Budget Message / Highlights - Metropolitan Water Reclamation ...
Budget Message / Highlights - Metropolitan Water Reclamation ... Budget Message / Highlights - Metropolitan Water Reclamation ...
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO 2009 BUDGET BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued) 3. Maintain the District’s top-quality bond rating. As liaison to rating agencies, Treasury will work to maintain the AAA credit ratings with Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s, and Fitch. With volatile economic market conditions, it is important to establish a periodic review of key ratios used by the credit rating industry to monitor the District’s overall performance, such as, expense to fund balance ratio, change in reserve balances, etc., to satisfy their AAA rating requirements. The Treasury Section will continue to provide necessary information to keep the agencies current with the District’s major changes and initiatives. Million $ $55 $50 $45 $40 39.8 Investment Interest Income / Average Investment Interest Rate All Funds 2000 - 2009 Investment Interest Income ($) Average Investment Interest (%) # of Investment Purchases (Thousands) 46.2 Interest Rate (%) and # of purchases (000) 20 18 16 14 $35 32.5 32.3 12 $30 $25 26.7 27.4 10 $20 $15 6.2 15.0 13.2 14.5 19.7 5.0 5.1 8 6 $10 $5 3.0 2.9 3.6 3.4 2.9 3.7 2.0 4.3 2.7 1.9 3.4 2.5 1.7 3.1 2.0 2.0 1.5 4 2 $0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Est. Proj. 0 Ending Investment Inventory (Par Value) $515.6 $627.5 $659.0 $720.5 $696.1 $634.5 $956.7 $810.5 $950.0 $810.0 (Dollars in Millions) 116 116
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO 2009 BUDGET 11000 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent 1. Establish policies and priorities to guide the Executive Director in meeting the District's responsibilities, insuring the protection of the environment, and the health and welfare of people in the community in the most responsive, efficient, and economical manner. $3,347,269 76.0% 2. Provide cash management service to maximize investment interest return without sacrifice of principal or required liquidity measured by exceeding the benchmark 90-day Treasury bill rate and investment on average of over 99 percent of available funds. $1,057,531 24.0% Enhance the District's image in national financial markets through prudent use of debt financing for capital needs and debt service savings. Total $4,404,800 100.0% MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009 Actual Estimated Proposed 1. Maximize investment earnings by exceeding the interest rate benchmark monthly. 100% 100% 100% 2. Invest 99 percent of available funds on a daily basis. 100% 100% 100% 3. Maintain bank deposits processed within 24 hours of receipt at 100 percent. 100% 100% 100% 4. Maintain minority broker/dealer and institutional investment participation at 30 percent 30% 30% 30% or more of portfolio. PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 Budgeted Change Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent 7110 Legislative $2,609,537 2009 37 $3,049,869 ($61,244) (2.0) 2008 37 $3,111,113 7210 Treasury Activities $771,579 2009 7 $1,057,531 $38,344 3.8 2008 7 $1,019,187 7130 Administrative Activities $107,884 2009 1 $297,400 $150,200 102.0 a) 2008 1 $147,200 a) Increase due to consulting services in support of the Board of Commissioners. Totals $3,489,000 2009 45 $4,404,800 $127,300 3.0% 2008 45 $4,277,500 117 117
- Page 81 and 82: Five-Year Financial Forecast, 2009-
- Page 83 and 84: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 85 and 86: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 87 and 88: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 89 and 90: SECTION III FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BY
- Page 91 and 92: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 93 and 94: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 95 and 96: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 97 and 98: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 99 and 100: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 101 and 102: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 103 and 104: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 105 and 106: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 107 and 108: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 109 and 110: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 111 and 112: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 113 and 114: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 115 and 116: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 117 and 118: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 119 and 120: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 121 and 122: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 123 and 124: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 125 and 126: SECTION IV DETAIL OF DEPARTMENT APP
- Page 127 and 128: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 129 and 130: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 131: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 135 and 136: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 137 and 138: GENERAL ADMINISTRATION BOARD OF COM
- Page 139 and 140: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 141 and 142: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 143 and 144: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 145 and 146: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 147 and 148: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 149 and 150: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 151 and 152: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 153 and 154: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 155 and 156: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 157 and 158: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 159 and 160: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 161 and 162: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 163 and 164: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 165 and 166: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 167 and 168: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 169 and 170: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 171 and 172: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 173 and 174: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 175 and 176: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 177 and 178: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 179 and 180: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
- Page 181 and 182: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DIST
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
11000 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. Establish policies and priorities to guide the Executive Director in meeting the District's<br />
responsibilities, insuring the protection of the environment, and the health and welfare of<br />
people in the community in the most responsive, efficient, and economical manner. $3,347,269 76.0%<br />
2. Provide cash management service to maximize investment interest return without sacrifice<br />
of principal or required liquidity measured by exceeding the benchmark 90-day Treasury bill<br />
rate and investment on average of over 99 percent of available funds. $1,057,531 24.0%<br />
Enhance the District's image in national financial markets through prudent use of debt financing<br />
for capital needs and debt service savings.<br />
Total $4,404,800 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. Maximize investment earnings by exceeding the interest rate benchmark monthly. 100% 100% 100%<br />
2. Invest 99 percent of available funds on a daily basis. 100% 100% 100%<br />
3. Maintain bank deposits processed within 24 hours of receipt at 100 percent. 100% 100% 100%<br />
4. Maintain minority broker/dealer and institutional investment participation at 30 percent 30% 30% 30%<br />
or more of portfolio.<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY:<br />
2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
7110 Legislative $2,609,537 2009 37 $3,049,869 ($61,244) (2.0)<br />
2008 37 $3,111,113<br />
7210 Treasury Activities $771,579 2009 7 $1,057,531 $38,344 3.8<br />
2008 7 $1,019,187<br />
7130 Administrative Activities $107,884 2009 1 $297,400 $150,200 102.0 a)<br />
2008 1 $147,200<br />
a) Increase due to consulting services in support of the Board of Commissioners.<br />
Totals $3,489,000 2009 45 $4,404,800 $127,300 3.0%<br />
2008 45 $4,277,500<br />
117<br />
117