19.01.2015 Views

Species-Specific Identification of Campylobacters by Partial 16S ...

Species-Specific Identification of Campylobacters by Partial 16S ...

Species-Specific Identification of Campylobacters by Partial 16S ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VOL. 41, 2003 SPECIES-SPECIFIC IDENTIFICATION OF CAMPYLOBACTERS 2541<br />

tion products <strong>of</strong> 595 and 740 bp (data not shown). Cloning and<br />

sequence analysis <strong>of</strong> these products revealed that the larger<br />

<strong>16S</strong> rDNA fragment contained an IVS <strong>of</strong> 145 bp, whereas the<br />

smaller fragment lacked this IVS. All observed IVSs were<br />

inserted following base position 213 <strong>of</strong> the C. jejuni (ATCC<br />

43431) <strong>16S</strong> rDNA (23).<br />

<strong>16S</strong> rDNA sequence diversity. In order to evaluate whether<br />

<strong>16S</strong> rDNA data reliably determine species identity and sufficiently<br />

discriminate among Campylobacter species, it was necessary<br />

to calculate the amount <strong>of</strong> intraspecies and interspecies<br />

<strong>16S</strong> rDNA sequence variation. Multiple alignments <strong>of</strong> 135<br />

Campylobacter <strong>16S</strong> rDNA sequences <strong>of</strong> all taxa <strong>of</strong> the genus<br />

known to exist were performed. A matrix representing the<br />

sequence variations among the strains analyzed was calculated.<br />

Subsequently, a dendrogram was constructed from these data<br />

to verify the species-specific cluster formation <strong>of</strong> the sequences.<br />

The maximum intraspecies <strong>16S</strong> rDNA sequence diversities<br />

ranged from 0.1 to 0.9% when multiple strains <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

species were compared (Table 2). Higher degrees <strong>of</strong> maximum<br />

intraspecies diversity were found within the taxa C. curvus<br />

(1.1%), C. upsaliensis (1.3%), C. lari (2.5%), C. coli (1.5%),<br />

and C. hyointestinalis (4.5%). For the last species, a higher level<br />

<strong>of</strong> variation was attributed to a significant difference in <strong>16S</strong><br />

rDNA sequences between the two subspecies <strong>of</strong> C. hyointestinalis<br />

(C. hyointestinalis subsp. hyointestinalis and C. hyointestinalis<br />

subsp. lawsonii). These subspecies displayed a mean <br />

standard deviation sequence diversity <strong>of</strong> 3.7% 0.84%. This<br />

allowed the subspecies-specific differentiation <strong>of</strong> 14 <strong>of</strong> 15<br />

strains, as displayed <strong>by</strong> the dendrogram in Fig. 2. Strain C.<br />

hyointestinalis subsp. hyointestinalis SVS 3038 (GenBank accession<br />

no. AF097691) was the sole exception. The <strong>16S</strong> rDNA<br />

sequence <strong>of</strong> that strain exhibited a minimum <strong>of</strong> only 1% diversity<br />

from the sequence <strong>of</strong> C. hyointestinalis subsp. lawsonii<br />

and, therefore, clustered together with that subspecies (Fig. 2).<br />

The <strong>16S</strong> rDNA variations were not adequate to differentiate<br />

between the subspecies <strong>of</strong> C. jejuni or between the subspecies<br />

<strong>of</strong> C. fetus, since in both cases several strains <strong>of</strong> each subspecies<br />

had sequences identical to those <strong>of</strong> strains <strong>of</strong> the other subspecies.<br />

The minimum interspecies <strong>16S</strong> rDNA sequence diversities<br />

ranged from 0 to 11.2% (Table 2). To gain a detailed view <strong>of</strong><br />

whether <strong>16S</strong> rDNA data reliably discriminate among the taxa,<br />

the sequence diversities <strong>of</strong> all 135 strains were visualized <strong>by</strong> a<br />

dendrogram analysis. Cluster analysis placed most sequences<br />

into groups that correlated with species (Fig. 2). The exception<br />

from these findings was a lack <strong>of</strong> discrimination among the taxa<br />

C. coli and C. jejuni and two C. lari strains. Several C. coli and<br />

C. jejuni strains had identical <strong>16S</strong> rDNA sequences (e.g., C. coli<br />

H99/119 and C. jejuni LMG 9217), and nearly all C. coli and<br />

C. jejuni strains were assigned to a common cluster. Only two<br />

strains <strong>of</strong> C. coli, type strain CCUG 11238 and strain LMG<br />

9220, displayed higher degrees <strong>of</strong> variation and could therefore<br />

be clearly distinguished from C. jejuni (Fig. 2). In addition, two<br />

strains <strong>of</strong> C. lari, CF89-12 and LMG 11760, were also assigned<br />

to the cluster that comprised C. coli and C. jejuni due to highly<br />

related <strong>16S</strong> rDNA sequences (Fig. 2). Both strains displayed<br />

atypical phenotypic pr<strong>of</strong>iles not consistent with classical nalidixic-acid<br />

resistant thermophilic C. lari (NARTC). Strain<br />

CF89-12 was a urease-producing thermophilic C. lari strain,<br />

a The numbers above the diagonal are mean values <strong>of</strong> percent <strong>16S</strong> rDNA variation and the respective standard deviation. The numbers below the diagonal (in boldface) are the range <strong>of</strong> <strong>16S</strong> rDNA variation (in percent)<br />

among Campylobacter species. The numbers in the subheads correspond to the numbers for the species listed on the left.<br />

1. C. hominis (n 4) 0–0.6 6.4 0.31 7.6 0.16 6.9 0.16 7.3 0.16 7.7 0.24 7.1 0.03 8.8 0.04 8.3 0.04 9.2 0.21 9.5 0.08 11.3 0.03 11.1 0.08 10.0 0.06 9.7 0.10 9.6 0.06<br />

2. C. gracilis (n 5) 6.0–6.8 0–0.1 7.3 0.04 4.9 0.14 5.7 0.08 6.1 0.23 5.7 0.08 6.6 0.08 6.3 0.07 7.9 0.56 7.9 0.09 10.0 0.06 9.9 0.12 9.4 0.08 9.3 0.18 9.4 0.07<br />

3. C. sputorum (n 8) 7.4–7.8 7.2–7.4 0–0.1 6.4 0.03 6.5 0.13 5.6 0.22 6.6 0.03 7.8 0.05 8.0 0.05 8.5 0.27 8.8 0.14 9.1 0.05 8.9 0.08 9.2 0.08 8.7 0.22 8.8 0.07<br />

4. C. rectus (n 4) 6.7–7.1 4.7–5.2 6.4–6.4 0–0.9 2.1 0.15 3.9 0.24 4.6 0.24 6.0 0.27 6.0 0.15 7.0 0.30 7.8 0.26 9.0 0.06 8.9 0.14 7.9 0.24 7.7 0.29 7.8 0.11<br />

5. C. showae (n 3) 7.1–7.5 5.6–5.9 6.3–6.7 1.8–2.3 0.1–0.3 3.9 0.28 5.7 0.07 6.9 0.14 7.1 0.12 8.3 0.24 8.8 0.16 9.9 0.06 9.8 0.14 9.1 0.20 8.8 0.29 8.9 0.14<br />

6. C. curvus (n 5) 7.5–8.1 5.9–6.6 5.4–6.0 3.5–4.3 3.5–4.4 0–1.1 3.5 0.28 5.4 0.32 6.1 0.23 6.7 0.34 6.7 0.25 8.7 0.28 8.6 0.34 8.3 0.28 7.8 0.36 7.9 0.27<br />

7. C. concisus (n 5) 7.0–7.1 5.6–5.9 6.5–6.6 4.2–4.8 5.6–5.8 3.2–4.0 0–0.4 4.2 0.11 4.9 0.11 5.9 0.49 5.9 0.10 8.4 0.08 8.3 0.12 6.9 0.11 6.8 0.21 7.0 0.08<br />

8. C. mucosalis (n 5) 8.7–8.8 6.5–6.8 7.7–7.9 5.4–6.2 6.6–7.1 5.0–6.0 4.0–4.4 0.1–0.3 3.4 0.06 5.2 0.69 4.5 0.15 8.0 0.07 7.4 0.13 6.5 0.09 6.4 0.18 6.5 0.08<br />

9. C. fetus (n 26) 8.2–8.4 6.3–6.6 8.0–8.2 5.8–6.3 7.0–7.4 5.9–6.7 4.7–5.2 3.3–3.6 0–0.2 3.1 1.07 3.5 0.11 7.6 0.06 7.4 0.08 6.1 0.10 5.8 0.32 6.0 0.10<br />

10. C. hyointestinalis (n 16) 8.8–9.5 7.3–9.0 7.9–9.0 6.2–7.6 7.6–8.8 5.9–7.6 5.0–6.7 4.3–6.4 1.6–4.7 0–4.5 2.7 0.43 6.7 0.47 7.4 0.25 5.6 0.38 5.1 0.57 5.3 0.49<br />

11. C. lanienae (n 5) 9.4–9.6 7.7–8.1 8.6–9.0 7.3–8.1 8.6–9.1 6.3–7.1 5.7–6.0 4.2–4.7 3.4–3.8 1.9–3.4 0–0.9 6.3 0.11 7.3 0.19 5.1 0.18 4.6 0.35 4.9 0.11<br />

12. C. helveticus (n 4) 11.2–11.3 9.9–10.1 9.0–9.1 8.9–9.1 9.8–10.0 8.5–9.3 8.2–8.5 7.9–8.1 7.5–7.8 5.9–7.5 6.2–6.5 0.1–0.3 2.0 0.39 3.9 0.23 3.6 0.27 3.4 0.11<br />

13. C. upsaliensis (n 10) 10.9–11.2 9.8–10.2 8.8–9.1 8.6–9.2 9.5–10.2 8.2–9.7 8.0–8.6 7.1–7.7 7.2–7.7 7.0–8.1 7.0–7.9 1.6–3.2 0–1.3 4.9 0.26 4.5 0.32 4.3 0.16<br />

14. C. lari (n 6) 9.9–10.0 9.3–9.5 9.0–9.3 7.5–8.3 8.9–9.6 8.0–9.0 6.7–7.1 6.3–6.6 5.9–6.4 4.6–6.2 4.6–5.4 3.3–4.1 4.2–5.2 0–2.5 1.6 0.68 1.5 0.58<br />

15. C. coli (n 11) 9.5–9.8 8.9–9.6 8.1–9.0 6.9–8.1 8.1–9.3 7.0–8.6 6.2–7.1 5.9–6.7 5.0–6.3 3.5–6.1 3.5–5.0 3.3–4.4 4.1–5.4 0.5–3.1 0–1.5 0.4 0.42<br />

16. C. jejuni (n 17) 9.5–9.8 9.3–9.7 8.6–9.0 7.6–8.1 8.7–9.3 7.6–8.5 6.9–7.2 6.4–6.8 5.9–6.4 4.5–6.2 4.7–5.2 3.1–3.6 4.0–4.8 0.6–2.3 0.0–1.6 0–0.4<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16<br />

<strong>Species</strong><br />

% Variation a<br />

TABLE 2. Homology matrix<br />

Downloaded from jcm.asm.org at UNIVERSITATSBIBLIOTHEK on June 1, 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!