You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Frankenberger et al<br />
Table 2 Results of μTBS investigation to cavity floor dentin<br />
Adhesive<br />
Dentin<br />
contamination<br />
Cleaning<br />
method<br />
Curing mode<br />
of adhesive<br />
μTBS<br />
to cavity floor<br />
dentin in MPa (SD)<br />
XP BOND / SCA<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
Temp Bond<br />
Temp Bond<br />
Temp Bond<br />
Temp Bond NE<br />
Temp Bond NE<br />
Temp Bond NE<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
Scaler<br />
Prophypearls<br />
Clinpro powder<br />
Scaler<br />
Prophypearls<br />
Clinpro powder<br />
No LC<br />
separate<br />
IDS<br />
RC<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
39.6 (26.6)<br />
36.3 (19.2)<br />
38.4 (13.6)<br />
53.9 (17.1)<br />
21.9 (20.7)<br />
10.0 (14.9)<br />
34.5 (8.1)<br />
27.3 (16.2)<br />
11.0 (14.9)<br />
36.3 (20.5)<br />
Syntac<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
Temp Bond<br />
Temp Bond<br />
Temp Bond<br />
Temp Bond NE<br />
Temp Bond NE<br />
Temp Bond NE<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
Scaler<br />
Prophypearls<br />
Clinpro powder<br />
Scaler<br />
Prophypearls<br />
Clinpro powder<br />
No LC<br />
separate<br />
IDS<br />
RC<br />
w/o adhesive<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
13.7 (15.7)<br />
19.0 (14.2)<br />
30.1 (15.9)<br />
47.9 (18.0)<br />
22.5 (14.3)<br />
9.7 (8.9)<br />
5.9 (6.5)<br />
12.1 (11.4)<br />
7.1 (10.3)<br />
4.1 (5.1)<br />
12.0 (8.9)<br />
OptiBond FL<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
Temp Bond<br />
Temp Bond<br />
Temp Bond<br />
Temp Bond NE<br />
Temp Bond NE<br />
Temp Bond NE<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
Scaler<br />
Prophypearls<br />
Clinpro powder<br />
Scaler<br />
Prophypearls<br />
Clinpro powder<br />
No LC<br />
separate<br />
IDS<br />
RC<br />
w/o adhesive<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
no LC<br />
19.2 (16.3)<br />
26.6 (13.8)<br />
37.7 (16.9)<br />
50.7 (17.8)<br />
24.0 (17.5)<br />
10.4 (9.5)<br />
6.5 (6.5)<br />
18.2 (12.6)<br />
8.3 (10.2)<br />
8.2 (10.5)<br />
22.1 (18.0)<br />
IDS=immediate dentin sealing; RC=resin-coating technique<br />
erwise, the luting composites were cured together with the<br />
adhesives with an occlusal curing time of 220 s.<br />
The peripheral areas of the reconstructed/filled teeth<br />
were removed, remaining specimens were sectioned into<br />
slices in an apical direction, which were sectioned again to<br />
yield resin-dentin beams. The saw was adjusted to steps of<br />
1 mm, due to the thickness of the blade (300 μm) resulting<br />
in sticks with a cross-sectional area of 700 x 700 μm (0.5<br />
mm 2 ). From the resulting sticks of each group, 20 were selected<br />
(n = 20). These 20 sticks had to have a remaining<br />
dentin thickness to the pulp of 2.0 ± 0.5 mm. If more than<br />
20 beams were collected with the correct remaining dentin<br />
thickness, 20 sticks were randomly selected. For the case<br />
that one or more of the selected sticks failed due to the sectioning<br />
process, the percentage of prematurely failed specimens<br />
in relation to the total number of selected specimens<br />
was recorded. If more than 20 beams were collected with<br />
the correct remaining dentin thickness, 20 sticks were randomly<br />
selected. For the case that one or more of the selected<br />
sticks failed due to the sectioning process, the failed<br />
specimens received 0 MPa as final μTBS result. 38 The μTBS<br />
sticks were stored in distilled water for 24 h at 37°C and then<br />
fractured according to a well-suited protocol. 3 Fractured interfaces<br />
were submitted to SEM (Leitz ISI 50, Akashi; Tokyo,<br />
Japan; sputtering with Balzers SCD; Balzers, Liechtenstein).<br />
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, Version<br />
14.0 for Windows XP (SPSS; Chicago, IL, USA). As the majority<br />
of groups did not exhibit normal data distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov<br />
test), nonparametric tests were used<br />
(Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, Mann-Whitney<br />
U-test) for pairwise comparisons at the 95% significance<br />
level.<br />
Vol 9, Supplement 2, 2007 271