19.01.2015 Views

THE JOURNAL OF - Dentsply

THE JOURNAL OF - Dentsply

THE JOURNAL OF - Dentsply

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ferrari et al<br />

Table 2 Performance criteria according to Ryge<br />

Criteria and number of XP Bond<br />

restorations evaluated after SCA alpha bravo charlie delta<br />

6 months Calibra[n]<br />

Marginal discoloration and 53 53 0 0 0<br />

integrity<br />

Secondary caries 53 53 0 0 0<br />

Vitality test 53 53 0 0 0<br />

Interproximal contacts 53 53 0 0 0<br />

Retention 53 53 0 0 0<br />

Fracture 53 53 0 0 0<br />

sprayed and air dried carefully. 36% phosphoric acid gel was<br />

then applied for 15 s on enamel margins, and then for other<br />

15 s on dentin. The gel was removed with air spray and<br />

the surface blown gently with an air syringe. One drop of XP<br />

Bond was dispensed and mixed with one drop of self-curing<br />

activator. Using a microbrush, all cavity walls were wet and<br />

the adhesive material was left undisturbed for 20 s. After<br />

that, the solvent was evaporated by thoroughly blowing with<br />

air from an air syringe for 5 s. No light curing step was performed.<br />

Calibra Esthetic Resin Cement base and catalyst in<br />

similar amounts were mixed and applied on the cavity surface.<br />

Then the restoration was placed in the cavity preparation,<br />

and resin cement excess was removed with a clean microbrush.<br />

The Calibra cement was used in self-curing mode.<br />

The restorations were placed in March and April 2006 and<br />

examined for postoperative sensitivity at baseline, after 2<br />

weeks and 6 months by the same operator. At each recall,<br />

data on postoperative sensitivity, stability, and longevity<br />

were collected with reference to the USPHS criteria. Therefore,<br />

the following parameters were assessed:<br />

• postoperative sensitivity with the restoration under function,<br />

cold and warm stimuli, and a gentle air stream (on a<br />

scale from 0 to 10).<br />

• marginal discoloration and integrity<br />

• secondary caries<br />

• fracture<br />

• vitality test<br />

• retention<br />

• interproximal contacts<br />

The null hypothesis was that the self-curing mode does<br />

not affect postoperative sensitivity.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The results of postoperative sensitivities are summarized in<br />

Table 1. All 53 teeth were evaluated at baseline, and after 2<br />

weeks and 6 months. At baseline, 3 patients showed pre-operative<br />

sensitivity on 5 teeth. Ten cases of postoperative sensitivity<br />

were observed at the 2-week recall, but only 3 after<br />

6 months. At the 2-week recall, the postoperative sensitivity<br />

increased from 0 to 6 in one case immediately after luting<br />

the restoration (after the anesthetic wore off) but<br />

dropped to score 3 after 6 months. In 7 cases showing an<br />

increase in postoperative sensitivity after 2 weeks, the hypersensitivity<br />

disappeared completely after 6 months. In<br />

two cases, a residual postoperative sensitivity of score 2 remained<br />

after 6 months. No adverse events/effects occurred.<br />

All other parameters showed alpha scores (Table 2).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Ceramic crowns can be considered a safe type of restoration,<br />

and are reported to last longer than any other esthetic indirect<br />

restoration, 15 although many factors influence success,<br />

such as the kind of ceramic, luting agent, and extension of<br />

the lesion. Notwithstanding the restoration material, debonding<br />

and thus microleakage at the gingival margins – particularly<br />

if located below the cementoenamel junction – cannot<br />

be completely prevented. 1,8 All these factors are related to<br />

three subjects: patient, dentist, and material. 11<br />

In order to control for any additional source of variation besides<br />

the patient-related variability, one and the same operator<br />

placed all the restorations in this clinical trial. Inclusion<br />

and exclusion criteria were followed in order to obtain the<br />

Ethics Committee’s approval. The occurrence of postopera-<br />

Vol 9, Supplement 2, 2007 281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!