19.01.2015 Views

Budget Message / Highlights - Metropolitan Water Reclamation ...

Budget Message / Highlights - Metropolitan Water Reclamation ...

Budget Message / Highlights - Metropolitan Water Reclamation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />

FINANCIAL NARRATIVE (continued)<br />

BOND SALES<br />

The District's Capital Program is financed primarily with general obligation bond<br />

sales. Bond sales are used to provide necessary revenue for capital project cash<br />

flows. In May of 2006, $346.6 million in unlimited bonds and $50.8 million in<br />

limited bonds were sold and used to refund variable rate bonds of June 2002. An<br />

additional $100 million unlimited bonds and $250 million limited bonds, were<br />

sold and the sale completed in July 2006. In March of 2007, $280.1 million in<br />

unlimited bonds were sold and used to refund variable rate bonds of December<br />

2002 and $101.9 million in limited bonds were sold to refund bonds of July<br />

2006. Another bond sale is not anticipated to be necessary until 2009.<br />

Tax cap laws restrict the District’s non-referendum bond authority to funding<br />

projects initiated prior to October 1, 1991, which generally include only<br />

TARP projects. However, Public Act 89-385 provided additional nonreferendum<br />

authority to the District to authorize the issuance of “limited<br />

bonds.” In 1997, Public Act 90-485 was adopted that expands this “limited<br />

bond” authority by excluding bonds issued for TARP purposes from the tax<br />

extension limitation. The District’s limited bonds have sold successfully and<br />

will be used in the future. In 2003, Public Act 92-143 was passed to authorize<br />

the issuance of 30 year bonds and Public Act 92-726 extended the nonreferendum<br />

bonding authority from December 31, 2006 to December 31,<br />

2016.<br />

The Capital Funds narrative on page 97 provides a more detailed discussion.<br />

The statement of outstanding bonds and statutory debt margin on page 60<br />

shows the District's strong position. The Five-Year Financial Forecast on<br />

pages 66 and 74 details future bond sale projections. Bond sales are<br />

summarized in Exhibit 3.<br />

PROPERTY, SERVICES, and MISCELLANEOUS<br />

Exhibit 4 summarizes revenue from property, services and miscellaneous<br />

items. A major revenue source is a user charge system, which imposes a<br />

surcharge above property tax payments for commercial, industrial and taxexempt<br />

users of the sewage systems. Estimated user charge revenues in 2009<br />

are $49.3 million.<br />

Land rentals, investment income, sewer permit fees, connection impact fees,<br />

and other revenues will provide an estimated $42.7 million in 2009. Estimates<br />

for land rental revenues are based on existing and renegotiated leases.<br />

Investment income is based on projections of cash flow and interest rates for<br />

2008. Interest rates on short-term securities are expected to remain stable or<br />

decrease through 2008. Our investments are predominately short term in<br />

nature. Sewer permit revenue estimates are based on anticipated development<br />

projects and 2008 rates. Connection impact fees were established in 1998 to<br />

require new service areas to contribute to the past investment in the District’s<br />

infrastructure.<br />

NET ASSETS APPROPRIABLE<br />

Exhibit 5 shows the trend in net assets appropriable which is primarily<br />

impacted by bond sales, expenditures for capital projects, and the reservation<br />

of future years’ principal and interest payments in the debt service funds. Net<br />

assets appropriable have been used to reduce future years’ taxes. Beginning in<br />

2004, a portion of the projected Corporate Fund net assets was left<br />

unappropriated to maintain a fiscally sound fund balance. The negative<br />

amount in 2009 is because the obligation basis of budgetary accounting is<br />

used for the Capital Improvements Bond Fund and indicates that future bond<br />

sales will be necessary to finance projects.<br />

2009 BUDGET<br />

Exhibit 3<br />

Million<br />

$400<br />

Bond Sales<br />

$350<br />

$300<br />

$250<br />

$200<br />

$150<br />

$100<br />

$50<br />

Unlimited Limited<br />

$0<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />

Projected ---------------------------<br />

Exhibit 4<br />

Millions<br />

Property, Services & Misc.<br />

$160<br />

$140<br />

$120<br />

$100<br />

$80<br />

$60<br />

$40<br />

$20<br />

$0<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Estimated Projected<br />

Exhibit 5<br />

Millions<br />

$900<br />

$700<br />

$500<br />

$300<br />

$100<br />

-$100<br />

Net Assets Appropriable<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Estimated Projected<br />

79<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!