strong> minimum basic services for all households irrespective <strong>of</strong><br />

land tenure or occupancy status. It also advocated the granting <strong>of</strong> tenure on all<br />

government tenable lands, including resettlement or rehabilitated sites. Tenure<br />

shall be granted to all residents on all the tenable land sites owned or acquired by<br />

the government. Proper tenure rights shall be granted on resettlement or<br />

rehabilitated sites (GOI, 2001). Further, importance is given to security <strong>of</strong> tenure


Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Poor Settlements:<br />

Trends and Experiences<br />

76<br />

by including it as one <strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> the Jawaharlal Nehru <strong>Urban</strong> Renewal<br />

Mission (JNNURM). Provision <strong>of</strong> basic services to the urban poor including<br />

security <strong>of</strong> tenure at affordable prices, improved housing, water supply and<br />

sanitation, and ensuring delivery <strong>of</strong> other existing universal services <strong>of</strong> the<br />

government for education, health and social security (GOI, 2005).<br />

5.0 SECURITY OF TENURE: NATIONAL EXPERIENCES<br />

In India, different types <strong>of</strong> tenure systems were adopted by different state<br />

governments depending upon the different sizes <strong>of</strong> urban centres and differences in<br />

policies. Tenure is provided in the form <strong>of</strong> patta under the Patta Act 1984. This act<br />

has been one <strong>of</strong> the most imperative steps towards provision <strong>of</strong> tenure to urban poor<br />

settlements in India. Under the act, pattas were provided to the landless poor in<br />

urban areas and leasehold rights were issued to all persons occupying up to 50 sq.m<br />

<strong>of</strong> land for residential use.<br />

In Madhya Pradesh, about 15,000 pattas were issued to squatters on government<br />

land. While in Bhopal about 20,000 lease documents were granted to the poor<br />

households (Banerjee, 1994). Around 150,000 households were given pattas (in the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> lease-cum sale deed) in Tamil Nadu. During 1980 to 1998 about 9.5 million<br />

households in urban Andhra Pradesh have benefited from tenure regularization<br />

(Banerjee, 2002).<br />

Criticisms <strong>of</strong> Patta Act 1984 - The act was criticized for not including planning and<br />

urban development regulations which in turn failed to provide adequate services. It<br />

was also criticized that the Act served political interests and for its failure to<br />

integrate the urban poor with the city.<br />

The city wise experiences in India are illustrated below:<br />

5.1 Kolkata<br />

4 5<br />

In Kolkata, most <strong>of</strong> the bastis are on land under thika tenancy. The thika tenants<br />

have limited development rights on their property. The Basti Improvement<br />

Programme, funded by the World Bank was implemented in these localities<br />

involving conversion <strong>of</strong> service latrines, connection <strong>of</strong> water taps, surface drainage


77<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

facilities, construction and widening <strong>of</strong> roads and pathways, and provision <strong>of</strong> street<br />

lighting and waste disposal facilities within the bastis. As a result, living conditions<br />

were improved in bastis. Thika tenants cannot be ousted by any court order as they<br />

are protected under the tenancy laws and the slum act. Hence they constructed<br />

illegal buildings and leased it out to the slum dwellers. This led to the limited<br />

success met by any improvement programme by the state. Although bastis are<br />

improved under the programme, they still face deficiencies in basic services.<br />

(Ramaswamy V, 2008).<br />

5.2 Ahmedabad<br />

Launched in the early 1990s, Ahmedabad Slum Networking project is considered<br />

to be one <strong>of</strong> the most successful and innovative examples in provision <strong>of</strong> tenure<br />

security and services to the poor settlements by facilitating services such water and<br />

sanitation in an affordable and sustainable manner. It is an infrastructure and<br />

service provision programme that improves the livelihoods <strong>of</strong> people living and<br />

working in Ahmedabad slum area through active participation <strong>of</strong> the community<br />

(UN-Habitat, 2006). Slum Networking project provided a ten year licence to land<br />

for the unauthorized settlements enabling the slum dwellers to improve the local<br />

environment (Balamir et al, 2001). By December 2005, around 28 slum<br />

communities were successfully upgraded benefiting 4,868 households and 24,340<br />

people under the project. Project is still under implementation in 13 slum<br />

communities covering 3,835 households benefiting 19,175 people (UN-Habitat,<br />

2006).<br />

5.3 Mumbai<br />

Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SRS) is a revival <strong>of</strong> the Slum Redevelopment<br />

Scheme in 1995. Under the scheme, slums occupied prior to Jan 1, 1995 were<br />

regularized. The objective is to redevelop and also to rehabilitate the slum and its<br />

inhabitants. Under the scheme, rehabilitation flats are built free <strong>of</strong> cost to the slum<br />

dweller by cross-subsidization provided by free-sale flats. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> the land<br />

tenure status, developers are allowed to construct sale flats on slum land, whether it<br />

is government or private land, in exchange for the construction <strong>of</strong> flats for slum<br />

dwellers. The scheme met with limited success. By March 2000, only 3,486 units


Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Poor Settlements:<br />

Trends and Experiences<br />

78<br />

had been built for housing the slum dwellers through the SRS (Times <strong>of</strong> India,<br />

2000). This is because, the slum dwellers preferred to lease their flats middle-class<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals instead <strong>of</strong> staying in them. They continued staying in dilapidated and<br />

housing degraded conditions. As per the stipulated rules, flats cannot be bought or<br />

sold for ten years from the time the slum dweller takes ownership. These rules are<br />

abused by the dwellers (Times <strong>of</strong> India, 2006).<br />

5.4 Delhi<br />

In 1960s, slum relocation was adopted in Delhi to discourage slum proliferation in<br />

core areas. Slums were relocated to the identified peripheral areas. These sites<br />

turned into most undesirable and hazardous as no situ upgrading was done by the<br />

government. Later, Delhi adopted a policy <strong>of</strong> socialization <strong>of</strong> land. Informal<br />

settlements have grown rapidly as a result <strong>of</strong> regularization and absence <strong>of</strong> action<br />

by the authorities. More than 60 percent <strong>of</strong> the population in Delhi lives in sub<br />

standard settlements with quasi-legal land tenure (Risbud, 2002). Delhi is mostly<br />

dominated by court rulings. Evictions and relocation still forms a major part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

slum policies in Delhi. Court orders favoured the land owners resulting into largescale<br />

evictions (Balamir et al, 2001).<br />

5.5 Hyderabad<br />

In 1980s, landsharing was adopted in Hyderabad for those who squatted the land in<br />

private ownership for a considerable number <strong>of</strong> years. This was successful as it<br />

involved the sharing <strong>of</strong> land between the slum dwellers and the land lords on<br />

conditions agreeable to both the parties. It provided to be beneficial to both the<br />

parties. The advantages to the landlords are immediate possession <strong>of</strong> part land with<br />

increased value, special incentives <strong>of</strong>fered by the local body for agreeing to share<br />

the land and the advantage to the slum dwellers are security <strong>of</strong> land tenure, no<br />

further eviction threats, incentive to build permanent houses, an asset for future<br />

generations and most importantly, improved social status (Adusumilli, 2001).<br />

6.0 CONCLUSIONS<br />

The national and international experiences show that different approaches adopted


79<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

by different countries, regions or cities are mostly dependent on the state's policy<br />

and a number <strong>of</strong> diverse local factors. Each <strong>of</strong> these approaches met with varied<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> success depending on these factors. Broadly, these approaches have been<br />

classified into the following four categories:<br />

6.1 Tenure security against eviction by force<br />

Approaches involving the protection against threats <strong>of</strong> eviction have most <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

proved to be successful. Bairro Legal (Legal Neighbourhood) Programme in Brazil<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> such examples where provision <strong>of</strong> security <strong>of</strong> tenure led to the improved<br />

living conditions <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> residents. Ahmedabad Slum Networking Project<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> the most successful examples <strong>of</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> tenure security along with<br />

the basic services by engineering innovations. However approaches such as<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> temporary tenure rights as in the case <strong>of</strong> thika tenancy in Kolkata has<br />

met with limited success due to misuse <strong>of</strong> the rights by thika tenants.<br />

6.2 Incremental and flexible approaches<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> different levels <strong>of</strong> security as in the case <strong>of</strong> Bangkok's Land Rental<br />

System illustrates how land can be made accessible and affordable to the poor<br />

communities which otherwise would be an impossible task. Progressive Policy <strong>of</strong><br />

incremental development supporting legal land tenure <strong>of</strong> Namibia has also proved<br />

to have significantly contributed to the improved living conditions <strong>of</strong> the poor<br />

communities. In Indonesia, Kampung Improvement Programme (KIP) adopted a<br />

flexible approach <strong>of</strong> recognition <strong>of</strong> Kampungs, as a result it generated massive<br />

improvements.<br />

6.3 Collaborative and participatory approaches<br />

Other approaches such as The Community Mortgage Program (CMP) in<br />

Philippines, a collaborative approach between community based organization,<br />

NGOs and government. Innovative approaches like Landsharing as in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Hyderabad, India have met with success as it involved<br />

resolving <strong>of</strong> land disputes, provision <strong>of</strong> security <strong>of</strong> tenure and at the same time<br />

mutually beneficial for both the slum dwellers and the land lords. Landlords


Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Poor Settlements:<br />

Trends and Experiences<br />

80<br />

enjoyed special incentives and increased land value for their part <strong>of</strong> the land while<br />

the slum dwellers enjoyed the security <strong>of</strong> tenure against forced evictions.<br />

Community Land Trusts (CLT) concept in Kenya is one <strong>of</strong> popular examples <strong>of</strong><br />

tenure sharing, in which the tenure is with the community and not with individual.<br />

6.4 Regularization<br />

Regularization <strong>of</strong> poor communities irrespective <strong>of</strong> public or private land through<br />

The Concession <strong>of</strong> the Real Right to Use (CRRU) in Recife, Brazil has been<br />

instrumental in the physical improvement <strong>of</strong> the poor settlements with both private<br />

and public investments. This case demonstrates that the public land need not be<br />

privatized for recognition <strong>of</strong> housing rights. Successful massive land tenure<br />

regularization was taken up under the <strong>Urban</strong> Poverty Rights Project (UPRP) in<br />

Peru. This was possible only due to the policy change. Slum Rehabilitation Scheme<br />

(SRS) in Mumbai regularized slums and <strong>of</strong>fered free-sale flats. Despite this, the<br />

scheme met with limited success as there was a violation <strong>of</strong> stipulated rules by the<br />

slum dwellers. Even regularization <strong>of</strong> slums in Delhi was <strong>of</strong> no great help as court<br />

orders favoured the land owners resulting into large-scale evictions.<br />

On one hand it is found that approaches involving provision <strong>of</strong> tenure security<br />

against evictions by force, collaborative initiatives, community participation,<br />

tenure sharing, flexible and incremental tenure were successful. On the other hand,<br />

approaches involving the violation <strong>of</strong> rules, misuse <strong>of</strong> tenure rights and biased court<br />

orders have met with limited success.


81<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

Endnote:<br />

1 A favela is another name for a shanty town.<br />

2 Local word for slums<br />

3 Comisión de Formalización de la Propiedad Informal,<br />

Commission for the Regularisation <strong>of</strong> Informal Property, was<br />

created in 1996 by the State<br />

4 Local name for slum<br />

5 Thika is a contract for temporary possession <strong>of</strong> land.


Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Poor Settlements:<br />

Trends and Experiences<br />

82<br />

References:<br />

1. Adusumilli, U. (2001), Regulatory Guidelines for <strong>Urban</strong> Upgrading:<br />

Hyderabad Experience, International Workshop on Regulatory Guidelines for<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Upgrading, Bourton, Dunsmore, 17-18 May 2001, p6-7.<br />

2. Balamir, M., Payne, G (2001), Legality and Legitimacy in <strong>Urban</strong> Tenure<br />

Issues, Abstract <strong>of</strong> a Paper Submitted to the ESF/N-AERUS Conference,<br />

Katholiek Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.<br />

3. Banerjee, B (1994), Policies, Procedures and Techniques for Regularizing<br />

Irregular Settlements in India: The Case <strong>of</strong> Delhi, <strong>Urban</strong> Research Working<br />

Paper, No 34, Vrije University, Amsterdam.<br />

4. Banerjee, B (2002), Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure in Indian Cities, Holding Their<br />

Ground: Secure Land Tenure for the <strong>Urban</strong> Poor in Developing Countries,<br />

First Publication, p47, Earthscan Publications Ltd., London.<br />

5. COHRE (Centre On Housing Rights and Evictions) (2004), Housing Rights<br />

Bulletin, Vol 1, No. 4, December.<br />

6. Durand-Lasserve, A., Royston, L (2002), International Trends and<br />

Country Contexts From Tenure Regularisation to Tenure Security, Holding<br />

Their Ground: Secure Land Tenure for the <strong>Urban</strong> Poor in Developing<br />

Countries, First Publication, p1-3, Earthscan Publications, London,.<br />

7. Fernandez, F (1997), Pagtambayayong Foundation, in: Building the City with<br />

the People, New Trends in Community Initiatives in Cooperation with Local<br />

Governments, Habitat International Coalition, México. Case study.<br />

8. GOI (Government <strong>of</strong> India, Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Employment and Poverty<br />

Alleviation, Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Development) (2005), Jawaharlal Nehru<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Renewal Mission (JNNURM), New Delhi.<br />

9. GOI (Government <strong>of</strong> India, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Works and Housing) (1983), Report <strong>of</strong><br />

the Task Force on Housing and <strong>Urban</strong> Development, New Delhi.


83<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> India<br />

10. GOI (Government <strong>of</strong> India, The Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Development and Poverty<br />

Alleviation) (2001), Draft <strong>National</strong> Slum Policy, Government <strong>of</strong> India, New<br />

Delhi.<br />

11. Jaffer, M (1996), GONGO Project, Habitat International Coalition, Mexico,<br />

Case study.<br />

12. Mohit, R (2001), An Even Playing Field: Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure and the <strong>Urban</strong><br />

Poor in Bangkok, Thailand, Global Development Network's Third Annual<br />

Conference, December 9-12, 2001, Brazil.<br />

13. Muller, A (2000), Shack Dwellers Federation <strong>of</strong> Namibia, Namibia Housing<br />

Action Group (NHAG), Windhoek Namibia.<br />

14. Paul, E. R (2005), Land Sharing in Phnom Penh: an Innovative but Insufficient<br />

Instrument <strong>of</strong> Secure Tenure for the Poor, Expert Group Meeting on Secure<br />

Land Tenure: New Legal Frameworks and Tools, UN-ESCAP, Bangkok,<br />

Thailand, 8-9 December 2005.<br />

15. Payne, G (2001), The Impact <strong>of</strong> Regulation on the Livelihoods <strong>of</strong> the Poor, the<br />

ITDG Research Project, 'Regulatory Guidelines for <strong>Urban</strong> Upgrading',<br />

International Workshop on Regulatory Guidelines for <strong>Urban</strong> Upgrading,<br />

Bourton, Dunsmore, 17-18 May 2001, p13.<br />

16. Ramaswamy, V (2008), Basti Redevelopment in Kolkata, Economic &<br />

Political Weekly, Mumbai.<br />

17. Risbud, N (2002), Policies for Tenure Security in Delhi, Holding Their<br />

Ground: Secure Land Tenure for the <strong>Urban</strong> Poor in Developing Countries,<br />

Earthscan Publications Ltd., London.<br />

18. Times <strong>of</strong> India (2006), Gross Misuse <strong>of</strong> Mumbai's Slum Rehab Scheme, 26-<br />

10-2006.<br />

19. Times <strong>of</strong> India (2000), Maharashtra Government Scraps Slum Scheme, 12<br />

March 2000.


Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Poor Settlements:<br />

Trends and Experiences<br />

84<br />

20. UNCHS (United Nations Centre for Human Settlements) (Habitat) (1996),<br />

Access to Land and Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure as a Condition for Sustainable Shelter<br />

and <strong>Urban</strong> Development, New Delhi Declaration, Global Conference, New<br />

Delhi, India, 17-19 January.<br />

21. UNCHS (1999), <strong>Urban</strong> Poverty in Africa: Selected Countries' Experiences,<br />

Africa Forum on <strong>Urban</strong> Poverty, Nairobi.<br />

22. UN-Habitat (2006), Best Practices Database - Winners <strong>of</strong> the 2006 Dubai<br />

International Awards for Best Practices.<br />

23. UN-Habitat (2002), Global Campaign for Secure Tenure, A Tool for<br />

Advocating the Provision <strong>of</strong> Adequate Shelter for the <strong>Urban</strong> Poor, Concept<br />

Paper, 2nd Edition, United Nations Human Settlements Programme.<br />

24. UN-Habitat (2003), Handbook on Best Practices, Security <strong>of</strong> Tenure and<br />

Access To Land, Implementation <strong>of</strong> the Habitat Agenda United Nations<br />

Human Settlements Programme, Nairobi.<br />

25. World Bank (2003), World Development Report, Chapter 6.<br />

26. Yi Yang Z (1999), COFOPRI, an Experience <strong>of</strong> Land Tenure Regularization in<br />

Informal Settlements in Perú Regularisation Process at the Saul Cantoral<br />

Settlement: A Case Study.<br />

Useful Websites:<br />

1. www.censusindia.net<br />

2. www.urban.wikia.com/wiki/Kampung_improvement_program#Imp<br />

lementation (retrieved on 12 March 2009).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!