COACHING PACKET Effective Case Management - The Center for ...

Bourgon, G. & Armstrong, B. (2005). Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a
"Real World" prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32: 3-25.
Center for Effective Public Policy (CEPP) (2009). Coaching Packet: Shaping Offender Behavior.
Silver Spring, MD: Author.
Cullen, F.T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and
prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.) NIJ Criminal Justice 2000: Policies, Processes, and Decisions of the
Criminal Justice System (pp. 109-176). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Doran, G.T. (1981). There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives.
Management Review, 70(11).
Dowden, C. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of the risk, need and responsivity principles
and their importance within the rehabilitation debate. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Ottawa,
Ontario: Carleton University.
Dowden, C. & Andrews, D.A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective
correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International
Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2): 203-214.
Gendreau, P. & Goggin, C. (1996). Principles of effective correctional programming. Forum on
Corrections Research. Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service of Canada.
Gendreau, P., Little, T. & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of adult offender recidivism: What
works Criminology, 34(4): 575–607.
Lipsey, M. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile
offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4(2): 124-147.
Miller, A.F. & Cunningham, J.A. (1981). How to avoid costly job mismatches. Management
Review, 70(11).
Niven, S. & Stewart, D. (2005). Resettlement outcomes on release from prison in 2003. Home
Office Findings No. 248. London, England: Home Office.
Paparozzi, M. & Gendreau, P. (2005). An intensive supervision program that worked: Service
delivery, professional orientation, and organizational supportiveness. The Prison Journal, 85:
445-466.
Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Evaluating Intensive Supervision Probation/Parole: Results of
a Nationwide Experiment. Research in brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice,
National Institute of Justice.
© 2010 Center for Effective Public Policy Page 29