Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Blunck et al<br />
Table 3 Reference data obtained from the clinical assessment in % of the modified USPH criteria from the study center,<br />
Bologna<br />
Criteria for XP BOND [%] Adper Scotchbond 1XT [%]<br />
evaluated<br />
restorations n alpha bravo charlie delta n alpha bravo charlie delta<br />
Retention 30 100 0 0 0 30 100 0 0 0<br />
Postoperative<br />
sensitivity (∑) 30 96.7 3.3 0 0 30 76.7 23.3 0 0<br />
Marginal 30 100 0 0 0 30 100 0 0 0<br />
discoloration<br />
Marginal 30 100 0 0 0 30 100 0 0 0<br />
integrity<br />
Secondary 30 100 0 0 0 30 100 0 0 0<br />
caries<br />
Restoration 30 100 0 0 0 30 100 0 0 0<br />
contour<br />
Vitality test 30 100 0 0 0 30 100 0 0 0<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Gingell JC, Gilner PP. A clinical evaluation of a resinmodified<br />
glass ionomer restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;<br />
126:1245-1253.<br />
2. <strong>Dentsply</strong> XP BOND for eXtra Performance. Scientific Compendium. Konstanz:<br />
<strong>Dentsply</strong> DeTrey, 2006.<br />
3. Dondi Dall'Orologio G. 6-Month report: clinical evaluation of the adhesive<br />
XP BOND for restoration of cervical lesions at the University of Bologna,<br />
Italy. Report to <strong>Dentsply</strong> 2006.<br />
4. Harnirattisai C, Inokoshi S, Shimada Y, Hosoda H. Adhesive interface between<br />
resin and etched dentin of cervical erosion/abrasion lesions. Oper<br />
Dent 1993;18:138-143.<br />
5. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence<br />
Int 1992;23:39-41.<br />
6. Kanca J. Wet bonding: effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent<br />
1996; 9:273-276.<br />
7. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF. Five-year double-blind randomized<br />
clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified<br />
resin in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 2003;<br />
5:323-332.<br />
8. Peireira GDS, da, Paulillo LAMS, de Goes MF, Dias CTS. How wet should<br />
dentin be Comparison of methods to remove excess water during moist<br />
bonding. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:257-264.<br />
9. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van<br />
Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic<br />
review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-881.<br />
10. Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Prawer S, Tyas MJ. Micromorphological investigation<br />
of noncarious cervical lesions treated with demineralizing<br />
agents. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:279-287.<br />
11. Tay FR, Kwong SM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Yip HK, Moulding KM, Pashley<br />
DH. Bonding of a self-etching primer to non-carious cervical sclerotic<br />
dentin: Interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile bond strength evaluation.<br />
J Adhes Dent 2000;2:9-28.<br />
12. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review. J<br />
Dent 2004;32:173-196.<br />
13. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance<br />
of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.<br />
268 The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry