Budget Message / Highlights - Metropolitan Water Reclamation ...
Budget Message / Highlights - Metropolitan Water Reclamation ...
Budget Message / Highlights - Metropolitan Water Reclamation ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2009<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago
The Government Finance Officers Association of<br />
the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented<br />
an award for Distinguished <strong>Budget</strong> Presentation<br />
to the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District<br />
of Greater Chicago for its annual budget for the<br />
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008.<br />
In order to receive this award, a governmental<br />
unit must publish a budget document that meets<br />
program criteria as a policy document, as an<br />
operations guide, as a financial plan and as a<br />
communications medium.<br />
The award is valid for a period of one year only.<br />
We believe our current budget continues to<br />
conform to program requirements, and we are<br />
submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility<br />
for another award.
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
As Adopted by the Board of Commissioners<br />
December 11, 2008<br />
and Amended December 18, 2008<br />
Board of Commissioners<br />
Hon. TERRENCE J. O’BRIEN<br />
President<br />
Hon. KATHLEEN THERESE MEANY<br />
Vice President<br />
Hon. GLORIA ALITTO MAJEWSKI<br />
Chairman of Finance<br />
Hon. FRANK AVILA<br />
Hon. PATRICIA HORTON<br />
Hon. BARBARA J. McGOWAN<br />
Hon. CYNTHIA M. SANTOS<br />
Hon. DEBRA SHORE<br />
Hon. PATRICIA YOUNG<br />
Officers<br />
RICHARD LANYON<br />
Executive Director<br />
Harold G. Downs<br />
Treasurer<br />
Louis Kollias<br />
Director of Monitoring<br />
and Research<br />
Darlene A. LoCascio<br />
Director of Procurement<br />
and Materials Management<br />
Patrick j. Foley<br />
Director of Human Resources<br />
keith d. Smith<br />
Director of Information Technology<br />
OSOTH JAMJUN<br />
Director of Maintenance<br />
and Operations<br />
FREDERICK M. FELDMAN<br />
General Counsel<br />
JACQUELINE TORRES<br />
Director of Finance / Clerk<br />
JOSEPH P. SOBANSKI<br />
Director of Engineering<br />
For additional copies of this document, contact:<br />
Beverly K. Sanders, <strong>Budget</strong> Officer<br />
100 East Erie Street Chicago, IL 60611-3154<br />
www.mwrd.org
Calumet<br />
River<br />
Cook County and <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
East<br />
Dundee<br />
Barrington<br />
Hills<br />
South<br />
Barrington<br />
Barrington<br />
Inverness<br />
Deer Park<br />
Palatine<br />
Rolling<br />
Meadows<br />
Buffalo<br />
Grove<br />
Arlington<br />
Heights<br />
Wheeling<br />
Prospect<br />
Heights<br />
Mount<br />
Prospect<br />
Deerfield<br />
Glencoe<br />
Northbrook<br />
Winnetka<br />
Northfield<br />
Glenview<br />
Kenilworth<br />
Wilmette<br />
L A K E M I C H I G A N<br />
Elgin<br />
Streamwood<br />
Bartlett<br />
Hoffman<br />
Estates<br />
Hanover<br />
Park<br />
Schaumburg<br />
Roselle<br />
Salt Creek<br />
Elk<br />
Grove<br />
Des<br />
Plaines<br />
Des Plaines River<br />
Rosemont<br />
Park<br />
Ridge<br />
Niles<br />
Golf<br />
Morton<br />
Grove<br />
Skokie<br />
Lincolnwood<br />
Evanston<br />
North Shore Channel<br />
North Branch<br />
Population (2000)<br />
Square Miles<br />
Chicago 2,896,016 228<br />
Suburbs 2,480,725 726<br />
Cook County 5,376,741 954<br />
Population over 50,000<br />
Arlington Heights<br />
Berwyn<br />
Cicero<br />
Des Plaines<br />
Evanston<br />
Mount Prospect<br />
Oak Lawn<br />
Oak Park<br />
Orland Park<br />
Palatine<br />
Schaumburg<br />
Skokie<br />
Population over 30,000<br />
Calumet City<br />
Chicago Heights<br />
Elk Grove Village<br />
Glenview<br />
Harvey<br />
Hoffman Estates<br />
Niles<br />
Northbrook<br />
Park Ridge<br />
Streamwood<br />
Tinley Park<br />
Wheeling<br />
Bensenville<br />
Northlake<br />
Schiller<br />
Park<br />
Franklin<br />
Park<br />
Melrose<br />
Stone Park<br />
Park<br />
Norridge Harwood<br />
Heights<br />
River<br />
Grove<br />
Elmwood<br />
Park<br />
River<br />
Forest<br />
Oak<br />
Berkeley<br />
Bellwood<br />
Park<br />
Hillside Maywood<br />
Elmhurst<br />
Forest<br />
Park<br />
Broadview<br />
Westchester<br />
North<br />
Berwyn<br />
Riverside<br />
Cicero<br />
La Grange<br />
Park Riverside<br />
Brookfield<br />
Stickney<br />
Western La Stickney<br />
Springs Grange<br />
Forest<br />
View<br />
McCook<br />
Hinsdale<br />
Countryside Summit<br />
Indian<br />
Head Park<br />
Burr<br />
Ridge<br />
Hodgkins<br />
Bedford<br />
Park<br />
Justice<br />
Burbank<br />
Bridgeview<br />
Willow Springs<br />
Hometown<br />
Hickory<br />
Hills<br />
Des Plaines River<br />
Cal-Sag Channel<br />
Palos<br />
Hills<br />
Chicago<br />
Ridge<br />
Oak Lawn<br />
Chicago River<br />
Main Channel<br />
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal<br />
Evergreen<br />
Park<br />
Chicago<br />
Lemont<br />
Palos<br />
Park<br />
Worth<br />
Palos<br />
Heights<br />
Alsip<br />
Merrionette<br />
Park<br />
Calumet<br />
Blue Park<br />
Island<br />
Orland<br />
Park<br />
Oak<br />
Forest<br />
Robbins<br />
Crestwood<br />
Midlothian Posen<br />
Riverdale<br />
Dixmoor<br />
Harvey<br />
Phoenix<br />
Dolton<br />
Little Calumet River<br />
Burnham<br />
Calumet<br />
City<br />
Cook County Limits<br />
Orland<br />
Hills<br />
Tinley<br />
Park<br />
Country<br />
Club<br />
Hills<br />
Markham<br />
Hazel<br />
Crest<br />
East Hazel<br />
Crest<br />
Homewood<br />
South<br />
Holland<br />
Thornton<br />
Lansing<br />
MWRDGC Limits 1<br />
5<br />
North<br />
Miles<br />
The MWRDGC has responsibility for Stormwater Management for all of Cook<br />
County, including areas that currently lie outside the MWRDGC's boundaries.<br />
Frankfort<br />
Matteson<br />
Richton Park<br />
University<br />
Park<br />
Flossmoor<br />
Olympia<br />
Fields<br />
Park<br />
Forest<br />
Chicago<br />
Heights<br />
South<br />
Chicago<br />
Heights<br />
Glenwood<br />
Ford Heights<br />
Steger<br />
Sauk<br />
Village<br />
Lynwood<br />
i
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
DESCRIPTION OF THE<br />
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO:<br />
ITS HISTORY, LOCATION, SIZE, POPULATION, AND TYPE OF GOVERNMENT<br />
District and History<br />
The <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago (District) is an independent government and<br />
taxing body encompassing approximately 91 percent of<br />
the land area and 98 percent of the assessed valuation of<br />
Cook County, Illinois.<br />
The District is a separate legal entity sharing an<br />
overlapping tax base with the City of Chicago, the<br />
Chicago Board of Education, the Chicago School<br />
Finance Authority, the County of Cook, the Cook<br />
County Forest Preserve District, the Chicago Park<br />
District, the Chicago Public Building Commission, the<br />
Cook County Community College District, and various<br />
municipalities and school districts outside the City of<br />
Chicago but within the District’s boundaries.<br />
The District was originally organized as the Sanitary<br />
District of Chicago in 1889 under an act of the Illinois<br />
General Assembly which has been modified from time<br />
to time to increase the District’s authority and<br />
jurisdiction. The enabling act in 1889 was in direct<br />
response to a long standing problem with contamination<br />
of the water supply and nuisance conditions of the<br />
rivers. The District reversed the flow of the Chicago and<br />
Calumet River Systems to stop the discharge of sewage<br />
to Lake Michigan and instead, discharge it to the Des<br />
Plaines River, where it could be diluted as it flowed into<br />
the Illinois River and eventually the Mississippi River.<br />
Prior to the District’s construction of a 61.3 mile system<br />
of canals and waterway improvements, the Chicago and<br />
Calumet River Systems were tributary to Lake<br />
Michigan. These river systems are now tributary to the<br />
Illinois River system.<br />
From 1955 through 1988, the District was called The<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> Sanitary District of Greater Chicago. In<br />
order to provide a more accurate perception of the<br />
District’s current functions and responsibilities, the name<br />
was changed effective, January 1, 1989, to <strong>Metropolitan</strong><br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago.<br />
Mission and Responsibilities<br />
The mission of the District is to protect the health and<br />
safety of the public in its service area, protect the<br />
quality of the water supply source (Lake Michigan),<br />
improve the quality of water in watercourses in its<br />
service area, protect businesses and homes from flood<br />
damages, and manage water as a vital resource for its<br />
service area.<br />
The District collects wastewater from municipalities in<br />
its service area, conveys it to wastewater reclamation<br />
plants, provides full secondary treatment and discharges<br />
clean water to local waterways. The District is also<br />
responsible for stormwater management for all of Cook<br />
County, including areas outside of the District’s<br />
corporate boundaries for wastewater services.<br />
Services<br />
The District’s seven modern water reclamation plants<br />
provide excellent treatment for residential and industrial<br />
wastewater, meeting permitted discharge limits virtually<br />
at all times. The treatment process is protected by a<br />
pretreatment program to guard against hazardous<br />
substances and toxic chemicals. These are strictly<br />
regulated pursuant to federal and state requirements.<br />
The District routinely monitors all industries and nonresidential<br />
sources to assure that wastes are disposed of<br />
in an environmentally responsible and lawful manner.<br />
Treated wastewater, along with runoff from rainfall,<br />
enters local canals, rivers and streams that serve as<br />
headwaters of the Illinois River system. Stormwater in<br />
the separate sewered area is controlled to reduce flood<br />
damages by a number of stormwater detention<br />
reservoirs. In the combined sewer area, the District’s<br />
tunnel and reservoir project has significantly reduced<br />
basement backup and overflows to local waterways.<br />
Flow within the District’s waterway system and the<br />
Lake Michigan discretionary diversion flow are<br />
controlled by three inlet structures on Lake Michigan:<br />
Wilmette Pumping Station, Chicago River Controlling<br />
Works and O’Brien Lock and Dam. The single outlet<br />
control structure is the Lockport Lock and Powerhouse.<br />
While exercising no direct control over wastewater<br />
collection systems owned and maintained by cities,<br />
villages, sewer districts and utilities, the District does<br />
control municipal sewer construction by permits outside<br />
the city of Chicago. It also owns a network of<br />
intercepting sewers to convey wastewater from the local<br />
collection systems to the water reclamation plants.<br />
Facilities<br />
The District is located primarily within the boundaries<br />
of Cook County, Illinois. The District serves an area of<br />
883.5 square miles which includes the City of Chicago<br />
and 125 suburban communities. The District serves an<br />
equivalent population of 10.35 million people; 5.25<br />
million real people, a commercial and industrial<br />
equivalent of 4.5 million people, and a combined sewer<br />
overflow equivalent of 0.6 million people. The<br />
District’s 554 miles of intercepting sewers and force<br />
mains range in size from 12 inches to 27 feet in<br />
diameter, and are fed by approximately 10,000 local<br />
sewer system connections.<br />
ii<br />
ii
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
DESCRIPTION OF THE<br />
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO:<br />
ITS HISTORY, LOCATION, SIZE, POPULATION, AND TYPE OF GOVERNMENT<br />
The District’s Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP) is<br />
one of the country’s largest public works projects for<br />
pollution and flood control. Four tunnel systems total<br />
109.4 miles of tunnels, 9 to 33 feet in diameter and 150<br />
to 300 feet underground. One reservoir is in operation<br />
and construction is in progress on the two remaining<br />
reservoirs.<br />
The District owns and operates one of the world’s<br />
largest water reclamation plants, in addition to six other<br />
plants and 23 pumping stations. The District treats an<br />
average of 1.4 billion gallons of wastewater each day.<br />
The District’s total wastewater treatment capacity is<br />
over 2.0 billion gallons per day.<br />
The District controls 76.1 miles of navigable<br />
waterways, which are part of the inland waterway<br />
system connecting the Great Lakes with the Gulf of<br />
Mexico. It also owns and operates 35 stormwater<br />
detention reservoirs to provide regional stormwater<br />
flood damage reduction.<br />
In conjunction with its biosolids beneficial utilization<br />
and farm land application program, the District recycles<br />
all biosolids in land application programs in northeast<br />
Illinois, and owns over 13,500 acres of land in Fulton<br />
County, Illinois, formerly used for biosolids application.<br />
Governance<br />
The District is governed by a nine–member Board of<br />
Commissioners (Board). Commissioners are elected at<br />
large and serve on a salaried basis. Three<br />
Commissioners are elected every two years for six–year<br />
terms. Biannually, the Board elects from its membership<br />
a President, Vice President, and Chairman of the<br />
Committee on Finance.<br />
Organization Structure<br />
The Executive Director, who reports directly to the<br />
Board, manages the District’s day-to-day operations.<br />
Eight appointed department heads report to the<br />
Executive Director.<br />
The Treasurer of the District, its chief financial officer,<br />
is appointed by and reports directly to the Board.<br />
General Administration, Management & <strong>Budget</strong>,<br />
Affirmative Action, and Public Affairs are direct staff<br />
and support units, reporting to the Executive Director.<br />
Cook County<br />
Taxpayers<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
(elected)<br />
Civil Service<br />
Board<br />
Treasury<br />
Executive<br />
Director<br />
Affirmative<br />
Action<br />
General<br />
Administration<br />
Management<br />
& <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Public Affairs<br />
Monitoring<br />
& Research<br />
Procurement<br />
& Materials<br />
Management<br />
Human<br />
Resources<br />
Information<br />
Technology<br />
Law Finance Engineering<br />
Maintenance<br />
& Operations<br />
iii<br />
iii
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
HOW TO USE THE DISTRICT'S BUDGET<br />
The organization and presentation of the District's <strong>Budget</strong> is designed to satisfy the needs of citizens, public officials, and<br />
District employees. It is organized in compliance with the Illinois Compiled Statutes and structured to meet external and<br />
internal managerial needs. As a comprehensive management and balanced financial plan, this document describes the<br />
programs, services, and resources the District provides, as well as policies and long-run financial plans.<br />
The District's <strong>Budget</strong> is organized as follows:<br />
1) By Appropriation and Tax Levy Ordinances. Enacted by the Board of Commissioners under the authority of the Illinois<br />
Compiled Statutes, these are the legal authority allowing the District to carry out its legally mandated mission.<br />
2) By Funds. These are the accounting entities segregating sums of money or other resources for the purpose of carrying on<br />
specific activities or government functions in accordance with certain legal restrictions or limitations.<br />
3) By Department. These are the primary organizational units of the District.<br />
The District's <strong>Budget</strong> is presented in various sections, each providing the reader with specific information related to the<br />
District's financial plans and services.<br />
The sections are presented as follows:<br />
I. BUDGET FOREWORD. An introductory section that contains: the message from the President and Chairman<br />
of the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment; Narratives on Operational Goals and Accomplishments, Major<br />
Issues, Policy and Program Changes; <strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Highlights</strong>; Financial Objectives, Policies, and Accomplishments;<br />
Strategic Planning, Policy Development, and the <strong>Budget</strong> Process; and the beginning of the Appropriation<br />
Ordinance, which gives the <strong>Budget</strong> legal authority. The full Appropriation Ordinance consists of pages 42 & 43<br />
and sections II through VII.<br />
II.<br />
III.<br />
BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SUMMARIES, SCHEDULES, AND EXHIBITS. These provide an overview<br />
of the District's <strong>Budget</strong> and financial plans of the past, present, and future, including proposed tax levies,<br />
revenues, and appropriations.<br />
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BY FUND. These contain detailed information on taxes and all other sources<br />
of revenue and expenditure, plus financial statements detailing current assets, current liabilities, and the amount<br />
of assets available for appropriation in 2009.<br />
IV. DETAIL OF DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATIONS -<br />
CORPORATE FUND. These present detailed information by<br />
Department, and priority, of activities, objectives, programs,<br />
performance measures, proposed line item expenditures, and<br />
staffing. The legend to the right shows the placement of data within<br />
the text boxes of the organizational charts. Each department<br />
provides actual, budgeted, and proposed positions over a three year<br />
period. Salary ranges for pay plans and grades as shown in the<br />
Position Analysis are included in the Appendix.<br />
Organization unit number<br />
Organization unit name<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
Position Position Position<br />
Count Count Count<br />
Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Proposed<br />
V. CAPITAL BUDGET. The District's current and long-term programs for capital construction, modernization,<br />
and rehabilitation as detailed in the Construction Fund and Capital Improvements Bond Fund.<br />
VI.<br />
VII.<br />
VIII.<br />
IX.<br />
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND. The District's current and long-term programs for the Stormwater<br />
Management Fund are described.<br />
OTHER FUNDS. Information detailing the Reserve Claim Fund, Bond and Interest Sinking Funds, and the<br />
MWRD Retirement Fund are provided in this section.<br />
TAX LEVY ORDINANCES. These present the financial and management plan of the District as a legal<br />
document which coordinate and establish the legal authority for the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of<br />
Greater Chicago to obtain and expend funds during the fiscal year.<br />
APPENDIX. Information detailing the District's compensation plan, glossaries, acronym list and awards.<br />
To aid the reader in finding specific information quickly, there is a Table of Contents inserted on the manila<br />
tabbed divider before each section.<br />
iv<br />
iv
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Map of Cook County ..................................................................................................................................................<br />
Description of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago ......................................................<br />
How to Use the District's <strong>Budget</strong> ................................................................................................................................<br />
Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................<br />
i<br />
ii<br />
iv<br />
v<br />
SECTION I. BUDGET FOREWORD<br />
Presidents’ <strong>Message</strong> / 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Highlights</strong> ........................................................................................................... 1<br />
Financial Policies, Objectives, and Accomplishments ................................................................................................ 31<br />
Strategic Planning, Policy Development, and the <strong>Budget</strong> Process .............................................................................. 36<br />
Report of the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment................................................................................................. 40<br />
Annual Appropriation Ordinance ................................................................................................................................ 42<br />
SECTION II. BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SUMMARIES, SCHEDULES, AND EXHIBITS<br />
Where the Money Comes From; Where the Money Goes ........................................................................................... 45<br />
Net Assets Appropriable ............................................................................................................................................. 46<br />
Estimated Tax Rate ..................................................................................................................................................... 47<br />
Taxable Property (Equalized Assessed Valuation - Table and Graph) ....................................................................... 48<br />
Appropriations, Tax Levies, and Tax Rates ................................................................................................................ 49<br />
Comparative Statement of Appropriations, Tax Levies, and Tax Rates ...................................................................... 50<br />
Comparative Appropriations:<br />
by Major Object/Character of Expenditure (Graph) ................................................................................................ 52<br />
by Major Object ...................................................................................................................................................... 53<br />
by Character of Expenditure .................................................................................................................................... 54<br />
by Department and Major Program ......................................................................................................................... 55<br />
by Fund and Major Program (Graph) ...................................................................................................................... 56<br />
by Program Objective, by Fund ............................................................................................................................... 58<br />
Annual Debt Service Graph ........................................................................................................................................ 59<br />
Outstanding Bonds and Statutory Debt Margin .......................................................................................................... 60<br />
Account and Personnel Summary (Table and Graph) ................................................................................................. 61<br />
Five-Year Financial Forecast, 2009 – 2013 ................................................................................................................ 64<br />
SECTION III. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BY FUND<br />
Financial Narrative ...................................................................................................................................................... 77<br />
Summary of Revenue and Expenditures, 2009 – 2007 ................................................................................................ 81<br />
Summary of 2009 Assets Appropriable for All Funds ................................................................................................ 85<br />
Combined Balance Sheets, 2007 – 2006 ..................................................................................................................... 86<br />
Appropriations for Liabilities, 2009 – 2008 ................................................................................................................ 88<br />
Taxes Receivable, 2008 and Prior Years, Including Estimate for 2009 ...................................................................... 89<br />
Personal Property Replacement Taxes Receivable, 2008 and Prior Years, Including Estimate for 2009 ................... 90<br />
Corporate Fund:<br />
Financial Narrative .................................................................................................................................................. 91<br />
Revenue Graphs, 2002 – 2009 ................................................................................................................................. 92<br />
Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009 – 2008 .................................................................................................................. 93<br />
Appropriable Revenues, 2009 – 2006 ..................................................................................................................... 94<br />
Financing, 2009 – 2004 ........................................................................................................................................... 95<br />
Corporate Working Cash Fund: Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009 – 2008, and Revenues, 2009 – 2006 ................... 96<br />
Capital Funds:<br />
Financial Narrative .................................................................................................................................................. 97<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund:<br />
Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009 – 2008 .............................................................................................................. 98<br />
Appropriable Revenues, 2009 – 2006 .................................................................................................................. 99<br />
v<br />
v
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
SECTION III. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BY FUND (Continued)<br />
Construction Fund:<br />
Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009 – 2008 .............................................................................................................. 100<br />
Financing, 2009 – 2004, and Appropriable Revenues, 2009 – 2006 ................................................................... 101<br />
Construction Working Cash Fund: Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009 – 2008, and Revenues, 2009 – 2006 ........... 102<br />
Other Funds:<br />
Financial Narrative .................................................................................................................................................. 103<br />
Stormwater Management Fund:<br />
Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009 – 2008 .............................................................................................................. 104<br />
Appropriable Revenues, 2009 – 2006 .................................................................................................................. 105<br />
Stormwater Management Working Cash Fund: Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009 – 2008,<br />
and Appropriable Revenues, 2009 – 2006 ........................................................................................................... 106<br />
Bond and Interest Funds:<br />
Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009 – 2008 .............................................................................................................. 107<br />
Appropriable Revenues, 2009 – 2006 .................................................................................................................. 108<br />
Reserve Claim Fund: Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009 – 2008, and Appropriable Revenues, 2009 – 2006 .......... 109<br />
Retirement Fund: Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009 – 2008, and Appropriable Revenues, 2009 – 2006 ................ 110<br />
SECTION IV. DETAIL OF DEPARTMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE CORPORATE FUND<br />
Appropriations, Expenditures and <strong>Budget</strong>ed Positions, 2000 – 2009 ......................................................................... 111<br />
Corporate Fund Organization Chart ............................................................................................................................ 112<br />
Detailed Appropriations by Department:<br />
Board of Commissioners ......................................................................................................................................... 113<br />
General Administration ........................................................................................................................................... 121<br />
Monitoring and Research ......................................................................................................................................... 139<br />
Procurement and Materials Management ................................................................................................................ 167<br />
Human Resources..................................................................................................................................................... 181<br />
Information Technology .......................................................................................................................................... 197<br />
Law .......................................................................................................................................................................... 213<br />
Finance .................................................................................................................................................................... 225<br />
Maintenance and Operations<br />
Summary of All Divisions .................................................................................................................................... 237<br />
General Division .................................................................................................................................................. 250<br />
North Service Area .............................................................................................................................................. 266<br />
Calumet Service Area .......................................................................................................................................... 286<br />
Stickney Service Area .......................................................................................................................................... 305<br />
Engineering ............................................................................................................................................................. 327<br />
SECTION V. CAPITAL BUDGET<br />
Capital Program Functions and <strong>Budget</strong>ed Positions, 2002 – 2010 (Graphs) .............................................................. 341<br />
Organization Chart ...................................................................................................................................................... 342<br />
Ten-Year Capital Improvements Program Summary, 2004 – 2013 ............................................................................ 343<br />
Capital Program Objectives and Program Summary ................................................................................................... 344<br />
Capital Program Narrative .......................................................................................................................................... 347<br />
Construction Fund Project List ................................................................................................................................... 369<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund Project List ........................................................................................................... 371<br />
Tunnel and Reservoir Plan (TARP) Project Status Chart .......................................................................................... 376<br />
Other Project Exhibits ................................................................................................................................................. 377<br />
Line Item Analysis:<br />
Construction Fund ................................................................................................................................................... 387<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund ........................................................................................................................... 390<br />
Construction Fund: Position Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 392<br />
Bond Fund: Position Analysis .................................................................................................................................... 396<br />
vi<br />
vi
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
SECTION VI. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND<br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
Stormwater Management Fund:<br />
Appropriations, Expenditures, and <strong>Budget</strong>ed Positions, 2000 – 2009.................................................................. 403<br />
Stormwater Management Fund Organization Chart.............................................................................................. 404<br />
Stormwater Management Narrative ..................................................................................................................... 405<br />
Stormwater Management Objectives and Program Summary .............................................................................. 410<br />
Line Item Analysis ............................................................................................................................................... 413<br />
Position Analysis ................................................................................................................................................. 415<br />
SECTION VII. OTHER FUNDS<br />
Reserve Claim Fund:<br />
Description of Purpose and Operation ..................................................................................................................... 419<br />
Line Item Analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 420<br />
Bond and Interest Fund:<br />
Description of Purpose and Operation ..................................................................................................................... 421<br />
Appropriation for Payment of Outstanding Bonds, 2009 ......................................................................................... 423<br />
Retirement Fund:<br />
Description of Purpose and Operation ..................................................................................................................... 424<br />
Appropriation Ordinance ......................................................................................................................................... 426<br />
SECTION VIII. TAX LEVY ORDINANCES<br />
Retirement Fund and Corporate Fund ......................................................................................................................... 427<br />
Construction Fund........................................................................................................................................................ 428<br />
Bond and Interest Fund:<br />
Detailed Tax Levy Ordinance for Outstanding Bonds ............................................................................................. 429<br />
Detailed 2009 Tax Levy for Payment of Outstanding Bonds .................................................................................. 431<br />
Reserve Claim Fund .................................................................................................................................................... 432<br />
Stormwater Management Fund ................................................................................................................................... 433<br />
SECTION IX. APPENDIX<br />
Compensation Plan Narrative ...................................................................................................................................... 435<br />
Salary Schedules ......................................................................................................................................................... 436<br />
User Charge Rates ....................................................................................................................................................... 437<br />
Property Tax Base ....................................................................................................................................................... 438<br />
Awards ........................................................................................................................................................................ 440<br />
Financial Glossary ....................................................................................................................................................... 446<br />
Technical Glossary ...................................................................................................................................................... 450<br />
Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................................... 452<br />
vii<br />
vii
SECTION I<br />
BUDGET FOREWORD<br />
BUDGET FOREWORD<br />
This section introduces the budget with explanations of the organization and structure of the District's <strong>Budget</strong>. It also<br />
presents an overview of the substance of the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong>. It includes the following:<br />
(<br />
(<br />
(<br />
(<br />
In the Transmittal Letter from the President and the Chairman of the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment / <strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Highlights</strong>, major policies, initiatives, changes, and other significant features of<br />
the Final 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> are presented. This is followed by a statement of District Operational Goals and<br />
Accomplishments; a Narrative on Major Issues, Policy, and Program Changes; and the <strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>Highlights</strong>. It is in these sections that broad policy, program objectives, and operational<br />
accomplishments are defined.<br />
In Financial Policies, Objectives, and Accomplishments, an overview of the financial guidelines and<br />
accomplishments of the District is presented.<br />
The Strategic Planning, Policy Development, and the <strong>Budget</strong> Process describes planning, policy<br />
development, and the total <strong>Budget</strong> process. The detailed <strong>Budget</strong> process is presented in 12 clearly<br />
stated steps with a flowchart of the <strong>Budget</strong> cycle.<br />
The Annual Appropriation Ordinance gives legal effect to the entire <strong>Budget</strong> document as enacted into<br />
law by the Board of Commissioners under authority of the Illinois Compiled Statutes. It includes an<br />
explanation of the crosshatch (#) symbols used with some personnel positions within the <strong>Budget</strong>,<br />
indicating restrictions on the filling of these positions.<br />
Transmittal Letter, President and Chairman of the Committee on<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> and Employment / 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Highlights</strong> ...................................... 1<br />
Financial Policies, Objectives, and Accomplishments ............................................. 31<br />
Strategic Planning, Policy Development, and the <strong>Budget</strong> Process ...........................36<br />
Report of the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment............................................. 40<br />
Annual Appropriation Ordinance .............................................................................42
January 2, 2009<br />
To the Residents of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District:<br />
The Board of Commissioners and staff are pleased to present the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong>, as presented by the Executive Director<br />
and revised by the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment, which includes the resources to allow the <strong>Metropolitan</strong><br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago (District) to provide a quality water environment for our service area.<br />
The District is positioned to meet our financial goals and undertake new initiatives to protect our environment. We are<br />
pleased to report that the District continues to provide excellent service at great value to the community. We have<br />
adopted and amended the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> as a cost-effective plan to meet the needs of our residents.<br />
Committee Hearings<br />
The Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment received the Executive Director’s <strong>Budget</strong> Recommendations on October<br />
21, 2008. Hearings on these requests were conducted on November 6, 2008, when the Executive Director and his<br />
Department Heads presented major changes and initiatives included in the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong>. The Executive Director<br />
focused his presentation on current and future operations in support of the District’s mission. The Committee discussed<br />
developments in the District’s implementation of sustainable practices, the status of the Facility Master Plans, Phase II<br />
of the TARP Thornton Reservoir and Stage I of the TARP McCook Reservoir, the Stormwater Management program,<br />
and water quality standards, currently in development, that if implemented will have a significant financial impact on<br />
the District’s overall budget.<br />
The Public Hearing on the <strong>Budget</strong> was held on December 10, 2008 during which the Civic Federation deemed the<br />
proposed budget as a fiscally responsible plan and commended our emphasis on long-term planning and personnel cost<br />
containment. Local environmental advocacy groups recognized the District’s efforts and requested continued support of<br />
green initiatives including prairie native landscaping, rain gardens, and development of alternative energy sources. The<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> was adopted on December 11, 2008 and amended at the regular December 18, 2008 Board Meeting.<br />
Mission of the District<br />
The District will protect the health and safety of the public in its service area, protect the quality of the water supply source<br />
(Lake Michigan), improve the quality of water in watercourses in its service area, protect businesses and homes from flood<br />
damages, and manage water as a vital resource for its service area. The District’s service area is 883.5 square miles of<br />
Cook County, Illinois. The District is committed to achieving the highest standards of excellence in fulfilling its mission.<br />
Sustainable Practices<br />
While the core mission of the District is protecting the quality of the water flowing within and through our corporate<br />
borders, it would be particularly short-sighted to do this at the expense of other aspects of the environment.<br />
The District is in the process of formalizing several operating policies with the common concept of utilizing sustainable<br />
practices. These are methods of using resources that minimize their depletion or permanent damage thereby preserving<br />
these resources for future generations. The primary mission of the District has been the recovery of water used by<br />
humans, commerce, and industry in the metropolitan Chicago area since its establishment in 1889. Over the last 119<br />
years, this mission has been refined from simply sending the polluted water elsewhere, to recovery of wastewater,<br />
making the waterways a positive asset to the region, meeting the goals of the Clean <strong>Water</strong> Act, and managing<br />
stormwater.<br />
The District will establish goals and objectives to reduce the consumption of energy and other resources used to meet<br />
the goals of its primary mission. Central principles of the program will be effective preventative maintenance of<br />
facilities, along with a strong educational component for employees and the general public.<br />
District facilities are designed to operate for decades. The three major treatment facilities were initially constructed in the<br />
1920’s and 1930’s. Master Plans developed in the last few years for the renovation of these plants are designed from the<br />
standpoint of increasing energy efficiency and recovering usable byproducts, i.e., digester gas and biosolids. For those<br />
1<br />
1
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
facilities that are not old enough to warrant major rehabilitation, normal maintenance and repairs regularly include process<br />
modifications and parts replacements geared toward the same ends. To ensure that materials and services used to maintain<br />
our facilities support these objectives, the District will adopt an environmentally-responsible purchasing policy.<br />
The effort will be directed at all levels of operations, including grass-roots efforts such as native prairie landscaping,<br />
rain gardens, and rain barrels. These initiatives are small in scale when compared to the billions of gallons of<br />
stormwater and sewage processed by the District, but their value lies in educating ourselves and the public about<br />
preserving and protecting the environment.<br />
Energy Policy<br />
The District’s energy policy promotes sound practices of energy usage at District facilities while continuing to comply<br />
with all operating permits. The objective of the energy policy is to establish energy management practices that promote<br />
fiscal responsibility while encouraging conservation of our natural resources and utilization of renewable energy<br />
sources. These practices promote the reduction of greenhouse gases by reducing District energy usage and/or by the<br />
substitution of conventional sources with renewable resources.<br />
Measurement criteria will be established by the<br />
Energy Conservation Committee to gauge the<br />
effectiveness of the energy management practices<br />
in the development of capital projects, operations,<br />
maintenance, and decommissioning of existing<br />
facilities. Periodic audits (both internal and<br />
external) will be performed by the Energy<br />
Conservation Committee to evaluate energy use<br />
and efficiency. Audits will also identify<br />
improvement opportunities consistent with this<br />
policy. Periodic training of staff will be provided to<br />
ensure continued adherence to this policy.<br />
Electricity is one of the District’s largest single<br />
categories of expenditures. Through active control<br />
of operations, we have maintained a level use of<br />
energy in spite of the addition of necessary, but<br />
energy-demanding facilities. Operational<br />
economies to reduce electrical usage include<br />
refined control of dissolved oxygen in aeration<br />
tanks, heating and lighting efficiencies, and load<br />
reductions during peak-load periods.<br />
Million $<br />
50 Heat drying<br />
45 of biosolids<br />
40<br />
discontinued<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Energy Consumption in Dollars 1981 - 2009<br />
81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 2008 2009<br />
Est. Proj.<br />
The District had benefited from an agreement with ComEd that held the rates charged our major plants constant for 50<br />
years. This agreement expired at the beginning of 2007 and has compelled us to purchase electricity on the open market.<br />
The District currently purchases electricity for a fixed rate under a three-year agreement. A two-year extension of this<br />
agreement was recently signed with an expiration date of December 31, 2011.<br />
Biosolids Policy (adopted March 15, 2007)<br />
The District is committed to following the principles set forth in the National Biosolids Partnership’s (NBP) Code of<br />
Good Practice in all aspects of its biosolids management programs:<br />
NBP Code of Good Practice<br />
Compliance: To commit to compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements regarding operations<br />
and reclaimed water production at wastewater treatment facility, and management, transportation, storage, and use or<br />
disposal of biosolids away from the facility.<br />
Natural<br />
Gas<br />
Electricity<br />
TARP Mainstream<br />
Pump Station online<br />
SEPA stations online<br />
1957 rate agreement<br />
with Com Ed expired<br />
January 2, 2007<br />
• Product: To provide biosolids that meet the applicable standards for their intended use or disposal.<br />
• Environmental Management System: To develop an environmental management system for biosolids that<br />
includes a method of independent third party verification to ensure effective on-going biosolids operations.<br />
• Quality Monitoring: To enhance the monitoring of biosolids production and management practices.<br />
• Quality Practices: To require good housekeeping practices for biosolids production, processing, transport, and<br />
storage and during final use or disposal operations.<br />
2<br />
2
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
• Contingency and Emergency Response Plans: To develop response plans for unanticipated events such as<br />
inclement weather, spills, and equipment malfunctions.<br />
• Sustainable Management Practices and Operations: To enhance the environment by committing to sustainable,<br />
environmentally acceptable biosolids management practices and operations through an environmental<br />
management system.<br />
• Preventive Maintenance: To prepare and implement a plan for preventive maintenance for equipment used to<br />
manage biosolids and wastewater solids.<br />
• Continual Improvement: To seek continual improvement in all aspects of biosolids management.<br />
• Communications: To provide methods of effective communications with gatekeepers, stakeholders, and<br />
interested citizens on key elements of each environmental management system, including information relative<br />
to system performance.<br />
The District is also committed to:<br />
• Generating and utilizing all biosolids in a responsible manner that complies with all requirements of the<br />
District’s permits and applicable federal, state, and local regulations.<br />
• Providing multiple avenues of utilization of biosolids as the District believes that diversity leads to competition<br />
and subsequently lower costs to the taxpayer.<br />
• Continually maximizing the proportion of biosolids beneficially utilized through land application programs and<br />
the District’s Controlled Solids Distribution Program.<br />
• Instilling public confidence in the District’s biosolids activities through consistent production of a high quality<br />
biosolids product.<br />
• Reducing the area of land committed to the processing and drying of biosolids, thereby reducing the potential<br />
for odors and improving the stewardship of District property.<br />
Nutrient Removal<br />
While the majority of nutrients in the Illinois River come from non-point source agricultural runoff, sewage treatment<br />
plants are identifiable sources and can be statutorily regulated. The potential for nutrient standards being imposed on<br />
sewage treatment plants is a very real possibility, and an area of concern.<br />
Nitrates are less toxic to aquatic life than other nitrogen compounds, but must be reduced in downstream drinking water<br />
for public health reasons. Excessive nitrates affect infants’ circulatory systems resulting in “blue baby syndrome.”<br />
Nitrates and phosphates are linked to fertilizing downstream algal blooms and contribute to the growing 8,500 square<br />
mile “dead zone” in the Gulf of Mexico.<br />
The most common conventional<br />
treatment for phosphorus removal in a<br />
sewage treatment plant involves<br />
precipitating the phosphorus out of<br />
solution using a chemical aid such as<br />
alum or ferric chloride. The precipitate<br />
is removed in the sedimentation process<br />
and ultimately ends up in the biosolids.<br />
Another phosphorus removal<br />
technology involves removal of the<br />
soluble fraction of phosphorus through<br />
a biological process involving a series<br />
of anaerobic and aerobic zones. This<br />
technology does not achieve very low<br />
levels of phosphorus, but can be<br />
effective to produce effluent in the<br />
range of 0.5 – 1 mg/L total phosphorus.<br />
Additional phosphorus removal can be<br />
Hennepin<br />
District WRP effluent flow via the Des Plaines and<br />
Illinois Rivers to the Mississippi River and ultimately<br />
into the Gulf of Mexico.<br />
Lockport<br />
Powerhouse<br />
Marsh<br />
Collateral<br />
Channel<br />
Centennial<br />
Trail Marsh<br />
achieved by filtering the liquid stream to remove the fine particulate fraction of the phosphorus. The combination of<br />
precipitation with filtration can remove phosphorus to very low levels, but is very expensive.<br />
The removal of nitrogen-containing compounds from sewage effluent can be achieved through biological processes.<br />
The process involves a series of anoxic and aerobic zones that cultivate the appropriate bacteria to oxidize ammonia<br />
nitrogen to nitrate (aerobic zone) and reduce nitrate to nitrogen gas (anoxic zone). This nitrogen gas is released to the<br />
3<br />
3
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
atmosphere. This process requires substantially more secondary treatment capacity and pumping capacity than a typical<br />
secondary treatment process because the treatment requires increased recycle in the secondary process. The use of a<br />
series of anoxic and aerobic zones can be effective to treat to total nitrogen in the range of 8 mg/L. Using a biological<br />
filter and addition of a carbon source can further reduce total nitrogen to the range of 3 - 5 mg/L. For the combined<br />
capacity of all the District plants, this process would be operationally very expensive, and cost on the order of several<br />
billion dollars to install.<br />
Wetlands<br />
The District is investigating several potential wetland demonstration projects aimed at evaluating alternative methods<br />
for dealing with nutrients. Anaerobic bacterial reduction of nitrates to nitrogen gas in wetlands is known in principle and<br />
from some demonstration projects, but not at a scale or under specific conditions needed for District requirements.<br />
Using wetlands for nutrient removal can be a market-based strategy that uses restored floodplain wetlands designed,<br />
built and operated for the purpose of managing nutrients, trapping sediments, and/or storing floodwaters. These<br />
wetlands would produce nutrient reduction credits that can be sold to municipal or industrial treatment facilities that<br />
need to meet a water quality standard and cannot cost-effectively remove nutrients themselves.<br />
Recent studies have suggested that wetland-based nutrient removal will reduce the cost impact on homeowners within<br />
the MWRD service area by 51 percent in comparison to the implementation of conventional wastewater treatment<br />
technology needed to meet eventual Illinois water quality standards.<br />
Treatment Wetlands Study at Lockport<br />
Powerhouse Marsh<br />
Des Plaines<br />
River<br />
Chicago<br />
Sanitary<br />
and Ship<br />
The District currently is designing two pilot treatment wetlands on<br />
its property to demonstrate nutrient removal near the Lockport<br />
Powerhouse and along the Centennial Trail north of 135th Street.<br />
Data obtained from these wetlands under local conditions could be<br />
applied to potentially larger operational wetlands.<br />
The District is also investigating another project. In the Lake<br />
Calumet area, the District is studying, in conjunction with the City of<br />
Chicago, the feasibility of a concept to create wetlands and modify<br />
existing wetlands to remove nutrients from Calumet WRP effluent.<br />
Habitat protection and recreational opportunities would be integrated<br />
into the project.<br />
Wetlands can also have additional benefits of long-term sequestering<br />
of carbon as peat, mitigating downstream flooding, providing<br />
recreational areas, and recreating native habitat for many fish,<br />
wildlife, and plant species. Many endangered species inhabit<br />
wetlands or wetlands play an important part of their life cycle.<br />
Wetlands contribute to the maintenance of biological diversity.<br />
Wetlands can help improve water quality by removing or retaining<br />
nutrients, organics, and sediment carried by runoff.<br />
Contaminated Sediment Remediation<br />
A one-acre contaminated sediment capping and wetland creation<br />
demonstration project is being designed and will be constructed in<br />
collaboration with the University of Illinois at Chicago and The<br />
Wetlands Initiative, in the Collateral Channel on the Sanitary and<br />
Ship Canal near Kedzie Avenue. This is a $5.3 million project in the<br />
Corporate Fund. Success of this demonstration project will be critical<br />
in dealing with contaminated sediments in other parts of the Chicago<br />
<strong>Water</strong>ways System.<br />
<strong>Water</strong> Quality Initiatives<br />
On October 26, 2007, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) initiated a rulemaking with the Illinois<br />
Pollution Control Board, captioned “In the Matter of: <strong>Water</strong> Quality Standards and Effluent Limitations for the<br />
Chicago Area <strong>Water</strong>way System and Lower Des Plaines River, Proposed Amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 301, 302,<br />
303 and 304” (R08-9). The rulemaking arises out of a Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) conducted by the IEPA and<br />
4<br />
4
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
seeks to upgrade the recreational and aquatic use designations for the Chicago Area <strong>Water</strong>ways (CAWs) and Lower Des<br />
Plaines River.<br />
If enacted as proposed, the rules would require the District to disinfect the effluent from its Stickney, Calumet and<br />
North Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants (WRPs), and increase the level of dissolved oxygen (DO) in certain segments of<br />
the CAWs. The District’s preliminary estimate of the capital costs associated with disinfection at these three WRPs<br />
range from approximately $963,000,000 to $2,153,000,000. The capital cost of flow augmentation or supplemental<br />
aeration just for the Upper North Shore Channel, the North and South Branches of the Chicago River, and the South<br />
Fork of the South Branch of the Chicago River, that is necessary to comply with the proposed DO standards in these<br />
stretches of the CAWs 90 percent of the time ranges from approximately $204,480,000 to $352,480,000.<br />
The District has initiated a number of water quality studies designed to supplement the rulemaking and ensure that any<br />
rules adopted are scientifically sound, technically feasible, and economically reasonable. The following studies either<br />
have been completed or are on-going:<br />
• Spatial and Temporal Characterization of Fecal Coliform in the CAWs: The District initiated a three-year<br />
study of fecal coliform distribution in the North Shore Channel/North Branch Chicago River (NSC)/(NBCR) and<br />
Little Calumet River/Calumet-Sag Channel Systems in 2004. The study was designed to determine the<br />
concentration of fecal coliform across these CAWs reaches that are typically observed during dry and wet weather<br />
and to determine the change in concentrations that occurs across each reach following wet weather events. The field<br />
sampling was concluded in 2006 and a final report was produced in 2007. The report indicates that imposition of<br />
the effluent fecal coliform standards proposed in the UAA rulemaking will not result in attainment of 400<br />
CFU/100mL in the waterways due to fecal coliform concentrations being much higher than this concentration<br />
upstream of the North Side and Calumet WRPs and in tributary flows, and during wet weather which exerts an<br />
influence on CAWs water quality with respect to bacterial concentration a minimum of 60 percent of the time<br />
throughout the year. This study indicates that effluent disinfection will not provide any significant improvement in<br />
water quality in the CAWs and highlights the need to determine the levels of fecal coliform in the CAWs that are<br />
protective of identified recreational uses. The District has initiated a follow-up study to assess non-point sources of<br />
E. coli in the CAWs in collaboration with the United States Geological Society’s Lake Michigan Ecological<br />
Research Station. This study will continue through 2010.<br />
• USEPA Bacterial <strong>Water</strong> Quality Criteria Review: In 2004, the District convened a panel of experts to review the<br />
applicability of the USEPA’s 1986 criteria and the draft 2003 guidance for setting bacterial water quality standards<br />
in the CAWs. The expert panel, chaired by Dr. Charles Haas of Drexel University, and including Drs. Joan Rose of<br />
Michigan State University, Herbert Allen of the University of Delaware, and Abdel Al-Shaarawi of Environment<br />
Canada concluded that there are currently no criteria available to derive a science based water quality standard that<br />
is protective of secondary contact type recreational uses such as are occurring on the CAWs. The expert panel<br />
recommended that the District conduct a quantitative microbial risk assessment and/or an epidemiological study of<br />
CAWs recreators to determine the relationship between water quality and risk of illness among recreational users of<br />
the CAWs.<br />
• Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment for CAWs Recreational Users: In 2005 the District, in partnership<br />
with its consultants GeoSyntec Consultants, Dr. Charles Gerba of the University of Arizona, Clancy Environmental<br />
Consultants, Inc., Hoosier Microbiological Laboratory, Inc., Patterson Environmental Consultants, and Cecil Lue-<br />
Hing and Associates, initiated a quantitative microbial risk assessment for recreational uses identified as occurring<br />
under the IEPA’s UAA on the CAWs. The study consisted of sampling and determining microbiological water<br />
quality during dry and wet weather conditions including effluent, and upstream and downstream of the Stickney,<br />
Calumet, and North Side WRPs and major Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) pump stations. Analytical parameters<br />
included fecal coliform, E. coli, enterococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella spp., infectious<br />
Cryptosporidium parvum, viable Giardia lamblia, total culturable viruses, viable adenovirus, and Calicivirus. State<br />
of the art risk modeling was utilized along with use observation data from the UAA Study to simulate the risk to<br />
recreators due to incidental contact and non-contact recreational use of the CAWs. An interim dry weather risk<br />
assessment report was completed in 2006 and the final study report was completed in April 2008. The study<br />
indicates that current recreational practices on the CAWs pose very low risk to recreators below the 10 and 14<br />
illnesses/1000 recreational events, which IEPA has set as an acceptable threshold for incidental and non-contact<br />
recreation in the CAWs UAA Report.<br />
• Epidemiological Study of Incidental Contact and Non-Contact Recreation on the CAWs: The District has<br />
initiated an epidemiological study of CAWs recreators through the University of Illinois at Chicago School of<br />
Public Health. This state of the art study was initiated in 2007 and will validate the results of a recently completed<br />
5<br />
5
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
quantitative microbial risk assessment and will also provide scientific data necessary to properly evaluate the actual<br />
risk of illness and its correlation to indicator bacteria concentrations in the CAWs. This study has been modeled<br />
after the methodology that USEPA utilizes to set water quality standards for coastal waters, but with a focus on<br />
incidental contact and non-contact recreational uses. The project is being peer reviewed by a panel of<br />
epidemiology, environmental health, microbiology, and water quality experts organized by the <strong>Water</strong> Environment<br />
Research Foundation (WERF). The WERF review panel has issued a letter of endorsement of the qualifications of<br />
the project team, the methodologies being deployed, and the quality of data being collected to date. The field<br />
survey and sample collection phases of the study are scheduled to be completed by mid-2009 and the final study<br />
report is scheduled to be completed in early 2010.<br />
• Disinfection Technology Selection: The District formulated a Blue Ribbon Panel which consisted of Dr. Charles<br />
Haas of Drexel University, Dr. Benito Marinas of the University of Illinois, and Dr. Kellog J. Schwab of Johns<br />
Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health to evaluate and rank the suitability of all available<br />
disinfection technologies for use at the District’s Stickney, Calumet, and North Side WRPs. The Blue Ribbon Panel<br />
evaluated an array of technologies including chlorination, ultraviolet irradiation (UV), and ozonation. The panel<br />
considered desirable performance requirements, qualitative economic requirements, indirect environmental and<br />
public health impacts, and perception issues. The panel recommended that UV and ozonation be considered for<br />
preliminary design and cost estimation.<br />
• Preliminary Design and Cost Estimate for Effluent Disinfection: The District, through its consultant<br />
CTE/AECOM Engineers, Inc., initiated a study of the preliminary design and cost estimation to add a unit process<br />
for final effluent disinfection at the Stickney, Calumet, and North Side WRPs. This work was initiated in 2004 and<br />
an engineering report was issued in 2005 with probable cost estimates. Probable cost estimates for UV disinfection<br />
at the Stickney, Calumet, and North Side WRPs were as high as $2,153,000,000, if filtration is required, and<br />
$963,000,000 if filtration is not required. Probable cost estimates for ozonation at the Stickney, Calumet, and North<br />
Side WRPs were as high as $2,702,000,000, if filtration is required, and $1,511,000,000 if filtration is not required.<br />
CTE/AECOM is now refining and updating these costs for the Stickney, Calumet, and North Side WRPs, and the<br />
update will be completed in 2009.<br />
• Pilot UV Technology Assessment: The District has designed a pilot scale technology assessment which it will<br />
conduct at its Hanover Park WRP beginning in early 2009 to compare several UV technologies side-by-side and<br />
evaluate efficacy, energy consumption, reliability, maintenance requirements, and select a preferred technology.<br />
This information will be utilized to convert the current chlorine based disinfection systems at the Hanover Park,<br />
Egan, and Kirie WRPs to UV based disinfection and to prepare for installation of UV disinfection at the Stickney,<br />
Calumet, and North Side WRPs if required as a result of the UAA rulemaking.<br />
• Evaluation of Technical Feasibility and Cost of End-of-Pipe Treatment of CSOs: In 2004, the District<br />
undertook a study through its consultant CTE/AECOM of the feasibility and cost of treatment of 170 CSOs along<br />
the NSC, NBCR, Chicago River, and South Branch Chicago River (SBCR). The study was completed in 2006, and<br />
it was determined that primary treatment with subsequent UV disinfection could be provided for 105 of the 170<br />
CSOs in the study area requiring 48 acres of land and would provide capacity to treat a total CSO volume of 2,009<br />
million gallons per day. The estimated cost for these treatment facilities is $966,000,000.<br />
• Comprehensive Ambient <strong>Water</strong> Quality Monitoring (AWQM) Program: <strong>Water</strong> chemistry has been assessed<br />
monthly, bimonthly or semi-annually at 59 stations, including 28 stations within the CAWs, since 2001. In<br />
addition, fish, benthic invertebrate, and physical habitat data have been collected annually at eight of these CAWs<br />
stations and on a four-year revolving basis at the other 20 stations. Sediment chemistry and toxicity has been<br />
measured at each station once every four years since 2001, as well. A majority of the data IEPA relied upon during<br />
the UAA process and included in the UAA Report was collected as part of the AWQM Program and was furnished<br />
by the District.<br />
• Continuous Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring Program: The District implemented a Continuous DO Monitoring<br />
(CDOM) Program in 1998, which has since been expanded throughout the CAWs. Currently, 22 of the CDOM<br />
stations are within the CAWs; nine in the Chicago River System and six in the Calumet River System. The<br />
extensive hourly data generated by this program has allowed the District to better identify DO problems and<br />
explore the effects of wet weather on this system. The data have also been provided to the IEPA for use in<br />
promulgating water quality standards.<br />
• Evaluation of Sidestream Elevated Pool Aeration (SEPA) Stations: The District is conducting field tests using<br />
the SEPA Stations on the Calumet-Sag Channel to determine whether the stations can be operated to comply with<br />
6<br />
6
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
the DO standards proposed in R08-9, and, if so, what the additional electricity requirements would be to meet the<br />
new standards. The field work was completed in 2008 and a final report for the project will be issued in 2009.<br />
• Dissolved Oxygen Modeling: Beginning in 2003, the District began working with Dr. Charles Melching of<br />
Marquette University to develop a state of the art unsteady state hydraulic and water quality model (CAWs WQ<br />
Model). This CAWs WQ Model was completed in 2005 and calibrated for several typical wet weather periods. It<br />
has been a tool for all of the engineering studies the District has undertaken. The CAWs WQ Model is currently<br />
undergoing refinement to improve the calibration, and extend its abilities to simulate a wider range of conditions. It<br />
is being calibrated to simulate entire typical wet and dry water years. This improved CAWs WQ Model will<br />
provide a better assessment of the attainability of proposed dissolved oxygen criteria under a range of expected<br />
conditions. Existing available modeling analysis only examined selected conditions, and utilized a model that<br />
needed important improvements. This modeling work is expected to be completed by early 2009.<br />
• Flow Augmentation of the Upper North Shore Channel: In 2005, the District initiated a study, through its<br />
consultant CTE/AECOM, to determine water quality management options for the Upper North Shore Channel<br />
(UNSC). The UNSC is a four-mile segment of the CAWs that extends from Lake Michigan at the Wilmette<br />
Pumping Station to the outfall of the North Side WRP and is plagued with low DO due to stagnant flow. Using the<br />
CAWs WQ Model developed for the District by Marquette University, CTE/AECOM Engineers determined that<br />
augmenting the flow in the UNSC with 100 million gallons per day of aerated North Side WRP effluent was<br />
optimal, at a present worth cost of $74,880,000.<br />
• Supplemental Aeration of the North and South Branches of the Chicago River: CTE/AECOM explored the<br />
technologies and costs for adding supplemental aeration to the NBCR and SBCR. The CAWs WQ Model was also<br />
used to support this study. The study concluded that four stations, in addition to the existing aeration stations that<br />
were installed by the District in 1980 at Devon Avenue and Webster Avenue on the NSC and NBCR, respectively,<br />
would be required. The range of present worth costs is $47,700,000 million to $132,600,000 million, depending on<br />
the aeration technology.<br />
• Flow Augmentation and Supplemental Aeration of the South Fork of the South Branch of the Chicago River<br />
(Bubbly Creek): CTE/AECOM investigated water quality management options for Bubbly Creek using the CAWs<br />
WQ Model and determined that a combination of flow augmentation and supplemental aeration would improve<br />
conditions in Bubbly Creek. The costs for the management options, depending upon the aeration technology, was<br />
determined to range from $81,900,000 to $145,000,000.<br />
• CAWs Habitat Evaluation and Improvement Study: In early 2007, the District initiated the planning and<br />
development of a request for proposal for a comprehensive study of the varying habitats, including sediments,<br />
throughout the CAWs, as well as identification of ambient fish populations and life stages. This information will<br />
better define the capabilities of the CAWs to support aquatic life and resolve issues of its potential to support early<br />
life stages of fish. Existing information on habitat is limited and information on early life stages non-existent. A<br />
habitat metric specifically designed for this highly modified urban waterway system will be developed as the basis<br />
for aquatic life use designations and expected improvements in aquatic life use due to proposed water quality<br />
improvements will be assessed. This study is being conducted by LimnoTech. The field data collection phase was<br />
completed in 2008 and the final report completed by mid-2009.<br />
• Integrated <strong>Water</strong> Quality Strategy: The District is currently conducting engineering, cost, and water quality<br />
studies to develop an integrated water quality strategy for meeting the proposed DO standards in R08-9. This study<br />
is being conducted by CTE/AECOM Engineers, Inc., and integrates approaches such as flow augmentation,<br />
supplemental aeration, and CSO capture and treatment, which were previously studied individually, into a unified<br />
strategy for water quality improvement. The study also looks comprehensively at the entire CAWs including the<br />
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and the Calumet River System, which were not included in previous engineering<br />
studies. Existing analysis by the District of potential water quality improvements only looks at treatment and<br />
waterway restoration actions independently. This study is exploring the feasibility and effectiveness of<br />
combinations of actions and will then analyze the economic costs. Current information does not consider combined<br />
effects or combined costs. This study will be completed by spring 2009.<br />
• Determination of Economic and Environmental Impact of Meeting Proposed Effluent Disinfection and<br />
Dissolved Oxygen Standards: In conjunction with the integrated water quality strategy, the District will conduct<br />
an economic feasibility assessment to determine the costs to implement the integrated treatment and stream<br />
improvement projects given the District’s current economic structure, which has certain tax-based limitations. The<br />
District initiated the study in 2007 to determine the overall costs and environmental impacts that will result from<br />
7<br />
7
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
compliance with the proposed disinfection standard and water quality DO standard in R08-9. This project is being<br />
conducted by Malcolm Pirnie Consultants and will be completed by mid-2009.<br />
• 3-Dimensional Hydraulic Modeling of Bubbly Creek, South Fork Chicago River, and Chicago Sanitary and<br />
Ship Canal: The District is currently supporting researchers at the University of Illinois to study the complex<br />
hydraulics of the CAWs under various conditions. This research will examine issues of stratification, bidirectional<br />
flow, and stagnation, under a range of dry and wet weather conditions. Currently, available information only<br />
identifies the existence of stratification, bidirectional flow, and stagnation, but does not characterize its extent and<br />
occurrence under a variety of conditions. This study will provide the more sophisticated modeling necessary for<br />
selection of the sites and sizes of supplemental aeration facilities for final design if necessary. The one-dimensional<br />
unsteady state model being utilized for most of the waterways is insufficient for modeling to the level of precision<br />
necessary under the unique conditions present in these CAWs reaches. This study is not expected to be completed<br />
until the end of 2010.<br />
Aquatic Life Protection<br />
The Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) study of the Chicago Area <strong>Water</strong>ways (CAWs) conducted by the Illinois<br />
Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) has proposed more stringent Dissolved Oxygen (DO) standards for the<br />
CAWs. Hearings are currently being conducted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) for possible adoption<br />
into mandated DO standards for the CAWs. In response to previous requests by the IEPA, the Monitoring and Research<br />
Department (M&R) retained the services of Marquette University to construct a computer model of the CAWs to<br />
predict dissolved oxygen levels at various points along the CAWs under different flow conditions. The model was<br />
calibrated using actual instream dissolved oxygen data from various wet weather and dry weather periods.<br />
The Engineering Department, through the services of a consultant, used the model to predict the effects of making<br />
specific changes to the waterways, in accordance with the request from the IEPA. The studied changes were:<br />
supplemental aeration, flow augmentation, and primary treatment of combined sewer overflows (CSO). Flow<br />
augmentation involves the pumping of final effluent from a District <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant to a segment of the CAWs<br />
that exhibits stagnant flow conditions. The intent is to induce a constant flow, thereby providing natural oxygenation of<br />
the water. Flow augmentation using supersaturated plant effluent water was also studied. Supplemental aeration<br />
includes technologies such as instream ceramic air diffusers, instream jet aerators, U-tubes, and side stream treatment,<br />
similar to the District’s five SEPA stations.<br />
The results, which were presented to the IEPA, indicated potential benefits from flow augmentation and supplemental<br />
aeration. Primary treatment of CSO flows was determined to provide no benefit under wet weather conditions, to be<br />
physically impossible to implement at all CSO sites, and to be prohibitively expensive. Consequently, the IEPA<br />
dismissed this approach from further study.<br />
Based on this earlier work, the water quality model is now being refined by Marquette University in order to be used by<br />
the Engineering Department for an integrated water quality strategy for the CAWs. Whereas, the previous study looked<br />
only at the effects of specific actions unto themselves, the integrated water quality strategy will analyze the CAWs on a<br />
holistic basis, studying a combination of both supplemental aeration and flow augmentation activities, while relating<br />
changes in DO in one segment of the waterway to the various other interconnected segments. The goal is to find the<br />
combination of actions that produces a positive result in all segments of the waterways. Two scenarios will be modeled:<br />
achieving compliance with proposed dissolved oxygen standards 90 percent of the time and 100 percent of the time.<br />
Results are expected in early 2009 and will be presented to the IEPA and the IPCB. Based on the selected course of<br />
action, the Engineering Department will then study the specific design conditions, equipment, siting, and costs to<br />
implement an integrated strategy.<br />
Effluent Disinfection<br />
In planning for 2009, the District will face a number of operational and financial challenges. Under the proposed<br />
rulemaking the District will be required to provide disinfection at its three largest water reclamation plants (WRPs).<br />
The objective of disinfection is to reduce the concentrations of pathogens (bacteria) in the water reclamation plant<br />
effluent in order to safeguard the health of the public who use the waterways for contact recreation. The need for<br />
disinfection is based upon the quality and use of the receiving stream. Currently, the District’s Egan, Kirie, and Hanover<br />
Park WRPs provide effluent disinfection, since they discharge into waterways designated by the IEPA as General Use<br />
waterways. The Stickney, Calumet, North Side, and Lemont WRPs do not provide disinfection, as they discharge into<br />
man-made canals primarily used for drainage of treated effluent and stormwater, and for navigation, and designated by<br />
the IEPA as Secondary Contact waterways. The proposal currently before the Illinois Pollution Control Board by the<br />
8<br />
8
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
IEPA is to establish limits for fecal coliform bacteria in the final effluent at the Stickney, Calumet, and North Side<br />
plants. This proposal is controversial, as it is based upon arbitrary limits, is not based on science, and is not supported<br />
by the conclusions of the UAA conducted by the IEPA.<br />
In order to provide the objective scientific conclusion that is lacking in the basis for IEPA’s proposed limits, the District<br />
has conducted and commissioned numerous studies on this subject. These studies include “Spatial and Temporal<br />
Characterization of Fecal Coliform in the CAWs,” “USEPA Bacterial <strong>Water</strong> Quality Review,” “Quantitative Microbial<br />
Risk Assessment for CAWs Recreational Users,” “Epidemiological Study of Incidental Contact and Non-Contact<br />
Recreation on the CAWs,” and “Chicago Area <strong>Water</strong>ways Recreational Study.” In addition, the District commissioned<br />
a blue ribbon task force to determine the most appropriate technology for disinfection if it were to be implemented, and<br />
the costs for such implementation. Due to the high cost of disinfection, the Engineering Department has undertaken an<br />
economic and environmental impact study for meeting the proposed effluent limitations.<br />
The three WRPs which currently do disinfect the effluent use a chemical process of chlorination to deactivate the<br />
pathogens, followed by the addition of sodium bisulfite to reduce chlorine residual. Free chlorine has been shown to<br />
produce chlorinated byproducts which may be harmful to aquatic life. Because of this, in 2008, the District began a pilot<br />
study to evaluate different ultraviolet light (UV) disinfection technologies side-by-side at the Hanover Park WRP. UV<br />
disinfection inactivates bacteria without the use of chemicals. The District is evaluating three different technologies.<br />
Two of the technologies utilize low-pressure high-intensity lamps, with one controlling dosage based on transmittance<br />
and the other based on lamp intensity. The third technology is a unique system utilizing microwave technology instead<br />
of the traditional bulb. Initial evaluation of these technologies is expected to be completed in 2009. The District will use<br />
the results of this study to design UV disinfection facilities for the Egan, Kirie, and Hanover Park WRPs, to replace the<br />
current chlorination/dechlorination chemical disinfection process.<br />
Tunnel and Reservoir Plan Accomplishments<br />
TUNNEL AND RESERVOIR PLAN<br />
March 2006 marked the completion of three decades<br />
of tunnel construction as part of the Tunnel and<br />
Reservoir Plan (TARP). The tunnel system, Phase I<br />
of TARP, is designed to capture up to 2.4 billion<br />
gallons of the first flush of sewage contaminated<br />
stormwater from combined sewers that had<br />
previously flowed into the area waterways. This is a<br />
major portion of the combined sewer overflows<br />
(CSOs) into local rivers.<br />
This project has produced major improvements in<br />
local river water quality, greatly increasing the value<br />
of property bordering the rivers. Wildlife, particularly<br />
birds and fish, are returning as the water quality<br />
improves. Reduction in obvious water pollution has<br />
promoted increased recreational use of these<br />
waterways, which presents other problems. The<br />
waterways are still potentially unsafe for human body<br />
contact due to bacterial contamination, and due to a<br />
lack of access locations.<br />
Phase II of TARP continues with the design and<br />
construction of the McCook and Thornton<br />
Reservoirs. The TARP reservoirs will greatly<br />
increase the volume available for capturing<br />
contaminated combined sewer overflows that<br />
previously would have discharged to the rivers. The<br />
ultimate storage capacity of the TARP system in<br />
2024 will be approximately 17.5 billion gallons.<br />
As of July 2008, approximately 58.7 million tons of<br />
rock (77 percent of the total excavation) has been<br />
mined from Thornton Composite Reservoir by<br />
contract with Hanson Material Service Corporation<br />
9<br />
9
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
(HMS). The crushed limestone from the excavation is sold by HMS into the local construction market. The District will<br />
have two years following the completion of the excavation in about 2012, to bring the Composite Reservoir on-line and<br />
return the Transitional Reservoir to HMS.<br />
The Thornton Transitional Reservoir has contained in aggregate 16.9 billion gallons of flood water as of the end of<br />
December 2008 from 25 storms. The protection provided to downstream communities from flood damage during these<br />
events is valued at an estimated $258 million.<br />
The McCook TARP Reservoir is being constructed in two stages on District property between the Des Plaines River<br />
and the Sanitary and Ship Canal. In 2008, overburden removal from the McCook site will be substantially completed<br />
with the exception of the expanded reservoir area. Full production mining of the Stage I rough hole began in the spring<br />
by Vulcan Construction Materials, LP, under an agreement with the District at an expected removal rate of 7 million<br />
tons of rock per year. In addition , the Army Corps of Engineers completed the first half of the grout curtain in late 2008<br />
and is expected to complete the groundwater cut-off wall around the perimeter of the reservoir in early 2009.<br />
Master Planning for 2009 and Beyond<br />
The District developed “Master Plans” in 2004 through 2006 for the three large WRPs, which are engineering studies of<br />
the infrastructure of the treatment processes at each plant, specifying future capital projects. Recommendations of the<br />
Master Plans are based on process improvements that will increase efficiencies in manpower and energy, and reduce<br />
maintenance costs. Infrastructure at the end of its useful life is addressed by major reconstruction, rehabilitation and<br />
expansion projects planned for each plant. The initial construction project cost estimates of approximately $2.1 billion<br />
will consume the District’s entire available non-referendum debt capacity through the sunset of the District’s statutory<br />
bonding authority in 2016.<br />
Construction work and engineering design work continues on the implementation of the Master Planning projects<br />
developed for the District’s three largest water reclamation Plants: Stickney, Calumet, and North Side. At the Calumet<br />
plant, the new Central Boiler Facility will be completed and placed in operation in 2009, while construction of the new<br />
High Level Influent Pumping Station will surpass the halfway mark. In 2009, construction work will start on twelve<br />
new circular primary settling tanks, a new grit removal facility, two new intermediate blowers for more energy efficient<br />
operation, and new gravity belt thickeners for improved<br />
solids handling. At the Stickney plant, in 2009, a project<br />
will be advertised for construction of new gravity sludge<br />
concentration tanks to improve solids capture in the plant.<br />
In addition, a project to begin demolition of Imhoff<br />
Battery A and half of the existing skimming tanks will be<br />
advertised in preparation of constructing new circular<br />
primary settling tanks in place of all the Imhoff tanks. At<br />
the North Side plant, design work will continue on a new<br />
Battery E to give the North Side plant the necessary<br />
redundant capacity to permit the existing inefficient final<br />
settling tanks of Batteries A, B, and C to be systematically<br />
taken out of service, demolished, and rebuilt.<br />
Calumet Central Boiler Facility<br />
Stormwater Management<br />
The Cook County Stormwater Management Plan (CCSMP), adopted by the District’s Board of Commissioners on<br />
February 15, 2007, is a high level organizational plan describing the District’s approach towards the countywide<br />
stormwater management program. The CCSMP provides the goals of the program, detailed information necessary for<br />
the preparation of individual watershed plans and the framework for a countywide regulatory ordinance. There are six<br />
established watersheds within Cook County to be studied. Work on the first three watershed plans began in late 2006.<br />
Two are scheduled for completion by the spring of 2009, with the third finishing in mid-2009. Plans for the remaining<br />
three watersheds began late in 2007, and will be completed in 2010.<br />
10<br />
10
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Cook County <strong>Water</strong>sheds<br />
The primary objective of the watershed plans is<br />
the determination of capital improvement projects<br />
to help alleviate regional stormwater management<br />
problems. The District will prioritize potential<br />
projects arising from the watershed plans on a<br />
countywide basis. Until the watershed plans are<br />
completed, the District will consider funding<br />
projects which provide regional benefits and have<br />
been studied and approved by regional agencies<br />
such as the Illinois Department of Natural<br />
Resources/Office of <strong>Water</strong> Resources and the<br />
United States Army Corps of Engineers. One of<br />
the first projects may be the creation of a reservoir<br />
at Heritage Park in the Village of Wheeling.<br />
Additional downstream projects are contingent on<br />
this additional compensatory upstream stormwater<br />
storage, including the Levee 37 project protecting<br />
areas of Prospect Heights and Mount Prospect.<br />
Work on the countywide regulatory ordinance, the<br />
<strong>Water</strong>shed Management Ordinance (WMO),<br />
began in 2007 and will conclude in 2009. The<br />
ordinance will establish uniform, minimum,<br />
countywide stormwater management regulations<br />
including drainage and detention, floodplain<br />
management, wetland protection, stream habitat<br />
and riparian environment protection, soil erosion<br />
and sediment control, and water quality. A draft of<br />
the WMO will undergo a public review period in<br />
2009 prior to its adoption by the District Board of<br />
Commissioners.<br />
The Maintenance and Operations Department initiated a Small Stream Maintenance Program (SSMP) in 2006 to<br />
provide stream cleaning services for the removal of debris and fallen trees which impede the flow of the streams and<br />
cause flooding. The SSMP has expanded services to include approximately 1,000 miles of small streams in Cook<br />
County. Stream cleaning is done with a combination of in-house staff and contracted services based on citizen and<br />
community requests for debris removal and field surveys by District staff. District staff work in concert with local<br />
communities to remove and dispose of debris as needed.<br />
Other Post-Employment Benefits Trust<br />
The District provides subsidized health care benefits for its retirees. The Government Accounting Standards Board<br />
(GASB) pronouncement 45, requires reporting of the future liability for maintaining these benefits in the<br />
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). The initial projection of the future liability to the District was<br />
estimated as being as large as $900 million, depending on the underlying assumptions and adoption of policies.<br />
The Board adopted staff’s policy recommendation on July 13, 2006 to establish an irrevocable trust for funding the<br />
future liability with the following operating parameters:<br />
• 50 percent funded level target;<br />
• 50 years to reach funding level;<br />
• $10 million funding in each of the first 5 years beginning in 2007 from the Corporate Fund;<br />
• An initial investment mixture of 50 percent equities and 50 percent bonds with a maximum limit of 65 percent<br />
equities that allows for investment growth.<br />
The policy set adopted by the District is cautious by design, and will provide ample opportunity for adjustment as<br />
experience is gained. Future direction may also be changed significantly by national health care policies and programs.<br />
The accumulated unfunded Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) obligation was approximately $443 million when<br />
reported in the 2006 CAFR.<br />
11<br />
11
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
In 2006, the District proposed state legislation to give authority to establish an OPEB trust. Public Act 95-394 became<br />
effective on August 26, 2007. An initial contribution of $15 million was budgeted in 2007. Following establishment of<br />
the trust, additional funding of $10 million was placed in the OPEB trust for a total of $25 million. This additional<br />
funding was due to surpluses in the Human Resources Department health insurance account and the deferral of projects<br />
and purchases in other departments. In 2008, $22 million was placed in the OPEB trust, $7 million funded by a transfer<br />
of earned investment interest from the Capital Improvements Bond Fund.<br />
Retirement Fund<br />
The District recognizes its responsibility to the employees’ retirement program, and the declining funded ratios that are<br />
similar to challenges for other large Illinois pension funds. As a result, the District has assisted the Retirement Fund<br />
with an analysis of additional funding options. As any change in the amount or source of funding for the Retirement<br />
Fund would require changes in state statute, the analysis will provide a rational and objective basis for recommending<br />
specific legislative changes. Most known options will increase the District’s employer contributions to the Retirement<br />
Fund.<br />
Financial Summary<br />
The District’s appropriation and tax levy for 2009 as recommended, compared to the 2008 <strong>Budget</strong>, as adjusted is:<br />
2009 2008 (adjusted) Increase / (Decrease) Percent Change<br />
Total Tax Levy $ 412,317,710 $ 426,172,116 $ (13,854,406) (3.3)<br />
Aggregate Levy 283,350,300 271,999,732 11,350,568 4.2<br />
Appropriation 1,630,593,990 1,472,660,136 157,933,854 10.7<br />
The aggregate levy is statutorily limited to an annual increase of 5 percent or the Consumer Price Index (CPI),<br />
whichever is lower. The increase in the 2009 aggregate levy is equal to the estimated CPI for 2008.<br />
In March 2008, the 2007 Bond and Interest Fund levy was abated by $7.1 million as a result of investment earnings<br />
generated by the Corporate Fund and surplus levy resulting from the March 2007 debt refunding.<br />
In conclusion, the District has several major challenges in the near future and is financially well positioned to meet<br />
those challenges. The recommended 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> submittal is a cost-effective plan to meet the needs of our residents.<br />
Respectfully submitted,<br />
Terrence J. O’Brien<br />
President<br />
Cynthia M. Santos<br />
Chairman, Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment<br />
12<br />
12
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
The following pages summarize the major policies, on-going programs, and initiatives that directed the development of the<br />
District's 2009 annual budget.<br />
Mission Statement and Operational Goals and Accomplishments<br />
The District will protect the health and safety of the public in its service area, protect the quality of the water supply source<br />
(Lake Michigan), improve the quality of water in watercourses in its service area, protect businesses and homes from flood<br />
damages, and manage water as a vital resource for its service area. The District’s service area is 883.5 square miles of Cook<br />
County, Illinois. The District is committed to achieve the highest<br />
standards of excellence in fulfilling its mission.<br />
To protect the health and safety of its residents: The District is<br />
dedicated to comply with environmental regulations governing<br />
discharges to air, land and water, and assists first-responders in<br />
handling threatening incidents and hazardous waste spills.<br />
To protect the quality of Lake Michigan water: The District has<br />
successfully eliminated all sewage discharges to Lake Michigan and<br />
strives to minimize discharges to the lake caused by excessive rainfall<br />
runoff. To continue to protect Lake Michigan, our region’s fresh<br />
drinking water supply, and protect the public health, the District will<br />
continue to monitor potential sources of discharges that may threaten<br />
Lake Michigan and will minimize stormwater discharges to the lake<br />
through careful operation of the Tunnel and Reservoir Plan (TARP)<br />
project and the waterway system.<br />
To improve the water quality of area waterways: The District will<br />
cost-effectively collect and treat approximately 519 billion gallons of<br />
wastewater from businesses and homes and captured stormwater<br />
runoff from its service area. Our performance for treating this<br />
wastewater approaches 100 percent compliance with all applicable<br />
effluent standards at all water reclamation plants (WRPs). The District<br />
also employs strategic planning to provide for adequate facilities to<br />
meet this operational goal into the future. The District has completed<br />
and operates the tunnel portion of TARP, comprising 109.4 miles of<br />
tunnels and dewatering pumping stations. The tunnels capture a<br />
majority of the area’s combined sewer overflow (CSO) pollution load. The District operates one TARP reservoir serving the<br />
northwest suburban area and is working on the design and construction of two large reservoirs serving the remainder of the 375<br />
square-mile combined sewer area in the District’s 883.5 square-mile service area.<br />
To control commercial and industrial waste discharges to the sewers and waterways: The District effectively eliminates<br />
offensive or dangerous discharges into the public sewer system through the administration of the Sewage and Waste Control<br />
Ordinance that specifies limits on the quantity and quality of wastes discharged by Industrial Users as required by USEPA<br />
Regulations. The discharges, unless properly controlled and treated,<br />
could interfere with our treatment processes and adversely impact<br />
waterways.<br />
Calumet River at Torrence Avenue, SEPA Station No. 1 in center<br />
Stony Island Avenue Biosolids Drying Site in background<br />
Drainage from the Chicago watershed was redirected to the<br />
Des Plaines River and away from Lake Michigan in 1900,<br />
thereby protecting the drinking water supply.<br />
To maintain our facilities and infrastructure to ensure that they<br />
remain an asset to the residents of the District: The District owns<br />
and operates 7 modern and effective WRPs, 554 miles of<br />
intercepting sewers and force mains, 23 pumping stations, and 35<br />
flood control reservoirs. Through preventive maintenance<br />
management, modernization, rehabilitation, and planned<br />
replacement, the District will ensure the long-term reliability and<br />
cost-effectiveness of operations. Facility improvement master plans<br />
covering the next 35 years have been prepared for the Calumet,<br />
North Side, and Stickney WRPs. Plans for the Lemont WRP are<br />
being developed to replace the plant with a pumping station and 10<br />
mile force main to the Stickney WRP.<br />
13<br />
13
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
To provide stormwater management for Cook County: The District has begun to develop effective rules, regulations and<br />
projects that will reduce potential damage to life, public health, safety and property from flooding. Flood damages in Cook<br />
County are estimated at over $200 million annually. The District’s Stormwater Management program will employ effective<br />
regulations on new development, as well as structural and non-structural measures to reduce flood damages, will maintain area<br />
watercourses to their design capacity and will strive to properly manage rainfall runoff close to where it falls.<br />
To control staff growth and costs through<br />
effective management of District operations:<br />
Positions by Staffing Category 2000 - 2009<br />
Productivity gains are achieved through investment 2,500<br />
in cost-effective technology and sound management<br />
principles. The District will continue to control fulltime<br />
personnel consistent with the demands of safety, 2,000<br />
productivity and new responsibilities, and utilize<br />
advances in technology following careful analysis of<br />
their efficiency and reliability.<br />
To improve recruiting, hiring, and development<br />
of a dedicated work force, including minorities<br />
and women: Female and minority representation in<br />
the District’s work force has increased to a current<br />
level of 25.3 percent and 38.3 percent, respectively.<br />
These percentages correspond favorably with the<br />
Cook County minority labor force percentage of 33<br />
percent and the District-specific class representation<br />
index for women, of 25 percent.<br />
M illion $<br />
50 Heat drying<br />
45 of biosolids<br />
discontinued<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
Natural<br />
Gas<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
500<br />
Energy Consumption in Dollars 1981 - 2009<br />
TARP Mainstream<br />
Pump Station online<br />
SEPA stations online<br />
1957 rate agreement<br />
w ith Com Ed expired<br />
January 2, 2007<br />
0<br />
Exempt<br />
Professional M anagement<br />
General Service<br />
Negotiated (NR) & Prevailing (PR) Rate<br />
00 02 04 06 2008 2009<br />
Est. Proj.<br />
To keep energy costs to a minimum: Since<br />
1980, the District’s total expenditure rates for<br />
natural gas and electricity have been held below<br />
the general inflation rate despite increased<br />
workloads and escalating utility rates. This<br />
achievement results from aggressive energy<br />
conservation programs and investment in more<br />
energy-efficient equipment and technology.<br />
Compensating for regulatory and rate changes<br />
effective January 1, 2007 will continue to be a<br />
major focus during the coming year.<br />
To continue our Affirmative Action<br />
10<br />
Electricity<br />
program: This program ensures the full and<br />
5<br />
equitable participation by minority, small, and<br />
women’s business enterprises in the<br />
0<br />
performance of District construction contracts.<br />
81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 2008 2009<br />
Est. Proj. In 1990, the District was the first major Cook<br />
County government to adopt a revised<br />
Affirmative Action ordinance which included standards enunciated in the United States Supreme Court decision in City of<br />
Richmond v. Croson. The District’s methodology was chosen by the USEPA as an example of excellence for its Availability<br />
Assessment. The model was distributed nationwide to all USEPA grant recipients for their use in formulating their own<br />
availability assessment. A statistical study of current minority, small and women contractors was begun in 2006 to comply with<br />
federal requirements and recent court decisions. In accordance with the 2000 Census’ racial and ethnic designations, Equal<br />
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidelines, the disparity study begun in 2006 and public input, the Board of<br />
Commissioners adopted a revised Affirmative Action Ordinance in late 2007.<br />
14<br />
14
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
Major Issues, Policy, and Program Changes<br />
Legislative Changes<br />
During the 2008 Spring Session of the Illinois General Assembly, legislation was passed and signed by the Governor that<br />
impacts the District. A summary of this legislation and its implications for the District is as follows:<br />
Public Act 95-825 and Public Act 95-716 These acts amend the MWRD Act to enlarge the corporate limits of the MWRD by<br />
annexing various parcels of land in Hoffman Estates into the District’s service area.<br />
Public Act 95-891 This act amends the MWRD Act to allow the Board of Commissioners to transfer interest earned on any<br />
moneys to the MWRD Retirement Fund, as well as to the funds that are in most need of the money.<br />
Public Act 95-923 This act provides several amendments to the MWRD Act as follows:<br />
• Provides that charges for removal or discharge of a civil service employee of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District<br />
must be filed with the civil service board within 30 days from the date of suspension. Provides that those charges shall be<br />
promptly investigated by the civil service board (now, the civil service board must conduct an investigation within 30 days<br />
from the date of suspension). Provides that the employee's suspension shall be extended until the civil service board enters<br />
a finding unless the board approves an agreement to terminate the suspension at an earlier date. Provides that a hearing<br />
take place within 120 days from the date the charges were filed. Provides that either the District or the employee may file a<br />
petition for rehearing within 21 days after the finding and decision are served.<br />
• Amends the MWRD article of the Illinois Pension code by adding an appointed retiree member and one additional elected<br />
employee member to the Board of Trustees. The terms for successors to the employee members is increased from 3 years<br />
to 4 years, and for appointees from 2 years to 3 years.<br />
• Changes the titles of certain MWRD managers and departments effective January 1, 2009.<br />
• Amends the MWRD Act to enlarge the corporate limits of the MWRD by annexing parcels of land in Matteson and<br />
Olympia Fields into the District’s service area.<br />
Outstanding Legislative Initiatives<br />
Federal Funding of McCook and Thornton Reservoirs continues to be pursued through the Energy and <strong>Water</strong> Development<br />
Appropriation. The fiscal year 2009 <strong>Water</strong> Development Appropriation bills in the House and Senate contain provisions for $30.0<br />
million and $34.0 million, respectively. It appears that Congress may need to approve a Continuing Resolution (CR) to provide<br />
funding for government programs at either the House approved or Senate approved levels for fiscal year 2009 or the fiscal year<br />
2008 enacted level, whichever is less through March 6, 2009. Different scenarios are under development for funding through<br />
November, January, and February due to the uncertainty of when Congress will finalize the fiscal year 2009 appropriations<br />
process.<br />
Long-Term Facilities Planning<br />
In recognition of future population growth, aging infrastructure, and potentially more restrictive effluent discharge limitations,<br />
the District completed the development of Infrastructure and Process Needs Feasibility Studies for the District’s three largest<br />
water reclamation plants, Stickney, Calumet, and North Side. These studies identified the major capital improvements needed<br />
at each plant to continue to provide exceptional quality effluent into the year 2040. The goal is to reduce overall maintenance<br />
costs, operations costs, and energy consumption. The final product of the studies will be a Master Plan to establish, prioritize,<br />
and budget the construction contracts needed for each plant over the next three decades. Projects identified through the Master<br />
Plans are included in the Capital Improvements Bond Fund project lists.<br />
During 2007, the District entered into a $20,000,000 agreement for design services to replace the existing Imhoff tanks at the<br />
Stickney <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant with new Preliminary Settling Tanks. Upon completion of design, each of the three planned<br />
batteries will require approximately three years to construct. New clarifiers will be constructed within the structure of the<br />
existing Imhoff tanks, thereby saving the cost on new tank foundations, and some major influent and effluent flow distribution<br />
15<br />
15
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
channels. This project will both enhance the treatment process as well as reduce odors associated with the now obsolete Imhoff<br />
process.<br />
Master Plan projects continue to be designed and constructed at the Calumet WRP. The construction of a new Central Boiler<br />
Building will be completed and in operation in 2009. Construction of the new High Level Influent Pumping Station began in<br />
2007, and will continue through 2009. The design of 12 new circular primary settling tanks, and a new aerated grit building<br />
with an estimated value of $245,000,000, is complete, with construction anticipated to commence in 2009.<br />
Design work began in 2008 for the highest priority project under the North Side WRP Master Plan, the construction of Battery E.<br />
This battery is necessary to increase the biological treatment capacity. The addition of Battery E will give the North Side WRP the<br />
necessary redundant capacity to permit the existing final settling tanks of Batteries A, B, and C to be systematically taken out of<br />
service, demolished, and re-built. Battery E has an initial estimated construction cost of $315,000,000.<br />
The Master Plan study of Lemont basin treatment and collection facilities recommended replacement of the Lemont WRP with a<br />
new pumping station. A construction contract for a new pumping station and a 10-mile long force main to connect with existing<br />
sewers feeding the Stickney WRP is expected to be awarded in 2010.<br />
TARP Reservoirs<br />
The Tunnel and Reservoir Plan (TARP) consists of 109.4 miles of deep rock tunnels designed to capture up to 2.4 billion<br />
gallons of the first flush of sewage contaminated stormwater from combined sewers that had previously flowed into the area<br />
waterways. The final Calumet leg of the system began operations in March 2006. In addition, the plan includes reservoirs for<br />
storage of an additional 15.15 billion gallons of combined sewer overflow prior to treatment. See page 376 for the TARP<br />
system map.<br />
Thornton Composite and Transitional Reservoirs - In 1998, the District executed an agreement for land rights to the quarry<br />
property required for the Thornton Composite and Transitional Reservoirs. The agreement outlined the actions to be taken by<br />
both parties for mining of the Expanded North Lobe, use of the Lower West Lobe for the Transitional Reservoir, construction<br />
of the Composite Reservoir, decommissioning of the Transitional Reservoir, and the schedule for transfer of various properties.<br />
We have since completed the construction of the Transitional Reservoir in 2003.<br />
In September 2003, the District executed a Project Cooperation Agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for<br />
construction of the Thornton Composite Reservoir. Due to federal budget constraints, it was apparent that the Corps would not<br />
be able to provide sufficient and timely funding for this project. In light of contractually specified timetables with the property<br />
owner, requirements of our NPDES permits, and proven flood control benefits, the District has assumed responsibility for<br />
design and construction. This will allow the District to control scheduling, award, and construction of the project and ensure its<br />
timely completion in 2014.<br />
Mining of the rough hole required for construction of the Thornton Composite Reservoir is on schedule with approximately<br />
58.7 million tons of rock (77 percent of total) having been mined as of July 2008. Design is progressing on the contracts<br />
required for conversion of the “rough hole” into the completed reservoir. These contracts are the Connecting Tunnels and<br />
Gates, Groundwater Protection System, Tollway Dam and Grout Curtain, and the Final Reservoir Preparation contracts.<br />
McCook Reservoir - The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) finalized their Special Reevaluations Report (SRR) on the<br />
McCook CUP Reservoir in July 1998. This report recommended a 7.0 billion-gallon reservoir to be constructed in two stages at<br />
the District's LASMA site. Stages 1 and 2 are planned to be 75 percent funded by the Corps and 25 percent funded by the<br />
District under contract 73-161-2H. The expansion of Stage 2 by 3.0 billion gallons is currently being pursued, with the District<br />
funding any incremental costs.<br />
The District executed a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with the Corps in May 1999. One of the major challenges<br />
facing the District is federal appropriations to cover the 75 percent Corps funding.<br />
The McCook TARP Reservoir is being constructed in two stages on District property between the Des Plaines River and the<br />
Sanitary and Ship Canal. In 2008, overburden removal from the McCook site was substantially completed with the exception<br />
of the expanded reservoir area. Full production mining of the Stage I rough hole began in the spring by Vulcan Construction<br />
Materials, LP, under an agreement with the District at an expected removal rate of 7 million tons of rock per year. In addition ,<br />
the Army Corps of Engineers completed the first half of the grout curtain in late 2008 and is expected to complete the<br />
groundwater cut-off wall around the perimeter of the reservoir in early 2009.<br />
16<br />
16
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
Real Estate Tax Levies<br />
The District's primary source of operating revenue is ad valorem real estate taxes. The passage of the Property Tax Extension<br />
Limitation Act, Tax Cap, in 1995 limited future increases in property tax levies, except debt service, to the lesser of 5 percent or<br />
the change in the national consumer price index (CPI) plus allowable increases for new property. The District made significant<br />
reductions in operating expenditures in 1995 and 1996 to absorb the initial impact of revenue reductions due to the Tax Cap. Since<br />
then, restructuring of the Construction Fund projects, a healthy fund balance, interest transfers, and reduced property tax funding<br />
requirements for the Working Cash Funds allowed controlled growth in the Corporate Fund, within the limits of the Tax Caps.<br />
Since 1997, the CPI has averaged 2.7 percent and the growth in Corporate Fund expenditures has increased about 2.9 percent<br />
annually. This gap between CPI and expenditures is within the additional growth of new property tax base, and other nonproperty<br />
tax revenues. Matching the growth in expenditures to revenue was primarily the result of aggressively reducing nonoperations<br />
related expenditures. The 2009 Corporate Fund budget continues to take advantage of accumulated surpluses by<br />
reinvesting in short term upgrade projects and catching up on deferred maintenance.<br />
Decisions by the Illinois Property Tax Appeals Board (PTAB) and<br />
Property Tax Refunds - All Funds<br />
other property tax refunds ordered by the circuit courts have reduced<br />
25<br />
District tax revenues by $151.4 million since 1994. While the<br />
through Sept. 2008<br />
allowance for loss in collections of taxes has provided for a good 20<br />
portion of this, the net effect is that total collections have been less<br />
than expected. To provide for the refunds, the rate for loss in 15<br />
collection was raised to 3.5 percent in 2003 from the 3.0 percent<br />
10<br />
used for the 2002 levy. This loss in collection factor will continue to<br />
be used through 2009.<br />
5<br />
Cook County reassesses property values on a triennial cycle, rotating<br />
0<br />
from North Suburban to South Suburban to City of Chicago.<br />
Historically, when the City is reassessed, there are a larger number<br />
of assessment appeals that must be resolved before the final<br />
Equalized Assessed Valuations can be set, tax rates calculated and property tax bills prepared. In Springfield, The Governor<br />
returned House Bill 664 to the legislature on September 20, 2007 with an amendatory veto. The bill extended and modified the<br />
7 percent cap on increases to residential Equalized Assessed Valuation (EAV) which expired in 2006. The amendatory veto<br />
was overridden on October 12, 2007. With the Cook County Assessor’s office waiting for a resolution of this matter before<br />
printing the second installment bills, the 2006 levy collectible in 2007 were due December 3, 2007. That delay shifted some<br />
tax receipts into 2008, effectively increasing revenues recognized in 2008.<br />
Non-Property Tax Revenues - Fund Balances<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
2008<br />
Economic growth in this region has been reflected in increased non-property tax revenues that help support District operations<br />
and fund balance levels. While the District is primarily supported by property taxes, prior years’ strong levels of investment<br />
interest income, personal replacement property tax and user charge revenues significantly cushioned the impacts of the Tax<br />
Cap Law restrictions on tax levy increases.<br />
Slow increases in certain non-property tax revenues were anticipated in the conservative revenue estimates used for the 2009<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>. Before 2004, all net assets appropriable had been reappropriated as revenue for the subsequent year. Beginning in<br />
2004, a portion of the projected net assets remained unappropriated to provide for a fiscally responsible fund balance. A<br />
Corporate Fund balance within the $45 to $55 million range, or 12 to 15 percent of appropriations, is viewed by District<br />
management and the financial markets as necessary to maintain financial stability and sustain us through economic<br />
uncertainties. This fund balance level is consistent with recommendations of the Government Finance Officers Association.<br />
This is an integral part of a long-term plan that also includes reductions of future expenditures to better match current revenues.<br />
Revenues and expenditures are closely monitored, so that favorable variances in revenues are recognized and made available<br />
for expenditure or unfavorable revenue variances lead to appropriate restrictions.<br />
Investment interest income in 2009 is projected to be $27.4 million compared to an estimated $32.3 million in 2008. The actual<br />
revenue for 2007 was $46.2 million. The Treasurer is statutorily limited to investments in U. S. Government debt and high<br />
quality, short term bonds. The variation in investment income is largely due to the decreases in short-term interest rates, and<br />
Million $<br />
17<br />
17
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
cyclical increases and decreases in fund balances. The current level of short-term interest rates is anticipated to continue<br />
through 2009. Interest income earned in any fund except the Reserve Claim Fund can be transferred to other funds.<br />
Personal Property Replacement Tax (PPRT) revenue is estimated to decrease in 2009 to $42.7 million. As the PPRT is primarily a<br />
tax on corporate income, it is expected to be similar to the 2008 level in parallel with the plateau in the state and national<br />
economy. PPRT revenue is distributed first to fully fund the Retirement Fund, and subsequent receipts are distributed to other nondebt<br />
funds. The calculation of PPRT allocation to the Retirement Fund was reviewed in 2006, and revised to eliminate a loss in<br />
collections factor that is no longer applicable.<br />
User Charge revenues have fluctuated in the $45 to $57 million dollar range over the last 10 years. Food Processing, Chemical<br />
and Government segments of the local economy comprise the majority of large payers. Several large payers have closed over<br />
the past several years; increased production and payments at many of the remaining industries have more than made up for the<br />
closures. The 2008 revenues are estimated to be $57.0 million and are conservatively projected to decrease to $49.3 million in<br />
2009.<br />
Non-Referendum Bonding Authority<br />
The District has authority to issue bonds without seeking voter approval via referendum through the year 2016. The initial Tax<br />
Cap legislation (PA89-1) limited this non-referendum authority to only projects that were initiated prior to October 1, 1991.<br />
Public Act 89-385 provided the District with the authority to issue non-referendum “limited bonds” for capital projects initiated<br />
after October 1, 1991. However, it was limited to the District's 1994 debt service level of $141,463,920. Public Act 90-485 has<br />
provided a further modification by authorizing the exclusion of debt for TARP projects from this debt service limit. With<br />
inclusion of the levies for the 2004 State Revolving Fund series of bonds for non-TARP projects; Capital Improvement Bonds<br />
Series D of December 2002 and the Series of July 2006; Refunding Bonds Series of May 2006 and Series of March 2007, there<br />
is approximately $105.7 million annual debt service available under the 1994 debt service limit related to the tax levy year<br />
2008.<br />
Additional bond issues through 2016 will be used to finance capital projects identified through the “Master Plans” for<br />
replacement, expansion and modernization of process facilities. Initial estimates and schedules for the projects were analyzed and<br />
compared to bond issuance authority and funding availability. The bond issuance authority will generally accommodate the<br />
proposed projects through 2016. Extension or increase in the authority will be necessary for additional projects that may be<br />
required to meet more stringent NPDES permit discharge limits, including effluent disinfection, nutrient removal and<br />
supplemental aeration.<br />
Other Post Employment Benefits<br />
The District provides and subsidizes health care benefits for its retirees. The Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB)<br />
pronouncement 45 requires reporting of the future liability for maintaining these benefits. Following Board policy, the District<br />
established an irrevocable trust late in 2007 for funding the future liability with the following operating parameters: a 50<br />
percent funded level target, 50 years to reach funding level, $10 million funding in each of the first 5 years beginning in 2007<br />
from the Corporate Fund, and an initial investment mixture of 50 percent equities and 50 percent bonds with a maximum limit<br />
of 65 percent equities that allows for investment growth.<br />
These assumptions set the accumulated unfunded OPEB obligation at approximately $443 million as of January 1, 2007. The<br />
policies adopted by the District are cautious by design, and will provide ample opportunity for adjustment as experience is<br />
gained through other public agencies. Future direction may also be changed significantly by national health care policies. The<br />
passage of legislation in 2008 allows the Board of Commissioners to transfer interest earned on any moneys to the MWRD<br />
Retirement Fund.<br />
An initial contribution of $15 million was budgeted in 2007. Following establishment of the trust, additional funding of $10<br />
million was placed in the OPEB trust for a total of $25 million. This additional funding was due to surpluses in the Human<br />
Resources Department health insurance account and the deferral of projects and purchases in other departments. In 2008, $22<br />
million was placed in the OPEB trust, $7 million funded by a transfer of earned investment interest from the Capital<br />
Improvements Bond Fund. A contribution of $10 million is budgeted for 2009.<br />
18<br />
18
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
Sewage Collection and Treatment<br />
In 2009, the District expects to collect and treat approximately 519 billion gallons of wastewater at our seven water reclamation<br />
plants. These services will be performed in compliance with discharge permits issued by the Environmental Protection Agency,<br />
which regulates the quality of our effluent as it leaves our treatment plants. Our high level of compliance emphasizes our<br />
excellent performance. This is reflected in 99.9 percent overall compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination<br />
System (NPDES) requirements in 2007. Operating performance in 2008 is expected to achieve similar performance levels.<br />
Renewal of NPDES permits for Lemont, Calumet, Stickney, North Side, and the John Egan WRP’s were prepared and<br />
submitted in 2007. The Lemont permit became effective in March 2008 as did the Lockport Powerhouse. Negotiations of the<br />
permit language for the North Side, Stickney, and Calumet WRP’s is ongoing. Renewal of these permits may present some<br />
challenges to the District if more stringent limits for certain pollutants are included in the new permit. The results of the User<br />
Attainability Analysis being conducted by the IEPA could have a major impact on the plant effluent requirements under these<br />
new permits in future years. We have anticipated the financial resources needed to meet the modifications in the <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
Service Efforts and Accomplishments<br />
The Annual <strong>Budget</strong> of the District has historically included performance measures throughout the document, particularly in<br />
each Departmental <strong>Budget</strong>. The service efforts and accomplishments (SEA) reported in this section are confined to wastewater<br />
treatment and utilization of biosolids, which represent our primary mission. Reporting is based on the model recommended for<br />
wastewater treatment agencies developed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board.<br />
Collection, Treatment, and Solids Utilization<br />
Inputs:<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
2009<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
2008<br />
Actual<br />
2007<br />
% Change<br />
2008-2009<br />
Total cost of collection (millions) $58.6 $55.0 $50.3 6.5%<br />
Total cost of treatment (millions)<br />
Total cost of solids utilization (millions)<br />
$81.8<br />
$30.7<br />
$75.6<br />
$31.3<br />
$65.5<br />
$16.9<br />
8.2%<br />
1.9%<br />
Number of full time equivalent employees:<br />
Collection<br />
Treatment<br />
Solids Utilization<br />
279<br />
418<br />
51<br />
277<br />
416<br />
53<br />
287<br />
410<br />
63<br />
.7%<br />
.5%<br />
3.8%<br />
Design average flow/design maximum flow million<br />
gallons per day (MGD) level of treatment by plant:<br />
Stickney – Secondary<br />
Calumet – Secondary<br />
North Side – Secondary<br />
Kirie– Secondary<br />
Egan – Tertiary<br />
Hanover Park – Tertiary<br />
Lemont – Secondary<br />
1,200/1,400<br />
354/430<br />
333/450<br />
52/110<br />
30/50<br />
12/22<br />
2.3/4<br />
1,200/1,400<br />
354/430<br />
333/450<br />
52/110<br />
30/50<br />
12/22<br />
2.3/4<br />
1,200/1,400<br />
354/430<br />
333/450<br />
52/110<br />
30/50<br />
12/22<br />
2.3/4<br />
Outputs:<br />
Amount of wastewater collected and treated by plant:<br />
Stickney WRP (millions gallons)<br />
Calumet WRP (millions gallons)<br />
North Side WRP (millions gallons)<br />
Kirie WRP (millions gallons)<br />
Egan WRP (millions gallons)<br />
Hanover Park WRP (millions gallons)<br />
Fox River WRP (contract agreement)<br />
Lemont WRP (millions gallons)<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
2009<br />
300,000<br />
100,000<br />
89,000<br />
13,000<br />
10,200<br />
3,600<br />
2,100<br />
850<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
2008<br />
300,000<br />
97,000<br />
89,000<br />
13,000<br />
10,200<br />
3,500<br />
2,000<br />
800<br />
Actual<br />
2007<br />
267,549<br />
99,528<br />
88,122<br />
13,278<br />
9,537<br />
3,300<br />
2,082<br />
883<br />
% Change<br />
2008-2009<br />
--<br />
3.1%<br />
--<br />
--<br />
--<br />
2.9%<br />
5.0%<br />
6.3%<br />
19<br />
19
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
Outputs (continued):<br />
Dry tons of biosolids utilized by area:<br />
North Service Area<br />
Calumet Service Area<br />
Stickney Service Area<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
2009<br />
6,000<br />
30,600<br />
101,000<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
2008<br />
6,000<br />
30,600<br />
97,000<br />
Actual<br />
2007<br />
6,633<br />
37,050<br />
89,517<br />
% Change<br />
2008-2009<br />
--<br />
--<br />
4.1%<br />
Outcomes: 2007 2006 2005 2004<br />
Achievement of wastewater plant purification permit<br />
standards by plant:<br />
North Side WRP<br />
Calumet WRP<br />
Stickney WRP<br />
Kirie WRP<br />
Lemont WRP<br />
Hanover Park WRP<br />
Egan WRP<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
99.96%<br />
99.99%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
99.99%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
99.99%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
100.00%<br />
99.97%<br />
99.96%<br />
In 2006, the National Association of Clean <strong>Water</strong> Agencies (NACWA) released the results of its biennial survey of 198<br />
wastewater agencies. Among reporting agencies serving populations greater than 1 million, the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago has the lowest average cost for collection and treatment of sewage. The costs listed<br />
next to these major agencies in the chart are the 2005 Total Operating Costs per million gallons of sewage treated. The<br />
estimated release date of the 2007 financial survey is February 2009.<br />
Total Operating Costs<br />
Based on NACWA 2005 Financial Survey<br />
Cost per Million Gallons (mg) Treated<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District of Greater Chicago<br />
$531<br />
Milwaukee <strong>Metropolitan</strong> Sewerage District<br />
$728<br />
Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District,<br />
Cleveland, OH<br />
New York Department of<br />
Environmental Protection<br />
$745<br />
$795<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> St. Louis Sewer District<br />
$856<br />
City of Phoenix<br />
$881<br />
Massachusetts <strong>Water</strong> Resources Authority,<br />
Boston, MA<br />
$1,070<br />
City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation<br />
$1,286<br />
City of Philadelphia <strong>Water</strong> Department<br />
$1,373<br />
$500 $1,000 $1,500<br />
20<br />
20
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
Tax Levy, Tax Rate, and Appropriations<br />
The overall 2009 tax levy required to finance the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> is $412.3 million, a decrease of $13.9 million or 3.3 percent<br />
from the 2008 Adjusted Tax Levy. This overall decrease is due to levy increases of $2.8 million in the Corporate Fund, $11.4<br />
million in the Construction Fund, $1.1 million in the Retirement Fund offset by decreases of $18.8 million in the Bond<br />
Redemption and Interest Fund, $6.4 million in the Stormwater Management Fund, and $3.9 million in the Reserve Claim Fund.<br />
The overall tax rate for 2009, based on the most recent equalized assessed valuation, totals 26.45 cents, a decrease of .9 cents<br />
from 2008 as adjusted. The allowance for loss in collection of property taxes is budgeted at 3.5 percent, the same as 2008. The<br />
budgeted loss will be maintained at this level, based on trends in the required refunds of prior property tax payments.<br />
Overall appropriations for 2009 total $1,630.6 million, an increase of $157.9 million from 2008 adjusted appropriation.<br />
Increases in the Construction Fund of $3.4 million, the Capital Improvements Bond Fund of $189.5 million, Retirement Fund<br />
of $1.0, Reserve Claim Fund $12.0 are offset by decreases in the Corporate Fund of $2.2 million, the Stormwater Management<br />
Fund of $1.1 million, and the Bond Redemption and Interest Fund of $44.7 million. Explanations of these changes are provided<br />
in the following detailed Fund summaries.<br />
The following tables and narratives provide clearer explanations of budgetary differences between the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> and the<br />
2008 <strong>Budget</strong> as Adjusted:<br />
Increase Percent<br />
Levies 2009 2008 Adjusted (Decrease) Change<br />
Corporate Fund $ 242,027,000 $ 239,261,800 $ 2,765,200 1.2 %<br />
Stormwater Management Fund 8,849,000 15,211,800 (6,362,800) (41.8) %<br />
Construction Fund 11,390,000 - 11,390,000 100.0 %<br />
Retirement Fund 26,751,300 25,664,500 1,086,800 4.2 %<br />
Reserve Claim Fund 3,182,000 7,073,432 (3,891,432) (55.0)%<br />
Bond Redemption and Interest Fund 120,118,410 138,960,584 (18,842,174) (13.6)%<br />
TOTAL $ 412,317,710 $ 426,172,116 $ (13,854,406) (3.3)%<br />
Increase Percent<br />
Appropriations 2009 2008 (Decrease) Change<br />
Corporate Fund $ 395,002,600 $ 397,186,600 $ (2,184,000) (0.5) %<br />
Stormwater Management 33,807,000 34,924,000 (1,117,000) (3.2) %<br />
Construction Fund 35,583,800 32,160,100 3,423,700 10.6 %<br />
Retirement Fund 31,385,921 30,371,534 1,014,387 3.3 %<br />
Reserve Claim Fund 67,500,000 55,500,000 12,000,000 21.6 %<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund 932,866,800 743,350,100 189,516,700 25.5 %<br />
Bond Redemption and Interest Fund 134,447,869 179,167,802 (44,719,933) (25.0) %<br />
TOTAL $1,630,593,990 $1,472,660,136 $ 157,933,854 10.7 %<br />
Comparisons on the estimated taxes paid by the owner of a home with a market value of $100,000 for 2009 as budgeted, and<br />
2008 as adjusted for the 2007 Equalized Assessed Valuation, are as follows:<br />
Percent<br />
2009 <strong>Budget</strong>ed 2008 Adjusted Decrease Change<br />
Estimated taxes for $100,000 home $107.13 $110.73 $ 3.60 (3.3%)<br />
21<br />
21
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
Corporate Fund<br />
The Corporate Fund is the District’s General Fund and includes appropriation requests for all the day-to-day operational costs<br />
anticipated for 2009. The total appropriation for the Corporate Fund in 2009 is $395.0 million, a decrease of $2.2 million, or<br />
0.5 percent from 2008. The major reasons for this decrease include funding for the OPEB trust at the policy level of 2009<br />
($12.0 million), offset by expected increases in facility repairs ($9.4 million).<br />
The 2009 tax levy for the Corporate Fund is $242.0 million, an increase of $2.8 million or 1.2 percent compared to 2008. It is<br />
the District’s intent to maintain the fund balance, or net assets appropriable for the Corporate Fund in the $45 to $55 million<br />
range. This fund balance level balances the competing imperatives of minimizing the annual levy and providing for unexpected<br />
shortfalls in revenues. In order to draw down a high fund balance and achieve the intended level, $69.7 million of the 2008<br />
ending fund balance projected at $90.6 million will be appropriated to fund 2009 expenditures.<br />
Continuing through 2009, economically sensitive non-property tax revenues are expected to decrease based on forecasted local<br />
and national economic indicators.<br />
Property taxes and user charges are the primary funding sources for the District’s Corporate Fund. Illinois law limits the tax<br />
rate of this fund to 41 cents per $100 of equalized assessed valuation. The estimated tax rate for the Corporate Fund in 2009 is<br />
15.52 cents. User charges are collected from industrial, commercial and non-profit organizations to recover operations,<br />
maintenance and replacement costs proportional to their sewage discharges, in excess of property taxes collected. The major<br />
categories of payers, chemical manufacturers, food processors and government services, are generally expected to maintain<br />
their recent level of discharges.<br />
Capital Program:<br />
Construction Fund and<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund<br />
The District’s overall Capital Program includes 2009<br />
project awards, land, support, future projects, and<br />
projects under construction, with a total cost of<br />
approximately $3.4 billion. Capital projects involve the<br />
acquisition, improvement, replacement, remodeling,<br />
completing, altering, constructing and enlarging of<br />
District facilities. Included are all fixtures which are<br />
permanently attached to and made a part of such<br />
structures and non–structural improvements, and which<br />
cannot be removed without in some way impairing the<br />
facility or structure.<br />
Projects under construction have been presented and<br />
authorized in previous <strong>Budget</strong>s and are recognized in<br />
the Annual <strong>Budget</strong> as both outstanding liabilities in the<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund, and as reappropriations<br />
in the Construction Fund. Future<br />
projects, not yet appropriated, are included in the<br />
Annual <strong>Budget</strong> to present a comprehensive picture of<br />
the District's Capital program. These future projects<br />
will be requested for appropriation subject to their<br />
priority, design, and available funding.<br />
Overall Capital Improvements Program<br />
(million $)<br />
2009 Project<br />
Awards, $871.4<br />
Future Project<br />
Awards, $1,429.8<br />
Projects Under<br />
Construction,<br />
$911.4<br />
Support and Land<br />
Acquisition,<br />
$181.6<br />
The District utilizes two funds for its Capital program, the Construction Fund and the Capital Improvements Bond Fund. The<br />
Construction Fund is utilized as a “pay as you go” capital rehabilitation and modernization program. Capital projects are<br />
financed by a tax levy sufficient to pay for project costs as they are constructed. As the District replaces, rehabilitates, and<br />
modernizes aged and less effective infrastructure, capital projects are assigned to the Corporate, Construction or Capital<br />
Improvements Bond Fund based on the nature of the project, dollar magnitude and useful life of the improvement. The<br />
Construction Fund is used for operations related projects, where the useful life of the improvement is less than 20 years or<br />
when the values are less than $1 million dollars.<br />
22<br />
22
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
The District’s Capital Improvements Bond Fund, the District’s other capital fund, includes major capital infrastructure projects<br />
whose useful lives extend beyond 20 years, and which will be financed by long-term debt, Federal and State grants, and State<br />
Revolving Fund loans.<br />
The 1995 Tax Extension Limitation Law (Tax Cap), and subsequent amendments to the bill, dramatically impacted the<br />
methods of financing the Capital Improvements Bond Fund. The original legislation required, in general, that all new debt be<br />
approved by referendum. However, an exemption for projects initiated before October 1, 1991 was granted to the District to<br />
enable completion of the Tunnel and Reservoir Plan (TARP). The bill was later amended to establish a “debt extension base,”<br />
which allowed local governments, with nonreferendum authority, to continue to issue nonreferendum debt in terms of “limited<br />
bonds,” as long as their annual debt service levies did not exceed 1994 levels. This law was further amended in 1997 to exclude<br />
TARP project debt from this debt service extension base. These changes allow the District to effectively utilize “limited bonds”<br />
as a source of financing.<br />
Construction Fund<br />
The Construction Fund appropriation for 2009 totals $35.6 million, an increase of $3.4 million from 2008. Five projects are<br />
budgeted for award in 2009, at a total contract cost of $10.2 million and requiring an appropriation of $5.8 million. The<br />
remaining $29.8 million appropriation is required for salaries, support, and projects under construction. In 2008, five new<br />
projects were appropriated for $17.2 million; and the appropriation for projects under construction, salaries, and support<br />
required $29.7 million.<br />
Beginning in 2002, the budgeting of Engineering staff working on Capital projects was split between the Construction Fund<br />
and the Capital Improvements Bond Fund. For 2009, 45 positions are budgeted in the Construction Fund and 191 positions are<br />
budgeted in the Capital Improvements Bond Fund. Directly budgeting staff and personnel-related costs such as health care in<br />
the several funds avoids complicated interfund reimbursement procedures and accounting with no negative financial impact.<br />
The distribution of positions between the funds is re-evaluated annually to reflect current projects.<br />
Capital projects in the Construction Fund are primarily supported by property taxes and thus subject to Tax Cap limitation. The<br />
passage of legislation in 1997 allowing for expanded authority to issue “limited bonds” by excluding pre-existing TARP<br />
projects, provides additional financing flexibility to proceed with our capital program. The 2009 tax levy for the Construction<br />
Fund of $11.4 million is a 100.0 percent increase from 2008, when there was no tax levy.<br />
A listing and description of proposed projects, and projects under construction, scheduled for 2009, can be found in Section V<br />
(Capital Program) of this <strong>Budget</strong> document.<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund<br />
The 2009 appropriation for the Capital Improvements Bond Fund is $932.9 million, an increase of $189.5 million, or 25.5<br />
percent from 2008. The appropriation is based on the scheduled award of $861.2 million in projects. Capital Improvements<br />
Bond Fund projects scheduled for award in 2009 with estimated award values consist of two Tunnel and Reservoir Plan<br />
projects at $317.0 million, six plant expansion and improvement projects at $102.6 million; four solids management projects at<br />
$106.1 million; seven collection projects at $70.2 million and thirteen replacement of facilities projects at $265.3 million.<br />
The increase in appropriation for the Capital Improvements Bond Fund of $189.5 million reflects the pattern in the award of<br />
major projects. An appropriation for the open value of existing contracts is also carried forward from the prior year.<br />
The remaining $71.7 million appropriation for this Fund will provide for salaries, studies, services, and supplies to support<br />
District design and administration of proposed and ongoing construction activity, including the TARP reservoirs. A<br />
comprehensive narrative, and exhibits detailing our entire Capital program, is provided in the Capital <strong>Budget</strong> (Section V), of<br />
this <strong>Budget</strong> document.<br />
Retirement Fund<br />
The Retirement Fund of the District is established under Illinois Compiled Statutes to provide funding and administration for a<br />
retirement program for District employees. The Fund is financed with employee and employer contributions, and investment<br />
income, which are distributed to the fund when collected. The annual appropriation requests for this fund are taxes receivable<br />
from previous years’ tax levies.<br />
23<br />
23
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
The District’s Early Retirement and Optional Retirement Programs that existed through 2002 met their legislative sunset and<br />
terminated on December 31, 2002. A new optional program, effective January 1, 2003, allowed increases in retirement<br />
annuities of up to 12 percent of the employee’s final average salary but terminated December 31, 2007.<br />
The 2009 appropriation for the Fund is $31.4 million, an increase of $1.0 million or 3.3 percent compared to 2008. The 2009<br />
tax levy of $26.8 million is an increase of $1.1 million, or 4.2 percent, from 2008. The increase in appropriation is due to the<br />
statutorily required formula that bases the District levy, and subsequent appropriations, on employee contributions made in<br />
previous years. The increase in the 2009 levy is due to an increase in employee contributions. A detailed explanation of the<br />
fund’s fiscal status, participation, and income is presented in Section VII of this <strong>Budget</strong> document.<br />
Reserve Claim Fund<br />
The Reserve Claim Fund acts as the District’s insurance fund. The District is primarily self-insured and utilizes this fund for<br />
emergency repairs and claims against the District. District policy is to annually levy a half-cent annual tax rate to provide funds<br />
for current claims, and to accumulate a fund reserve towards the statutorily authorized limit of $78.0 million.<br />
The 2009 appropriation of $67.5 million is an increase of $12.0 million, or 21.6 percent, compared to 2008. The increase in the<br />
Reserve Claim Fund is due to estimated 2008 revenues and the final statements for cash and investments for the year-ended<br />
2007, which are carried forward for fund balance in future years. The $4.3 million estimate for accounts payable and other<br />
liabilities is based on an internal review and analysis. This estimate is reviewed and adjusted annually. A historical profile of<br />
the resources available in the fund is provided in Section VII of this <strong>Budget</strong> document. The levy decreased $3.9 million for this<br />
fund in 2009. The District is not levying the full half-cent rate allowed by State Statute, against the last known equalized<br />
assessed valuation (EAV) in 2009, although the Board of Commissioners reaffirmed the policy to permit a levy at the statutory<br />
allowable tax rate to protect the District in the event of catastrophic failure of District operational infrastructure or other claims.<br />
For the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong>, the last known EAV ($156.0 billion) is for the 2007 levy year.<br />
Bond Redemption and Interest Fund<br />
The Bond Redemption and Interest Fund is the District’s debt<br />
Net Debt and Statutory Debt Margin<br />
service fund. The District finances its major Capital<br />
$10<br />
Improvements Program with the sale of long-term general<br />
obligation bonds, grants received from the State and Federal<br />
$8<br />
government, and loans from the Illinois State <strong>Water</strong> Pollution<br />
Control Revolving (SRF) Loan Fund. Principal and interest<br />
$6<br />
payments on District general obligation bonds, and SRF loans,<br />
require an annual levy and appropriation.<br />
$4<br />
Since 1990, the District’s Board of Commissioners has<br />
authorized the issuance of a total of $1.2 billion of Capital $2<br />
Improvement Bonds, as part of the District’s participation in the<br />
State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan program. Due to the $0<br />
availability of SRF loans, 33 construction projects with loan<br />
00 01 02 03 04 05 2006 2007 2008<br />
authorization are either underway or complete. The Revolving<br />
Net Debt Outstanding Debt Margin<br />
Loan Fund replaced the Federal Construction Grants program<br />
from which the District had historically received 55 to 75<br />
percent direct funding for qualifying capital improvements. State Revolving Fund loans are currently granted at the low interest<br />
rate of 2.5 percent.<br />
The District’s debt is authorized under Illinois Compiled Statutes, which specifies a debt limit equal to 5.75 percent of the<br />
District’s equalized assessed valuation (EAV). The District’s last-known EAV is $156.0 billion, setting the District’s statutory<br />
debt limit at $9.0 billion. Outstanding debt applicable to the debt limit, and identified in the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong>, totals $1.4 billion.<br />
The debt margin is therefore $7.6 billion.<br />
The last new money bond sale by the District was in July 2006, with the issuance of $100 million of General Obligation<br />
Unlimited Tax Series Bonds of July 2006, and $250 million of General Obligation Limited Tax Series Bonds of July 2006 to<br />
mature in the years 2010 through 2035. In March 2007, $380.2 million in refunding bonds were sold at very attractive longterm<br />
interest rates and set to mature in the years 2014 through 2035.<br />
in billions of dollars<br />
24<br />
24
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
The 2009 appropriation for the Bond Redemption and Interest Fund totals $134.4 million, a decrease of $44.7 million, or 25.0<br />
percent, compared to 2008 adjusted. Appropriations and tax levies are adjusted for new bond sales or state revolving loans. A<br />
debt service graph is found on page 59 that displays debt service from 2001 through 2013 and one on page 422 that displays<br />
debt service from 2009 through retirement.<br />
The 2009 tax levy for this Fund is $120.1 million, a decrease of $18.8 million, or 13.6 percent, from the 2008 adjusted levy.<br />
This decrease is primarily due to no levy being required for August 1992 Refunding Bonds that mature in 2009.<br />
Monitoring and Research<br />
In 2009, the Monitoring and Research (M&R) Department will continue the monitoring of dissolved oxygen (DO) levels and<br />
collection of water quality data in the District’s waterways to determine the need for supplemental aeration, to meet the DO<br />
standard in the Chicago River system and to assess water quality impacts under reduced lake diversion. The water quality<br />
monitoring program also provides data to assess water and stream quality to meet Clean <strong>Water</strong> Act reporting requirements.<br />
Continuous DO monitoring began in 1998 and was expanded in 2006 to provide data required to develop nutrient standards<br />
and will continue through 2009.<br />
M&R will work on a number of initiatives related to nutrient control. These include working with the M&O and Engineering<br />
Departments on a phosphorus removal demonstration study at the Egan WRP and working with the Illinois EPA (IEPA) to<br />
develop appropriate nutrient water quality standards for the State of Illinois, by intensely monitoring effects of nutrient removal<br />
at the Egan WRP on water quality in Salt Creek. The experimental portion of this project was completed at the end of 2008 and<br />
the final report will be completed in 2009. M&R is also characterizing WRP recycle streams to determine potential for future<br />
nutrient removal; this work will also continue through 2009.<br />
In support of the proposed rulemaking, M&R will continue to develop and support the presentation of testimony in the<br />
resulting rulemaking before the Illinois Pollution Control Board. The District is also engaging consultants to study the risks of<br />
boating, canoeing and fishing on the CAWs and to determine the reduction in risk of illness that can be expected if <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants that discharge to the CAWs disinfected their effluents. Studies are also underway to determine nonpoint<br />
sources of bacterial pollution to the CAWs and to assess the extent to which further improvements to fish populations in the<br />
CAWs are limited by habitat. M&R is managing all of these studies, which are likely impact the wastewater treatment process<br />
and future operating permits. The studies will continue through 2009 and are scheduled for completion in 2010.<br />
M&R will work with M&O to evaluate new initiatives in solids processing and management. Most notably, a pilot scale drying<br />
system will be installed, which will allow for year-round production of air-dried exceptional quality biosolids and potential<br />
odor reduction at the solids management areas. Pilot work is anticipated to begin in 2010.<br />
Measures to reduce the discharge of mercury and silver, begun in 2003 in the Egan WRP service area, will be continued in<br />
2009. The USEPA’s Pretreatment Streamlining Final Rule became effective in November 2005. M&R will continue<br />
Pretreatment Program streamlining through implementation of the provisions of the Final Rule and new software to increase<br />
staff efficiency and maintain District and industrial user records in a single database.<br />
Industrial Waste Monitoring<br />
The accompanying three tables demonstrate the success of the District’s industrial waste monitoring program by cooperatively<br />
working with industry. The first two tables show the trends in concentrations of metals associated with industrial activity in<br />
biosolids generated at the Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant (WRP) and Stickney WRP. The third table on the following page<br />
shows the number of industrial users demonstrating exemplary compliance with the Sewage and Waste Control Ordinance, as<br />
well as the number of industrial users in significant noncompliance. The number of industrial users in exemplary compliance<br />
has increased 4.8 percent from 1998 to 2007. The number of industrial users in significant noncompliance has decreased 43.5<br />
percent from 1998 to 2007.<br />
25<br />
25
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
Metals Concentrations in Calumet WRP Digested Biosolids<br />
Percent<br />
Annual Mean Concentration (mg/kg)<br />
Change<br />
Metal 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2007 1992-2007<br />
Cadmium 42 7 6 4 4 10 3 3 3 -92.9<br />
Chromium 289 85 82 67 73 127 77 90 66 -77.2<br />
Copper 320 296 307 331 330 411 388 404 358 11.2<br />
Lead 136 119 145 135 108 111 99 93 81 -40.4<br />
Nickel 40 32 32 34 30 37 34 41 32 -20.0<br />
Zinc 1,432 1,393 1,626 1,429 1,125 1,138 907 975 952 -33.5<br />
Metals Concentrations in Stickney WRP Digested Biosolids<br />
Percent<br />
Annual Mean Concentration (mg/kg)<br />
Change<br />
Metal 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2007 1992-2007<br />
Cadmium 41 18 8 6 4 4 4 4 3 -92.7<br />
Chromium 1,017 439 338 258 251 307 224 164 150 -85.2<br />
Copper 580 509 385 377 387 405 399 381 363 -37.4<br />
Lead 302 248 184 163 139 131 130 124 120 -60.3<br />
Nickel 109 70 61 55 54 57 53 46 41 -62.4<br />
Zinc 1,827 1,495 1,165 840 872 829 865 877 904 -50.5<br />
The District must provide information to the public regarding Industrial Users (IUs) that are in significant noncompliance with<br />
applicable pretreatment standards, and other pretreatment requirements. Amendments to the Ordinance, adopted by the Board<br />
on September 5, 1991, provide for the annual publication of names of significant violators in the newspaper. A summary of the<br />
compliance status of IUs is presented in the table below.<br />
Industrial User Compliance Indicators 1998-2007<br />
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
Exemplary Compliance 251 258 267 263 266 256 246 244 261 263<br />
Consistent Compliance 240 209 208 200 156 * * * * *<br />
Not in Compliance 62 80 70 62 75 73 63 52 47 35<br />
Violation Category:<br />
Effluent Limitations 30 22 11 15 19 22 11 13 13 12<br />
Reporting Requirements 36 62 61 49 62 55 56 45 36 27<br />
Monitoring Facilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Dilution Prohibition 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Right of Access 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Total Violations Published 66 85 72 64 82 77 67 58 52 39<br />
* This indicator is no longer tracked.<br />
26<br />
26
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
Environmental Monitoring<br />
It is the District’s policy to perform certain levels of environmental monitoring of our lake and inland waterways. This<br />
information is utilized to satisfy certain reporting requirements and aid the District in its facilities planning. This information<br />
has enabled the District to use the most cost-effective and efficient methods to comply with water quality standards. Our<br />
ongoing waterway monitoring program provided the District with data to support the use of sidestream aeration. This decision<br />
allowed the District to avoid spending over $300 million for plant expansions in favor of spending only $39 million for<br />
sidestream aeration stations.<br />
Solids Processing, Dewatering, and Disposal<br />
Our total sewage treatment process is expected to extract 265,950 dry tons of biosolids which will require treatment and<br />
dewatering by way of concentration to reduce its volume, heated digestion, centrifuging, and air drying. In 2009, the District<br />
will produce 137,600 dry tons of biosolids for beneficial use as final cover for landfills, direct farmland application of<br />
centrifuge cake, and through the controlled solids distribution program. Work has also begun with Engineering and M&R in<br />
reviewing the possible production of Class A biosolids directly from our digesters.<br />
A contract to process approximately 30 percent of the solids stream at the Stickney WRP via construction and operation of an<br />
alternative biosolids handling facility was awarded in 2001. Initial operations were expected to begin in 2004, however<br />
construction was delayed due to difficulties in obtaining the necessary permits. Currently, operations are expected to begin in<br />
spring 2009 and will result in a net operational cost increase of approximately $5 to $7 million to process and utilize biosolids.<br />
The contract is specifically designed to develop new markets for the processed biosolids that do not compete with current<br />
outlets.<br />
The identification and development of new and innovative markets for our biosolids product will continue in 2009. The Solids<br />
Marketing Team in the M&R and M&O Departments has made significant progress towards the identification and<br />
development of long-term stable markets for the beneficial use of biosolids. In pursuing the use of cost effective outlets for our<br />
biosolids, we have significantly reduced our biosolids inventory. This situation enables the District to continue a program<br />
which is among the most cost effective in the world. See page 244 of the Maintenance & Operations Department <strong>Budget</strong> for a<br />
complete discussion of this program.<br />
Energy<br />
With the exception of the main office complex, all<br />
Energy Consumption in Dollars 1988-2009<br />
energy costs are budgeted by the Maintenance and Million $<br />
Operations (M&O) Department. The 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> for 60<br />
energy totals $43.0 million for M&O, or 19.4 percent,<br />
CPI<br />
of M&O’s total appropriation.<br />
In spite of bringing new facilities on line, the M&O<br />
Department has held energy purchases relatively<br />
constant for the last 20 years, and well below the<br />
general rate of inflation, through an aggressive Energy<br />
Management Program. Key components of the program<br />
include adjustments to collection / treatment operations<br />
whereby energy intensive pumping during off-peak<br />
electrical rate hours is maximized, increased use of<br />
methane gas (a by-product of the treatment process) to<br />
fuel the boilers throughout the facilities and a gas<br />
turbine at Stickney, and the rehabilitation of<br />
hydroelectric turbines at the Lockport Powerhouse to<br />
increase their overall efficiency by approximately 10<br />
percent.<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Electricity<br />
88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 2008 2009<br />
Est. Proj.<br />
The District currently purchases electricity for the<br />
District’s major facilities from a provider at a fixed rate under a three-year agreement. A two-year extension of the agreement was<br />
recently signed with an expiration date of December 31, 2011. We are seeing an increase in overall rates for the electricity<br />
generation component of approximately 31 per cent over existing rates, based on a mixture of daily and seasonally specific rates,<br />
plus an additional 5 percent for Com Ed’s revised distribution tariffs. Upgrades to equipment, resulting in more efficient operation<br />
Natural<br />
Gas<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
27<br />
27
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
of the turbines, and renegotiated rates for the purchase of our electricity by ComEd has resulted in a projected increase for 2009<br />
revenue. The estimated electrical generation is 45 million KWHs with an anticipated revenue value of $2.1 million.<br />
Staffing<br />
District policy is to reduce staffing only by attrition. Current trends project the retirement of approximately 70-80 employees<br />
annually. The projected retirement level fits in well with the appropriation control (AC) program. The reallocation of personnel<br />
in certain job titles planned for attrition, based on completion of a specified project, to another title at a different location has<br />
worked very well since the beginning of this effort with the 1996 budget.<br />
District staff size and composition has for over two decades been managed through use of our “crosshatch program.” A “#1”<br />
following a position in the <strong>Budget</strong> indicates that the position, when vacated, will be dropped immediately. An “(AC)”<br />
following a position indicates that it is an appropriation control position identified for attrition, based on completion of a capital<br />
project or the implementation of revised work programs. These “(AC)” positions are dropped upon the recommendation of the<br />
Department Head and approval of the Executive Director. A “#2” after a title, signifies that when the position is vacated, the<br />
person filling the vacancy will receive the title in the parentheses. It can also indicate that while a grade level for a class title<br />
has been lowered the incumbent in the position will be retained at the current grade level. This is indicated by a notation of the<br />
new grade level in parentheses following the title. A #4 after a title, signifies that while a class title has been assigned to the<br />
Technical, Administrative and Managerial (TAM) salary schedule, the incumbent in the position will be compensated under the<br />
previously assigned Professional and Managerial (PM) or General Service (GS) salary schedule. When the position is vacated,<br />
the person filling the vacancy by promotion or new appointment will be compensated under the TAM salary schedule.<br />
A total of 2,131 positions are budgeted for 2009, an increase of 22 positions from 2008. The District continues to budget<br />
positions within the controls adopted in 1995 to slow the growth of future salary appropriations to fit within restrictions on<br />
property taxes resulting from the Property Tax Extension Limitation Act. In 2009, 46 appropriation control (AC) positions are<br />
budgeted compared to 48 in 2008, and 11 crosshatch (#1) positions are budgeted as compared to 4 in 2008.<br />
Salary expenditures are the largest item in our operating budget, comprising slightly more than 50 percent of the Corporate<br />
Fund. It is impossible to match future appropriation requirements with restricted growth in property tax revenue without<br />
making plans to change the way we work. Efforts have been made since 1995 to reengineer many labor intensive functions and<br />
reallocate staff. Adjustments to the original appropriation control program will continue to be made. Reductions in staffing<br />
levels impact all areas of District operations: professional/managerial, clerical, operating, and building trade personnel.<br />
Employee Benefits, Civil Service Examinations, Training, and Collective Bargaining<br />
Human resource activities include the hiring, promotion, and transfer of employees; the development and administration of the<br />
examination process; directing the District’s Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program and ensuring compliance with<br />
Federal and State employment laws; classification, compensation, and benefits administration; labor and employee relations<br />
activities; training and professional development programs; interaction with the District’s Civil Service Board; and<br />
maintenance of employment records related to employees and budgeted positions.<br />
The Human Resources Department schedules approximately 50 Civil Service examinations annually. Roughly 40 percent of<br />
the District’s employees are represented by unions under collective bargaining agreements. There are 15 different unions<br />
representing District employees in six different bargaining units. Three-year successor agreements were negotiated with all<br />
bargaining units in 2008.<br />
Information Technology<br />
The 2009 appropriation request for the Information Technology Department is $21.0 million, a decrease of 4.1 percent,<br />
compared to the 2008 <strong>Budget</strong>. The appropriation is expected to remain fairly level over the next four years in order to execute<br />
the Information Technology Strategic Plan (ITSP). The District uses SAP R/3 software for its Enterprise Financial System<br />
which was originally implemented in 2000 and was the first successful public sector implementation of multiple business<br />
function modules in the State of Illinois. It was upgraded to the current version in 2004 and provides an integrated business<br />
system with financial, human resources, and purchasing applications in a common database.<br />
The Information Technology Department is responsible for refining and maintaining a District-wide Information Technology<br />
Strategic Plan; planning and program management services; design and implementation services; applications development and<br />
support services; infrastructure operations and maintenance services; user support services, including Help Desk services;<br />
maintaining and operating the District-wide wide-area and local-area computer networks; security and Disaster Recovery<br />
Services; promoting sustainable development and performance management by enhancing access and integration information,<br />
28<br />
28
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
communication, networking and awareness among key decision makers at the District; facilitating, through up-to-date<br />
technology, the coordination and monitoring of efforts of the various departments for the holistic and integrated approach<br />
required for sustainable development; and providing technical training and other information technology support to District<br />
employees to improve their abilities to use, manage and coordinate resources for sustainable management.<br />
The IT Strategic Plan initiatives begun in 2008 are expected to drive enhancements to the District’s information management<br />
capabilities in support of District efforts to improve stakeholder value, core business effectiveness, operational efficiency,<br />
enterprise asset management, life-cycle cost management, performance management, and sustainability.<br />
The IT Strategic Plan objectives are aligned with the District’s operational goals as well as water/wastewater industry<br />
initiatives, and include the following nine (9) programs: Enterprise Project Management, Business Performance Management,<br />
<strong>Water</strong> Quality, Workflow Automation, Enterprise Asset Management, GIS Integration, Operations Optimization, eBusiness,<br />
and IT Infrastructure.<br />
As part of the initiative to move forward for more efficient and paperless management, ITD is implementing document<br />
management, record management, Netweaver Portals, and performance dashboards for business warehouse and business<br />
intelligence applications, Geo-spatial information system, and Internet Based Privately Owned Treatment Works<br />
Administration and Compliance System. Additionally to support robust applications, the aging routers and switches were<br />
evaluated and replaced with gigaman service that has greater capacity and reliability. Gigaman is a fiber-optic, point-to-point<br />
gigabit Ethernet service that links together two networks that are physically located within the same metropolitan area or<br />
general region.<br />
The Information Technology Strategic Plan challenges the District to deliver solid strategic responses, and the District has<br />
elected to respond by: streamlining workflows, reducing and eliminating paper-based processes; initiating an integrated and<br />
unified approach to performing the services it provides to the community; seamlessly integrating the District’s entire business<br />
environment, both internally and externally, and driving an enterprise focus to the way the District performs key functions such<br />
as asset management, performance management, business/operations analysis and reporting, records and document<br />
management, and sustainable development.<br />
Affirmative Action<br />
The 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> includes a request of $953,178 in the General Administration <strong>Budget</strong> to monitor and promote our Minority,<br />
Women, and Small Business Administration participation program. The Procurement and Materials Management Department<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> includes $54,600 for advertisement and promotion of our program. This program extends to all District constructionoriented<br />
contracts exceeding $100,000 in value and to bidding opportunities on all other services, materials, and equipment.<br />
The District is currently in the process of revising and updating the Affirmative Action Ordinance based on new case law,<br />
regional contracting discrimination studies and public hearings. This will enable the District to update the program to continue<br />
to effectively make available contracting opportunities to the diverse business community.<br />
In 2007, the Board of Commissioners adopted a revised Affirmative Action Ordinance, Appendix D. The most significant<br />
changes were as follows: The small business size standard was increased from $17 million to $31 million; compliance<br />
requirements and penalties for noncompliance were strengthened; bids that exceed the allowable suppliers exception amount<br />
will be deemed non-responsive; and additional race and gender neutral measures were included.<br />
The Affirmative Action Section will continue to participate in local minority, women’s and small business expos sponsored by<br />
the Chicago Minority Business Development Council, Illinois Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, the Women’s Business<br />
Development Center, Minority Enterprise Development Week and the City of Chicago Building New Partnerships. These<br />
outreach activities are vitally needed to ensure continued accessibility for minority, small and women’s businesses to bid on<br />
District procurements and to participate in District construction and biosolids contracts and professional services engagements.<br />
Our Affirmative Action program was revised in March of 1990 to conform with Supreme Court guidelines, as outlined in City<br />
of Richmond v. Croson case. The District was the first major government in Cook County to adopt a new program consistent<br />
with Supreme Court guidelines.<br />
A certification program was developed in 1998 that requires the continuing reorganization of the Protected Class Enterprise<br />
(PCE) vendor list. The purpose of this effort is to develop a list that will designate as a PCE only businesses that are in fact a<br />
PCE. The District will list only those companies that have provided a copy of a Certification letter issued within the prior year<br />
from the City of Chicago or Illinois State Department of Transportation, or have been reviewed and approved by the District as<br />
a PCE in the past two years.<br />
29<br />
29
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> / <strong>Highlights</strong><br />
In 1993, the District adopted a Special Provisions for Apprenticeship Ordinance to ensure opportunities for training minority<br />
and female apprentices in the building trades on the District's construction contracts. This program has created the opportunity<br />
for minorities and females to engage in certified apprentice programs while gainfully employed on District construction<br />
contracts. These contracts have been selected based on the trades involved and volume of estimated trade hours. More than<br />
293,000 minority and female apprentice hours of occupational training have been accomplished since the Board of<br />
Commissioners adopted this Ordinance.<br />
The District’s methodology for its Availability Assessment was chosen by the USEPA as an example of excellence. The model<br />
was distributed nation-wide to all USEPA grant recipients for use in formulating their own availability analysis.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Recognition<br />
The Government Finance Officers Association presented an award for Distinguished <strong>Budget</strong> Presentation to the District for the<br />
2008 Annual <strong>Budget</strong>. This is the 24th consecutive year the District has received this prestigious award. The 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> will<br />
be submitted for consideration for this award.<br />
The presentation of the MWRDGC 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> focuses on the Business Plans developed by each department. Business Plans<br />
include a mission statement, goals, objectives and action plans over a five year planning cycle. The mission statements and<br />
goals are incorporated into each of the departmental narratives. Business Plan presentations will continue to be developed in<br />
future budgets to feature goals and objectives more directly correlated to budgeted resources.<br />
The 2009 Tentative <strong>Budget</strong> will consisted of a supplement containing the material changes approved at the Committee on<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> and Employment hearings, and the Executive Director’s 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> Recommendations by reference.<br />
30<br />
30
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
Financial Policies, Objectives, and Accomplishments<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Financial Policies,<br />
Objectives<br />
and<br />
Accomplishments<br />
In order to meet its Federal, State, and local responsibilities, while ensuring cost-effective operations, the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago adheres to a number of financial policies. These policies are part of a dynamic process<br />
whereby the best use is made of available District resources. The following provides an overview of these policies, their<br />
objectives, and measurable accomplishments resulting from their use.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ary Policies<br />
In order to protect the strong financial position of the District, ensure uninterrupted services, and stabilize annual tax levies, the<br />
Board adopted the following policies on December 21, 2006 to enhance and maintain budgetary fund balances. The General<br />
Corporate Fund and Capital Improvements Bonds Fund investment policies were amended on December 14, 2007.<br />
General Corporate Fund<br />
• Corporate Fund undesignated fund balance as of January 1 of each budget year between 12 percent and 15 percent of<br />
appropriations, approximately $45 to $55 million. The fund balance may be maintained by not fully appropriating prior<br />
year fund balances. This level of fund balance will ensure the District’s ability to maintain all operations even in the event<br />
of unanticipated revenue shortfalls, and provide time to adjust budget and operations;<br />
• Corporate Working Cash Fund sufficient to finance 95 percent of the full annual expenditure of the Corporate Fund. This<br />
will be financed through transfers of surpluses from the Construction Working Cash Fund, direct tax levies, tax levy<br />
financed debt (Working Cash Bonds), and transfers of accumulated interest from other funds. This level of fund balance<br />
will continue financing of the Corporate Fund in the event of the typical and extraordinary delays in second installment<br />
real estate tax collections; and<br />
• Reserve Claim Fund at the maximum level permitted by statute or 0.05 percent of the Equalized Assessed Valuation. This<br />
will be financed through tax levies. This level of funding will protect the District in the event of catastrophic failure of<br />
District operational infrastructure or other claims. As the District is primarily self-insured, adequate reserves are critical.<br />
The District will appropriate funds from the unreserved/undesignated fund balance for emergencies and other requirements that<br />
the District believes to be in its best interest. In the event that any of these specific component objectives cannot be met, the<br />
Executive Director will report this fact and the underlying causes to the Board with a plan to bring the fund balances back into<br />
compliance with policy within a two-year period. In order to maintain relevance, this policy will be reviewed every three years<br />
following adoption or sooner at the discretion of the Executive Director.<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund investment income<br />
Investment earnings from the Capital Improvements Bond Fund resulting from all future bond issues will fund an equity<br />
transfer to the Bond & Interest Funds and be used to abate property tax levies or for other corporate needs. This practice will<br />
also limit the payment of arbitrage rebates.<br />
Bond & Interest Funds investment income<br />
Fund balances in the Bond & Interest Funds that might accumulate due to investment income will be identified and used to<br />
abate Bond & Interest property tax levies. This is being done to appropriately reduce property tax levies by the amount earned<br />
on invested balances above what is necessary for paying principal and interest due over the following 12 months, while still<br />
maintaining appropriate fund balances. This policy and the subsequent tax abatements will assist in compliance with the<br />
Board’s overall tax levy policy (not to exceed a 5 percent increase over prior year not including the Stormwater Management<br />
Fund tax levy).<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund accumulated income<br />
Revenues that have accumulated in the Capital Improvements Bond Fund (CIBF) from investment income, grants, or State<br />
Revolving Fund revenues will primarily be used for capital projects. Capital projects are generally in the CIBF; however,<br />
capital projects in the Construction or Corporate Funds of critical importance may be financed by transfers from this revenue<br />
source. These funds may be transferred to the Bond & Interest Funds to be used to abate property taxes, or may be used for<br />
other corporate needs as necessary. The <strong>Budget</strong> for the District shall present a complete financial plan for the <strong>Budget</strong> Year.<br />
31<br />
31
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
Financial Policies,<br />
Objectives<br />
and<br />
Accomplishments<br />
The <strong>Budget</strong> will be prepared and presented as one comprehensive management and balanced financial plan, including capital<br />
and operating requirements, financing requirements, and requirements for employee retirement and reserve claim funding.<br />
In addition, the District prepares and manages its budgets based on the following long-standing policies.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> estimates shall be prepared, and appropriations made, in a manner that reflects the use of program and performance<br />
principles and unit cost data. Appropriations shall be arranged according to funds, programs, and organizational units.<br />
Historical levels of funding and expenditure shall be included in the <strong>Budget</strong> to provide comparisons. Financial forecasting of<br />
future requirements shall be included to provide estimates of future financial and operating conditions.<br />
The <strong>Budget</strong> shall contain separate, and combined, estimated balance sheets for each fund, with estimates of current assets and<br />
liabilities as available for appropriation at the beginning of the <strong>Budget</strong> Year.<br />
The <strong>Budget</strong> shall include a statement showing the method of arriving at the net tax figure, and provide estimates of all taxes to<br />
be levied for such <strong>Budget</strong> Year, as well as all other current receipts to be derived from other revenue sources.<br />
Statements shall be included in the <strong>Budget</strong>, which detail bonded indebtedness of the District, and show bonds authorized and<br />
unsold, District borrowing capacity, and the maturity dates of bond issues and corresponding rates of interest.<br />
The District will comply with the 1995 Tax Extension Limitation Law (Tax Cap) and Board policy limiting increases in the<br />
total property tax levy to 5 percent, excluding the Stormwater Management Fund.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ary Objectives<br />
The District shall make every effort to minimize the tax levy through the use of sound management and cost-effective operations.<br />
The District will maintain a positive relationship between revenues and expenditures.<br />
The financing of the Corporate, Stormwater Management and Construction Fund <strong>Budget</strong>s will be managed through use of the<br />
Corporate, Stormwater and Construction Working Cash Funds, respectively. Interfund transfers will be used to minimize<br />
property tax levies for the working cash funds.<br />
The District's <strong>Budget</strong> shall be prepared and presented in such a manner that it serves as a clear and comprehensive policy<br />
document, financial plan, operations guide, and communications device to its staff, public officials, and citizens.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ary Accomplishments<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
The District's property tax levies are in compliance with the Tax Cap Law. Fiscal plans have been developed and implemented<br />
to reduce expenditures as necessary to meet property tax revenue constraints while meeting our statutory and regulatory<br />
responsibilities.<br />
The District, through the sale of Working Cash Bonds, has effectively institutionalized a financing strategy that avoids shortterm<br />
financing of District operations. The bond rating agencies have favorably recognized this practice. For 2009, the Working<br />
Cash Funds have sufficient balances to provide the desired level of financing without imposing a tax levy.<br />
The Five-Year Financial Forecast component of the <strong>Budget</strong> and interim budgetary reporting has identified future revenue<br />
shortfalls well ahead of time to allow for legislative relief to be sought or for other management plans and programs to be<br />
developed to avoid actual revenue shortfalls or financial over-commitments.<br />
The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) of the United States and Canada has presented an award for<br />
Distinguished <strong>Budget</strong> Presentation for the District's 2008 Annual <strong>Budget</strong>. This is the 24th consecutive year the District has<br />
received this prestigious award. For the years 1988 through 1998, the District's <strong>Budget</strong> was recognized as "Especially Notable"<br />
or "Outstanding." The entire 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> is available on the Internet at www.mwrd.org.<br />
32<br />
32
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
Investment and Cash Management Policy<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Financial Policies,<br />
Objectives<br />
and<br />
Accomplishments<br />
The District's formal investment policy, in place since December 1999, and revised in April 2001, states in its preamble that,<br />
"It shall be the policy of the District that all public funds available, not restricted by immediate need, be invested in investment<br />
securities so as to maximize return without sacrifice of safety or necessary liquidity." This policy complies with Public Act 90-<br />
688 requiring all public entities within the State of Illinois to have a formal Investment Policy passed by its governing authority<br />
and sets forth the parameters and objectives of the District's investment and cash management policy.<br />
The primary objectives of investment activities, in priority order, are safety, liquidity, and yield.<br />
District funds can be invested in such securities as authorized by Illinois Public Act, 235, the Public Funds Investment Act.<br />
The District will further limit its investments to: (1) Direct U.S. Treasury obligations and appropriate U.S. Government<br />
Agency securities; (2) certificates of deposit or time deposits of banks insured by the FDIC; (3) short-term discount obligations<br />
of the Federal National Mortgage Association; (4) short-term obligations of corporations (commercial paper) rated in the<br />
highest classification; (5) the State Treasurers' "Illinois Funds" (formerly IPTIP); and (6) repurchase agreements of U.S.<br />
Government securities.<br />
Certificates of deposit or time deposits will be collateralized with securities of the U.S. Government, in an amount equal to 110<br />
percent (at market) of the funds on deposit, or with a Federal Home Loan Bank letter of credit equal to 102 percent (at market).<br />
Funds received are to be deposited on the day of receipt and invested as soon as the funds become available, if not immediately<br />
required for cash flow needs.<br />
Investment Objectives<br />
To maintain an average daily investment of at least 99 percent of funds available for investment.<br />
To increase minority bank, community development bank, and broker/dealer participation in District investments to 30 percent<br />
of invested funds.<br />
Investment Accomplishments<br />
In the past ten years, the interest income earned on investments has been:<br />
Bonded Debt Policy<br />
1999 $ 33,800,000 2004 $ 14,500,000<br />
2000 39,800,000 2005 19,700,000<br />
2001 26,700,000 2006 32,500,000<br />
2002 15,000,000 2007 46,200,000<br />
2003 13,200,000 2008 32,300,000 (Estimated)<br />
Total $ 273,700,000<br />
Bonded debt of the District is to be issued only in the amounts and for the purposes to which Illinois Statutes limit the District.<br />
Bonded debt issued for working cash or capital improvement purposes is to be issued as general obligation debt of the District.<br />
Capital improvement bonded debt is to be issued to mature no more than 30 years from the year of issue.<br />
Bonded debt is to be issued only when needed, and in amounts necessary for meeting such needs, unless financial market<br />
conditions and/or projections indicate that it is to the District's best interest to deviate from this practice.<br />
Excess fund balances in the Bond and Interest funds will be identified and used to abate Bond and Interest fund levies.<br />
33<br />
33
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
Bonded Debt Objectives<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Financial Policies,<br />
Objectives<br />
and<br />
Accomplishments<br />
To maintain or improve the District's Aaa, AAA, and AAA bond ratings from Moody’s Investor Services, Fitch IBCA, and<br />
Standard & Poor’s Corporation, respectively.<br />
To provide timely and cost-effective bonded debt financing.<br />
To structure future debt service so as to provide a stable trend in future debt service tax levies.<br />
Bonded Debt Accomplishments<br />
Bond Rating History<br />
In April 2001, Fitch IBCA upgraded the<br />
District's outstanding General Obligation<br />
Bonds to AAA from AA+ and Standard &<br />
Poors Investors Services upgraded the<br />
District's Bonds to AA+ from AA. In April<br />
of 2002, Moody's Investor's Service<br />
upgraded the District's Bonds to AAA from<br />
AA1. For the July 2006 bond issue,<br />
Standard & Poor’s also increased the<br />
District’s rating to AAA.<br />
The Illinois Legislature amended the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District<br />
Act to provide that the District must levy a direct annual tax to pay the principal and interest on indebtedness within 30 years<br />
after contracting the debt, enabling the District to now issue debt for a maximum of 30 years after contracting the debt.<br />
Previously, the District was allowed to issue debt for a maximum of 20 years. In addition, the District’s Act was amended to<br />
extend non-referendum bonding authority from December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2016.<br />
Financial and Accounting Policies<br />
Accounting policies of the District conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) as applicable to<br />
governments.<br />
The basic accounting and reporting entity of the District is a "fund". The District's governmental funds are maintained on the<br />
modified accrual basis of accounting. All governmental funds are accounted for on a spending or "financial flow" measurement<br />
focus.<br />
The only fiduciary fund of the District is the Pension Trust Fund. Pension Trust Fund assets and liabilities are accounted for on<br />
the full accrual basis. Investments of the Pension Trust Fund are recorded at market value.<br />
Property taxes, user charge revenue, and the personal property replacement tax are accrued to the extent that they are measurable<br />
and available to satisfy liabilities of the reporting period.<br />
An Internal Auditing function is maintained as an independent appraisal activity for the review of accounting, financial, and<br />
other operations. It aids managerial control by measuring and evaluating the effectiveness of, and compliance with, District<br />
policies, procedures, and other internal controls, as directed by the Executive Director. A two-year audit program is developed<br />
and updated annually to perform this function.<br />
Financial and Accounting Objectives<br />
Moody’s Investor<br />
Services<br />
Fitch IBCA Standard & Poor’s<br />
Corporation<br />
1938-1944 Baa<br />
1944-1968 A<br />
1944-1968 A1<br />
1968-1974 Aa<br />
1974-1997 Aa2<br />
1997-1999 Aa1 1995-1999 AA 1969-2001 AA<br />
1999-2002 Aa1 1999-2001 AA+ 2001-2006 AA+<br />
2002-present Aaa 2001-present AAA 2006-present AAA<br />
District financial information is available through the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, <strong>Budget</strong> Report, Grantor Agency<br />
Reports, and supplementary information.<br />
34<br />
34
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
Financial Policies,<br />
Objectives<br />
and<br />
Accomplishments<br />
District financial reports are prepared in compliance with GAAP to fulfill the District's duty to be publicly accountable while<br />
allowing users to assess that accountability.<br />
District financial reports are designed to assist users in evaluating the District's ongoing operations and assess the level of<br />
services provided and our ability to meet obligations as they become due.<br />
The annual audit performed by independent certified public accountants assures compliance with the District's financial<br />
objectives. In addition to meeting the requirements as set forth in the State of Illinois Compiled Statutes, Chapter 70, 2605/5.12,<br />
the audit will also ensure compliance with the Federal Single Audit Act regulations in OMB Circular A-133.<br />
The Internal Audit unit assists the Executive Director by furnishing independent and objective analyses, appraisals,<br />
recommendations, and pertinent comments concerning the activities reviewed.<br />
The District has addressed Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) pronouncement #45, requiring reporting of the<br />
future liability for maintaining Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB), primarily retiree health insurance benefits. Following<br />
Board policy, the District established an irrevocable trust for funding the future liability with the following operating<br />
parameters:<br />
• 50 percent funded level target,<br />
• 50 years to reach funding level,<br />
• $10 million funding in each of the first 5 years beginning in 2007 from the Corporate Fund,<br />
• Subsequent funding will be based on a percentage of payroll,<br />
• An initial investment mixture of 50 percent equities and 50 percent bonds with a maximum limit of 65 percent equities<br />
that allows for investment growth.<br />
Financial Accomplishments<br />
The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial<br />
Reporting to the District for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the Year ending December 31, 2006. This<br />
is the 32nd consecutive year that the District has received this prestigious award. The entire Comprehensive Annual Financial<br />
Report for the year ending December 31, 2007 is available on the Internet at www.mwrd.org.<br />
The Audit of the 2007 financial statements, completed on April 28, 2008, includes an unqualified opinion.<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
In 2007, the Internal Audit unit completed seventeen audits and fifteen will be completed in 2008. Twelve audits will be<br />
scheduled in 2009.<br />
35<br />
35
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Strategic Planning,<br />
Policy Development<br />
and<br />
The <strong>Budget</strong> Process<br />
Strategic Planning, Policy Development, and the <strong>Budget</strong> Process<br />
Strategic planning and policy development for the District, performed on both the legislative and executive level, is ongoing<br />
and integrally related to the <strong>Budget</strong> process.<br />
Planning and Policy Development Activities of the Board of Commissioners<br />
The District's Board of Commissioners is the organization's legislative branch wherein planning is done through a standing<br />
committee structure, whereby committee chairpersons and vice-chairpersons are elected by the Board of Commissioners<br />
concurrent with the biannual election of officers. With the exception of the Committee on Finance, whose chair is specifically<br />
referred to in the District's enabling legislation, the focus of each committee is determined by the Board itself. The members of<br />
these committees are made up of fellow commissioners. The Board of Commissioners' 2009 committees are as follows:<br />
Affirmative Action <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment Engineering<br />
Ethics Federal Legislation Finance<br />
Stormwater Management Industrial Waste and <strong>Water</strong> Pollution Judiciary<br />
Labor and Industrial Relations Maintenance and Operations Municipalities<br />
Pension, Personnel Relations, and Civil Service Public Health and Welfare Public Information and Education<br />
Purchasing Real Estate Development Research and Development<br />
State Legislation and Rules<br />
These standing committees develop plans and formulate policies that are then brought before the entire Board of<br />
Commissioners for formal adoption. These plans and policies provide direction to both the Board itself and the staff. On<br />
critical issues, and where broad discussion is warranted for future consensus building, the committee chairperson periodically<br />
calls "study sessions" inviting public testimony and discussion.<br />
District Commissioners participate in regional planning and policy development as members of commissions, associations, and<br />
steering committees. By law, the President of the District serves on the Cook County Public Building Commission. The<br />
District has formally designated Commissioner representatives on the Chicago <strong>Metropolitan</strong> Agency for Planning and Fulton<br />
County Steering Committee. District participation in these regional planning committees ensures regional coordination,<br />
cooperation, and communication for policy development and planning.<br />
The Board of Commissioners periodically recruits pro bono ad hoc Blue Ribbon Committees made up of government and<br />
business leaders to solicit input on issues of either regional interest or where expertise in areas outside the District's primary<br />
functions is required.<br />
Formal adoption of District policies is enacted at regularly scheduled board meetings (semi-monthly) or at special board<br />
meetings focused on a specific issue.<br />
Strategic Planning by Staff<br />
The Executive Director serves as the District's Chief Executive Officer and is responsible for the day-to-day administration of<br />
the organization. It is through the direction and authority of this office that compliance with the laws governing the agency and<br />
the policies established by the Board of Commissioners is assured. Under the direction of these laws and policies, staff<br />
planning takes place on various organizational platforms. Through organizational planning units, steering committees, task<br />
forces, and general managerial planning, District staff establishes organizational goals, objectives, and priorities. Planning<br />
takes place on both an interdepartmental and intradepartmental basis.<br />
Two organizational units within the District cross departmental lines for the sole purpose of coordination, collection,<br />
consolidation, and formal publishing of the planning process. These organizational units are the TARP and Project Support<br />
Section of the Engineering Department and the Central <strong>Budget</strong> Office and Administration Section of General Administration.<br />
The TARP and Project Support Section of the Engineering Department coordinates the preparation of facilities planning efforts<br />
for the District's treatment plants and other infrastructure as necessary to develop and maintain a capital improvement program<br />
to comply with the District's mission and mandate of clean water. These studies examine water quality, demographic, and other<br />
issues within the region, and the course of action and timetables by which the District plans to construct sewers and treatment<br />
facilities capable of providing wastewater conveyance and treatment for the region. These plans comply with Illinois and<br />
Federal EPA guidelines for water quality.<br />
36<br />
36
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Strategic Planning,<br />
Policy Development<br />
and<br />
The <strong>Budget</strong> Process<br />
The Central <strong>Budget</strong> Office and Administration Section of General Administration, staff to the Executive Director, prepares the<br />
Annual <strong>Budget</strong> and five-year financial plans. Similar to the Planning Section of the Engineering Department in its coordinating<br />
role, the <strong>Budget</strong> Office consolidates the capital and maintenance plans for the upcoming and future years, including costs.<br />
Revenue projections and debt service requirements are examined along with the financial feasibility of capital projects in light<br />
of external and self-imposed financial constraints. The end product of this process is the annual appropriation ordinance and a<br />
five-year financial forecast.<br />
Department Business Planning<br />
Beginning in 2002, and continuing through 2008, the Executive Director directed all Departments to prepare five-year strategic<br />
business plans to address the business processes, practices, and procedures required to facilitate the District's mission. Major<br />
goals of this initiative included reducing the cost and staff required in our business processes while improving efficiency and<br />
effectiveness. The strategic plan incorporates key business functions of departments, including process improvement or quality<br />
efforts, information technology, personnel, and budget requirements. Significant objectives for this plan included: 1)<br />
eliminating unnecessary processes and streamlining burdensome processes associated with accomplishing departmental<br />
objectives; 2) moving from paper-based transactions to electronically transmitted transactions, approvals, and delivery of<br />
information; 3) improving management information and tools; 4) higher productivity; and, 5) improving staff capabilities and<br />
competencies.<br />
Each business plan contains the following components:<br />
• A mission statement that delineates the departmental purpose, customers and services.<br />
• Goals that address the strategic issues and reflect the desired outcomes as a result of the business plan implementation.<br />
• Objectives that are specific and measurable leading to goal attainment.<br />
• Action plans describing the specific strategies used and activities undertaken to implement the business plan.<br />
• Performance measures are also included to evaluate results and provide accountability.<br />
Business plans were updated in 2008 to coincide with the 2009 annual budget and five-year forecast to provide the monetary<br />
linkage and feasibility assessment of the initiatives. The mission statements and goals for each department are incorporated into<br />
the departmental budget narratives.<br />
Committees and Task Force Planning<br />
Other formal planning is accomplished through the utilization of committees and task forces. Committees and task forces meet<br />
monthly with the exception of the Energy Conservation Committee and Board of Standardization, which meet quarterly or as<br />
needed. A listing of the various staff committees and task forces is as follows:<br />
Master Plan Committee Solids Committee Information Technology Strategic Planning Committee<br />
Inventory Review Board GASB Task Force Records Management Committee<br />
Board of Standardization Audit Committee Public Affairs Strategic Planning Committee<br />
Energy Conservation Committee Natural Gas Committee<br />
Each of these planning groups is delegated the responsibility to serve as District-wide planners for specific organizational<br />
needs. Each committee or task force has representation that crosses departmental lines to ensure corporate agreement. The<br />
Energy Conservation Committee and Information Technology Strategic Committee include subcommittees with designated<br />
assignments and purpose. These subcommittees work independently and then report their recommendations to the committees<br />
of the whole.<br />
The <strong>Budget</strong> Process and <strong>Budget</strong> Procedures<br />
All participants in the planning process are made aware of the District's <strong>Budget</strong> process and cycle. The <strong>Budget</strong> calendar is<br />
relatively the same from year-to-year and is distributed to the Board of Commissioners and staff in the first quarter of the<br />
preceding <strong>Budget</strong> Year. Correspondingly, planning groups develop plans, schedules, and detailed justification for personnel,<br />
contractual services, materials and supplies, equipment, and capital projects to comply with the annual budgeting process and<br />
cycle. Existing facilities' plans, historical expenditures, cash-flow projections, and five-year financial forecasts provide<br />
valuable guidelines as to the availability of resources for the upcoming <strong>Budget</strong> development. These guidelines both facilitate<br />
the development of the <strong>Budget</strong> and allow for meaningful debate during the <strong>Budget</strong> review process as to priorities and<br />
organizational goals for the <strong>Budget</strong> Year, as well as future years. An outline of the Annual <strong>Budget</strong> process and procedures is<br />
presented on the following page.<br />
37<br />
37
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
The fiscal year of the District begins on January 1 and ends on December 31.<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Strategic Planning,<br />
Policy Development<br />
and<br />
The <strong>Budget</strong> Process<br />
1. After the first half of the fiscal year, the <strong>Budget</strong> Office holds a meeting with Departmental <strong>Budget</strong> representatives to<br />
discuss policy and procedures for <strong>Budget</strong> preparation that begins in July. Instructions are distributed to departments,<br />
together with guidelines from the Executive Director, which indicate the direction the <strong>Budget</strong> should follow for the<br />
coming fiscal year. The basic forms are returned to the <strong>Budget</strong> Office and a general summary is prepared for the<br />
Executive Director, who conducts departmental hearings in September.<br />
2. A revenue meeting is conducted by the Executive Director, Administrative Services Manager, and <strong>Budget</strong> Officer,<br />
along with those departments responsible for revenue items. Available resources used to finance the <strong>Budget</strong> are<br />
analyzed at this meeting.<br />
3. It is usual to have two rounds of departmental hearings. When departmental estimates are approved and final decisions<br />
are made, a <strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Message</strong> is prepared and the proposals of the Executive Director become the initial <strong>Budget</strong><br />
document. After departmental requests are finalized, the Executive Director's <strong>Budget</strong> Recommendations are published<br />
within 15 days. This Executive Director's <strong>Budget</strong> is usually published and presented to the Board of Commissioners in<br />
October. At all times, the <strong>Budget</strong> figures are balanced between revenues and expenditures.<br />
4. The Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment of the Board of Commissioners holds public meetings with the Executive<br />
Director and department heads regarding the Executive Director's proposals.<br />
5. At the conclusion of these hearings, the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment recommends the preparation of a<br />
second document called the "Tentative <strong>Budget</strong>" which incorporates changes approved at the hearings. Once printed,<br />
this is placed on public display for a minimum of ten days. An advertisement is published in a general circulation<br />
newspaper announcing the availability of the Tentative <strong>Budget</strong> for inspection at the main office of the MWRDGC,<br />
and specifying the time and date of the public hearing.<br />
6. At least one public hearing is held between 10 and 20 days after the <strong>Budget</strong> has been made available for public<br />
inspection. All interested individuals and groups are invited to participate.<br />
7. After the public hearing, the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment presents the Tentative <strong>Budget</strong>, which includes<br />
revisions and the approved Appropriation and Tax Levy Ordinances, to the Board of Commissioners for adoption.<br />
This action must take place before January 1.<br />
8. The <strong>Budget</strong> as adopted by the Board of Commissioners can be amended once at the next Regular Meeting of the<br />
Board. No amendment, however, can be requested before a minimum of five days after the <strong>Budget</strong> has been adopted.<br />
Amendments for contracts and/or services not received before December 31 must be reappropriated in the new <strong>Budget</strong><br />
and are included through this amendment process.<br />
9. The Final <strong>Budget</strong> document "As Adopted and Amended" is produced; and, an abbreviated version, known as the<br />
"short form" is published in a newspaper of general circulation before January 20 of the fiscal year.<br />
10. <strong>Budget</strong> implementation begins on January 1. The Finance Department and <strong>Budget</strong> Office provide control of<br />
appropriations and ensure that all expenditures are made in accordance with <strong>Budget</strong> specifications. The manual<br />
entitled "Classification of <strong>Budget</strong>ary Code Accounts" is published in conformance with the Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> and is<br />
used to administer, control, and account for the <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
11. Supplemental appropriations can be made for the appropriation of revenues from Federal or State grants, loans, bond<br />
issues and emergencies. The Executive Director is authorized to transfer appropriations between line items within an<br />
object class of expenditure within a department. After March 1 st of each fiscal year, transfers of appropriations<br />
between objects of expenditures or between departments must be presented for approval to the Board of<br />
Commissioners in accordance with applicable statutes.<br />
12. The Board of Commissioners can authorize, by a two-thirds majority, the transfer of accumulated investment income<br />
between funds, and the transfer of assets among the Working Cash Funds.<br />
38<br />
38
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CALENDAR FOR 2009 BUDGET<br />
General Superintendent’s <strong>Budget</strong> Recommendations<br />
Submitted to Board of Commissioners ..........................................................................Tuesday, October 21, 2008<br />
Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> & Employment Hearings ........................................... 1 P.M. Thursday, November 6, 2008<br />
(Friday, November 7, 2008 if needed)<br />
Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> & Employment Submits Tentative <strong>Budget</strong><br />
to Board of Commissioners for Public Display .................................................. Wednesday, November 26, 2008<br />
Board of Commissioners Holds a Public Hearing<br />
on the <strong>Budget</strong> at 10:00 A.M..................................................................................Wednesday, December 10, 2008<br />
Board of Commissioners Adopts the <strong>Budget</strong>........................................................... Thursday, December 11, 2008<br />
Board of Commissioners Amends the Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> .......................................... Thursday, December 18, 2008<br />
BUDGET CYCLE<br />
Departmental <strong>Budget</strong> Preparation<br />
Review of <strong>Budget</strong> Estimates by General Superintendent's Staff<br />
Preparation & Printing of GS Recommended <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> & Employment Review<br />
1st Mid-Year <strong>Budget</strong> Review<br />
Five-year Financial Forecast<br />
Preparation & Printing of Tentative <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Board Review & Public Hearings<br />
Final <strong>Budget</strong> Amendments & Printing<br />
2nd Mid-Year <strong>Budget</strong> Review<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Implementation<br />
Short-form <strong>Budget</strong> Published in General Circulation Newspaper<br />
<br />
May June July August September October November December January February March April<br />
2008 2009<br />
The procedure for the annual budget process is detailed on the previous page.<br />
39<br />
39
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON BUDGET AND EMPLOYMENT<br />
Presented to the Board of Commissioners of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
CHICAGO, November 26, 2008<br />
To the Honorable, the President and Members of the Board of<br />
Commissioners of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District<br />
of Greater Chicago<br />
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN:<br />
Your Chairman of the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment<br />
respectfully reports that she has under consideration the resources<br />
of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago and its estimated receipts, together with the sum of<br />
money required to be appropriated to defray the necessary<br />
expenses and liabilities of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District of Greater Chicago for the fiscal year beginning January<br />
1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009, as prepared and<br />
submitted by the General Superintendent in the document entitled<br />
“2009 <strong>Budget</strong> – General Superintendent’s <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Recommendations – October 21, 2008,” which document is<br />
incorporated by reference herein, made a part hereof and attached<br />
hereto.<br />
Your Chairman of the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment<br />
has duly considered and reviewed the above budget estimates and<br />
revised and amended the same, in certain particulars, which<br />
estimates, as amended, were and are approved by your Chairman<br />
of the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment and are submitted<br />
herewith in final revised form, setting forth the details of the<br />
estimates of the resources, revenues and expenditures for the<br />
future consideration, review, adoption and passage by the Board<br />
of Commissioners. Your Chairman of the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong><br />
and Employment further reports that in the consideration and<br />
revision of the estimated resources and departmental<br />
expenditures, it has received, considered, and transmits them<br />
herewith for the guidance of the Board of Commissioners and for<br />
public information. The budget estimates are prepared and made<br />
up of the following three parts:<br />
a. General <strong>Budget</strong> summary setting forth the aggregate figures of<br />
the budget in such manner as to show the balanced relations<br />
between the total proposed expenditures and the total<br />
anticipated revenues and other means of financing the budget<br />
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, contrasted with<br />
the actual receipts and disbursement figures for the preceding<br />
year and the estimated figures for the current year. The budget<br />
of the Corporate Fund, Construction Fund, Capital<br />
Improvements Bond Fund and Stormwater Management Fund<br />
has been planned and balanced with receipts on an actual cash<br />
basis and expenditures on accrual basis pursuant to Statutes,<br />
b. The several estimates, statements and other detail, and the<br />
complete financial plan for the budget year, set forth as<br />
required in Section 5.3 of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District Act (Chap. 70, Sec. 2605/5.3, Illinois Compiled<br />
Statutes),<br />
c. Complete draft of the Appropriation Ordinances and Tax<br />
Levy Ordinances required to give legal sanction to the<br />
appropriation when approved and adopted by the Board of<br />
Commissioners of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District of Greater Chicago.<br />
Your Chairman of the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment<br />
further reports that she has prepared and herewith transmits a<br />
draft of Ordinances to be adopted and passed by the Board of<br />
Commissioners entitled:<br />
and<br />
and<br />
and<br />
and<br />
“Annual Appropriation Ordinance of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago for the fiscal year<br />
beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009”;<br />
“An Ordinance for the Levy of Taxes for the fiscal year<br />
beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009,<br />
upon all taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009, for the<br />
purpose of providing revenues for the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District Retirement Fund and Corporate Fund”;<br />
“An Ordinance for the Levy of Taxes for the fiscal year<br />
beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009,<br />
upon all taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009, for the<br />
purpose of providing revenues for the Construction Fund”;<br />
“An Ordinance for the Levy of Taxes for the fiscal year<br />
beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009,<br />
to pay the interest on outstanding Bonds and to discharge the<br />
principal thereof ”;<br />
“An Ordinance for the Levy of Taxes for the fiscal year<br />
beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009,<br />
upon all taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
40<br />
40
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009, for the<br />
purpose of providing revenues for the Reserve Claim Fund”;<br />
and<br />
“An Ordinance for the Levy of Taxes for the fiscal year<br />
beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009,<br />
upon all taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago as<br />
said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009, for the purpose<br />
of providing revenues for the Stormwater Management Fund”;<br />
Your Chairman of the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment<br />
also recommends the passage of the following Orders:<br />
Ordered: That the foregoing report and budget estimates as<br />
transmitted by the Chairman of the Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment, and the following Ordinances submitted with said<br />
report, which have not been adopted be and the same are hereby<br />
received for the consideration, adoption and passage by the Board<br />
of Commissioners of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District of Greater Chicago:<br />
and<br />
and<br />
and<br />
and<br />
“Annual Appropriation Ordinance of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago for the fiscal year<br />
beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009”;<br />
“An Ordinance for the Levy of Taxes for the fiscal year<br />
beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009<br />
upon all taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago as<br />
said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009, for the purpose<br />
of providing revenues for the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District Retirement Fund and Corporate Fund”;<br />
“An Ordinance for the Levy of Taxes for the fiscal year<br />
beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009,<br />
upon all taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago as<br />
said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009, for the purpose<br />
of providing revenues for the Construction Fund”;<br />
“An Ordinance for the Levy of Taxes for the fiscal year<br />
beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009, to<br />
pay the interest on outstanding Bonds and to discharge the<br />
principal thereof ”;<br />
and<br />
“An Ordinance for the Levy of Taxes for the fiscal year<br />
beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009,<br />
upon all taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009, for the<br />
purpose of providing revenues for the Reserve Claim Fund”;<br />
“An Ordinance for the Levy of Taxes for the fiscal year<br />
beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009,<br />
upon all taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009, for the<br />
purpose of providing revenues for the Stormwater<br />
Management Fund”;<br />
and it is further<br />
Ordered: That upon the adoption and passage of the<br />
Appropriation Ordinance and the above mentioned Tax Levy<br />
Ordinances, the report of your Chairman of the Committee on<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> and Employment, together with the complete budget<br />
and statements of the assets, the estimated resources and the<br />
revenues of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of<br />
Greater Chicago for the fiscal year 2009 and the Ordinances<br />
listed above which are required to give legal sanction to the<br />
appropriations when adopted and passed by the Board of<br />
Commissioners, shall be printed in the Proceedings of the<br />
Board of Commissioners, and in pamphlet form for easy<br />
reference and examination and for controlling the expenditures<br />
by the Board of Commissioners during the fiscal year<br />
beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009;<br />
and it is further<br />
Ordered: That the report of your Chairman of the Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment and the Appropriation Ordinances<br />
of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago for the year 2009 and the Tax Levy Ordinances listed<br />
above which are required to give legal sanction to the<br />
appropriation when adopted and passed by the Board of<br />
Commissioners together with the summary of estimated<br />
revenues and estimated expenditures for the year beginning<br />
January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009, shall be<br />
published once before January 20, 2009, in a newspaper having<br />
general circulation within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago;<br />
and it is further<br />
Ordered: That the Clerk of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago is hereby authorized<br />
and directed to carry out the aforementioned orders and to<br />
incur the necessary expenses thereof.<br />
Approved as to Form and Legality:<br />
Respectfully submitted,<br />
Deputy Attorney<br />
Attorney<br />
Chairman,<br />
Committee on <strong>Budget</strong> and Employment<br />
41<br />
41
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ANNUAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE OF THE<br />
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT<br />
OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2009<br />
AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009<br />
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago:<br />
Section 1. That this Ordinance be and the same is hereby<br />
termed the "Annual Appropriation Ordinance of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009 and<br />
ending December 31, 2009."<br />
Section 2. That the amounts hereinafter set forth or so<br />
much thereof as may be authorized by law and as may be<br />
needed, and not exceeding the aggregate sum allocated to<br />
and expendable by each department or principal division,<br />
be and the same are hereby appropriated for the payment<br />
of: (a) interest coupons on bonds; (b) sinking fund<br />
requirements for the payment of the principal of said bonds;<br />
(c) the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Retirement Fund;<br />
(d) Construction Fund purposes; (e) Capital Improvements<br />
Bond Fund purposes; (f) Reserve Claim Fund (g)<br />
Stormwater Management Fund purposes and (h) all other<br />
corporate purposes of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District of Greater Chicago during the fiscal year beginning<br />
January 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009.<br />
Section 3. That for the purposes of accounting and<br />
expenditure control, the budgetary accounts set forth under<br />
the recital of estimated resources of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago and budgetary<br />
accounts and code designations set forth in this Ordinance,<br />
shall be the official code designations of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong><br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago and that the<br />
manual of Classification of <strong>Budget</strong>ary Code Accounts<br />
issued by General Administration of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong><br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago, as revised,<br />
shall be in conformity therewith.<br />
Section 4. That the Clerk and the other Heads of<br />
Departments of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District of Greater Chicago shall use the aforesaid official<br />
code designations in administering the Appropriation<br />
Ordinance and in accounting for expenditures authorized<br />
herein.<br />
Section 5. That wherever an appropriation is made under<br />
the classification "Personal Services," "Contractual<br />
Services," "Materials and Supplies," "Machinery and<br />
Equipment," "Capital Improvements," "Land" or "Fixed<br />
and Other Charges," it is supported by a schedule of Line<br />
Items.<br />
The Executive Director is authorized to transfer<br />
appropriations between line items within an object class of<br />
expenditure within a department. Transfers of<br />
appropriations between objects of expenditure or between<br />
departments must be presented for approval to the Board of<br />
Commissioners in accordance with applicable statutes.<br />
All expenditures against such appropriations shall be made<br />
in accordance with such supporting Line Item Schedules,<br />
and no voucher shall be approved by the Clerk for a sum<br />
exceeding the amount shown in said schedules; that the<br />
titles and the compensations appearing in the Personal<br />
Services supporting schedules shall be construed to be the<br />
official titles and maximum compensation for the same.<br />
(a) Included in the appropriation for Total Personal Services<br />
is Account Number 601010 "Salaries of Regular<br />
Employees" that includes District pickup of employees'<br />
contributions to the Pension Fund and in applicable<br />
departments, divisions or sections is Account Number<br />
601060 "Compensation Plan Adjustments" provided for the<br />
purpose of implementing the Compensation Plan and<br />
associated salary and pay grade schedules for classified<br />
employees and exempt secretaries as adopted by the Board<br />
of Commissioners. The amounts set up under Account<br />
Number 601060 "Compensation Plan Adjustments" include<br />
(1) the adjustment of salaries for employees eligible to<br />
receive step increases based on the prescribed standards of<br />
service and performance, (2) changes in Labor and Trades<br />
Wage Schedule Classifications as authorized by the Board<br />
of Commissioners and (3) payments to employees for<br />
incentive pay for unused sick leave over one hundred and<br />
twenty (120) days; retirement, severance, termination and<br />
unused overtime and/or vacation pay.<br />
(b) The symbol "#" or crosshatch followed by a number,<br />
when used in the budget document, means the following:<br />
#1. After a title, signifies that the incumbent will retain<br />
the title until he or she vacates the position and then<br />
the position will be dropped.<br />
(AC). After a title, signifies that the position is subject<br />
to appropriation control. It may be dropped at the<br />
discretion of the Executive Director based on<br />
operational requirements.<br />
42<br />
42
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
#2. After a title, signifies that when the position is<br />
vacated, the person filling the vacancy will receive the<br />
title within the parentheses. It can also indicate that<br />
while a grade level for a class title has been lowered<br />
the incumbent in the position will be retained at the<br />
current grade level. This is indicated by a notation of<br />
the new grade level in parentheses following the title.<br />
#4. After a title, signifies that while a class title has<br />
been assigned to the Technical, Administrative and<br />
Managerial (TAM) salary schedule the incumbent in<br />
the position will be compensated under the previously<br />
assigned Professional and Managerial (PM) or General<br />
Service (GS) salary schedule. When the position is<br />
vacated, the person filling the vacancy by promotion<br />
or new appointment will be compensated under the<br />
TAM salary schedule.<br />
Section 6. That amounts appropriated under classifications<br />
other than "Personal Services" to any department or division<br />
of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago shall be expended under the following conditions:<br />
(a) Insofar as practicable, all contracts for purchases and<br />
open market orders for purchases to be charged against such<br />
appropriation shall be based upon specifications which are<br />
definite and certain as to character and quality, and which<br />
conform to standard specifications for the various classes of<br />
Materials and Supplies, Machinery and Equipment already<br />
prescribed or hereafter to be prescribed by the Board of<br />
Standardization of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District of Greater Chicago.<br />
(b) The Clerk of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District of Greater Chicago shall certify to the sufficiency of<br />
appropriations out of which such amounts due under<br />
contracts are to be paid.<br />
(c) The Director of Procurement and Materials Management<br />
shall certify that the specifications for purchases of such<br />
Materials and Supplies, and Machinery and Equipment, for<br />
which standard specifications have been prescribed by the<br />
Board of Standardization of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago, are in conformity<br />
with such standard specifications.<br />
(d) All open market orders issued by any department or<br />
division for Materials and Supplies, and Machinery and<br />
Equipment, for which specifications shall have been<br />
prescribed by the Board of Standardization of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago, shall contain a description of the goods ordered<br />
and insofar as practicable and feasible conform with such<br />
standard specifications.<br />
(e) The Director of Procurement and Materials Management<br />
shall, in auditing claims for goods delivered on open market<br />
order, determine through inspection or otherwise, whether<br />
the goods delivered conform to such standard specifications.<br />
(f) Every contract or purchase order involving amounts in<br />
excess of $10,000.00 shall be signed by the Chairman of the<br />
Committee on Finance or other duly authorized officer of<br />
the Board of Commissioners, by the Executive Director, by<br />
the Clerk, and by the Director of Procurement and Materials<br />
Management of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District of Greater Chicago.<br />
The only exception to the above is for contracts and<br />
purchase orders for materials, supplies and equipment for<br />
which the competitive bid threshold is $25,000.00. These<br />
contracts and purchase orders only require the signature of<br />
the Director of Procurement and Materials Management of<br />
the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago.<br />
(g) The Comptroller of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District of Greater Chicago shall conduct audits of all<br />
expenditures. The Comptroller shall report the results of<br />
such audit to the President and the Board of Commissioners<br />
of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago.<br />
Section 7. That no employee shall have the right to demand<br />
continuous employment and compensation by reason of the<br />
appropriation if it becomes necessary to lay an employee off<br />
due to lack of work or lack of funds.<br />
Section 8. That the supporting schedules and statements<br />
including unpaid bills and the item objects and purposes are<br />
appropriated for as follows:<br />
43<br />
43
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
NOTE PAGE<br />
44<br />
44
SECTION II<br />
BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SUMMARIES,<br />
SCHEDULES, AND EXHIBITS<br />
This section includes a broad overview of the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> with comparisons to past years and the projection of future<br />
District needs.<br />
It begins by asking two basic questions: Where Does the Money Come From Where Does the Money Go Answers are<br />
presented graphically on dollar bill illustrations.<br />
BUDGET<br />
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />
The comparison of budget and current year appropriations, tax levies, and tax rates by fund is one of the most<br />
comprehensive and most useful comparisons in the <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
Continuing to look at the overall picture, this section presents a detailed view of the entire <strong>Budget</strong>, organizing information<br />
in different ways so that the user can compare budget and current year appropriations by department, fund, object, and<br />
program. Allocation of personnel is also compared by year, department, and fund.<br />
Having looked at the <strong>Budget</strong> plan for 2009 and compared it to previous years, this section also provides a projection of the<br />
future, a comprehensive financial forecast for 2009-2013.<br />
Where the Money Comes From and Where the Money Goes ................................... 45<br />
Net Assets Appropriable ............................................................................................ 46<br />
Estimated Tax Rate .................................................................................................... 47<br />
Taxable Property (Equalized Assessed Valuation - Table and Graph) ...................... 48<br />
Appropriations, Tax Levies, and Tax Rates ............................................................... 49<br />
Comparative Statement of Appropriations, Tax Levies, and Tax Rates .................... 50<br />
Comparative Appropriations:<br />
by Major Object/Character of Expenditure (Graph) ..................................... 52<br />
by Major Object ............................................................................................ 53<br />
by Character of Expenditure ......................................................................... 54<br />
by Department and Major Program ...............................................................55<br />
by Fund and Major Program (Graph) ............................................................56<br />
by Program Objective, by Fund .................................................................... 58<br />
Annual Debt Service (Graph) .................................................................................... 59<br />
Outstanding Bonds and Statutory Debt Margin ......................................................... 60<br />
Account and Personnel Summary (Tables and Graph) .............................................. 61<br />
Five-Year Financial Forecast, 2009-2013 .................................................................. 64
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM: $1,630.6 MILLION<br />
Net Assets Appropriated *<br />
$342.9 million / 21.0%<br />
User Charge Income<br />
$49.3 million / 3.0%<br />
Miscellaneous<br />
$3.6 million / 0.2%<br />
Land Rentals<br />
$11.0 million / 0.7%<br />
Sewer Permit Fees<br />
$1.8 million / 0.1%<br />
State Revolving Fund Loans<br />
& Future Bond Sales<br />
$919.1 million / 56.4%<br />
Net Tax Sources<br />
$275.5 million / 16.9%<br />
Investment Income<br />
$27.4 million / 1.7%<br />
* $342.9 of the $363.8 Net Assets Appropriable detailed in the analysis on the next page will be appropriated as revenue for 2009.<br />
Excludes Capital Improvements Bond Fund.<br />
WHERE THE MONEY GOES: $1,630.6 MILLION<br />
Plant Operation and Maintenance<br />
$221.4 million / 13.6%<br />
Staff Services<br />
$127.9 million / 7.8%<br />
Stormwater<br />
Management<br />
$33.8 million / 2.2%<br />
Monitoring and Research<br />
$31.5 million / 1.9%<br />
Construction and Design<br />
$982.6 million / 60.3%<br />
Bond Redemption and Interest Funds<br />
$134.5 million / 8.2%<br />
Claims and Judgments<br />
$67.5 million / 4.1%<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
Retirement Fund<br />
$31.4 million / 1.9%<br />
45<br />
45
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ALL FUNDS<br />
SUMMARY OF NET ASSETS APPROPRIABLE<br />
at January 1, 2009<br />
(IN MILLIONS)<br />
FUND<br />
CURRENT ASSETS<br />
CORPORATE<br />
CAPITAL<br />
IMPROVEMENTS<br />
BOND<br />
CONSTRUCTION<br />
STORMWATER<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
RETIREMENT<br />
BOND AND<br />
INTEREST<br />
RESERVE CLAIM<br />
TOTAL<br />
Cash & Investments $ 120.7 $ 283.5 $ 22.5 $ 24.7 $ - $ 88.7 $ 59.1 $ 599.2<br />
Restricted Cash - - - - - - - -<br />
Deposit with Escrow Agent - - - - - - - -<br />
Taxes Receivable 231.9 - (0.2) 14.7 24.8 133.9 6.9 412.0<br />
Replacement Tax 25.8 - 2.0 - 6.6 - 4.3 38.7<br />
Grants - - - - - - - -<br />
State Revolving Fund<br />
Loans Receivable - 77.9 - - - - - 77.9<br />
Due from Other Funds 0.4 - - - - - - 0.4<br />
Total $ 378.8 $ 361.4 $ 24.3 $ 39.4 $ 31.4 $ 222.6 $ 70.3 $ 1,128.2<br />
CURRENT LIABILITIES,<br />
DESIGNATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS<br />
Unpaid Bills and<br />
Contingent Liabilities $ 36.2 $ 772.3 $ 2.8 $ 0.6 $ - $ - $ 4.3 $ 816.2<br />
Due to Working Cash Funds 252.0 - - 14.4 - - - 266.4<br />
Due to Other Funds - - - - - - - -<br />
Liabilities for Restricted Assets - - - - - - - -<br />
Principal and Interest - - - - - 91.7 - 91.7<br />
Total $ 288.2 $ 772.3 $ 2.8 $ 15.0 $ - $ 91.7 $ 4.3 $ 1,174.3<br />
*Net Assets Appropriable $ 90.6 $ (410.9) $ 21.5 $ 24.4 $ 31.4 $ 130.9 $ 66.0 $ (46.1)<br />
Assets available for future use (20.8) - - - - - - (20.8)<br />
Net Assets Appropriated $ 69.8 $ (410.9) $ 21.5 $ 24.4 $ 31.4 $ 130.9 $ 66.0 $ (66.9)<br />
* Net Assets Appropriable = Current Assets minus Current Liabilities<br />
46<br />
46
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ESTIMATED TAX RATE<br />
Estimated Tax Rate to be levied for each $100.00 of assessed valuation as equalized to finance the appropriations of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago is as follows:<br />
Upon all taxable property within the territorial limits of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009.<br />
Gross Corporate Fund..................................................................................................... 15.52 ¢<br />
Construction Fund........................................................................................................... 0.73<br />
Stormwater Management Fund....................................................................................... 0.57<br />
Retirement Fund.............................................................................................................. 1.72<br />
Reserve Claim Fund........................................................................................................ 0.20<br />
Subtotal................................................................................................................... 18.74 ¢<br />
Bond Redemption & Interest Funds:<br />
Capital Improvement Bonds - Series:<br />
Series C Unlimited Tax - December 2002................................................................. 0.02 ¢<br />
Series D Limited Tax - December 2002.................................................................... 1.20<br />
July 2006 Limited Tax............................................................................................... 1.44<br />
State Revolving Fund Bonds - Series:<br />
1990 A-C, E; 1991 F,G,I,L; 1992 Q,T,U; 1994 R,V;<br />
1997 AA-DD, 2001 A-C; 2004 A-H.......................................................................... 2.43 ¢<br />
Refunding Bonds - Series:<br />
July 1997.................................................................................................................... 0.00 ¢<br />
May 2006 Unlimited Tax........................................................................................... 1.15<br />
May 2006 Limited Tax.............................................................................................. 0.17<br />
March 2007 Unlimited Tax A.................................................................................... 0.62<br />
March 2007 Unlimited Tax B.................................................................................... 0.32<br />
March 2007 Limited Tax C........................................................................................ 0.36<br />
Subtotal Bond & Interest Funds........................................................................... 7.71 ¢<br />
TOTAL ESTIMATED TAX RATE - 2009......................................... 26.45 ¢<br />
47<br />
47
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE DISTRICT (Equalized Assessed Valuation)<br />
The equalized assessed property valuation of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District has shown<br />
an average growth of 7.78% per year over the past 10<br />
years. The boundaries of the District encompass 91%<br />
of the area of Cook County. The District is located in<br />
one of the strongest and economically diverse<br />
geographical areas of the country. The growth in<br />
commercial, industrial and residential sectors in both<br />
downtown Chicago and the suburbs contributes to the<br />
strong base and growth in value of properties located<br />
within the District.<br />
The Cook County Assessor is responsible for all<br />
taxable real property within Cook County except for<br />
railroad property and pollution control facilities,<br />
which are assessed directly by the State of Illinois.<br />
The equalized assessed valuation of real estate<br />
property is determined in Cook County, Illinois based<br />
on market values of real estate, reduced by a<br />
classification factor determined by property use, and<br />
then multiplied by the State of Illinois equalization<br />
factor. The statutory objective is to value property at<br />
33 1 / 3 % of estimated fair market value.<br />
The equalized assessed property valuation of the<br />
District is very important due to the primary reliance<br />
of the District on the property tax to fund current<br />
operations and future capital programs.<br />
$180<br />
$160<br />
$140<br />
$120<br />
$100<br />
$80<br />
$60<br />
$40<br />
$20<br />
Billions<br />
Equalized Assessed Valuation has<br />
shown an annual average growth of<br />
7.78% over the past 10 years.<br />
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
Year Real Property Railroad Property and<br />
Pollution Control<br />
Facilities<br />
Total<br />
1997 $ 73.55 billion $310.94 million $ 73.86 billion<br />
1998 76.44 billion 314.02 million 76.75 billion<br />
1999 80.53 billion 337.21 million 80.86 billion<br />
2000 85.15 billion 367.14 million 85.52 billion<br />
2001 92.51 billion 404.55 million 92.91 billion<br />
2002 102.40 billion 431.82 million 102.84 billion<br />
2003 110.12 billion 145.81 million 110.27 billion<br />
2004 118.99 billion 148.62 million 119.13 billion<br />
2005 130.44 billion 148.80 million 130.59 billion<br />
2006 141.31 billion 156.27 million 141.47 billion<br />
2007 155.80 billion 172.25 million 155.97 billion<br />
48<br />
48
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
M illion $<br />
1,750<br />
1,650<br />
1,550<br />
1,450<br />
1,350<br />
1,250<br />
1,150<br />
1,050<br />
950<br />
850<br />
750<br />
650<br />
550<br />
450<br />
350<br />
250<br />
150<br />
50<br />
-50<br />
M illion $<br />
500<br />
$964<br />
387<br />
577<br />
Appropriations and Expenditures, 2000 - 2009<br />
$976 $1,008<br />
344<br />
632<br />
285<br />
723<br />
Expenditures<br />
$919<br />
302<br />
$882<br />
277<br />
$969<br />
330<br />
617 605 639<br />
$1,039<br />
Unexpended Appropriations<br />
276<br />
Tax Levies, All Funds, 2000 - 2009<br />
$1,023<br />
266<br />
763 758<br />
$1,428<br />
762<br />
711<br />
$1,631<br />
* Adjusted<br />
** Estimated<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008* 2009**<br />
450<br />
400<br />
350<br />
$355<br />
$373<br />
$382<br />
$398<br />
$413<br />
$411 $401 $409 $426 $412<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
* Adjusted<br />
** Estimated<br />
0<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008* 2009**<br />
Cents / $100 EAV<br />
Tax Rates, Actual, All Funds, 2000 - 2009<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
41.9¢<br />
41.5¢<br />
40.1¢<br />
37.1¢<br />
36.1¢<br />
34.7¢<br />
31.5¢<br />
30<br />
26.2¢<br />
27.3¢ 26.5¢<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
* Adjusted<br />
** Estimated<br />
using 2007 EAV<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008* 2009**<br />
49<br />
49
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF APPROPRIATIONS AND TAX LEVIES<br />
2009-2007 ALL FUNDS<br />
2008 2008 2007<br />
APPROPRIATIONS 2009 AS PASSED AS ADJUSTED * FINAL<br />
FUND<br />
Corporate Fund $ 395,002,600 $ 397,186,600 $ 397,186,600 $ 362,323,300<br />
Construction Fund 35,583,800 32,160,100 32,160,100 42,630,500<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund ** 932,866,800 743,350,100 743,350,100 347,446,100<br />
Stormwater Management Fund 33,807,000 34,924,000 34,924,000 24,499,600<br />
Retirement Fund 31,385,921 30,371,534 30,371,534 30,889,770<br />
Reserve Claim Fund 67,500,000 55,500,000 55,500,000 56,705,500<br />
Bond Redemption & Interest Fund 134,447,869 134,593,881 179,167,802 158,653,041<br />
TOTAL $ 1,630,593,990 $ 1,428,086,215 $ 1,472,660,136 $ 1,023,147,811<br />
LEVIES<br />
Corporate Fund $ 242,027,000 $ 239,261,800 $ 239,261,800 $ 233,982,335<br />
Construction Fund 11,390,000 - - 5,181,347<br />
Stormwater Management Fund 8,849,000 15,211,800 15,211,800 3,941,762<br />
Retirement Fund 26,751,300 25,664,500 25,664,500 24,843,316<br />
Reserve Claim Fund 3,182,000 7,073,432 7,073,432 6,529,346<br />
Subtotal $ 292,199,300 $ 287,211,532 $ 287,211,532 $ 274,478,106<br />
Bond Redemption & Interest Funds:<br />
Capital Improvement Bonds - Series:<br />
Series C Unlimited Tax-Dec 2002 $ 339,767 $ 339,767 $ 339,767 $ 339,767<br />
Series D Limited Tax-Dec 2002 18,673,964 18,689,508 18,689,508 15,051,684<br />
July 2006 Limited Tax 22,391,969 7,231,347 7,231,347 7,231,347<br />
State Revolving Fund (SRF) Bonds :<br />
Series 1990 A-C, E; 1991 F,G,I,L; 37,946,117 37,573,642 37,298,447 38,283,490<br />
1992 Q,T,U; 1994 R,V; 1997 AA-DD,<br />
2001 A-C; 2004 A-H<br />
Refunding Bonds - Series:<br />
August 1992 - 16,924,041 16,924,041 17,332,332<br />
July 1997 - 20,076,425 17,710,881 20,125,130<br />
May 2006 Unlimited Tax 17,958,549 17,958,549 17,958,549 17,958,549<br />
May 2006 Limited Tax 2,631,606 2,631,606 2,631,606 2,631,606<br />
March 2007 Unlimited Tax A 9,638,083 9,638,083 9,638,083 9,238,083<br />
March 2007 Unlimited Tax B 4,996,749 4,996,749 4,996,749 3,496,749<br />
March 2007 Limited Tax C 5,541,606 5,541,606 5,541,606 4,041,606<br />
Subtotal Bond Redemption & Interest Funds $ 120,118,410 $ 141,601,323 $ 138,960,584 $ 135,730,343<br />
TOTAL $ 412,317,710 $ 428,812,855 $ 426,172,116 $ 410,208,449<br />
NOTES: * As Adjusted reflects the 2007 EAV plus any subsequent supplemental levies and or appropriations.<br />
** Prior year obligations for the Capital Improvements Bond Fund are included in the Appropriation for Liabilities.<br />
50<br />
50
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF TAX RATES<br />
2009-2007 ALL FUNDS<br />
TAX RATES<br />
( In Cents)<br />
Per $100 in Equalized Assessed Valuation 2009 2008 2008 2007<br />
FUND AS PASSED AS ADJUSTED FINAL<br />
tax rate limit<br />
Gross Corporate Fund 41 ¢ * 15.52 ¢ 16.91 ¢ 15.34 ¢ 15.00 ¢<br />
Construction Fund 10 ¢ 0.73 - - 0.33<br />
Stormwater Management Fund 5 ¢ 0.57 1.08 0.98 0.25<br />
Retirement Fund 1.72 1.81 1.65 1.59<br />
Reserve Claim Fund ½ ¢ 0.20 0.50 0.45 0.42<br />
Subtotal 18.74 ¢ 20.30 ¢ 18.42 ¢ 17.59 ¢<br />
Bond Redemption & Interest Funds:<br />
Capital Improvement Bonds - Series:<br />
Series C Unlimited Tax - Dec 2002 0.02 ¢ 0.02 ¢ 0.02 ¢ 0.02 ¢<br />
Series D Limited Tax - Dec 2002 1.20 1.32 1.20 0.97<br />
July 2006 Limited Tax 1.44 0.51 0.46 0.46<br />
State Revolving Fund (SRF) Bonds:<br />
Series 1990 A-C, E; 1991 F,G,I,L;<br />
1992 Q,T,U; 1994 R,V; 1997 AA-DD, 2.43 2.66 2.39 2.45<br />
2001 A-C; 2004 A-H<br />
Refunding Bonds - Series:<br />
August 1992 - 1.20 1.09 1.11<br />
July 1997 - 1.42 1.14 1.29<br />
May 2006 Unlimited Tax 1.15 1.27 1.15 1.15<br />
May 2006 Limited Tax 0.17 0.19 0.17 0.17<br />
March 2007 Unlimited Tax Series A 0.62 0.68 0.62 0.59<br />
March 2007 Unlimited Tax Series B 0.32 0.35 0.32 0.22<br />
March 2007 Limited Tax Series C 0.36 0.39 0.36 0.26<br />
Subtotal Bond Redemption & Interest Funds 7.71 ¢ 10.01 ¢ 8.92 ¢ 8.69 ¢<br />
TOTAL 26.45 ¢ 30.31 ¢ 27.34 ¢ 26.28 ¢<br />
* In 2005, the Corporate tax rate limit was reduced from 46¢ to 41¢ and Stormwater Management was added at 5¢.<br />
2007 Equalized Assessed Valuation of $155,972,794,427 was used to adjust 2007 tax rates and for 2008 estimate.<br />
51<br />
51
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
COMPARATIVE APPROPRIATIONS BY MAJOR OBJECT OF EXPENDITURE<br />
Personal Services<br />
320.2<br />
365.5<br />
Contractual Service<br />
140.2<br />
129.2<br />
Materials & Supplies<br />
28.1<br />
26.4<br />
Machinery &<br />
Equipment<br />
12.6<br />
10.6<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Capital Projects<br />
662.3<br />
899.3<br />
Land<br />
.4<br />
6.9<br />
Fixed & Other<br />
Charges<br />
229.8<br />
271.8<br />
Total<br />
1,630.6<br />
1,472.7<br />
$0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1000 $1200 $1400 $1600 $1800<br />
Millions<br />
COMPARATIVE APPROPRIATIONS BY MAJOR CHARACTER OF EXPENDITURE<br />
Current Expense<br />
584.3<br />
619.2<br />
Capital Outlay<br />
674.3<br />
911.8<br />
Debt Retirement<br />
134.4<br />
179.2<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900<br />
Millions<br />
52<br />
52
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
COMPARATIVE APPROPRIATION BY MAJOR OBJECTS OF EXPENDITURE<br />
2009-2008 ALL FUNDS<br />
MATERIALS MACHINERY CAPITAL FIXED<br />
ORGANIZATION PERSONAL CONTRACT AND AND PROJECTS & OTHER<br />
or FUND YEAR TOTAL SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT LAND CHARGES<br />
Board of Commissioners 2009 $ 4,404,800 $ 4,294,400 $ 74,700 $ 35,700 $ - $ - $ - $ -<br />
2008 $ 4,277,500 $ 4,176,600 $ 63,700 $ 37,200 $ - $ - $ - $ -<br />
General Administration 2009 22,835,600 13,216,000 6,195,300 1,272,800 2,151,500 - - -<br />
2008 29,205,000 12,342,900 4,976,300 1,065,800 1,345,000 - - 9,475,000<br />
Monitoring & Research 2009 31,448,400 26,173,600 2,313,200 1,054,700 1,906,900 - - -<br />
2008 30,059,500 25,584,500 2,190,300 1,029,000 1,255,700 - - -<br />
Procurement & Materials 2009 10,393,700 5,527,200 263,500 4,603,000 - - - -<br />
Management 2008 9,807,900 5,371,300 263,500 4,173,100 - - - -<br />
Human Resources 2009 54,001,400 53,350,200 425,500 65,700 160,000 - - -<br />
2008 64,433,800 63,889,800 428,300 60,100 55,600 - - -<br />
Information Technology 2009 20,987,200 12,275,800 5,102,800 2,143,600 1,465,000 - - -<br />
2008 21,882,800 14,081,400 3,707,300 2,484,800 1,609,300 - - -<br />
Law 2009 8,196,000 6,948,500 523,200 84,300 - - - 640,000<br />
2008 7,969,700 6,693,000 547,600 89,100 - - - 640,000<br />
Finance 2009 3,762,800 3,592,200 143,100 27,500 - - - -<br />
2008 3,655,200 3,445,500 129,500 55,200 25,000 - - -<br />
Maintenance & Operations:<br />
General Division 2009 23,487,100 8,003,200 12,792,900 629,400 2,061,600 - - -<br />
2008 24,544,200 7,916,100 14,053,000 313,100 2,262,000<br />
- - -<br />
North Service Area 2009 49,665,300 23,351,400 23,156,600 2,769,500 387,800 - - -<br />
2008 47,199,400 22,488,600 20,920,500 3,194,000 596,300 -<br />
-<br />
-<br />
Calumet Service Area 2009 44,690,900 18,954,800 21,209,500 3,151,800 1,374,800 - - -<br />
2008 42,485,500 18,863,900 19,626,100 2,873,500 1,122,000<br />
- - -<br />
Stickney Service Area 2009 103,563,000 39,515,600 51,865,400 10,559,300 1,622,700 - - -<br />
2008 95,639,600 37,877,100 46,184,500 10,650,000 928,000<br />
- - -<br />
TOTAL Maintenance & 2009 221,406,300 89,825,000 109,024,400 17,110,000 5,446,900 - - -<br />
Operations 2008 209,868,700 87,145,700 100,784,100 17,030,600 4,908,300 - - -<br />
Engineering 2009 17,566,400 5,087,000 11,157,000 11,400 1,261,000 - 50,000 -<br />
(Corporate Fund) 2008 16,026,500 5,761,400 9,523,400 14,700 550,000 - 177,000 -<br />
TOTAL Corporate Fund 2009 $ 395,002,600 $ 220,289,900 $ 135,222,700 $ 26,408,700 $ 12,391,300 $ - $ 50,000 $ 640,000<br />
2008 $ 397,186,600 $ 228,492,100 $ 122,614,000 $ 26,039,600 $ 9,748,900 $ - $ 177,000 $ 10,115,000<br />
Engineering 2009 $ 35,583,800 $ 14,880,900 $ 2,376,500 $ 1,377,000 $ 230,500 $ 16,718,900 $ - $ -<br />
(Construction Fund) 2008 $ 32,160,100 $ 13,974,200 $ 1,696,500 $ 263,200 $ 350,000 $ 14,651,200 $ -<br />
$ 1,225,000<br />
Engineering (Capital 2009 932,866,800 54,603,500 1,648,600 200 - 873,529,500 300,000 2,785,000<br />
Improvements Bond Fund) 2008 743,350,100 94,414,700 764,600 200 55,000 639,415,600 1,300,000 7,400,000<br />
Stormwater Management 2009 33,807,000 18,444,700 1,000,100 305,000 - 9,057,200 - 5,000,000<br />
Fund 2008 34,924,000 16,626,700 4,080,800 133,500 411,000 8,272,000 5,400,000 -<br />
Bond Redemption & 2009 134,447,869 - - - - - - 134,447,869<br />
Interest Fund 2008 179,167,802 - - - - - - 179,167,802<br />
Retirement Fund 2009 31,385,921 - - - - - - 31,385,921<br />
2008 30,371,534 - - - - - - 30,371,534<br />
Reserve Claim Fund 2009 67,500,000 12,000,000 - - - - - 55,500,000<br />
2008 55,500,000 12,000,000 - - - - - 43,500,000<br />
GRAND TOTAL 2009 $ 1,630,593,990 $ 320,219,000 $ 140,247,900 $ 28,090,900 $ 12,621,800 $ 899,305,600 $ 350,000 $ 229,758,790<br />
2008 $ 1,472,660,136 $ 365,507,700 $ 129,155,900 $ 26,436,500 $ 10,564,900 $ 662,338,800 $ 6,877,000 $ 271,779,336<br />
PERCENTAGES 2009 100.0% 19.6% 8.6% 1.7% 0.8% 55.2% 0.0% 14.1%<br />
2008 100.0% 24.8% 8.8% 1.8% 0.7% 45.0% 0.5% 18.5%<br />
53<br />
53
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
COMPARATIVE APPROPRIATION BY CHARACTER OF EXPENDITURE<br />
2009-2008 ALL FUNDS<br />
CURRENT CAPITAL DEBT<br />
ORGANIZATION OR FUND YEAR TOTAL EXPENSE OUTLAY RETIREMENT<br />
Board of Commissioners 2009 $ 4,404,800 $ 4,404,800 $ - $<br />
-<br />
2008 $ 4,277,500 $ 4,277,500 $ - $<br />
-<br />
General Administration 2009 22,835,600 20,684,100 2,151,500 -<br />
2008 29,205,000 27,860,000 1,345,000 -<br />
Monitoring & Research 2009 31,448,400 29,541,500 1,906,900 -<br />
2008 30,059,500 28,803,800 1,255,700 -<br />
Procurement & Materials Management 2009 10,393,700 10,393,700 - -<br />
2008 9,807,900 9,807,900 - -<br />
Human Resources 2009 54,001,400 54,001,400 - -<br />
2008 64,433,800 64,433,800 - -<br />
Information Technology 2009 20,987,200 19,522,200 1,465,000 -<br />
2008 21,882,800 20,273,500 1,609,300 -<br />
Law 2009 8,196,000 8,196,000 - -<br />
2008 7,969,700 7,969,700 - -<br />
Finance 2009 3,762,800 3,762,800 - -<br />
2008 3,655,200 3,630,200 25,000 -<br />
Maintenance & Operations:<br />
General Division 2009 23,487,100 21,425,500 2,061,600 -<br />
2008 24,544,200 22,282,200 2,262,000 -<br />
North Service Area 2009 49,665,300 49,277,500 387,800 -<br />
2008 47,199,400 46,603,100 596,300 -<br />
Calumet Service Area 2009 44,690,900 43,316,100 1,374,800 -<br />
2008 42,485,500 41,363,500 1,122,000 -<br />
Stickney Service Area 2009 103,563,000 101,940,300 1,622,700 -<br />
2008 95,639,600 94,711,600 928,000 -<br />
TOTAL Maintenance & Operations 2009 $ 221,406,300 $ 215,959,400 $ 5,446,900 $<br />
-<br />
2008 $ 209,868,700 $ 204,960,400 $ 4,908,300 $<br />
-<br />
Engineering (Corporate Fund) 2009 17,566,400 16,255,400 1,311,000 -<br />
2008 16,026,500 15,299,500 727,000 -<br />
TOTAL Corporate Fund 2009 $ 395,002,600 $ 382,721,300 $ 12,281,300 $<br />
-<br />
2008 $ 397,186,600 $ 387,316,300 $ 9,870,300 $<br />
-<br />
Engineering 2009 $ 35,583,800 $ 18,634,400 $ 16,949,400 $<br />
-<br />
(Construction Fund) 2008 $ 32,160,100 $ 17,158,900 $ 15,001,200 $<br />
-<br />
Engineering 2009 932,866,800 59,337,300 873,529,500 -<br />
(Capital Improvements Bond Fund) 2008 743,350,100 102,579,500 640,770,600 -<br />
Stormwater Management Fund 2009 33,807,000 24,749,800 9,057,200 -<br />
2008 34,924,000 26,241,000 8,683,000 -<br />
Bond Redemption & Interest Fund 2009 134,447,869 - - 134,447,869<br />
2008 179,167,802 - - 179,167,802<br />
Retirement Fund 2009 31,385,921 31,385,921 - -<br />
2008 30,371,534 30,371,534 - -<br />
Reserve Claim Fund 2009 67,500,000 67,500,000 - -<br />
2008 55,500,000 55,500,000 - -<br />
GRAND TOTAL 2009 $ 1,630,593,990 $ 584,328,721 $ 911,817,400 $ 134,447,869<br />
2008 $ 1,472,660,136 $ 619,167,234 $ 674,325,100 $ 179,167,802<br />
PERCENTAGES 2009 100% 36% 56% 8%<br />
2008 100% 42% 46% 12%<br />
54<br />
54
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
2009 - 2008 PROGRAM APPROPRIATION - ALL FUNDS<br />
BY DEPARTMENT AND MAJOR PROGRAM<br />
(IN MILLIONS)<br />
MAJOR PROGRAM SERIES<br />
FLOOD &<br />
SOLIDS SOLIDS POLLUTION GENERAL<br />
COLLECTION TREATMENT PROCESSING UTILIZATION CONTROL SUPPORT TOTAL<br />
DEPARTMENT 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008<br />
Board of Commissioners $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4.4 $ 4.3 $ 4.4 $ 4.3<br />
General Administration - - - - - - - - - - 22.9 29.2 22.9 29.2<br />
Monitoring & Research - - - - - - - - 31.4 30.1 - - 31.4 30.1<br />
Procurement & Materials - - - - - - - - - - 10.4 9.8 10.4 9.8<br />
Management<br />
Human Resources - - - - - - - - - - 54.0 64.4 54.0 64.4<br />
Information Technology - - - - - - - - - - 21.0 21.9 21.0 21.9<br />
Law - - - - - - - - 0.7 0.7 7.4 7.2 8.2 7.9<br />
Finance - - - - - - - - - - 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.7<br />
Maintenance & Operations 59.0 55.0 80.9 75.6 39.7 38.5 30.6 31.3 7.2 5.6 4.0 3.9 221.4 209.9<br />
Engineering ( Corporate ) 5.2 5.0 7.0 5.8 0.2 0.9 3.3 1.7 1.7 1.6 0.2 1.0 17.6 16.0<br />
Total Corporate Fund $64.2 $60.0 $87.9 $81.4 $39.9 $39.4 $33.9 $32.9 $41.0 $38.0 $128.1 $145.4 $395.0 $397.2<br />
Engineering<br />
( Construction and Capital 89.1 102.9 209.6 323.6 216.9 32.2 90.4 103.1 358.7 202.0 3.7 11.7 968.4 775.5<br />
Improvements Bond Funds )<br />
Stormwater Management - - - - - - - - 33.8 34.9 - - 33.8 34.9<br />
Fund<br />
Miscellaneous - - - - - - - - - - 233.3 265.0 233.3 265.0<br />
( Debt Service, Retirement<br />
and Reserve Funds )<br />
GRAND TOTAL $153.3 $162.9 $297.5 $405.0 $256.8 $71.6 $124.3 $136.0 $433.6 $274.9 $365.1 $422.1 $1,630.5 $1,472.6<br />
Note: Totals are rounded.<br />
55<br />
55
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
APPROPRIATION DISTRIBUTION BY PROGRAM<br />
To comply with Illinois State Statute, it is necessary to prepare budget estimates and appropriate funds according to programs<br />
as well as organizational units, performance principles, and unit cost data. The two charts on this page and the next page<br />
show the relationship of major objectives or functions within the Corporate, Construction and Capital Improvements Bond<br />
Funds. The charts compare major program appropriations to the total Fund appropriations for 2009 and 2008, as budgeted on<br />
page 58.<br />
Corporate Fund<br />
% of Appropriation<br />
2009 $395,002,600<br />
2008 $397,186,600<br />
40%<br />
35%<br />
36.6%<br />
30%<br />
32.4%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15.1%<br />
22.2%<br />
20.5%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
16.3%<br />
9.9%<br />
10.1% 10.4%<br />
9.6%<br />
8.6%<br />
8.3%<br />
2008<br />
2009<br />
Collection Treatment Solids<br />
Processing<br />
Flood &<br />
Pollution<br />
Solids<br />
Utilization<br />
General<br />
Support<br />
56<br />
56
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
APPROPRIATION DISTRIBUTION BY PROGRAM (continued)<br />
Capital Improvements Bond & Construction Funds<br />
% of Appropriation<br />
2009 $968,450,600<br />
2008 $775,510,100<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
41.7%<br />
30%<br />
4.2%<br />
37.0%<br />
26.0%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
13.3%<br />
21.6% 22.4%<br />
13.3%<br />
1.5%<br />
0%<br />
9.2%<br />
Collection Treatment Solids<br />
Processing<br />
Flood &<br />
Pollution<br />
9.3%<br />
Solids<br />
Utilization<br />
0.4%<br />
General<br />
Support<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
57<br />
57
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
2009 - 2008 PROGRAM APPROPRIATION COMPARISON<br />
ALL FUNDS<br />
PROGRAM OBJECTIVE 2009 2008 DOLLAR PERCENT<br />
BUDGETED BUDGETED INCREASE INCREASE PERSONNEL<br />
NUMBER NAME COST COST (DECREASE) (DECREASE) 2009 2008<br />
1000 Collection $ 153,365,415 $ 162,954,951 $ (9,589,536)<br />
(5.9) 349 346<br />
2000 Treatment 297,437,555 405,003,758 (107,566,203) (26.6) 520 507<br />
3000 Solids Processing 256,835,365 71,612,667 185,222,698 258.6 287 286<br />
4000 Flood and Pollution Control 433,567,775 274,834,684 158,733,091 57.8 421 418<br />
5000 Solids Utilization 124,329,267 136,137,634 (11,808,367) (8.7) 61 63<br />
7000 General Support<br />
(Debt Retirement, Law, etc.) 365,058,613 422,116,442 (57,057,829) (13.5) 493 489<br />
TOTAL $ 1,630,593,990 $ 1,472,660,136 $ 157,933,854<br />
10.7 2,131 2,109<br />
2009 2008 DOLLAR PERCENT<br />
BUDGETED BUDGETED INCREASE INCREASE PERSONNEL<br />
SUMMARY BY FUND COST COST (DECREASE) (DECREASE) 2009 2008<br />
Corporate $ 395,002,600 $ 397,186,600 $ (2,184,000)<br />
(0.5) 1,846 1,840<br />
Construction and Capital 968,450,600 775,510,200 192,940,400 234.0 236 222<br />
Improvements Bond Fund<br />
Stormwater Management Fund 33,807,000 34,924,000 (1,117,000) 461 49 47<br />
Retirement Fund 31,385,921 30,371,534 1,014,387 3.3 - -<br />
Bond and Interest Fund 134,447,869 179,167,802 (44,719,933) (25.0) - -<br />
Reserve Claim Fund 67,500,000 55,500,000 12,000,000 21.6 - -<br />
TOTAL $ 1,630,593,990 $ 1,472,660,136 $ 157,933,854<br />
10.7 2,131 2,109<br />
58<br />
58
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE - PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST 2001 - 2013<br />
Millions<br />
$180<br />
Early redemption of<br />
Refunding Bonds -<br />
Series July, 1997<br />
179.2<br />
166.2<br />
$160<br />
157.6<br />
160.1<br />
147.3<br />
160.3<br />
158.7<br />
Debt service reduction due to the<br />
impact of May 2006 & March 2007<br />
Refunding Bond Sales, Swap<br />
termination and maturation of other<br />
bond series.<br />
$140<br />
138.1<br />
134.4<br />
$120<br />
115.6<br />
113.2<br />
110.8<br />
$100<br />
96.2<br />
$80<br />
$60<br />
$40<br />
$20<br />
$0<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
This chart shows debt service for current bonds outstanding. It does not include bonds to be sold in the future,<br />
which are detailed in the 5-Year Financial Forecast on page 66.<br />
59<br />
59
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
OUTSTANDING BONDS AND ESTIMATED STATUTORY DEBT MARGIN<br />
DECEMBER 31, 2008<br />
DATE OF INTEREST AMOUNT<br />
BOND SERIES MATURITY RATES PAYABLE<br />
Capital Improvements Bonds - Series:<br />
December 2002 Series C 2016 5.375 $<br />
6,100,000<br />
December 2002 Series D 2013 3.0 to 5.375 73,100,000<br />
July 2006 Limted Tax 2033 5.00 139,565,000<br />
SUBTOTAL - Construction and Capital Improvements Bonds: $<br />
218,765,000<br />
Refunding Bonds - Series:<br />
August 1992 2009 5.9 to 6.05 $<br />
15,400,000<br />
July 1997 2014 4.7 to 5.50 16,200,000<br />
May 2006 Unlimited 2031 5.00 346,600,000<br />
May 2006 Limited Tax 2031 5.00 50,790,000<br />
March 2007 Series A 2014 to 2022 4.0 to 5.0 188,315,000<br />
March 2007 Series B 2034 to 2035 4.0 to 5.0 91,845,000<br />
March 2007 Series C 2025 to 2033 4.0 to 5.0 101,860,000<br />
SUBTOTAL - Refunding Bonds: $<br />
811,010,000<br />
State Revolving Fund Bonds - Series:<br />
January 1994 , 90A L170393 2013 3.59 $<br />
3,295,358<br />
December 1991 , 90B L170401 2011 3.745 1,623,425<br />
April 1992, 90C L170414 2011 3.745 1,192,667<br />
June 1992, 90D L170416 2012 3.59 286,850<br />
March 1993, 90E L170391 2012 3.59 3,072,297<br />
November 1992, 91F L170672 2012 3.59 2,495,366<br />
August 1992, 91G L170407 2012 3.59 413,336<br />
June 1992, 91I L170667 2011 3.59 156,300<br />
November 1992, 91L L170675 2012 3.59 1,653,466<br />
July 1994, 92P L170774 2013 2.50 10,834,812<br />
May 1995, 92Q L170874 2014 2.50 9,799,869<br />
June 1996, 94R L170820 2017 2.50 13,623,083<br />
February 1996, 92S L170875 2015 2.50 6,255,177<br />
January 1997, 92T L170876 2016 2.50 9,352,999<br />
July 1996, 92U L170877 2017 2.50 11,078,095<br />
February 1997, 94V L171150 2018 2.50 18,982,676<br />
January 2000, 97AA L170822 2019 2.506 31,208,793<br />
December 2000, 97BB L171151 2020 2.535 6,742,811<br />
July 2002, 97CC L172031 2021 2.535 27,084,908<br />
August 2003, 97DD L171152 2023 2.905 12,561,222<br />
July 2004, 01A L172126 2024 2.50 48,288,190<br />
July 2004, 01B L172127 2024 2.50 51,861,309<br />
July 2006, 01C L172128 2026 2.50 47,872,799<br />
March 2007, 04C L172493 2027 2.50 2,544,747<br />
March 2007, 04D L172494 2027 2.50 2,440,351<br />
March 2007, 04G L172611 2027 2.50 3,876,233<br />
January 2009, 04A L172485 2028 2.50 8,023,360<br />
January 2009, 04B L172488 2028 2.50 20,677,770<br />
January 2009, 04E L172495 2028 2.50 5,625,807<br />
SUBTOTAL - State Revolving Fund Bonds: $<br />
362,924,076<br />
TOTAL OUTSTANDING BONDS: $ 1,392,699,076<br />
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED STATUTORY DEBT MARGIN<br />
Debt Applicable to Debt Limit:<br />
Outstanding Bonds $ 1,392,699,076<br />
Bond Anticipation Note - Principal 63,038,700<br />
Bond Anticipation Note - Interest 860,698<br />
Liabilities of Tax- Financed Funds 53,171,284 $ 1,509,769,758<br />
Less Applicable Assets:<br />
Cash and Investments - Bond Redemption & Interest Funds $<br />
(91,677,772)<br />
Interest on Bonds Payable in Next Twelve Months 61,345,270 $<br />
(30,332,502)<br />
NET DEBT APPLICABLE TO LIMIT: $ 1,479,437,256<br />
Statutory Debt Limit 5.75% of 2007 Equalized Assessed Valuation ($155,972,794,427) $ 8,968,435,680<br />
Less Net Debt Applicable to Limit 1,479,437,256<br />
ESTIMATED STATUTORY DEBT MARGIN: $ 7,488,998,424<br />
60<br />
60
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ACCOUNT SUMMARY COMPARISON<br />
2009-2008 ALL FUNDS<br />
Increase (Decrease)<br />
Account Appropriation 2009 - 2008<br />
ORGANIZATION OR FUND 2009 2008 Dollars Percent<br />
Board of Commissioners $ 4,404,800 $ 4,277,500 $ 127,300 3.0<br />
General Administration 22,835,600 29,205,000 (6,369,400) (21.8)<br />
Monitoring & Research 31,448,400 30,059,500 1,388,900 4.6<br />
Procurement & Materials Management 10,393,700 9,807,900 585,800 6.0<br />
Human Resources 54,001,400 64,433,800 (10,432,400) (16.2)<br />
Information Technology 20,987,200 21,882,800 (895,600) (4.1)<br />
Law 8,196,000 7,969,700 226,300 2.8<br />
Finance 3,762,800 3,655,200 107,600 2.9<br />
Maintenance & Operations:<br />
General Division 23,487,100 24,544,200 (1,057,100) (4.3)<br />
North Service Area 49,665,300 47,199,400 2,465,900 5.2<br />
Calumet Service Area 44,690,900 42,485,500 2,205,400 5.2<br />
Stickney Service Area 103,563,000 95,639,600 7,923,400 8.3<br />
TOTAL Maintenance & Operations $ 221,406,300 $ 209,868,700 11,537,600 5.5<br />
Engineering (Corporate Fund) 17,566,400 16,026,500 1,539,900 9.6<br />
TOTAL Corporate Fund $ 395,002,600 $ 397,186,600 (2,184,000) (0.5)<br />
Engineering (Construction Fund) 35,583,800 32,160,100 3,423,700 10.6<br />
Engineering 932,866,800 743,350,100 189,516,700 25.5<br />
(Capital Improvements Bond Fund)<br />
Stormwater Management Fund 33,807,000 34,924,000 (1,117,000) (3.2)<br />
Bond Redemption & Interest Fund 134,447,869 179,167,802 (44,719,933) (25.0)<br />
Retirement Fund 31,385,921 30,371,534 1,014,387 3.3<br />
Reserve Claim Fund 67,500,000 55,500,000 12,000,000 21.6<br />
GRAND TOTAL $ 1,630,593,990 $ 1,472,660,136 $ 157,933,854 10.7<br />
61<br />
61
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
PERSONNEL SUMMARY COMPARISON<br />
2009-2007 ALL FUNDS<br />
Increase (Decrease)<br />
Proposed <strong>Budget</strong>ed Actual 2009 - 2008<br />
ORGANIZATION OR FUND 2009 2008 2007 Positions Percent<br />
Board of Commissioners 45 45 42 - -<br />
311<br />
General Administration 146 138 143 8 5.8<br />
65<br />
Monitoring & Research 308 309 311 (1) (0.3)<br />
44<br />
Procurement & Materials Management 70 70 70 - -<br />
Human Resources 54 54 52 - -<br />
Information Technology 72 72 65 - -<br />
Law 40 40 40 - -<br />
Finance 31 33 32 (2) (6.1)<br />
Maintenance & Operations:<br />
General Division 65 76 44 (11) (14.5)<br />
North Service Area 279 273 271 6 2.2<br />
Calumet Service Area 238 235 244 3 1.3<br />
Stickney Service Area 464 461 481 3 0.7<br />
TOTAL Maintenance & Operations 1,046 1,045 1,040 1 0.1<br />
Engineering (Corporate Fund) 34 34 33 - -<br />
TOTAL Corporate Fund 1,846 1,840 1,828 6 0.3<br />
Engineering (Construction Fund) 45 45 49 - -<br />
Engineering 191 177 155 14 7.9<br />
(Capital Improvements Bond Fund)<br />
Stormwater Management Fund 49 47 48 2 4.3<br />
Bond Redemption & Interest Fund - - - - -<br />
Retirement Fund - - - - -<br />
Reserve Claim Fund - - - - -<br />
GRAND TOTAL 2,131 2,109 2,080 22 1.0<br />
62<br />
62
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
PERSONAL SERVICE APPROPRIATIONS<br />
Positions reported in this chart are<br />
actual positions through 2008,<br />
meaning that at some point during<br />
the year the position was filled.<br />
Historically, very few positions were<br />
unfilled for the entire year, however,<br />
due to recent cost containment<br />
efforts there were on average for the<br />
years 2003 through 2007, thirty one<br />
postions that were budgeted but<br />
remained vacant for the entire<br />
budget year. In 2008, there were<br />
twelve positions that remained<br />
vacant.<br />
Maintenance & Operations,<br />
Engineering, and Monitoring &<br />
Research are referred to as the<br />
District’s Operating Departments.<br />
These departments are directly<br />
responsible for daily operations of<br />
sewage collection, treatment, disposal<br />
and environmental monitoring<br />
activities. The remaining departments<br />
are generally termed as Support<br />
Departments. While positions in these<br />
departments may be considered<br />
indirect or overhead, they are also<br />
2,500<br />
2,000<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
500<br />
necessary for technical expertise, statutory compliance, governance and, public accountability.<br />
Reductions in the operating departments through 2007 can be attributed to automation of manual processes, the transfer of<br />
support positions to support departments and completion of major infrastructure projects. Before 2002, capital project<br />
employees were budgeted only in the Construction Fund.<br />
Modest staffing increases in the operating departments beginning in 2008 are necessary to adequately staff for the design and<br />
implementation of the Master Plans and Stormwater Management initiatives.<br />
The exhibit below provides the personal service appropriations for 2008 and 2009, and the actual expenditures for personal<br />
services in 2007. The increase in salaries of regular employees includes a cost of living adjustment. The significant reduction in<br />
contractual services is due to the award of Bond Funded multi-year consultant contracts that were fully encumbered in 2008.<br />
Personal Service Summary - All Funds<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
2008 - 2009 Change<br />
Actual Exp. Adj. Approp. <strong>Budget</strong>ed Dollars Percent<br />
Salaries of Regular Employees* $153,338,426 $165,484,150 $171,262,400 $5,778,250 3.49%<br />
Compensation Plan Adjustments 7,262,050 8,066,200 7,926,400 (139,800) -1.73%<br />
Social Security & Medicare Contributions 1,984,430 2,203,000 2,205,000 2,000 0.09%<br />
Employee Claims 6,181,654 10,110,000 12,100,000 1,990,000 19.68%<br />
Other Employee Personal Services** 2,280,071 3,665,600 3,852,700 187,100 5.10%<br />
Contractual Services 28,335,215 173,635,405 77,297,300 (96,338,105) -55.48%<br />
Health & Life Insurance Premiums*** 56,872,136 57,844,935 47,229,400 (10,615,535) -18.35%<br />
Total $256,253,982 $421,009,290 $321,873,200 ($99,136,090) -23.55%<br />
* Includes 2009 salary adjustments<br />
** Includes Tuition, Training, Non-budgeted Salaries, and Relief Workers<br />
*** Includes OPEB Distribution<br />
0<br />
Position History (2001 - 2009)<br />
2,274 2,232<br />
2,159<br />
2,142<br />
2,134<br />
2,102<br />
2,081<br />
2,109<br />
2,131<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Stormwater Management Fund*<br />
Monitoring & Research<br />
Engineering<br />
Maintenance & Operations<br />
Support Departments<br />
Board of Commissioners<br />
General Administration<br />
Procurement & Mat'ls. Mgt.<br />
Human Resources<br />
Information Technology<br />
Law<br />
Finance<br />
* In 2009, 49 positions for the General Administration, Maintenance and Operations, and<br />
Engineering Departments are budgeted in the Stormwater Management Fund, while the<br />
operations remain with the departments.<br />
63<br />
63
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST<br />
2009 - 2013<br />
In 1988, the District began including its Five-Year Financial Forecast in the <strong>Budget</strong>. This<br />
forecast, as defined by generally accepted accounting principles, is an interim financial report.<br />
Interim financial reports are designed to provide estimates of future financial operating<br />
conditions to policymakers and managers. They reflect no legal obligation of the organization,<br />
present or future.<br />
The District's five-year forecast is prepared prior to the Executive Director’s <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Recommendations and reflects the best estimates of revenues, fund equity, and appropriation<br />
needs available at the time. This forecast is presented to the Executive Director. Subject to his<br />
review and approval, it is then included in the <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
The five-year forecast presentation is in the form of a letter from the <strong>Budget</strong> Officer to the<br />
Executive Director which discusses the assumptions used in making the forecast. It also provides<br />
a discussion of the changes and trends in operations which are expected to occur during the fiveyear<br />
forecast period. Graphs and tables are provided, detailing the financial projections of all<br />
funds.<br />
64<br />
64
Mr. Richard Lanyon October 21, 2008<br />
General Superintendent<br />
O F F I C E<br />
SUBJECT: FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST, 2009 – 2013<br />
Dear Sir:<br />
I have reviewed the Five-Year Financial Forecast prepared for the fiscal years 2009 – 2013, and offer the following report and<br />
summary. Subject to your review and approval, this will be included in the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong>. These projections are a tool<br />
designed to aid the District in planning and controlling its financial position over a longer range than the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> itself.<br />
They also contribute to making the <strong>Budget</strong> a comprehensive financial plan of District operations, past, present, and future.<br />
This forecast is designed to provide the reviewer with a better understanding of how the District’s revenues and expenditures<br />
are expected to develop during the next five years. It also summarizes the tax impact of the District’s strategic goals and<br />
objectives. As useful as the forecast is in providing a short and long-term view of the District’s financial position, it should be<br />
used with an understanding of the underlying expenditure and revenue assumptions. The report’s value lies in the projected<br />
trends rather than the absolute numbers.<br />
OVERVIEW<br />
The Property Tax Extension Limitation (Tax Cap) law of 1995, Public Act 89-1, remains the primary limiting factor for the<br />
District’s long-term financial planning. This law essentially limits increases in property tax levies for our aggregate or operating<br />
funds, to an increase of 5 percent or the change in the national Consumer Price Index (CPI), whichever is less. Revenue sources<br />
for the District are limited by statute, and are derived primarily from property taxes. Projections of economic growth in Illinois,<br />
reflected in revenues from personal property replacement tax collections, investment income, real estate leases, and user charge<br />
collections are anticipated to show moderate growth over the projection period. Large swings in these smaller revenue streams are<br />
possible, but unpredictable.<br />
The aggregate levy for 2009 is estimated to increase by 4.1 percent over 2008, and is projected to increase an average of 4.0<br />
percent per year for 2009 through 2013. As noted on the graph on page 68, the 2009 levy year is projected to be under the<br />
Tax Cap limitation. In planning for future years, it is necessary to plan major expenditures such that appropriations and<br />
resulting levies do not exceed the statutory limitations on property tax revenues in any given year. The Cook County Clerk<br />
ensures that the District’s levy remains in compliance by adjusting the levy extension, if required. The District has directed<br />
the County Clerk to make any such reduction only to the Construction Fund. The Tax Cap is not expected to reduce the 2008<br />
levy collected in 2009, which is the basis of the 2009 projection.<br />
The Tax Cap law also had an impact on the future funding of the District’s capital program. While the Debt Service levy is<br />
not part of the aggregate levy, under Public Act 89-1, the District’s non-referendum bond authority was restricted to fund only<br />
projects initiated prior to October 1, 1991, which generally covered only TARP projects. However, Public Act 89-385<br />
provided additional non-referendum authority to the District by authorizing the issuance of “limited bonds.” These “limited<br />
bonds” can be issued to the extent that the total debt service requirement of any new debt when combined with existing debt<br />
service does not exceed the debt service extension base established by the Act of $141.5 million. This “limited bond” capacity<br />
was expanded for the District by passage of Public Act 90-485 in the 1997 legislative session by excluding debt issued and<br />
used for TARP projects from the limiting debt service extension base. The limited bond debt service is $32.9 million in 2009.<br />
In 2001, the Illinois Legislature amended the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District Act to allow the issuance of debt for<br />
up to thirty years (previously twenty years). In 2002, the District’s overall non-referendum authority was extended through<br />
December 31, 2016. In 2004, the District received authority to issue $150 million (previously $100) of non-referendum bonds<br />
during any budget year. These legislated changes provide resources for financing the capital program for the next eight years.<br />
65<br />
65
Five-Year Financial Forecast, 2009-2013 October 21, 2008<br />
EXPENDITURES: DEPARTMENTAL GUIDELINES AND METHODOLOGY<br />
The <strong>Budget</strong> Office asked each department to project its needs for the years 2009 – 2013. These projections were made before<br />
the actual 2009 Departmental <strong>Budget</strong> requests were finalized and may not precisely match 2009 budget requests. The<br />
projections were made in current dollars, then inflated based on the most recently provided inflation factors from the Illinois<br />
Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability. These were applied to reflect market forecasts for material and<br />
service expenditures appropriate to our industry. The Human Resources Department directly projected health and life<br />
insurance costs based on current multi-year agreements and industry trends. Electricity was adjusted for rate changes due to<br />
industry deregulation and current multi-year agreements.<br />
REVENUE AND FINANCING ASSUMPTIONS<br />
Key assumptions made in the projections of revenues and tax rates are:<br />
• Short term fluctuations in commodities such as lumber, chemicals, and metals should have little impact over the long<br />
term. Over the long term, these costs will be viewed as normal cost increases in tandem with an economy that will<br />
continue with modest growth trends for the projection period.<br />
• Tax collections will be 96.5 percent of what is levied - allowing for loss in collections, Property Tax Appeals Board<br />
(PTAB) decisions, Circuit Court decisions, and other tax refunds.<br />
• The annual Equalized Assessed Valuation (EAV) projection is based on the actual 2007 amount as provided by the<br />
Cook County Clerk plus a 2.0 percent increase, compounded annually.<br />
• The estimated annual tax levy increase for the aggregate funds controlled by the Tax Cap is based on projections of<br />
available funding, increases in the CPI and allowable adjustments to EAV for new property of 1.2 percent annually.<br />
• The planned sale of capital improvement bonds, assumed to be 20 year level payment, will occur as follows:<br />
Year Limited Bonds Unlimited Bonds<br />
2009 $ 300 million $ -<br />
2010 $ 300 million $ 80 million<br />
2012 $ 300 million $ 20 million<br />
2013 $ 150 million $ -<br />
• Bond and Interest Fund levy estimates are based on a 6 percent interest rate on bond issues.<br />
• The District will receive between $44 and $49 million annually in State Revolving Fund loans.<br />
• Operating Fund Balances will be no less than 12.5 percent of Appropriations.<br />
APPROPRIATION FORECASTS<br />
Total District appropriations are expected to range from $942.0 to $1,712.7 million for the period 2009 – 2013, and are<br />
summarized in the exhibit on page 68, and detailed in Table I on page 69. The year to year variation is largely due to the<br />
schedule for awards on major capital projects. Changes and explanations within the various District funds are as follows:<br />
Corporate Fund<br />
The Corporate Fund, the District's general fund, includes all appropriations for day-to-day operations. Appropriations for the<br />
fund are expected to increase an average of 1.9 percent annually from 2009 – 2013. This relative stability of appropriations is<br />
attributed to the planned growth of operations, offset by changes in the work force. Annual average increases greater than the<br />
general price index are anticipated for health care, contracted solids disposal, and energy.<br />
The increasing cost of providing health care benefits, specifically prescription drugs, HMO premiums and other indemnity<br />
costs for current employees and retirees is being addressed through revisions in health plans requiring greater employee<br />
contributions, and phased in over several years. The District continues to evaluate alternatives to deal with this trend in a<br />
manner that is fair and equitable to all parties. The Board’s policy direction for funding the Other Post Employment Benefits<br />
(OPEB) liability is addressed with an appropriation of $10 million in 2009 and $10 million annually 2010 through 2013.<br />
A fund balance within the $45 to $55 million range is viewed by District management and the financial markets as necessary to<br />
maintain financial stability and sustain us through economic uncertainties. The beginning 2009 fund balance is projected to be<br />
higher, but reflects the planned draw down over a few years. While user charges, investment income, sewer permits, and Personal<br />
Property Replacement Tax income have benefited from the economy the last few years, these revenues are expected to fall in<br />
2009 due to rising energy costs, inflation, contraction in the real estate market, and the general decline in the overall economy. A<br />
66<br />
66
Five-Year Financial Forecast, 2009-2013 October 21, 2008<br />
portion of the projected net assets will remain unappropriated to protect the down-side of possible economic swings, and provide<br />
for a fiscally responsible fund balance.<br />
With the planned construction of new facilities that will require significant amounts of new energy, aggressive conservation<br />
efforts and alternative energy generation have been pursued at existing facilities to minimize the cost impact. In this forecast,<br />
substantially increased energy costs are evident in 2008 and balanced against reduced consumption as we realize the benefits<br />
of these modernization projects. The unit cost for electricity rose 37 percent on January 2, 2007 when a 1957 agreement with<br />
Com Ed expired. With the deregulation of the electrical supply industry, the District entered into an agreement with Peoples<br />
Energy Corporation for electrical generation, while Com Ed continues local power delivery.<br />
Natural gas costs have been increasingly volatile in the recent past. Attempts to stabilize natural gas cost, such as with spot<br />
market purchases, will be pursued in the future. Natural gas purchases along with captured digester gas have provided for<br />
stable and consistent needs. “Master Plan” projects are expected to increase digester gas production and reduce purchases.<br />
Overall biosolids disposal costs are competitive due to favorable local markets. A contract to handle approximately 30<br />
percent of the solids stream at Stickney, via an alternative biosolids facility, was awarded in 2001 with operations expected to<br />
begin in late 2008. Once this facility is operational, it is anticipated that the District will recognize a net increase of<br />
approximately $11 to $13 million per year in costs to process and utilize biosolids. This increase reflects both operating and<br />
capital costs. Operating costs are indexed to the CPI and natural gas prices, while the capital costs are fixed. The project,<br />
however, is specifically designed to provide the District with alternative markets for biosolids that do not compete with<br />
current utilization outlets, thus avoiding the potential for volatile costs associated with a single outlet.<br />
Capital Improvements Bond and Construction Funds<br />
The Capital Improvements Bond Fund<br />
CAPITAL PROGRAM EXPENDITURES<br />
accounts for all resources, principally<br />
Sewer Plant Tarp CIBF Cash Balance<br />
bond proceeds and construction<br />
grants, used for the construction of<br />
$600,000<br />
capital facilities. Bond sales<br />
$500,000<br />
supporting the Capital Improvements<br />
Bond Fund are projected to be $350<br />
$400,000<br />
million in 2009 and 2011. These bond<br />
$300,000<br />
sales will provide a sufficient level of<br />
$200,000<br />
available funds to continue the<br />
$100,000<br />
District’s capital improvements<br />
program including the construction of<br />
$0<br />
the Tunnel and Reservoir /CUP Plan<br />
(Chicago Underflow Plan). By law the District may separate the funding of its projects into Limited and Unlimited Bonds.<br />
Unlimited Bond sales of $100 million are planned for 2009 and 2011. This funding will be used in conjunction with Federal<br />
appropriations from the Army Corps of Engineers to support a major portion of the McCook and Thornton CUP reservoir<br />
projects.<br />
The District has agreements with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the Army Corps of Engineers to share the funding<br />
costs of the CUP reservoirs. In the past year, the District has also had language inserted into the <strong>Water</strong> Resources<br />
Development Act calling for reimbursement of funds for these projects. Due to the current Federal Fiscal climate,<br />
reimbursements are not expected in the near future and not included in this projection.<br />
$ Thousands<br />
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018<br />
The Construction Fund is used to finance modernization and rehabilitation project costs, and is funded primarily through the<br />
annual property tax levies. Appropriations for this fund lapse at year-end and uncompleted projects must be reappropriated.<br />
During the years, 2009 through 2013 appropriations will decline as major rehabilitation and expansion work expands in the<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund (CIBF).<br />
The District has initiated a major plan to determine its future needs and establish long-range rehabilitation plans for plant<br />
facilities that will improve the air and water environment. This effort, called the Master Plan, will provide a long-range road<br />
map to improve treatment processes, reduce energy costs, improve the quality of biosolids produced on site, improve pumping<br />
capacities of the plants, and better accommodate future construction projects.<br />
Initial estimates and schedules have been analyzed and compared to bond issuance authority and funding availability. As<br />
illustrated in the graph to the above, the cash balance in the CIBF (solid line) will generally accommodate the proposed<br />
projects (stacked bars) through 2016. This is when the District’s non-referendum bonding authority expires. Extension of the<br />
authority (dashed line) is necessary for additional projects including nutrient removal or effluent disinfection.<br />
67<br />
67
Five-Year Financial Forecast, 2009-2013 October 21, 2008<br />
Retirement, Debt Service, and Reserve Claim Funds<br />
The appropriation for the Retirement Fund is expected to increase an average of 2.9 percent annually from 2009 – 2013. The<br />
appropriation will remain stable over the five year period, reflecting a slowly declining employee base. The Early Retirement<br />
and Optional Retirement Plans expired at the end of 2007, and there are no plans to seek any new benefits.<br />
Debt Service Fund appropriations will increase an average of 6.2 percent annually over the period. Current debt service<br />
schedules, additional debt service requirements for new revolving fund loans, and anticipated bond sales in the years 2009<br />
through 2013 will increase due to increased capital expenditures related to major plant modernization “Master Plan” projects.<br />
The May 2006 and March 2007 General Obligation Refunding Bonds and June 2006 General Obligation Capital<br />
Improvements Bonds are structured such that debt will be maturing in 2023 through 2035. This took advantage of authority to<br />
issue debt for up to thirty years and leaves the District additional margin for limited bonds under the $141.5 million debt<br />
service tax extension limit.<br />
The appropriation for the Reserve Claim Fund is expected to increase an average of 5 percent annually. The Reserve Claim<br />
Fund is the District's self-insurance fund, and the annual appropriation equals all available resources in the fund. The<br />
projected annual increases are based on historical trends that will continue towards the fund’s statutory limit, as established by<br />
Board of Commissioner’s policy. Expenditures related to Workers Compensation claims are low and stable due to an active<br />
safety education and enforcement program. The District is self-insured and has approximately $30 billion in infrastructure.<br />
TAX LEVY FORECASTS<br />
Overall tax levies are projected to increase an average rate of 7.8 percent annually over the five-year period. Efforts will be<br />
undertaken to adjust annual variability consistent with meeting our objectives. The District has been very successful in<br />
managing its financial resources to limit any increases in the overall tax levy to 5 percent with tax abatements since before the<br />
imposition of Tax Caps. Projections of tax levies and revenue sources for the various District funds are as follows:<br />
Corporate Fund<br />
Tax levy projections for the Corporate Fund are expected to increase an average of 4.5 percent annually from 2009 – 2013.<br />
This fund provides for day-to-day operations and has diverse sources of revenue. Taxes account for 65 percent of Corporate<br />
revenue. Other significant funding sources include industrial user charge fees, investment income, and land rentals. The<br />
funding from the user charge system, which by design recovers costs attributable to industrial users, are expected to plateau in<br />
the $50 to $51 million range. Food Processing, local governments, and Chemical Processing users pay the majority of user<br />
charge fees. Revenues from these local industries have been relatively robust.<br />
Construction Fund<br />
The tax levy for the Construction Fund is projected to peak at $11.4 million in 2009 and then stabilize around $6 million.<br />
during the period 2009 – 2013. This range of funding will support the continuing infrastructure modernization program. Tax<br />
levy estimates for the Construction and Corporate Funds are balanced based on funding requirements. Careful planning of<br />
rehabilitation projects will be balanced with major capital projects for replacement and redesign specified in the Master Plans.<br />
Stormwater Management Fund<br />
The Stormwater Management Fund levy is projected to remain in the range of $9 million to $25 million during the period<br />
2009 - 2013. Regional stormwater management projects are being vetted for funding in 2010 and the following years.<br />
Retirement Fund<br />
The average increase projected for 2009 – 2013 is 2.9 percent for the Retirement Fund levy. Early retirement and optional<br />
contribution programs expired at the end of 2007. Currently, there are no plans to seek renewal of these programs through the<br />
state legislature.<br />
Debt Service Fund<br />
The existing tax levies for the District's Debt Service Fund are based on seven refunding bonds, five capital improvement<br />
bonds, and twenty-nine State Revolving Fund (SRF) bonds. Additional projected Capital Improvement and SRF bond sales<br />
will be used to finance TARP and other capital projects. Debt service funds account for annual property tax levies and certain<br />
other revenues, primarily investment income that is used to finance the payment of interest and principal on general obligation<br />
bond issues. It is District policy to use excess investment income from bond issues to abate portions of the levy. The projected<br />
debt for the District during 2009 – 2013 appears on page 72. The District’s outstanding bonds and ability to issue additional<br />
bonds is presented on pages 445 - 446.<br />
68<br />
68
Five-Year Financial Forecast, 2009-2013 October 21, 2008<br />
Reserve Claim and Working Cash Funds<br />
Tax levy increases for the Reserve Claim Fund are projected to range from $3.1 million to $8.6 million from 2009 – 2013.<br />
There is no levy planned for the working cash funds for this period. The District is authorized to levy a half-cent annually<br />
against taxable property for the Reserve Claim, Corporate and Construction Working Cash funds. The Stormwater Working<br />
Cash Fund has no debt or tax levy authority. The annual increases projected for the Reserve Claim Fund is equal to our<br />
projected increase in Equalized Assessed Valuation (EAV). Consistent with Board of Commissioner’s policy, the Reserve<br />
Claim fund levy will continue at its statutory limit in order to accumulate a reserve fund balance approaching the statutory<br />
maximum.<br />
The District’s Board of Commissioners may, by a two-thirds vote of all its members, transfer fund balances among its<br />
Working Cash Funds. The Corporate, Stormwater, and Construction Working Cash Funds will remain sufficiently funded by<br />
transfers among the working cash fund, themselves.<br />
TAX RATE FORECASTS<br />
Forecasts of property tax rates are dependent on projected Equalized Assessed Valuations (EAV). The estimated tax rates are<br />
calculated using the projected levy and EAV applicable for a particular tax year. Annual tax rate limits exist for the District's<br />
Corporate, Construction, Reserve Claim, and Working Cash funds. The District's Corporate and Construction Funds annual<br />
tax rate limits are 41 and 10 cents, respectively. Adequate margins exist in both the Corporate Fund and Construction Fund to<br />
extend taxes for District operations. A half-cent annual levy is allowed for the Reserve Claim, Corporate & Construction<br />
Working Cash Funds. The Stormwater Management Fund can levy up to 5 cents and is not limited by the Tax Cap.<br />
The rates are expected to increase primarily due to increases for Stormwater and debt service. Public Act 93-0715 limits the<br />
growth of residential property EAV to 7 percent annually with a maximum individual property exemption of $20,000. This<br />
law had only a marginal impact on the revenue for funds levying their maximum rate, i.e., the Reserve Claim Fund. The 7<br />
percent limit on residential EAV increases was effective 2004 through 2006. In 2007 Public Act 95-0644 renewed the 7<br />
percent EHE (Expanded Homeowner’s Exemption) for an additional assessment period with new maximum exemption<br />
amounts.<br />
SUPPORTING EXHIBITS<br />
The data presented to illustrate the projected financial status of the District is divided into six segments: Summary of All<br />
Funds, the Corporate Fund, Capital Improvements Funds, Debt Service, Program Distribution within Fund, and the Combined<br />
GAAP-Basis Balance Sheets for the Corporate Fund Group.<br />
The graphs on page 68, and the tables on page 69, summarize the projected appropriations, property tax rates and tax levies<br />
for all funds for the years 2009 through 2013. Historical comparisons can be made by reviewing the actual appropriations, tax<br />
rates and levies for the years 2000 – 2009 on page 47.<br />
Table II, on page 70 provides detailed revenue and tax rate projections, as well as expenditures by department and major<br />
categories for the Corporate Fund for 2009 – 2013. Actual Corporate Fund appropriations and expenditures for the years<br />
2000 – 2009 can be found on page 109.<br />
Appropriable resources and projected expenditures for the Capital Improvements Bond Fund appear on page 72, and<br />
projections for revenues, tax rates, and expenditures for the Construction Fund for the years 2009 – 2013, appear on page 71.<br />
A summary of actual and projected expenditures for both funds, for the years 2004 – 2013, can be found in the Capital<br />
Program Section, on page 366. The table on the top of page 72, and the exhibits on page 73, present appropriation projections<br />
by major programs.<br />
The balance sheet statement on page 74 is prepared on a GAAP-basis of accounting and is included to show the effect on the<br />
Corporate Fund Group. The Corporate Fund Group is made up of the Corporate, Corporate Working Cash and Reserve Claim<br />
Funds. One of the most important factors in evaluating the financial position of a government is the balance sheet of the<br />
corporate fund group, which relates total assets, liabilities, and fund equity. The strength of a government’s financial position<br />
is shown in its total fund equity and unreserved, undesignated fund balance. The total fund equity projection for 2009 is<br />
$226.8 million. This total fund equity projection includes future claims in the Reserve Claim Fund. The projection for the<br />
years 2009 to 2013 shows an average of $213.0 million.<br />
Very truly yours,<br />
Beverly K. Sanders<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Officer<br />
69<br />
69
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Projected Tax Rates<br />
Projected Total Tax Levy<br />
$ per $100 EAV<br />
$0.50<br />
$ in Millions<br />
$600<br />
$562.5<br />
$0.40<br />
$500<br />
$465.7<br />
$502.7<br />
$516.7<br />
$0.30<br />
$0.26<br />
$0.28<br />
$0.30 $0.30<br />
$0.32<br />
$400<br />
$300<br />
$417.1<br />
$0.20<br />
$0.10<br />
$200<br />
-78713<br />
$100<br />
Projected Tax Rate per $100 Equalized Assessed Valuation of $155.972 Billion.<br />
$0.00<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
$0<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Projected Appropriation<br />
Projected Aggregate Levy<br />
$ in Millions<br />
$2,000<br />
$1,800<br />
$1,600<br />
$1,502<br />
$1,713<br />
$ in Millions<br />
$350<br />
$300<br />
Tax Cap Limit ▲<br />
332<br />
319<br />
307<br />
295<br />
284<br />
50189.66 56140.93 63291.15<br />
$1,400<br />
$250<br />
$1,200<br />
$1,000<br />
$800<br />
$973<br />
$942<br />
$1,027<br />
$200<br />
$150<br />
$283<br />
$296<br />
$307<br />
$319<br />
$332<br />
$600<br />
$100<br />
$400<br />
$200<br />
$50<br />
$0<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
$0<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
70<br />
70
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST, 2009 - 2013 TABLE I<br />
ALL FUNDS<br />
Projected Tax Rates 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Corporate $0.1504 $0.1491 $0.1557 $0.1569 $0.1599 $0.1643<br />
Construction $0.0000 0.0070 0.0029 0.0034 0.0040 0.0029<br />
Stormwater $0.0095 0.0055 0.0108 0.0147 0.0146 0.0143<br />
Debt Service $0.0770 0.0769 0.0919 0.1013 0.0999 0.1168<br />
Retirement $0.0214 0.0165 0.0162 0.0165 0.0167 0.0170<br />
Reserve Claim $0.0046 0.0020 0.0039 0.0049 0.0049 0.0049<br />
Total ($ in cents) $0.2629 $0.2570 $0.2813 $0.2977 $0.3000 $0.3202<br />
Percentage Change -2.24% 9.46% 5.83% 0.78% 6.73%<br />
Projected Tax Rate per $100 Equalized Assessed Valuation of $155.972 Billion.<br />
2007 Actual Equalized Assessed Valuation plus 2% annual increase was used in calculating annual tax rates.<br />
Projected Tax Levies 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Corporate $239,262 $242,027 $257,653 $264,935 $275,344 $288,602<br />
Construction 0 11,390 4,811 5,735 6,842 5,058<br />
Stormwater 15,212 8,849 17,820 24,844 25,132 25,176<br />
Debt Service-existing 141,601 122,691 114,306 111,621 117,984 115,858<br />
Debt Service-proposed 0 2,171 37,835 59,482 54,115 89,311<br />
Retirement 25,664 26,751 26,743 27,779 28,844 29,867<br />
Reserve Claim 7,073 3,182 6,491 8,276 8,441 8,610<br />
Total Levy ($ in thousands) $428,813 $417,061 $465,659 $502,673 $516,703 $562,483<br />
Percentage Change -2.74%<br />
$417.06<br />
11.65%<br />
$465.66<br />
7.95%<br />
$502.67<br />
2.79%<br />
$516.70<br />
8.86%<br />
$562.48<br />
Aggregate Levy ($ in thousands) $272,000 $283,350 $295,698 $306,726 $319,472 $332,137<br />
Percentage Change 4.17% 4.36% 3.73% 4.16% 3.96%<br />
$283.35 $295.70 $306.73 $319.47 $332.14<br />
$284 $295 $307 $319 $332<br />
Projected Annual Appropriations 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Corporate $397,187 $395,003 $396,528 $407,376 $418,240 $425,612<br />
Capital Improvements 743,350 806,526 1,051,233 266,741 197,983 262,001<br />
Construction 32,160 35,584 17,390 20,187 23,194 18,668<br />
Stormwater 34,924 33,807 28,333 33,608 35,507 36,240<br />
Debt Service-existing 160,185 136,761 118,033 115,631 113,225 119,415<br />
Debt Service-proposed 0 - 2,869 28,183 47,314 53,633<br />
Retirement 30,890 31,386 32,714 32,707 33,971 35,274<br />
Reserve Claim 56,706 62,500 65,625 68,906 72,352 75,969<br />
Total Appropriation ($ in thousands) $1,455,401 $1,501,566 $1,712,725 $973,340 $941,786 $1,026,812<br />
$1,502 $1,713 $973 $942 $1,027<br />
Projected Positions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Corporate 1,840 1,842 1,829 1,801 1,801 1,792<br />
Capital Improvements 45 45 45 44 44 44<br />
Construction 177 191 191 190 189 189<br />
Stormwater 47 49 49 49 49 49<br />
Total Positions 2,109 2,127 2,114 2,084 2,083 2,074<br />
$2 $2 $2 $2 $2<br />
Note: Totals are Rounded<br />
71<br />
71
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST, 2009 - 2013 TABLE II<br />
CORPORATE FUND<br />
% average<br />
annual chng.<br />
5-Year Revenue and Tax Rate Projections 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 - 2013<br />
Property Taxes $230,888 $236,372 $248,635 $255,662 $265,707 $278,501 4.19%<br />
Personal Property Replacement Tax 27,507 25,780 24,952 27,854 26,760 26,961 1.31%<br />
User Charge 50,000 49,000 50,000 50,000 51,000 51,000 1.01%<br />
Investment Income 4,353 4,228 4,331 4,910 5,078 5,613 7.44%<br />
Land Rentals 9,001 11,000 10,500 11,000 12,000 12,700 3.79%<br />
Sewer Permits 1,500 1,800 2,000 2,100 2,300 2,300 6.41%<br />
Miscellaneous 32,669 3,784 4,079 4,181 4,285 4,392 3.82%<br />
Net Assets Appropriable 84,338 82,051 69,376 68,893 68,145 58,860 (7.71%)<br />
Net Assets Available for Future Use -39,579 (19,013) (17,344) (17,223) (17,036) (14,715) (6.05%)<br />
Total Appropriable Resources ($ in thousands ) $400,676 $395,003 $396,528 $407,376 $418,240 $425,612 1.89%<br />
Projecected Equalized Assessed Valuation<br />
(Based upon the 2007 Actual EAV) ####### $159.092 $162.274 $165.520 $168.830 $172.207 $175.651<br />
at assumed 2.0% annually compounded increase.) billion billion billion billion billion billion<br />
Projected Tax Rate cents per $100 Equalized 15.0¢ 14.9¢ 15.6¢ 15.7¢ 16.0¢ 16.4¢<br />
Assessed Valuation (EAV)<br />
Gross Levy - assumes 3.5% uncollectible. $239,262 $242,027 $257,653 $264,935 $275,344 $288,602<br />
Projected Appropriations by Major Categories 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 - 2013<br />
Employee Cost - Salaries $154,972 $159,216 $164,366 $167,991 $173,952 $179,049 2.98%<br />
Employee Cost - Health Care 40,291 29,439 37,190 45,141 48,291 54,566 16.92%<br />
Other Post Employment Benefits Trust 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 (8.33%)<br />
Professional Services 18,229 16,284 14,519 15,739 14,791 12,638 (5.75%)<br />
Energy Cost 40,939 47,510 51,051 52,739 53,863 54,725 3.62%<br />
Chemicals 7,554 7,615 7,500 7,385 7,275 7,218 (1.33%)<br />
Materials and Supplies 15,136 15,659 15,866 15,572 14,834 14,822 (1.34%)<br />
Solids Disposal 15,041 13,669 13,473 14,252 15,476 16,405 4.73%<br />
Contracted Solids Disposal 6,800 7,000 7,200 8,025 9,097 9,890 9.10%<br />
Computer Systems & Telecommunications 9,704 10,531 9,833 9,263 8,577 6,227 (11.81%)<br />
Repairs to Structures & Equipment 40,676 47,209 44,783 40,561 40,914 37,057 (5.78%)<br />
14,769 14,729 15,210 16,154 16,415 18,136 5.39%<br />
Machinery & Equipment 7,784 10,452 4,720 3,680 3,801 3,868 (17.96%)<br />
Property & Capital Projects 177 50 177 189 206 219 69.00%<br />
Real Estate Taxes 640 640 640 685 746 791 5.50%<br />
Total ($ in thousands ) $397,187 $395,003 $396,528 $407,376 $418,240 $425,612 1.89%<br />
Projection of Department Appropriations 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 - 2013<br />
Board of Commissioners $4,278 $4,405 $4,589 $4,726 $4,876 $5,083 3.65%<br />
General Administration 29,205 22,836 20,271 20,977 21,492 22,064 (0.66%)<br />
Research and Development 30,060 31,448 30,825 30,669 31,824 32,528 0.87%<br />
Purchasing 9,808 10,394 10,368 10,480 10,838 10,862 1.12%<br />
Personnel 64,434 54,001 56,819 64,879 69,317 77,663 9.57%<br />
Information Technology 21,883 20,987 20,507 22,712 19,812 16,003 (5.88%)<br />
Law 7,970 8,196 7,810 8,191 8,711 8,451 0.88%<br />
Finance 3,655 3,763 3,954 3,869 3,988 4,212 2.91%<br />
Engineering 16,027 17,566 18,340 17,339 15,570 12,802 (7.26%)<br />
Maintenance & Operations 209,869 221,406 223,047 223,535 231,812 235,945 1.61%<br />
Total ($ in thousands ) $397,187 $395,003 $396,528 $407,376 $418,240 $425,612 1.89%<br />
Projected Appropriation Distribution by Program 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 - 2013<br />
1000 Collection $60,088 $64,267 $68,028 $69,027 $70,962 $70,352 2.32%<br />
2000 Treatment 81,439 87,857 90,502 90,198 90,749 92,901 1.41%<br />
3000 Solids Processing 39,395 39,916 39,403 40,740 41,404 42,167 1.40%<br />
4000 Flood & Pollution Control 37,960 41,049 38,992 38,976 39,883 40,679 (0.18%)<br />
5000 Solids Disposal 32,943 33,884 33,029 31,384 34,009 34,071 0.26%<br />
7000 General Support 145,362 128,029 126,573 137,052 141,235 145,442 3.29%<br />
Total ($ in thousands ) $397,187 $395,003 $396,528 $407,376 $418,240 $425,612 1.89%<br />
Note: Totals are rounded<br />
72<br />
72
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST, 2009 - 2013<br />
CONSTRUCTION FUND<br />
Five-Year Revenue and Tax Rate Projections 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
TABLE III<br />
Property Taxes $0 $10,991 $4,643 $5,535 $6,602 $4,881<br />
Personal Property Replacement Tax 0 2,010 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,100<br />
User Charge 300 300 300 300 300 300<br />
Investment Income & Miscellaneous Revenue 1,385 1,103 913 1,040 1,075 1,186<br />
Net Assets Appropriable 28,443 21,180 10,434 12,112 13,916 11,201<br />
Total Revenue and Appropriable Resources ($ in thousands) $30,128 $35,584 $17,390 $20,187 $23,194 $18,668<br />
Projected Equalized Assessed Valuation (EAV) $159.092 $162.274 $165.520 $168.830 $172.207 $175.651<br />
(2007 Actual EAV at assumed 2.0% annually compounded increase) billion billion billion billion billion billion<br />
Projected Tax Rate cents per $100 of EAV 0.0¢ 0.7¢ 0.3¢ 0.3¢ 0.4¢ 0.3¢<br />
Gross Levy - assumes 3.5% uncollectible rate. $0 $11,390 $4,811 $5,735 $6,842 $5,058<br />
Projected Appropriations 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Employee Cost - Salaries $4,439 $4,620 $4,837 $4,940 $5,122 $4,313<br />
Employee Cost - Health Care 677 698 921 1,103 1,331 1,223<br />
Capital Projects - Existing 0 410 357 0 0 0<br />
Capital Projects - Proposed 0 978 0 0 0 0<br />
Professional services 14,651 16,719 3,453 6,123 8,940 6,636<br />
Other Charges 12,394 12,160 7,822 8,021 7,801 6,495<br />
Total ($ in thousands) $32,160 $35,584 $17,390 $20,187 $23,194 $18,668<br />
Projected Appropriation Distribution by Program 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
1000 Collection $4,092 $5,480 $5,882 $3,559 $1,156 $2,972<br />
2000 Treatment 18,149 17,220 4,339 10,856 8,866 9,413<br />
3000 Solids Processing 1,089 3,532 1,151 1,139 1,185 1,218<br />
4000 Flood & Pollution Control 4,043 7,267 3,642 2,290 9,696 2,470<br />
5000 Solids Disposal 1,468 380 1,505 1,530 1,554 1,578<br />
7000 General Support 3,319 1,707 871 813 736 1,016<br />
TOTAL ($ in thousands) $32,160 $35,584 $17,390<br />
$45,654<br />
$20,187<br />
$46,331<br />
$23,194<br />
$46,138<br />
$18,668<br />
$46,615<br />
STORMWATER FUND<br />
Five-Year Revenue and Tax Rate Projections 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Property Taxes $14,400 $8,300 $17,196 $23,974 $24,252 $24,295<br />
Investment Income & Miscellaneous Revenue $7,019 984 995 1,134 1,172 1,293<br />
Net Assets Appropriable $18,241 24,523 10,142 8,500 10,083 10,652<br />
Total Revenue and Appropriable Resources ($ in thousands) $39,660 $33,807 $28,333 $33,608 $35,507 $36,240<br />
Projected Equalized Assessed Valuation (EAV) $159.092 $162.274 $165.520 $168.830 $172.207 $175.651<br />
(2007 Actual EAV compounded 2% annually) billion billion billion billion billion billion<br />
Projected Tax Rate cents per $100 of EAV 1.0¢ 0.5¢ 1.1¢ 1.5¢ 1.5¢ 1.4¢<br />
Gross Levy - assumes 3.5% uncollectible rate. $14,923 $8,849 $17,820 $24,844 $25,132 $25,176<br />
Projected Appropriations 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Employee Cost - Salaries $3,636 $4,014 $4,106 $4,255 $4,409 $4,585<br />
Employee Cost - Health Care 451 465 614 736 887 816<br />
Professional Services 12,540 13,966 5,388 3,906 4,199 4,451<br />
Contractual Services 944 1,000 1,043 1,116 1,220 1,292<br />
Capital Projects 8,272 6,550 13,169 19,478 20,729 20,936<br />
Other Charges 9,082 7,812 4,014 4,118 4,064 4,161<br />
Total ($ in thousands) $34,924 $33,807 $28,333 $33,608 $35,507 $36,240<br />
Projection Appropriation Distribution by Program 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
4000 Flood & Pollution Control $34,924 $33,747 $28,253 $33,523 $35,414 $36,141<br />
TOTAL ($ in thousands) $34,924 $33,807 $28,333 $33,608 $35,507 $36,240<br />
Note: Totals are rounded<br />
73<br />
73
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST, 2009 - 2013<br />
TABLE IV<br />
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BOND FUND<br />
Appropriable Resources (Cash) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Bond Sales - Limited $0 $300,000 $300,000 $100,000 $0 $150,000<br />
Bond Sales - Unlimited - - - - 150,000<br />
State Revolving Loan Fund Receipts $42,000 45,000 44,000 46,000 48,000 50,000<br />
Investment Income & Miscellaneous Revenue $25,082 13,800 10,600 12,200 12,700 10,700<br />
Grant Funding (TARP + COE) $0 - - - - -<br />
Beginning Cash $588,486 419,231 525,952 490,619 242,201 (34,455)<br />
Total Assets Appropriable ($ in thousands) $655,568 $778,031 $880,552 $648,819 $302,901 $326,245<br />
Expenditures $236,337 $252,080 $389,932 $406,618 $337,356 $240,162<br />
Ending Cash ($ in thousands) $419,231 $525,952 $490,619 $242,201 ($34,455) $86,084<br />
Projected Tax Rate per $100 Equalized Assessed Valuatio 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Professional Consulting Services $0 $22,780 $77,657 $79,718 $76,762 $77,267<br />
Employee Cost - Salaries $15,482 17,600 18,035 18,572 19,192 19,902<br />
Employee Cost - Health Care $1,579 1,628 2,149 2,951 2,708 2,854<br />
Capital Projects - Limited Bonds $147,626 145,906 206,300 218,869 174,430 118,707<br />
Capital Projects - Unlimited Bonds $63,430 61,602 84,107 84,823 62,580 18,868<br />
Other Charges $8,220 2,564 1,684 1,684 1,684 2,564<br />
Total ($ in thousands) $236,337 $252,080 $389,932 $406,618 $337,356 $240,162<br />
Projected Appropriation Distribution by Program 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
1000 Collection $98,776 $78,911 $27,124 $10,788 $12,592 $2,338<br />
2000 Treatment $305,416 101,232 864,813 155,356 54,255 173,235<br />
3000 Solids Processing $31,128 212,083 21,672 15,110 36,354 4,618<br />
4000 Flood & Pollution Control $197,908 322,325 135,510 83,293 92,497 79,437<br />
5000 Solids Disposal $101,727 90,029 884 912 942 975<br />
7000 General Support $8,396 1,948 1,230 1,282 1,342 1,399<br />
TOTAL ($ in thousands) $743,350 $806,526 $1,051,233 $266,741 $197,983 $262,001<br />
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS<br />
EXISTING DEBT 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
January 1 Debt $1,563,155 $1,526,689 $1,458,184 $1,387,092 $1,331,426 $1,276,002<br />
Annual Current Debt Retirement ($90,466) (68,505) (71,092) (55,666) (55,424) (55,554)<br />
Net Debt $1,472,689 $1,458,184 $1,387,092 $1,331,426 $1,276,002 $1,220,448<br />
PROPOSED FUTURE DEBT 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Annual Sale of Bonds<br />
Capital Bonds - Limited $0 $300,000 $300,000 $100,000 $0 $150,000<br />
Capital Bonds - Unlimited $0 - - - - 150,000<br />
State Revolving Fund Bond Issues $54,000 45,000 44,000 46,000 48,000 50,000<br />
Future Debt Retirement $0 - (878) (2,636) (7,618) (17,916)<br />
Proposed New Debt ($ in thousands) $54,000 $345,000 $343,123 $143,365 $40,383 $332,084<br />
PROJECTED DEBT OUTSTANDING $1,526,689 $1,803,184 $1,730,214 $1,474,790 $1,316,384 $1,552,532<br />
Gross levy for existing debt $142,830 $122,691 $119,306 $116,621 $122,984 $120,858<br />
Gross levy for future debt 2,171 37,835 59,482 54,115 89,311<br />
Abatement from investment income ($20,300) - (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000)<br />
Net Levy $122,530 $124,862 $152,141 $171,104 $172,098 $205,169<br />
Tax Rate (cents) 7.7¢ 7.7¢ 9.2¢ 10.1¢ 10.0¢ 11.7¢<br />
Projected Equalized Assessed Valuation (EAV) $159.092 $162.274 $165.520 $168.830 $172.207 $175.651<br />
(2007 Actual EAV compounded 2% annually) billion billion billion billion billion billion<br />
Note: Totals are rounded<br />
74<br />
74
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST, 2009 - 2013<br />
APPROPRIATIONS<br />
Million $<br />
450<br />
Corporate Fund<br />
Million $<br />
40<br />
Construction Fund<br />
Million $<br />
1200<br />
Capital Improvements<br />
Bond Fund<br />
400<br />
35<br />
1000<br />
350<br />
30<br />
300<br />
800<br />
25<br />
250<br />
20<br />
600<br />
200<br />
150<br />
Projected Tax Rate per $100 Equalized Assessed Valuation of $155.972 Billion.<br />
15<br />
400<br />
100<br />
10<br />
200<br />
50<br />
5<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
7000 General Support 5000 Solids Disposal 4000 Flood & Pollution Control<br />
3000 Solids Processing 2000 Treatment 1000 Collection<br />
This set of stacked bar charts is a restatement of each fund's appropriation table. The relatively steady proportions across all<br />
programs within the Corporate Fund reflects the District's consistent view of its objectives in the near term. The most<br />
significant expenditures for the Construction Fund are related to the rehabilitation and updating of aging intercepting sewers<br />
and control structures. The fluctuations in Capital Improvement Bond (CIB) Fund's appropriations represent the award of<br />
major TARP (Tunnel and Reservoir Plan) and Master Plan projects. The CIB Fund operates on a full obligation basis and is<br />
the only fund where the encumbered appropriations do not lapse at the fiscal year end.<br />
75<br />
75
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST, 2009 - 2013<br />
Combined GAAP Balance Sheets - General Corporate Fund<br />
(in thousands of dollars)<br />
Assets 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />
Cash $ 761 $ 554 $ 619 $ 673 $ 742<br />
Investments 220,016 230,185 240,735 251,801 263,124<br />
Receivables:<br />
Property Taxes 279,651 289,439 299,569 310,054 320,906<br />
Less allowance for uncollectible taxes 31,975 33,094 34,252 35,451 36,692<br />
Net property taxes receivable $247,676 256,344 265,316 274,603 284,214<br />
Personal property replacement tax - - - - -<br />
User Charges 6,638 6,837 7,042 7,254 7,471<br />
Miscellaneous 4,341 4,428 4,517 4,607 4,699<br />
Inventories 35,766 35,936 35,942 35,865 35,865<br />
Total assets $ 515,198 $ 534,285 $ 554,172 $ 574,803 $ 596,116<br />
Liabilities and Fund Equity<br />
Liabilities:<br />
Deferred tax revenue $237,177 $ 245,845 $ 254,816 $ 264,103 $ 273,714<br />
Accounts Payable and other liabilities 48,590 51,020 53,571 56,249 59,062<br />
Due to other funds 357 328 394 472 472<br />
Total Liabilities $ 286,124 $ 297,194 $ 308,782 $ 320,825 $ 333,248<br />
Fund Equity:<br />
Fund Balances - Reserved:<br />
Working Cash $ 291,832 $ 302,046 $ 312,618 $ 323,559 $ 334,884<br />
Unreserved:<br />
Undesignated (62,758) (64,955) (67,228) (69,581) (72,017)<br />
Total Fund Equity $ 229,074 $ 237,091 $ 245,390 $ 253,978 $ 262,867<br />
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $ 515,198 $ 534,285 $ 554,172 $ 574,803 $ 596,116<br />
76<br />
76
SECTION III<br />
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BY FUND<br />
In this section, the financial structure of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago is presented with<br />
an explanation of the funds used, the accounting basis employed, and the relationships among the various funds. All<br />
financial statements, which Illinois Compiled Statutes require to be included in the <strong>Budget</strong>, are presented in this section.<br />
These statements and schedules provide full disclosure of assets and liabilities.<br />
The financial statements are first presented in summary, with an overall financial narrative, then with summary statements<br />
of revenue and expenditures for 2007 through the <strong>Budget</strong> Year 2009. Consolidated statements of taxes receivable,<br />
providing historical data on tax levies, are included in this section. A consolidated Appropriation for Liabilities statement is<br />
presented, which identifies and provides an appropriation for unpaid bills, contracts, and other liabilities. These liabilities<br />
are then subtracted from current assets to determine assets available for appropriation.<br />
Major fund category narratives are presented for the Corporate Fund, Capital Funds, and Other Funds, which discuss<br />
revenue sources, trends in revenue and expenditures, fiscal/financial policies, and procedures for these funds. Estimated<br />
balance sheets, statements of appropriable revenue, and statements of financial sources are then presented individually for<br />
each fund.<br />
Financial Narrative ...................................................................................................77<br />
Summary of Revenue and Expenditures, 2009-2007 .............................................. 81<br />
Summary of 2009 Appropriable Revenue for All Funds ..........................................85<br />
Combined Balance Sheets, 2007-2006 .................................................................... 86<br />
Appropriations for Liabilities, 2009-2008 ............................................................... 88<br />
Taxes Receivable, 2008 and Prior Years, Including Estimate for 2009 ...................89<br />
Personal Property Replacement Taxes Receivable, 2008 and Prior Years,<br />
Including Estimate for 2009 ............................................................................90<br />
Corporate Fund: Financial Narrative ...................................................................... 91<br />
Revenue Graphs, 2002-2009 ................................................................92<br />
Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009-2008 ................................................. 93<br />
Appropriable Revenues, 2009-2006 .................................................... 94<br />
Financing, 2009-2004 .......................................................................... 95<br />
Corporate Working Cash Fund: Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009-2008,<br />
and Revenues, 2009-2006 ............................................................................... 96<br />
Capital Funds: Financial Narrative ......................................................................... 97<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund:<br />
Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009-2008 ................................................. 98<br />
Appropriable Revenues, 2009-2006 .................................................... 99<br />
Construction Fund:<br />
Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009-2008 ................................................. 100<br />
Financing, 2009-2004, and Appropriable Revenues, 2009-2006 .........101<br />
Construction Working Cash Fund: Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009-2008,<br />
and Revenues, 2009-2006 .................................................................... 102<br />
Other Funds: Financial Narrative .............................................................................103<br />
Stormwater Management Fund:<br />
Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009-2008 ................................................. 104<br />
Appropriable Revenues, 2009-2006 .................................................... 105<br />
Stormwater Management Working Cash Fund: Estimated Balance<br />
Sheets, 2009-2008, and Appropriable Revenues, 2009-2006 .............. 106<br />
Bond and Interest Funds:<br />
Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009-2008 ................................................. 107<br />
Appropriable Revenues, 2009-2006 .................................................... 108<br />
Reserve Claim Fund:<br />
Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009-2008 ................................................. 109<br />
54 Appropriable Revenues, 2009-2006 .................................................... 109<br />
56 Retirement Fund:<br />
57 Estimated Balance Sheets, 2009-2008 ................................................. 110<br />
58 Appropriable Revenues, 2009-2006 .................................................... 110<br />
FINANCIAL<br />
STATEMENTS BY FUND
1234<br />
1234<br />
1234<br />
1234<br />
DISTRICT'S FLOW OF FUNDS STRUCTURE<br />
REVENUE SOURCES:<br />
Property Tax<br />
User Charge<br />
Investment Income<br />
Property Leases, Other<br />
Corporate Working Cash<br />
Bond Sales<br />
Property Tax<br />
Bond Sales<br />
Grants<br />
State of Illinois -<br />
Revolving Fund Loans<br />
Investment Income<br />
Other<br />
Property Tax<br />
Investment Income<br />
CORPORATE FUND<br />
Corporate Fund<br />
Temporary Loans<br />
CAPITAL FUNDS<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund<br />
Construction Fund<br />
OTHER FUNDS<br />
Bond and Interest Sinking Funds<br />
Reserve Claim Fund<br />
Corporate Working Cash Fund<br />
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901<br />
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901<br />
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901<br />
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901<br />
Temporary Loans<br />
Retirement Fund<br />
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901<br />
Construction Working Cash Fund<br />
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567<br />
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901<br />
1234 1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567<br />
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567<br />
1234<br />
1234 1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567<br />
Stormwater Management Fund<br />
1234<br />
1234567890123456789012345678901212345678901234567<br />
Temporary Loans<br />
1234<br />
Stormwater Working Cash Fund<br />
123456789012345678901234567890121234567890123<br />
123456789012345678901234567890121234567890123<br />
123456789012345678901234567890121234567890123<br />
123456789012345678901234567890121234567890123<br />
123456789012345678901234567890121234567890123<br />
Uses of Funds:<br />
General Operational Expenditures<br />
Permanent Facilities<br />
Environmental Facilities<br />
Principal and Interest on Bond<br />
Issues<br />
Payments for Claims<br />
and Damages<br />
Employee Pension Payments
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
FINANCIAL NARRATIVE<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FUND STRUCTURE, PURPOSE, AND ACCOUNTING BASIS<br />
The financial structure of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago is organized on a fund accounting<br />
basis. Each statutorily authorized fund maintains a self-balancing set of accounts that are reported separately in their own<br />
financial statements. The District’s use of funds ensures that public money is spent appropriately and within the amounts<br />
authorized. Established funds account for the different types of activities and legal restrictions that are associated with a<br />
particular government function. The use of funds and the budgeting, accounting, and auditing that are associated with this<br />
type of structure are governed by Illinois Compiled Statutes and generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), as<br />
determined by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB).<br />
The MWRDGC uses the following funds to control its financial activities:<br />
Corporate,<br />
Corporate Working Cash,<br />
Capital Improvements Bond,<br />
Bond & Interest (Debt Service),<br />
Construction,<br />
Construction Working Cash,<br />
Stormwater,<br />
Stormwater Working Cash,<br />
Reserve Claim, and<br />
Retirement.<br />
The chart on the facing page shows the flow of money within and between these funds.<br />
The Corporate Fund is used to pay for the operations and general expenditures of the District, not specifically chargeable to<br />
other funds. The Corporate Working Cash Fund consists of accounts maintained for the sole purpose of making temporary<br />
loans to the Corporate Fund in anticipation of tax collections. The accounts of the Corporate, Corporate Working Cash and<br />
Reserve Claim Funds are combined and reported as the General Corporate Fund for financial reporting purposes.<br />
The capital project funds account for resources used for the acquisition of capital facilities. The Capital Improvements Bond<br />
Fund is used for improvements, replacements, and additions to designated environmental improvement projects, and accounts<br />
for the proceeds of bonds authorized by the Illinois General Assembly, grant revenues, and other revenues. The Construction<br />
Fund is used for the acquisition of long-term assets used in the principal functions of the District, and accounts for a property<br />
tax levy and other revenues. The Construction Working Cash Fund consists of accounts maintained for the sole purpose of<br />
making temporary loans to the Construction Fund in anticipation of tax collections. The accounts of the Construction and<br />
Construction Working Cash Funds are combined and reported as the Construction Fund for financial reporting purposes.<br />
The Bond and Interest Fund is used for the payment of interest and redemption of general obligation bond issues. It accounts<br />
for property tax levies and certain other revenues, such as interest on investments. A subfund is created for each bond issue.<br />
The Reserve Claim Fund is used for the payment of claims, awards, losses, or liabilities that might be imposed against the<br />
District and for the replacement or repair of damaged District property. It accounts for a property tax levy and other<br />
revenues. As stated above, the accounts of the Reserve Claim Fund are included in the General Corporate Fund for financial<br />
reporting purposes.<br />
The Stormwater Management Fund was established beginning in 2005 by an act of the Illinois state legislature. The purpose<br />
of this fund is to account for property tax levies and certain other revenues, such as interest on investments and permit fees,<br />
which are used for planning, management and implementation activities relating to stormwater, flood and floodwater<br />
management in Cook County, including areas outside of the District’s corporate boundaries. The Stormwater Management<br />
Working Cash Fund, established during 2005 by an act of the Illinois state legislature, consists of accounts maintained for the<br />
sole purpose of making temporary loans to the Stormwater Management Fund in anticipation of tax collections. The accounts<br />
of the Stormwater Management Fund and the Stormwater Working Cash Funds are combined and reported as the Stormwater<br />
Management Fund for financial reporting purposes.<br />
The Retirement Fund is used to fund pension costs in accordance with statutory provisions and to account for a specific<br />
property tax levy. The taxes are collected by the District and paid to the MWRD Retirement Fund, a pension trust fund.<br />
BASIS OF ACCOUNTING<br />
All of these funds are defined as governmental-type funds, except for the pension trust fund. For GAAP purposes, the<br />
governmental funds are accounted for on a spending or “financial flow” measurement focus using the modified accrual basis<br />
of accounting, which means that only current assets and liabilities, are generally included on the balance sheets. The reported<br />
fund balances (net current assets) are considered a measure of “available spendable resources.”<br />
The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the District is prepared on a GAAP basis. GASB Statement Number 34 was<br />
effective for the 2002 fiscal year, and the District is in compliance with all of its provisions. The District is using the modified<br />
approach for assessing infrastructure, except for TARP deep tunnels and drop shafts which will be depreciated. The District<br />
uses specific budgetary accounts to record the repair or preservation of existing capital assets in addition to the construction<br />
77<br />
77
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
FINANCIAL NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
of new assets or enhancements of existing capital assets. Inventory is accounted for on the purchase method for budgetary<br />
purposes and on the consumption method for GAAP financial reporting.<br />
The budget is prepared using a cash basis of accounting for revenue recognition and an accrual basis for recording<br />
expenditures as prescribed by Illinois Compiled Statutes. Revenues are recognized when received in cash, and expenditures<br />
are recorded at the time when the liability is incurred, except for principal and interest on long-term debt, compensated<br />
absences, claims, judgments and arbitrage which are recognized when due and payable.<br />
Encumbrance accounting is used in the budgetary process for all funds. Appropriations lapse at year-end for the Corporate,<br />
Stormwater Management, Reserve Claim, Construction, Retirement, and Bond and Interest Funds. Appropriations for the<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund use a full encumbrance (obligation) method of budgetary accounting, which means that<br />
appropriations lapse at year-end only to the extent of the unencumbered balances. The appropriation for the Capital<br />
Improvements Bond Fund is adjusted to carry forward the open value of encumbrances from the prior year.<br />
The MWRDGC is a special district government created by the State of Illinois. Its powers and authority in regard to revenue<br />
sources are generally restricted to those powers granted by applicable state<br />
statutes. The following exhibits, 1 through 6, are derived from the summary of<br />
revenue and expenditures found on pages 82-84 of the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> and similar<br />
summaries in prior years' budgets. This is a summary of all District funds.<br />
Exhibit 1<br />
Millions Net Tax Sources<br />
TAX SOURCES<br />
$300<br />
$275<br />
The main source of revenue for the District is ad valorem property taxes. The<br />
authority to levy property taxes for the various funds generally specifies a tax rate<br />
limit per hundred dollars of property value, which when applied, yields a<br />
maximum amount of money which can be levied or collected against property<br />
owners. All District funds, with the exception of the District's Capital<br />
Improvements Bond Fund, derive their revenues primarily from property taxes.<br />
Approximately 25.3 percent of the 2009 appropriation is supported by property<br />
taxes. Taxes levied in one year are collected in the next year and Working Cash<br />
Funds for the Corporate, Construction and Stormwater Management Funds<br />
$250<br />
$225<br />
$200<br />
$175<br />
$150<br />
$125<br />
$100<br />
$75<br />
$50<br />
$25<br />
provide temporary financing while awaiting property tax receipts. Net Tax<br />
$0<br />
Sources displayed in Exhibit 1 reflect only property tax revenue for the<br />
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Corporate, Construction and Stormwater Management Funds. The estimate for<br />
uncollectible taxes for 2009 is 3.5 percent, based on annual review of prior years<br />
tax collections.<br />
A personal property replacement tax provides income tax revenue from<br />
corporations, partnerships and the invested capital of public utilities to replace the<br />
personal property taxes, which were once received from these sources. These<br />
revenues are received directly from the State of Illinois. Revenue from this source<br />
is estimated at $43.5 million for 2009 which is a slight increase from the 2008<br />
budget estimate of $43.0 million. However, this revenue is expected to stabilize as<br />
a reflection of the slowing Illinois economy.<br />
Exhibit 1 presents revenue from net tax sources for the years 2005 - 2009. Due to<br />
the enactment of Tax Cap laws in 1995, future increases in property tax levies,<br />
except for debt service and the Stormwater Management Fund, are limited to the<br />
lesser of 5 percent or the change in the national Consumer Price Index (CPI) plus<br />
new property. For 2009, an increase of 4.2 percent is forecast, consisting of an<br />
estimated 4.0 percent change in the CPI plus an estimated 0.2 percent for new<br />
development and newly annexed properties. Impacts of the Tax Cap laws are<br />
Exhibit 2<br />
Millions<br />
$60<br />
$50<br />
$40<br />
$30<br />
$20<br />
$10<br />
Grants and Loans<br />
$0<br />
discussed in the fund narratives and budget foreword.<br />
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Estimated Projected<br />
GRANTS and LOANS<br />
Federal and state grants, and state loans contribute to finance the District's capital programs. For 2009, $33.4 million in State<br />
Revolving Fund (SRF) loans is budgeted. In the past the District has been successful in obtaining some grant funding and will<br />
continue to pursue grants for additional TARP projects. Exhibit 2 shows the grants and loans for the years 2005 - 2009.<br />
The District anticipates receiving an annual allocation of at least $30 million in State Revolving Fund loans, based on the<br />
current capitalization level of the state fund and repayment trends.<br />
Estimated Projected<br />
78<br />
78
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
FINANCIAL NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
BOND SALES<br />
The District's Capital Program is financed primarily with general obligation bond<br />
sales. Bond sales are used to provide necessary revenue for capital project cash<br />
flows. In May of 2006, $346.6 million in unlimited bonds and $50.8 million in<br />
limited bonds were sold and used to refund variable rate bonds of June 2002. An<br />
additional $100 million unlimited bonds and $250 million limited bonds, were<br />
sold and the sale completed in July 2006. In March of 2007, $280.1 million in<br />
unlimited bonds were sold and used to refund variable rate bonds of December<br />
2002 and $101.9 million in limited bonds were sold to refund bonds of July<br />
2006. Another bond sale is not anticipated to be necessary until 2009.<br />
Tax cap laws restrict the District’s non-referendum bond authority to funding<br />
projects initiated prior to October 1, 1991, which generally include only<br />
TARP projects. However, Public Act 89-385 provided additional nonreferendum<br />
authority to the District to authorize the issuance of “limited<br />
bonds.” In 1997, Public Act 90-485 was adopted that expands this “limited<br />
bond” authority by excluding bonds issued for TARP purposes from the tax<br />
extension limitation. The District’s limited bonds have sold successfully and<br />
will be used in the future. In 2003, Public Act 92-143 was passed to authorize<br />
the issuance of 30 year bonds and Public Act 92-726 extended the nonreferendum<br />
bonding authority from December 31, 2006 to December 31,<br />
2016.<br />
The Capital Funds narrative on page 97 provides a more detailed discussion.<br />
The statement of outstanding bonds and statutory debt margin on page 60<br />
shows the District's strong position. The Five-Year Financial Forecast on<br />
pages 66 and 74 details future bond sale projections. Bond sales are<br />
summarized in Exhibit 3.<br />
PROPERTY, SERVICES, and MISCELLANEOUS<br />
Exhibit 4 summarizes revenue from property, services and miscellaneous<br />
items. A major revenue source is a user charge system, which imposes a<br />
surcharge above property tax payments for commercial, industrial and taxexempt<br />
users of the sewage systems. Estimated user charge revenues in 2009<br />
are $49.3 million.<br />
Land rentals, investment income, sewer permit fees, connection impact fees,<br />
and other revenues will provide an estimated $42.7 million in 2009. Estimates<br />
for land rental revenues are based on existing and renegotiated leases.<br />
Investment income is based on projections of cash flow and interest rates for<br />
2008. Interest rates on short-term securities are expected to remain stable or<br />
decrease through 2008. Our investments are predominately short term in<br />
nature. Sewer permit revenue estimates are based on anticipated development<br />
projects and 2008 rates. Connection impact fees were established in 1998 to<br />
require new service areas to contribute to the past investment in the District’s<br />
infrastructure.<br />
NET ASSETS APPROPRIABLE<br />
Exhibit 5 shows the trend in net assets appropriable which is primarily<br />
impacted by bond sales, expenditures for capital projects, and the reservation<br />
of future years’ principal and interest payments in the debt service funds. Net<br />
assets appropriable have been used to reduce future years’ taxes. Beginning in<br />
2004, a portion of the projected Corporate Fund net assets was left<br />
unappropriated to maintain a fiscally sound fund balance. The negative<br />
amount in 2009 is because the obligation basis of budgetary accounting is<br />
used for the Capital Improvements Bond Fund and indicates that future bond<br />
sales will be necessary to finance projects.<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Exhibit 3<br />
Million<br />
$400<br />
Bond Sales<br />
$350<br />
$300<br />
$250<br />
$200<br />
$150<br />
$100<br />
$50<br />
Unlimited Limited<br />
$0<br />
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />
Projected ---------------------------<br />
Exhibit 4<br />
Millions<br />
Property, Services & Misc.<br />
$160<br />
$140<br />
$120<br />
$100<br />
$80<br />
$60<br />
$40<br />
$20<br />
$0<br />
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Estimated Projected<br />
Exhibit 5<br />
Millions<br />
$900<br />
$700<br />
$500<br />
$300<br />
$100<br />
-$100<br />
Net Assets Appropriable<br />
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Estimated Projected<br />
79<br />
79
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
FINANCIAL NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
TOTAL REVENUES and EXPENDITURES<br />
Exhibit 6 displays the favorable balance between revenues and<br />
Exhibit 6<br />
expenditures. The margin between revenues and expenditures is Million<br />
primarily accounted for by bond sale proceeds to finance future $1,600<br />
Total Revenue & Expenditures<br />
payments for capital projects. In general, a balance is maintained<br />
between revenues and expenditures to fully utilize net assets<br />
appropriable, therefore limiting property taxes.<br />
$1,400<br />
$1,200<br />
For 2009, a portion of the Corporate Fund projected net assets will<br />
remain unappropriated to ensure a fiscally responsible fund balance.<br />
District management and the financial markets view a Corporate Fund<br />
balance within the $45 to $55 million range as necessary to maintain<br />
financial stability in the face of economic uncertainties. This fund<br />
$1,000<br />
$800<br />
$600<br />
balance level is consistent with the level recommended by the<br />
Government Finance Officers Association. This strategy is an integral<br />
part of a long-term plan that also includes reductions of future<br />
expenditures to better match current revenues. The 2009 beginning<br />
fund balance is likely to be reduced as property tax refunds are<br />
$400<br />
$200<br />
$0<br />
Expenditures Revenues<br />
processed, and appeals delay 2008 receipts.<br />
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />
Estimated Projected<br />
Summary financial statements presented on pages 81-88 provide comparisons of revenues and expenditures for all funds for<br />
the years 2007-2009. These statements provide a financial summarization by fund of the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> as adopted, the<br />
estimated status at year-end of the 2008 <strong>Budget</strong>, and the actual results of operations for the 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>. The relationships<br />
among the pages are diagramed below.<br />
Page 82<br />
2009 <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Revenues<br />
by type vs Fund<br />
Page 85<br />
2009 <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Assets<br />
Appropriable by<br />
Fund<br />
Page 88<br />
2008 & 2009<br />
Appropriations for<br />
Liabilities by Fund<br />
Page 81<br />
Summary by Fund<br />
2009 <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
2008 Estimated<br />
2007 Actual<br />
Expenditures<br />
by Dept. vs Fund<br />
Page 84<br />
Page 83<br />
2008 Estimated<br />
Revenues<br />
by type vs Fund<br />
Expenditures<br />
by Dept. vs Fund<br />
Pages 86 - 87<br />
2007 Actual<br />
Revenues<br />
by type vs Fund<br />
2006 & 2007<br />
Assets & Liabilities<br />
by Fund on GAAP<br />
basis.<br />
Expenditures<br />
by Dept. vs Fund<br />
The table of taxes receivable on page 89 provides detailed data on property tax levies and tax receipts from 2004 to 2008.<br />
While 2004 through 2006 show high levels of collection, delayed refunds continue to be processed through the Property Tax<br />
Appeals Board and the Circuit Courts. Estimated refunds affecting levy years prior to 2004 are summarized.<br />
Specific details about all revenue sources, assets, liabilities and appropriable revenue are presented in the various funds’<br />
financial narratives and statements on pages 91 through 110.<br />
80<br />
80
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ALL FUNDS<br />
SUMMARY OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND NETS ASSETS APPROPRIABLE (b)<br />
2009 BUDGETED, 2008 ESTIMATED, AND 2007 ACTUAL<br />
(In Thousands)<br />
FUND<br />
2009 BUDGETED<br />
CORPORATE<br />
CAPITAL<br />
IMPROVEMENTS<br />
BOND<br />
CONSTRUCTION<br />
STORMWATER<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
RETIREMENT<br />
(d)<br />
BOND AND<br />
INTEREST<br />
(d)<br />
RESERVE<br />
CLAIM<br />
(d)<br />
TOTAL<br />
Net Assets Appropriable $ 90,572.8 $ (410,824.3) $ 21,480.8 $ 24,423.0 $ 31,385.9 $ 129,891.0 $ 66,030.7 $ (47,040.1)<br />
Net Assets Appropriated $ 69,728.6 $ (410,824.3) $ 21,480.8 $ 24,423.0 $ 31,385.9 $ 129,891.0 $ 66,030.7 $ (67,884.3)<br />
Revenue 325,274.0 1,343,691.1 14,103.0 9,384.0 - 4,556.9 1,469.3 1,698,478.3<br />
Appropriation $ 395,002.6 $ 932,866.8 $ 35,583.8 $ 33,807.0 $ 31,385.9 $ 134,447.9 $ 67,500.0 $ 1,630,594.0<br />
2008 ESTIMATED<br />
Beginning Net Assets $ 84,338.3 $ 207,859.4 $ 28,442.9 $ 18,241.2 $ 32,529.2 $ 76,714.3 $ 74,958.9 $ 523,084.2<br />
Appropriable as adjusted (c)<br />
Revenue (a) 352,092.1 57,837.4 4,154.0 16,637.7 - 102,453.5 2,471.8 535,646.5<br />
Adjustment for 2008 receipts 9,605.3 - 1,663.2 2,900.3 - - - 14,168.8<br />
Expenditures (355,462.9) (676,521.1) (12,779.3) (13,356.2) (32,529.2) (179,167.8) (11,400.0) (1,281,216.5)<br />
Ending Net Assets<br />
Appropriable $ 90,572.8 $ (410,824.3) $ 21,480.8 $ 24,423.0 $ - $ - $ 66,030.7 $ (208,317.0)<br />
2007 ACTUAL<br />
Beginning Net Assets $ 93,829.0 $ 291,857.4 $ 30,956.8 $ 20,678.8 $ 28,703.6 $ 150,596.2 $ 62,381.3 $ 679,003.1<br />
Appropriable as adjusted (c)<br />
Revenue 322,204.0 81,454.2 9,637.5 5,081.9 - 5,427.2 10,180.6 434,080.7<br />
Expenditures (331,694.7) (165,452.2) (12,246.7) (7,519.5) (28,703.6) (156,023.4) (9,353.5) (710,993.6)<br />
Ending Net Assets<br />
Appropriable $ 84,338.3 $ 207,859.4 $ 28,347.6 $ 18,241.2 $ - $ - $ 63,208.4 $ 402,090.2<br />
Notes:<br />
Adjusted NAA 1/1/2008 $ 99,650.6 $ 30,835.4 $ 19,467.9<br />
Adjustment (a) $15,312.3 2,392.5 1,226.7<br />
(a) Adjustment to NAA required due to current 2008 estimate on collection of property tax levies and PPRT. See the Balance Sheets and Appropriable<br />
Revenue statements 1/1/2008 for the Corporate (pages 93-94) and Construction (pages 100-101) Funds. The adjustment is reflected in the 2008 revenues.<br />
(b) This statement is a summary presentation of pages 82-84, separating current revenue and net assets appropriable from the Revenue category.<br />
(c) Ending net assets appropriable for one year are revised for accounting adjustments, equity transfers and changes in the amount of designations<br />
to establish beginning net assets for the next year.<br />
(d) Revenue for the Retirement, Reserve Claim, and Bond and Interest Funds does not include the current year tax levies which are reflected in the<br />
next year's net assets appropriable.<br />
81<br />
81
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ALL FUNDS<br />
SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES<br />
2009 BUDGETED<br />
(In Thousands)<br />
FUND<br />
REVENUE<br />
CORPORATE<br />
CAPITAL<br />
IMPROVEMENTS<br />
BOND<br />
CONSTRUCTION<br />
STORMWATER<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
RETIREMENT<br />
BOND AND<br />
INTEREST<br />
RESERVE CLAIM<br />
TOTAL<br />
Net Assets Appropriable $ 90,572.8 $ (410,824.3) $ 21,480.8 $ 24,423.0 $ 31,385.9 $ 129,891.0 $ 66,030.7 $ (47,040.1)<br />
Net Assets Available for Future Use (20,844.2) - - - - - - (20,844.2)<br />
Net Property Taxes 233,556.1 - 10,991.4 8,539.3 - - - 253,086.8<br />
Personal Property Replacement Tax 25,780.0 - 2,010.0 - - - - 27,790.0<br />
Working Cash Borrowings Adjustment (4,936.1) - (301.4) (139.3) - - - (5,376.8)<br />
Bond Sales (Present and Future) - 1,296,521.1 - - - - - 1,296,521.1<br />
Grants: Federal & State - - - - - - - -<br />
State Revolving Fund Loans - 33,370.0 - - - - - 33,370.0<br />
Property & Services 17,028.0 13,800.0 903.0 984.0 - 4,556.9 1,469.3 38,741.2<br />
User Charge 49,000.0 - 300.0 - - - - 49,300.0<br />
TIF Differential Fee and Impact Fee 925.0 - 200.0 - - - - 1,125.0<br />
Equity Transfer - - - - - - - -<br />
Miscellaneous 3,921.0 - - - - - - 3,921.0<br />
TOTAL REVENUE $ 395,002.6 $ 932,866.8 $ 35,583.8 $ 33,807.0 $ 31,385.9 $ 134,447.9 $ 67,500.0 $ 1,630,594.0<br />
EXPENDITURES<br />
Board of Commissioners $ 4,404.8 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,404.8<br />
General Administration 22,835.6 - - - - - - 22,835.6<br />
Monitoring & Research 31,448.4 - - - - - - 31,448.4<br />
Procurement & Mat'ls Mgt. 10,393.7 - - - - - - 10,393.7<br />
Human Resources 54,001.4 - - - - - - 54,001.4<br />
Information Technology 20,987.2 - - - - - - 20,987.2<br />
Law 8,196.0 - - - - - - 8,196.0<br />
Finance 3,762.8 - - - - - - 3,762.8<br />
Engineering 17,566.4 932,866.8 35,583.8 - - - - 986,017.0<br />
Maintenance & Operations 221,406.3 - - - - - - 221,406.3<br />
Stormwater Management Fund - - - 33,807.0 - - - 33,807.0<br />
Retirement Fund - - - - 31,385.9 - - 31,385.9<br />
Bond & Interest Fund - - - - - 134,447.9 - 134,447.9<br />
Reserve Claim Fund - - - - - - 67,500.0 67,500.0<br />
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 395,002.6 $ 932,866.8 $ 35,583.8 $ 33,807.0 $ 31,385.9 $ 134,447.9 $ 67,500.0 $ 1,630,594.0<br />
Notes:<br />
Revenue for the Retirement, Reserve Claim and Bond and Interest Funds does not include the current year tax levies which are reflected in the<br />
next year's net assets appropriable. This is applicable to pages 82-84. Consolidated statements of taxes receivable can be found on pages 89 and 90.<br />
Each District fund is balanced with revenues equal to appropriations.<br />
82<br />
82
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ALL FUNDS<br />
SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES<br />
2008 ESTIMATED<br />
(In Thousands)<br />
FUND<br />
REVENUE<br />
CORPORATE<br />
CAPITAL<br />
IMPROVEMENTS<br />
BOND<br />
CONSTRUCTION<br />
STORMWATER<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
RETIREMENT<br />
BOND AND<br />
INTEREST<br />
RESERVE CLAIM<br />
TOTAL<br />
Net Assets Appropriable $ 84,338.3 $ 207,859.4 $ 28,442.9 $ 18,241.2 $ 32,529.2 $ 76,714.3 $ 74,958.9 $ 523,084.2<br />
Adjustment for Receipts 24,917.6 - 4,055.7 4,127.0 - - - 33,100.3<br />
Net Property Taxes 230,887.6 - - 14,679.4 - - - 245,567.0<br />
Personal Property Replacement Tax 27,507.0 - - - - - - 27,507.0<br />
Working Cash Borrowings Adjustment (6,394.6) - - (279.4) - - - (6,674.0)<br />
Bond Sales (Present and Future) - - - - - - - -<br />
Grants: Federal & State - - - - - - - -<br />
State Revolving Fund Loans - 39,257.4 - - - - - 39,257.4<br />
Property & Services 14,853.5 18,580.0 979.7 1,011.0 - 57,879.5 2,471.8 95,775.5<br />
User Charge 56,740.0 - 300.0 - - - - 57,040.0<br />
TIF Differential Fee and Impact Fee 925.0 - 481.8 - - - - 1,406.8<br />
Equity Transfer 7,000.0 - - - - 44,574.0 - 51,574.0<br />
Miscellaneous 5,261.3 - - - - - - 5,261.3<br />
TOTAL REVENUE $ 446,035.7 $ 265,696.8 $ 34,260.1 $ 37,779.2 $ 32,529.2 $ 179,167.8 $ 77,430.7 $ 1,072,899.5<br />
EXPENDITURES<br />
Board of Commissioners $ 3,572.3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,572.3<br />
General Administration 21,996.9 - - - - - - 21,996.9<br />
Monitoring & Research 26,418.1 - - - - - - 26,418.1<br />
Procurement & Mat'ls Mgt. 9,036.4 - - - - - - 9,036.4<br />
Human Resources 62,274.0 - - - - - - 62,274.0<br />
Information Technology 19,902.3 - - - - - - 19,902.3<br />
Law 7,972.1 - - - - - - 7,972.1<br />
Finance 3,317.9 - - - - - - 3,317.9<br />
Engineering 7,386.4 676,521.1 12,779.3 - - - - 696,686.8<br />
Maintenance & Operations 193,586.5 - - - - - - 193,586.5<br />
Stormwater Management Fund - - - 13,356.2 - - - 13,356.2<br />
Retirement Fund - - - - 32,529.2 - - 32,529.2<br />
Bond & Interest Fund - - - - - 179,167.8 - 179,167.8<br />
Reserve Claim Fund - - - - - - 11,400.0 11,400.0<br />
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 355,462.9 $ 676,521.1 $ 12,779.3 $ 13,356.2 $ 32,529.2 $ 179,167.8 $ 11,400.0 $ 1,281,216.5<br />
83<br />
83
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ALL FUNDS<br />
SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES<br />
2007 ACTUAL<br />
(In Thousands)<br />
FUND<br />
REVENUE<br />
CORPORATE<br />
CAPITAL<br />
IMPROVEMENTS<br />
BOND<br />
CONSTRUCTION<br />
STORMWATER<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
RETIREMENT<br />
BOND AND<br />
INTEREST<br />
RESERVE CLAIM<br />
TOTAL<br />
Net Assets Appropriable $ 93,829.0 $ 291,857.4 $ 30,956.8 $ 20,678.8 $ 28,703.6 $ 150,596.2 $ 62,381.3 $ 679,003.1<br />
Adjustment for Receipts 1,571.0 - 95.3 - - - - 1,666.3<br />
Net Property Taxes 224,907.7 - 5,000.0 3,803.8 - - - 233,711.5<br />
Personal Property Replacement Tax 23,421.0 - 1,096.7 - - - - 24,517.7<br />
Working Cash Borrowings Adjustment (4,628.7) - (196.7) (59.1) - - - (4,884.5)<br />
Bond Sales - - - - - - - -<br />
Grants: Federal & State - - - 253.0 - - - 253.0<br />
State Revolving Fund Loans - 56,372.2 - - - - - 56,372.2<br />
Property & Services 19,253.0 - - 1,084.2 - - - 20,337.2<br />
User Charge 51,950.2 - 300.0 - - - - 52,250.2<br />
TIF Differential and Impact Fee 699.2 - 961.2 - - - - 1,660.4<br />
Equity Transfer - - - - - - 8,000.0 8,000.0<br />
Miscellaneous 5,030.6 25,082.0 2,476.3 - - 5,427.2 2,180.6 40,196.7<br />
TOTAL REVENUE $ 416,033.0 $ 373,311.6 $ 40,689.6 $ 25,760.7 $ 28,703.6 $ 156,023.4 $ 72,561.9 $ 1,113,083.8<br />
EXPENDITURES<br />
Board of Commissioners $ 3,489.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,489.0<br />
General Administration 25,706.8 - - - - - - 25,706.8<br />
Monitoring & Research 25,335.1 - - - - - - 25,335.1<br />
Procurement & Materials Mgmt. 8,146.2 - - - - - - 8,146.2<br />
Human Resources 61,833.0 - - - - - - 61,833.0<br />
Information Technology 15,856.6 - - - - - - 15,856.6<br />
Law 6,114.1 - - - - - - 6,114.1<br />
Finance 3,088.9 - - - - - - 3,088.9<br />
Engineering 4,324.0 165,452.2 12,246.7 - - - - 182,022.9<br />
Maintenance & Operations 177,801.0 - - - - - - 177,801.0<br />
Stormwater Management Fund - - - 7,519.5 - - - 7,519.5<br />
Retirement Fund - - - - 28,703.6 - - 28,703.6<br />
Bond & Interest Fund - - - - - 156,023.4 - 156,023.4<br />
Reserve Claim Fund - - - - - - 9,353.5 9,353.5<br />
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 331,694.7 $ 165,452.2 $ 12,246.7 $ 7,519.5 $ 28,703.6 $ 156,023.4 $ 9,353.5 $ 710,993.6<br />
84<br />
84
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED ASSETS APPROPRIABLE FOR THE CORPORATE,<br />
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BOND, RETIREMENT, CONSTRUCTION,<br />
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, BOND & INTEREST, AND RESERVE CLAIM FUNDS<br />
FOR THE YEAR 2009<br />
DESCRIPTION<br />
FUND<br />
___________ _____________ ___________ ___________ __________ ___________ __________ _____________<br />
CORPORATE<br />
CAPITAL<br />
IMPROVEMENTS<br />
BOND<br />
CONSTRUCTION<br />
STORMWATER<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
RETIREMENT<br />
BOND AND<br />
INTEREST<br />
RESERVE CLAIM<br />
2009 Revenue $ 325,274,000 $ 1,343,691,125 $ 14,103,000 $ 9,384,000 $ - $ 3,482,000 $ 1,469,300 $ 1,697,403,425<br />
TOTAL<br />
Resources Available<br />
at 01/01/09 378,724,651 361,453,515 24,289,113 39,423,000 31,385,921 222,643,641 70,330,700 1,128,250,541<br />
Total Resources 703,998,651 1,705,144,640 38,392,113 48,807,000 31,385,921 226,125,641 71,800,000 2,825,653,966<br />
Less: Liabilities<br />
Liabilities and<br />
Designations<br />
at 01/01/09 288,151,809 772,277,840 2,808,313 15,000,000 - 91,677,772 * 4,300,000 1,174,215,734<br />
Net Assets Available<br />
for Future Use 20,844,242 - - - - - - 20,844,242<br />
ASSETS<br />
APPROPRIABLE $ 395,002,600 $ 932,866,800 $ 35,583,800 $ 33,807,000 $ 31,385,921 $ 134,447,869 $ 67,500,000 $ 1,630,593,990<br />
* FUTURE YEARS' PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST<br />
85<br />
85
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
GAAP Basis Statement From 2007 CAFR - Exhibit A-1<br />
Governmental Funds Balance Sheets / Statements of Net Assets<br />
December 31, 2007 (with comparative amounts for prior year)<br />
(in thousands of dollars)<br />
General<br />
Debt Service Capital Improvements<br />
Corporate Fund Fund Bond Fund<br />
2007 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006<br />
Assets<br />
Cash $ 326 $ 347 $ 341 $ 79 $ 100 $ 6<br />
Deposits with escrow agent - - - 4,184 - -<br />
Certificates of deposit (note 1) 10,187 75,476 - - 141,154 126,812<br />
Investments (note 4) 187,226 135,415 77,258 104,552 314,062 464,964<br />
Taxes receivable, net (note 5) 231,208 211,776 137,832 119,300 - -<br />
Other receivables, net (note 5) 6,735 4,885 - 20 5,741 9,736<br />
Due from other funds (note 12) 475 338 - - - -<br />
Inventories 35,787 36,326 - - - -<br />
Restricted cash 1,851 1,821 - 3,463 553 1,083<br />
Net pension asset - - - - - -<br />
Capital assets not being depreciated (note 6) - - - - - -<br />
Capital assets being depreciated, net (note 6) - - - - - -<br />
Total Assets $ 473,795 $ 466,384 $ 215,431 $ 231,598 $ 461,610 $ 602,601<br />
Liabilities, Fund Balances / Net assets<br />
Liabilities:<br />
Deferred tax revenue (note 5) $ 196,695 $ 190,383 $ 117,939 $ 107,002 $ - $ -<br />
Other deferred/unearned revenue (note 5) 2,348 2,295 - - - -<br />
Accounts payable and other liabilities (note 5) 39,942 28,728 - 56 29,124 59,433<br />
Due to Pension Trust Fund (note 12) - - - - - -<br />
Due to other funds (note 12) 300 - - - 297 204<br />
Accrued interest payable - - - - - -<br />
Long-term liabilities: (note 11)<br />
Due within one year - - - - - -<br />
Due in more than one year - - - - - -<br />
Total Liabilities 239,285 221,406 117,939 107,058 29,421 59,637<br />
Fund balances/net assets<br />
Fund balances:<br />
Reserved for working cash 267,842 263,216 - - - -<br />
Unreserved (note 1.p):<br />
Undesignated (33,332) (18,238) 97,492 124,540 432,189 542,964<br />
Total fund balances 234,510 244,978 97,492 124,540 432,189 542,964<br />
Total liabilities and fund balances $ 473,795 $ 466,384 $ 215,431 $ 231,598 $ 461,610 $ 602,601<br />
Net assets:<br />
Invested in capital assets,<br />
net of related debt<br />
Restricted for corporate working cash<br />
Restricted for reserve claim<br />
Restricted for debt service<br />
Restricted for capital projects<br />
Restricted for construction working cash<br />
Restricted for stormwater working cash<br />
Unrestricted<br />
Total Net Assets<br />
Notes reference the 2007 CAFR of the MWRDGC - Available on the Internet at www.mwrd.org<br />
86<br />
86
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
Construction<br />
Fund<br />
Other Governmental /<br />
Retirement Fund<br />
Total Governmental<br />
Activities<br />
Adjustments<br />
(Note 2a)<br />
Statements of<br />
Net Assets<br />
2007 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006<br />
$ 17 $ 21 $ 11 $ 6 $ 795 $ 459 $ - $ - $ 795 $ 459<br />
- - - - - 4,184 - - - 4,184<br />
15,161 12,125 26,879 17,885 193,381 232,298 - - 193,381 232,298<br />
36,110 31,320 24,443 21,384 639,099 757,635 - - 639,099 757,635<br />
4,999 17,144 33,871 44,157 407,910 392,377 - - 407,910 392,377<br />
- - - - 12,476 14,641 - (495) 12,476 14,146<br />
300 - - - 775 338 (775) (338) - -<br />
- - - - 35,787 36,326 - - 35,787 36,326<br />
- - - - 2,404 6,367 - - 2,404 6,367<br />
- - - - - - - 16,353 - 16,353<br />
- - - - - - 3,960,962 3,825,450 3,960,962 3,825,450<br />
- - - - - - 1,730,928 1,740,482 1,730,928 1,740,482<br />
$ 56,587 $ 60,610 $ 85,204 $ 83,432 $ 1,292,627 $ 1,444,625 $ 5,691,115 $ 5,581,452 $ 6,983,742 $ 7,026,077<br />
$ 3,317 $ 15,445 $ 22,572 $ 35,211 $ 340,523 $ 348,041 $ (340,523) $ (348,041) $ - $ -<br />
- - - - 2,348 2,295 (23) (29) 2,325 2,266<br />
2,662 2,810 1,179 340 72,907 91,367 - - 72,907 91,367<br />
- - 9,828 7,417 9,828 7,417 20,237 21,775 30,065 29,192<br />
106 90 72 44 775 338 (775) (338) - -<br />
- - - - - - 10,121 10,216 10,121 10,216<br />
- - - - - - 97,124 102,406 97,124 102,406<br />
- - - - - - 1,537,122 1,562,552 1,537,122 1,562,552<br />
6,085 18,345 33,651 43,012 426,381 449,458 1,323,283 1,348,541 1,749,664 1,797,999<br />
26,313 25,750 35,275 32,064 329,430 321,030 (329,430) (321,030)<br />
24,189 16,515 16,278 8,356 536,816 674,137 (536,816) (674,137)<br />
50,502 42,265 51,553 40,420 866,246 995,167 (866,246) (995,167)<br />
$ 56,587 $ 60,610 $ 85,204 $ 83,432 $ 1,292,627 $ 1,444,625<br />
$ 4,580,604 $ 4,541,778 $ 4,580,604 $ 4,541,778<br />
267,848 263,229 267,848 263,229<br />
31,295 26,844 31,295 26,844<br />
203,656 220,306 203,656 220,306<br />
18,656 1,044 18,656 1,044<br />
26,313 25,750 26,313 25,750<br />
35,275 32,064 35,275 32,064<br />
70,431 117,063 70,431 117,063<br />
$ 5,234,078 $ 5,228,078 $ 5,234,078 $ 5,228,078<br />
87<br />
87
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
APPROPRIATION FOR LIABILITIES - BY FUND<br />
JANUARY 1, 2009 AND 2008<br />
CORPORATE FUND 2009 2008<br />
Unpaid Bills:<br />
Accrued Salaries and Wages $ 3,741,835 $ 3,087,462<br />
Personal Services - Other 3,482,698 2,364,284<br />
Payroll Withholding and Miscellaneous 3,969,584 3,304,366<br />
Contractual Services 19,491,476 11,897,025<br />
Capital Projects - -<br />
Materials and Supplies 3,820,861 2,686,058<br />
Machinery and Equipment 1,645,355 1,185,957<br />
Due to Corporate Working Cash Fund 252,000,000 243,700,000<br />
Designated for Future Claims Liabilities - -<br />
Total Liabilities of Corporate Fund $ 288,151,809 $ 268,225,152<br />
CONSTRUCTION FUND<br />
Unpaid Bills:<br />
Accrued Salaries and Wages $ 148,307 $ 101,000<br />
Contracts Payable 2,372,796 963,578<br />
Personal Services 129,123 104,000<br />
Contractual Services 141,125 119,000<br />
Materials and Supplies 16,962 13,000<br />
Machinery and Equipment - -<br />
Due to Construction Working Cash Fund - 5,900,000<br />
Designated for Future Claims Liabilities - -<br />
Total Liabilities of Construction Fund $ 2,808,313 $ 7,200,578<br />
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BOND FUND<br />
Unpaid Bills:<br />
Accrued Salaries and Wages $ 104,107 $ 310,000<br />
Personal Services - Other 67,342,733 44,437,700<br />
Contractual Services 335,000 2,472,500<br />
Contracts Payable 704,496,000 423,492,100<br />
Total Liabilities of Capital Improvements Bond Fund $ 772,277,840 $ 470,712,300<br />
RESERVE CLAIM FUND<br />
Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities $ 4,300,000 $ 4,200,000<br />
BOND AND INTEREST FUND<br />
Future Payment of Principal & Interest $ 91,677,772 $ 107,323,407<br />
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND<br />
Contracts Payable $ 600,000 $ 650,000<br />
Due to Stormwater Working Cash Fund 14,400,000 3,744,674<br />
Total Liabilities of Stormwater Management Fund $ 15,000,000 $ 4,394,674<br />
TOTAL LIABILITIES JANUARY 1 , 2009 AND 2008 $ 1,174,215,734 $ 862,056,111<br />
88<br />
88
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
STATEMENT OF TAXES RECEIVABLE FOR 2008 AND PRIOR YEARS AT JANUARY 1, 2009<br />
INCLUDING THE ESTIMATED COLLECTIONS FOR THE YEAR 2009<br />
ESTIMATED CASH<br />
TAX COLLECTED UNCOLLECTED RESERVE NET TAXES ESTIMATED<br />
YEAR FUND EXTENSION THRU 12/31/08 % AT 12/31/08 $ % RECEIVABLE IN 2009<br />
2008 Corporate $ 239,261,800 $ - 0% $ 239,261,800 $ 8,374,163 3.5% $ 230,887,637 $ 230,887,637<br />
Bond & Interest 138,960,584 - 0% 138,960,584 4,863,620 3.5% 134,096,964 134,096,964<br />
Retirement 25,664,500 - 0% 25,664,500 898,258 3.5% 24,766,242 24,766,243<br />
Construction 0 - 0% - - 3.5% - -<br />
Stormwater Management 15,211,800 - 0% 15,211,800 532,413 3.5% 14,679,387 14,679,387<br />
Reserve Claim 7,073,432 - 0% 7,073,432 247,570 3.5% 6,825,862 6,825,862<br />
Total $ 426,172,116 $ - 0% $ 426,172,116 $ 14,916,024 3.5% $ 411,256,092 $ 411,256,093<br />
2007 Corporate $ 233,982,335 $ 225,792,953 96.5% $ 8,189,382 $ 4,679,647 2.0% $ 3,509,735 $ 4,679,647<br />
Bond & Interest 135,730,343 130,979,781 96.5% 4,750,562 2,714,607 2.0% 2,035,955 2,714,607<br />
Retirement 24,843,316 23,973,800 96.5% 869,516 496,866 2.0% 372,650 567,735<br />
Construction 5,181,347 5,000,000 96.5% 181,347 103,627 2.0% 77,720 103,627<br />
Stormwater Management 3,941,762 3,803,800 96.5% 137,962 78,835 2.0% 59,127 78,835<br />
Reserve Claim 6,529,346 6,300,819 96.5% 228,527 130,587 2.0% 97,940 130,587<br />
Total $ 410,208,449 $ 395,851,153 96.5% $ 14,357,296 $ 8,204,169 2.0% $ 6,153,127 $ 8,275,038<br />
2006 Corporate $ 213,500,000 $ 206,027,500 96.5% $ 7,472,500 $ 7,472,500 3.5% $ - $ (638,249)<br />
Bond & Interest 123,608,326 119,282,035 96.5% 4,326,291 4,326,291 3.5% - (369,521)<br />
Retirement 25,072,000 24,194,480 96.5% 877,520 877,520 3.5% - (74,952)<br />
Construction 17,766,010 17,144,200 96.5% 621,810 621,810 3.5% - (53,111)<br />
Stormwater Management 15,507,944 14,965,166 96.5% 542,778 542,778 3.5% - (46,360)<br />
Reserve Claim 5,956,730 5,748,244 96.5% 208,486 208,486 3.5% - (17,807)<br />
Total $ 401,411,010 $ 387,361,625 96.5% $ 14,049,385 $ 14,049,385 3.5% $ - $ (1,200,000)<br />
2005 Corporate $ 206,565,119 $ 204,086,338 98.8% $ 2,478,781 $ 2,478,781 1.2% $ - $ (451,949)<br />
Bond & Interest 147,281,203 145,513,829 98.8% 1,767,374 1,767,374 1.2% - (322,240)<br />
Retirement 23,598,000 23,314,824 98.8% 283,176 283,176 1.2% - (51,631)<br />
Construction 17,940,062 17,724,781 98.8% 215,281 215,281 1.2% - (39,251)<br />
Stormwater Management 10,451,088 10,325,675 98.8% 125,413 125,413 1.2% (22,866)<br />
Reserve Claim 5,513,331 5,447,171 98.8% 66,160 66,160 1.2% - (12,063)<br />
Total $ 411,348,803 $ 406,412,618 98.8% $ 4,936,185 $ 4,936,185 1.2% $ - $ (900,000)<br />
2004 Corporate $ 198,675,787 $ 196,291,678 98.8% $ 2,384,109 $ 2,384,109 1.2% $ - $ (336,687)<br />
Bond & Interest 166,152,205 164,158,379 98.8% 1,993,826 1,993,826 1.2% - (281,570)<br />
Retirement 28,247,000 27,908,036 98.8% 338,964 338,964 1.2% - (47,869)<br />
Construction 14,846,943 14,668,780 98.8% 178,163 178,163 1.2% - (25,160)<br />
Reserve Claim 5,141,868 5,080,166 98.8% 61,702 61,702 1.2% - (8,714)<br />
Total $ 413,063,803 $ 408,107,039 98.8% $ 4,956,764 $ 4,956,764 1.2% $ - $ (700,000)<br />
Prior Corporate $ (2,260,610)<br />
Years Bond & Interest (1,890,545)<br />
Levies Retirement (321,405)<br />
Construction (168,934)<br />
Reserve Claim (58,506)<br />
Total $ (4,700,000)<br />
RECAPITULATION BY FUND<br />
Corporate $ 1,091,985,041 $ 832,198,469 $ 259,786,572 $ 25,389,200 $ 234,397,372 $ 231,879,789<br />
Bond & Interest 711,732,661 559,934,024 151,798,637 15,665,718 136,132,919 133,947,695<br />
Retirement 127,424,816 99,391,140 28,033,676 2,894,784 25,138,892 24,838,121<br />
Construction 55,734,362 54,537,761 1,196,601 1,118,881 77,720 (182,829)<br />
Stormwater Management 34,661,506 18,768,966 15,892,540 1,154,026 14,738,514 14,688,996<br />
Reserve Claim 30,214,707 22,576,400 7,638,307 714,505 6,923,802 6,859,359<br />
Total $ 2,051,753,093 $ 1,587,406,760 $ 464,346,333 $ 46,937,114 $ 417,409,219 $ 412,031,131<br />
89<br />
89
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
STATEMENT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY REPLACEMENT TAXES RECEIVABLE<br />
FOR 2008 AND PRIOR YEARS AT JANUARY 1, 2009<br />
INCLUDING THE ESTIMATED COLLECTIONS FOR THE YEAR 2009<br />
ACTUAL/ESTIMATED<br />
CASH<br />
COLLECTED<br />
ESTIMATED<br />
YEAR FUND RECEIVABLE THROUGH 2008 IN 2009<br />
2008 Corporate $ 25,780,000 $ - $<br />
25,780,000<br />
Retirement 6,547,800 - 6,547,800<br />
Construction 2,010,000 - 2,010,000<br />
Reserve Claim 4,328,000 - 4,328,000<br />
Corporate Working Cash 3,987,000 - 3,987,000<br />
Construction Working Cash - - -<br />
Stormwater Working Cash 847,200 - 847,200<br />
Total $ 43,500,000 $ - $<br />
43,500,000<br />
2007 Corporate $ 27,507,000 $ 27,507,000 $<br />
-<br />
Retirement 6,338,200 6,338,200 -<br />
Construction - - -<br />
Reserve Claim 4,708,000 4,708,000 -<br />
Corporate Working Cash 4,337,000 4,337,000 -<br />
Construction Working Cash - - -<br />
Stormwater Working Cash 2,010,000 2,010,000 -<br />
Total $ 44,900,200 $ 44,900,200 $<br />
-<br />
2006 Corporate $ 25,662,440 $ 25,662,440 $<br />
-<br />
Retirement 6,629,000 6,629,000 -<br />
Construction 1,096,653 1,096,653 -<br />
Reserve Claim 4,875,711 4,875,711 -<br />
Corporate Working Cash 4,493,602 4,493,602 -<br />
Construction Working Cash - - -<br />
Stormwater Working Cash 2,082,494 2,082,494 -<br />
Total $ 44,839,900 $ 44,839,900 $<br />
-<br />
2005 Corporate $ 23,453,177 $ 23,453,177 $<br />
-<br />
Retirement 6,238,900 6,238,900 -<br />
Construction 2,477,341 2,477,341 -<br />
Reserve Claim 761,162 761,162 -<br />
Corporate Working Cash 3,615,759 3,615,759 -<br />
Construction Working Cash - - -<br />
Stormwater Working Cash 1,368,066 1,368,066<br />
Total $ 37,914,405 $ 37,914,405 $<br />
-<br />
2004 Corporate $ 21,806,108 $ 21,806,108 $<br />
-<br />
Retirement 3,813,700 3,813,700 -<br />
Construction 1,632,158 1,632,158 -<br />
Reserve Claim 564,054 564,054 -<br />
Corporate Working Cash 7,506,687 7,506,687 -<br />
Construction Working Cash - - -<br />
Total $ 35,322,707 $ 35,322,707 $<br />
-<br />
2003 Corporate $ 18,042,303 $ 18,042,303 $<br />
-<br />
Retirement 3,504,700 3,504,700 -<br />
Construction 2,524,030 2,524,030 -<br />
Reserve Claim 466,537 466,537 -<br />
Corporate Working Cash 466,537 466,537 -<br />
Construction Working Cash - - -<br />
Total $ 25,004,107 $ 25,004,107 $<br />
-<br />
90<br />
90
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CORPORATE FUND<br />
The Corporate Fund is the general fund of the District. It is used to account for the general operations and expenditures of the<br />
District. The 2009 appropriation request is $395,002,600, a decrease of $2.2 million, or 0.5 percent from 2008. The major<br />
reasons for this decrease include funding for the OPEB trust at the policy level of 2009 ($12.0 million), offset by expected<br />
increases in facility repairs ($9.4 million).<br />
Property taxes are the major source of revenue for the Corporate Fund. In 2009, the net property tax levy will provide 74.4<br />
percent of the fund's revenue. The property tax levy proposed for 2009 is $242,027,000, an increase of $2.7 million or 1.2<br />
percent from the 2008 levy.<br />
A fund balance within the $45 to $55 million range is viewed by District management and the financial markets as necessary to<br />
maintain financial stability and sustain us through economic uncertainties. This fund balance level is consistent with the level<br />
recommended by the Government Finance Officers Association. In order to ensure that an adequate fund balance is maintained,<br />
all net assets appropriable have not been reappropriated as revenue for the subsequent year. For 2009, a portion amounting to<br />
$20.8 million of the projected net assets will remain unappropriated to provide for a fiscally responsible fund balance.<br />
User charge revenue allocated to the Corporate Fund is estimated at $49.0 million in 2009, an increase of $1.0 million from the<br />
2008 budget. Total user charge revenue for 2008 is estimated at $57.0 million, of which $0.3 million is allocated to the<br />
Construction Fund. While industries have made adjustments to reduce their loadings and associated expenses, current user charge<br />
rates continue to provide revenue paralleling the costs of treatment. However, the current downturn in the state economy may<br />
weaken both the food processing and chemical industries, two major categories of user charge payers. The third major segment of<br />
user charge payers is government operated airports and water filtration facilities. The revenues from these sources are more affected<br />
by weather conditions than the general economy.<br />
User charge rates and revenues parallel changes in operations and maintenance costs. User charge rates are based on USEPArequired<br />
review of the classes of users to ensure that each class pays their proportionate share of actual operations, maintenance,<br />
and replacement (OM&R) costs. Large commercial, industrial and tax-exempt property are charged fees based on the volume<br />
and strength of their effluents, with credit given for the OM&R portion of any property taxes paid. The OM&R credit is<br />
adjusted for any users in tax increment financing (TIF) districts to give credit only for property taxes actually received.<br />
Residential and small commercial/industrial classes pay only property taxes. This rate method ensures that the costs of<br />
providing service to these classes of users are fully recaptured. User charge rate history, annual revenue history, and a list of<br />
major payers appears in the Appendix.<br />
Personal property replacement tax revenue is primarily based on a corporate income tax. It is budgeted at $25.8 million for<br />
2009, a decrease of $1.7 million compared to the adjusted 2008 estimate. The total personal property replacement tax revenues<br />
have shown significant growth since 2002, trending with the state of the economy and is expected to reflect the current<br />
downturn. The allocation to the Corporate Fund has increased from $16.0 million in 2002.<br />
In 2009, land rental revenue is budgeted at $11.0 million. Real estate income for the District has trended upward in recent<br />
years. Expiring leases are reviewed and necessary environmental or other types of property remediation are attempted to be<br />
performed well ahead of lease expiration to expedite re-leasing at current market rates. This process should result in increased<br />
revenues in the future. Revenue from the sale of surplus land is estimated at $2 thousand in 2009 and $2 thousand in 2008.<br />
Investment income is budgeted for 2009 at $4.2 million. The adjusted estimate for 2008 is $4.4 million. The 2007 and 2006<br />
actual amounts were $8.1 and $6.1 million, respectively. This level of income reflects stable short-term interest rates and fund<br />
balances available for investment during the past several years.<br />
The revenue estimate for sewer permit fees for 2009 is $1.8 million. Actual 2008 revenues are projected to be $1.5 million. The<br />
District's policy is to recapture 100 percent of the costs of the sewer permit program, and sewer permit fees are recalculated<br />
annually to accomplish this objective. Permits are required for new real estate development, and applications are expected to<br />
level off or decline slightly in 2009 due to the expected continued turmoil in the area real estate market.<br />
The Corporate Working Cash Fund is used to provide short-term financing to the Corporate Fund. As the property tax levy for<br />
one year is not collected until the next year, short-term financing of the current year tax levy is necessary. The District sells<br />
Working Cash Bonds and is authorized to extend a property tax levy to meet these needs. State statute allows loans in the<br />
amount of 100 percent of the property tax levy plus personal property replacement tax receivables. The estimated amount the<br />
District will allocate as available for loan in 2009 is $254.4 million or 95 percent of the maximum. Public Act 93-252 amended<br />
the District's Act to allow the Board of Commissioners, by a two-thirds vote to transfer fund balances between its Working<br />
Cash Funds. The Board also has authority to transfer accumulated investment income between funds by a two-thirds vote.<br />
Estimated revenues of $4.0 million Personal Property Replacement Tax to the Corporate Working Cash Fund for 2009 will<br />
provide sufficient resources to avoid the need to levy taxes in the foreseeable future.<br />
91<br />
91
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
REVENUE - CORPORATE FUND (BUDGETARY BASIS)<br />
Millions<br />
$250<br />
Net Property Tax Levy<br />
The property tax levy is the primary source of revenue<br />
for the Corporate Fund. Its increase therefore trends<br />
with increases with appropriations.<br />
Millions<br />
$30<br />
$25<br />
Personal Property Replacement Tax<br />
This tax is primarily based on corporate<br />
income tax.<br />
$200<br />
$20<br />
$150<br />
$15<br />
$100<br />
$10<br />
$50<br />
$5<br />
$0<br />
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008* 2008** 2009***<br />
$0<br />
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008* 2008** 2009***<br />
User Charge<br />
Millions<br />
The growth in the Food Processing and Chemical industries has been<br />
$70<br />
offset by improvements in processing and reduced discharges.<br />
$60<br />
$50<br />
$40<br />
$30<br />
$20<br />
$10<br />
$0<br />
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008* 2008** 2009***<br />
Millions<br />
$10<br />
$8<br />
$6<br />
$4<br />
$2<br />
$0<br />
Favorable rates and<br />
investment balances<br />
Investment Income<br />
Decreases in short term<br />
interest rates and<br />
investment balances.<br />
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008* 2008** 2009***<br />
$30<br />
$25<br />
$20<br />
$15<br />
$10<br />
$5<br />
$0<br />
Other<br />
Millions Equity Transfer from the Capital Improvements Bond Fund in 2002 & 2008.<br />
Release of Designation for Environmental Liabilities in 2002. Release of<br />
$35<br />
remaining Designation for Fixed asset replacement in 2003.<br />
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008* 2008** 2009***<br />
Millions<br />
$12<br />
$11<br />
$10<br />
$9<br />
$8<br />
$7<br />
$6<br />
$5<br />
$4<br />
$3<br />
$2<br />
$1<br />
$0<br />
Land Rentals<br />
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008* 2008** 2009***<br />
Note: Other includes sewer permit and permit services<br />
fees, land sales, agricultural product sales, Tax Increment<br />
Finance (TIF) district surplus distribution and other small<br />
revenue sources.<br />
Note: 2002 - 2007 actual<br />
* 2008 as budgeted<br />
** 2008 adjusted estimate<br />
*** 2009 estimate<br />
92<br />
92
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CORPORATE FUND<br />
ESTIMATED BALANCE SHEET<br />
JANUARY 1, 2009 and 2008<br />
ASSETS<br />
2009 2008<br />
AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR<br />
CURRENT ASSETS APPROPRIATION APPROPRIATION<br />
Cash and Investments $ 120,689,862 $ 120,689,862 $ 121,984,646 $ 121,984,646<br />
Taxes Receivable 234,397,372 231,879,789 228,110,225 225,629,667<br />
Replacement Tax 25,780,000 25,780,000 26,002,200 26,002,200<br />
Due from Other Funds 375,000 375,000 350,000 350,000<br />
Total Current Assets $ 381,242,234 $ 378,724,651 $ 376,447,071 $ 373,966,513<br />
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY<br />
CURRENT LIABILITIES<br />
Unpaid Bills:<br />
Accrued Salaries and Wages $ 3,741,835 $ 3,741,835 $ 3,087,462 $ 3,087,462<br />
Personal Services - Other 3,482,698 3,482,698 2,364,284 2,364,284<br />
Payroll Withholding and Miscellaneous 3,969,584 3,969,584 3,304,366 3,304,366<br />
Contractual Services 19,491,476 19,491,476 11,897,025 11,897,025<br />
Materials and Supplies 3,820,861 3,820,861 2,686,058 2,686,058<br />
Machinery and Equipment 1,645,355 1,645,355 1,185,957 1,185,957<br />
Due to Corporate Working Cash Fund 252,000,000 252,000,000 243,700,000 243,700,000<br />
Total Current Liabilities $ 288,151,809 $ 288,151,809 $ 268,225,152 $ 268,225,152<br />
Total Liabilities and Designations $ 288,151,809 $ 268,225,152<br />
ASSETS APPROPRIABLE FOR 2009 AND 2008<br />
Net Assets Appropriable $ 90,572,842 $ 105,741,361<br />
Net Assets Available for Future Use $ (20,844,242) $ (39,579,261)<br />
Net Assets Appropriated 69,728,600 66,162,100<br />
Equity Transfer - 7,000,000<br />
Estimated Revenue 325,274,000 324,024,500<br />
Total Assets Appropriable $ 395,002,600 $ 397,186,600<br />
FUND EQUITY<br />
Undesignated $ 93,090,425 $ 108,221,919<br />
Total Fund Equity $ 93,090,425 $ 108,221,919<br />
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $ 381,242,234 $ 376,447,071<br />
93<br />
93
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CORPORATE FUND<br />
APPROPRIABLE REVENUE<br />
2009 - 2006<br />
ESTIMATED<br />
ACTUAL<br />
2009 2008 2008<br />
REVENUE DESCRIPTION BUDGET ADJUSTED BUDGET 2007 2006<br />
Revenue from Property Taxes<br />
Gross Tax Levy $ 242,027,000 $ 239,261,800 $ 239,261,800 $ 233,065,000 $ 213,500,000<br />
Less Allowance for Uncollectible Taxes (8,470,945) (8,374,163) (8,374,163) (8,157,275) (7,472,500)<br />
Net Property Taxes $ 233,556,055 $ 230,887,637 $ 230,887,637 $ 224,907,725 $ 206,027,500<br />
Revenue from Personal Property<br />
Replacement Tax $ 25,780,000 $ 27,507,000 $ 26,002,200 $ 23,421,000 $ 24,000,000<br />
Net Tax Sources $ 259,336,055 $ 258,394,637 $ 256,889,837 $ 248,328,725 $ 230,027,500<br />
Adjustment to match working cash borrowings (4,936,055) (6,394,637) (4,889,837) (4,628,725) (4,427,500)<br />
Working Cash Financing at 95% of Gross Tax Sources 254,400,000 252,000,000 252,000,000 243,700,000 225,600,000<br />
Investment Income $ 4,228,000 $ 4,353,000 $ 8,800,000 $ 8,093,242 $ 6,148,828<br />
Land Rentals 11,000,000 9,000,500 9,000,500 9,487,920 8,252,543<br />
Sewer Permit Fees 1,800,000 1,500,000 2,200,000 1,671,811 1,783,073<br />
Sewer Service Agreement Revenue 897,000 828,000 775,000 794,076 790,407<br />
User Charge 49,000,000 56,740,034 48,000,000 51,950,184 53,215,670<br />
Lockport Electricity Generation * 2,100,000 2,000,000 1,400,000 1,702,435 311,840<br />
Miscellaneous (details below) 1,849,000 3,358,259 1,849,000 3,233,070 3,988,272<br />
Subtotal $ 70,874,000 $ 77,779,793 $ 72,024,500 $ 76,932,738 $ 74,490,633<br />
Adjustment to Net Assets Available for Projected Receipts - 15,312,300 - 1,570,986 6,613,986<br />
Equity Transfer from Capital Improvements Bond Fund - 7,000,000 7,000,000 - -<br />
GRAND TOTAL $ 325,274,000 $ 352,092,093 $ 331,024,500 $ 322,203,724 $ 306,704,619<br />
Components of Miscellaneous<br />
TIF Surplus Distribution $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 474,241 $ 1,154,021<br />
TIF Differential Fee 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000<br />
Land Sales 2,000 2,000 2,000 19,078 159,663<br />
Fines 2,000 2,000 2,000 357,573 419,155<br />
Claims and Damage Settlements 5,000 5,000 5,000 - -<br />
Agricultural Products 2,000 2,000 2,000 13,984 11,930<br />
<strong>Water</strong> Sales 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,807 12,087<br />
Scrap Sales 8,000 8,000 8,000 73,987 43,507<br />
Sales of Automobiles - - - 3,525 -<br />
Interest on Taxes - Cook County Treasurer 300,000 300,000 300,000 396,494 -<br />
Other 600,000 2,109,259 600,000 1,663,381 1,962,909<br />
Total $ 1,849,000 $ 3,358,259 $ 1,849,000 $ 3,233,070 $ 3,988,272<br />
* Prior to 2007, electricity supplier credited electricity generation against other billings.<br />
94<br />
94
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CORPORATE FUND<br />
FINANCING<br />
2009 - 2004<br />
ESTIMATED<br />
ACTUAL<br />
2009 (1) 2008 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004<br />
Revised Original<br />
BORROWINGS<br />
Working Cash Loans Current Year $ 254,400,000 $ 252,000,000 $ 252,000,000 $ 231,963,071 $ 225,100,000 $ 214,600,000 $ 202,400,000<br />
Working Cash Loans Prior Year - 11,736,929 - - - - -<br />
Total Borrowings $ 254,400,000 $ 263,736,929 $ 252,000,000 $ 231,963,071 $ 225,100,000 $ 214,600,000 $ 202,400,000<br />
REPAYMENTS<br />
Working Cash Loans Repaid<br />
Current $ 252,000,000 $ 243,700,000 $ 243,700,000 $ 213,863,100 $ 214,600,000 $ 202,400,000 $ 174,100,000<br />
Working Cash Loans Repaid<br />
Prior - 11,736,930 - - - - 6,352,800<br />
TOTAL REPAYMENTS $ 252,000,000 $ 255,436,930 $ 243,700,000 $ 213,863,100 $ 214,600,000 $ 202,400,000 $ 180,452,800<br />
(1) FINANCING LIMITATION<br />
2009<br />
(IN MILLIONS)<br />
Property Tax Levy $ 242.0<br />
Personal Property Replacement Tax 25.8<br />
Total $ 267.8<br />
* Borrowing Limitation 95.0 %<br />
Total Available for Financing $ 254.4<br />
* Statutory limitation is 100%<br />
95<br />
95
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CORPORATE WORKING CASH FUND<br />
ESTIMATED BALANCE SHEET<br />
JANUARY 1, 2009 and 2008<br />
AND ESTIMATED AMOUNTS AVAILABLE FOR 2009 AND 2008<br />
ASSETS<br />
2009 2008<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
CURRENT ASSETS AMOUNT APPROPRIATION AMOUNT APPROPRIATION<br />
Cash & Investments $ 20,220,361 $ 20,220,361 $ 24,046,899 $ 24,046,899<br />
Replacement Tax 3,987,000 3,987,000 4,100,000 4,100,000<br />
Due from Corporate Fund 252,000,000 252,000,000 243,700,000 243,700,000<br />
Total Current Assets $ 276,207,361 $ 276,207,361 $ 271,846,899 $ 271,846,899<br />
FUND EQUITY<br />
Estimated Revenue and Other Financing Sources $ 100,000 $ 317,000<br />
ASSETS AVAILABLE FOR 2009 AND 2008 $ 276,307,361 $ 272,163,899<br />
FUND EQUITY<br />
$ 276,207,361 $ 271,846,899<br />
CORPORATE WORKING CASH FUND<br />
REVENUES<br />
2009 - 2006<br />
ESTIMATED<br />
ACTUAL<br />
2009 2008 2008 2007 2006<br />
REVENUE DESCRIPTION BUDGET ADJUSTED BUDGET<br />
Revenue from Money and Property<br />
Investment Income $ 100,000 $ 103,000 $ 317,000 $ 134,881 $ 472,226<br />
Revenue from Miscellaneous Sources - - - - -<br />
Prior Period(s) Tax Collections - - - - (54,517)<br />
Other Financing Sources<br />
Transfers In From Bond & Interest Fund - - - - 15,000,000<br />
TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 103,000 $ 317,000 $ 134,881 $ 15,417,709<br />
96<br />
96
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CAPITAL FUNDS<br />
The Capital Funds of the District are the Capital Improvements Bond Fund and the Construction Fund. These funds are used to<br />
account for the acquisition of capital facilities. The District's major functions of sewage collection and treatment, solids<br />
processing, solids utilization, and flood control are capital intensive, requiring significant investments in infrastructure. The<br />
national priority of environmental protection, coupled with the District's prime mission of protecting the Lake Michigan<br />
drinking water supply from pollution, drives the capital program for the District. National, state, and local priorities drive joint<br />
efforts by making grants and other funding assistance available to the District to financially support our program.<br />
The Capital Improvements Bond Fund is used to provide resources from grants, bonds, and other sources to design and<br />
construct major capital facilities that are structures of permanent duration. The 2009 appropriations request is $932.9 million<br />
compared to $743.4 million in 2008. The appropriation varies by the scheduled awards of major projects.<br />
The Capital Improvements Bond Fund balance sheet (page 98) estimates the net assets appropriable for 2009 at ($410.8) million<br />
and $32.5 million for 2008. The sale of bonds in 2009 is subject to the financing requirements of current projects and the new<br />
projects appropriated. The amount of authorized but unissued bonds is currently $600 million and this level of authority allows<br />
the District to proceed with the award of multi-year contracts, then sell bonds as cash flow requirements demand during the<br />
course of the project. The Capital Improvements Bond Fund balance sheet shows an estimated negative net assets appropriable<br />
for 2009. This is a result of accounting for the full value of the contract award as a liability, without recognizing the bonds to be<br />
sold during the course of the projects to meet financial needs. An obligation basis of budgetary accounting is used for this fund.<br />
Liabilities are recognized as the total value of all project awards at the time of award, even though cash disbursements are made<br />
over several future years.<br />
Since 1969, the District has sold approximately $4.7 billion in bonds in order to support its capital program. The District is<br />
authorized to issue $150 million in nonreferendum Capital Improvements Bonds in any one year, plus amounts unissued from<br />
the prior three years. Bonds for State Revolving Fund loans are excluded. At December 31, 2008, the amount of authorized but<br />
unissued bonds will be $600 million. The District’s non-referendum bond sale authority was extended to 2016 by State Statute<br />
in 2002 and the annual debt issuance authorization was increased from $100 million to $150 million in 2003. The Five-Year<br />
Forecast on pages 64 - 76 presents detailed projections of the financial aspects of the capital program into the future.<br />
Property tax limitation laws enacted in Illinois had significant impacts on the future funding of the District’s capital program<br />
through bond sales. Under Public Act 89-1, the District's nonreferendum bond authority was restricted to finance only projects<br />
initiated prior to October 1, 1991, which generally covers only Tunnel and Reservoir Plan (TARP) projects. However, Public<br />
Acts 89-385 and 90-485 provided additional nonreferendum authority to the District by authorizing the issuance of ‘‘limited tax<br />
bonds.’’ Limited bonds can be issued to the extent that any new debt when combined with existing debt service does not exceed<br />
the debt service extension base established by these Acts, which for the District is $141.5 million. These ‘‘limited tax bonds’’<br />
allow the District to issue nonreferendum debt for projects initiated after October 1, 1991 and exclude debt associated with the<br />
TARP program and other projects initiated prior to that date from the extension base. There will be sufficient authorization to<br />
issue bonds to meet our capital program into the future.<br />
The State of Illinois Revolving Loan Fund (SRF) provides low-interest loans to finance qualifying projects and upon project<br />
completion, District bonds are issued at the same low-interest rate. The current interest rate for new loans to the District is 2.50<br />
percent. The District has authorized the sale of $348.3 million in SRF bonds as of June 2007. Several projects are currently<br />
financed through state revolving fund loans. The District expects to receive an allocation of at least $30 million annually from<br />
state revolving fund loans in the future. For 2009, $33.4 million in State Revolving Fund loans is budgeted to fund plant<br />
projects.<br />
For 2009, no grant revenue is anticipated for the Capital Improvements Bond Fund. In 2002, $4.8 million in grant revenue was<br />
received for the Thornton Transitional Reservoir. The District has been very successful in obtaining grant funding in the past,<br />
and future grants or appropriations are being pursued for the TARP program at the Federal level through the Energy and <strong>Water</strong><br />
Development Appropriations, and the <strong>Water</strong> Resources Development Act.<br />
The Construction Fund is a property-tax-supported fund designed to provide resources for capital projects for which long-term<br />
bond funding is not desirable or is not available. This fund is intended for pay-as-you-go capital projects to perform major<br />
rehabilitation of facilities, extending their useful life. The funding mechanism for this is a working cash fund that provides loans<br />
in anticipation of tax collections. The liabilities for contracts not completed during a fiscal year are reappropriated in the next<br />
year. Net assets appropriable therefore fluctuate based on the value of contract liabilities carried forward to the next year.<br />
The 2009 tax levy planned for the Construction Fund is $11.4 million. There was no tax levy in 2008. Appropriations have<br />
increased by $3.4 million from 2008 to 2009. This increased appropriation level reflects the anticipated expenditures for<br />
existing projects and the appropriations required to fund projects with 2009 award dates.<br />
97<br />
97
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BOND FUND<br />
ESTIMATED BALANCE SHEET<br />
JANUARY 1, 2009 and 2008<br />
ASSETS<br />
2009 2008<br />
AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR<br />
APPROPRIATION APPROPRIATION<br />
CURRENT ASSETS<br />
Cash and Investments $ 283,508,515 $ 283,508,515 $ 447,048,800 $ 447,048,800<br />
Grants Receivable - - - -<br />
State Revolving Fund Loans Receivable 77,945,000 77,945,000 56,142,900 56,142,900<br />
Total Current Assets $ 361,453,515 $ 361,453,515 $ 503,191,700 $ 503,191,700<br />
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY<br />
CURRENT LIABILITIES<br />
Unpaid Bills:<br />
Accrued Salaries and Wages $ 104,107 $ 104,107 $ 310,000 $ 310,000<br />
Personal Services - Other 67,342,733 67,342,733 44,437,700 44,437,700<br />
Contractual Services 335,000 335,000 2,472,500 2,472,500<br />
Contracts Payable 704,496,000 704,496,000 423,492,100 423,492,100<br />
Total Current Liabilities $ 772,277,840 $ 772,277,840 $ 470,712,300 $ 470,712,300<br />
Designated for Future Claims Liabilities - - - -<br />
Total Liabilities $ 772,277,840 $ 772,277,840 $ 470,712,300 $ 470,712,300<br />
ASSETS APPROPRIABLE<br />
Net Assets Appropriable $ (410,824,325) $ 32,479,400<br />
Net Assets Appropriated (410,824,325) 32,479,400<br />
Estimated Revenue 1,343,691,125 710,870,700<br />
Total Assets Appropriable $ 932,866,800 $ 743,350,100<br />
FUND EQUITY $ (410,824,325) $ 32,479,400<br />
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $ 361,453,515 $ 503,191,700<br />
98<br />
98
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BOND FUND<br />
APPROPRIABLE REVENUES<br />
2009 - 2006<br />
ESTIMATED<br />
ACTUAL<br />
2009 2008 2008 2007 2006<br />
BUDGET ADJUSTED BUDGET<br />
REVENUE DESCRIPTION<br />
Revenue from Money and Property<br />
Bond Sales (Present and Future) $ 1,296,521,125 $ - $ 637,935,700 $ - $ 354,509,155<br />
Investment Income and Miscellaneous 13,800,000 18,580,000 18,935,000 25,082,000 20,968,646<br />
Total $ 1,310,321,125 $ 18,580,000 $ 656,870,700 $ 25,082,000 $ 375,477,801<br />
Revenue from Miscellaneous Sources<br />
Federal and State Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -<br />
State Revolving Fund Loans 33,370,000 39,257,350 54,000,000 56,372,220 79,379,775<br />
Miscellaneous - - - - -<br />
Total $ 33,370,000 $ 39,257,350 $ 54,000,000 $ 56,372,220 $ 79,379,775<br />
GRAND TOTAL $ 1,343,691,125 $ 57,837,350 $ 710,870,700 $ 81,454,220 $ 454,857,576<br />
99<br />
99
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CONSTRUCTION FUND<br />
ESTIMATED BALANCE SHEET<br />
JANUARY 1, 2009 and 2008<br />
ASSETS<br />
2009 2008<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
AMOUNT APPROPRIATION AMOUNT APPROPRIATION<br />
CURRENT ASSETS<br />
Cash & Investments $ 22,461,942 $ 22,461,942 $ 32,242,343 $ 32,242,343<br />
Taxes Receivable 77,720 (182,829) 5,266,490 4,918,335<br />
Replacement Tax 2,010,000 2,010,000 - -<br />
Total Current Assets $ 24,549,662 $ 24,289,113 $ 37,508,833 $ 37,160,678<br />
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY<br />
CURRENT LIABILITIES<br />
Unpaid Bills:<br />
Accrued Salaries and Wages $ 148,307 $ 148,307 $ 101,000 $ 101,000<br />
Contracts Payable 2,372,796 2,372,796 963,578 963,578<br />
Personal Services 129,123 129,123 104,000 104,000<br />
Contractual Services 141,125 141,125 119,000 119,000<br />
Materials and Supplies 16,962 16,962 13,000 13,000<br />
Machinery and Equipment - - - -<br />
Due to:<br />
Construction Working Cash Fund - - 5,900,000 5,900,000<br />
Total Current Liabilities $ 2,808,313 $ 2,808,313 $ 7,200,578 $ 7,200,578<br />
Designated for Future Claims Liabilities $ - $ -<br />
Total Current Liabilities and Designations $ 2,808,313 $ 7,200,578<br />
ASSETS APPROPRIABLE FOR 2009 AND 2008<br />
Net Assets Appropriable $ 21,480,800 $ 29,960,100<br />
Net Assets Appropriated $ 21,480,800 $ 29,960,100<br />
Estimated Revenue 14,103,000 2,200,000<br />
Total Assets Appropriable $ 35,583,800 $ 32,160,100<br />
FUND EQUITY<br />
Designated for Future Claim Liabilities $ - $ -<br />
Undesignated 21,741,349 30,308,255<br />
Total Fund Equity $ 21,741,349 $ 30,308,255<br />
Total Liabilities & Fund Equity $ 24,549,662 $ 37,508,833<br />
100<br />
100
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CONSTRUCTION FUND FINANCING<br />
2009 - 2004<br />
BORROWINGS<br />
ESTIMATED<br />
ACTUAL<br />
2009 (1) 2008 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004<br />
Revised Original<br />
Working Cash Loans $ 12,700,000 $ - $ - $ 5,900,000 $ 17,285,000 $ 19,687,000 $ 16,700,000<br />
REPAYMENTS<br />
Total Borrowings $ 12,700,000 $ - $ - $ 5,900,000 $ 17,285,000 $ 19,687,000 $ 16,700,000<br />
Working Cash Loans Repaid<br />
- Current $ - $ 5,900,000 $ 5,900,000 $ 16,731,065 $ 19,687,000 $ 16,700,000 $ 25,100,000<br />
- Prior Year $ - 553,935 - - - - -<br />
Total Repayments $ - $ 6,453,935 $ 5,900,000 $ 16,731,065 $ 19,687,000 $ 16,700,000 $ 25,100,000<br />
( 1 ) FINANCING LIMITATION<br />
(IN MILLIONS)<br />
Property Tax Levy $ 11.4<br />
Personal Property Replacement Tax 2.0<br />
Total 13.4<br />
CONSTRUCTION FUND - APPROPRIABLE REVENUE<br />
2009 - 2006<br />
Borrowing Limitation * 95% * Statutory limitation is 100%<br />
Total Available for Financing $ 12.7<br />
ESTIMATED ACTUAL<br />
2009 2008 2008 2007 2006<br />
BUDGET ADJUSTED BUDGET<br />
REVENUE DESCRIPTION<br />
Revenue from Property Taxes<br />
Gross Tax Levy $ 11,390,000 $ - $ - $ 5,181,347 $ 17,766,010<br />
Less : PTELA reduction - - - - -<br />
Less : Allowance for Uncollectible Taxes (398,650) - - (181,347) (621,810)<br />
Net Property Taxes $ 10,991,350 $ - $ - $ 5,000,000 $ 17,144,200<br />
Revenue from Personal Property 95% 95% 95% 95%<br />
Replacement Tax $ 2,010,000 $ - $ - $ 1,096,653 $ 2,477,341<br />
Net Tax Sources 13,001,350 - - 6,096,653 19,621,541<br />
Adjustment to Match Working Cash Borrowings $ (301,350) $ - $ - $ (196,653) $ (2,336,541)<br />
Working Cash Financing (Maximum 95% $ 12,700,000 $ - $ - $ 5,900,000 $ 17,285,000<br />
of Gross Tax Sources)<br />
Revenue from Current Services<br />
Connection Impact Fees $ 200,000 $ 481,837 $ 200,000 $ 961,239 $ 104,535<br />
Revenue from Money and Property<br />
Investment Income & Miscellaneous 903,000 979,679 1,700,000 2,476,308 3,057,365<br />
User Charge 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 400,000<br />
Subtotal $ 1,403,000 $ 1,761,516 $ 2,200,000 $ 3,737,547 $ 3,561,900<br />
Adjustment to Net Assets Available for Projected Receipts $ - $ 2,392,464 $ - $ 95,310 $ 1,369,600<br />
Total $ 14,103,000 $ 4,153,980 $ 2,200,000 $ 9,732,857 $ 22,216,500<br />
101<br />
101
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CONSTRUCTION WORKING CASH FUND<br />
ESTIMATED BALANCE SHEET<br />
JANUARY 1, 2009 and 2008<br />
AND ESTIMATED AMOUNTS AVAILABLE FOR 2009 AND 2008<br />
ASSETS<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
AMOUNT APPROPRIATION AMOUNT APPROPRIATION<br />
CURRENT ASSETS<br />
Cash & Investments $ 26,716,473 $ 26,716,473 $ 15,173,705 $ 15,173,705<br />
Taxes Receivable - - - -<br />
Replacement Tax - - - -<br />
Due to Corporate Working Cash Fund - - - -<br />
Due from Construction Fund - - 5,900,000 5,900,000<br />
Total Current Assets $ 26,716,473 $ 26,716,473 $ 21,073,705 $ 21,073,705<br />
FUND EQUITY<br />
Estimated Revenue and Other Financing Sources $ 678,000 $ 338,000<br />
ASSETS AVAILABLE FOR 2009 AND 2008 $ 27,394,473 $ 21,411,705<br />
FUND EQUITY<br />
$ 26,716,473 $ 21,073,705<br />
CONSTRUCTION WORKING CASH FUND<br />
REVENUES<br />
2009 - 2006<br />
ESTIMATED<br />
ACTUAL<br />
2009 2008 2008<br />
REVENUE DESCRIPTION BUDGET ADJUSTED BUDGET 2007 2006<br />
Revenue from Money and Property<br />
Investment Income $ 678,000 $ 338,000 $ 338,000 $ 269,769 $ 102,849<br />
Revenue from Miscellaneous Sources - - - - -<br />
Other Financing Sources<br />
Transfer Out - Stormwater Working Cash - - - - -<br />
Adjustment to Prior Period Tax - - - - -<br />
TOTAL $ 678,000 $ 338,000 $ 338,000 $ 269,769 $ 102,849<br />
102<br />
102
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
OTHER FUNDS NARRATIVE<br />
The Stormwater Management Fund was established by Public Act 93-1049 on January 1, 2005. This Fund accounts for tax levies<br />
and other revenue to be used for stormwater management activities throughout all of Cook County. The 2009 property tax levy for<br />
the Stormwater Management Fund is $8.8 million, a decrease of $6.4 million or 41.8 percent from the 2008 <strong>Budget</strong> as adjusted.<br />
During 2005, Public Act 94-474 authorized the creation and use of a Stormwater Management Working Cash Fund for the sole<br />
purpose of providing temporary loans to the Stormwater Management Fund in anticipation of tax collections.<br />
Details of this fund’s purpose and $33.8 million 2009 appropriation are presented on pages 403 through 418.<br />
The Reserve Claim Fund is essentially the District’s self-insurance fund, and is financed primarily through an annual property tax<br />
levy of one-half cent (0.5¢) per $100 of the last known equalized assessed valuation (EAV). This one-half cent tax rate is the<br />
maximum allowed by state statute, however for 2009, a tax levy of $3.2 million is budgeted. The available fund balance and amount<br />
available for appropriation for the Reserve Claim Fund are based on the net impact of current revenues and current expenditures.<br />
The 2009 appropriation for this fund is $67.5 million, an increase of $12.0 million from 2008. This increase will move the fund<br />
toward the maximum fund balance allowable. The allowance for accounts payable and estimated liabilities is estimated at $4.3<br />
million. In 2002, $10 million was transferred from the Corporate Fund. The Corporate Fund had $10 million in assets that were<br />
designated to provide for environmental liabilities. This designation was removed to allow the transfer of the assets to the<br />
Reserve Claim Fund where a more appropriate statutory definition exists for the use of appropriations on environmental<br />
liabilities.<br />
This fund is the District’s self-insurance fund and it is important that all potential claims and contingencies are evaluated to<br />
ensure that sufficient resources are set aside. The Board adopted a policy for the 1998 budget year and subsequent years, for the<br />
accumulation of fund balance towards the statutory limit and a continuance of the maximum annual tax levy for the fund. The<br />
Board of Commissioners annually reaffirms the policy to accumulate toward the statutory limit and to levy at the statutory<br />
allowable tax rate to provide necessary resources for environmental liabilities.<br />
The maximum fund balance that can be accumulated is .05 percent of the last known equalized assessed valuation. For the 2009<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>, using the last known EAV of 2009, the maximum accumulation will be $78.0 million. The financial status of this fund<br />
is closely monitored. Administrative risk management programs in the Claims and Safety areas are in place to help control the<br />
rate of growth for the employee disability component. A detail presentation of this fund is presented on page 419.<br />
The Bond and Interest (B&I) Fund is a series of subfunds that account for the property tax levies and other revenues received<br />
to pay for the principal and interest of bonds issued by the District. The property tax levies for outstanding bond issues are<br />
collected and paid through this fund. The 2009 property tax levy for the B&I Fund is $120.1 million, a decrease of $18.8<br />
million or approximately 13.6 percent from the 2008 <strong>Budget</strong> as adjusted. Appropriations and tax levies are adjusted for new<br />
bond sales or state revolving fund loans. The 2009 appropriation for this fund is $134.4 million, which is a decrease of $44.7<br />
million from 2008 adjusted. The 2008 appropriation adjustments were primarily due to the refunding of May 2006 and March<br />
2007 bond series, and a call for redemption of $43.7 million principal value Refunding Bond, series July, 1997, maturities of<br />
2010 through 2014.<br />
Property tax levy collections are invested prior to the time when actual principal and interest payments must be made. Investment<br />
income earned on tax collections is credited to the specific sub-funds for each bond issue. The amount of estimated investment<br />
income for 2009 is $3.5 million, which is essentially level with the adjusted 2008 budget estimate. Investment income has decreased<br />
from the $5.7 million received in 2006; this is primarily due to decreasing short-term investment income rates. Excess investment<br />
income will be used to abate a portion of the levy. A detailed presentation on the B & I Fund is found on pages 421 and 422.<br />
The Retirement Fund receives the proceeds of the annual tax levy that the District extends on behalf of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District Retirement Fund, a pension trust fund. The amounts, as certified by the Retirement Fund Board, are levied by<br />
the District and appropriated when received. The tax levy for 2009 is $26.8 million compared to the 2008 levy of $25.7 million and<br />
these are based on a statutory multiplier of employee contributions made in 2007 and 2006, respectively. The District’s Early<br />
Retirement and Optional Retirement Programs terminated on December 31, 2002. A subsequent modified optional contribution<br />
program and early retirement option expired on December 31, 2007. These programs leveled out the rate of retirements over the<br />
last several years. The appropriable resources and appropriation consist of the collection of the previous year’s tax levy plus<br />
personal property replacement tax receipts. In 2006, a review of the calculation for loss in collection of taxes resulted in a higher<br />
allocation of personal property replacement taxes going forward.<br />
The District's Retirement Fund is part of the aggregate levy under the Tax Cap law that is limited to annual increases of 5.0<br />
percent or the CPI, whichever is less. Due to the irregular nature of levy requirements of the fund which parallel retirements, the<br />
District's Board of Commissioners established a policy in 1995 to exclude the Retirement Fund levy from any future<br />
adjustments to the aggregate levy required by tax caps. When required, adjustments or limitations have been made to other<br />
funds subject to the aggregate levy limit. An expanded presentation on the Retirement Fund is made on pages 424 and 425.<br />
103<br />
103
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND<br />
ESTIMATED BALANCE SHEET - JANUARY 1, 2009 and 2008<br />
ASSETS<br />
2009 2008<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
AMOUNT APPROPRIATION AMOUNT APPROPRIATION<br />
CURRENT ASSETS<br />
Cash & Investments $ 24,734,004 $ 24,734,004 $ 19,795,203 $ 19,795,203<br />
Taxes Receivable 14,738,514 14,688,996 4,036,419 4,083,471<br />
Total Current Assets $ 39,472,518 $ 39,423,000 $ 23,831,622 $ 23,878,674<br />
CURRENT LIABILITIES<br />
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY<br />
Unpaid Bills:<br />
Accrued Salaries and Wages $ - $ - $ - $ -<br />
Contracts Payable 600,000 600,000 650,000 650,000<br />
Personal Services - - - -<br />
Contractual Services - - - -<br />
Materials and Supplies - - - -<br />
Machinery and Equipment - - - -<br />
Due to :<br />
Stormwater Management Working Cash Fund 14,400,000 14,400,000 3,744,674 3,744,674<br />
Total Current Liabilities $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 4,394,674 $ 4,394,674<br />
Designated for Future Claims Liabilities $ - $ -<br />
Total Current Liabilities and Designations $ 15,000,000 $ 4,394,674<br />
ASSETS APPROPRIABLE FOR 2009 AND 2008<br />
Net Assets Appropriable $ 24,423,000 $ 19,484,000<br />
Net Assets Appropriated 24,423,000 19,484,000<br />
Estimated Revenue 9,384,000 15,440,000<br />
Total Assets Appropriable $ 33,807,000 $ 34,924,000<br />
FUND EQUITY $ 24,472,518 $ 19,436,948<br />
Total Liabilities & Fund Equity $ 39,472,518 $ 23,831,622<br />
104<br />
104
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND FINANCING<br />
2009 - 2004<br />
BORROWINGS<br />
ESTIMATED<br />
ACTUAL<br />
2009 (1) 2008 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004<br />
Revised Original<br />
Working Cash Loans $ 8,400,000 $ 14,400,000 $ 14,400,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 14,732,547 $ 9,930,000 $ -<br />
Total Borrowings $ 8,400,000 $ 14,400,000 $ 14,400,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 14,732,547 $ 9,930,000 $ -<br />
REPAYMENTS<br />
Working Cash Loans Repaid<br />
- Current $ 14,400,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 14,732,547 $ 9,930,000 $ - $ -<br />
- Prior Year - - - - - - -<br />
Total Repayments $ 14,400,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 14,732,547 $ 9,930,000 $ - $ -<br />
( 1 ) FINANCING LIMITATION<br />
(IN MILLIONS)<br />
Property Tax Levy $ 8.8<br />
Personal Property Replacement Tax -<br />
$ 8.8<br />
Borrowing Limitation * 95% * Statutory limitation is 100%<br />
Total Available for Financing $ 8.4<br />
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND<br />
APPROPRIABLE REVENUE 2009 - 2006<br />
ESTIMATED ACTUAL<br />
2009 2008 2008 2007 2006<br />
BUDGET ADJUSTED BUDGET<br />
REVENUE DESCRIPTION<br />
Revenue from Property Taxes<br />
Gross Tax Levy $ 8,849,000 $ 15,211,800 $ 15,211,800 $ 3,941,762 $ 15,507,944<br />
Less : Allowance for Uncollectible Taxes (309,715) (532,413) (532,413) (137,962) (542,778)<br />
Net Property Taxes $ 8,539,285 $ 14,679,387 $ 14,679,387 $ 3,803,800 $ 14,965,166<br />
Adjustment to Match Working Cash Borrowings (139,285) (279,387) (279,387) (59,126) (233,166)<br />
1<br />
Working Cash Financing at 95% of Gross Tax Sources $ 8,400,000 $ 14,400,000 $ 14,400,000 $ 3,744,674 $ 14,732,000<br />
Revenue from Money and Property<br />
Investment Income & Miscellaneous $ 984,000 $ 1,011,000 $ 1,040,000 $ 1,084,222 $ 1,035,052<br />
Grants - - - 253,000 -<br />
Subtotal $ 984,000 $ 1,011,000 $ 1,040,000 $ 1,337,222 $ 1,035,052<br />
Adjustment to Net Assets Available for Projected Receipts $ - $ 1,226,740 $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 9,384,000 $ 16,637,740 $ 15,440,000 $ 5,081,896 $ 15,767,052<br />
105<br />
105
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
STORMWATER WORKING CASH FUND<br />
ESTIMATED BALANCE SHEET<br />
JANUARY 1, 2009 and 2008<br />
ASSETS<br />
2009 2008<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
AMOUNT APPROPRIATION AMOUNT APPROPRIATION<br />
CURRENT ASSETS<br />
Cash & Investments $ 23,293,310 $ 23,293,310 $ 31,263,477 $ 31,263,477<br />
Replacement Tax 847,200 847,200 1,900,000 1,900,000<br />
Due from Stormwater Management Fund 14,400,000 14,400,000 3,700,000 3,700,000<br />
Total Current Assets $ 38,540,510 $ 38,540,510 $ 36,863,477 $ 36,863,477<br />
FUND EQUITY<br />
Estimated Revenue and Other Financing Sources $ 660,000 $ 931,000<br />
ASSETS AVAILABLE FOR 2009 AND 2008 $ 39,200,510 $ 37,794,477<br />
FUND EQUITY<br />
$ 38,540,510 $ 36,863,477<br />
STORMWATER WORKING CASH FUND<br />
APPROPRIABLE REVENUES<br />
2009 - 2006<br />
ESTIMATED<br />
ACTUAL<br />
2009 2008 2008 2007 2006<br />
BUDGET ADJUSTED BUDGET<br />
REVENUE DESCRIPTION<br />
Investment Income $ 660,000 $ 931,000 $ 931,000 $ 839,558 $ 555,294<br />
Transfer in from Other Funds<br />
Construction Working Cash - - - - -<br />
Bond & Interest Funds - - - - 5,000,000<br />
GRAND TOTAL $ 660,000 $ 931,000 $ 931,000 $ 839,558 $ 5,555,294<br />
106<br />
106
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
BOND & INTEREST FUND<br />
ESTIMATED BALANCE SHEET<br />
JANUARY 1, 2009 and 2008<br />
ASSETS<br />
2009 2008<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
AMOUNT APPROPRIATION AMOUNT APPROPRIATION<br />
CURRENT ASSETS<br />
Cash & Investments $ 87,621,047 $ 87,621,047 $ 87,813,037 $ 87,813,037<br />
Restricted Cash - - - -<br />
Deposits with Escrow Agent - - - -<br />
Taxes Receivable 136,132,919 133,947,695 139,685,405 137,268,251<br />
Total Current Assets $ 223,753,966 $ 221,568,742 $ 227,498,442 $ 225,081,288<br />
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY<br />
CURRENT LIABILITIES<br />
Bonds Payable $ 73,102,599 $ 68,877,498<br />
Interest Payable 61,345,270 65,716,409<br />
Program Expense Payable - -<br />
Equity Transfer - -<br />
Total Current Liabilities $ 134,447,869 $ 134,593,907<br />
ASSETS APPROPRIABLE FOR 2009 AND 2008<br />
Net Assets Appropriable $ 221,568,742 $ 225,081,288<br />
Equity Transfers From Corporate and Construction - 10,700,000<br />
Estimated Revenue 4,556,899 6,136,000<br />
Total Assets Available $ 226,125,641 $ 241,917,288<br />
Liabilities Payable from Restricted Assets - -<br />
Less: Assets Available for Future Years<br />
(Principal & Interest Payments) (91,677,772) (107,323,407)<br />
Total Assets Appropriable $ 134,447,869 $ 134,593,881<br />
FUND EQUITY<br />
Undesignated $ 89,306,097 $ 92,904,535<br />
TOTAL FUND EQUITY $ 89,306,097 $ 92,904,535<br />
Total Liabilities<br />
and Fund Equity $ 223,753,966 $ 227,498,442<br />
107<br />
107
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
BOND AND INTEREST FUND<br />
APPROPRIABLE REVENUE<br />
2009 - 2006<br />
ESTIMATED<br />
ACTUAL<br />
2009 2008 2008 2007 2006<br />
REVENUE DESCRIPTION BUDGET ADJUSTED BUDGET<br />
Revenue from Taxes<br />
Real Estate<br />
Current $ 134,096,964 $ 131,045,000 $ 137,831,281 $ 108,777,574 $ 142,624,675<br />
Prior (149,269) (45,000) (563,030) 201,759 2,698,943<br />
Replacement Tax - - - - -<br />
Total $ 133,947,695 $ 131,000,000 $ 137,268,251 $ 108,979,333 $ 145,323,618<br />
Revenue from Money and Property<br />
Investment Income $ 4,556,899 $ 3,576,000 $ 6,136,000 $ 5,198,000 $ 5,673,799<br />
Other - 224,593 - 229,168 2,781,011<br />
Revenue from Miscellaneous Sources<br />
Cash Available 87,621,047 76,714,335 87,813,037 111,405,345 145,958,242<br />
Other - - - - -<br />
Other Financing Sources (Uses)<br />
Refunding (net) - - - (55,601,448) (18,610,000)<br />
Transfer - out - - - - (20,000,000)<br />
Bond Premium - - - 53,097,924 14,359,064<br />
Sale of Capital Improvement Bonds - - - - 6,756,944<br />
Bond Redemption - - - - -<br />
Refunding Transaction Costs - - - (2,609,995) (2,313,919)<br />
Gain on Swap - - - 39,399 -<br />
Equity Transfer From Corporate Fund - 9,475,000 9,475,000 9,270,000 -<br />
Equity Transfer From Construction Fund - 1,225,000 1,225,000 2,730,000 -<br />
Equity Transfer From CIB Fund - 44,574,000 - - -<br />
Less: Amount to Be<br />
Expended After <strong>Budget</strong> Year (91,677,772) (87,621,047) (107,323,407) (76,714,335) (111,405,345)<br />
GRAND TOTAL $ 134,447,869 $ 179,167,881 $ 134,593,881 $ 156,023,391 $ 168,523,414<br />
108<br />
108
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
RESERVE CLAIM FUND<br />
ESTIMATED BALANCE SHEET<br />
JANUARY 1, 2009 and 2008<br />
ASSETS<br />
2009 2008<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
CURRENT ASSETS AMOUNT APPROPRIATION AMOUNTAPPROPRIATION<br />
Cash and Investments $ 59,143,341 $ 59,143,341 $ 46,956,061 $ 46,956,061<br />
Taxes Receivable 6,923,802 6,859,359 6,390,170 6,327,939<br />
Replacement Tax 4,328,000 4,328,000 4,450,000 4,450,000<br />
Total Current Assets $ 70,395,143 $ 70,330,700 $ 57,796,231 $ 57,734,000<br />
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY<br />
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND OTHER LIABILITIES $ 4,300,000 $ 4,300,000 $ 4,200,000 $ 4,200,000<br />
ASSETS APPROPRIABLE FOR 2009 AND 2008<br />
Net Assets Appropriable $ 66,030,700 $ 53,534,000<br />
Equity Transfer from Capital Improvements Bond Fund - -<br />
Estimated Revenue 1,469,300 1,966,000<br />
Total Assets Appropriable $ 67,500,000 $ 55,500,000<br />
FUND EQUITY $ 66,095,143 $ 53,596,231<br />
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY $ 70,395,143 $ 57,796,231<br />
RESERVE CLAIM FUND<br />
APPROPRIABLE REVENUE<br />
2009 - 2006<br />
ESTIMATED<br />
ACTUAL<br />
2009 2008 2008 2007 2006<br />
REVENUE DESCRIPTION BUDGET ADJUSTED BUDGET<br />
Revenue from Taxes<br />
Real Estate - Current $ 6,825,862 $ 7,011,905 $ 6,300,819 $ 5,242,031 $ 5,339,018<br />
Real Estate - Prior 33,497 30,550 27,120 30,971 88,269<br />
Replacement Tax 4,328,000 4,708,000 4,450,000 4,875,710 761,162<br />
SUBTOTAL $ 11,187,359 $ 11,750,455 $ 10,777,939 $ 10,148,712 $ 6,188,449<br />
Equity Transfer from Capital Improvements<br />
Bond Fund $ - $ - $ - $ 8,000,000 $ -<br />
Adjusted for Projected 2008 Receipts - - - - -<br />
Investment Income and Miscellaneous 1,469,300 2,471,828 1,966,000 2,180,560 2,237,581<br />
GRAND TOTAL $ 12,656,659 $ 14,222,283 $ 12,743,939 $ 20,329,272 $ 8,426,030<br />
109<br />
109
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
RETIREMENT FUND<br />
ESTIMATED BALANCE SHEET<br />
JANUARY 1, 2009 and 2008<br />
ASSETS<br />
2009 2008<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
AVAILABLE FOR<br />
CURRENT ASSETS AMOUNT APPROPRIATION AMOUNT APPROPRIATION<br />
Taxes Receivable $ 25,138,892 $ 24,838,121 $ 24,349,880 $ 24,033,334<br />
Replacement Tax 6,547,800 6,547,800 6,338,200 6,338,200<br />
Total Current Assets $ 31,686,692 $ 31,385,921 $ 30,688,080 $ 30,371,534<br />
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY<br />
Due to Retirement Fund $ 31,686,692 $ 30,688,080<br />
ASSETS APPROPRIABLE FOR 2009 AND 2008 $ 31,385,921 $ 30,371,534<br />
RETIREMENT FUND<br />
APPROPRIABLE REVENUES<br />
2009 - 2006<br />
ESTIMATED<br />
ACTUAL<br />
2009 2008 2008 2007 2006<br />
BUDGET ADJUSTED BUDGET<br />
REVENUE DESCRIPTION<br />
Revenue from Taxes<br />
Real Estate - Current $ 24,766,243 $ 23,973,800 $ 23,973,800 $ 22,063,816 $ 22,851,912<br />
Real Estate - Prior 71,878 2,217,165 59,534 10,779 465,090<br />
Replacement Tax 6,547,800 6,338,200 6,338,200 6,629,000 6,238,900<br />
GRAND TOTAL $ 31,385,921 $ 32,529,165 $ 30,371,534 $ 28,703,595 $ 29,555,902<br />
110<br />
110
SECTION IV<br />
DETAIL OF DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATIONS<br />
The Corporate Fund provides for day-to-day staff services as well as the operations and maintenance of treatment plants,<br />
pumping stations, collection sewers, tunnels, and related facilities. This section provides appropriation detail for the<br />
operations and support departments.<br />
Graphs indicate staffing, appropriations, and expenditures from 2000 through budgeted 2009, and charts show organizational<br />
structure. The organization chart shows organization number, actual 2007 positions, as well as positions budgeted for 2008<br />
and 2009. In this section, and throughout the <strong>Budget</strong>, actual expenditures are used for 2007 with estimated costs for 2008 and<br />
budgeted costs for 2009. Additional information for each Department includes:<br />
(<br />
(<br />
(<br />
(<br />
(<br />
(<br />
A Narrative explanation of the responsibilities of the Department, changes in appropriation from the 2008<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>, accomplishments during 2008, and significant features for the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong>. The mission statement,<br />
major goals, and initiatives are also provided.<br />
A list of Objectives by Priority describes each objective, assigns the costs associated with it, and indicates its<br />
percentage of the total Department budget.<br />
Programs by Priority includes major Department functions and projected costs and staffing levels with<br />
comparison to budgeted 2008. Actual costs are shown for 2007.<br />
Performance Data measures specific Department activities by cost, and where possible, measurable units, and<br />
compares estimated budgeted costs for 2009 and 2008 with actual costs for 2007.<br />
The Line Item Analysis provides detailed line item appropriations over a three year period. Appropriations for<br />
2009 are shown as proposed by the Executive Director, subsequently recommended by the Committee on<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> and Employment, and ulitmately adopted and amended by the Board of Commissioners. Original and<br />
adjusted appropriations including estimated expenditures are shown for 2008. Actual 2007 expenditures are<br />
provided.<br />
The Position Analysis provides comparative departmental personnel position information for the previous,<br />
current, and budget years. Position counts and appropriations for the current and budget years are provided as<br />
totals by section or unit, division, and department. The pay plan and grade for each class title is provided and<br />
can be used to reference the salary schedules contained in the appendix to determine the applicable salary range.<br />
The 2009 salary appropriation is adjusted for vacancies in the Line Item Analysis.<br />
Corporate Appropriations, Expenditures, and <strong>Budget</strong>ed Positions, 2000-2009 ........ 111<br />
Corporate Fund Organization Chart .......................................................................... 112<br />
Board of Commissioners ........................................................................................... 113<br />
General Administration ............................................................................................. 121<br />
Monitoring and Research ...........................................................................................139<br />
Procurement and Materials Management .................................................................. 167<br />
Human Resources....................................................................................................... 181<br />
Information Technology ............................................................................................ 197<br />
Law ............................................................................................................................213<br />
Finance ...................................................................................................................... 225<br />
Maintenance and Operations<br />
Summary of All Divisions .............................................................................237<br />
General Division ........................................................................................... 250<br />
North Service Area ....................................................................................... 266<br />
Calumet Service Area ................................................................................... 286<br />
Stickney Service Area ................................................................................... 305<br />
Engineering ............................................................................................................... 327<br />
CORPORATE FUND
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CORPORATE FUND<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
$395,002,600<br />
$397,186,600<br />
Decrease ($2,184,000)<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Maintenance & Operations<br />
$221,406,300 56.0%<br />
Engineering<br />
$17,566,400 4.4%<br />
Finance<br />
$3,762,800 1.0%<br />
Law<br />
$8,196,000 2.1%<br />
Information Technology<br />
Board of Commissioners<br />
$20,987,200 5.3% $4,404,800 1.1%<br />
General Administration<br />
$22,835,600 5.8%<br />
Human Resources<br />
Monitoring & Research<br />
$54,001,400 13.7%<br />
$31,448,400 8.0%<br />
Procurement & Materials Management<br />
$10,393,700 2.6%<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Millions<br />
Positions<br />
$450<br />
2,500<br />
$400<br />
$350<br />
2,000<br />
$300<br />
$250<br />
1,500<br />
$200<br />
1,000<br />
$150<br />
$100<br />
500<br />
$50<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
$0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
111<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
111
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CORPORATE FUND<br />
TOTAL CORPORATE FUND<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
1,828 1,840 1,846<br />
11000<br />
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS<br />
35 38 38<br />
CIVIL SERVICE<br />
BOARD *<br />
013<br />
TREASURY<br />
7 7 7<br />
EXECUTIVE **<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
15000<br />
GENERAL<br />
ADMINISTRATION ***<br />
143 138 146<br />
16000<br />
MONITORING &<br />
RESEARCH<br />
311 309 308<br />
25000<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
52 54 54<br />
30000<br />
LAW<br />
40 40 40<br />
50000<br />
ENGINEERING<br />
33 34 34<br />
20000<br />
PROCUREMENT &<br />
MATERIALS MANAGEMENT<br />
70 70 70<br />
27000<br />
INFORMATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
65 72 72<br />
40000<br />
FINANCE<br />
32 33 31<br />
66000 - 69000<br />
MAINTENANCE &<br />
OPERATIONS ****<br />
1,040 1,045 1,046<br />
* Personnel count for Civil Service Board is reflected in Human Resources Department<br />
total under Section 251.<br />
** Personnel count for Executive Director’s Office is reflected in General Administration.<br />
*** 2 position are funded by the Stormwater Management Fund while the operations<br />
remain in the General Administration Department.<br />
**** 36 positions are funded by the Stormwater Management Fund while the operations<br />
remain in the Maintenance and Operations Department.<br />
112<br />
112
BOARD OF<br />
COMMISSIONERS<br />
BOARD OF<br />
COMMISSIONERS<br />
CIVIL SERVICE<br />
BOARD<br />
TREASURY<br />
EXECUTIVE<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
GENERAL<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
MONITORING &<br />
RESEARCH<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
LAW<br />
MAINTENANCE<br />
& OPERATIONS<br />
PROCUREMENT & MATERIALS<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
INFORMATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
FINANCE<br />
ENGINEERING
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Increase<br />
$4,404,800<br />
$4,277,500<br />
$127,300<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Treasury<br />
$1,057,531 24.0%<br />
Legislative<br />
Administrative<br />
$297,400 6.8%<br />
$3,049,869<br />
69.2%<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Millions<br />
Positions<br />
50<br />
$4<br />
45<br />
40<br />
$3<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
$2<br />
20<br />
15<br />
$1<br />
10<br />
$0<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
5<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
113<br />
113
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS<br />
11000<br />
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
42 45 45<br />
012<br />
Legislative Section<br />
35 37 37<br />
013<br />
Treasury Section<br />
7 7 7<br />
014<br />
Administrative Section<br />
0 1 1<br />
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR<br />
DEPARTMENTS<br />
114<br />
114
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
As the policy-making entity of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District, the Board of Commissioners is charged with the<br />
task of establishing policies and procedures which meet the District’s objective of protecting the water environment for the<br />
citizens of Cook County. The mission of the Board of Commissioners is the mission of the District: to protect the health and<br />
safety of the public in its service area; protect the quality of the water supply source (Lake Michigan); improve the quality of<br />
water in watercourses in its service area; protect businesses and homes from flood damages; and manage water as a vital<br />
resource for its service area.<br />
The Treasurer is charged to: direct the District’s financial program to maximize investment interest income while preserving<br />
safety of principal; issue bonds to meet District capital requirements; make timely payment of required debt service; and<br />
provide continuing sound financial management to maintain the District’s exceptional AAA bond rating.<br />
The 2009 appropriation request for the Board of Commissioners is $4,404,800, an increase of $127,300 or 3.0 percent above<br />
the 2008 appropriation. Staffing requirements for the department remain unchanged at 45 employees.<br />
Significant features of this year’s budget are:<br />
• Investment Interest Income Estimate: $27.4 million or less – 2009 will be a difficult year for investing due to very low<br />
interest rates forecasted for the fixed income market;<br />
• Implementation of web-based CD purchase bidding system – this will begin when the District’s portal technology is<br />
available; work is anticipated for late 2009;<br />
• Creation of a District Debt Policy – the policy will incorporate GFOA guidelines for issuing debt;<br />
• Bond Sale – The District will issue approximately $300 million Limited Tax Capital Improvement Bonds to fund planned<br />
infrastructure improvements and rehabilitation in the second half of 2009;<br />
• OPEB activities – the Investment Advisor will develop the Trust’s Investment Policy and purchase the initial inventory of<br />
investment funds;<br />
• Actuarial valuation of OPEB liability as of January 1, 2009 – an asset-liability modeling study to determine future cash<br />
requirements for the Trust will be included. This study is required to determine how best to invest the Trust’s assets to earn<br />
sufficient investment return to satisfy the Retiree Health Care Plan’s liability for future benefits.<br />
Accomplishments during 2008 were:<br />
• Investment Interest Income is estimated to be $32.3 million. The chart on the following page summarizes Investment<br />
Interest Income and average investment interest rates for the years 2000-2009;<br />
• The District had no exposure to volatile variable rate debt or interest rate swaps. The District terminated its last swap<br />
transaction in March 2007 when the financial conditions were favorable to exit the swap;<br />
• On December 1, 2008, the District called for redemption of $43,700,000 principal value Refunding Bonds, Series July,<br />
1997, maturities of 2010 through 2014. A required 2 percent call premium of $874,000 resulted in a cost of $44,574,000<br />
for call of the bonds. Future interest costs of $12,513,300 were avoided, and tax levies totaling $58,252,124 for future<br />
years have been abated. The call was financed with $22 million of retained interest income and other funds available in the<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Funds;<br />
• The economic downturn in the financial markets created significant new challenges for investing in short-term interestbearing<br />
investments. As of year-end, the District experienced no loss on investments.<br />
The Department’s goals and initiatives for 2009 include the following:<br />
1. Maximize investment income. Maximize investment yield on District investments while protecting principal in<br />
compliance with Investment Policy. A low interest rate environment will continue through 2009. Invest available cash<br />
balances to policy limits to earn highest positive yield without jeopardizing principal value. Develop a Certificate of<br />
Deposit purchase bidding system utilizing new SAP portal technology.<br />
2. Maximize capital financing efficiencies. Treasury will research creation of a Debt Policy that will incorporate<br />
GFOA guidelines for issuing debt. A web-based bond marketing system will be investigated for subsequent Capital<br />
Improvement Bond issuance.<br />
Work with the Information Technology Department to program the remaining legacy debt service processes and<br />
reporting in SAP. This project will include the replication of SRF loan process from Excel to within the SAP Treasury<br />
Module.<br />
115<br />
115
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
3. Maintain the District’s top-quality bond rating. As liaison to rating agencies, Treasury will work to maintain the<br />
AAA credit ratings with Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s, and Fitch. With volatile economic market conditions, it is<br />
important to establish a periodic review of key ratios used by the credit rating industry to monitor the District’s overall<br />
performance, such as, expense to fund balance ratio, change in reserve balances, etc., to satisfy their AAA rating<br />
requirements. The Treasury Section will continue to provide necessary information to keep the agencies current with<br />
the District’s major changes and initiatives.<br />
Million $<br />
$55<br />
$50<br />
$45<br />
$40<br />
39.8<br />
Investment Interest Income / Average Investment Interest Rate<br />
All Funds 2000 - 2009<br />
Investment Interest Income ($)<br />
Average Investment Interest (%)<br />
# of Investment Purchases (Thousands)<br />
46.2<br />
Interest Rate (%) and<br />
# of purchases (000)<br />
20<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
$35<br />
32.5<br />
32.3<br />
12<br />
$30<br />
$25<br />
26.7<br />
27.4<br />
10<br />
$20<br />
$15<br />
6.2<br />
15.0<br />
13.2<br />
14.5<br />
19.7<br />
5.0 5.1<br />
8<br />
6<br />
$10<br />
$5<br />
3.0 2.9<br />
3.6<br />
3.4<br />
2.9<br />
3.7<br />
2.0<br />
4.3<br />
2.7<br />
1.9<br />
3.4<br />
2.5<br />
1.7<br />
3.1<br />
2.0 2.0<br />
1.5<br />
4<br />
2<br />
$0<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Est.<br />
Proj.<br />
0<br />
Ending<br />
Investment<br />
Inventory<br />
(Par Value)<br />
$515.6 $627.5 $659.0 $720.5 $696.1 $634.5 $956.7 $810.5 $950.0 $810.0<br />
(Dollars in Millions)<br />
116<br />
116
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
11000 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. Establish policies and priorities to guide the Executive Director in meeting the District's<br />
responsibilities, insuring the protection of the environment, and the health and welfare of<br />
people in the community in the most responsive, efficient, and economical manner. $3,347,269 76.0%<br />
2. Provide cash management service to maximize investment interest return without sacrifice<br />
of principal or required liquidity measured by exceeding the benchmark 90-day Treasury bill<br />
rate and investment on average of over 99 percent of available funds. $1,057,531 24.0%<br />
Enhance the District's image in national financial markets through prudent use of debt financing<br />
for capital needs and debt service savings.<br />
Total $4,404,800 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. Maximize investment earnings by exceeding the interest rate benchmark monthly. 100% 100% 100%<br />
2. Invest 99 percent of available funds on a daily basis. 100% 100% 100%<br />
3. Maintain bank deposits processed within 24 hours of receipt at 100 percent. 100% 100% 100%<br />
4. Maintain minority broker/dealer and institutional investment participation at 30 percent 30% 30% 30%<br />
or more of portfolio.<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY:<br />
2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
7110 Legislative $2,609,537 2009 37 $3,049,869 ($61,244) (2.0)<br />
2008 37 $3,111,113<br />
7210 Treasury Activities $771,579 2009 7 $1,057,531 $38,344 3.8<br />
2008 7 $1,019,187<br />
7130 Administrative Activities $107,884 2009 1 $297,400 $150,200 102.0 a)<br />
2008 1 $147,200<br />
a) Increase due to consulting services in support of the Board of Commissioners.<br />
Totals $3,489,000 2009 45 $4,404,800 $127,300 3.0%<br />
2008 45 $4,277,500<br />
117<br />
117
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
11000 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
7110 Legislative Cost $2,609,537 $3,111,113 $3,049,869<br />
7210 Treasury Activities<br />
Investment Transactions Transactions 6,335 7,100 6,700<br />
Cost $172,000 $202,000 $192,000<br />
Cost/Transaction $27.15 $28.45 $28.66<br />
Investment Collateral Transactions Transactions 422 370 490<br />
Cost $2,000 $2,200 $2,900<br />
Cost/Transaction $4.74 $5.95 $5.92<br />
Wire Transfers and Other Transactions Units 5,610 5,200 5,650<br />
Cost $91,000 $92,000 $100,000<br />
Cost/Unit $16.22 $17.69 $17.70<br />
Receipts Processed Receipts 2,697 4,400 2,800 a)<br />
Cost $32,000 $60,000 $39,000<br />
Cost/Receipt $11.87 $13.64 $13.93<br />
Bid Deposit Transactions Transactions 914 980 1,000<br />
Cost $12,000 $15,000 $15,200<br />
Cost/Transaction $13.13 $15.31 $15.20<br />
Checks Processed Checks 19,894 20,331 20,500<br />
Cost $28,000 $35,000 $35,500<br />
Cost/Check $1.41 $1.72 $1.73<br />
Payroll Direct Deposit Transactions Transactions 52,946 52,500 54,600<br />
Cost $38,000 $42,000 $43,000<br />
Cost/Transaction $0.72 $0.80 $0.79<br />
Treasury Administration Cost $318,579 $445,987 $424,931<br />
OPEB Trust Administration Cost $0 $125,000 $125,000<br />
Direct Bond Issues/Debt Service/SRF Loan Administration Cost $78,000 $0 $80,000<br />
7130 Administrative Activities Cost $107,884 $147,200 $297,400 b)<br />
Totals $3,489,000 $4,277,500 $4,404,800<br />
a) The number of paper check deposits have decreased as more receipts are converted to ACH direct deposit to the bank.<br />
b) Increase due to consulting services in support of the Board of Commissioners.<br />
118<br />
118
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
11000 Department Board of Commissioners<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 2,891,821 $ 3,285,800 $ 3,285,800 $ 2,734,800 $ 3,285,800 $ 3,277,000 $ 3,380,100<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 9,344 67,500 92,500 91,000 60,200 69,000 64,500<br />
601080 Salaries of Nonbudgeted Employees - - - - 57,200 57,200 57,200<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 5,509 18,300 18,300 11,000 20,400 20,400 20,400<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 349,554 528,600 439,200 350,000 499,100 499,100 499,100<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 98,600 98,600 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 172,891 276,400 340,800 308,000 273,100 273,100 273,100<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,429,119 4,176,600 4,176,600 3,494,800 4,294,400 4,294,400 4,294,400<br />
612010 Travel 6,542 10,200 10,200 6,200 15,900 15,900 15,900<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 14,965 18,700 15,900 12,000 22,400 22,400 22,400<br />
612040 Postage, Freight, and Delivery Charges - 200 200 100 200 200 200<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services 558 500 1,000 800 700 700 700<br />
612210 Communication Services 81 200 200 200 100 100 100<br />
612280 Subscriptions and Membership Dues 30,002 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. - 200 2,500 2,500 1,700 1,700 1,700<br />
612820 Computer Software Maintenance 439 500 500 400 500 500 500<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. - 200 200 100 200 200 200<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 52,587 63,700 63,700 55,300 74,700 74,700 74,700<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 7,078 37,000 36,200 21,900 35,500 35,500 35,500<br />
623720 Books, Maps, and Charts - - 800 200 - - -<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 216 200 200 100 200 200 200<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 7,294 37,200 37,200 22,200 35,700 35,700 35,700<br />
TOTAL BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS $ 3,489,000 $ 4,277,500 $ 4,277,500 $ 3,572,300 $ 4,404,800 $ 4,404,800 $ 4,404,800<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
119<br />
119
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Board of Commissioners<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
012 Legislative Section<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
EX22 President 1 1 1 79,999.92 1 79,999.92<br />
EX21 Vice President 1 1 1 75,000.12 1 75,000.12<br />
EX01 Commissioner (Chairman, Committee on Finance) 1 1 1 75,000.12 1 75,000.12<br />
EX02 Commissioner 6 6 6 339,999.40 6 379,999.88<br />
EX23 Administrative Assistant to Commissioner (Secretary) #2 (EX04) 1 1 1 89,066.64 1 92,184.04<br />
EX04 Administrative Assistant to Commissioner (Secretary) 25 27 27 1,979,416.66 27 2,009,455.50<br />
TOTAL Legislative Section 35 37 37 2,638,482.86 37 2,711,639.58<br />
013 Treasury Section<br />
EX05 Treasurer 1 1 1 196,944.02 1 203,837.14<br />
HP20 Assistant Treasurer - - - 0.00 1 139,998.82<br />
HP19 Assistant Treasurer 1 1 1 122,968.30 - 0.00<br />
HP16 Treasury Analyst - 1 1 97,932.38 2 175,232.46<br />
HP15 Treasury Analyst 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
HP15 Investment Officer #2 (Treasury Analyst) - 1 1 102,831.30 - 0.00<br />
HP15 Investment Officer #4 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
HP13 Accounting Clerk III 1 2 2 154,487.84 2 152,047.22<br />
HP11 Accounting Clerk II #4 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
EX06 Secretary to Officer 1 1 1 77,243.92 1 79,947.40<br />
TOTAL Treasury Section 7 7 7 752,407.76 7 751,063.04<br />
014 Administrative Section<br />
EX03 Administrative Aide to President - 1 1 149,374.16 1 154,602.24<br />
TOTAL Administrative Section - 1 1 149,374.16 1 154,602.24<br />
TOTAL Board of Commissioners 42 45 45 3,540,264.78 45 3,617,304.86<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
120<br />
120
GENERAL<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
BOARD OF<br />
COMMISSIONERS<br />
CIVIL SERVICE<br />
BOARD<br />
TREASURY<br />
EXECUTIVE<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
GENERAL<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
MONITORING &<br />
RESEARCH<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
LAW<br />
MAINTENANCE<br />
& OPERATIONS<br />
PROCUREMENT & MATERIALS<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
INFORMATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
FINANCE<br />
ENGINEERING
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Decrease<br />
$22,835,600<br />
$29,205,000<br />
($6,369,400) Fleet Vehicles<br />
$1,967,400 8.6%<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Reprographic<br />
$1,917,917 8.4%<br />
Building Services<br />
$4,016,420 17.6%<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> & Studies<br />
$1,196,185 5.2%<br />
Affirmative Action<br />
$953,178 4.2%<br />
Environmental<br />
Assessment<br />
$813,420 3.6%<br />
Safety<br />
$2,406,684 10.5%<br />
Public Affairs<br />
$2,485,771 10.9%<br />
Executive Director<br />
$553,828 2.4%<br />
Financial Management Resources<br />
$890,697 3.9%<br />
Police<br />
$5,634,100 24.7%<br />
$35<br />
$30<br />
$25<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
Millions<br />
Equity Transfer to Abate Portion of 2006<br />
and 2007 Bond and Interest Fund Levy<br />
Automotive Fleet Unit<br />
transferred from Purchasing<br />
Department<br />
Posit ions<br />
175<br />
150<br />
125<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Automotive Fleet<br />
Unit added<br />
$20<br />
Completion of<br />
Enterprise System<br />
100<br />
t<br />
Management Analyst<br />
positions transferred to<br />
operating departments<br />
$15<br />
$10<br />
75<br />
50<br />
Additional police officer and<br />
management analyst positions<br />
transferred from the M&R and<br />
Engineering Departments to the<br />
Business Service Center<br />
$5<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
25<br />
$0<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
121<br />
121
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION<br />
15000<br />
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
143 138 146<br />
050<br />
Executive Division<br />
36 31 32<br />
051<br />
Executive Section<br />
3 3 3<br />
052<br />
Affirmative Action Section<br />
11 11 11<br />
060<br />
Management and<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Section<br />
22 17 18<br />
061<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
3 3 3<br />
065<br />
Central <strong>Budget</strong> Office &<br />
Administration Section<br />
19 14 15<br />
067<br />
Central <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Management Unit<br />
6 7 6<br />
068 (2)<br />
Business Services<br />
Unit<br />
13 7 9<br />
070<br />
Public Affairs Section<br />
7 7 9<br />
053<br />
Administrative Services<br />
Division<br />
100 100 105<br />
071<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
1 1 1<br />
054<br />
Administrative<br />
Services Section<br />
2 2 2<br />
072 (1)<br />
Information<br />
Services Unit<br />
4 4 4<br />
073<br />
Library Unit<br />
2 2 2<br />
055<br />
Safety Section<br />
14 14 14<br />
075<br />
Site Remediation<br />
Section<br />
2 2 2<br />
080<br />
Police Section<br />
64 64 72<br />
090<br />
Facilities Section<br />
18 18 15<br />
074<br />
Graphics Unit<br />
0 0 2<br />
056<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
4 4 4<br />
081<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
2 2 2<br />
091<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
2 2 3<br />
057<br />
Safety Unit<br />
10 10 10<br />
082<br />
Police Unit<br />
62 62 70<br />
092<br />
Reproduction Unit<br />
2 2 2<br />
093<br />
Automotive Fleet<br />
Unit<br />
2 2 2<br />
095<br />
Desktop Publishing<br />
Unit<br />
2 2 0<br />
096<br />
Building Services<br />
Unit<br />
5 5 5<br />
097<br />
Graphics Unit<br />
2 2 0<br />
098<br />
Mail Unit<br />
3 3 3<br />
(1) In 2009, 2 positions are funded by the Stormwater Management Fund while the operations remain in<br />
the General Administration Department.<br />
(2) In 2008, 7 Management Analyst positions were transferred to other departments – 4 positions to<br />
Engineering, 2 positions to Monitoring and Research and 1 position to Information Technology. One (1)<br />
Management Analyst position was added to Section 068 to support contract preparation.<br />
122<br />
122
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
General Administration supports the office of the Executive Director in implementing Board policies. The organization<br />
includes the Affirmative Action, <strong>Budget</strong> and Management, Site Remediation, Facilities, Police, Public Affairs, and Safety<br />
Sections.<br />
The 2009 appropriation request for General Administration is $22,835,600, a decrease of $6,369,400 or 21.8 percent from the<br />
2008 budget request. The decrease is primarily due to a 2008 equity transfer to the Bond and Interest Fund to abate a portion of<br />
the 2007 levy. The staffing requirements for the Department are 146 positions, an increase of eight positions from 2008. The<br />
increase is due to the addition of eight (8) Police Officer positions and one (1) Management Analyst II position. The Police<br />
Officer positions were added to meet the need for increased security in the North Service Area and to provide temporary<br />
positions for reorganization. The Management Analyst II position was added to provide additional administrative service to the<br />
support departments. One (1) Desktop Publisher position was dropped. There will also be an Associate Public Affairs<br />
Representative position added to the Stormwater Management Fund, reporting to the Public Affairs Manager. This position<br />
was added to support community outreach concerning “Detailed <strong>Water</strong>shed Plans” and the “<strong>Water</strong>shed Management<br />
Ordinance.” Departmental appropriations for non-salary items are projected to remain relatively stable over the next five years.<br />
Accomplishments during 2008 include:<br />
• The 2008 <strong>Budget</strong> received the 24 th consecutive Distinguished <strong>Budget</strong> Presentation award from the GFOA;<br />
• Continued improvement of security coverage of District facilities with the ongoing installation of Closed Circuit Television<br />
(CCTV) cameras with Digital Video Recording technology in critical areas;<br />
• Health and Safety award for 2007 from the Illinois Safety Council based on the reduction of lost time accidents from the<br />
previous year;<br />
• Safe Driving Award from Illinois Safety Council based on a reduction of accidents between 2006 and 2007;<br />
• Completion of Phase I of the conversion of photocopiers to electronic document management devices;<br />
• The addition of the Public Affairs Strategic Planning Committee to support the increased role of the District in proactively<br />
addressing community issues;<br />
• A risk management assessment of the overall effectiveness of the District’s management of financial, operational,<br />
contractual, and environmental risks;<br />
• Upgrades for the District’s <strong>Budget</strong> Planning Tool to increase control and reporting capabilities.<br />
New features for the 2009 budget include:<br />
• Renovation of the 4 th , 5 th and 6 th floors of the Main Office Building Complex (MOBC);<br />
• Expanded public outreach in support of Public Affairs activities including the mailing of an annual report;<br />
• Continued upgrade of video monitoring from VHS to digital;<br />
• Completion of phase two of an electronic document management system in support of Engineering and Monitoring and<br />
Research workflows;<br />
• Installation of Starcom radios for the Police Section;<br />
• Update and replacement of the print shop equipment;<br />
• Provide budget development training, and author a <strong>Budget</strong> in Brief document for the 2010 budget;<br />
• Environmental assessment of areas surrounding the wastewater treatment plants.<br />
Mission statements, primary responsibilities, major goals, and initiatives for 2009 are discussed below.<br />
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION<br />
The mission of the Administrative Services Division is to provide a safe and secure work environment for all employees,<br />
provide public education and accurate up-to-date information on the District and its mission, provide efficient and cost-effective<br />
support services to maintain the MOBC and the District fleet, and provide administrative services required by all departments to<br />
accomplish the District’s mission. The goals and initiatives of the Administrative Services Division include the following:<br />
1. Physically protect and secure District personnel, facilities, and outlying properties in a professional and costeffective<br />
manner.<br />
The primary responsibility of the Police Section is the security of District employees and facilities. In 2009, the section will<br />
continue with its program to upgrade its recording systems from VHS to Digital format. Also, Starcom radios will be added to<br />
police vehicles enabling targeted communication to local law enforcement agencies. Eight additional Police Officers will be<br />
added in support of North Service Area security. The Police Section will continue to enforce and administer breath analysis in<br />
compliance with the District's Drug-Free Workplace policy. In addition to currently certified officers, additional police officers<br />
123<br />
123
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
will be sent for State of Illinois Breath Analysis operator certification. Use of Force refresher training will be conducted. This<br />
training deals with the liability issues whenever force is used.<br />
2. Provide a safe work environment for District employees through training, accident prevention initiatives, and work<br />
place monitoring.<br />
The Safety Section is responsible for the health and safety of all District employees. The major areas of concern are safe work<br />
procedures, safe work environment, preventive health measures, life protection, accident prevention and investigations, and<br />
record keeping. In 2009, Safety Section personnel shall administer maintenance and certification of fire systems, fire pumps,<br />
fire extinguishers, fire protection equipment, and testing equipment. The Safety Section will continue to provide routine safety<br />
training programs such as defibrillator training, CPR, traffic safety, confined space entry, and lead/asbestos awareness. Lead,<br />
asbestos, mercury, and other chemical clean-ups will continue to be the responsibility of the Safety Section.<br />
3. Provide environmental condition assessment, risk reduction, site remediation, and hazardous materials handling<br />
and disposal services at District Facilities and on District-owned properties.<br />
The Site Remediation Section (SRS) will continue to assess the environmental condition of various District properties as their<br />
primary responsibility. The Site Remediation staff's first priority is to assess the condition of District properties where current<br />
leases are expiring. In addition, the SRS, with the assistance of outside environmental consultants, performs environmental site<br />
inspections at some District-owned leased properties regardless of lease status. It is in the District’s best interest to ascertain the<br />
environmental condition of all of its leased properties as far in advance as possible of the expiration of the leases. The ongoing<br />
goal of Site Remediation continues to be documenting when and where the District’s property has been environmentally<br />
contaminated by the current tenant’s operations and then working with the Law Department to ensure that the responsible<br />
tenant completely remediate their leased District property, in a timely manner, to the District’s standards and satisfaction. The<br />
Site Remediation staff will continue to be available on an as-needed basis to assist the District’s other Departments in resolving<br />
site contamination, environmental compliance, and hazardous waste handling and disposal issues that arise on various District<br />
projects and at various District facilities and properties.<br />
4. Operate and maintain the Main Office Buildings to provide a functional and cost-effective office environment for<br />
assigned staff and to provide fleet services for all District vehicles in an efficient and cost-effective manner.<br />
The Facilities Section is responsible for the maintenance and operation of the MOBC and the District fleet. Major projects<br />
scheduled in 2009 for the MOBC include: rehabilitation of 2 chillers, upgrade and replace print shop equipment, and the<br />
renovation of the 4 th , 5 th , and 6 th floors of the McMillan Pavilion. In 2009, the Automotive Fleet Unit will continue with the<br />
fleet maintenance service contract. Also, fleet management will have a continued emphasis on investing in energy efficient<br />
technology where feasible.<br />
PUBLIC AFFAIRS SECTION<br />
The Public Affairs Section provides public and employee understanding of District functions and activities through media,<br />
publications, responses to public inquiries, tours, events, and employee newsletters. The Public Affairs staff prepares regular<br />
news releases to keep the public informed about the work of the District, and provides speakers to schools and community<br />
groups. Additionally, the Public Affairs staff processes the District’s responses to more than 600 questions submitted annually<br />
under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The Public Affairs staff assists other departments with special events, such as<br />
groundbreaking ceremonies and the multi-yearly Household Hazardous Waste Collection Days. When foreign dignitaries or<br />
professionals come to the District, Public Affairs coordinates their visits. In 2009, the Public Affairs Section plans to have<br />
targeted mailing of the District’s Annual Report and coordinate the activities of the Public Affairs Strategic Planning<br />
Committee. The District’s Technical Library processes all requests for books, subscriptions, and memberships, and oversees the<br />
District’s Records Management Program. The Library unit has implemented a plan to outsource the storage of inactive records<br />
to provide a more efficient and safer method of records storage. In 2009, the Library Unit will supervise the phase two of a<br />
District-wide electronic document management system in support of the Engineering and Monitoring and Research<br />
Departments.<br />
MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET SECTION<br />
The mission of the Management and <strong>Budget</strong> Section is to prepare an annual budget to provide fiscal means and policies that<br />
enable the District to protect the health and safety of the public in its service area, protect the quality of the water supply source<br />
(Lake Michigan), improve the quality of water in watercourses in its service area, protect businesses and homes from flood<br />
damage, and manage water as a vital resource for its service area.<br />
124<br />
124
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Provide efficient and cost-effective business services to all Departments in support of the overall District mission.<br />
The Management and <strong>Budget</strong> Section will continue to plan and monitor revenue and expenditures to ensure compliance with<br />
tax cap limitations and facilitate good financial management. In 2009, the Business Service Center will add one additional<br />
Management Analyst II in service of the support departments.<br />
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SECTION<br />
The mission of the Affirmative Action Section is to ensure that minority, women, and small businesses are given equal<br />
opportunity to participate in the performance of the District’s construction program and professional service contracts in excess<br />
of $100,000, in accordance with case law and the District’s policies. Affirmative Action Section goals include the following:<br />
Meet or exceed the participation targets established by the Board of Commissioners and establish better communication<br />
with other departments and our vendors.<br />
The Affirmative Action Section maintained the growth and improvement of the Protected Class Enterprise (PCE) vendor list in<br />
2008. Other planned improvements include the posting of the District’s Advisory Council and support of a Business Diversity<br />
Resource Hotline. The PCE vendor list has been made available via a searchable database on the District’s Internet site. The<br />
Section will continue to administer this program in 2009, which ensures that bona fide minority, women, and small businesses<br />
are given an equal opportunity to participate in the performance of District<br />
construction and consultant contracts. The Affirmative Action Staff will be<br />
providing assistance for the year 2009 as a member of the Chicago Minority<br />
Business Development Council, Minority Enterprise Development Week<br />
activities, the Women’s Business and Buyers Mart, and the Chicago Business<br />
Opportunity Fair. These activities along with active participation with the<br />
District Affirmative Action Advisory Council foster the creation, growth, and<br />
expansion of minority, women and small businesses. The Section also<br />
continues to implement the District’s “Apprenticeship Training Program” by<br />
assigning a goal of total training hours to be accomplished by minority and<br />
female apprentices in the building trades on District construction contracts<br />
which are labor intensive.<br />
The <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago has a long<br />
standing commitment to ensure that minority, women, and small businesses<br />
are given equal opportunity to participate in the performance of District<br />
construction contracts. The District’s initial affirmative action program,<br />
enacted in 1977, was the first program in the metropolitan area. In 1993, the<br />
District adopted a Special Provisions for Apprenticeship Ordinance to ensure<br />
opportunities for training minority and female apprentices in the building<br />
trades on the District’s construction contracts. This program further<br />
demonstrates the District’s commitment to the principles of fairness and<br />
equality.<br />
The Special Provisions for Apprenticeship Ordinance has created<br />
opportunities for minorities and females to engage in certified apprentice<br />
programs while gainfully employed on District construction contracts. These<br />
contracts have been selected based on the trades involved and volume of<br />
estimated trade hours. More than 293,000 minority and female apprentice<br />
hours of occupational training have been accomplished since the Board of<br />
Commissioners adopted this Ordinance. The Ordinance provides for a socially<br />
responsible approach to the employment growth of our community.<br />
Since the program began in 1977, over $720 million in subcontract awards to<br />
minority businesses have been made and over $297 million to women-owned<br />
businesses. The program applies to construction and consultant contracts cost<br />
estimates exceed $100,000.<br />
Since adoption of the Affirmative Action Ordinance in 1977, the Board has<br />
amended the Ordinance frequently to reflect changes in the utilization goals<br />
based upon the market availability of PCEs. Revisions have also been made to<br />
enhance the effectiveness of monitoring contract compliance.<br />
In 2007 the Board of Commissioners adopted a revised Affirmative Action<br />
Ordinance, Appendix D. The most significant changes were as follows: The<br />
small business size standard was increased from $17 million to $31 million;<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
15%<br />
12%<br />
9%<br />
6%<br />
3%<br />
0%<br />
35%<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
Minority Business Enterprises<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007 3rd Qtr.<br />
2008<br />
Women Business Enterprises<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007 3rd Qtr.<br />
2008<br />
Small Business Enterprises<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007 3rd Qtr.<br />
2008<br />
Graphs above reflect the percentage of<br />
participation in construction and consulting<br />
contracts with cost estimates exceeding $100,000.<br />
125<br />
125
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
compliance requirements and penalties for noncompliance were strengthened; bids that exceed the allowable supplier exception<br />
amount will be deemed non-responsive; and additional race and gender neutral measures were included.<br />
The Ordinance includes certain standards enunciated in the Supreme Court decision in City of Richmond v. Croson. The<br />
District was the first major Cook County government to adopt an affirmative action ordinance following the ruling. In 1998,<br />
the United States Environmental Protection Agency recognized the District’s affirmative action annual study to compile and<br />
analyze data for PCE goal availability, which is a fundamental standard for establishing affirmative action goals. The goals set<br />
for general contracting are 20 percent for minority, 10 percent for women, and 10 percent for small business participation. In<br />
accordance with the Affirmative Action Ordinance, when minority or women owned businesses meet the criteria for small<br />
business enterprises, their respective awards may be counted towards the attainment of goals established for Small Business<br />
Enterprises. The charts illustrate the success of the affirmative action program through the third quarter of 2008. The third<br />
quarter numbers represent an estimate based upon first and second quarter actuals.<br />
A comprehensive reorganization of the PCE vendor list was conducted in 1998. The purpose of this effort was to develop a list<br />
that designates only businesses that are in fact PCEs. The District lists as a PCE only those companies that have provided a<br />
copy of a City of Chicago certification letter issued within the prior year, and/or those firms which have been reviewed and<br />
approved by the District as a PCE in the prior two years. Non-certified PCEs currently on the District’s vendor list are being<br />
encouraged to obtain a City of Chicago certification.<br />
Construction & Consulting Contracts 2004 2005 2006 2007 3rd Qtr. 2008<br />
Minority Business Enterprises $22,176,011 $30,170,332 $48,498,346 $15,455,427 $41,124,176<br />
Women Business Enterprises $11,295,165 $11,013,594 $25,293,947 $7,794,445 $18,649,399<br />
Small Business Enterprises $29,830,996 $38,817,093 $40,548,450 $16,370,952 $61,077,244<br />
Total Contract Bid Amounts $136,202,409 $135,279,827 $272,871,958 $70,670,640 $226,971,470<br />
126<br />
126
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
15000 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. Physically protect and secure District personnel, facilities, and outlying properties through access control,<br />
police patrol, and proactive crime prevention. $5,634,100 24.7%<br />
2. Provide a safe work environment for District employees through training, accident prevention initiatives, and<br />
workplace monitoring. $2,406,684 10.5%<br />
3. Carry out the policies established by the elected Board of Commissioners for the protection of the water<br />
environment of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago. $553,828 2.4%<br />
4. Reach participation goals established by the Board of Commissioners for MBE (Minority Business Enterprise),<br />
WBE (Women Business Enterprise), and SBE (Small Business Enterprise) for construction and professional<br />
services contracts. $953,178 4.2%<br />
5. Prepare and administer the District's annual <strong>Budget</strong> to be used as a Policy, Financial, Operations, and<br />
Communications plan in the furtherance of the District's mission and statutory requirements. $982,047 4.3%<br />
6. Operate and maintain the Main Office Buildings to provide a functional and cost-effective office environment<br />
for assigned staff. $4,016,420 17.6%<br />
7. Inspect and evaluate District properties for compliance with United States Environmental Protection Agency<br />
(USEPA) and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) requirements. $813,420 3.6%<br />
8. Provide public understanding of District functions and activities through media, publications, responses to<br />
public inquiries, tours, and employee newsletters. $2,485,771 10.9%<br />
9. Provide centralized financial management services to support departments so they may accomplish<br />
their objectives through effective budget preparation and administration. $890,697 3.9%<br />
10. Provide fleet management services by administering the operation, maintenance, repair, and procurement of<br />
the District's fleet. $1,967,400 8.6%<br />
11. Reproduce and distribute materials used for the District's internal and external communications and records<br />
purposes in a timely, efficient, and cost-effective manner. $1,917,917 8.4%<br />
12. Perform organization and management research studies and compliance audits to evaluate the District's various<br />
business activities for cost saving opportunities and compliance with legal mandates and those established by<br />
the Board of Commissioners. $214,138 0.9%<br />
Total $22,835,600 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. Reduce the number of annual disability claims related to back injury through employee safety training.<br />
Claim dollars related to back claims $212,000 $215,000 $215,000<br />
Disability days related to back injuries 872 890 890<br />
Number of back injury claims 33 28 28<br />
127<br />
127
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
15000 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
7340 Security of Plants and Property $5,147,465 2009 73 $5,634,100 $401,632 7.7 a)<br />
2008 65 $5,232,468<br />
7480 Safety Program $1,536,226 2009 14 $2,406,684 $204,560 9.3 b)<br />
2008 14 $2,202,124<br />
7100 Office of the Executive Director $482,945 2009 3 $536,205 $22,498 4.4<br />
2008 3 $513,707<br />
7110 Legislative $43,265 2009 0 $17,623 $623 3.7<br />
2008 0 $17,000<br />
7210 Treasury Activities $9,270,000 2009 0 $0 $0 0.0<br />
2008 0 $0<br />
7251 MWRDGC <strong>Budget</strong> Preparation $827,812 2009 7 $803,327 ($9,365,401) (92.1) c)<br />
2008 7 $10,168,728<br />
7470 Affirmative Action $851,941 2009 11 $953,178 ($632) (0.1)<br />
2008 11 $953,810<br />
7368 Real Estate Environmental Assessment $581,640 2009 2 $813,420 $31,313 4.0<br />
2008 2 $782,107<br />
7240 Public Information $1,141,936 2009 7 $2,485,771 $737,335 42.2 d)<br />
2008 7 $1,748,436<br />
7460 Main Office Complex Building Services $2,662,239 2009 10 $4,016,420 $574,965 16.7 e)<br />
2008 10 $3,441,455<br />
7490 Automotive Fleet Operations $736,643 2009 2 $1,967,400 $334,100 20.5 f)<br />
2008 2 $1,633,300<br />
7255 Services for Operating Departments $629,800 2009 0 $0 $0 0.0<br />
2008 0 $0<br />
7253 Services for Support Departments $735,388 2009 9 $890,697 $91,115 11.4<br />
2008 8 $799,582<br />
7254 Enterprise Systems $55,593 2009 1 $178,720 $40,825 29.6 g)<br />
2008 1 $137,895<br />
7220 Reprographic Services $905,111 2009 6 $1,917,917 $609,355 46.6 h)<br />
2008 7 $1,308,562<br />
7252 Organization and Management Studies $98,798 2009 1 $214,138 ($51,688) (19.4) i)<br />
2008 1 $265,826<br />
Totals $25,706,802 2009 146 $22,835,600 ($6,369,400) (21.8%)<br />
2008 138 $29,205,000<br />
a) Increase includes purchase of Starcom radios $200,000 and the addition of eight (8) Police Officers to meet minimum staffing requirements.<br />
b) Increase due to Main Office Building fire alarm system, $300,000, Lockport Fire Alarm System, $40,000.<br />
c) Decrease due to 2008 equity transfer, $9,475,000.<br />
d) Increase due to strategic communication services, $150,000, annual report fullfillment services, $500,000.<br />
e) Renovate 4th, 5th, and 6th floors McMillan Pavilion, $400,000, Rebuild chillers, $70,000.<br />
f) New additions to the fleet to support operations.<br />
g) Increase includes SAP configuration upgrade, $40,000.<br />
h) Increase due to upgrade and replacement of print shop equipment, $585,600.<br />
i) Decrease due to completion of Phase l of risk assessment for the District, $75,000.<br />
128<br />
128
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
15000 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
7100 Office of the Executive Director Cost $482,945 $513,707 $536,205<br />
7110 Legislative Cost $43,265 $17,000 $17,623<br />
7210 Treasury Activities Cost $9,270,000 $0 $0<br />
7220 Reprographic Services<br />
7224 Consult, Design, and Prepare Graphics Cost $164,383 $181,590 $199,217<br />
7221 Copy and Print # of Impressions 10,750,000 8,500,000 8,500,000<br />
Cost $613,821 $1,007,500 $1,706,900 a)<br />
Cost/Impression $0.06 $0.12 $0.20<br />
7223 Typesetting Services (Includes Board Proceedings) # of Pages 21,000 23,700 23,700<br />
Cost $126,907 $119,472 $11,800 b)<br />
Cost/Page $6.04 $5.04 $0.50<br />
7240 Public Information<br />
7247 Internal Public Information:<br />
MWRD News # of Editions 4 4 4<br />
Cost $53,694 $46,748 $46,748<br />
Cost/Edition $13,424 $11,687 $11,687<br />
Inter-Departmental Support Cost $156,703 $230,260 $189,430 c)<br />
7248 External Public Information:<br />
Respond to Public Inquiries; Furnish Public Information # of Responses 14,726 14,800 1,972,000<br />
Pamphlets; Respond to FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) Cost $115,703 $103,454 $794,664 d)<br />
Requests Cost/Response $7.86 $6.99 $0.40<br />
Coordinate MWRD Communications with Public, Civic, Social, # of Contacts 25,158 25,200 300,000<br />
and School Groups Cost $57,567 $71,600 $105,500 e)<br />
Cost/Contact $2.29 $2.84 $0.35<br />
Monitor Public Hearings, Board Meetings, News Clips, Media; Cost $23,359 $39,391 $43,500<br />
Issue Press Releases<br />
Special Public Events Cost $18,549 $23,100 $48,500 f)<br />
7249 Library, Subscriptions, and Memberships Cost $716,361 $1,233,883 $1,257,429<br />
7250 <strong>Budget</strong> Preparation and Management Studies<br />
7251 MWRD <strong>Budget</strong> Preparation, Monitoring, Administration Cost $827,812 $10,168,728 $803,327 g)<br />
7252 Organization and Management Studies Cost $98,798 $265,826 $214,138 h)<br />
7253 Prepare, Monitor, Administer Support Department <strong>Budget</strong>s Cost $735,388 $799,582 $890,697<br />
7254 Enterprise System Cost $55,593 $137,895 $178,720 i)<br />
7255 Prepare, Monitor, Administer Operating Department <strong>Budget</strong>s Cost $629,800 $0 $0<br />
a) Increase due to upgrade and replacement of print shop equipment, $585,600.<br />
b) Desktop Publisher position dropped.<br />
c) Decrease due to staff reallocation.<br />
d) Increase due to strategic communication services, $150,000, annual report fullfillment services, $500,000.<br />
e) Increase due to the development of childrens DVD, $25,000.<br />
f) Increase public recognition $25,000.<br />
g) Decrease due to 2008 equity transfer, $9,475,000.<br />
h) Decrease due to completion of Phase l of risk assessment for the District, $75,000.<br />
i) Increase includes SAP configuration upgrade, $40,000.<br />
129<br />
129
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
15000 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
7340 Security of Plants and Property<br />
Patrol of District Facilities # of Miles 85,000 84,806 118,047<br />
Cost $1,100,576 $985,458 $985,458<br />
Cost/Mile $12.95 $11.62 $8.35<br />
Patrol of District Real Estate # of Miles 265,000 264,734 319,640<br />
Cost $2,686,819 $2,754,602 $3,156,234 j)<br />
Cost/Mile $10.14 $10.41 $9.87<br />
Access Control to Facilities # of Hours 54,000 66,032 62,374<br />
Cost $1,360,070 $1,492,408 $1,492,408<br />
Cost/Hour $25.19 $22.60 $23.93<br />
7368 Real Estate Environmental Assessment Cost $581,640 $782,107 $813,420<br />
7460 Main Office Complex Building Services<br />
7461 Annual Operation and Maintenance (Cost per square foot per year) Area (Sq. Ft.) 180,040 180,040 180,040<br />
Cost $1,579,519 $1,766,600 $1,766,600<br />
Cost/Square Ft. $8.77 $9.81 $9.81<br />
Nonrecurring MOB Purchases and Repairs Cost $597,288 $1,150,400 $1,663,932 k)<br />
7462 Construction Design Cost $35,536 $35,100 $59,400<br />
7463 Collect and Distribute Mail # of Pieces 1,200,000 1,259,300 1,259,300<br />
Cost $376,651 $401,500 $447,893<br />
Cost/Piece $0.31 $0.32 $0.36<br />
7464 Telephone Switchboard Operations at MOB Cost $73,245 $87,855 $78,595<br />
7470 Affirmative Action<br />
7471 Contract Compliance Cost $416,706 $439,674 $432,511<br />
7472 Community Activity Cost $257,238 $294,212 $295,452<br />
7473 Affirmative Action Support Cost $177,997 $219,924 $225,215<br />
7480 Safety Program<br />
Total OSHA Compliance as detailed below: Cost $409,093 $828,184 $692,744<br />
Asbestos Abatement Cost $77,756 $82,259 $82,259<br />
New Safety Equipment Cost $95,414 $285,459 $285,459<br />
Replacement Safety Equipment Cost $93,029 $140,790 $140,790<br />
Safety Equipment Maintenance Cost $102,802 $281,243 $145,803 l)<br />
Lead Abatement Cost $40,092 $38,433 $38,433<br />
OSHA Inspections Cost $672,323 $902,717 $902,717<br />
First Aid Assistance Cost $115,257 $128,000 $128,000<br />
j) Increase includes purchase of Starcom radios, $200,000, and the addition of eight (8) Police Officers to meet minimum staffing requirements.<br />
k) Renovate 4th, 5th, and 6th floors McMillan Pavilion, $400,000, Rebuild chillers, $70,000.<br />
l) Decrease due to Escape Pack Contract, $57,000, and a Safety Environmental Assessment, $90,000.<br />
130<br />
130
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
15000 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
Safety Training:<br />
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and First Aid Training People Trained 310 127 127<br />
Cost $19,889 $17,500 $17,500<br />
Cost/Trainee $64.16 $137.80 $137.80<br />
Confined Spaces Training People Trained 245 240 240<br />
Cost $19,839 $23,000 $23,000<br />
Cost/Trainee $80.98 $95.83 $95.83<br />
Lockout/Tagout Training People Trained 255 322 150 m)<br />
Cost $8,967 $7,850 $7,850<br />
Cost/Trainee $35.16 $24.38 $52.33<br />
Industrial Hygiene/Right to Know Training People Trained 350 1,000 1,000<br />
Cost $9,820 $12,900 $12,900<br />
Cost/Trainee $28.06 $12.90 $12.90<br />
General Safety Training People Trained 8,950 13,100 12,500<br />
Cost $164,736 $173,000 $173,000<br />
Cost/Trainee $18.41 $13.21 $13.84<br />
Medical Health Surveillance:<br />
Hearing Test People Tested 210 660 200<br />
Cost $16,023 $11,900 $11,900 n)<br />
Cost/Test $76.30 $18.03 $59.50<br />
Spirometry Test People Tested 70 40 40<br />
Cost $15,217 $8,356 $8,356<br />
Cost/Test $217.39 $208.90 $208.90<br />
Fire Prevention/Protection Improvements Cost $6,811 $10,000 $350,000 o)<br />
Safety Management Administration:<br />
Contract Reviews for Compliance with Safety Standards, and # of Reviews 175 180 180<br />
Accident Investigations Cost $33,513 $38,403 $38,403<br />
Cost/Review $191.50 $213.35 $213.35<br />
Accident Report Reviews for Avoidance of Repeat Accidents # of Reviews 165 215 215<br />
Cost $34,800 $28,814 $28,814<br />
Cost/Review $210.91 $134.02 $134.02<br />
Environmental Studies Planning & Implementation Cost $9,938 $11,500 $11,500<br />
7490 Automotive Fleet Operations<br />
7491 Automotive Fleet Procurement Cost $6,591 $806,800 $1,173,000 p)<br />
7496 Automotive Fleet Disposal Cost $6,591 $6,800 $7,000<br />
7499 Automotive Fleet Operations Cost $723,461 $819,700 $787,400<br />
Totals $25,706,802 $29,205,000 $22,835,600<br />
m) Reduction due to normal fluctuation in number of employees trained.<br />
n) Cost of hearing mobile services is fixed regardless of number of employees tested.<br />
o) Increase due to Main Office Building fire alarm system, $300,000, Lockport Powerhouse Alarm, $40,000.<br />
p) New additions to the fleet to support operations.<br />
131<br />
131
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
15000 Department General Administration<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 10,417,205 $ 10,598,300 $ 10,368,300 $ 9,972,400 $ 10,732,500 $ 10,724,900 $ 11,050,700<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 1,186,915 700,100 910,100 871,000 688,200 695,800 699,700<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 74,236 84,200 84,200 35,000 110,700 110,700 110,700<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 351,731 810,700 665,700 555,000 1,209,700 1,209,700 1,182,700<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 325,300 325,300 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 199,592 149,600 169,600 153,000 149,600 149,600 149,600<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 12,229,679 12,342,900 12,197,900 11,586,400 13,216,000 13,216,000 13,193,400<br />
612010 Travel 8,344 24,350 21,850 10,000 27,000 27,000 27,000<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 39,846 52,300 47,300 40,000 53,300 53,300 53,300<br />
612040 Postage, Freight, and Delivery Charges 184,537 210,800 235,800 235,000 241,100 241,100 241,100<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 20,633 19,600 31,600 29,000 16,800 16,800 16,800<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services 160,455 183,400 183,400 175,000 198,300 198,300 198,300<br />
612090 Reprographic Services 82,493 123,800 123,800 87,000 123,600 123,600 123,600<br />
612150 Electrical Energy 365,880 469,500 469,500 469,500 684,000 684,000 684,000<br />
612160 Natural Gas 44,835 60,500 60,500 40,000 60,500 60,500 60,500<br />
612170 <strong>Water</strong> and <strong>Water</strong> Services 3,060 3,400 3,900 3,000 3,400 3,400 3,400<br />
612210 Communication Services 3,235 4,500 4,500 4,000 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
612280 Subscriptions and Membership Dues 400,504 441,500 441,500 404,500 417,200 417,200 417,200<br />
612330 Rental Charges 27,486 36,400 56,400 25,000 37,900 37,900 37,900<br />
612370 Administration Building Operation 768,439 783,500 783,500 723,500 845,900 845,900 843,700<br />
612390 Administration Building Annex Operation 588,865 669,900 684,900 649,900 618,600 618,600 616,400<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 207,152 219,550 284,550 280,000 760,900 760,900 760,900<br />
612520 Waste Material Disposal Charges 71,676 97,800 97,800 43,800 116,400 116,400 116,400<br />
612680 Repairs to Buildings 21,146 427,300 367,300 110,000 681,400 681,400 681,400<br />
612780 Safety Repairs and Services 79,705 401,100 376,100 210,000 551,200 551,200 551,200<br />
612800 Repairs to Office Furniture and Equipment 167,733 234,100 234,100 200,000 253,100 253,100 253,100<br />
612820 Computer Software Maintenance 1,905 24,400 24,400 6,500 4,200 4,200 4,200<br />
612840 Communications Equipment Maintenance<br />
(Includes Software) - - - - 25,000 25,000 25,000<br />
132<br />
132
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
15000 Department General Administration<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
612860 Repairs to Vehicle Equipment 440,312 482,900 482,900 452,900 464,300 464,300 464,300<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. 2,291 5,700 5,700 5,000 6,200 6,200 6,200<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,690,532 4,976,300 5,021,300 4,203,600 6,195,300 6,195,300 6,190,900<br />
623070 Electrical Parts and Supplies 8,971 12,000 12,000 11,000 12,900 12,900 12,900<br />
623090 Plumbing Accessories and Supplies 1,894 4,000 7,000 6,000 5,800 5,800 5,800<br />
623110 Hardware 7,335 12,200 12,200 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000<br />
623130 Buildings, Grounds, Paving Materials, and<br />
Supplies - 1,600 3,600 3,400 2,200 2,200 2,200<br />
623270 Mechanical Repair Parts 120 - - - - - -<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 179,856 214,600 214,600 200,000 261,700 261,700 261,700<br />
623700 Wearing Apparel 23,698 47,500 47,500 45,000 49,300 49,300 49,300<br />
623720 Books, Maps, and Charts 42,614 40,000 40,000 36,000 40,000 40,000 40,000<br />
623780 Safety and Medical Supplies 111,792 237,500 237,500 137,500 171,600 171,600 171,600<br />
623800 Computer Software 6,599 254,100 21,500 13,600 289,000 289,000 289,000<br />
623810 Computer Supplies 23,455 129,500 57,100 15,000 134,500 134,500 134,500<br />
623850 Communications Supplies - - - - 200,000 200,000 200,000<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 22,649 112,800 112,800 102,800 93,800 93,800 120,800<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 428,983 1,065,800 765,800 582,300 1,272,800 1,272,800 1,299,800<br />
634800 Office Furniture and Equipment 69,097 400,000 400,000 340,000 975,500 975,500 975,500<br />
634820 Computer Software - 35,000 35,000 34,600 - - -<br />
634860 Vehicle Equipment - 900,000 1,800,000 1,550,000 1,166,000 1,166,000 1,166,000<br />
634990 Machinery and Equipment, N.O.C. 18,511 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 10,000<br />
400 TOTAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 87,608 1,345,000 2,245,000 1,924,600 2,151,500 2,151,500 2,151,500<br />
667020 Equity Transfer 9,270,000 9,475,000 9,475,000 3,700,000 - - -<br />
700 TOTAL FIXED AND OTHER CHARGES 9,270,000 9,475,000 9,475,000 3,700,000 - - -<br />
TOTAL GENERAL ADMINISTRATION $ 25,706,802 $ 29,205,000 $ 29,705,000 $ 21,996,900 $ 22,835,600 $ 22,835,600 $ 22,835,600<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
133<br />
133
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: General Administration<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
050 Executive Division<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
051 Executive Section<br />
EX07 Executive Director - - - - 1 254,797.40<br />
EX07 General Superintendent 1 1 1 246,181.00 - -<br />
EX06 Secretary to Officer 2 2 2 169,650.52 2 175,588.40<br />
TOTAL Executive Section 3 3 3 415,831.52 3 430,385.80<br />
052 Affirmative Action Section<br />
HP18 Affirmative Action Program Administrator 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 123,509.62<br />
HP16 Senior Compliance Officer 2 2 2 204,716.98 2 184,395.12<br />
HP15 Compliance Officer 3 5 5 405,715.70 5 406,851.12<br />
HP15 Compliance Officer (AC) 1 - - - - -<br />
HP13 Assistant Compliance Officer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 2 2 2 92,477.32 2 95,713.54<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist (AC) 1 1 1 42,778.32 1 44,275.66<br />
TOTAL Affirmative Action Section 11 11 11 874,992.30 11 854,745.06<br />
060 Management and <strong>Budget</strong> Section<br />
061 Administrative Unit<br />
HP21 Administrative Services Manager 1 1 1 140,014.68 1 152,547.98<br />
HP20 <strong>Budget</strong> Officer 1 1 1 121,390.36 1 139,998.82<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 52,251.68 1 56,570.54<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 3 3 3 313,656.72 3 349,117.34<br />
065 Central <strong>Budget</strong> Office and Administration Section<br />
067 Central <strong>Budget</strong> Management Unit<br />
HP18 Management Analyst IV 1 1 1 99,391.76 1 113,191.00<br />
HP17 Management Analyst III 3 3 3 313,939.86 3 329,775.94<br />
HP15 Management Analyst II - 1 1 72,728.50 1 92,693.38<br />
HP13 Management Analyst I 2 2 2 154,487.84 1 60,328.06<br />
TOTAL Central <strong>Budget</strong> Management Unit 6 7 7 640,547.96 6 595,988.38<br />
134<br />
134
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: General Administration<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
068 Business Service Center Unit<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP18 Management Analyst IV 3 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
HP17 Management Analyst III 2 2 2 229,587.54 2 232,775.14<br />
HP17 Management Analyst III (AC) 2 - - - - -<br />
HP15 Management Analyst II 3 2 2 183,325.22 3 256,304.36<br />
HP15 Management Analyst II #1 1 - - - - -<br />
HP13 Management Analyst I 1 1 1 62,078.12 2 132,427.10<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 71,011.72 1 73,497.06<br />
TOTAL Business Service Center Unit 13 7 7 675,306.58 9 828,833.20<br />
TOTAL Central <strong>Budget</strong> Office and Administration Section 19 14 14 1,315,854.54 15 1,424,821.58<br />
TOTAL Management and <strong>Budget</strong> Section 22 17 17 1,629,511.26 18 1,773,938.92<br />
TOTAL Executive Division 36 31 31 2,920,335.08 32 3,059,069.78<br />
070 Public Affairs Section<br />
071 Administrative Unit<br />
HP18 Manager of Public Affairs - - - - 1 97,711.12<br />
HP17 Manager of Public Affairs - 1 1 79,669.20 - -<br />
HP17 Public Information Coordinator 1 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 1 1 1 79,669.20 1 97,711.12<br />
072 Information Services Unit (* Number of positions now budgeted and funded by the Stormwater Management Fund appear below position count)<br />
HP14<br />
Community Education Specialist #2 (Associate Public Information<br />
Representative)<br />
1 1 1 82,778.80 1 85,675.98<br />
HP14 Associate Public Information Representative - - - - - -<br />
(*1)<br />
HP13 Assistant Public Information Representative 2 2 2 143,113.62 2 152,047.22<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 37,963.12 1 37,146.20<br />
TOTAL Information Services Unit 4 4 4 263,855.54 4 274,869.40<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*1) (*1) (*1) (*2)<br />
073 Library Unit<br />
HP16 Records and Library Supervisor 1 1 1 97,932.38 1 101,359.96<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 49,847.20 1 39,143.00<br />
TOTAL Library Unit 2 2 2 147,779.58 2 140,502.96<br />
135<br />
135
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: General Administration<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
074 Graphics Unit<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP15 Graphic Coordinator - - - - 1 101,402.60<br />
HP13 Graphic Artist - - - - 1 68,175.38<br />
TOTAL Graphics Unit - - - - 2 169,577.98<br />
TOTAL Public Affairs Section 7 7 7 651,355.90 9 682,661.46<br />
053 Administrative Services Division<br />
054 Administrative Services Section<br />
HP23 Deputy Director of Maintenance and Operations - - - - 1 217,850.62<br />
HP23 Deputy Chief Engineer 1 1 1 210,483.78 - -<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 1 1 67,746.38 1 59,981.22<br />
TOTAL Administrative Services Section 2 2 2 278,230.16 2 277,831.84<br />
055 Safety Section<br />
056 Administrative Unit<br />
HP18 Safety Manager 1 1 1 124,318.74 1 128,669.84<br />
HP17 Senior Safety Coordinator 1 1 1 107,768.44 1 116,388.22<br />
HP15 Safety Coordinator 1 1 1 93,766.40 1 97,048.12<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 52,251.68 1 54,080.52<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 4 4 4 378,105.26 4 396,186.70<br />
057 Safety Unit<br />
HP15 Safety Coordinator 3 3 3 268,675.16 3 265,015.40<br />
HP13 Safety Inspector 6 6 6 429,341.12 6 409,052.54<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 71,011.72 1 76,875.50<br />
TOTAL Safety Unit 10 10 10 769,028.00 10 750,943.44<br />
TOTAL Safety Section 14 14 14 1,147,133.26 14 1,147,130.14<br />
090 Facilities Section<br />
091 Administrative Unit<br />
HP17 Facilities Administrator #4 1 1 1 117,135.20 1 121,234.88<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant - - - - 1 76,875.50<br />
136<br />
136
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: General Administration<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 57,062.46 1 59,059.52<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 2 2 2 174,197.66 3 257,169.90<br />
092 Reproduction Unit<br />
HP14 Chief Printing Press Operator 1 1 1 90,839.58 1 94,018.86<br />
HP12 Printing Press Operator I 1 1 1 67,746.38 1 70,117.58<br />
TOTAL Reproduction Unit 2 2 2 158,585.96 2 164,136.44<br />
093 Automotive Fleet Unit<br />
HP15 Automotive Fleet Supervisor 1 1 1 85,349.94 1 88,337.08<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 49,847.20 1 51,591.80<br />
TOTAL Automotive Fleet Unit 2 2 2 135,197.14 2 139,928.88<br />
095 Desktop Publishing Unit<br />
HP11 Composer Typist II #2 (Desktop Publisher) 1 - - - - -<br />
HP11 Desktop Publisher - 1 1 59,249.32 - -<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 42,630.12 - -<br />
TOTAL Desktop Publishing Unit 2 2 2 101,879.44 - -<br />
096 Building Services Unit<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 1 1 1 82,778.80 1 85,675.98<br />
HP11 Motor Vehicle Dispatcher Supervisor 1 1 1 62,043.28 1 64,214.80<br />
HP09 Motor Vehicle Dispatcher 1 1 1 42,108.56 1 43,582.24<br />
HP08 Telephone Operator 1 1 1 32,638.58 1 35,668.36<br />
HP08 Telephone Operator #4 1 1 1 40,793.74 1 42,221.40<br />
TOTAL Building Services Unit 5 5 5 260,362.96 5 271,362.78<br />
097 Graphics Unit<br />
HP15 Graphic Coordinator 1 1 1 97,973.46 - -<br />
HP13 Graphic Artist 1 1 1 62,078.12 - -<br />
TOTAL Graphics Unit 2 2 2 160,051.58 - -<br />
098 Mail Unit<br />
HP11 Mail Clerk II #4 1 - - - - -<br />
137<br />
137
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: General Administration<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP11 Mail Clerk II - 1 1 64,836.20 1 67,105.48<br />
HP09 Senior Clerk #2 (Courier) 2 2 2 94,580.46 2 97,890.78<br />
TOTAL Mail Unit 3 3 3 159,416.66 3 164,996.26<br />
TOTAL Facilities Section 18 18 18 1,149,691.40 15 997,594.26<br />
075 Site Remediation Section<br />
HP20 Engineer of Site Remediation 1 1 1 142,201.80 1 147,178.98<br />
HP17 Site Remediation Specialist 1 1 1 103,085.84 1 106,693.86<br />
TOTAL Site Remediation Section 2 2 2 245,287.64 2 253,872.84<br />
080 Police Section<br />
081 Administrative Unit<br />
HP18 Chief of Police 1 1 1 94,406.78 1 102,870.56<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 67,746.38 1 70,117.58<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 2 2 2 162,153.16 2 172,988.14<br />
082 Police Unit<br />
HP16 Police Lieutenant - - - - 2 221,044.20<br />
HP15 Police Lieutenant 1 1 1 97,973.46 - -<br />
HP15 Police Lieutenant #4 1 1 1 102,831.30 - -<br />
HP14 Police Sergeant - - - - 7 628,932.72<br />
HP13 Police Sergeant 7 7 7 559,660.14 - -<br />
NR2483 Police Officer #1 - - - 3,443,897.60 5 336,232.00<br />
NR2483 Police Officer 53 53 53 3,443,897.60 56 3,765,798.40<br />
TOTAL Police Unit 62 62 62 4,204,362.50 70 4,952,007.32<br />
TOTAL Police Section 64 64 64 4,366,515.66 72 5,124,995.46<br />
TOTAL Administrative Services Division 100 100 100 7,678,162.44 105 7,801,424.54<br />
TOTAL General Administration 143 138 138 10,598,497.52 146 11,543,155.78<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*1) (*1) (*1) (*2)<br />
Note: Two positions budgeted in Section 072 are funded by the Stormwater Management Fund<br />
while the operations remain in General Administration.<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
138<br />
138
BOARD OF<br />
COMMISSIONERS<br />
MONITORING &<br />
RESEARCH<br />
CIVIL SERVICE<br />
BOARD<br />
TREASURY<br />
EXECUTIVE<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
GENERAL<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
MONITORING &<br />
RESEARCH<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
LAW<br />
MAINTENANCE<br />
& OPERATIONS<br />
PROCUREMENT & MATERIALS<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
INFORMATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
FINANCE<br />
ENGINEERING
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MONITORING AND RESEARCH<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Increase<br />
$31,448,400<br />
$30,059,500<br />
$1,388,900<br />
Research<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Operations Monitoring<br />
$10,723,989 34.1%<br />
$938,787<br />
3.0%<br />
Technical Assistance<br />
$3,957,485<br />
12.6%<br />
Waste Monitoring<br />
Environmental Monitoring<br />
$3,750,310 11.9%<br />
$12,077,829 38.4%<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Millions<br />
Positions<br />
$35<br />
400<br />
$30<br />
Increase due to planned<br />
equipment replacements<br />
350<br />
$25<br />
300<br />
250<br />
$20<br />
200<br />
$15<br />
150<br />
$10<br />
100<br />
$5<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
50<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
$0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
139<br />
139
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MONITORING AND RESEARCH<br />
16000<br />
MONITORING AND RESEARCH<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
311 309 308<br />
110<br />
Executive Division<br />
4 4 4<br />
111<br />
Executive Section<br />
4 4 4<br />
120<br />
Environmental Monitoring and Research<br />
Division<br />
65 64 66<br />
160<br />
Analytical Laboratories Division<br />
110 111 111<br />
190<br />
Administration/Industrial Waste Division<br />
132 130 127<br />
121<br />
Environmental Monitoring & Research<br />
Administrative Section<br />
5 5 6<br />
161<br />
Analytical Laboratories Administrative<br />
Section<br />
5 5 5<br />
191<br />
Industrial Waste Administrative Section<br />
11 14 14<br />
122<br />
Wastewater Treatment Process<br />
Research Section<br />
16 16 16<br />
162<br />
Stickney Analytical Laboratory Section<br />
30 31 31<br />
192<br />
Enforcement Section<br />
18 18 18<br />
123<br />
Biosolids Utilization and Soil Science<br />
Section<br />
14 14 16<br />
164<br />
Industrial Waste Analytical Laboratory<br />
Section<br />
28 28 28<br />
193<br />
User Charge and Technical Services<br />
Section<br />
19 19 18<br />
124<br />
Analytical Microbiology and<br />
Biomonitoring Section<br />
16 16 16<br />
165<br />
Organic Compounds Analytical<br />
Laboratory Section<br />
12 12 12<br />
194<br />
Field Services Central Area Section<br />
32 31 30<br />
126<br />
Aquatic Ecology and <strong>Water</strong> Quality<br />
Section<br />
11 11 12<br />
166<br />
Egan Analytical Laboratory Section<br />
19 19 19<br />
195<br />
Field Services South Area Section<br />
12 10 10<br />
128<br />
Radiochemistry Section<br />
3 2 0<br />
167<br />
Calumet Analytical Laboratory Section<br />
16 16 16<br />
196<br />
Field Services North Area Section<br />
10 11 10<br />
197<br />
Field Services North West Area Section<br />
13 10 10<br />
198<br />
Field Services Marine and Monitoring<br />
Section<br />
17 17 17<br />
140<br />
140
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MONITORING AND RESEARCH<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The mission of the Monitoring and Research Department<br />
(M&R) is to protect the sewerage system, water reclamation<br />
plants, and receiving waterways from toxic industrial waste<br />
discharges; and provide analytical laboratory services to<br />
support the Maintenance and Operations Department (M&O)<br />
to assure compliance with Illinois Environmental Protection<br />
Agency (IEPA) permits and United States Environmental<br />
Protection Agency (USEPA) regulations.<br />
In support of our mission, M&R administers the Sewage and<br />
Waste Control Ordinance (SWCO), and assures proportional<br />
recovery of wastewater treatment costs by administration of<br />
the User Charge Ordinance (UCO). Administration of these<br />
ordinances through the monitoring of wastewater from<br />
commercial and industrial sources is necessary to comply with<br />
the federally mandated Pretreatment and User Charge program<br />
requirements.<br />
M&R is responsible for:<br />
• Providing analytical laboratory support to control<br />
treatment and other operations;<br />
• Control of industrial waste discharges to the collecting<br />
sewer system and waterways and the reduction of those<br />
offending discharges via administration of the SWCO and<br />
the USEPA-approved Pretreatment Program; full<br />
implementation of the Pretreatment Program and<br />
increased surveillance of industry will ensure that the<br />
District operations, including solids disposal, meet<br />
regulatory requirements;<br />
• Recovery of District operating costs for treating excess<br />
industrial wastes which is accomplished via<br />
administration of the USEPA-approved User Charge<br />
Program for collection of revenues from tax-exempt and<br />
large commercial and industrial dischargers;<br />
• Monitoring the environmental quality of Lake Michigan,<br />
area rivers and canals, and the Illinois River to document<br />
the effectiveness of the District’s wastewater treatment<br />
program;<br />
• Assisting in the resolution of sewage treatment and solids<br />
disposal operations problems;<br />
• Providing other departments and agencies with<br />
wastewater treatment, waterways management, and solids<br />
processing related technical assistance upon request;<br />
• Conducting applied and operations research to achieve<br />
improvement and cost reductions in District wastewater<br />
treatment, waterways management, and solids processing<br />
activities;<br />
• Annual Chemical Hygiene Audits and air quality testing<br />
of the laboratories;<br />
• Monthly technical presentations as part of the seminar<br />
series.<br />
The 2009 request for the M&R Department is $31,448,400, an<br />
increase of $1,388,900, or 4.6 percent as compared to the 2008<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> of $30,059,500. The number of requested positions is<br />
308, a decrease of one position from 2008. New positions of a<br />
Number o f A ccount s<br />
5,000<br />
4,500<br />
4,000<br />
3,500<br />
3,000<br />
2,500<br />
2,000<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
Inspections<br />
9,000<br />
8,000<br />
7,000<br />
6,000<br />
5,000<br />
4,000<br />
3,000<br />
2,000<br />
1,000<br />
0<br />
User Charge Accounts<br />
Industrial Waste Division<br />
Productivity of Pollution Control Officers<br />
Reduced surveillance<br />
due to increased user<br />
compliance<br />
Increased<br />
inspections in<br />
User Charge and<br />
<strong>Water</strong>ways<br />
Total Inspections<br />
Inspections/PCO<br />
Projected<br />
Actual<br />
Est.<br />
Est .<br />
2003 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
Per Position<br />
400<br />
Proj.<br />
Proj.<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
141<br />
141
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MONITORING AND RESEARCH<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
Soil Scientist I and a Biologist II have been requested to manage increasing biosolids marketing and emerging environmental<br />
regulatory workload, while an Administrative Assistant position has been dropped due to advancements in the Pretreatment<br />
Information Management System (PIMS). Two Pollution Control Officer I positions have also been dropped, due to a<br />
decreased demand for surveillance of industrial users, and administration of the SWCO and the UCO, because industrial users<br />
are more compliant than in previous years. Additional M&R positions have been identified for elimination in subsequent<br />
years.<br />
Included in the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> are the following goals and initiatives to facilitate achievement of our mission:<br />
1. Provide technical assistance to other departments and agencies.<br />
Continue the in-situ monitoring of dissolved oxygen (DO) levels and collection of ambient water quality data in the District's<br />
waterways to determine the need for supplemental aeration to meet the DO standard in the Chicago <strong>Water</strong>way System, assess<br />
water quality impacts under reduced lake diversion allocations and comply with permit requirements. The ambient water<br />
quality monitoring program also provides data for the assessment of water and stream quality to meet Clean <strong>Water</strong> Act<br />
reporting requirements by the IEPA.<br />
M&R will continue its odor monitoring programs at District facilities and attempt to correlate the results of manual odor<br />
observations with the results of continuous hydrogen sulfide monitors at the Calumet WRP. In addition, M&R will implement<br />
the use of in-situ continuous hydrogen sulfide monitors in the intercepting sewer system. On-going collaboration with air<br />
emission research by outside parties will also be continued to increase the base of knowledge and the science of air emission<br />
and odor monitoring. Continue cooperative studies with the USEPA and United States Geological Survey regarding the fate of<br />
microconstituents of emerging concern.<br />
Provide analytical services to check the specification of raw materials used by M&O for plant operations. M&R analyzes raw<br />
materials such as hypochlorite, polymer sodium bisulfite, bioxide, and ferric chloride to verify the materials are acceptable and<br />
meet specifications.<br />
2. Monitor the quality of biosolids for beneficial use.<br />
Continue to conduct research for and promote expansion of beneficial use markets in the Chicago metropolitan area for the<br />
District’s biosolids in cooperation with M&O. Activity has been initiated to establish areas of low maintenance native<br />
vegetation using biosolids at each of the District’s seven water reclamation plants. Also, M&R is conducting research projects<br />
designed to promote the beneficial use of centrifuge cake biosolids in Kankakee and Will Counties, and to determine the<br />
environmental impact from phosphorus in land-applied District biosolids.<br />
3. Conduct applied and operations research to achieve improvement and cost reductions in District wastewater<br />
treatment, waterways management, and solids processing activities.<br />
M&R is working on a number of initiatives related to nutrient control. These include working with the M&O and Engineering<br />
Departments to conduct a phosphorus removal demonstration project at the Egan WRP and evaluating its effects on water<br />
quality in Salt Creek; and working with the IEPA to develop appropriate nutrient water quality standards for the State of<br />
Illinois. Continuous DO monitoring on small streams will continue in 2009 to provide data needed in the development of<br />
nutrient standards. M&R will continue to provide technical support to the Engineering and M&O Departments on treatment<br />
plant operations and design, sludge dewatering, air emissions, and management of water quality in the Chicago <strong>Water</strong>way<br />
System.<br />
4. Provide analytical services for treatment process operations and biosolids utilization to meet regulatory and permit<br />
requirements.<br />
A principal responsibility of M&R is to provide analytical laboratory services to support M&O in their operational monitoring<br />
and control of the sewage treatment processes, solids dewatering processes and biosolids utilization operations, and for IEPA<br />
permits compliance reporting.<br />
M&R will continue to upgrade Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) software to ensure continuous vendor<br />
software support. Current upgrades have reduced customized software, adopted standard quality control software and migrated<br />
to the Sample Manager for Windows (SMW) 2003 software product. Funds are budgeted to maintain accreditation for all<br />
M&R analytical laboratories under programs administered by the State of Illinois.<br />
142<br />
142
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
5. Monitor water quality of Lake Michigan and area rivers and canals to document the effectiveness of District’s<br />
wastewater treatment program and assess compliance with state standards.<br />
M&R will maintain and use an unsteady-state water quality model for making decisions on water-quality management<br />
planning and operational issues during wet-weather, extreme temperature, and low-flow conditions. The water quality model<br />
has been installed on a District computer server and is accessible to the Engineering, M&O, and M&R Departments. The<br />
model is being used to assist the IEPA for the Use Attainability Analysis study, as required in District WRP permits, and in<br />
Master Planning efforts being undertaken for the Stickney, North Side, and Calumet WRPs.<br />
6. Administer the Pretreatment and User Charge Programs in compliance with federal regulations.<br />
M&R will continue to control industrial discharges to the sewerage system to protect the WRP treatment process, worker<br />
safety, receiving waterways, and biosolids quality through administration of the Pretreatment Program and the SWCO. The<br />
District’s operating costs for treating excess industrial wastes will be recovered from tax-exempt and commercial-industrial<br />
users under the User Charge Program. It is anticipated that the User Charge program will collect $49,300,000 in 2009. M&R<br />
will also pursue Pretreatment Program streamlining through implementation of electronic industrial user reporting and internal<br />
management of District and industrial user records. Measures to reduce the discharge of mercury and silver, begun in 2003 in<br />
the Egan WRP service area, will be continued in 2009.<br />
Significant features of the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong> include:<br />
• Continuation of a joint study of the Chicago River with the<br />
University of Illinois and the Illinois Department of Natural<br />
Resources to further understanding and find measures to<br />
abate decreases in Chicago River quality;<br />
• Studies on the need for effluent disinfection at District<br />
WRPs;<br />
• Upgrade of LIMS;<br />
• Upgrade of PIMS;<br />
• Continuation of the services of laboratories, for conducting<br />
sediment toxicity tests on District waterways and for<br />
conducting specialized analyses of waste streams for landfill<br />
permit renewal, for analyzing emerging chemicals in<br />
biosolids and industrial waste samples for regulatory<br />
development impact analysis, and for analyzing an<br />
expanded suite of volatile organic compounds in wastewater<br />
influents;<br />
• Continued use of continuous DO monitors to assess water<br />
quality in District waterways;<br />
• Continued odor and Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)<br />
emission monitoring to assess air emissions from District<br />
facilities;<br />
• Establishment of a molecular biology laboratory room at the<br />
Lue-Hing M&R Complex to allow for bacterial source<br />
tracking studies;<br />
• Continued utilization studies to increase the beneficial reuse<br />
Samples<br />
(Millions)<br />
Industrial Waste Division<br />
Productivity of Sampler Positions<br />
of District biosolids with special emphasis on their use in the turfgrass industry and at Chicago Park District area sites;<br />
• Continued use of USEPA Method 1631E for determination of low-level mercury concentrations;<br />
• Continuation of the services of contract farmers to maintain full-scale research studies in Will and Kankakee Counties<br />
demonstrating benefits and safety of Class B biosolids in agricultural use;<br />
• Continued use of Johns Hopkins University’s analytical services for antimicrobial agents Triclosan and Triclocarban<br />
which are used in personal care products and which studies have indicated may be deleterious to public health;<br />
• Participation in proceedings of the Illinois Pollution Control Board regarding new water quality standards to be proposed<br />
by IEPA;<br />
• Testing air quality of the laboratories;<br />
• M&R will purchase a new Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS) and a Liquid Chromatograph/Mass<br />
Spectrometer (LC-MS) to measure constituents at much lower levels.<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
22.6<br />
0.7<br />
Increase due to water<br />
quality monitoring not<br />
previously performed<br />
17.6 17.0<br />
0.5<br />
0.5<br />
20.6<br />
0.5<br />
Samples Collected<br />
Samples/Position<br />
26.4<br />
0.5<br />
25.6<br />
0.6<br />
Est.<br />
24.8<br />
0.5<br />
2003 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
Per Position<br />
(Thousands)<br />
Proj.<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
143<br />
143
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MONITORING AND RESEARCH<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
Accomplishments during 2008 include:<br />
• Continuation of a multiyear project for expanded study of water quality conditions in the Chicago area waterways and<br />
utilizing automatic in-situ DO monitors to study the need for additional supplemental aeration stations;<br />
• Continuation of a chlorophyll water quality monitoring program on Chicago area waterways, to provide a measure of the<br />
amount of algae which compete with fish and other aquatic organisms for dissolved oxygen and can potentially depress<br />
oxygen levels to a point too low to support diverse fish populations;<br />
• Continuation of the implementation of enhancements to the Pretreatment Information Management System (PIMS) to<br />
increase efficiency and productivity of the enforcement program via electronic management of field assignment scheduling<br />
and reporting, and the tracking and follow-up required for industrial self-reporting;<br />
• Continuation of a project to assess the risk of recreational exposure to secondary-contact waters with and without<br />
disinfection of District WRP effluents for the Use Attainability Analysis;<br />
• Completion of a project to peer-review USEPA’s 2003 criteria for setting bacterial water quality standards for the Use<br />
Attainability Analysis;<br />
• Initiation of a epidemiological study regarding recreational use of the Chicago Area <strong>Water</strong>ways;<br />
• Continued a study to demonstrate the benefits and safety of biosolids use on farmland in Will and Kankakee Counties;<br />
• Installation and configuration of GPS-X software for simulation of wastewater treatment processes at the Stickney and<br />
Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants;<br />
• The Analytical Laboratories Division continued analyzing diazinon in the District effluent and biosolids samples;<br />
• Continued analysis of hazardous pollutants for USEPA Part 503 sludge regulation;<br />
• Continued monitoring Triclosan and Triclocarban in the District raw sewage, biosolids, and effluent samples;<br />
• Continued posting plant and Ambient <strong>Water</strong> Monitoring Quality Network data on the Internet, including the organics data;<br />
• Continued a full-scale phosphorus removal project at the Egan WRP to determine effects on water quality in Salt Creek;<br />
• Maintained Processes to Further Remove Pathogens (PFRP) certification from USEPA for Class A biosolids for the<br />
Stickney and Calumet WRPs and a new certification for the Egan WRP;<br />
• Continued M&R oversight and monthly reporting of activities relative to M&O contracts for the land application of Class<br />
B biosolids to farmland;<br />
• Maintained a continuous hydrogen sulfide monitoring system to detect odor emissions from the Calumet WRP;<br />
• Continued cooperative work and studies with the USEPA in the monitoring of endocrine disruption in District wastewater<br />
and sludge as well as fish;<br />
• Continued a cooperative project with the IEPA and University of Illinois to study nutrients in the Des Plaines River and<br />
Salt Creek;<br />
• Initiated the second phase of a study on antibiotic-resistant bacteria in wastewater to assess the potential public health<br />
hazards of such pathogens in the waterways;<br />
• Continued a cooperative study with the IEPA on phosphorus availability from land-applied biosolids;<br />
• Provided technical analyses to the Engineering Department on the Calumet, Stickney, and North Side WRP Master<br />
Planning studies;<br />
• Generated over 80 monitoring reports required by IEPA solids drying and land application permits, National Pollutant<br />
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits, and USEPA regulations;<br />
• Continued evaluating and implementing new methodologies that require smaller volumes of samples and reagents<br />
minimizing laboratory-generated wastes;<br />
• Continued monitoring nonylphenols in 18 selected Ambient <strong>Water</strong> Quality Monitoring Network Stations;<br />
• Renewal of NPDES permits for the Egan, Kirie, North Side, Lockport Powerhouse, Stickney, Calumet and Lemont WRPs;<br />
• M&R provided input to the IT systems assessment and Enterprise Portal Project, Geographical Information System, and<br />
Document Management Project;<br />
• Initiated a Habit Evaluation and Improvement Study of the Chicago Area <strong>Water</strong>ways System as part of the Use<br />
Attainability Analysis;<br />
• Continued a vector attraction reduction monitoring program for biosolids generation at the Calumet and Egan WRPs;<br />
• Continued a microbiological examination of activated sludge in support of M&O plant operations;<br />
• Continued microbiological analyses to evaluate disinfection technologies;<br />
• Initiated a research study to assess the impact of nonpoint pollution sources on the North Shore Channel;<br />
• Continued cooperative work with the City of Chicago’s Streetscape and Sustainable Design Program;<br />
• Created the Pharmaceutical Waste Disposal Workgroup;<br />
144<br />
144
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
• Assisted the Law Department in developing and providing testimony and questions regarding the Illinois Pollution<br />
Control Board Rulemaking R08-9 “In The Matter of <strong>Water</strong> Quality Standards and Effluent Limitations for the Chicago<br />
Area <strong>Water</strong>ways and the Lower Des Plaines River: Proposed Amendments to 35 ILL ADM. Code Parts 302, 303, 304”;<br />
• Completed analytical services for a three-year study of evaluating organic compounds from dropshafts in Kirie TARP<br />
system, EM&RD will compile results;<br />
• Began monitoring diazinon in selected upstreams and downstreams of Stickney, Calumet, Egan, and North Side WRPs;<br />
• Renovation of the Egan laboratories and completion of the Calumet laboratory.<br />
MONITORING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMS: M&R will perform an estimated 1,593,095 laboratory<br />
analyses in 2009 to assure that District operations meet mandated standards of environmental quality, and to enable the District<br />
to control treatment and other operations. The following sections describe the major program areas supported by M&R.<br />
LIQUID MONITORING: M&R provides analytical services to M&O to support operations at the seven WRPs. M&R<br />
transmits data to M&O for reporting to the IEPA as required by National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)<br />
permits. Three M&R laboratories provide these services: the Egan Analytical laboratory at the Egan WRP receives 92 samples<br />
daily from Egan, Hanover Park, North Side, and Kirie WRPs; the Stickney Analytical laboratory receives 90 samples per day<br />
from the Stickney WRP; and the Calumet Analytical laboratory receives 70 samples per day from the Calumet and Lemont<br />
WRPs. The laboratories perform analyses for more than 170 different parameters, including minerals, organics, nutrients,<br />
metals, and physical characteristics, in providing operations monitoring. Also, the Microbiology and Biomonitoring<br />
Laboratories perform analyses of bacterial indicator organisms and effluent toxicity.<br />
TARP (Tunnel and Reservoir Plan) GROUNDWATER: Sampling TARP wells is a requirement of the IEPA for<br />
acquiring construction and operation permits for TARP. Monitoring reports are submitted annually to the IEPA for all systems.<br />
This sampling has been conducted by the District for approximately the last 31 years. TARP has had no adverse impact on<br />
groundwater quality.<br />
SOLIDS MONITORING: M&R provides analytical services to M&O for monitoring the processing and use of sewage<br />
biosolids at the WRPs, drying sites, and land application projects. M&R also performs monitoring and reporting for nine<br />
District biosolids processing/utilization sites. Eight are located in Cook County and one in Fulton County, Illinois. The eight<br />
Cook County sites are operated by the Calumet, Egan, Hanover Park, and Stickney WRPs. IEPA operating permits for the<br />
eight biosolids processing/utilization sites require periodic groundwater monitoring as well as routine analyses of the biosolids<br />
processed/utilized at these sites. To satisfy IEPA permit requirements, the District has installed wells and lysimeters at the<br />
Cook County and Fulton County sites. Typically, wells are used<br />
in obtaining water samples in soils from 40 to 60 feet in depth<br />
and lysimeters for samples in soils five to 40 feet in depth.<br />
Groundwater monitoring and sludge quality data for all eight<br />
Cook County sites are reported to the IEPA on a quarterly basis.<br />
Fulton County is reported monthly. Cook County wells are 90 –<br />
180 feet deep and Fulton County wells are 40 – 60 feet deep. The<br />
District also operates a local biosolids marketing program under<br />
an IEPA Controlled Solids Distribution Permit. In this program,<br />
biosolids are used to construct or maintain athletic fields, golf<br />
courses and parks. M&R provides technical support to biosolids<br />
users, conducts background soil testing to promote beneficial use<br />
of biosolids and generates monthly reports as required by the<br />
IEPA permit. Biosolids utilization in Fulton County was<br />
discontinued in 2004, and its long-term use has had no adverse<br />
impact on groundwater quality. M&R will provide support<br />
through the Quality Assurance Coordinator to M&O for<br />
certification for their Environmental Management Systems from<br />
the National Biosolids Partnership.<br />
1,000<br />
900<br />
800<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
780<br />
Number of Enforcement Actions<br />
770<br />
703<br />
Decrease due to increased<br />
user compliance and the<br />
District's pollution prevention<br />
outreach program<br />
599<br />
526<br />
539<br />
478<br />
425<br />
Projected<br />
Actual<br />
420<br />
420<br />
0<br />
Est. Proj.<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
145<br />
145
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MONITORING AND RESEARCH<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGE REGULATION: M&R administers the SWCO, including the USEPA pretreatment<br />
requirements to control the discharge of industrial waste and to ensure that District operations, including solids disposal, meet<br />
increased regulatory requirements.<br />
SEWAGE AND WASTE CONTROL: The SWCO specifies limits on the quality of waste discharged by Industrial<br />
Users (IUs) into the District’s system as required by USEPA pretreatment regulations. This will protect the sewage treatment<br />
processes from interference, caused by toxic pollutants, and prevent untreatable pollutants from passing through the treatment<br />
processes, causing effluent violations. The District is in compliance with all environmental standards. Surveillance of these<br />
industries is an ongoing activity. When field inspections and/or pollutant analysis indicate noncompliance with Ordinance<br />
limits or conditions, a notice of violation or noncompliance is issued to the discharger. The number of enforcement actions<br />
includes show cause and legal action recommendations. In 2007, 2,374 inspections were conducted and 981 industrial<br />
dischargers were sampled. The costs of administering this ordinance are recovered from the industrial and commercial<br />
dischargers (IUs) through the UCO.<br />
USER CHARGE: M&R administers the User Charge<br />
program for collection of revenues from tax-exempt and large<br />
commercial and industrial dischargers. The collection of User<br />
Charge revenues from tax-exempt and large<br />
commercial/industrial users of the District’s system requires<br />
annual reconciliation of each account by M&R to assure proper<br />
payment. For purposes of administration, User Charge payers<br />
are grouped as annual payers or monthly payers. Annual User<br />
Charge accounts pay less than $4,800 each.<br />
Monthly User Charge payers in the aggregate account for more<br />
than 97 percent of total User Charge revenues and are monitored<br />
more intensely to verify the accuracy of their self-reported User<br />
Charge payments. Administrative costs for User Charge and<br />
Pretreatment Programs are recovered from the users. Estimated<br />
2008 User Charge revenue, based on 2008 rates and 2006 user<br />
effluent data, is $57,000,000.<br />
The rates take into account the replacement costs budgeted in the<br />
Construction Fund for the required replacement of District<br />
treatment facilities. While the majority of the User Charge<br />
revenue remains in the Corporate Fund, an appropriate portion<br />
of revenues is directed to the Construction Fund.<br />
User Charge Revenue<br />
WATERWAY MONITORING: <strong>Water</strong>way monitoring is performed to assure that waterways within the District’s<br />
service area meet the Illinois Pollution Control Board’s (IPCB) water quality standards. Sampling is carried out at regular<br />
frequencies at a large number of locations, including the Illinois River above Peoria. Samples are analyzed for a wide variety of<br />
pollutants and pollution indicators. The resulting information is also used to demonstrate the beneficial impact of District<br />
operations. Dramatic improvement in water quality is documented by waterway monitoring, as is shown by the bar graph titled<br />
“Average Concentration of Total Cyanide,” which shows how the concentration of cyanide in waterways has decreased over<br />
the period between 1975 and 2007. This decrease in cyanide concentrations in the waterways is a direct result of the<br />
implementation of local and federal categorical pretreatment programs to reduce the impact of industrial waste discharges on<br />
wastewater treatment plant operations. These programs were implemented in the early 1980’s. In 2009, M&R will analyze an<br />
estimated 3,000 water samples from District waterways and the Illinois River for a wide variety of contaminants and pollution<br />
indicators.<br />
Millions<br />
$70<br />
$60<br />
$50<br />
$40<br />
$30<br />
$20<br />
$10<br />
$0<br />
49.3<br />
(Explanatio n of revenue variatio n is provided on page 89)<br />
50.0<br />
47.1<br />
Projected<br />
Actual<br />
50.5<br />
50.8<br />
44.1<br />
53.6<br />
53.6<br />
57.0<br />
49.3<br />
Est. Pro j.<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
146<br />
146
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Total<br />
Cyanide<br />
(mg/l)<br />
0.040<br />
0.030<br />
0.020<br />
0.010<br />
Average Concentration of Total Cyanide<br />
North Shore Channel /<br />
North Branch Chicago<br />
Chicago Sanitary &<br />
Ship Canal<br />
Little Calumet River /<br />
Cal-Sag Channel<br />
The District is participating with other<br />
federal, state, and local agencies in a<br />
multiyear project called a Use<br />
Attainability Analysis (UAA). This<br />
project will determine how the Chicago<br />
Area <strong>Water</strong>way System (CAWS) has<br />
changed through the years, as well as the<br />
most suitable uses (i.e., commercial<br />
usage, swimming, fishing, water skiing,<br />
boating, etc.) for part or all of the CAWS<br />
for the future. There has not been an<br />
evaluation of this type since the early<br />
1970s. At this point in time, its longterm<br />
impact on the District has not been<br />
fully determined.<br />
0.000<br />
1975 1982 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
INSPECTION EVENTS: The Industrial Waste Division<br />
(IWD) has been designated by the IEPA as a response unit for<br />
chemical and hazardous waste spills in the Cook County area.<br />
Industrial Waste personnel will respond to an estimated 300<br />
requests for emergency assistance during the year 2009. M&R<br />
responds to a variety of requests for emergency assistance which<br />
are received from citizens, fire and police departments,<br />
municipalities, civic organizations, industries, District facilities,<br />
and other governmental agencies. In addition, routine boat<br />
patrols and helicopter flights are conducted to locate pollution<br />
sources, and lakefront recreational events are closely monitored<br />
to prevent pollution from entering Lake Michigan.<br />
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: During 2009, M&R will<br />
continue to monitor the dissolved oxygen levels in the waterways using state-of-the-art multiparameter water quality monitors.<br />
The primary purpose of these activities is to assist the Engineering Department in locating and identifying reaches in the<br />
waterways where the dissolved oxygen concentration is less than applicable IPCB standards, for planning future activities<br />
related directly to improving water quality. The M&R Department will continue to provide technical assistance to the M&O<br />
and Engineering Departments with regards to developing treatment technologies.<br />
INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT<br />
As a result of more stringent USEPA regulations and IEPA permit requirements, the information requirements of the District<br />
have grown significantly. M&R is responding to these demands by designing and developing various computerized<br />
information systems. These systems enable the Department to meet the various reporting and information needs of the District<br />
effectively and efficiently. The following narrative summarizes the development of two major information systems and their<br />
respective benefits. M&R provides current reports on the District website for public information.<br />
LABORATORY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LIMS)<br />
Number of Emergency Responses<br />
The District’s LIMS is utilized to track controlled movement of samples and test results through a laboratory utilizing barcoding<br />
and scanning equipment, and to electronically manage reporting of results and transmission of data. Over the last 26<br />
years, the analytical demands on M&R have increased by approximately 79 percent (1,616,442 analyses in 2007 versus<br />
900,009 analyses in 1982). Preliminary studies of laboratory information systems began in 1988, with the first consulting<br />
contract being awarded in 1989. The LIMS project became operational in 1996. The total cost, including computer work<br />
stations, bar-coding equipment, network wiring, software licenses, system upgrades and maintenance, projected to 2009, is<br />
approximately $4.6 million.<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
331<br />
333<br />
342<br />
358<br />
325<br />
285<br />
The Monitoring and Research Department provides<br />
emergency response to fire and police officials,<br />
citizens, and other federal and state agencies<br />
300<br />
Est. Proj.<br />
2003 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
147<br />
147
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MONITORING AND RESEARCH<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
LIMS is used by M&R and Maintenance and Operations Department personnel for electronic sample scheduling, login and<br />
tracking, as well as acquisition and storage of sample data from analytical instruments, and for reporting analytical results.<br />
Enhancements completed in 2004 have reduced customizations, processing and historical data access time, improved the<br />
integrity of sample custody, and improved ease of use.<br />
Annual cost savings are estimated in the area of $775,000 and include the reduced need for contractual services (laboratories<br />
and technicians), and the ability to complete increasing workloads more quickly without increased staff. Total savings,<br />
projected to 2008, are estimated at $10.7 million and represent an increase in productivity. The Analytical Laboratories<br />
Division will investigate new software for LIMS in 2009.<br />
PRETREATMENT INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PIMS)<br />
The District’s PIMS is designed to facilitate District compliance and enforcement of the USEPA pretreatment regulations. The<br />
PIMS facilitates electronic management of this work and provides for field assignment scheduling and reporting, the tracking<br />
and follow-up required for industrial self-reporting, and cost recovery for sampling and inspection allowed by Illinois State<br />
Statutes. System development, mostly “in-house” aided by consultants, was completed in 1995. The total cost for the PIMS,<br />
including software licenses and maintenance, was $1.5 million. In order to meet the growing needs of the Industrial Waste<br />
Division, development of a new PIMS was initiated in 1998. The M&R functions of a new PIMS were completed and became<br />
operational in December 2004.<br />
Additional enhancements were made to PIMS in 2008. As part of the Information Technology Strategic Plan and Business<br />
Objectives evaluation of District-wide information systems; PIMS and PIMS-Bill were identified for replacement. New PIMS<br />
software will increase staff efficiency and maintain all IWD data in a single database. An integrated User Charge/Finance<br />
Department module will streamline the assessment, invoicing and collection of charges related to the IWD Ordinances, as well<br />
as simplifying calculation methods where feasible.<br />
148<br />
148
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Monitoring and Research<br />
Operations Monitoring Programs 4652 and 4653 - Cook County<br />
Environmental Monitoring Program 4672 - <strong>Water</strong>ways and<br />
Biological Sampling<br />
Operations of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District meet stringent standards contained in National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System (NPDES) permits issued for each water reclamation plant. Processing and disposal of solids are regulated<br />
by Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) permits. M&R monitors water quality at 59 stations in Chicago area<br />
shallow and deep-draft waterways within the District’s service area. The environmental information is also used to demonstrate<br />
the beneficial effects of advanced treated discharges from the District’s seven WRPs on instream water quality.<br />
149<br />
149
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Monitoring and Research<br />
Environmental Monitoring Program 4671- Lake Michigan<br />
KENILWORTH<br />
WILMETTE<br />
GILLSON PARK<br />
WILMETTE HARBOR<br />
LIGHTHOUSE<br />
DEMPSTER STREET<br />
LAKE<br />
MICHIGAN<br />
MONTROSE<br />
NORTH AVENUE<br />
OAK STREET<br />
CHICAGO RIVER LOCKS<br />
MONROE HARBOR<br />
12th STREET<br />
31st STREET<br />
= LOCATIONS WHERE BYPASSING OCCURS<br />
RAINBOW<br />
CALUMET HARBOR<br />
CALUMET<br />
Monitoring and Research monitors Lake Michigan to assure the quality of the water supply to communities in the District’s<br />
jurisdiction. Samples will be taken as needed in 2009 at the stations indicated on the map, to assess the bypassing of excessive<br />
storm runoff to the Lake from inland waterways, the discharge from industrial sources near Calumet and Indiana Harbors and<br />
public events held on Chicago’s lakefront. Environmental monitoring of Lake Michigan, Program 4671, is budgeted at<br />
$342,272 in 2009.<br />
150<br />
150
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
16000 MONITORING AND RESEARCH OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. PLANT OPERATIONS MONITORING:<br />
Monitor the District's collection, treatment, and disposal operations Liquid Process Analyses $7,411,644 23.6%<br />
to assure compliance with National Pollution Discharge Elimination Solids Process Analyses $3,312,345 10.5%<br />
System (NPDES), Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA), $10,723,989 34.1%<br />
and other regulations.<br />
2. INDUSTRIAL WASTE AND USER CHARGE:<br />
Administer the Pretreatment Program, Sewage and Waste Control Residential Users $130,395 0.4%<br />
Ordinance, the User Charge Ordinance, the Environmental Tax Exempt Users $525,311 1.7%<br />
Remediation Wastewater Ordinance, and the Septic Tank and Large Commercial/Industrial Users $4,245,857 13.5%<br />
Chemical Toilet Waste Hauler Ordinance. Environmental Remediation $83,543 0.3%<br />
Septic Tank/Chemical Waste $63,497 0.2%<br />
* Note: "SIU's" refers to Significant Industrial Users. SIU's* - Pretreatment Program $5,345,635 17.0%<br />
SIU's* - Extraordinary<br />
Monitoring/Enforcement $1,214,435 3.8%<br />
Other Industrial Users $126,580 0.4%<br />
All Other - General $342,576 1.1%<br />
$12,077,829 38.4%<br />
3. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING:<br />
Monitor the quality of Lake Michigan and the waterways in order Lake Michigan Monitoring $342,272 1.1%<br />
to detect and reduce the incidence of pollution. <strong>Water</strong>ways Monitoring $3,154,638 10.0%<br />
Inspection Events $253,400 0.8%<br />
$3,750,310 11.9%<br />
4. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE:<br />
Conduct a program of independent review of plant operations and M&O Assistance $1,117,626 3.6%<br />
of regular consultation and assistance for the solution of operating General Assistance $931,573 3.0%<br />
problems, and provide technical assistance to other agencies upon Regulatory Review and Response $1,908,286 6.0%<br />
request, and provide review and response to proposed regulations $3,957,485 12.6%<br />
issued by federal, state, and local governments.<br />
5. OPERATIONS AND APPLIED RESEARCH:<br />
Conduct applied and operations research for improvement and cost<br />
reduction of District operations. $938,787 3.0%<br />
Total $31,448,400 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. Submit all required environmental monitoring reports on time. 100% 100% 100%<br />
2. Maintain laboratory accreditation. 100% 100% 100%<br />
3. Complete a four-year biological monitoring assessment of the Chicago area waterways. 25% 25% 25%<br />
4. Provide sample data for IEPA monitoring compliance reports by the 13th of the following<br />
month 100 percent on time. 100% 100% 100%<br />
5. Provide sample data for industrial surveillance and User Charge and Technical Services<br />
Section by the 15th of the following month 100 percent on time. 100% 100% 100%<br />
151<br />
151
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
16000 MONITORING AND RESEARCH OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
7. Provide water quality sample data by the 15th of the following month 100 percent on time. 100% 100% 100%<br />
8. Issue Discharge Authorizations in response to all SIU requests within timeframes established<br />
under the Sewage and Waste Control Ordinance (141 requests in 2007); issue enforcement<br />
actions within the timeframes established under the Sewage and Waste Control Ordinance<br />
(425 actions in 2007). 100% 100% 100%<br />
9. Process User Charge Annual Certified Statements submitted by Commercial-Industrial Users<br />
by September 30 (3,510 reports). 100% 100% 100%<br />
10. Respond to emergency assistance requests from fire and police departments, citizens, and<br />
state and federal agencies. 325 350 300<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY:<br />
2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
4650 Operations Monitoring $7,485,210 2009 93 $10,723,989 $887,862 9.0 a)<br />
2008 93 $9,836,127<br />
4660 Waste Monitoring $11,647,635 2009 145 $12,077,829 ($388,455) (3.1) b)<br />
2008 147 $12,466,284<br />
4670 Environmental Monitoring $2,886,569 2009 28 $3,750,310 $462,293 14.1 c)<br />
2008 27 $3,288,017<br />
4680 Technical Assistance $2,662,348 2009 34 $3,957,485 $577,444 17.1 d)<br />
2008 34 $3,380,041<br />
4690 Operations and Applied Research $653,355 2009 8 $938,787 ($150,244) (13.8) e)<br />
2008 8 $1,089,031<br />
Totals $25,335,117 2009 308 $31,448,400 $1,388,900 4.6%<br />
2008 309 $30,059,500<br />
a) Net increase due to additional funding for LIMS ($29,000), replacement of various testing and laboratory equipment ($200,000),<br />
long-term ecosystem studies ($100,000), reconfiguration of growth chambers ($16,000), and carryovers of survey on the use of Chicago-area<br />
waterways ($139,000), and contract for liquid chromatograph/mass spectrometer ($250,000).<br />
b) Net decrease due a reduction in funding for the salaries of employees in budgeted positions ($464,231).<br />
c) Net increase due to additional funding for various water quality studies ($159,000) and a biological survey of District property ($200,000).<br />
d) Net increase due to additional funding for the maintenance and preservation of marine equipment and resources to study polymer<br />
efficiency ($50,000), combined sewer overflow ($60,000), and odor control at District WRPs ($30,000), and carryover of pharmaceutical disposal<br />
survey ($153,800), offset by a reallocation of salaries.<br />
e) Net decrease due to the elimination of funding for a biological survey of riparian habitat ($200,000), offset by a reallocation of salaries.<br />
152<br />
152
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
16000 MONITORING AND RESEARCH PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
4650 Operations Monitoring<br />
4652 Liquid Monitoring Liquid Process Analyses 545,939 569,780 517,800<br />
Cost $5,057,736 $6,762,647 $7,411,644 a)<br />
Cost/Analysis $9.26 $11.87 $14.31<br />
- Liquid Process Treatment Analyses by Location: North Service Area Lab 226,220 240,933 198,083<br />
Stickney Lab 124,869 127,203 131,269<br />
Calumet Lab 181,929 188,343 170,593<br />
- Analyses for Required IEPA Reporting: (93 Monitoring Wells) TARP Groundwater 12,921 13,301 17,855<br />
4653 Solids Monitoring Solids Process Analyses 327,178 420,120 252,822<br />
Cost $2,427,474 $3,073,480 $3,312,345 b)<br />
Cost/Analysis $7.42 $7.32 $13.10<br />
4660 Waste Monitoring<br />
- Solids Process Treatment Analyses by Location: North Service Area Lab 74,702 90,139 62,862<br />
Stickney Lab 124,840 183,518 126,367<br />
Calumet Lab 113,867 119,463 47,593<br />
- Analyses for Required IEPA Reporting by Location 13,769 27,000 16,000<br />
of Processing/Utilization Site<br />
4661 User Charge Ordinance - Residential and Small Non- Administration Costs $119,390 $127,994 $130,395<br />
Residential Commercial - Industrial Users (6,013<br />
Small Nonresidential Commercial/Industrial Users)<br />
4662 User Charge Ordinance - Tax Exempt Users Administration Costs $363,600 $529,733 $525,311<br />
Number of Users 2,703 2,740 2,740<br />
Revenue $13,876,656 $14,000,000 $14,500,000<br />
Revenue/User $5,133.80 $5,109.49 $5,291.97<br />
4663 User Charge Ordinance - Large Commercial-Industrial Number of Users 807 850 830<br />
Users Waste Monitoring Analyses 115,653 117,880 146,510<br />
*2008 estimate includes $300,000 in Construction Fund Revenue* $39,103,169 $34,300,000 $35,500,000<br />
revenue. Monitoring Cost $3,845,329 $4,262,495 $4,245,857<br />
Revenue/User $48,454.98 $40,352.94 $42,771.08<br />
Monitoring Cost/User $4,764.97 $5,014.70 $5,115.49<br />
Accounts 3,510 3,590 3,570<br />
4664 Environmental Remediation Permits 6 8 8<br />
Cost $77,108 $77,914 $83,543<br />
Cost/Permit $12,851.33 $9,739.25 $10,442.88<br />
4665 Septic Tank and Chemical Toilet Waste Administration Permits 6 6 8<br />
Cost $59,674 $61,544 $63,497<br />
Cost/Permit $9,945.67 $10,257.33 $7,937.13<br />
a) Net increase due to additional funding for salaries and wages, LIMS license renewal and technical support ($29,000), the replacement of<br />
various testing and laboratory equipment ($200,000), long-term ecosystem studies ($100,000), reconfiguration of growth chambers ($16,000),<br />
and carryovers of survey on the use of Chicago-area waterways ($139,500) and contract for liquid chromatograph/mass spectrometer ($250,000).<br />
b) Net increase due to reallocation of salaries, long-term soil ecosystem studies ($100,000), and reconfiguation of growth chambers ($16,000)<br />
for the Biosolids and Soil Solids Laboratory at the Stickney WRP.<br />
153<br />
153
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
16000 MONITORING AND RESEARCH PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
4666 Sewage and Waste Control Ordinance - Significant Administration Costs $5,641,175 $5,761,316 $5,345,635 c)<br />
Industrial Users (SIUs) Minimum Regulatory Number of SIUs 407 420 410<br />
Requirement Activities Cost/SIU $13,860.38 $13,717.42 $13,038.13<br />
Waste Monitoring Analyses 345,968 370,741 339,900<br />
4667 Sewage and Waste Control Ordinance - Significant Administration Costs $1,195,764 $1,191,519 $1,214,435<br />
Industrial Users (SIUs) Extraordinary Monitoring and Number of SIUs 264 160 250<br />
Enforcement Activities Cost/SIU $4,529.41 $7,446.99 $4,857.74<br />
4668 Other Industrial Users Administration Costs $109,165 $118,781 $126,580<br />
Number of IUs 400 440 420<br />
Cost/IU $272.91 $269.96 $301.38<br />
4669 Waste Monitoring - All Other - General Number of Inspections 321 350 250<br />
Administration Costs $236,430 $334,988 $342,576<br />
Cost/Inspection $736.54 $957.11 $1,370.30<br />
4670 Environmental Monitoring<br />
4671 Lake Michigan Monitoring Sampling Events 86 60 56<br />
Environmental Analyses 30 30 30<br />
Cost $283,591 $316,915 $342,272<br />
4672 <strong>Water</strong>ways Monitoring Sampling Events 2,259 3,000 2,240<br />
Environmental Analyses 212,115 177,179 234,566<br />
Cost $2,379,252 $2,730,902 $3,154,638 d)<br />
4673 Inspection Events Inspection Events 465 448 445<br />
Cost $223,726 $240,200 $253,400<br />
4680 Technical Assistance<br />
4681 Assistance to Maintenance and Operations Department Number of Responses 496 460 515<br />
Number of Analyses 63,187 144,180 75,587<br />
Number of Sampling Events 18,629 19,842 20,300<br />
Cost $839,857 $931,192 $1,117,626 e)<br />
4682 General Assistance to All Other Departments Number of Responses 338 230 370<br />
Number of Analyses 1,668 4,224 895<br />
Number of Sampling Events 3,510 3,605 3,500<br />
Cost $798,366 $872,973 $931,573<br />
4683 Regulatory Review and Response Number of Responses 265 150 326<br />
Number of Sampling Events 29 100 100<br />
Cost $1,024,125 $1,575,876 $1,908,286 f)<br />
4690 Operations and Applied Research Research Projects 175 200 200<br />
Laboratory Analyses 163,140 100,300 199,316<br />
Cost $653,355 $1,089,031 $938,787 g)<br />
Totals $25,335,117 $30,059,500 $31,448,400<br />
c) Net decrease due to the dropping of two Pollution Control Officer I positions, as well as the reallocation of salary distributions to more accurately<br />
reflect current operations ($464,231).<br />
d) Net increase mainly due to additional funding for a biological survey of District property ($200,000), various water quality studies ($159,000),<br />
and maintenance of marine equipment for the Environmental Monitoring /Research and Industrial Waste Divisions ($19,000).<br />
e) Net increase due to funding for various consulting services and equipment to study polymer efficiency ($50,000), combined sewer overflow<br />
($60,000), and odor control ($30,000) at the District's WRPs.<br />
f) Net increase due to additional funding for various scientific studies related to: air emission ($10,000), nutrient removal ($100,000), fecal<br />
coliform analysis ($23,000), and emerging contaminants in waterways ($25,000), and carryover of pharmaceutical disposal survey ($153,800),<br />
offset by reallocation of salaries.<br />
g) Net decrease due to the elimination of funding for a biological survey of riparian habitat ($200,000).<br />
154<br />
154
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
16000 Department Monitoring & Research<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 21,786,415 $ 22,867,400 $ 22,867,400 $ 22,200,000 $ 22,504,300 $ 22,502,600 $ 23,162,400<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 632,409 778,500 778,500 705,000 767,100 786,600 802,800<br />
601080 Salaries of Nonbudgeted Employees - 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 10,000<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 70,621 114,900 125,100 67,000 122,400 122,400 122,400<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 703,785 1,561,800 1,476,600 517,400 1,841,600 1,841,600 2,191,300<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 676,300 676,300 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 282,792 251,900 251,900 240,000 251,900 251,900 251,900<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 23,476,022 25,584,500 25,509,500 23,729,400 26,173,600 26,191,400 26,540,800<br />
612010 Travel 17,264 27,500 27,500 17,300 31,700 31,700 31,700<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 63,614 92,200 92,200 67,000 98,700 98,700 98,700<br />
612040 Postage, Freight, and Delivery Charges 9,258 18,600 18,600 12,000 19,100 19,100 21,600<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 47,522 33,300 57,100 53,000 35,800 35,800 35,800<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services 1,232 4,000 4,000 2,200 4,700 4,700 4,700<br />
612090 Reprographic Services 1,002 5,100 5,100 3,000 9,500 9,500 9,500<br />
612160 Natural Gas 548 - - - - - -<br />
612170 <strong>Water</strong> and <strong>Water</strong> Services 3,272 8,900 8,900 4,700 9,300 9,300 9,300<br />
612210 Communication Services 24 2,000 2,000 100 2,000 2,000 2,000<br />
612330 Rental Charges 15,091 46,600 46,600 25,000 53,600 53,600 53,600<br />
612410 Governmental Service Charges 18,000 147,400 147,400 75,000 143,400 143,400 143,400<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 391,424 881,300 871,300 500,000 887,300 887,300 887,300<br />
612790 Repairs to Marine Equipment 78,241 97,000 158,000 64,000 109,000 109,000 159,000<br />
612820 Computer Software Maintenance 94,558 214,300 144,300 100,000 243,000 243,000 212,100<br />
612840 Communications Equipment Maintenance<br />
(Includes Software) - 4,800 - - 4,800 4,800 4,800<br />
612970 Repairs to Testing and Laboratory<br />
Equipment 393,969 597,800 597,800 423,000 652,800 652,800 672,800<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. 241 9,500 9,500 2,300 8,500 8,500 8,500<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,135,260 2,190,300 2,190,300 1,348,600 2,313,200 2,313,200 2,354,800<br />
155<br />
155
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
16000 Department Monitoring & Research<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
623070 Electrical Parts and Supplies - - 500 300 - - -<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 36,058 58,000 58,000 45,000 56,800 56,800 56,800<br />
623530 Farming Supplies 7,929 11,500 11,500 11,500 15,500 15,500 15,500<br />
623570 Laboratory Testing Supplies, Small<br />
Equipment, and Chemicals 288,240 701,300 594,100 425,200 703,400 713,400 713,400<br />
623700 Wearing Apparel 16,255 33,900 33,900 21,400 33,900 33,900 33,900<br />
623720 Books, Maps, and Charts 65 5,300 5,300 700 4,900 4,900 4,900<br />
623780 Safety and Medical Supplies - - 500 500 - - -<br />
623800 Computer Software 1,966 4,500 4,500 1,000 500 500 500<br />
623810 Computer Supplies 4,428 17,500 17,500 5,700 26,300 8,500 8,500<br />
623820 Fuel 26,302 57,700 57,200 43,200 68,000 68,000 68,000<br />
623850 Communications Supplies 900 5,000 5,000 300 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 38,266 134,300 241,000 189,000 140,400 140,400 140,400<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 420,409 1,029,000 1,029,000 743,800 1,054,700 1,046,900 1,046,900<br />
634970 Testing and Laboratory Equipment 303,426 1,235,700 1,235,700 589,800 1,256,900 1,246,900 1,505,900<br />
634990 Machinery and Equipment, N.O.C. - 20,000 20,000 6,500 650,000 650,000 -<br />
400 TOTAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 303,426 1,255,700 1,255,700 596,300 1,906,900 1,896,900 1,505,900<br />
TOTAL MONITORING & RESEARCH $ 25,335,117 $ 30,059,500 $ 29,984,500 $ 26,418,100 $ 31,448,400 $ 31,448,400 $ 31,448,400<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
156<br />
156
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Monitoring and Research<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
110 Executive Division<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
111 Executive Section<br />
EX11 Director of Monitoring and Research - - - 0.00 1 229,316.62<br />
EX11 Director of Research and Development 1 1 1 221,561.86 - 0.00<br />
HP17 Quality Assurance Coordinator 1 1 1 112,452.34 1 116,388.22<br />
EX06 Secretary to Officer 1 1 1 84,825.26 1 87,794.20<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 1 1 71,011.72 1 73,497.06<br />
TOTAL Executive Section 4 4 4 489,851.18 4 506,996.10<br />
TOTAL Executive Division 4 4 4 489,851.18 4 506,996.10<br />
120 Environmental Monitoring and Research Division<br />
121 Environmental Monitoring and Research Administration Section<br />
HP21 Assistant Director of Monitoring and Research - - - 0.00 1 183,080.56<br />
HP21 Assistant Director of Research and Development 1 1 1 169,514.02 - 0.00<br />
HP20 Research Scientist IV 1 1 1 128,327.68 1 139,998.82<br />
HP18 Biostatistician 1 1 1 114,348.00 1 123,509.62<br />
HP18 Radiation Chemist (AC) - - - 0.00 1 123,509.62<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 67,746.38 1 70,117.58<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 1 1 67,746.38 1 70,117.58<br />
TOTAL Environmental Monitoring and Research Administration Section 5 5 5 547,682.46 6 710,333.78<br />
122 Wastewater Treatment Process Research Section<br />
HP18 Research Scientist III 2 2 2 253,622.72 2 247,020.54<br />
HP17 Research Scientist II 2 2 2 210,854.28 2 218,233.86<br />
HP15 Research Scientist I 4 4 4 345,611.24 4 348,998.26<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II 2 2 2 115,705.72 2 119,755.48<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I 4 4 4 189,764.90 4 193,918.66<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I #4 1 1 1 54,428.40 1 56,333.42<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 52,251.68 1 54,080.52<br />
TOTAL Wastewater Treatment Process Research Section 16 16 16 1,222,238.94 16 1,238,340.74<br />
157<br />
157
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Monitoring and Research<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
123 Biosolids Utilization and Soil Science Section<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP18 Soil Scientist III 1 1 1 114,348.00 1 118,350.18<br />
HP17 Soil Scientist II 2 2 2 196,803.36 2 213,387.72<br />
HP15 Soil Scientist I 2 2 2 158,077.66 3 247,593.32<br />
HP14 Sanitary Chemist I 2 2 2 177,649.94 1 94,018.86<br />
HP14 Sanitary Chemist I (AC) - - - 0.00 1 94,018.86<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II 2 2 2 115,705.72 2 125,537.88<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I 1 2 2 87,666.54 3 139,835.80<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I #4 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 54,657.46 1 49,100.74<br />
HP09 Laboratory Assistant 2 2 2 75,925.98 2 85,019.22<br />
TOTAL Biosolids Utilization and Soil Science Section 14 14 14 980,834.66 16 1,166,862.58<br />
124 Analytical Microbiology & Biomonitoring Section<br />
HP18 Microbiologist IV 1 1 1 109,363.28 1 118,350.18<br />
HP17 Microbiologist III 1 1 1 79,669.20 1 87,305.40<br />
HP16 Microbiologist II 1 1 1 106,784.60 1 110,522.10<br />
HP14 Biologist I #2 (Microbiologist I) 1 1 1 90,839.58 1 94,018.86<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II 2 2 2 115,705.72 2 122,647.20<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II #4 3 3 3 187,840.12 3 200,790.20<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I 2 2 2 99,694.40 2 103,183.60<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I #4 2 2 2 113,587.24 2 117,562.64<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 47,440.38 1 39,143.00<br />
HP09 Laboratory Assistant 2 2 2 80,071.68 2 82,873.96<br />
TOTAL Analytical Microbiology & Biomonitoring Section 16 16 16 1,030,996.20 16 1,076,397.14<br />
126 Aquatic Ecology & <strong>Water</strong> Quality Section<br />
HP18 Biologist IV 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
HP17 Biologist III 1 1 1 103,085.84 1 111,540.26<br />
HP16 Biologist II 1 1 1 93,505.88 2 179,813.66<br />
158<br />
158
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Monitoring and Research<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP14 Biologist I 1 1 1 70,688.28 1 77,333.36<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II 3 3 3 169,369.20 3 178,187.88<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II #4 1 1 1 62,563.28 1 68,018.60<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I 2 2 2 92,476.80 2 98,201.48<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 49,847.20 1 49,100.74<br />
TOTAL Aquatic Ecology & <strong>Water</strong> Quality Section 11 11 11 770,840.46 12 896,025.52<br />
128 Radiochemistry Section<br />
HP18 Radiation Chemist (AC) 1 1 1 119,332.98 - 0.00<br />
HP14 Sanitary Chemist I (AC) 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I #4 1 1 1 54,428.40 - 0.00<br />
TOTAL Radiochemistry Section 3 2 2 173,761.38 - -<br />
TOTAL Environmental Monitoring and Research Division 65 64 64 4,726,354.10 66 5,087,959.76<br />
160 Analytical Laboratories Division<br />
161 Analytical Laboratories Administrative Section<br />
HP21 Assistant Director of Monitoring and Research - - - 0.00 1 152,547.98<br />
HP21 Assistant Director of Research and Development 1 1 1 162,139.90 - 0.00<br />
HP17 Sanitary Chemist III 1 1 1 112,452.34 1 116,388.22<br />
HP15 Sanitary Chemist II 1 1 1 85,349.94 1 88,337.08<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 1 1 61,217.26 1 66,739.40<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant - 1 1 61,217.26 1 66,739.40<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
TOTAL Analytical Laboratories Administrative Section 5 5 5 482,376.70 5 490,752.08<br />
162 Stickney Analytical Laboratory Section<br />
HP18 Sanitary Chemist IV 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
HP17 Sanitary Chemist III 1 1 1 117,135.20 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Sanitary Chemist II 3 3 3 268,676.46 3 278,080.14<br />
HP14 Sanitary Chemist I 4 4 4 298,872.08 4 317,675.02<br />
159<br />
159
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Monitoring and Research<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP14 Sanitary Chemist I (AC) - 1 1 82,778.80 1 85,675.98<br />
HP13 Laboratory Technician III 2 2 2 158,279.42 2 167,743.68<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II 7 7 7 400,780.64 7 423,480.20<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I 8 8 8 374,719.80 8 392,813.72<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I #4 1 1 1 54,428.40 1 58,781.32<br />
HP09 Laboratory Assistant 2 2 2 73,853.26 2 72,146.88<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist - 1 1 44,180.76 1 45,726.98<br />
TOTAL Stickney Analytical Laboratory Section 30 31 31 2,003,008.80 31 2,097,188.34<br />
164 Industrial Waste Analytical Laboratory Section<br />
HP18 Sanitary Chemist IV 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 128,669.84<br />
HP17 Sanitary Chemist III 1 1 1 117,135.20 1 116,388.22<br />
HP15 Sanitary Chemist II 2 2 2 195,946.92 2 202,805.20<br />
HP14 Sanitary Chemist I 3 3 3 232,214.84 3 223,655.38<br />
HP13 Laboratory Technician III 2 2 2 165,860.76 2 175,588.40<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II 6 6 6 355,498.00 6 367,940.56<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II #4 1 1 1 59,558.46 1 64,753.00<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I 7 7 7 315,250.52 7 333,754.46<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I #4 2 2 2 113,587.24 2 117,562.64<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I (AC) 2 2 2 85,260.24 2 90,735.06<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 57,062.46 1 59,059.52<br />
TOTAL Industrial Waste Analytical Laboratory Section 28 28 28 1,826,678.62 28 1,880,912.28<br />
165 Organic Compounds Analytical Laboratory Section<br />
HP18 Instrumentation Chemist IV 1 1 1 114,348.00 1 118,350.18<br />
HP17 Instrumentation Chemist III 2 2 2 224,903.64 2 218,234.12<br />
HP16 Instrumentation Chemist II 2 2 2 200,291.26 2 202,719.92<br />
HP15 Instrumentation Chemist I 1 1 1 68,520.92 1 75,273.90<br />
HP15 Instrumentation Chemist I (AC) 1 1 1 85,349.94 1 66,564.42<br />
160<br />
160
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Monitoring and Research<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II 3 3 3 160,989.66 3 175,297.20<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II #4 1 1 1 65,718.38 1 68,018.60<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 40,225.90 1 44,122.26<br />
TOTAL Organic Compounds Analytical Laboratory Section 12 12 12 960,347.70 12 968,580.60<br />
166 Egan Analytical Laboratory Section<br />
HP18 Sanitary Chemist IV 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
HP17 Sanitary Chemist III 1 1 1 117,135.20 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Sanitary Chemist II 1 1 1 93,766.40 1 101,402.60<br />
HP14 Sanitary Chemist I 2 2 2 145,405.78 2 154,667.76<br />
HP13 Laboratory Technician III 1 1 1 65,869.96 1 72,099.04<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II 1 1 1 56,456.40 1 58,432.40<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II #4 2 2 2 131,436.76 2 136,037.20<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I 5 5 5 220,371.58 5 240,525.22<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I (AC) 2 2 2 80,597.66 2 83,267.60<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 57,062.46 1 59,059.52<br />
HP09 Laboratory Assistant 2 2 2 71,780.28 2 76,437.92<br />
TOTAL Egan Analytical Laboratory Section 19 19 19 1,169,186.46 19 1,236,993.68<br />
167 Calumet Analytical Laboratory Section<br />
HP18 Sanitary Chemist IV 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
HP17 Sanitary Chemist III 1 1 1 112,452.34 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Sanitary Chemist II 1 1 1 93,766.40 1 97,048.12<br />
HP14 Sanitary Chemist I 2 2 2 169,588.64 2 179,694.84<br />
HP13 Laboratory Technician III 1 1 1 81,035.50 1 87,794.20<br />
HP11 Laboratory Technician II 3 3 3 172,162.90 3 181,079.60<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I 4 4 4 175,332.82 4 193,915.02<br />
HP10 Laboratory Technician I #4 1 1 1 54,428.40 1 56,333.42<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 52,251.68 1 56,570.54<br />
161<br />
161
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Monitoring and Research<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP09 Laboratory Assistant #4 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
HP09 Laboratory Assistant - 1 1 42,108.56 1 45,726.98<br />
TOTAL Calumet Analytical Laboratory Section 16 16 16 1,082,431.22 16 1,153,227.14<br />
TOTAL Analytical Laboratories Division 110 111 111 7,524,029.50 111 7,827,654.12<br />
190 Administration / Industrial Waste Division<br />
191 Industrial Waste Administrative Section<br />
HP22 Deputy Director of Monitoring and Research - - - 0.00 1 167,359.40<br />
HP22 Assistant Chief Engineer 1 1 1 153,808.72 - 0.00<br />
HP18 Management Analyst IV - 1 1 99,391.76 1 123,509.62<br />
HP17 Management Analyst III - 1 1 112,452.34 1 121,234.88<br />
HP13 Management Analyst I - 1 1 62,078.12 1 60,328.06<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 1 1 74,275.76 1 59,981.22<br />
HP13 Senior Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 73,452.34 1 79,947.40<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 4 4 4 211,413.02 4 198,895.84<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist 4 4 4 170,506.44 3 132,892.24<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist (AC) - - - 0.00 1 50,018.28<br />
TOTAL Industrial Waste Administrative Section 11 14 14 957,378.50 14 994,166.94<br />
192 Enforcement Section<br />
HP18<br />
Industrial Waste Enforcement Supervisor #2 (Supervising Environmental<br />
Specialist)<br />
1 - - 0 - 0<br />
HP18 Supervising Environmental Specialist - 1 1 114,348.00 1 123,509.62<br />
HP17 Senior Environmental Engineer 1 1 1 103,085.84 1 106,693.86<br />
HP17 Senior Environmental Engineer #2 (Senior Environmental Specialist) 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
HP17 Senior Environmental Specialist 1 2 2 224,904.68 2 232,775.14<br />
HP15 Associate Environmental Engineer 3 3 3 247,635.18 3 260,656.50<br />
HP15 Associate Environmental Specialist - 1 1 93,766.40 3 286,789.62<br />
HP15 Associate Environmental Engineer #2 (Associate Environmental Specialist) 1 1 1 89558.82 1 92693.38<br />
HP15 Pollution Control Officer II #2 (Associate Environmental Specialist) 8 7 7 677400.1 5 502658.52<br />
162<br />
162
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Monitoring and Research<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP14 Pollution Control Officer I #2 (Assistant Environmental Specialist) 2 2 2 173,618.38 2 154,665.94<br />
TOTAL Enforcement Section 18 18 18 1,724,317.40 18 1,760,442.58<br />
193 User Charge and Technical Services Section<br />
HP18 Supervising Environmental Specialist - - - 0.00 1 123,509.62<br />
HP18 Engineer of User Charge #2 (Supervising Environmental Specialist) 1 1 1 142,121.98 - 0.00<br />
HP17 Senior Environmental Engineer #2 (Senior Environmental Specialist) 2 1 1 117,135.20 1 121,234.88<br />
HP17 Senior Environmental Specialist - 1 1 112,452.34 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Associate Environmental Specialist 1 3 3 277,089.80 3 286,787.80<br />
HP15 Associate Environmental Engineer 1 1 1 89,558.82 1 92,693.38<br />
HP15 Associate Environmental Engineer #2 (Associate Environmental Specialist) 4 2 2 183,325.22 2 194,096.24<br />
HP14 Assistant Environmental Engineer 2 2 2 121,222.40 2 133,807.70<br />
HP14 Pollution Control Officer I #2 (Assistant Environmental Specialist) 4 3 3 256,397.18 4 363,562.42<br />
HP14 Assistant Environmental Specialist - 1 1 82,778.80 - 0.00<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 4 4 4 284,045.84 3 220,490.40<br />
TOTAL User Charge and Technical Services Section 19 19 19 1,666,127.58 18 1,657,417.32<br />
194 Field Services Central Area Section<br />
HP18 Pollution Control Officer IV #2 (Supervising Environmental Specialist) 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
HP17 Pollution Control Officer III #2 (Senior Environmental Specialist) 2 2 2 234,270.40 2 242,469.76<br />
HP15 Associate Environmental Specialist - - - 0.00 1 101,402.60<br />
HP15 Pollution Control Officer II #2 (Associate Environmental Specialist) 4 4 4 387,686.78 3 299,853.32<br />
HP14 Pollution Control Officer I #2 (Assistant Environmental Specialist) 12 12 12 1,037,683.40 11 959,123.62<br />
HP14 Pollution Control Officer I (AC) 2 1 1 90,839.58 1 94,018.86<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 71,011.72 1 73,497.06<br />
HP11 Principal Clerk Stenographer #2 (Principal Office Support Specialist) 1 1 1 64,836.20 1 67,105.48<br />
NR3642 Pollution Control Technician II 1 1 1 57,886.40 1 59,904.00<br />
NR3641 Pollution Control Technician I 8 8 8 391,476.80 8 398,611.20<br />
TOTAL Field Services Central Area Section 32 31 31 2,464,995.26 30 2,429,815.44<br />
163<br />
163
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Monitoring and Research<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
195 Field Services South Area Section<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP17 Senior Environmental Specialist - - - 0.00 1 121,234.88<br />
HP17 Pollution Control Officer III #2 (Senior Environmental Specialist) 1 1 1 112,452.34 - 0.00<br />
HP15 Associate Environmental Specialist - - - 0.00 1 92,693.38<br />
HP15 Pollution Control Officer II #2 (Associate Environmental Specialist) 1 1 1 72,728.50 - 0.00<br />
HP14 Pollution Control Officer I #2 (Assistant Environmental Specialist) 5 4 4 351,268.32 4 359,392.28<br />
HP14 Pollution Control Officer I (AC) 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
NR3641 Pollution Control Technician I 4 4 4 205,192.00 4 218,899.20<br />
TOTAL Field Services South Area Section 12 10 10 741,641.16 10 792,219.74<br />
196 Field Services North Area Section<br />
HP17 Senior Environmental Specialist 1 1 1 117,135.20 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Associate Environmental Specialist - 1 1 93,766.40 1 97,048.12<br />
HP14 Pollution Control Officer I #2 (Assistant Environmental Specialist) 3 5 5 397,773.74 4 351,046.80<br />
HP14 Pollution Control Officer I (AC) 2 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
NR3641 Pollution Control Technician I 4 4 4 192,587.20 4 199,305.60<br />
TOTAL Field Services North Area Section 10 11 11 801,262.54 10 768,635.40<br />
197 Field Services Northwest Area Section<br />
HP17 Pollution Control Officer III #2 (Senior Environmental Specialist) 1 1 1 117,135.20 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Pollution Control Officer II #2 (Associate Environmental Specialist) 2 1 1 97,973.46 1 101,402.60<br />
HP14 Pollution Control Officer I #2 (Assistant Environmental Specialist) 5 4 4 343,207.54 4 334,360.78<br />
HP14 Pollution Control Officer I (AC) 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
NR3641 Pollution Control Technician I 4 4 4 198,889.60 4 212,368.00<br />
TOTAL Field Services Northwest Area Section 13 10 10 757,205.80 10 769,366.26<br />
198 Field Services Marine and Monitoring Section<br />
HP17 Pollution Control Officer III #2 (Senior Environmental Specialist) 1 1 1 117,135.20 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Pollution Control Officer II #2 (Associate Environmental Specialist) 1 1 1 1 101,402.60<br />
HP14 Pollution Control Officer I #2 (Assistant Environmental Specialist) - - - 2 183,867.58<br />
HP14 Pollution Control Officer I (AC) 2 2 2 - 0.00<br />
164<br />
164
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Monitoring and Research<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NR6441 Patrol Boat Operator 4 4 4 259,916.80 4 286,707.20<br />
NR3642 Pollution Control Technician II (AC) 3 3 3 173,659.20 3 179,712.00<br />
NR3641 Pollution Control Technician I 6 6 6 317,241.60 6 321,817.60<br />
TOTAL Field Services Marine and Monitoring Section 17 17 17 1,143,576.20 17 1,194,741.86<br />
TOTAL Administration / Industrial Waste Division 132 130 130 10,256,504.44 127 10,366,805.54<br />
TOTAL Monitoring and Research 311 309 309 22,996,739.22 308 23,789,415.52<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
165<br />
165
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
NOTE PAGE<br />
166<br />
166
BOARD OF<br />
COMMISSIONERS<br />
CIVIL SERVICE<br />
BOARD<br />
TREASURY<br />
PROCUREMENT &<br />
MATERIALS MGMT<br />
EXECUTIVE<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
GENERAL<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
MONITORING &<br />
RESEARCH<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
LAW<br />
MAINTENANCE<br />
& OPERATIONS<br />
PROCUREMENT & MATERIALS<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
INFORMATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
FINANCE<br />
ENGINEERING
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
PROCUREMENT AND MATERIALS MANAGEMENT<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Increase<br />
$10,393,700<br />
$9,807,900<br />
$585,800<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Buying<br />
$2,218,146 21.4%<br />
Affirmative Action<br />
$55,800 0.5%<br />
Stores Issue<br />
$7,047,587 67.8%<br />
Inventory & Catalog<br />
$1,072,167 10.3%<br />
$12<br />
$10<br />
$8<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
Millions<br />
Fleet operations<br />
transferred to General<br />
Administration<br />
Positions<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Fleet positions<br />
transferred to<br />
General<br />
Administration<br />
$6<br />
50<br />
$4<br />
40<br />
30<br />
$2<br />
20<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
10<br />
$0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
167<br />
167
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
PROCUREMENT AND MATERIALS MANAGEMENT<br />
20000<br />
PROCUREMENT AND MATERIALS<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
70 70 2008 70<br />
211<br />
Executive Section<br />
3 3 3<br />
215<br />
General and Inventory Control<br />
Division<br />
8 8 8<br />
220<br />
Acquisition Division<br />
21 21 21<br />
225<br />
Stores & Inventory Division<br />
38 38 38<br />
217<br />
Inventory Control Section<br />
8 8 8<br />
221<br />
Administrative Section<br />
4 5 5<br />
226<br />
Administrative Section<br />
2 2 2<br />
222<br />
Buying Section<br />
11 12 12<br />
230<br />
Stores Section<br />
36 36 36<br />
224<br />
Clerical Section<br />
6 4 4<br />
231<br />
Stores Administrative Unit<br />
1 1 1<br />
232<br />
Stickney Storeroom Unit<br />
21 21 21<br />
233<br />
Calumet Storeroom Unit<br />
5 5 5<br />
234<br />
North Side Storeroom Unit<br />
4 4 4<br />
235<br />
Egan Storeroom Unit<br />
5 5 5<br />
168<br />
168
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
PROCUREMENT AND MATERIALS MANAGEMENT<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The mission of the Procurement and Materials Management Department is to procure materials and services required for<br />
District operations in compliance with the Purchasing Act. The Department operates four storerooms at District facilities and<br />
provides services related to planning, receiving, storing, and issuing of materials. The Department is also responsible for<br />
managing the District’s sale of obsolete, used, and surplus materials.<br />
The 2009 appropriation request for the Procurement and Materials Management Department is $10,393,700, an increase of<br />
$585,800 or 6 percent from 2008. Staffing requirements for the Department are 70 positions, the same as 2008. The<br />
Department continues to monitor the growth in expenditures while expanding the services provided to operating departments.<br />
Significant features of this year’s budget include:<br />
• Utilize job order contracting (JOC), a competitively bid procurement tool, for small projects ($10,000 to $100,000), time<br />
sensitive work orders, and emergency situations that may arise;<br />
• Continue procurement of environmentally friendly products utilized in the day to day operations and include these<br />
requirements when contracting for services;<br />
• Implementation of the SAP Suppliers Relationship Management module (SRM) which will incorporate standard contract<br />
management, automated bid evaluation and award, catalog management, and document builder components.<br />
Accomplishments during 2008 include:<br />
• In conjunction with the State of Illinois, the Procurement and Materials Management Department implemented iBid to<br />
auction surplus and obsolete materials and equipment. This tool enables the District to dispose of surplus and obsolete<br />
items in a timely manner;<br />
• Developed an environmental procurement policy which includes the economic and environmental values needed to protect<br />
the quality of life;<br />
• Implemented two environmental programs; one for janitorial products resulting in ten (10) environmentally friendly<br />
janitorial products which replaced twenty-four (24) old cleaners including bleach and one bulb replacement program<br />
where twenty-one (21) different compact florescent lamps have been added to the inventory replacing incandescent lamps;<br />
• Development of a contract database that shows a timeline for the development of contract documents beginning with the<br />
date that authority is received up to and including post-award activity;<br />
• Continued work on the development of a comprehensive procedural handbook for contracts and request for proposals;<br />
• Increased the competitive bid threshold from $10,000 to $25,000 for furnish and deliver of materials or equipment only;<br />
• Disposed of various purchasing documents located at the North Side plant in accordance with the District’s document<br />
retention policy.<br />
During 2009, the Procurement and Materials Management Department will maintain its commitment to continuous<br />
improvement in procuring the highest quality goods and providing the most efficient services to other departments within the<br />
District. The goals and initiatives of the Procurement and Materials Management Department for 2009 are as follows:<br />
1. Provide goods and services that meet customer standards<br />
of quality in a timely manner.<br />
Millions<br />
$1,000<br />
Procurement and Materials Management is constantly looking at<br />
ways to provide needed goods and services in a timely manner<br />
Formal Contracts Advertised<br />
Bond Fund<br />
859.2<br />
for the operating departments. During 2008 a number of<br />
Construction Fund<br />
$800<br />
unforeseeable events occurred that require the need for the<br />
Corporate Fund<br />
696.1<br />
District to utilize the JOC program. This program gives the<br />
District the ability to have a competitively bid contractor $600<br />
available to handle small projects ($10,000 to $100,000); time<br />
sensitive work orders, and emergency situations as they arise.<br />
The unit price book establishes pricing for various construction<br />
$400<br />
related tasks. The contractors then submit bids for overhead and<br />
profit factors. The contract is awarded to the contractor with the<br />
188.6<br />
$200<br />
lowest profit and overhead factor.<br />
121.9<br />
158.3 160.1<br />
The benefits to utilizing the JOC program include simplifying<br />
contract administrative work associated with the bidding of small<br />
$0<br />
Est. Proj.<br />
projects, shorter lead time between the identification of a need for<br />
contracted maintenance or construction services and the actual<br />
acquisition of such services, and overall reduced costs.<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
169<br />
169
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
PROCUREMENT AND MATERIALS MANAGEMENT<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
2. Continuously manage inventory effectively so as to balance an acceptable level of investment while providing a high<br />
level of service to the operating departments.<br />
In 2008, the Procurement and Materials Management Department began to review the consumable inventory products<br />
purchased for the day-to-day operations of the District. The first area investigated was janitorial products. In working with<br />
Maintenance and Operations, the Procurement and Materials Management Department replaced twenty-four cleaners,<br />
including bleach, with ten (10) environmentally friendly products. As a result, the Procurement and Materials Management<br />
Department reduced and standardized the number of products, established the use of environmentally friendly products, and<br />
still achieved a high quality of satisfaction from the operating departments. In 2009, we will take the next step forward and<br />
include these requirements when contracting for janitorial services for the plants and the main and annex office buildings.<br />
The second area the Procurement and Materials Management Department reviewed was incandescent lamps. As of today,<br />
Procurement and Materials Management has added or replaced incandescent lamps with twenty-one (21) different compact<br />
florescent lamps (CFL) in the inventory. When the remaining inventory of incandescent lamps is depleted, these lamps will<br />
also be replaced with compact florescent lamps.<br />
The Procurement and Materials Management Department, in 2009, will continue to review the consumable inventory and<br />
replace the materials and supplies with environmentally friendly products while providing a high level of service to the<br />
operating departments. Commodities to be targeted are paint and related supplies, paper products and a continued effort to<br />
replace incandescent lamps with compact florescent lamps.<br />
3. Increase the use of technology to improve communications with customers and reduce paper.<br />
In 2000, the District implemented an integrated enterprise system. The weakest module was the procurement component. A<br />
customized contract workbench had to be developed to process contract payments including accounting for liquidated<br />
damages, retainage and change orders processing. Since then the enterprise software developer has made tremendous<br />
enhancements to the procurement module by offering a suppliers relationship management module. This module would replace<br />
the customized components with “best practice” standard functionality. In addition, other enhancements will include a<br />
document builder component, catalog management, auction capability, automated bid evaluation, and bid deposit processing<br />
ability.<br />
4. Achieve excellence award in public procurement.<br />
In 2007 the Procurement and Materials Management Department received its recertification of the National Institute of<br />
Governmental Purchasing’s (NIGP) Outstanding Agency Accreditation Award – OA. This certification is valid until July 2011.<br />
NIGP has a higher award called the Pareto Award which recognizes achievement in the areas of leadership, technology and<br />
information, strategic planning, customer focus, process management and performance improvements. The District is currently<br />
seeking this certification.<br />
$120<br />
Cost to Prepare a Purchase Order<br />
Thousands<br />
$1,100<br />
Sales of Surplus Goods<br />
$100<br />
$80<br />
92.06 93.60<br />
82.84<br />
80.00<br />
72.68<br />
74.66<br />
$1,000<br />
$900<br />
$800<br />
$700<br />
939.9<br />
Includes $792,400<br />
for sale of scrap at<br />
Fulton County<br />
$60<br />
$600<br />
$500<br />
$40<br />
$400<br />
$300<br />
$20<br />
$0<br />
Est.<br />
Proj.<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
$200<br />
$100<br />
$0<br />
90.7<br />
78.7<br />
126.7<br />
110.0<br />
Est.<br />
110.0<br />
Proj.<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
170<br />
170
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
20000 PROCUREMENT AND MATERIALS MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. Provide purchasing services for all outside labor, materials, services, and equipment through contracts<br />
and purchase orders with an estimated value of $859,166,773. The estimated number of<br />
contracts and purchase orders is 324 and 6,800 respectively. $2,218,146 21.4%<br />
2. Service the District user departments' material and supply requirements by operating and maintaining<br />
an effective and economical storeroom function by ordering, receiving, storing, and issuing inventory<br />
valued at $37,000,000. $7,047,587 67.8%<br />
3. Support the material and supply requirements of the District by planning, monitoring, cataloging, and<br />
controlling $37,000,000 of inventory consisting of 57,545 items. $1,072,167 10.3%<br />
4. Maximize participation in District purchases by administering the Minority, Small, and Women-<br />
Owned Business programs. $55,800 0.5%<br />
Total $10,393,700 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. Process all requisitions and issue related purchase orders in less than 25 days.<br />
Percent of Purchase Orders Processed within 25 days 85% 90% 90%<br />
Percent of Purchase Orders Processed over 25 days 15% 10% 10%<br />
2. Maintain an inventory level of at least 97 percent for operating supplies and engineering material in stock.<br />
Total Inventory (# of stock items at all storerooms) 56,053 56,500 58,000<br />
Total Stock-outs (Storeroom stock items only) 1,033 1,000 1,000<br />
Total Issues 21,233 21,000 21,000<br />
Total Items Issued 57,916 58,000 58,000<br />
Percent of Stock-out (Maintain a level below 3 percent) 1.8% 1.7% 1.7%<br />
3. Achieve inventory accuracy of 98 percent of operating supplies.<br />
Total Cycle Count 22,560 24,872 23,430<br />
Total Errors 66 374 352<br />
Percent Accuracy 99.7% 98.5% 98.5%<br />
4. Maximize participation in District purchases under $10,000 by pursuing Minority, Small, and<br />
Women-Owned Business solicitation initiatives.<br />
Minority Business Enterprises Solicited 10.8% 20.0% 20.0%<br />
Women-Owned Business Enterprises Solicited 9.7% 10.0% 10.0%<br />
Small Business Enterprises Solicited 0.6% 10.0% 10.0%<br />
Total Percent Solicited 21.1% 40.0% 40.0%<br />
171<br />
171
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
20000 PROCUREMENT AND MATERIALS MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
7260 Buying Procedures $1,792,135 2009 23 $2,218,146 $98,575 4.7<br />
2008 23 $2,119,571<br />
7280 Stores Operation and Issue $5,486,992 2009 37 $7,047,587 $463,655 7.0 a)<br />
2008 37 $6,583,932<br />
7270 Inventory and Cataloging $833,037 2009 10 $1,072,167 $22,370 2.1<br />
2008 10 $1,049,797<br />
7470 Affirmative Action Program $34,009 2009 0 $55,800 $1,200 2.2<br />
2008 0 $54,600<br />
Totals $8,146,173 2009 70 $10,393,700 $585,800 6.0%<br />
2008 70 $9,807,900<br />
a) Increase due to increased inventory requests from other departments and an increase in the cost of materials and supplies.<br />
172<br />
172
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
20000 PROCUREMENT AND MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
7260 Buying Procedures<br />
7261 Prepare, Issue, and Maintain Purchase Orders to Purchase Orders 6,747 6,800 6,800<br />
Appropriate Suppliers Cost $397,762 $477,091 $498,837<br />
Cost/Purchase Order $58.95 $70.16 $73.36<br />
7262 Process Requisition Requirements into Inquiries for Requisitions 15,797 15,000 16,000<br />
Competitive Purchases Cost $165,730 $203,408 $217,516<br />
Cost/Requisition $10.49 $13.56 $13.59<br />
7263 Purchase all Labor, Materials, Services, and Equipment Contracts Advertised 300 300 324<br />
through Formal Contracts Cost $677,378 $711,374 $747,191<br />
Cost/Contract $2,257.93 $2,371.25 $2,306.15<br />
7264 Prepare, Receive, and Evaluate Quotations from Various Inquiries 42,658 32,400 43,000<br />
Suppliers Cost $222,598 $270,150 $286,045<br />
Cost/Inquiry $5.22 $8.34 $6.65<br />
7265 Advertise, Evaluate Bids, and Award the Sale of Scrap, Revenue $126,685 $100,000 $110,000<br />
Surplus Materials, and Document Fees Cost $10,445 $10,868 $11,627<br />
Cost/$1,000 Revenue $82.45 $108.68 $105.70<br />
7269 General Buying Procedures Cost $318,222 $446,680 $456,930<br />
7270 Inventory and Cataloging<br />
Plan and Control Inventory to Support Material and Supply<br />
Requirements of the District<br />
7271 Accurately Identify, Classify, Code, and Maintain Catalog Inventory $36,678,425 $37,000,000 $37,000,000<br />
for Equipment, Materials, and Supplies in District Storerooms Cost $219,990 $302,042 $310,825<br />
Cost/Million $5,997.80 $8,163.30 $8,400.68<br />
7272 Plan and Control Systems to Insure Optimum Levels of Inventory $36,678,425 $37,000,000 $37,000,000<br />
Inventory and Accountability of District Stock Cost $288,810 $289,210 $302,399<br />
Cost/Million $7,874.11 $7,816.49 $8,172.95<br />
7273 Requirement Planning, Controlling, Monitoring, and Analy- Cost $213,332 $223,055 $231,500<br />
zing Commodity Index Coded Items from a Central Location<br />
7279 General Inventory Procedures Cost $110,905 $235,490 $227,443<br />
7280 Stores Operation and Issue<br />
Operate and Maintain an Effective and Economical Storeroom Function<br />
7282 Initiate and Prepare Requisitions in Accordance with Requisitions 16,916 16,500 17,000<br />
Established Policies and Rules Cost $251,657 $256,400 $265,242<br />
Cost/Requisition $14.88 $15.54 $15.60<br />
7283 Receive, Inspect, and Move Purchased Materials, Both Stock Receipts 11,336 11,000 11,500<br />
and Non-Stock Items, to Ensure Compliance with Quantity Cost $669,071 $743,066 $747,197<br />
and Quality Specifications of Purchase Orders Cost/Receipt $59.02 $67.55 $64.97<br />
7284 Provide for the Proper Storage Facilities, People, and Equip- Inventory $36,678,425 $37,000,000 $37,000,000<br />
ment to Effectively Store Materials and Supplies to Protect Cost $665,199 $828,000 $802,300<br />
Against Damage, Malfunction or Loss, and to Move Materials Cost/Million $18,135.98 $22,378.38 $21,683.78<br />
in a Safe and Economical Manner<br />
173<br />
173
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
20000 PROCUREMENT AND MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
7285 Provide Controlled Disbursement of Stored Materials Issue Slips 21,233 21,000 21,000<br />
and Supplies to Requesting Departments Cost $604,940 $682,048 $703,205<br />
Cost/Issue Slip $28.49 $32.48 $33.49<br />
7286 General Stores Operations and Issue Cost $64,788 $69,318 $73,443<br />
7289 Inventory Purchases Cost $3,231,337 $4,005,100 $4,456,200 a)<br />
7471 Affirmative Action Compliance<br />
Administer the Minority, Small, and Women-Owned Business Cost $34,009 $54,600 $55,800<br />
Programs to Allow Maximum Participation in District Purchases<br />
Total $8,146,173 $9,807,900 $10,393,700<br />
a) Increase due to increased inventory requests from other departments and an increase in the cost of materials and supplies.<br />
174<br />
174
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
20000 Department Procurement & Materials<br />
Management<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 4,508,780 $ 5,009,000 $ 5,009,000 $ 4,796,800 $ 5,031,500 $ 5,031,500 $ 5,177,300<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 133,622 207,900 207,900 127,900 190,700 190,700 195,800<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 8,049 20,000 20,000 15,000 19,700 19,700 19,700<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services - 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 150,900 150,900 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 62,800 59,400 59,400 51,400 59,400 59,400 59,400<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 4,713,251 5,371,300 5,371,300 5,066,100 5,527,200 5,527,200 5,527,200<br />
612010 Travel 36 2,100 2,100 1,600 2,100 2,100 2,100<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 214 4,300 4,300 2,300 4,300 4,300 4,300<br />
612040 Postage, Freight, and Delivery Charges - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 3,381 3,000 4,000 3,400 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services - 600 600 500 600 600 600<br />
612240 Testing and Inspection Services - 3,000 3,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />
612280 Subscriptions and Membership Dues - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
612360 Advertising 146,356 196,400 192,900 145,000 196,400 196,400 196,400<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. - 5,200 5,200 4,200 5,200 5,200 5,200<br />
612680 Repairs to Buildings 2,624 1,800 4,300 4,300 2,800 2,800 2,800<br />
612800 Repairs to Office Furniture and Equipment 1,856 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800<br />
612820 Computer Software Maintenance 3,662 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700<br />
612840 Communications Equipment Maintenance<br />
(Includes Software) 1,372 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000<br />
612860 Repairs to Vehicle Equipment 2,493 26,400 26,400 26,400 26,400 26,400 26,400<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. - 1,200 1,200 1,200 200 200 200<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 161,994 263,500 263,500 210,400 263,500 263,500 263,500<br />
623030 Metals 147,230 200,000 220,000 218,000 281,900 281,900 281,900<br />
623070 Electrical Parts and Supplies 278,525 437,000 347,000 330,000 469,300 469,300 469,300<br />
623090 Plumbing Accessories and Supplies 283,275 317,500 392,500 373,000 341,000 341,000 341,000<br />
623110 Hardware 81,419 79,000 89,000 79,000 84,800 84,800 84,800<br />
175<br />
175
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
20000 Department Procurement & Materials<br />
Management<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
623130 Buildings, Grounds, Paving Materials, and<br />
Supplies 119,079 129,000 164,000 162,000 99,600 99,600 99,600<br />
623170 Fiber, Paper, and Insulation Materials 44,533 39,000 49,000 44,000 36,000 36,000 36,000<br />
623190 Paints, Solvents, and Related Materials 62,932 41,000 61,000 52,000 37,800 37,800 37,800<br />
623250 Vehicle Parts and Supplies 9,725 9,500 9,500 9,500 8,000 8,000 8,000<br />
623270 Mechanical Repair Parts 125,689 168,000 148,000 138,000 143,700 143,700 143,700<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 145,826 196,000 151,000 145,000 180,900 180,900 180,900<br />
623570 Laboratory Testing Supplies, Small<br />
Equipment, and Chemicals 557,070 517,600 632,100 577,600 564,900 564,900 564,900<br />
623660 Cleaning Supplies 290,491 289,000 329,000 307,000 264,300 264,300 264,300<br />
623680 Tools and Supplies 126,679 139,000 144,000 141,500 128,400 128,400 128,400<br />
623700 Wearing Apparel 142,871 134,000 174,000 172,200 123,700 123,700 123,700<br />
623780 Safety and Medical Supplies 32,489 68,500 63,500 55,100 63,200 63,200 63,200<br />
623810 Computer Supplies 114,584 296,000 141,000 133,000 260,800 260,800 260,800<br />
623820 Fuel 424,321 669,000 609,000 500,000 1,027,300 1,027,300 1,027,300<br />
623840 Gases 38,970 60,000 85,000 80,000 55,400 55,400 55,400<br />
623850 Communications Supplies 13,122 19,000 14,500 14,000 16,800 16,800 16,800<br />
623860 Lubricants 206,081 206,000 236,000 219,000 278,200 278,200 278,200<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 26,017 159,000 114,000 10,000 137,000 137,000 137,000<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 3,270,928 4,173,100 4,173,100 3,759,900 4,603,000 4,603,000 4,603,000<br />
TOTAL PROCUREMENT & MATERIALS MGMT $ 8,146,173 $ 9,807,900 $ 9,807,900 $ 9,036,400 $ 10,393,700 $ 10,393,700 $ 10,393,700<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
176<br />
176
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Procurement and Materials Management<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
210 Administration Division<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
211 Executive Section<br />
EX08 Director of Procurement and Materials Management - - - 0.00 1 203,837.14<br />
EX08 Purchasing Agent 1 1 1 196,944.02 - 0.00<br />
EX06 Secretary to Officer 2 2 2 146,904.68 2 159,894.80<br />
TOTAL Executive Section 3 3 3 343,848.70 3 363,731.94<br />
TOTAL Administration Division 3 3 3 343,848.70 3 363,731.94<br />
215 General and Inventory Control Division<br />
217 Inventory Control Section<br />
HP17 Materials Planning Administrator 1 1 1 107,768.44 1 111,540.26<br />
HP16 Materials Planning Supervisor 1 1 1 89,079.38 1 92,197.04<br />
HP15 Senior Materials Planner 1 1 1 81,142.36 1 83,982.34<br />
HP11 Materials Planner 3 4 4 217,446.06 4 227,947.46<br />
HP11 Materials Planner #4 2 1 1 72,339.54 1 74,871.42<br />
TOTAL Inventory Control Section 8 8 8 567,775.78 8 590,538.52<br />
TOTAL General and Inventory Control Division 8 8 8 567,775.78 8 590,538.52<br />
220 Acquisition Division<br />
221 Administrative Section<br />
HP20 Assistant Director of Procurement and Materials Management - - - 0.00 1 154,357.32<br />
HP20 Assistant Purchasing Agent 1 1 1 149,137.56 - 0.00<br />
HP13 Senior Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 84,825.26 1 87,794.20<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 2 3 3 206,504.48 3 217,111.70<br />
TOTAL Administrative Section 4 5 5 440,467.30 5 459,263.22<br />
222 Buying Section<br />
HP18 Head Buyer 1 1 1 114,348.00 1 118,350.18<br />
HP17 Buyer III 2 2 2 196,803.88 2 213,385.90<br />
HP16 Buyer II 4 4 4 374,023.52 4 373,370.92<br />
HP13 Buyer I 4 4 4 240,732.70 4 253,081.92<br />
177<br />
177
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Procurement and Materials Management<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist - 1 1 40,225.90 1 39,143.00<br />
TOTAL Buying Section 11 12 12 966,134.00 12 997,331.92<br />
224 Clerical Section<br />
HP13 Senior Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 62,078.12 1 83,871.84<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 2 1 1 42,630.12 1 41,633.80<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 33,817.16 1 35,000.68<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist #4 1 1 1 42,778.32 1 44,275.66<br />
TOTAL Clerical Section 6 4 4 181,303.72 4 204,781.98<br />
TOTAL Acquisition Division 21 21 21 1,587,905.02 21 1,661,377.12<br />
225 Stores and Inventory Division<br />
226 Administrative Section<br />
HP19 Stores and Inventory Manager 1 1 1 139,049.04 1 149,463.60<br />
HP15 Senior Materials Planner 1 1 1 97,973.46 1 101,402.60<br />
TOTAL Administrative Section 2 2 2 237,022.50 2 250,866.20<br />
230 Stores Section<br />
231 Stores Administrative Unit<br />
HP17 Stores Administrator 1 1 1 89,035.44 1 92,151.80<br />
TOTAL Stores Administrative Unit 1 1 1 89,035.44 1 92,151.80<br />
232 Stickney Storeroom Unit<br />
HP14 Head Storekeeper 1 1 1 90,839.58 1 94,018.86<br />
NR1857 Principal Storekeeper 3 3 3 207,729.60 3 215,030.40<br />
NR1853 Storekeeper 8 9 9 584,812.80 9 605,217.60<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 4 4 4 247,436.80 4 256,089.60<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A #1 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
NR1835 Materials Handler Laborer 1 1 1 57,532.80 1 59,550.40<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 49,847.20 1 51,591.80<br />
178<br />
178
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Procurement and Materials Management<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist 2 2 2 88,361.52 2 91,453.96<br />
TOTAL Stickney Storeroom Unit 21 21 21 1,326,560.30 21 1,372,952.62<br />
233 Calumet Storeroom Unit<br />
NR1857 Principal Storekeeper 1 1 1 69,243.20 1 71,676.80<br />
NR1853 Storekeeper 2 2 2 129,958.40 2 134,492.80<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A (AC) 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A - 1 1 61,859.20 1 64,022.40<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 48,326.72 1 50,018.28<br />
TOTAL Calumet Storeroom Unit 5 5 5 309,387.52 5 320,210.28<br />
234 North Side Storeroom Unit<br />
NR1857 Principal Storekeeper 1 1 1 69,243.20 1 71,676.80<br />
NR1853 Storekeeper 1 1 1 64,979.20 1 67,246.40<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A (AC) 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A - 1 1 61,859.20 1 64,022.40<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 46,253.74 1 47,872.50<br />
TOTAL North Side Storeroom Unit 4 4 4 242,335.34 4 250,818.10<br />
235 Egan Storeroom Unit<br />
NR1857 Principal Storekeeper 1 1 1 69,243.20 1 71,676.80<br />
NR1853 Storekeeper 2 2 2 129,958.40 2 134,492.80<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A (AC) 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A - 1 1 61,859.20 1 64,022.40<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 44,180.76 1 47,872.50<br />
TOTAL Egan Storeroom Unit 5 5 5 305,241.56 5 318,064.50<br />
TOTAL Stores Section 36 36 36 2,272,560.16 36 2,354,197.30<br />
TOTAL Stores and Inventory Division 38 38 38 2,509,582.66 38 2,605,063.50<br />
TOTAL Procurement and Materials Management 70 70 70 5,009,112.16 70 5,220,711.08<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
179<br />
179
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
NOTE PAGE<br />
180<br />
180
BOARD OF<br />
COMMISSIONERS<br />
CIVIL SERVICE<br />
BOARD<br />
TREASURY<br />
EXECUTIVE<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
GENERAL<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
MONITORING &<br />
RESEARCH<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
LAW<br />
MAINTENANCE<br />
& OPERATIONS<br />
PROCUREMENT & MATERIALS<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
INFORMATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
FINANCE<br />
ENGINEERING
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Decrease<br />
$54,001,400<br />
$64,433,800<br />
($10,432,400)<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Retiree Benefits<br />
$24,865,500 46.0%<br />
Recruiting & Marketing<br />
$516,883 1.0%<br />
Training &<br />
Development<br />
$974,493 1.8%<br />
Compensation<br />
& Classification<br />
$416,423 0.8%<br />
Examinations &<br />
Employment<br />
$2,039,289 3.8%<br />
Employee Benefits<br />
$20,601,528 38.0%<br />
Labor & Employee Relations<br />
$794,152 1.5%<br />
Personnel Administration<br />
$1,083,141 2.0%<br />
Civil Service Board<br />
$258,225 0.5%<br />
Social Security & Medicare<br />
$2,205,000 4.1%<br />
Equal Employment Opportunity<br />
$246,766 0.5%<br />
$70<br />
$60<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
M illions<br />
Positions<br />
70<br />
60<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Engineer Trainee<br />
program reinstated<br />
$50<br />
Increase due to $15,000,000<br />
addition to fund OPEB trust<br />
50<br />
$40<br />
40<br />
$30<br />
30<br />
Reduction in<br />
interns and<br />
trainees<br />
$20<br />
20<br />
$10<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
10<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
$0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
181<br />
181
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
25000<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
52 54 54<br />
251<br />
Civil Service Board Section<br />
3 3 3<br />
252<br />
Executive Unit<br />
2 2 2<br />
253<br />
Administration / EEO<br />
Section<br />
9 8 9<br />
255<br />
Training Section<br />
0 13 13<br />
258<br />
Labor and Employee<br />
Relations Section<br />
8 6 6<br />
254<br />
Employment Services<br />
Section<br />
23 15 14<br />
256<br />
Classification,<br />
Compensation, and<br />
Benefits Section<br />
7 7 7<br />
182<br />
182
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The mission of the Human Resources Department is to provide effective human resource management by developing and<br />
implementing policies, programs and services that align with the stated organizational mission and goals. These activities<br />
include attracting, retaining and developing a high quality workforce reflective of the diversity of our region in a manner that is<br />
in compliance with our legal and regulatory environment; developing and administering the examination process; directing the<br />
District’s Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program and ensuring compliance with federal and state employment laws;<br />
administering the classification, compensation and benefits programs; managing labor and employee relations activities;<br />
managing training and professional development programs; interacting with the District’s Civil Service Board; and maintaining<br />
the Enterprise System – Human Resources Module and employment records related to employees and budgeted positions.<br />
The 2009 Human Resources Department appropriation request is $54,001,400, a decrease of $10,432,400, or 16.2 percent from<br />
2008. Staffing remains the same at 54 employees. Eight Engineer Trainee positions, one Apprentice position, assigned to the<br />
Maintenance and Operations Department, and three Civil Service Board members are included in the number of employees<br />
budgeted to the Human Resources Department.<br />
Goals and initiatives for the Human Resources Department include the following:<br />
1. Provide an efficient, accessible employment process in alignment with the District’s regulatory environment.<br />
Number of Participants in 2008 Exams<br />
2,324<br />
Test Type<br />
Written<br />
16<br />
323<br />
43<br />
356<br />
Oral<br />
Perf ormance<br />
Training & Experience<br />
Lottery<br />
For 55 job classifications<br />
The District operates in a Civil Service environment, as mandated by state statute. Of the 281 job classifications, 247 are<br />
subject to civil service examination. The goal of the Employment Services Section is to anticipate vacancies and prepare<br />
timely, valid examinations that will provide departments with a sufficient number of qualified candidates. Examinations for<br />
high-turnover classifications are scheduled on a regular basis so that an eligible list is usually in place. Examinations for singleincumbent<br />
or lower-turnover classifications are scheduled on an as-needed basis.<br />
The Employment Services Section plans to give 50 examinations in 2009. In 2009, we plan to implement our applicant<br />
tracking and scoring system to allow web-based applications. This will permit candidates to apply for jobs on-line and receive<br />
electronic notices from District staff, resulting in lower printing and mailing costs.<br />
The Human Resources Department coordinates the Engineer Trainee Program and the District-wide Recruitment Program.<br />
Ongoing advertising in print and electronic media assists the District in attracting a diverse and qualified applicant pool for<br />
current and future examinations. In 2009, the District will concentrate its campus recruitment efforts on core colleges and<br />
universities, in which we have invested our resources, by building relationships with scientific and engineering faculty, staff,<br />
and student organizations.<br />
183<br />
183
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
The District’s minority workforce percentage as of June 30,<br />
2008, was 38.3 percent, which compares favorably with the<br />
Cook County minority labor force availability rate of 33<br />
percent. The District’s female workforce percentage as of<br />
June 30, 2008 was 25.3 percent which equals the Cook<br />
County female labor force availability rate of 25 percent,<br />
when adjusted for District-specific occupations. There is an<br />
under-representation of minorities and/or females within<br />
specific job classifications in the building trades,<br />
professional, engineering, and managerial categories.<br />
Hispanic<br />
4.8%<br />
Racial Distribution of District Employees<br />
African<br />
American<br />
24.3%<br />
Asian<br />
8.8%<br />
American<br />
Indian<br />
0.4%<br />
White<br />
61.7%<br />
Percentage of District Employees Who Are Minorities or Females<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Projected<br />
Minorities 37.6% 37.8% 37.9% 37.9% 37.9% 38.3%<br />
Females * 26.3% 26.5% 27.1% 25.5% 26.5% 25.3%<br />
It is important to note that a majority of the District’s job categories include classifications that are nontraditional for women.<br />
Nontraditional occupations, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, are those occupations wherein 25 percent or fewer<br />
women have the requisite skills or work in that occupation.<br />
The District-specific group includes only job classifications found at the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District. It does not<br />
include classifications such as teachers, registered nurses and social workers that are included in the Cook County data.<br />
Ongoing improvement in minority and female representation is expected through continued efforts to build relationships with<br />
organizations that are significant recruitment sources for women and minorities, as well as placing recruitment advertisements<br />
in minority and female publications, and continuing college recruitment activities.<br />
The adjacent table shows that minority<br />
and female promotional appointments Minority and Female Percentage of Promotions & New Hires Since 2003<br />
have averaged 32.8 percent and 31.5 50%<br />
Minority Promotions Female Promotions<br />
percent, respectively, of all promotional<br />
45% Minority New Hires Female New Hires<br />
appointments made during the six years<br />
reported. Similarly, the table also shows 40%<br />
that minority and female new<br />
35%<br />
appointments have represented 34.0<br />
percent and 30.2 percent, respectively, 30%<br />
of all new appointments during the<br />
same time frame.<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />
184<br />
184
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
2. Make the MWRD an employer of choice and a good place to work.<br />
The District provides health care benefits for all District employees, approximately 1,930 retirees and eligible dependents.<br />
Employees and eligible retirees can select either the Blue Cross PPO or a health-maintenance organization (HMO). There is<br />
one HMO available for employees and retirees. The District is self-insured for both medical plans. Employees are also offered<br />
a choice of dental plans.<br />
The District’s costs for the benefits programs are partially offset by employee and<br />
Distribution of Health Plan Membership retiree contributions. For 2009, employee and retiree contributions for health and<br />
Employees Retirees dental insurance are projected to be $7.2 million.<br />
% in HMO 42% 20%<br />
The Disease Management Program implemented in 2003, and administered by<br />
% in Blue Cross 58% 80%<br />
Blue Cross, continues to identify employees with chronic health conditions and<br />
provides them with programs to defer or prevent high cost admissions for acute medical conditions.<br />
The 2009 Human Resources Department budget includes $10,000,000 that will be allocated to a trust fund for the purpose of<br />
pre-funding retiree health care expenses. This is in response to the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB)<br />
Statement No. 45 covering OPEB costs. These funds will be invested and eventually used to pay the District’s portion of retiree<br />
health care expenses in the future.<br />
By Federal regulation, the District makes matching employee Medicare contributions, which are equal to 1.45 percent of gross<br />
earnings, for employees hired after March 31, 1986. Effective July 2, 1991, the District was also required to begin matching the<br />
entire 7.65 percent FICA contribution for all employees, such as relief workers, who are not eligible for coverage under the<br />
District’s retirement plan.<br />
The table below shows the growth both in cost and in number of employees subject to these payroll taxes between 2002 and<br />
2008, with a projection for 2009. As the number of covered employees grows due to turnover, the District’s expense will<br />
correspondingly increase.<br />
The Administration/EEO Section manages the administration of the District’s EEO/Affirmative Action (AA) Programs, as well<br />
as ensuring compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).<br />
Social Security and Medicare Program Cost and Participation<br />
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Projected<br />
Number of Employees Subject to Medicare Tax 1,725 1,992 1,970 1,970 1,970 1,984 2,004 2,100<br />
Medicare and Social Security Tax Costs ($000s) $1,537.0 $1,615.0 $1,686.4 $1,686.4 $1,686.4 $1,984.4 $2,100.0 $2,205.0<br />
3. Provide processes and procedures for employee representation, internal complaints and investigations in alignment<br />
with the District’s regulatory environment.<br />
The Labor and Employee Relations Section administers collective bargaining agreements for all represented employees,<br />
including contract administration, advice and counseling for managers and supervisors regarding investigations, and<br />
disciplinary matters for both represented and non-represented employees. Approximately 850 of the District’s employees are<br />
represented by unions certified by The Illinois Labor Relations Board for the purpose of negotiating wages, hours, and other<br />
terms and conditions of employment and resolution of disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements. There are 15<br />
different unions representing District employees in six different bargaining units. All six collective bargaining agreements<br />
expired on June 30, 2008. Negotiations for new three-year agreements have been completed. The Administration/EEO Section<br />
is responsible for receiving and processing complaints of discrimination, sexual harassment and other forms of harassment; and<br />
conducting inquiries and investigations, including advice and counseling for employees and supervisors.<br />
In 2009, a consultant will be selected to provide workplace violence training for supervisors and for individuals who will serve<br />
on a crisis management team.<br />
185<br />
185
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
4. Ensure that the District workforce has the knowledge, abilities and skills to meet the organization’s current and<br />
future needs.<br />
The District provides its employees with training and development opportunities through tuition reimbursement, attendance at<br />
seminars and conferences, and in-house training.<br />
Employee Training Participation<br />
Tuition<br />
In-House<br />
Reimbursement<br />
Training<br />
2006 67 306<br />
2007 73 288<br />
Projected 2008 83 2,260<br />
Projected 2009 95 5,230<br />
Note: In 2006 Tuition Reimbursement count was changed from number of<br />
classes to number of participants.<br />
The Training Section ensures that the District’s workforce has the knowledge, skills, and abilities to meet the organization’s<br />
current and future needs by providing a continuum of professional development for employees.<br />
The Human Resources Department has partnered with e-Path Learning System, a vendor-hosted e-learning and training class<br />
management system. The initial use for e-Path will be delivery of the Supervisory Skills/Management Practices (SSMP)<br />
training program for 200 new supervisors.<br />
The Human Resources Department launched a Management and Leadership Program in 2008. This program is targeted<br />
towards approximately 180 mid- to upper-level managers representing every department. The purpose of this program is to<br />
provide critical management and leadership skills to these managers, and better prepare them to assume future leadership<br />
positions at the District. The 2009 Human Resources Department budget includes an expansion of leadership training to<br />
include first-line supervisors and middle managers.<br />
Each year, the Training Section budgets for eight Engineer Trainee positions. These short-term assignments are filled by<br />
engineering students currently enrolled in an appropriate engineering discipline, in their second or third year of college. This<br />
diverse group of Engineer Trainees is given various developmental assignments in the Maintenance & Operations, Engineering<br />
or Monitoring and Research Departments. The Engineer Trainee program provides the engineering students with valuable,<br />
practical experience to augment their educations, while helping the District develop its relationship with engineering schools<br />
that contribute to our highly-skilled workforce. Additionally, in 2008 a Mentor Program was established for new engineers at<br />
the District. The Mentor Program pairs new engineers with more experienced District engineers and provides developmental<br />
programs for the participants.<br />
The Training Section has budgetary and administrative responsibility for a Machinist Apprentice position which was reestablished<br />
in 2008, and is assigned to the M&O Department. The apprenticeship is a four- to five-year program that combines<br />
practical on-the-job training with specialized technical classes relating to the machinist trade. As the District works towards the<br />
goal of a representative and diverse workforce, the Apprentice program provides an avenue to gain the training and experience<br />
necessary to become a journeyman Machinist.<br />
In 2008, the Training Section provided customer service training to ninety employees who, as part of their regular assignments,<br />
have direct contact with employees, retirees, vendors or the general public in a service capacity. The program addressed the<br />
basics of effective communication to help deliver superior customer service to internal and external customers. A one-day<br />
technical writing course was also provided to thirty engineers and scientists. Both programs were well received and will be<br />
expanded in 2009. Both programs will be included in a multi-vendor RFP for various in-house programs as part of the ongoing<br />
professional development of all District employees.<br />
In 2008, ethics training was provided to all District employees. The objective of this training was to encourage the ethical<br />
conduct of all District employees, to raise awareness of ethical issues and challenges and to further strengthen the District’s<br />
commitment to conducting business in an ethical manner. This program also encouraged employees to bring ethical concerns,<br />
questions and issues to managers without fear of retaliation.<br />
In 2009, a consultant will be selected to provide District-wide workplace violence training which will focus on strategies for<br />
preventing workplace violence.<br />
186<br />
186
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
25000 HUMAN RESOURCES OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. Review employment applications and develop and administer 50 examinations to meet Civil Service<br />
requirements and current operational needs. Oversee the certification process to fill positions. $2,039,289 3.8%<br />
2. Maintain comparative wage and salary data, administer non-represented and management compensation<br />
systems, and recommend changes to the Civil Service Board and the Board of Commissioners, in order to<br />
ensure internal pay equity and external competitiveness. $416,423 0.8%<br />
3. Administer six collective bargaining agreements, covering 850 employees, and manage employee relations<br />
programs, which include investigation of employee complaints and performance rating reviews on behalf<br />
of the Director of Human Resources, and administrate the District's Combined Charities Campaign and the<br />
unemployment compensation program. $794,152 1.5%<br />
4. Provide health insurance benefits and administration for retirees and annuitants, which includes OPEB<br />
pre-funding for retiree health care expenses. $24,865,500 46.0%<br />
5. Establish a highly competitive employee benefits package, including health, life, and dental insurance,<br />
vision plan, and Deferred Compensation Plan, and administer other related benefit programs, such as<br />
Employee Assistance Program (EAP) services, flexible spending account (FSA) plan, voluntary<br />
insurance products, and tuition reimbursement. $20,601,528 38.0%<br />
6. Implement the District's equal employment opportunity (EEO) and affirmative action objectives through<br />
targeted recruitment, counseling, and complaint investigation. $246,766 0.5%<br />
7. Provide the necessary administrative support to the District and Human Resources Department sections by maintaining<br />
centralized files on all employees; oversee the hiring, promotion, transfer, termination, return to work,<br />
or any other action affecting an employee's status; manage computerized information to perform Departmental<br />
functions with greater efficiency at less cost; and coordinate the Performance Management Program and<br />
probationary reporting. $1,083,141 2.0%<br />
8. Maintain a highly-skilled work force by offering professional development courses, technical training programs,<br />
and administering the performance management system. $974,493 1.8%<br />
9. Comply with State Civil Service Statutes, by arranging for hearing of complaints from employees or other<br />
persons, the hearing of charges against employees for discharge, and the ratification of amendments to the<br />
Personnel Rules and the compensation and classification plan. $258,225 0.5%<br />
10. Comply with Federal regulations for matching employee Social Security and Medicare contributions (payroll tax). $2,205,000 4.1%<br />
11. Develop and maintain a targeted advertising program necessary to establish recruitment resources, and<br />
administer college and campus recruitment activities and diversity outreach activities. $516,883 1.0%<br />
Total $54,001,400 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. Process personnel requisitions within an average of three working days. 100% 100% 100%<br />
2. Administer targeted number of Civil Service examinations, in order to replenish Eligible Lists.* 100% 100% 100%<br />
3. Process EEO recommendations within three days. 99% 100% 100%<br />
4. Process merit increases on completed files within the pay period in which they are due. 100% 100% 100%<br />
* Number fluctuates based on the needs of the departments and vacancy rates.<br />
187<br />
187
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
25000 HUMAN RESOURCES OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
7290 Examinations and Employment Activities $1,809,287 2009 12 $2,039,289 ($180,645) (8.1) a)<br />
2008 14 $2,219,934<br />
7300 Compensation and Classification Activities $374,015 2009 4 $416,423 $34,642 9.1<br />
2008 4 $381,781<br />
7310 Training and Development Activities $488,326 2009 4 $857,161 $181,741 26.9 b)<br />
2008 2 $675,420<br />
7311 Employee Performance Management $0 2009 2 $117,332 $117,332 100.0 c)<br />
2008 1 $0<br />
7315 Retiree Benefits $12,411,241 2009 1 $14,865,500 $1,090,119 7.9 d)<br />
2008 1 $13,775,381<br />
7316 OPEB Trust Contributions $25,000,000 2009 0 $10,000,000 ($12,000,000) (54.5) e)<br />
2008 0 $22,000,000<br />
7320 Employee Benefits $17,651,228 2009 2 $20,601,528 $99,200 0.5<br />
2008 2 $20,502,328<br />
7295 Equal Employment Opportunity Activity $221,538 2009 2 $246,766 ($14,856) (5.7)<br />
2008 2 $261,622<br />
7296 Recruitment and Marketing Activities $215,073 2009 9 $516,883 ($1,451) (0.3)<br />
2008 9 $518,334<br />
7325 Labor and Employee Relations $669,770 2009 5 $794,152 ($163,487) (17.1) f)<br />
2008 7 $957,639<br />
7330 Personnel Administration $780,668 2009 8 $1,083,141 $181,079 20.1 g)<br />
2008 7 $902,062<br />
7150 Civil Service Board Procedures $277,489 2009 5 $258,225 ($31,074) (10.7)<br />
2008 5 $289,299<br />
7604 Social Security and Medicare Contributions $1,934,393 2009 0 $2,205,000 $255,000 13.1 h)<br />
2008 0 $1,950,000<br />
Totals $61,833,028 2009 54 $54,001,400 ($10,432,400) (16.2%)<br />
2008 54 $64,433,800<br />
a) Decrease due to fewer examinations requested by departments for 2009 than 2008.<br />
b) Increase due to new initiatives such as Management and Leadership Development.<br />
c) Increase due to new reporting item.<br />
d) Increase is below industry trend factor of 11 percent.<br />
e) Decrease due to OPEB trust plan requires lower contribution in 2009.<br />
f) Decrease due to staff reallocation to training program and residency activities.<br />
g) Increase due to staff reallocation to training program and residency activities from employee relations activities.<br />
h) Increase due to greater numbers of new employees subject to Social Security and Medicare payments.<br />
188<br />
188
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
25000 HUMAN RESOURCES PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
7150 Civil Service Board Procedures<br />
Hear and Render Decisions on Appeals from Employees; Actions 173 132 204<br />
Ratify Amendments to the Personnel Rules; Hear and Cost $277,489 $289,299 $258,225<br />
Render Decisions on Discharges Cost/Action $1,603.98 $2,191.66 $1,265.81<br />
7290 Examination and Employment Activities<br />
Candidates 9,252 5,500 4,500<br />
Examinations 71 55 50<br />
Applications 12,842 5,728 6,300<br />
Requisitions 318 304 300<br />
Cost $1,809,287 $2,219,934 $2,039,289 a)<br />
7295 Equal Employment Opportunity Activities<br />
Provide Counseling and Investigate Complaints Actions 530 600 600<br />
Cost $221,538 $261,622 $246,766<br />
Cost/Action $418.00 $436.04 $411.28<br />
7296 Recruitment and Marketing Activities<br />
Diversity /Outreach Recruitment Cost $40,250 $259,167 $259,167<br />
Campus Recruitment Cost $174,823 $259,167 $257,716<br />
7300 Compensation and Classification Activities Cost $374,015 $381,781 $416,423<br />
7310 Training and Development<br />
In-House Training and Professional Development Participants 288 2,260 5,230<br />
Cost $229,598 $243,151 $545,452 b)<br />
Cost/Participant $797.22 $107.59 $104.29<br />
Seminars and Conference Costs Cost $91,770 $67,542 $136,100<br />
Engineer Trainees Costs Cost $100,125 $108,067 $108,067<br />
Apprenticeship Program Cost $66,833 $67,542 $67,542<br />
7311 Employee Performance Management Cost $0 $0 $117,332 c)<br />
7315 Retiree Benefits<br />
Health Insurance -Corporate Fund Retirees Retirees 1,935 1,890 1,937<br />
Cost $7,520,646 $8,265,229 $9,228,231 d)<br />
Cost/Participant $3,886.64 $4,373.14 $4,764.19<br />
Prescription Drug Retirees Participants 1,935 1,890 1,937<br />
Cost $4,890,595 $5,510,152 $5,637,269 e)<br />
Cost/Participant $2,527.44 $2,915.42 $2,910.31<br />
7316 OPEB Trust Contributions Cost $25,000,000 $22,000,000 $10,000,000 f)<br />
a) Decrease due to fewer examinations requested by departments for 2009 than 2008.<br />
b) Increase due to new initiatives such as Management and Leadership Development.<br />
c) Increase due to new reporting item.<br />
d) Increase of 12 percent is offset by lower expected increase in prescription drug costs resulting in lower overall increase than industry trend of 11<br />
percent.<br />
e) Cost-containment efforts such as increased co-pays and mail-order prescriptions are slowing the increase in total cost of the program.<br />
f) Decrease due to OPEB trust plan requires lower contribution in 2009.<br />
189<br />
189
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
25000 HUMAN RESOURCES PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
7320 Employee Benefits<br />
Health Insurance - Corporate Fund Employees Participants 1,700 1,698 1,703<br />
(includes vision care) 1 Cost $13,267,748 $13,326,513 $15,360,780 g)<br />
Cost/Participant $7,804.56 $7,848.36 $9,019.84<br />
Prescription Drugs 1 Participants 1,700 1,698 1,703<br />
Cost $2,807,632 $5,740,653 $3,322,788 h)<br />
Cost/Participant $1,651.55 $3,380.83 $1,951.14<br />
Dental Insurance - Corporate Fund Employees 1 Participants 1,694 1,995 1,694<br />
Cost $1,079,004 $1,148,130 $1,150,000<br />
Cost/Participant $636.96 $575.50 $678.87<br />
Life Insurance - Corporate Fund Employees 1 Employees 1,755 1,690 1,763<br />
Cost $111,040 $112,763 $90,000 i)<br />
Cost/Employee $63.27 $66.72 $51.05<br />
Deferred Compensation Administration Cost $35,000 $20,502 $121,000 j)<br />
Other Benefits<br />
Employee Assistance Program Cost $68,441 $94,311 $85,000<br />
Wellness Program Cost $26,308 $30,753 $35,000<br />
Flexible Spending Accounts Program Cost $24,554 $28,703 $40,000 k)<br />
Administer and Finance the Tuition Reimbursement Participants 73 83 95<br />
Program for the Entire District Cost $231,501 $189,118 $396,960 l)<br />
Cost/Participant $3,171.25 $2,278.53 $4,178.53<br />
7325 Labor and Employee Relations<br />
Labor and Employee Relations Activities Employees 2,344 2,080 2,350<br />
Cost $630,617 $813,993 $694,152 m)<br />
Compliance with Unemployment Compensation Claims 41 52 50<br />
Requirements Cost $39,153 $143,646 $100,000<br />
Cost/Claim $954.95 $2,762.42 $2,000.00<br />
7330 Personnel Administration<br />
Personnel Activity Administration Employees Served 2,344 2,080 2,350<br />
Cost $638,495 $739,691 $904,196 n)<br />
Cost/Employee $272.40 $355.62 $384.76<br />
Medical Services Payments and Record Maintenance Examinations 675 700 700<br />
Cost $142,173 $162,371 $178,945<br />
Cost/Examination $210.63 $231.96 $255.64<br />
7604 Social Security and Medicare Contributions<br />
Social Security and Medicare Matching Contributions Cost $1,934,393 $1,950,000 $2,205,000 o)<br />
Total $61,833,028 $64,433,800 $54,001,400<br />
g) Increase of 15 percent is offset by lower expected costs in prescription drugs resulting in lower overall increase than industry trend of 11 percent.<br />
h) Cost-containment efforts such as increased co-pays and mail-order prescriptions are slowing the increase in total cost of the program.<br />
i) District life insurance rate has decreased.<br />
j) Increase due to consulting costs for selection of new plan vendor.<br />
k) Costs to adminstrative plans have increased.<br />
l) Increase due to new tuition reimbursement program implemented in 2008.<br />
m) Decrease due to staff reallocation to training program and residency activities.<br />
n) Increase due to greater numbers of new employees subject to Social Security and Medicare payments.<br />
o) Number of employees served have increased.<br />
1<br />
Additional funds budgeted in the Construction, Bond, and Stormwater Management Funds.<br />
190<br />
190
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
25000 Department Human Resources<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 3,534,231 $ 4,082,000 $ 4,082,000 $ 4,082,000 $ 4,039,200 $ 4,039,200 $ 4,157,500<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 130,529 274,700 274,700 106,000 292,600 292,600 294,400<br />
601070 Social Security and Medicare Contributions 1,984,430 1,950,000 2,203,000 2,161,000 2,205,000 2,205,000 2,205,000<br />
601080 Salaries of Nonbudgeted Employees - 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 10,000<br />
601090 Employee Claims 25,817 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 356,358 564,300 514,300 407,000 586,000 586,000 586,000<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 959,182 1,574,400 1,524,400 900,000 1,519,400 1,519,400 1,519,400<br />
601250 Health and Life Insurance Premiums 54,527,543 55,291,200 55,138,200 53,953,300 44,439,400 44,439,400 44,439,400<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 120,100 120,100 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 32,701 43,200 43,200 43,200 38,500 38,500 38,500<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 61,550,791 63,889,800 63,889,800 61,752,500 53,350,200 53,350,200 53,350,200<br />
612010 Travel 5,596 14,900 14,900 14,900 13,700 13,700 13,700<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 6,935 23,800 23,800 23,800 25,100 25,100 25,100<br />
612040 Postage, Freight, and Delivery Charges 1,610 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 5,898 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,200 5,200 5,200<br />
612250 Court Reporting Services 8,715 60,000 60,000 60,000 40,000 40,000 40,000<br />
612260 Medical Services 141,434 185,200 185,200 185,200 190,000 190,000 190,000<br />
612280 Subscriptions and Membership Dues - - 1,400 1,400 - - -<br />
612330 Rental Charges 9,076 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000<br />
612360 Advertising - 35,000 33,600 25,100 - - -<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 12,066 36,000 36,000 35,000 69,000 69,000 69,000<br />
612820 Computer Software Maintenance 7,650 15,000 15,000 15,000 43,000 43,000 43,000<br />
612840 Communications Equipment Maintenance<br />
(Includes Software) - 18,000 18,000 5,000 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. - 200 200 200 2,000 2,000 2,000<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 198,980 428,300 428,300 405,800 425,500 425,500 425,500<br />
623250 Vehicle Parts and Supplies 471 - - - - - -<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 8,981 13,300 13,300 13,300 20,000 20,000 20,000<br />
191<br />
191
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
25000 Department Human Resources<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
623720 Books, Maps, and Charts 6,827 12,400 12,400 12,400 14,900 14,900 14,900<br />
623800 Computer Software 30,600 3,000 3,000 3,000 - - -<br />
623810 Computer Supplies 4,180 2,100 2,100 2,100 - - -<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 6,418 29,300 29,300 29,300 30,800 30,800 30,800<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 57,477 60,100 60,100 60,100 65,700 65,700 65,700<br />
634800 Office Furniture and Equipment 25,780 25,000 25,000 25,000 110,000 110,000 110,000<br />
634820 Computer Software - 30,600 30,600 30,600 50,000 50,000 50,000<br />
400 TOTAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 25,780 55,600 55,600 55,600 160,000 160,000 160,000<br />
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES $ 61,833,028 $ 64,433,800 $ 64,433,800 $ 62,274,000 $ 54,001,400 $ 54,001,400 $ 54,001,400<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
192<br />
192
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Human Resources<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
251 Civil Service Board Section<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
EX16 Civil Service Board Chairman 1 1 1 17,500.08 1 17,500.08<br />
EX09 Civil Service Board Member 2 2 2 29,999.84 2 29,999.84<br />
TOTAL Civil Service Board Section 3 3 3 47,499.92 3 47,499.92<br />
252 Executive Unit<br />
EX10 Director of Human Resources - - - 0.00 1 203,837.14<br />
EX10 Director of Personnel 1 1 1 196,944.02 - 0.00<br />
EX06 Secretary to Officer 1 1 1 84,825.26 1 87,794.20<br />
TOTAL Executive Unit 2 2 2 281,769.28 2 291,631.34<br />
253 Administration / EEO Section<br />
HP20 Assistant Director of Human Resources - - - 0.00 1 168,716.86<br />
HP20 Assistant Director of Personnel 1 1 1 156,074.10 - 0.00<br />
HP17 Senior Human Resources Analyst - - - 2 227,928.48<br />
HP17 Senior Personnel Analyst 2 2 2 220,220.78 - 0.00<br />
HP15 Associate Personnel Analyst 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
HP13 Assistant Human Resources Analyst - - - 1 68,175.38<br />
HP13 Assistant Personnel Analyst 1 1 1 69,661.02 - 0.00<br />
HP12 Human Resources Assistant - - - 2 119,962.44<br />
HP12 Personnel Assistant - 1 1 54,687.88 - 0.00<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 1 1 74,275.76 1 59,981.22<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 3 2 2 104,504.66 2 80,776.80<br />
TOTAL Administration / EEO Section 9 8 8 679,424.20 9 725,541.18<br />
254 Employment Services Section<br />
HP19 Human Resources Manager - - - 1 138,367.84<br />
HP19 Supervising Personnel Analyst 1 1 1 128,328.72 - 0.00<br />
HP17 Senior Human Resources Analyst - - - 3 324,928.24<br />
HP17 Senior Personnel Analyst 3 3 3 309,256.22 - 0.00<br />
HP15 Associate Human Resources Analyst - - - 2 176,674.16<br />
193<br />
193
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Human Resources<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP15 Associate Personnel Analyst 3 3 3 251,842.24 - 0.00<br />
HP15<br />
Associate Human Resources Analyst #2 (Assistant Human Resources<br />
Analyst)<br />
- - - 1 88,337.08<br />
HP13 Assistant Human Resources Analyst - - - 1 83,871.84<br />
HP13 Assistant Personnel Analyst 1 1 1 77,243.92 - 0.00<br />
HP12 Human Resources Assistant - - - 3 173,186.52<br />
HP12 Personnel Assistant 4 4 4 231,811.32 - 0.00<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 3 3 3 144,730.82 3 152,284.34<br />
TR3509 Engineer Trainee (4 months) 8 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
TOTAL Employment Services Section 23 15 15 1,143,213.24 14 1,137,650.02<br />
255 Training Section<br />
HP19 Human Resources Manager - - - 1 149,463.60<br />
HP19 Supervising Personnel Analyst - 1 1 112,248.76 - 0.00<br />
HP17 Senior Human Resources Analyst - - - 1 116,388.22<br />
HP17 Senior Personnel Analyst - 1 1 112,452.34 - 0.00<br />
HP15 Associate Human Resources Analyst - - - 1 92,693.38<br />
HP15 Associate Personnel Analyst - 1 1 89,558.82 - 0.00<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist - 1 1 54,657.46 1 44,122.26<br />
PR1025 Apprentice - 1 1 42,202.16 1 56,704.70<br />
TR3509 Engineer Trainee (4 months) - 8 8 351,576.16 8 351,576.16<br />
TOTAL Training Section - 13 13 762,695.70 13 810,948.32<br />
256 Classification, Compensation, and Benefits Section<br />
HP19 Human Resources Manager - - - 1 121,724.72<br />
HP19 Supervising Personnel Analyst 1 1 1 144,409.20 - 0.00<br />
HP17 Senior Human Resources Analyst - - - 1 111,540.26<br />
HP17 Senior Personnel Analyst 2 1 1 107,768.44 - 0.00<br />
HP17 Senior Personnel Analyst #2 (Assistant Personnel Analyst) - 1 1 103,085.84 - 0.00<br />
HP15 Associate Human Resources Analyst - - - 2 181,030.72<br />
HP15 Associate Personnel Analyst 2 2 2 170,701.96 - 0.00<br />
194<br />
194
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Human Resources<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP13 Assistant Human Resources Analyst - - - 2 152,046.44<br />
HP13 Assistant Personnel Analyst 1 1 1 73,452.34 - 0.00<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 54,657.46 1 59,059.52<br />
TOTAL Classification, Compensation, and Benefits Section 7 7 7 654,075.24 7 625,401.66<br />
258 Labor and Employee Relations Section<br />
HP19 Human Resources Manager - - - 1 132,820.22<br />
HP19 Supervising Personnel Analyst 1 1 1 122,968.30 - 0.00<br />
HP17 Senior Human Resources Analyst - - - 1 111,540.26<br />
HP17 Senior Personnel Analyst 2 1 1 107,768.44 - 0.00<br />
HP15 Associate Human Resources Analyst - - - 2 194,095.98<br />
HP15 Associate Personnel Analyst 2 2 2 187,532.28 - 0.00<br />
HP13 Assistant Human Resources Analyst - - - 1 72,099.04<br />
HP12 Personnel Assistant 2 1 1 57,952.96 - 0.00<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 45,036.42 1 49,100.74<br />
TOTAL Labor and Employee Relations Section 8 6 6 521,258.40 6 559,656.24<br />
TOTAL Human Resources 52 54 54 4,089,935.98 54 4,198,328.68<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
195<br />
195
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
NOTE PAGE<br />
196<br />
196
BOARD OF<br />
COMMISSIONERS<br />
CIVIL SERVICE<br />
BOARD<br />
TREASURY<br />
EXECUTIVE<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
GENERAL<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
INFORMATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
MONITORING &<br />
RESEARCH<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
LAW<br />
MAINTENANCE<br />
& OPERATIONS<br />
PROCUREMENT & MATERIALS<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
INFORMATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
FINANCE<br />
ENGINEERING
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
$20,987,200<br />
$21,882,800<br />
Decrease ($895,600)<br />
Computer Security<br />
$596,100 2.9%<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Systems Analysis and<br />
Programming<br />
$5,958,066 28.4%<br />
Information Systems<br />
Planning<br />
$1,054,869 5.0%<br />
Voice and Data<br />
Telecommunications<br />
Support<br />
$2,713,516 12.9%<br />
Departmental Services<br />
$3,155,361 15.0%<br />
Computer Hardware and<br />
Software Support<br />
$6,248,086 29.8%<br />
Help Desk<br />
$541,946 2.6%<br />
Computer Operations Support<br />
$719,256 3.4%<br />
$24<br />
$22<br />
$20<br />
$18<br />
$16<br />
$14<br />
$12<br />
$10<br />
$8<br />
$6<br />
$4<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
Millions<br />
Implementation of Enterprise-wide<br />
Strategic Plan Initiative<br />
Transfer communication costs from user<br />
departments, software acquisition,<br />
Enterprise System consulting, and<br />
software maintenance<br />
Posit ions<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Reductions due to<br />
attrition, efficiencies,<br />
and transfers to<br />
General Administration<br />
Staff added to support<br />
the Information<br />
Technology Stragegic<br />
Plan<br />
$2<br />
$0<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
10<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
197<br />
197
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY<br />
27000<br />
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
65 72 72<br />
270<br />
Executive Division<br />
6 7 7<br />
271<br />
Executive Section<br />
2 2 2<br />
274<br />
Strategic Guidance Section<br />
4 5 5<br />
273<br />
IT User Support Division<br />
15 16 16<br />
280<br />
IT Infrastructure Division<br />
20 19 19<br />
290<br />
IT Application Development<br />
Division<br />
24 30 30<br />
276<br />
Administrative Section<br />
3 3 3<br />
284<br />
Administrative Section<br />
2 2 2<br />
291<br />
Administrative Section<br />
3 4 4<br />
275<br />
User Support Section<br />
12 13 13<br />
277<br />
Departmental Consulting Unit /<br />
Field Operations<br />
4 4 4<br />
278<br />
Departmental Consulting Unit /<br />
MOB Complex<br />
2 3 3<br />
281<br />
MOB Operations /<br />
Helpdesk Unit<br />
5 5 5<br />
282<br />
Stickney Operations / Helpdesk<br />
Unit<br />
1 1 1<br />
283<br />
Infrastructure Section<br />
18 17 17<br />
285<br />
Network Management Unit<br />
5 5 5<br />
286<br />
Voice, Data, and Video<br />
Management Unit<br />
9 8 8<br />
287<br />
Systems Management Unit<br />
4 4 4<br />
299<br />
Application Development<br />
Section<br />
21 26 26<br />
292<br />
Database Support Unit<br />
4 3 3<br />
293<br />
Enterprise System Support Unit<br />
3 6 6<br />
294<br />
LIMS Unit<br />
4 4 4<br />
295<br />
Special Projects Unit<br />
4 5 5<br />
296<br />
Applications Systems Support<br />
Unit<br />
4 4 4<br />
297<br />
Geographic Information<br />
Systems Unit<br />
2 4 4<br />
198<br />
198
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The mission of the Information Technology Department (ITD) is to align information technology with the stated goals and<br />
objectives of the District and to maintain the technology infrastructures and architectures at levels that promote efficacy,<br />
efficiency, and sustainable practices throughout the District.<br />
In pursuit of this mission, ITD coordinates the planning, updating, and implementation of information technology throughout<br />
the District to incorporate new technological advances and to ensure that the District’s use of technology remains focused on<br />
providing quality services, while promoting sustainable practices. In addition, this Department establishes district-wide<br />
computer standards, monitors and oversees computer security, and provides support for numerous district-wide applications.<br />
ITD is responsible for:<br />
• Refining and maintaining a district-wide Information Technology Strategic Plan (ITSP);<br />
• Planning and program management services;<br />
• Design, develop and implementation services for enterprise architecture;<br />
• Applications development and support services for various business process of the District;<br />
• Provide enterprise infrastructure operations and maintenance services;<br />
• User support services, including Help Desk services;<br />
• Maintaining and operating the district-wide wide-area and local-area computer networks;<br />
• Provide, audit, and monitor (with appropriate tools) Security and Disaster Recovery Services;<br />
• Promoting sustainable development and performance management by enhancing access and integration of information,<br />
communication, networking, and awareness among key decision makers at the District;<br />
• Facilitating, through up-to-date technology, the coordination and monitoring of efforts of the various departments to<br />
accomplish the holistic and integrated approach required for sustainable development;<br />
• Provide technical training and other information technology support to District employees to improve their abilities to use,<br />
manage and coordinate resources for sustainable management.<br />
The ITSP developed in 2007 outlines initiatives that will drive enhancements to the District’s information management<br />
capabilities in support of District efforts to improve stakeholder value, core business effectiveness, operational efficiency,<br />
enterprise asset management, life-cycle cost management, performance management, and sustainability.<br />
The ITSP provides the foundation for:<br />
• Identifying the key business<br />
performance metrics that District<br />
managers need for accurate and timely<br />
decision making;<br />
• Aligning information technologies<br />
and information technology services<br />
with the District’s vision, mission,<br />
goals and objectives;<br />
• Enabling business process<br />
improvements for customer problem<br />
resolution, facilities engineering and<br />
construction, integrated budgeting and<br />
planning, performance management,<br />
and sustainable practices;<br />
• Facilitating continuous improvement<br />
including improvements to the<br />
District’s asset management,<br />
regulatory management, and financial<br />
management programs;<br />
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TRANSACTION SUPPORT<br />
2008<br />
BPT - <strong>Budget</strong><br />
3,848,000<br />
Preparation Tool<br />
3,316,401<br />
3,138,139<br />
SAP - System and<br />
Application<br />
Program<br />
MMS -<br />
Maintenance<br />
Management<br />
System<br />
LIMS - Laboratory<br />
Information<br />
Management<br />
10,000 40,000<br />
System<br />
BPT SAP MMS LIMS Outlook<br />
These transactions represent the productivity<br />
resulting from the systems presented, and<br />
these systems are maintained by ITD.<br />
• Defining a strategic direction and plans for information technology projects;<br />
• Instilling best practices for managing IT investments;<br />
• Delineating the key strategies for organizational and staffing structures to support information technology;<br />
• Integrating information technology and business processes throughout the District.<br />
199<br />
199
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
The 2009 appropriation request for ITD is $20,987,200, a decrease of $895,600, or 4.1 percent, compared to the 2008 budget.<br />
Staffing will remain unchanged for a total of 72 positions in 2009.<br />
The following activities represent the major areas of focus of ITD for 2009:<br />
• Acquire and implement cost-justified technologies that support business functions to effectively manage the District<br />
growth and sustainable development.<br />
• Implement SAP Document Management system for data retention, retrieval, and recovery compliance with statutory,<br />
regulatory, and industry standard auditing requirements;<br />
• Implement SAP Records Management system and establish effective electronic record management policies and<br />
procedures consistent with the District’s record retention program and statutory and regulatory requirements;<br />
• Initiate GIS (Geospatial Information System) integration with SAP system to facilitate departments to share and view<br />
geographic information, as well as field-related information for tracking industrial use, stormwater facility<br />
maintenance, buried asset maintenance, etc;<br />
• Implement SAP xRPM (Resource and Portfolio Management system) as a tool for project management.<br />
• Maximize customer service and satisfaction among all departments by providing high quality, responsive service.<br />
• Incorporate strategies of the Information Technology Strategic Plan (ITSP) through 2011 and provide feedback to<br />
customers on project status throughout development, implementation, and maintenance;<br />
• Improve the District’s e-mail services and spam filtering;<br />
• Eliminate unnecessary tasks, workflows and reducing paper documents are aspects of identified projects that are<br />
focused on satisfying the customer and providing the tools to maximize efficiency.<br />
• Ensure availability and security of information systems.<br />
• Continue to consolidate North Side Data Center utilization to provide auxiliary power, air conditioning, and space for<br />
IT systems;<br />
• Continue to develop and document security program;<br />
• Proactively manage security at Web level, Network level and Application level;<br />
• Continued planning for the construction of the new West-Southwest Data Center.<br />
• Proactively evaluate and recommend available/emerging technologies for applicability to the District operations,<br />
performance management, and sustainability plan.<br />
• Implement eProcurement for improved supplier relationship management;<br />
• Implement SAP Strategy Management for district-wide key performance indicators to support Performance<br />
Management System and Sustainability Action Plan;<br />
• Continue Business Warehouse efforts started in 2008, and Implement SAP Business Planning and <strong>Budget</strong>ing;<br />
• Implement operations optimization data-ware.<br />
• Promote increased use of technology to improve efficiency of business processes and sustainable practices.<br />
• Implement SAP workflow, Guided Procedures for business processes;<br />
• Work with District staff to develop a business continuity plan, emergency response plan, and provide awareness and<br />
training programs for staff;<br />
• Continue improving and testing the plan;<br />
• Review the strategic plan for updates or revisions.<br />
• Provide for the development and professional enrichment of ITD staff.<br />
• Provide ongoing application and technical training for ITD professionals.<br />
200<br />
200
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Accomplishments during 2008 include:<br />
The following graph shows the 2008 accomplishments of ITD in meeting the objectives of the IT Strategic Plan.<br />
100%<br />
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY<br />
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVES<br />
2008<br />
TARGET<br />
2008<br />
2007<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
20%<br />
0%<br />
Enterprise<br />
Project<br />
Management<br />
Business<br />
Performance<br />
Management<br />
<strong>Water</strong> Quality<br />
Workflow<br />
Automation<br />
Enterprise<br />
Asset<br />
Management<br />
GIS<br />
Integration<br />
Operations<br />
Optimization*<br />
eBusiness<br />
IT<br />
Infrastructure<br />
TOTALS<br />
*Operations Optimization project will begin in 2010.<br />
Listed below are the detailed accomplishments of ITD for 2008:<br />
• Acquire and implement cost justified technologies that support business functions to effectively manage the District<br />
growth and sustainable development.<br />
• Installed Project Planning MS Server;<br />
• Implemented SAP NetWeaver stack technology/Portal;<br />
• Started implementation of Employee Self-Service;<br />
• Formulated District-wide key performance indicators to support Performance Management System and Sustainability<br />
Action Plan and implemented in SAP Strategy Management software;<br />
• Installed enterprise Business intelligence/business warehouse (BI/BW) infrastructure;<br />
• Replaced two main Storage Area Networks (SAN), where 90% of the District’s data is stored. The two new SANs are<br />
now located at the Stickney <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant and the Egan <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant. These new SANs<br />
instantly copy all their files to the other SAN providing full redundancy in the event of a major data center failure.<br />
Furthermore, the two new SANs are now backed up three times a day providing a higher level of file recovery for<br />
District employees. Finally, the new SANs provide more than 30 times of data storage than the eight year old SANs<br />
they replaced.<br />
• Maximize customer service and satisfaction among all departments by providing high quality, responsive service.<br />
• Improved the District’s e-mail services and spam filtering;<br />
• Human Resources Department testing computers upgraded<br />
and enhanced to secured testing system.<br />
• Ensure availability and security of information systems.<br />
• Proactively implemented Governance Risk Compliance<br />
(GRC) tool to audit SAP Security and develop Security policy<br />
and standards manual for Security Governance Committee;<br />
• Provided 99.65% invulnerable devices for Network Security;<br />
• Equipped North Side Data Center to provide<br />
auxiliary power, air conditioning, and space for IT systems;<br />
Spam<br />
63.98%<br />
INBOUND EMAIL<br />
January 1, 2008 - December 31, 2008<br />
Policy*<br />
0.02% Forwarded to<br />
Users<br />
35.89%<br />
Virus<br />
0.11%<br />
*Policy refers to restrictions ITD puts on emails that contain potentially harmful<br />
attachments, such as .exe, .zip, and .bat files.<br />
201<br />
201
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
• Main network core has been upgraded using the latest technology from Cisco. This upgrade provides increased<br />
throughput, higher speeds, and more reliability for future network utilizations such as video conferencing.<br />
• Proactively evaluate and recommend available/emerging technologies for applicability to the District operations,<br />
performance management, and sustainability plan.<br />
• Implemented the One-Step Trade program for Treasury;<br />
• Performed BPT migration;<br />
• Phone system upgrade at the Main Office Building was completed. This upgrade provides full system redundancy for<br />
all three critical systems within the phone switch;<br />
• Accomplished major upgrade of Scale system – Oracle and Fault tolerance.<br />
• Promote increased use of technology to improve efficiency of business processes and sustainable practices.<br />
• Three additional conference rooms at the District<br />
VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS<br />
were equipped with audio-video conferencing<br />
2008<br />
functionality. This addresses challenges the<br />
District is facing with higher fuel costs by allowing<br />
meetings across the District without forcing<br />
District staff to drive to a central location;<br />
• Perform SAP Upgrade ERP 6.0;<br />
• Implemented enterprise Geospatial Information<br />
System (GIS) infrastructure;<br />
• Developed and implemented enterprise Internetbased<br />
Privately Owned Treatment Works<br />
Administration and Compliance System (IPACS).<br />
• Provide for the development and professional<br />
enrichment of ITD staff.<br />
Remaining<br />
Facilities<br />
Stickney<br />
MOB<br />
McMillan<br />
Pavilion<br />
Remaining Facilities are to receive video communication capability at Egan, North Side, Calumet,<br />
Kirie, Lockport, LASMA, Fulton County, Mainstream, Racine, and North Side Data Center.<br />
• Implementation of smartphone technology. We are now able to provide secure access to email and files, while<br />
District staff is not at a computer, through the use of a District issued cellular phone;<br />
• Deployed thin-clients for use in all District facilities;<br />
• Provided Engineering-Construction with mobile computing capabilities and hardware.<br />
The Department’s goals and initiatives for 2009 include the following:<br />
1. Acquire and implement cost justified technologies that support business functions to effectively manage the District<br />
growth and sustainable development.<br />
The ITSP challenges the District to deliver solid strategic responses, and the District has elected to respond by: streamlining<br />
workflows, reducing and eliminating paper-based processes; initiating an integrated and unified approach to performing the<br />
services it provides to the community; seamlessly integrating the District’s entire business environment, both internally and<br />
externally, and driving an enterprise focus to the way the District performs key functions such as asset management,<br />
performance management, business/operations analysis and reporting, records and document management, and sustainable<br />
development. It has produced a project portfolio aligned with business goals and objectives of the departments. The IT<br />
Strategic Planning Committee (ITSPC) will reconsider its charter and focus on the information technology components of<br />
enterprise processes. These organizational vehicles will enable ITD to more effectively elicit District business needs and<br />
priorities. ITD will expand web/portal architecture and commence projects that are dependent on this architecture besides<br />
employee self-service (ESS), such as business intelligence/business warehouse (BI/BW). ITD will continue to improve<br />
Storage Area Networks (SAN) and Data Replication systems supporting our end user application.<br />
2. Maximize customer service and satisfaction among all departments by providing high quality, responsive service.<br />
ITD has reorganized its management structure to better align functions, tasks and duties. ITD recognizes that the<br />
organizational structure can still be improved and will continue to review it in 2009. ITD will continue to incorporate<br />
strategies of the ITSP through 2012. ITD will continue to improve the District’s e-mail services and spam filtering.<br />
Eliminating unnecessary tasks, workflows and reducing paper documents are aspects of identified projects that are focused on<br />
satisfying the customer and providing the tools to maximize efficiency.<br />
202<br />
202
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
3. Ensure availability and security of information systems.<br />
ITD will continue providing network support and interface standards to ensure compatibility and reliability of District<br />
computer systems. Aging routers, switches and internet connections are being evaluated and replaced with equipment that has<br />
greater capacity and reliability; 80% of this task has been accomplished. ITD will also continue to protect electronic<br />
information through effective security, authentication policies and procedures that will facilitate sharing among authorized<br />
personnel while ensuring the validity and retention of the data while providing backup for recovery. ITD will continue<br />
updating its disaster recovery program and will further refine it by improving on testing methodology.<br />
Disaster prevention has been refined by utilizing external security expertise to identify vulnerabilities, improve audit<br />
procedures, and recommend security standards. ITD has begun improvement of the disaster recovery plan by expanding the<br />
network recovery module. In collaboration with the Engineering Department, ITD has begun to study and recommend future<br />
disaster-tolerant computer room environments.<br />
4. Proactively evaluate and recommend available/emerging technologies for applicability to the District operations,<br />
performance management, and sustainability plan.<br />
The ITSP (2007) has highlighted the need to implement a service-oriented architecture, with greater utilization of Web<br />
Services to support the streamlining of District business processes. ITD is implementing Web Services technologies on an<br />
enterprise level that can be used for internal and external information exchange. Web services technology is being used to<br />
develop management and business process portals that will improve productivity through enhanced information accessibility in<br />
a timely manner while reducing costs associated with information access and sharing. ITD will endeavor to proactively<br />
identify solution development opportunities to address various District business needs with available or emerging technologies.<br />
This will be accomplished through a wide variety of parallel efforts, including: (a) close collaboration with other departments<br />
during the implementation of projects specified in the ITSP; (b) periodic meetings with the IT Steering Committee and ITSPC;<br />
(c) periodic communication events with other departments, with ITD presenting industry best practices and discussing potential<br />
departmental needs; (d) brainstorming sessions between the ITD Section Managers and Section Managers from other<br />
departments; (e) encouraging ITD staff to expand their understanding of wastewater industry trends, and (f) conducting<br />
periodic review of District technologies for purposes of updating and improving existing systems, methods, and technologies.<br />
ITD will continue to explore technologies designed to conserve energy, reduce consumption of fuels, and promote recycling.<br />
Towards this goal, ITD completed 30% (2008) of implementation of district-wide video communications to reduce staff hours<br />
and fuel associated with travel among various locations.<br />
5. Promote increased use of technology to improve efficiency of business processes and sustainable practices.<br />
ITD has long promoted the effective application of technology to enable business process improvements. With the advent of<br />
the newly updated ITSP, ITD is expanding this emphasis on business process improvements during 2008 and beyond. In<br />
particular, with the upgrade to SAP ERP 6.0 and the implementation of the SAP NetWeaver technology stack, many new<br />
opportunities for business process improvement will surface. In addition, during 2008, ITD encouraged collaborative efforts<br />
among departments to drive out new business process improvement goals and objectives, using business process modeling and<br />
analysis to capture improvement opportunities and roll those opportunities into application development. For instance, the<br />
deployment of enterprise GIS-enabled applications will demand extensive re-thinking of field-related business processes for<br />
industrial use tracking, stormwater facilities maintenance, buried assets maintenance, and others. ITD plans to collaborate with<br />
departments to get these new business process designs in place. The ITD has already partnered (2008) with relevant<br />
departments for implementing a performance management system, a sustainability action plan, a document management<br />
system, and an Internet-based Privately Owned Treatment Works Administration and Compliance System (IPACS).<br />
6. Provide for the development and professional enrichment of ITD staff.<br />
ITD will continue to promote training and education to provide and maintain a competent, professional workforce empowered<br />
for decision making. This will be accomplished by developing and implementing a training curriculum for professional staff<br />
that will provide training and exposure on current and emerging technologies, continuing application and technical education<br />
aligned with the District’s information technology architecture and standards, and a program that allows more opportunity for<br />
participation in the management process via cross training and job rotation.<br />
203<br />
203
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
27000 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SUPPORT: The Information Technology Department<br />
(ITD) provides maintenance and operations of all hardware including Sun/UNIX SAP servers and SANS/<br />
Thin-Client central computer hardware and software for nine major locations. $6,248,086 29.8%<br />
2. VOICE, DATA, AND VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT: The ITD Infrastructure Section maintains<br />
the District's wide-area network as well as the Main Office Building's local area networks. Staff is responsible<br />
for planning, installation, and maintenance of voice, data, and video communications for the entire District. $2,713,516 12.9%<br />
3. INFORMATION SYSTEMS PLANNING AND COORDINATION: Provides a strategic perspective used to<br />
align ITD with the stated goals and objectives of the District and its departments. The staff is responsible for<br />
services such as strategic planning of technology and communications, as well as disaster recovery planning. $1,054,869 5.0%<br />
4. SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND PROGRAMMING: The Application Development Section will be<br />
responsible for the system management of the Enterprise Financial System applications which include<br />
ongoing database maintenance, system configuration, and enhancements using ABAP programming<br />
techniques. Internet/intranet services will continue to expand to meet District needs. $5,958,066 28.4%<br />
5. COMPUTER OPERATIONS SUPPORT: The Information Technology Department operates 2 computer<br />
rooms which house the District's Sun and ALPHA systems, SANS, network servers, and ancillary equipment. $719,256 3.4%<br />
6. DEPARTMENTAL SERVICES: The Information Technology Department provides direct consulting,<br />
planning, and maintenance assistance to all departments as well as the administration of SANS/Thin-Client<br />
and necessary networking. Additional services include support of department-specific software such as<br />
LIMS, MMS, IPACS, and Treasury and real estate applications. $3,155,361 15.0%<br />
7. COMPUTER SECURITY: Information Technology is responsible for the security of all District information<br />
systems, disaster recovery system, and data, which includes monitoring and enforcing compliance with<br />
software licensing agreements, District security directives, and the disaster recovery plan. The staff is<br />
also responsible for auditing remaining workstations to verify compliance. $596,100 2.9%<br />
8. DESKTOP APPLICATION SUPPORT: The assigned staff will continue to provide applications and technical<br />
support to over 1,650 computer system users. $541,946 2.6%<br />
Total $20,987,200 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. Number of Business Applications accessible via Portal Technology. 0 5 5<br />
2. Software process maturity based on the Software Engineering Institute Capability Maturity Model.* Level 2 Level 3 Level 3<br />
3. Number of self-maintained departmental web pages. 0 6 6<br />
4. Percent of network infrastructure switched replaced (replacement cycle is 4-5 years). 100% 30% 30%<br />
5. Percent of migration of traditional rack-mounted servers to blade servers. N/A 40% 40%<br />
6. Level of integration of business processes. 20% 40% 40%<br />
* The Capability Maturity Model is based upon 5 levels, the initial level, the repeatable level, the defined level, the managed level, and the<br />
optimizing level.<br />
204<br />
204
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
27000 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
7385 Computer Operations Support $664,539 2009 8 $719,256 $32,656 4.8<br />
2008 8 $686,600<br />
7384 Computer Hardware and Software Support $3,649,462 2009 8 $6,248,086 $440,382 7.6 a)<br />
2008 8 $5,807,704<br />
7383 Voice, Data, and Video Communications Support $3,359,520 2009 8 $2,713,516 ($320,460) (10.6) b)<br />
2008 8 $3,033,976<br />
7381 Systems Analysis and Programming $4,191,035 2009 17 $5,958,066 ($1,645,895) (21.6) c)<br />
2008 17 $7,603,961<br />
7387 Computer Security $418,178 2009 3 $596,100 ($181,600) (23.4) d)<br />
2008 3 $777,700<br />
7388 Information Systems Planning $843,995 2009 4 $611,469 ($75,769) (11.0)<br />
2008 4 $687,238<br />
7389 Information Systems Coordination $253,045 2009 2 $443,400 $161,000 57.0 e)<br />
2008 2 $282,400<br />
7382 Desktop Applications Support $407,578 2009 5 $541,946 $97,652 22.0 f)<br />
2008 5 $444,294<br />
7800 Information Technology Services Provided Directly to $2,069,231 2009 17 $3,155,361 $596,434 23.3 g)<br />
Other Departments 2008 17 $2,558,927<br />
Totals $15,856,583 2009 72 $20,987,200 ($895,600) (4.1%)<br />
2008 72 $21,882,800<br />
a) Increase due to infrastructure requirements for Information Technology Strategic Plan ($300,000) and North Side Data Center ($100,000) - Servers<br />
and Storage.<br />
b) Decrease due to less maintenance for Cisco Routers/Switches ($300,000).<br />
c) Decrease due to fewer professional service requirements for several strategic plan initiatives ($1,600,000).<br />
d) Decrease due to the accomplishment of IT security enhancements in 2008 ($180,000).<br />
e) Increase due to emergency notification system and maintenance ($75,000) and disaster recovery software and supplies ($52,000).<br />
f) Increase due to Microsoft Training for 30 employees for strategic plan initiatives ($50,000) and increased spare parts for computers ($25,000).<br />
g) Increase due to increase in Microsoft License Support ($500,000).<br />
205<br />
205
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
27000 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
7380 Information Technology and Telecommunications<br />
7381 Acquire, Develop, and Maintain Computer Programs Processes Supported 4,500 0 0<br />
and Systems Cost $4,191,035 $0 $0<br />
Cost/Process Supported $931.34 $0.00 $0.00<br />
Acquire, Develop, and Maintain Computer Programs<br />
Application Modules<br />
and Systems Supported 0 75 80<br />
Cost $0 $1,233,961 $1,530,666 a)<br />
Cost/Module $0.00 $16,452.81 $19,133.33<br />
Strategic Plan Projects Cost $0 $6,370,000 $4,427,400 a)<br />
7382 Desktop Applications Support # of Service Calls 7,960 10,000 10,400<br />
Cost $407,578 $444,294 $541,946 b)<br />
Cost/Service Call $51.20 $44.43 $52.11<br />
7383 Voice, Data, and Video Communications Support Cost $3,359,520 $3,033,976 $2,713,516 c)<br />
7384 Computer Hardware and Software Support Cost $3,649,462 $5,807,704 $6,248,086 d)<br />
7385 Computer Operations Support Cost $664,539 $686,600 $719,256<br />
7387 General Computer Security Program Cost $418,178 $777,700 $596,100 e)<br />
7388 Information Systems Planning Cost $843,995 $687,238 $611,469<br />
7389 Information Systems Coordination Cost $253,045 $282,400 $443,400 f)<br />
7800 Information Technology Services Provided Directly to # of Users 1,558 1,550 1,650<br />
Other Departments Cost $2,069,231 $2,558,927 $3,155,361 g)<br />
Cost/User $1,328.13 $1,650.92 $1,912.34<br />
Total $15,856,583 $21,882,800 $20,987,200<br />
a) Decrease due to fewer professional service requirements for several strategic plan initiatives ($1,600,000).<br />
b) Increase due to Microsoft Training for 30 employees for strategic plan initiatives ($50,000) and increased spare parts for computers ($25,000).<br />
c) Decrease due to less maintenance for Cisco Routers/Switches ($300,000).<br />
d) Increase due to infrastructure requirements for Information Technology Strategic Plan ($300,000) and North Side Data Center ($100,000) - Servers<br />
and Storage.<br />
e) Decrease due to the accomplishment of IT security enhancements in 2008 ($180,000).<br />
f) Increase due to emergency notification system and maintenance ($75,000) and disaster recovery software and supplies ($52,000).<br />
g) Increase due to increase in Microsoft License Support ($500,000).<br />
206<br />
206
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
27000 Department Information Technology<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 5,986,343 $ 6,613,500 $ 6,713,500 $ 6,613,500 $ 6,937,400 $ 6,928,500 $ 7,125,700<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 146,777 176,600 376,600 275,100 301,900 310,800 321,700<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 87,196 216,800 216,800 176,800 228,900 228,900 228,900<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 592,061 7,025,000 3,573,600 3,560,000 4,550,000 4,550,000 4,550,000<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 208,100 208,100 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 32,929 49,500 49,500 36,500 49,500 49,500 49,500<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 6,845,306 14,081,400 10,930,000 10,661,900 12,275,800 12,275,800 12,275,800<br />
612010 Travel 12,810 32,400 22,400 12,000 32,300 32,300 32,300<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 29,497 54,600 27,100 25,000 54,900 54,900 54,900<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 6,890 6,000 13,000 12,000 6,000 6,000 6,000<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services 111 500 700 500 500 500 500<br />
612210 Communication Services 768,154 800,400 1,255,600 1,200,000 1,305,700 1,305,700 1,305,700<br />
612280 Subscriptions and Membership Dues 100 2,200 2,200 2,000 8,500 8,500 8,500<br />
612330 Rental Charges - 1,000 1,000 600 30,000 30,000 30,000<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 19,841 3,400 16,400 10,000 4,900 4,900 4,900<br />
612810 Computer Equipment Maintenance 701,107 611,000 516,000 516,000 860,000 860,000 860,000<br />
612820 Computer Software Maintenance 1,272,656 1,473,500 1,882,500 1,796,500 2,448,000 2,448,000 2,448,000<br />
612840 Communications Equipment Maintenance<br />
(Includes Software) 447,909 721,000 1,209,000 950,000 351,000 351,000 351,000<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. - 1,300 1,300 - 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,259,075 3,707,300 4,947,200 4,524,600 5,102,800 5,102,800 5,102,800<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 1,207 21,000 26,000 26,000 11,000 11,000 11,000<br />
623720 Books, Maps, and Charts 1,103 5,000 5,000 600 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
623800 Computer Software 1,609,405 303,000 421,300 330,000 371,000 371,000 371,000<br />
623810 Computer Supplies 625,671 1,792,000 3,061,500 2,300,000 1,621,100 1,621,100 1,621,100<br />
623850 Communications Supplies 1,495,281 363,000 98,000 90,000 135,000 135,000 135,000<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 176 800 800 800 500 500 500<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 3,732,843 2,484,800 3,612,600 2,747,400 2,143,600 2,143,600 2,143,600<br />
207<br />
207
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
27000 Department Information Technology<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
634810 Computer Equipment 539,568 495,300 495,300 495,300 1,045,000 1,045,000 1,045,000<br />
634820 Computer Software 1,340,758 764,000 1,772,700 1,449,100 70,000 70,000 70,000<br />
634840 Communications Equipment (Includes<br />
Software) 139,033 350,000 25,000 24,000 350,000 350,000 350,000<br />
400 TOTAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 2,019,359 1,609,300 2,293,000 1,968,400 1,465,000 1,465,000 1,465,000<br />
TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ 15,856,583 $ 21,882,800 $ 21,782,800 $ 19,902,300 $ 20,987,200 $ 20,987,200 $ 20,987,200<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
208<br />
208
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Information Technology<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
270 Executive Division<br />
271 Executive Section<br />
EX17 Director of Information Technology 1 1 1 196,944.02 1 203,837.14<br />
EX06 Secretary to Officer 1 1 1 84,825.26 1 87,794.20<br />
TOTAL Executive Section 2 2 2 281,769.28 2 291,631.34<br />
274 Strategic Guidance Section<br />
HP19 Computer Technology Supervisor #2 (Computer Systems Coordinator) 1 1 1 144,409.20 1 149,463.60<br />
HP18 Computer Security Analyst 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
HP17 Computer Systems Administrator 1 1 1 112,452.34 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Management Analyst II - 1 1 89,558.82 1 92,693.38<br />
HP12 Data Coordinator #1 1 1 1 79,896.18 1 82,692.48<br />
TOTAL Strategic Guidance Section 4 5 5 555,620.52 5 579,913.88<br />
TOTAL Executive Division 6 7 7 837,389.80 7 871,545.22<br />
273 IT User Support Division<br />
276 Administrative Unit<br />
HP20 Assistant Director of Information Technology 1 1 1 156,074.10 1 161,536.70<br />
HP18 Senior Computer Systems Administrator 1 1 1 119,332.98 1 123,509.62<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 52,251.68 1 56,570.54<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 3 3 3 327,658.76 3 341,616.86<br />
275 User Support Section<br />
277 Departmental Consulting Unit / Field Operation Unit<br />
HP17 Computer Systems Administrator 3 3 3 318,622.72 3 339,468.74<br />
HP15 Computer Systems Coordinator 1 1 1 85,349.94 1 92,693.38<br />
TOTAL Departmental Consulting Unit / Field Operation Unit 4 4 4 403,972.66 4 432,162.12<br />
278 Departmental Consulting Unit / MOB Complex Unit<br />
HP17 Computer Systems Administrator 1 1 1 103,085.84 1 106,693.86<br />
HP15 Computer Systems Coordinator 1 2 2 141,249.42 2 154,902.02<br />
TOTAL Departmental Consulting Unit / MOB Complex Unit 2 3 3 244,335.26 3 261,595.88<br />
209<br />
209
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Information Technology<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
281 MOB Operations / Help Desk Unit<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP17 Computer Systems Administrator 1 1 1 98,401.68 1 106,693.86<br />
HP12 Systems Support Specialist II (AC) 1 1 1 57,952.96 1 63,359.92<br />
HP11 Systems Support Specialist I 2 2 2 93,358.72 2 102,409.32<br />
HP11 Word Processing Coordinator #1 1 1 1 65,718.38 1 68,018.60<br />
TOTAL MOB Operations / Help Desk Unit 5 5 5 315,431.74 5 340,481.70<br />
282 Stickney Operations / Help Desk Unit<br />
HP12 Systems Support Specialist II (AC) 1 1 1 72,339.54 1 74,871.42<br />
TOTAL Stickney Operations / Help Desk Unit 1 1 1 72,339.54 1 74,871.42<br />
TOTAL User Support Section 12 13 13 1,036,079.20 13 1,109,111.12<br />
TOTAL IT User Support Division 15 16 16 1,363,737.96 16 1,450,727.98<br />
280 IT Infrastructure Division<br />
284 Administrative Unit<br />
HP20 Assistant Director of Information Technology 1 1 1 156,074.10 1 168,716.86<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 52,251.68 1 56,570.54<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 2 2 2 208,325.78 2 225,287.40<br />
283 Infrastructure Section<br />
285 Network Management Unit<br />
HP18 Senior Network Analyst 1 1 1 124,318.74 1 128,669.84<br />
HP16 Network Analyst 4 4 4 360,744.02 4 382,532.54<br />
TOTAL Network Management Unit 5 5 5 485,062.76 5 511,202.38<br />
286 Voice, Data, and Video Management Unit<br />
HP18 Senior Computer Systems Administrator 1 1 1 119,332.98 1 128,669.84<br />
HP18 Senior Network Analyst 1 1 1 124,318.74 1 128,669.84<br />
HP17 Computer Systems Administrator 1 1 1 117,135.20 1 121,234.88<br />
HP17 Computer Systems Administrator (AC) 1 1 1 103,085.84 1 106,693.86<br />
HP16 Network Analyst 1 1 1 93,505.88 1 96,778.50<br />
HP15 Computer Systems Coordinator 1 1 1 64,313.34 1 75,273.90<br />
HP15 Computer Operations Supervisor #2 (Computer Systems Coordinator) 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
210<br />
210
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Information Technology<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP15 Senior Telecommunications Specialist 1 1 1 72,728.50 1 79,628.12<br />
NR1541 Telecommunications Specialist 1 1 1 64,136.80 1 66,375.40<br />
TOTAL Voice, Data, and Video Management Unit 9 8 8 758,557.28 8 803,324.34<br />
287 Systems Management Unit<br />
HP18 Senior Network Analyst 1 1 1 119,332.98 1 123,509.62<br />
HP17 Computer Systems Administrator 2 2 2 206,170.12 2 203,693.62<br />
HP15 Computer Systems Coordinator 1 1 1 72,728.50 1 66,564.42<br />
TOTAL Systems Management Unit 4 4 4 398,231.60 4 393,767.66<br />
TOTAL Infrastructure Section 18 17 17 1,641,851.64 17 1,708,294.38<br />
TOTAL IT Infrastructure Division 20 19 19 1,850,177.42 19 1,933,581.78<br />
290 IT Application Development Division<br />
291 Administrative Unit<br />
HP20 Assistant Director of Information Technology 1 1 1 149,137.56 1 161,536.70<br />
HP18 Systems Analyst 2 2 2 238,665.96 2 247,019.24<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant - 1 1 54,687.88 1 59,981.22<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 3 4 4 442,491.40 4 468,537.16<br />
299 Application Development Section<br />
292 Database Support Unit<br />
HP18 Systems Analyst 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
HP16 Senior Programmer Analyst 1 1 1 97,932.38 1 101,359.96<br />
HP16 Data Base Analyst 1 1 1 80,227.16 1 73,872.50<br />
HP14 Programmer 1 1 1 70,688.28 1 64,818.00<br />
TOTAL Database Support Unit 4 3 3 248,847.82 3 240,050.46<br />
293 Enterprise System Support Unit<br />
HP19 Supervising Systems Analyst - 1 1 112,248.76 1 138,367.84<br />
HP18 Systems Analyst 1 1 1 114,348.00 1 123,509.62<br />
HP17 Webmaster 1 1 1 107,768.44 1 111,540.26<br />
HP16 Senior Programmer Analyst 1 1 1 80,227.16 1 87,615.84<br />
211<br />
211
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Information Technology<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP14 Programmer - 2 2 133,313.44 2 133,807.70<br />
TOTAL Enterprise System Support Unit 3 6 6 547,905.80 6 594,841.26<br />
294 LIMS Unit<br />
HP18 Systems Analyst #2 (Senior Programmer Analyst) 1 1 1 114,348.00 - 0.00<br />
HP16 Senior Programmer Analyst 1 1 1 106,784.60 2 184,394.60<br />
HP16 Data Base Analyst 1 1 1 84,652.88 1 83,035.16<br />
HP14 Programmer 1 1 1 62,626.20 1 68,989.70<br />
TOTAL LIMS Unit 4 4 4 368,411.68 4 336,419.46<br />
295 Special Projects Unit<br />
HP19 Supervising Systems Analyst - 1 1 144,409.20 1 149,463.60<br />
HP18 Systems Analyst 1 1 1 124,318.74 1 128,669.84<br />
HP16 Senior Programmer Analyst 3 3 3 262,812.16 3 276,592.16<br />
TOTAL Special Projects Unit 4 5 5 531,540.10 5 554,725.60<br />
296 Applications Systems Support Unit<br />
HP18 Senior Computer Systems Administrator 1 1 1 124,318.74 1 128,669.84<br />
HP17 Senior Systems Programmer 3 3 3 313,940.12 3 324,927.98<br />
TOTAL SAP Basis Support 4 4 4 438,258.86 4 453,597.82<br />
297 Geographical Information Systems Unit<br />
HP18 Systems Analyst 1 1 1 104,378.04 1 113,191.00<br />
HP17 Computer Systems Administrator 1 1 1 89,035.44 1 96,999.76<br />
HP16 Senior Programmer Analyst - 1 1 80,227.16 1 83,035.16<br />
HP14 Programmer - 1 1 66,656.72 1 68,989.70<br />
TOTAL Geographical Information Systems Unit 2 4 4 340,297.36 4 362,215.62<br />
TOTAL Application Development Section 21 26 26 2,475,261.62 26 2,541,850.22<br />
TOTAL IT Application Development Division 24 30 30 2,917,753.02 30 3,010,387.38<br />
TOTAL Information Technology 65 72 72 6,969,058.20 72 7,266,242.36<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
212<br />
212
BOARD OF<br />
COMMISSIONERS<br />
CIVIL SERVICE<br />
BOARD<br />
TREASURY<br />
EXECUTIVE<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
GENERAL<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
MONITORING &<br />
RESEARCH<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
LAW<br />
MAINTENANCE<br />
& OPERATIONS<br />
LAW<br />
PROCUREMENT & MATERIALS<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
INFORMATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
FINANCE<br />
ENGINEERING
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
LAW<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Increase<br />
$8,196,000<br />
$7,969,700<br />
$226,300<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Real Estate<br />
$3,034,974 37.0%<br />
Claims<br />
$956,804 11.7%<br />
Waste Monitoring<br />
Employment Matters<br />
$692,493 8.4%<br />
$748,823<br />
9.1%<br />
Contract Administration<br />
$242,194 3.0%<br />
Sewer Rehabilitation<br />
$40,654 0.5%<br />
Legislative Activities<br />
$259,813 3.2%<br />
General Litigation<br />
$2,220,245 27.1%<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Millions<br />
$9<br />
$8<br />
Increased litigation and<br />
Affirmative Action<br />
Positions<br />
50<br />
45<br />
$7<br />
40<br />
$6<br />
$5<br />
$4<br />
$3<br />
$2<br />
$1<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
$0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
213<br />
213
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
LAW<br />
30000<br />
LAW<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
40 40 40<br />
310<br />
Executive Division<br />
8 8 8<br />
311<br />
Executive Office<br />
3 3 3<br />
312<br />
Clerical Section<br />
5 5 5<br />
320<br />
Real Estate/General<br />
Administration Division<br />
12 12 12<br />
330<br />
General Litigation Division<br />
4 4 4<br />
340<br />
Contract and Finance<br />
Division<br />
4 4 3<br />
360<br />
Environmental Issues<br />
Division<br />
8 5 5<br />
370<br />
Employment and Claims<br />
Division<br />
4 7 8<br />
321<br />
Administrative Section<br />
1 1 1<br />
332<br />
Litigation Section<br />
4 4 4<br />
342<br />
Contract and Finance<br />
Section<br />
4 4 3<br />
361<br />
Administrative Section<br />
1 1 1<br />
372<br />
Employment Section<br />
4 7 5<br />
323<br />
Real Estate-General<br />
Administration Section<br />
8 8 8<br />
362<br />
Environmental Issues<br />
Section<br />
4 4 4<br />
373<br />
Claims Section<br />
0 0 3<br />
324<br />
Real Estate Asset<br />
Management Section<br />
3 3 3<br />
363<br />
Claims Section<br />
3 0 0<br />
214<br />
214
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
LAW<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The mission of the Law Department is to provide cost-effective counsel, representation, litigation, and real estate<br />
administration services for the District. The Department’s primary responsibilities include:<br />
• Provide counsel to the Board of Commissioners, Executive Director, and department heads;<br />
• Work with other MWRDGC departments to enforce/litigate environmental ordinances to ensure the dischargers within the<br />
District’s jurisdiction comply with federal and state pollution control laws;<br />
• Work with the USEPA, IEPA, and District staff to ensure that the District complies with legal aspects of regulations<br />
governing discharges from District plants to waterways;<br />
• Represent the District in all litigation at the trial and appellate levels in state and federal courts;<br />
• Represent the District before administrative agencies;<br />
• Provide for the administration of MWRDGC real estate;<br />
• Investigate property damage and personal injury claims and process Workers’ Compensation cases;<br />
• Manage legal aspects of personnel matters and litigation before the Civil Service Board and other tribunals.<br />
The 2009 appropriation request for the Law Department is $8,196,000 an increase of $226,300 or 2.8 percent from 2008.<br />
Staffing requirements for the Department are 40 positions, the same as 2008.<br />
Significant features of this year’s budget are:<br />
• Real estate lease and easement income is estimated to be $10.5 million in 2009;<br />
• The hiring of outside counsel to assist in the litigation of the Federal Consent Decree and the Illinois Pollution Control<br />
Board hearings to establish waterway standards;<br />
• In support of the District’s standard for geographic information system (GIS), consulting services will be solicited to<br />
address GIS needs for real estate management;<br />
• An increased utilization of technology in the form of electronic document management for forms, filings and<br />
presentations.<br />
Accomplishments during 2008 were:<br />
• The Law Department continues to implement changes in its leasing statute in an effort to maximize rental income. The<br />
focus of the changes are to give the District more flexibility in leasing lands with development impediments and in leasing<br />
lands located in Fulton County; In addition, action is taken to protect legal rights to all its real estate;<br />
• The Law Department continues to assist in the formation of a county-wide Stormwater Management plan with related<br />
ordinances to implement the authority granted to the District by the Illinois General Assembly in November of 2004;<br />
• The Law Department continues to represent the District in personnel matters before administrative agencies, state courts<br />
and federal tribunals. Following one contested federal jury trial, the Court of Appeals upheld a significant decision in the<br />
District’s favor;<br />
• The Law Department developed a “Litigation Hold” procedure to designate documents that are important in contested<br />
cases, and it has successfully defended legal challenges to its construction contracts;<br />
• The Environmental Division continues its support in obtaining operating permits for the District’s treatment plants from<br />
the IEPA while overseeing compliance with the Federal Clean Air Act and Clean <strong>Water</strong> Act and it has opposed permits<br />
issued to entities that contribute to the pollution of Lake Michigan.<br />
The Department’s goals and initiatives for 2009 include the following:<br />
1. Protect the District, its officers, and employees against lawsuits when sued and to resolve matters prior to litigation.<br />
Employment-related matters continued to consume a significant amount of Law Department’s resources. Several employment<br />
cases were successfully litigated to judgment or dismissal in the state and federal courts. In 2009, the Law Department will<br />
continue to provide guidance to various District departments in connection with personnel questions relating to benefits and<br />
terms and conditions of employment, drafting or assisting in drafting of guidelines and directives, while routinely handling<br />
employment issues before the Civil Service Board and local, state, and federal agencies, as well as state and federal courts.<br />
The Claims and Environmental Division, like all Law Department Divisions, attempts to negotiate settlements of cases before<br />
litigating them. In representing the District before the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission on cases filed by District<br />
employees, the Division strives to be fair to employees while minimizing the expense to the District. In 2009, the Division will<br />
continue to work with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources to preserve the current level of diversion of Lake Michigan<br />
water. In 2009, all divisions of the Law Department will continue to pursue settlement negotiations with litigants where<br />
appropriate and pursue aggressive motion practice in order to dispose of litigation at the earliest possible stage.<br />
2. Facilitate enforcement of laws and ordinances through legal remedies.<br />
In 2009, the Environmental Division will continue to focus its attention on working with other District departments to<br />
successfully obtain operating permits for the District’s water reclamation plants from the Illinois Environmental Protection<br />
Agency (IEPA), while overseeing District compliance with the Federal Clean Air and Clean <strong>Water</strong> Acts. This Division also<br />
215<br />
215
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
prosecutes all Sewage and Waste Control Ordinance, Sewer Permit Ordinance, and User Charge Ordinance violation cases,<br />
both administratively and in the courts. This Division will continue to provide legal support and counsel to the District and the<br />
governmental bodies in Cook County as implementation of the District’s Stormwater Management activities increase.<br />
3. Utilize the Law Department’s resources in support of the District’s mission.<br />
The Contract and Finance Division continues to actively work with the District’s Contract Committee reviewing and revising<br />
contract language in an effort to standardize District contracts, including sole source, professional services contracts. This<br />
standardization effort will continue in 2009, and has resulted<br />
in a decrease in contract-related litigation.<br />
4. Administer a cost-effective real estate program.<br />
The Real Estate Division has continued to pursue a multipronged<br />
approach to the administration of District lands not<br />
currently required for its corporate purposes. This balanced<br />
program seeks to: maximize rental income in those<br />
instances where District land is made available for private<br />
use in accordance with state law; improve the aesthetics and<br />
create greater opportunity for public access and use of<br />
District land located along its waterways; and ensure the<br />
protection of District lands including, but not limited to,<br />
environmental remediation where appropriate.<br />
The District’s rental revenues continue to increase due to the<br />
application of innovative appraisal techniques to unique<br />
properties, increased marketing efforts, and re-leasing<br />
expired and remediated leaseholds at higher rentals. While<br />
maximizing rentals from private use of District land, the<br />
Division has remained committed to improving the<br />
aesthetics, public access and public recreational<br />
opportunities along its waterways. Toward that end, the<br />
District continues to lease some of its land, for a nominal<br />
fee, to local Park Districts, the Forest Preserve District, and<br />
municipalities for the specific purpose of providing the<br />
general public with greater access to recreational<br />
opportunities along the waterways including, but not limited<br />
to, athletic fields, biking and jogging paths, canoe and boat<br />
launches, and nature preserves.<br />
While maximizing rental revenue and creating greater<br />
opportunities for public access and use of the waterways,<br />
the Division maintains an aggressive enforcement program<br />
to ensure that District lands are protected and that its lease<br />
provisions are complied with. In some cases, the Division<br />
has been successful in requiring private parties to<br />
voluntarily complete their remediation obligations. In other<br />
instances, the Division has pursued and will continue to<br />
aggressively pursue litigation through special counsel when<br />
Asset<br />
Real Estate Management Income<br />
Land Sales, Leases, Easements, 16.4% & Permits<br />
voluntary measures do not produce the desired results. As an important part of its enforcement program, the Division will more<br />
aggressively monitor and prosecute violations of its <strong>Water</strong>way Strategy Resolution, which imposes requirements for<br />
maintaining and improving the aesthetics along the District’s waterways.<br />
The year 2009 will see the Real Estate Division undertaking even more aggressive and intensive marketing and policing<br />
strategies to maximize rental income, increase public access, and ensure the aesthetics and protection of District lands. A<br />
comprehensive review of the Real Estate program will be initiated to analyze the operations of the Division with a view toward<br />
streamlining activities and increasing productivity.<br />
5. Develop the necessary level of staff and appropriation to meet functional responsibilities.<br />
A staffing plan has been developed to meet the department’s objectives while maintaining current service levels. When<br />
caseloads exceed department resources, or specific subject matter expertise is required, the department will outsource this work<br />
to legal firms.<br />
M illions<br />
$10<br />
$9<br />
$8<br />
$7<br />
$6<br />
$5<br />
$4<br />
$3<br />
$2<br />
$1<br />
$0<br />
Environmental<br />
Assessment<br />
33.2%<br />
Land Sales<br />
Land Rentals<br />
Sale of 9.6 Acre<br />
Bus Barn Site<br />
2009 Real Estate Program <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Total $3,034,974<br />
General<br />
Operations<br />
15.1%<br />
Sale of<br />
1,458.6<br />
Acres in<br />
Fulton<br />
County<br />
Tax Payments<br />
22.1%<br />
Leases<br />
4.7%<br />
Easements<br />
4.0%<br />
Permits<br />
4.5%<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Est.<br />
Proj.<br />
216<br />
216
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
30000 LAW OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. Provide prosecution, defense, and appellate services in litigation. Provide other direct legal services and<br />
counseling, as necessary, to the Board of Commissioners, the Executive Director , and the Officers of<br />
the District to further the corporate purposes and protect the interests of the District. $2,220,245 27.1%<br />
2. Monitor all state legislation and legislative activities. $259,813 3.2%<br />
3. Review and revise contract language in an effort to standardize District contracts. $242,194 3.0%<br />
4. Work with other departments to manage legal aspects of employment related matters and litigation<br />
before the Civil Service Board and in the State and Federal Courts. $692,493 8.4%<br />
5. Provide for the administration of all vacant and unoccupied District real estate; administer the leasing and<br />
disposition or other use of District real estate when not presently needed for its corporate purposes; assist<br />
in and administer the acquisition of right-of-way for District construction and improvement projects and<br />
other corporate uses; administer environmental and remediation activities; supervise real estate tax<br />
litigation; provide assistance in developing and processing the real estate agenda for meetings of the Board<br />
of Commissioners.<br />
6. Through its leasing, permit, and easement grant activities, the Real Estate Division will generate<br />
approximately $10.5 million income in 2009. $3,034,974 37.0%<br />
7. Provide legal services to ensure the proper disposal of wastes through the sewer systems in the Chicagoland<br />
area. Oversee the diversion of water from Lake Michigan for water quality services. Provide legal<br />
representation, counseling, and administrative support in connection with enforcement of the Sewage and<br />
Waste Control Ordinance, Sewer Permit Ordinance, and User Charge Ordinance of the District. $748,823 9.1%<br />
8. Sewer Rehabilitation. Upon referral from the Engineering Department, the Law Department conducts<br />
administrative hearings to enforce compliance with the Sewer Permit Ordinance and the Manual of Procedures. $40,654 0.5%<br />
9. Investigate and process all liability claims and employee injury claims against the District. $956,804 11.7%<br />
Total $8,196,000 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Unit of Measure Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. Revise lease procedures and policies to enhance marketability of District<br />
real estate. $6.4 million $9.0 million $10.5 million<br />
2. Replace below market value expiring leases with new interim short term<br />
occupancy permits requiring payment of fair market value upon expiration<br />
of lease and during pendency of compliance review. Interim permits 9 3 5<br />
3. Expedite compliance review for expiring leases or interim permits in<br />
order to advertise an increased number of new long term leases. New leases 5 7 5<br />
4. Resolve unpaid user charge cases to increase collections and District<br />
revenue. Cases 7 10 12<br />
217<br />
217
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
30000 LAW OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
7350 General Litigation $2,789,208 2009 16 $3,414,745 $237,270 7.5 a)<br />
2008 16 $3,177,475<br />
7360 Real Estate Operations $1,780,211 2009 13 $3,034,974 $29,822 1.0<br />
2008 13 $3,005,152<br />
7370 Claims Processing and Investigations $832,433 2009 5 $956,804 ($54,745) (5.4)<br />
2008 5 $1,011,549<br />
4660 Waste Monitoring $663,657 2009 5 $748,823 $23,999 3.3<br />
2008 5 $724,824<br />
1571 Local Sewer - Rehabilitation Ordinance Enforcement $48,640 2009 1 $40,654 ($10,046) (19.8) b)<br />
2008 1 $50,700<br />
a) Increase due to Litigation of Federal Consent Decree and Illinois Pollution Control Board Standards.<br />
b) Decrease due to staff reassignment.<br />
Totals $6,114,149 2009 40 $8,196,000 $226,300 2.8%<br />
2008 40 $7,969,700<br />
218<br />
218
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
30000 LAW PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
7350 General Litigation<br />
Provide Prosecution and Defense Services to Protect the Interests of the District:<br />
7351 Legislative Cost $144,529 $161,885 $160,386<br />
7352 Financial Matters - Bonds, Etc. Cost $81,492 $83,438 $83,945<br />
7353 Governmental and Regulatory Matters Cost $84,917 $96,381 $99,427<br />
7354 Contract Administration Cost $261,562 $253,900 $242,194<br />
7355 Litigation Cost $1,476,945 $1,409,638 $1,630,252 a)<br />
7356 Employment Matters Cost $333,738 $675,976 $692,493<br />
7359 General Legal Services Cost $406,025 $496,257 $506,048<br />
7360 Real Estate Operations<br />
Provide Administration of All District Land:<br />
7361 Real Estate Leases - Administration of Leases and Granting Leases 202 212 218<br />
of Leases Cost $114,730 $134,685 $142,325<br />
Cost/Lease $567.97 $635.31 $652.87<br />
7362 Real Estate Easements - Administration of Easements and Easements 312 325 334<br />
Granting of New Easements Cost $101,953 $115,700 $122,015<br />
Cost/Easement $326.77 $356.00 $365.31<br />
7363 Real Estate Permits - Administration of Permits and Granting Permits 204 210 216<br />
of New Permits Cost $115,477 $130,394 $137,415<br />
Cost/Permit $566.06 $620.92 $636.18<br />
7367 Real Estate Asset Management - Administer Plan to Increase Cost $401,885 $477,430 $498,213<br />
Revenue by Lease/Sale of Real Estate Holdings<br />
7368 Real Estate Environmental Assessment - Administer Activities Cost $159,948 $1,051,387 $1,008,423<br />
Related to Environmental Assessment and Remediation of Real<br />
Estate Holdings<br />
7369 Other Real Estate Operations, Including Development of Agenda, Cost $425,102 $455,556 $455,690<br />
Providing Information, Tax Litigation, and Support Services to<br />
the Board of Commissioners<br />
Payment of Real Estate Taxes Cost $461,116 $640,000 $670,893<br />
a) Increase due to Litigation of Federal Consent Decree and Illinois Pollution Control Board Standards.<br />
219<br />
219
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
30000 LAW PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
Provide Legal Representation and Administrative Support for:<br />
4662 User Charge Ordinance - Tax Exempt Users Cases 4 13 10<br />
Cost $79,315 $75,561 $80,737<br />
Cost/Case $0.00 $5,812.38 $8,073.70<br />
4663 User Charge - Large Commercial-Industrial Users Cases 60 55 50<br />
Cost $363,653 $387,069 $395,685<br />
Cost/Case $6,060.88 $7,037.62 $7,913.70<br />
4667 Sewage and Waste Control Ordinance - Significant Cases 42 34 24<br />
Industrial Users (SIUs) Cost $220,689 $262,194 $272,401<br />
Cost/Case $5,254.50 $7,711.59 $11,350.04<br />
1571 Sewer Permit Ordinance Cases 18 21 30<br />
Cost $48,640 $50,700 $40,654 b)<br />
Cost/Case $2,702.22 $2,414.29 $1,355.13<br />
7371 Investigate and Process All Employee Injury Claims Claims 525 465 480<br />
Cost $540,237 $618,549 $529,659 c)<br />
Cost/Claim $1,029.02 $1,330.21 $1,103.46<br />
7379 Investigate and Process Liability Claims Claims 29 55 50<br />
Cost $122,474 $157,500 $223,912 d)<br />
Cost/Claim $4,223.24 $2,863.64 $4,478.24<br />
Insurance Premiums Relative to Claims Cost $169,722 $235,500 $203,233<br />
Total $6,114,149 $7,969,700 $8,196,000<br />
b) Decrease due to staff reassignment.<br />
c) Decrease due to lower than anticipated special counsel costs associated with workers' compensation.<br />
d) Increase due to inclusion of broker record services and an increase in excess liability insurance.<br />
220<br />
220
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
30000 Department Law<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 4,079,531 $ 4,320,500 $ 4,320,500 $ 4,320,300 $ 4,338,000 $ 4,338,000 $ 4,473,700<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 215,250 188,300 188,300 50,000 210,200 210,200 212,400<br />
601080 Salaries of Nonbudgeted Employees - 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 10,000<br />
601100 Tuition and Training Payments 5,764 81,000 81,000 20,000 81,000 81,000 81,000<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 1,024,197 2,062,400 3,112,400 2,591,200 2,140,600 2,134,300 2,134,300<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 137,900 137,900 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 21,772 30,800 30,800 30,000 30,800 30,800 30,800<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 5,346,514 6,693,000 7,743,000 7,011,500 6,948,500 6,942,200 6,942,200<br />
612010 Travel 6,043 6,000 6,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 6,000<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 3,897 12,000 12,000 6,000 2,000 2,000 2,000<br />
612040 Postage, Freight, and Delivery Charges - 5,000 5,000 2,000 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 1,534 2,400 2,400 2,400 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services - 200 200 200 200 200 200<br />
612090 Reprographic Services 13,598 45,000 45,000 12,000 40,000 46,300 46,300<br />
612210 Communication Services - 1,800 1,800 100 - - -<br />
612250 Court Reporting Services 11,503 88,000 88,000 35,000 80,000 80,000 80,000<br />
612280 Subscriptions and Membership Dues - - - - 1,800 1,800 1,800<br />
612290 Insurance Premiums 169,573 240,500 240,500 130,000 246,000 246,000 246,000<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 59,501 141,000 141,000 81,600 134,500 134,500 134,500<br />
612810 Computer Equipment Maintenance - 500 500 300 500 500 500<br />
612840 Communications Equipment Maintenance<br />
(Includes Software) 1,722 4,200 4,200 3,000 3,200 3,200 3,200<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. - 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 267,371 547,600 547,600 277,600 523,200 529,500 529,500<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 1,954 27,200 27,200 12,000 23,000 23,000 23,000<br />
623720 Books, Maps, and Charts 35,008 58,900 58,900 30,000 55,200 55,200 55,200<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 2,186 3,000 3,000 1,000 6,100 6,100 6,100<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 39,148 89,100 89,100 43,000 84,300 84,300 84,300<br />
667130 Taxes on Real Estate 461,116 640,000 640,000 640,000 640,000 640,000 640,000<br />
700 TOTAL FIXED AND OTHER CHARGES 461,116 640,000 640,000 640,000 640,000 640,000 640,000<br />
TOTAL LAW $ 6,114,149 $ 7,969,700 $ 9,019,700 $ 7,972,100 $ 8,196,000 $ 8,196,000 $ 8,196,000<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
221<br />
221
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Law<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
310 Executive Division<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
311 Executive Office<br />
EX12 General Counsel - - - - 1 229,316.62<br />
EX12 Attorney 1 1 1 221,561.86 - -<br />
HP23 Deputy General Counsel - - - - 1 217,850.62<br />
HP23 Deputy Attorney 1 1 1 210,483.78 - -<br />
EX24 Secretary to Officer #2 (New Grade) (EX06) 1 1 1 89,066.64 1 92,184.04<br />
TOTAL Executive Office 3 3 3 521,112.28 3 539,351.28<br />
312 Clerical Section<br />
HP15 Senior Legal Assistant 1 1 1 93,766.40 1 101,402.60<br />
HP13 Legal Assistant 2 2 2 108,993.04 2 120,656.12<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 2 2 2 102,097.84 2 95,714.06<br />
TOTAL Clerical Section 5 5 5 304,857.28 5 317,772.78<br />
TOTAL Executive Division 8 8 8 825,969.56 8 857,124.06<br />
320 Real Estate / General Administration Division<br />
321 Administrative Section<br />
HP22 Head Assistant Attorney 1 1 1 177,483.02 1 191,862.32<br />
TOTAL Administrative Section 1 1 1 177,483.02 1 191,862.32<br />
323 Real Estate-General Administration Section<br />
HP18 Senior Assistant Attorney 1 - - - - -<br />
HP16 Assistant Attorney - 1 1 71,374.42 1 78,453.44<br />
HP15 Senior Legal Assistant 2 2 2 162,284.72 2 176,674.16<br />
HP13 Legal Assistant 1 1 1 77,243.92 1 79,947.40<br />
HP13 Investigator (AC) 1 1 1 73,452.34 1 76,023.22<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 74,275.76 1 76,875.50<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 1 1 64,482.60 1 70,117.58<br />
HP12 Secretary (AC) 1 1 1 71,011.72 1 73,497.06<br />
TOTAL Real Estate-General Administration Section 8 8 8 594,125.48 8 631,588.36<br />
222<br />
222
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Law<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
324 Real Estate Asset Management<br />
HP20 Principal Assistant Attorney 1 1 1 135,264.48 1 154,357.32<br />
HP18 Senior Assistant Attorney 1 1 1 94,406.78 1 102,870.56<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 67,746.38 1 70,117.58<br />
TOTAL Real Estate Asset Management 3 3 3 297,417.64 3 327,345.46<br />
TOTAL Real Estate / General Administration Division 12 12 12 1,069,026.14 12 1,150,796.14<br />
330 General Litigation Division<br />
332 Litigation Section<br />
HP22 Head Assistant Attorney 1 1 1 185,374.28 1 200,030.48<br />
HP20 Principal Assistant Attorney 1 1 1 142,201.80 1 154,357.32<br />
HP18 Senior Assistant Attorney 1 1 1 94,406.78 1 102,870.56<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 1 1 74,275.76 1 76,875.50<br />
TOTAL Litigation Section 4 4 4 496,258.62 4 534,133.86<br />
TOTAL General Litigation Division 4 4 4 496,258.62 4 534,133.86<br />
340 Contract and Finance Division<br />
342 Contract and Finance Section<br />
HP22 Head Assistant Attorney 1 1 1 193,266.06 1 183,694.94<br />
HP20 Principal Assistant Attorney 1 1 1 156,074.10 1 147,178.98<br />
HP18 Senior Assistant Attorney - 1 1 89,422.32 1 97,711.12<br />
HP18 Senior Assistant Attorney (AC) 1 1 1 124,318.74 - -<br />
HP16 Assistant Attorney 1 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Contract and Finance Section 4 4 4 563,081.22 3 428,585.04<br />
TOTAL Contract and Finance Division 4 4 4 563,081.22 3 428,585.04<br />
360 Environmental Issues Division<br />
361 Administrative Section<br />
HP22 Head Assistant Attorney 1 1 1 185,374.28 1 191,862.32<br />
TOTAL Administrative Section 1 1 1 185,374.28 1 191,862.32<br />
362 Environmental Issues Section<br />
HP20 Principal Assistant Attorney 1 1 1 149,137.56 1 161,536.70<br />
223<br />
223
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Law<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP18 Senior Assistant Attorney 2 2 2 208,754.78 1 118,350.18<br />
HP18 Senior Assistant Attorney (AC) - - - - 1 97,711.12<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 1 1 64,482.60 1 59,981.22<br />
TOTAL Environmental Issues Section 4 4 4 422,374.94 4 437,579.22<br />
363 Claims Section<br />
HP17 Claims and Investigations Administrator #4 1 - - - - -<br />
HP15 Claims Examiner #4 1 - - - - -<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Claims Section 3 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Environmental Issues Division 8 5 5 607,749.22 5 629,441.54<br />
370 Employment and Claims Division<br />
372 Employment Section<br />
HP22 Head Assistant Attorney 1 1 1 169,591.50 1 183,694.94<br />
HP20 Principal Assistant Attorney 1 1 1 135,264.48 1 147,178.98<br />
HP18 Senior Assistant Attorney 1 1 1 119,332.98 2 226,380.18<br />
HP17 Claims and Investigations Administrator - 1 1 - -<br />
HP17 Claims and Investigations Administrator #4 - 1 1 93,025.40 - -<br />
HP15 Claims Examiner - 1 1 - -<br />
HP15 Claims Examiner #4 - 1 1 102,831.30 - -<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 2 2 1 70,117.58<br />
TOTAL Employment Section 4 7 7 620,045.66 5 627,371.68<br />
373 Claims Section<br />
HP17 Claims and Investigations Administrator - - - 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Claims Examiner - - - 1 75,273.90<br />
HP12 Secretary - - - 1 73,497.06<br />
TOTAL Claims Section - - - 334,614.80 3 270,005.84<br />
TOTAL Employment and Claims Division 4 7 7 758,803.76 8 897,377.52<br />
TOTAL Law 40 40 40 4,320,888.52 40 4,497,458.16<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
224<br />
224
BOARD OF<br />
COMMISSIONERS<br />
CIVIL SERVICE<br />
BOARD<br />
TREASURY<br />
EXECUTIVE<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
GENERAL<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
MONITORING &<br />
RESEARCH<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
LAW<br />
MAINTENANCE<br />
& OPERATIONS<br />
PROCUREMENT & MATERIALS<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
INFORMATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
FINANCE<br />
ENGINEERING<br />
FINANCE
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FINANCE<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Increase<br />
$3,762,800<br />
$3,655,200<br />
$107,600<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
General Accounting &<br />
Reporting<br />
$1,567,496 41.7%<br />
Internal Audit<br />
$496,081 13.2%<br />
User Charge, Grant,<br />
Project, & Real Estate<br />
Accounting<br />
$321,285<br />
8.5%<br />
Accounts Payable, Payroll,<br />
& Employee Expense<br />
Clerk's Corporate Functions<br />
$888,837 23.6% $489,101 13.0%<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Millions<br />
$16<br />
Positions<br />
50<br />
$14<br />
$12<br />
$10<br />
Provisions were made in<br />
2001 - 2002 for increased<br />
retirements due to<br />
anticipated expiration of the<br />
Early Retirement Program<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
$8<br />
25<br />
$6<br />
20<br />
$4<br />
15<br />
10<br />
$2<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
5<br />
$0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
225<br />
225
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FINANCE<br />
40000<br />
FINANCE<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
32 33 31<br />
410<br />
Executive Division<br />
7 8 8<br />
411<br />
Executive Section<br />
3 3 3<br />
413<br />
Internal Auditing Section<br />
4 5 5<br />
420<br />
Accounting Division<br />
25 25 23<br />
430<br />
Administrative Section<br />
1 1 1<br />
440<br />
Financial Administration and<br />
Disbursements Section<br />
13 14 12<br />
450<br />
Special Projects and Payroll Section<br />
5 5 5<br />
460<br />
General Accounting Section<br />
6 5 5<br />
441<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
2 2 2<br />
451<br />
Special Projects Unit<br />
2 2 2<br />
463<br />
Accounting Unit<br />
6 5 5<br />
442<br />
Administrative Services Unit<br />
3 3 2<br />
452<br />
Payroll Unit<br />
3 3 3<br />
443<br />
Billing Unit<br />
4 4 4<br />
446<br />
Accounts Payable Unit<br />
4 5 4<br />
226<br />
226
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FINANCE<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The mission of the Finance Department is to provide accurate, economical, and efficient financial payment, collection,<br />
accounting and reporting services on the transactions of the District in compliance with relevant statutes, professional<br />
standards, and District policy as determined by the Board of Commissioners for the benefit of the taxpayers and the District as<br />
a whole.<br />
The primary objectives of the Finance Department are to account and report financial transactions, pursue revenue collections<br />
and pay obligations. Financial reporting requirements include ensuring and demonstrating, to a diverse user community, the<br />
District’s compliance with all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, as well as professional standards and District<br />
policies and procedures. Financial information is furnished in District annual reports to enable these user groups to readily<br />
assess the District’s financial position and the results of operations. The department reports all District generated revenues as<br />
well as billing and reporting user charges. Central to the department’s activities are the prompt payment of all obligations and<br />
the communication of accurate, relevant, and timely information to the District’s Board of Commissioners and management,<br />
oversight agencies, investors, and the general public. AAA bond ratings, external auditors’ unqualified opinions and the<br />
GFOA’s Certificate of Achievement in Financial Reporting demonstrate the effectiveness of the District’s fiscal management<br />
and financial reporting.<br />
The 2009 appropriation request for the Finance Department is $3,762,800, an increase of $107,600 or 2.9 percent from 2008.<br />
The increase is primarily due to merit and cost of living increases. Staffing requirements for the Department decreased to 31<br />
positions from 33 as a result of one dropped Accounting Clerk II position and one Senior Support Specialist.<br />
Accomplishments during 2008 are as follows:<br />
• The District was presented with the Government Finance Officers Association’s (GFOA) Certificate of Achievement for<br />
Excellence in Financial Reporting for the 2006 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the thirty-second consecutive<br />
year;<br />
• The District received an unqualified opinion on the fair presentation, in all material aspects, of the District’s fiscal year<br />
2007 financial statements from external auditors;<br />
• Implemented GASB Statement No. 49 on Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pollution Remediation Obligations;<br />
• Implemented GASB Statement No. 50 on Pension Disclosures-an amendment to GASB Statements No. 25 and No. 27;<br />
• Expanded payment methods to include on-line credit card payments for miscellaneous revenues;<br />
• Implemented an Agenda Management System that automated the Board Agenda process, provided for legislation search<br />
capabilities and enhanced transparency with public access to legislative matters;<br />
• Completed fifteen planned and two unplanned internal audit projects;<br />
• Expanded automation of accounts payable invoice processing through implementation of OCR Technology;<br />
• In the fourth quarter of 2008, investigated feasibility of automating time entry process.<br />
The Department’s goals and initiatives for 2009 include the following:<br />
1. To pay District obligations accurately and in accordance with the Prompt Payment Act.<br />
The District is subject to the Local Government Prompt Payment Act. There were no violations of the Act in 2008. Prompt<br />
payment of District obligations is a top priority for the department. Accounts Payable paid 93 percent of vendor invoices in<br />
fewer than 60 days, with 78 percent paid in fewer than 30 days. Untimely entries of goods receipts and lack of prompt invoice<br />
approvals are the primary causes for noncompliance. The department plans to achieve 95 percent compliance within 60 days<br />
and 85 percent compliance within 30 days in 2009 through aggressive follow-up with District requisitioners, improving the<br />
aging report, and expanding invoiceless A/P processing and electronic payments.<br />
2. To record and report all financial transactions in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as<br />
promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), as well as any other applicable financerelated<br />
statutory, regulatory, and/or management requirements.<br />
The Finance Department strives to obtain an unqualified audit opinion on the District’s financial statements and seeks to earn<br />
the Certificate of Excellence in Financial Reporting from the GFOA. The accounting system has been designed to ensure and<br />
demonstrate that the data presented in all financial reports is relevant, accurate, reliable, complete, and fairly presented in all<br />
material aspects.<br />
227<br />
227
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FINANCE<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
3. To consistently achieve a high level of customer satisfaction with payroll operations.<br />
The achievement of this goal is reflected in the ability to pay all employees accurately and on-time in compliance with<br />
regulatory schedules. The Payroll Unit ensures accurate and timely payments of wages, reimbursable expenses, and that<br />
employee benefits are charged appropriately. Finance intends to implement Employee-Self Service (ESS) in SAP during 2009<br />
which will provide employees with the ability to access compensation information on-line. Finance will also explore the<br />
automation of the time entry process.<br />
4. Promote cost effective and quality service to external and internal clients through continuous improvements.<br />
Finance desires to reduce their costs to process invoices, as well as overall costs to run the Finance Department. Expanding the<br />
automatic invoice processing and expanding electronic vendor payments for system contracts and non-system contracts will<br />
reduce operating costs and improve staff productivity. Providing tools to managers so that they may effectively use financial<br />
data will increase Finances’ customer service. The 1099 reporting process will be improved as a result of adding and<br />
maintaining W-9 information in SAP vendor database.<br />
5. To safeguard official records and ensure they are readily retrievable.<br />
The Office of the Clerk records, publishes, and archives all the official proceedings (and related documents) of the Board of<br />
Commissioners and manages the fiscal records of the District in accordance with State statutes. Use of District-wide tracking<br />
software facilitates the timely retrieval and reproduction of records that may be required by District managers, Freedom of<br />
Information Act requests and/or subpoenas. Finance is required by statutory regulations to preserve the official acts of the<br />
Board of Commissioners. Finance will seek to standardize the preparation of Board Letters and Orders, facilitate electronic<br />
capture of Board proceedings and other approved records, and make them available to District constituents through its web site.<br />
Finances’ goal will be to streamline overall Board processes and eliminate inefficiencies.<br />
6. To ensure all revenues due the District (excluding property and personal property replacement taxes) are billed<br />
and collected in a timely manner.<br />
Finance bills and collects user charge revenues, the<br />
District Revenues<br />
User Charge<br />
Thousands<br />
major component of the accounts receivable function.<br />
Grants<br />
To facilitate an alternate method of collecting<br />
$60,000<br />
SRF Lo ans<br />
revenues and maximize cash management, the<br />
Rents<br />
department will seek to expand the on-line payment<br />
option to user charge payers, real estate tenants, and<br />
$50,000<br />
other billings to facilitate prompt payments.<br />
Revenues from government real estate transactions<br />
$40,000<br />
and miscellaneous sources, as well as proceeds from<br />
grant loans, are also invoiced and collected by the<br />
Billing Unit. Finance will investigate the feasibility<br />
$30,000<br />
of implementing the SAP Accounts Receivable<br />
module to replace PIMS BILL and IREIS legacy<br />
systems.<br />
$20,000<br />
The Law and Finance Departments will continue to<br />
pursue collection from delinquent User Charge<br />
customers to ensure payment and reduce delinquent<br />
$10,000<br />
accounts.<br />
7. To conduct independent audits in accordance<br />
with applicable auditing standards and<br />
management guidelines, as detailed in the Internal<br />
Audit Charter.<br />
Internal Audit provides the Audit Committee, chaired by the Executive Director, objective analysis, appraisals,<br />
recommendations, and pertinent comments on the audited operations. In 2008 the Internal Auditing Section developed a risk<br />
assessment model by which all audits since have and will be planned. The Internal Audit section will continue to perform<br />
audits of District functions to identify opportunities to reduce costs, enhance revenues, and improve operational efficiencies.<br />
Finance intends to implement the audit tools available in SAP and establish related internal audit reviews.<br />
8. To provide a work environment that is conducive to and promotes employee excellence.<br />
Finance has developed a cross-training program for its professional and support staff. Finance promotes ongoing training,<br />
through the tuition reimbursement program, in-house and external seminars for all its staff members.<br />
$0<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />
Estimated<br />
228<br />
228
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
40000 FINANCE OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. Provide for the accounting, auditing, and payment of all District expenditures, which are comprised of<br />
vendor payments, employee wages, expenses, and fringe benefits. Vendor payments are made in<br />
compliance with the Prompt Payment Act. $888,837 23.6%<br />
2. Provide for the accounting, billing, and collection of all revenue such as User Charge, SRF, Real<br />
Estate, and other miscellaneous billings. $321,285 8.5%<br />
3. Provide for the independent appraisal and analysis of departmental activities approved for internal<br />
auditing by the Audit Committee. $496,081 13.2%<br />
4. Provide for general accounting and reporting (e.g., financial statement preparation, fixed assets,<br />
cost accounting analysis, general ledger maintenance and bank account reconciliation). $1,567,496 41.7%<br />
5. Provide for the preparation of the Board agenda, printing of the minutes of all Board meetings, and<br />
for the documentation, retention, and retrieval of all official records of the Board of Commissioners. $489,101 13.0%<br />
Total $3,762,800 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. Maintain 95 percent compliance with the Prompt Payment Act. 93% 95% 95%<br />
2. Decrease invoice processing cost to less than $15.00 per Vendor invoice. $19.33 $13.94 $13.18<br />
3. Maintain a 95 percent or better collection rate for user charge and other fees. 91% 93% 93%<br />
4. Complete 95 percent of the audits proposed by the Audit Committee. 85% 95% 95%<br />
229<br />
229
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
40000 FINANCE OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
7391 Accounts Payable $547,968 2009 4 $380,585 ($21,908) (5.4)<br />
2008 6 $402,493<br />
7392 Payroll and Employee Expense $311,955 2009 5 $508,252 $27,374 5.7<br />
2008 5 $480,878<br />
7393 Billing and Collections $249,251 2009 4 $321,285 $1,585 0.5<br />
2008 4 $319,700<br />
7395 Internal Auditing $377,352 2009 5 $496,081 ($59,384) (10.7) a)<br />
2008 4 $555,465<br />
7405 Financial Systems Development $187,727 2009 2 $331,535 $90,180 37.4 b)<br />
2008 2 $241,355<br />
7399 Accounting and Financial Reporting $952,013 2009 5 $1,235,961 $79,686 6.9<br />
2008 7 $1,156,275<br />
7398 Clerk's Corporate Functions $462,671 2009 6 $489,101 ($9,933) (2.0)<br />
2008 5 $499,034<br />
Totals $3,088,937 2009 31 $3,762,800 $107,600 2.9%<br />
2008 33 $3,655,200<br />
a) The need for consultant assistance on internal audits has decreased from the prior year.<br />
b) The increase is primarily due to consultants related to the implementation of the time entry management system.<br />
230<br />
230
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
40000 FINANCE PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
7390 Accounting and Auditing<br />
7391 Invoices Audited and Processed for Payment Invoices 28,342 28,880 28,880<br />
Cost $547,968 $402,493 $380,585<br />
Cost/Invoice $19.33 $13.94 $13.18<br />
7392 Payroll and Expense Accounting, Auditing, and Check Checks 56,186 55,955 55,955<br />
Processing Operations Cost $311,955 $480,878 $508,252<br />
Cost/Check $5.55 $8.59 $9.08<br />
7393 Billing and Collections Billings 14,137 14,500 14,500<br />
Cost $249,251 $319,700 $321,285<br />
Cost/Billing $17.63 $22.05 $22.16<br />
7395 Internal Auditing Cost $377,352 $555,465 $496,081 a)<br />
7398 Clerk's Corporate Functions and Administrative Services Cost $462,671 $499,034 $489,101<br />
7399 Accounting and Financial Reporting Cost $952,013 $1,156,275 $1,235,961<br />
7405 Financial System Management and Development Cost $187,727 $241,355 $331,535 b)<br />
Totals $3,088,937 $3,655,200 $3,762,800<br />
a) The need for consultant assistance on internal audits has decreased from the prior year.<br />
b) The increase is primarily due to consultants related to the implementation of the time entry management system.<br />
231<br />
231
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
40000 Department Finance<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 2,596,149 $ 2,757,400 $ 2,757,400 $ 2,676,600 $ 2,750,400 $ 2,750,400 $ 2,839,500<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 39,431 106,900 106,900 11,000 109,620 109,620 110,500<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 41,806 41,000 41,000 35,000 60,200 60,200 60,200<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 306,023 501,700 501,700 444,700 543,480 543,480 543,500<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustment - - - - 90,000 90,000 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 22,523 38,500 38,500 25,000 38,500 38,500 38,500<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,005,932 3,445,500 3,445,500 3,192,300 3,592,200 3,592,200 3,592,200<br />
612010 Travel 1,688 6,400 6,400 5,200 7,200 7,200 7,200<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 1,872 14,000 14,000 6,300 15,800 15,800 15,800<br />
612040 Postage 2,364 3,500 3,500 3,500 2,500 2,500 2,500<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 1,580 2,600 2,600 2,300 2,600 2,600 2,600<br />
612090 Reprographic Services - 5,000 5,000 1,000 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
612210 Communication Services - 1,500 1,500 500 500 500 500<br />
612250 Court Reporting Services 54,931 82,000 82,000 51,700 72,000 72,000 72,000<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 915 4,800 4,800 4,800 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />
612800 Repairs to Office Furniture and Equipment 4,633 9,500 9,500 8,500 9,500 9,300 9,300<br />
612820 Computer Software Maintenance - - - - 25,000 25,000 25,000<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. - 200 200 - - 200 200<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 67,983 129,500 129,500 83,800 143,100 143,100 143,100<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 14,414 53,000 53,000 15,000 26,500 26,300 26,300<br />
623720 Books, Maps, and Charts 203 2,000 2,000 1,800 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />
623810 Computer Supplies 405 - - - - - -<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. - 200 200 - - 200 200<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 15,022 55,200 55,200 16,800 27,500 27,500 27,500<br />
634820 Computer Software - 25,000 25,000 25,000 - - -<br />
400 TOTAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT - 25,000 25,000 25,000 - - -<br />
TOTAL FINANCE $ 3,088,937 $ 3,655,200 $ 3,655,200 $ 3,317,900 $ 3,762,800 $ 3,762,800 $ 3,762,800<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
232<br />
232
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Finance<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
410 Executive Division<br />
411 Executive Section<br />
EX13 Director of Finance/Clerk 1 1 1 196,944.02 1 203,837.14<br />
EX06 Secretary to Officer 2 2 2 154,486.28 2 163,817.42<br />
TOTAL Executive Section 3 3 3 351,430.30 3 367,654.56<br />
413 Internal Auditing Section<br />
HP19 Accounting Manager 1 1 1 128,328.72 1 138,367.84<br />
HP17 Supervising Accountant - - - 0.00 1 92,151.80<br />
HP15 Senior Accountant 3 3 3 243,429.68 2 181,030.46<br />
HP11 Accounting Clerk II - 1 1 45,282.90 1 49,758.80<br />
TOTAL Internal Auditing Section 4 5 5 417,041.30 5 461,308.90<br />
TOTAL Executive Division 7 8 8 768,471.60 8 828,963.46<br />
420 Accounting Division<br />
430 Administrative Section<br />
HP21 Comptroller #4 1 1 1 170,900.60 1 176,882.16<br />
TOTAL Administrative Section 1 1 1 170,900.60 1 176,882.16<br />
440 Financial Administration and Disbursements Section<br />
441 Administrative Unit<br />
HP19 Accounting Manager 1 1 1 133,688.62 1 138,367.84<br />
HP17 Supervising Accountant 1 1 1 107,768.44 1 111,540.26<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 2 2 2 241,457.06 2 249,908.10<br />
442 Administrative Services Unit<br />
HP13 Senior Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 69,661.02 1 76,023.22<br />
HP12 Secretary - - - 0.00 1 66,739.40<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 49,847.20 - 0.00<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 37,963.12 - 0.00<br />
TOTAL Administrative Services Unit 3 3 3 157,471.34 2 142,762.62<br />
233<br />
233
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Finance<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
443 Billing Unit<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP15 Senior Accountant 1 1 1 85,349.94 1 88,337.08<br />
HP13 Accounting Clerk III 1 1 1 77,243.92 1 79,947.40<br />
HP11 Accounting Clerk II 2 2 2 112,912.80 2 116,864.80<br />
TOTAL Billing Unit 4 4 4 275,506.66 4 285,149.28<br />
446 Accounts Payable Unit<br />
HP13 Accounting Clerk III 1 1 1 69,661.02 1 76,023.22<br />
HP11 Accounting Clerk II 3 4 4 181,131.86 3 146,385.46<br />
TOTAL Accounts Payable Unit 4 5 5 250,792.88 4 222,408.68<br />
TOTAL Financial Administration and Disbursements Section 13 14 14 925,227.94 12 900,228.68<br />
450 Special Projects and Payroll Section<br />
451 Special Projects Unit<br />
HP19 Accounting Manager 1 1 1 106,888.08 1 116,177.36<br />
HP17 Supervising Accountant 1 1 1 103,085.84 1 111,540.26<br />
TOTAL Special Projects Unit 2 2 2 209,973.92 2 227,717.62<br />
452 Payroll Unit<br />
HP15 Senior Accountant 1 1 1 97,973.46 1 101,402.60<br />
HP15 Senior Accountant #2 (Accounting Clerk III) 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
HP13 Accounting Clerk III - 1 1 65,869.96 1 72,099.04<br />
HP11 Accounting Clerk II - 1 1 45,282.90 1 49,758.80<br />
HP09 Accounting Clerk I 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
TOTAL Payroll Unit 3 3 3 209,126.32 3 223,260.44<br />
TOTAL Special Projects and Payroll Section 5 5 5 419,100.24 5 450,978.06<br />
460 General Accounting Section<br />
463 Accounting Unit<br />
HP19 Accounting Manager 1 1 1 133,688.62 1 143,915.72<br />
HP17 Supervising Accountant 1 1 1 112,452.34 1 116,388.22<br />
HP15 Senior Accountant 1 1 1 72,728.50 1 79,628.12<br />
234<br />
234
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Finance<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP13 Accounting Clerk III 2 2 2 158,277.60 2 163,817.42<br />
HP11 Accounting Clerk II 1 - - 0.00 - 0.00<br />
TOTAL Accounting Unit 6 5 5 477,147.06 5 503,749.48<br />
TOTAL General Accounting Section 6 5 5 477,147.06 5 503,749.48<br />
TOTAL Accounting Division 25 25 25 1,992,375.84 23 2,031,838.38<br />
TOTAL Finance 32 33 33 2,760,847.44 31 2,860,801.84<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
235<br />
235
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
NOTE PAGE<br />
236<br />
236
BOARD OF<br />
COMMISSIONERS<br />
CIVIL SERVICE<br />
BOARD<br />
TREASURY<br />
EXECUTIVE<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
GENERAL<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
MONITORING &<br />
RESEARCH<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
LAW<br />
MAINTENANCE<br />
& OPERATIONS<br />
PROCUREMENT & MATERIALS<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
INFORMATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
FINANCE<br />
ENGINEERING<br />
MAINTENANCE<br />
& OPERATIONS
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS – ALL DIVISIONS<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Increase<br />
$221,406,300<br />
$209,868,700<br />
$11,537,600<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Solids Processing<br />
$39,982,839 18.1%<br />
Solids Utilization<br />
$30,716,065 13.9%<br />
Treatment<br />
$81,826,418 37.0%<br />
Flood & Pollution Control<br />
$6,311,983 2.8%<br />
General Support<br />
$3,977,780 1.8%<br />
Collection<br />
$58,591,215 26.4%<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
M illions<br />
$250<br />
$200<br />
Increased Electricity Estimate &<br />
Alternate Biosolids Facility<br />
Positions<br />
1,400<br />
1,200<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Staff reduction due to plant<br />
modernization projects<br />
1,000<br />
$150<br />
800<br />
$100<br />
600<br />
$50<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
400<br />
200<br />
$0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
237<br />
237
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – ALL DIVISIONS<br />
66000-69000<br />
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
1,040 1,045 1,046 *<br />
601<br />
EXECUTIVE OFFICE<br />
2 2 2<br />
600<br />
GENERAL DIVISION<br />
42 74 63<br />
700<br />
NORTH SERVICE AREA<br />
271 273 279<br />
800<br />
CALUMET SERVICE<br />
AREA<br />
244 235 238<br />
900<br />
STICKNEY SERVICE<br />
AREA<br />
481 461 464<br />
* The 2009 position total for M&O is 1,046. There are an additional 36 positions funded by<br />
the Stormwater Management Fund while the operations remain in the Maintenance and<br />
Operations Department.<br />
238<br />
238
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The mission of the Maintenance & Operations<br />
Department (M&O) is to protect our water environment<br />
by collecting and treating wastewater and by maintaining<br />
our waterways free of pollution in the most economical<br />
and environmentally sustainable manner possible.<br />
Personnel<br />
$89,825,000 40.6%<br />
By Major Line Item<br />
Natural Gas<br />
$3,015,000 1.4%<br />
M&O consists of four Divisions, three of which are Field<br />
Divisions that maintain and operate the collection systems<br />
and treatment plants within the District’s 883.5 square<br />
miles service area, and a General Division that provides<br />
administrative support in terms of regulatory, financial,<br />
budgetary, procurement and personnel issues, as well as<br />
maintenance and operations of the waterways, the<br />
Lockport Powerhouse and oversight of solids operations.<br />
M&O <strong>Budget</strong> = $ 221,406,300<br />
Electricity<br />
$39,968,300 18.1%<br />
Solids Contracts<br />
$20,478,000 9.2%<br />
While each Division has provided a separate narrative<br />
highlighting individual areas of responsibilities,<br />
challenges and accomplishments, M&O as a whole is<br />
responsible for:<br />
Collecting wastewater discharges annually from a<br />
population equivalent of 10.35 million people<br />
(domestic and industrial discharge) by maintaining<br />
and operating:<br />
• A complex 554 mile network of intercepting sewers<br />
with approximately 430 connections and 23 remote<br />
pumping stations;<br />
• 109.4 miles of TARP tunnels with approximately 150<br />
controlled connections.<br />
Treating approximately 518.8 billion gallons of<br />
wastewater annually by maintaining and operating:<br />
• Seven wastewater treatment plants.<br />
Minimizing local area flooding by maintaining and<br />
operating:<br />
• 76 miles of navigable waterways & the Lockport<br />
Powerhouse;<br />
• 125 miles of small streams & 35 retention reservoirs.<br />
Further improving quality of water in area waterways<br />
by maintaining and operating:<br />
• 5 Side Stream Elevated Pool Aerations Stations<br />
(SEPA);<br />
• 2 Instream Aeration Stations (IAS).<br />
Processing and beneficial reuse of Biosolids, the<br />
byproduct of wastewater treatment by maintaining<br />
and operating:<br />
• 3 biosolids handling facilities.<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
Other<br />
$60,705,100<br />
Calumet<br />
Service Area<br />
238<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
27.4%<br />
Chemicals<br />
$7,414,900 3.3%<br />
2009 Personnel Distribution<br />
Stickney<br />
Service Area<br />
470<br />
Positions = 1,082*<br />
*Includes 36 positions funded by Stormwat er M anagement Fund<br />
Total Positions & Positions to be<br />
Dropped in the Future<br />
General<br />
Division<br />
92<br />
1,0 4 6 1,0 17 1,036 1,0 54 1,0 55<br />
North Service<br />
Area<br />
282<br />
1,071 1,080 1,080 1,080 1,082<br />
25 63 44 26<br />
27<br />
*<br />
M&O’s commitment to providing the most effective<br />
conventional wastewater treatment to obtain the highest<br />
quality effluent is reflected in achieving a 99.9 percent<br />
overall compliance rate with the requirements of the<br />
200<br />
0<br />
Positions <strong>Budget</strong>ed Future Drops<br />
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
*Includes 36 positions f unded by St ormwater M anagement Fund<br />
239<br />
239
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
District’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits in 2007. This compliance record at all seven of<br />
the District’s <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants (WRPs) resulted in one Silver, three Gold Awards and three Platinum Awards from the<br />
National Association of Clean <strong>Water</strong> Agencies (NACWA). NPDES permit renewals for the Lemont, Calumet, Stickney, North<br />
Side, and John Egan WRPs were prepared and submitted in 2007. NPDES permit renewals for the Kirie and Hanover Park<br />
WRPs will be completed in 2009. The Lemont permit became effective in March 2008 as did the Lockport Powerhouse permit.<br />
Negotiations of the permit language for the North Side, Stickney, and Calumet WRPs are ongoing. Renewal of these permits<br />
may present some challenges to the District if more stringent limits for certain pollutants are included in the new permit. The<br />
results of the Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) being conducted by IEPA may result in new or more stringent pollutant limits<br />
in the permits and may require the construction of additional facilities at the District water reclamation plants or on the<br />
waterways.<br />
The 2009 Corporate budget includes 1,046 positions, with another 36 positions funded by the Stormwater Management Fund<br />
while supervised under the Maintenance and Operations Department. This represents an increase of one position in the<br />
Corporate Fund, and an increase of one position in the Stormwater Management Fund. Our position changes for 2009 reflect<br />
adjustment of position levels to provide correct staff to manage the upcoming Master Plan project implementations and large<br />
scale projects within M&O.<br />
Our 2009 budget of $221,406,300 reflects an increase of $11,537,600, or 5.5 percent, over the 2008 appropriation. The largest<br />
portion of the increase is for anticipated electricity and natural gas rate increases, $2,574,400, in part due to the renegotiation of<br />
the current electricity agreement’s rates and a higher than anticipated distribution rate for the Stickney WRP. The continuation<br />
into 2009 for repairs to the Racine Pumping Station, due to the 2008 flooding, and emergency repairs to blower motor #4 at<br />
Stickney, account for approximately $1,110,000 of the increase. Increased requests for consulting services for various studies<br />
and requests for proposals, $1,123,500, repair services for plant facilities, $3,636,500, and major equipment<br />
purchases/carryovers, which increased by $538,600, impact the overall M&O budget.<br />
Other requests impacting our 2009 budget include increased requests for treatment plant repairs such as:<br />
• Cleaning and repairing two rapid sand filters at the Hanover Park WRP, $500,000;<br />
• North Service Area Man-hours contract to complete back log work, $225,000;<br />
• Distributed Control Services for North Service Area WRPs, $255,000;<br />
• Solar Project at John Egan WRP, $180,000;<br />
• Replace Sodium Hypochlorite Pumps at the Kirie WRP, $150,000;<br />
• Modify and Replace Diffuser Piping at Stickney WRP (SWRP), $350,000;<br />
• Rehabilitate the North Side Sludge Line, $350,000;<br />
• Furnish, Deliver and Install Air Compressors at the SWRP Pump and Blower House and West Side Pumping Station,<br />
$290,000;<br />
• Replace Centrifuge Conveyor Assembly at Calumet WRP, $340,000;<br />
• Upgrade Waste Gas Flares at Calumet WRP, $325,000;<br />
• Furnish, Deliver and Install SEPA Gear Boxes, $475,000.<br />
ENERGY CONSERVATION<br />
M&O has been proactive in energy conservation by:<br />
• Executing a capacity based load reduction agreement (CLR7) with Commonwealth Edison that provides the District with<br />
incentives to curtail usage during specific conditions, resulting in cost savings;<br />
• Establishing an energy conservation committee that reviews and evaluates house lighting fixtures, lumen monitoring, overlit<br />
areas, building temperature controls, and staff training in energy conservation;<br />
• Evaluating & purchasing all-electric personnel carriers and hybrid alternatives;<br />
• Utilizing Computerized Dissolved Oxygen Control System for aeration tanks to optimize use of oxygen;<br />
• Installing medium sized blowers to match oxygen demand in the aeration tanks, thereby optimizing oxygen usage;<br />
• Utilizing 95% of digester gas produced for plant processes and heating, air conditioning, and electricity generation;<br />
• Installing high efficiency motors and variable speed drives for pumps and guide vane controls for blowers;<br />
• Establishing plant operations to match peak and off-peak power rates, by maximizing pumping during off-peak hours;<br />
• Investigating natural gas procurement options;<br />
• Investigating and implementing a natural gas conservation program at the plants.<br />
240<br />
240
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS AND EFFICIENCIES<br />
M&O continually evaluates and implements changes in plant processes and administrative processes that result in efficiencies<br />
and cost and/or energy savings such as:<br />
• Completed the evaluation and upgrade of the distributed control systems at 5 of the 7 plants, with Stickney WRP to be<br />
completed by 2013;<br />
• Study and evaluation of the ultraviolet disinfection system at Hanover Park WRP;<br />
• Initiation of an Environmental Management System (EMS) program for wastewater operations at Egan and Kirie WRPs;<br />
• Continue implementation of the Engineering Program consistent with the Master Plan;<br />
• Optimization of inventory costs by surveying and organizing procured parts at the remote locations and the WRPs;<br />
• Continued optimization of preventative maintenance procedures and overhaul schedules consistent with operational and<br />
maintenance needs;<br />
• Installation of online process analyzers at the North Side WRP;<br />
• Installation of carbon dioxide injection system at the Stickney WRP;<br />
• Completion of installation of stainless steel rotating pumps at West Side Pumping Station at Stickney WRP;<br />
• Investigation and implementation of an electronic document management system for Contracts Administration.<br />
GREEN INITIATIVES<br />
M&O has proactively implemented green initiatives, such as:<br />
• Maintained approximately 50 acres of natural prairie landscapes on District property;<br />
• Implemented a rain barrel distribution program;<br />
• Installed six rain gardens in the North Service Area;<br />
• Ordered and purchased replacement heavy equipment with new technologies that reduce drying time of biosolids, and air<br />
emissions;<br />
• Organized and sponsored two Household Hazardous Waste Collections;<br />
• Completed preliminary engineering for a proto-type long term Household Hazardous Waste Collection facility to be<br />
located at a District treatment plant.<br />
GLOBAL WARMING<br />
M&O has done preliminary evaluations of impacts of global warming on its operations and is participating with the City of<br />
Chicago in a Climate Change Study:<br />
• The annual operating costs for pumping and treatment are related to yearly precipitation and may decrease slightly (4<br />
percent reduction) at first, since rainfall amounts are expected to decrease in the near future and again in the middle of the<br />
century. An increase (9 percent increase) is projected by the turn of the century since rainfall amounts are projected to<br />
increase slightly;<br />
• Projected precipitation amounts do not appear to increase significantly enough by the end of the century to warrant TARP<br />
expansion.<br />
WATERWAYS CONTROL<br />
• PROTECTION OF LAKE MICHIGAN<br />
The <strong>Water</strong>ways Control Center, located at 100 E. Erie, Chicago, and manned around the clock, continuously receives<br />
meteorological data, radar displays, and information from 24 precipitation stations, 15 water-level gauges and four gauges<br />
which record stored combined sewage captured by Deep Tunnels. This data and information, coupled with operational<br />
experience, are integrated by state-of-the-art computer systems to provide the optimal direction for control of the 76 miles,<br />
of the District’s navigable inland waterways. This results in accomplishing the mission of the District, to protect Lake<br />
Michigan, our drinking water source.<br />
• BETTER UTILIZATION OF TARP<br />
The <strong>Water</strong>ways Control Center is the central information center for the status of the three TARP systems and functions as<br />
the District’s communication center. Computer graphics, which utilize both TARP and operational information, are used to<br />
predict potential flooding problems. These predictions enable the dispatchers to make operational adjustments to minimize<br />
the impact of most rainstorms. The full reduction in potential flooding and improvement of water quality is subject to the<br />
completion of the multi-billion gallon TARP reservoirs.<br />
241<br />
241
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
• REVENUE<br />
The water elevation of the Chicago <strong>Water</strong>ways is controlled by the Lockport Powerhouse. The 38-foot drop in water<br />
elevation is utilized by two hydro-powered generators to produce clean, efficient electricity. Various factors, like the<br />
permanent water diversion reduction by order of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources and the relocation of the<br />
south wall of the Chicago River Controlling Works however, have reduced the District’s electrical generation ability.<br />
Upgrades to equipment, resulting in more efficient operation of the turbines, and renegotiated rates for the purchase of our<br />
electricity by ComEd has resulted in a projected increase for 2009 revenue. The estimated electrical generation is 45<br />
million KWHs with an anticipated revenue value of $2.1 million.<br />
• IMPROVED WATER QUALITY<br />
By United States Supreme Court Decree, the District is allowed specific volumes of Lake Michigan water to be diverted<br />
for improving the water quality of the navigable waterways through dilution from cleaner Lake Michigan <strong>Water</strong>.<br />
Currently, this volume is 270 cubic feet per second or 64 billion gallons per year. This diversion is utilized primarily in the<br />
critical summer months to improve the water quality of the District waterways. The current allowable diversion for water<br />
quality improvement is directly tied to the completion of the TARP systems. The completion of TARP will allow a<br />
reduction in diversion without sacrificing water quality.<br />
242<br />
242
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ASSET MANAGEMENT<br />
Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB), Rule 34 imposes financial rules with which municipalities and other<br />
government bodies, including the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago must comply. There are two<br />
options available under GASB 34 for reporting infrastructure assets. One option allows for depreciation of assets, the other,<br />
“Modified Approach” requires asset condition assessments to be performed and reported on a regular basis. The District has<br />
chosen to use the “Modified Approach”, in an effort to enhance our financial reporting position by demonstrating the<br />
exceptional condition of our assets. Accountability under GASB 34 is both financial and operational. The District has<br />
completed its five year plan, to be repeated every three years, to conduct GASB 34 assessments of its facilities.<br />
The District is divided into seven distinct networks as listed in the schedule. Each network is further divided into Systems and<br />
subsystems. The systems are, System 1000 – Collection, System 2000 – Treatment, System 3000 – Solids Processing, System<br />
4000 – Flood and Pollution Control, and System 5000 – Solids Utilization. The reports contain network trees identifying the<br />
sub-systems, components, and number of MMS Assets (AMU’s); a summary of current and future contracts/projects impacting<br />
each individual AMU; a list of assets within each AMU; documentation of the preventive maintenance costs and the<br />
maintenance cost trends over last three years. Each AMU is evaluated in terms of its maintenance history and physical<br />
condition based on an established evaluation criteria. The evaluation team consists of one each licensed Mechanical, Electrical,<br />
and Civil Engineer. The team is from a location other than the Plant being evaluated.<br />
Following is a list of Plants, their respective evaluations, and year evaluated:<br />
Year<br />
Kirie<br />
WRP<br />
Hanover<br />
Park WRP<br />
2002 3 3<br />
2003<br />
North Side<br />
WRP<br />
John Egan<br />
WRP<br />
2004 3 2<br />
<strong>Water</strong>ways<br />
Stickney<br />
WRP<br />
2005 2 2 3<br />
Calumet<br />
WRP<br />
2006 2 3 3<br />
2007 3 2<br />
2008 X X X<br />
2009 X X X<br />
Lemont<br />
WRP<br />
In 2009, we will conclude the second review of all networks. To date, those networks which have been audited for the second<br />
time have either maintained their rating or improved their rating. Projects that address deficiencies may take several years to<br />
complete, and thus not all facilities may see improvements during a subsequent rating cycle. Our facilities are operating<br />
reliably and with the Master Plan project and GASB 34 audit resultant projects, they will continue to serve the District into the<br />
future.<br />
Rating Scale:<br />
1 = Excellent Relatively new asset or recently rehabilitated or otherwise restored to a like new condition.<br />
2 = Very Good Performance successful, operation reliable, no significant maintenance required beyond routine PM<br />
or minor repair in foreseeable future.<br />
3 = Good Performance successful, operation reliable, significant maintenance required in foreseeable future.<br />
4 = Acceptable Performance successful, operation reliable, significant rehabilitation / replacement planned in near<br />
future.<br />
5 = Fair Performance marginal, operation not reliable without immediate repair / replacement.<br />
6 = Poor Inoperable or operation significantly impaired.<br />
X = Scheduled Review scheduled and/or results not currently available.<br />
243<br />
243
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
BIOSOLIDS PROCESSING AND UTILIZATION PLAN<br />
The District’s wastewater treatment processes produce approximately 192,000 dry tons of biosolids each year making our<br />
program the largest of its kind in the country. Discovering new outlets for the entire production of biosolids presents an<br />
ongoing challenge. One of our key objectives is to beneficially utilize as much of the biosolids as possible in an<br />
environmentally safe manner. Beneficial reuse essentially means the utilization of biosolids to take advantage of the superior<br />
nutrient qualities and soil-like characteristics of the biosolids. These qualities can be used to support vegetation and crops while<br />
reducing the need for topsoil and fertilizers. Beneficial reuse includes cropland application; development of parks, golf courses<br />
and recreational fields; application as a top dressing to rejuvenate turf areas; and for use as daily cover and final cover of<br />
sanitary landfills.<br />
In addition to pursuing the beneficial<br />
reuse of our biosolids, we also strive<br />
to run a highly cost-effective<br />
operation. We are employing more<br />
efficient machines and other<br />
technologies into our daily operations<br />
to speed up the drying process, lower<br />
costs, and lower air emissions. Long<br />
range plans and strategies developed<br />
in the early to mid-1990s have now<br />
been implemented. This places the<br />
District in a very sound operating<br />
position for the future. One of the<br />
strategies was to utilize the lagoon<br />
operation as part of the solids<br />
processing cycle rather than for long<br />
term storage. Under this plan,<br />
centrifuge cake and low solids are<br />
aged in the lagoons for an average of<br />
18 months as a means of further<br />
processing. Beyond this aging cycle,<br />
DRY TONS<br />
200,000 DT's<br />
180,000 DT's<br />
160,000 DT's<br />
140,000 DT's<br />
120,000 DT's<br />
100,000 DT's<br />
80,000 DT's<br />
60,000 DT's<br />
40,000 DT's<br />
20,000 DT's<br />
0 DT's<br />
2004 (actual)<br />
2005 (actual)<br />
SOLIDS UTILIZATION PLAN<br />
2004 - 2013<br />
Pelletizer<br />
Land Application -<br />
Cake<br />
Dry Utilization<br />
the biosolids are utilized on a steady-state basis in order to minimize the creation of a backlog that could result in accumulating<br />
significant funding requirements in the future. One goal of this plan was to eliminate the backlog of biosolids that had<br />
accumulated in the last decade as cost effective outlets arose. This backlog has been removed and biosolids are now essentially<br />
processed and utilized on a steady-state basis.<br />
An ongoing concern for all biosolids producing agencies is the availability of consistent, reliable and cost-effective outlets for<br />
their biosolids. During the 1990s our Biosolids Marketing Team produced high profile success stories such as the development<br />
of the Harborside International and <strong>Water</strong>’s Edge Golf Courses along with other smaller successes. The Marketing Team<br />
continues to nurture ongoing outlet programs and to pursue future biosolids outlets. It became apparent, however, that due to<br />
the size of our program we could not rely on large-scale opportunities of this nature to arise when needed. Rather, we needed to<br />
secure an outlet for our biosolids that had consistent and long-term viability, the ability to withstand annual fluctuations and<br />
was cost effective. Although the District’s Fulton County site met these criteria, the higher transportation costs due to its<br />
location approximately 200 miles southwest of Chicago, precluded it as a highly desirable option. However, due to the ready<br />
availability of large stretches of farmland in neighboring counties, within reasonable distances from our plants, we decided to<br />
pursue a program of direct farmland application of centrifuge cake. This program, which began in 1995, has proven extremely<br />
successful and has grown steadily over the years.<br />
The 2009 Solids Utilization Plan is anticipated to beneficially use approximately 137,600 dry tons of biosolids (30,600 from<br />
Calumet, 101,000 from Stickney, and 6,000 from the North Service Area). We will continue our efforts to beneficially utilize<br />
the District’s biosolids production as final cover for landfills, direct farmland application of centrifuge cake and for use under<br />
the controlled solids distribution program. We have also begun working with Engineering and the Monitoring and Research<br />
Department in reviewing the possible production of Class A biosolids directly from our digesters under our master plans.<br />
2006 (actual)<br />
2007 (actual)<br />
2008 (plan)<br />
2009 (plan)<br />
2010 (plan)<br />
2011 (plan)<br />
2012 (plan)<br />
2013 (plan)<br />
244<br />
244
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
In addition, a contract to handle approximately 30 percent of the solids stream at Stickney (approximately 55,000 dt), via an<br />
alternative biosolids facility, was awarded in 2001 with operations starting in late 2008. Once this facility is operational, it is<br />
anticipated that M&O will recognize a net budgetary increase of<br />
approximately $5 to $7 million per year in costs to process and<br />
utilize biosolids due to this alternative, but this alternative will<br />
provide additional outlets for biosolids that do not compete with<br />
our established markets.<br />
In pursuing the use of cost effective outlets for our biosolids, we<br />
have significantly reduced our biosolids inventory.<br />
TREATMENT OF INTERCEPTED SEWER<br />
FLOWS AND TARP CAPTURE<br />
Several key District objectives, which are accomplished by the<br />
M&O Department, are the collection of wastewater, including<br />
TARP capture, and the treatment of these flows to meet all<br />
permit requirements with an ongoing goal of improving water<br />
quality in the Chicago area waterways. The charts on this page<br />
show the long term trends of the District’s operation of the TARP<br />
System, the improvement of plant performance and the resulting<br />
improvement in the water quality of the receiving waterways.<br />
The TARP Tunnel System is designed to capture the “first flush”<br />
of the pollution load that would otherwise be discharged to the<br />
waterways. In addition to maintaining the readiness of this $2.4<br />
billion system, we are also charged with operating it to maximize<br />
its available storage capacity upon arrival of rainstorms while<br />
simultaneously minimizing the energy requirements and demand<br />
charges associated with pumping the tunnels out. The ongoing<br />
effort to minimize energy costs has been well documented over<br />
the years. The effectiveness of M&O’s operation of the TARP<br />
System can be seen from the steadily increasing quantities of<br />
pollutants that have been captured by TARP over the years. The<br />
District has estimated the concentration of various pollutants<br />
found in combined sewer overflows that are captured by TARP<br />
by multiplying these concentrations by the volume of flow<br />
captured by TARP. The average annual capture of suspended<br />
solids (SS), carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (CBOD)<br />
and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) are 70.09, 25.4, and 2.5 million<br />
pounds. This ongoing effectiveness of TARP operations is shown<br />
in the bottom graph.<br />
The intercepted wastewater flows and the pump out from TARP<br />
are then treated at our water reclamation plants. In spite of<br />
increasing flows due to the ongoing build out of TARP and the<br />
associated increase of captured pollutants, our plants continue to<br />
discharge a decreasing quantity of pollutants in their effluents.<br />
This combined plant performance is shown for the North Side,<br />
Stickney, and Calumet WRPs in the top graph. These plants<br />
consistently discharge pollutant loadings well below those<br />
allowed in their respective NPDES permits. To more fully<br />
appreciate this achievement, it should be remembered that the<br />
average daily treated flow at these three plants is approximately<br />
1.4 billion gallons and none of these three plants have had an<br />
NPDES permit violation for the parameters shown during the<br />
represented time frame.<br />
Pounds<br />
100,000<br />
90,000<br />
80,000<br />
70,000<br />
60,000<br />
50,000<br />
40,000<br />
30,000<br />
20,000<br />
10,000<br />
M illions<br />
2,000<br />
1,800<br />
1,600<br />
1,400<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
0<br />
1982 to 1997<br />
1998<br />
Stickney, Calumet, & North Side WRPs<br />
Combined Effluent<br />
1993 through 2007<br />
(Average Daily Discharge)<br />
1993<br />
1994<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
Suspended Solids<br />
Combined TARP Capture<br />
Mainstream, Kirie, and Calumet<br />
1982 through 2007<br />
(Cumulative Pounds Captured)<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
Suspended Solids<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand<br />
Ammonia Nitrogen<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand<br />
Ammonia Nitrogen<br />
245<br />
245
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
66000 - 69000 M and O - ALL DIVISIONS OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. COLLECTION AND TREATMENT: The M&O Department will collect and treat approximately<br />
518.8 billion gallons of sewage through its seven treatment facilities and through a contract agreement<br />
with the Fox River <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District. $140,417,633 63.4%<br />
2. SOLIDS PROCESSING: The M&O Department will remove and process approximately 265,950<br />
dry tons of concentrated sewage through various systems including heated digestion, centrifuging,<br />
concentration, and aging low solids sludge and centrifuge cake in lagoons. $39,982,839 18.1%<br />
3. SOLIDS UTILIZATION: The M&O Department will utilize approximately 131,600 dry tons of<br />
biosolids for application at final utilization sites such as farm applications and daily and final cover<br />
at sanitary landfills. $30,716,065 13.9%<br />
4. FLOOD AND POLLUTION CONTROL: The M&O Department will strive to minimize local area<br />
flooding and pollution of Lake Michigan through continuous control of the water levels in 76<br />
navigable miles of major rivers and canals and 125 non-navigable miles of small streams<br />
and through the operation of 35 retention reservoirs in cooperation with local communities.<br />
It will also work to maintain the quality of the waterways system and associated District property<br />
through the activities of the debris boats and the channel maintenance crews. $6,311,983 2.8%<br />
5. GENERAL SUPPORT: The M&O Department provides technical and administrative support for<br />
other departments indirectly related to the operational activities of Collection and Treatment,<br />
Solids Processing, Flood and Pollution Control, and Solids Utilization. $3,977,780 1.8%<br />
600<br />
500<br />
Collection & Treatment<br />
Total $221,406,300 100.0%<br />
Billion Gallons<br />
Effluent quality meets<br />
or exceeds standards<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
100.00%<br />
99.98%<br />
99.96%<br />
99.94%<br />
99.92%<br />
99.90%<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
NPDES Permit Compliance<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
Thousand dry tons<br />
260<br />
250<br />
240<br />
230<br />
220<br />
210<br />
200<br />
Solids Processing<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
246<br />
Thousand dry tons<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
Solids Utilization<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
246
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
66000 - 69000 M and O - ALL DIVISIONS OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
1000 Collection $50,516,777 2009 279 $58,591,215 $3,603,416 6.6<br />
2008 277 $54,987,799<br />
1100 Surface Interceptor Systems $4,539,057 2009 41 $5,945,955 $555,910 10.3<br />
2008 41 $5,390,045<br />
1200 Tunnel and Reservoir System $12,699,341 2009 55 $13,722,930 $1,338,031 10.8<br />
2008 55 $12,384,899<br />
1300 Pumping Station Facilities $15,880,812 2009 72 $15,967,883 $693,718 4.5<br />
2008 71 $15,274,165<br />
1900 Collection - Indirect Costs $17,397,567 2009 111 $22,954,447 $1,015,757 4.6<br />
2008 110 $21,938,690<br />
2000 Treatment $65,543,362 2009 418 $81,826,418 $6,226,078 8.2<br />
2008 416 $75,600,340<br />
2000 Pre-Treatment $3,755,858 2009 37 $3,672,030 $75,488 2.1<br />
2008 37 $3,596,542<br />
2100 Primary Treatment $4,673,373 2009 45 $5,739,507 $722,765 14.4<br />
2008 45 $5,016,742<br />
2200 Secondary Treatment $22,915,364 2009 103 $26,715,475 $1,627,775 6.5<br />
2008 104 $25,087,700<br />
2300 Tertiary Treatment $1,714,003 2009 14 $2,180,388 $746,818 52.1<br />
2008 13 $1,433,570<br />
2400 Wetlands $63,545 2009 0 $0 $0 0.0<br />
2008 0 $0<br />
2900 Treatment - Indirect Costs $32,421,219 2009 219 $43,519,018 $3,053,232 7.5<br />
2008 217 $40,465,786<br />
3000 Solids Processing $36,811,812 2009 241 $39,982,839 $1,487,413 3.9<br />
2008 243 $38,495,426<br />
3100 Thickening $5,769,236 2009 42 $6,429,331 $111,578 1.8<br />
2008 43 $6,317,753<br />
3200 Stabilization $6,820,548 2009 49 $6,390,941 $338,239 5.6<br />
2008 48 $6,052,702<br />
3300 Dewatering $11,324,218 2009 58 $12,936,947 $640,535 5.2<br />
2008 60 $12,296,412<br />
3900 Solids Processing - Indirect Costs $12,897,810 2009 92 $14,225,620 $397,061 2.9<br />
2008 92 $13,828,559<br />
Note: Explanations of significant changes are provided by individual division.<br />
247<br />
247
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
66000 - 69000 M and O - ALL DIVISIONS OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
4000 Flood and Pollution Control $4,579,055 2009 32 $6,311,983 $715,750 12.8<br />
2008 31 $5,596,233<br />
4200 <strong>Water</strong>ways Control and Stormwater Reservoirs $2,560,454 2009 24 $2,947,975 $1,035 0.0<br />
2008 23 $2,946,940<br />
4210 Maintenance of <strong>Water</strong>ways $248,153 2009 0 $343,046 $236,246 221.2<br />
2008 0 $106,800<br />
4300 Stormwater Management $64,611 2009 1 $62,800 ($35,800) (36.3)<br />
2008 1 $98,600<br />
4400 Aeration Facilities $1,032,129 2009 2 $1,660,870 $328,810 24.7<br />
2008 2 $1,332,060<br />
4900 Flood and Pollution Control - Indirect Costs $673,708 2009 5 $1,297,292 $185,459 16.7<br />
2008 5 $1,111,833<br />
5000 Solids Utilization $16,924,809 2009 51 $30,716,065 ($542,445) (1.7)<br />
2008 53 $31,258,510<br />
5100 Solids Drying $3,500,337 2009 10 $4,520,866 ($1,190,129) (20.8)<br />
2008 10 $5,710,995<br />
5200 Solids Distribution $8,924,407 2009 10 $18,267,079 $640,159 3.6<br />
2008 10 $17,626,920<br />
5900 Solids Utilization - Indirect Costs $4,500,065 2009 31 $7,928,120 $7,525 0.1<br />
2008 33 $7,920,595<br />
7000 General Support $3,425,526 2009 25 $3,977,780 $47,388 1.2<br />
2008 25 $3,930,392<br />
Totals $177,801,341 2009 1,046 $221,406,300 $11,537,600 5.5% *<br />
2008 1,045 $209,868,700<br />
* The 2009 position total for M&O is 1,046. There are an additional 36 positions funded by the Stormwater Management Fund while the operations<br />
remain in the M&O Department.<br />
Note: Explanations of significant changes are provided by individual division.<br />
248<br />
248
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
66000 - 69000 M and O - ALL DIVISIONS PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
1000-2900 Collection and Treatment<br />
Collect and Treat Sewage at Seven Treatment Facilities and Mil. Gallons 484,279 515,500 518,750<br />
Through a Contract Agreement with the Fox River <strong>Water</strong> Cost $116,060,139 $130,588,139 $140,417,633<br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District Cost/Mil. Gallons $239.66 $253.32 $270.68<br />
3000 Solids Processing<br />
Remove and Process Solids from Concentrated Sewage Through Dry Tons 7,795,324 8,442,113 9,732,608<br />
Various Systems Including Heated Digestion, Centrifuging, Cost $36,811,812 $38,495,426 $39,982,839<br />
Concentration, and Aging Low Solids Sludge and Centrifuge Cake Cost/Dry Ton $4.72 $4.56 $4.11<br />
in Lagoons<br />
4000 Flood and Pollution Control<br />
Operation and Maintenance of the <strong>Water</strong>ways to Minimize Area<br />
Flooding and Pollution<br />
4200 Minimize Area Flooding and Pollution of Lake Michigan Through Cost $1,455,009 $1,718,568 $1,526,809<br />
the Continuous Control of <strong>Water</strong> Levels in Major Rivers and Canals<br />
Minimize Diversion of Lake Michigan <strong>Water</strong> in Accordance mil gal/year diversion 71,804 71,967 71,967<br />
with the U.S. Supreme Court Decree Cost $425,423 $456,900 $462,953<br />
Cost/mil gal/year $5.92 $6.35 $6.43<br />
Operation of Retention Reservoirs Reservoirs 32,976 27,485 28,282<br />
Cost $179,600 $187,400 $191,300<br />
Cost/Reservoir $5.45 $6.82 $6.76<br />
Generate Electricity at Lockport Powerhouse to Obtain KWH 44,586,717 36,000,000 45,000,000<br />
Approximately $2,100,000 in Revenue Cost $500,422 $584,072 $766,913<br />
Cost/KWH $0.0112 $0.0162 $0.0170<br />
* Revenue Generated $1,756,855 $1,400,000 $2,100,000<br />
4210 Maintenance of the <strong>Water</strong>ways and Canal Banks Within the <strong>Water</strong>way Miles 745 166 166<br />
Jurisdiction of the District. Activities Include Debris Removal, Cost $248,153 $106,800 $343,046<br />
Insect and Rodent Control, Bridge Repair, and Aeration Costs Cost/Mile $333.15 $644.80 $2,071.14<br />
Along Navigable (76 miles) and Non-Navigable (125 miles) <strong>Water</strong>ways<br />
4300 Stormwater Management Cost $64,611 $98,600 $62,800<br />
4400 Aeration Facilities Cost $1,032,129 $1,332,060 $1,660,870<br />
4900 Flood and Pollution Control - Indirect Costs Cost $673,708 $1,111,833 $1,297,292<br />
5000 Solids Utilization<br />
Utilize Further Dewatered Sewage for Application at Final Dry Tons 96,278 133,600 131,600<br />
Utilization Sites Such as the Land <strong>Reclamation</strong> Fields in Fulton Total Cost $16,924,809 $24,458,510 $23,246,565<br />
County, the Fischer Farm, Daily and Final Cover at Sanitary Total Cost/Dry Ton $175.79 $183.07 $176.65<br />
Landfills, and Other Farm Applications<br />
5271 Pelletizer Disposal Dry Tons 553 54,750 54,600<br />
Control management and disposal of solids by private Cost $0 $6,800,000 $7,469,500<br />
contracts Cost/Dry Ton $0.00 $124.20 $136.80<br />
7000 General Support<br />
Technical and Administrative Support for Other Departments' Cost $3,425,526 $3,930,392 $3,977,780<br />
Activities Indirectly Related to the Operational Activities<br />
of Collection and Treatment, Solids Processing, Flood and<br />
Pollution Control, and Solids Utilization<br />
Departmental Total $177,801,341 $209,868,700 $221,406,300<br />
Note: Explanations of significant changes are provided by individual division.<br />
* Revenue Generated not included in total costs.<br />
249<br />
249
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – GENERAL DIVISION<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Decrease<br />
$23,487,100<br />
$24,544,200<br />
($1,057,100)<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Flood & Pollution Control<br />
$2,777,084 11.8%<br />
Solids Utilization<br />
$17,011,391 72.4%<br />
General Support<br />
$114,050 0.5%<br />
Collection<br />
$1,127,519 4.8%<br />
Treatment<br />
$1,755,767 7.5%<br />
Solids Processing<br />
$701,289 3.0%<br />
$25<br />
$20<br />
$15<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
M illions<br />
Consolidation of all solids<br />
operations under one Biosolids<br />
Manager<br />
Posit ions<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Consolidation of all solids<br />
operations under one Biosolids<br />
Manager<br />
Staffing Unit transferred to<br />
Personnel Department<br />
Staff transferred<br />
to M&O field<br />
Staff transferred<br />
from M&O field<br />
$10<br />
Completion of<br />
turbine<br />
rehabilitation<br />
40<br />
30<br />
$5<br />
20<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
10<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
$0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
250<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
250
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – GENERAL DIVISION<br />
601<br />
Executive Office<br />
2 2 2<br />
66000<br />
General Division (1)<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
42 74 63<br />
611<br />
General Division Executive<br />
Office<br />
2 2 2<br />
620<br />
Administrative Section<br />
12 13 3<br />
630<br />
<strong>Water</strong>ways Control Section<br />
20 15 15<br />
634<br />
Channel Maintenance Unit (2)<br />
8 0 0<br />
640<br />
Technical Administration<br />
Section<br />
0 14 14<br />
650<br />
Solids Management Section<br />
0 30 29<br />
621<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
12 13 3<br />
631<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
2 2 2<br />
641<br />
Technical Administration<br />
Unit<br />
0 1 1<br />
651<br />
Solids Administration Unit<br />
0 2 2<br />
632<br />
Channels Operations Unit<br />
4 1 1<br />
642<br />
Contract Preparation Unit<br />
0 8 8<br />
652<br />
CALSMA Field Operations<br />
Unit<br />
0 8 8<br />
633<br />
Channel Control Unit<br />
4 4 4<br />
643<br />
Technical Services Unit<br />
0 5 5<br />
653<br />
Solids Operations<br />
Administration Unit<br />
0 1 1<br />
635<br />
Lockport Powerhouse Unit<br />
10 8 8<br />
654<br />
LASMA Field Operations<br />
Unit<br />
0 13 12<br />
655<br />
LASMA Support Unit<br />
0 6 6<br />
(1) In 2009, 27 positions are funded by the Stormwater Management Fund while the operations<br />
remain in the Maintenance and Operations Department.<br />
(2) The Unit name was changed from Contract Preparation to Channel Maintenance Unit in<br />
2008.<br />
251<br />
251
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – GENERAL DIVISION<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The 2009 appropriation request for the General Division is $23,487,100, a decrease of $1,057,100 or 4.3 percent from<br />
2008. The 2009 staffing level is 65 positions, a decrease of eleven positions from the previous year, which accounts in<br />
large part for the overall decrease, and is the result of one position drop due to operational efficiencies, an Engineering<br />
Technician III, and ten position transfers due to the reestablishment of a separate <strong>Budget</strong> Management Unit for each of<br />
the four Divisions, including, one Management Analyst III position, three Management Analyst II positions, three<br />
Management Analyst I positions, two Principal Office Support Specialist positions, and one Senior Office Support<br />
Specialist position. In addition, 27 positions will be funded under the Stormwater Management Fund, reflecting an<br />
increase of one position, an Associate Civil Engineer.<br />
The General Division provides a specialized function as the administrative arm of the Maintenance and Operations<br />
Department. The Division is divided into four functional sections: The <strong>Water</strong>ways Control Section; the Solids<br />
Management Section; the Technical Administration Section; and the Administrative Section. The Sections provide the<br />
following specific functions:<br />
• <strong>Water</strong>ways Control Section - Maintain and operate the <strong>Water</strong>ways Control Center at the Main Office Building to<br />
insure minimal navigational water elevations and to prevent flooding and reversals to Lake Michigan during rain<br />
storms. Maintain and operate the Lockport Powerhouse which generates power and revenue for the District.<br />
Maintain and operate the Chicago River Controlling Works; the Lockport Controlling Works; the Pump Back<br />
Station in the Chicago River; the Wilmette Pumping Station; and the Centennial Fountain. Maintain six bridges<br />
over the Northshore Channel. Provide small stream maintenance services including the removal of garbage and<br />
woody debris which impede the flow of the streams within the District Service Area;<br />
• Solids Management Section – Manage and coordinate biosolids processing and utilization on a District-wide basis.<br />
Operate the Lawndale Avenue Solids Management Area (LASMA) and the Calumet Solids Management Area<br />
(CALSMA);<br />
• Technical Administration Section – Provide all procurement services for the Department, including the<br />
administration of long- and short-form contracts, and sole source purchase orders. Provide liaison services between<br />
the Engineering and M&O Department for Master Plan studies. Handle all regulatory communications with the<br />
regulatory Agencies such as the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) and manage all MWRD<br />
environmental permits: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), Federally Enforceable State<br />
Operating Permit (FESOP), Clean Air Act Permit Program (CAAPP) Title V, Biosolids Operating, and Stormwater.<br />
Coordinate all reporting requirements associated with the above permits. Coordinate Combined Sewer Overflow<br />
(CSO) reporting. Consolidate and supply technical information requested from plant personnel, other departments,<br />
and other agencies. Review and comment on reports and contracts from other departments. Review and comment<br />
on proposed and new regulatory requirements for impacts on District operations. Coordinate Household Hazardous<br />
Waste collection activities with the IEPA. Develop and implement the MWRD’s Environmental Management<br />
System (EMS) for Biosolids;<br />
• <strong>Budget</strong> Management Unit – Provide budgetary, personnel, and administrative services, such as training on District<br />
computer systems and records management, for the M&O Department.<br />
The 2009 General Division <strong>Budget</strong> provides the resources necessary to support the department, to allow for the needed<br />
rehabilitation and preservation of General Division facilities, and to manage and improve the District’s Biosolids<br />
Program. Through the effective and efficient deployment of resources, both human and financial, we intend to achieve<br />
our 2009 objectives, manage costs, and prepare for the future.<br />
<strong>Highlights</strong> of the General Division activities in 2009 are as follows:<br />
• Prepare and monitor approximately 175 Long- and Short-Form Contracts, 150+ Sole Source requests, and 10<br />
Requests for Proposals;<br />
• Generate approximately 45 million KWH’s at the Lockport Powerhouse, to produce $2.1 million worth of<br />
electricity;<br />
• Initiate NPDES permit renewal process for Kirie and Hanover WRPs;<br />
• Initiate IEPA operating permit renewal for land application of sewage sludge, Harlem Avenue Solids Drying Area,<br />
and Fulton County Land application;<br />
• Conduct a Carbon Footprint Study to: identify and quantify all sources of greenhouse gases at District Facilities,<br />
calculate the respective carbon footprints, and recommend ways to reduce these emissions;<br />
• Continue the rain barrel purchase and distribution program. In 2009, we anticipate disbursing 2,500 barrels;<br />
• Identify eroding banks along the waterways and begin work on developing a model to reverse erosion;<br />
252<br />
252
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
• Develop a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan for the District. The plan would seek to:<br />
a) Develop operating procedures to prevent oil spills,<br />
b) Establish control measures to prevent a spill from reaching navigable waters,<br />
c) Institute countermeasures to contain, clean up, and mitigate the effects of an oil spill that reaches navigable waters;<br />
• Perform a full cleaning of the 20 year old Centennial Fountain, including polishing of all granite;<br />
• Rebuild the north interior wall of the Lockport Powerhouse in accordance with the requirements of the Illinois Register of<br />
Historic Places;<br />
• Rehabilitate six bridges over the North Shore Channel, including a complete deck rebuild of the Touhy Avenue Bridge, via<br />
an Engineering contract;<br />
• Reduce administrative costs for drying operations by:<br />
a) Limiting the number of biosolids-related contracts by combining contracts where possible,<br />
b) Utilizing District Hoisting Engineers in a more cost-effective manner and,<br />
c) Researching and implementing better management practices to become more environmentally friendly;<br />
• Purchase three (3) sludge pumps and loading devices and one (1) screening system with a conveyor, to achieve operational<br />
efficiencies and reduce biosolids-related contract costs;<br />
• Reduce total landfill daily cover dry tons by 20 percent at LASMA/CALSMA;<br />
• Assemble and train the District’s Operations Challenge Team, consisting of seven Maintenance and Operation employees<br />
from a variety of backgrounds who participate in a national competition held annually at the <strong>Water</strong> Environment<br />
Federation Technical Exhibit and Conference (WEFTEC). The competition, which includes both written and physical<br />
challenges, tests the team’s skills in five areas: process control, laboratory operations, collection systems, maintenance and<br />
safety. As every member competes in every event, participants are afforded the opportunity to gain valuable experience in<br />
areas beyond their normal field of expertise, a benefit to the employees and the organization.<br />
Accomplishments in 2008 included:<br />
• Generated electricity and revenue at Lockport Powerhouse in the amount of $2.5 million, $700,000 more than budgeted.<br />
The increase may be attributed to fewer generator problems, a more effective generator operating plan designed to take<br />
advantage of ComEd rate differentials, and increased rates paid by ComEd as the result of deregulation;<br />
• Continued the beneficial use of approximately 127,600 dry tons of biosolids;<br />
• Procured new heavy equipment for solids operations which will reduce drying time, and thus costs, to process a dry ton,<br />
while reducing air emissions. Tier 3 emission standards are now a requirement at both LASMA and CALSMA;<br />
• Continued the rain barrel purchase and distribution program disbursing 2,500 barrels;<br />
• Removed 35,000 cubic yards (CY) of debris from the river and small streams;<br />
• Implemented additional safety procedures, with documentation, for stormwater operations along with chain saw training<br />
and tool box talks;<br />
• Continued negotiations for the renewal language required for the renewal of NPDES permits for Calumet, Stickney, and<br />
North Side WRPs, and obtained new permits;<br />
• Updated the M&O Facilities Handbook;<br />
• Following a successful third party audit of the Environmental Management System (EMS), received the National<br />
Biosolids Partnership’s EMS certification and admission to the Partnership’s EMS program;<br />
• Worked with the Army Corps of Engineers to coordinate Lockport Powerhouse operations during:<br />
a) The Corp’s project to rebuild the west dike wall of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal north of the Powerhouse,<br />
b) The Corp’s project to clean, seal, and fill three abandoned exciters bays to reduce or eliminate leakage of the<br />
Powerhouse dam wall;<br />
• Replaced nine pit gates, which are nearly 50 years old, at the Lockport Powerhouse;<br />
• The District’s Operations Challenge Team, consisting of seven employees from diverse backgrounds, participated for only<br />
the second time in the national skills competition held annually at WEFTEC, and enjoyed impressive results, improving<br />
from 23rd to 12th place overall.<br />
The General Division has undergone a transformation in the last several years, a process which continues as the Solids<br />
Management Section achieves operational and managerial efficiencies; the Small Stream Maintenance Program expands and<br />
improves; and environmental initiatives are actively pursued. What remains unchanged, however, is the division’s commitment<br />
to achieving the highest standards of excellence as we diligently serve the department, the organization, and the community.<br />
253<br />
253
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
66000 M and O - GENERAL DIVISION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. COLLECTION AND TREATMENT: The General Division will provide technical and administrative<br />
support for the M&O Department's seven treatment facilities. $2,883,286 12.3%<br />
2. SOLIDS PROCESSING: The General Division will provide technical and administrative support for the<br />
removal and processing of solids from concentrated sewage through various systems including heated<br />
digestion, centrifuging, air drying, and conditioning of low solids sludge and centrifuge cake in lagoons. $701,289 3.0%<br />
3. SOLIDS UTILIZATION: The General Division will provide management and coordination of biosolids<br />
processing and utilization of District-wide activities. $17,011,391 72.4%<br />
4. FLOOD AND POLLUTION CONTROL: The <strong>Water</strong>ways Control Section will minimize<br />
flooding and pollution of Lake Michigan through continuous control of the water levels in 76 miles<br />
of major rivers and canals while limiting diversion of water from the lake in accordance with the United<br />
States Supreme Court decree of 1967. In addition, the <strong>Water</strong>ways Control Section will operate the<br />
Lockport Powerhouse and will generate 45 million KWH of electricity to obtain approximately<br />
$2.1 million in revenue. $2,777,084 11.8%<br />
5. GENERAL SUPPORT: The General Division provides technical and administrative support for<br />
other departments not directly related to the operational activities of Collection and Treatment,<br />
Solids Processing, Flood and Pollution Control, and Solids Utilization. $114,050 0.5%<br />
Total $23,487,100 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Unit of Measure Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. Operation of the Lockport Powerhouse to generate the equivalent of<br />
$2.1 million worth of electricity in 2009. KWH generated 44,586,717 36,000,000 45,000,000<br />
* Revenue generated $1,756,855 $1,400,000 $2,100,000<br />
2. General Division will minimize diversion of Lake Michigan<br />
water in accordance with U.S. Supreme Court decree,<br />
through control of water levels. mil gal/yr diversion 71,804 71,967 71,967<br />
3. The Biosolids Section will oversee the utilization of 131,600 dry<br />
tons of biosolids in 2009. (North Service Area's 6,000 dry tons of solids<br />
remains in that division.) dry tons N/A 127,600 131,600<br />
* Revenue Generated not included in total costs.<br />
254<br />
254
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
66000 M and O - GENERAL DIVISION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
1000 Collection $509,692 2009 3 $1,127,519 ($210,477) (15.7)<br />
2008 6 $1,337,996<br />
1200 Tunnel and Reservoir System $576 2009 0 $0 $0 0.0<br />
2008 0 $0<br />
1300 Pumping Station Facilities $1,488 2009 0 $0 $0 0.0<br />
2008 0 $0<br />
1900 Collection - Indirect Costs $507,628 2009 3 $1,127,519 ($210,477) (15.7) a)<br />
2008 6 $1,337,996<br />
2000 Treatment $1,096,489 2009 12 $1,755,767 $111,508 6.8<br />
2008 16 $1,644,259<br />
2900 Treatment - Indirect Costs $1,096,489 2009 12 $1,755,767 $111,508 6.8 b)<br />
2008 16 $1,644,259<br />
3000 Solids Processing $603,059 2009 6 $701,289 ($467,194) (40.0)<br />
2008 9 $1,168,483<br />
3300 Processing Tertiary Solids $6,192 2009 1 $86,754 ($359,029) (80.5) c)<br />
2008 2 $445,783<br />
3900 Solids Processing - Indirect Costs $596,867 2009 5 $614,535 ($108,165) (15.0) d)<br />
2008 7 $722,700<br />
4000 Flood and Pollution Control $1,924,524 2009 17 $2,777,084 $253,236 10.0<br />
2008 17 $2,523,848<br />
4200 <strong>Water</strong>ways Control and Stormwater Reservoirs $1,754,642 2009 15 $2,196,216 ($27,506) (1.2)<br />
2008 15 $2,223,722<br />
4210 Maintenance of <strong>Water</strong>ways $16,042 2009 0 $252,646 $225,946 846.2 e)<br />
2008 0 $26,700<br />
4300 Stormwater Management $0 2009 0 $0 ($35,200) (100.0) f)<br />
2008 0 $35,200<br />
4900 Flood and Pollution Control - Indirect Costs $153,840 2009 2 $328,222 $89,996 37.8 g)<br />
2008 2 $238,226<br />
a) Decrease primarily due to transfer of ten full-time equivalent positions from General Division to other Divisions in order to reestablish<br />
separate M&O <strong>Budget</strong> Management Units, ($230,000). Offset by increased requests for consulting services, ($20,000).<br />
b) Increase due to: new requests for carbon footprint study, ($250,000); pest control study, ($20,000); increased requests for consulting<br />
services for M&O, ($100,000); and salaries of non-budgeted employees, ($26,000). Offset by transfer of ten full-time equivalent positions<br />
from General Division to other Divisions in order to reestablish separate M&O <strong>Budget</strong> Management Units, ($288,000).<br />
c) Decrease due to reallocation of salary distribution resulting from position transfers, ($27,500), and reduced requests for: truck hauling to<br />
lagoons, ($255,000); and contractor equipment and personnel due to acquisition of District equipment operated by District personnel, ($76,500).<br />
d) Decrease primarily due to transfer of ten full-time equivalent positions from General Division to other Divisions in order to reestablish<br />
separate M&O <strong>Budget</strong> Management Units, ($103,000).<br />
e) Increase due to: cyclical bridge repair, ($20,000); consulting services for a Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC)<br />
Plan, ($25,000); and transfer of debris and pontoon boat operating costs from Stormwater Fund to Corporate Fund, ($185,000). Offset by<br />
reassignment of scavenger services at Lockport Powerhouse (LPH), ($7,000).<br />
f) Decrease due to transfer of four relief workers to Stormwater Management Fund, ($35,200).<br />
g) Increase due to: reassignment of indirect costs for Lockport Powerhouse (LPH), ($54,000); new requests for fire suppression system<br />
maintenance at LPH, ($15,000); building repairs at LPH, ($14,000); and electrical database upgrade, ($15,000). Offset by one-time 2008<br />
request for hydraulic valve for LPH, ($7,000).<br />
255<br />
255
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
66000 M and O - GENERAL DIVISION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
5000 Solids Utilization $380,866 2009 27 $17,011,391 ($741,069) (4.2)<br />
2008 28 $17,752,460<br />
5100 Solids Drying $0 2009 8 $4,339,166 ($1,119,929) (20.5) h)<br />
2008 8 $5,459,095<br />
5200 Solids Distribution $0 2009 3 $8,488,023 $411,593 5.1 i)<br />
2008 3 $8,076,430<br />
5900 Solids Utilization - Indirect Costs $380,866 2009 16 $4,184,202 ($32,733) (0.8)<br />
2008 17 $4,216,935<br />
7000 General Support $103,550 2009 0 $114,050 ($3,104) (2.7)<br />
2008 0 $117,154<br />
Totals $4,618,180 2009 65 $23,487,100 ($1,057,100) (4.3%) *<br />
2008 76 $24,544,200<br />
h) Decrease primarily due to reduced funding for unresolved liquidated damages, ($40,000) and operational plan which calls for decreased use<br />
of contractor equipment and personnel in favor of District equipment and personnel and decreased use of truck hauling services for drying site<br />
operations, ($1,514,500). Offset by reallocation of salary distribution, ($14,000); as well as new requests for one screening system with<br />
conveyor for the Calumet location, ($220,000), and three sludge pumps for the drying sites, ($200,000).<br />
i) Increased requests for truck hauling services for farm utilization of biosolids and expanded controlled solids distribution, ($1,068,000). Offset<br />
by reduced estimates for other contractual services, including disposal and utilization of biosolids at landfill sites, ($658,000).<br />
* The 2009 position total for the General Division is 65. There are 27 additional positions funded by the Stormwater Management Fund.<br />
256<br />
256
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
66000 M and O - GENERAL DIVISION PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
1000-2900 Collection and Treatment<br />
Technical and Administrative Support for Collection and Treat- Cost $1,606,181 $2,982,255 $2,883,286<br />
ment Activities<br />
3000 Solids Processing<br />
Technical and Administrative Support for Solids Removal and Cost $603,059 $1,168,483 $701,289 a)<br />
Processing<br />
4000 Flood and Pollution Control<br />
4200 Operation and Maintenance of the <strong>Water</strong>ways to Minimize Area Cost $828,797 $1,182,750 $966,350 b)<br />
Flooding and Pollution<br />
Minimize Diversion of Lake Michigan <strong>Water</strong> in Accordance mil gal/year diversion 71,804 71,967 71,967<br />
with the U.S. Supreme Court Decree Cost $425,423 $456,900 $462,953<br />
Cost/mil gal/year $5.92 $6.35 $6.43<br />
Generate Electricity at Lockport Powerhouse to Obtain KWH 44,586,717 36,000,000 45,000,000<br />
Approximately $2.1 million in Revenue Cost $500,422 $584,072 $766,913 c)<br />
Cost/KWH $0.0112 $0.0162 $0.0170<br />
* Revenue Generated $1,756,855 $1,400,000 $2,100,000<br />
4210 Maintenance of the <strong>Water</strong>ways and Canal Banks Within the<br />
Jurisdiction of the District. Activities Include Debris Removal, Cost $16,042 $26,700 $252,646 d)<br />
Insect and Rodent Control, Bridge Repairs and Aeration Costs<br />
Along Non-Navigable <strong>Water</strong>ways<br />
4300 Stormwater Management Cost $0 $35,200 $0 e)<br />
4900 Flood and Pollution Control - Indirect Costs Cost $153,840 $238,226 $328,222 f)<br />
5000 Solids Drying / Utilization<br />
7000 General Support<br />
Management and Coordination of the Solids Utilization Dry Tons 0 127,600 131,600<br />
Program. Cost $380,866 $17,752,460 $17,011,391 g)<br />
Cost/Dry Ton $0.00 $139.13 $129.27<br />
Technical and Administrative Support for Other Departments' Cost $103,550 $117,154 $114,050<br />
Activities Indirectly Related to the Operational Activities of<br />
Collection and Treatment, Solids Processing, Flood and Pollution<br />
Control, and Solids Utilization<br />
Division Total $4,618,180 $24,544,200 $23,487,100<br />
a) Decrease primarily due to reduced requests for contractor equipment and truck hauling at the lagoons, ($331,500); and transfer of ten full-time<br />
equivalent positions from General Division to other Divisions in order to reestablish separate M&O <strong>Budget</strong> Management Units, ($130,000).<br />
b) Decrease primarily due to: reduced requests for contractual services, ($240,500); reduced requests for materials and supplies, ($8,700); and<br />
transfer of indirect costs for Lockport Powerhouse (LPH), ($54,000). Offset by new request for Centennial Fountain restoration, ($100,000).<br />
c) Hydraulic systems maintenance at LPH, ($30,000). Generator repairs at LPH, ($110,000). Carryover of Arc Flash Study for LPH, ($15,000).<br />
d) Increase primarily due to: transfer of debris and pontoon boat operating costs from Stormwater Fund to Corporate Fund, ($185,000); increased<br />
requests for contractual services, ($45,000); and reallocation of salaries, ($3,000). Offset by: reassignment of scavenger costs at LPH, ($7,000).<br />
e) Decrease due to transfer of four relief workers from Corporate Fund to Stormwater Management Fund, ($35,200).<br />
f) Increase primarily due to reassignment of indirect costs for LPH, ($54,000); and building improvements at LPH, ($29,000).<br />
g) Decrease primarily due to reduced requests for disposal and utilization of biosolids at landfill sites, ($658,000); and contractor owned and<br />
operated material-handling equipment, ($892,500). Offset by: net increase in truck hauling contracts, ($446,000); net increase in heavy<br />
equipment purchases, ($56,600); and transfer of remaining solids operation costs from other Divisions to General Division, ($278,000).<br />
* Revenue Generated not included in total costs.<br />
257<br />
257
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
66000 Department Maintenance & Operations<br />
Division General 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 3,774,460 $ 6,390,800 $ 6,388,800 $ 6,350,500 $ 6,666,700 $ 6,555,100 $ 5,862,100<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 181,500 519,200 459,200 400,000 527,300 525,500 525,700<br />
601080 Salaries of Nonbudgeted Employees 26,217 75,000 211,000 210,000 140,000 140,000 140,000<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 9,999 41,700 48,700 38,000 32,700 32,700 32,700<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 83,754 830,000 756,000 327,000 1,500,900 1,400,900 1,400,900<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 196,000 217,800 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 11,307 59,400 59,400 52,000 41,800 59,400 41,800<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 4,087,237 7,916,100 7,923,100 7,377,500 9,105,400 8,931,400 8,003,200<br />
612010 Travel 6,218 8,600 11,600 10,100 15,900 15,900 15,900<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 8,072 20,600 16,500 14,000 28,200 28,200 28,200<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 5,316 5,700 11,700 10,500 8,200 8,200 8,200<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services 1,799 2,100 2,100 1,000 2,100 2,100 2,100<br />
612150 Electrical Energy 54,855 61,500 61,500 61,000 61,700 61,700 61,700<br />
612170 <strong>Water</strong> and <strong>Water</strong> Services 1,959 5,100 5,100 5,000 5,100 5,100 5,100<br />
612210 Communication Services 145,463 107,100 156,200 150,000 107,300 107,300 107,300<br />
612240 Testing and Inpection Services 4,960 6,900 6,900 6,100 6,500 6,500 6,500<br />
612330 Rental Charges - 10,500 9,000 8,500 13,200 13,200 13,200<br />
612410 Governmental Service Charges 82,500 82,900 85,400 85,400 95,600 95,600 95,600<br />
612420 Maintenance of Grounds and Pavements 1,555 112,800 109,800 109,800 224,700 224,700 224,700<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 135,748 455,600 319,100 312,000 238,900 238,900 238,900<br />
612520 Waste Material Disposal Charges 3,305 12,783,000 12,889,500 10,818,300 11,417,000 11,342,000 11,342,000<br />
612620 Repairs to <strong>Water</strong>way Facilities 41,566 103,700 71,200 44,000 317,100 317,100 242,100<br />
612650 Repairs to Process Facilities - 74,900 52,400 36,200 50,900 50,900 50,900<br />
612680 Repairs to Buildings - - - - 38,000 38,000 38,000<br />
612760 Repairs to Material Handling and Farming - 160,000 188,000 178,600 160,000 160,000 160,000<br />
612790 Repairs to Marine Equipment - - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000<br />
612800 Repairs to Office Furniture and Equipment - - - - 500 500 500<br />
612820 Computer Software Maintenance - 49,000 48,000 48,000 49,000 49,000 49,000<br />
612840 Communications Equipment Maintenance<br />
(Includes Software) 171 1,000 1,000 300 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />
258<br />
258
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
66000 Department Maintenance & Operations<br />
Division General 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. 915 2,000 2,000 800 2,000 2,000 2,000<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 494,402 14,053,000 14,047,000 11,899,600 12,942,900 12,867,900 12,792,900<br />
623030 Metals - 3,500 3,500 1,000 3,500 3,500 3,500<br />
623070 Electrical Parts and Supplies 2,358 17,000 17,000 8,900 18,500 18,500 18,500<br />
623090 Plumbing Accessories and Supplies 1,433 1,200 5,700 5,200 2,700 2,700 2,700<br />
623110 Hardware 225 400 400 300 700 700 700<br />
623130 Buildings, Grounds, Paving Materials, and<br />
Supplies - 49,500 49,500 42,000 42,500 42,500 42,500<br />
623250 Vehicle Parts and Supplies - 85,000 85,000 72,000 119,000 119,000 95,000<br />
623270 Mechanical Repair Parts 15,742 28,500 28,500 17,800 25,000 25,000 25,000<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 6,135 21,500 33,500 33,500 21,500 21,500 21,500<br />
623560 Processing Chemicals - 30,000 30,000 14,800 15,000 15,000 15,000<br />
623570 Laboratory Testing Supplies, Small<br />
Equipment, and Chemicals - - 5,000 3,400 1,200 1,200 1,200<br />
623660 Cleaning Supplies - 600 600 500 600 600 600<br />
623680 Tools and Supplies 99 1,400 3,400 3,100 2,900 2,900 2,900<br />
623700 Wearing Apparel - 2,000 2,500 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />
623780 Safety and Medical Supplies - - 25,000 22,200 500 500 500<br />
623800 Computer Software - 3,000 3,000 3,000 300 300 300<br />
623810 Computer Supplies 1,276 1,000 1,000 - - - -<br />
623820 Fuel - 42,000 42,000 40,000 330,000 330,000 330,000<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 1,116 26,500 26,500 5,900 66,500 66,500 66,500<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 28,384 313,100 362,100 275,600 653,400 653,400 629,400<br />
634620 Equipment for <strong>Water</strong>ways Facilities 8,157 7,000 7,000 5,500 15,000 15,000 15,000<br />
634760 Material Handling and Farming Equipment - 1,990,000 1,990,000 402,600 1,695,000 1,827,000 2,046,600<br />
634790 Marine Equipment - - - - 753,000 753,000 -<br />
634820 Computer Software - 265,000 265,000 - - - -<br />
400 TOTAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 8,157 2,262,000 2,262,000 408,100 2,463,000 2,595,000 2,061,600<br />
TOTAL GENERAL DIVISION $ 4,618,180 $ 24,544,200 $ 24,594,200 $ 19,960,800 $ 25,164,700 $ 25,047,700 $ 23,487,100<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
259<br />
259
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: General 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
601 Executive Office<br />
EX14 Director of Maintenance and Operations - - - - 1 229,316.62<br />
EX14 Chief of Maintenance and Operations 1 1 1 221,561.86 - -<br />
EX06 Secretary to Officer 1 1 1 84,825.26 1 87,794.20<br />
TOTAL Executive Office 2 2 2 306,387.12 2 317,110.82<br />
611 General Division Executive Office<br />
HP22 Assistant Director of Maintenance and Operations - - - - 1 191,862.32<br />
HP22 Assistant Chief Engineer 1 1 1 185,374.28 - -<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 1 1 67,746.38 1 63,359.92<br />
TOTAL General Division Executive Office 2 2 2 253,120.66 2 255,222.24<br />
620 Administrative Section<br />
621 Administrative Unit<br />
HP18 Management Analyst IV 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
HP17 Management Analyst III 2 2 2 215,538.18 1 106,693.86<br />
HP15 Management Analyst II 3 4 4 339,167.92 1 83,982.34<br />
HP13 Management Analyst I 3 3 3 224,148.60 - -<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 2 2 2 94,883.62 - -<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 44,180.76 - -<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 12 13 13 1,047,223.06 3 324,505.74<br />
TOTAL Administrative Section 12 13 13 1,047,223.06 3 324,505.74<br />
630 <strong>Water</strong>ways Control Section<br />
631 Administrative Unit<br />
HP20 Supervising Civil Engineer 1 1 1 135,264.48 1 132,819.18<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist - - - - 1 51,591.80<br />
HP11 Principal Clerk Stenographer #2 (Principal Office Support Specialist) - 1 1 64,836.20 - -<br />
HP11 Principal Clerk Stenographer #1 1 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 2 2 2 200,100.68 2 184,410.98<br />
260<br />
260
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: General 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
632 Channels Operations Unit (* Number of positions budgeted and funded by the Stormwater Management Fund appear below position count)<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer - 1 1 124,318.74 1 128,669.84<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer - - - - - -<br />
(*1)<br />
NR6271 Systems Dispatcher 4 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Channels Operations Unit 4 1 1 124,318.74 1 128,669.84<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*1)<br />
633 Channel Control Unit (formerly named Technical Projects Unit)<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 - - - - -<br />
NR6271 Systems Dispatcher - 4 4 368,160.00 4 381,056.00<br />
TOTAL Channel Control Unit (formerly named Technical Projects Unit) 4 4 4 368,160.00 4 381,056.00<br />
634 Channel Maintenance Unit (formerly the Contract Preparation Unit)<br />
(* Number of positions budgeted and funded by the Stormwater Management Fund appear below position count)<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer - - - - - -<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer - - - - - -<br />
(*1) (*1) (*2)<br />
TOTAL Channel Maintenance Unit (formerly the Contract Preparation Unit) - - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*2) (*2) (*3)<br />
635 Lockport Powerhouse Unit<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 1 1 1 66,656.72 1 73,162.44<br />
NR7394 Powerhouse Mechanic Leadman 1 1 1 103,625.60 1 107,244.80<br />
NR7393 Powerhouse Mechanic 1 1 1 87,110.40 1 90,168.00<br />
HP15 Associate Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 85,349.94 1 88,337.08<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 1 1 1 74,718.28 1 81,505.32<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 1 - - - - -<br />
NR7399 Utility Man 1 1 1 70,616.00 1 73,091.20<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 1 1 1 61,859.20 1 64,022.40<br />
261<br />
261
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: General 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A #2 (Maintenance Laborer Class B) 1 1 1 61,859.20 1 64,022.40<br />
TOTAL Lockport Powerhouse Unit 10 8 8 611,795.34 8 641,553.64<br />
636 Boat Operations Unit (* Number of positions budgeted and funded by the Stormwater Management Fund appear below position count)<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V - - - - - -<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 - - - - - -<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV - - - - - -<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 - - - - - -<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer Class A Shift - - - - - -<br />
(*2) (*2) (*2)<br />
TOTAL Boat Operations Unit - - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*6) (*6) (*6)<br />
637 North Service Area Channel Maintenance Unit<br />
(* Number of positions budgeted and funded by the Stormwater Management Fund appear below position count)<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V - - - - - -<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman - - - - - -<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer Class A Shift - - - - - -<br />
(*4) (*4) (*4)<br />
TOTAL North Service Area Channel Maintenance Unit - - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*6) (*6) (*6)<br />
638 Calumet Service Area Channel Maintenance Unit<br />
(* Number of positions budgeted and funded by the Stormwater Management Fund appear below position count)<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V - - - - - -<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman - - - - - -<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer Class A Shift - - - - - -<br />
(*4) (*4) (*4)<br />
TOTAL Calumet Service Area Channel Maintenance Unit - - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*6) (*6) (*6)<br />
639 Stickney Service Area Channel Maintenance Unit<br />
(* Number of positions budgeted and funded by the Stormwater Management Fund appear below position count)<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 - - - - - -<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman - - - - - -<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer Class A Shift - - - - - -<br />
(*4) (*4) (*4)<br />
TOTAL Stickney Service Area Channel Maintenance Unit - - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*6) (*6) (*6)<br />
TOTAL <strong>Water</strong>ways Control Section 20 15 15 1,304,374.76 15 1,335,690.46<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*26) (*26) (*27)<br />
262<br />
262
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: General 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
634 Channel Maintenance Unit (formerly named the Contract Preparation Unit)<br />
HP18 Contract Administrator 1 - - - - -<br />
HP17 Senior Mechanical Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP15 Associate Electrical Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP15 Associate Mechanical Engineer 2 - - - - -<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Channel Maintenance Unit (formerly named the Contract Preparation Unit) 8 - - - - -<br />
640 Technical Administration Section<br />
641 Technical Administration Unit<br />
HP20 Supervising Civil Engineer - 1 1 121,390.36 1 147,178.98<br />
TOTAL Technical Administration Unit - 1 1 121,390.36 1 147,178.98<br />
642 Contract Preparation Unit<br />
HP18 Contract Administrator - 1 1 124,318.74 1 128,669.84<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer - 1 1 107,768.44 1 96,999.76<br />
HP17 Senior Mechanical Engineer - 1 1 107,768.44 1 116,388.22<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer - 1 1 76,935.30 1 88,337.08<br />
HP15 Associate Mechanical Engineer - 2 2 162,284.72 2 172,319.42<br />
HP15 Associate Electrical Engineer - 1 1 93,766.40 1 97,048.12<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant - 1 1 67,746.38 1 66,739.40<br />
TOTAL Contract Preparation Unit - 8 8 740,588.42 8 766,501.84<br />
643 Technical Services Unit<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer - 1 1 114,348.00 1 123,509.62<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer - 1 1 117,135.20 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer - 1 1 81,142.36 1 83,982.34<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV (AC) - 1 1 79,896.18 1 82,692.48<br />
263<br />
263
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: General 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist - 1 1 57,062.46 1 56,570.54<br />
TOTAL Technical Services Unit - 5 5 449,584.20 5 467,989.86<br />
TOTAL Technical Administration Section - 14 14 1,311,562.98 14 1,381,670.68<br />
650 Solids Management Section<br />
651 Solids Administration Unit<br />
HP20 Supervising Civil Engineer - 1 1 121,390.36 1 139,998.82<br />
HP11 Principal Clerk Stenographer #2 (Principal Office Support Specialist) - 1 1 59,249.32 1 61,323.08<br />
TOTAL Solids Administration Unit - 2 2 180,639.68 2 201,321.90<br />
652 CALSMA Field Operations Unit<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer - 1 1 93,719.60 1 101,845.64<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer - 2 2 162,284.72 2 185,385.20<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 - 1 1 88,154.56 1 96,281.38<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV - 3 3 157,535.82 3 159,671.20<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III - 1 1 53,663.22 1 58,432.40<br />
TOTAL CALSMA Field Operations Unit - 8 8 555,357.92 8 601,615.82<br />
653 Solids Operations Administration Unit<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer - 1 1 119,332.98 1 118,350.18<br />
TOTAL Solids Operations Administration Unit - 1 1 119,332.98 1 118,350.18<br />
654 LASMA Field Operations Unit<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer - 1 1 112,452.34 1 116,388.22<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer - 2 2 187,532.80 2 194,096.24<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer - 1 1 62,626.20 1 60,647.08<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer (AC) - 1 1 78,749.06 1 81,505.32<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V - 2 2 161,527.86 2 171,351.96<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 - 1 1 88,154.56 1 91,239.98<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV - 3 3 190,182.20 3 200,216.64<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 - 1 1 76,119.16 1 78,783.38<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III - 1 1 45,282.90 - -<br />
TOTAL LASMA Field Operations Unit - 13 13 1,002,627.08 12 994,228.82<br />
264<br />
264
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: General 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
655 LASMA Support Unit<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer (AC) - 1 1 107,768.44 1 116,388.22<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer (AC) - 1 1 89,558.82 1 97,048.12<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V - 1 1 66,656.72 1 68,989.70<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III - 1 1 42,489.98 1 46,867.86<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist - 1 1 54,657.46 1 56,570.54<br />
NR8652 Maintenance Laborer Class B - 1 1 43,139.20 1 44,657.60<br />
TOTAL LASMA Support Unit - 6 6 404,270.62 6 430,522.04<br />
TOTAL Solids Management Section - 30 30 2,262,228.28 29 2,346,038.76<br />
TOTAL Maintenance and Operations General Division 44 76 76 6,484,896.86 65 5,960,238.70<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*1) (*26) (*26) (*27)<br />
Note: Twenty-seven (27) position budgeted in Sections 634, 636, 637, 638 and 639 are funded by the<br />
Stormwater Management Fund, while the operations remain in the Maintenance and Operations Department.<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
265<br />
265
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – NORTH SERVICE AREA<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Increase<br />
$49,665,300<br />
$47,199,400<br />
$2,465,900<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Solids Processing<br />
$5,130,595 10.3%<br />
Solids Utilization<br />
$1,460,172 2.9%<br />
Flood & Pollution Control<br />
$778,876 1.6%<br />
Treatment<br />
$29,194,577 58.8%<br />
General Support<br />
$469,181 1.0%<br />
Collection<br />
$12,631,899 25.4%<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
Millions<br />
$60<br />
Increased Electricity<br />
Estimate<br />
$50<br />
Positions<br />
350<br />
300<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
$40<br />
250<br />
$30<br />
200<br />
150<br />
$20<br />
100<br />
$10<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
50<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
$0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
266<br />
266
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – NORTH SERVICE AREA<br />
67000<br />
NORTH SERVICE AREA<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
271 273 279<br />
710<br />
North Service Area<br />
Executive Office<br />
3 3 3<br />
711<br />
North Service Area<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Control Unit<br />
0 0 3<br />
715<br />
North Service Area<br />
Branch<br />
165 166 166<br />
750<br />
Hanover Park WRP<br />
Section<br />
23 23 25<br />
780<br />
James C. Kirie WRP<br />
Section<br />
40 40 40<br />
790<br />
John E. Egan WRP<br />
Section<br />
40 41 42<br />
715<br />
North Service Area<br />
Branch Office<br />
2 2 2<br />
751<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
3 3 3<br />
781<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
4 4 4<br />
791<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
4 4 4<br />
720<br />
Plant Engineering and<br />
Maintenance Section<br />
18 19 19<br />
740<br />
General Plant<br />
Services Section<br />
23 23 23<br />
753<br />
Operations Unit<br />
13 13 13<br />
783<br />
Operations Unit<br />
26 26 26<br />
793<br />
Operations Unit<br />
24 24 25<br />
721<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
1 1 1<br />
730<br />
Plant Operations<br />
Section<br />
42 42 42<br />
731<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
2 2 2<br />
741<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
1 1 1<br />
760<br />
Area Maintenance<br />
Section<br />
80 80 80<br />
764<br />
Area Maintenance<br />
Unit<br />
80 80 80<br />
754<br />
Maintenance Unit<br />
3 3 5<br />
755<br />
General Plant<br />
Services Unit<br />
4 4 4<br />
784<br />
Maintenance Unit<br />
3 3 3<br />
785<br />
General Plant<br />
Services Unit<br />
7 7 7<br />
794<br />
Maintenance Unit<br />
5 6 6<br />
795<br />
General Plant<br />
Services Unit<br />
7 7 7<br />
722<br />
Mechanical<br />
Engineering Unit<br />
3 3 3<br />
723<br />
Electrical<br />
Engineering Unit<br />
11 12 12<br />
732<br />
Treatment<br />
Operations Unit<br />
19 19 19<br />
734<br />
Mechanical<br />
Operations Unit<br />
21 21 21<br />
742<br />
* North Service Area<br />
Sewer Maintenance Unit<br />
11 11 11<br />
743<br />
Buildings and<br />
Grounds Unit<br />
11 11 11<br />
724<br />
Maintenance Unit<br />
3 3 3<br />
* In 2009, 2 positions in Section 742, and 1 position in Section 795 are funded by the<br />
Stormwater Management Fund while the operations remain in the Maintenance and<br />
Operations Department.<br />
267<br />
267
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS - NORTH SERVICE AREA<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The 2009 appropriation request for the North Service Area is $49,665,300, an increase of $2,465,900 or 5.2 percent from 2008.<br />
The 2009 staffing level of 279 is an increase of six positions from 2008, one Senior Mechanical Engineer at the Hanover Park<br />
WRP, one Management Analyst II, one Management Analyst I and one Senior Office Support Specialist at the North Side<br />
WRP, transferred from the General Division, one Fireman-Oiler at the Hanover Park WRP, and one Operating Engineer II at<br />
the Egan WRP, returning to work. There are three positions under the direction of M&O funded by the Stormwater<br />
Management Fund.<br />
The budget reflects an effort to address our main objectives:<br />
• 100 percent compliance with NPDES Permit requirements. In 2007, percent permit compliance by plant was as follows:<br />
North Side WRP (NSWRP), 100.00 percent; Egan WRP, 99.99 percent; Kirie WRP, 100.00 percent; and Hanover Park<br />
WRP, 99.96 percent;<br />
• Continued infrastructure improvements, rehabilitation, and replacement by a combination of Engineering and M&O<br />
contracts;<br />
• Continued implementation of the Engineering program consistent with the Master Plan.<br />
NORTH SIDE WRP<br />
• Continue the design phase of projects recommended under the Master Plan, which began in 2008. The most important is<br />
the design and construction of a new secondary treatment battery under Contract 06-020-3P, Battery E. Battery E will be<br />
the plant's fifth treatment battery, which includes primary settling tanks, aerations tanks, and final settling tanks. The<br />
design based-loaded flow will be 105 MGD. Battery E will provide much needed redundancy to the NSWRP treatment<br />
capacity and allow for future rehabilitation and upgrades of existing Batteries A, B, C and D, also recommended under the<br />
Master Plan. The rehabilitation of the existing batteries cannot be started before redundant capacity is installed;<br />
• Install an additional ammonia analyzer to compliment the two ammonia analyzers planned for installation in 2008 to<br />
monitor ammonia levels in the raw sewage and Battery A mixed liquor. Online ammonia analyzers will help operating<br />
staff to monitor treatment performance and prevent plant upsets;<br />
• Continue with the ABB distributed control system upgrade and hardwiring project under a five-year sole source<br />
agreement. In 2009, the work will cover Batteries C and D at the NSWRP. The upgrade will include controllers and<br />
hardware replacement as well as software upgrades that will ensure system availability and reliability for at least twenty<br />
years;<br />
• Replace the Bristol communication equipment used for monitoring and control of the remote pumping stations, along<br />
with the excitation system for six raw sewage pumps at the NSWRP;<br />
• Rehabilitate the operating gallery buildings, including tuck pointing and masonry repairs. These repairs will ensure these<br />
buildings will continue to provide service into the future;<br />
• Continue to maintain the 4.2 acres of Native Prairie Landscape (NPL) and six rain gardens;<br />
• Clean the Golf Glenview Sewer-Morton Grove Extension. This will reduce odors and restore the original flow capacity.<br />
HANOVER PARK WRP<br />
• Continue to aid in the design development of the Hanover Park WRP Master Plan, which began in 2008;<br />
• Reroute existing raw sewage discharge to the retention ponds, and provide better control of primary waste to the digesters<br />
without the use of airlifts, under Tertiary Filter Rehabilitation, New Pump Variable Frequency Drives and Other Plant<br />
Improvements Contract 04-824-2P, in progress;<br />
• Complete the repair and cleaning of the plant’s eight rapid sand filters. Two filters will be cleaned and repaired in 2009.<br />
Six were cleaned and repaired in 2007;<br />
• Procure and install a generator for the Bartlett Pump Station so that the station has an on-site second source of electric<br />
power in the event of a power outage. Modify the Hanover Park WRP’s on-site generator so that emergency power will be<br />
provided automatically;<br />
• Drain, clean, and repair Digesters 1 and 2 in late 2008, under Cleaning of Anaerobic Digesters and Other Improvements<br />
Contract 02-818-2P, which will improve digester gas containment and utilization. The option of dedicating one of these<br />
digesters for processing food waste will be evaluated in 2009;<br />
• Continue to develop and maintain "green initiatives", including seven acres of installed NPL, and investigate future rain<br />
gardens.<br />
268<br />
268
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
KIRIE WRP<br />
• Continue Contract 01-353-2M, Pumping Station Rehabilitation, to replace the raw sewage pumps and piping, which have<br />
served their useful life;<br />
• Replace pump motors, obsolete magnetic drives, and variable frequency drives (VFDs) with new energy efficient motors<br />
and VFDs under Tertiary Filter Rehabilitation, New Pump VFDs and Other Plant Improvements Contract 04-824-2P;<br />
• Upgrade miscellaneous electrical equipment, replacing indoor transformers, obsolete fire alarm system, and roadway<br />
lighting under Electrical Equipment Upgrade Contract 01-817-2E;<br />
• Replace three high pressure house air compressors which have served their useful life;<br />
• Apply protective coatings to three clarifiers under Services to Paint Final Tanks Contract 09-782-11. This is part of an<br />
equipment program to extend the useful service life of twelve clarifiers;<br />
• Continue to develop and maintain "green initiatives", including 3.25 acres of installed NPL, and invest in future rain<br />
gardens and safer pest control;<br />
• Continue to develop and implement an Environmental Management System (EMS) for wastewater treatment. The EMS<br />
provides a systematic way to review and improve operations for better organizational control and environmental<br />
performance;<br />
• Continue to optimize the use of the O'Hare CUP Reservoir. Since the reservoir went on-line in 1997, there have been thirty<br />
four Reservoir fill events for a total of over 3.197 billion gallons stored for later treatment.<br />
EGAN WRP<br />
• Continue to develop and implement an EMS for wastewater treatment. The EMS provides a systematic way to review and<br />
improve operations for better organizational control and environmental performance;<br />
• Continue to implement the National Biosolids Partnership’s (NBP) EMS for the biosolids program, to compliment and<br />
improve the District’s solids management program;<br />
• Rehabilitate the tertiary filter under Tertiary Filter Rehabilitation, New Pump VFDs and Other Plant Improvements<br />
Contract 04-824-2P to return the filter capacity to its original design condition and increase current capacity. Under the<br />
same contract, new boiler controls are expected to increase digester gas utilization thereby reducing usage of natural gas;<br />
• Replace motors for raw sewage pumps 1 to 6; and replace drives with energy efficient VFDs for raw sewage pumps 1, 2, 5<br />
and 6; under 4160 V Switchgear, Motor Control Centers, Raw Sewage Pumps, Motors and Drives Replacement Contract<br />
99-467-2E;<br />
• Recondition the Blower #1 motor. There are a total of four blowers at the Egan WRP of which three blower motors have<br />
been reconditioned. The reconditioning is necessary to improve performance, reliability, and to reduce electrical energy<br />
consumption;<br />
• Continue various plant improvements, including replacement of old, broken or malfunctioning windows with energy<br />
efficient thermal windows; and repairing and replacing portions of the original thirty-year old concrete roads;<br />
• Rehabilitate two clarifier drives. This is part of a program to rehabilitate a total of twelve clarifier drives. The drives have<br />
been in service for 33 years and require reconditioning;<br />
• Continue maintenance of the ten acres of NPL that was installed in 2007;<br />
• Continue to develop energy conservation and renewable energy initiatives. Replace old lighting fixtures with high<br />
efficiency induction lighting fixtures. Rehabilitate South Aeration tanks and replace diffuser plates under Aeration Tanks<br />
Rehabilitation and Diffuser Plates Replacement Contract 03-490-3P. Conduct an energy assessment and combined heat<br />
and power feasibility study through the University of Illinois Energy Resources Center, and develop a solar thermal<br />
project to pre-heat boiler make-up water.<br />
SUMMARY<br />
During the last several years, North Service Area Division staff has taken advantage of the available funding to replace or<br />
rehabilitate infrastructure. As a part of this continuing effort, work on a number of infrastructure items in older facilities<br />
requiring attention has been proposed for this year’s budget. Efforts to continue maintenance of facilities and equipment,<br />
combined with the Master Plans and support received from the Engineering Department, as well as energy conservation and<br />
“green initiatives”, prepare the Division to meet future needs in a reliable manner.<br />
269<br />
269
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
270
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
67000 M and O - NORTH DIVISION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. COLLECTION AND TREATMENT: The North Service Area will collect and treat approximately<br />
117.9 billion gallons of sewage through its treatment facilities and a contract agreement with the<br />
Fox River <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District. $41,826,476 84.2%<br />
Design: Flows CBOD * SS *<br />
North Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant 333 MGD 10 mg/l 12 mg/l<br />
John Egan <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant 30 MGD 10 mg/l 12 mg/l<br />
Hanover Park <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant 12 MGD 10 mg/l 12 mg/l<br />
James Kirie <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant 52 MGD 4 mg/l 5 mg/l<br />
Fox River <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District 4 MGD N.A. N.A.<br />
* NPDES monthly effluent quality standards: CBOD - Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand<br />
SS - Suspended Solids<br />
2. SOLIDS PROCESSING: The North Service Area will remove 54,050 dry tons and process 15,950 dry tons<br />
of concentrated sewage through various systems including heated digestion, centrifuging, concentration,<br />
and centrifuge cake in lagoons at CALSMA** and LASMA**. $5,130,595 10.3%<br />
3. SOLIDS UTILIZATION: The North Service Area will provide support to utilize 1,500 dry tons of further<br />
dewatered sewage for application at the Fischer Farm in Hanover Park. An estimated 4,500 dry tons are<br />
targeted for land application via the Egan biosolids farm application contract. $1,460,172 2.9%<br />
4. FLOOD AND POLLUTION CONTROL: The North Service Area will work to prevent local area flooding<br />
and control diversion of water from Lake Michigan through the operation of 21 retention reservoirs,<br />
in cooperation with local communities, and by assisting in the operation of the Wilmette Controlling<br />
Works and the North Shore Channel. They will also work to maintain the quality of the waterways system<br />
and associated District property in cooperation with the debris boats and the channel maintenance crews. $778,876 1.6%<br />
5. GENERAL SUPPORT: The North Service Area provides technical and administrative support for other<br />
departments not directly related to the operational activities of Collection and Treatment, Solids<br />
Processing, Flood and Pollution Control, and Solids Utilization. $469,181 1.0%<br />
Total $49,665,300 100.0%<br />
**CALSMA - Calumet Solids Management Area and LASMA - Lawndale Solids Management Area<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Unit of Measure Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. The North Service Area will collect and treat approximately 117.9<br />
billion gallons of sewage in 2009. billion gallons 116.3 117.7 117.9<br />
2. The North Service Area will remove 54,050 dry tons and process solids<br />
from 15,950 dry tons of concentrated sewage. dry tons process solids 15,615 15,950 15,950<br />
3. The North Service Area will obtain 100 percent permit compliance in<br />
2009 for NPDES effluent limits. percent 100% 100% 100%<br />
4. The North Service Area will provide support to utilize 6,000 dry tons dry tons 6,633 6,000 6,000<br />
of biosolids in 2009.<br />
271<br />
271
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
67000 M and O - NORTH DIVISION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
1000 Collection $12,045,925 2009 81 $12,631,899 $314,713 2.6<br />
2008 79 $12,317,186<br />
1100 Surface Interceptor Systems $1,168,258 2009 9 $1,430,476 $157,571 12.4 a)<br />
2008 9 $1,272,905<br />
1200 Tunnel and Reservoir System $2,313,393 2009 12 $2,389,323 $49,567 2.1<br />
2008 12 $2,339,756<br />
1300 Pumping Station Facilities $4,650,589 2009 28 $4,360,409 $199,597 4.8 b)<br />
2008 27 $4,160,812<br />
1900 Collection - Indirect Costs $3,913,685 2009 32 $4,451,691 ($92,022) (2.0)<br />
2008 31 $4,543,713<br />
2000 Treatment $22,537,936 2009 161 $29,194,577 $2,145,214 7.9<br />
2008 159 $27,049,363<br />
2000 Pre-Treatment $622,997 2009 6 $731,592 $63,568 9.5<br />
2008 6 $668,024<br />
2100 Primary Treatment $650,503 2009 8 $668,415 $38,463 6.1<br />
2008 8 $629,952<br />
2200 Secondary Treatment $8,109,653 2009 46 $9,474,267 $52,766 0.6<br />
2008 46 $9,421,501<br />
2300 Tertiary Treatment $1,548,600 2009 13 $1,988,588 $699,717 54.3 c)<br />
2008 13 $1,288,871<br />
2900 Treatment - Indirect Costs $11,606,183 2009 88 $16,331,715 $1,290,700 8.6 d)<br />
2008 86 $15,041,015<br />
a) Increase due to one-time cleaning of Golf Glenview Sewer-Morton Grove Extension ($325,000); offset by decreased requests for repairs to sewers<br />
and sewer structures ($150,000) and TV inspection of sewers in the North Service Area ($25,000).<br />
b) Increase due to increased estimate for electricity ($130,000), reallocation of salary distribution ($20,000) and addition of two full-time positions<br />
for the North Service Area ($50,000).<br />
c) Increase due to cleaning and repairing of two rapid sand filters at the Hanover Park WRP ($500,000), replacement of sodium hypochlorite pumps<br />
at the Kirie WRP ($150,000) and addition of two full-time positions for the North Service Area ($45,000).<br />
d) Increase due to: rehabilitation of the operating gallery buildings at the North Side WRP ($410,000); sole source agreement with Emerson<br />
to provide Distributed Control System (DCS) related services at the Egan, Kirie, and Hanover Park WRPs ($255,000); increase for<br />
Manhours contract to address backlog hours ($260,000); solar project at the Egan WRP ($180,000); increased cost estimate for the bulk<br />
storage building at the Egan WRP ($65,000); records storage improvements at the Egan WRP ($55,000); and transfer of three full-time<br />
positions from General Division to the North Service Area to reestablish separate M&O <strong>Budget</strong> Management Units ($65,000).<br />
272<br />
272
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
67000 M and O - NORTH DIVISION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
3000 Solids Processing $4,356,560 2009 30 $5,130,595 $70,995 1.4<br />
2008 28 $5,059,600<br />
3100 Thickening $730,879 2009 7 $793,071 $38,318 5.1<br />
2008 7 $754,753<br />
3200 Stabilization $957,908 2009 8 $1,065,290 ($30,923) (2.8)<br />
2008 7 $1,096,213<br />
3300 Dewatering $1,302,830 2009 7 $1,598,472 $198,760 14.2 e)<br />
2008 7 $1,399,712<br />
3900 Solids Processing - Indirect Costs $1,364,943 2009 8 $1,673,762 ($135,160) (7.5) f)<br />
2008 7 $1,808,922<br />
4000 Flood and Pollution Control $699,481 2009 5 $778,876 ($56,062) (6.7)<br />
2008 5 $834,938<br />
4200 <strong>Water</strong>ways Control and Stormwater Reservoirs $395,570 2009 4 $334,419 ($9,179) (2.7)<br />
2008 4 $343,598<br />
4210 Maintenance of <strong>Water</strong>ways $300 2009 0 $0 $0 0.0<br />
2008 0 $0<br />
4400 Aeration Facilities $206,232 2009 0 $293,400 ($62,300) (17.5) g)<br />
2008 0 $355,700<br />
4900 Flood and Pollution Control - Indirect Costs $97,379 2009 1 $151,057 $15,417 11.4<br />
2008 1 $135,640<br />
5000 Solids Utilization $1,444,789 2009 1 $1,460,172 ($38,460) (2.6)<br />
2008 1 $1,498,632<br />
5200 Solids Distribution $764,580 2009 0 $661,729 $34,882 5.6<br />
2008 0 $626,847<br />
5900 Solids Utilization - Indirect Costs $680,209 2009 1 $798,443 ($73,342) (8.4)<br />
2008 1 $871,785<br />
7000 General Support $471,460 2009 1 $469,181 $29,500 6.7<br />
2008 1 $439,681<br />
Totals $41,556,151 2009 279 $49,665,300 $2,465,900 5.2% *<br />
2008 273 $47,199,400<br />
e) Increase due to one-time purchase of borescope for the Egan WRP ($35,000), increased requests for Polymer contract ($120,000) and repairs to<br />
centrifuge at the Egan WRP ($100,000); offset by decreased request for conveyor parts at the Egan WRP ($55,000).<br />
f) Decrease due to 2008 installation of gas detection system at the Egan WRP ($144,000) and lower estimate for payments to Fox River WRD<br />
($88,000); offset by painting services at the Hanover Park WRP ($25,000), higher estimate for natural gas usage ($10,000) and transfer of three<br />
full-time positions from General Division to the North Service Area to reestablish separate M&O <strong>Budget</strong> Management Units ($60,000).<br />
g) Decrease due to lower estimate for electrical energy usage for the Devon and Webster Aeration Stations ($62,300).<br />
* The 2009 position total for the North Service Area is 279. There are three additional positions funded by the Stormwater Management Fund.<br />
273<br />
273
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
67000 M and O - NORTH DIVISION PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
1000-2900 Collection and Treatment<br />
Collect and Treat Sewage at Treatment Facilities and Through a<br />
Contract Agreement with the Fox River <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District<br />
North Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Mil. Gallons 88,122 89,000 89,000<br />
Cost $18,918,272 $22,234,991 $23,146,100 a)<br />
Cost/Mil. Gallons $214.68 $249.83 $260.07<br />
John Egan <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Mil. Gallons 9,537 10,200 10,200<br />
Cost $5,506,097 $6,647,186 $7,059,921 b)<br />
Cost/Mil. Gallons $577.34 $651.68 $692.15<br />
Hanover Park <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Mil. Gallons 3,300 3,500 3,600<br />
Cost $2,565,005 $2,513,939 $3,265,243 c)<br />
Cost/Mil. Gallons $777.27 $718.27 $907.01<br />
James Kirie <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Mil. Gallons 13,278 13,000 13,000<br />
Cost $6,730,101 $6,570,433 $7,131,212 d)<br />
Cost/Mil. Gallons $506.86 $505.42 $548.55<br />
Fox River <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Mil. Gallons 2,082 2,000 2,100<br />
Cost $864,386 $1,400,000 $1,224,000 e)<br />
Cost/Mil. Gallons $415.17 $700.00 $582.86<br />
3000 Solids Processing<br />
Remove 54,050 Dry Tons of Solids, Transfer 45,000 to SWRP Dry Tons 15,615 15,950 15,950<br />
and Process 15,950 from Concentrated Sewage Through Various Cost $4,356,560 $5,059,600 $5,130,595<br />
Systems Cost/Dry Ton $279.00 $317.22 $321.67<br />
a) Increase for: infrastructure cleaning and repairs ($195,000); rehabilitation of the operating gallery buildings ($410,000); and increased<br />
estimate for electricity ($315,000).<br />
b) Increase for: solar project ($180,000); Manhours contract to address backlog hours ($150,000); increased cost estimate for the bulk<br />
storage building ($65,000) and replacement windows ($30,000).<br />
c) Increase for: cleaning and repairing of two rapid sand filters ($500,000); sole source agreement with Emerson to provide Distributed Control<br />
System (DCS) related services ($85,000); increased estimate for electricity ($30,000); and personnel program distribution changes due to<br />
addition of two full-time positions ($130,000).<br />
d) Increase for: sole source agreement with Emerson to provide Distributed Control System (DCS) related services ($85,000); Manhours contract<br />
to address backlog hours ($100,000); replacement of sodium hypochlorite pumps ($150,000); maintenance and calibration of switchgear and<br />
substation equipment ($50,000); maintenance of DCS ($50,000) and HVAC ($50,000); and bioxide ($40,000) and sodium<br />
hypochlorite ($20,000).<br />
e) Decrease due to lower estimate for payments to Fox River WRD ($176,000).<br />
274<br />
274
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
67000 M and O - NORTH DIVISION PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
4000 Flood and Pollution Control<br />
Operation and Maintenance of the <strong>Water</strong>ways to Minimize Area<br />
Flooding and Pollution<br />
4200 Minimize Area Flooding and Pollution of Lake Michigan Reservoirs 21 21 21<br />
Through the Continuous Control of <strong>Water</strong> Levels in Major Cost $395,570 $343,598 $334,419<br />
Rivers and Canals and the Operation of Retention Reservoirs Cost/Reservoir $18,836.67 $16,361.81 $15,924.71<br />
4210 Maintenance of the <strong>Water</strong>ways and Canal Banks Within the <strong>Water</strong>way Miles 63 63 63<br />
Jurisdiction of the District. Activities Include Debris Removal, Cost $300 $0 $0 f)<br />
Insect and Rodent Control, Bridge Repair, and Aeration Costs Cost/Mile $4.76 $0.00 $0.00<br />
Along Non-Navigable <strong>Water</strong>ways<br />
4400 Aeration Facilities Cost $206,232 $355,700 $293,400 g)<br />
4900 Flood and Pollution Control - Indirect Costs Cost $97,379 $135,640 $151,057<br />
5000 Solids Utilization<br />
7000 General Support<br />
Utilize Further Dewatered Sewage for Application at Final Dry Tons 6,633 6,000 6,000<br />
Utilization Sites Such as the Fischer Farm at Hanover Park Cost $1,444,789 $1,498,632 $1,460,172<br />
and Other Farm Application Sites Cost/Dry Ton $217.82 $249.77 $243.36<br />
Technical and Administrative Support for Other Departments' Cost $471,460 $439,681 $469,181<br />
Activities Indirectly Related to the Operational Activities<br />
of Collection and Treatment, Solids Processing, Flood and<br />
Pollution Control, and Solids Utilization<br />
f) Operations budgeted in Stormwater Management Fund.<br />
g) Decrease due to lower estimate for electrical energy usage for the Devon and Webster Aeration Stations ($62,300).<br />
Division Total $41,556,151 $47,199,400 $49,665,300<br />
275<br />
275
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
67000 Department Maintenance & Operations<br />
Division North Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 20,462,207 $ 21,426,200 $ 20,989,200 $ 20,989,200 $ 21,549,500 $ 21,543,700 $ 22,084,500<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 964,808 778,500 1,224,500 1,206,700 823,400 894,300 959,600<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 13,055 64,300 38,300 38,300 56,700 66,700 66,700<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 27,585 114,000 114,000 87,400 135,000 135,000 135,000<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 271,000 271,000 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 117,982 105,600 122,600 112,000 105,600 105,600 105,600<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 21,585,637 22,488,600 22,488,600 22,433,600 22,941,200 23,016,300 23,351,400<br />
612010 Travel 4,470 8,200 8,200 7,000 10,300 10,300 10,300<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 14,927 18,600 27,600 27,000 26,400 26,400 26,400<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 48,181 38,000 64,500 59,000 45,000 45,000 45,000<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services 1,017 800 3,000 1,600 1,200 1,200 1,200<br />
612150 Electrical Energy 8,722,761 9,376,000 9,736,000 9,402,100 9,986,000 9,576,600 9,576,600<br />
612160 Natural Gas 927,189 1,083,500 1,083,500 1,083,500 1,148,900 1,148,900 1,148,900<br />
612170 <strong>Water</strong> and <strong>Water</strong> Services 36,434 40,200 47,200 41,000 39,600 39,600 39,600<br />
612210 Communication Services 41,563 36,900 36,900 36,700 38,100 38,100 38,100<br />
612240 Testing and Inspection Services 48,261 90,100 90,100 66,700 73,000 73,000 73,000<br />
612330 Rental Charges 6,425 36,400 36,400 25,500 39,800 82,900 82,900<br />
612410 Governmental Service Charges 2,360,358 3,057,700 2,765,700 2,600,000 2,705,700 2,705,700 2,705,700<br />
612420 Maintenance of Grounds and Pavements 458,914 674,200 606,200 562,000 674,200 674,200 674,200<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 46,658 62,600 54,600 54,100 52,800 52,800 52,800<br />
612520 Waste Material Disposal Charges 1,024,569 922,400 1,022,400 1,022,000 957,000 957,000 957,000<br />
612530 Farming Supplies 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000<br />
612600 Repairs to Collection Facilities 957,851 1,144,300 1,059,800 1,059,800 1,395,000 1,370,900 1,310,900<br />
612650 Repairs to Process Facilities 1,118,237 2,806,600 2,796,600 2,647,000 4,139,200 4,630,700 4,535,700<br />
612680 Repairs to Buildings 793,128 1,422,400 1,029,400 990,000 1,554,400 1,743,400 1,828,400<br />
612760 Repairs to Material Handling and Farming 1,598 5,400 6,600 3,700 5,400 5,400 5,400<br />
612780 Safety Repairs and Services - 50,000 - - - - -<br />
612860 Repairs to Vehicle Equipment 7,188 11,200 20,800 14,800 10,700 10,700 10,700<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. 5,381 10,000 10,000 5,000 8,800 8,800 8,800<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16,650,110 20,920,500 20,530,500 19,733,500 22,936,500 23,226,600 23,156,600<br />
623030 Metals 4,441 8,500 8,500 8,300 9,000 9,000 9,000<br />
623070 Electrical Parts and Supplies 450,133 490,900 700,800 550,000 316,500 316,500 316,500<br />
276<br />
276
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
67000 Department Maintenance & Operations<br />
Division North Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
623090 Plumbing Accessories and Supplies 141,380 150,500 232,500 200,000 171,500 171,500 171,500<br />
623110 Hardware 7,778 15,900 15,900 13,600 13,500 13,500 13,500<br />
623130 Buildings, Grounds, Paving Materials, and<br />
Supplies 40,934 44,100 44,100 29,100 57,100 57,100 57,100<br />
623170 Fiber, Paper, and Insulation Materials 229 500 500 500 500 500 500<br />
623190 Paints, Solvents, and Related Materials 1,361 4,200 4,200 2,600 4,700 4,700 4,700<br />
623250 Vehicle Parts and Supplies 8,826 17,800 8,800 5,800 9,000 9,000 9,000<br />
623270 Mechanical Repair Parts 783,782 725,500 875,500 813,000 686,500 686,500 706,500<br />
623300 Manhole Materials 74,606 9,900 9,900 9,800 9,900 9,900 9,900<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 31,026 19,500 40,000 32,200 10,000 10,000 10,000<br />
623560 Processing Chemicals 1,279,432 1,478,800 1,317,800 1,300,000 1,229,800 1,229,800 1,229,800<br />
623570 Laboratory Testing Supplies, Small<br />
Equipment, and Chemicals 14,212 29,000 14,500 12,000 23,700 23,700 23,700<br />
623660 Cleaning Supplies 1,007 2,700 800 800 2,800 2,800 2,800<br />
623680 Tools and Supplies 37,707 60,700 87,700 84,000 60,500 60,500 60,500<br />
623720 Books, Maps, and Charts 280 1,000 1,000 500 500 500 500<br />
623780 Safety and Medical Supplies 60,658 45,000 45,000 34,200 46,000 60,000 60,000<br />
623800 Computer Software 3,560 32,600 32,600 29,100 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
623810 Computer Supplies 16,699 9,500 9,500 9,500 5,500 5,500 5,500<br />
623820 Fuel 26,056 27,000 27,000 22,900 41,500 41,500 41,500<br />
623840 Gases - 1,500 1,500 1,100 2,000 2,000 2,000<br />
623860 Lubricants 7,824 4,500 1,500 900 4,500 4,500 4,500<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 34,372 14,400 14,400 12,400 25,500 25,500 25,500<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 3,026,303 3,194,000 3,494,000 3,172,300 2,735,500 2,749,500 2,769,500<br />
634600 Equipment for Collection Facilities 21,669 65,000 40,300 35,000 20,000 57,500 57,500<br />
634650 Equipment for Process Facilities 127,825 300,000 372,000 265,000 120,000 120,000 170,000<br />
634860 Vehicle Equipment 137,842 217,800 274,000 266,600 91,500 160,300 160,300<br />
634970 Testing and Laboratory Equipment 6,765 13,500 - - - - -<br />
400 TOTAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 294,101 596,300 686,300 566,600 231,500 337,800 387,800<br />
TOTAL NORTH SERVICE AREA $ 41,556,151 $ 47,199,400 $ 47,199,400 $ 45,906,000 $ 48,844,700 $ 49,330,200 $ 49,665,300<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
277<br />
277
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: North Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
710 North Service Area Executive Office<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP22 Assistant Director of Maintenance and Operations - - - - 1 200,030.48<br />
HP22 Assistant Chief Engineer 1 1 1 193,266.06 - -<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 1 1 74,275.76 1 76,875.50<br />
HP09 Courier 1 1 1 35,890.14 1 35,000.68<br />
TOTAL North Service Area Executive Office 3 3 3 303,431.96 3 311,906.66<br />
711 North Service Area <strong>Budget</strong> Control Unit<br />
HP15 Management Analyst II - - - - 1 83,982.34<br />
HP13 Management Analyst I - - - - 1 60,328.06<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist - - - - 1 45,726.98<br />
TOTAL North Service Area <strong>Budget</strong> Control Unit - - - - 3 190,037.38<br />
715 North Service Area Branch<br />
715 North Service Area Branch Office<br />
HP21 Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations I 1 1 1 162,139.90 1 175,446.96<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 67,746.38 1 70,117.58<br />
TOTAL North Service Area Branch Office 2 2 2 229,886.28 2 245,564.54<br />
720 Plant Engineering and Maintenance Section<br />
721 Administrative Unit<br />
HP19 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations II 1 1 1 133,688.62 1 132,820.22<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 1 1 1 133,688.62 1 132,820.22<br />
722 Mechanical Engineering Unit<br />
HP18 Principal Mechanical Engineer - 1 1 109,363.28 1 113,191.00<br />
HP17 Senior Mechanical Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP15 Associate Mechanical Engineer 1 1 1 85,349.94 1 88,337.08<br />
HP14 Assistant Mechanical Engineer 1 1 1 74,718.28 1 81,505.32<br />
TOTAL Mechanical Engineering Unit 3 3 3 269,431.50 3 283,033.40<br />
723 Electrical Engineering Unit<br />
HP18 Principal Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 114,348.00 1 123,509.62<br />
278<br />
278
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: North Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP17 Senior Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 103,085.84 1 111,540.26<br />
HP15 Associate Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 76,935.30 1 83,982.34<br />
HP15 Associate Process Control Engineer - 1 1 72,728.50 1 70,919.16<br />
NR6251 Chief Electrical Operator 1 1 1 91,416.00 1 94,619.20<br />
NR6233 Electrical Operator II 5 5 5 393,848.00 5 407,680.00<br />
NR6232 Electrical Operator I 2 2 2 150,134.40 2 155,376.00<br />
TOTAL Electrical Engineering Unit 11 12 12 1,002,496.04 12 1,047,626.58<br />
724 Maintenance Unit<br />
HP18 Master Mechanic I 1 1 1 119,332.98 1 128,669.84<br />
HP16 Assistant Master Mechanic #4 1 1 1 112,374.34 1 116,307.36<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 48,326.72 1 52,163.28<br />
TOTAL Maintenance Unit 3 3 3 280,034.04 3 297,140.48<br />
TOTAL Plant Engineering and Maintenance Section 18 19 19 1,685,650.20 19 1,760,620.68<br />
730 Plant Operations Section<br />
731 Administrative Unit<br />
HP19 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations II 1 1 1 122,968.30 1 132,820.22<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 1 1 1 89,035.44 1 101,845.64<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 2 2 2 212,003.74 2 234,665.86<br />
732 Treatment Operations Unit<br />
HP16 Treatment Plant Operator III 1 1 1 106,784.60 1 110,522.10<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II 4 5 5 361,499.06 5 395,009.68<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II #4 4 3 3 265,168.02 3 249,365.22<br />
HP12 Treatment Plant Operator I 2 2 2 102,847.68 3 166,427.56<br />
HP12 Treatment Plant Operator I #4 2 2 2 134,508.40 1 71,197.62<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 4 4 4 259,916.80 4 268,985.60<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 2 2 2 123,718.40 2 128,044.80<br />
TOTAL Treatment Operations Unit 19 19 19 1,354,442.96 19 1,389,552.58<br />
279<br />
279
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: North Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
734 Mechanical Operations Unit<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP17 Chief Operating Engineer I 1 1 1 117,135.20 1 116,388.22<br />
HP16 Assistant Chief Operating Engineer 1 1 1 106,784.60 1 110,522.10<br />
NR6832 Operating Engineer II 7 7 7 578,177.60 7 598,416.00<br />
NR6831 Operating Engineer I 5 5 5 398,736.00 5 412,672.00<br />
NR6810 Fireman-Oiler 7 7 7 475,529.60 7 492,128.00<br />
TOTAL Mechanical Operations Unit 21 21 21 1,676,363.00 21 1,730,126.32<br />
TOTAL Plant Operations Section 42 42 42 3,242,809.70 42 3,354,344.76<br />
740 General Plant Services Section<br />
741 Administrative Unit<br />
HP18 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations I 1 1 1 114,348.00 1 123,509.62<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 1 1 1 114,348.00 1 123,509.62<br />
742 North Service Area Sewer Maintenance Unit<br />
(* Number of positions budgeted and funded by the Stormwater Management Fund appear below position count)<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 1 1 1 93,766.40 1 97,048.12<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer #2 (Engineering Technician V) 1 - - - - -<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V - 1 1 74,718.28 1 81,505.32<br />
(*1)<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 1 1 1 71,011.72 1 73,497.06<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 2 2 2 136,448.00 2 143,353.60<br />
(*1)<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 4 4 4 259,916.80 4 268,985.60<br />
(*6) (*2) (*2) (*2)<br />
PR6473 Truck Driver 2 2 2 131,456.00 2 129,376.00<br />
TOTAL North Service Area Sewer Maintenance Unit 11 11 11 767,317.20 11 793,765.70<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*9) (*3) (*3) (*2)<br />
743 Buildings and Grounds Unit<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 1 1 1 85,349.94 1 88,337.08<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 1 1 1 54,687.88 1 53,223.56<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 1 1 1 68,224.00 1 71,676.80<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 3 3 3 185,577.60 3 192,067.20<br />
NR8652 Maintenance Laborer, Class B 5 5 5 215,696.00 5 223,288.00<br />
280<br />
280
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: North Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
TOTAL Buildings and Grounds Unit 11 11 11 609,535.42 11 628,592.64<br />
TOTAL General Plant Services Section 23 23 23 1,491,200.62 23 1,545,867.96<br />
760 Area Maintenance Section<br />
764 Area Maintenance Unit<br />
PR7779 Pipefitter Foreman 1 1 1 91,520.00 1 97,864.00<br />
PR7775 Pipefitter Leadman 1 1 1 87,360.00 1 93,704.00<br />
PR7773 Pipefitter 13 13 13 1,081,600.00 13 1,137,032.00<br />
PR5753 Plumber 2 2 2 170,560.00 2 178,880.00<br />
PR7347 Electrical Mechanic Foreman 1 1 1 89,440.00 1 92,768.00<br />
PR7349 Electrical Mechanic Sub-Foreman 1 1 1 84,032.00 1 87,360.00<br />
PR7343 Electrical Mechanic 14 14 14 1,100,736.00 14 1,147,328.00<br />
PR7425 Electrical Instrument and Testing Mechanic Foreman 1 1 1 98,134.40 1 101,566.40<br />
PR7424 Electrical Instrument and Testing Mechanic Leadman 1 1 1 90,376.00 1 93,537.60<br />
PR7423 Electrical Instrument and Testing Mechanic 12 12 12 931,008.00 12 963,456.00<br />
PR7579 Machinist Foreman 1 1 1 86,091.20 1 90,542.40<br />
PR7575 Machinist Leadman 1 1 1 84,011.20 1 88,462.40<br />
PR7573 Machinist 16 16 16 1,277,619.20 16 1,348,838.40<br />
PR6453 Hoisting Engineer 1 1 1 88,504.00 1 91,104.00<br />
PR5975 Structural Ironworker Leadman 1 1 1 85,800.00 1 87,880.00<br />
PR5973 Structural Ironworker 2 2 2 163,280.00 2 167,440.00<br />
PR5933 Architectural Ironworker 2 2 2 155,376.00 2 162,448.00<br />
PR5153 Carpenter 2 2 2 157,123.20 2 165,443.20<br />
PR5553 Painter 2 2 2 147,264.00 2 153,504.00<br />
PR6473 Truck Driver 5 5 5 318,240.00 5 320,320.00<br />
TOTAL Area Maintenance Unit 80 80 80 6,388,075.20 80 6,669,478.40<br />
TOTAL Area Maintenance Section 80 80 80 6,388,075.20 80 6,669,478.40<br />
TOTAL North Service Area Branch 165 166 166 13,037,622.00 166 13,575,876.34<br />
281<br />
281
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: North Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
750 Hanover Park <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Section<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
751 Administrative Unit<br />
HP19 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations II 1 1 1 139,049.04 1 149,463.60<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 1 1 1 112,452.34 1 116,388.22<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 45,036.42 1 49,100.74<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 3 3 3 296,537.80 3 314,952.56<br />
753 Operations Unit<br />
HP16 Treatment Plant Operator III #4 1 1 1 107,607.50 1 111,373.86<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II 2 2 2 157,497.08 4 330,190.64<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II #4 5 5 5 465,127.00 3 288,844.14<br />
HP12 Treatment Plant Operator I 2 2 2 128,965.20 2 119,963.22<br />
HP12 Treatment Plant Operator I #4 3 3 3 209,919.58 3 204,850.36<br />
TOTAL Operations Unit 13 13 13 1,069,116.36 13 1,055,222.22<br />
754 Maintenance Unit<br />
HP17 Senior Mechanical Engineer - - - - 1 92,151.80<br />
HP15 Associate Mechanical Engineer (AC) - - - - 1 101,402.60<br />
HP15 Associate Mechanical Engineer 1 1 1 93,766.40 - -<br />
HP15 Associate Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 81,142.36 1 88,337.08<br />
NR6810 Fireman-Oiler #1 - - - - 1 70,304.00<br />
NR6810 Fireman-Oiler 1 1 1 67,932.80 1 70,304.00<br />
TOTAL Maintenance Unit 3 3 3 242,841.56 5 422,499.48<br />
755 General Plant Services Unit<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V - 1 1 74,718.28 1 81,505.32<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II #2 (Engineering Technician V) 1 - - - - -<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 2 2 2 123,718.40 2 128,044.80<br />
NR8652 Maintenance Laborer, Class B 1 1 1 57,532.80 1 59,550.40<br />
TOTAL General Plant Services Unit 4 4 4 255,969.48 4 269,100.52<br />
TOTAL Hanover Park <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Section 23 23 23 1,864,465.20 25 2,061,774.78<br />
282<br />
282
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: North Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
780 James C. Kirie <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Section<br />
781 Administrative Unit<br />
HP20 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations III 1 1 1 163,011.42 1 168,716.86<br />
HP18 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations I 2 2 2 238,666.74 2 252,179.46<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 37,819.34 1 39,143.00<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 4 4 4 439,497.50 4 460,039.32<br />
783 Operations Unit<br />
HP16 Treatment Plant Operator III 1 1 1 97,932.38 1 101,359.96<br />
HP16 Assistant Chief Operating Engineer 1 1 1 102,358.88 1 92,197.04<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II 5 5 5 393,743.22 5 420,038.84<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II #4 2 2 2 181,179.96 2 187,521.36<br />
HP12 Treatment Plant Operator I 2 2 2 122,435.56 3 186,701.32<br />
HP12 Treatment Plant Operator I #4 2 2 2 148,458.70 1 78,783.38<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 1 1 1 82,778.80 1 89,848.72<br />
NR6831 Operating Engineer I 6 6 6 478,483.20 6 495,206.40<br />
NR6810 Fireman-Oiler 2 2 2 135,865.60 2 140,608.00<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 4 4 4 259,916.80 4 268,985.60<br />
TOTAL Operations Unit 26 26 26 2,003,153.10 26 2,061,250.62<br />
784 Maintenance Unit<br />
HP17 Senior Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 103,085.84 1 111,540.26<br />
HP17 Senior Mechanical Engineer 1 1 1 117,135.20 1 121,234.88<br />
HP16 Assistant Master Mechanic 1 1 1 102,358.88 1 110,522.10<br />
TOTAL Maintenance Unit 3 3 3 322,579.92 3 343,297.24<br />
785 General Plant Services Unit<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 1 1 1 93,025.40 1 96,281.38<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 1 1 1 68,224.00 1 71,676.80<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 4 4 4 247,436.80 4 256,089.60<br />
283<br />
283
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: North Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NR8652 Maintenance Laborer, Class B 1 1 1 43,139.20 1 44,657.60<br />
TOTAL General Plant Services Unit 7 7 7 451,825.40 7 468,705.38<br />
TOTAL James C. Kirie <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Section 40 40 40 3,217,055.92 40 3,333,292.56<br />
790 John E. Egan <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Section<br />
791 Administrative Unit<br />
HP20 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations III 1 1 1 121,390.36 1 161,536.70<br />
HP18 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations I 2 2 2 238,665.96 2 247,019.24<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 52,251.68 1 54,080.52<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 4 4 4 412,308.00 4 462,636.46<br />
793 Operations Unit<br />
HP16 Assistant Chief Operating Engineer 1 1 1 93,505.88 1 101,359.96<br />
HP16 Treatment Plant Operator III #4 1 1 1 107,607.50 1 111,373.86<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II 2 3 3 240,276.92 3 252,857.28<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II #4 5 4 4 349,156.08 4 361,376.60<br />
HP12 Treatment Plant Operator I 4 4 4 241,605.00 4 250,062.28<br />
NR6832 Operating Engineer II #1 - - - - 1 85,488.00<br />
NR6832 Operating Engineer II 1 1 1 82,596.80 1 85,488.00<br />
NR6831 Operating Engineer I 6 6 6 478,483.20 6 495,206.40<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 1 1 1 78,749.06 1 81,505.32<br />
NR6810 Fireman-Oiler 2 2 2 135,865.60 2 140,608.00<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 1 1 1 61,859.20 1 64,022.40<br />
TOTAL Operations Unit 24 24 24 1,869,705.24 25 2,029,348.10<br />
794 Maintenance Unit<br />
HP17 Senior Mechanical Engineer 1 1 1 107,768.44 1 116,388.22<br />
HP14 Assistant Mechanical Engineer 1 1 1 74,718.28 1 73,162.44<br />
HP17 Senior Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 112,452.34 1 116,388.22<br />
HP15 Associate Process Control Engineer - 1 1 72,728.50 1 66,564.42<br />
HP14 Assistant Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 78,749.06 1 81,505.32<br />
284<br />
284
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: North Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP16 Assistant Master Mechanic 1 1 1 106,784.60 1 110,522.10<br />
TOTAL Maintenance Unit 5 6 6 553,201.22 6 564,530.72<br />
795 General Plant Services Unit<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 1 1 1 93,025.40 1 96,281.38<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV - - - 74,718.28 - -<br />
(*1)<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 1 1 1 68,224.00 1 71,676.80<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 4 4 4 247,436.80 4 256,089.60<br />
NR8652 Maintenance Laborer, Class B 1 1 1 43,139.20 1 44,657.60<br />
TOTAL General Plant Services Unit 7 7 7 451,825.40 7 468,705.38<br />
(*1)<br />
TOTAL John E. Egan <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Section 40 41 41 3,287,039.86 42 3,525,220.66<br />
TOTAL Maintenance and Operations North Service Area 271 273 273 21,709,614.94 279 22,998,108.38<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*9) (*3) (*3) (*3)<br />
Note: Three (3) positions budgeted in Sections 742 and 795 are funded by the Stormwater Management Fund<br />
while the operations remain in the Maintenance and Operations Department.<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
285<br />
285
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – CALUMET SERVICE AREA<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Increase<br />
$44,690,900<br />
$42,485,500<br />
$2,205,400<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Solids Processing<br />
$9,516,658 21.3%<br />
Solids Utilization<br />
$2,495,449 5.6%<br />
Treatment<br />
$17,317,547 38.7%<br />
Flood & Pollution Control<br />
$1,832,649 4.1%<br />
General Support<br />
$480,800 1.1%<br />
Collection<br />
$13,047,797 29.2%<br />
$50<br />
$45<br />
$40<br />
$35<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
Millions<br />
Increased Electricity<br />
Estimate<br />
Positions<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Staffing reduction due to<br />
operational efficiency<br />
$30<br />
$25<br />
Solids operations transferred to General<br />
Division<br />
200<br />
$20<br />
150<br />
Solids operations transferred to General<br />
Division<br />
$15<br />
100<br />
$10<br />
$5<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
50<br />
$0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
286<br />
286
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – CALUMET SERVICE AREA<br />
CALUMET SERVICE AREA<br />
68000<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
244 235 238<br />
810<br />
Calumet Executive Office<br />
6 6 2<br />
811<br />
Administrative and <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Control Unit<br />
0 0 7<br />
820<br />
Plant Engineering and<br />
Maintenance Section<br />
95 97 97<br />
830<br />
Plant Operations Section<br />
84 81 81<br />
840<br />
General Plant Services<br />
Section<br />
44 51 51<br />
850<br />
Calumet Solids Management<br />
Area Section<br />
8 0 0<br />
890<br />
Land <strong>Reclamation</strong> Branch<br />
Section<br />
7 0 0<br />
821<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
831<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
841<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
891<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
1 1 1<br />
3 3 3<br />
1 1 2<br />
1 0 0<br />
822<br />
Mechanical Engineering Unit<br />
6 6 6<br />
832<br />
Treatment Operations Unit<br />
24 24 24<br />
842<br />
Calumet Service Area Sewer<br />
Maintenance Unit<br />
19 19 19<br />
892<br />
Land <strong>Reclamation</strong> Branch Unit<br />
4 0 0<br />
823<br />
Electrical Engineering Unit<br />
834<br />
Mechanical Operations Unit<br />
843<br />
Buildings and Grounds Unit<br />
893<br />
Mechanical Operations Unit<br />
2 0 0<br />
19 20 20<br />
53 50 50<br />
24 25 25<br />
824<br />
Maintenance Unit<br />
69 70 70<br />
839<br />
Lemont Operations Unit<br />
4 4 4<br />
844<br />
Fulton County Farm<br />
Operations<br />
0 6 5<br />
In 2009, there are no positions funded by the Stormwater Management Fund.<br />
287<br />
287
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – CALUMET SERVICE AREA<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The 2009 appropriation request for the Calumet Service Area is $44,690,900, an increase of $2,205,400 or 5.2 percent more<br />
than 2008. The staffing level of 238 represents an increase of three (3) positions, transferred, from the General Division, a<br />
Management Analyst I and Management Analyst II, and one Electrical Mechanic returning to work. There are no positions<br />
budgeted in the Stormwater Management Fund managed by this division.<br />
HIGHLIGHTS/ACHIEVEMENTS/GOALS<br />
The 2009 Calumet budget requests reflect efforts to address a number of important objectives:<br />
• 100 percent NPDES permit compliance. Both the Calumet WRP and Lemont WRP met 100 percent of all permit<br />
requirements in 2007 and in 2008;<br />
• Continued implementation of the Engineering program consistent with the Master Plan;<br />
• Continued emphasis on maintaining and improving security and emergency response capabilities;<br />
• Continued rehabilitation and improvements to facilities and equipment. Calumet continues to address, in particular, the<br />
digital control system and its performance and reliability issues, with Foxboro and local area network upgrades, and the<br />
completion of phase three at Lemont WRP, 95 th Street Pump Station, and the 125 th Street Pump Station. This will complete<br />
three of the total of five phases to replace obsolete and unreliable equipment. Improvements to our gas alarm annunciators<br />
and evacuation alarm system will be undertaken;<br />
• Continued emphasis in reducing fossil fuel energy consumption by controlling our natural gas usage/expenditures by<br />
maintaining an aggressive control and monitoring program with continuous review and adjustments to meet current actual<br />
needs. However, due to the new central boiler facility coming on line in 2009 and the fact that it will take some period of<br />
time to fine tune the system for optimum operation, we anticipate gas usage will go up temporarily, until fine tuning is<br />
complete. The ultimate goal has been, and continues to be, to reduce overall gas usage by 60 percent from our long-term<br />
average of 500,000 therms per year. We anticipate that we will attain this goal by the year 2010. Calumet is exploring<br />
various ways to reduce the use of coal generated electricity, possibly supplementing with solar energy, and also cutting<br />
back on our usage of diesel and gasoline fuels by making adjustments to operations and replacing equipment with much<br />
more environmentally responsible equipment, such as electric powered cars and trucks;<br />
• Work is in progress to hire a Licensed Professional Farm Manager for the 5,334 acres of cropland on the Fulton County<br />
property. Use of a Professional Farm Manager will allow the District to maximize revenue from this property.<br />
BUDGET SUMMARY<br />
Some of the major new M&O initiatives affecting our 2009 budget request are:<br />
• $820,000 for phase three of the installation of new Foxboro equipment to replace the existing obsolete equipment which<br />
no longer can be counted on to provide reliable process control data and information;<br />
• $600,000 to overhaul one preliminary tank and rehabilitate two other preliminary tanks. Rehabilitating these tanks will<br />
allow us to resume our schedule of rehabilitating two tanks per year. The bids for the current contract, 08-880-12, came in<br />
higher than anticipated resulting in only one tank overhaul done per year. After completing the scheduled two tanks in<br />
2009, partial rehabilitations will be done until the new preliminary tanks are on line. Although these tanks will eventually<br />
be replaced under the Master Plan, they need to continue to provide reliable service to meet the NPDES permit until they<br />
are actually replaced;<br />
• $340,000 to replace the existing centrifuge conveyor assembly. The conveyor assembly is worn and is structurally<br />
unsound and beyond repair;<br />
• $250,000 for replacement of the variable frequency drives for the low level pumps and return sludge pumps. The existing<br />
drives are obsolete and will no longer be supported by the manufacturer. This item is being funded by the Capital<br />
Improvements Bond Fund;<br />
• $250,000 to replace three existing sludge transfer pumps in digesters cluster #2, that are worn out, with new direct coupled<br />
and mechanical seal pumps, and replace sections of sludge and effluent piping. This item is being funded by the Capital<br />
Improvements Bond Fund;<br />
• $140,000 to rebuild a centrifuge rotating element. The existing rotating element is beyond in-house repair and requires<br />
repairs by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to return it to the original specifications. A complete rebuild by the<br />
manufacturer is more cost effective than purchasing a replacement;<br />
288<br />
288
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
• $130,000 to rebuild two existing centrifuge gear boxes, which are currently past their useful service lives and require<br />
original equipment manufacturer (OEM) rebuild services. The existing gear boxes can be rebuilt by the OEM to the<br />
original specifications;<br />
• $120,000 to rehabilitate pump rotating assemblies. We currently do not have any spare rotating assemblies for our main<br />
sewage pumps. This contract will allow us to have enough spares available for our four main sewage pumps, until the new<br />
pumping station is on line. The purpose for the partial rehabilitation of the smaller rotating assembly is to have spares<br />
available for our return sludge pumps, along with the smaller pumps at 95th Street Pumping Station;<br />
• $120,000 to upgrade the waste gas flare system at the digesters. The existing system/controls are obsolete and need to be<br />
upgraded. The upgrade will allow us to install a new Foxboro control system for this equipment that will be compatible<br />
with the existing plant wide process control system.<br />
The largest impact on our 2009 budget request is an additional $877,500 for the anticipated increased cost of electricity, due to<br />
renegotiation of our rates in 2009, and $350,000 for natural gas, for a total utility increase of $1,227,500. We are working with<br />
the Energy Conservation committee to identify, minimize and reduce our energy unit consumption, with a goal of reducing<br />
consumption up to 5 percent District wide by 2013. Reduced consumption is not anticipated to reduce associated dollars due to<br />
the high volatility of electricity and natural gas costs seen in recent years.<br />
THE CALUMET MASTER PLAN<br />
The Calumet Master Plan, developed jointly by the M&O and Engineering departments, has projected plant process needs<br />
through the year 2040. Major construction projects recommended and in process are:<br />
• Hydraulic Improvements (High Level Influent Pumping Station), Contract 93-232-2M. This new pumping station<br />
construction is in progress and our expectation is that this contract will be completed in 2010;<br />
• Central Boiler Facility, Contract 03-296-3M. To meet demands for process and building heating and cooling is currently<br />
under construction. This contract is tentatively scheduled for completion in 2009;<br />
• Two additional 75,000 standard cubic feet per minute Blowers, Contract 06-218-2M. To provide all process and auxiliary<br />
air needs from the existing Blower Building and eliminate the existing blowers located in the Pump and Blower Building,<br />
soon to be replaced by the new Pumping Station. We anticipate this contract to be awarded in 2009;<br />
• Preliminary Treatment Facilities (grit facilities and primary settling tanks), Contract 07-220-3P. This will provide new<br />
updated and appropriately sized grit removal facilities and new primary settling tanks with primary sludge and scum<br />
systems. The existing aerated grit, preliminary settling tanks, primary sludge concentration tanks, and primary pumping<br />
system will be removed from service. This contract was awarded in 2008;<br />
• Pre-Digestion Sludge Thickening Facilities, Contract 96-251-2P. This is a modification and upgrade to the facilities for<br />
better process and control. Anticipated construction period is to be 2009.<br />
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROJECTS<br />
The following projects are currently on-going Engineering contracts, not part of the Master Plan.<br />
• 00-275-2V, Research and Development Facility. This provides for a state of the art lab facility;<br />
• 04-294-3M, Calumet TARP Valve Isolation and Pump Station Upgrade. This replaces four (4) of the larger existing<br />
pumps, installation of emergency dewatering systems, and replacement of switchgear;<br />
• 00-809-1E, Installation of Remote Monitors for Unmanned Sites. This provides for equipment to remotely monitor for<br />
intrusion, smoke/fire, loss of power, etc. at the various pump stations, reservoirs, SEPA stations, and gate chambers<br />
located throughout the District.<br />
ENGINEERING PROGRAM PROJECTS BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION IN 2009 INCLUDE:<br />
• 06-212-3M, E1 and W1 Pump Modifications. This contract provides for the replacement of the existing 28.8 million<br />
gallons per day (MGD) pumps with larger 72 MGD pumps controlled by variable frequency drives;<br />
• 98-260-2M, Coarse Screen Replacement, Piping, and Electrical work at 95 th Street and 125 th Street Pumping Stations. This<br />
contract provides for the replacement of the old bar screens, along with the installation of a conveyor system for the<br />
collection and disposal of debris that has been collected by the coarse bar screens. There will also be some replacement of<br />
suction and discharge piping at the 125 th Street Pump Station.<br />
289<br />
289
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – CALUMET SERVICE AREA<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
2008 ACCOMPLISHMENTS<br />
• Repaired and rehabilitated the digester complex HVAC system that had heating units with inadequate heating capacity,<br />
defective controls, and defective coils;<br />
• Completed the second phase of the Foxboro Digital Control System upgrade. The entire process is estimated to require<br />
three years to complete, at a total cost of $3,000,000;<br />
• Completed installation of a new additional pump at the Palos Hills Pumping Station. This pump provides us with a backup<br />
pump, in case of an emergency or primary pump failure;<br />
• Purchased four electric trucks and three electric personnel carriers, replacing old gasoline powered carriers. We will be<br />
purchasing more of the same and plan to eventually replace all existing gasoline powered carriers with electric vehicles, as<br />
budgetary constraints allow;<br />
• Continued maintenance of the Native Prairie Landscape (NPL) at the Calumet WRP. Performed the first controlled burn of<br />
3.5 acres of NPL at the Lemont WRP.<br />
The major Engineering projects underway at Calumet Service Area have challenged staff and our operations, yet, we continue<br />
to meet 100 percent of our NPDES permits during this time. As Master Plan initiatives continue to be implemented, the<br />
Calumet Service Area will continue to strive to maintain this high level of compliance throughout the building and installation<br />
of new facilities designed to ensure our viability into the future.<br />
290<br />
290
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
291
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
68000 M and O - CALUMET DIVISION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. COLLECTION AND TREATMENT: The Calumet Service Area will collect and treat approximately<br />
101 billion gallons of sewage through its Calumet and Lemont treatment facilities. $30,365,344 67.9%<br />
Design: Flows CBOD * SS *<br />
Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant 354 MGD 10 mg/l 15 mg/l<br />
Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant 2.3 MGD 20 mg/l 25 mg/l<br />
* NPDES monthly effluent quality standards: CBOD - Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand<br />
SS - Suspended Solids<br />
2. SOLIDS PROCESSING: The Calumet Service Area will remove and process 50,000 dry tons of concentrated<br />
sewage through various systems including heated digestion, centrifuging, concentration, and aging low<br />
solids sludge and centrifuge cake in lagoons. $9,516,658 21.3%<br />
3. SOLIDS UTILIZATION: The Calumet Service Area will provide support to utilize approximately 30,600 dry<br />
tons of further dewatered sewage for application at final utilization sites such as daily and<br />
final cover in sanitary landfills. $2,495,449 5.6%<br />
4. FLOOD AND POLLUTION CONTROL: The Calumet Service Area will work to prevent local area flooding<br />
through the operation of 8 retention reservoirs, in cooperation with local communities, including the new<br />
Thornton Transitional Reservoir. They will also work to maintain the quality of the waterways system<br />
and associated District property in cooperation with the debris boats and the channel maintenance crews. $1,832,649 4.1%<br />
5. GENERAL SUPPORT: The Calumet Service Area provides technical and administrative support for other<br />
departments not directly related to the operational activities of Collection and Treatment, Solids<br />
Processing, Flood and Pollution Control, and Solids Utilization. $480,800 1.1%<br />
Total $44,690,900 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Unit of Measure Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. The Calumet Service Area will collect and treat approximately 101<br />
billion gallons of sewage in 2009. billion gallons 100 98 101<br />
2. The Calumet Service Area will remove and process solids from 50,000<br />
dry tons of concentrated sewage. dry tons process solids 49,197 45,000 50,000<br />
3. The Calumet Service Area will obtain 100 percent permit compliance in<br />
2009 for NPDES effluent limits. percent 100% 100% 100%<br />
4. The Calumet Service Area will provide support to utilize 30,600 dry tons of dry tons 37,050 30,600 30,600<br />
biosolids in 2009.<br />
292<br />
292
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
68000 M and O - CALUMET DIVISION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
1000 Collection $11,301,860 2009 72 $13,047,797 $2,587 0.0<br />
2008 71 $13,045,210<br />
1100 Surface Interceptor Systems $1,580,699 2009 15 $1,885,730 $86,309 4.8<br />
2008 15 $1,799,421<br />
1200 Tunnel and Reservoir System $3,145,872 2009 14 $4,182,823 $227,350 5.7 a)<br />
2008 14 $3,955,473<br />
1300 Pumping Station Facilities $2,874,535 2009 15 $2,978,530 $148,808 5.3 a)<br />
2008 15 $2,829,722<br />
1900 Collection - Indirect Costs $3,700,754 2009 28 $4,000,714 ($459,880) (10.3) b)<br />
2008 27 $4,460,594<br />
2000 Treatment $12,604,447 2009 90 $17,317,547 $248,403 1.5<br />
2008 88 $17,069,144<br />
2000 Pre-Treatment $673,261 2009 7 $614,345 ($1,598) (0.3)<br />
2008 7 $615,943<br />
2100 Primary Treatment $926,970 2009 11 $1,425,233 $309,694 27.8 c)<br />
2008 11 $1,115,539<br />
2200 Secondary Treatment $4,580,011 2009 23 $4,701,846 $138,359 3.0 d)<br />
2008 24 $4,563,487<br />
2300 Tertiary Treatment $67,203 2009 1 $154,900 $46,101 42.4 e)<br />
2008 0 $108,799<br />
2400 Wetlands $63,545 2009 0 $0 $0 0.0<br />
2008 0 $0<br />
2900 Treatment - Indirect Costs $6,293,457 2009 48 $10,421,223 ($244,153) (2.3) f)<br />
2008 46 $10,665,376<br />
3000 Solids Processing $7,623,393 2009 57 $9,516,658 $1,290,495 15.7<br />
2008 57 $8,226,163<br />
3100 Thickening $597,657 2009 8 $587,343 ($7,951) (1.3)<br />
2008 9 $595,294<br />
3200 Stabilization $1,758,240 2009 11 $1,990,666 $374,236 23.2 g)<br />
2008 11 $1,616,430<br />
a) Increased requests for electrical service ($324,900) due to higher cost.<br />
b) Decrease due to 2008 receipt of replacement sewer control truck ($150,000) and transferral of pump and blower elevator improvement funding<br />
responsibility to the Capital Improvement Bond Fund ($365,000).<br />
c) Increase request to rehabilitate four preliminary tanks ($300,000).<br />
d) Increase due to increased electricity request ($215,500) offset by receipt of new sodium hypochlorite tank ($40,000).<br />
e) Increase due to increased request for sodium hypochlorite used for odor control and cessation of using hydrogen peroxide for same.<br />
f) Decrease due to completion of major roof repairs and replacement in 2008 ($462,000); offset by new one-time request<br />
for a replacement truck crane with clam bucket ($246,000).<br />
g) Increase due to increased electrical service cost ($81,000) and cyclical requests: refurbish digester breakers ($100,000); replace four<br />
digester draw pumps ($120,000); and replacement of sludge pump piping ($50,000).<br />
293<br />
293
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
68000 M and O - CALUMET DIVISION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
3300 Dewatering $2,350,296 2009 16 $3,022,845 $435,563 16.8 h)<br />
2008 16 $2,587,282<br />
3900 Solids Processing - Indirect Costs $2,917,200 2009 22 $3,915,804 $488,647 14.3 i)<br />
2008 21 $3,427,157<br />
4000 Flood and Pollution Control $1,234,250 2009 5 $1,832,649 $556,749 43.6<br />
2008 4 $1,275,900<br />
4200 <strong>Water</strong>ways Control and Stormwater Reservoirs $230,642 2009 2 $226,040 $33,820 17.6 j)<br />
2008 1 $192,220<br />
4210 Maintenance of <strong>Water</strong>ways $22,111 2009 0 $100 $0 0.0<br />
2008 0 $100<br />
4300 Stormwater Management $64,611 2009 1 $62,800 ($600) (0.9)<br />
2008 1 $63,400<br />
4400 Aeration Facilities $825,897 2009 2 $1,367,470 $490,110 55.9 k)<br />
2008 2 $877,360<br />
4900 Flood and Pollution Control - Indirect Costs $90,989 2009 0 $176,239 $33,419 23.4 l)<br />
2008 0 $142,820<br />
5000 Solids Utilization $4,731,154 2009 10 $2,495,449 $9,514 0.4<br />
2008 11 $2,485,935<br />
5100 Solids Drying $1,069,737 2009 1 $94,500 ($70,800) (42.8) m)<br />
2008 1 $165,300<br />
5200 Solids Distribution $2,615,927 2009 5 $1,492,692 $21,143 1.4<br />
2008 5 $1,471,549<br />
5900 Solids Utilization - Indirect Costs $1,045,490 2009 4 $908,257 $59,171 7.0<br />
2008 5 $849,086<br />
7000 General Support $399,516 2009 4 $480,800 $97,652 25.5 n)<br />
2008 4 $383,148<br />
Totals $37,894,620 2009 238 $44,690,900 $2,205,400 5.2% *<br />
2008 235 $42,485,500<br />
h) Increase due to request to replace centrifuge conveyor assembly ($340,000).<br />
i) Increase due to electricity ($37,000), natural gas ($118,000), new storage buildings ($77,500), and replacement truck crane with bucket ($186,000).<br />
j) Increase due to increased electricity cost ($35,000).<br />
k) Increase due to furnish, deliver, and install new gearboxes at SEPA stations 3 and 4 ($475,000).<br />
l) Increase due to increased electricity cost ($3,200), replacement truck crane with bucket ($18,000), and two (2) new storage buildings ($7,500).<br />
m) Decrease due to 2008 receipt of a replacement forklift ($35,000) and receipt of a replacement 6" trash pump ($35,000).<br />
n) Increase due to increased electricity cost ($15,000), request for building control system services ($50,000), and new requests for the<br />
new R&D Lab building at CWRP for maintenance and repair parts ($20,000) and a new de-ionizer system ($5,000).<br />
* The 2009 position total for Calumet Service Area is 238. There are no additional positions funded by the Stormwater Management Fund.<br />
294<br />
294
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
68000 M and O - CALUMET DIVISION PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
1000-2900 Collection and Treatment<br />
Collect and Treat Sewage at the Calumet and Lemont <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Mil. Gallons 99,528 97,000 100,000<br />
Cost $23,258,341 $29,526,634 $29,789,484 a)<br />
Cost/Mil. Gallons $233.69 $304.40 $297.89<br />
Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Mil. Gallons 883 800 850<br />
Cost $647,966 $587,720 $575,860<br />
Cost/Mil. Gallons $733.82 $734.65 $677.48<br />
3000 Solids Processing<br />
Remove and Process Solids from Concentrated Sewage Through Dry Tons 49,197 45,000 50,000<br />
Various Systems Including Heated Digestion, Centrifuging, Cost $7,623,393 $8,226,163 $9,516,658 b)<br />
Concentration, and Aging Low Solids Sludge and Centrifuge Cost/Dry Ton $154.96 $182.80 $190.33<br />
Cake in Lagoons<br />
4000 Flood and Pollution Control<br />
Operation and Maintenance of the <strong>Water</strong>ways to Minimize Area<br />
Flooding and Pollution<br />
4200 Minimize Area Flooding and Pollution of Lake Michigan Reservoirs 7 7 8<br />
Through the Continuous Control of <strong>Water</strong> Levels in Major Cost $230,642 $192,220 $226,040 c)<br />
Rivers and Canals and the Operation of Retention Reservoirs Cost/Reservoir $32,948.86 $27,460.00 $28,255.00<br />
4210 Maintenance of the <strong>Water</strong>ways and Canal Banks Within the <strong>Water</strong>way Miles 38 38 38<br />
Jurisdiction of the District. Activities Include Debris Removal, Cost $22,111 $100 $100<br />
Insect and Rodent Control, Bridge Repair, and Aeration Costs Cost/Mile $581.87 $2.63 $2.63<br />
Along Non-Navigable <strong>Water</strong>ways<br />
4300 Stormwater Management Cost $64,611 $63,400 $62,800<br />
4400 Aeration Facilities Cost $825,897 $877,360 $1,367,470 d)<br />
4900 Flood and Pollution Control - Indirect Costs Cost $90,989 $142,820 $176,239 e)<br />
5000 Solids Utilization<br />
7000 General Support<br />
Utilize Further Dewatered Sewage for Application at Final Dry Tons 37,050 30,600 30,600<br />
Utilization Sites, such as for Daily and Final Cover Cost $4,731,154 $2,485,935 $2,495,449<br />
in Sanitary Landfills Cost/Dry Ton $127.70 $81.24 $81.55<br />
Technical and Administrative Support for Other Departments' Cost $399,516 $383,148 $480,800 f)<br />
Activities Indirectly Related to the Operational Activities<br />
of Collection and Treatment, Solids Processing, Flood and<br />
Pollution Control, and Solids Utilization<br />
Division Total $37,894,620 $42,485,500 $44,690,900<br />
a) Increased request for electrical service to the TARP pumping station ($206,000) due to higher cost.<br />
b) Increase due to higher cost for electrical service ($201,000) and natural gas ($118,000). Also, new one-time requests: refurbish digester breakers<br />
($100,000); replace four digester draw pumps ($120,000); replace sludge pump piping ($50,000); replace centrifuge conveyor assembly<br />
($340,000); new equipment storage buildings ($77,500); and purchase of a new replacement truck crane with clam-bucket ($186,000).<br />
c) Increase due to increased electricity cost ($35,000).<br />
d) Increase due to new one-time request to furnish, deliver, and install new gearboxes at SEPA stations 3 and 4 ($475,000).<br />
e) Increase due to increased electricity cost ($3,200), replacement truck crane w/bucket ($18,000), and two (2) new storage buildings ($7,500).<br />
f) Increase due to increased electricity cost ($15,000), new one-time request for building control system services ($50,000), and new requests for the<br />
new R&D Lab building at CWRP for: maintenance and repair parts ($20,000) and a new de-ionizer system ($5,000).<br />
295<br />
295
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
68000 Department Maintenance & Operations<br />
Division Calumet Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 16,937,519 $ 17,481,600 $ 17,481,600 $ 17,212,600 $ 17,187,700 $ 17,185,500 $ 17,596,000<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 1,217,301 814,500 814,500 720,000 824,000 826,200 832,200<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 17,269 81,400 81,400 25,000 36,200 36,200 36,200<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 46,562 284,000 284,000 130,000 288,000 288,000 288,000<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 159,600 159,600 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 128,625 202,400 202,400 140,000 202,400 202,400 202,400<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 18,347,276 18,863,900 18,863,900 18,227,600 18,697,900 18,697,900 18,954,800<br />
612010 Travel 4,206 5,500 5,500 4,000 6,700 6,700 6,700<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 19,365 11,600 11,600 11,400 12,000 12,000 12,000<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 68,492 78,000 78,000 76,500 78,000 78,000 78,000<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services 730 700 1,700 1,400 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />
612150 Electrical Energy 9,193,025 8,782,100 8,782,100 8,782,100 9,659,600 9,659,600 9,659,600<br />
612160 Natural Gas 170,923 350,000 350,000 342,900 700,000 700,000 700,000<br />
612170 <strong>Water</strong> and <strong>Water</strong> Services 210,305 222,400 222,400 210,000 242,400 242,400 242,400<br />
612210 Communication Services 110,603 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000<br />
612240 Testing and Inspection Services 21,462 60,900 60,900 27,000 56,900 56,900 56,900<br />
612330 Rental Charges 14,339 32,600 32,600 25,000 30,100 30,100 60,600<br />
612410 Governmental Service Charges 110,363 123,300 123,300 116,000 123,300 123,300 123,300<br />
612420 Maintenance of Grounds and Pavements 1,168,979 1,449,500 1,429,500 1,300,000 1,275,800 1,275,800 1,275,800<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 204,918 314,500 314,500 250,000 289,000 289,000 289,000<br />
612520 Waste Material Disposal Charges 2,510,815 362,000 312,000 225,000 303,000 303,000 303,000<br />
612600 Repairs to Collection Facilities 1,080,528 1,367,800 1,367,800 1,200,000 1,563,700 1,563,700 1,612,900<br />
612650 Repairs to Process Facilities 1,164,623 4,093,100 4,192,100 4,100,000 5,433,400 5,433,400 5,360,200<br />
612680 Repairs to Buildings 568,250 2,102,700 1,717,700 1,200,000 1,182,900 1,182,900 1,149,600<br />
612760 Repairs to Material Handling and Farming<br />
Equipment 45,649 52,000 52,000 47,700 56,000 56,000 56,000<br />
612780 Safety Repairs and Services 7,914 15,500 15,500 15,500 15,500 15,500 15,500<br />
612820 Computer Software Maintenance 24,000 - - - - - -<br />
296<br />
296
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
68000 Department Maintenance & Operations<br />
Division Calumet Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
612840 Communications Equipment Maintenance<br />
(Includes Software) - 18,400 18,400 18,400 19,500 19,500 19,500<br />
612860 Repairs to Vehicle Equipment 23,142 35,500 35,500 30,000 37,000 37,000 37,000<br />
612970 Repairs to Testing and Laboratory<br />
Equipment - 2,500 2,500 300 2,500 2,500 2,500<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. 11,871 15,500 15,500 9,000 18,000 18,000 18,000<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16,734,502 19,626,100 19,271,100 18,122,200 21,236,300 21,236,300 21,209,500<br />
623030 Metals 46,493 17,900 17,900 10,100 18,900 18,900 18,900<br />
623070 Electrical Parts and Supplies 206,658 239,100 239,100 225,000 298,000 298,000 298,000<br />
623090 Plumbing Accessories and Supplies 264,862 383,900 383,900 330,000 364,400 364,400 364,400<br />
623110 Hardware 5,579 13,400 13,400 6,000 10,000 10,000 10,000<br />
623130 Buildings, Grounds, Paving Materials, and<br />
Supplies 46,015 49,500 49,500 40,000 57,500 57,500 57,500<br />
623170 Fiber, Paper, and Insulation Materials - 3,000 3,000 100 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />
623190 Paints, Solvents, and Related Materials 1,775 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000<br />
623250 Vehicle Parts and Supplies 50,485 86,500 115,500 105,000 65,500 65,500 65,500<br />
623270 Mechanical Repair Parts 759,693 820,700 1,045,700 1,000,000 1,021,100 1,021,100 1,021,100<br />
623300 Manhole Materials - 10,000 10,000 8,000 - - -<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 20,463 15,400 15,400 12,000 23,000 23,000 23,000<br />
623530 Farming Supplies 4,950 5,000 5,000 2,000 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
623560 Processing Chemicals 533,340 902,000 871,900 640,000 947,600 947,600 947,600<br />
623660 Cleaning Supplies 21,291 24,400 24,400 22,500 16,000 16,000 16,000<br />
623680 Tools and Supplies 62,144 66,500 66,500 53,500 71,000 71,000 71,000<br />
623720 Books, Maps, and Charts 1,778 3,100 3,100 1,300 3,100 3,100 3,100<br />
623780 Safety and Medical Supplies 31,113 58,500 48,600 39,000 63,500 63,500 63,500<br />
623810 Computer Supplies 879 1,900 1,900 200 5,900 5,900 5,900<br />
623820 Fuel 65,685 75,000 150,000 140,000 76,000 76,000 76,000<br />
623840 Gases - 4,500 4,500 3,700 4,500 4,500 4,500<br />
623850 Communications Supplies 1,616 4,000 4,000 1,000 4,000 4,000 4,000<br />
623860 Lubricants 8,653 21,900 21,900 8,000 22,900 22,900 22,900<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 71,589 65,300 56,300 43,000 68,900 68,900 68,900<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 2,205,061 2,873,500 3,153,500 2,692,400 3,151,800 3,151,800 3,151,800<br />
297<br />
297
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
68000 Department Maintenance & Operations<br />
Division Calumet Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
634600 Equipment for Collection Facilities 14,938 24,000 24,000 16,000 74,000 74,000 74,000<br />
634650 Equipment for Process Facilities 105,322 146,500 171,500 147,000 151,000 151,000 177,800<br />
634760 Material Handling and Farming Equipment 46,234 177,000 227,000 225,000 636,000 636,000 636,000<br />
634860 Vehicle Equipment 433,779 759,500 709,500 670,000 355,000 472,000 472,000<br />
634990 Machinery and Equipment, N.O.C. 7,508 15,000 15,000 8,000 15,000 15,000 15,000<br />
400 TOTAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 607,781 1,122,000 1,147,000 1,066,000 1,231,000 1,348,000 1,374,800<br />
TOTAL CALUMET SERVICE AREA $ 37,894,620 $ 42,485,500 $ 42,435,500 $ 40,108,200 $ 44,317,000 $ 44,434,000 $ 44,690,900<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
298<br />
298
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: Calumet Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
810 Calumet Executive Office Section<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP22 Assistant Director of Maintenance and Operations - - - - 1 191,862.32<br />
HP22 Assistant Chief Engineer 1 1 1 185,374.28 - -<br />
HP13 Senior Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 84,825.26 - -<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 1 1 71,011.72 1 73,497.06<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 2 2 2 109,314.92 - -<br />
HP09 Courier #4 1 - - - - -<br />
HP09 Courier - 1 1 42,108.56 - -<br />
TOTAL Calumet Executive Office 6 6 6 492,634.74 2 265,359.38<br />
811 Administrative and <strong>Budget</strong> Control Unit<br />
HP15 Management Analyst II - - - - 1 101,402.60<br />
HP13 Management Analyst I - - - - 1 79,947.40<br />
HP13 Senior Administrative Assistant - - - - 1 87,794.20<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist - - - - 3 174,689.58<br />
HP09 Courier - - - - 1 45,726.98<br />
TOTAL Administrative and <strong>Budget</strong> Control Unit - - - - 7 489,560.76<br />
820 Plant Engineering and Maintenance Section<br />
821 Administrative Unit<br />
HP20 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations III 1 1 1 149,137.56 1 147,178.98<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 1 1 1 149,137.56 1 147,178.98<br />
822 Mechanical Engineering Unit<br />
HP18 Principal Mechanical Engineer 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 123,509.62<br />
HP17 Senior Mechanical Engineer 2 2 2 206,170.12 2 203,693.62<br />
HP15 Associate Mechanical Engineer 2 2 2 149,663.80 2 154,902.02<br />
HP14 Assistant Mechanical Engineer 1 1 1 62,626.20 1 73,162.44<br />
TOTAL Mechanical Engineering Unit 6 6 6 547,764.10 6 555,267.70<br />
823 Electrical Engineering Unit<br />
HP18 Principal Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
299<br />
299
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: Calumet Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP17 Senior Electrical Engineer 2 2 2 215,536.88 2 223,080.52<br />
HP15 Associate Process Control Engineer - 1 1 72,728.50 1 75,273.90<br />
HP15 Associate Electrical Engineer 2 2 2 153,870.86 2 163,610.98<br />
HP14 Assistant Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 62,626.20 1 68,989.70<br />
NR6251 Chief Electrical Operator 1 1 1 91,416.00 1 94,619.20<br />
NR6233 Electrical Operator II 5 5 5 393,848.00 5 407,680.00<br />
NR6232 Electrical Operator I 6 6 6 450,403.20 6 466,128.00<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 1 1 1 64,482.60 1 66,739.40<br />
TOTAL Electrical Engineering Unit 19 20 20 1,634,216.22 20 1,699,951.24<br />
824 Maintenance Unit<br />
HP18 Master Mechanic I 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
HP16 Assistant Master Mechanic 2 2 2 213,569.20 2 221,044.20<br />
PR7779 Pipefitter Foreman 1 1 1 91,520.00 1 97,864.00<br />
PR7773 Pipefitter 9 9 9 748,800.00 9 787,176.00<br />
PR7773 Pipefitter (AC) - 1 1 83,200.00 1 87,464.00<br />
PR5753 Plumber 2 2 2 170,560.00 2 178,880.00<br />
PR7425 Electrical Instrument and Testing Mechanic Foreman 1 1 1 98,134.40 1 101,566.40<br />
PR7423 Electrical Instrument and Testing Mechanic 8 8 8 620,672.00 8 642,304.00<br />
PR7347 Electrical Mechanic Foreman 1 1 1 89,440.00 1 92,768.00<br />
PR7349 Electrical Mechanic Sub-Foreman 1 1 1 84,032.00 1 87,360.00<br />
PR7343 Electrical Mechanic #1 - - - - 1 81,952.00<br />
PR7343 Electrical Mechanic 10 10 10 786,240.00 10 819,520.00<br />
PR7579 Machinist Foreman 1 1 1 86,091.20 1 90,542.40<br />
PR7575 Machinist Leadman 1 1 1 84,011.20 1 88,462.40<br />
PR7573 Machinist 12 12 12 958,214.40 12 1,011,628.80<br />
PR5155 Carpenter Leadman 1 1 1 82,721.60 1 86,881.60<br />
PR5153 Carpenter 2 2 2 157,123.20 2 165,443.20<br />
300<br />
300
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: Calumet Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
PR6453 Hoisting Engineer 3 3 3 265,512.00 3 273,312.00<br />
PR5975 Structural Ironworker Leadman 1 1 1 85,800.00 1 87,880.00<br />
PR5973 Structural Ironworker 5 5 5 408,200.00 5 418,600.00<br />
PR5553 Painter 2 2 2 147,264.00 2 153,504.00<br />
PR6479 Truck Driver Foreman 1 1 1 65,728.00 1 65,728.00<br />
PR6473 Truck Driver 3 3 3 190,944.00 3 190,944.00<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 57,062.46 - -<br />
TOTAL Maintenance Unit 69 70 70 5,704,143.64 70 5,964,654.54<br />
TOTAL Plant Engineering and Maintenance Section 95 97 97 8,035,261.52 97 8,367,052.46<br />
830 Plant Operations Section<br />
831 Administrative Unit<br />
HP20 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations III 1 1 1 149,137.56 1 154,357.32<br />
HP18 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations I 1 1 1 114,348.00 1 133,829.54<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 1 1 1 72,728.50 1 79,628.12<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 3 3 3 336,214.06 3 367,814.98<br />
832 Treatment Operations Unit<br />
HP16 Treatment Plant Operator III #4 1 1 1 107,607.50 1 111,373.86<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II 3 5 5 385,682.70 6 480,684.88<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II #4 5 3 3 254,921.42 2 172,603.60<br />
HP12 Treatment Plant Operator I 4 4 4 244,869.82 4 256,818.64<br />
HP12 Treatment Plant Operator I #4 1 1 1 72,339.54 1 74,871.42<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 9 9 9 584,812.80 9 605,217.60<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 1 1 1 61,859.20 1 64,022.40<br />
TOTAL Treatment Operations Unit 24 24 24 1,712,092.98 24 1,765,592.40<br />
834 Mechanical Operations Unit<br />
HP17 Chief Operating Engineer I 1 1 1 117,135.20 1 121,234.88<br />
HP16 Assistant Chief Operating Engineer 2 2 2 195,864.76 2 188,975.54<br />
NR6832 Operating Engineer II 12 12 12 991,161.60 12 1,025,856.00<br />
301<br />
301
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: Calumet Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NR6831 Operating Engineer I 19 19 19 1,515,196.80 19 1,568,153.60<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 7 7 7 454,854.40 7 470,724.80<br />
NR6810 Fireman-Oiler 6 6 6 407,596.80 6 421,824.00<br />
NR6810 Fireman-Oiler #1 3 - - - - -<br />
PR6473 Truck Driver (AC) 3 - - - - -<br />
PR6473 Truck Driver - 3 3 190,944.00 3 190,944.00<br />
TOTAL Mechanical Operations Unit 53 50 50 3,872,753.56 50 3,987,712.82<br />
839 Lemont Operations Unit<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II 1 1 1 90,839.58 1 94,018.86<br />
HP12 Treatment Plant Operator I 2 2 2 119,170.22 2 130,099.32<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 1 1 1 61,859.20 1 64,022.40<br />
TOTAL Lemont Operations Unit 4 4 4 271,869.00 4 288,140.58<br />
TOTAL Plant Operations Section 84 81 81 6,192,929.60 81 6,409,260.78<br />
840 General Plant Services Section<br />
841 Administrative Unit<br />
HP19 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations II - 1 1 144,409.20 1 143,915.72<br />
HP18 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations I 1 - - - - -<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer - - - - 1 92,151.80<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 1 1 1 144,409.20 2 236,067.52<br />
842 Calumet Service Area Sewer Maintenance Unit<br />
(* Number of positions budgeted and funded by the Stormwater Management Fund appear below position count)<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 1 1 1 89,558.82 1 92,693.38<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 1 1 1 66,656.72 1 64,818.00<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 1 1 1 82,778.80 1 85,675.98<br />
(*1)<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV - - - - 1 66,739.40<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 1 1 1 48,160.06 - -<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 3 3 3 204,672.00 3 215,030.40<br />
(*1)<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 9 9 9 584,812.80 9 605,217.60<br />
302<br />
302
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: Calumet Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
(*4)<br />
PR6473 Truck Driver 3 3 3 197,184.00 3 197,184.00<br />
TOTAL Calumet Service Area Sewer Maintenance Unit 19 19 19 1,273,823.20 19 1,327,358.76<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*6)<br />
843 Buildings and Grounds Unit<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 1 1 1 72,728.50 1 79,628.12<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer - 1 1 66,656.72 1 64,818.00<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 1 1 1 76,119.16 1 78,783.38<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 2 2 2 136,448.00 2 143,353.60<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 9 9 9 556,732.80 9 576,201.60<br />
NR8652 Maintenance Laborer, Class B 11 11 11 488,924.80 11 506,126.40<br />
TOTAL Buildings and Grounds Unit 24 25 25 1,397,609.98 25 1,448,911.10<br />
844 Fulton County Farm Operations<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer - 1 1 89,035.44 - -<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #2 (Agricultural Technician I) - 1 1 79,896.18 1 82,692.48<br />
HP12 Agricultural Technician II - 1 1 54,687.88 1 59,981.22<br />
HP11 Agricultural Technician I - 1 1 45,282.90 1 43,977.18<br />
HP11 Field and Laboratory Technician (AC) - 1 1 65,718.38 1 68,018.60<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist - 1 1 47,440.38 1 49,100.74<br />
TOTAL Fulton County Farm Operations - 6 6 382,061.16 5 303,770.22<br />
TOTAL General Plant Services Section 44 51 51 3,197,903.54 51 3,316,107.60<br />
850 Calumet Solids Management Area Section<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 2 - - - - -<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 1 - - - - -<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 2 - - - - -<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 1 - - - - -<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III 1 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Calumet Solids Management Area Section 8 - - - - -<br />
303<br />
303
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: Calumet Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
890 Land <strong>Reclamation</strong> Branch Section<br />
891 Administrative Unit<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 1 - - - - -<br />
892 Land <strong>Reclamation</strong> Branch Unit<br />
HP12 Agricultural Technician II 1 - - - - -<br />
HP11 Agricultural Technician I 1 - - - - -<br />
HP11 Field and Laboratory Technician (AC) 2 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Land <strong>Reclamation</strong> Branch Unit 4 - - - - -<br />
893 Mechanical Operations Unit<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV (AC) 1 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Mechanical Operations Unit 2 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Land <strong>Reclamation</strong> Branch Section 7 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Maintenance and Operations Calumet Service Area 244 235 235 17,918,729.40 238 18,847,340.98<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*6)<br />
Note: There are no positions budgeted for the Stormwater Management Fund for 2009.<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
304<br />
304
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – STICKNEY SERVICE AREA<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Increase<br />
$103,563,000<br />
$95,639,600<br />
$7,923,400<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Solids Processing<br />
$24,634,297 23.8%<br />
Solids Utilization<br />
$9,749,053 9.4%<br />
Treatment<br />
$33,558,527 32.4%<br />
Flood & Pollution Control<br />
$923,374 0.9%<br />
General Support<br />
$2,913,749 2.8%<br />
Collection<br />
$31,784,000 30.7%<br />
$110<br />
$100<br />
$90<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
Millions<br />
Positions<br />
700<br />
600<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Reduction due to transfer of solids<br />
operations to the General Division<br />
$80<br />
500<br />
$70<br />
$60<br />
Increase mainly due to increases in<br />
electrical energy rates<br />
400<br />
$50<br />
Reduction due to transfer of solids<br />
operations to the General Division<br />
300<br />
$40<br />
$30<br />
200<br />
$20<br />
$10<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
100<br />
$0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
305<br />
305
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – STICKNEY SERVICE AREA<br />
69000<br />
STICKNEY SERVICE AREA<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
481 461 464<br />
910<br />
Stickney Executive Office<br />
2 2 2<br />
911<br />
Stickney <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Control Unit<br />
0 0 5<br />
920<br />
Plant Engineering and<br />
Maintenance Branch<br />
218 220 219<br />
930<br />
Plant Operations Branch<br />
181 182 181<br />
940<br />
General Plant Services<br />
Section<br />
57 57 57<br />
950<br />
Lawndale Solids<br />
Management Area Section<br />
23 0 0<br />
921<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
931<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
941<br />
Administrative Unit<br />
2 2 2<br />
2 2 2<br />
3 3 3<br />
922<br />
Mechanical<br />
Engineering Unit<br />
18 19 19<br />
923<br />
Electrical<br />
Engineering Unit<br />
31 32 32<br />
924<br />
Maintenance Unit<br />
167 167 166<br />
932<br />
Treatment<br />
Operations Unit<br />
58 59 59<br />
934<br />
Mechanical<br />
Operations Unit<br />
121 121 120<br />
942<br />
*Stickney Service Area<br />
Sewer Maintenance Unit<br />
19 19 19<br />
943<br />
Buildings and Grounds<br />
Unit<br />
28 28 28<br />
945<br />
Railroad Unit<br />
7 7 7<br />
* In Section 942, 6 positions are funded by the Stormwater Management Fund for 2009 while<br />
the operations remain in the Maintenance and Operations Department.<br />
306<br />
306
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – STICKNEY SERVICE AREA<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The 2009 appropriation request for the Stickney Service Area is $103,563,900 an increase of $7,923,400 or 8.3 percent from<br />
2008. The staffing level of 464 is a net increase of 3 positions. The increase is attributed to the increase of six (6) positions<br />
composed of five (5) positions transferred from the General Division: one (1) Management Analyst III; one (1) Management<br />
Analyst II; one (1) Management Analyst I; and two (2) Principal Office Support Specialists. We added one (1) returning to<br />
work Treatment Plant Operator I. The increase is netted against the execution of three (3) crosshatched positions: one (1)<br />
Engineering Technician IV; one (1) Treatment Plant Operator II; and, one (1) Fireman-Oiler. Not included in the 464 total<br />
positions are six Sewer Control positions, which are funded under the Stormwater Management Fund. With the inclusion of<br />
these Stickney directed positions; the total staffing level is 470 for 2009 in the Stickney Service Area.<br />
Plant performance has been consistently excellent, with 100 percent NPDES permit compliance once again achieved.<br />
The 2009 budget requests reflect on-going efforts to address several important objectives as follows:<br />
• Continued sewage collection/treatment and biosolids processing/utilization/disposal, all within the limits of Environmental<br />
Protection Agency (EPA) NPDES Permit;<br />
• Compliance with the Title V air permit;<br />
• Ongoing infrastructure improvements, rehabilitation and replacement by a combination of Engineering and M&O<br />
contracts;<br />
• Procurement of equipment and components critical for maintaining the process equipment systems, and upgrades for<br />
improved economy and reliability.<br />
We continue to actively pursue modifications and improvements for operational economy, effectiveness and reliability. The<br />
goal of our operation plan/budget is to fully support the objectives of the M&O Department, and the District as a whole, and to<br />
satisfy the future demands and expectations of the population served.<br />
ENGINEERING PROJECTS<br />
With the cooperation of the Engineering Department, the following capital improvement projects have been completed and/or<br />
are scheduled to be completed in 2008.<br />
• 00-473-1D, Replace Casework, Fume Hoods and Misc. Work - This will provide central air conditioning to a portion of<br />
the Stickney R&D Lab currently utilizing window air conditioners. Rebalancing of the entire R&D complex will also be<br />
performed;<br />
• 02-818-2P, Cleaning of Anaerobic Digesters at SWRP & CWRP - Cleaning of the digesters to remove debris will improve<br />
their operational efficiency;<br />
• 00-184-2M, Improvements to Imhoff and Sludge Concentration Areas - With the improvements to the tanks, there is an<br />
expectation for some marginal cost saving; however, the majority of the savings will be realized by reducing man hours<br />
and work orders performed.<br />
Engineering Projects expected to be completed in 2009 include:<br />
• 04-825-3M, Addition of an Intermediate Blower, No. 2 at SWRP - The additional blower will be utilized in conjunction<br />
with the 91-177-XX contracts. The ultimate result of the new blower will be the ability to better control dissolved oxygen<br />
levels with appropriately sized equipment. As a result, energy savings are expected;<br />
• 99-169-2M, Improvements to Sluice Gates and Misc. Work at Racine Avenue Pumping Station (RAPS) - This will replace<br />
defective sluice gates, stems and actuators throughout the pump stations. Significant upgrades to the HVAC system will<br />
also be implemented;<br />
• 99-180-1M, Ventilation and Other Improvements - These repairs will improve the atmosphere in the Sludge Concentration<br />
Area, which is presently conducive to corrosion. It is expected that with improved ventilation we will experience less<br />
corrosion and provide an environment more suitable for staff and equipment;<br />
• 06-156-3P, Replacement of Grit Piping - The grit pipe in the pump gallery has failed twice in the last two years. Under the<br />
new contract, the contractor will remove and replace existing grit pipes, valves, all fittings and pipe supports from the<br />
Aerated Grit Chambers to the Grit Dewatering Tanks with an improved piping material;<br />
307<br />
307
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – STICKNEY SERVICE AREA<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
• 07-168-3P, Scum Concentration, Post Centrifuge Building, Preliminary Tank and Elevator Improvements - Deteriorated<br />
sludge boxes in preliminary control houses will be replaced. The drain valves in scum concentration tanks are also<br />
scheduled for replacement. The new drain valves will better allow for tank draw down in the event of required<br />
maintenance;<br />
• 02-111-3M, Rehabilitation of Mainstream TARP Pumps -The pumps have been in service since 1985 and need to be<br />
rehabilitated to restore original conditions. The pumps are not operating at optimum capacity or efficiency;<br />
• 07-163-3M, R&D HVAC Improvements - Replace aging supply and exhaust air handling units, chillers, ductwork and<br />
four cooling towers to improve conditions at the R&D facility.<br />
BIOSOLIDS<br />
In 2009, the Stickney Biosolids Operation was transferred to the General Division. This realignment has allowed for<br />
consolidated work efforts under a united Solids Management Area, with the primary goal to minimize costs.<br />
The Alternative Biosolids Processing Facility began operations in the fall of 2008. This operation will produce a pellet-type<br />
product. The pelletizer operation will gradually lower lagoon inventories and dry utilization. For 2009, we anticipate that the<br />
pelletizer operation will produce 54,600 dry tons of product.<br />
ENERGY MANAGEMENT, “GREEN” AND MASTER PLAN RELATED INITIATIVES<br />
The Plant Engineering, Maintenance and Operations teams have eagerly pursued energy management excellence, while<br />
looking for ‘green’ opportunities as they become available. We have convened both a Natural Gas Committee, as well as an<br />
Energy Conservation Committee, to study and implement efficiencies.<br />
Stickney WRP expects the delivery of all-electric personnel carriers. The plan is to continue this movement, and look to allelectric<br />
and hybrid alternatives first, when evaluating future needs.<br />
Much of the regular maintenance work also improves efficiency. For example, projects such as: the Boiler Rehabilitation<br />
Program, the overhaul of Process Blower #7, the rehabilitation of rotating assemblies at Racine Avenue Pump Station, pumps<br />
at Main Stream not only extend the useful life of the equipment and lessen the probability of critical failure, but they result in<br />
reduced energy consumption.<br />
Reduced energy consumption, through modernization, procurement and installation of the next generation of pre-digestion<br />
sludge centrifuges (XM-905) begins in 2009. The new assemblies will use less than 50% of the energy as compared to the<br />
existing equipment (PM-95000), and can process double the flow of bio-solids (WAS) flow. These same XM-905 centrifuges<br />
will provide sufficient treatment capacity such that a planned facility expansion will not be required. Additionally, the<br />
conversion of Imhoff Tanks to round primary tanks, the addition of round primary sludge concentration tanks and other Master<br />
Plan items will provide paybacks in terms of increased digester gas production and reduced maintenance costs.<br />
MAJOR M&O CONTRACT WORK FOR 2009<br />
• Continue various maintenance programs, such as painting final tanks, tank rehabilitation, plant HVAC maintenance, boiler<br />
maintenance, ozone generator repairs, centrifuge rotating assembly repairs;<br />
• Rehabilitate a rotating assembly at the Racine Avenue Pump Station;<br />
• Continue repair program for South West Main Sewage Pump 66-inch Discharge Valves;<br />
• Continue conversion of the Primary Tank flight chains from carbon steel to stainless steel;<br />
• Replace leaky diffuser piping in the primary tank area to meet treatment objectives and save energy;<br />
• Install one high-effiency air compressor to replace existing units that are approaching the end of their expected useful life,<br />
It is anticipated that this will reduce energy consumption and maintenance costs by approximately $20,000 per year;<br />
• Continue preparation of ERMS and Title V Annual Emission Reports;<br />
• Install next generation pre-digestion centrifuge rotating assemblies which have higher outputs and use less energy;<br />
• Continue assisting IRB with various inventory reduction projects and establishment of material reorder points and transfers<br />
that result in inventory reduction;<br />
• Repair Main Stream Pumping Station main sewage pump discharge valve #4 to ensure low head pump availability;<br />
308<br />
308
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
• Inspect/clean Westside wet well to address liquid vortexing and pump cavitation problems, and reduce the frequency of<br />
major maintenance required on impellers, wear rings, and casings;<br />
• Conduct Arc Flash training and procurement/rental of protective gear in accordance with NFPA 70E ;<br />
• Rehabilitate the Main Stream Pumping Station (MSPS) dewatering and discharge valve chamber cranes;<br />
• Retrofit post centrifuge back-drive motor to improve reliability and increase useful life;<br />
• Replace 400kW portable emergency generator;<br />
• Continue sewage collection/treatment and biosolids processing, all within the limits of our NPDES Permit;<br />
• Pelletizer Facility in full operation and related operational changes Division-wide to accommodate and make use of the<br />
efficiencies created by the new facility;<br />
• Continue to cooperate with Engineering for additional Sewer Rehabilitation such as the lining of Salt Creek #3 in<br />
LaGrange Park;<br />
• Building rehabilitation program to comply with GASB 34, including rehabilitating the Battery C Gallery;<br />
• Under assistance of M&R, SWRP Building & Grounds plans to revise the SWRP landscape contract in order to reduce the<br />
use of chemicals and ultimately utilize more environmental friendly materials;<br />
• Improve snow removal/de-icing by using environmental friendly approaches;<br />
• Continue railroad track, railroad car, and locomotive preventative maintenance and repair.<br />
2008 ACCOMPLISHMENTS<br />
• Rehabilitated a rotating assembly at Racine Avenue Pump Station;<br />
• Procured services and parts to repair Southwest Main Sewage Pump 66-inch Discharge Valves;<br />
• Continued program to procure and replace WS Main Sewage Pump cast iron rotating elements with stainless steel, which<br />
are estimated to last at least three times longer than cast iron;<br />
• Installed new pneumatic controls in the Aerated Grit Pump Gallery to isolate the gallery from the tanks in order to prevent<br />
flooding during any potential pipe failure;<br />
• Procured four pre-digestion centrifuge rotating assemblies. The new design of the assemblies will result in higher output<br />
and significantly lower energy usage;<br />
• Replaced existing audible gas alarm with Federal Select Tone – Standardize alarm throughout plant;<br />
• Replaced regular AC source to flashing lights with solar panels for increased reliability and decreased maintenance labor<br />
costs at Location 13A PS Railroad Crossing;<br />
• Replaced hard-wire with wireless communication systems for increased reliability and decreased maintenance labor costs<br />
for West Side Overflow Bypass;<br />
• Upgraded UPS system at the MSPS to increase reliability, minimize outages and costs of repairs;<br />
• Replaced surge arrestors on Main Sewage Pumps at MSPS to eliminate costly motor breakdowns and increase equipment<br />
reliability;<br />
• Replaced outdoor surveillance cameras with pan, tilt and zoom dome cameras. The new units will decrease downtime and<br />
maintenance costs as well as enhance security at the Stickney <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant;<br />
• Installed control panel for the air compressors city water break tank. This will provide an additional source of cooling<br />
water for the air compressors at the Pump & Blower House in the event effluent water become unavailable;<br />
• Registered elevators with the Illinois State Fire Marshall, completed inspections, and plans for updates for elevators in<br />
order to comply with the Illinois Elevator Safety Regulation Act;<br />
• Installed two additional ammonia analyzers in Aeration Batteries B and C to improve plant operability. This equipment<br />
will be included in the new DCS, per our request to Engineering;<br />
• Earned the National Association of Clean <strong>Water</strong> Agencies Platinum Peak Performance Award. This honor is in recognition<br />
of complete and consistent NPDES permit compliance, and the receipt of Gold Awards for five concurrent years;<br />
• Continued the Bubbly Creek drawback operations which allows for movement of water in this portion of the river system<br />
to help contain odor emissions;<br />
• Installed odor control unit at 43 rd Street and East Avenue per study recommendations;<br />
• Continued building rehabilitation program to meet GASB 34 goals: Battery B Gallery rehabilitation and a new roof at<br />
Mainstream Pump Station;<br />
• Worked with District Police staff to improve SWRP security through fence and monitoring enhancements;<br />
• Maintained Natural Prairie Landscape Area – 13.5 acres installed at Stickney WRP and MSPS;<br />
309<br />
309
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS – STICKNEY SERVICE AREA<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
• “Green – Initiatives”:<br />
• Replaced several cleaning products with “Green-Seal” approved items;<br />
• Used reflective coating for new roof at MSPS, in order to provide a reduction in air-conditioning related energy<br />
consumption;<br />
• Completed carpet replacement at SWRP Safety & Security Offices: Specifications called for carpet made from 55<br />
percent recycled content and installed with zero VOC adhesives, and recycling old discarded carpeting;<br />
• Procured Polyolefin coated security fence - no solvent used during the manufacturing process;<br />
• Utilized Low-VOC paints on fence painting contracts;<br />
• Sold and distributed rain-barrels;<br />
• Improved safety of railroad operations, railroad car and locomotive preventative maintenance and repairs.<br />
Summary<br />
During the past several years, staff has taken advantage of available funding to replace or rehabilitate infrastructures. Due to<br />
these efforts, combined with support received from the Engineering Department, the Division is poised to meet the challenges<br />
of fiscally tight appropriations despite energy and general inflationary pressures.<br />
310<br />
310
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
311
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
69000 M and O - STICKNEY DIVISION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. COLLECTION AND TREATMENT: The Stickney Service Area will collect and treat approximately<br />
300 billion gallons of sewage through its treatment facilities. $65,342,527 63.1%<br />
Design: Flows CBOD * SS *<br />
Stickney <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant 1,200 MGD 10 mg/l 12 mg/l<br />
* NPDES monthly effluent quality standards: CBOD - Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand<br />
SS - Suspended Solids<br />
2. SOLIDS PROCESSING: The Stickney Service Area will remove 155,000 dry tons and process solids from<br />
200,000 dry tons of concentrated sewage (includes 45,000 from North Side Plant) through various systems<br />
including heated digestion, centrifuging, concentration, and aging low solids sludge and centrifuge cake in<br />
lagoons. $24,634,297 23.8%<br />
3. SOLIDS UTILIZATION: The Stickney Service Area will provide support to utilize 101,000 dry tons of further<br />
dewatered sewage for application at final utilization sites such as farm application and as daily and final<br />
cover in sanitary landfills. $9,749,053 9.4%<br />
4. FLOOD AND POLLUTION CONTROL: The Stickney Service Area will work to prevent local area flooding<br />
through the operation of 6 retention reservoirs, in cooperation with local communities. They will also<br />
work to maintain the quality of the waterways system and associated District property in cooperation with<br />
the debris boats and the channel maintenance crews. $923,374 0.9%<br />
5. GENERAL SUPPORT: The Stickney Service Area provides technical and administrative support for other<br />
departments not directly related to the operational activities of Collection and Treatment, Solids<br />
Processing, Flood and Pollution Control, and Solids Utilization. $2,913,749 2.8%<br />
Total $103,563,000 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Unit of Measure Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. The Stickney Service Area will collect and treat approximately 300<br />
billion gallons of sewage in 2009. billion gallons 268 300 300<br />
2. The Stickney Service Area will remove and process solids from 200,000<br />
dry tons of concentrated sewage. dry tons process solids 156,316 200,000 200,000<br />
3. The Stickney Service Area will obtain 100 percent permit compliance in<br />
2009 for NPDES effluent limits. percent 100% 100% 100%<br />
4. The Stickney Service Area will provide support to utilize 101,000 dry<br />
tons of biosolids in 2009. dry tons 89,517 97,000 101,000<br />
312<br />
312
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
69000 M and O - STICKNEY DIVISION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
1000 Collection $26,659,300 2009 123 $31,784,000 $3,496,593 12.4<br />
2008 121 $28,287,407<br />
1100 Surface Interceptor Systems $1,790,100 2009 17 $2,629,749 $312,030 13.5 a)<br />
2008 17 $2,317,719<br />
1200 Tunnel and Reservoir System $7,239,500 2009 29 $7,150,784 $1,061,114 17.4 b)<br />
2008 29 $6,089,670<br />
1300 Pumping Station Facilities $8,354,200 2009 29 $8,628,944 $345,313 4.2 c)<br />
2008 29 $8,283,631<br />
1900 Collection - Indirect Costs $9,275,500 2009 48 $13,374,523 $1,778,136 15.3 d)<br />
2008 46 $11,596,387<br />
2000 Treatment $29,304,490 2009 155 $33,558,527 $3,720,953 12.5<br />
2008 153 $29,837,574<br />
2000 Pre-Treatment $2,459,600 2009 24 $2,326,093 $13,518 0.6<br />
2008 24 $2,312,575<br />
2100 Primary Treatment $3,095,900 2009 26 $3,645,859 $374,608 11.5 e)<br />
2008 26 $3,271,251<br />
2200 Secondary Treatment $10,225,700 2009 34 $12,539,362 $1,436,650 12.9 f)<br />
2008 34 $11,102,712<br />
2300 Tertiary Treatment $98,200 2009 0 $36,900 $1,000 2.8<br />
2008 0 $35,900<br />
2900 Treatment - Indirect Costs $13,425,090 2009 71 $15,010,313 $1,895,177 14.5 g)<br />
2008 69 $13,115,136<br />
3000 Solids Processing $24,228,800 2009 148 $24,634,297 $593,117 2.5<br />
2008 149 $24,041,180<br />
3100 Thickening $4,440,700 2009 27 $5,048,917 $81,211 1.6<br />
2008 27 $4,967,706<br />
3200 Stabilization $4,104,400 2009 30 $3,334,985 ($5,074) (0.2)<br />
2008 30 $3,340,059<br />
a) Increase due to: new contract for Combined Sewer Outfall (CSO) monitoring and reduction in NPDES requirements ($100,000); and rehabilitate<br />
tide gates and stop logs in the SWRP service area, last performed in 2005 ($200,000).<br />
b) Higher demand for electrical service for the Main Stream Pumping Station (MSPS) and other TARP facilities ($783,300).<br />
c) Higher demand for electrical service for pumping stations in the SWRP service area ($340,800).<br />
d) Increase due to: epoxy flooring and resurfacing projects ($280,000); building reroofing ($656,000); services of operating engineers at the Racine<br />
Avenue pumping station ($306,000); and replacement of manlift safety devices ($120,000).<br />
e) Increase due to new contract to modify and replace diffuser piping in the primary channels and tanks ($350,000).<br />
f) Increase due to: rehabilitate aeration blowers ($1,211,000); painting of battery final tanks ($233,000); and replacement parts for mechanical<br />
equipment in aeration batteries ($60,000).<br />
g) Increase due to: contract to furnish and deliver replacement emergency generators ($145,000); increase in water services ($233,000);<br />
contract to furnish, delivery and install air compressors ($165,000); contract to replace cooling tower media ($260,000); increase in HVAC<br />
maintenance in the Stickney area ($198,000); natural gas for process and building heat ($68,000); and master plan energy review, ($500,000).<br />
313<br />
313
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
69000 M and O - STICKNEY DIVISION OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
3300 Dewatering $7,664,900 2009 34 $8,228,876 $365,241 4.6 h)<br />
2008 35 $7,863,635<br />
3900 Solids Processing - Indirect Costs $8,018,800 2009 57 $8,021,519 $151,739 1.9 i)<br />
2008 57 $7,869,780<br />
4000 Flood and Pollution Control $720,800 2009 5 $923,374 ($38,173) (4.0)<br />
2008 5 $961,547<br />
4200 <strong>Water</strong>ways Control and Stormwater Reservoirs $179,600 2009 3 $191,300 $3,900 2.1<br />
2008 3 $187,400<br />
4210 Maintenance of <strong>Water</strong>ways $209,700 2009 0 $90,300 $10,300 12.9<br />
2008 0 $80,000<br />
4400 Aeration Facilities $0 2009 0 $0 ($99,000) (100.0) j)<br />
2008 0 $99,000<br />
4900 Flood and Pollution Control - Indirect Costs $331,500 2009 2 $641,774 $46,627 7.8<br />
2008 2 $595,147<br />
5000 Solids Utilization $10,368,000 2009 13 $9,749,053 $227,570 2.4<br />
2008 13 $9,521,483<br />
5100 Solids Drying $2,430,600 2009 1 $87,200 $600 0.7<br />
2008 1 $86,600<br />
5200 Solids Distribution $5,543,900 2009 2 $7,624,635 $172,541 2.3 k)<br />
2008 2 $7,452,094<br />
5900 Solids Utilization - Indirect Costs $2,393,500 2009 10 $2,037,218 $54,429 2.7<br />
2008 10 $1,982,789<br />
7000 General Support $2,451,000 2009 20 $2,913,749 ($76,660) (2.6)<br />
2008 20 $2,990,409<br />
Totals $93,732,390 2009 464 $103,563,000 $7,923,400 8.3% *<br />
2008 461 $95,639,600<br />
$0<br />
h) Increase due to: furnish, deliver, and install a new liquid CO2 storage tank ($250,000); maintenance of contol system at post digestion<br />
centrifuge ($55,000); and maintenance of switchgear at post digestion last performed in 2005 ($50,000).<br />
i) Increase due to replacement of electric personnel carriers ($80,200) and replacement parts for post digestion centrifuges ($74,800).<br />
j) Correction of cost assignment to Program 2212 - Blowers and Air Mains, from prior years incorrect Program 4410 - Instream Aeration Facilities.<br />
k) Increase due to contracted rate adjustment for pelletizer operation in 2009 ($200,000).<br />
* The 2009 position total for the Stickney Service Area is 464. There are 6 additional positions funded by the Stormwater Management Fund.<br />
314<br />
314
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
69000 M and O - STICKNEY DIVISION PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
1000-2900 Collection and Treatment<br />
Collect and Treat Sewage at the Stickney <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Mil. Gallons 267,549 300,000 300,000<br />
Plant Cost $55,963,790 $58,124,981 $65,342,527 a)<br />
Cost/Mil. Gallons $209.17 $193.75 $217.81<br />
3000 Solids Processing<br />
Remove 155,000 Dry Tons of Solids and Process 200,000 Dry Dry Tons 156,316 200,000 200,000<br />
Tons of Solids (Includes 45,000 Dry Tons from North Service Area) Cost $24,228,800 $24,041,180 $24,634,297 b)<br />
from Concentrated Sewage Through Various Systems Including Cost/Dry Ton $155.00 $120.21 $123.17<br />
Heated Digestion, Centrifuging, Concentration, and Aging Low<br />
Solids Sludge and Centrifuge Cake in Lagoons<br />
4000 Flood and Pollution Control<br />
Operation and Maintenance of the <strong>Water</strong>ways to Minimize Area<br />
Flooding and Pollution<br />
4200 Minimize Area Flooding and Pollution of Lake Michigan Reservoirs 6 4 6<br />
Through the Continuous Control of <strong>Water</strong> Levels in Major Cost $179,600 $187,400 $191,300<br />
Rivers and Canals and the Operation of Retention Reservoirs Cost/Reservoir $29,933.33 $46,850.00 $31,883.33<br />
4210 Maintenance of the <strong>Water</strong>ways and Canal Banks Within the <strong>Water</strong>way Miles 100 100 100<br />
Jurisdiction of the District. Activities Include Debris Removal, Cost $209,700 $80,000 $90,300<br />
Insect and Rodent Control, Bridge Repair, and Aeration Costs Cost/Mile $2,097.00 $800.00 $903.00<br />
Along Navigable (76 miles) and Non-Navigable (24 miles) <strong>Water</strong>ways<br />
4400 Aeration Facilities Cost $0 $99,000 $0 c)<br />
4900 Flood and Pollution Control - Indirect Costs Cost $331,500 $595,147 $641,774<br />
5000 Solids Utilization<br />
Utilize Further Dewatered Sewage for Application at Final Dry Tons 89,517 97,000 101,000<br />
Utilization Sites Such as Daily Cover for CID Landfill, Final Cost $10,368,000 $2,721,483 $2,279,553 d)<br />
Cover of Landfills, and Farm/Land Application Cost/Dry Ton $115.82 $28.06 $22.57<br />
5271 Pelletizer Disposal Dry Tons 553 54,750 54,600<br />
Control management and disposal of solids by private Cost* $0 $6,800,000 $7,469,500 e)<br />
contracts Cost/Dry Ton $0.00 $124.20 $136.80<br />
7000 General Support<br />
Technical and Administrative Support for Other Departments' Cost $2,451,000 $2,990,409 $2,913,749<br />
Activities Indirectly Related to the Operational Activities<br />
of Collection and Treatment, Solids Processing, Flood and<br />
Pollution Control, and Solids Utilization<br />
Division Total $93,732,390 $95,639,600 $103,563,000<br />
a) Increase largely due to: increased requests for electrical service for the Main Stream Pumping Station (MSPS) and other TARP facilities, ($783,300);<br />
increased requests for electrical service for pumping stations in the SWRP service area, ($340,800); rehabilitate the aeration blowers ($1,211,000);<br />
building reroofing ($656,000); new contract to modify and replace diffuser piping in the primary channels and tanks, ($350,000); increases in<br />
expoxy flooring and resurfacing projects, ($280,000); painting of battery final tanks, ($233,000); rehabilitate tide gates and stop logs in the SWRP<br />
service area last performed in 2005, ($200,000); and master plan energy review, ($500,000).<br />
b) Increase due to furnish, deliver, and install a new liquid CO2 storage tank ($250,000); replacement of electric personnel carriers ($80,200);<br />
replacement parts for post digestion centrifuges ($74,800); maintenance of control system at post digestion centrifuge ($55,000); and maintenance of<br />
switchgear at post digestion last performed in 2005 ($50,000).<br />
c) Correction of cost assignment to program 2212 - Blowers and Air Mains, from prior years incorrect program 4410 - Instream Aeration Facilities.<br />
d) Decrease due to reallocation of pelletizer electrical cost from general solids utilization to direct pelletizer operation ($469,500).<br />
e) Increase due to contracted rate adjustment for the pelletizer in 2009 and the direct allocation of electrical cost to the pelletizer facility, ($669,500).<br />
* Dry tons utilized for initial testing in 2007. Payment for pelletizer operations withheld until all operational testing complete.<br />
315<br />
315
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
69000 Department Maintenance & Operations<br />
Division Stickney Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 34,508,715 $ 35,388,800 $ 35,388,800 $ 35,000,000 $ 35,850,200 $ 35,797,500 $ 36,303,000<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 2,010,804 1,943,100 2,033,100 2,000,000 1,988,800 2,041,500 2,120,900<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 30,576 106,900 106,900 96,400 125,800 125,800 125,800<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 174,978 209,500 209,500 201,000 225,100 225,100 737,100<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 311,300 311,300 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 185,133 228,800 138,800 135,000 228,800 228,800 228,800<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 36,910,206 37,877,100 37,877,100 37,432,400 38,730,000 38,730,000 39,515,600<br />
612010 Travel 5,837 10,900 10,900 9,500 22,500 22,500 22,500<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 24,294 19,000 49,000 47,500 33,700 33,700 33,700<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 113,789 145,500 145,500 132,000 145,500 145,500 145,500<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services 659 900 2,300 1,900 900 900 900<br />
612150 Electrical Energy 22,592,005 19,523,700 25,523,700 21,746,400 24,043,300 22,297,400 20,670,400<br />
612160 Natural Gas 838,924 1,232,100 1,232,100 1,232,100 1,166,100 1,166,100 1,166,100<br />
612170 <strong>Water</strong> and <strong>Water</strong> Services 484,930 441,000 501,000 440,700 509,600 509,600 509,600<br />
612210 Communication Services 87,318 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000<br />
612240 Testing and Inspection Services 33,627 96,800 96,800 84,500 96,200 109,200 109,200<br />
612330 Rental Charges 68,858 100,200 148,400 95,000 111,600 111,600 141,600<br />
612410 Governmental Service Charges 87,332 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000<br />
612420 Maintenance of Grounds and Pavements 845,322 1,242,000 1,242,000 1,140,400 1,277,700 1,280,700 1,280,700<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 276,374 654,400 566,200 561,400 351,800 351,800 351,800<br />
612520 Waste Material Disposal Charges 7,850,278 851,000 851,000 850,000 851,000 851,000 851,000<br />
612590 Sludge Disposal - 6,800,000 433,600 400,000 7,000,000 7,000,000 7,000,000<br />
612600 Repairs to Collection Facilities 4,013,617 4,605,900 4,605,900 4,233,400 4,978,200 4,938,600 5,678,600<br />
612650 Repairs to Process Facilities 5,617,440 6,328,700 6,325,700 5,475,500 7,302,000 7,450,500 8,440,500<br />
612670 Repairs to Railroads 213,750 460,500 460,500 279,000 447,500 472,900 472,900<br />
612680 Repairs to Buildings 4,392,500 3,195,000 3,195,000 2,666,000 3,814,400 4,453,400 4,453,400<br />
612760 Repairs to Material Handling and Farming<br />
Equipment 186,487 53,000 98,000 62,000 103,000 103,000 103,000<br />
612780 Safety Repairs and Services 96,192 117,000 135,000 112,000 47,000 122,000 122,000<br />
316<br />
316
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
69000 Department Maintenance & Operations<br />
Division Stickney Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
612800 Repairs to Office Furniture and Equipment 183 4,000 4,000 1,200 - - -<br />
612840 Communications Equipment Maintenance<br />
(Includes Software) 48,492 63,000 63,000 41,000 56,000 56,000 56,000<br />
612860 Repairs to Vehicle Equipment 25,722 29,900 29,900 27,500 46,000 46,000 46,000<br />
612970 Repairs to Testing and Laboratory<br />
Equipment - 3,000 3,000 500 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. 11,638 42,000 42,000 23,500 42,000 42,000 42,000<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 47,915,568 46,184,500 45,929,500 39,828,000 52,614,000 51,732,400 51,865,400<br />
623030 Metals 13,590 18,000 18,000 8,500 18,000 18,000 18,000<br />
623070 Electrical Parts and Supplies 684,185 671,300 846,300 634,500 696,400 701,400 701,400<br />
623090 Plumbing Accessories and Supplies 399,206 455,500 485,500 400,000 426,600 456,600 456,600<br />
623110 Hardware 19,940 30,600 36,600 32,000 32,700 32,700 32,700<br />
623130 Buildings, Grounds, Paving Materials, and<br />
Supplies 88,734 100,400 100,400 65,700 146,400 146,400 146,400<br />
623170 Fiber, Paper, and Insulation Materials - 5,000 5,000 1,500 12,000 12,000 12,000<br />
623190 Paints, Solvents, and Related Materials 2,628 3,000 3,000 2,700 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
623250 Vehicle Parts and Supplies 50,377 73,700 73,700 69,800 75,200 75,200 75,200<br />
623270 Mechanical Repair Parts 2,431,614 3,357,500 3,244,500 2,750,900 3,067,800 3,152,800 3,152,800<br />
623300 Manhole Materials 39,397 40,400 40,400 39,900 41,400 41,400 41,400<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 17,577 40,400 40,400 34,500 31,400 31,400 31,400<br />
623560 Processing Chemicals 3,766,280 5,143,000 5,133,500 4,750,500 5,422,500 5,422,500 5,222,500<br />
623570 Laboratory Testing Supplies, Small<br />
Equipment, and Chemicals - 3,000 3,000 3,000 - - -<br />
623660 Cleaning Supplies 4,165 8,000 8,000 6,200 8,500 8,500 8,500<br />
623680 Tools and Supplies 118,419 171,500 171,500 149,500 198,900 198,900 198,900<br />
623700 Wearing Apparel 1,046 3,000 3,000 2,300 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />
623720 Books, Maps, and Charts 2,402 5,000 5,000 4,300 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
623780 Safety and Medical Supplies 50,180 98,000 98,000 76,800 96,500 96,500 96,500<br />
623800 Computer Software 3,305 12,000 12,000 11,500 12,000 12,000 12,000<br />
623810 Computer Supplies 9,455 25,000 25,000 19,800 40,000 40,000 40,000<br />
317<br />
317
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
69000 Department Maintenance & Operations<br />
Division Stickney Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
623820 Fuel 233,437 225,000 297,500 250,000 166,500 166,500 166,500<br />
623840 Gases 2,062 5,000 5,000 3,900 7,000 7,000 7,000<br />
623850 Communications Supplies 53,651 72,500 72,500 56,000 72,500 72,500 72,500<br />
623860 Lubricants 1,216 28,000 28,000 19,000 2,000 2,000 2,000<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 66,683 55,200 56,700 53,500 52,000 52,000 52,000<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 8,059,549 10,650,000 10,812,500 9,446,300 10,639,300 10,759,300 10,559,300<br />
634600 Equipment for Collection Facilities 14,578 14,000 17,000 15,400 - - -<br />
634650 Equipment for Process Facilities 87,204 134,000 214,000 194,100 212,600 212,600 462,600<br />
634760 Material Handling and Farming Equipment 77,959 225,000 179,200 149,500 - - -<br />
634860 Vehicle Equipment 605,634 471,000 475,300 471,000 776,000 1,000,100 1,000,100<br />
634970 Testing and Laboratory Equipment 9,317 58,000 53,700 46,000 31,000 31,000 31,000<br />
634990 Machinery and Equipment, N.O.C. 52,375 26,000 68,800 28,800 77,000 129,000 129,000<br />
400 TOTAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 847,067 928,000 1,008,000 904,800 1,096,600 1,372,700 1,622,700<br />
TOTAL STICKNEY SERVICE AREA $ 93,732,390 $ 95,639,600 $ 95,627,100 $ 87,611,500 $ 103,079,900 $ 102,594,400 $ 103,563,000<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
TOTAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS $ 177,801,341 $ 209,868,700 $ 209,856,200 $ 193,586,500 $ 221,406,300 $ 221,406,300 $ 221,406,300<br />
318<br />
318
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: Stickney Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
910 Stickney Executive Office<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP23 Deputy Director of Maintenance and Operations - - - - 1 217,850.62<br />
HP23 Deputy Chief Engineer 1 1 1 210,483.78 - -<br />
HP12 Secretary 1 1 1 64,482.60 1 70,117.58<br />
TOTAL Stickney Executive Office 2 2 2 274,966.38 2 287,968.20<br />
911 Stickney <strong>Budget</strong> Control Unit<br />
HP17 Management Analyst III - - - - 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Management Analyst II - - - - 1 92,693.38<br />
HP13 Management Analyst I - - - - 1 60,328.06<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist - - - - 2 100,692.54<br />
TOTAL Stickney <strong>Budget</strong> Control Unit - - - - 5 374,948.86<br />
920 Plant Engineering and Maintenance Branch<br />
921 Administrative Unit<br />
HP21 Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations I 1 1 1 162,139.90 1 175,446.96<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 61,217.26 1 66,739.40<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 2 2 2 223,357.16 2 242,186.36<br />
922 Mechanical Engineering Unit<br />
HP20 Supervising Mechanical Engineer 1 1 1 163,011.42 1 168,716.86<br />
HP18 Principal Mechanical Engineer 1 2 2 223,710.50 2 247,020.02<br />
HP17 Senior Mechanical Engineer 4 4 4 421,707.00 4 436,467.98<br />
HP15 Associate Mechanical Engineer 5 5 5 426,751.00 5 432,980.08<br />
HP14 Assistant Mechanical Engineer 4 4 4 262,596.36 4 292,647.94<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 1 1 1 78,749.06 1 85,675.98<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 1 1 1 64,482.60 1 66,739.40<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 37,819.34 1 41,633.80<br />
TOTAL Mechanical Engineering Unit 18 19 19 1,678,827.28 19 1,771,882.06<br />
923 Electrical Engineering Unit<br />
HP20 Supervising Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 156,074.10 1 161,536.70<br />
319<br />
319
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: Stickney Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP18 Principal Electrical Engineer 2 2 2 233,680.98 2 252,179.46<br />
HP18 Principal Electrical Engineer (AC) 1 1 1 114,348.00 1 118,350.18<br />
HP17 Senior Electrical Engineer 3 3 3 318,622.46 3 334,622.34<br />
HP15 Associate Electrical Engineer 3 3 3 277,091.10 3 260,660.66<br />
HP14 Assistant Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 78,749.06 1 81,505.32<br />
HP15 Associate Process Control Engineer - 1 1 72,728.50 1 88,337.08<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 1 1 1 70,688.28 1 77,333.36<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 1 1 1 54,687.88 1 56,602.00<br />
NR6275 Chief Powerhouse Dispatcher I 1 1 1 92,934.40 1 99,361.60<br />
NR6272 Powerhouse Dispatcher 4 4 4 348,441.60 4 360,672.00<br />
NR6233 Electrical Operator II 12 12 12 945,235.20 12 978,432.00<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 52,251.68 1 54,080.52<br />
TOTAL Electrical Engineering Unit 31 32 32 2,815,533.24 32 2,923,673.22<br />
924 Maintenance Unit<br />
HP19 Master Mechanic II 1 1 1 144,409.20 1 149,463.60<br />
HP16 Assistant Master Mechanic 2 2 2 195,864.76 2 211,882.84<br />
HP16 Assistant Master Mechanic #4 2 2 2 219,981.84 2 227,681.22<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV (AC) 1 1 1 54,687.88 - -<br />
PR7779 Pipefitter Foreman 1 1 1 91,520.00 1 97,864.00<br />
PR7775 Pipefitter Leadman 2 2 2 174,720.00 2 187,408.00<br />
PR7773 Pipefitter 26 26 26 2,163,200.00 26 2,274,064.00<br />
PR7743 Pipecoverer 2 2 2 154,544.00 2 165,984.00<br />
PR7425 Electrical Instrument and Testing Mechanic Foreman 1 1 1 98,134.40 1 101,566.40<br />
PR7424 Electrical Instrument and Testing Mechanic Leadman 1 1 1 90,376.00 1 93,537.60<br />
PR7423 Electrical Instrument and Testing Mechanic 15 15 15 1,163,760.00 15 1,204,320.00<br />
PR7423 Electrical Instrument and Testing Mechanic (AC) 1 - - - - -<br />
PR7347 Electrical Mechanic Foreman 1 1 1 89,440.00 1 92,768.00<br />
320<br />
320
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: Stickney Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
PR7349 Electrical Mechanic Sub-Foreman 2 2 2 168,064.00 2 174,720.00<br />
PR7343 Electrical Mechanic 19 19 19 1,493,856.00 19 1,557,088.00<br />
PR5759 Plumber Foreman 1 1 1 91,520.00 1 95,680.00<br />
PR5753 Plumber 4 4 4 341,120.00 4 357,760.00<br />
PR7579 Machinist Foreman 1 1 1 86,091.20 1 90,542.40<br />
PR7575 Machinist Leadman 2 2 2 168,022.40 2 176,924.80<br />
PR7573 Machinist 25 25 25 1,996,280.00 25 2,107,560.00<br />
PR5989 Ironworker Foreman 1 1 1 88,920.00 1 91,000.00<br />
PR5973 Structural Ironworker 8 8 8 653,120.00 8 669,760.00<br />
PR5973 Structural Ironworker (AC) 1 - - - - -<br />
PR5935 Architectural Ironworker Leadman 1 1 1 84,448.00 1 87,984.00<br />
PR5933 Architectural Ironworker 4 4 4 310,752.00 4 324,896.00<br />
PR5933 Architectural Ironworker (AC) 2 2 2 155,376.00 2 162,448.00<br />
PR5955 Sheet Metal Worker Leadman 1 1 1 85,654.40 1 88,712.00<br />
PR5953 Sheet Metal Worker 6 6 6 471,494.40 6 488,342.40<br />
PR5159 Carpenter Foreman 1 1 1 83,761.60 1 87,921.60<br />
PR5155 Carpenter Leadman 1 1 1 82,721.60 1 86,881.60<br />
PR5153 Carpenter 8 8 8 628,492.80 8 661,772.80<br />
PR6459 Hoisting Engineer Foreman 1 1 1 96,824.00 1 99,424.00<br />
PR6453 Hoisting Engineer 5 7 7 619,528.00 7 637,728.00<br />
PR6453 Hoisting Engineer (AC) 2 2 2 177,008.00 2 182,208.00<br />
PR5555 Painter Leadman 1 1 1 78,249.60 1 81,556.80<br />
PR5553 Painter 3 3 3 220,896.00 3 230,256.00<br />
PR6479 Truck Driver Foreman 1 1 1 65,728.00 1 65,728.00<br />
PR6473 Truck Driver 8 8 8 509,184.00 8 509,184.00<br />
PR6473 Truck Driver (AC) 1 1 1 63,648.00 1 63,648.00<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 49,847.20 1 51,591.80<br />
TOTAL Maintenance Unit 167 167 167 13,511,245.28 166 14,037,857.86<br />
TOTAL Plant Engineering and Maintenance Branch 218 220 220 18,228,962.96 219 18,975,599.50<br />
321<br />
321
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: Stickney Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
930 Plant Operations Branch<br />
931 Administrative Unit<br />
HP21 Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations I 1 1 1 162,139.90 1 175,446.96<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 57,952.96 1 63,359.92<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 2 2 2 220,092.86 2 238,806.88<br />
932 Treatment Operations Unit<br />
HP20 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations III - 1 1 133,688.62 1 154,357.32<br />
HP19 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations II 1 - - - - -<br />
HP18 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations I 1 1 1 119,332.98 2 235,363.70<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 1 1 1 103,085.84 - -<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 1 1 1 89,558.82 1 92,693.38<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 2 2 2 125,252.92 2 129,636.00<br />
HP16 Treatment Plant Operator III 4 4 4 413,860.46 5 534,286.22<br />
HP16 Treatment Plant Operator III #4 2 2 2 215,215.00 1 111,373.86<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II 3 4 4 323,057.54 5 411,695.70<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II (AC) - 1 1 66,656.72 - -<br />
HP14 Treatment Plant Operator II #4 6 5 5 442,181.48 4 370,730.36<br />
HP12 Treatment Plant Operator I 5 6 6 370,568.12 6 386,917.70<br />
HP12 Treatment Plant Operator I #4 1 - - - 1 74,871.42<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 1 1 1 68,224.00 1 71,676.80<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 20 20 20 1,299,584.00 20 1,344,928.00<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 8 8 8 494,873.60 8 492,814.40<br />
NR8652 Maintenance Laborer, Class B (AC) 1 1 1 43,139.20 1 44,657.60<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 47,440.38 1 49,100.74<br />
TOTAL Treatment Operations Unit 58 59 59 4,355,719.68 59 4,505,103.20<br />
934 Mechanical Operations Unit<br />
HP18 Chief Operating Engineer II 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
322<br />
322
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: Stickney Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP17 Chief Operating Engineer I 2 2 2 210,854.02 2 227,928.74<br />
HP16 Assistant Chief Operating Engineer 4 5 5 498,514.12 5 525,124.08<br />
HP16 Assistant Chief Operating Engineer #4 2 1 1 107,607.50 1 111,373.86<br />
NR6832 Operating Engineer II 35 35 35 2,890,888.00 35 2,992,080.00<br />
NR6831 Operating Engineer I 30 30 30 2,392,416.00 30 2,476,032.00<br />
NR6831 Operating Engineer I (AC) 4 4 4 318,988.80 4 330,137.60<br />
NR6810 Fireman-Oiler 12 12 12 815,193.60 12 843,648.00<br />
NR6810 Fireman-Oiler (AC) 1 1 1 67,932.80 - -<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 21 21 21 1,364,563.20 21 1,412,174.40<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift #2 (Maintenance Laborer, Class A) 1 - - - - -<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift (AC) 5 5 5 324,896.00 5 336,232.00<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 3 4 4 247,436.80 4 256,089.60<br />
TOTAL Mechanical Operations Unit 121 121 121 9,368,594.82 120 9,644,649.82<br />
TOTAL Plant Operations Branch 181 182 182 13,944,407.36 181 14,388,559.90<br />
940 General Plant Services Section<br />
941 Administrative Unit<br />
HP20 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations III - - - - 1 143,915.72<br />
HP19 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations II 1 1 1 133,688.62 - -<br />
HP18 Assistant Engineer of Treatment Plant Operations I (AC) 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
HP09 Courier 1 1 1 44,180.76 1 45,726.98<br />
TOTAL Administrative Unit 3 3 3 307,173.36 3 323,472.24<br />
942 Stickney Service Area Sewer Maintenance Unit<br />
(* Number of positions budgeted and funded by the Stormwater Management Fund appear below position count)<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 1 1 1 107,768.44 1 116,388.22<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 1 1 1 93,766.40 1 97,048.12<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 1 1 1 78,749.06 1 81,505.32<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 1 1 1 88,154.56 1 91,239.98<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 1 1 1 61,217.26 1 63,359.92<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III 1 1 1 48,076.08 1 43,977.18<br />
323<br />
323
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: Stickney Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 3 3 3 204,672.00 3 215,030.40<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 7 7 7 454,854.40 7 470,724.80<br />
(*4) (*4) (*4) (*4)<br />
PR6473 Truck Driver 3 3 3 197,184.00 3 197,184.00<br />
(*1) (*1) (*1) (*1)<br />
TOTAL Stickney Service Area Sewer Maintenance Unit 19 19 19 1,334,442.20 19 1,376,457.94<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*6) (*6) (*6) (*6)<br />
943 Buildings and Grounds Unit<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 1 1 1 112,452.34 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 1 1 1 81,142.36 1 83,982.34<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 1 1 1 78,749.06 1 81,505.32<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 1 1 1 54,687.88 1 49,845.64<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III - 1 1 42,489.98 1 46,867.86<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III #4 1 - - - - -<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 2 3 3 204,672.00 3 215,030.40<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman (AC) 1 - - - - -<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 9 9 9 556,732.80 9 576,201.60<br />
NR8652 Maintenance Laborer, Class B 4 11 11 517,712.00 11 535,912.00<br />
NR8652 Maintenance Laborer, Class B (AC) 7 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Buildings and Grounds Unit 28 28 28 1,648,638.42 28 1,710,580.04<br />
945 Railroad Unit<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 1 1 1 78,749.06 1 85,675.98<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 1 1 1 68,224.00 1 71,676.80<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 5 5 5 321,776.00 5 336,232.00<br />
TOTAL Railroad Unit 7 7 7 468,749.06 7 493,584.78<br />
TOTAL General Plant Services Section 57 57 57 3,759,003.04 57 3,904,095.00<br />
950 Lawndale Solids Management Area Section<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer (AC) 2 - - - - -<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 2 - - - - -<br />
324<br />
324
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Maintenance and Operations<br />
Division: Stickney Service Area 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer (AC) 1 - - - - -<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer #2 (Engineering Technician V) 1 - - - - -<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer (AC) 1 - - - - -<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 2 - - - - -<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 1 - - - - -<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 2 - - - - -<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 2 - - - - -<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III 1 - - - - -<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III (AC) 1 - - - - -<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III #4 1 - - - - -<br />
NR8652 Maintenance Laborer, Class B 1 - - - - -<br />
HP11 Principal Clerk Stenographer #2 (Principal Office Support Specialist) 1 - - - - -<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Lawndale Solids Management Area Section 23 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Maintenance and Operations Stickney Service Area 481 461 461 36,207,339.74 464 37,931,171.46<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Fund Positions (*6) (*6) (*6) (*6)<br />
Note: Six (6) positions budgeted in Section 942 are funded by the Stormwater Management Fund<br />
while the operations remain in the Maintenance and Operations Department.<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
325<br />
325
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
NOTE PAGE<br />
326<br />
326
BOARD OF<br />
COMMISSIONERS<br />
CIVIL SERVICE<br />
BOARD<br />
TREASURY<br />
EXECUTIVE<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
GENERAL<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
MONITORING &<br />
RESEARCH<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
LAW<br />
MAINTENANCE<br />
& OPERATIONS<br />
PROCUREMENT & MATERIALS<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
INFORMATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
FINANCE<br />
ENGINEERING<br />
ENGINEERING
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ENGINEERING – CORPORATE FUND<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Increase<br />
$17,566,400<br />
$16,026,500<br />
$1,539,900<br />
Stormwater Infiltration Reduction<br />
$166,888 1.0%<br />
Public Service &<br />
Interagency Relations<br />
$810,239 4.6%<br />
Maintenance Projects<br />
Related to the Capital<br />
Improvements Program<br />
$14,167,300 80.6%<br />
Sewer Permit Review<br />
$2,421,973 13.8%<br />
$50 $22<br />
$40 $20<br />
$30 $18<br />
$20 $16<br />
$14<br />
$12<br />
$10<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
Millions<br />
Local Assistance Loan Program<br />
transferred to Fund Center 70000<br />
Discontinuation of<br />
interfund charges<br />
and fewer<br />
maintenance<br />
projects<br />
Positions<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
$8<br />
15<br />
$6<br />
$4<br />
10<br />
$2<br />
$0<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
5<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
327<br />
327
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ENGINEERING CORPORATE FUND<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The programs of the Engineering Department are described in three sections of the budget. The Local Sewer Systems Section<br />
of the Engineering Department is financed by the Corporate Fund, which is described below. The Engineering Capital <strong>Budget</strong><br />
is described in Section V, and the Stormwater Management budget is described in Section VI.<br />
The Engineering Department is responsible for planning, developing, and implementing a Capital Improvement Program that<br />
meets the District's statutory responsibilities, is compliant with applicable State and Federal regulations and requirements, is<br />
responsive to the needs of its residents as directed through the policies put forth by its Board of Commissioners in the areas of<br />
Sewage Treatment, Pollution Control, and Stormwater Management. Secondarily, it provides requested and required<br />
engineering assistance to other Departments within the District in support of their related mission.<br />
The 2009 appropriation request for Engineering – Corporate Fund is $17,566,400, an increase of $1,539,900 or 9.6 percent<br />
from 2008. This increase is due to ongoing maintenance projects related to the Capital Improvement Program. The staffing<br />
level of 34 remains unchanged from 2008.<br />
The Corporate Fund supports the work of the Local Sewers Permits Section, whose responsibility is enforcement of the Sewer<br />
Permit Ordinance (Ordinance) and the Sewer Rehabilitation Program. The Ordinance regulates the construction of sewer<br />
systems that are tributary to the District’s interceptor sewer system. By issuing sewer permits, the District maintains a uniform<br />
standard for construction of sewer systems within its boundaries and a permanent record of that construction. The Ordinance<br />
also requires stormwater detention for developments greater than a specified acreage in separate sewered areas. This<br />
requirement reduces the risk of additional flooding from local streams, which may result from new development during periods<br />
of heavy rain. The Engineering Department recovers the cost of the Ordinance through permit fees. In 2009, we anticipate $1.8<br />
million in sewer permit fees from 525 permits. The District’s sanitary sewer rehabilitation program applies to 125<br />
communities, 118 communities have been brought into compliance over the past 20 years. We will also continue our<br />
aggressive approach towards getting the balance of the seven remaining communities to complete their sewer rehabilitation<br />
programs in an effort to reduce infiltration and inflow into their sanitary sewer systems.<br />
SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS IN THE 2009 BUDGET<br />
The Corporate Fund budget is also used for repair and maintenance projects that are not eligible for capital improvement funds.<br />
There are five projects scheduled for award in 2009, and five under construction that will preserve the value of the District's<br />
facilities. The awards schedule includes Project 06-841-1S, Collateral Channel Contaminated Sediment Remediation<br />
Demonstration Project, SSA. A one-acre area will be partitioned at the north end of the Collateral Channel through sheet piling<br />
and the contaminated sediments will be treated by “active capping,” a process to chemically stabilize the active contaminants.<br />
The treatment area will be covered with a geo-textile and an impermeable membrane to isolate the sediments. Clean fill will be<br />
placed above the membrane, topped off with wetland substrate soils and wetland vegetation. The final soil surface will be two<br />
feet below the normal water level to allow for proper wetland water depth and receive overflows from the nearby outfall. The<br />
sheet pile partition will be notched to allow excess flow to discharge to the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal (CSSC). A pump<br />
facility and force main will be included to bring CSSC water to the wetland during dry weather periods.<br />
ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING 2008 INCLUDE:<br />
• Award of construction contracts 04-299-2P, Aeration Batteries A, B, C, E, & E2 Improvements, CWRP and 06-156-3P,<br />
Drain Valves at Scum Concentration & Post Building and Support Structures at Grit Tanks Replacement, SWRP;<br />
• Substantial completion of construction Project 05-831-1D, Permanent Abandonment of Pump Stations 13A & 18E Various<br />
Building Demolitions, SSA.<br />
LOCAL SEWERS PERMITS SECTION<br />
PERMIT ADMINISTRATION<br />
The Local Sewers Permits Section administers the Sewer Permit Ordinance and the Manual of Procedures for Administration<br />
of the Sewer Permit Ordinance. The Sewer Permit Ordinance establishes requirements for issuance of sewer permits and<br />
regulates the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of local public and private sewer connections for residential,<br />
commercial, institutional, governmental, and industrial developments, public sewerage systems, and treatment facilities, which<br />
discharge directly or indirectly into District interceptor sewers and TARP facilities or waters within the boundaries of the<br />
District. The Ordinances require special attention to construction in floodplains, and also mandate stormwater runoff mitigation<br />
in separate sewered areas so that the rate of runoff from new developments and redevelopment exceeding certain acreage limits<br />
does not exceed the rate of runoff from the sites in their natural or pre-development state. As a result of Ordinance<br />
enforcement, up to the end of 2007 approximately 7.15 billion gallons of local stormwater detention capacity has been<br />
approved since the detention ordinance provisions were enacted in 1972.<br />
328<br />
328
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
The Manual of Procedures for the Administration of the Sewer Permit Ordinance is an ordinance providing minimum engineering<br />
standards for design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the above facilities. Sewer permit application construction plans<br />
submitted by government or private sector applicants must demonstrate compliance with District ordinances, policies, and sound<br />
engineering practice before a sewer construction and operation permit can be issued.<br />
It is estimated that 525 standard and 75 Notification and Request for Inspection (NRI) sewer construction permits will be<br />
issued in 2009. The NRI permits are used for reconstruction or replacement of existing sewers, including appurtenances, using<br />
the same alignment, or for new construction of a grease trap, triple basin, inspection manhole, or mud basin with less than 25<br />
linear feet of new sewer service construction<br />
in conjunction with an existing building<br />
alteration, and/or change in ownership or<br />
use.<br />
The District is authorized to recover 100<br />
percent of the sewer permit processing costs.<br />
The permit fee structure is evaluated<br />
annually to ensure cost recovery. Estimated<br />
revenue from these fees in 2008 is $1.7<br />
million, based on the current fee structure.<br />
The number of permits issued is to a large<br />
extent dependent on local economic<br />
development. In 2009, it is estimated that<br />
525 permits will be issued, generating<br />
revenue of $1.8 million. It is estimated that<br />
the year 2009 reflects a moderate economic<br />
climate for development and redevelopment<br />
Notification &<br />
Request for<br />
Inspection Permit<br />
Standard Permits<br />
Inspections<br />
75<br />
80<br />
69<br />
525<br />
412<br />
556<br />
Permit Activity<br />
2009 Projected<br />
2008 Estimated<br />
2005-2007 Actual Average<br />
10,000<br />
10,000<br />
9,600<br />
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000<br />
occurring within the District’s service area. However, this revenue source will be closely monitored and possibly revised based<br />
on economic conditions.<br />
The number of sewer permits issued has averaged 556 for the last three years (2005-542; 2006-563; 2007-564). While the<br />
District’s service area is almost fully developed, many of the sewer permits involve the development of marginal, low-lying<br />
lands and redevelopment of older properties. Such permits are normally more complex to analyze and review due to<br />
assessment of the development’s impact on stormwater detention requirements.<br />
SEWER REHABILITATION PROGRAMS<br />
The Local Sewers Permits Section also administers the District’s sanitary sewer rehabilitation program applying to the 125<br />
communities with separate sanitary sewer systems within the District’s service area. The purpose of this program is to remove<br />
excess groundwater infiltration and stormwater inflow (I/I) from the sanitary sewer systems in order to prevent water pollution<br />
and basement sewage backups and other adverse sewer surcharging that can create health hazards and financial losses.<br />
At the onset of the program in the early<br />
1970’s, the District’s sewer rehabilitation<br />
program allowed an average wet weather<br />
flow of 100 gallons per capita per day<br />
(gpcpd) to be discharged to the District’s<br />
sewer system. This limit was subsequently<br />
determined to be unrealistic, and was<br />
amended to 150 gpcpd.<br />
An alternate compliance option, the<br />
Infiltration/Inflow Corrective Action<br />
Program (ICAP) has been included in the<br />
sewer rehabilitation program since 1986. The<br />
ICAP is a comprehensive program of local<br />
sewer system rehabilitation which eliminates<br />
excessive infiltration and inflow of<br />
stormwater based on federal guidelines for<br />
Violations<br />
Processed<br />
Sewer Permit Violation Processing<br />
cost effectiveness. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency<br />
(IEPA) demand strict enforcement of the sewer rehabilitation program in order to comply with requirements of the Clean <strong>Water</strong><br />
Act. The purpose of this enforcement is to reduce the burden of treating stormwater and excess groundwater infiltration and<br />
eliminate public health hazards due to sewer surcharging and basement flooding. The estimated wet weather flow prior to<br />
rehabilitation was 760 gpcpd. It is currently estimated at 444 gpcpd.<br />
30<br />
50<br />
50<br />
0 20 40 60<br />
2009 Projected<br />
2008 Estimated<br />
2005-2007 Actual Average<br />
329<br />
329
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ENGINEERING CORPORATE FUND<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
It is estimated that infiltration and inflow account for approximately 120 of the over 500 billion gallons of wastewater treated at<br />
District facilities annually. When the few remaining agencies complete their sanitary sewer rehabilitation there will be a<br />
reduction of approximately 12 billion gallons of wastewater treated annually in addition to the flows eliminated by agencies<br />
that have completed their rehabilitation program. Based on current costs for collection and treatment of wastewater, this<br />
represents a waste of District and taxpayer dollars in the area of $20 to $25 million annually. In addition, infiltration and inflow<br />
requires the District to make capital expenditures to construct and expand treatment plants with adequate capacity to process<br />
these unnecessary flows. Repair and rehabilitation of local sewer systems dramatically decreases these costly and unnecessary<br />
flows and saves taxpayers the burden of paying for treating this clean water.<br />
Upon completion of this program, it is expected that the wet weather flow will be reduced by approximately fifty percent. This<br />
will bring the MWRD and local agencies in compliance with state and federal guidelines, but will not totally eliminate<br />
basement flooding and sewer surcharging. As of December 31, 2008, a total of 118 cities and villages have completed their<br />
initial sewer rehabilitation programs and have<br />
embarked on long term maintenance programs to<br />
Sewer Rehabilitation<br />
keep their sewer systems in proper operating<br />
conditions. To date, seven communities have not<br />
yet satisfactorily completed their I/I removal<br />
programs.<br />
118<br />
It is estimated that the enforcement of the<br />
Rehabilitation Programs will entail four show<br />
cause hearings and three court hearings in 2009,<br />
to resolve the issues arising between the District<br />
and the communities. It is estimated that the<br />
administration of the program will also involve<br />
evaluation of three supplemental Sewer System<br />
Evaluation Survey reports, three flow monitoring<br />
reports, approximately 30 field inspections and<br />
380 pieces of correspondence in 2009. Starting<br />
in 2005, the District stepped up enforcement of<br />
the communities’ approved Long-term Operation<br />
and Maintenance Programs with a view to<br />
maintain their sanitary sewer systems and<br />
minimize entry of I/I into the sewer system.<br />
COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE<br />
The Local Sewers Permits Section responds to questions and requests from the public and local communities regarding District<br />
ordinances. In general, inquiries relative to the District Sewer Permit Ordinance include such diverse topics as permit<br />
requirements, stormwater detention, floodplains, special construction problems, preliminary engineering review, engineering<br />
standards, availability of District facilities, proposed District projects, review of proposed local ordinances and interpretation of<br />
District ordinances. Approximately 8,000 telephone, 700 written, and numerous internal inquiries will be received and<br />
addressed in 2009.<br />
Approximately 550 field investigations will be<br />
undertaken to resolve sewerage and drainage<br />
questions and complaints. The complaints arise<br />
from sewage back-up and surcharges, flooding and<br />
other unsanitary or unsafe conditions detrimental to<br />
the health and welfare of the public. As a result of<br />
investigating these matters and contacts made with<br />
local officials, the District has been instrumental in<br />
bringing about a satisfactory solution to the<br />
majority of the complaints. The Section<br />
coordinates activities with other governmental<br />
agencies to resolve multi-jurisdictional problems.<br />
The Section also evaluates new proposed sewer<br />
construction procedures and products.<br />
Local Sewer<br />
Systems in<br />
Compliance<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Correspondence &<br />
Reports Processed<br />
Citizen Complaints<br />
Field<br />
Investigations<br />
Written Requests<br />
Telephone<br />
Requests<br />
118<br />
117<br />
2009 Projected<br />
2008 Estimated<br />
2005-2007 Actual Average<br />
238<br />
380<br />
380<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400<br />
100<br />
100<br />
550<br />
550<br />
700<br />
700<br />
Public Services<br />
2009 Projected<br />
2008 Estimated<br />
8,000<br />
8,000<br />
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000<br />
330<br />
330
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Corporate Fund Program<br />
Awards in 2009<br />
# Project Name<br />
Project<br />
Number<br />
Est.<br />
Construction<br />
Cost<br />
MWRD<br />
2009<br />
Appropriation<br />
Duration<br />
(days)<br />
Est.<br />
Award<br />
Date<br />
1 ∴ Diffuser Plate Replacement - Batteries C&D, SWRP 06-157-3P $4,000 $1,700 730 Mar-09<br />
2 ** Westdale Gardens Pumping Station & Force Main, Northwest 8A 07-162-2S 629 407 400 Apr-09<br />
Extension A, SSA<br />
3 ** Touhy Avenue Bridge Rehabilitation and Repair of other Bridges 05-834-2D 500 349 370 Apr-09<br />
on the North Shore Channel, NSA<br />
4 ∴ Blower Nos. 9 & 10 and Air Main Installation, CWRP 06-218-3M 925 294 930 Apr-09<br />
5 Collateral Channel Contaminated Sediment Remediation<br />
Demonstration Project, SSA<br />
06-841-1S 5,300 186 600 Dec-09<br />
Total 2009 Awards $11,354 $2,936<br />
Projects Under Development<br />
#<br />
# Project Name<br />
Project<br />
Number<br />
Est. Construction<br />
Cost<br />
Cumulative<br />
Constr.<br />
Cost<br />
Duration<br />
(days)<br />
Est.<br />
Award<br />
Date<br />
6 ∴ Stop Logs and Diversion Pumps at Wilmette Pumping Station and 06-023-3P $1,300 $12,654 730 Mar-10<br />
Evanston Pumping Station Rehabilitation, NSA<br />
7 ∴ Data Center, North Side WRP 08-035-3V 500 13,154 365 Apr-10<br />
8 ** Lockport Power House Interior North Wall Repairs, SSA 08-862-2D 130 13,284 360 May-10<br />
9 ∴ Digester Facility Improvements, HPWRP 08-530-3P 400 13,684 365 Aug-10<br />
10 ** HVAC Improvements at 95th, 122nd, & 125th Street Pumping<br />
Stations, CSA<br />
06-213-2M 250 13,934 360 Sep-10<br />
Total Future Awards $2,580<br />
Cumulative 2009 and Future Awards $13,934 $13,934<br />
∴ This project is funded by the Capital Improvements Bond Fund and the Corporate Fund.<br />
The related Capital Improvement Bond Fund portion is detailed in the Capital Funds section.<br />
** These projects are funded by the Construction and Corporate Funds.<br />
The related Construction Fund portion is detailed in the Capital Fund's section.<br />
Note: All cost figures are in thousands of dollars; inflation factor is 0%.<br />
331<br />
331
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Corporate Fund Program Project Impacts<br />
Justification<br />
Impact<br />
# Project Name<br />
Awards in 2009<br />
Project<br />
Number<br />
1 ∴ Diffuser Plate Replacement - Batteries C&D, SWRP 06-157-3P x = = =<br />
2 ∗∗ Westdale Gardens Pumping Station & Force Main, 07-162-2S x - - -<br />
Northwest 8A Extension A, SSA<br />
3 ∗∗ Touhy Avenue Bridge Rehabilitation and Repair of 05-834-2D x = = =<br />
other Bridges on the North Shore Channel, NSA<br />
4 ∴ Blower Nos. 9 & 10 and Air Main Installation, CWRP 06-218-3M x x = + =<br />
5 Collateral Channel Contaminated Sediment<br />
Remediation Demonstration Project, SSA<br />
06-841-1S = - =<br />
Capacity Needs<br />
Useful Life<br />
Economic Benefit<br />
Safety/Regulatory<br />
Manpower<br />
Energy<br />
Chemical<br />
Projects Under Development<br />
6 ∴ Stop Logs and Diversion Pumps at Wilmette Pumping 06-023-3P x = = =<br />
Station and Evanston Pumping Station Rehabilitation,<br />
NSA<br />
7 ∴ Data Center, North Side WRP 08-035-3V x = -- =<br />
8 ∗∗ Lockport Power House Interior North Wall Repairs, 08-862-2D x x = = =<br />
SSA<br />
9 ∴ Digester Facility Improvements, HPWRP 08-530-3P x = = =<br />
10 ∗∗ HVAC Improvements at 95th, 122nd, & 125th Street<br />
Pumping Stations, CSA<br />
06-213-2M x = = =<br />
∴ These projects are funded by the Capital Improvements Bond Fund and the Corporate Fund.<br />
The related Capital Improvements Bond portion is detailed in the Capital Fund's section.<br />
** These projects are funded by the Construction and Corporate Funds.<br />
The related Construction Fund portion is detailed in the Capital Fund's section.<br />
LEGEND<br />
Under "Justification", the marked columns note the categories of benefits expected from each project.<br />
+ or -<br />
+ or -<br />
+ or -<br />
=<br />
Manpower<br />
Labor savings (+) or increases (-) expected to result in ++ or -- Labor impact significant enough to ultimately result in reduction (++)<br />
redirecting existing manpower away from or toward facility<br />
or increase (--) in personnel. See additional cost details contained<br />
or process to other tasks with no net change in total position costs.<br />
in "Description of Capital Projects" section.<br />
Energy<br />
Minor energy savings (+) or costs (-) having a negligible ++ or -- Major energy savings (++) or costs (--) expected to result in significant<br />
impact on the District's overall energy budget.<br />
revisions to a facility's energy budget. See additional cost details<br />
in "Description of Capital Projects" section.<br />
Chemical<br />
Chemical savings (+) or costs (-) having a negligible ++ or -- Major chemical savings (++) or costs (--) expected to result in<br />
impact on the District's overall chemical costs.<br />
significant revisions to the budgeted chemical expenditures for the<br />
associated process. See additional cost details contained in<br />
No budgetary impact expected.<br />
"Description of Capital Projects" section.<br />
332<br />
332
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
50000 ENGINEERING - CORPORATE FUND OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. Protect public health by administering the Sewer Permit Ordinance and Manual of Procedures to regulate<br />
local sewer connections to local treatment plants and discharges to District waters, and mitigation of runoff from<br />
new developments/redevelopments. $2,421,973 13.8%<br />
2. Reduce treatment costs by eliminating excessive infiltration and inflow of stormwater into sanitary sewers<br />
through a comprehensive rehabilitation program of the local sewer system. $166,888 1.0%<br />
3. Provide information to the public and local communities regarding District Ordinances; coordinate<br />
solutions to regional problems with other governmental agencies; review and evaluate new cost-effective<br />
sewer construction procedures and products. $810,239 4.6%<br />
4. Award of five maintenance projects: Collateral Channel Contaminated Sediment Remediation Demonstration Project,<br />
SSA; Diffuser Plate Replacement - Batteries C&D, SWRP; Blower Nos 9 & 10 and Air Main Installation CWRP;<br />
Westdale Gardens Pumping Station & Force Main, Northwest 8A Extension A, SSA; Touhy Avenue Bridge<br />
Rehabilitation and Repair of other Bridges on the North Shore Channel, NSA and costs related to<br />
maintenance projects under construction. $14,167,300 80.6%<br />
Total $17,566,400 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. Reduction of avoidable inflow and infiltration by promoting repair and rehabilitation<br />
of the 125 local sanitary sewer systems.<br />
Proposed number of agencies that have completed their initial rehabilitation 117 118 118<br />
Percentage complete 93% 94% 94%<br />
The agencies that have not completed their initial rehabilitation have systems that require extensive rehabilitation. Funding<br />
for these repairs are not readily available. Efforts to bring these agencies into compliance have resulted in consent decrees and<br />
court orders against the few agencies that are still not in compliance. The District will continue on this course of enforcement<br />
until the remaining agencies meet their objectives.<br />
333<br />
333
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
50000 ENGINEERING - CORPORATE FUND OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
1000 Collection $2,733,682 2009 34 $5,220,800 $171,800 3.4<br />
2008 34 $5,049,000<br />
1530 Local Sewer Permit Activity $1,918,170 2009 25 $2,421,973 $84,952 3.6<br />
2008 25 $2,337,021<br />
1560 Local Sewer - Public Service Coordination $659,176 2009 7 $810,239 $139,136 20.7 a)<br />
2008 7 $671,103<br />
1571 Local Sewer Rehabilitation Ordinance Enforcement $133,680 2009 2 $166,888 ($1,488) (0.9)<br />
Activity 2008 2 $168,376<br />
1800 Collection Construction $22,656 2009 0 $1,821,700 ($50,800) (2.7)<br />
2008 0 $1,872,500<br />
2000 Treatment $639,737 2009 0 $6,976,600 $1,137,600 19.5<br />
2008 0 $5,839,000<br />
2300 Tertiary Treatment (Physical/Chemical) $0 2009 0 $0 ($350,000) (100.0) b)<br />
2008 0 $350,000<br />
2400 Wetlands $0 2009 0 $2,399,000 ($251,000) (9.5) c)<br />
2008 0 $2,650,000<br />
2700 Treatment Design $366 2009 0 $15,000 ($500) (3.2)<br />
2008 0 $15,500<br />
2800 Treatment Construction $639,371 2009 0 $4,373,600 $1,850,100 73.3 d)<br />
2008 0 $2,523,500<br />
2929 Buildings- General, Electrical/Mechanical $0 2009 0 $189,000 ($111,000) (37.0) e)<br />
2008 0 $300,000<br />
3000 Solids Processing $10,435 2009 0 $193,000 ($707,000) (78.6)<br />
2008 0 $900,000<br />
3700 Solids Processing Design $2,633 2009 0 $0 $0 0.0<br />
2008 0 $0<br />
3800 Solids Processing Construction $7,802 2009 0 $193,000 ($707,000) (78.6) f)<br />
2008 0 $900,000<br />
a) Increase due to estimated retirement, severance and termination payments for retiring employees.<br />
b) Decrease due to completion of projects 07-528-AP; 07-528-BP; 07-258-CP Ultraviolet Disinfection Study Pilot Study.<br />
c) Decrease due to third quarter award of project 06-841-2S Collateral Channel Contaminated Sediment Remediation Demonstration Project, SSA.<br />
d) Increase due to award of 06-157-3P Diffuser Plate Replacement and the provision for the Warranty and Service agreement for project<br />
91-177-AE Plant Process Computer - A , SWRP.<br />
e) Decrease due to anticipated completion of project 07-854-3M Emergency Elevator Improvements KWRP, HPWRP.<br />
f) Decrease due to the reduction in Structural Repair/Concrete Rehabilitation and contingency requirements.<br />
334<br />
334
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
50000 ENGINEERING - CORPORATE FUND OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
4000 Flood and Pollution Control $941,022 2009 0 $1,666,000 $86,900 5.5<br />
2008 0 $1,579,100<br />
4216 Bridge and Road Maintenance $4,004 2009 0 $401,000 $336,500 521.7 g)<br />
2008 0 $64,500<br />
4219 Maintenance of <strong>Water</strong>ways-All Other (General) $467,394 2009 0 $50,000 ($127,000) (71.8) h)<br />
2008 0 $177,000<br />
4700 Flood and Pollution Control Design $468,274 2009 0 $1,215,000 ($122,600) (9.2) i)<br />
2008 0 $1,337,600<br />
4800 Flood and Pollution Control Construction $1,350 2009 0 $0 $0 0.0<br />
2008 0 $0<br />
5000 Solids Disposal $0 2009 0 $3,285,000 $1,600,600 95.0<br />
2008 0 $1,684,400<br />
5800 Solids Disposal Construction $0 2009 0 $3,285,000 $1,600,600 95.0 j)<br />
2008 0 $1,684,400<br />
7000 General Support $0 2009 0 $225,000 ($750,000) (76.9) k)<br />
2008 0 $975,000<br />
Totals $4,324,876 2009 34 $17,566,400 $1,539,900 9.6%<br />
2008 34 $16,026,500<br />
g) Increase due to the planned award of project 05-834-2D Touhy Avenue bridge rehabilitation and repairs of other bridges on the North Shore<br />
Channel, NSA.<br />
h) Decrease due to the reduction of need for demolition of structures.<br />
i) Decrease due to anticipated completion of project 07-859-1C Economic and Environmental Assessment of <strong>Water</strong> Quality Chicago Area <strong>Water</strong>ways<br />
System.<br />
j) Increase due to project 01-198-AD Demolition of Sludge Disposal Building, Rehabilitation of Blower House and Course Screen building.<br />
k) Decrease due to the reduction of professional surveying requirements for 2009.<br />
335<br />
335
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
50000 ENGINEERING - CORPORATE FUND PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
1500 Local Sewer - Engineering Activity<br />
1530 Local Sewer Permit Activity<br />
1531 Review/Issuance of MWRD Sewer Permits Permits 564 560 525<br />
Cost $962,614 $1,290,122 $1,338,131<br />
Cost/Permit $1,706.76 $2,303.79 $2,548.82<br />
1533 Review of Other Permits Cost $134,960 $125,895 $127,741<br />
1535 Local Sewer Construction Surveillance/Enforcement Inspections 9,600 10,500 10,000<br />
Cost $682,506 $783,421 $810,998<br />
Cost/Inspection $71.09 $74.61 $81.10<br />
1537 Permit Revision Cost $138,090 $137,583 $145,103<br />
1560 Local Sewer - Public Service Coordination<br />
1561 Public Service Requests 8,650 8,700 8,700<br />
Cost $486,954 $489,603 $626,476 a)<br />
Cost/Request $56.30 $56.28 $72.01<br />
1563 Interagency Coordination Cost $172,222 $181,500 $183,763<br />
1571 Local Sewer Rehabilitation Ordinance Enforcement Activity Systems 214 380 380<br />
Cost $133,680 $168,376 $166,888<br />
Cost/System $624.67 $443.09 $439.18<br />
1119-7741 Other Programs Cost $1,613,850 $12,850,000 $14,167,300 b)<br />
Award of five maintenance projects: Collateral Channel Contaminated Sediment<br />
Remediation Demonstration Project, SSA; Diffuser Plate Replacement - Batteries C&D,<br />
SWRP; Blower Nos 9 & 10 and Air Main Installation CWRP; Westdale Gardens Pumping<br />
Station & Force Main, Northwest 8A Extension A, SSA; Touhy Avenue Bridge<br />
Rehabilitation and Repair of other Bridges on the North Shore Channel, NSA and costs<br />
related to maintenance projects under construction.<br />
Total $4,324,876 $16,026,500 $17,566,400<br />
a) Increase due to estimated retirement, severance and termination payments for retiring employees.<br />
b) Increase due to planned award of projects and carryover of funding for projects awarded prior to 2009.<br />
336<br />
336
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
50000 Department Engineering<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 2,572,072 $ 2,893,600 $ 2,893,600 $ 2,893,600 $ 2,955,900 $ 2,955,900 $ 3,043,400<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 83,536 127,800 127,800 18,000 197,100 197,100 199,600<br />
601080 Salaries of Nonbudgeted Employees - 50,000 50,000 - 50,000 50,000 50,000<br />
601100 Tuition and Training Payments 16,938 12,600 12,600 11,000 12,700 12,700 12,700<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 45,112 1,314,500 1,164,500 627,000 541,000 541,000 541,000<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 90,000 90,000 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 26,000 25,300 35,300 35,000 25,300 25,300 25,300<br />
601410 Personal Service Expense for Preliminary<br />
Engineering Reports and Studies - 727,600 867,600 689,000 588,000 588,000 588,000<br />
601420 Personal Service Expense for Construction<br />
Drawings, Specifications, and Cost<br />
Estimates 418,274 560,000 560,000 392,000 577,000 577,000 577,000<br />
601430 Personal Service Expense for Aerial Surveys - 50,000 50,000 - 50,000 50,000 50,000<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,161,932 5,761,400 5,761,400 4,665,600 5,087,000 5,087,000 5,087,000<br />
612010 Travel 591 5,000 5,000 1,400 6,100 6,100 6,100<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 5,343 14,400 14,400 4,600 15,900 15,900 15,900<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 1,884 2,000 2,000 100 2,000 2,000 2,000<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services 413 400 600 500 500 500 500<br />
612090 Reprographic Services - 24,500 24,500 - 24,500 24,500 24,500<br />
612210 Communication Services - 100 100 - 100 100 100<br />
612240 Testing and Inspection Services 11,755 65,300 65,300 25,000 10,000 10,000 10,000<br />
612330 Rental Charges - 400 400 400 400 400 400<br />
612380 Soil and Rock Mechanics Investigation 5,935 80,000 80,000 5,500 40,000 40,000 40,000<br />
612410 Governmental Service Charges 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 50,000 50,000 50,000<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 6,335 25,000 25,000 13,000 25,000 25,000 25,000<br />
612600 Repairs to Collection Facilities - 1,332,500 1,332,500 63,000 882,200 882,200 882,200<br />
612620 Repairs to <strong>Water</strong>way Facilities 2,850 3,837,400 2,462,200 1,325,500 3,507,300 3,507,300 3,482,300<br />
612650 Repairs to Process Facilities 258,020 1,198,800 1,198,800 816,600 2,921,800 2,921,800 2,921,800<br />
612680 Repairs to Buildings 342,340 2,884,400 2,884,400 250,000 3,667,000 3,667,000 3,667,000<br />
337<br />
337
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
101 Fund Corporate LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
50000 Department Engineering<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
612840 Communications Equipment Maintenance<br />
(Includes Software) - 2,000 2,000 - 2,000 2,000 2,000<br />
612970 Repairs to Testing and Laboratory<br />
Equipment - 1,000 1,000 - 2,000 2,000 2,000<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. - 200 200 - 200 200 200<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 685,466 9,523,400 8,148,400 2,505,600 11,157,000 11,157,000 11,132,000<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 7,104 5,400 3,400 3,000 3,400 3,400 3,400<br />
623700 Wearing Apparel 2,396 6,500 8,500 8,200 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
623720 Books, Maps, and Charts 398 500 500 - 500 500 500<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 186 2,300 2,300 - 2,500 2,500 2,500<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 10,084 14,700 14,700 11,200 11,400 11,400 11,400<br />
634600 Equipment for Collection Facilities - 200,000 10,000 - 561,000 561,000 561,000<br />
634650 Equipment for Process Facilities - 350,000 540,000 132,000 700,000 700,000 700,000<br />
400 TOTAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT - 550,000 550,000 132,000 1,261,000 1,261,000 1,261,000<br />
656010 Land 467,394 177,000 177,000 72,000 50,000 50,000 50,000<br />
600 TOTAL LAND 467,394 177,000 177,000 72,000 50,000 50,000 50,000<br />
667340 Payments for Easements - - - - - - 25,000<br />
700 TOTAL FIXED AND OTHER CHARGES - - - - - - 25,000<br />
TOTAL ENGINEERING $ 4,324,876 $ 16,026,500 $ 14,651,500 $ 7,386,400 $ 17,566,400 $ 17,566,400 $ 17,566,400<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
TOTAL CORPORATE FUND $ 331,696,005 $ 397,186,600 $ 397,174,100 $ 355,462,900 $ 395,002,600 $ 395,002,600 $ 395,002,600<br />
338<br />
338
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Corporate POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
510 Infrastructure Management Division<br />
516 Local Sewers Permits Section<br />
HP20 Supervising Civil Engineer 1 1 1 158,263.56 1 168,716.86<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer 3 3 3 376,613.64 3 401,488.62<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 7 7 7 709,674.42 7 780,784.94<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 4 5 5 343,716.36 5 441,691.64<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 5 5 5 358,795.58 5 349,120.72<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 1 1 1 80,367.82 1 85,675.98<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #2 (Engineering Draftsman II) 1 1 1 90,315.94 1 96,281.38<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 3 3 3 266,218.94 3 288,844.14<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 1 1 1 62,604.36 1 70,117.58<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 2 2 2 140,688.60 2 153,654.80<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III 1 1 1 52,100.10 1 46,867.86<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 2 2 2 96,788.90 2 108,160.26<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 40,882.14 1 35,000.68<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist #4 1 1 1 41,532.40 1 44,275.66<br />
TOTAL Local Sewers Permits Section 33 34 34 2,818,562.76 34 3,070,681.12<br />
TOTAL Infrastructure Management Division 33 34 34 2,818,562.76 34 3,070,681.12<br />
TOTAL Engineering Corporate 33 34 34 2,818,562.76 34 3,070,681.12<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
339<br />
339
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
NOTE PAGE<br />
340<br />
340
SECTION V<br />
CAPITAL BUDGET<br />
The Capital <strong>Budget</strong> and program is the District's plan for the construction, rehabilitation, and modernization of Districtowned<br />
and operated infrastructure. It includes plans to protect Lake Michigan from pollution, to clean up approximately<br />
200 miles of rivers and streams within the District's jurisdiction to meet federal and state standards, and to reduce the level<br />
of flooding which has persistently plagued many municipalities within the District's jurisdiction.<br />
The Capital <strong>Budget</strong> includes the Capital Improvements Bond Fund and the Construction Fund. To understand the Capital<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>, it is necessary to visualize existing facilities as well as the program for the next year and the long-term plan.<br />
The type of funding for each fund corresponds to the estimated useful life of the project and statutory restrictions on bond<br />
sales. The Tax Cap Law imposes restrictions on the nonreferendum bonding authority of the District. There are exceptions<br />
in the Tax Cap Law to allow nonreferendum bonds to be sold to finance certain District projects. Bonds or long-term debt<br />
are only utilized to finance projects with useful lives beyond 20 years. Capital projects not eligible for bond financing, or<br />
with shorter useful lives, are funded on a "pay as you go" basis and financed primarily by property taxes. The Capital<br />
Improvements Bond Fund receives most of its resources from bond sales, state revolving fund loans, and governmental<br />
grants. It provides for major plant and sewer construction, flood control facilities, and land acquisition. The Construction<br />
Fund is financed primarily through a property tax levy and provides for much of the District's infrastructure rehabilitation<br />
and modernization.<br />
The narrative discussion of the District's 2009 Capital Improvements Program places the 2009 program within the context<br />
of our long-range plan. Information is provided on the levels of funding in 2009 and in the future. The graphs, charts,<br />
figures, and descriptions of the Engineering Department Construction Fund and Capital Improvements Bond Fund Program<br />
within this section aid the reader in understanding this component of the <strong>Budget</strong>. The impact on operating costs associated<br />
with capital projects scheduled for award in 2009 is presented in the capital program narrative.<br />
CAPITAL BUDGET<br />
Capital Improvements Functions, and <strong>Budget</strong>ed Positions, 2002-2010 (Graphs) ..... 341<br />
Organization Chart ..................................................................................................... 342<br />
Ten-Year Capital Improvements Program Summary, 2004-2013 .............................. 343<br />
Capital Program Objectives and Program Summary ................................................. 344<br />
Capital Program Narrative ......................................................................................... 347<br />
Construction Fund Project List and Operating Impacts ............................................. 369<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund Project List and Operating Impacts ..................... 371<br />
Tunnel and Reservoir Plan (TARP) Project Status Chart .......................................... 376<br />
Other Project Exhibits ............................................................................................... 377<br />
Line Item Analysis:<br />
Construction Fund .........................................................................................387<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund ................................................................ 390<br />
Construction Fund Position Analysis ......................................................................... 392<br />
Bond Fund Position Analysis .................................................................................... 396
BOARD OF<br />
COMMISSIONERS<br />
CIVIL SERVICE<br />
BOARD<br />
TREASURY<br />
EXECUTIVE<br />
DIRECTOR<br />
GENERAL<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
MONITORING &<br />
RESEARCH<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
LAW<br />
MAINTENANCE<br />
& OPERATIONS<br />
PROCUREMENT & MATERIALS<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
INFORMATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
FINANCE<br />
ENGINEERING<br />
ENGINEERING<br />
Bond/Construction
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ENGINEERING – BOND AND CONSTRUCTION<br />
2009<br />
2008<br />
Increase<br />
$968,450,600<br />
$775,510,200<br />
$192,940,400<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
Treatment Facilities<br />
$164,883,000 17.0%<br />
Collection Facilities<br />
$77,175,000 8.0%<br />
Project Support<br />
$181,581,700 18.8%<br />
Land & Right of Way<br />
$1,300,000 0.1%<br />
Flood & Pollution Control<br />
$332,495,000 34.3%<br />
Construction Fund Prior<br />
Year's Contracts<br />
$7,715,900 0.8%<br />
Solids Processing &<br />
Disposal Facilities<br />
$203,300,000 21.0%<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The program of the Engineering Department is described in three sections of the budget: the Capital <strong>Budget</strong> described below,<br />
the Corporate Fund Engineering <strong>Budget</strong> in Section IV, and the Stormwater Management Fund <strong>Budget</strong> in Section VI. A<br />
comprehensive Capital Program Narrative appears on the following pages. The Engineering Department utilizes the<br />
Construction and Capital Improvements Bond Funds for the District’s Capital Improvements Program. Capital Improvements<br />
are comprised of all new facilities and projects that preserve the useful life of District facilities or increase the capacity or<br />
efficiency of these facilities. The project support for the Engineering Department’s Capital Improvements Bond Fund and<br />
Construction Fund consists of:<br />
• Planning, design and construction of District infrastructure;<br />
• Liaison and coordination with USEPA, Illinois EPA and the<br />
Army Corps of Engineers;<br />
• Pursuing funding for capital projects.<br />
The 2009 capital program (Capital Improvements Bond and<br />
Construction Funds) totals $968,450,600, an increase of<br />
$192,940,400 or 24.9 percent more than 2008. A total of 104<br />
projects funded by the Bond or Construction Funds will be<br />
under planning, design, or construction in 2009.<br />
The staffing level of 236 is a net increase of fourteen positions<br />
from 2008. The increase is needed to support the additional<br />
workload associated with the implementation of the Master<br />
Plans recently completed for all of the District’s major treatment<br />
facilities. Since 2002, positions and personnel related items such<br />
as health care have been budgeted in both the Construction and<br />
Bond Funds to avoid the administrative tasks associated with<br />
interfund reimbursement transactions. The reallocation of<br />
positions is based on staff assignments to projects and the<br />
corresponding funding for those projects.<br />
900<br />
800<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
Engineering Department Staffing & Consultants<br />
628<br />
573<br />
635<br />
530<br />
469<br />
441<br />
372<br />
378<br />
334<br />
357 352<br />
260<br />
239 212<br />
125 120 120<br />
32 32 32 33 33 33 34 34 34<br />
221 236<br />
205 200 197 196 206 222 236<br />
100<br />
CAPITAL CORPORATE CONSULTANT<br />
0<br />
02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009 2010<br />
*<br />
*An additional eleven positions are funded by the Stormwater<br />
Management Fund (see page 404), while the operations remain in<br />
the Engineering Department.<br />
905<br />
341<br />
341
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ENGINEERING<br />
50000<br />
ENGINEERING<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
248 267 281<br />
505<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> and Administrative Section<br />
0 0 6<br />
501<br />
Executive Division<br />
3 3 3<br />
510<br />
Infrastructure Management Division<br />
77 83 76<br />
540<br />
Process Facilities Design Division<br />
88 93 101<br />
550<br />
Construction Division<br />
80 88 95<br />
511<br />
Administrative Section<br />
3 3 3<br />
541<br />
Administrative Section<br />
5 6 6<br />
551<br />
Administrative Section<br />
6 6 5<br />
515<br />
TARP and Project Support Section<br />
13 19 13<br />
542<br />
Plant Design Management Section<br />
9 9 10<br />
552<br />
Construction Support Services Section<br />
0 13 13<br />
516<br />
Local Sewers Permits Section<br />
(Corporate Fund)<br />
33 34 34<br />
544<br />
Process Design Section<br />
26 25 25<br />
553<br />
Construction South Area Section<br />
38 35 38<br />
517<br />
Collection Facilities Section<br />
17 16 15<br />
545<br />
Mechanical Design Section<br />
13 14 17<br />
554<br />
Construction North and Central Area<br />
Section<br />
36 34 39<br />
522<br />
Stormwater Management Section (1)<br />
(Stormwater Management Fund)<br />
11 11 11<br />
546<br />
Electrical Design Section<br />
15 15 17<br />
547<br />
Civil / Structural Design Section<br />
20 24 26<br />
(1) Additional Stormwater Management Fund positions are budgeted in Sections 072,<br />
634, 636, 637, 638, 639, 742, 795 and 942. See the Maintenance and Operations<br />
Department and General Administration Department organizational charts.<br />
342<br />
342
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2000 BUDGET<br />
10-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
2004 - 2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BOND FUND AND CONSTRUCTION FUND<br />
(CAPITAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST)<br />
TOTAL<br />
ACTUAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS ESTIMATED CASH DISBURSEMENTS DISBURSEMENTS<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008* 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2004 - 2013<br />
BY CATEGORY<br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
and Solids Management $24.16 $38.43 $43.98 $77.84 $29.33 $127.12 $274.58 $317.58 $333.90 $204.35 $1,471.27<br />
Replacement of Facilities 55.82 108.79 115.40 47.33 14.44 7.56 $349.34<br />
Collection Facilities 2.57 4.62 33.64 15.60 22.13 72.92 96.35 111.36 96.11 52.82 $508.12<br />
Stormwater Management 1.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 $41.00<br />
Tunnel and Reservoir Plan 69.40 53.37 40.69 35.78 22.32 64.36 115.81 88.28 62.79 40.93 $593.73<br />
TOTAL $96.13 $96.42 $118.31 $129.22 $129.60 $374.19 $612.14 $574.55 $517.24 $315.66 $2,963.46<br />
BY FUND<br />
Stormwater Management Fund $1.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $41.00<br />
Construction Fund $17.71 $11.24 $7.69 $2.04 $3.52 13.20 8.76 3.66 0.00 0.00 $67.82<br />
Bond Fund 78.42 85.18 110.62 127.18 126.08 359.99 593.38 560.89 507.24 305.66 $2,854.64<br />
TOTAL $96.13 $96.42 $118.31 $129.22 $129.60 $374.19 $612.14 $574.55 $517.24 $315.66 $2,963.46<br />
Notes:<br />
1. All project costs are in millions of dollars.<br />
2. Information regarding the distributon of funds between the subitems in the Bond and Construction funds can be found<br />
in the Five-Year Financial Forecast.<br />
* ESTIMATED CASH DISBURSEMENTS<br />
343<br />
343
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
50000 ENGINEERING - BOND AND CONSTRUCTION FUNDS OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. TREATMENT FACILITIES: Award 15 construction projects:<br />
Distributed Control System for Solids Processes at SWRP, MSPS, and other Remote Stations, SSA and 14 other<br />
projects that will reduce operation and maintenance costs or provide facility improvements. $164,883,000 17.0%<br />
2. COLLECTION FACILITIES: Award 8 construction projects: Salt Creek Intercepting Sewer 2 Rehabilitation<br />
and 7 other projects that will reduce operation costs or provide facility improvements. $77,175,000 8.0%<br />
3. SOLIDS PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES: Award 5 construction projects:<br />
Sludge Thickening Facilities SWRP and 4 others. $203,300,000 21.0%<br />
4. FLOOD AND POLLUTION CONTROL: Award 9 construction projects:<br />
Connecting Tunnels and Gates Thornton Composite Reservoir and 8 others. $332,495,000 34.3%<br />
5. CONSTRUCTION FUND PROJECT COST: For contracts awarded prior to 2009. $7,715,900 0.8%<br />
6. LAND AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION COSTS: Acquisition of land for the expansion of<br />
reservoir projects. Payments for land easements. $1,300,000 0.1%<br />
7. PROJECT SUPPORT: Administration, design, and construction inspection for current and future<br />
contracts; funding support; and construction services, such as materials, concrete, and soil testing. $181,581,700 18.8%<br />
Total $968,450,600 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. Awarding Contracts for the continued implementation of the District's Capital<br />
Improvements Program.<br />
Number of Projects proposed 25 28 37<br />
Number of Contracts awarded 4 13 37<br />
Plans available for award 4 13 37<br />
The projects proposed for each year are based upon the requirements dictated by the Capital Improvements Program. The number<br />
of actual projects awarded may not, on face value, quantify performance. There are several factors that could either increase or<br />
decrease the number of projects awarded. Some of these factors are project size, project complexity, unforeseen obstacles, etc.<br />
These numbers are provided only as a general indicator of performance.<br />
344<br />
344
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
50000 ENGINEERING - BOND AND CONSTRUCTION FUNDS OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
4700 Flood & Pollution Control Design $3,579,912 2009 8 $7,640,845 ($8,955,468) (54.0) a)<br />
2008 7 $16,596,313<br />
4800 Flood & Pollution Control Construction $51,633,139 2009 18 $351,070,889 $165,716,175 89.4 b)<br />
2008 19 $185,354,714<br />
1700 Collection Design $2,500,433 2009 12 $5,666,169 $2,629,798 86.6 c)<br />
2008 12 $3,036,371<br />
1800 Collection Construction $18,267,198 2009 23 $83,432,107 ($16,398,974) (16.4) d)<br />
2008 22 $99,831,081<br />
2400 Wetlands $0 2009 0 $30,900 ($1,898,280) (98.4) e)<br />
2008 0 $1,929,180<br />
2700 Treatment Design $12,204,439 2009 51 $30,304,967 ($27,762,284) (47.8) f)<br />
2008 47 $58,067,251<br />
2800 Treatment Construction $87,269,434 2009 51 $179,244,216 ($84,323,771) (32.0) g)<br />
2008 44 $263,567,987<br />
3700 Solids Processing Design $4,818,102 2009 25 $2,485,874 ($1,510,455) (37.8) h)<br />
2008 23 $3,996,329<br />
3800 Solids Processing Construction $4,933,835 2009 21 $214,433,924 $186,213,012 659.8 i)<br />
2008 20 $28,220,912<br />
5700 Solids Disposal Design $684,511 2009 8 $834,805 $65,642 8.5<br />
2008 8 $769,163<br />
5800 Solids Disposal Construction $195,223 2009 2 $89,610,140 ($12,815,421) (12.5) j)<br />
2008 2 $102,425,561<br />
7360 Real Estate Operations $251,607 2009 2 $324,358 $83,679 34.8 k)<br />
2008 3 $240,679<br />
a) Decrease due to reduction in required outside consultant work for final contract plans and specifications.<br />
b) Increase due to the planned awards in 2009 of project 04-202-4F Connecting Tunnels and Gates, Thornton Composite Reservoir, CSA.<br />
c) Increase for consultant costs associated with 08-866-3S, Inverted Siphon Reconstruction.<br />
d) Decrease due to the reduction in planned awards in 2009 for collection system construction projects.<br />
e) Decrease due to award of consultant contract 07-846-3S Treatment Wetlands at Lockport Powerhouse Marsh.<br />
f) Decrease due to reduction in required outside consultant work for final contract plans and specifications.<br />
g) Decrease due to the reduction in planned awards in 2009 for treatment construction projects.<br />
h) Decrease due to the reassignment of the consultant contract for Sludge Concentration Tanks Improvements at North Side WRP to<br />
functional area 2700.<br />
i) Increase due to the planned award of project 96-114-2P Sludge Thickening Facilities, Stickney WRP.<br />
j) Decrease due to reduction of planned awards in 2009 for solids disposal construction projects.<br />
k) Increase due to project 07-165-2C Utilization Study Main Office Building, Main Office Building Annex.<br />
345<br />
345
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
50000 ENGINEERING - BOND AND CONSTRUCTION FUNDS OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
7740 Land and Easements $36,109 2009 8 $2,431,641 $481,203 24.7 l)<br />
2008 9 $1,950,438<br />
7700 Grants, Permits, and Government Operations $10,770,255 2009 7 $527,956 ($8,216,665) (94.0) m)<br />
2008 6 $8,744,621<br />
7760 Environmental Planning $195,591 2009 0 $411,809 ($367,791) (47.2) n)<br />
2008 0 $779,600<br />
Totals $197,339,788 2009 236 $968,450,600 $192,940,400 24.9%<br />
2008 222 $775,510,200<br />
l) Increase due to a greater requirement for easements.<br />
m) Decrease due to the one-time equity transfer to the Reserve Claim Fund in 2008.<br />
n) Decrease due to expected completion of 06-022-2P Master Underground Process Piping Survey (MUPPS), North Side WRP.<br />
346<br />
346
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM<br />
The <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago protects Lake Michigan, the area’s main source of drinking<br />
water, from pollution. It has constructed the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, the North Shore Channel, and the Calumet-Sag<br />
Channel to divert drainage flows away from Lake Michigan.<br />
The District has constructed 554 miles of interceptor sewers to collect wastewater from 125 municipalities for conveyance to<br />
its Stickney, North Side, Calumet, Kirie, Egan, Hanover Park and Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants. The District operates and<br />
maintains these seven water reclamation plants to treat wastewater collected from a service area of 883.5 square miles. In<br />
addition, the District has constructed 109 miles of Tunnel and Reservoir Plan (TARP) tunnels to capture combined sewer<br />
overflows, which previously discharged into the waterways of the District. The District has participated in the construction of<br />
31 storm water reservoirs that provide 3.5 billion gallons of storage.<br />
The wastewater treated by the District’s facilities represents a population equivalent of approximately 10.1 million people, a<br />
domestic load from 5.0 million people, and a non-domestic load from business and industry equal to about 4.5 million people,<br />
and a combined-sewer overflow equivalent of 0.6 million people. The District’s water reclamation plants process an average of<br />
approximately 1.5 billion gallons of wastewater each day.<br />
Each of the District’s water reclamation plants (WRP) operates under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System<br />
(NPDES) permit issued by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. All of the District’s WRPs are in compliance with<br />
their NPDES permit. In order to maintain compliance, the District’s facilities are continuously rehabilitated and upgraded to<br />
provide cost effective collection and treatment.<br />
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM POLICY<br />
The District’s Capital Improvements Program consists of those projects identified as necessary to assure safe and uninterrupted<br />
operation of its facilities, meet existing and new statutory and regulatory requirements, and maintain efficiency in a cost<br />
effective manner. Necessary projects are identified in one of two ways. Studies are conducted to investigate the potential need<br />
for new or expanded facilities. Such studies can be initiated when facilities are nearing or operating at capacity in order to<br />
determine future needs or when facilities are anticipated to be required as a result of pending regulations. Projects determined<br />
necessary as a result of such studies are requested to be authorized and added to the Capital Improvements Program. Meetings<br />
and discussions are also conducted between the Engineering and Maintenance and Operations Departments. Such meetings are<br />
specifically held to determine the needs of the existing facilities and to identify those needs beyond the capacity and resources<br />
of the Maintenance and Operations Department to perform. Again, projects determined necessary as a result of such needs are<br />
requested to be authorized and added to the Capital Improvements Program. The program is comprised of all projects, both<br />
near and long term, which are identified and authorized consistent with the above process.<br />
Prioritization is developed for the entire list of projects. Discussions routinely held between the Engineering and Maintenance<br />
and Operations Departments result in a dynamic listing that is revised or added to as necessary. Prioritization is thoroughly<br />
reviewed and evaluated by concerned departments during the budget preparation period. Scheduling of projects is based upon<br />
review of need (prioritization), design, other time requirements, and financial resources. As a result of such reviews, projects<br />
are added to the current budget period, or scheduled for future years.<br />
The Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement 34 became effective in 2003. By adopting the modified<br />
approach for infrastructure, we agree to perform condition assessments of our facilities, establish service levels for our<br />
infrastructure, and appropriate monies to maintain these high standards thus protecting the environment and avoiding the<br />
detrimental impacts of deferred maintenance. The results of these assessments are reported in the Comprehensive Annual<br />
Financial Report.<br />
BENEFICIAL IMPACT OF CAPITAL PROJECTS<br />
Over the last century, District taxpayers have invested $24.6 billion in present day dollars to construct interceptors, tunnels,<br />
treatment plants, and other infrastructure necessary to serve the area. Additional facilities remaining to be completed to meet<br />
current and anticipated needs through the year 2026 will cost an estimated $2.1 billion. Through proper operation,<br />
maintenance, repair, and replacement, the District ensures continued efficient, reliable service and protects its investment and<br />
infrastructure and meets NPDES permit requirements. This Capital Improvements Program identifies and prioritizes obsolete<br />
equipment and facilities for upgrade and modernization.<br />
347<br />
347
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (continued)<br />
PROGRAM FUNDING<br />
Sources of funding for the Capital Improvements Program consist of the sale of Capital Improvement Bonds, general property<br />
tax revenues, State Revolving Fund loans, and federal and state grants.<br />
Construction Fund<br />
Section 9.6(a) of “An ACT to create sanitary districts and to remove obstructions in the Des Plaines and Illinois Rivers,”<br />
approved May 29, 1889, as amended, provides that the Board of Commissioners of the District can levy and collect taxes for<br />
construction purposes (which means the replacement, remodeling, completion, alteration, construction, and enlargement, which<br />
will add appreciably to the value, utility, or useful life of sewage treatment works or flood control facilities, and additions<br />
thereto, pumping stations, tunnels, conduits and intercepting sewer connecting therewith, and outlet sewers together with the<br />
equipment and appurtenance necessary thereto, and for the acquisition of the sites and rights of way necessary thereto, and for<br />
engineering expenses for designing and supervising construction of the work above described) for the year 1985 and each year<br />
thereafter which shall be at a rate not to exceed .10 percent of the assessed valuations of all taxable property within the sanitary<br />
district as equalized and determined for state and local taxes.<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund<br />
Section 9.6(a) of “An ACT to create sanitary districts and to remove obstructions in the Des Plaines and Illinois Rivers,”<br />
approved May 29, 1889, as amended, provides that the Board of Commissioners of the District is authorized to issue bonds for<br />
District purposes. The District issues bonds to provide funds to replace, remodel, complete, alter, construct, and enlarge sewage<br />
treatment or flood control facilities, to acquire air pollution control equipment, and to build or acquire sewers. The total<br />
allowable Bond debt at any given time can not exceed 3.35 percent of the last known equalized assessed valuation of taxable<br />
property within the District. The ordinance authorizing the issuance of the bonds provides for the levy of a tax on all taxable<br />
property within the District adequate to pay principal and interest on the Bonds when due, including a provision for loss in the<br />
collection of taxes.<br />
Tax Cap laws enacted in Illinois have significant impacts on the funding of the District’s capital program through bond sales.<br />
Under Public Act 89-1, the District’s non-referendum bond authority is restricted to fund only projects initiated prior to<br />
October 1, 1991, which generally covers only TARP projects. However, Public Act 89-385 provided additional nonreferendum<br />
authority to the District by authorizing the issuance of “limited bonds.” These “limited bonds” allow the District to<br />
issue non-referendum debt for projects initiated after October 1, 1991. Limited bonds can be issued up to the debt service<br />
extension base established by the Act. This “limited bond” authority was expanded for the District by passage of Public Act<br />
90-485 in the 1997 legislative session. This act excludes debt associated with the TARP program from the “limited bond”<br />
limitation. Limited tax bonds were issued in 2001, 2002 and 2006. These bonds were well received by the market and future<br />
limited tax bond sales are projected. The use of limited tax bonds in conjunction with the unlimited bonds authorized for TARP<br />
related projects positions the District’s capital funding on firm footing.<br />
State Revolving Loan Fund (SRF)<br />
The purpose of the SRF is to ensure that each state’s program is designed and operated to continue to provide capital funding<br />
assistance for water pollution control activities into perpetuity. The USEPA implemented the SRF program in a manner that<br />
preserves for the states a high degree of flexibility for operating their revolving funds in accordance with each state’s unique<br />
needs and circumstances.<br />
Funds in the SRF shall not be used to provide grants. SRF balances must be available in perpetuity and must be used solely to<br />
provide loans and other authorized forms of financial assistance:<br />
a. To municipalities, inter-municipal, interstate or state agencies for the construction of publicly owned wastewater<br />
treatment works; and<br />
b. For implementation of a new point source pollution control management program; and<br />
c. For development and implementation of a conservation and management plan.<br />
For many years the major sources of funding for District projects were Federal Grants and the Build Illinois Compliance<br />
Grants, both of which were discontinued. Under the grant program, the District received approximately $1.9 billion between<br />
1973 and 1993 leaving 25 percent of the cost to be borne by the District. The District continues to aggressively pursue federal<br />
and state funding to minimize the impact on its constituency. The SRF is an integral part of the District’s capital improvements<br />
financing. SRF revenues are based on the award and construction schedule of specific projects. The annual amount of revenue<br />
received from SRF loans has averaged $30 million.<br />
348<br />
348
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Operating Cost Impacts of Capital Improvements Projects<br />
Specific tables are provided to show the estimated cost impacts on the operating budget of capital improvement projects<br />
scheduled for award and under development.<br />
The annual maintenance or operating costs associated with new capital projects are an important part of the decision making<br />
process for the selection of capital projects. In many cases, the District must build new or modify existing facilities to meet<br />
regulatory requirements, and increases in operating costs cannot be avoided. In other cases, operating costs can be significantly<br />
reduced based on the replacement of aging infrastructure or equipment. In either case, the operating cost impacts of proposed<br />
capital projects are analyzed by design personnel, as well as operating staff in order to implement a capital program that meets<br />
operating needs in the most cost-effective manner.<br />
The operating cost impact tables are designed to give a range of cost impacts on the most significant cost elements,<br />
specifically, manpower, chemicals, and energy. The cost impact ranges are defined as: no impact, minor impact or major<br />
impact. These estimated cost impacts will be reviewed once the specific projects are placed in operation to guide in preparation<br />
of operating budgets, and to evaluate if planned efficiencies are realized.<br />
Included in the operating cost impact tables is a categorization of the justification for a particular capital project. As discussed<br />
above, projects must be built to meet regulatory requirements but they may also be built to obtain operating efficiencies,<br />
provide a safer operating environment or extend the useful life. The specific categories used are capacity needs, useful life,<br />
economic benefit, and safety/regulatory. Projects are often justified by more than one criterion.<br />
Overall Capital Program Costs<br />
The District’s 2009 overall Capital Program includes 2009 project awards, program support and projects under construction<br />
with a total estimated construction cost of approximately $1,964.4 million. A breakdown of these projects is as follows (in<br />
millions of dollars):<br />
2009 project awards $ 871.4<br />
2009 program support (project support and land) 181.6<br />
Projects currently under construction 911.4<br />
Total $ 1,964.4<br />
<br />
A breakdown of projects scheduled for 2009 awards by fund is as follows:<br />
Construction Fund projects $ 10.2<br />
Bond Fund projects 861.2<br />
Total $ 871.4<br />
<br />
A breakdown of projects under construction by fund is as follows:<br />
Construction Fund projects $ 18.6<br />
Bond Fund projects 892.8<br />
Total $ 911.4<br />
349<br />
349
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
CAPITAL PROJECTS LISTED BY SERVICE AREA<br />
The following is a list of Capital Projects within the District’s three major service areas. They are presented by their<br />
association with a <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant (WRP) and by their completion status; projects are under construction,<br />
to be awarded in 2009, or under development. This listing is followed by a brief description of each project.<br />
Bold type indicates projects to be financed by "Unlimited Tax Bonds."<br />
LAKE MICHIGAN<br />
STICKNEY<br />
SERVICE<br />
AREA (SSA)<br />
Stickney<br />
WRP<br />
Stickney <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
Projects Under Construction (with estimated completion date)<br />
Estimated Construction Cost<br />
73-161-CH McCook Reservoir Overburden Removal, Stages 1 & 2, SSA (9/2009) $ 63,668,000<br />
91-177-AE Plant Process Computer – A, SWRP (5/2009) 40,703,000<br />
99-169-2M Improve Sluice Gates and Miscellaneous Work, Racine Avenue PS (7/2009) 3,951,000<br />
99-180-1M Ventilation and Other Improvements, SWRP (12/2009) 5,107,000<br />
00-809-1E Remote Unmanned Sites, Smoke Annunciation (2/2009) 1,534,000<br />
01-103-2S 39th Street Conduit Rehabilitation - Phase I Bypass Tunnel, SSA (7/2013) 142,700,000<br />
01-198-AD∴ Demolition of Sludge Disposal Building, Rehabilitation of Pump & Blower<br />
22,500,000<br />
House & Coarse Screen Building, SWRP (1/2011)<br />
01-817-2E Electrical Equipment Upgrade (7/2009) 3,400,000<br />
02-110-2E Electrical Distribution System and Conduit & Cable Replacement, SSA<br />
7,707,000<br />
(2/2010)<br />
02-818-2P** Cleaning of Anaerobic Digesters and Other Rehabilitation, SWRP, CWRP<br />
10,189,000<br />
(12/2009)<br />
04-125-3S Upper Des Plaines Pump Station Rehabilitation and TARP Connection, SSA<br />
11,756,000<br />
(4/2009)<br />
05-144-3D Lagoon 23 Lining & Lysimeters Installation, LASMA, HASMA & CWRP<br />
10,899,000<br />
(4/2009)<br />
05-836-3D Lockport Power House Sluice Gates Replacement, SSA (8/2010) 11,227,000<br />
06-156-3P Grit Piping Replacement, SWRP (4/2009) 2,869,000<br />
Total $ 338,210,000<br />
350<br />
350
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Projects for 2009 Award<br />
91-177-CE Distributed Control System for Solids Processes at SWRP, MSPS and other<br />
$ 39,000,000<br />
Remote Locations, SSA<br />
96-114-2P Sludge Thickening Facilities, SWRP 173,700,000<br />
01-101-1M Biosolids Processing Facility – Pelletizer Plant, SWRP 89,172,000<br />
02-111-3M TARP Pumps Rehabilitation in North Pump House, MSPS 3,000,000<br />
03-122-3S Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewers 12 & 13B Rehabilitation, SSA 1,380,000<br />
04-131-2D C/D Service Tunnel Rehabilitation - Phase I, SWRP 5,200,000<br />
05-147-2M HVAC Improvements, SWRP 5,000,000<br />
06-154-3S Summit Conduit Rehabilitation, SSA 1,700,000<br />
06-155-3S Salt Creek Intercepting Sewer 2 Rehabilitation, SSA 25,000,000<br />
06-157-3P∴ Diffuser Plate Replacement - Batteries C & D, SWRP 20,000,000<br />
07-162-2S** Westdale Gardens Pumping Station & Force Main, Northwest 8A Extension<br />
2,200,000<br />
A, SSA<br />
07-163-3M R & D Building HVAC Improvements, SWRP 7,400,000<br />
07-168-3P Scum Concentration, Post Centrifuge Building, Preliminary Tank and<br />
4,000,000<br />
Elevator Improvements, SWRP Racine Avenue PS<br />
08-170-3D Office, Shop and Storage Facility Service Tunnel Rehabilitation and Paving<br />
5,000,000<br />
of B&F Streets, SWRP<br />
08-171-3P Westside Imhoff Battery A and Skimming Tank Demolition, SWRP 30,000,000<br />
08-173-2V Aquatic Ecology and <strong>Water</strong> Quality Equipment Storage Building, SWRP 600,000<br />
Total $ 412,352,000<br />
Projects Under Development<br />
73-161-DH McCook Reservoir Expanded Stage 2 Overburden Removal, SSA $ 27,000,000<br />
91-177-DE Distributed Control System for Westside, SWRP 17,500,000<br />
01-103-AS 39th Street Conduit Rehabilitation - Phase II and 43 rd St. Structure<br />
25,000,000<br />
Rehabilitation, SSA<br />
02-113-3P Final Clarifier Collectors Replacement at Batteries A, B & C, SWRP 13,900,000<br />
04-128-3P Westside Primary Settling Tanks - Batteries A Imhoff Replacement, SWRP 150,000,000<br />
04-129-3P Westside Grit Handling Improvements, SWRP 130,000,000<br />
04-132-3D C/D Service Tunnel and Connecting Tunnel Rehabilitation - Phase 2, SWRP 3,500,000<br />
04-133-3D A/B Service Tunnel Rehabilitation - Phase 3, SWRP 2,500,000<br />
04-134-3D A/B & C/D Service Tunnels Rehabilitation - Phase 4, SWRP 3,500,000<br />
04-135-3P Westside Circular Primary Settling Tanks – Battery B Imhoff Replacement,<br />
150,000,000<br />
SWRP<br />
05-146-3M Mainstream South Pump House TARP Pumps Rehabilitation, SWRP 4,000,000<br />
06-151-3V R & D Laboratory Facility at Stickney WRP 80,000,000<br />
06-158-3S Des Plaines River Intercepting Sewer Rehabilitation, SSA 8,400,000<br />
08-172-3S Inverted Siphon Reconstruction, SSA 44,000,000<br />
08-862-2D** Lockport Powerhouse Interior North Wall Repairs, SSA 650,000<br />
Total $ 659,950,000<br />
Stickney Service Area Grand Total $ 1,410,512,000<br />
351<br />
351
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
North Side<br />
WRP<br />
LAKE MICHIGAN<br />
NORTH<br />
SERVICE<br />
AREA (NSA)<br />
Hanover<br />
Park WRP<br />
Egan WRP<br />
Kirie WRP<br />
North Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
Projects Under Construction (with estimated completion date)<br />
Estimated Construction Cost<br />
02-013-3E Electrical Distribution Improvements, NSA (10/2009) $ 2,877,000<br />
04-825-3M Install New Blower No. 2 at SWRP and Replace Blower Nos. 1 and 7 at<br />
4,941,000<br />
NSWRP (8/2009)<br />
Total $ 7,818,000<br />
Projects for 2009 Award<br />
02-010-3S Evanston Intercepting Sewer Orrington Avenue Leg Rehabilitation, NSA $ 5,977,000<br />
05-018-2S Sewer & Structure Rehabilitation, NSA, SSA 5,000,000<br />
05-834-2D ** Touhy Avenue Bridge Rehabilitation and Repairs of other Bridges on the<br />
2,500,000<br />
North Shore Channel, NSA<br />
06-024-2M Underground Potable and Effluent <strong>Water</strong> Piping Upgrades, NSWRP 1,000,000<br />
06-363-3D O'Hare CUP Reservoir Repair & Rehabilitation, NSA 6,500,000<br />
06-843-3E Switchgear Replacement at Devon & Webster Instream Aeration Stations and<br />
2,000,000<br />
O'Hare CUP Reservoir & Emergency Generator Installation at LASMA and<br />
Bartlett P.S.<br />
07-027-3S Northside Sludge Pipeline Replacement - Section 1, NSA 16,600,000<br />
07-028-3S Harms Road 2 Rehabilitation, NSA 5,400,000<br />
08-040-3P Rehabilitation of Fine Bubble Diffuser System, NSWRP 2,000,000<br />
08-865-3P Aeration Tanks and Elevators Rehabilitation, NSWRP, KWRP, EWRP 20,400,000<br />
Total $ 67,377,000<br />
Projects Under Development<br />
97-090-2P Battery D Air Diffuser System Replacement, NSWRP $ 6,000,000<br />
04-015-3V Storage Building, NSWRP 4,210,000<br />
06-020-3P Battery E, NSWRP 315,000,000<br />
06-023-3P∴ Stop Logs and Diversion Pumps at Wilmette Pumping Station & Evanston<br />
6,500,000<br />
Pumping Station Repairs, NSA<br />
07-030-3D North Branch of the Chicago River and North Shore Channel Restoration 6,300,000<br />
08-034-3S Inverted Siphon Reconstruction, NSA 48,000,000<br />
08-035-3V∴ Data Center, North Side WRP 10,000,000<br />
Total $ 396,010,000<br />
352<br />
352
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
John Egan <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
Projects Under Construction (with estimated completion date)<br />
99-467-2E Electrical Upgrade; Pumps, Motors & Drives Replacement; and Elevator<br />
$ 9,000,000<br />
Upgrades, EWRP (12/2010)<br />
00-473-1D** Replace Casework, Fume Hoods and Miscellaneous Work at the Egan WRP<br />
8,043,000<br />
(05/2009)<br />
04-824-2P Tertiary Filter Rehabilitation, New Pump Variable Frequency Drives & Other<br />
16,164,000<br />
Plant Improvements, HPWRP, EWRP, KWRP (10/2010)<br />
Total $ 33,207,000<br />
Project for 2009 Award<br />
06-494-3P Centrifuge Building & Sludge Loading System Upgrades, EWRP $ 4,000,000<br />
Total $ 4,000,000<br />
Project Under Development<br />
07-497-3D Wet Weather Equalization Ponds, EWRP $ 20,000,000<br />
Kirie <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
Projects Under Construction (with estimated completion date)<br />
Total $ 20,000,000<br />
01-353-2M Kirie Pump Station Rehabilitation (04/2009) $ 21,345,000<br />
07-854-3M∴ Emergency Elevator Improvements at KWRP, HPWRP (05/2009) 3,463,000<br />
Project for 2009 Award<br />
Total $ 24,808,000<br />
06-359-3S Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewer 14A Rehabilitation, NSA $ 12,000,000<br />
Projects Under Development<br />
Total $ 12,000,000<br />
06-357-3S Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewer 20B Rehabilitation, NSA $ 3,274,000<br />
06-358-3M Gate Control Equipment Upgrade at TARP Control Structures, KWRP, NSA 2,200,000<br />
06-360-3S Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewer 14B Rehabilitation, NSA 6,700,000<br />
07-364-2M Primary Odor Control Equipment Installation at O'Hare TARP DS-5 1,000,000<br />
Hanover Park <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
Plant<br />
Project for 2009 Award<br />
Total $ 13,174,000<br />
06-842-3E DCS and Electrical Work, HWRP, KWRP, EWRP $ 2,000,000<br />
Projects Under Development<br />
Total $ 2,000,000<br />
06-526-3P Hanover Park Master Plan Projects, HPWRP $ 100,000,000<br />
08-529-3D Retention Ponds Deepening, Lining and Modifications, HPWRP 19,000,000<br />
08-530-3P∴ Digester Facility Improvements, HPWRP 4,000,000<br />
08-867-3P Digester Gas Storage Facility, SWRP, HWRP 18,000,000<br />
Total $ 141,000,000<br />
North Service Area Grand Total $ 721,394,000<br />
353<br />
353
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
LAKE MICHIGAN<br />
CALUMET<br />
SERVICE<br />
AREA (CSA)<br />
Calumet<br />
WRP<br />
Lemont WRP<br />
Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
Projects Under Construction (with estimated completion date)<br />
Estimated Construction Cost<br />
77-235-2F Thornton Composite Reservoir (6/2012) $ 37,365,000<br />
93-232-2M Hydraulic Improvements, Calumet WRP (4/2010) 120,570,000<br />
98-260-2M Coarse Screens Installation, Piping & Electrical Work, 95th St. and 125th St.<br />
10,319,000<br />
Pumping Station (9/2009)<br />
03-296-3M Installation of Central Boiler Facility, Calumet WRP (4/2009) 27,952,000<br />
04-294-3M TARP Valve Isolation and Pump Station Upgrade, Calumet WRP (06/2009) 59,489,000<br />
04-299-2P ∴ Aeration Batteries A, B, C, E1, & E2 Improvements, CWRP (03/2011) 20,392,000<br />
07-220-3P Primary Settling Tanks and Grit Removal Facilities, CWRP (10/2012) 245,000,000<br />
Total $ 521,087,000<br />
Projects for 2009 Award<br />
96-251-2P Sludge Thickening Facilities, CWRP $ 9,000,000<br />
00-273-1V Office and Locker Room Improvements for M&O Department and<br />
10,025,000<br />
Engineering/Construction Division and New Security Facilities for Calumet<br />
and Stickney WRPs<br />
04-201-4F Tollway Dam, Grout Curtain & Quarry Plugs, Thornton Composite<br />
115,000,000<br />
Reservoir, CSA<br />
04-202-4F Connecting Tunnels and Gates, Thornton Composite Reservoir, CSA 202,000,000<br />
06-212-3M Calumet TARP Pumping Station Pump E1/W1 Improvements, CWRP 19,700,000<br />
06-216-3E Electrical Upgrades, CWRP, CSA 3,500,000<br />
06-218-3M∴ Blower Nos. 9 & 10 and Air Main Installation, CWRP 17,575,000<br />
06-839-3E TARP Radio Upgrade and Backup Antenna, CSA, SSA, NSA 2,000,000<br />
Total $ 378,800,000<br />
354<br />
354
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Projects Under Development<br />
04-203-4F Final Reservoir Preparation, Thornton Composite Reservoir, CSA $ 33,000,000<br />
05-210-3P Digester Upgrades for Class A Biosolids, CWRP 30,000,000<br />
05-828-2V Roof Renovation Lockport Powerhouse 1,700,000<br />
06-213-2M** HVAC Improvements at 95th, 122nd, & 125th St. Pumping Stations, CSA 2,500,000<br />
06-215-3D Lagoons 3 and 4 Lining, CWRP 10,028,000<br />
08-224-3D Lagoons 14 and 15 Lining, CWRP 10,000,000<br />
08-227-3S Inverted Siphon Reconstruction, CSA 34,000,000<br />
08-714-3P Lemont Pumping Stations and Forcemains, CSA, SSA 45,000,000<br />
Total $ 166,228,000<br />
Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
Project Under Development<br />
05-711-3P Reservoir, LWRP $ 36,000,000<br />
Total $ 36,000,000<br />
Calumet Service Area Grand Total $ 1,102,115,000<br />
Capital Projects Grand Total– All Service Areas $ 3,234,021,000<br />
Bold type indicates projects to be financed by "Unlimited Tax Bonds."<br />
∗∗ These projects are funded by the Construction Fund and Corporate Fund.<br />
∴ These projects are funded by the Capital Improvements Bond Fund and the Corporate Fund.<br />
* These projects are funded by the Capital Improvements Bond Fund, Construction Fund and Corporate Fund.<br />
355<br />
355
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL PROJECTS<br />
All Capital Projects are briefly described here. They are presented in project numerical order:<br />
73-161-AH<br />
73-161-CH<br />
73-161-DH<br />
73-161-EH<br />
73-161-FH<br />
73-161-GH<br />
73-161-HH<br />
77-235-AF<br />
77-235-BF<br />
77-235-CF<br />
McCook Reservoir McCook Conveyance Tunnel<br />
A tunnel will be constructed under the Des Plaines River to provide a means for transporting mined<br />
materials from the McCook Quarry site to the Vulcan Quarry for processing. This tunnel will also<br />
allow for maintenance and operation of mining equipment.<br />
McCook Reservoir Overburden Removal, Stages 1 and 2<br />
The project provides for the removal and disposal of overburden down to bedrock and the grading of<br />
the side slopes per U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ design of the McCook Reservoir.<br />
McCook Reservoir Expanded Stage 2 Overburden Removal, SSA<br />
The project provides for the additional removal and disposal of overburden (Lagoons 21 & 22) in<br />
order to allow for construction of an additional 3 billion gallons of storage. Expanded Stage 2 of the<br />
McCook Reservoir will not be operational until 2022, so accurate quantifiable impacts to operating<br />
costs are not available at this time.<br />
McCook Reservoir Vulcan Mining Hard Costs<br />
Incremental costs above those incurred at the existing Vulcan quarry associated with an agreement<br />
between the MWRD and Vulcan to mine out a rough hole at the site of the McCook CUP Reservoir.<br />
Vulcan Conveyance System and Maintenance Facilities<br />
The project provides for the construction of a conveyance system to allow transport of crushed rock,<br />
mined from the McCook Reservoir for processing and sale. The conveyance systems will consist of<br />
a series of conveyors, totaling approximately 4,800’ in length, a primary rock crusher, and other rock<br />
feeder equipment. In addition, office, locker room and maintenance facilities will be constructed at<br />
the Reservoir site.<br />
Furnish & Deliver Miscellaneous Mining Equipment, McCook Reservoir, SSA<br />
Includes the purchase of equipment required by Vulcan for excavation of the McCook Reservoir over<br />
the next 12 years, including drills, water pumping systems and other mobile equipment.<br />
Furnish & Deliver Mining Equipment (05-RFP-07), McCook Reservoir, SSA<br />
Includes the purchase of equipment required by Vulcan for excavation of the McCook Reservoir over<br />
the next 12 years, specifically four (4) 150 ton rigid frame trucks and three (3) 16 cubic yard wheel<br />
loaders.<br />
Thornton Reservoir Vincennes Avenue Relocation<br />
Relocation of Vincennes Avenue between 167th Street and Tri State Tollway. Incidental to Thornton<br />
Composite Reservoir. To be credited by Corp of Engineers @ 75/25%. MWRD share is 25%.<br />
Thornton Transitional Reservoir<br />
Design and construct a 3.9 BG reservoir to accept overflows from Thorn Creek per the Natural<br />
Resources Conservation Service Little Calumet <strong>Water</strong>shed Plan. The reservoir will be<br />
decommissioned in 2014 and become part of the Thornton Composite Reservoir.<br />
Groundwater Monitoring Wells and Lysimeter<br />
Install four ground monitoring wells for Thornton Transitional Reservoir so that the District will be<br />
able to monitor any impact that the reservoir may have on nearby groundwater supplies.<br />
356<br />
356
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
77-235-2F<br />
91-177-AE<br />
91-177-CE<br />
91-177-DE<br />
93-232-2M<br />
96-114-2P<br />
96-251-2P<br />
97-090-2P<br />
97-156-2H<br />
Thornton Composite Reservoir<br />
The Thornton Composite Reservoir project is part of CUP/TARP plan for the Calumet TARP System<br />
and will also accept overflows from Thorn Creek. This project number encompasses miscellaneous<br />
costs associated with the 7.9 billion gallon reservoir, including land acquisition and mining hard<br />
costs.<br />
Plant Process Computer – A, SWRP<br />
To improve efficiency of all aspects of plant operations, this project will provide a distributed control<br />
system to interface with and replace critical components of the plant's existing computer control<br />
system for liquid treatment operations.<br />
Distributed Control System for Solids Processes at SWRP, MSPS and other Remote Stations, SSA<br />
To improve efficiency of all aspects of plant operations, this project will provide a distributed control<br />
system to interface with and replace critical components of the plant's existing computer control<br />
system for Solids Processes at SWRP, Mainstream Pumping Station, and Stickney remote sites.<br />
Distributed Control System for Westside, SWRP<br />
To improve efficiency of all aspects of plant operations, this project will provide a distributed control<br />
system to interface with and replace critical components of the plant's existing computer controls<br />
system for the Westside Pumping Station.<br />
Hydraulic Improvements, Calumet WRP<br />
This project provides the Calumet WRP with a firm raw sewage pumping capacity of 430 MGD<br />
without using the TARP Pumping Station. This project provides equipment to meet NPDES permit<br />
requirements.<br />
Sludge Thickening Facilities, SWRP<br />
This project will construct a new addition to the Sludge Thickening Building to accommodate six<br />
new gravity belt thickeners. This project is required to accommodate thickening for year 2040<br />
sludge flow rates.<br />
Sludge Thickening Facilities, CWRP<br />
This project consists of the construction of two new circular primary sludge concentration tanks.<br />
Also, the existing primary sludge concentration tanks 12 & 21 will be modified and converted for<br />
service as primary settling tanks. The two new sludge concentration tanks will increase the plant’s<br />
primary sludge concentration capacity. The conversion of the two existing concentration tanks to<br />
primary settling tanks will increase the plant’s primary settling tank capacity. The increased primary<br />
settling tank capacity will allow the plant’s primary tanks to be taken out of service for periodic<br />
maintenance.<br />
Battery D Air Diffuser System Replacement, NSWRP<br />
This project will provide for the replacement of the air diffuser plates in Battery D, or provide an<br />
alternative aeration/diffuser system. The existing plates leak and have become clogged, resulting in<br />
poor oxygen transfer efficiency and a waste of energy.<br />
73rd Street TARP Tunnel Relocation, Stickney WRP<br />
The project consists of constructing approximately 6,760 linear feet of 14' inside diameter unlined<br />
tunnel, connections to existing TARP tunnels, one 22-foot inside diameter construction shaft and all<br />
collateral work thereto.<br />
357<br />
357
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL PROJECTS (continued)<br />
98-260-2M<br />
99-169-2M<br />
99-180-1M<br />
99-467-2E<br />
00-273-1V<br />
00-473-1D<br />
00-809-1E<br />
01-101-1M<br />
01-103-2S<br />
01-103-AS<br />
Coarse Screens Installation, Piping & Electrical Work, 95th St. and 125th St. Pumping Station<br />
This project provides for the replacement of three coarse screens, installation of a debris collection<br />
and conveyor system, and a new structure to house the conveyor system. Also included in this<br />
project is the replacement of the suction and discharge piping for the dry weather pumps at the 125th<br />
Street Pumping Station.<br />
Improve Sluice Gates and Miscellaneous Work, Racine Avenue Pump Station<br />
Replacement of sluice gates, actuators, replacement of tide gates, installation of monorails for stop<br />
logs and other mechanical equipment at the Racine Avenue Pump Station. This work is necessary for<br />
the continued compliance with the District’s NPDES permit requirements.<br />
Ventilation & Other Improvements, Stickney WRP<br />
Replacement of the ventilation system in the fine screen area of the Sludge Concentration Building,<br />
replacement of the existing effluent water tower, installation of a new car puller for the Grit<br />
Dewatering Building and other work at the Stickney WRP.<br />
Electrical Upgrades: Pumps, Motors & Drives Replacement and Elevator Upgrade, EWRP<br />
This project provides for the replacement of motors, drives and pumps that will increase raw sewage<br />
pumping capacity required by the current dry-weather flow volume and elevator improvements. This<br />
project will provide a reduction in annual operating expenses.<br />
Office and Locker Room Improvements for M&O Department and Engineering/Construction<br />
Division and New Security Facilities for Calumet and Stickney WRPs.<br />
Remodel locker rooms in Pump & Blower Annex and 2 nd Floor, Lunchroom and Safety Office in<br />
Pump & Blower Annex. Convert existing Lab space into offices in Administration Building. Replace<br />
HVAC and Fire Suppression Systems in Control and Computer rooms in Administration Building.<br />
Remodel M&O offices in Administration Building and M&O Annex. Relocate IWD Staff to Digester<br />
Service Building. Reconstruct Entry Guardhouse for the Stickney and Calumet WRPs.<br />
Replace Casework, Fume Hoods and Miscellaneous Work at the Egan WRP<br />
Work includes: (1) replacement of existing top, casework and benches in toxic substance and<br />
analytical labs; (2) replacement of 33 fume hoods; (3) replacement of the fume hood exhaust system;<br />
(4) replacement of the lab Air Handling Unit (AHU); (5) supplemental cooling to labs; and (6)<br />
refinishing the lab floors.<br />
Remote Unmanned Sites, Smoke Annunciation<br />
Inspect unmanned sites and if needed, furnish and install equipment to remotely monitor the<br />
unmanned sites for intrusion, smoke/fire, loss of power, ground fault, flood, and low temperature as<br />
required. Also, replace existing monitoring equipment that is marginal or inoperative.<br />
Biosolids Processing Facility – Pelletizer Plant, SWRP<br />
Private sector contract for processing and disposing 150 DT/Day of Biosolids from the Stickney<br />
WRP for a period of 20 years. The Contractor will design, build and operate the facility for a period<br />
of 20 years. The Engineering Department will fund the capital cost portion of the contract, while the<br />
Maintenance and Operations Department will be responsible for operating costs.<br />
39th Street Conduit Rehabilitation - Phase I Bypass Tunnel, SSA<br />
Construction of a fifteen foot diameter deep tunnel and associated connecting structure, sewers and<br />
drop shafts to divert flow from the service area of the 39th Street Conduit during the Phase II<br />
rehabilitation of that conduit.<br />
39th Street Conduit Rehabilitation - Phase II and 43 rd St. Structure Rehab., SSA<br />
Rehabilitation of the 39th Street Conduit with a 15-inch concrete liner.<br />
358<br />
358
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
01-198-AD<br />
01-353-2M<br />
Demolition of Sludge Disposal Building, Rehabilitation of Pump & Blower House & Coarse Screen<br />
Building, SWRP<br />
Demolition of the Sludge Disposal Building, including removal of remaining asbestos material.<br />
Reconstruction of the common wall between Sludge Disposal Building and Pump and Blower House<br />
Building and replacement of the roof, skylights and windows of the Pump and Blower House.<br />
Reconstruction of the exterior wall and roof of South West Coarse Screen Building. Repair of<br />
masonry façade and replacement of roof at the West Side Pump Station. Construction of a new oil<br />
storage shed.<br />
Kirie Pump Station Rehabilitation<br />
Replace pumps, motor, substations, switchgear, piping, valves, meters, controls and various<br />
mechanical and electrical items, and install new variable frequency drives.<br />
01-817-2E<br />
Electrical Equipment Upgrade<br />
Replace fire alarm panels; replace transformers for unit substations U61, U62, U82, and U83.<br />
Provide lighting at the Kirie WRP. Replace motor controls 1, 6, 10, and 10A, motors, Edward Fire<br />
Alarm system and remove parapet lighting at the Egan WRP.<br />
02-009-3S<br />
Rehabilitation of Evanston Intercepting Sewer Lake Street Leg, NSA<br />
This project provides for the rehabilitation of 7’-6” diameter and 10’ semi-elliptical sewers of the<br />
Lake Street Leg either by sliplining or channelining.<br />
02-010-3S<br />
Evanston Intercepting Sewer Orrington Avenue Leg Rehabilitation, NSA<br />
This project provides for the rehabilitation of 18” & 2’ diameter sewers of the Orrington Avenue Leg<br />
by cured-in place pipe lining and 7’ and 7’-6” diameter sewers by either sliplining or channelining.<br />
02-013-3E<br />
Electrical Distribution Improvements, NSA<br />
Furnish and install a natural gas engine generator and distribution system to provide power during an<br />
outage or to use for peak shaving for demand charge reduction. Replace switches at substation to<br />
remote control switches. Upgrade power distribution and distributed control system at North Branch<br />
Pumping Station.<br />
02-110-2E<br />
Electrical Distribution System and Conduit & Cable Replacement, SSA<br />
Upgrade the electrical distribution systems at the Engineering Control Lab, M&O Administration<br />
Building and supply batteries to provide paralleling feeds. Replace electrical substation at Aerated<br />
Grit Building, replace switchgear and motor control centers. Replace conduit and wiring in TARP<br />
control structures.<br />
02-111-3M<br />
TARP Pumps Rehabilitation in North Pump House, MSPS<br />
Complete pump and motor overhaul, pumps 1, 3 and 4 in South Pump house, pumps 5, 7 and 8 in<br />
North Pump House. Rehabilitation will extend the useful life of these pumps which have been in<br />
service since May 1985.<br />
02-113-3P<br />
Final Clarifier Collectors Replacement at Batteries A, B & C, SWRP<br />
Replace the collection mechanism with stainless steel or galvanized steel components for final tanks<br />
in Batteries A, B & C, including rake arms and skimmers.<br />
02-818-2P<br />
Cleaning of Anaerobic Digesters and Other Rehabilitation, SWRP, CWRP<br />
Clean all 24 digesters at Stickney and 12 digesters at Calumet. Repair miscellaneous piping and<br />
structures as needed. Install back up recirculation pumps at Calumet. Clean gas lines at both plants.<br />
Install gas meters at Stickney.<br />
359<br />
359
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL PROJECTS (continued)<br />
03-122-3S<br />
Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewers 12 & 13B Rehabilitation, SSA<br />
Project consists of rehabilitating 3.5' diameter 3,700 foot long sewer and 6 manholes in Bryn Mayer<br />
Avenue in the Village of Rosemont; and 27" diameter, 2,650 foot long sewer and 8 manholes in<br />
Lawrence Avenue in the Village of Schiller Park.<br />
03-296-3M<br />
04-015-3V<br />
Installation of Central Boiler Facility, Calumet WRP<br />
A central boiler facility at Calumet WRP is required to satisfy the additional heating demands of new<br />
infrastructure additions, i.e. influent pumping station, TARP valve chamber, grit dewatering facility,<br />
primary settling tanks, and new laboratory building. Existing heating demands will also be handled<br />
from the new central boiler facility.<br />
New and planned process facilities at the Calumet WRP could require the plant to add and maintain<br />
up to 16 boilers, located across the plant. Construction of a Central Boiler Facility will consolidate all<br />
steam loads to 5 large boilers in one location. This will reduce labor costs by eliminating the need for<br />
hiring an additional operating engineer, and eliminating the need for additional contracted<br />
maintenance services. This results in an annual labor savings of $260,000.<br />
Storage Building, NSWRP<br />
A new storage building for items secured through the Procurement and Materials Management and<br />
Maintenance and Operations Departments.<br />
04-125-3S<br />
Upper Des Plaines Pump Station Rehabilitation and TARP Connection, SSA<br />
Structural/Architectural, Mechanical and Electrical Improvements to P.S. - New Pumps, Lighting,<br />
HVAC and design of gated diversion structure. Structure to intercept flows during peak periods and<br />
divert to TARP drop shaft. Located at North Ave. and Thatcher, River Forest, IL.<br />
04-128-3P<br />
Westside Primary Settling Tanks - Battery A Imhoff Replacement, SWRP<br />
The Imhoff tanks are at the end of their useful life. This project will provide conventional primary<br />
treatment to flows through the Westside Plant by converting the existing Imhoff tanks to circular<br />
primary tanks. Nine 150 ft. diameter tanks will be constructed in each of the existing batteries A, B,<br />
and C of the Imhoff tank area. Construction will be phased to do one battery at a time.<br />
Currently, the sludge that is digested in the Imhoff tanks produces gas, but the gas is not captured.<br />
The Imhoff tanks will be replaced with primary settling tanks. The sludge will be sent from the<br />
primary tanks to the digesters, where the gas will be captured and used in the plant’s central boiler<br />
facility as a heating fuel. The equivalent heating value of the digester gas compared to natural gas, at<br />
today’s prices, is approximately $700,000 per year. This project will increase the amount of digester<br />
gas used in the plant by 15%, thus reducing the District's reliance on natural gas.<br />
04-129-3P<br />
Westside Grit Handling Improvements, SWRP<br />
Convert a portion of the existing Westside skimming tanks into grit removal basins. Involves<br />
modification to flow distribution and collection channels, demolition of the existing tanks and<br />
construction of new grit collection tanks. New grit slurry pumping and washing facilities will be<br />
provided. Tanks will be covered for odor control.<br />
04-130-3M<br />
Digester Upgrades for Class A Biosolids, SWRP<br />
Modifications to existing 24 anaerobic digesters to enable operation as a sequential batch temperature<br />
phased anaerobic digestion mode for production of Class A biosolids. Modifications to existing<br />
sludge holding tanks, new heat exchangers, heat recovery units, steam injectors, pumping facilities<br />
and replacement of floating covers to fixed covers on 12 digesters.<br />
360<br />
360
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
04-131-2D<br />
04-132-3D<br />
04-133-3D<br />
04-134-3D<br />
04-135-3P<br />
04-201-4F<br />
04-202-4F<br />
04-203-4F<br />
04-294-3M<br />
C/D Service Tunnel Rehabilitation - Phase I, SWRP<br />
Rehabilitate approximately 100' of the C/D Service Tunnel located to the Northwest of Battery B<br />
Effluent Conduit Crossing (between column lines 27 and 37). The tunnel was constructed<br />
approximately 55 years ago and portions have deteriorated to the point where significant repairs or<br />
replacement is required.<br />
C/D Service Tunnel and Connecting Tunnel Rehabilitation - Phase 2, SWRP<br />
Rehabilitate approx 100' of the C/D service tunnel including portions at the influent conduit and<br />
Battery B effluent conduit crossing (between column lines 14 and 26). Approx 150' of the connecting<br />
tunnel will also be repaired under this project. The tunnel was constructed approx 55 years ago, and<br />
portions have deteriorated to the point where significant repairs or replacement is required.<br />
A/B Service Tunnel Rehabilitation - Phase 3, SWRP<br />
Repair and rehabilitate approximately 100' of the A/B service tunnel located to the northeast of<br />
exhaust vent number four (between column lines 10 and 23). The tunnel was constructed<br />
approximately 65 years ago and portions have deteriorated to the point where significant repairs or<br />
replacement is required.<br />
A/B & C/D Service Tunnels Rehabilitation - Phase 4, SWRP<br />
Rehabilitate approximately 130' of the A/B and C/D service tunnels located directly to the north of<br />
the Pump and Blower House. The tunnel was constructed between 1936 and 1950, and portions have<br />
deteriorated to the point where significant repairs or replacement is required.<br />
Westside Circular Primary Settling Tanks – Battery B Imhoff Replacement, SWRP<br />
Replace the existing Battery B Imhoff Tanks with circular Preliminary Settling Tanks at the Stickney<br />
WRP Westside Treatment Facilities. Also, this project will consist of other components including<br />
scum handing facilities, odor control facilities, service tunnels and modifications to site support<br />
facilities.<br />
Tollway Dam, Grout Curtain & Quarry Plugs, Thornton Composite Reservoir, CSA<br />
Construction of a roller compacted concrete dam under I-80/294 to prevent water in the reservoir<br />
from entering the Hanson Material Service’s Thornton Quarry at the Thornton Composite Reservoir.<br />
Two concrete plugs will be constructed in existing haul tunnels to isolate the reservoir from the<br />
quarry. A double row grout curtain will be constructed along the south side of the reservoir to<br />
prevent water from exfiltrating into the quarry and to provide stability to the I-80/294 pillar.<br />
Connecting Tunnels and Gates, Thornton Composite Reservoir, CSA<br />
Construction of the Inlet/Outlet Tunnels that will connect the Thornton Composite Reservoir to the<br />
Indiana Avenue TARP Tunnel. Tunnels are to be lined with concrete. Construction of the control<br />
gates to isolate the tunnels from the reservoir.<br />
Final Reservoir Preparation, Thornton Composite Reservoir, CSA<br />
Construction of surface aeration system, reservoir wash down tanks, pumps and piping; maintenance<br />
building, access roads, fencing and landscaping. Constructing drainage ditches and plunge pools in<br />
the reservoir floor. Grouting of water producing features in the rock walls; sealing and bolting<br />
reservoir walls; construction of the Thorn Creek tunnels and gates; plugging the abandoned Thorn<br />
Creek Tunnel and constructing a drainage conduit.<br />
TARP Valve Isolation and Pump Station Upgrade, Calumet WRP<br />
Construction of Valve Chamber and installation of 4' x 7' bonneted gate valves upstream of Calumet<br />
TARP Pumping Station; construction of valve chamber access shaft; replacement of four 72 mgd<br />
pumps; construction of separate pump room access shaft; installation of emergency dewatering<br />
system in each pump room; and replacement of electrical switch gear.<br />
361<br />
361
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL PROJECTS (continued)<br />
04-299-2P<br />
04-491-3S<br />
04-824-2P<br />
04-825-3M<br />
05-018-2S<br />
05-144-3D<br />
05-146-3M<br />
Aeration Batteries A, B, C, E1, & E2 Improvements, CWRP<br />
Replace dissolved oxygen and suspended solids transmitters in all aeration tanks. Replace air piping<br />
in Battery C in mixed liquor and return sludge channels. Replace gates and operators in Batteries E1<br />
and E2 aeration. Replace diffusers in Batteries E1 and E2 influent, mixed liquor and return sludge<br />
channels. Replace diffuser plates in tanks B1 thru B7, A7 and A9.<br />
Egan Sludge & Centrate Pipeline Replacement, NSA<br />
Construction of 10 inch diameter 6500' long high density polyethylene pipeline by horizontal<br />
directional drilling in order to replace existing cast iron pipeline; and construction of air-relief and<br />
blow-off structures.<br />
Tertiary Filter Rehabilitation, New Pump Variable Frequency Drives & Other Plant Improvements,<br />
HPWRP, EWRP, KWRP<br />
Filter rehabilitation, replacement of six sluice gates and stop logs, installation of two new waste gas<br />
burners and miscellaneous piping, valve and pumps at the Egan WRP. Connect raw sewage main to<br />
overflow pipe to oxidation ponds, power door operators and replacement of primary sludge piping at<br />
Hanover Park WRP. Installation of variable frequency drives and new motors for eight pumps.<br />
Install New Blower No. 2 at SWRP and Replace Blower Nos. 1 and 7 at NSWRP<br />
Installation of new Blower No.2 at Stickney WRP and replacement of existing Blower Nos. 1 and 7<br />
with new larger capacity, multi-stage blower assemblies at the North Side WRP.<br />
Sewer & Structure Rehabilitation, NSA, SSA<br />
Upper Salt Creek Sewer Rehabilitation, Willow Road Junction Structure Rehabilitation and Palatine<br />
Road Siphon Rehabilitation.<br />
Lagoon 23 Lining & Lysimeters Installation, LASMA, HASMA & CWRP<br />
Lining and paving of lagoon bottom, retaining wall construction and slope protection of lagoon side<br />
slopes of Lagoon 23. Construction of new draw-off boxes. Modifications to the sludge and<br />
supernatant draw-off pipelines and other ancillary features as needed.<br />
Mainstream South Pump House TARP Pumps Rehabilitation, SWRP<br />
Perform a complete pump and motor overhaul of Main Sewage Pumps No. 1, 3 and 4 in the South<br />
Pump House at the Mainstream Pump Station. Installation of new instrumentation equipment as<br />
required to properly monitor the individual pump flow rates and operation of the new pumps and<br />
motors. Inspection and overhaul of the hydraulic actuators at the discharge valves DV-1, DV-3 and<br />
DV-4. Replacement of the valve seals at suction valves SV-1, SV-3 and SV-4. Inspection of the<br />
suction conduits SC-1, SC-3 and SC-4. Replace controls at the sluice gates G-3 and G-4 at the<br />
MSPS.<br />
362<br />
362
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
05-147-2M<br />
05-210-3P<br />
05-711-3P<br />
05-828-2V<br />
05-834-2D<br />
05-836-3D<br />
06-020-3P<br />
06-023-3P<br />
06-024-2M<br />
HVAC Improvements, SWRP<br />
Remove and replace three air handling units, two chillers, effluent water pumps and strainers in the<br />
Central Control Building; remove and replace one air handling unit, one A/C rooftop unit and six<br />
rooftop exhaust units in the Central Heat Building; remove and replace two air handling units in the<br />
SW Preliminary Control House; remove and replace two air handling units in the Aerated Grit<br />
Building; remove and replace one air handling unit, four cooling towers serving the R&D Building;<br />
design and install a dedicated A/C unit for the Greenhouse in the R&D Building; remove and replace<br />
the existing ozone generators at the digesters with new ozone units; install large capacity exhaust<br />
fans to increase the air changes in the North and South Gate Houses; install an exhaust fan<br />
arrangement to allow for better ventilation in the Offices, Shops and Storage Complex; replace two<br />
air handling units and ductwork in the Post Centrifuge Facility; replace one fan, one unit heater, four<br />
coils and update control system for the air handling units, design and install a supply fan for the<br />
blower floor, replace steam radiation system in the Pump & Blower Building; replace three coils at<br />
air handling units in the Imhoff Batteries A, Pump & Blower Building; replace three coils at air<br />
handling units in the Imhoff Batteries A, B, and C; and replace one air handling unit in the tunnel<br />
from the Central Heat Building.<br />
Digester Upgrades for Class A Biosolids, CWRP<br />
Project will include changes to existing digesters and sludge heating process. New heat exchangers<br />
and steam injectors will be provided. Project will include new digester gas piping, new controls for<br />
sludge pumping, digester operation and modifications of existing digester floating covers.<br />
Reservoir, LWRP<br />
Construction of a reservoir to temporarily store wet weather flows near the Lemont <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant.<br />
Roof Renovation, Lockport Powerhouse<br />
Repair and renovate existing Powerhouse Roof.<br />
Touhy Avenue Bridge Rehabilitation and Repairs of other Bridges on the North Shore Channel, NSA<br />
Replace concrete deck. Repair concrete abutment walls, wing walls and piers. Replace base plates<br />
and bearings. Replace deteriorated steel stringers. Replace expansion joints. Repair slope<br />
protection.<br />
Lockport Power House Sluice Gates Replacement, SSA<br />
One of the sluice gates in Bay 7 is stuck in position and is inoperable. Another gate is experiencing<br />
significant leakage. The sluice gates in Bay 3 and 4 are also having difficulties in operation. The<br />
bulkhead system will be installed on Bay 3, 4 and 7. After the bulkhead system is in place, the sluice<br />
gates and steel guides will be replaced. The underwater concrete structure will be rehabilitated. The<br />
gates are over 45 years old, served their useful life, and now need replacement.<br />
Battery E, NSWRP<br />
New primary settling tanks, aeration tanks, and final settling tanks comprising Battery E. All major<br />
influent and effluent conduits, power distribution, force mains and air mains.<br />
Stop Log Gates and Diversion Pumps at Wilmette Pumping Station and Evanston Pumping Station<br />
Repairs, NSA<br />
Installation of a bulkhead structure at the Wilmette Diversion Gate that would isolate the date for<br />
inspection and maintenance purposes. Installation of two diversion pumps. The project also includes<br />
replacement of screen, concrete repairs and HVAC modifications at the Evanston Pump Station.<br />
Underground Potable and Effluent <strong>Water</strong> Piping Upgrades, NSWRP<br />
Replacing and upgrading areas of effluent and potable water piping that were determined to be in<br />
need of immediate replacement by a recent hydraulic study of the plant. Also includes the<br />
replacement of some condensate piping.<br />
363<br />
363
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL PROJECTS (continued)<br />
06-151-3V<br />
06-154-3S<br />
06-155-3S<br />
R & D Laboratory Facility, SWRP<br />
New Laboratory building to house all analytical and research laboratories and related offices for the<br />
M&R Department.<br />
Summit Conduit Rehabilitation, SSA<br />
Project consists of rehabilitating 1,650 feet of 6-foot ovoid/semi-elliptic/elliptic sewer by cured-inplace<br />
lining/slip lining/ segmental lining method and inlet and outlet structures by spray-on products.<br />
Salt Creek Intercepting Sewer 2 Rehabilitation, SSA<br />
Project consists of rehabilitating 30,000 feet of sewer ranging in size from 12 inch circular to 7' x 7'<br />
semi-elliptic sewer by cured-in-place and/or slip lining process and lining approx. 72 manholes.<br />
06-156-3P<br />
06-157-3P<br />
06-158-3S<br />
06-212-3M<br />
06-213-2M<br />
Drain Valves at Scum Conc. & Post Bldg. and Support Structures at Grit Tanks Replacement, SWRP<br />
The drain valves and associated piping need to be removed and replaced in the Southwest Scum<br />
Concentration Building. New drain pans and drain valves are required in the Post Digestion<br />
Building. Isolation valves are needed on the water piping for the sludge heat exchangers for<br />
Digesters 13-24. Remove and replace cantilever support structures at the aerated grit tanks.<br />
Diffuser Plate Replacement - Batteries C & D, SWRP<br />
Remove and replace the drop piping, diffuser plates and air lifts in Battery C. Remove and replace<br />
the drop piping, diffuser plates and air lifts in Battery D. Remove and replace the mixed liquor and<br />
return activated sludge channel piping and diffusers in Battery D.<br />
Des Plaines River Intercepting Sewer Rehabilitation, SSA<br />
Project consists of rehabilitating approximately 18,000 feet of sewer ranging in size from 20 inch<br />
circular to 8' x 4'-6" semi-elliptic conduit and approximately 52 manholes by spray-on product.<br />
Calumet TARP Pumping Station Pumps E1/W1 Improvements, CWRP<br />
Replace existing 28.8 MGD pumps with larger 72 MGD pumps. The pumps will be variable<br />
frequency controlled (VFD) controlled with the VFDs being housed in grade level structure, also<br />
being built for this project.<br />
HVAC Improvements at 95th, 122nd, & 125th St. Pumping Stations, CSA<br />
Replacement of HVAC systems at 95th St., 122nd St., and 125th St. Pump Stations and also at<br />
Calumet Digesters, Clusters 1 & 2, and Control Room.<br />
06-215-3D<br />
06-216-3E<br />
Lagoons 3 and 4 Lining, CWRP<br />
Lining and paving of bottom of lagoons, retaining wall construction, protection of side slopes of the<br />
lagoons, construction of new draw-off boxes, modifications to the sludge and supernatant draw-off<br />
pipe line, and all other ancillary features as needed.<br />
Electrical Upgrades, CWRP, CSA<br />
At Calumet WRP, replace low level pump variable frequency drives; replace digester motor control<br />
centers 301, 304, 305; upgrade fire and gas alarm systems into DCS at Digesters; and add<br />
miscellaneous controls from Digester Control Room to DCS. At Melvina Ditch, replace eddy current<br />
drives for Pumps 2 and 3. At Palos Hills P.S., add more pumps. At 122nd Street P.S., replace Motor<br />
Control Center.<br />
364<br />
364
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
06-218-3M<br />
06-357-3S<br />
06-358-3M<br />
06-359-3S<br />
06-360-3S<br />
06-363-3D<br />
06-494-3P<br />
06-526-3P<br />
06-839-3E<br />
06-842-3E<br />
Blower Nos. 9 & 10 and Air Main Installation, CWRP<br />
Furnish, deliver and install two new 75,000 SCFM blowers (Nos. 9 and 10), replace existing 5700 hp<br />
motors on Blowers Nos. 6 and 7 with 6000 hp motors, and provide blower system master controller,<br />
install new 60" air main header to provide a "looped" plant process air piping system, relocation of<br />
underground utilities for the installation of the 60" air main. Replace primary and secondary air filter<br />
elements, rearrange stored material in blower building basement for installation of new blowers,<br />
misc. modifications in the blower building and provide an uninterruptible power supply system in<br />
Control Building.<br />
Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewer 20B Rehabilitation, NSA<br />
Project consists of rehabilitating 6,100 feet of 60 inch diameter circular pipe sewer by cured-in-place<br />
pipe lining process, rehabilitating two entrance conduits to Drop Shaft 5 by spray-on products and<br />
rehabilitating 9 manholes by spray-on products.<br />
Gate Control Equipment Upgrade at TARP Control Structures, KWRP, NSA<br />
Upgrading about 25 TARP control structures including hydraulic power units, actuators,<br />
accumulators and stem assemblies.<br />
Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewer 14A Rehabilitation, NSA<br />
Project consists of rehabilitating 18,600 feet of 69 inch diameter circular sewer by cured-in-place<br />
pipe lining and/or slip lining process, and 32 manholes and structures.<br />
Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewer 14B Rehabilitation, NSA<br />
Project consists of rehabilitating 3,000 feet of 48 inch diameter sewer and 11,000 feet of 69 inch<br />
diameter sewer by cured-in-place pipe lining and/or slip lining method. Rehabilitating 26<br />
manholes/structures and constructing one new manhole on an existing junction structure.<br />
O'Hare CUP Reservoir Repair & Rehabilitation, NSA<br />
Project includes a two phase approach to implement the most economical remediation measure to<br />
stop the seepage and to stabilize the slopes of the O'Hare CUP Reservoir.<br />
Centrifuge Building & Sludge Loading System Upgrades, EWRP<br />
Rehabilitate the floor drain system in the lower level of the Centrifuge Building. Remove the<br />
Serpentex Belt in the Centrifuge Loading Building. Remove the hoppers and conveyors and replace<br />
with a pumping system.<br />
Hanover Park Master Plan Projects, HPWRP<br />
Based on the 40 year plan for the Hanover Park <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant, development of major<br />
infrastructure needs, process needs and solids handling needs projects will be done. The Master Plan<br />
will prioritize major construction projects for the next 20 years.<br />
TARP Radio Upgrade and Backup Antenna, CSA, SSA, NSA<br />
This project upgrades the current TARP radio system. The new system will have double the data<br />
speed of the current system, allowing for faster communications and a higher capacity. This project<br />
also provides a fully redundant backup repeater radio site that can take over in the event of a problem<br />
at the existing repeater site at Presidential Towers.<br />
DCS and Electrical Work, HPWRP, KWRP, EWRP<br />
This project is a clean-up contract to the Distributed Control System Installation contract. Scope<br />
includes items below plus assorted issues. Hanover Park: Miscellaneous small items and other work.<br />
Kirie: Blower controls and Filter Building switchgear. Egan: Filter valve controls.<br />
365<br />
365
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL PROJECTS (continued)<br />
06-843-3E<br />
07-027-3S<br />
07-028-3S<br />
07-030-3D<br />
07-162-2S<br />
07-163-3M<br />
07-168-3P<br />
07-220-3P<br />
07-221-3P<br />
Switchgear Replacement at Devon & Webster Instream Aeration Stations and O'Hare CUP Reservoir<br />
& Emergency Generator Installation at LASMA and Bartlett Pumping Station<br />
Replace switchgear at Devon and Webster Instream Aeration Stations and O'Hare CUP Reservoir.<br />
Install emergency generators at Bartlett Pumping Station and LASMA.<br />
North Side Sludge Pipeline Replacement - Section 1, NSA<br />
Construction of 24 inch diameter 19,600 feet long ductile iron pipe line with cathodic protection<br />
system or high density polyethylene pipeline with 16 air relief, vacuum relief/blow off/cleanout<br />
structures and all other collateral work.<br />
Harms Road 2 Rehabilitation, NSA<br />
Rehabilitation of 9,070 foot long 4'-6" x 5' semi-elliptic sewer and 14 manhole structures in<br />
Northbrook and rehabilitation/replacement of control structure in Seegers Road, Des Plaines.<br />
North Branch of the Chicago River and North Shore Channel Restoration, NSA<br />
Project includes two-phase approach to implement the most economical remediation measure to stop<br />
the toe erosion and to stabilize the bank slopes at the North Branch of the Chicago River (NBCR)<br />
and North Shore Channel (NSC).<br />
Westdale Gardens Pumping Station & Force Main, Northwest 8A Extension A, SSA<br />
Project consists of a 6-inch diameter, 5700 ft. long force main to be installed by open cut and/or<br />
directional drilling method and a pumping station-wet well system for the Westdale Gardens<br />
Subdivision.<br />
R & D Building HVAC Improvements, SWRP<br />
Install a new air handling unit, absorption chiller, heat exchangers, pumps and Strobic fans. Replace<br />
four existing cooling towers, three chilled water pumps and two condenser water pumps. Work<br />
includes associated controls and rebalancing of the systems. The new air-handling unit will be 100<br />
percent outside air type unit, dual fan system, with carbon filters, 30 percent pre-filters & 85 percent<br />
final filters. Remove existing air handling units S-144, S-146 & S-148 and four existing Carrier<br />
supplemental ceiling mounted heaters. Install new diffusers and registers in rooms currently served<br />
by AHU-3, S-144, S-146 & S-148. Remove seventeen existing "mushroom" type exhausts fans and<br />
install a new exhaust ductwork system and four new Strobic exhaust fans on the roof of the R & D<br />
Building to exhaust rooms currently served by AHU-3, S-144, S-146 & S-148. Relocate existing<br />
Strobic fans EF-879/881. Install a new roof mounted supply ductwork system for the new Air<br />
Handling Unit to interface with the existing ductwork inside the building. Replace fume hoods used<br />
for ovens with canopy hoods in LW-103. Clean ductwork associated with new air handling unit.<br />
Scum Concentration, Post Centrifuge Building, Preliminary Tank and Elevator Improvements,<br />
SWRP, Racine Avenue Pumping Station<br />
Under this project, drain valves with associated piping and operating stems located in the scum pits<br />
in the Scum Concentration Building will be replaced. Twelve sludge/polymer transfer tanks and all<br />
suction piping on the polymer feed pumps Nos. 1-12 at the Post Digestion Building will be removed<br />
and replaced. Ten sludge boxes for the preliminary tanks will be removed and replaced. Hydraulic<br />
passenger elevators at SWRP and Racine Pumping Station will be rehabilitated.<br />
Primary Settling Tanks and Grit Removal Facilities, CWRP<br />
The improvements at the Calumet WRP include construction of eight aerated grit tanks, associated<br />
grit dewatering facilities, 16 circular primary settling tanks, associated influent and effluent conduits,<br />
and other related facilities.<br />
Calumet TARP Pump Station Mechanically Cleaned Bar Screens, Calumet WRP<br />
To furnish, deliver and install devices to mechanically clean existing TARP bar screens.<br />
366<br />
366
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
07-364-2M<br />
07-497-3D<br />
07-854-3M<br />
Primary Odor Control Equipment Installation at O’Hare TARP DS-5<br />
Install a biofilter and necessary piping to reduce the H2S emanating from O'Hare TARP DS-5. The<br />
discharge from the biofilter will be piped to the existing odor control equipment to further remove<br />
H2S. The electrical equipment that was damaged by the flooding of the existing odor control<br />
structure will be repaired or replaced. To furnish, deliver and install devices to mechanically clean<br />
existing TARP bar screens.<br />
Wet Weather Equalization Pond, EWRP<br />
Construction of a new storage pond with an estimated volume of 50 million gallons, to serve as<br />
temporary storage of plant influent during storm events.<br />
Emergency Elevator Improvements at KWRP, HPWRP<br />
This is a major District-wide upgrade and repair of plant elevators. Work includes modernization of<br />
control systems, rust control and prevention, replacement of hydraulic cylinders and pistons,<br />
complete replacement of some units, replacement of hydraulic pumps, replacement of hoist way<br />
parts, installation of fire safety systems and maintenance of elevators.<br />
08-034-3S<br />
08-035-3V<br />
08-040-3P<br />
08-170-3D<br />
08-171-3P<br />
08-172-3S<br />
08-173-2V<br />
08-224-3D<br />
Inverted Siphon Reconstruction, NSA<br />
Reconstruction of the inverted siphons located in the North Service Area.<br />
Data Center, North Side WRP<br />
Conversion of the property at 3601 W. Oakton, Skokie, Illinois into usable space for the District’s<br />
Information Technology Department.<br />
Rehabilitation of Fine Bubble Diffuser System, NSWRP<br />
Rehabilitation of Fine Bubble Diffuser System located at the North Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant.<br />
Office, Shop & Storage Facility Service Tunnel Rehabilitation and Paving of B & F Streets, SWRP<br />
Repave B and F Streets over the Battery A and B Effluent Conduits and reinforce the conduit roof<br />
slabs to support truck loads. Repair the deteriorated concrete at the Service Tunnel between Office,<br />
Shop & Storage Facility (OSS) and Research and Development (R & D) buildings. Improve<br />
drainage and repair damage to the building facade at the cafeteria entrance.<br />
Westside Imhoff Battery A and Skimming Tank Demolition, SWRP<br />
The objective and scope of the work is to demolish the existing Battery A Imhoff Tanks and half of<br />
the Skimming Tanks at the Stickney WRP Westside Treatment Facilities. This project will prepare<br />
the site for Contracts 04-128-3P, New Primary Settling Tanks and 04-129-3P, New Grit Facilities.<br />
Concrete from the existing tanks will be crushed and prepared for reuse, asbestos and other<br />
hazardous material will be removed, and sludge will be removed from Battery A Imhoff Tanks.<br />
Inverted Siphon Reconstruction, SSA<br />
Reconstruction of the inverted siphons located in the Stickney Service Area.<br />
Aquatic Ecology & <strong>Water</strong> Quality Equipment Storage Building, SWRP<br />
A pre-fab building for the storage of vehicular & incidental equipment used by section 126, Aquatic<br />
Ecology & <strong>Water</strong> Quality. Boats, boat trailers, ATV's & trailers, along with outboard motors and<br />
portable fish tanks are included items for storage.<br />
Lagoon 14 & 15 Lining, CWRP<br />
Lining and paving of lagoon bottoms, retaining wall construction, protection of side slopes of the<br />
lagoons, construction of new draw-off boxes, modifications to the sludge and supernatant draw-off<br />
pipe lines and other ancillary features as needed.<br />
367<br />
367
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL PROJECTS (continued)<br />
08-227-3S<br />
08-529-3D<br />
08-530-3P<br />
08-714-3P<br />
08-862-2D<br />
08-865-3P<br />
08-867-3P<br />
Inverted Siphon Reconstruction, CSA<br />
Reconstruction of the inverted siphons located in the Calumet Service Area.<br />
Retention Pond Deepening, Lining and Modifications, HPWRP<br />
Deepening of the retention ponds and elimination of two intermediate berms to increase the storage<br />
volume from an estimated 40 million gallons, to a volume of 80 million gallons, to serve as<br />
temporary storage during storm events; lining of the ponds. Lining and paving of lagoon bottoms,<br />
retaining wall construction, protection of side slopes of the lagoons, construction of new draw-off<br />
boxes, modifications to the sludge and supernatant draw-off pipe lines and other ancillary features as<br />
needed.<br />
Digester Facility Improvements, HPWRP<br />
All work to be performed in the digester complex: Install automatic gas isolation system to isolate<br />
the digesters from the gas header system; rehabilitate the HVAC system; modify the hot water<br />
circulating system; install a magnetic flow meter in the primary sludge line; and modify the gas<br />
piping system.<br />
Lemont Pumping Station and Forcemains, CSA, SSA<br />
It is expected that the capacity of the Lemont WRP will soon be exceeded due to population growth<br />
in the area. Therefore, this project consists of constructing a pump station and forcemains in order to<br />
transport all of Lemont’s sewage to the collection system for the Stickney WRP, where it will be<br />
treated. The pump station and forcemains will also operate in conjunction with the reservoir being<br />
built at the Lemont WRP under Contract 05-711-3P.<br />
Lockport Power House Interior North Wall Repairs, SSA<br />
Repair of leaking construction joint and replacement of masonry on the interior north wall of the<br />
Lockport Power House.<br />
Aeration Tanks and Elevators Rehabilitation, NSWRP, KWRP, EWRP<br />
Replacement of disc membrane fine bubble diffusers with ceramic plate fine bubble diffusers in<br />
North Aeration Battery at EWRP. Replacement of fine bubble diffuser plates, damaged plate<br />
holders, and air drops in South Aeration Battery at EWRP and in Batteries A and B at KWRP.<br />
Replacement of fine bubble diffusers with coarse bubble diffusers in channels of Batteries A and B at<br />
KWRP. Replacement of flow transmitters in North Aeration Battery at EWRP and in Batteries A<br />
and B at KWRP. Rehabilitation of elevators at KWRP and NSWRP. Replacement of slide gate for<br />
fine screen isolation at EWRP. Miscellaneous concrete repairs at EWRP and KWRP.<br />
Digester Gas Storage Facility, Stickney WRP and Hanover Park WRP<br />
Construction of underground storage tanks for digester gas, associated collection and transmission<br />
piping, compression/pumping station and ancillary equipment.<br />
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BOND FUND<br />
Under the powers derived from the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District Act (70 ILCS 2605) section 9.6a, the<br />
Board of Commissioners of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago has authorized the<br />
issuance and sale of general obligation bonds to provide funds required for the replacement, remodeling,<br />
completing, altering and enlarging of sewage treatment works or flood control facilities and additions thereto,<br />
acquire air pollution stations, tunnels, conduits, intercepting sewers and outlet sewers together with the equipment<br />
and appurtenances thereto, and for the acquisition of the sites and rights-of-way necessary thereto, and for<br />
engineering expenses for designing and supervising the construction of such works, which for 2009 amount to<br />
$932,866,800.<br />
368<br />
368
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Construction Fund Program<br />
Awards in 2009<br />
Est<br />
Constr-<br />
MWRD<br />
2009 Dura-<br />
Est<br />
# Project Name<br />
Project<br />
Number<br />
uction<br />
Cost<br />
Appropriation<br />
tion<br />
(days)<br />
Prof<br />
Svcs<br />
Award<br />
Date<br />
39 Westdale Gardens Pumping Station & Force Mail Northwest 8A 07 162 2S 1 400 #REF! 400 0 0<br />
2<br />
1 ** Westdale Gardens Pumping Station & Force Main, Northwest 8A 07-162-2S $1,571 $1,018 400<br />
0<br />
$0<br />
M 07<br />
Apr-09<br />
Extension A, SSA<br />
2 ** Touhy Avenue Bridge Rehabilitation and Repairs of other Bridges 05-834-2D 2,000 1,395 370 0 Apr-09<br />
on the North Shore Channel, NSA<br />
3 HVAC Improvements, SWRP 05-147-2M 5,000 2,681 455 0 May-09<br />
4 Aquatic Ecology & <strong>Water</strong> Quality Equipment Storage Building, 08-173-2V 600 600 210 0 Sep-09<br />
SWRP<br />
5 Underground Potable and Effluent <strong>Water</strong> Piping Upgrades,<br />
NSWRP<br />
06-024-2M 1,000 102 540 0 Nov-09<br />
$10,171 $5,796<br />
Projects Under Development<br />
# Project Name<br />
Project<br />
Number<br />
Est. Construction<br />
Cost<br />
Cumulative<br />
Constr.<br />
Cost<br />
Duration<br />
(days)<br />
Prof.<br />
Svcs.<br />
Est<br />
Award<br />
Date<br />
6 Primary Odor Control Equipment Installation O'Hare TARP DS-5 07-364-2M $1,000 $11,171 270 $0 Mar-10<br />
7 ** Lockport Power House Interior North Wall Repairs, SSA 08-862-2D 520 11,691 360 0 May-10<br />
8 ** HVAC Improvements at 95th, 122nd, & 125th Street Pumping 06-213-2M 2,250 13,941 360 0 Sep-10<br />
Stations, CSA<br />
9 Roof Renovation, Lockport Powerhouse 05-828-2V 1,700 15,641 170 0 Jan-11<br />
Total Future Awards $5,470 $0<br />
Cumulative 2009 and Future Awards $15,641 $15,641 $0<br />
** These projects are funded by the Construction and Corporate Funds.<br />
The related Corporate Fund portion is detailed in the Corporate Fund's section.<br />
Note: All cost figures are in thousands of dollars; inflation factor is 0%.<br />
369<br />
369
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Construction Fund Program Impacts<br />
Justification<br />
Impact<br />
# Project Name<br />
Awards in 2009<br />
Project<br />
Number<br />
Capacity Needs<br />
Useful Life<br />
Economic Benefit<br />
Safety/Regulatory<br />
Manpower<br />
Energy<br />
Chemical<br />
1 ** Westdale Gardens Pumping Station & Force Main, Northwest<br />
8A Extension A, SSA<br />
2 ** Touhy Avenue Bridge Rehabilitation and Repairs of other<br />
Bridges on the North Shore Channel, NSA<br />
07-162-2S x - - -<br />
05-834-2D x = = =<br />
3 HVAC Improvements, SWRP 05-147-2M x = = =<br />
4 Aquatic Ecology & <strong>Water</strong> Quality Equipment Storage 08-173-2V x = - =<br />
Building, SWRP<br />
5 Underground Potable and Effluent <strong>Water</strong> Piping Upgrades,<br />
NSWRP<br />
06-024-2M x = = =<br />
Projects Under Development<br />
$2,250<br />
6 Primary Odor Control Equipment Installation O'Hare TARP 07-364-2M x + + +<br />
DS-5<br />
7 ** Lockport Power House Interior North Wall Repairs, SSA 08-862-2D x x = = =<br />
8 ** HVAC Improvements at 95th, 122nd, & 125th Street Pumping<br />
Stations, CSA<br />
06-213-2M x = = =<br />
9 Roof Renovation, Lockport Powerhouse 05-828-2V x = = =<br />
** These projects are funded by the Construction and Corporate Funds.<br />
The related Corporate Fund portion is detailed in the Corporate Fund's section.<br />
Note: All cost figures are in thousands of dollars; inflation factor is 0%.<br />
LEGEND<br />
Under "Justification", the marked columns note the categories of benefits expected from each project.<br />
Manpower<br />
+ or - Labor savings (+) or increases (-) expected to result in ++ or -- Labor impact significant enough to ultimately result in reduction (++)<br />
redirecting existing manpower away from or toward facility<br />
or increase (--) in personnel. See additional cost details contained<br />
or process to other tasks with no net change in total position costs.<br />
in "Description of Capital Projects" section.<br />
Energy<br />
+ or - Minor energy savings (+) or costs (-) having a negligible ++ or -- Major energy savings (++) or costs (--) expected to result in significant<br />
impact on the District's overall energy budget.<br />
revisions to a facility's energy budget. See additional cost details<br />
in "Description of Capital Projects" section.<br />
Chemical<br />
+ or - Chemical savings (+) or costs (-) having a negligible ++ or -- Major chemical savings (++) or costs (--) expected to result in<br />
impact on the District's overall chemical costs.<br />
significant revisions to the budgeted chemical expenditures for the<br />
associated process. See additional cost details contained in<br />
= No budgetary impact expected.<br />
"Description of Capital Projects" section.<br />
∗ This project is funded by the Capital Improvements Bond Fund, Construction Fund and Corporate Fund.<br />
The related Corporate Fund portion is detailed in the Corporate Fund's section.<br />
370<br />
370
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund Program<br />
Awards in 2009<br />
# Project Name<br />
Project<br />
Number<br />
Est<br />
Construction<br />
Cost<br />
Duration<br />
(days)<br />
Prof<br />
Svcs<br />
Land<br />
Cost<br />
Est<br />
Award<br />
Date<br />
1 Distributed Control System for Solids Processes at SWRP, MSPS and other 91-177-CE $39,000 820 $0 $0 Jan-09<br />
Remote Stations, SSA<br />
2 R&D Building, HVAC Improvements, SWRP 07-163-3M 7,400 635 0 0 Feb-09<br />
3 ∴ Diffuser Plate Replacement - Batteries C & D, SWRP 06-157-3P 16,000 730 0 0 Mar-09<br />
4 Harms Road 2 Rehabilitation, NSA 07-028-3S 5,400 450 0 0 Mar-09<br />
5 Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewers 12 & 13B Rehabilitation, SSA 03-122-3S 1,380 300 0 0 Apr-09<br />
6 Summit Conduit Rehabilitation, SSA 06-154-3S 1,700 250 0 0 Apr-09<br />
7 ∴ Blower Nos. 9 & 10 and Air Main Installation, CWRP 06-218-3M 17,575 930 0 0 Apr-09<br />
8 Scum Concentration, Post Centrifuge Building, Preliminary Tank and 07-168-3P 4,000 365 0 0 May-09<br />
Elevator Improvements, SWRP Racine Avenue Pumping Station<br />
9 Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewer 14A Rehabilitation, NSA 06-359-3S 12,000 450 0 0 May-09<br />
10 Calumet TARP Pumping Station Pumps E1/W1 Improvements, CWRP 06-212-3M 19,700 900 0 0 May-09<br />
11 Connecting Tunnel and Gates, Thornton Composite Reservoir, CSA 04-202-4F 202,000 1,460 1,350 0 May-09<br />
12 Sludge Thickening Facilities, CWRP 96-251-2P 9,000 900 0 0 May-09<br />
13 Evanston Intercepting Sewer Orrington Avenue Leg Rehabilitation, NSA 02-010-3S 5,977 500 0 0 Jun-09<br />
14 Tollway Dam, Grout Curtain & Quarry Plugs, Thornton Composite 04-201-4F 115,000 730 1,160 0 Jun-09<br />
Reservoir, CSA<br />
15 TARP Pumps Rehabilitation in North Pump House, MSPS 02-111-3M 3,000 720 0 0 Jun-09<br />
16 Salt Creek Intercepting Sewer 2 Rehabilitation, SSA 06-155-3S 25,000 700 0 0 Jun-09<br />
17 Biosolids Processing Facility - Pelletizer Plant, SWRP 01-101-1M 89,172 6,935 0 0 Jul-09<br />
18 Rehabilitation of Fine Bubble Diffuser System, NSWRP 08-040-3P 2,000 365 0 0 Jul-09<br />
19 Switchgear Replacement at Devon & Webster Instream Aeration Stations 06-843-3E 2,000 365 0 0 Jul-09<br />
and O'Hare CUP Reservoir & Emergency Generator Installation at LASMA<br />
and Bartlett Pumping Station<br />
20 C/D Service Tunnel Rehabilitation Phase 1, SWRP 04-131-2D 5,200 380 0 0 Jul-09<br />
21 North Side Sludge Pipeline Replacement - Section 1, NSA 07-027-3S 16,600 730 0 0 Jul-09<br />
22 Sewer & Structure Rehabilitation NSA, SSA 05-018-2S 5,000 550 0 0 Aug-09<br />
23 TARP Radio Upgrade and Backup Antenna, CSA, SSA, NSA 06-839-3E 2,000 365 0 0 Sep-09<br />
24 Westside Imhoff Battery A and Skimming Tank Demolition, SWRP 08-171-3P 30,000 365 0 0 Sep-09<br />
25 Aeration Tanks and Elevators Rehabilitation, NSWRP, KWRP, EWRP 08-865-3P 20,400 730 0 0 Sep-09<br />
26 Office and Locker Room Improvements for M&O Department and<br />
00-273-1V 10,025 500 0 0 Sep-09<br />
Engineering/Construction Division, and New Security Facilities for Calumet<br />
and Stickney WRPs<br />
27 Office, Shop & Storage Facility Service Tunnel Rehabilitation and Paving of 08-170-3D 5,000 360 0 0 Oct-09<br />
B & F Streets, SWRP<br />
28 DCS and Electrical Work HPWRP, KWRP, EWRP 06-842-3E 2,000 425 0 0 Oct-09<br />
29 Sludge Thickening Facilities, SWRP 96-114-2P 173,700 1,300 4,000 0 Nov-09<br />
30 O'Hare CUP Reservoir Repair & Rehabilitation, NSA 06-363-3D 6,500 730 0 0 Nov-09<br />
31 Centrifuge Building & Sludge Loading System Upgrades, EWRP 06-494-3P 4,000 365 0 0 Dec-09<br />
32 Electrical Upgrades CWRP, CSA 06-216-3E 3,500 540 0 0 Dec-09<br />
Total 2009 Awards $861,229 $6,510 $0<br />
Projects Under Development<br />
# Project Name<br />
Project<br />
Number<br />
Est<br />
Construction<br />
Cost<br />
Duration<br />
(days)<br />
Prof<br />
Svcs<br />
Land<br />
Cost<br />
Est<br />
Award<br />
Date<br />
33 Hanover Park Master Plan Projects, HPWRP 06-526-3P $100,000 3,653 $0 $0 Jan-10<br />
34 Reservoir, LWRP 05-711-3P 36,000 720 1,000 0 Jan-10<br />
35 Inverted Siphon Reconstruction, NSA 08-034-3S 48,000 600 0 0 Mar-10<br />
36 Storage Building, NSWRP 04-015-3V 4,210 450 0 0 Mar-10<br />
37 ∴ Stop Logs and Diversion Pumps at Wilmette Pumping Station and Evanston 06-023-3P 5,200 730 0 0 Mar-10<br />
Pumping Station Repairs, NSA<br />
38 ∴ Data Center, North Side WRP 08-035-3V 9,500 365 0 0 Apr-10<br />
39 Final Reservoir Preparation, Thornton Composite Reservoir, CSA 04-203-4F 33,000 1,095 1,700 0 Apr-10<br />
40 Wet Weather Equalization Ponds, EWRP 07-497-3D 20,000 550 0 0 Apr-10<br />
371<br />
371
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Projects Under Development (continued)<br />
# Project Name<br />
Project<br />
Number<br />
Est<br />
Construction<br />
Cost<br />
Duration<br />
(days)<br />
Prof<br />
Svcs<br />
Land<br />
Cost<br />
Est<br />
Award<br />
Date<br />
41 Mainstream South Pump House TARP Pumps Rehabilitation, SWRP 05-146-3M $4,000 455 $0 $0 May-10<br />
42 North Branch of the Chicago River and North Shore Channel Restoration 07-030-3D 6,300 730 0 0 Jun-10<br />
43 Westside Grit Handling Improvements, SWRP 04-129-3P 130,000 1,200 0 0 Jun-10<br />
44 Distributed Control System for Westside, SWRP 91-177-DE 17,500 450 0 0 Jul-10<br />
45 Lemont Pumping Station and Forcemains, CSA, SSA 08-714-3P 45,000 1,100 0 0 Jul-10<br />
46 Westside Primary Settling Tanks - Battery A Imhoff Replacement, SWRP 04-128-3P 150,000 1,095 7,000 0 Jul-10<br />
47 ∴ Digester Facility Improvements, HPWRP 08-530-3P 3,600 365 0 0 Aug-10<br />
48 Final Clarifier Collectors Replacement at Batteries A, B & C, SWRP 02-113-3P 13,900 900 0 0 Oct-10<br />
49 Lagoons 3 and 4 Lining, CWRP 06-215-3D 10,028 365 0 0 Nov-10<br />
50 Gate Control Equipment Upgrade at TARP Control Structures, KWRP, NSA 06-358-3M 2,200 540 0 0 Jan-11<br />
51 A/B & C/D Service Tunnels Rehabilitation - Phase 4, SWRP 04-134-3D 3,500 365 0 0 Jan-11<br />
52 Des Plaines River Intercepting Sewer Rehabilitation, SSA 06-158-3S 8,400 400 0 0 Jan-11<br />
53 Battery D Air Diffuser System Replacement, NSWRP 97-090-2P 6,000 540 0 0 Mar-11<br />
54 Inverted Siphon Reconstruction, SSA 08-172-3S 44,000 600 0 0 Mar-11<br />
55 Retention Ponds Deepening, Lining and Modifications, HPWRP 08-529-3D 19,000 730 0 0 Apr-11<br />
56 Battery E, NSWRP 06-020-3P 315,000 1,460 10,000 0 Jun-11<br />
57 C/D Service Tunnel and Connecting Tunnel Rehabilitation- Phase 2, SWRP 04-132-3D 3,500 365 0 0 Sep-11<br />
58 Digester Upgrades for Class A Biosolids, CWRP 05-210-3P 30,000 730 3,000 0 Jan-12<br />
59 Digester Gas Storage Facility, Stickney WRP and Hanover Park WRP 08-867-3P 18,000 730 2,000 0 Jan-12<br />
60 R&D Laboratory Facility at Stickney WRP 06-151-3V 80,000 1,500 8,500 0 Feb-12<br />
61 Inverted Siphon Reconstruction, CSA 08-227-3S 34,000 500 0 0 Mar-12<br />
62 Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewer 14B Rehabilitation, NSA 06-360-3S 6,700 360 0 0 Apr-12<br />
63 Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewer 20B Rehabilitation, NSA 06-357-3S 3,274 350 0 0 May-12<br />
64 Lagoons 14 & 15 Lining, CWRP 08-224-3D 10,000 475 0 0 May-12<br />
65 McCook Reservoir Expanded Stage 2 Overburden Removal, SSA 73-161-DH 27,000 545 0 0 Dec-12<br />
66 A/B Service Tunnel Rehabilitation - Phase 3, SWRP 04-133-3D 2,500 365 0 0 Jan-13<br />
67 39th Street Conduit Rehabilitation-Phase II & 43rd St. Structure Rehab, SSA 01-103-AS 25,000 770 0 0 May-13<br />
68 Westside Circular Primary Settling Tanks - Battery B Imhoff Replacement,<br />
SWRP<br />
04-135-3P 150,000 1,200 0 0 Apr-14<br />
Total Future Awards $1,424,312 $33,200 $0<br />
Cumulative 2009 and Future Awards $2,285,541 $39,710 $0<br />
* Payment to be made over 20 years contingent on initiation of successful operations of plant by vendor.<br />
∴ These projects are funded by the Capital Improvements Bond Fund and the Corporate Fund.<br />
The related Corporate Fund portion is detailed in the Corporate Fund's section.<br />
Bold Type Indicates Unlimited Bond Projects<br />
Note: All cost figures are in thousands of dollars; inflation factor is 0%.<br />
Method of Financing<br />
State General<br />
Revolving Obligation<br />
Fund Loans Bonds<br />
Total<br />
$0 $339,510 $339,510 Tunnel And Reservoir Plan<br />
264,180 889,120 $1,153,300 <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
Expansion and Improvements<br />
0 159,149 $159,149 Solids Management<br />
65,820 232,634 $298,454 Collection Facilities<br />
0 0 $0 Stormwater Management<br />
0 374,838 $374,838 Replacement of Facilities<br />
$330,000 $1,995,251 $2,325,251<br />
372<br />
372
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
TARP PHASE 2 PROJECT COSTS<br />
Though only partially complete, TARP has already been effective in reducing pollution and flooding. In order to substantially resolve<br />
the pollution and flooding problems in the Chicagoland combined sewer area, the reservoirs component of TARP must be completed.<br />
The O'Hare Reservoir is completed and functional, and the larger two reservoirs, McCook and Thornton, are under design and<br />
construction. McCook and Thornton Reservoir project costs are shown in the tables below.<br />
McCook Reservoir<br />
Estimated Cost ($1,000s)<br />
Project<br />
Outside<br />
Engineering Construction<br />
Eligible for<br />
Federal Cost<br />
Sharing<br />
Project Name<br />
Number<br />
Total<br />
Status<br />
McCook Reservoir - Army Corps Work 73-161-2H $93,662 $339,866 $433,528 $433,528 Army Corps Projects, MWRD pays 25%<br />
Conveyance Tunnel 73-161-AH 891 4,537 5,428 0 Completed<br />
Site Preparation 73-161-BH 0 889 889 307 Completed<br />
Overburden Removal 73-161-CH 500 63,618 64,118 0 Construction to be Completed in 2009<br />
Expanded Stage 2 Overburden Removal 73-161-DH 0 23,000 23,000 0 Replaced Stage 3<br />
Vulcan Excavation Agreement Hard Costs 73-161-EH 46 57,444 57,490 0 Stage 1 Mining Underway through 2013<br />
Expanded Stage 2 Hard Costs - 0 8,200 8,200 0 To be Negotiated with Vulcan<br />
Vulcan Conveyor & Maintenance Facilities 73-161-FH 1,832 30,303 32,135 1,753 Completed<br />
Vulcan Miscellaneous Mining Vehicles 73-161-GH 0 6,200 6,200 0 Completed<br />
Vulcan Mining Trucks and Loaders 73-161-HH 0 11,105 11,105 0 Completed<br />
Furnish and Deliver Primary Crusher PO3030920 0 1,626 1,626 0 Completed<br />
Willow Springs Berm 96-249-2P 0 3,593 3,593 0 Completed<br />
73rd Street Tunnel Relocation 97-156-2H 129 15,003 15,132 15,132 Completed<br />
MWRD Land Value - 30 8,250 8,280 8,280 Appraisal Under Review by Corps<br />
Total Project Cost $97,089 $573,634 $670,723 $459,000<br />
Total McCook Reservoir Project Costs $670,723<br />
-Amount Ineligible for Cost Sharing 211,724<br />
-Amount Eligible for Cost Sharing 459,000<br />
Corps Share (75%) 344,250<br />
MWRD Share (25%) 114,750<br />
MWRD Cash Payments to Date 39,895<br />
MWRD Estimated Credits 25,472<br />
Estimated Remaining Payments to Corps 49,383<br />
Thornton Reservoir<br />
Estimated Cost ($1,000s)<br />
Project<br />
Outside<br />
Engineering Construction<br />
Eligible for<br />
Federal Cost<br />
Sharing<br />
Project Name<br />
Number<br />
Total<br />
Status<br />
Vincennes Avenue Relocation 77-235-AF $467 $3,931 $4,398 $4,398 Completed<br />
Thornton Transitional Reservoir 77-235-BF 2,970 51,737 54,707 32,079 Completed<br />
Transitional Reservoir GW Monitoring Wells 77-235-CF 0 529 529 0 Completed<br />
Overburden Removal and Berm Construction JOC 0 1,674 1,674 0 Completed<br />
Chain Link Fence 77-235-2F 0 140 140 140 Completed<br />
MSC Hard Costs 77-235-2F 0 22,483 22,483 12,525 Mining to be Completed in 2011<br />
MSC Lost Reserves/Hard Costs 77-235-2F 0 21,199 21,199 15,485 Completed<br />
Other Lands and Easements 77-235-2F 0 7,260 7,260 7,260 Mostly Completed<br />
Corps of Engineers LRR (Planning) 77-235-2F 6,345 0 6,345 6,345 Completed<br />
Groundwater Protection System 05-208-4F 4,440 62,000 66,440 66,440 Under Design<br />
Tollway Dam and Grout Curtain 04-201-4F 3,480 43,000 46,480 46,480 Under Design<br />
TARP Connecting Tunnels and Gates 04-202-4F 5,367 202,000 207,367 207,367 Under Design<br />
Final Reservoir Preparation 04-203-4F 5,987 33,000 38,987 38,987 Under Design<br />
Total Project Costs $29,057 $448,953 $478,010 $437,507<br />
Total Thornton Reservoir Project Costs $478,010<br />
-Amount Ineligible for Cost Sharing 40,503<br />
-Amount Eligible for Cost Sharing 437,507<br />
Corps Share (75%) 328,130<br />
MWRD Share (25%) 109,377<br />
Note 1: Hard costs are incremental costs of mining incurred when excavating the reservoirs compared to typical mining costs at the quarries.<br />
Note 2: MWRD will receive royalties for sale of rock from the McCook Reservior site.<br />
Note 3: The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) is anticipated to reimburse the District $23,571,000 for the Thornton Transitional Reservoir.<br />
373<br />
373
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund Program Impacts<br />
Justification<br />
Impact<br />
# Project Name<br />
Awards in 2009<br />
Project<br />
Number<br />
1 Distributed Control System for Solids Processes at SWRP, 91-177-CE x + = =<br />
MSPS and other Remote Stations, SSA<br />
2 R&D Building, HVAC Improvements, SWRP 07-163-3M x x = + =<br />
3 ∴ Diffuser Plate Replacement - Batteries C & D, SWRP 06-157-3P x = = =<br />
4 Harms Road 2 Rehabilitation, NSA 07-028-3S x = = =<br />
5 Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewers 12 & 13B<br />
03-122-3S x = = =<br />
Rehabilitation, SSA<br />
6 Summit Conduit Rehabilitation, SSA 06-154-3S x = = =<br />
7 ∴ Blower Nos. 9 & 10 and Air Main Installation, CWRP 06-218-3M x x = + =<br />
8 Scum Concentration, Post Centrifuge Building, Preliminary 07-168-3P x = = =<br />
Tank and Elevator Improvements, SWRP Racine Avenue<br />
Pumping Station<br />
9 Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewer 14A Rehabilitation, NSA 06-359-3S x = = =<br />
10 Calumet TARP Pumping Station Pumps E1/W1 Improvements, 06-212-3M x - = =<br />
CWRP<br />
11 Connecting Tunnel and Gates, Thornton Composite 04-202-4F x x - - =<br />
Reservoir, CSA<br />
12 Sludge Thickening Facilities, CWRP 96-251-2P x - - -<br />
13 Evanston Intercepting Sewer Orrington Avenue Leg<br />
02-010-3S x = = =<br />
Rehabilitation, NSA<br />
14 Tollway Dam, Grout Curtain & Quarry Plugs, Thornton 04-201-4F x x x = = =<br />
Composite Reservoir, CSA<br />
15 TARP Pumps Rehabilitation in North Pump House, MSPS 02-111-3M x = = =<br />
16 Salt Creek Intercepting Sewer 2 Rehabilitation, SSA 06-155-3S x -- = =<br />
17 Biosolids Processing Facility - Pelletizer Plant, SWRP 01-101-1M x = = =<br />
18 Rehabilitation of Fine Bubble Diffuser System, NSWRP 08-040-3P x x = = =<br />
19 Switchgear Replacement at Devon & Webster Instream 06-843-3E x = = =<br />
Aeration Stations and O'Hare CUP Reservoir & Emergency<br />
Generator Installation at LASMA and Bartlett Pumping Station<br />
20 C/D Service Tunnel Rehabilitation Phase 1, SWRP 04-131-2D x = = =<br />
21 North Side Sludge Pipeline Replacement - Section 1, NSA 07-027-3S x = = =<br />
22 Sewer & Structure Rehabilitation NSA, SSA 05-018-2S x x x = = =<br />
23 TARP Radio Upgrade and Backup Antenna, CSA, SSA, NSA 06-839-3E x = = =<br />
24 Westside Imhoff Battery A and Skimming Tank Demolition, 08-171-3P x = = =<br />
SWRP<br />
25 Aeration Tanks and Elevators Rehabilitation, NSWRP, KWRP, 08-865-3P x = = =<br />
EWRP<br />
26 Office and Locker Room Improvements for M&O Department 00-273-1V x x = - =<br />
and Engineering/Construction Division, and New Security<br />
Facilities for Calumet and Stickney WRPs<br />
27 Office, Shop & Storage Facility Service Tunnel Rehabilitation 08-170-3D x = = =<br />
and Paving of B & F Streets, SWRP<br />
28 DCS and Electrical Work HPWRP, KWRP, EWRP 06-842-3E x = = =<br />
29 Sludge Thickening Facilities, SWRP 96-114-2P x x + + =<br />
30 O'Hare CUP Reservoir Repair & Rehabilitation, NSA 06-363-3D x = = =<br />
31 Centrifuge Building & Sludge Loading System Upgrades, 06-494-3P x + = =<br />
EWRP<br />
32 Electrical Upgrades CWRP, CSA 06-216-3E x x = = =<br />
Projects Under Development<br />
33 Hanover Park Master Plan Projects, HPWRP 06-526-3P<br />
34 Reservoir, LWRP 05-711-3P x + + =<br />
35 Inverted Siphon Reconstruction, NSA 08-034-3S x = = =<br />
36 Storage Building, NSWRP 04-015-3V x = - =<br />
37 ∴ Stop Logs and Diversion Pumps at Wilmette Pumping Station 06-023-3P x = = =<br />
and Evanston Pumping Station Repairs, NSA<br />
38 ∴ Data Center, North Side WRP 08-035-3V x = -- =<br />
39 Final Reservoir Preparation, Thornton Composite Reservoir,<br />
CSA<br />
04-203-4F x x - - =<br />
374<br />
Capacity Needs<br />
Useful Life<br />
Economic Benefit<br />
Safety/Regulatory<br />
Manpower<br />
Energy<br />
Chemical<br />
374
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund Program Impacts<br />
Projects Under Development (continued)<br />
Justification<br />
Impact<br />
# Project Name<br />
Project<br />
Number<br />
40 Wet Weather Equalization Ponds, EWRP 07-497-3D x x = = =<br />
41 Mainstream South Pump House TARP Pumps Rehabilitation, 05-146-3M x = = =<br />
SWRP<br />
42 North Branch of the Chicago River and North Shore Channel 07-030-3D x = = =<br />
Restoration<br />
43 Westside Grit Handling Improvements, SWRP 04-129-3P x x + ++ =<br />
44 Distributed Control System for Westside, SWRP 91-177-DE x + = =<br />
45 Lemont Pumping Station and Forcemains, CSA, SSA 08-714-3P x - + =<br />
46 Westside Primary Settling Tanks - Battery A Imhoff<br />
04-128-3P x x x ++ = =<br />
Replacement, SWRP<br />
47 ∴ Digester Facility Improvements, HPWRP 08-530-3P x = = =<br />
48 Final Clarifier Collectors Replacement at Batteries A, B & C, 02-113-3P x x + = =<br />
SWRP<br />
49 Lagoons 3 and 4 Lining, CWRP 06-215-3D x = = =<br />
50 Gate Control Equipment Upgrade at TARP Control Structures, 06-358-3M x = = =<br />
KWRP, NSA<br />
51 A/B & C/D Service Tunnels Rehabilitation - Phase 4, SWRP 04-134-3D x = = =<br />
52 Des Plaines River Intercepting Sewer Rehabilitation, SSA 06-158-3S x = = =<br />
53 Battery D Air Diffuser System Replacement, NSWRP 97-090-2P x = + =<br />
54 Inverted Siphon Reconstruction, SSA 08-172-3S x = = =<br />
55 Retention Ponds Deepening, Lining and Modifications, HPWRP 08-529-3D x = = =<br />
56 Battery E, NSWRP 06-020-3P x x - - =<br />
57 C/D Service Tunnel and Connecting Tunnel Rehabilitation- 04-132-3D x = = =<br />
Phase 2, SWRP<br />
58 Digester Upgrades for Class A Biosolids, CWRP 05-210-3P x = = =<br />
59 Digester Gas Storage Facility, Stickney WRP and Hanover Park 08-867-3P x = + =<br />
WRP<br />
60 R&D Laboratory Facility at Stickney WRP 06-151-3V x = = =<br />
61 Inverted Siphon Reconstruction, CSA 08-227-3S x = = =<br />
62 Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewer 14B Rehabilitation, NSA 06-360-3S x = = =<br />
63 Upper Des Plaines Intercepting Sewer 20B Rehabilitation, NSA 06-357-3S x -- = =<br />
64 Lagoons 14 & 15 Lining, CWRP 08-224-3D x = = =<br />
65 McCook Reservoir Expanded Stage 2 Overburden<br />
73-161-DH x x x - -- =<br />
Removal, SSA<br />
66 A/B Service Tunnel Rehabilitation - Phase 3, SWRP 04-133-3D x = = =<br />
67 39th Street Conduit Rehabilitation-Phase II & 43rd St. Structure 01-103-AS x x = = =<br />
Rehab, SSA<br />
68 Westside Circular Primary Settling Tanks - Battery B Imhoff 04-135-3P x x x ++ = =<br />
Replacement, SWRP<br />
Bold type indicates projects to be financed by "Unlimited Tax Bonds."<br />
∴ These projects are funded by the Bond and Corporate Funds.<br />
The related Corporate Fund portion is detailed in the Corporate Fund's section<br />
LEGEND<br />
Under "Justification", the marked columns note the categories of benefits expected from each project.<br />
Manpower<br />
+ or - Labor savings (+) or increases (-) expected to result in ++ or -- Labor impact significant enough to ultimately result in reduction (++)<br />
redirecting existing manpower away from or toward facility<br />
or increase (--) in personnel. See additional cost details contained<br />
or process to other tasks with no net change in total position costs.<br />
in "Description of Capital Projects" section.<br />
Energy<br />
+ or - Minor energy savings (+) or costs (-) having a negligible ++ or -- Major energy savings (++) or costs (--) expected to result in significant<br />
impact on the District's overall energy budget.<br />
revisions to a facility's energy budget. See additional cost details<br />
in "Description of Capital Projects" section.<br />
Chemical<br />
+ or - Chemical savings (+) or costs (-) having a negligible ++ or -- Major chemical savings (++) or costs (--) expected to result in<br />
impact on the District's overall chemical costs.<br />
significant revisions to the budgeted chemical expenditures for the<br />
associated process. See additional cost details contained in<br />
= No budgetary impact expected.<br />
"Description of Capital Projects" section.<br />
Capacity Needs<br />
Useful Life<br />
Economic Benefit<br />
Safety/Regulatory<br />
Manpower<br />
Energy<br />
Chemical<br />
375<br />
375
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
376
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
377
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
378
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
379
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
380
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
381
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
382
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
383
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
384
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
385
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
386
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
201 Fund Construction LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
50000 Department Engineering<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 4,027,505 $ 4,068,600 $ 4,068,600 $ 3,980,500 $ 4,172,900 $ 4,163,100 $ 4,286,900<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 71,942 90,600 90,600 50,000 103,700 113,500 114,900<br />
601080 Salaries of Nonbudgeted Employees - 20,000 20,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 20,000<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 71,337 181,200 181,200 157,600 120,000 120,000 120,000<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 480,071 2,945,000 2,945,000 1,000,000 3,097,600 3,097,600 3,097,600<br />
601250 Health and Life Insurance Premiums 589,992 676,700 676,700 675,000 697,500 697,500 697,500<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 125,200 125,200 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 85,969 78,100 78,100 77,000 78,100 78,100 78,100<br />
601410 Personal Service Expense for Preliminary<br />
Engineering Reports and Studies 328,514 2,069,000 2,069,000 934,000 1,645,900 1,645,900 1,645,900<br />
601420 Personal Service Expense for Construction<br />
Drawings, Specifications, and Cost<br />
Estimates 875,406 2,965,000 2,965,000 1,318,200 3,347,000 3,347,000 3,347,000<br />
601430 Personal Service Expense for Aerial Surveys - 50,000 50,000 49,000 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
601440 Personal Services for Post-Award<br />
Engineering for Construction Projects 101,325 830,000 830,000 75,000 1,468,000 1,468,000 1,468,000<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 6,632,061 13,974,200 13,974,200 8,326,300 14,880,900 14,880,900 14,880,900<br />
612010 Travel 10,150 31,800 31,800 18,000 39,600 39,600 39,600<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 21,597 52,400 52,400 24,000 66,200 66,200 66,200<br />
612040 Postage, Freight, and Delivery Charges 963 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 5,087 9,500 9,500 7,000 9,500 9,500 9,500<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services 478 1,500 1,500 400 1,500 1,500 1,500<br />
612090 Reprographic Services 18,846 291,000 281,000 10,000 111,000 111,000 111,000<br />
612170 <strong>Water</strong> and <strong>Water</strong> Services 1,835 3,500 8,500 5,000 3,500 3,500 3,500<br />
612210 Communication Services 94 500 500 100 500 500 500<br />
612240 Testing and Inspection Services 10,879 317,000 317,000 60,000 100,000 100,000 100,000<br />
612250 Court Reporting Services 4,004 10,000 10,000 9,900 30,000 30,000 30,000<br />
612330 Rental Charges 1,036 3,200 3,200 1,600 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />
612380 Soil and Rock Mechanics Investigation - 132,000 132,000 35,000 50,000 50,000 50,000<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 398,216 758,000 758,000 300,000 215,300 215,300 215,300<br />
387<br />
387
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
201 Fund Construction LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
50000 Department Engineering<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
612600 Repairs to Collection Facilities - - - - 540,000 540,000 540,000<br />
612650 Repairs to Process Facilities - - - - 383,000 383,000 383,000<br />
612680 Repairs to Buildings - - - - 465,000 465,000 465,000<br />
612780 Safety Repairs and Services - - - - 260,000 260,000 260,000<br />
612820 Computer Software Maintenance 45,690 49,100 54,100 49,100 55,100 55,100 55,100<br />
612970 Repairs to Testing and Laboratory<br />
Equipment 505 4,000 4,000 3,900 4,500 4,500 4,500<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. 22,003 31,000 31,000 20,000 38,800 38,800 38,800<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 541,383 1,696,500 1,696,500 546,000 2,376,500 2,376,500 2,376,500<br />
623070 Electrical Parts and Supplies - - - - 300,000 300,000 300,000<br />
623270 Mechanical Repair Parts - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 36,143 222,200 192,200 75,000 37,500 37,500 59,500<br />
623720 Books, Maps, and Charts 3,170 9,500 9,500 9,000 12,500 12,500 12,500<br />
623800 Computer Software - 11,500 11,500 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000<br />
623810 Computer Supplies - 4,000 4,000 1,000 - - -<br />
623850 Communications Supplies 1,319 - - - - - -<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 1,146 16,000 46,000 32,000 17,000 17,000 17,000<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 41,778 263,200 263,200 127,000 1,377,000 1,377,000 1,399,000<br />
634810 Computer Equipment - 100,000 100,000 91,000 - - -<br />
634820 Computer Software 160,605 250,000 250,000 250,000 230,500 230,500 230,500<br />
634990 Machinery and Equipment, N.O.C. 31,718 - - - - - -<br />
400 TOTAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 192,323 350,000 350,000 341,000 230,500 230,500 230,500<br />
645600 Collection Facilities Structures 13,851 775,600 775,600 770,000 1,635,600 1,635,600 1,635,600<br />
645650 Process Facilities Structures 328,063 2,206,300 2,206,300 909,000 745,700 745,700 745,700<br />
645680 Buildings 912,800 4,416,000 4,416,000 150,000 100,000 700,000 700,000<br />
645700 Preservation of Collection Facility<br />
Structures 26,427 3,363,200 3,363,200 200,000 2,710,100 2,710,100 2,710,100<br />
645720 Preservation of <strong>Water</strong>way Facility Structures - 100,000 100,000 10,000 3,140,000 2,540,000 2,518,000<br />
645750 Preservation of Process Facility Structures 827,967 3,575,800 3,575,800 1,200,000 7,690,500 7,690,500 7,675,500<br />
388<br />
388
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
201 Fund Construction LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
50000 Department Engineering<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
645780 Preservation of Buildings - 214,300 214,300 200,000 697,000 697,000 697,000<br />
500 TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 2,109,108 14,651,200 14,651,200 3,439,000 16,718,900 16,718,900 16,681,900<br />
667020 Equity Transfer 2,730,000 1,225,000 1,225,000 - - - -<br />
667340 Payments for Easements - - - - - - 15,000<br />
700 FIXED AND OTHER CHARGES 2,730,000 1,225,000 1,225,000 - - - 15,000<br />
TOTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION $ 12,246,653 $ 32,160,100 $ 32,160,100 $ 12,779,300 $ 35,583,800 $ 35,583,800 $ 35,583,800<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the Position Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
389<br />
389
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
401 Fund Capital Improvements LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
Bond<br />
50000 Department Engineering<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original *<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted **<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 12,310,967 $ 15,128,300 $ 15,128,300 $ 14,055,100 $ 16,549,500 $ 16,528,000 $ 16,962,900<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 211,089 252,600 252,600 180,000 298,100 302,500 318,300<br />
601080 Salaries of Nonbudgeted Employees 26,656 20,000 20,000 4,000 104,000 104,000 104,000<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 22,359 81,500 81,500 46,300 150,800 150,800 150,800<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 1,479,067 8,706,500 12,395,688 2,700,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 1,900,000<br />
601250 Health and Life Insurance Premiums 1,364,044 1,578,800 1,578,935 1,450,000 1,627,500 1,627,500 1,627,500<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 498,000 498,000 -<br />
601410 Personal Service Expense for Preliminary<br />
Engineering Reports and Studies 881,769 6,950,000 8,458,052 1,565,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000<br />
601420 Personal Service Expense for Construction<br />
Drawings, Specifications, and Cost<br />
Estimates 14,357,122 51,650,000 95,367,897 19,750,000 11,050,000 11,050,000 22,550,000<br />
601440 Personal Services for Post-Award<br />
Engineering for Construction Projects 1,943,828 10,047,000 20,690,568 1,749,000 7,830,000 7,830,000 8,990,000<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 32,596,901 94,414,700 153,973,540 41,499,400 42,007,900 41,990,800 54,603,500<br />
612010 Travel 4,605 30,600 15,600 7,000 29,200 29,200 29,200<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 13,999 47,000 27,000 20,000 54,400 54,400 54,400<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 24,770 19,000 29,000 27,000 19,000 19,000 19,000<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services 497 1,500 1,500 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500<br />
612090 Reprographic Services 3,786 110,000 156,575 39,000 45,000 45,000 45,000<br />
612150 Electrical Energy - 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />
612160 Natural Gas 22 2,000 2,000 - 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />
612170 <strong>Water</strong> and <strong>Water</strong> Services 3,472 - - - - - -<br />
612210 Communication Services 19 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />
612240 Testing and Inspection Services 411,345 540,000 914,277 410,000 800,000 800,000 800,000<br />
612250 Court Reporting Services 3,250 5,000 39,021 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
612330 Rental Charges 857 3,000 3,000 1,000 5,000 5,000 5,000<br />
612380 Soil and Rock Mechanics Investigation 35,633 - 656,086 167,000 550,000 550,000 550,000<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 53,350 5,200 796,852 50,000 52,200 52,200 137,200<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. - 200 200 100 200 200 200<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 555,605 764,600 2,642,211 732,200 1,563,600 1,563,600 1,648,600<br />
390<br />
390
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
401 Fund Capital Improvements LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
Bond<br />
50000 Department Engineering<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original *<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted **<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. - 200 200 100 200 200 200<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES - 200 200 100 200 200 200<br />
634620 Equipment for <strong>Water</strong>way Facilities 9,486,285 - 2,323,962 2,323,000 - - -<br />
634990 Machinery and Equipment, N.O.C. - 55,000 55,000 36,000 - - -<br />
400 TOTAL MACHINERY AND<br />
EQUIPMENT 9,486,285 55,000 2,378,962 2,359,000 - - -<br />
645600 Collection Facilities Structures 16,279,216 215,780,000 240,113,917 18,257,400 268,280,000 268,280,000 224,280,000<br />
645620 <strong>Water</strong>way Facilities Structures 36,849,788 38,860,000 79,465,697 20,000,000 55,000,000 73,880,000 127,000,000<br />
645650 Process Facilities Structures 70,982,388 301,683,100 319,345,753 25,800,000 303,372,000 303,372,000 359,022,000<br />
645680 Buildings 1,934,532 1,289,200 9,446,309 810,000 100,000 840,000 840,000<br />
645690 Capital Projects, N.O.C. - - 1,144,150 10,000 7,719,100 7,719,100 7,719,100<br />
645700 Preservation of Collection Facility<br />
Structures 212,375 7,650,000 15,182,025 3,000,000 60,077,000 60,577,000 60,577,000<br />
645720 Preservation of <strong>Water</strong>way Facility<br />
Structures - 11,100,000 12,000,000 805,000 7,300,000 7,300,000 7,300,000<br />
645750 Preservation of Process Facility Structures 4,720,424 47,504,500 159,894,717 37,600,000 53,890,000 68,400,000 73,725,000<br />
645780 Preservation of Buildings 3,475,621 15,548,800 26,738,245 3,200,000 5,916,400 13,066,400 13,066,400<br />
500 TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 134,454,344 639,415,600 863,330,813 109,482,400 761,654,500 803,434,500 873,529,500<br />
656010 Land - 1,300,000 1,170,000 - 300,000 300,000 300,000<br />
600 TOTAL LAND - 1,300,000 1,170,000 - 300,000 300,000 300,000<br />
667020 Equity Transfer 8,000,000 7,000,000 7,000,000 7,000,000 - - -<br />
667340 Payment for Easements - 400,000 530,000 500,700 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000<br />
767300 Bond Issuance Costs - - - - - 1,785,000 1,785,000<br />
700 TOTAL FIXED AND OTHER<br />
CHARGES 8,000,000 7,400,000 7,530,000 7,500,700 1,000,000 2,785,000 2,785,000<br />
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BOND $ 185,093,135 $ 743,350,100 $ 1,031,025,726 $ 161,573,800 $ 806,526,200 $ 850,074,100 $ 932,866,800<br />
* The Capital Improvements Bond Fund is budgeted and accounted for on an obligation basis.<br />
** The appropriation in the Capital Improvements Bond Fund is adjusted to carry forward open value of contracts from the prior year.<br />
NOTE: The Capital Improvements Bond Fund appropriation is controlled on the Summary Object level.<br />
Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the position analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
391<br />
391
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Construction POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
501 Executive Division<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
EX15 Director of Engineering - - - - 1 229,316.62<br />
EX15 Chief Engineer 1 1 1 221,561.86 - -<br />
HP12 Secretary #2 (Administrative Assistant) 1 1 1 64,482.60 1 70,117.58<br />
EX06 Secretary to Officer 1 1 1 84,825.26 1 87,794.20<br />
TOTAL Executive Division 3 3 3 370,869.72 3 387,228.40<br />
505 <strong>Budget</strong> and Administrative Section<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant - - - - 2 146,993.08<br />
TOTAL <strong>Budget</strong> and Administrative Section - - - - 2 146,993.08<br />
510 Infrastructure Management Division<br />
511 Administrative Section<br />
HP22 Assistant Director of Engineering - - - - 1 200,030.48<br />
HP22 Assistant Chief Engineer 1 1 1 193,266.06 - -<br />
HP12 Secretary #2 (Administrative Assistant) 1 1 1 67,746.38 1 70,117.58<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 1 1 54,657.46 1 56,570.54<br />
TOTAL Administrative Section 3 3 3 315,669.90 3 326,718.60<br />
515 TARP and Project Support Section<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 3 3 3 299,889.72 3 320,080.28<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 1 1 1 74,718.28 1 64,818.00<br />
HP13 Graphic Artist 1 1 1 73,452.34 1 76,023.22<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 2 2 2 142,022.14 - -<br />
TOTAL TARP and Project Support Section 8 7 7 590,082.48 5 460,921.50<br />
517 Collection Facilities Section<br />
HP20 Supervising Civil Engineer 1 1 1 163,011.42 1 168,716.86<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 3 3 3 243,429.68 2 163,610.46<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer #2 (Assistant Civil Engineer) - - - - 1 92,693.38<br />
392<br />
392
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Construction POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 1 1 1 82,778.80 1 85,675.98<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 1 1 1 88,154.56 1 96,281.38<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV - - - - 1 56,602.00<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III 1 1 1 45,282.90 - -<br />
TOTAL Collection Facilities Section 8 7 7 622,657.36 7 663,580.06<br />
TOTAL Infrastructure Management Division 19 17 17 1,528,409.74 15 1,451,220.16<br />
540 Process Facilities Division<br />
541 Administrative Section<br />
HP22 Assistant Director of Engineering - - - - 1 191,862.32<br />
HP22 Assistant Chief Engineer 1 1 1 177,483.02 - -<br />
HP12 Secretary #2 (Administrative Assistant) 1 1 1 74,275.76 1 76,875.50<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist - 1 1 57,062.46 1 59,059.52<br />
TOTAL Administrative Section 2 3 3 308,821.24 3 327,797.34<br />
544 Process Design Section<br />
HP20 Supervising Civil Engineer 1 1 1 156,074.10 1 161,536.70<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 1 1 1 103,085.84 1 111,540.26<br />
TOTAL Process Design Section 2 2 2 259,159.94 2 273,076.96<br />
545 Mechanical Design Section<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 1 1 1 93,025.40 1 96,281.38<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III - - - - 1 49,758.80<br />
HP11 Photocopy Machine Operator #1 1 1 1 64,836.20 1 67,105.48<br />
TOTAL Mechanical Design Section 2 2 2 157,861.60 3 213,145.66<br />
546 Electrical Design Section<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Electrical Design Section 1 - - - - -<br />
547 Civil / Structural Design Section<br />
HP18 Principal Structural Engineer 1 1 1 119,332.98 1 123,509.62<br />
393<br />
393
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Construction POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP17 Senior Architect 1 1 1 112,452.34 1 116,388.22<br />
TOTAL Civil / Structural Design Section 2 2 2 231,785.32 2 239,897.84<br />
TOTAL Process Facilities Division 9 9 9 957,628.10 10 1,053,917.80<br />
550 Construction Division<br />
551 Administrative Section<br />
HP22 Assistant Director of Engineering - - - - 1 183,694.94<br />
HP22 Assistant Chief Engineer 1 1 1 177,483.02 - -<br />
HP12 Secretary #2 (Administrative Assistant) 1 1 1 74,275.76 1 76,875.50<br />
HP11 Principal Clerk Stenographer #1 1 1 1 64,836.20 - -<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 2 2 2 85,260.24 2 103,183.34<br />
TOTAL Administrative Section 5 5 5 401,855.22 4 363,753.78<br />
552 Construction Support Services Section<br />
HP20 Construction Claims Administrator - 1 1 135,264.48 1 139,998.82<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer - 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
HP13 Senior Administrative Assistant - 1 1 81,035.50 1 83,871.84<br />
TOTAL Construction Support Services Section - 3 3 345,603.96 3 357,700.20<br />
553 Construction South Area Section<br />
HP15 Associate Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 81,142.36 1 88,337.08<br />
HP14 Assistant Electrical Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP11 Electronic Control Technician I 2 - - - - -<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III 1 1 1 45,282.90 1 49,758.80<br />
TOTAL Construction South Area Section 5 2 2 126,425.26 2 138,095.88<br />
554 Construction North and Central Area Section<br />
HP20 Construction Claims Administrator 1 - - - - -<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 1 1 1 81,142.36 1 83,982.34<br />
HP15 Associate Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 81,142.36 1 88,337.08<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 1 1 1 62,626.20 1 64,818.00<br />
HP13 Senior Administrative Assistant 1 - - - - -<br />
394<br />
394
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Construction POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP12 Electronic Control Technician II 2 - - - - -<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 1 3 3 190,182.46 3 173,187.04<br />
TOTAL Construction North and Central Area Section 8 6 6 415,093.38 6 410,324.46<br />
TOTAL Construction Division 18 16 16 1,288,977.82 15 1,269,874.32<br />
TOTAL Engineering Construction 49 45 45 4,145,885.38 45 4,309,233.76<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
395<br />
395
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Capital Improvements Bond POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
505 <strong>Budget</strong> and Administrative Section<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP18 Management Analyst IV - - - - 1 123,509.62<br />
HP17 Management Analyst III - - - - 1 106,693.86<br />
HP15 Management Analyst II - - - - 1 92,693.38<br />
HP13 Management Analyst I - - - - 1 60,328.06<br />
TOTAL <strong>Budget</strong> and Administrative Section - - - - 4 383,224.92<br />
510 Infrastructure Management Division<br />
515 TARP and Project Support Section<br />
HP20 Supervising Civil Engineer 1 1 1 149,137.56 1 154,357.32<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer 1 1 1 114,348.00 1 118,350.18<br />
HP18 Management Analyst IV - 1 1 114,348.00 - -<br />
HP17 Management Analyst III - 1 1 112,452.34 - -<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 1 1 1 84,353.10 1 106,693.86<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 2 4 4 311,949.30 4 331,575.66<br />
HP15 Management Analyst II - 1 1 89,558.82 - -<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer - 1 1 66,656.72 1 64,818.00<br />
HP13 Management Analyst I - 1 1 81,035.50 - -<br />
TOTAL TARP and Project Support Section 5 12 12 1,123,839.34 8 775,795.02<br />
517 Collection Facilities Section<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer 1 1 1 114,348.00 1 123,509.62<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 3 3 3 323,306.62 3 344,315.40<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer #2 (Assistant Civil Engineer) - - - - 1 79,628.12<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer - 1 1 72,728.50 - -<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP13 Engineering Draftsman III 1 1 1 77,243.92 1 79,947.40<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 1 1 1 61,217.26 - -<br />
396<br />
396
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Capital Improvements Bond POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III 2 2 2 90,565.80 2 99,517.60<br />
TOTAL Collection Facilities Section 9 9 9 739,410.10 8 726,918.14<br />
TOTAL Infrastructure Management Division 14 21 21 1,863,249.44 16 1,502,713.16<br />
540 Facilities Design Division<br />
541 Administrative Section<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist 1 2 2 97,287.58 2 100,692.54<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist 2 1 1 35,890.14 1 39,291.72<br />
TOTAL Administrative Section 3 3 3 133,177.72 3 139,984.26<br />
542 Plant Design Management Section<br />
HP20 Supervising Civil Engineer 1 1 1 156,074.10 1 168,716.86<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer 2 2 2 233,680.98 2 247,019.24<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 3 3 3 285,840.62 2 198,845.66<br />
HP17 Senior Mechanical Engineer - - - - 1 92,151.80<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 2 1 1 64,313.34 2 154,901.50<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 1 2 2 129,282.92 1 68,989.70<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV - - - - 1 56,602.00<br />
TOTAL Plant Design Management Section 9 9 9 869,191.96 10 987,226.76<br />
544 Process Design Section<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer 1 1 1 129,303.98 1 133,829.54<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer #2 (Assistant Civil Engineer) - 2 2 229,587.54 1 92,151.80<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 5 3 3 309,255.96 4 431,620.80<br />
HP17 Senior Process Control Engineer 1 1 1 112,452.34 1 92,151.80<br />
HP16 CAD Administrator 1 1 1 97,932.38 1 101,359.96<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 2 2 2 137,041.84 1 79,628.12<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 1 1 1 62,626.20 2 129,636.78<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer #2 (Assistant Structural Engineer) 1 - - - - -<br />
397<br />
397
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Capital Improvements Bond POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP13 Engineering Draftsman III 2 2 2 158,279.42 2 163,819.24<br />
HP13 Engineering Draftsman III #4 2 2 2 163,884.24 2 169,620.10<br />
HP12 Engineering Draftsman II 3 3 3 173,858.10 3 176,565.48<br />
HP12 Engineering Draftsman II #4 5 5 5 344,427.98 5 356,482.88<br />
TOTAL Process Design Section 24 23 23 1,918,649.98 23 1,926,866.50<br />
545 Mechanical Design Section<br />
HP20 Supervising Mechanical Engineer 1 1 1 142,201.80 1 154,357.32<br />
HP18 Principal Mechanical Engineer 2 2 2 223,711.28 2 236,700.36<br />
HP17 Senior Mechanical Engineer 3 3 3 313,938.56 3 329,774.38<br />
HP15 Associate Mechanical Engineer 3 4 4 345,610.72 5 424,271.38<br />
HP14 Assistant Mechanical Engineer 1 1 1 58,596.20 2 133,807.70<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV - - - - 1 66,739.40<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 1 1 1 76,119.16 - -<br />
TOTAL Mechanical Design Section 11 12 12 1,160,177.72 14 1,345,650.54<br />
546 Electrical Design Section<br />
HP20 Supervising Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 156,074.10 1 161,536.70<br />
HP18 Principal Electrical Engineer 2 2 2 243,651.72 2 252,179.46<br />
HP17 Senior Electrical Engineer 5 5 5 552,893.90 6 688,633.40<br />
HP15 Associate Electrical Engineer 4 4 4 349,817.52 5 437,334.82<br />
HP14 Assistant Electrical Engineer 2 3 3 191,909.12 3 211,141.84<br />
TOTAL Electrical Design Section 14 15 15 1,494,346.36 17 1,750,826.22<br />
547 Civil / Structural Design Section<br />
HP20 Supervising Structural Engineer 1 1 1 142,201.80 1 154,357.32<br />
HP18 Principal Structural Engineer 1 1 1 109,363.28 1 118,350.18<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer 1 1 1 119,332.98 1 123,509.62<br />
HP18 Principal Architect 1 1 1 109,363.28 1 113,191.00<br />
398<br />
398
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Capital Improvements Bond POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP17 Senior Architect 1 1 1 103,085.84 1 106,693.86<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 3 3 3 295,205.56 3 315,233.88<br />
HP17 Senior Structural Engineer 3 3 3 285,838.80 3 286,148.98<br />
HP15 Associate Structural Engineer 3 3 3 222,391.78 3 243,239.10<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 2 2 2 166,492.30 2 159,256.24<br />
HP15 Associate Architect 1 2 2 170,701.96 3 247,595.66<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 1 1 1 86,810.36 2 154,666.72<br />
HP14 Assistant Structural Engineer - 3 3 191,909.64 3 211,142.88<br />
TOTAL Civil / Structural Design Section 18 22 22 2,002,697.58 24 2,233,385.44<br />
TOTAL Facilities Design Division 79 84 84 7,578,241.32 91 8,383,939.72<br />
550 Construction Division<br />
551 Administrative Section<br />
HP09 Senior Office Support Specialist (AC) 1 1 1 44,180.76 1 45,726.98<br />
TOTAL Administrative Section 1 1 1 44,180.76 1 45,726.98<br />
552 Construction Support Services Section<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer - 1 1 112,452.34 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer - 3 3 239,223.40 3 247,595.40<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V - 1 1 82,778.80 1 85,675.98<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 - 1 1 88,154.56 1 91,239.98<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV - 2 2 119,170.48 2 130,098.80<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 - 1 1 72,339.54 1 74,871.42<br />
HP10 Principal Office Support Specialist - 1 1 42,630.12 1 39,143.00<br />
TOTAL Construction Support Services Section - 10 10 756,749.24 10 789,859.46<br />
553 Construction South Area Section<br />
HP20 Supervising Civil Engineer 1 1 1 149,137.56 1 139,998.82<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer 1 1 1 119,332.98 1 128,669.84<br />
399<br />
399
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Capital Improvements Bond POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP18 Principal Electrical Engineer - 1 1 99,391.76 1 113,191.00<br />
HP17 Senior Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 103,085.84 2 184,303.60<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 6 5 5 543,527.66 6 649,856.48<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer #2 (Assistant Mechanical Engineer) - 1 1 85,349.94 1 75,273.90<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer #2 (Assistant Civil Engineer) - - - - 2 172,322.02<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 10 8 8 678,599.74 6 508,253.98<br />
HP15 Associate Mechanical Engineer - 2 2 145,457.00 2 133,128.84<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 1 1 1 66,656.72 1 64,818.00<br />
HP14 Assistant Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 74,718.28 2 150,495.02<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 2 1 1 82,778.80 1 85,675.98<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V (AC) - 1 1 88,154.56 1 91,239.98<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 4 4 4 372,101.60 4 385,125.52<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 4 3 3 173,858.36 3 163,049.12<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 1 - - - - -<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III 1 2 2 93,358.98 2 99,517.08<br />
TOTAL Construction South Area Section 33 33 33 2,875,509.78 36 3,144,919.18<br />
554 Construction North and Central Area Section<br />
HP20 Supervising Civil Engineer - 1 1 121,390.36 1 161,536.70<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer 2 2 2 243,651.72 2 241,859.80<br />
HP18 Principal Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 129,303.98 2 205,741.12<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 4 3 3 313,940.64 4 426,772.58<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer #2 (Assistant Mechanical Engineer) - 1 1 107,768.44 - -<br />
HP17 Senior Electrical Engineer 4 4 4 407,658.16 3 320,079.76<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 2 2 2 170,701.96 2 181,030.72<br />
HP15 Associate Electrical Engineer 1 1 1 89,558.82 1 92,693.38<br />
HP15 Associate Mechanical Engineer - 1 1 72,728.50 1 75,273.90<br />
400<br />
400
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Capital Improvements Bond POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 3 3 3 208,031.98 3 215,313.02<br />
HP14 Assistant Electrical Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP14 Assistant Mechanical Engineer - - - - 1 64,818.00<br />
HP14 Electronic Control Technician III 1 - - - - -<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 2 3 3 228,185.62 4 313,504.36<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 3 2 2 181,179.96 2 192,562.76<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 1 - - - 2 113,204.00<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 - - - - 1 78,783.38<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III 3 4 4 183,924.78 4 193,253.58<br />
TOTAL Construction North and Central Area Section 28 28 28 2,458,024.92 33 2,876,427.06<br />
TOTAL Construction Division 62 72 72 6,134,464.70 80 6,856,932.68<br />
TOTAL Engineering Capital Improvements Bond 155 177 177 15,575,955.46 191 17,126,810.48<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
401<br />
401
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
NOTE PAGE<br />
402<br />
402
SECTION VI<br />
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND<br />
Stormwater Management is organized with all revenues and expenditures accounted for in a separate fund. The District<br />
assumed responsibility for Stormwater Management following the passage of Public Act 093-1049 in November 2004.<br />
This law gives the District responsibility for stormwater management for all Cook County, including areas that currently<br />
lie outside the District's boundaries.<br />
The District has established seven watershed planning councils. The purpose of the watershed planning councils is to<br />
advise the District on the development and implementation of the countywide stormwater management plan, representing<br />
concerns of local governments. Municipal leagues are responsible for coordinating activities of the watershed planning<br />
councils.<br />
Stormwater Management Fund<br />
Appropriations, Expenditures, & <strong>Budget</strong>ed Positions, 2000-2009 ............... 403<br />
Stormwater Management Fund Organization Chart....................................... 404<br />
Stormwater Management Narrative .............................................................. 405<br />
Stormwater Management Objectives and Program Summary ....................... 410<br />
Line Item Analysis ........................................................................................ 413<br />
Position Analysis ...........................................................................................415<br />
STORMWATER
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT<br />
2009<br />
$33,807,000<br />
FUNCTIONS<br />
2008<br />
Decrease<br />
$34,924,000<br />
($1,117,000)<br />
Administrative Overhead<br />
$1,756,174 5.2%<br />
Flood Mitigation Projects<br />
$19,611,959 58.0%<br />
Stormwater<br />
Management Planning<br />
$5,807,228 17.2%<br />
Stormwater Regulation<br />
$1,353,700 4.0%<br />
Operations & Maintenance<br />
$5,277,939 15.6%<br />
APPROPRIATIONS & EXPENDITURES<br />
BUDGETED POSITIONS<br />
Millions<br />
Positions<br />
$40<br />
50<br />
$35<br />
45<br />
$30<br />
Stormwater Management<br />
began in 2005<br />
40<br />
Stormwater Management<br />
began in 2005<br />
35<br />
$25<br />
30<br />
$20<br />
25<br />
$15<br />
20<br />
$10<br />
15<br />
10<br />
$5<br />
2008 Expenditures are estimated<br />
EXPENDITURES APPROPRIATIONS<br />
5<br />
$0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
403<br />
0<br />
2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009<br />
403
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT<br />
55000<br />
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT *<br />
2007 2008 2009<br />
48 47 49<br />
15000<br />
General Administration<br />
Department<br />
1 1 2<br />
50000<br />
Engineering Department<br />
11 11 11<br />
66000-69000<br />
Maintenance &<br />
Operations Department<br />
36 35 36<br />
072<br />
Information Services<br />
Unit<br />
1 1 2<br />
522<br />
Stormwater<br />
Management Section<br />
11 11 11<br />
630<br />
General Division<br />
1 26 27<br />
740<br />
North Side <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
9 3 3<br />
840<br />
Calumet <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
6 0 0<br />
940<br />
Stickney <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
20 6 6<br />
634<br />
Channel<br />
Maintenance Unit<br />
0 2 3<br />
632<br />
Channels<br />
Operations Unit<br />
1 0 0<br />
742<br />
North Service Area<br />
Sewer Maintenance<br />
Unit<br />
9 3 2<br />
842<br />
Calumet Service Area<br />
Sewer Maintenance<br />
Unit<br />
6 0 0<br />
942<br />
Stickney Service Area<br />
Sewer Maintenance<br />
Unit<br />
6 6 6<br />
946<br />
Channel<br />
Maintenance<br />
Unit<br />
14 0 0<br />
636<br />
Boat Operations Unit<br />
0 6 6<br />
795<br />
General Plant<br />
Services Unit<br />
0 0 1<br />
637<br />
North Service Area Channel<br />
Maintenance Unit<br />
0 6 6<br />
638<br />
Calumet Service Area<br />
Channel Maintenance Unit<br />
0 6 6<br />
639<br />
Stickney Service Area<br />
Channel Maintenance Unit<br />
0 6 6<br />
* Positions funded by the Stormwater Management Fund are operationally controlled by<br />
the Maintenance and Operations, Engineering and General Administration departments.<br />
404<br />
404
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE<br />
The mission of the Stormwater Management Fund is to protect the safety of Cook County’s residents and minimize flooding<br />
damage by coordinating, planning, implementing, financing, and operating regional stormwater management projects, to foster<br />
improvements in water quality within the watersheds and to educate the public with respect to sustainable growth concepts.<br />
The District assumed responsibility for stormwater management for all of Cook County, including areas that currently lie<br />
outside the District’s boundaries, with the passage of Public Act 93-1049 (Act) in November of 2004.<br />
The 2009 appropriation request for the Stormwater Management Fund budget is $33,807,000, a decrease of $1,117,000 or 3.2<br />
percent from last year. This decrease is due primarily to the suspension of negotiations with Lake County Forest Preserve<br />
District regarding the Buffalo Creek expansion. The fund consolidates the stormwater management activities of the<br />
Engineering, Maintenance & Operations, and General Administration Departments. The budgeted staffing level of 49 is an<br />
increase of one Associate Civil Engineer and one Associate Public Information Representative position from fiscal year 2008.<br />
ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING 2008 INCLUDE:<br />
• Expansion of the Small Streams Maintenance Program (SSMP) to approximately 1,000 miles of small streams in the<br />
District’s service area, 300 miles in the North Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant (NSWRP) service area, 300 miles in the<br />
Stickney <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant (SWRP) service area and 400 miles in the Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant (CWRP)<br />
service area. Prior to the implementation of the program, the NSWRP serviced 57 miles, the SWRP serviced 24 miles and<br />
the CWRP serviced 25 miles, or approximately 11 percent of total mileage. In 2008, as in the previous year, a contract was<br />
awarded to perform work outside the scope of District capabilities. The contract is presently in place and both District and<br />
contractor personnel continue to make great strides in improving small stream flow, reducing the chance of flooding. It is<br />
anticipated that the 2009 contract cost will be approximately 2.5 million dollars, which is 15 percent greater than the 2008<br />
budget;<br />
• Initiation of a Rain Garden Demonstration Program to raise public awareness of the function, construction, maintenance,<br />
and benefits associated with rain gardens. The District intends to sponsor construction of rain gardens at selected high<br />
schools throughout Cook County;<br />
• Initiation of a Permeable Pavement Pilot Study at the SWRP. The permeable pavement test plots will be monitored to<br />
measure their effectiveness as a stormwater management tool;<br />
• Expansion of the Rain Barrel Program.<br />
INITIATIVES FOR 2009 INCLUDE:<br />
• The Engineering Department is overseeing the development of six Detailed <strong>Water</strong>shed Plans (DWPs). The DWPs will be<br />
conducted in two phases: Phase A and Phase B. Phase A consists primarily of data gathering and identification of existing<br />
stormwater related concerns within a watershed. Phase B includes further data evaluation, hydrologic and hydraulic<br />
modeling, and the development of alternatives to address stormwater related concerns. Phase B studies are currently<br />
underway for the Calumet-Sag Channel, Upper Salt Creek, and the Little Calumet River watersheds. Phase A has been<br />
completed for the Lower Des Plaines Tributaries, Poplar Creek, and the North Branch Chicago River watersheds; Phase B<br />
for these watersheds were awarded in 2008. The length of time required for each study varies from one to two years. It is<br />
anticipated that all DWPs will be completed by 2010. Completion of the DWPs will enable the District to initiate the<br />
Stormwater Management Fund Capital Improvements Program and allow for the development of a more detailed schedule<br />
of expenditures for design, post award and construction contracts. Until the DWPs are completed, the District will provide<br />
funding for projects which provide regional benefits and have been studied and approved for funding by regional agencies<br />
such as the Illinois Department of Natural Resources/Office of <strong>Water</strong> Resources and the United States Army Corps of<br />
Engineers (Corps). One such project currently under consideration is a flood control facility to provide compensatory<br />
storage necessary for the construction of Levee 37, a Corps project proposed in their approved 1999 Des Plaines River<br />
Phase I Study;<br />
• The Engineering Department began the process of developing a comprehensive stormwater management regulatory<br />
ordinance known as the Cook County <strong>Water</strong>shed Management Ordinance (WMO) in 2007. The WMO will establish<br />
uniform, minimum, countywide stormwater management regulations throughout Cook County. Components which may be<br />
regulated under the WMO include drainage and detention, floodplain management, wetland protection, riparian<br />
environment protection, soil erosion and sediment control, and water quality. The Stormwater Management Section<br />
anticipates the draft WMO to be completed, presented for public review and submitted for final approval to the Board of<br />
Commissioners in 2009.<br />
405<br />
405
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND<br />
2009 BUDGET NARRATIVE (continued)<br />
Detailed information regarding each Department’s activities as related to the Stormwater Management Program is presented in<br />
the following sections.<br />
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT<br />
DETAILED WATERSHED PLANS<br />
There are six established watersheds within Cook County and a DWP will ultimately be developed for each one as required by<br />
the Act. The established watersheds of Cook County are listed below:<br />
1. North Branch Chicago River<br />
2. Lower Des Plaines River<br />
3. Calumet-Sag Channel<br />
4. Little Calumet River<br />
5. Poplar Creek<br />
6. Upper Salt Creek<br />
The Engineering Department is overseeing the development of six DWPs. The DWPs will be conducted in two phases: Phase<br />
A and Phase B. Phase A consists primarily of data gathering and identification of existing stormwater related concerns within a<br />
watershed. Phase B includes further data evaluation, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, and the development of alternatives to<br />
address stormwater related concerns. Phase B studies are currently underway for the Calumet-Sag Channel, Upper Salt Creek,<br />
and the Little Calumet River watersheds. Phase A has been completed for the Lower Des Plaines Tributaries, Poplar Creek, and<br />
the North Branch Chicago River watersheds; Phase B for these watersheds were awarded in 2008. The length of time required<br />
for each study varies from one to two years. It is anticipated that all DWPs will be completed by 2010.<br />
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGAM<br />
As mentioned previously, the Act requires the District to develop DWPs for each established watershed in Cook County.<br />
Furthermore, the Act specifically requires the District to “include cost benefit analysis in its deliberations and in evaluating<br />
priorities for projects.” The prime objective of the DWPs will be the determination of capital improvement projects, along with<br />
their associated benefits and costs, to help alleviate existing stormwater management concerns. The District will prioritize, for<br />
funding purposes, potential projects arising from the DWPs on a countywide basis. Completion of the DWPs will enable the<br />
District to initiate the Stormwater Management Fund Capital Improvements Program and allow for the development of a more<br />
detailed schedule of expenditures for design, post award and construction contracts. Until the DWPs are completed, the District<br />
will provide funding for projects which provide regional benefits and have been studied and approved for funding by regional<br />
agencies such as the Illinois Department of Natural Resources/Office of <strong>Water</strong> Resources and the United States Army Corps of<br />
Engineers (Corps). One such project currently under consideration is a flood control facility to provide compensatory storage<br />
necessary for the construction of Levee 37, a Corps project proposed in their approved 1999 Des Plaines River Phase I Study.<br />
COOK COUNTY WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE<br />
The Engineering Department, with the assistance of a consulting engineering firm, began the process of developing the WMO<br />
in 2007. The WMO will establish uniform, minimum stormwater management regulations throughout Cook County.<br />
Conservation efforts which may be regulated under the WMO include drainage and detention, floodplain management, wetland<br />
protection, stream habitat and riparian environment protection, soil erosion and sediment control, and water quality. Work will<br />
continue in 2008 and completion of the WMO is anticipated to occur in 2009.<br />
To create an effective process for obtaining input from various stakeholders during the development of the WMO, the District<br />
formed a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). The purpose of TAC is to provide input and advice to the District on<br />
regulatory and enforcement issues. Membership of the TAC is comprised of municipal engineers, public works directors and<br />
various agencies with stormwater management regulatory authority. Each <strong>Water</strong>shed Planning Council (WPC) nominated two<br />
municipal engineers and/or public works directors to serve on the TAC.<br />
The District has also formed a Public and Private Organization Advisory Committee (PPOAC) whose role will be to provide<br />
input and advice on issues of concern to the TAC. Membership of the PPOAC will be comprised of environmental groups,<br />
ecosystem partnerships, and advocacy groups such as homebuilders associations.<br />
406<br />
406
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
IMPLEMENTATION OF A PERMEABLE PAVEMENT PILOT STUDY AT SWRP<br />
The District will construct permeable pavement test plots in the main parking lot at SWRP as part of a pilot study to evaluate<br />
and compare the runoff response and long-term performance of permeable pavement systems under Contract 07-165-5F,<br />
“Permeable Pavement Installation, SWRP.” Monitoring devices installed during construction will be used by the District’s<br />
Monitoring and Research Department to monitor both the quantity and quality of the stormwater passing through these<br />
systems. The goal of this pilot study is to compare the performance of permeable pavement to standard pavement under similar<br />
conditions, and to use this information to help the District establish its position on the use of permeable pavement as a<br />
stormwater control measure throughout Cook County.<br />
RAIN GARDEN DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM<br />
To raise public awareness of the function, construction, maintenance and benefits, associated with rain gardens, the District<br />
will implement a program to sponsor construction of rain gardens at selected public high schools throughout Cook County. The<br />
District will reimburse each participating school for construction of the rain garden and the school will be required to maintain<br />
the rain garden and incorporate the garden into its curriculum. The District will prepare informational materials to be shared<br />
with the general public about rain gardens to complement the demonstration projects constructed at various high schools.<br />
DISTRICT WATER RECLAMATION PLANT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS<br />
The Engineering Department will develop stormwater management plans for each of the District’s <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
(WRPs). The goal of the stormwater management plans will be to identify opportunities where Best Management Practices<br />
(BMPs) or Green Infrastructure (GI) techniques can be implemented. Each plan will provide an analysis of existing drainage<br />
conditions and recommend conceptual BMP or GI projects which can be implemented. Cost estimates will also be provided for<br />
each conceptual project.<br />
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT<br />
SMALL STREAMS MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (SSMP)<br />
The Maintenance and Operations <strong>Water</strong>ways Section has the<br />
responsibility of debris and blockage removal of all small streams within<br />
the District. We will continue our SSMP and anticipate that within a few<br />
years, the need for removing major blockages will decrease and the main<br />
focus will be on inspection and maintenance of the streams.<br />
In 2007, a contract was awarded to perform work outside the scope of<br />
District capabilities. The contract is presently in place and both District<br />
and contractor personnel have made great strides in improving small<br />
stream flow, reducing the chance of flooding. It is anticipated that the<br />
2009 contract cost will be approximately 2.5 million dollars, more than<br />
double the 2007 budget.<br />
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT<br />
35,000<br />
30,000<br />
25,000<br />
20,000<br />
15,000<br />
10,000<br />
5,000<br />
0<br />
Cubic Yards of Debris Removed from<br />
Small Streams and Rivers in Cook<br />
County<br />
Small Streams<br />
2007 Actual 2008<br />
Estimate<br />
2009<br />
Estimate<br />
A Public Affairs Representative position was added to the Stormwater Management Fund in 2007. Responsibilities assigned to<br />
the position include assistance in preparation of the annual report, assistance in public education about stormwater<br />
management, preparation of updates to the District’s website, and attendance at all stormwater management related public<br />
meetings. An Associate Public Information Representative is being added in the 2009 budget to provide community outreach<br />
for the “Detailed <strong>Water</strong>shed Plans” and “<strong>Water</strong>shed Management Ordinance”. This position will report to the Manager of<br />
Public Affairs.<br />
Informational materials have been developed to support the Rain Garden Demonstration Program as described previously. A<br />
standing Public Affairs Strategic Planning Committee has been assembled in 2008. One of the significant responsibilities of the<br />
committee will be to provide an organized curriculum for public awareness of stormwater management conservation benefits.<br />
Rivers<br />
407<br />
407
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
408
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WATERSHEDS<br />
Poplar<br />
Creek<br />
Upper<br />
Salt<br />
Creek<br />
Lower<br />
Des Plaines<br />
Tributaries<br />
North Branch<br />
of Chicago<br />
River<br />
Lake<br />
Michigan<br />
Calumet-Sag<br />
Channel<br />
SMALL STREAM MAINTENANCE PROGRAM<br />
2009 PLANNED SERVICE MILES<br />
WATERSHED<br />
MILES<br />
CAL-SAG CHANNEL 225<br />
LITTLE CALUMET RIVER 225<br />
LOWER DES PLAINES 175<br />
NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER 175<br />
POPLAR CREEK 100<br />
UPPER SALT CREEK 100<br />
TOTAL 1,000<br />
Little<br />
Calumet<br />
River<br />
Combined Sewer Area Boundary<br />
409
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
55000 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
OBJECTIVES BY PRIORITY: Cost Percent<br />
1. Development of a <strong>Water</strong>shed Management Ordinance. Initiation of the program to improve flood<br />
control, manage runoff and improve water quality throughout Cook County, and clearly define<br />
uniform rules and regulations. $3,109,874 9.2%<br />
2. Develop detailed watershed plans which include evaluation of existing conditions, identification of<br />
areas of concern, and recommendation of corrective actions. These recommended corrective actions<br />
will drive the capital projects program. $5,387,083 15.9%<br />
3. Planning, design, and construction of stormwater management projects by the District or outside<br />
agencies under agreement. $19,611,959 58.0%<br />
4. Development of Geographic Information System (GIS) for stormwater management. $26,129 0.1%<br />
5. Promote awareness and understanding of stormwater management issues through ongoing public<br />
information efforts. $394,016 1.2%<br />
6. Operation and maintenance of facilities for the purpose of stormwater management of<br />
natural and manmade drainageways. $5,277,939 15.6%<br />
Total $33,807,000 100.0%<br />
MEASURABLE GOALS: 2007 2008 2009<br />
Unit of Measure Actual Estimated Proposed<br />
1. Development of Cook County Stormwater Management Plan Percent Complete 100% N/A N/A<br />
2. Development of detailed watershed plans (DWP, 6 total planned) Percent Complete<br />
a) Little Calumet River DWP 5% 90% 100%<br />
b) Cal-Sag Channel DWP 5% 100% 100%<br />
c) Upper Salt Creek DWP 5% 100% 100%<br />
d) Lower Des Plaines Tributaries DWP N/A 50% 90%<br />
e) North Branch Chicago River DWP N/A 65% 80%<br />
f) Poplar Creek DWP N/A 100% 100%<br />
3. Development of <strong>Water</strong>shed Management Ordinance Percent Complete N/A 80% 100%<br />
4. Commitment of funds for eligible stormwater management projects Dollars Committed $0 $9,000,000 $6,350,200<br />
5. Remove 35,000 cubic yards of debris from 1,000 miles of small Miles Cleaned N/A 1,000 1,000<br />
streams and rivers. Debris Cubic Yards Removed N/A 35,000 35,000<br />
410<br />
410
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
55000 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM SUMMARY<br />
PROGRAMS BY PRIORITY: 2007 <strong>Budget</strong>ed Change<br />
Number Name Actuals Positions Dollars Dollars Percent<br />
4310 Stormwater Management Planning $2,503,811 2009 7 $5,807,228 ($4,302,643) (42.6) a)<br />
2008 6 $10,109,871<br />
4320 Stormwater Regulation $912,058 2009 3 $1,353,700 ($502,835) (27.1) b)<br />
2008 3 $1,856,535<br />
4330 Operations and Maintenance $3,123,839 2009 33 $5,277,939 $212,491 4.2 c)<br />
2008 33 $5,065,448<br />
4340 Flood Mitigation Projects $66,871 2009 1 $19,611,959 $3,474,366 21.5 d)<br />
2008 1 $16,137,593<br />
4350 Administrative Overhead $912,937 2009 5 $1,756,174 $1,621 0.1<br />
2008 4 $1,754,553<br />
Totals $7,519,516 2009 49 $33,807,000 ($1,117,000) (3.2%)<br />
2008 47 $34,924,000<br />
a) Decrease due to the completion of Phase A of all detailed watershed plans and Phase B for three watersheds.<br />
b) Decrease due to the anticipated completion of the Cook County <strong>Water</strong>shed Management Ordinance.<br />
c) Increase due to the expanded scope of the rain barrel procurement program and the Small Streams Maintenance Contract.<br />
d) Increase due to the expected award of flood mitigation projects.<br />
411<br />
411
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
55000 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND PERFORMANCE DATA<br />
Program 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number Measurable Activity Title Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed Estimated<br />
4310 Stormwater Management Planning<br />
Councils 7<br />
4311 <strong>Water</strong>shed Councils Cost $57,886 $49,156 $40,452<br />
Cost/Council 4,486 $5,778.86<br />
4312 Mapping, Surveys, and Soil Testing Cost $263,138 $1,011,100 $87,068 a)<br />
4313 <strong>Water</strong>shed Plan Development Cost $1,896,268 $7,853,639 $5,259,563 b)<br />
4314 Publications and Public Information Cost $76,043 $361,646 $394,016<br />
4315 GIS System Cost $210,476 $834,330 $26,129 c)<br />
4320 Stormwater Regulation<br />
4322 Storm & Flood Ordinance Development Cost $901,350 $1,841,581 $1,334,268 d)<br />
4323 Inspections Cost $10,708 $14,954 $19,432<br />
4330 Operations and Maintenance<br />
4331 Stormwater Retention Reservoir Activity Cost $273,463 $336,112 $342,164<br />
4332 Small Stream Maintenance Cost $2,547,120 $4,450,336 $4,603,475 e)<br />
Miles Cleaned 0 1,000 1,000<br />
Cost per Mile $0 $4,450 $4,603<br />
Debris Cubic Yards Removed 0 27,000 35,000<br />
Cost per Cubic Yard $0 $165 $132<br />
4334 Operations and Maintenance Contracted with Other Governments Cost $103,842 $126,400 $133,900<br />
4335 <strong>Water</strong>ways Debris Removal Cost $199,414 $152,600 $198,400<br />
4340 Flood Mitigation Projects<br />
4341 Planning/Design Cost $45,988 $2,421,577 $9,200,159 f)<br />
4343 Construction Cost $0 $1,272,000 $601,000 g)<br />
4344 Flood Mitigation Projects Contracted with Other Governments Cost $20,883 $7,044,016 $4,810,800 g)<br />
4345 Land and Easements Cost $0 $5,400,000 $5,000,000 g)<br />
4350 Administrative Overhead<br />
Employees 7 r 7<br />
4351 Personnel Administration Cost $119,236 $120,948 $159,264<br />
4352 <strong>Budget</strong> Administration Cost $22,428 $33,227 $35,400<br />
4354 Administrative Overhead with Other Governments Cost $29,610 $54,433 $41,265 h)<br />
4358 Service to Other Government Agencies Cost $37,044 $237,742 $40,400 i)<br />
Cost/ Other Agency<br />
4359 General Administrative Overhead Cost $704,619 $1,308,203 $1,479,845 j)<br />
Total $7,519,516 $34,924,000 $33,807,000<br />
a) Decrease due to the completion of construction necessary for the permeable pavement study.<br />
b) Decrease due to the completion of Phase A of all detailed watershed plans and Phase B for three watersheds.<br />
c) Decrease due to the GIS implementation being transferred to the Information Technology Department.<br />
d) Decrease due to the anticipated completion of the Cook County <strong>Water</strong>shed Management Ordinance.<br />
e) Increase due to the expanded scope of the rain barrel procurement program and the Small Streams Maintenance Contract.<br />
f) Increase due to the design of the Levee 37 Compensatory Storage Facility.<br />
g) Decrease due to the suspension of negotiations regarding Buffalo Creek Reservoir Expansion.<br />
h) Decrease due to reduction in anticipated court reporting services.<br />
i) Decrease due to transfer of Rain Garden program to general administrative overhead.<br />
j) Increase due to the addition of the Rain Garden program and one Public Information Representative position.<br />
412<br />
412
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
501 Fund Stormwater Management LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
50000 Department Stormwater Management<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601010 Salaries of Regular Employees $ 2,944,506 $ 3,444,200 $ 3,444,200 $ 3,400,000 $ 3,651,700 $ 3,651,700 $ 3,756,700<br />
601060 Compensation Plan Adjustments 26,793 128,400 128,400 35,000 149,400 149,400 153,400<br />
601080 Salaries of Nonbudgeted Employees - 20,000 20,000 - 20,000 20,000 20,000<br />
601100 Tuition & Training Payments 9,015 35,300 35,300 12,000 41,100 41,100 41,100<br />
601170 Payments for Professional Services 180,256 950,000 900,000 350,000 200,000 200,000 200,000<br />
601250 Health and Life Insurance Premiums 390,557 451,100 451,100 400,000 465,000 465,000 465,000<br />
601270 General Salary Adjustments - - - - 109,000 109,000 -<br />
601300 Personal Services, N.O.C. 4,095 7,700 7,700 5,500 42,900 42,900 42,900<br />
601410 Personal Service Expense for Preliminary<br />
Engineering Reports and Studies 2,625,059 9,270,000 9,270,000 5,075,000 5,265,600 5,265,600 6,481,500<br />
601420 Personal Service Expense for Construction<br />
Drawings, Specifications, and Cost<br />
Estimates - 2,200,000 2,200,000 - 8,400,000 8,400,000 8,500,000<br />
601440 Personal Services for Post-Award<br />
Engineering for Construction Projects - 120,000 120,000 - 100,000 100,000 100,000<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 6,180,281 16,626,700 16,576,700 9,277,500 18,444,700 18,444,700 19,760,600<br />
612010 Travel 1,709 2,900 2,900 2,900 5,700 5,700 5,700<br />
612030 Meals and Lodging 5,244 6,900 6,900 6,800 8,200 8,200 8,200<br />
612040 Postage, Freight, and Delivery Charges 305 5,000 5,000 300 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />
612050 Compensation for Personally-Owned<br />
Automobiles 46,760 34,000 66,000 60,000 46,000 46,000 46,000<br />
612080 Motor Vehicle Operating Services 701 1,700 1,700 1,000 2,200 2,200 2,200<br />
612090 Reprographic Services 7,241 60,000 60,000 5,000 20,000 20,000 20,000<br />
612170 <strong>Water</strong> and <strong>Water</strong> Services - 800 800 - - - -<br />
612250 Court Reporting Services 7,040 31,200 31,200 10,000 16,000 16,000 16,000<br />
612330 Rental Charges - 1,000 1,000 500 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />
612360 Advertising - - 80,000 30,000 60,000 60,000 60,000<br />
612380 Soil and Rock Mechanics Investigation 737 114,000 114,000 23,000 62,000 62,000 62,000<br />
612420 Maintenance of Grounds and Pavements 6,247 943,000 933,100 - 7,000 7,000 7,000<br />
612490 Contractual Services, N.O.C. 118,719 620,000 684,400 400,000 766,000 766,000 636,500<br />
612620 Repairs to <strong>Water</strong>way Facilities 999,904 2,179,000 2,159,000 2,051,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000<br />
413<br />
413
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
501 Fund Stormwater Management LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
50000 Department Stormwater Management<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
612790 Repairs to Marine Equipment 55,925 59,300 69,200 65,000 - - -<br />
612820 Computer Software Maintenance - 15,000 15,000 - - - -<br />
612860 Repairs to Vehicle Equipment - 1,000 1,000 500 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />
612990 Repairs, N.O.C. 2,057 6,000 11,000 7,000 11,000 11,000 11,000<br />
200 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,252,589 4,080,800 4,242,200 2,663,000 3,507,100 3,507,100 3,377,600<br />
623520 Office, Printing, and Photographic Supplies,<br />
Equipment, and Furniture 270 4,000 4,000 1,000 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />
623680 Tools and Supplies 2,043 11,000 11,000 10,500 11,000 11,000 11,000<br />
623700 Wearing Apparel 3,052 6,000 6,000 2,300 9,000 9,000 9,000<br />
623720 Books, Maps, and Charts 251 2,000 2,000 1,000 - - -<br />
623800 Computer Software - 5,000 5,000 - - - -<br />
623810 Computer Supplies - 5,000 5,000 2,500 1,500 1,500 1,500<br />
623820 Fuel - - 12,500 12,500 - - -<br />
623850 Communications Supplies - 500 500 500 500 500 500<br />
623990 Materials and Supplies, N.O.C. 1,125 100,000 240,000 120,000 280,000 280,000 280,000<br />
300 TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 6,741 133,500 286,000 150,300 305,000 305,000 305,000<br />
634760 Materials Handling and Farming Equipment - 30,000 45,000 45,000 - - -<br />
634790 Marine Equipment 39,895 - - - - - -<br />
634810 Computer Equipment - 20,000 20,000 1,000 - - -<br />
634820 Computer Software 40,010 20,000 20,000 - - - -<br />
634860 Vehicle Equipment - 341,000 341,000 340,600 - - -<br />
400 TOTAL MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 79,905 411,000 426,000 386,600 - - -<br />
645620 <strong>Water</strong>way Facilities Structures - 8,272,000 7,005,600 - 6,350,200 6,350,200 5,262,800<br />
645780 Preservation of Buildings - - 1,000,000 878,800 200,000 200,000 101,000<br />
500 TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS - 8,272,000 8,005,600 878,800 6,550,200 6,550,200 5,363,800<br />
667340 Payment for Easements - 5,400,000 5,400,000 - 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000<br />
700 TOTAL FIXED AND OTHER CHARGES - 5,400,000 5,400,000 - 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000<br />
TOTAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT $ 7,519,516 $ 34,924,000 $ 34,936,500 $ 13,356,200 $ 33,807,000 $ 33,807,000 $ 33,807,000<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Line Item Analysis differ from those contained in the position analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
414<br />
414
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Stormwater Management POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
15000 General Administration<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
072 Information Services Unit<br />
HP14 Associate Public Information Representative - - - - 1 68,989.70<br />
HP13 Assistant Public Information Representative 1 1 1 58,288.10 1 64,250.94<br />
TOTAL Information Services Unit 1 1 1 58,288.10 2 133,240.64<br />
TOTAL General Administration 1 1 1 58,288.10 2 133,240.64<br />
50000 Engineering<br />
522 Stormwater Management Section<br />
HP20 Supervising Civil Engineer 1 1 1 149,137.56 1 161,536.70<br />
HP18 Principal Civil Engineer 1 1 1 119,332.98 1 123,509.62<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 4 4 4 388,924.64 4 417,081.34<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 2 2 2 153,872.16 2 163,612.54<br />
HP14 Assistant Civil Engineer 2 2 2 129,282.92 2 125,465.08<br />
HP12 Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 64,482.60 1 70,117.58<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management Section 11 11 11 1,005,032.86 11 1,061,322.86<br />
TOTAL Engineering 11 11 11 1,005,032.86 11 1,061,322.86<br />
60000 Maintenance and Operations<br />
630 General Division<br />
632 Channels Operations Unit<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Channels Operations Unit 1 - - - - -<br />
634 Channel Maintenance Unit<br />
HP17 Senior Civil Engineer - 1 1 112,452.34 1 121,234.88<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer - 1 1 97,973.46 2 176,676.50<br />
TOTAL Channel Maintenance Unit - 2 2 210,425.80 3 297,911.38<br />
636 Boat Operations Unit<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V - 1 1 74,718.28 1 81,505.32<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 - 1 1 83,988.06 1 86,927.62<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV - 1 1 54,687.88 1 59,981.22<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 - 1 1 76,119.16 1 78,783.38<br />
415<br />
415
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Stormwater Management POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer Class A Shift - 2 2 129,958.40 2 134,492.80<br />
TOTAL Boat Operations Unit - 6 6 419,471.78 6 441,690.34<br />
637 North Service Area Channel Maintenance Unit<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V - 1 1 82,778.80 1 85,675.98<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman - 1 1 68,224.00 1 71,676.80<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer Class A Shift - 4 4 259,916.80 4 268,985.60<br />
TOTAL North Service Area Channel Maintenance Unit - 6 6 410,919.60 6 426,338.38<br />
638 Calumet Service Area Channel Maintenance Unit<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V - 1 1 62,626.20 1 68,989.70<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman - 1 1 68,224.00 1 71,676.80<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer Class A Shift - 4 4 259,916.80 4 268,985.60<br />
TOTAL Calumet Service Area Channel Maintenance Unit - 6 6 390,767.00 6 409,652.10<br />
639 Stickney Service Area Channel Maintenance Unit<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 - 1 1 88,154.56 1 91,239.98<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman - 1 1 68,224.00 1 71,676.80<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer Class A Shift - 4 4 259,916.80 4 268,985.60<br />
TOTAL Stickney Service Area Channel Maintenance Unit - 6 6 416,295.36 6 431,902.38<br />
TOTAL General Division 1 26 26 1,847,879.54 27 2,007,494.58<br />
740 North Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
742 North Service Area Sewer Maintenance Unit<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 1 - - - - -<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 1 1 1 54,687.88 - -<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 1 - - - - -<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 6 2 2 129,958.40 2 134,492.80<br />
TOTAL North Service Area Sewer Maintenance Unit 9 3 3 184,646.28 2 134,492.80<br />
795 General Plant Services Unit<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV - - - - 1 49,845.64<br />
TOTAL General Plant Services Unit - - - - 1 49,845.64<br />
TOTAL North Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant 9 3 3 184,646.28 3 184,338.44<br />
416<br />
416
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Fund: Stormwater Management POSITION ANALYSIS<br />
Dept: Engineering<br />
Division: 2007 2008 2009<br />
PAY PLAN<br />
& GRADE<br />
840 Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
CLASS TITLE<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
BUDGETED<br />
POSITIONS<br />
ACTUAL<br />
POSITIONS<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
NUMBER<br />
APPROPRIATION<br />
IN DOLLARS<br />
842 Calumet Service Area Sewer Maintenance Unit<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 1 - - - - -<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 1 - - - - -<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 4 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Calumet Service Area Sewer Maintenance Unit 6 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant 6 - - - - -<br />
940 Stickney <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
942 Stickney Service Area Sewer Maintenance Unit<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 1 1 1 68,224.00 1 71,676.80<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 4 4 4 259,916.80 4 268,985.60<br />
PR6473 Truck Driver 1 1 1 65,728.00 1 65,728.00<br />
TOTAL Stickney Service Area Sewer Maintenance Unit 6 6 6 393,868.80 6 406,390.40<br />
946 Channel Maintenance Unit<br />
HP15 Associate Civil Engineer 1 - - - - -<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V 1 - - - - -<br />
HP14 Engineering Technician V #4 2 - - - - -<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV 1 - - - - -<br />
HP12 Engineering Technician IV #4 1 - - - - -<br />
HP11 Engineering Technician III 1 - - - - -<br />
NR8331 Laborer Foreman 1 - - - - -<br />
NR8650 Maintenance Laborer, Class A Shift 4 - - - - -<br />
NR8651 Maintenance Laborer, Class A 2 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Channel Maintenance Unit 14 - - - - -<br />
TOTAL Stickney <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant 20 6 6 393,868.80 6 406,390.40<br />
TOTAL Maintenance and Operations 36 35 35 2,426,394.62 36 2,598,223.42<br />
TOTAL Stormwater Management 48 47 47 3,489,715.58 49 3,792,786.92<br />
Note: The positions budgeted in Sections 072, 522, 634, 636, 637, 638, 639, 742, 795, and 942<br />
are funded by the Stormwater Management Fund, while the operations remain in the<br />
General Administration, Engineering, and Maintenance and Operations Departments, respectively.<br />
NOTE: Departmental appropriation totals for salaries in the Position Analysis differ from those contained in the Line Item Analysis by a factor identified to adjust for vacancies.<br />
Salary ranges corresponding to the pay plan and grade for each class title can be found in the table of Salary Schedules in the Appendix.<br />
417<br />
417
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
NOTE PAGE<br />
418<br />
418
SECTION VII<br />
OTHER FUNDS<br />
Other funds included in the annual District <strong>Budget</strong> are: the Reserve Claim Fund, Bond and Interest Fund, Retirement Fund,<br />
Corporate Working Cash Fund, Construction Working Cash Fund, and Stormwater Management Working Cash Fund.<br />
The Reserve Claim Fund is used to accumulate resources for the payment of claims and judgments against the District, as<br />
well as for emergency repair or replacement of District facilities. A narrative description of the purpose and operation of<br />
this fund is contained in this section along with an appropriation schedule. A tax levy ordinance for this Fund is presented<br />
in Section VIII of this <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
The Bond and Interest Fund is used to accumulate the proceeds from property taxes and investment income, which are set<br />
aside to pay the principal and interest on the outstanding bond issues of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of<br />
Greater Chicago. These funds are segregated and accounted for by each bond issue. A narrative description of this fund<br />
and an appropriation schedule, detailing payment of principal and interest during 2009, are included in this section. A tax<br />
levy ordinance for the principal and interest due in 2010 and 2011 from the Bond and Interest Fund is included in Section<br />
VIII of this <strong>Budget</strong>. Statements of Outstanding Bonds and Estimated Statutory Debt Margin, with a graphic illustration of<br />
past, current, and estimated future debt service, are included in the <strong>Budget</strong>ary and Financial Summaries section, pages 59<br />
and 60.<br />
The Retirement Fund is the pension plan for District employees, accounted for in a trust fund the Illinois Compiled Statutes<br />
established as a legal entity separate and distinct from the District. This section contains an appropriation of taxes the<br />
District received on behalf of the Retirement Fund. A tax levy ordinance for this Fund is presented in Section VIII of this<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
The District utilizes Corporate and Construction Working Cash Funds, as authorized by Illinois Compiled Statutes, to make<br />
temporary loans to the Corporate and Construction Funds, and Stormwater Management Working Cash Fund. Loans are<br />
repaid to the Working Cash Funds from the tax levies of the Funds. The use of Working Cash Funds eliminates the need to<br />
issue short-term financing. There will be no tax levies for the Corporate or the Construction Working Cash Funds in 2009.<br />
Reserve Claim Fund:<br />
Description of Purpose and Operation .......................................................... 419<br />
Line Item Analysis ........................................................................................ 420<br />
Bond and Interest Fund:<br />
Description of Purpose and Operation .......................................................... 421<br />
Appropriation for Payment of Outstanding Bonds, 2009 ..............................423<br />
Retirement Fund:<br />
Description of Purpose and Operation .......................................................... 424<br />
Appropriation Ordinance .............................................................................. 426<br />
OTHER FUNDS
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
RESERVE CLAIM FUND<br />
Description of Fund, Purpose, and Operation<br />
The Reserve Claim Fund is the MWRD’s self-insurance fund. It<br />
is maintained at an appropriation level adequate to meet potential<br />
liabilities. The fund is capable of providing coverage for those<br />
risks that can be expected to be encountered, and being able to<br />
pay such claims without exposing the agency to financial risk<br />
that could curtail normal operations of protecting the public<br />
health, safety, and welfare.<br />
A property tax levy of 0.5 cents per $100 of equalized assessed<br />
valuation provides funds for this purpose. The accumulation of<br />
funds, per Illinois State Statute, is not to exceed .05 percent of<br />
the equalized assessed valuation (EAV), or approximately $78.0<br />
million. Resources are accumulated in this fund to the extent that<br />
revenue from the annual tax levy, personal property replacement<br />
tax, and investment income on the fund balance is reduced by<br />
the payments of claims.<br />
The policy set by the Board of Commissioners is to accumulate<br />
a reserve fund balance towards the statutory limit and to levy at<br />
the statutory limit. This policy is similar in function to insurance<br />
company reserves. The estimated 2008 year-end fund balance is<br />
$53.6 million and the projection for 2009 is $66.1 million.<br />
The appropriation for the Reserve Claim Fund is not designed to<br />
be spent during any one budget year. The available fund balance<br />
plus new revenue to be received must be appropriated each year<br />
to authorize the MWRD to fund emergencies and to settle large<br />
claims or lawsuits. Designation is also provided for accounts<br />
payable and other contingent liabilities. For 2009, accounts<br />
payable and other liabilities are estimated at $4.3 million. The<br />
designation for liabilities is reviewed and adjusted on an annual<br />
basis.<br />
The fund is appropriated in two line items, Account 601090<br />
(Employee Claims) and Account 667220 (General Claims and<br />
Emergency Repair and Replacement Costs Over $10,000).<br />
Account 601090 is for the payment of workers' compensation<br />
and other MWRD employee claims while Account 667220 is<br />
used to pay general claims or judgments against the MWRD as<br />
well as emergency repairs or replacements of MWRD facilities.<br />
The District staff makes considerable efforts to control claim<br />
expenditures by implementing aggressive safety training<br />
programs and returning workers to work as soon as possible.<br />
55.5<br />
RESERVE CLAIM FUND APPROPRIATIONS<br />
Millions<br />
$80<br />
Transfer of excess investment<br />
$70<br />
income from the Capital<br />
Improvements Bond Fund<br />
67.5<br />
$60 Transfer of a<br />
56.7<br />
designation for<br />
$50 liabilities from the<br />
Corporate Fund<br />
$40<br />
$30<br />
$20<br />
$10<br />
$0<br />
Millions<br />
$70<br />
$60<br />
$50<br />
$40<br />
$30<br />
$20<br />
$10<br />
$0<br />
Millions<br />
$10<br />
$8<br />
15.0 17.0 30.0 31.0 33.0 35.0 41.7<br />
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />
Est. Proj.<br />
RESERVE CLAIM FUND BALANCE<br />
(BUDGETARY BASIS END OF YEAR)<br />
Statutory Limit<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Year 2009<br />
$78.0 million<br />
16.5 18.0 32.9 33.3 34.9 37.3 41.0<br />
53.5 53.6<br />
RESERVE CLAIM FUND EXPENDITURES<br />
9.4<br />
7.9<br />
66.1<br />
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />
Est. Proj.<br />
8.1<br />
$6<br />
$4<br />
4.7<br />
3.1<br />
2.9 3.0<br />
3.8<br />
4.4<br />
4.9<br />
$2<br />
$0<br />
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />
Est. Proj.<br />
419<br />
419
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
901 Fund Reserve Claim LINE ITEM ANALYSIS<br />
Department<br />
Division 2007 2008 2009<br />
Account<br />
Number<br />
Account Name<br />
Expenditure<br />
Original<br />
Appropriation<br />
Adjusted<br />
Appropriation<br />
12/31/08<br />
Estimated<br />
Expenditure<br />
12/31/08<br />
Proposed by<br />
General<br />
Superintendent<br />
Recommended<br />
by Committee<br />
on <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Employment<br />
Adopted and<br />
Amended by<br />
Board of<br />
Commissioners<br />
601090 Employee Claims $ 6,155,837 $ 12,000,000 $ 12,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 10,500,000 $ 10,500,000 $ 12,000,000<br />
100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 6,155,837 12,000,000 12,000,000 4,000,000 10,500,000 10,500,000 12,000,000<br />
667220 General Claims and Emergency Repair and<br />
Replacement Costs Over $10,000 3,197,619 43,500,000 43,500,000 3,888,000 52,000,000 52,000,000 55,500,000<br />
700 TOTAL FIXED AND OTHER CHARGES 3,197,619 43,500,000 43,500,000 3,888,000 52,000,000 52,000,000 55,500,000<br />
TOTAL RESERVE CLAIM FUND $ 9,353,456 $ 55,500,000 $ 55,500,000 $ 7,888,000 $ 62,500,000 $ 62,500,000 $ 67,500,000<br />
420<br />
420
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
BOND AND INTEREST FUND<br />
Description of Fund and Purpose<br />
The District's Bond and Interest Fund is a debt service fund established to account for annual property tax levies and certain<br />
other revenues, principally interest on investments that are used for the payment of interest and redemption of general<br />
obligation bond issues. Sub-funds are established for each debt issue.<br />
Debt Limits, Margins, and Borrowing Authority<br />
Non-Referendum Debt Limit and Margin<br />
Applicable Illinois Statutes establish the following Billions $<br />
limitations relative to the District:<br />
6<br />
• General Obligation Notes may be issued at an<br />
amount not to exceed 85 percent of the current<br />
General Corporate Fund tax levy.<br />
• The District may fund up to 100 percent of the<br />
aggregate total of the estimated amount of taxes<br />
levied or to be levied for corporate purposes plus<br />
the General Corporate Fund portion of the personal<br />
property replacement tax allocation certified for<br />
distribution during the budget year, through<br />
borrowing from the Corporate Working Cash Fund<br />
and the issuance of tax anticipation notes or<br />
warrants.<br />
• The District's debt may not exceed 5.75 percent of the last published equalized assessed valuation of taxable real estate<br />
($156.0 billion for 2007) within the District. On December 31, 2008, the District's statutory debt limit is estimated at $9.0<br />
billion, with a net applicable debt of $1.4 billion and an estimated statutory debt margin of $7.6 billion.<br />
• The amount of non-referendum Capital Improvements Bonds which may be outstanding may not exceed 3.35 percent of the<br />
last-known equalized assessed valuation of taxable real property within the District. On December 31, 2007, it is estimated<br />
that the District's outstanding Construction and Capital Improvement Bonds ($232.6 million), Refunding Bonds ($885.0<br />
million), and State Revolving Fund Bonds and Bond Anticipation Notes ($348.3 million), will total to $1.5 billion with a<br />
non-referendum statutory debt limit of $5.2 billion and a non-referendum bonded debt margin of $3.8 billion.<br />
• The Illinois Compiled Statutes provide authorization for the funding of the District's Capital Improvement Program by the<br />
issuance of non-referendum capital improvement bonds through the year 2016 as extended in 2002 by legislation. Bonds<br />
may be issued during any one-budget year in an amount not to exceed $150 million plus the amounts of any bonds<br />
authorized and unissued during the three preceding budget years. This amount was increased from $100 million during<br />
2003 as the result of Public Act 93-279. The extension of non-referendum bonding authority is a significant change that<br />
accommodates funding of the capital program as planned. Bonds unissued at December 31, 2008 were $450 million. At<br />
December 31, 2009, $550 million will be<br />
unissued.<br />
• This non-referendum authority had been<br />
significantly impacted by enactment of the Tax<br />
Cap laws, Public Acts (PA) 89-1 and 89-385.<br />
PA 89-1 restricted the District's non-referendum<br />
authority to only apply to projects initiated prior<br />
to October 1, 1991. There was a specific<br />
exception, essentially to exclude debt for the<br />
TARP project, to the more restrictive provisions<br />
of the Act which require referendum approval of<br />
all new debt. A subsequent law, PA 89-385<br />
provides additional non-referendum authority to<br />
the District by authorizing the issuance of<br />
"limited bonds". These "limited bonds" allow the<br />
District to issue non-referendum debt for projects<br />
initiated after October 1, 1991. Limited bonds<br />
can be issued to the extent that the total debt<br />
0<br />
Billions $<br />
10<br />
9<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Outstanding Bonds<br />
Non Referendum Debt Margin<br />
Net Debt and Statutory Debt Margin<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
Net Debt Outstanding<br />
Statutory Debt Margin<br />
421<br />
421
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
service requirements of any new debt when combined with existing debt service, does not exceed the debt service extension<br />
base established by the Act. The debt service extension limitation for the District is $134.6 million.<br />
Additional legislation was passed in 1997 to expand the “limited bond’ authority for the District. Public Act 90-485<br />
excludes debt associated with the TARP program from the limitations imposed by prior Tax Cap legislation.<br />
• The amount of non-referendum Corporate Working Cash Bonds which, when added to a) proceeds from the sale of<br />
working cash bonds previously issued, b) any amounts collected from the corporate working cash fund levy, and c)<br />
amounts transferred from the construction working cash funds, may not exceed 90 percent of the amount produced by<br />
multiplying the maximum general corporate tax rate (41 cents per $100 of EAV) permitted by the last known equalized<br />
assessed valuation of all property in the District ($156.0 billion) at the time the bonds are issued, plus 90 percent of the<br />
last-known entitlement of the Personal Property Replacement Tax. At December 31, 2007 (last audited numbers), the<br />
District's remaining Corporate Working Cash Fund Bond authorization equaled $324.5 million.<br />
Current and Future Bond Debt Service<br />
The exhibit below reflects the current debt service obligation of the District. In May 2006, the District issued $346.6 million<br />
General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Unlimited Tax Series, and $50.8 million General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Limited<br />
Tax Series, which refunded the Variable Rate Refunding Bonds Unlimited Tax Series A and Limited Tax Series B of June,<br />
2002, respectively.<br />
A July 2006 issuance of General Obligation Capital Improvement Bonds, $100 million Unlimited Tax Series and $250 million<br />
Limited Tax Series, will provide capital project funding through 2008. As current State Revolving Fund loans are converted to<br />
bonds, additional annual debt service will be added. These amounts will be in the range of $1 to $3 million per year.<br />
In March 2007, the District issued $382.02 million in general obligation refunding bonds to refund December 2002 Unlimited<br />
Series C and Series E, fixing the variable rate bonds and terminating the associated LIBOR interest rate swap on Series E. The<br />
March 2007 bond issue also refunded the July 2006 Limited and Unlimited Bonds. Total debt service and therefore future<br />
District tax levies will be reduced by $21.6 million through 2035.<br />
On December 1, 2008 there was a call for redemption of $43,700,000 principal value Refunding Bonds, Series July, 1997,<br />
maturities of 2010 through 2014. The call was financed with $22 million of retained interest income and other funds available<br />
in the Capital Improvements Funds.<br />
The debt for future bond sales is not included in this exhibit. Future bond sales are based on estimated cash flow requirements<br />
of the Capital Improvements Bond Fund program. It is estimated that the next Capital Improvement Bond issue will be<br />
necessary in early 2009. The estimates for total debt service assuming future bond sales are included in the Five-Year Financial<br />
Forecast included in Section II, Financial Summaries by Fund, of this budget document.<br />
$160<br />
DEBT SERVICE<br />
(Millions of Dollars)<br />
District General Obligation Bonded Debt Service<br />
(Includes IEPA Debt)<br />
$140<br />
$120<br />
Interest<br />
Principal<br />
$100<br />
$80<br />
By 2036 all current outstanding<br />
debt will be matured.<br />
$60<br />
$40<br />
$20<br />
$0<br />
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036<br />
Years<br />
(Debt service is for the year ending December 31)<br />
422<br />
422
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
BOND AND INTEREST FUNDS<br />
Appropriation for Payment of Outstanding Bonds During the Year 2009<br />
JANUARY 1, 2009 JULY 1, 2009<br />
RATES OF INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL TOTAL<br />
BOND ISSUE INTEREST PAYABLE PAYABLE PAYABLE PAYABLE PAYABLE<br />
Capital Improvement Bonds - Series:<br />
Series C Unlimited Tax - Dec 2002 5.38 $ 163,938 (1) $ - $ 163,938 (2) $ - (2) $ 327,876<br />
Series D Limited Tax - Dec 2002 3.75 to 5.375 1,817,688 (1) - 1,817,688 (2) 14,400,000 (2) 18,035,376<br />
July 2006 Limited Tax 5.00 3,489,125 (1) - 3,489,125 (2) - (2) 6,978,250<br />
State Revolving Fund Bonds - Series:<br />
90A SRF L 170393 3.59 59,152 303,785 53,699 309,238 725,874<br />
90B SRF L 170401 3.745 30,399 258,179 25,564 263,013 577,155<br />
90C SRF L 170414 3.745 22,333 189,674 18,781 193,225 424,013<br />
90D SRF L 170416 3.59 5,149 38,824 4,452 39,521 87,946<br />
91E SRF L 170391 3.59 55,148 317,583 49,447 323,283 745,461<br />
91F SRF L 170672 3.59 44,792 292,847 39,535 298,104 675,278<br />
91G SRF L 170407 3.59 7,419 48,508 6,549 49,378 111,854<br />
91 I SRF L 170667 3.59 2,805 21,155 2,426 21,535 47,921<br />
91L SRF L 170675 3.59 29,680 194,045 26,196 197,529 447,450<br />
92P SRF L 170774 2.50 135,435 924,951 123,873 936,511 2,120,770<br />
92Q SRF L 170874 2.50 122,498 698,937 113,762 707,672 1,642,869<br />
94R SRF L 170820 2.50 170,288 679,585 161,794 688,080 1,699,747<br />
92S SRF L 170875 2.50 78,190 381,731 73,418 386,503 919,842<br />
92T SRF L 170876 2.50 116,912 497,208 110,697 503,423 1,228,240<br />
92U SRF L 170877 2.50 138,476 552,629 131,568 559,535 1,382,208<br />
94V SRF L 171150 2.50 237,283 841,320 226,767 851,836 2,157,206<br />
97AA SRF L 170822 2.506 391,046 1,240,843 375,499 1,256,390 3,263,778<br />
97BB SRF L 171151 2.535 85,465 242,144 82,396 245,214 655,219<br />
97CC SRF L 172031 2.535 343,301 847,548 332,559 858,292 2,381,700<br />
97DD SRF L 171152 2.905 182,452 337,072 177,556 341,968 1,039,048<br />
01A SRF L 172126 2.57 620,503 1,277,832 604,083 1,294,253 3,796,671<br />
01B SRF L 172127 2.50 648,266 1,279,308 632,275 1,295,299 3,855,148<br />
01C SRF L 172128 2.50 598,410 1,098,734 584,676 1,112,468 3,394,288<br />
04A SRF L 172485 2.50 126,945 166,242 98,214 168,322 559,723<br />
04B SRF L 172488 2.50 308,750 428,440 253,117 433,795 1,424,102<br />
04C SRF L 172493 2.50 31,809 54,515 31,128 55,197 172,649<br />
04D SRF L 172494 2.50 30,504 52,279 29,851 52,933 165,567<br />
04E SRF L 172495 2.50 83,231 112,818 68,913 114,229 379,191<br />
04G SRF L 172611 2.50 48,453 83,040 47,415 84,078 262,986<br />
Refunding Bonds - Series:<br />
August 1992 6.00 to 6.05 465,850 (1) - 465,850 (2) 15,400,000 (2) 16,331,700<br />
July 1997 5.00 to 5.50 445,500 (1) - 445,500 (2) 16,200,000 (2) 17,091,000<br />
May 2006 Unlimited 5.035 8,665,000 (1) - 8,665,000 (2) - (2) 17,330,000<br />
May 2006 Limited 5.035 1,269,750 (1) - 1,269,750 (2) - (2) 2,539,500<br />
March 2007 Unlimited Series A 5.00 4,650,375 (1) - 4,650,375 (2) - (2) 9,300,750<br />
March 2007 Unlimited Series B 5.00 2,410,931 (1) - 2,410,932 (2) - (2) 4,821,863<br />
March 2007 Limited Series C 5.00 2,673,825 (1) - 2,673,825 (2) - (2) 5,347,650<br />
TOTAL $ 30,807,077 $ 13,461,775 $ 30,538,193 $ 59,640,824 $ 134,447,869<br />
(1) Interest Payable June 1, 2009 and/or December 1, 2009. (2) Interest and Principal Payable December 1, 2009.<br />
423<br />
423
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
RETIREMENT FUND<br />
Description of Fund, Purpose and Operation<br />
The <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District Retirement Fund<br />
Active Participants<br />
is a defined benefit fund that provides disability and retirement<br />
2,500<br />
benefits to the employees of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District of Greater Chicago according to Chapter 40, Act 5,<br />
Article 13 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes.<br />
2,144 2,140 2,084 2,137 2,067 2,060 2,051 2,025 1,995 2,002<br />
Public Act 95-0923 which was signed by the Governor on August<br />
26, 2008, adds two additional trustees (one appointed<br />
2,000<br />
retiree and one elected active employee) to the Board of Trustees<br />
for a total of seven members authorized to carry out the<br />
provisions of the statute. The Board will consist of three appointed<br />
and four elected trustees. Each of the three appointed<br />
1,500<br />
trustees will serve a term of three years and each of the four<br />
elected active employees will serve a term of four years. The<br />
term of one appointed and one elected trustee will expire each<br />
1,000<br />
year.<br />
Public Act 95-0891, which also became effective in August<br />
2008, amends the MWRD Act to allow the Board of Commissioners<br />
to transfer interest earned on any moneys to the MWRD<br />
500<br />
Retirement Fund, as well as to the funds that are in most need<br />
of the money.<br />
As of December 31, 2007, there were 2,002 active (contributing)<br />
participants in the Fund and 2,338 beneficiaries. Annuities<br />
accounted for 2,276 of these beneficiaries including 1,600<br />
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
0<br />
retired employees, 654 surviving spouses, and 22 children. Additionally,<br />
the Fund was paying disability benefits to 62 District<br />
employees.<br />
An Optional Contribution Plan approved by the Illinois State Legislature in 1987, was amended in 1993, 1997 and 2002. The<br />
plan allowed employees to make additional contributions to the fund through December 31, 2007. Beginning in 2003, it allowed<br />
increases in retirement annuities of up to 12 percent of the employee’s final average salary. Employee contributions to<br />
this program during 2004, 2005 and 2006 totaled $1,153,704, $1,208,493, and $1,331,828 respectively.<br />
2,500<br />
2,000<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
Beneficiaries<br />
2,205 2,230 2,215 2,201 2,217 2,255 2,279<br />
2,314 2,338<br />
2,244<br />
Children Annuitants<br />
Disabilities<br />
Spouse Annuitants<br />
Employee Annuitants<br />
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
Million $<br />
1,500<br />
1,400<br />
1,300<br />
1,200<br />
1,100<br />
1,000<br />
900<br />
800<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
969<br />
Assets at Actuarial Value<br />
1,257<br />
1,110 1,156 1,137 1,147 1,162 1,172 1,210<br />
1,047<br />
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
424<br />
424
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Gross income for the Fund is composed of employee contributions,<br />
employer contributions, and investment income.<br />
Employees contribute 9 percent of their salaries. Employer<br />
contributions come from real estate property tax levies and<br />
the Personal Property Replacement Tax and are based on<br />
the amount of employee contributions as described below.<br />
A revised calculation for loss in tax collections, approved in<br />
2006, will increase the overall employer contribution. Investment<br />
income includes dividends and interest, as well as<br />
realized and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in the<br />
fair value of the investments.<br />
The gross tax levy for the Fund is based primarily on the<br />
total employee contributions two years prior to the year of<br />
the levy times a multiplier. The multiplier is defined under<br />
Illinois Statute and is only changed upon recommendation<br />
by the Trustees of the Fund, based on fund requirements and<br />
approval by the Illinois State Legislature. A multiplier of<br />
2.19 has been used for computing the levy since 1988. In<br />
2003 the multiplier for the optional contributions was reduced<br />
to 1.0.<br />
Expenses are composed of annuity payments, investment<br />
management expenses, administrative expenses, refunds,<br />
and disability benefits.<br />
Gross income for 2007 was $108.8 million; reflecting $49.3<br />
million lower income than 2006. The primary reason for the<br />
2007 decrease was the lower than expected returns for the<br />
equity markets.<br />
As of December 31, 2007 the funded ratio of the Fund was<br />
70.0 percent. Beginning in 1997, fund assets and this ratio<br />
are reported at the new Actuarial Asset Value required by<br />
the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. The funded<br />
ratio has been in the range from the current low of 70.0 percent<br />
to 87.6 percent during the last ten years.<br />
For the 2009 <strong>Budget</strong>, the gross levy totals $26.8 million, an<br />
increase of $1.1 million or 4.2 percent above the 2008 levy.<br />
The 2009 appropriation is $31,385,921.<br />
Million $<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
152.5<br />
54.0<br />
98.8<br />
58.8<br />
Gross Income vs. All Expenses<br />
Gross Income<br />
Expenses<br />
68.1<br />
62.2<br />
65.9<br />
215.8<br />
71.2 77.2<br />
145.0<br />
82.6<br />
96.5<br />
158.1<br />
88.0 94.1<br />
108.8<br />
100.0<br />
%<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
0<br />
Million $<br />
(50)<br />
(100)<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
85.6<br />
86.4<br />
Funded Ratio at Actuarial Value<br />
87.6<br />
85.9<br />
77.3<br />
75.5<br />
73.6<br />
70.8<br />
70.1<br />
70.0<br />
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
152.5<br />
Million $<br />
98.8<br />
68.1<br />
Gross Income<br />
29.6 (23.1)<br />
215.8<br />
145.0<br />
96.5<br />
158.1<br />
Employer Contributions<br />
Employee Contributions<br />
Investment Income<br />
108.8<br />
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
54.0<br />
Annuities<br />
Disability Benefits<br />
Refunds<br />
Investment Expense<br />
Administrative Expense<br />
58.8<br />
62.2<br />
65.9<br />
Expenses<br />
71.2<br />
77.2<br />
82.6<br />
88.0<br />
94.1<br />
100.0<br />
0<br />
29.6 (23.1)<br />
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
0<br />
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
425<br />
425
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Appropriation Ordinance<br />
THE METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT RETIREMENT FUND<br />
Amount of Estimated Expenditures for the Purpose of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District Retirement Fund<br />
$31,385,921.<br />
Section 9. That the appropriation herein of the amounts for<br />
the payment of “unpaid bills” or “contractual liabilities,” or<br />
to defray the expense of any project or purpose, shall not<br />
be construed as an approval or an admission of liability by<br />
the Board of Commissioners of any said bills or<br />
contractual liabilities, or of any project or purpose<br />
mentioned herein but shall be regarded only as the<br />
provision of a fund or funds, for the payment thereof when<br />
said bills or contractual liabilities have been found to be<br />
valid and legal obligations against the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago and when<br />
properly vouchered and audited by the Department of<br />
Finance, or when any project or purpose is approved and<br />
authorized by the Board of Commissioners of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago, as the case may be.<br />
Section 10. This ordinance shall take effect January 1,<br />
2009.<br />
Approved as to Form and Legality:<br />
Approved:<br />
Deputy General Counsel<br />
President,<br />
Board of Commissioners of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District<br />
of Greater Chicago<br />
General Counsel<br />
426<br />
426
SECTION VIII<br />
TAX LEVY ORDINANCES<br />
The Tax Levy Ordinances are the means by which tax levies, enacted by the Board of Commissioners under authority of the<br />
Illinois Compiled Statutes, are given legal effect.<br />
Each tax levy states the revenue which is to be raised, through the collection of property taxes, to finance the operations of a<br />
specific fund. The gross tax levy, which allows for loss in collection, is presented with the amount of estimated loss, where<br />
applicable. A factor of 3.5 percent, for loss in collection, is used for 2009 levies.<br />
This section includes 2009 Tax Levy Ordinances for the Retirement Fund, Corporate Fund, Construction Fund, Reserve<br />
Claim Fund, and Stormwater Management Fund. A Tax Levy Ordinance, to pay the interest on outstanding bonds and to<br />
discharge the principal thereof, along with a detailed schedule of the 2009 Tax Levy for Payment of Outstanding Bonds, can<br />
be found in this section.<br />
Retirement Fund and Corporate Fund ........................................................................ 427<br />
Construction Fund ..................................................................................................... 428<br />
Bond and Interest Fund:<br />
Tax Levy Ordinance for Outstanding Bonds .................................................429<br />
Tax Levy for Payment of Outstanding Bonds, 2009 ..................................... 431<br />
Reserve Claim Fund ................................................................................................... 432<br />
Stormwater Management Fund ..................................................................................433<br />
TAX LEVY<br />
ORDINANCES
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
An Ordinance<br />
FOR THE LEVY OF TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR<br />
BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2009 AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009<br />
UPON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL LIMITS OF THE<br />
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
AS SAID TERRITORIAL LIMITS EXIST ON JANUARY 1, 2009<br />
FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING REVENUES FOR<br />
THE METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT<br />
RETIREMENT FUND AND CORPORATE FUND<br />
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago:<br />
Section 1. That there be and is hereby levied upon all taxable property within the territorial limits of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago, as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009, for the fiscal year ending December 31,<br />
2009, the amounts of money hereinafter stated as follows:<br />
For the amount certified to the Board of Commissioners of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago by the<br />
Retirement Board of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District Retirement Fund for the purpose of providing the revenue for<br />
the Retirement Fund of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District pursuant to Article 13 of the Illinois Pension Code, the sum<br />
of $26,751,300 which includes the sum of $936,296 as a reserve for loss in collection of taxes, distributed as<br />
Contributions for Service Retirement Allowances and Spouses’ Allowances...............................$11,600,016<br />
Contributions for Ordinary Disability Benefits .................................................................................1,172,664<br />
Contributions for Expense of Administration....................................................................................1,323,468<br />
Contributions for Duty Disability Benefits...........................................................................................406,597<br />
Contributions for Children’s Annuities ................................................................................................103,514<br />
Contributions for Current and Past Service Requirements ............................................................ 12,145,041<br />
$26,751,300<br />
For Corporate Purposes of said the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago “the sum of $242,027,000<br />
which includes the sum of $8,470,945 as a reserve for loss in the collection of taxes.”<br />
Section 2. That the Clerk of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago be, and is hereby directed to<br />
certify to the County Clerk of Cook County, the several amounts above set forth to be raised by taxation in the year 2009 and<br />
to file a certified copy of the Ordinance with the said County Clerk of Cook County and said County Clerk of Cook County<br />
aforesaid, is hereby directed to cause the aforesaid amounts of money to be extended upon and against the taxable property<br />
within the territorial limits of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago, as said territorial limits exist on<br />
January 1, 2009, all in accordance with the laws and statutes of the State of Illinois in such case made and provided, and the<br />
Clerk of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago is hereby directed to cause this Ordinance to be<br />
published at least once in a newspaper published within the territorial limits of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of<br />
Greater Chicago and to incur the necessary expenses therefor.<br />
Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2009.<br />
Approved as to Form and Legality:<br />
Approved:<br />
Deputy General Counsel<br />
General Counsel<br />
President,<br />
Board of Commissioners of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District<br />
of Greater Chicago<br />
427<br />
427
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
An Ordinance<br />
FOR THE LEVY OF TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR<br />
BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2009 AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009<br />
UPON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL LIMITS OF THE<br />
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
AS SAID TERRITORIAL LIMITS EXIST ON JANUARY 1, 2009<br />
FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING REVENUES<br />
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION FUND<br />
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago:<br />
Section 1. That there be and is hereby levied upon all<br />
taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago,<br />
as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009, for the<br />
fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, to provide revenue<br />
for the replacement, remodeling, completion, alteration,<br />
construction, and enlargement, including alterations,<br />
enlargements and replacements which will add appreciably<br />
to the value, utility, or the useful life of sewage treatment<br />
works or flood control facilities, and additions therefor,<br />
pumping stations, tunnels, conduits and intercepting sewers<br />
connecting therewith, and outlet sewers together with the<br />
equipment and appurtenances necessary thereto, and for the<br />
acquisition of the sites and rights of way necessary thereto,<br />
and for engineering expenses for designing and supervising<br />
the construction of the works above described, “the sum of<br />
$11,390,000 which includes the sum of $398,650 as a<br />
reserve for loss in collection of taxes.”<br />
Section 2. That the Clerk of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago be, and is hereby<br />
directed to certify to the County Clerk of Cook County, the<br />
amount above set forth to be raised by taxation in the year<br />
2008 and to file a certified copy of the Ordinance with the<br />
said County Clerk of Cook County, and said County Clerk<br />
of Cook County aforesaid, is hereby directed to cause the<br />
aforesaid amount of money to be extended upon and against<br />
the taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago, as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009,<br />
all in accordance with the laws and statutes of the State of<br />
Illinois in such case made and provided, and the Clerk of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
is hereby directed to cause this Ordinance to be published at<br />
least once in a newspaper published within the territorial<br />
limits of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of<br />
Greater Chicago and to incur the necessary expenses<br />
therefor.<br />
Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2009.<br />
Approved as to Form and Legality:<br />
Approved:<br />
Deputy General Counsel<br />
General Counsel<br />
President,<br />
Board of Commissioners of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District<br />
of Greater Chicago<br />
428<br />
428
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
An Ordinance<br />
FOR THE LEVY OF TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR<br />
BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2009 AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009<br />
TO PAY THE INTEREST ON OUTSTANDING BONDS AND TO<br />
DISCHARGE THE PRINCIPAL THEREOF<br />
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago:<br />
Section 1. For the purpose of creating a sinking fund to<br />
pay the principal and interest on outstanding bonds, there<br />
is hereby levied upon all taxable property within the<br />
territorial limits of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
District of Greater Chicago, as said territorial limits exist<br />
on January 1, 2009, and all taxable property in townships<br />
or parts of townships disconnected from the <strong>Metropolitan</strong><br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago prior to<br />
January 1, 2009, but after the issuance of any bonds, the<br />
amounts of money hereinafter stated:<br />
Capital Improvement Bonds – Series:<br />
Series C Unlimited Tax – December 2002........... 12-01-02 .................................................$ 339,767<br />
Series D Limited Tax – December 2002 .............. 12-01-02 ..................................................18,673,964<br />
July 2006 Limited Tax ......................................... 07-01-06 ..................................................22,391,969<br />
State Revolving Funds Bonds – Series:<br />
90A SRF L170393 ..................................................................................................................... 752,201<br />
90B SRF L170401...................................................................................................................... 598,088<br />
90C SRF L170414...................................................................................................................... 439,392<br />
90E SRF L170391...................................................................................................................... 772,498<br />
91F SRF L170672 ...................................................................................................................... 699,770<br />
91G SRF L170407 ..................................................................................................................... 115,911<br />
91I SRF L170667......................................................................................................................... 49,658<br />
91L SRF L170675...................................................................................................................... 463,678<br />
92Q SRF L170874 ...................................................................................................................1,702,456<br />
94R SRF L170820....................................................................................................................1,761,395<br />
92T SRF L170876....................................................................................................................1,272,788<br />
92U SRF L170877 ...................................................................................................................1,432,341<br />
94V SRF L171150 ...................................................................................................................2,235,447<br />
97AA SRF L170822.................................................................................................................3,382,154<br />
97BB SRF L171151................................................................................................................... 678,983<br />
97CC SRF L172031.................................................................................................................2,468,083<br />
97DD SRF L171152.................................................................................................................1,076,734<br />
01A SRF L172126 ...................................................................................................................3,934,374<br />
01B SRF L172127....................................................................................................................3,994,973<br />
01C SRF L172128....................................................................................................................3,517,397<br />
04A SRF L172485 ..................................................................................................................... 552,403<br />
04B SRF L172488....................................................................................................................1,423,652<br />
04C SRF L172493...................................................................................................................... 178,911<br />
04D SRF L172494 ..................................................................................................................... 171,571<br />
04E SRF L172495...................................................................................................................... 379,566<br />
04F SRF L172496 ...................................................................................................................... 121,761<br />
04G SRF L172611 ..................................................................................................................... 272,523<br />
04H SRF L172849 ...................................................................................................................2,849,741<br />
07D SRF L172763 ..................................................................................................................... 647,668<br />
Refunding Bonds – Series:<br />
May 2006 Unlimited Tax ..................................... 05-01-06 ..................................................17,958,549<br />
May 2006 Limited Tax......................................... 05-01-06 ................................................... 2,631,606<br />
March 2007 Unlimited Tax Series A.................... 03-21-07 ................................................... 9,638,083<br />
March 2007 Unlimited Tax Series B.................... 03-21-07 ................................................... 4,996,749<br />
March 2007 Limited Tax Series C ....................... 03-21-07 .............................................. 5,541,606<br />
$ 120,118,410<br />
429<br />
429
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
An Ordinance<br />
FOR THE LEVY OF TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR<br />
BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2009 AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009<br />
TO PAY THE INTEREST ON OUTSTANDING BONDS AND TO<br />
DISCHARGE THE PRINCIPAL THEREOF<br />
(CONTINUED)<br />
Section 2. That the Clerk of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago be, and is hereby<br />
directed to certify to the County Clerk of Cook County,<br />
the several amounts above set forth to be raised by<br />
taxation in the year 2009 for the purpose of providing the<br />
funds to pay the interest on bonds and discharge the<br />
principal thereof, and to file a certified copy of this<br />
Ordinance with said County Clerk of Cook County, and<br />
said County Clerk of Cook County is hereby directed to<br />
cause aforesaid amounts of money to be extended upon<br />
and against taxable property within the territorial limits of<br />
the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009,<br />
and the County Clerk of Cook County is further directed<br />
to extend upon all taxable property in all townships or<br />
parts of townships disconnected from the <strong>Metropolitan</strong><br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago prior to<br />
January 1, 2009 those amounts aforesaid necessary to pay<br />
the principal and interest for any bonds issued prior to the<br />
date of disconnection, all in accordance with the laws and<br />
statutes of the State of Illinois in such case made and<br />
provided, and the Clerk of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago is hereby<br />
directed to cause this Ordinance to be published at least<br />
once in a newspaper published within the territorial limits<br />
of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago and to incur the necessary expenses therefor.<br />
Section 3: This Ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2009.<br />
Approved as to Form and Legality:<br />
Approved:<br />
Deputy General Counsel<br />
General Counsel<br />
President,<br />
Board of Commissioners of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District<br />
of Greater Chicago<br />
430<br />
430
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
BOND AND INTEREST FUNDS<br />
2009 Tax Levy for Payment of Outstanding Bonds<br />
INTEREST RESERVE FOR<br />
ISSUE PAYMENT UNCOLLECTED GROSS<br />
BOND ISSUE DATED DATES INTEREST PRINCIPAL TAX (A) LEVY<br />
Capital Improvement Bonds - Series:<br />
Ser C Unlim Tax-Dec 2002 12-01-02 6/1/10- 12/1/10 $ 327,875 $ - $ 11,892 $ 339,767<br />
Ser D Lim Tax-Dec 2002 12-01-02 6/1/10- 12/1/10 2,920,375 15,100,000 653,589 18,673,964<br />
July 2006 Limited Tax 07-01-06 6/1/10- 12/1/10 6,978,250 14,630,000 783,719 22,391,969<br />
State Revolving Fund Bonds - Series:<br />
90A SRF L170393 07-01-96 7/1/10- 1/1/11 79,243 646,631 26,327 752,201<br />
90B SRF L170401 01-01-94 7/1/10- 1/1/11 26,133 551,022 20,933 598,088<br />
90C SRF L170414 01-01-93 7/1/10- 1/1/11 19,199 404,814 15,379 439,392<br />
90E SRF L170391 01-01-00 7/1/10- 1/1/11 69,461 676,000 27,037 772,498<br />
91F SRF L170672 07-01-96 7/1/10- 1/1/11 51,930 623,348 24,492 699,770<br />
91G SRF L170407 07-01-94 7/1/10- 1/1/11 8,602 103,252 4,057 115,911<br />
91I SRF L170667 07-01-97 7/1/10- 1/1/11 2,891 45,029 1,738 49,658<br />
91L SRF L170675 01-01-96 7/1/10- 1/1/11 34,409 413,040 16,229 463,678<br />
92Q SRF L170874 03-22-95 7/1/10- 1/1/11 182,850 1,460,020 59,586 1,702,456<br />
94R SRF L170820 07-01-99 7/1/10- 1/1/11 280,151 1,419,595 61,649 1,761,395<br />
92T SRF L170876 01-02-97 7/1/10- 1/1/11 189,615 1,038,625 44,548 1,272,788<br />
92U SRF L170877 07-01-00 7/1/10- 1/1/11 227,815 1,154,394 50,132 1,432,341<br />
94V SRF L171150 01-01-03 7/1/10- 1/1/11 399,760 1,757,446 78,241 2,235,447<br />
97AA SRF L170822 01-08-99 7/1/10- 1/1/11 671,492 2,592,286 118,375 3,382,154<br />
97BB SRF L171151 10-24-00 7/1/10- 1/1/11 149,093 506,126 23,764 678,983<br />
97CC SRF L172031 04-27-02 7/1/10- 1/1/11 610,170 1,771,530 86,383 2,468,083<br />
97DD SRF L171152 08-01-03 7/1/10- 1/1/11 329,986 709,062 37,686 1,076,734<br />
01A SRF L172126 01-15-04 7/1/10- 1/1/11 1,124,153 2,672,518 137,703 3,934,374<br />
01B SRF L172127 01-15-05 7/1/10- 1/1/11 1,182,782 2,672,367 139,824 3,994,973<br />
01C SRF L172128 06-27-08 7/1/10- 1/1/11 1,099,125 2,295,163 123,109 3,517,397<br />
04A SRF L172485 06-30-08 7/1/10- 1/1/11 185,802 347,267 19,334 552,403<br />
04B SRF L172488 06-30-08 7/1/10- 1/1/11 478,849 894,975 49,828 1,423,652<br />
04C SRF L172493 06-05-07 7/1/10- 1/1/11 58,771 113,878 6,262 178,911<br />
04D SRF L172494 06-05-07 7/1/10- 1/1/11 56,360 109,206 6,004 171,571<br />
04E SRF L172495 06-30-08 7/1/10- 1/1/11 130,614 235,667 13,285 379,566<br />
04F SRF L172496 (B) 7/1/10- 1/1/11 117,500 - 4,261 121,761<br />
04G SRF L172611 06-05-07 7/1/10- 1/1/11 89,522 173,462 9,539 272,523<br />
04H SRF L172849 (B) 7/1/10- 1/1/11 2,750,000 - 99,741 2,849,741<br />
07D SRF L172763 (B) 7/1/10- 1/1/11 625,000 - 22,669 647,668<br />
Refunding Bond - Series:<br />
May 2006 Unlimited Tax 05-01-06 6/1/10- 12/1/10 17,330,000 - 628,549 17,958,549<br />
May 2006 Limited Tax 05-01-06 6/1/10- 12/1/10 2,539,500 - 92,106 2,631,606<br />
March 2007 Unlimited Tax A 03-21-07 6/1/10- 12/1/10 9,300,750 - 337,333 9,638,083<br />
March 2007 Unlimited Tax B 03-21-07 6/1/10- 12/1/10 4,821,863 - 174,886 4,996,749<br />
March 2007 Limited Tax C 03-21-07 6/1/10- 12/1/10 5,347,650 - 193,956 5,541,606<br />
TOTAL $ 60,797,541 $ 55,116,724 $ 4,204,145 $ 120,118,410<br />
(A) Reserve at 3.5%<br />
(B) Pre-Bond<br />
431<br />
431
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
An Ordinance<br />
FOR THE LEVY OF TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR<br />
BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2009 AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009<br />
UPON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL LIMITS OF<br />
THE METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
AS SAID TERRITORIAL LIMITS EXIST ON JANUARY 1, 2009<br />
FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING REVENUES<br />
FOR THE RESERVE CLAIM FUND<br />
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago:<br />
Section 1. That there is hereby levied the sum of $3,182,000<br />
upon all taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009, for the<br />
fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, for the purpose of<br />
providing revenues for establishing and maintaining a<br />
reserve fund for the payment of claims, awards, losses,<br />
judgments or liabilities which might be imposed on such<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District under the<br />
Worker’s Compensation Act or the Workmen’s<br />
Occupational Diseases Act, and any claim in tort, including<br />
but not limited to, any claim imposed upon the <strong>Metropolitan</strong><br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District under the Local Governmental<br />
and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act, and for<br />
the repair or replacement, where the cost thereof exceeds the<br />
sum of $10,000, of any property owned by the <strong>Metropolitan</strong><br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District which is damaged by fire, flood,<br />
explosion, vandalism or any other peril, natural or manmade.<br />
Section 2. That the Clerk of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago be, and is hereby<br />
directed to certify to the County Clerk of Cook County, the<br />
amount above set forth to be raised by taxation in the year<br />
2009 and to file a certified copy of the Ordinance with the<br />
said County Clerk of Cook County and said County Clerk of<br />
Cook County aforesaid, is hereby directed to cause the<br />
aforesaid amount of money to be extended upon and against<br />
the taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago, as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009,<br />
all in accordance with the laws and statutes of the State of<br />
Illinois in such case made and provided, and the Clerk of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
is hereby directed to cause this Ordinance to be published at<br />
least once in a newspaper published within the territorial<br />
limits of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of<br />
Greater Chicago and to incur the necessary expenses<br />
therefor.<br />
Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2009.<br />
Approved as to Form and Legality:<br />
Approved:<br />
Deputy General Counsel<br />
General Counsel<br />
President,<br />
Board of Commissioners of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District<br />
of Greater Chicago<br />
432<br />
432
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
An Ordinance<br />
FOR THE LEVY OF TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR<br />
BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2009 AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009<br />
UPON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL LIMITS OF THE<br />
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
AS SAID TERRITORIAL LIMITS EXIST ON JANUARY 1, 2009<br />
FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING REVENUES<br />
FOR THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND<br />
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago:<br />
Section 1. That there be and is hereby levied upon all<br />
taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago,<br />
as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009, for the<br />
fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, to provide revenue<br />
for the development, design, planning, construction,<br />
operation, and maintenance of regional stormwater<br />
management “the sum of $8,849,000 which includes the sum<br />
of $309,715 as a reserve for loss in collection of taxes.”<br />
Section 2. That the Clerk of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago be, and is hereby<br />
directed to certify to the County Clerk of Cook County, the<br />
amount above set forth to be raised by taxation in the year<br />
2009 and to file a certified copy of the Ordinance with the<br />
said County Clerk of Cook County, and said County Clerk<br />
of Cook County aforesaid, is hereby directed to cause the<br />
aforesaid amount of money to be extended upon and against<br />
the taxable property within the territorial limits of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago, as said territorial limits exist on January 1, 2009,<br />
all in accordance with the laws and statutes of the State of<br />
Illinois in such case made and provided, and the Clerk of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
is hereby directed to cause this Ordinance to be published at<br />
least once in a newspaper published within the territorial<br />
limits of the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of<br />
Greater Chicago and to incur the necessary expenses<br />
therefor.<br />
Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2009.<br />
Approved as to Form and Legality:<br />
Approved:<br />
Deputy General Counsel<br />
General Counsel<br />
President,<br />
Board of Commissioners of the<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District<br />
of Greater Chicago<br />
433<br />
433
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
NOTE PAGE<br />
434<br />
434
SECTION IX<br />
APPENDIX<br />
This section explains the structure of the District's compensation plan and financial and technical terminology contained in<br />
the District's <strong>Budget</strong>. It also details the various awards the District has received for its accomplishments over the last 35<br />
years.<br />
Compensation Plan Narrative ..................................................................................... 435<br />
Salary Schedules ........................................................................................................ 436<br />
User Charge Rates ...................................................................................................... 437<br />
Property Tax Base ...................................................................................................... 438<br />
Awards ....................................................................................................................... 440<br />
Financial Glossary ...................................................................................................... 446<br />
Technical Glossary ..................................................................................................... 450<br />
Acronyms ...................................................................................................................452<br />
APPENDIX
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
DISTRICT COMPENSATION PLAN<br />
In accordance with Illinois State Statute, Chapter 70, Section 2605/4.2, there is created a Department of Human Resources<br />
for the District, the executive officer of which is the Director of Human Resources. The Director shall, with the consent and<br />
approval of the Civil Service Board of the District, classify all nonexempt and nonrepresented positions in the District for<br />
the purposes of establishing pay grades.<br />
For the purposes of establishing uniformity of pay and title for positions, the Director prescribes the maximum and<br />
minimum pay for each grade and title.<br />
While maintaining internal balance as established by the relative evaluation of classes, the compensation for nonrepresented<br />
and nonexempt positions shall be at least equal to the median compensation provided by other employers for similar work in<br />
the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> Chicago labor market or other appropriate labor market.<br />
Salary advancement within salary ranges for nonrepresented positions and certain exempt positions is provided to recognize<br />
growth in the job, and the rate of advance shall be based primarily upon the quality of performance. Salary advancement<br />
stages are defined as "steps" within the salary schedules for each grade of position.<br />
Prior to 2000, two salary schedules were in place for noncollective bargaining and nonexempt positions. These schedules<br />
are referred to as the Professional and Managerial Salary Schedule (PM) and the General Service Salary Schedule (GS).<br />
Schedule PM – The Professional and Managerial Salary Schedule consists of 22 grades (PM 1 – PM 22). Each grade<br />
contains 9 steps. Schedule GS – The General Service Salary Schedule consists of 14 grades (GS 1 – GS 14), with each<br />
grade having the following steps:<br />
Grades GS 1 through GS 5 contain 6 steps Grades GS 6 through GS 9 contain 7 steps<br />
Grades GS 10 through GS 13 contain 8 steps Grade GS 14 contains 9 steps<br />
Exceptions to the above number of (GS) steps exist for employees in these positions hired prior to 1977. The General<br />
Service Salary Schedule was modified in 1977 and 1999, limiting the number of salary advancement steps for employees<br />
hired after specific effective dates.<br />
A compensation study, covering all of the approximately 200 job classifications and nearly 1,200 positions under the PM<br />
and GS pay plans was completed in 1999. The compensation study assessed the District’s pay practices and found that pay<br />
within the District is internally equitable, as well as being highly competitive when compared with the external marketplace.<br />
The compensation study also evaluated the existing salary administration function and made recommendations for a<br />
competitive, market-based salary structure, to ensure that the District will remain competitive now and in the future. The<br />
Board of Commissioners approved the implementation of the Technical, Administrative, and Managerial (TAM) salary<br />
structure effective January 1, 2000. The TAM salary schedule consists of 16 grades (HP 7 - HP 23); each grade contains 9<br />
steps.<br />
Employees then compensated under the GS and PM pay plans were converted to this single unified pay plan with each grade<br />
having identical longevity requirements for steps six through nine. Employees who realized greater or equal pay under the<br />
new program transitioned to the TAM plan on January 1, 2000. Employees in classifications that were allocated to salary<br />
grades wherein the rate at the highest available TAM step was lower than the maximum available under the GS or PM salary<br />
schedule remained in the GS or PM salary grade to protect their current and future salary potential. When these positions<br />
are vacated, or an incumbent would realize greater earnings, those positions are incorporated into the new pay plan.<br />
Positions falling under this criteria were initially annotated as #2 (New Grade) through 2004, and commencing with the<br />
2005 budget are designated #4.<br />
Employees in positions covered by collective bargaining agreements shall be compensated on the basis of negotiations<br />
between unions representing such employees and the management of the District. The rates paid to all such employees shall<br />
be adjusted in accordance with changes caused by the duly prescribed negotiations, provided that any change in rates may<br />
be made applicable at the beginning of the budget year next following the date of change in the rate, in the event necessary<br />
funds are not available. Compensation for these positions is defined in the Salary Schedule for Labor Trades (LT).<br />
Compensation for exempt positions is established by the Board of Commissioners, with the exception of their own<br />
compensation, which is established by Illinois Compiled Statutes. Compensation for exempt positions is defined in the<br />
Salary Schedule for Exempt Employees (EX).<br />
435<br />
435
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
SALARY SCHEDULES (bi-weekly rates)<br />
Exempt (EX)<br />
EX01 $2,884.62 EX09 $576.92 EX17 $7,839.89<br />
EX02 $1,923.07 to $2,692.31 EX10 $7,839.89 EX18 None<br />
EX03 $5,946.24 EX11 $8,819.87 EX19 None<br />
EX04 $2,169.38 to $3,376.70 EX12 $8,819.87 EX20 None<br />
EX05 $7,839.89 EX13 $7,839.89 EX21 $2,884.62<br />
EX06 $2,169.38 to $3,376.70 EX14 $8,819.87 EX22 $3,076.92<br />
EX07 $9,799.90 EX15 $8,819.87 EX23 $3,545.54<br />
EX08 $7,839.89 EX16 $673.08 EX24 $3,545.54<br />
Technical, Administrative, and Managerial (HP)<br />
HP07 $1,127.14 to $1,641.59 HP13 $2,169.38 to $3,376.70 HP19 $4,041.60 to $5,748.60<br />
HP08 $1,226.73 to $1,807.32 HP14 $2,332.58 to $3,616.11 HP20 $4,279.97 to $6,489.11<br />
HP09 $1,346.18 to $2,006.28 HP15 $2,560.17 to $3,900.10 HP21 $4,692.97 to $7,041.56<br />
HP10 $1,505.50 to $2,271.52 HP16 $2,841.25 to $4,250.85 HP22 $5,180.30 to $7,693.48<br />
HP11 $1,691.43 to $2,580.98 HP17 $3,171.45 to $4,662.88 HP23 $5,760.00 to $8,378.87<br />
HP12 $1,917.14 to $2,956.75 HP18 $3,559.70 to $5,147.29<br />
Labor Trades (LT)<br />
NR1541 $2,552.90 NR6271 $3,664.00 NR8651 $2,462.40 PR5953 $3,130.40 PR7423 $3,088.00<br />
NR1835 $2,290.40 NR6272 $3,468.00 NR8652 $1,717.60 PR5955 $3,412.00 PR7424 $3,597.60<br />
NR1853 $2,586.40 NR6275 $3,821.60 PR5153 $3,181.60 PR5973 $3,220.00 PR7425 $3,906.40<br />
NR1857 $2,756.80 NR6441 $2,756.80 PR5155 $3,341.60 PR5975 $3,380.00 PR7573 $3,242.40<br />
NR2483 $2,586.40 NR6810 $2,704.00 PR5159 $3,381.60 PR5989 $3,500.00 PR7575 $3,402.40<br />
NR3641 $1,853.60 NR6831 $3,174.40 PR5553 $2,952.00 PR6453 $3,504.00 PR7579 $3,482.40<br />
NR3642 $2,028.00 NR6832 $3,288.00 PR5555 $3,136.80 PR6459 $3,824.00 PR7743 $3,192.00<br />
NR5369 $2,599.20 NR7393 $3,468.00 PR5753 $3,440.00 PR6473 $2,508.00 PR7773 $3,364.00<br />
NR6210 $2,844.80 NR7394 $4,124.80 PR5755 $3,600.00 PR6479 $2,688.00 PR7775 $3,604.00<br />
NR6232 $2,988.00 NR7399 $2,811.20 PR5759 $3,680.00 PR7343 $3,152.00 PR7779 $3,764.00<br />
NR6233 $3,136.00 NR8331 $2,756.80 PR5933 $3,124.00 PR7347 $3,568.00 PR1025 $1,783.20 to $2,918.40<br />
NR6251 $3,639.20 NR8650 $2,586.40 PR5935 $3,384.00 PR7349 $3,360.00 TR3509 $1,749.43<br />
The Position Analysis for each Department shows the Pay Plan and Grade for each budgeted position. The Salary Schedules<br />
above display the salary ranges associated with each Pay Plan and Grade. For example, in Section 922 of the Stickney Division<br />
of M&O, the Principal Mechanical Engineer position is associated with the HP (Technical, Administrative, and Managerial)<br />
Pay Plan at Grade 18. By looking up HP18 in the second table above, it is found that the salary range for this or any other title<br />
at that Pay Plan and Grade is $3,559.70 to $5,147.29 bi-weekly. By multiplying those rates by 26, it can be determined that the<br />
annual salary range for such positions is $92,552.20 to $133,829.54. For the HP and some EX Pay Plans, the actual salary<br />
earned in a position is dependent on the "step" of the incumbent occupying the position. Where applicable, there are nine (9)<br />
steps in each Pay Plan and Grade. Which step an incumbent is at is determined by a combination of the incumbent's longevity<br />
in the title and at the District. Incumbents with the greatest longevity factors will be at the highest steps, assuming satisfactory<br />
job performance.<br />
436<br />
436
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
USER CHARGE RATES<br />
Year<br />
Large Commercial Industrial Users<br />
Flow per<br />
million<br />
gallons<br />
BOD 5 per<br />
1,000 pounds<br />
SS per<br />
1,000 pounds<br />
O, M&R<br />
Factor<br />
Flow per<br />
million<br />
gallons<br />
BOD 5 per<br />
1,000 pounds<br />
SS per<br />
1,000 pounds<br />
Revenues in<br />
$ millions<br />
2008 $ 223.72 $ 229.23 $ 178.11 49.9% $ 230.29 $ 235.98 $ 183.35 $ 57.0<br />
2007 224.87 228.39 173.01 50.4% 231.07 234.69 177.77 53.6<br />
2006 225.80 239.79 183.41 56.8% 235.40 249.99 191.20 53.6<br />
2005 210.91 226.64 174.33 56.8% 219.30 235.65 181.26 44.1<br />
2004 202.39 215.86 168.16 56.9% 209.31 223.25 173.92 50.8<br />
2003 217.74 227.39 182.75 62.4% 223.29 233.19 187.41 50.5<br />
2002 185.09 197.10 151.53 55.8% 190.74 203.22 156.16 47.1<br />
2001 200.21 216.96 158.11 59.5% 201.98 218.89 159.51 50.0<br />
2000 215.09 205.33 163.43 48.8% 181.83 173.52 138.14 49.3<br />
1999 205.63 196.13 160.40 45.1% 175.13 167.04 136.61 53.3<br />
1998 202.75 190.60 156.57 46.5% 176.16 165.60 136.03 51.8<br />
1997 189.48 192.39 159.62 47.1% 165.71 168.35 139.72 53.6<br />
BOD 5 Biochemical Oxygen Demand based on standard 5-day test<br />
SS Suspended Solids<br />
O, M&R Portion of real estate taxes credited to users for District's Operations, Maintenance and Replacement costs<br />
TOP USER CHARGE PAYERS<br />
Tax-Exempt Users<br />
User charges are calculated based on sewer discharge volumes and representative sampling of the discharge for concentrations<br />
of BOD 5 and suspended solids. Loadings in thousands of pounds annually are extrapolated from the volume and concentration<br />
measurements, with the rates listed above applied. Users are given a credit for real estate taxes paid to the District multiplied by<br />
the O, M&R factor. Users owing more than $4,800 annually pay monthly estimates.<br />
2006 2007 Est. 2008 **<br />
Corn Products Corp. $ 10,810,509 $ 9,146,999 $ 9,143,604<br />
Sexton Congress Development Co. 1,756,011 3,480,466 3,467,932<br />
City of Chicago, Jardine <strong>Water</strong> Filtration Plant 2,825,259 2,244,727 2,311,213<br />
City of Chicago, South <strong>Water</strong> Purification Plant 1,758,998 2,093,982 2,156,866<br />
Madison Paper Co. 1,160,262 1,346,740 1,335,569<br />
SCA Tissue North America, LLC 276,569 1,137,091 1,124,300<br />
City of Chicago, South Airfield / Lake O'Hare 1,020,459 991,555 998,520<br />
City of Chicago - Midway Airport 694,067 932,759 1,001,809<br />
City of Chicago - O'Hare North Airfield 464,415 664,139 671,959<br />
Nalco Company 511,048 593,187 581,064<br />
Ferrara Pan Candy 750,902 547,117 504,867<br />
Northlake Business Campus 480,378 537,261 504,140<br />
City of Chicago - O'Hare Terminal 62,394 434,712 450,226<br />
Gelita North America 415,181 432,807 414,239<br />
Mars Snackfood US, LLC* 410,898 409,721 391,213<br />
* Formerly known as Master Foods USA<br />
** Monthly payment are reconciled with actual flows, loadings, and tax credit following Feb. 20, 2008 annual filing.<br />
437<br />
437
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
PROPERTY TAX BASE<br />
The <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago receives the majority of its income from local<br />
real estate taxes. Taxes are collected by the Cook County Treasurer based on property values established by the<br />
Cook County Assessor. North, South and City of Chicago townships are reassessed on a three year rotation.<br />
Lake<br />
Michigan<br />
Areas outside of MWRDGC corporate boundaries<br />
The underlying county township map is derived from the Illinois Secretary of State Archives:<br />
http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/departments/archives/irad/township_maps/cook_map.html<br />
438<br />
438
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
PROPERTY TAX BASE<br />
MWRDGC Equalized Assessed Valuation by Township 2002 - 2007<br />
(in $ millions)<br />
Township<br />
Suburban<br />
Tax Levy Year<br />
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
10 Barrington $ 285 $ 286 $ 307 $ 326 $ 335 $ 397 6.68%<br />
11 Berwyn 639 632 647 802 801 836 9.71%<br />
12 Bloom 467 463 492 566 590 629 8.58%<br />
13 Bremen 1,481 1,475 1,535 1,796 1,841 1,951 8.80%<br />
14 Calumet 201 198 194 224 225 232 5.44%<br />
15 Cicero 647 634 639 784 771 801 8.16%<br />
16 Elk Grove 3,649 3,572 3,940 4,181 4,175 4,826 6.03%<br />
17 Evanston 1,738 1,727 2,104 2,243 2,246 2,772 9.82%<br />
18 Hanover 1,160 1,173 1,394 1,562 1,672 1,971 10.93%<br />
19 Lemont 545 556 605 770 783 849 12.76%<br />
20 Lyden 2,473 2,464 2,769 2,914 2,921 3,397 6.72%<br />
21 Lyons 2,984 2,988 3,141 3,882 3,881 4,110 9.76%<br />
22 Maine 3,678 3,646 4,212 4,486 4,597 5,464 8.26%<br />
23 New Trier 3,087 3,069 3,938 4,236 4,241 5,651 12.69%<br />
24 Niles 3,630 3,587 4,170 4,528 4,519 5,501 8.76%<br />
25 Northfield 4,161 4,193 4,966 5,423 5,440 6,587 9.35%<br />
26 Norwood Park 687 677 791 852 866 1,047 8.96%<br />
27 Oak Park 1,128 1,124 1,153 1,481 1,462 1,538 13.04%<br />
28 Orland 2,348 2,413 2,554 3,019 3,113 3,358 10.09%<br />
29 Palatine 2,487 2,459 2,838 3,036 3,057 3,587 7.74%<br />
30 Palos 1,249 1,237 1,289 1,563 1,576 1,671 9.08%<br />
31 Proviso 2,739 2,695 2,777 3,283 3,276 3,457 7.90%<br />
32 Rich 985 1,003 1,088 1,273 1,338 1,431 9.77%<br />
33 Riverforest 386 383 399 489 492 516 12.90%<br />
34 Riverside 473 473 491 607 609 643 9.99%<br />
35 Schaumburg 4,168 4,101 4,689 5,009 5,036 5,802 7.13%<br />
36 Stickney 1,031 1,002 1,034 1,222 1,229 1,296 7.17%<br />
37 Thornton 2,015 1,964 2,021 2,326 2,334 2,419 6.35%<br />
38 Wheeling 4,064 4,009 4,618 4,933 5,035 5,879 7.80%<br />
39 Worth 2,921 2,895 3,006 3,467 3,495 3,709 7.77%<br />
City of Chicago<br />
70 Hyde Park 2,929 3,294 3,333 3,528 4,261 4,405 8.53%<br />
71 Jefferson 8,173 9,390 9,764 10,429 12,236 13,273 9.76%<br />
72 Lake 4,917 5,461 5,675 6,054 7,308 7,671 9.22%<br />
73 Lake View 5,616 7,072 7,284 7,908 9,407 10,020 11.89%<br />
74 North Chicago 7,941 9,747 10,381 11,335 13,239 13,972 11.45%<br />
75 Rogers Park 1,080 1,297 1,303 1,390 1,669 1,764 10.25%<br />
76 South Chicago 9,100 10,293 10,678 11,227 12,225 12,802 7.33%<br />
77 West Chicago 5,575 6,614 6,917 7,434 9,165 9,740 11.45%<br />
Total EAV 102,837 110,267 119,135 130,587 141,469 155,973 9.03%<br />
Shaded figures indicate assessed values following triennial reassessments.<br />
Average<br />
Annual<br />
Change<br />
439<br />
439
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
AWARDS AND ACHIEVEMENTS RECOGNITION<br />
American Academy of Environmental 1995 Honor Award for the Sidestream Elevated Pool Aeration stations<br />
1989 Grand Prize Award for Planning the Sidestream Elevated Pool Aeration<br />
stations<br />
American Public Works Association 2003 Environmental Project of the Year, Over $10 Million Category, for the<br />
Thornton Transitional Reservoir<br />
Public Works Leader of the Year awarded to General Superintendent John C.<br />
Farnan<br />
2000 Reversal of the Chicago River, one of the "Top Ten Public Works Projects of<br />
the Century"<br />
Tunnel and Reservoir Plan Phase I, one of the "Top Ten Chicago Area<br />
Public Works Projects of the 20th Century"<br />
Tunnel and Reservoir Plan Phase I, Member's Choice for "Most Significant<br />
Chicago Area Public Works Projects of the 20th Century"<br />
1995 The American Public Works Association Award for the District's Innovative<br />
Energy Audit and Control Program<br />
1981 Outstanding Public Works Project of the Year for the Tunnel and Reservoir<br />
Plan<br />
American Rivers, Incorporated 1994 Scientific or Engineering Breakthrough Award for the Calumet River System<br />
Sidestream Elevated Pool Aeration Project<br />
American Society of Civil Engineers -<br />
Illinois Section<br />
2003 Outstanding Civil Engineering Achievement of the Year Award, Over $5<br />
Million Category, for the Thornton Transitional Reservoir<br />
2000 District's wastewater treatment system a "Civil Engineering Monument of the<br />
Millennium"<br />
1998 Outstanding Civil Engineering Achievement Award for the O'Hare-CUP<br />
Reservoir Project<br />
1996 Public Sector Employer Recognition Award<br />
1994 Outstanding Civil Engineering Award received for Sidestream Elevated Pool<br />
Aeration Project<br />
1986 Outstanding Civil Engineering Award received for Tunnel and Reservoir<br />
Plan<br />
Outstanding Civil Engineering Achievement of Past 100 Years in Illinois for<br />
the Tunnel and Reservoir Plan<br />
1985 TARP Mainstream System, Phase 1, the "Outstanding Civil Engineering<br />
Achievement of 1985"<br />
1974 Outstanding Civil Engineering Award received for the Prairie Plan in Fulton<br />
County<br />
Chicago Federation of Labor - AFL CIO 2001 Michael J. Bruton Workplace Safety Award<br />
Chicago Wilderness and United States<br />
Environmental Protection Agency<br />
2007 Conservation and Native Landscaping Award for Native Prairie Restorations<br />
at the Lemont and North Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
City of Chicago 2000 Best Practices in expanding employment opportunities for people with<br />
disabilities<br />
Conservation Foundation & DuPage River 2002 DuPage River Clean <strong>Water</strong> Award<br />
2006-2005 Clean <strong>Water</strong> Award for Hanover Park <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
440<br />
440
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Engineering News Record 1999 Construction of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal in 1900 and Tunnel &<br />
Reservoir Plan (TARP) in 1985 named as two of the top 125 engineering<br />
projects of the past 125 years<br />
Government Finance Officers Association of<br />
the United States and Canada<br />
2008 Award of Financial Reporting Achievement for the Retiree Health Care Trust<br />
2008-1985 <strong>Budget</strong> document recognized for Distinguished <strong>Budget</strong> Presentation<br />
2007-1975 Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting -<br />
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Years 1975 through<br />
2007<br />
2007-1993 Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting - MWRD<br />
Retirement Fund, Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal<br />
Years 1993 through 2007<br />
1999,<br />
1996-1993<br />
Outstanding Achievement in Popular Annual Financial Reporting<br />
1998-1988 <strong>Budget</strong> document recognized as "Especially Notable", or "Outstanding"<br />
Illinois Engineering Council 2006 Outstanding Engineering Achievement Award for TARP Phase I<br />
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 1994, 1983,<br />
1981<br />
Illinois Safety Council and Greater Chicago<br />
Safety Council<br />
Certificate of Excellence Award for Wastewater Safety for Kirie <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
1993-1992 Certificate of Excellence Award for Safety received by various treatment<br />
plants<br />
1992-1987 Certificate of Excellence Award for Wastewater Safety received by various<br />
treatment plants<br />
1991-1988 Letters of Commendation of Excellence on Maintenance, Operation and<br />
Compliance for various treatment plants<br />
1988 Hanover Park Treatment Plant named Plant of the Year<br />
2007 Safety and Health Outstanding Safety Performance Award for North Side<br />
and Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
Fleet and Transportation Outstanding Safety Performance Award - District<br />
Wide<br />
2006 Safety and Health Outstanding Safety Performance Award for Calumet and<br />
Stickney <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
2005 Safe Driving Award - District Wide, Fulton County Prairie Plan, Egan <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant, Hanover Park <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant, Kirie <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant, Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant, Northside <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant, Stickney <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant, Main Office Building,<br />
Main Office Building Annex and Lockport Powerhouse<br />
Health and Safety Award for Northside <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
2004, 2001 Transportation Award for Outstanding Safety Performance - District Wide<br />
2004 Health and Safety Award - Fulton County Prairie Plan, Kirie <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> District, Lawndale Avenue Solids Management Area, Lemont<br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant, Main Office Annex, North Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
Plant, Racine Avenue Pumping Station and Stickney <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
Plant<br />
Outstanding Safety Performance Award<br />
2003 Health and Safety Award - District Wide, Egan <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant,<br />
Fulton County Prairie Plan, Hanover Park <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant, Kirie<br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant, Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant, Lockport<br />
Powerhouse, Main Office Building, Main Office Building Annex and<br />
Northside <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
441<br />
441
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
AWARDS AND ACHIEVEMENTS RECOGNITION (Continued)<br />
Illinois Safety Council and Greater Chicago<br />
Safety Council (Continued)<br />
2003-2002<br />
1996-1994<br />
Safety and Health Award for Outstanding Safety Performance<br />
2002, 2000 Outstanding Safety Performance in maintaining a safe and healthy working<br />
environment for its employees<br />
Illinois Society of Professional Engineers 1986 MWRDGC System one of the "Ten Outstanding Engineering Achievements in<br />
Illinois in the Last 100 Years"<br />
International Personnel Management<br />
Association<br />
Lake Michigan <strong>Water</strong> Analysts 1995 Award of Excellence<br />
1985 Outstanding Engineering Accomplishment Award for the Tunnel and<br />
Reservoir Plan - Phase I System<br />
1984 Outstanding Engineering Accomplishment Award for Upper Salt Creek<br />
<strong>Water</strong>shed Floodwater Management Plan<br />
1995 1995 Award for Excellence - Best personnel department in a medium-sized<br />
agency<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> Chicago Masonry Council 1981 "Excellence in Masonry '80" for Kirie <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant Masonry<br />
Design<br />
National Association of Clean <strong>Water</strong><br />
Agencies, formerly known as Association of<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> Sewage Agencies<br />
2008 National Environmental Achievement Award in Public Information &<br />
Education - Education Program category for "Mission Possible: Educating<br />
People to Promote Beneficial Use of Biosolids<br />
2007 NACWA Award for Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Platinum Award for 16 concurrent years of full<br />
compliance for Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant and Platinum Award for<br />
11 concurrent years of full compliance for Stickney and Lemont <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
NACWA Award for Full Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Silver Award for Hanover Park <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong><br />
Plant<br />
NACWA Award for Full Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Gold Award for John E. Egan, James C. Kirie and North<br />
Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
NACWA Award for Full Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Platinum Award for Stickney, Calumet and Lemont<br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
2006 NACWA Award for Full Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Platinum Award for Stickney, Calumet and Lemont<br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
NACWA Award for Full Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Gold Award for James C. Kirie, John E. Egan, Hanover<br />
Park, and North Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
2005-2003 Certificate of Recognition for Excellence in Management for excellence in<br />
utility management and successful implementation of programs that address<br />
the range of management challenges facing public wastewater utilities in<br />
today's competitive environment<br />
2005 NACWA Award for Full Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Gold Award for Stickney, Calumet, James C. Kirie, John<br />
E. Egan, Hanover Park and Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
NACWA Award for Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Silver Award for North Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
442<br />
442
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
2004 NACWA Award for Full Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Gold Award for Stickney, Calumet, North Side and<br />
Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
NACWA Award for Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Silver Award for James C. Kirie, John E. Egan and<br />
Hanover Park <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
2003 AMSA Award for Full Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Gold Award for Stickney, Calumet, North Side, Hanover<br />
Park, John E. Egan, James C. Kirie, and Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
2002 AMSA Award for Full Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Platinum Award for Hanover Park, North Side, and<br />
Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
AMSA Award for Full Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Gold Award for John E. Egan, James E. Kirie, Stickney,<br />
and Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
2001 Research and Technology Award on "Biosolids as a Topsoil Substitute for<br />
the Germination and Growth of Turf, Forage, Prairie Grasses and Wild<br />
Flower Plants"<br />
National Environmental Achievement Award for excellence in Research and<br />
Technology<br />
AMSA Award for Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination<br />
System, Platimun Award for Stickney and Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
AMSA Award for Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination<br />
System, Silver Award for John E. Egan <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
AMSA Award for Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination<br />
System, Gold Award for Hanover Park, James E. Kirie, North Side, and<br />
Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
2000 AMSA Award for Full Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Silver Award for John E. Egan, and James E. Kirie<br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
AMSA Award for Full Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge<br />
Elimination System, Gold Award for Hanover Park, North Side, Stickney,<br />
Calumet, and Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
1999 Gold Award for 100% Compliance with National Pollution Discharge<br />
System Permit Standards - Stickney, Calumet, North Side, Hanover Park,<br />
John E. Egan, James C. Kirie, and Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
National Environmental Achievement Award - Research & Technology for<br />
Optimization of Conventional Low Technology Sludge Process to Produce<br />
Class A Sludge<br />
1998 Gold Award for 100% Compliance with National Pollution Discharge<br />
System Permit Standards - Stickney, Calumet, North Side, Hanover Park,<br />
James C. Kirie, and Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
1997 National Achievement Outstanding Operations Award to North Side <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants for its Instrumentation Project<br />
Platinum Award for 100% Compliance for more than 5 years with National<br />
Pollution Discharge System Permit Standards - Calumet and North Side<br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
Gold Award for 100% Compliance with National Pollution Discharge<br />
System Permit Standards - James C. Kirie, Lemont and Stickney <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
443<br />
443
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
AWARDS AND ACHIEVEMENTS RECOGNITION (Continued)<br />
National Association of Clean <strong>Water</strong><br />
Agencies, formerly known as Association of<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> Sewage Agencies (Continued)<br />
National Biosolids Partnership<br />
(<strong>Water</strong> Environment Federation and<br />
National Association of Clean <strong>Water</strong><br />
Agencies)<br />
National Institute of Governmental<br />
Purchasing<br />
1997 Silver Award for 99.9% Compliance with National Pollution Discharge<br />
System Permit Standards - John E. Egan and Hanover Park <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plants<br />
1993 Outstanding Operations Award for Sidestream Pool Aeration Stations<br />
2008 Certificate of Achievement for meeting all the requirements for admittance<br />
and certification to the National Biosolids Partnership Environmental<br />
Management System Program<br />
2011-2003 Outstanding Agency Accreditation Achievement Award<br />
National Purchasing Institute 2006-2005 Achievement of Excellence in Procurement<br />
National Society of Professional Engineers 1985 Outstanding Engineering Accomplishment Award for the Tunnel and<br />
Reservoir Plan - Phase I System<br />
1973 Outstanding Engineering Achievements in the United States for the<br />
Brookfield LaGrange Rock Tunnel<br />
Structural Engineers Association of Illinois 1985 Honor Award for the Structural-Geotechnical Design of the Tunnel and<br />
Reservoir Plan Mainstream Pumping Station<br />
The Consulting Engineers Council of<br />
Illinois<br />
1985 Engineering Excellence Honor Award for the Tunnel and Reservoir Plan<br />
Mainstream System Phase I<br />
United States Department of Defense 2003 Certificate of Appreciation for Outstanding Achievement through Value<br />
Engineering<br />
United States Environmental Protection<br />
Agency<br />
2008 Exemplary Biosolids Management Award - First Place in the Public<br />
Acceptance Category<br />
2004 National Second Place Clean <strong>Water</strong> Act Recognition Award, Kirie <strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant, for Outstanding Operations and Maintenance, Large<br />
Advanced Plant<br />
2003 Certificate of Recognition as a Clean <strong>Water</strong> Partner for the 21st Century<br />
1998 Designation of the Chicago River as "One of the 25 Outstanding Success<br />
Stories in the Nation on the Occasion of the 25th Anniversary of the Clean<br />
<strong>Water</strong> Act"<br />
1996 Award of Excellence for First Place in Category Five in the National<br />
Pretreatment Program<br />
1995 National Pretreatment Award recognizing excellence in the administration of<br />
the District's Pretreatment Program<br />
1994 National First Place Award recognizing the District's Outstanding Combined<br />
Sewer Overflow Control Program<br />
Award for Excellence in maintenance and operations category in Region V<br />
as the best large advanced plant - James C. Kirie <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
1993 Second Place for Outstanding Treatment Facility by Stickney and John E.<br />
Egan plants in the area of maintenance and operations<br />
1992 North Side Treatment Plant named "Best in the Midwest" for municipal<br />
pollution control<br />
Affirmative Action Program named "Best in the Country"<br />
1991 Special Award for sustained outstanding long-term contribution to the<br />
beneficial use of sludge at the Prairie Plan, Fulton County<br />
Award for the Affirmative Action Program<br />
444<br />
444
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
<strong>Water</strong> Environment Federation 1992 Recognition for the Solids Dewatering Prototype at the Stickney Plant<br />
1999-1989 Award for Outstanding Achievement in <strong>Water</strong> Quality Improvement<br />
The <strong>Water</strong>front Center 2008 Excellence on the <strong>Water</strong>front Award for Sidestream Elevated Pool Aeration<br />
Project<br />
445<br />
445
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FINANCIAL GLOSSARY<br />
Abatement: A complete or partial cancellation of a tax levy<br />
imposed by a government.<br />
Accrual Basis of Accounting: The basis of accounting<br />
under which transactions are recognized when they occur,<br />
regardless of the timing of cash receipts and disbursements.<br />
Accrued: The accumulation of a receivable or payable<br />
during a given period even though no explicit transaction<br />
occurs within that period.<br />
Activities: The major programs and projects performed by<br />
an organizational unit.<br />
Ad Valorem Tax: A tax levied in proportion to the value of<br />
the property against which it is levied (also known as property<br />
tax).<br />
Appropriation: An amount of money in the budget,<br />
authorized by the Board of Commissioners, for expenditure or<br />
obligation within organizational units for specific purposes.<br />
The Corporate Fund appropriates money for operating and<br />
general purposes. The Capital Improvements Bond Fund<br />
appropriates money for major improvements, plant expansion,<br />
sewers, etc.<br />
Assessed Valuation: The value of all taxable property within<br />
the boundaries of the MWRDGC as a basis for levying taxes<br />
(i.e., the property's value). See tax base.<br />
Assets: Resources owned or held by the MWRDGC which<br />
have monetary value.<br />
Balance Sheet: A statement showing the financial position at<br />
a given time, disclosing assets, liabilities and fund balances.<br />
Bond: A written promise to pay a specified sum of money<br />
(called the principal) at a specified date in the future, together<br />
with periodic interest at a specified rate. In the budget<br />
document, these payments are identified as debt service.<br />
Bond Redemption and Interest Fund (Debt Service<br />
Fund): Established to account for annual property tax levies<br />
and certain other revenues, primarily interest on investments,<br />
which are used for the payment of principal and interest of<br />
general obligation bond issues.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>: A balanced financial plan for a given period of time,<br />
which includes appropriations and tax levy ordinances for the<br />
various sources of revenue which finance the various funds.<br />
The budget is not only a financial plan; it also serves as a<br />
policy guide, as an operations guide and as a communications<br />
medium.<br />
Capital Equipment: Fixed assets such as vehicles, marine<br />
equipment, computers, furniture, technical instruments etc.,<br />
which have a life expectancy of more than one year and a<br />
value over $5,000.<br />
Capital Projects Fund: Established to account for all<br />
resources, principally bond proceeds and construction grants,<br />
which are used for the acquisition or construction of capital<br />
facilities. Included in Capital Projects Funds are the Capital<br />
Improvements Bond Fund and the Construction Fund.<br />
Capital Improvements Bond Fund: Established to account<br />
for the proceeds of bonds authorized by the Illinois General<br />
Assembly, government grants and certain other revenues, all<br />
to be used in connection with improvements, replacements<br />
and additions to the MWRDGC facilities.<br />
Capital Improvements Program: A long-range plan of the<br />
District for the construction, rehabilitation and modernization<br />
of District-owned and operated infrastructure. It includes<br />
plans to protect Lake Michigan from pollution, to clean up<br />
approximately 200 miles of rivers and streams, and to reduce<br />
the level of flooding within the District's jurisdiction.<br />
Capital Outlay: Expenditures which result in the acquisition<br />
of, or addition to, fixed assets including land, buildings,<br />
improvements, machinery and equipment. Most equipment<br />
or machinery is included in the annual operating budget.<br />
Capital improvements such as acquisition of land,<br />
construction and engineering expenses are included in the<br />
Capital <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
Capitalized: Capital outlays recorded as additions to the<br />
asset account, not expenses.<br />
Carryover (Net Assets Appropriable): That resource<br />
balance left after subtracting Current Liabilities and<br />
Designated Fund Balances from Current Assets.<br />
Cash Basis of Accounting: Revenues are not recorded until<br />
cash is received, and expenditures are recorded only when<br />
cash is disbursed.<br />
Cash Management: A conscious effort to manage cash<br />
flows in such a way that interest and penalties paid are<br />
minimized and interest earned is maximized. Funds received<br />
are deposited on the day of receipt and invested as soon as<br />
the funds are available. The District maximizes the return on<br />
all funds available for investment without sacrifice of safety<br />
or necessary liquidity.<br />
Classification of <strong>Budget</strong>ary Code Accounts: A manual<br />
published yearly which specifies the official code<br />
designations set forth in the annual budget for the purposes of<br />
accounting and expenditure control. <strong>Budget</strong>ary code listings<br />
for funds, organizations, locations, programs and line items<br />
are included.<br />
Commitment Items: Expenditure classifications established<br />
to account for and budget the appropriations approved. Also<br />
referred to as Line Item.<br />
446<br />
446
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Construction Fund: Established to account for an annual<br />
property tax levy and certain other revenues to be used in<br />
connection with improvements, replacements and additions to<br />
the MWRDGC facilities.<br />
Construction Working Cash Fund: Established to make<br />
temporary loans (repayable from the tax levy of the<br />
applicable year) to the Construction Fund, reducing the need<br />
for issuing short-term debt and the resultant interest expense.<br />
Corporate Fund: Established to account for an annual<br />
property tax levy and certain other revenues which are to be<br />
used for the operations and payments of general expenditures<br />
of the District not specifically chargeable to other funds.<br />
Corporate Working Cash Fund: Established to make<br />
temporary loans (repayable from the tax levy of the<br />
applicable year) to the Corporate Fund, thus reducing the<br />
need for issuing short-term debt and the resultant interest<br />
expense.<br />
Crosshatch (#): The crosshatch mark (#) indicates a<br />
restriction on the filling of a vacated position.<br />
Current Assets: Cash plus assets that are expected to be<br />
converted to cash, sold or consumed during the next twelve<br />
months or as a part of the normal operating cycle.<br />
Current Liabilities: Obligations that will become due<br />
within the next year or within the normal operating cycle, if<br />
longer than a year.<br />
Debt Service Fund: See Bond Redemption and Interest<br />
Fund.<br />
Debt Service Requirements: The amount of money<br />
required to pay interest and principal on outstanding debt.<br />
Delinquent Taxes: Taxes remaining unpaid on and after the<br />
date to which a penalty for nonpayment is attached.<br />
Depreciation: The allocation of the acquisition cost of plant,<br />
property and equipment to the particular periods or products<br />
that benefit from the utilization of the asset in service.<br />
Disbursements: Payments made on obligations.<br />
Encumbrances: Obligations incurred in the form of orders,<br />
contracts and similar items that will become payable when<br />
goods are delivered or services rendered.<br />
Equalization: After the County Assessor has established the<br />
assessed valuation for a given year, and following any<br />
revisions by the Board of (Tax) Appeals, the Illinois<br />
Department of Revenue is required by statute to review the<br />
assessed valuation. The Illinois Department of Revenue<br />
establishes an equalization factor, commonly called the<br />
"multiplier," for each county to make all valuations uniform<br />
among the 102 counties in the state.<br />
Equalized Assessed Valuation (EAV): Once the<br />
equalization factor (multiplier) is established, the assessed<br />
valuation, as revised by the Board of (Tax) Appeals, is<br />
multiplied by the equalization factor (multiplier) to determine<br />
the EAV.<br />
Expenditure: An amount of money disbursed or obligated.<br />
Expenditures include current operating expenses requiring the<br />
present or future use of net current assets, debt service, and<br />
capital outlays. (see Accrual and Cash Basis of Accounting).<br />
Fiduciary Funds: Established to account for transactions<br />
related to assets held in trust for a public purpose.<br />
Fiscal Year: The time frame to which the budget applies.<br />
For the MWRDGC, this is the period from January 1 through<br />
December 31.<br />
Fixed Assets: Long-term tangible assets that have a normal<br />
use expectancy of more than one year and do not lose their<br />
individual identity through use. Fixed assets include<br />
buildings, equipment, improvements other than buildings and<br />
land.<br />
Function: A group of related tasks, such as sewage treatment<br />
and collection, or the reduction of water pollution, which is<br />
aimed at accomplishing a major service or regulatory program<br />
for which a governmental unit is responsible.<br />
Fund: An accounting entity established to account for sums<br />
of money or other resources, such as taxes, charges, fees, etc.,<br />
to conduct specified operations and to attain certain<br />
objectives. Funds are frequently under specific limitations.<br />
For more information regarding specific funds, refer to the<br />
Financial Narrative in Section III, "Financial Statements by<br />
Fund."<br />
Fund Accounting: A governmental accounting system<br />
which is organized and operated on a fund basis.<br />
Fund Balance: The cumulative difference of all revenues<br />
and all expenditures of the fund from the time the<br />
governmental entity was established. Fund balance is also<br />
considered to be the difference between fund assets and fund<br />
liabilities and is sometimes referred to as "fund equity."<br />
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP):<br />
Uniform minimum standards of, and guidelines for, external<br />
financial accounting and reporting. They govern the form<br />
and content of the basic financial statements of an entity.<br />
GAAP encompasses the conventions, rules, and procedures<br />
necessary to define accepted accounting practices at a<br />
particular time. They include not only broad guidelines of<br />
general application, but also detailed practices and<br />
procedures. GAAP provides a standard by which to measure<br />
financial presentations. The primary authoritative statement<br />
on the application of GAAP to state and local governments is<br />
Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB)<br />
pronouncements.<br />
447<br />
447
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
FINANCIAL GLOSSARY (CONTINUED)<br />
General Obligation Bonds: Bonds, the payment for which<br />
the full faith and credit of the issuing government are<br />
pledged.<br />
Governmental Funds: Group of funds utilized to account<br />
for revenues and expenditures in compliance with the legal<br />
requirements and constraints of current statutes for<br />
governmental agencies.<br />
Grant: A contribution by one governmental unit to another<br />
unit. The contribution is usually made to aid in the support of<br />
a specified function, such as sewer construction, pollution<br />
control, etc.<br />
Home-Rule Unit: The principle or practice of selfgovernment<br />
in the internal affairs of a dependent political<br />
unit. In Illinois, any municipality with a population of more<br />
than 25,000 is a home-rule unit unless it elects by referendum<br />
not to be a home-rule unit. Any other municipality may elect<br />
by referendum to become a home-rule unit.<br />
Internal Control: Methods and procedures that are mainly<br />
concerned with the authorization of transactions,<br />
safeguarding of assets, and accuracy of the financial records.<br />
Liabilities: Obligations incurred in past or current<br />
transactions requiring present or future settlement.<br />
Line Items: Expenditure classifications established to<br />
account for and budget the appropriations approved. Also<br />
referred to as Commitment Item.<br />
Limited Tax Bonds: A form of nonreferendum bonding<br />
authority granted by Illinois PA 89-385 allowing the District<br />
to issue additional debt for projects initiated after October 1,<br />
1991. Limited Tax Bonds can be issued to the extent that the<br />
total debt service requirements of any new debt, when<br />
combined with existing debt service, do not exceed the debt<br />
service extension base established by the Act.<br />
Midyear Reviews: Twice during the fiscal year (in May and<br />
August), the current year budget is evaluated based on<br />
spending to date and current projections. The primary areas<br />
reviewed and analyzed are (1) current year budget versus<br />
previous year revenues and expenditures; (2) year-to-date<br />
expenditure and revenue status plus expenditure and revenue<br />
projections for the remainder of the year; and (3) data to<br />
support recommendations for budget transfers.<br />
Modified Accrual Basis of Accounting: The basis of<br />
accounting under which revenues are recognized when<br />
measurable and available to pay liabilities, and expenditures<br />
are recognized when the liability is incurred except for<br />
interest on long-term debt which is recognized when due.<br />
Multiplier: See Equalization.<br />
Net Assets Appropriable: That resource balance left after<br />
subtracting Current Liabilities and Designated Fund Balances<br />
from Current Assets. Commonly referred to as carryover.<br />
Net Present Value: A mathematical formula used to<br />
measure the expected return on investments by calculating<br />
how much money needs to be invested today to result in a<br />
certain sum at a future time.<br />
Object Classification: A grouping of expenditures on the<br />
basis of goods or services purchased (e.g., personal services,<br />
materials and supplies, equipment, etc.), also referred to as<br />
Object of Expenditure.<br />
Objectives: The yearly organizational levels of achievement<br />
expected. A statement of purpose defined more specifically<br />
than a goal. (A goal can include several related objectives.)<br />
Objectives are listed in order of priorities with their<br />
associated costs including estimates of salaries, equipment,<br />
supplies, etc.<br />
Obligations: Amounts which a government may be legally<br />
required to meet out of its resources. They include not only<br />
actual liabilities, but also encumbrances not yet paid.<br />
Ordinance: A bill, resolution or order by means of which<br />
appropriations are given legal effect. It is the method by<br />
which the appropriation of the annual budget is enacted into<br />
law by the Board of Commissioners per authority of state<br />
statutes.<br />
Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB): Cost of retiree<br />
health insurance benefits recognized over the active service<br />
life of the employees rather than on a pay-as-you-go basis.<br />
Performance: The measurable unit of types of work, related<br />
to District activities and, where meaningful, the costs of<br />
operation that are used to develop the costs for each unit of<br />
activity (i.e., dollars per one million gallons of sewage treated).<br />
Personal Property Replacement Tax: Since July 1979, this<br />
income tax on corporations, partnerships and invested capital<br />
of utilities replaces the personal property taxes previously<br />
levied.<br />
Pollution Control Facilities: The State of Illinois directly<br />
assesses all pollution control facilities which have been<br />
certified by the Pollution Control Board. Pollution control<br />
facilities include any system, method, construction, device or<br />
appliance appurtenant that is designed, constructed, installed<br />
or operated for the primary purpose of eliminating,<br />
preventing or reducing air and water pollution as defined in<br />
the Environmental Protection Act. This does not include any<br />
pollution control facility used for radioactive waste, nuclear<br />
generation of electric power or for sewage disposal or<br />
treatment.<br />
Programs: The essential activities performed by the<br />
MWRDGC such as collection, treatment, flood and pollution<br />
control, etc., including specific and related sub-activities.<br />
448<br />
448
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Property Tax Extension Limitation Laws: Illinois Public<br />
Act 89-1 provides for limitations on real estate property tax<br />
levies. As applicable to the District, the 1994 tax levy,<br />
payable in 1995 is limited to a 5% increase from the 1993<br />
levy. Future levies are limited to increases of the lesser of<br />
5% or the percentage change in the national consumer price<br />
index (CPI-U).<br />
Property Tax Rate: The amount of tax stated in terms of a<br />
unit of the tax base, expressed as dollars per $100 of<br />
equalized assessed valuation.<br />
Railroad Property: The State of Illinois directly assesses<br />
railroad property which includes all railroad "operating<br />
property." Tracks and right-of-way, all structures, equipment,<br />
and all property connected with or used in the operation of<br />
the railroad along with real estate held for expansion.<br />
Nonoperating railroad property is assessed by the County<br />
Assessor.<br />
Real Property: Real estate, including land and<br />
improvements (buildings, fences, pavements, etc.) classified<br />
for purposes of assessment.<br />
Refunding Bonds: Bonds issued to retire bonds already<br />
outstanding.<br />
Reserve Claim Fund: Established for the payment of<br />
claims, awards, losses, judgments or liabilities which might<br />
be imposed against the District, and for the repair or<br />
replacement of damaged District property.<br />
Resources: The actual assets of a governmental unit, such as<br />
cash, taxes receivable, land, buildings, etc., including<br />
estimated revenues applying to the current fiscal year, and<br />
bonds authorized and unissued.<br />
Retirement Fund: Established to account for annual<br />
pension costs and supported in part by property taxes which<br />
are levied in accordance with statutory requirements.<br />
Tax Base: The aggregate value of the items being taxed.<br />
The base of the District's real property tax is the market value<br />
of all taxable real estate within the boundaries of the<br />
MWRDGC. See assessed valuation.<br />
Tax Cap: (Property Tax Extension Limitation Laws).<br />
Illinois Public Act 89-1 provides for limitations on real estate<br />
property tax levies. As applicable to the District, the 1994 tax<br />
levy, payable in 1995 is limited to a 5% increase from the<br />
1993 levy. Future levies are limited to increases of the lesser<br />
of 5% or the percentage change in the National Consumer<br />
Price Index (CPI-U).<br />
Taxes: Mandatory charges levied by a governmental unit for<br />
the purpose of financing services performed for the common<br />
benefit.<br />
Tax Levy: An amount of money raised through the<br />
collection of property taxes to finance each fund operation.<br />
Tax Levy Ordinance: An ordinance through which taxes are<br />
levied. See ordinance.<br />
Tax Rate: See Property Tax Rate.<br />
User Charge System: In compliance with the 1977 Clean<br />
<strong>Water</strong> Act, the MWRDGC is required to augment the ad<br />
valorem property tax system with a charge related to the<br />
actual use of waste treatment services. Users exceeding their<br />
ad valorem amount pay additional amounts for services<br />
received.<br />
Working Cash Funds (Corporate and Construction):<br />
Authorized by Illinois State Statutes to make temporary loans<br />
to the Corporate and Construction Funds. Loans are repaid to<br />
the Working Cash Funds from the tax levies of the funds.<br />
The use of Working Cash funds eliminates the need for the<br />
issuance of short-term financing.<br />
Revenue: Income generated by taxes, notes, bonds,<br />
investment income, land rental, user charge, sludge and scrap<br />
sales as well as federal and state grants.<br />
Sinking Fund: See Bond Redemption and Interest Fund.<br />
Special District: A governmental entity established by the<br />
State of Illinois for a specific purpose or purposes. The<br />
MWRDGC was originally organized under an act of the<br />
General Assembly of the State of Illinois in 1889.<br />
State Revolving Fund (SRF): Under the <strong>Water</strong> Quality Act<br />
Amendment of 1987, the federal authorization created State<br />
Revolving Funds administered by State agencies which<br />
provide loans from these funds to municipal agencies for their<br />
wastewater construction programs. These loans carry interest<br />
rates which are below general rates available in the municipal<br />
bond market. Therefore, pollution control facilities receive<br />
subsidies which can provide the approximate equivalent of a<br />
25 to 30% grant.<br />
449<br />
449
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS<br />
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD): The quantity of<br />
oxygen used in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter in<br />
a specified time, at a specific temperature, and under specific<br />
conditions; the BOD analysis is a standard test used in<br />
assessing wastewater strength. See "Carbonaceous<br />
Biochemical Oxygen Demand."<br />
Biological Oxidation: The process whereby living organisms<br />
in the presence of oxygen, convert the organic matter<br />
contained in wastewater into new cells and subsequently into<br />
more stable compounds.<br />
Biosolids: The nutrient-rich organic materials resulting from<br />
the treatment of domestic sewage in a wastewater treatment<br />
facility. These organic materials are generated when solids<br />
(sewage sludge) generated during the treatment of domestic<br />
sewage are treated further to meet the 40 CFR (Code of<br />
Federal Regulations) Part 503 sewage sludge regulatory<br />
requirements for beneficial reuse.<br />
Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD):<br />
The portion of BOD attributable to organic matter containing<br />
carbon; does not include nitrogenous oxygen demand.<br />
Design Capacity: The maximum rate of sewage flow which<br />
a treatment plant is capable of treating, on a long-term basis,<br />
to continuously attain required effluent quality.<br />
Dewatering: <strong>Water</strong> removal or concentration of solids by<br />
filtration, centrifugation, or drying.<br />
Drying Bed: Large areas on which solids are placed for<br />
dewatering by gravity, drainage, and evaporation.<br />
Centrifuge: A mechanical device in which centrifugal force<br />
is used to separate solids from liquids and/or to separate<br />
liquids of different densities, i.e., a dewatering device.<br />
Coarse and Fine Screens: A coarse screen is a bar screen<br />
with approximate 3" openings located at the point of<br />
incoming wastewater which is used to capture large objects<br />
and other debris; this device protects the sewage pumps. A<br />
fine screen is a bar screen with approximately 5/8" openings<br />
to collect and remove small debris via a traveling rake. The<br />
screening is conveyed to a scavenger disposal box.<br />
Collection System: A system of underground<br />
conduits/sewers collecting wastewater from a source and<br />
conveying it to the treatment facility.<br />
Combined Sewer: A sewer that transports wastewater and (in<br />
wet weather conditions) stormwater.<br />
Digestion, Anaerobic: The biological decomposition of<br />
organic matter in the absence of oxygen, resulting in partial<br />
gasification, liquidation, and mineralization. The digester gas<br />
is collected, compressed and used to fuel the plant boilers.<br />
Effluent: The resulting product of the wastewater treatment<br />
process which is also used for tank cleaning, grass watering,<br />
and conveyor belt cleaning.<br />
503 Regulations: The U.S. EPA issued on February 19, 1993,<br />
comprehensive federal sewage sludge use and disposal<br />
regulations which are organized in five parts: general provisions,<br />
land application, surface disposal, pathogens and vector attraction<br />
reduction, and incineration. Parts addressing standards for land<br />
application, surface disposal, and incineration practices consist of<br />
sections covering applicability and special definitions, general<br />
requirements, pollutant limits, operational requirements,<br />
management practices, frequency of monitoring, recordkeeping,<br />
and reporting requirements.<br />
Industrial User (IU): A person who conducts any industrial,<br />
manufacturing, agricultural, trade, or business process or who<br />
conducts the development, recovery or processing of natural<br />
resources.<br />
Industrial Waste: All solid, liquid, or gaseous waste<br />
resulting from an industrial user.<br />
Infrastructure: Assets that are long-lived capital assets that<br />
normally are stationary in nature and normally can be<br />
preserved for a significantly greater number of years than<br />
most capital assets. Examples from our infrastructure<br />
holdings would include wastewater tankage, LASMA Drying<br />
sites, SEPA stations, the Deep Tunnel, sewerage interceptors.<br />
Interceptor: A larger sewer which "intercepts" the<br />
wastewater from smaller and/or local sewers.<br />
Interceptor Inspection and Rehabilitation Program<br />
(IIRP): The inspection and repair of District sewers and<br />
interceptors.<br />
Lagoon, Solids: An earthen basin which is used for the<br />
storage, continued stabilization, and dewatering of solids.<br />
Lysimeter: A device used for collecting water from the pore<br />
spaces of soils and for determining the chemical composition<br />
of the water that percolates through a certain depth of soil.<br />
MGD: Millions of gallons per day.<br />
Maintenance Management System (MMS): A Districtwide<br />
computerized system to assist management in<br />
maintaining the District's infrastructure.<br />
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System<br />
(NPDES): The permit and regulation system governing<br />
direct discharges into navigable waters administered by the<br />
IEPA and USEPA.<br />
Odor Control Program: The systematic modifying or<br />
altering of certain processes to minimize obnoxious odors.<br />
Ferric chloride, ozonation (conversion of oxygen into ozone),<br />
and deodorants are some of the various methods used in<br />
combating odors.<br />
Pretreatment (Industrial): Any method, construction,<br />
device, arrangement, or appliance installed for the purpose of<br />
treating, neutralizing, stabilizing, disinfecting, or disposing of<br />
sewage, industrial waste, or other wastes prior to entry into<br />
the District's sewerage system.<br />
450<br />
450
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
Pretreatment Program: The District's efforts to identify,<br />
monitor and control by enforcement, the discharge of<br />
industrial waste from industrial sources into the District's<br />
sewerage system, in conformance with federal regulations<br />
promulgated pursuant to the Clean <strong>Water</strong> Act.<br />
Primary Treatment: The District uses a series of large<br />
screens to remove large debris from the wastewater which can<br />
clog the machinery. Heavy solids like sand and grit are then<br />
removed in the grit chamber. Any remaining heavy solids<br />
settle to the bottom of the primary settling tanks.<br />
Reservoirs, Storm: Temporary storage areas for containing<br />
surface waters during extreme storm conditions.<br />
Secondary Treatment Process: The wastewater flows to<br />
aeration tanks which have been seeded with bacteria. Filtered<br />
air is pumped through the liquid to provide oxygen for the<br />
bacteria. The bacteria consume organic materials in the<br />
wastewater, grow and multiply. The mixture of bacteria and<br />
water then flow into a secondary settling tank. The bacteria<br />
clump together and become heavy "flocs" which settle to the<br />
bottom of the tank and are removed. At this point, the water<br />
can be discharged to a nearby waterway after disinfection,<br />
with over 90% of its contaminants removed.<br />
Sewage: <strong>Water</strong>-carried human wastes or a combination of<br />
water-carried wastes from residences, business buildings,<br />
institutions and industrial establishments, together with such<br />
ground, surface, storm or other waters as may be present.<br />
Sewage and Waste Control Ordinance: An ordinance to<br />
provide for the abatement and prevention of pollution by<br />
regulating and controlling the quantity and quality of sewage<br />
and industrial waste admitted to or discharged into the<br />
sewerage systems, sewage treatment facilities, and waterways<br />
under the jurisdiction of the District. This ordinance was<br />
originally adopted by the District's Board of Commissioners<br />
in 1969 and continues to be amended as necessary.<br />
Sewerage System: Sewers, intercepting sewers, pipes or<br />
conduits, pumping stations, force mains, constructed drainage<br />
ditches, surface water intercepting ditches, and all other<br />
constructions, devices, and appliances used for collecting or<br />
conducting sewage, industrial waste, or other wastes to a<br />
point of treatment or ultimate disposal.<br />
Sidestream Elevated Pool Aeration (SEPA): A process in<br />
which a portion of the flow of a body of water is pumped up<br />
approximately 15 feet; the water is then allowed to cascade<br />
downward over a series of weirs, thus increasing the<br />
dissolved oxygen content of the body of water.<br />
Solids: The accumulated solids separated from wastewater<br />
during processing. Also, the precipitate or product resulting<br />
from chemical treatment, coagulation, or sedimentation of<br />
wastewater.<br />
Solids Content: The weight of total solids in sludge per unit<br />
total weight of sludge, expressed in percent. <strong>Water</strong> content<br />
plus solids content equal 100 percent.<br />
Solids Processing: A variety of settling or filtering<br />
operations (grit and scum dewatering, raw sludge<br />
concentration, sludge stabilization, dewatered stabilized<br />
sludge air drying, for example) used to collect solid material<br />
from wastewater or other liquids for subsequent utilization.<br />
Stuvite: A salt precipitate of Magnesium, Ammonium and<br />
Phosphate in wastewater treatment facilities which may build<br />
up to the level that cause operational blockages.<br />
Suspended Solids: Solid material that either floats on the<br />
surface of, or contained in suspension in, wastewater or other<br />
liquids. This material is largely removed by settling or<br />
filtering processes at a treatment plant. (See Solids<br />
Processing, above.)<br />
TARP (Deep Tunnel): The Tunnel and Reservoir Plan<br />
(TARP) is designed to improve water quality by capturing<br />
combined sewer overflows (CSOs), storing this polluted<br />
wastewater, and then pumping it into a treatment plant for<br />
processing. Some sample wastewater storage capacity data:<br />
Mainstream TARP, 1 billion gallons; Calumet TARP, 187<br />
million gallons; O'Hare TARP, 70 million gallons.<br />
Tertiary Treatment: The third stage of wastewater<br />
treatment which purifies the wastewater by removal of fine<br />
particles, nitrates, and phosphates with sand filtration. This<br />
process removes 99% of the impurities.<br />
USEPA: The United States Environmental Protection<br />
Agency. This federal agency is responsible for setting the<br />
guidelines and policies related to wastewater effluents and<br />
solids disposal. The Illinois EPA issues the MWRD's<br />
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit and<br />
other regulatory constraints.<br />
Utilization: Solids used for daily landfill cover, final cover<br />
for a landfill closure, and to reclaim severely disturbed soil<br />
such as strip-mining land.<br />
Wastewater Treatment: Processes which involve physical<br />
removal of contaminants from the wastewater by use of<br />
coarse screens, fine screens, grit tanks and settling tanks<br />
(primary treatment); further treatment via aeration and<br />
clarification (secondary treatment); and in some cases, the<br />
physical or chemical separation and removal of impurities<br />
from secondary-treated effluent (tertiary treatment).<br />
Wetlands: Areas which are inundated by surface or<br />
groundwater at a frequency which maintains saturation. The<br />
wetlands can be natural (marshes, bogs, swamps, for<br />
example) or man-made.<br />
451<br />
451
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
ACRONYMS<br />
AA<br />
ABAP<br />
AC<br />
ADA<br />
ALD<br />
ASCE<br />
ASUG<br />
BOD<br />
BSC<br />
CAAPP<br />
CAFR<br />
CALSMA<br />
CAWs<br />
CBOD<br />
CCSMP<br />
COLA<br />
CPI<br />
CPR<br />
CRCW<br />
CSA<br />
CSO<br />
CUP<br />
CWRP<br />
DNR<br />
DO<br />
DT<br />
DWP<br />
EAP<br />
EEO<br />
EEOC<br />
EGIS<br />
EME<br />
EMS<br />
EPA<br />
EWRP<br />
FEMA<br />
FESOP<br />
FICA<br />
FMLA<br />
FOIA<br />
FSA<br />
GASB<br />
GFOA<br />
GIS<br />
gpcpd<br />
HASMA<br />
HIBE<br />
HMO<br />
HPWRP<br />
HVAC<br />
I/I<br />
IAS<br />
ICAP<br />
Affirmative Action<br />
SAP programming language, German acronym<br />
Appropriation Controlled position<br />
Americans with Disabilities Act<br />
Analytical Laboratory Division<br />
American Society of Civil Engineers<br />
America's SAP Users Group<br />
Biochemical Oxygen Demand<br />
Business Service Center<br />
Clean Air Act Permit Program<br />
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report<br />
Calumet Solids Management Area<br />
Chicago Area <strong>Water</strong>ways<br />
Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand<br />
Cook County Stormwater Management<br />
Program<br />
Cost Of Living Adjustment<br />
Consumer Price Index<br />
Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation<br />
Chicago River Controlling Works<br />
Calumet Service Area<br />
Combined Sewer Overflow<br />
Chicago Underflow Plan<br />
Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
Department of Natural Resources<br />
Dissolved Oxygen<br />
Dry Tons<br />
Detailed <strong>Water</strong>shed Plans<br />
Employee Assistance Program<br />
Equal Employment Opportunity<br />
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission<br />
Enterprise Geographic Information System<br />
Extraordinary Monitoring & Enforcement<br />
under User Charge<br />
Environmental Management System<br />
United States Environmental Protection<br />
Agency<br />
Egan <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
Federal Emergency Management Agency<br />
Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit<br />
Old Age Survivors and Disability Insurance &<br />
Medicare<br />
Family Medical Leave Act<br />
Freedom Of Information Act<br />
Flexible Spending Account<br />
Government Accounting Standards Board<br />
Government Finance Officers Association<br />
Geographic Information System<br />
gallons per capita per day<br />
Harlem Avenue Solids Management Area<br />
Consumable inventory budgeted and ordered<br />
by the Purchasing Department<br />
Health Maintenance Organization<br />
Hanover Park <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning<br />
Infiltration/Inflow<br />
Instream Aeration Station<br />
Infiltration/Inflow Corrective Action Program<br />
IDHR Illinois Department of Human Rights<br />
IDOT Illinois Department Of Transportation<br />
IEPA Illinois Environmental Protection Agency<br />
IPCB Illinois Pollution Control Board<br />
IRB Inventory Review Board<br />
ITSPC Information Technology Strategic Planning<br />
Committee<br />
IU Industrial Users<br />
JEWRP John Egan <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
JOC Job Order Contracting<br />
KWH Kilo Watt Hours<br />
KWRP Kirie <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
LAN Local Area Network<br />
LASMA Lawndale Avenue Solids Management Area<br />
LAWCON Land And <strong>Water</strong> CONservation act<br />
LIBOR London Inter-Bank Offered Rate<br />
LIMS Laboratory Information Management System<br />
LPH Lockport Powerhouse<br />
LWRP Lemont <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
M&O Maintenance & Operations department<br />
M&R Monitoring & Research department<br />
MBE Minority Business Enterprise<br />
MGD Million Gallons per Day<br />
MMS Maintenance Management System<br />
MOB Main Office Building - 100 E. Erie St.,<br />
Chicago, Illinois<br />
MOBA Main Office Building McMillan Pavilion - 111<br />
E. Erie St., Chicago, Illinois<br />
MOBC Main Office Building Complex - MOB &<br />
MOBA<br />
MSC Material Service Corporation<br />
MSPS Main Stream Pumping Station<br />
MSSMP Multi-Year Supervisory Skills Management<br />
Practices program<br />
NACWA National Association of Clean <strong>Water</strong> Agencies<br />
NBP National Biosolids Partnership<br />
NBPS North Branch Pumping Station<br />
NIGP National Institute of Government Purchasing<br />
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination<br />
System<br />
NPL Native Prairie Landscape<br />
NRCS National Resources Conservation Service<br />
NSA North Service Area<br />
NSWRP North Side <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer<br />
O,M&R Operations, Maintenance, and Replacement<br />
costs<br />
OPEB Other Post-Employment Benefits<br />
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration<br />
P&B Pump and Blower<br />
PCB Poly-Chlorinated Bi-phenols<br />
PIMS Pretreatment Management Information System<br />
PLC Programmable Logic Controller<br />
PO Purchase Order<br />
POTW Publicly Owned Treatment Works<br />
PPO Participating Provider Option<br />
PPOAC Public & Private Organization Advisory<br />
Committee<br />
452<br />
452
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
PS<br />
PVC<br />
R&D<br />
RAPS<br />
RAS<br />
RCRA<br />
RFP<br />
SAN<br />
SAP<br />
SBE<br />
SCADA<br />
scfm<br />
SEA<br />
SEPA<br />
SIU<br />
SRF<br />
SS<br />
SSA<br />
SSMP<br />
SWCO<br />
SWRP<br />
TAC<br />
TARP<br />
TIF<br />
TMDL<br />
UAA<br />
UC<br />
UCIMS<br />
UCO<br />
USEPA<br />
USX<br />
VFD<br />
WAS<br />
WBE<br />
WEF<br />
WET<br />
WMO<br />
WPC<br />
WRP<br />
ZEN<br />
Pumping Station<br />
Poly Vinyl Chloride plastic<br />
Research & Development department<br />
Racine Avenue Pumping Station<br />
Return Activated Sludge<br />
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act<br />
Request For Proposals<br />
Storage Area Network<br />
SAP is a German computer software firm<br />
Small Business Enterprise<br />
Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition<br />
system<br />
standard cubic feet per minute<br />
Service Efforts and Accomplishments<br />
Side stream Elevated Pool Aeration stations<br />
Significant Industrial User<br />
State Revolving Fund loan program<br />
Suspended Solids<br />
Stickney Service Area<br />
Supervisory Skills / Management Practices<br />
training program<br />
Sewage and Waste Control Ordinance<br />
Stickney <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
Technical Advisory Committee<br />
Tunnel And Reservoir Plan<br />
Tax Increment Financing district<br />
Total Maximum Daily Loads<br />
Use Attainability Analysis<br />
User Charge<br />
User Charge Information Management System<br />
User Charge Ordinance<br />
United States Environmental Protection<br />
Agency<br />
Former United States Steel site<br />
Variable Frequency Drive<br />
Waste Activated Sludge<br />
Women-owned Business Enterprise<br />
<strong>Water</strong> Environment Federation<br />
Whole Effluent Toxicity<br />
<strong>Water</strong>shed Management Ordinance<br />
<strong>Water</strong>shed Planning Council<br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
Capital spare parts within inventory<br />
management system<br />
453<br />
453
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
2009 BUDGET<br />
NOTE PAGE<br />
454<br />
454
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO<br />
HISTORICAL INFORMATION<br />
1837 Chicago was incorporated as a city. The city’s primary<br />
source of drinking water is Lake Michigan.<br />
1856 Sewers were constructed to collect the city’s waste. These<br />
sewers emptied into the Chicago River ultimately<br />
becoming a health hazard.<br />
1860- Chicagoans suffered from diseases such as typhoid<br />
1890 and dysentery transmitted through the drinking water<br />
supply.<br />
1885 A torrential rainstorm flushed pollution from the river<br />
into Lake Michigan prompting public concern for ways to<br />
safeguard the quality of the drinking water.<br />
1886 A Drainage and <strong>Water</strong> Supply Commission was created<br />
to study the growing problem of contamination of the<br />
city’s water supply.<br />
1889 Illinois Legislature passed an act enabling the<br />
establishment of the Sanitary District of Chicago to keep<br />
sewage pollution out of Lake Michigan. Referendum<br />
passed.<br />
1892 Ground was broken on the 28-mile Main Channel of the<br />
Sanitary and Ship Canal. The canal would reverse the<br />
flow of the Chicago River by linking it to the Des Plaines<br />
River, and thus prevent pollution of Lake Michigan by the<br />
river.<br />
1900 Main Channel of the Sanitary and Ship Canal opened.<br />
1907 Main Channel Extension including Lockport Powerhouse<br />
and Lock completed.<br />
1910 North Shore Channel completed.<br />
1919 District’s Board of Commissioners passed an ordinance<br />
committing the District to the construction and operation<br />
of treatment plants.<br />
1922 The 16-mile Calumet-Sag Channel became operational;<br />
Calumet Treatment Plant placed into operation.<br />
1928 North Side Treatment Plant placed into operation.<br />
1930 U.S. Supreme Court Decree issued reducing diversion of<br />
Lake Michigan in steps. Effective January 1, 1939,<br />
diversion reduced to 1,500 cubic feet per second; West<br />
Side Treatment Plant placed into operation.<br />
1939 Southwest Treatment Plant placed into operation.<br />
1949 West and Southwest Treatment Plants combined.<br />
1955 District’s name changed to the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> Sanitary<br />
District of Greater Chicago (MSDGC); the Chicago<br />
Sewage Disposal System named one of the Seven<br />
Wonders of Modern Engineering by the American<br />
Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), recognizing the size<br />
of the system, including intercepting sewers, treatment<br />
plants, and waterways.<br />
1956 Referendum, enabled by legislation, passed adding 412<br />
square miles to the District.<br />
1961 Lemont Treatment Plant placed into operation.<br />
1963 Hanover Park Treatment Plant placed into operation.<br />
1969 Board adopted the Sewage and Waste Control Ordinance,<br />
prohibiting any waste discharge into Lake Michigan.<br />
1971 Fulton County “Prairie Plan” began whereby abandoned<br />
strip-mines were reclaimed into agriculturally productive<br />
land; won “Outstanding Civil Engineering Achievement<br />
Award” from the ASCE.<br />
1972 District adopted the Tunnel and Reservoir Plan (TARP)<br />
as recommended by a committee of representatives from<br />
the state, city, county, and MSDGC. The plan provided<br />
for the collection, transportation, storage, and treatment of<br />
combined rainwater and sewage that in periods of heavy<br />
rain overflowed into waterways, underpasses, and<br />
basements.<br />
1975 Construction began on the 31-mile Mainstream tunnel<br />
system; Egan Treatment Plant placed into operation.<br />
1977 Construction began on the Calumet tunnel system.<br />
1985 Mainstream tunnel system placed into operation-capable<br />
of storing 1 billion gallons of combined sewage and<br />
stormwater.<br />
1986 Mainstream tunnel system received award for<br />
“Outstanding Civil Engineering Achievement” from the<br />
ASCE; 9.2 mile Calumet tunnel system placed into<br />
operation.<br />
1988 Chicago Tribune reported, “As a result of an aggressive<br />
cleanup program by the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> Sanitary District,<br />
bold imaginative efforts are being taken by private<br />
developers and the Chicago River is beginning to<br />
challenge the lake front as Chicago’s premier attraction.”<br />
1989 District celebrated 100th anniversary. As part of the<br />
Centennial Celebration, the District changed its name to<br />
the <strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater<br />
Chicago.<br />
1990 Army Corps of Engineers and the District began<br />
construction of the O’Hare-CUP Reservoir, the first of<br />
three reservoirs in the TARP program.<br />
1992- District’s five Sidestream Elevated Pool Aeration Stations<br />
1994 (SEPA) completed along the Calumet River system.<br />
These stations add oxygen to the waterways to enhance<br />
the aquatic environment. The District received<br />
“Outstanding Civil Achievement of 1994” by ASCE for<br />
these projects.<br />
1998 O’Hare-CUP Reservoir placed into operation, capable of<br />
storing 350 million gallons of combined sewage and<br />
stormwater; construction of the Torrence Avenue leg of<br />
the Calumet tunnel system began.<br />
2000 District celebrated the 100th anniversary of the reversal of<br />
the Chicago River and completed a century of protecting<br />
Chicago’s water environment; construction began on<br />
Thornton Reservoir.<br />
2001 ASCE named the District “One of the Monuments of the<br />
Millennium.”<br />
2004 By an act of the Illinois Legislature, the District became<br />
responsible for stormwater management in Cook County.<br />
2006 TARP Phase I 109-mile tunnel system completed.<br />
2007 District celebrated 100 th anniversary of the Lockport<br />
Powerhouse and Dam.
Tunnel Access<br />
Pump Station<br />
Grit Facilities<br />
Primary Tank<br />
Calumet <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> Plant<br />
Computer Modeling<br />
Construction is underway for the new influent pumping station at<br />
the Calumet WRP, as shown on the front cover. Design is nearly<br />
complete for the new grit and primary tank facilities, as shown<br />
above. Both of these large projects utilized computer design<br />
software to ascertain detailed design criteria. The design of the<br />
pumping station utilized computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling<br />
to minimize undesirable flow behaviors in order to maximize<br />
pumping efficiency and reduce pump vibration; thus reducing<br />
operations and maintenance costs. The design of the grit and primary<br />
tank facilities utilized both 3-Dimensional computer aided design<br />
(CAD) and CFD modeling. The 3-Dimensional models allowed<br />
designers to discover and remedy conflicts between structures,<br />
piping, and equipment, which will reduce costly conflicts during<br />
construction. The CFD modeling was performed to confirm the<br />
tank diameter and optimize the tank depth and inlet and feedwell<br />
dimensions. This allowed the designer to determine the performance<br />
limit of the tank where slight increased performance was<br />
not justified by the corresponding cost to construct the facilities.<br />
<strong>Metropolitan</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong> District of Greater Chicago<br />
100 East Erie Street Chicago, Illinois 60611-3154