Annex 4.3. Tabulation of the train path allocation process

Slovenske železnice - Infrastruktura d.o.o. – Network Statement of the RS 2013 – Annex 4/3 – 11.12.2011 – 1
ISSUING THE
DECISION ON
TRAIN PATH
ALLOCATION
Who issues the decision
How
When
To who
The Agency.
Hard copy.
Not later than 2 (two) months prior to the Network timetable enforcement.
To the Applicant and to the Manager for information.
1.2. LATE REQUEST – APPLICATIONS ARE ACCEPTED FROM EIGHT TO FIVE MONTHS PRIOR TO THE NETWORK TT ENFORCEMENT
Who issues the order
How
An Applicant, registered with a competent authority prior to the application submission.
The following three ways are enforced for requesting (ordering) a train path:
Electronic form, via web application "Train path ordering",
PCS – completion of a form in PCS tool,
Hard copy – completion of a written form, published in the Network Statement.
TRAIN PATH
ORDERING
When From eight to five months prior to the Network timetable enforcement (X – 8 to X – 5)
To who
Public Agency of the Republic of Slovenia for Railway Transport (Agency).
Special provisions
Who coordinates the suggestions
The Agency shall send the confirmation on admission of the request to the Applicant within 5 (five) days.
The Agency shall process only complete applications. If the Applicant submits an incomplete or
incomprehensible application, the Agency within 5 (five) working days after the receipt of the application
contacts the Applicant, asking it to complete the form, otherwise the application shall not be processed.
The Agency.
COORDINATION
OF PREPARED
CONSTRUCTION
How the prepared construction is
forwarded for coordination
Depends on the way of how the path order was accepted:
Electronic form, via web application "Train path ordering",
PCS,
Hard copy.
When Immediately, after accepting the prepared construction, not later than from X - 5 to X - 4.
With whom the coordination takes
place
Special provisions
With Applicant and the Manager.
If the Applicant during coordination process fails to submit its viewpoint in time, it is considered that the Applicant insists
on its primary application.
PAGE 3