19.01.2015 Views

THE JOURNAL OF - Dentsply

THE JOURNAL OF - Dentsply

THE JOURNAL OF - Dentsply

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Six-month Clinical Evaluation of XP BOND in Noncarious<br />

Cervical Lesions<br />

Uwe Blunck a /Katharina Knitter b /Klaus-Roland Jahn c<br />

Purpose: To evaluate the 6-month clinical performance of the etch-and-rinse one-bottle adhesive system XP BOND,<br />

used in combination with the composite resin CeramX Duo for the restoration of Class V noncarious cervical lesions<br />

(NCCL).<br />

Materials and Methods: XP BOND was tested in a total of 40 patients who received two Class V CeramX Duo restorations,<br />

Adper Scotchbond 1 XT was used as a control. After cleaning the teeth, the surface of the NCCL was treated<br />

using a carbide bur in dentin and a 40-μm diamond bur in enamel with no retentive preparations. The lesions were<br />

filled with two increments of CeramX Duo after the application of the respective adhesive by a single operator according<br />

to manufacturer’s instructions. After 6 months, the retention and the marginal integrity were evaluated.<br />

Results: Thirty-eight of 40 patients were evaluated after 6 months by two clinicians according to modified USPHS criteria,<br />

and all restorations using XP BOND were still in place. In the control group (using Adper Scotchbond 1XT), one<br />

restoration was lost. The statistical evaluation (chi 2 test) showed no significant differences in any of the criteria. No<br />

difference of marginal integrity was found between the two adhesive systems.<br />

Conclusion: XP BOND meets the ADA success criteria after 6 months.<br />

Keywords: clinical study, noncarious cervical lesions, Class V restorations, adhesive systems.<br />

J Adhes Dent 2007; 9:265-268. Submitted for publication: 15.12.06x; accepted for publication: 3.1.07.<br />

In operative dentistry, etch-and-rinse systems form an important<br />

group of bonding agents that are clinically widely<br />

used. However, as these systems require the demineralization<br />

of dentin and the exposure of the embedded collagen<br />

network, numerous concerns regarding drying of the protein<br />

mesh arise. 5,6,8 This is due to the need to rinse and carefully<br />

a Associate Professor, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Dental School, Campus<br />

Virchow Clinic, Berlin, Germany.<br />

b Assistant Professor, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Dental School, Campus<br />

Virchow Clinic, Berlin, Germany.<br />

c Professor, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Dental School, Campus Virchow<br />

Clinic, Berlin, Germany.<br />

Paper presented at Satellite Symposium on Dental Adhesives, Dublin,<br />

September 13th, 2006.<br />

Reprint requests: Dr. Uwe Blunck, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Dental<br />

School, Campus Virchow Clinic, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.<br />

Tel: +49-30-450-562-673, Fax: +49-30-450-562-961. e-mail:<br />

uwe.blunck@charite.de<br />

dry the surface after acid etching, in order to enable the constituents<br />

of the bonding system, specifically the uncured<br />

monomers, to penetrate the outer layers of the prepared<br />

dentin. It has therefore been proposed that a bonding system<br />

capable of penetrating dry and collapsed demineralized<br />

dentin would improve bonding, resulting in better clinical<br />

performance. 8<br />

XP BOND is a new one-bottle etch-and-rinse adhesive,<br />

composed of a pre-mixed solution of monomers dissolved in<br />

tert-butanol. Due to an improved ability to diffuse through<br />

partially collapsed demineralized dentin, it is claimed to be<br />

less technique sensitive. 2<br />

As for any other new dental restorative, data from clinical<br />

investigations are crucial to assess the effectiveness and reliability<br />

of the product before being launched. This is needed<br />

in order to validate results from the in vitro studies. As<br />

generally accepted for investigating the clinical effectiveness<br />

of such adhesive systems, noncarious Class V restorations<br />

are the standard test. 9,13 This is due to the fact that<br />

they do not provide any macromechanical retention, they require<br />

at least 50% bonding to dentin, and they are widely<br />

Vol 9, Supplement 2, 2007 265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!